WO2008071993A2 - Spectromètre de masse - Google Patents

Spectromètre de masse Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2008071993A2
WO2008071993A2 PCT/GB2007/004820 GB2007004820W WO2008071993A2 WO 2008071993 A2 WO2008071993 A2 WO 2008071993A2 GB 2007004820 W GB2007004820 W GB 2007004820W WO 2008071993 A2 WO2008071993 A2 WO 2008071993A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
time
release
ions
delay time
ion
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/GB2007/004820
Other languages
English (en)
Other versions
WO2008071993A3 (fr
Inventor
Daniel James Kenny
Jason Lee Wildgoose
Martin Green
Original Assignee
Micromass Uk Limited
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from GBGB0624993.2A external-priority patent/GB0624993D0/en
Application filed by Micromass Uk Limited filed Critical Micromass Uk Limited
Priority to US12/516,610 priority Critical patent/US8183524B2/en
Priority to JP2009540869A priority patent/JP5175859B2/ja
Priority to CA2672526A priority patent/CA2672526C/fr
Priority to EP07848560.4A priority patent/EP2092549B1/fr
Publication of WO2008071993A2 publication Critical patent/WO2008071993A2/fr
Publication of WO2008071993A3 publication Critical patent/WO2008071993A3/fr

Links

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01J—ELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
    • H01J49/00—Particle spectrometers or separator tubes
    • H01J49/26—Mass spectrometers or separator tubes
    • H01J49/34—Dynamic spectrometers
    • H01J49/40—Time-of-flight spectrometers
    • H01J49/401—Time-of-flight spectrometers characterised by orthogonal acceleration, e.g. focusing or selecting the ions, pusher electrode

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a mass spectrometer and a method of mass spectrometry.
  • the preferred embodiment relates to a method of enhancing the duty cycle of an orthogonal acceleration Time of Flight mass analyser.
  • ions having approximately the same energy are arranged to be passed through an orthogonal acceleration region.
  • An orthogonal acceleration electric field is periodically applied across the orthogonal acceleration region in order to orthogonally accelerate ions into the drift region of the Time of Flight mass analyser.
  • the length of the region over which the orthogonal acceleration electric field is applied, the energy of the ions and the frequency of the application of the orthogonal acceleration electric field determine the sampling duty cycle of the Time of Flight mass analyser. Ions which have approximately the same energy but different mass to charge ratios will have different velocities and hence will have different sampling duty cycles .
  • the maximum ion sampling duty cycle for a conventional orthogonal acceleration Time of Flight mass analyser when used with a continuous ion beam is typically approximately 20-25%.
  • the maximum duty cycle is achieved for those ions which have the maximum mass to charge ratio which are mass analysed by the mass analyser.
  • the ion sampling duty cycle is lower for ions having relatively low mass to charge ratios.
  • the average sampling duty cycle DCa v is equal to two thirds of the maximum sampling duty cycle DC 0 . Accordingly, if the maximum sampling duty cycle is 22.5% then the average sampling duty cycle is 15%.
  • ions are arranged to be released from the ion trap with substantially constant energy. Ions having different mass to charge ratios will therefore travel towards the orthogonal acceleration region with different velocities. As a result, ions having different mass to charge ratios will arrive at the orthogonal acceleration region at different times.
  • the time delay between the release of a packet of ions from the ion trap to the application of the pusher voltage to the orthogonal acceleration electrode determines the mass to charge ratio of the ions that are transmitted into the drift region of the orthogonal acceleration Time of Flight mass analyser. For those ions having a narrow range of mass to charge ratios which are transmitted into the draft region of the orthogonal acceleration Time of Flight mass analyser, the duty cycle can be increased to substantially 100%.
  • the orthogonal acceleration voltage is sychronised with packets of ions released from the travelling wave ion guide.
  • the ion guide is arranged to partition a continuous stream of ions into a series of packets of ions .
  • the time delay between the release of a packet of ions from the exit region of the travelling wave ion guide to the application of a pusher voltage determines the mass to charge ratio range of ions which are transmitted into the drift region of the orthogonal acceleration Time of Flight mass analyser.
  • the duty cycle can be increased to substantially 100%.
  • ions having other mass to charge ratios will not all be present in the orthogonal acceleration region at the time when the pusher voltage is applied to the orthogonal acceleration electrode. Accordingly, the sampling efficiency for these ions will be lower and may be zero.
  • a Time of Flight mass analyser comprising an orthogonal acceleration electrode and a drift region,- wherein, in use, a first pulse or packet of ions is released at a first release time Tl; wherein the mass analyser further comprises a control device which is arranged and adapted:
  • the first and/or second pulse or packet of ions may according to one embodiment be released from an ion trap, ion trapping region or ion gate upstream of the Time of Flight mass analyser.
  • second and/or third and/or fourth and/or fifth and/or sixth and/or seventh and/or eighth and/or ninth and/or tenth and/or further pulses or packets of ions are released from the ion trap, ion trapping region of ion gate.
  • the first and/or second pulse or packet of ions may be released from an ion guide which is preferably arranged upstream of the Time of Flight mass analyser.
  • the ion guide preferably partitions a continuous ion beam into a series of packets of ions.
  • Each packet of ions is preferably translated along the length of the ion guide in an axial potential or axial pseudo- potential well.
  • the packet of ions is preferably released from the ion guide.
  • the ions are then preferably onwardly transmitted to the Time of Flight mass analyser.
  • second and/or third and/or fourth and/or fifth and/or sixth and/or seventh and/or eighth and/or ninth and/or tenth and/or further pulses or packets of ions are released from the ion guide.
  • the control device is preferably arranged and adapted to energise the orthogonal acceleration electrode a third time after a third delay time At 1 -Z 3 from the first release time Tl and/or a fourth time after a fourth delay time ⁇ ti_ 4 from the first release time Tl and/or a fifth time after a fifth delay time ⁇ ti_ 5 from the first release time Tl and/or a sixth time after a sixth delay time ⁇ ti- 6 from the first release time Tl and/or a seventh time after a seventh delay time ⁇ ti_ 7 from the first release time Tl and/or an eighth time after an eighth delay time ⁇ ti_ 8 from the first release time Tl and/or a ninth time after a ninth delay time ⁇ ti-g
  • ⁇ t ⁇ _ 4 and/or the fifth delay time At 1 - S and/or the sixth delay time ⁇ ti-e and/or the seventh delay time ⁇ t ⁇ _ 7 and/or the eighth delay time ⁇ ti- ⁇ and/or the ninth delay time ⁇ ti_ 9 and/or the tenth delay time ⁇ ti-io are preferably predetermined delay times subsequent to the first release time Tl.
  • a second pulse or packet of ions is preferably released at a second release time T2.
  • the control device is preferably arranged and adapted to energise the orthogonal acceleration electrode a first time after a first delay time ⁇ t 2 -i from the second release time T2 and at least a second subsequent time after a second delay time ⁇ t 2 _ 2 from the second release time T2 and prior to the release of a third pulse or packet of ions at a third release time T3.
  • the control device is preferably arranged and adapted to energise the orthogonal acceleration electrode a third time after a third delay time ⁇ t 2 - 3 from the second release time T2 and/or a fourth time after a fourth delay time ⁇ t 2 - 4 from the second release time T2 and/or a fifth time after a fifth delay time ⁇ t 2 _ 5 from the second release time T2 and/or a sixth time after a sixth delay.
  • time ⁇ t 2 _ 6 from the second release time T2 and/or a seventh time after a seventh delay time ⁇ t 2 - 7 from the second release time T2 and/or an eighth time after an eighth delay time ⁇ t 2 - 8 from the- second release time T2 and/or a ninth time after a ninth delay time ⁇ t 2 - 9 from the second release time T2 and/or a tenth time after a tenth delay time ⁇ t 2 -io from the second release time T2 and prior to the release of a third ' pulse or packet of ions at a third release time T3.
  • the first delay time ⁇ t 2 _ ⁇ and/or the second delay time ⁇ t 2 ⁇ 2 and/or the third delay time ⁇ t 2 _ 3 and/or the fourth delay time ⁇ t 2 _ 4 and/or the fifth delay time ⁇ t 2 _ 5 and/or the sixth delay time ⁇ t 2 - 6 and/or the seventh delay time ⁇ t 2 _ 7 and/or the eighth delay time ⁇ t 2 - 8 and/or the ninth delay time ⁇ t 2 . 9 and/or the tenth delay time ⁇ t 2 -io are preferably predetermined delay times subsequent to the second release time T2.
  • a third pulse or packet of ions is preferably released at a third release time T3.
  • the control device is preferably arranged and adapted to energise the orthogonal acceleration electrode a first time after a first delay time ⁇ t 3 _i from the third release time T3 and at least a second subsequent time after a second delay time ⁇ t 3 - 2 from the third release time T3 and prior to the release of a fourth pulse or packet of ions at a fourth release time T4.
  • the control device is preferably arranged and adapted to energise the orthogonal acceleration electrode a third time after a third delay time ⁇ t 3 .
  • the first delay time ⁇ t 3 _ x and/or the second delay time ⁇ t 3 _ 2 and/or the third delay time ⁇ t 3 - 3 and/or the fourth delay time ⁇ t 3 . 4 and/or the fifth delay time ⁇ t 3 _ 5 and/or the sixth delay time ⁇ t 3 _ 6 and/or the seventh delay time ⁇ t 3 _ 7 and/or the eighth delay time ⁇ t 3 _ 8 and/or the ninth delay time ⁇ t 3 _ 9 and/or the tenth delay time ⁇ t 3 _ 10 are preferably predetermined delay times subsequent to the third release time T3.
  • a fourth pulse or packet of ions is preferably released at a fourth release time T4.
  • the control device is preferably arranged and adapted to energise the orthogonal acceleration electrode a first time after a first delay time ⁇ t 4 _i from the fourth release time T4 and at least a second subsequent time after a second delay ⁇ t 4 _ 2 from the fourth release time T4 and prior to the release of a fifth pulse or packet of ions at a fifth release time T5.
  • the control device is preferably arranged and adapted to energise the orthogonal acceleration electrode a third time after a third delay time ⁇ t 4 - 3 from the fourth release time T4 and/or a fourth time after a fourth delay time ⁇ t 4 _ 4 from the fourth release time T4 and/or a fifth time after a fifth delay time ⁇ t 4 _ 5 from the fourth release time T4 and/or a sixth time after a sixth delay time ⁇ t 4 _ 6 from the fourth release time T4 and/or a seventh time after a seventh delay time ⁇ t 4 .
  • the first delay time ⁇ t 4 _i and/or the second delay time ⁇ t 4 _ 2 and/or the third delay time ⁇ t 4 _ 3 and/or the fourth delay time ⁇ t 4 _ 4 and/or the fifth delay time ⁇ t 4 _ 5 and/or the sixth delay time ⁇ t 4 _ 6 and/or the seventh delay time ⁇ t 4 _ 7 and/or the eighth delay time ⁇ t 4 . 8 and/or the ninth delay time ⁇ t 4 _ 9 and/or the tenth delay time ⁇ t 4 _i 0 are preferably predetermined delay times subsequent to the fourth release time T4.
  • a fifth pulse or packet of ions is preferably released at a fifth release time T5.
  • the control device is preferably arranged and adapted to energise the orthogonal acceleration electrode a first time after a first delay time ⁇ t 5 _i from the fifth release time T5 and at least a second subsequent time after a second delay time ⁇ t 5 _ 2 from the fifth release time T5 and prior to the release of a sixth pulse or packet of ions at a sixth release time T6.
  • the control device is preferably arranged and adapted to energise the orthogonal acceleration electrode a third time after a third delay time ⁇ ts- 3 from the fifth release time T5 and/or a fourth time after a fourth delay time ⁇ t 5 .
  • ⁇ t 5 - 4 and/or the fifth delay time ⁇ t 5 _ 5 and/or the sixth delay time ⁇ t 5 _ 6 and/or the seventh delay time ⁇ t 5 _ 7 and/or the eighth delay time ⁇ t 5 _ 8 and/or the ninth delay time ⁇ t 5 _ 9 and/or the tenth delay time At 5 -I 0 are preferably predetermined delay times subsequent to the fifth release time T5.
  • the first delay time ⁇ ti_i from the fi-rst release time Tl and/or the first delay time ⁇ t 2 _i from the second release time T2 and/or the first delay time ⁇ t 3 _i from the third release time T3 and/or the first delay time ⁇ t 4 _ x from the fourth release time T4 and/or the first delay time ⁇ t 5 _i from the fifth release time T5 are substantially the same; and/or (ii) the second delay time ⁇ ti_ 2 from the first release time Tl and/or the second delay time ⁇ t 2 _ 2 from the second release time T2 and/or the second delay time ⁇ t 3 _ 2 from the third release time T3 and/or the second delay time ⁇ t 4 _ 2 from the fourth release time T4 and/or the second delay time ⁇ t 5 .
  • the third delay time ⁇ ti- 3 from the first release time Tl and/or the third delay time ⁇ t 2 - 3 from the second release time T2 and/or the third delay time ⁇ t 3 _ 3 from the third release time T3 and/or the third delay time ⁇ t 4 _ 3 from the fourth release time T4 and/or the third delay time ⁇ t 5 _ 3 from the fifth release time T5 are substantially the same; and/or (iv) the fourth delay time ⁇ ti_ 4 from the first release time Tl and/or the fourth delay time ⁇ t 2 _ 4 from the second release time T2 and/or the fourth delay time ⁇ t 3 _ 4 from the third release time T3 and/or the fourth delay time ⁇ t 4 _ 4 from the fourth release time T4 and/or the fourth delay time ⁇ t 5 _ 4 from the fifth release time T5 are substantially the same,- and/or (v) the fifth delay time ⁇ t ⁇
  • the first delay time At 1 - ! from the first release time Tl and/or the first delay time ⁇ t a _i from the second release time T2 and/or the first delay time ⁇ t 3 _ ⁇ from the third release time T3 and/or the first delay time ⁇ t «_i from the fourth release time T4 and/or the first delay time ⁇ t s _i from the fifth release time T5 are substantially different; and/or (ii) the second delay time ⁇ ti_ 2 from the first release time Tl and/or the second delay time ⁇ t 2 _ 2 from the second release time T2 and/or the second delay time ⁇ t 3 _ 2 from the third release time T3 and/or the second delay time ⁇ t 4 _ 2 from the fourth release time T4 and/or the second delay time ⁇ t 5 _ 2 from the fifth release time T5 are substantially different; and/or (iii) the third delay time ⁇ ti_ 3 from the first release time Tl and/or the first delay time ⁇ t
  • the first delay time ⁇ ti_i from the first release time Tl and/or the first delay time ⁇ t 2 -i from the second release time T2 and/or the first delay time ⁇ t 3 -i from the third release time T3 and/or the first delay time ⁇ t 4 _i from the fourth release time T4 and/or the first delay time ⁇ t 5 -i from the fifth release time T5 are preferably selected from the group consisting of: (i) ⁇ 1 ⁇ s; (ii) 1-2 ⁇ s; (iii) 2-3 ⁇ s; (iv) 3-4 ⁇ s; (v) 4-5 ⁇ s; (vi) 5-6 ⁇ s; .
  • the second delay time ⁇ ti- 2 from the first release time Tl and/or the second delay time ⁇ t 2 - 2 from the second release time T2 and/or the second delay time ⁇ t 3 _ 2 from the third release time T3 and/or the second- delay time ⁇ t 4 - 2 from the fourth release time T4 and/or the second delay time ⁇ t 5 _ 2 from the fifth release time T5 are preferably selected from the group consisting of: (i) ⁇ 1 ⁇ s;_ (ii) 1-2 ⁇ s; (iii) 2-3 ⁇ s; (iv) 3-4 ⁇ s; (v) 4-5 ⁇ s ; (vi) 5-6 ⁇ s; (vii) 6-7 ⁇ s ; (viii) 7-8 ⁇ s ; (ix) 8- 9 ⁇ s; (x) 9-10 ⁇ s; (xi) 10-11 ⁇ s; (xii) 11-12 ⁇ s ; (xiii) 12-13 ⁇ s; (xi
  • the third delay time ⁇ ti_ 3 from the first release time Tl and/or the third delay time ⁇ t 2 - 3 from the second release time T2 and/or the third delay time ⁇ t 3 _ 3 from the third release time T3 and/or the third delay time ⁇ t 4 _ 3 from the fourth release time T4 and/or the third delay time ⁇ t 5 - 3 from the fifth release time T5 are substantially different are preferably selected from the group consisting of: (i) ⁇ 1 ⁇ s,-
  • the fourth delay time ⁇ ti_ 4 from the first release time Tl and/or the fourth delay time ⁇ t 2 - « from the second release time T2 and/or the fourth delay time ⁇ t 3 - 4 from - li the third release time T3 and/or the fourth delay time ⁇ t 4 _ 4 from the fourth release time T4 and/or the fourth delay time ⁇ t 5 - 4 from the fifth release time T5 are substantially different are preferably selected from the group consisting of: (i) ⁇ 1 ⁇ s; (ii) 1-2 ⁇ s; (iii) 2-3 ⁇ s ; (iv) 3-4 ⁇ s ; (v) 4-5 ⁇ s ; (vi) 5-6 ⁇ s; (vii) 6-7 ⁇ s; (viii) 7-8 ⁇ s; (ix) 8-9 ⁇ s; (x) 9-10 ⁇ s ; (xi) 10-11 ⁇ s; (xii) 11-12 ⁇ s; (xiii) 12-13 ⁇ s
  • the fifth delay time At 1 - S from the first release time Tl and/or the fifth delay time ⁇ t 2 -s from the second release time T2 and/or the fifth delay time ⁇ t 3 - 5 from the third release time T3 and/or the fifth delay time ⁇ t 4 _ 5 from the fourth release time T4 and/or the fifth delay time ⁇ t 5 _ 5 from the fifth release time T5 are preferably selected from the group consisting of: (i) ⁇ 1 ⁇ s ; (ii) 1-2 ⁇ s; (iii) 2-3 ⁇ s ; (iv) 3-4 ⁇ s; (v) 4-5 ⁇ s; (vi) 5-6 ⁇ s ; (vii) 6-7 ⁇ s; (viii) 7-8 ⁇ s ; (ix) 8- 9 ⁇ s; (x) 9-10 ⁇ s; (xi) 10-11 ⁇ s; (xii) 11-12 ⁇ s ; (xiii) 12-13 ⁇ s; (xiv) 13
  • the control device is preferably arranged and adapted to energise the orthogonal acceleration electrode x times prior to the release of a subsequent pulse or packet of ions, wherein x is selected from the group consisting of: (i) 2; (ii) 3; (iii) 4; (iv) 5; (v) 6; (vi) 7; (vii) 8; (viii) 9; (ix) 10; (x). 11; (xi) 12 ; (xii ) 13 ; (xiii ) 14 ; (xiv) 15 ; (xv) 16 ; (xvi ) 17 ; (xvii ) 18 ; (xviii ) 19 ; (xix) 20 ; and (xx) > 20 .
  • the first delay time is preferably varied, increased, decreased or progressively changed after each release of a pulse or packet of ions .
  • the second delay time is preferably varied, increased, decreased or progressively changed after each release of a pulse or packet of ions .
  • the third delay time is preferably varied, increased, decreased or progressively changed after each release of a pulse or packet of ions .
  • the fourth delay time is preferably varied, increased, decreased or progressively changed after each release of a pulse or packet of ions .
  • the fifth delay time is preferably varied, increased, decreased or progressively changed after each release of a pulse or packet of ions .
  • n is selected from one or more of the following: (i) 1; (ii) 2; (Ui)- 3; (iv) 4; (v) 5; (vi) 6;. (vii) 7; (viii) 8; (ix) 9; and (x) 10.
  • n may be in the range 10-20, 20-30, 30-40, 40-50, 50-60, 60-70, 70-80, 80-90, 90- 100, 100-110, 110-120, 120-130, 130-140, 140-150, 150-160, 160- 170, 170-180, 180-190, 190-200, 200-250, 250-300, 300-350, 350- 400, 400-450, 450-500 and > 500.
  • An exponential relationship is particularly preferred.
  • cycles of operation may be performed in various different orders and the mass spectral data may then be interleaved or assembled into a composite set of mass spectral data.
  • the Time of Flight mass analyser preferably comprises an orthogonal acceleration Time of Flight mass analyser.
  • the Time of Flight mass analyser preferably further comprises a reflectron and an ion detector, wherein in use at least some ions are orthogonally accelerated by energisation of the orthogonal acceleration electrode into the drift region and wherein the ions which are orthogonally accelerated are then reflected by the reflectron and are directed so as to impinge upon the ion detector.
  • a mass spectrometer comprising a Time of Flight mass analyser as disclosed above.
  • the mass spectrometer may comprise an ion trap, ion trapping region or ion gate arranged preferably upstream of the Time of Flight mass analyser.
  • the ion trap, ion trapping region or ion gate is preferably arranged and adapted to periodically release or transmit a pulse or packet of ions.
  • the ion trap, ion trapping region or ion gate is preferably arranged to onwardly transmit or pass ions from the ion trap, ion trapping region or ion gate towards an orthogonal acceleration region arranged adjacent the orthogonal acceleration electrode during a time period xl and substantially to prevent the onward transmission or passing of ions from the ion trap, ion trapping region or ion gate towards the orthogonal acceleration region arranged adjacent the orthogonal acceleration electrode during a time period x2.
  • x2 > xl .
  • xl and/or x2 are selected from the group consisting of: (i) ⁇ 1 ⁇ s ; (ii) 1-2 ⁇ s; (iii) 2-3 ⁇ s; (iv) 3-4 ⁇ s; (v) 4-5 ⁇ s ; (vi) 5-6 ⁇ s; (vii) 6-7 ⁇ s ; (viii) 7-8 ⁇ s ; (ix) 8- 9 ⁇ s; (x) 9-10 ⁇ s ; (xi) 10-11 ⁇ s; (xii) 11-12 ⁇ s ; (xiii) 12-13 ⁇ s; (xiv) 13-14 ⁇ s; (xv) 14-15 ⁇ s; (xvi) 15-16 ⁇ s ; (xvii) 16-17 ⁇ s; (xviii) 17-18 ⁇ s ; (xix) 18-19 ⁇ s; (xx) 19-20 ⁇ s; (xxi) 20-25 ⁇ s; (xxii) 25-30 ⁇ s; (xxiii) 25
  • the ratio x2/xl is preferably selected from the group consisting of: (i) 1-5; (ii) 5-10; (iii) 10-15; (iv) 15-20; (v) 20-25; (vi) 25-30; (vii) 30-35; (viii) 35-40; (ix) 40-45; (x) 45- 50; (xi) 50-55; (xii) 55-60; (xiii) 60-65; (xiv) 65-70; (xv) 70- 75; (xvi) 75-80; (xvii) 80-85; (xviii) 85-90; (xix) 90-95; (xx) 95-100; (xxi) 100-120; (xxii) 120-140; (xxiii) 140-160; (xxiv) 160-180; (xxv) 180-200; and (xxvi) > 200.
  • the first pulse or packet of ions is preferably released or onwardly transmitted from the ion trap, ion trapping region or ion gate at the first release time Tl and/or wherein the second pulse or packet of ions is preferably released or onwardly transmitted from the ion trap, ion trapping region or ion gate at the second release time T2 and/or wherein the third pulse or packet of ions is preferably released or onwardly transmitted from the ion trap, ion trapping region or ion gate at the third release time T3 and/or wherein the fourth pulse or packet of ions is preferably released or onwardly transmitted from the ion trap, ion trapping region or ion gate at the fourth release time T4 and/or wherein the fifth pulse or packet of ions is preferably released or onwardly transmitted from the ion trap, ion trapping region or ion gate at the fifth release time T5.
  • the ion trap, ion trapping region or ion gate preferably comprises a plurality of electrodes arranged upstream of the Time of Flight mass analyser.
  • the ion trap, ion trapping region or ion gate preferably comprises: (i) a multipole rod set or a segmented multipole rod set; (ii) an ion tunnel or ion funnel; or (iii) a stack or array of planar, plate or mesh electrodes.
  • the mass spectrometer comprises an ion guide arranged preferably upstream of the mass analyser.
  • one or more axial potential wells or one or more axial pseudo-potential wells are preferably translated along the length of the ion guide and wherein when an axial potential well or an axial pseudo-potential well reaches the end or exit region of the ion guide ions contained within the axial potential well or the axial pseudo- potential well are preferably caused to be released.
  • the ions are preferably onwardly transmitted as a pulse or packet of ions.
  • the first pulse or packet of ions is preferably released or onwardly transmitted from the ion guide at the first release time Tl and/or wherein the second pulse or packet of ions is preferably released or onwardly transmitted from the ion guide at the second release time T2 and/or wherein the third pulse or packet of ions is preferably released or onwardly transmitted from the ion guide at the third release time T3 and/or wherein the fourth pulse or packet of ions is preferably released or onwardly transmitted from the ion guide at the fourth release time T4 and/or wherein the fifth pulse or packet of ions is preferably released or onwardly transmitted from the ion guide at the fifth release time T5.
  • the ion guide preferably comprises a plurality of electrodes arranged upstream of the Time of Flight mass analyser.
  • the ion guide preferably comprises: (i) a multipole rod set or a segmented multipole rod set; (ii) an ion tunnel or ion funnel; or
  • the multipole rod set preferably comprises a quadrupole rod set, a hexapole rod set, an octapole rod set or a rod set comprising more than eight rods.
  • the ion tunnel or ion funnel preferably comprises a plurality of electrodes or at least 2, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90 or 100 electrodes having apertures through which ions are transmitted in use, wherein at least 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 35%, 40%, 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95% or 100% of the electrodes have apertures which are of substantially- the same size or area or which have apertures which become progressively larger and/or smaller in size or in area.
  • At least 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 35%, 40%, 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95% or 100% of the electrodes preferably have internal diameters or dimensions selected from the group consisting of: (i) ⁇ 1.0 mm; (ii) ⁇ 2.0 mm; (iii) ⁇ 3.0 mm,- (iv) ⁇ 4.0 mm; (v) ⁇ 5.0 mm; (vi) ⁇ 6.0 mm; (vii) ⁇ 7.0 ran; (viii) ⁇ 8.0 mm,- (ix) ⁇ 9.0 mm,- (x) ⁇ 10.0 mm; and (xi) > 10.0 mm.
  • the stack or array of planar, plate or mesh electrodes preferably comprises a plurality or at least 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 or 20 planar, plate or mesh electrodes wherein at least 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 35%, 40%, 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95% or 100% of the planar, plate or mesh electrodes are arranged generally in the plane in which ions travel in use.
  • planar, plate or mesh electrodes are preferably supplied with an AC or RF voltage and wherein adjacent planar, plate or mesh electrodes are supplied with opposite phases of the AC or RF voltage .
  • the ion guide preferably comprises a plurality of axial segments or at least 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95 or 100 axial segments.
  • the ion guide preferably has an axial length selected from the group consisting of: (i) ⁇ 20 mm; (ii) 20-40 mm,- (iii) 40-60 mm; (iv) 60-80 mm,- (v) 80-100 mm,- (vi) 100-120 mm,- (vii) 120-140 mm; (viii) 140-160 mm,- (ix) 160-180 mm,- (x) 180-200 mm,- (xi) 200- 220 mm; (xii) 220-240 mm,- (xiii) 240-260 mm,- (xiv) 260-280 mm; (xv)- " 280-300 mm; " " and. " (xvi) > 300 mm.
  • the mass spectrometer preferably further comprises DC voltage means for maintaining a substantially constant DC voltage gradient along at least a portion or at least 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 35%, 40%, 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95% or 100% of the axial length of the ion guide in order to urge at least some ions along at least a portion or at least 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 35%, 40%, 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95% or 100% of the axial length of the ion guide .
  • the mass spectrometer preferably further comprises transient DC voltage means arranged and adapted to apply one or more transient DC voltages or potentials or one or more transient DC voltage or potential waveforms to at least some of the electrodes forming the ion guide in order to urge at least some ions along at least 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 35%, 40%, 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95% or 100% of the axial length of the ion guide.
  • the ion guide is preferably arranged and adapted to receive a continuous or pseudo-continuous beam of ions .
  • the application of one or more transient DC voltages or potentials or one or more transient DC voltage or potential waveforms to at least some of the electrodes forming the ion guide preferably converts or partitions the beam of ions such that at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 or 20 separate groups or packets of ions are confined and/or isolated in the ion guide at any particular time.
  • Each group or packet of ions is preferably separately confined and/or isolated in a separate axial potential well formed in the ion guide.
  • the one or more transient DC voltages or potentials or one or more transient DC voltage or potential waveforms are preferably translated along the length of the ion guide so that at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 or 20 separate groups or packets of ions are confined and/or isolated in the ion guide at any particular time and are preferably axially translated along the length of the ion guide.
  • the mass spectrometer preferably further comprises AC or RF voltage means arranged and adapted to apply two or more phase- shifted AC or RF voltages to electrodes forming the ion guide in 'order " to " urge at leastf some ions along at least 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 35%, 40%, 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95% or 100% of the axial length of the ion guide.
  • the mass spectrometer preferably further comprises means for applying a single phase AC or RF voltage across at least a portion of the length of the ion guide in order to generate an axial pseudo-potential .
  • the axial pseudo-potential is preferably arranged to urge at least some ions along at least 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 35%, 40%, 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95% or 100% of the axial length of the ion guide.
  • the mass spectrometer preferably further comprises a further mass filter or mass analyser which is preferably arranged upstream of the Time of Flight mass analyser.
  • the further mass filter or mass analyser is preferably selected from the group consisting of: (i) a quadrupole rod set mass filter; (ii) a Time of Flight mass filter or mass analyser,- (iii) a Wein filter; and (iv) a magnetic sector mass filter or mass analyser.
  • the mass spectrometer preferably further comprises a collision, fragmentation or reaction device.
  • the collision, fragmentation or reaction device is preferably arranged and adapted to fragment ions by Collision Induced Dissociation ("CID").
  • the collision, fragmentation or reaction device may be selected from the group consisting of: (i) a
  • SID Surface Induced Dissociation
  • PID Photo Induced Dissociation
  • a Laser Induced Dissociation fragmentation device - (vii) an infrared radiation induced dissociation device; (viii) an ultraviolet radiation induced dissociation device,- (ix) a nozzle- skimmer interface fragmentation device; (x) an in-source fragmentation device,- (xi) an ion-source Collision Induced
  • Dissociation fragmentation device - (xii) a thermal or temperature source fragmentation device; (xiii) an electric field induced fragmentation device; (xiv) a magnetic field induced fragmentation device; (xv) an enzyme digestion or enzyme degradation fragmentation device; (xvi) an ion-ion reaction fragmentation device,- (xvii) an ion-molecule reaction -fragmentati ' on ' device; ' (xviii) an ion-atom reaction fragmentation device; (xix) an ion-metastable ion reaction fragmentation device; (xx) an ion-metastable molecule reaction fragmentation device; (xxi) an ion-metastable atom reaction fragmentation device; (xxii) an ion-ion reaction device for reacting ions to form adduct or product ions,- (xxiii) an ion-molecule reaction device for reacting ions to form adduct or product ions; (xxiv) an ion
  • the mass spectrometer may further comprise acceleration means arranged and adapted to accelerate ions into the collision, fragmentation or reaction device wherein in a mode of operation at least 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 35%, 40%, 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95% or 100% of the ions are caused to fragment or react /upon entering the collision, fragmentation or reaction device.
  • the mass spectrometer preferably further comprises a control system arranged and adapted to switch or repeatedly switch the potential difference through which ions pass prior to entering the collision, fragmentation or reaction device between a relatively high fragmentation or reaction mode of operation wherein ions are substantially fragmented or reacted upon entering the collision, fragmentation or reaction device and a relatively low fragmentation or reaction mode of operation wherein substantially fewer ions are fragmented or reacted or wherein substantially no ions are fragmented or reacted upon entering the collision, fragmentation or reaction device.
  • fragmentation or reaction device are preferably accelerated through a potential difference selected from the group consisting of: (i) > 10 V; (ii) > 20 V; (iii) ⁇ 30 V; (iv) ⁇ 40 V; (V) > 50 V; (vi) > 60 V; (vii) > 70 V; (viii) > 80 V; (ix) > 90 V; (x) ⁇ 100 V; (xi) > 110 V; (xii) ⁇ 120 V; (xiii) > 130 V; (xiv) > 140 V; (xv) ⁇ 150 V; (xvi) ⁇ 160 V;
  • the control system is preferably arranged and adapted to switch the collision, fragmentation or reaction device between the relatively high fragmentation or reaction mode of operation and the relatively low fragmentation or reaction mode of operation at least once every 1 ms, 5 ms , 10 ms, 15 ms, 20 ms, 25 ms, 30 ms, 35 ms, 40 ms, 45 ms, 50 ms, 55 ms, 60 ms, 65 ms, 70 ms, 75 ms, 80 ms, 85 ms, 90 ms, 95 ms, 100 ms, 200 ms, 300 ms, 400 ms, 500 ms, 600 ms, 700 ms, 800 ms, 900 ms, 1 s, 2 s, 3 s, 4 s, 5 s, 6 s, 7 s, 8 s, 9 s or 10 s.
  • the collision, fragmentation or reaction device is preferably arranged and adapted to receive a beam of ions and to convert or partition the beam of ions such that at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 or 20 separate groups or packets of ions are confined and/or isolated in the collision, fragmentation or reaction device at any particular time, and wherein each group or packet of ions is separately confined and/or isolated in a separate axial potential well formed in the collision, fragmentation or reaction device.
  • the mass spectrometer preferably further comprises an ion source.
  • the ion source is preferably selected from the group consisting of: (i) an Electrospray ionisation (“ESI”) ion source; (ii) an Atmospheric Pressure Photo Ionisation (“APPI”) ion source; (iii) an Atmospheric Pressure Chemical Ionisation
  • APCI ion source
  • MALDI Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionisation
  • LLI Laser Desorption Ionisation
  • API Atmospheric Pressure Ionisation
  • DIOS Desorption Ionisation on Silicon
  • EI Electron Impact
  • CI Chemical Ionisation
  • FI Field Ionisation
  • FD Field Desorption
  • ICP Inductively Coupled Plasma
  • ICP Inductively Coupled Plasma
  • FAB Fast Atom Bombardment
  • FAB Liquid Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry
  • the mass spectrometer preferably further comprises a continuous or pulsed ion source.
  • a method of mass analysing ions according to their Time of Flight comprising: providing -an orthogonal acceleration electrode and a drift region; releasing a first pulse or packet of ions at a first release time Tl; energising the orthogonal acceleration electrode a first time after a first delay time ⁇ ti-i from the first release time Tl and prior to the release of a second pulse or packet of ions at a second release time T2 ; and energising the orthogonal acceleration electrode at least a second subsequent time after a second delay, time ⁇ ti_ 2 from the first release time Tl and prior to ⁇ the release of a second pulse or packet of ions at a second release time T2.
  • a Time of Flight mass analyser comprising: a control device which is arranged and adapted to release a first pulse or packet of ions at a first release time Tl and to energise an orthogonal acceleration electrode at multiple predetermined times after the first release time Tl and prior to the release a second pulse or packet of ions at a second release time T2.
  • the control device is preferably arranged to energise the orthogonal acceleration electrode at a first predetermined delay time At 1 - ! and at a second different predetermined delay time ⁇ ti_ 2 after the first release time Tl and prior to the release of a second pulse or packet of ions at a second release time T2.
  • the control device is preferably arranged to energise the orthogonal acceleration electrode at a first predetermined delay time ⁇ t 2 -i and at a second different predetermined delay time ⁇ t 2 - 2 after the second release time T2 and prior to the release of a "third " pulse " or " p ' acket ⁇ f ⁇ lohs " at a third release time T3.
  • a method of mass analysing ions according to their time of flight comprising: releasing a first pulse or packet of ions at a first release time Tl; and energising an orthogonal acceleration electrode at multiple predetermined times after the first release time Tl and prior to the release a second pulse or packet of ions at a second release time T2.
  • the method preferably further comprises energising the orthogonal acceleration electrode at a first predetermined delay time ⁇ ti_ ⁇ and at a second different predetermined delay time ⁇ ti_ 2 after the first release time Tl and prior to the release of a second pulse or packet of ions at a second release time T2.
  • the method preferably further comprises energising the orthogonal acceleration electrode at a first predetermined delay time ⁇ t 2 -i and at a second different predetermined delay time ⁇ t 2 _ 2 after the second release time T2 and prior to the release of a third pulse or packet of ions at a third release time T3.
  • one or more packets of ions are preferably released from an ion trap or other device which is preferably arranged upstream of an orthogonal acceleration Time of Flight mass analyser.
  • the ions in each packet preferably have a variety or range of different mass to charge ratios.
  • the Time of Flight mass analyser preferably comprises an orthogonal acceleration electrode or a pusher and/or puller electrode.
  • An orthogonal acceleration voltage is preferably applied to the orthogonal acceleration electrode or pusher and/or puller electrode at two or more separate or different delay times after the release of a packet of ions from the ion trap or other device and prior to a release of a subsequent packet of ions from the ion trap or other device .
  • the orthogonal acceleration voltage is preferably applied to the orthogonal acceleration in synchronism with the relea.s_e_ .of. each packet of ions .
  • an orthogonal acceleration voltage is preferably applied at two or more pre-determined delay times after the release of each packet of ions and prior to the release of a following or subsequent packet of ions.
  • the orthogonal acceleration voltage is applied in synchronism with the release of each packet of ions and is applied at two or more pre-determined delay times after the release of a first packet of ions and is then applied again at two or more different pre-determined delay times after the release of a second subsequent packet of ions.
  • the preferred embodiment advantageously enables the duty cycle of an orthogonal acceleration Time of Flight mass analyser to be increased or enhanced across a wide mass to charge ratio range compared to the known method of enhancing the duty cycle which is only effective across a narrow mass to charge ratio range .
  • Another advantage of the preferred embodiment is that the increase or enhancement in duty cycle is also preferably substantially constant across a wide mass to charge ratio range.
  • a further advantage of the preferred embodiment is that the duty cycle of a limited number of ions of interest may be increased to substantially 100% giving a significant overall duty cycle improvement over arrangements which utilise one orthogonal acceleration pulse per packet of ions released.
  • the mass spectrometer preferably comprises an ion source.
  • the ion source may comprise a pulsed ion source such as a Laser
  • LDM Desorption Ionisation
  • MALDI Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionisation
  • DIOS Desorption Ionisation on Silicon
  • the mass spectrometer may comprise a continuous ion source.
  • a means for converting a continuous ion beam into a discontinuous ion beam may be provided.
  • an RF ion trap may be provided which may be arranged to store ions and/or periodically release ions.
  • a travelling wave RF ion guide may be provided.
  • the RF ion guide preferably comprises a plurality of electrodes.
  • a "continuous ion ⁇ b ⁇ eam is preferably partitioned or fractionated into a series of packets of ions.
  • Each packet of ions is preferably contained or confined within a separate axial potential well which is preferably translated along the length of the ion guide.
  • One or more transient DC voltages or potentials or one or more transient DC voltage or potential waveforms are preferably applied to the electrodes .
  • One or more axial potential wells are preferably created or generated which are then preferably translated along the length of the ion guide.
  • a continuous ion source may be provided.
  • the ion source may, for example, comprise an Electrospray Ionisation ("ESI") ion source, an Atmospheric
  • APCI Pressure Chemical Ionisation
  • EI Electron Impact
  • APPI Atmospheric Pressure Photon Ionisation
  • CI Chemical Ionisation
  • FAB Fast Atom Bombardment
  • LIMS Liquid Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry
  • FI Field Ionisation
  • FD Field Desorption
  • the mass spectrometer may comprise a mass filter which may be arranged downstream of the ion source.
  • the mass filter is preferably arranged upstream of the orthogonal acceleration Time of Flight mass analyser.
  • the mass filter may also be arranged upstream of any means for converting a continuous ion beam into a discontinuous ion beam.
  • the mass filter may be operated in a mass filtering mode of operation wherein the mass filter is arranged to transmit ions having a single or specific mass to charge ratio or a relatively narrow range of mass to charge ratios .
  • the mass filter preferably comprises either a guadrupole rod set mass filter.
  • the mass filter may comprise a Time of Flight mass analyser, a Wein filter or a magnetic sector mass analyser.
  • the mass spectrometer may include a collision or fragmentation cell.
  • the collision or fragmentation cell is preferably arranged upstream of any means for " "converting " a " continuous " ion beam ' into a discontinuous ion beam.
  • at least some ions entering the collision or fragmentation cell are preferably caused to fragment into a plurality of fragment or daughter ions.
  • Fig. IA shows a conventional orthogonal acceleration Time of Flight mass analyser wherein a continuous ion beam is periodically sampled by energising an orthogonal acceleration electrode
  • Fig. IB shows the duty cycle as a function of mass to charge ratio for a conventional orthogonal acceleration Time of Flight mass analyser and a plot of an enhanced duty cycle as a function of mass to charge ratio which may be obtained according to a known method of enhancing the duty cycle of a Time of Flight mass analyser
  • Fig. IA shows a conventional orthogonal acceleration Time of Flight mass analyser wherein a continuous ion beam is periodically sampled by energising an orthogonal acceleration electrode
  • Fig. IB shows the duty cycle as a function of mass to charge ratio for a conventional orthogonal acceleration Time of Flight mass analyser and a plot of an enhanced duty cycle as a function of mass to charge ratio which may be obtained according to a known method of enhancing the duty cycle of a Time of Flight mass analyser
  • Fig. IA shows a
  • FIG. 2A shows an orthogonal acceleration Time of Flight mass analyser according an embodiment of the present invention wherein ions are initially trapped in an ion trap
  • Fig. 2B shows a first packet of ions which has been released from the ion trap and which becomes spatially dispersed
  • Fig. 2C shows an orthogonal acceleration electrode being energised for a first time so that a first group of ions are orthogonally accelerated into the drift region of the Time of Flight mass analyser
  • Fig. 2D shows other ions continuing to arrive at an orthogonal acceleration region adjacent the orthogonal acceleration electrode
  • Fig. 2E shows the orthogonal acceleration electrode being energised for a second time prior to a second packet of ions being released from the ion trap;
  • Fig. 3 illustrates the enhancement in duty cycle which may obtained according to an embodiment of the present invention by energising the orthogonal acceleration electrode of a Time of Flight mass analyser at three different delays times after the release of a first packet of ions from an ion trap and prior to the release of a second packet of ions from the ion trap
  • Fig. 4A is a plot of the duty cycle according to an embodiment wherein two cycles are performed and the orthogonal acceleration electrode is energised at three different delay " times " irfeacK " cycle " and wherein the delay times are increased from one cycle to the next
  • Fig. 3 illustrates the enhancement in duty cycle which may obtained according to an embodiment of the present invention by energising the orthogonal acceleration electrode of a Time of Flight mass analyser at three different delays times after the release of a first packet of ions from an ion trap and prior to the release of a second packet of ions from the ion trap
  • Fig. 4A is a plot of the duty
  • Fig. 4B is a plot of the duty cycle according to an embodiment wherein three cycles are performed and the orthogonal acceleration electrode is energised at three different delay times in each cycle and wherein the delay times are increased from one cycle to the next
  • Fig. 4C is a plot of the duty cycle according to an embodiment wherein four cycles are performed and the orthogonal acceleration electrode is energised at three different delay times in each cycle and wherein the delay times are increased from one cycle to the next
  • Fig. 4D is a plot of the duty cycle according to an embodiment wherein ten cycles are performed and the orthogonal acceleration electrode is energised at three different delay times in each cycle and wherein the delay times are increased from one cycle to the next
  • Fig. 4C is a plot of the duty cycle according to an embodiment wherein four cycles are performed and the orthogonal acceleration electrode is energised at three different delay times in each cycle and wherein the delay times are increased from one cycle to the next
  • Fig. 4D is a plot of the duty cycle
  • FIG. 4E illustrates the resulting duty cycle corresponding to the embodiment shown in Fig. 4A wherein two cycles were performed
  • Fig. 4F illustrates the resulting duty cycle corresponding to the embodiment shown in Fig. 4B wherein three cycles were performed
  • Fig. 4G illustrates the resulting duty cycle corresponding to the embodiment shown in Fig. 4C wherein four cycles were performed
  • Fig. 4H illustrates the resulting duty cycle corresponding to the embodiment shown in Fig. 4D wherein ten cycles were performed;
  • Fig. 5 shows: (i) the duty cycle of an orthogonal acceleration Time of Flight mass spectrometer operated in a conventional manner wherein a continuous ion beam is periodically sampled; (ii) a duty cycle according to an embodiment of the present invention which was theoretically predicted; (iii) and a duty cycle according to an embodiment of the present invention as was obtained experimentally; and
  • Fig. 6A shows a mass spectrum obtained by operating an orthogonal acceleration Time of Flight mass analyser in a conventional manner wherein a continuous ion beam was periodically sampled and Fig. 6B shows a mass spectrum obtained according to an embodiment of the present invention wherein the duty cycle was enhanced across a large proportion of the mass spectrum.
  • a known orthogonal acceleration Time of Flight mass analyser is shown in Fig. IA.
  • the orthogonal acceleration Time of Tlightr mass analyser comprises an orthogonal acceleration electrode 2, a reflectron 5 and an ion detector 6.
  • a continuous beam of ions is transmitted to the mass analyser and the mass analyser is arranged to sample the continuous beam of ions by periodically accelerating ions out from an acceleration region which is arranged adjacent to the orthogonal acceleration electrode 2.
  • the ions which are orthogonally accelerated pass into a drift region of the mass analyser.
  • a fraction or proportion 3 of the continuous ion beam is sampled or orthogonally accelerated into the drift region of the mass analyser when the orthogonal acceleration or pusher electrode 2 is energised.
  • the ions 4 which are orthogonally accelerated into the drift region are then reflected by a reflectron 5 and are directed back towards the ion detector 6.
  • the ions follow a trajectory as indicated by arrow 4.
  • an orthogonal acceleration voltage is not applied again to the orthogonal acceleration electrode 2 until the last of ions which have been orthogonally accelerated into the drift region arrive at the ion detector 6 and are detected.
  • the last ions to arrive at the ion detector 6 are those having the 1 highest mass to charge ratio.
  • the requirement of waiting until the last ions have arrived at the ion detector 6 before energising the orthogonal acceleration electrode 2 again is necessary in order to prevent ions having a relatively high mass to charge ratio which were orthogonally accelerated by a first pulse and which have not yet reached the ion detector 6 from being overtaken by ions having a relatively low mass to charge ratio which were orthogonally .accelerated by a second subsequent pulse.
  • the maximum sampling duty cycle DC of ions having a particular mass to charge ratio is determined by the geometry of the Time of Plight mass analyser and is typically between 10% and 25%.
  • the duty cycle can be calculated using the following relation:
  • w J-S ⁇ length of the orthogonal -acceleration or pusher- region adjacent the orthogonal acceleration electrode L is the separation between the centre of the orthogonal acceleration or pusher electrode and the centre of the ion detector and (m/z) max is the maximum mass to charge ratio of ions of interest.
  • the known method of duty cycle enhancement involves trapping ions in an ion trap which is arranged upstream of the Time of Flight mass analyser. Ions are released in a pulse from the ion trap and an orthogonal acceleration pulse is applied to the orthogonal acceleration electrode 2 after a predetermined delay. The delay time is set so as to correspond with the arrival of particular ions of interest at the orthogonal acceleration region adjacent which is immediately adjacent the orthogonal acceleration or pusher electrode 2.
  • a travelling wave ion guide is provided upstream of an orthogonal acceleration Time of Flight mass analyser.
  • the travelling wave ion guide is used to partition a continuous stream of ions which is received at the entrance to the travelling wave ion guide. Packets of ions are periodically released from the exit region of the ion guide as an axial potential well reaches the end of the ion guide.
  • the energisation of the orthogonal acceleration electrode is synchronised with each packet of ions which is released or ejected from the travelling wave ion guide.
  • the dashed line in Fig. IB shows how the Duty Cycle may be enhanced when an orthogonal acceleration pulse is synchronised to correspond with the arrival of ions having a mass to charge ratio of 500 Da at the orthogonal acceleration region of the Time of Flight mass analyser.
  • the operation of a mass spectrometer according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention will now be described with reference to Figs. 2A-2E.
  • the mass spectrometer 'compri'ses “ ⁇ an ⁇ orthogonal acceTerat ⁇ o ⁇ ⁇ Time " of Flight mass analyser and an ion storage device or an ion partitioning device 7 which is preferably arranged upstream of the Time of Flight mass analyser as shown in Fig. 2A.
  • the ion storage or ion partitioning device 7 may comprise according to an embodiment either an ion trap or alternatively a travelling wave ion guide.
  • the orthogonal acceleration Time of Flight mass analyser preferably comprises an orthogonal acceleration region which is preferably located adjacent an orthogonal acceleration electrode or a pusher and/or puller electrode 2.
  • the Time of Flight mass analyser preferably further comprises a reflectron 5 and an ion detector 6.
  • An arrow 4 indicates the approximate path that ions follow once they have been accelerated into the drift region of the orthogonal acceleration Time of Flight mass analyser.
  • a packet of ions is preferably released from the ion guide or the ion trap 7 arranged upstream of the orthogonal acceleration Time of Flight mass analyser.
  • the ions which are released preferably travel towards the orthogonal acceleration region of the Time of Flight mass analyser.
  • the ions preferably become spatially and/or temporally dispersed by the time that at least some ions arrive at or approach the orthogonal acceleration region adjacent the orthogonal acceleration or pusher and/or puller electrode 2. This is illustrated in Fig. 2B. Ions having a relatively low mass to charge ratio Ml will reach the orthogonal acceleration or pusher and/or puller electrode 2 prior to other ions which have a relatively high mass to charge ratio. As shown in Fig.
  • the orthogonal acceleration or pusher and/or puller electrode 2 is preferably energised a first time so as to orthogonally accelerate some ions into the drift or time of flight region of the Time of Flight mass analyser.
  • the ions are orthogonally accelerated at a predetermined time t2 after ions were first released from the upstream ion guide or ion trap 7.
  • the arrival time of an ion at the orthogonal acceleration region adjacent the orthogonal acceleration or pusher and/or puller electrode 2 is preferably dependent upon the mass to charge ratio of the ion.
  • the orthogonal acceleration electrode or pusher and/or puller electrode 2 is preferably energised at least a second time before a second or subsequent packet of ions is released from the ion guide or ion trap 7. This is in contrast to the known Time of Flight mass spectrometer wherein the orthogonal acceleration electrode is only energised once per release of ions from an ion trap arranged upstream of the Time of Flight mass analyser.
  • the voltage applied to the orthogonal acceleration electrode or pusher and/or puller electrode 2 is preferably reset to zero. Further ions preferably continue to approach the orthogonal acceleration region adjacent the orthogonal acceleration electrode or pusher and/or puller electrode 2. Once the orthogonal acceleration region has refilled with or admitted ions having relatively higher mass to charge ratios (as shown in Fig. 2D) then the orthogonal acceleration electrode or pusher and/or puller electrode 2 is preferably energised a second time at a time t4 shown in Fig. 2E. Fig.
  • 2E shows how substantially all ions having a mass to charge ratio of M6 and some ions having a mass to charge ratio of either M5 or M7 are orthogonally accelerated into the drift region of the Time of Flight mass analyser according to the preferred embodiment wherein M7 > M ⁇ > M5.
  • TbTe process of energising the orthogonal acceleration electrode or pusher and/or puller electrode 2 may be repeated a third and subsequent times prior to releasing a second or subsequent pulse of ions from the ion guide or ion trap 7.
  • the orthogonal acceleration electrode or pusher and/or puller electrode 2 is preferably repeatedly re-energised until ions having the highest mass to charge ratio of interest which were contained in the original or first packet of ions which was released from the ion guide or ion trap 7 has passed to the orthogonal acceleration region adjacent the orthogonal acceleration or pusher and/or puller electrode 2.
  • the number of repeat pulses or energisations of the orthogonal acceleration electrode or pusher and/or puller electrode 2 per release of a packet of ions from the ion guide or ion trap 7 may be partly dependent upon how quickly the acceleration voltage can be reset to zero after a group of ions has exited the orthogonal acceleration region. It may also be dependent upon the mass to charge ratio range of ions released in the initial packet of ions from the ion trap 7. Fig.
  • FIG. 3 shows a plot' of the theoretical duty cycle as a function of mass to charge ratio which may be achieved according to an embodiment of the present invention by energising the orthogonal acceleration electrode or pusher and/or puller electrode 2 three times after each release of an ion packet from an upstream ion trap 7 and prior to the release of subsequent packet of ions from the ion trap 7.
  • the timing of the energisation of the orthogonal acceleration electrode or pusher and/or puller electrode 2 was set so that ions having mass to charge ratios of 50, 270 and 1454 Da were optimised to be orthogonally accelerated into the drift region of the Time of Flight mass analyser.
  • the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of an enhanced duty cycle window at a mass to charge ratio (m/z) for each selected ion is governed by the following relation which is relevant to the apparatus used for these experiments:
  • the range of mass to charge ratios over which a duty cycle gain is achieved may be widened but at the expense of the maximum duty cycle that can be obtained.
  • the time delay between the release of a packet of ions from an upstream ion trap 7 or alternatively from a travelling wave ion guide to the energisation of the orthogonal acceleration electrode or pusher and/or puller electrode 2 may be varied from release to release.
  • the various delay times may be incremented by pre-determined amounts for a predetermined number of releases of packets of ions . This enables multiple enhanced duty cycle windows to be interleaved to give an overall averaged duty cycle.
  • the number of enhanced duty cycle windows that may be averaged in this manner may vary from two to any number.
  • the time delay between orthogonal pushes or energisations of the orthogonal acceleration or pusher and/or puller electrode 2 may be varied in different ways which may have the effect of altering the final averaged duty cycle distribution. For example, it may be varied linearly with mass or mass to charge ratio or it may be varied linearly with time. Other embodiments are contemplated wherein the time delay may be varied or exponentially with mass or mass to charge ratio or exponentially with time during a cycle. For example, ions may according to an embodiment be orthogonally accelerated after time delays of 2.5 ⁇ s, 5 ⁇ s, 10 ⁇ s and 20 ⁇ s .
  • Fig. 4A shows the duty cycle for two interleaved enhanced duty cycle windows.
  • a first pulse or packet of ions was released from an ion trap and then the orthogonal acceleration electrode was energised three times .
  • a second pulse or packet of ions was released from the ion trap and the orthogonal acceleration electrode was then energised a further three times.
  • the delay times at which the orthogonal acceleration electrode was energised in the second cycle were arranged to be different from the-delay times in " the ⁇ fifst cycle.
  • Fig. 4B shows the duty cycle for three interleaved enhanced duty cycle windows.
  • a first pulse or packet of ions was released from an ion trap and then the orthogonal acceleration electrode was energised three times.
  • a second pulse or packet of ions was released from the ion trap and the orthogonal acceleration electrode was then energised a further three times .
  • a third pulse or packet of ions was released from the ion trap and the orthogonal acceleration electrode was then energised a further three times .
  • the delay times at which the orthogonal acceleration electrode were energised in the first, second and third cycles were arranged to be different.
  • Fig. 4c shows the duty cycle for four interleaved enhanced duty cycle windows.
  • a first pulse or packet of ions was released from an ion trap and then the orthogonal acceleration electrode was energised three times.
  • a second pulse or packet of ions was released from the ion trap and the orthogonal acceleration electrode was then energised a further three times .
  • a third pulse or packet of ions was released from the ion trap and the orthogonal acceleration electrode was then energised a further three times.
  • a fourth pulse or packet of ions was released from the ion trap and the orthogonal acceleration electrode was then energised a further three times.
  • the delay times at which the orthogonal acceleration electrode were energised in the first, second, third and fourth cycles were arranged to be different.
  • Fig. 4D shows the duty cycle for ten interleaved enhanced duty cycle windows.
  • a first pulse or packet of ions was released from an ion trap and then the orthogonal acceleration electrode was energised three times.
  • a second pulse or packet of ions was released from the ion trap and the orthogonal acceleration electrode was then energised a further three times .
  • a third pulse or packet of ions was released from the ion trap and the orthogonal acceleration electrode was then energised a further three times.
  • a fourth pulse or packet of ions was released from the ion trap and the orthogonal acceleration electrode was then energised a further three times.
  • a fifth pulse or packet of ions was released from the ion trap and the orthogonal acceleration electrode was then energised a further three times.
  • a sixth pulse or packet of ions was released from the ion trap and the orthogonal acceleration electrode was then energised a further three times .
  • a seventh pulse or packet of ions was released from the ion trap and the orthogonal acceleration electrode was then energised a further three times.
  • an eighth pulse or packet of ions was released from the ion trap and the orthogonal acceleration electrode was then energised a further three times .
  • a ninth pulse or packet of ions was released from the ion trap and the orthogonal acceleration electrode was then energised a further three times .
  • a tenth cycle a tenth pulse or packet of ions was released from the ion trap and the orthogonal acceleration electrode was then energised a further three times.
  • the delay times at which the orthogonal acceleration electrode was energised in the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth and tenth cycles were arranged to be different .
  • the continuous line shows the duty cycle due to energising the orthogonal acceleration electrode a first time and at different delay times in each cycle.
  • the short dashed line shows the duty cycle due to energising the orthogonal acceleration electrode a second time and at different delay times in each cycle.
  • the long dashed line shows the duty cycle due to energising the orthogonal acceleration electrode a third time and at different delay times.
  • Fig. 4E shows the total averaged duty cycle when the contributions from two cycles of three pushes per cycle were combined.
  • Fig. 4F shows the total averaged duty cycle when the contributions from three cycles of three pushes per cycle were combined.
  • Fig. 4G shows the total averaged duty cycle when the contributions from four cycles of three pushes per cycle were combined.
  • Fig. 4H shows the total averaged duty cycle when the contributions from ten cycles of three pushes per cycle were combined.
  • the first push has been interleaved between ⁇ 50 "and 270 Da
  • the second push has been interleaved between 270 and 1450 Da
  • the third push has been interleaved between 1450 and 7800 Da.
  • Increasing the number of pushes has the effect of smoothing out the duty cycle distribution. It can be seen from Fig. 4H that interleaving ten cycles gives a constant 30% duty cycle from approximately 50 Da upwards.
  • Fig. 5 illustrates the normal duty cycle of an orthogonal acceleration Time of Flight mass analyser when sampling a continuous ion beam in a conventional manner.
  • Fig. 5 also shows the theoretical enhancement in duty cycle which may be obtained according to an embodiment of the present invention together with an experimentally obtained enhancement in duty cycle .
  • the theoretical and experimental enhancements in duty cycle relate to an embodiment wherein three orthogonal acceleration pulses were applied to the orthogonal acceleration electrode or pusher and/or puller electrode 2 after each packet of ions was released from the ion trap 7.
  • Four different enhanced duty cycle windows were interleaved.
  • Fig. 5 also shows preliminary experimental data which confirms that an improvement in duty cycle to a substantially constant value may be achieved over a wide mass to charge ratio range.
  • Fig. 6A shows a mass spectrum obtained by operating an orthogonal acceleration Time of Flight mass spectrometer in a conventional manner.
  • Fig. 6B shows a corresponding mass spectrum obtained according to a preferred embodiment by energising the pusher electrode 2 of a Time of Flight mass analyser multiple times after each release of ions from an ion trap 7 arranged upstream of the Time of Flight mass analyser.
  • the enhanced duty cycle windows were interleaved.
  • the two mass spectra are plotted with the same vertical or intensity scale.
  • the significant improvement in duty cycle particularly at relatively low mass to charge ratio has the effect of significantly increasing the intensity of the ion signal for these ions without sacrificing sensitivity for ions having relatively high mass to charge ratios .
  • the pusher electrode 2 may be energised whilst ions from a preceding push are still travelling towards the ion detector 6.
  • the ions in a preceding push are predominantly lower in mass to charge ratio than" those " in " the " subsequent "" push a ' nd hence the ions from the subsequent push will not overtake the ions having relatively lower mass to charge ratios from the preceding push. Therefore, spectral overlap will not occur.
  • two or more Time to Digital Converters (“TDCs”) may be used.
  • TDCs Time to Digital Converters
  • a single Time to Digital Converter may be used wherein a flag may be placed at a time which corresponds with the second pusher pulse. In this way the single Time to Digital Convertor may record both Time of Flight measurements .
  • the delay times at which points the orthogonal acceleration electrode is energised after the release of pulses or packets of ions may be varied in, for example, ten subsequent cycles of operation so that a substantially constant overall duty cycle of approximately 30% may be obtained across substantially the whole of the mass to charge ratio of interest
  • the delay times may not be varied from one cycle to the next.
  • ions having a mass to charge ratio of 50, 270.and 1454 may be orthogonally accelerated with a duty cycle of 100%.
  • the Time of Flight mass analyser may be operated in a mode wherein there are only two different delay times in subsequent cycles of operation.
  • the overall duty cycle would be similar to that shown in Fig. 4E.
  • five species of ions could, for example, be orthogonally accelerated with a duty cycle of 50%.
  • Embodiments of the present invention are contemplated wherein the Time of Flight mass analyser may be operated in a first mode of operation wherein a plurality of species of ions may be orthogonally accelerated with a high duty cycle (50-100%) and in a second mode of operation wherein substantially all ions above "a low-mass "cut-off ' are orthogonally accelerated with a substantially constant and relatively high duty cycle of approximately 30%.

Abstract

La présente invention concerne un spectromètre de masse comportant un analyseur de masse à temps de vol de l'accélération orthogonale. Une impulsion ou un paquets d'ions est libéré(e) soit à partir d'une piège à ions (7) soit à partir d'un guide d'ions ionique par ondes en amont d'une électrode d'accélération orthogonale (2) formant partie de l'analyseur de masse de temps de vol d'accélération orthogonale. Des ions dans l'impulsion ou le paquet d'ions qui est libéré(e) sont dispersés dans le temps et l'électrode d'accélération orthogonale (2) est excitée plusieurs fois préalablement à la libération d'une impulsion ou d'un paquet d'ions ultérieur(e).
PCT/GB2007/004820 2006-12-14 2007-12-14 Spectromètre de masse WO2008071993A2 (fr)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/516,610 US8183524B2 (en) 2006-12-14 2007-12-14 Mass spectrometer having time of flight mass analyser
JP2009540869A JP5175859B2 (ja) 2006-12-14 2007-12-14 質量分析計
CA2672526A CA2672526C (fr) 2006-12-14 2007-12-14 Spectrometre de masse
EP07848560.4A EP2092549B1 (fr) 2006-12-14 2007-12-14 Spectromètre de masse

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB0624993.2 2006-12-14
GBGB0624993.2A GB0624993D0 (en) 2006-12-14 2006-12-14 Mass spectrometer
US88450907P 2007-01-11 2007-01-11
US60/884,509 2007-01-11

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2008071993A2 true WO2008071993A2 (fr) 2008-06-19
WO2008071993A3 WO2008071993A3 (fr) 2009-04-02

Family

ID=39384818

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/GB2007/004820 WO2008071993A2 (fr) 2006-12-14 2007-12-14 Spectromètre de masse

Country Status (4)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2092549B1 (fr)
JP (1) JP5175859B2 (fr)
CA (1) CA2672526C (fr)
WO (1) WO2008071993A2 (fr)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9991108B2 (en) 2011-03-14 2018-06-05 Micromass Uk Limited Ion guide with orthogonal sampling

Families Citing this family (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2012084299A (ja) * 2010-10-08 2012-04-26 Jeol Ltd タンデム型飛行時間型質量分析計
WO2019229463A1 (fr) 2018-05-31 2019-12-05 Micromass Uk Limited Spectromètre de masse comportant une région de fragmentation
GB201808892D0 (en) 2018-05-31 2018-07-18 Micromass Ltd Mass spectrometer
GB201808890D0 (en) 2018-05-31 2018-07-18 Micromass Ltd Bench-top time of flight mass spectrometer
GB201808894D0 (en) 2018-05-31 2018-07-18 Micromass Ltd Mass spectrometer
GB201808936D0 (en) 2018-05-31 2018-07-18 Micromass Ltd Bench-top time of flight mass spectrometer
GB2602188B (en) 2018-05-31 2023-01-11 Micromass Ltd Mass spectrometer
GB201808949D0 (en) 2018-05-31 2018-07-18 Micromass Ltd Bench-top time of flight mass spectrometer
GB201808912D0 (en) 2018-05-31 2018-07-18 Micromass Ltd Bench-top time of flight mass spectrometer

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5689111A (en) * 1995-08-10 1997-11-18 Analytica Of Branford, Inc. Ion storage time-of-flight mass spectrometer
US20030001087A1 (en) * 2001-05-25 2003-01-02 Katrin Fuhrer Time-of-flight mass spectrometer for monitoring of fast processes
US20030066958A1 (en) * 2001-10-10 2003-04-10 Akihiko Okumura Mass spectrometer and measurement system using the mass spectrometer

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6794641B2 (en) * 2002-05-30 2004-09-21 Micromass Uk Limited Mass spectrometer
US7095013B2 (en) * 2002-05-30 2006-08-22 Micromass Uk Limited Mass spectrometer
GB0424426D0 (en) * 2004-11-04 2004-12-08 Micromass Ltd Mass spectrometer

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5689111A (en) * 1995-08-10 1997-11-18 Analytica Of Branford, Inc. Ion storage time-of-flight mass spectrometer
US20030001087A1 (en) * 2001-05-25 2003-01-02 Katrin Fuhrer Time-of-flight mass spectrometer for monitoring of fast processes
US20030066958A1 (en) * 2001-10-10 2003-04-10 Akihiko Okumura Mass spectrometer and measurement system using the mass spectrometer

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See also references of EP2092549A2 *

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9991108B2 (en) 2011-03-14 2018-06-05 Micromass Uk Limited Ion guide with orthogonal sampling

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2092549B1 (fr) 2013-08-14
CA2672526A1 (fr) 2008-06-19
JP2010514095A (ja) 2010-04-30
CA2672526C (fr) 2016-08-23
EP2092549A2 (fr) 2009-08-26
WO2008071993A3 (fr) 2009-04-02
JP5175859B2 (ja) 2013-04-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8183524B2 (en) Mass spectrometer having time of flight mass analyser
CA2672526C (fr) Spectrometre de masse
US9786479B2 (en) Mass spectrometer device and method using scanned phase applied potentials in ion guidance
US9646813B2 (en) Mass spectrometer
JP5198467B2 (ja) 質量分析計
JP4971992B2 (ja) 質量分析計
CA2656197C (fr) Spectrometre de masse
CA2711898C (fr) Piege a ions lineaire
CA2650390C (fr) Spectrometre de masse
GB2471581A (en) A RF collision cell with a variable radial pseudopotential field
JP2010511985A5 (fr)
CA2712459C (fr) Spectrometre a mobilite d'ions
US9824877B2 (en) Fast pushing time of flight mass spectrometer combined with restricted mass to charge ratio range delivery
GB2440613A (en) A mass analyzer utilising a plurality of axial pseudo-potential wells

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2672526

Country of ref document: CA

Ref document number: 2007848560

Country of ref document: EP

ENP Entry into the national phase in:

Ref document number: 2009540869

Country of ref document: JP

Kind code of ref document: A

NENP Non-entry into the national phase in:

Ref country code: DE

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 07848560

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 12516610

Country of ref document: US