WO2007110655A2 - Procede d'usinage d'une piece - Google Patents

Procede d'usinage d'une piece Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2007110655A2
WO2007110655A2 PCT/GB2007/001197 GB2007001197W WO2007110655A2 WO 2007110655 A2 WO2007110655 A2 WO 2007110655A2 GB 2007001197 W GB2007001197 W GB 2007001197W WO 2007110655 A2 WO2007110655 A2 WO 2007110655A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
tool
blank
cut
machining
assessment
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/GB2007/001197
Other languages
English (en)
Other versions
WO2007110655A3 (fr
Inventor
David George Pickett
Stefen Keith Buckland
Original Assignee
Renishaw Plc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Renishaw Plc filed Critical Renishaw Plc
Publication of WO2007110655A2 publication Critical patent/WO2007110655A2/fr
Publication of WO2007110655A3 publication Critical patent/WO2007110655A3/fr

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N3/00—Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress
    • G01N3/58—Investigating machinability by cutting tools; Investigating the cutting ability of tools
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C13/00—Dental prostheses; Making same
    • A61C13/0003—Making bridge-work, inlays, implants or the like
    • A61C13/0022—Blanks or green, unfinished dental restoration parts
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23Q—DETAILS, COMPONENTS, OR ACCESSORIES FOR MACHINE TOOLS, e.g. ARRANGEMENTS FOR COPYING OR CONTROLLING; MACHINE TOOLS IN GENERAL CHARACTERISED BY THE CONSTRUCTION OF PARTICULAR DETAILS OR COMPONENTS; COMBINATIONS OR ASSOCIATIONS OF METAL-WORKING MACHINES, NOT DIRECTED TO A PARTICULAR RESULT
    • B23Q17/00—Arrangements for observing, indicating or measuring on machine tools
    • B23Q17/09—Arrangements for observing, indicating or measuring on machine tools for indicating or measuring cutting pressure or for determining cutting-tool condition, e.g. cutting ability, load on tool
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23Q—DETAILS, COMPONENTS, OR ACCESSORIES FOR MACHINE TOOLS, e.g. ARRANGEMENTS FOR COPYING OR CONTROLLING; MACHINE TOOLS IN GENERAL CHARACTERISED BY THE CONSTRUCTION OF PARTICULAR DETAILS OR COMPONENTS; COMBINATIONS OR ASSOCIATIONS OF METAL-WORKING MACHINES, NOT DIRECTED TO A PARTICULAR RESULT
    • B23Q17/00—Arrangements for observing, indicating or measuring on machine tools
    • B23Q17/22—Arrangements for observing, indicating or measuring on machine tools for indicating or measuring existing or desired position of tool or work
    • B23Q17/2233—Arrangements for observing, indicating or measuring on machine tools for indicating or measuring existing or desired position of tool or work for adjusting the tool relative to the workpiece
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B19/00—Programme-control systems
    • G05B19/02—Programme-control systems electric
    • G05B19/18—Numerical control [NC], i.e. automatically operating machines, in particular machine tools, e.g. in a manufacturing environment, so as to execute positioning, movement or co-ordinated operations by means of programme data in numerical form
    • G05B19/406—Numerical control [NC], i.e. automatically operating machines, in particular machine tools, e.g. in a manufacturing environment, so as to execute positioning, movement or co-ordinated operations by means of programme data in numerical form characterised by monitoring or safety
    • G05B19/4065—Monitoring tool breakage, life or condition
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
    • G05B2219/30—Nc systems
    • G05B2219/37—Measurements
    • G05B2219/37207—Verify, probe, workpiece
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
    • G05B2219/30—Nc systems
    • G05B2219/37—Measurements
    • G05B2219/37576—Post-process, measure worpiece after machining, use results for new or same
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
    • G05B2219/30—Nc systems
    • G05B2219/50—Machine tool, machine tool null till machine tool work handling
    • G05B2219/50307—Correction by probing dimension of machined workpiece

Definitions

  • This invention relates to a method of machining a part.
  • a cutting tool When a cutting tool is used for drilling or milling features, it suffers wear and perhaps breakage.
  • the effectiveness of a cutting tool in a milling procedure can be assessed in a number of different ways. One way is to check the tool itself by monitoring tool vibration, rotational speed or, visually inspecting the tool using a sensor or tool setter.
  • the lifetime of a tool can be estimated by doing a series of milling processes or wear tests.
  • a tool can either be changed before it wears to a significant degree or tends to break based on the wear information.
  • its effectiveness can be checked when it reaches a certain age.
  • the machined product can be monitored. For example, as described in Published International Patent Application WO93/07445, the punching of holes in sheet material is monitored by optically or mechanically probing the punched holes. When the tool becomes dull or broken, the holes punched will no longer be consistently of the required diameter and the process can be stopped and the tool changed. This is a pass / fail system.
  • a method of machining a part from a blank comprising the steps of: (i) cutting an assessment tool cut in the blank using a tool; (ii) assessing the assessment tool cut; (iii) determining a difference between a nominal tool cut and the actual assessment tool cut; and (iv) performing a part forming cutting operation on the blank using the tool, in which step (iv) includes compensating for any difference determined in step (iii) between the nominal tool cut and the actual assessment tool cut.
  • Such a difference in tool cut can be caused by a change in the effectiveness of the tool i.e. due to damage of the cutting surface or, a difference between the nominal tool size and shape and the actual tool size and shape. It could also be caused by judder, for example caused by drag.
  • An assessment tool cut can be a feature cut in the blank which does not form a part of the shape of the machined part.
  • a part forming cutting operation can be a process of removing material from the blank in order to form the shape of the machined part.
  • a method of assessing tool performance comprising the steps of: assessing a feature cut by the tool; and compensating for any difference between a nominal tool cut and the actual tool cut.
  • the invention is particularly applicable to machining centres which use fixed tools as in these circumstances the tool cannot be moved to a tool checker or sensor for assessment.
  • the invention is also applicable where coated tools are used, i.e. the tool comprises a shank which is coated, an example is a diamond bur coating, to effect the milling process.
  • coated tools i.e. the tool comprises a shank which is coated, an example is a diamond bur coating, to effect the milling process.
  • Such tools have a nominal diameter but this will vary slightly from tool to tool, with erosion through use, or when loose diamonds are removed from the tool surface.
  • Such tools are cheaper than accurately manufactured tools but must be set i.e. the actual cut of the tool must be established in order that accurate machining processes can be carried out with the tools.
  • the tool itself can be flexible and allowed to deform i.e. bend during the milling process as such distortion can be compensated for. This means that the milling of hard materials such as sintered ceramic materials is facilitated. When such hard materials are being machined, even expensive, stiff tools will flex, making a tool cut unpredictable unless an assessment cut is machined, measured and used to compensate for any flexing by manipulation of the subsequent milling process.
  • Various compensations or offsets to account for the information gained by carrying out the assessment cut are input into the machining program resulting in alteration of the path that the tool takes whilst carrying out the machining program.
  • the actual cut is compared to the expected cut so the real location of the tool cutting surface with respect to a workpiece is established. Any difference between the expected and actual cut is compensated for in a subsequent milling process.
  • the part can be a dental prosthesis.
  • the part can be a dental coping.
  • the part can be a dental bridge.
  • the assessment feature can be assessed by a contact measurement probe.
  • Step (i) can comprise cutting a plurality of assessment tool cuts.
  • Step (ii) can comprise assessing each of the assessment tool cuts.
  • Step (iii) can comprise determining a difference between a nominal tool cut and the actual assessment tool cut for each of the assessment tool cuts. This is advantageous as it enables different properties of the tool 'and the cuts it makes to be determined and for any differences to be compensated for in step (iv) .
  • step (i) comprises cutting an assessment tool cut which enables the length of the tool to be determined.
  • step (i) comprises cutting an assessment tool cut which enables the diameter of the tool to be determined.
  • step (i) could comprise cutting a flat feature into the blank.
  • step (i) comprises cutting an assessment tool cut which enables more than one property of the tool to be determined.
  • step (i) could comprise cutting an assessment tool cut which enables the length and diameter of the tool to be determined.
  • step (iii) can comprise determining a difference between a nominal tool cut and the actual assessment tool cut for more than one dimensional property of the assessment tool cut.
  • step (i) comprises cutting an assessment tool cut which enables the tool tip radius to be determined.
  • step (i) could comprise forming a bore in the blank using the tool.
  • step (i) could comprise cutting a curved feature in the blank using the tool tip.
  • step (i) could comprise cutting a curved chamfer feature at a corner of the blank using the tool tip.
  • the method can comprise performing steps (i) to (iv) a plurality of times. This enables the quality of the machining to be monitored throughout the machining process .
  • the method can comprise repeating steps (i) to (iv) with a second tool.
  • This enables the part to be accurately machined using the method of the present invention using more than one tool .
  • the cutting of the blank is achieved via milling the blank with a milling tool.
  • an apparatus for machining a part from a blank comprising: a blank holder to which a blank from which a part is to be machined can be fixed; a tool manipulator to which a tool for cutting the blank to machine the part can be fixed; a measurement device for measuring a feature cut in the blank; and a controller configured to control the operation of the apparatus so as to machine a part in accordance with the method of the present invention.
  • a computer program product which when executed by a controller for an apparatus for machining a part from a blank causes the controller to control the apparatus to perform the method of the present invention.
  • Fig 1 shows a machining centre
  • Figs 2a and 2b show schematically, a tool and cutting profile thereof respectively;
  • Fig 3 shows examples of milling processes that can be carried out to assess tool performance
  • Figs 4a and 4b show alternative methods of establishing tool tip radius.
  • Fig 1 shows a machining centre 10 having a gantry 12 which supports a holder 14 to which a sample 16 can be fixed.
  • the machining centre 10 also supports a tool holder 18 to which a milling tool 20 can be attached.
  • the tool 20 rotates about its longitudinal axis 22 but is fixed in location with respect to the machining centre 10.
  • the sample 16 can be moved within the working volume of the machining centre 10 in x, y and z axes enabling different parts of an aspect of the sample to be presented to the tool.
  • the sample can be removed, manually rotated and re-inserted into the holder 14, or the holder 14 can be provided with a motor enabling rotation thereof.
  • the tool holder 18 is shown with its longitudinal axis 22 transverse to that of the sample holder, however, it could be disposed essentially parallel to the sample holder or, other tool holders can be located about the machining centre 10 enabling different tools to be used in the milling process without the need to stop the process to change a tool.
  • a probe 24 is also provided within the working volume of the machining centre 10.
  • the probe 24 is a contact probe and has a workpiece contacting tip 26 which deflects on contact with a surface of the sample 16.
  • a non-contact (for example an optical) probe can be provided.
  • Fig 2a shows a tool 20 with a diamond bur coating 30.
  • the coating 30 is not uniform, but gives a nominal tool profile 32 which indicates what the diameter of a cut by this type of tool should be. As the tool coating process is not repeatable and as diamond burs will break off the tool during use, this nominal profile is indicative only and will change over time.
  • a diamond bur coating can be formed on a tool shank in a number of ways for example, by sintering a mixture of diamond powder and metal (which can include bronze) - onto the shank or, by placing a shank which has diamond powder packed around it into a nickel plating tank and plating the powder onto the shank.
  • Fig 2b shows a desired or expected cut profile 32 and an actual cut profile 34.
  • the difference between the two lines is due to the variation in the cutting surface of the tool, wear of the cutting surface, bending of the tool during the cutting process and inaccuracies in sample to tool positioning (if the machine has not been calibrated) .
  • the actual cut 34 is measured, preferably by using a contact or non-contact probing system and differences from the expected cut are compensated for in the positioning of the sample with respect to the tool. If the same cut is made using the tool compensation that has been calculated for that tool, the actual cut profile 36 follows the expected cut profile 32 closely.
  • Fig 3 shows a set of tool assessment cuts which can be carried out on a component blank or sample from which a part is to be machined, to provide compensation information for tool.
  • the blank 40 is provided of sufficient size to allow the assessment cuts to be carried out on it as this produces more accurate results than using a separate assessment blank particularly in situations where the material being machined has variable properties such as density which affects wear and the degree of bend of the tool during machining.
  • the position of the blank 40 is located using the probe 24 (see Fig 1) .
  • One way to achieve this is to establish the centre of the blank by taking at least four separate measurements with the probe around the outside of the blank. If the blank is a cube, perhaps at least one measurement per side in a plane. It is advantageous to take all the measurements in one plane as then two of the dimensions of the blank are easily established during this process.
  • the centre of the blank is compared to the centre of rotation or centre line of the holder 14 (see Fig 1) and any differences noted and compensation is used to account for said difference.
  • This data along with approximate tool dimensions then gives an approximate relative location of the tool to the blank which is used to establish exact relative locations using the tool assessment process.
  • the location of the tool tip is established by machining a flat 42 into one of the faces of the blank 40.
  • the depth 42b of the flat 42 is measured by the probe and if it is within tolerance, say lO ⁇ m from the instructed cut depth, then no compensation is required. However, if the difference is too great, a tool length offset is calculated, stored and used for future machining processes with that tool.
  • the diameter of the tool is established by machining a flat 44 into one of the surfaces of the blank 40.
  • the depth 44a is measured by the probe and if it is out of tolerance then a tool diameter offset is calculated, stored and used for future machining processes with that tool.
  • the diameter cut 44 may be used to give both diameter and length data for the tool as the depth of cut 44b could indicate the tool length if, accurate tool positioning for the cut is achieved.
  • the tool tip radius is established by cutting a radial feature 46 into the blank and measuring this with the probe.
  • the resultant data is fitted into a circular form from which the tip radius is calculated.
  • the tool setting procedure outlined above can be repeated for the other tools.
  • the method for machining the part from the blank might utilise a roughing cutter and a finishing cutter. Accordingly, the tool setting procedure can be used for both of these cutters.
  • the tool setting procedure outlined above can be repeated for the same tool multiple times, for instance at certain intervals.
  • the tool setting procedure can be performed on a tool prior to and/or subsequent every machine cutting operation which is performed by the tool to form the part from the blank 40.
  • tool setting data obtained subsequent to a machine cutting operation can be compared with tool setting data obtained prior to a machine cutting operation in order to obtain an indication of the quality of the cut obtained from the machine cutting operation.
  • the tool setting data is acquired by drilling a hole 52 (Fig 3) into the blank.
  • the depth and diameter are measured to give tool length and diameter respectively.
  • the tool tip radius can be established in a number of ways.
  • the tool tip radius R 1 is larger than the probe tip radius 2 ⁇ a then the tool tip radius can be measured directly using the drilled hole as the bottom of the hole replicates the profile of the tool tip.
  • the tool tip radius Ri is smaller than the probe tip radius l ⁇ b as shown in Fig 4b then, one can machine out from the drilled hole 52 in an arc of radius R 2 which is greater than the radius Ri of the probe tip 26.
  • the tool tip radius Ri can be established via a simple calculation based on the resultant hole radius R.
  • a cutting operation on the blank 40 can be performed to form the part using the tool.
  • a dental part such as a coping can be formed by milling the blank 40 according to a predetermined milling operation.
  • An accurate cut can be obtained during the milling operation by compensating for any differences determined during the tool setting procedure.
  • the tool is assessed during the stages of the machining process as wear during the machining process affects the cut of the tool tip. This then allows for the machining program to be amended to reflect any changes in the cutting region of the tool thus ensuring accurate machining of the part.
  • Any compensation that is required in order to change the tool cut from its actual cut to the desired or nominal cut, can be applied to a milling or cutting program.
  • This cutting software is located in a machine controller, interface or computer which, in use is in communication with the machining centre.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Epidemiology (AREA)
  • Dentistry (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Human Computer Interaction (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Numerical Control (AREA)
  • Automatic Control Of Machine Tools (AREA)
  • Turning (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne un procédé d'usinage d'une pièce à partir d'une ébauche, comprenant les étapes consistant à pratiquer une découpe d'outil d'évaluation dans l'ébauche à l'aide d'un outil, à évaluer la découpe d'outil d'évaluation, à déterminer une différence entre une découpe d'outil nominale et la découpe d'outil d'évaluation effective, et à réaliser une opération de découpe de formage de pièce dans l'ébauche à l'aide de l'outil. L'étape consistant à réaliser une opération de découpe de formage de pièce comprend l'étape consistant à corriger la différence éventuellement déterminée.
PCT/GB2007/001197 2006-03-25 2007-03-23 Procede d'usinage d'une piece WO2007110655A2 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB0606054A GB0606054D0 (en) 2006-03-25 2006-03-25 Tool assessment
GB0606054.5 2006-03-25

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2007110655A2 true WO2007110655A2 (fr) 2007-10-04
WO2007110655A3 WO2007110655A3 (fr) 2007-11-15

Family

ID=36384217

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/GB2007/001197 WO2007110655A2 (fr) 2006-03-25 2007-03-23 Procede d'usinage d'une piece

Country Status (2)

Country Link
GB (1) GB0606054D0 (fr)
WO (1) WO2007110655A2 (fr)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2014135436A1 (fr) * 2013-03-07 2014-09-12 Alicona Imaging Gmbh Dispositif de façonnage d'une pièce
JP2017019040A (ja) * 2015-07-09 2017-01-26 ローランドディー．ジー．株式会社 切削加工機および使用すべき加工ツールの判断方法
EP3797735A1 (fr) * 2019-09-24 2021-03-31 DENTSPLY SIRONA Inc. Procédé d'usinage de restauration dentaire avec réduction de falsification de contours
US20230210643A1 (en) * 2022-01-06 2023-07-06 Zeus Tech Co., Ltd. Real-time monitoring system for artificial tooth processing machine

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4031368A (en) * 1972-04-17 1977-06-21 Verkstadsteknik Ab Adaptive control of cutting machining operations
US4176396A (en) * 1977-09-23 1979-11-27 The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. Apparatus for directly measuring machine tool wear
US4620281A (en) * 1981-09-22 1986-10-28 General Electric Company In-process cutting tool condition compensation and part inspection
WO1993007445A1 (fr) * 1991-10-10 1993-04-15 Finn-Power International, Inc. Appareil et procede permettant de determiner l'efficacite operationnelle d'une machine-outil
US20040049312A1 (en) * 2002-09-10 2004-03-11 Christopher Bender Production system for the manufacture of products

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4031368A (en) * 1972-04-17 1977-06-21 Verkstadsteknik Ab Adaptive control of cutting machining operations
US4176396A (en) * 1977-09-23 1979-11-27 The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. Apparatus for directly measuring machine tool wear
US4620281A (en) * 1981-09-22 1986-10-28 General Electric Company In-process cutting tool condition compensation and part inspection
WO1993007445A1 (fr) * 1991-10-10 1993-04-15 Finn-Power International, Inc. Appareil et procede permettant de determiner l'efficacite operationnelle d'une machine-outil
US20040049312A1 (en) * 2002-09-10 2004-03-11 Christopher Bender Production system for the manufacture of products

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2014135436A1 (fr) * 2013-03-07 2014-09-12 Alicona Imaging Gmbh Dispositif de façonnage d'une pièce
JP2017019040A (ja) * 2015-07-09 2017-01-26 ローランドディー．ジー．株式会社 切削加工機および使用すべき加工ツールの判断方法
EP3797735A1 (fr) * 2019-09-24 2021-03-31 DENTSPLY SIRONA Inc. Procédé d'usinage de restauration dentaire avec réduction de falsification de contours
WO2021058417A1 (fr) 2019-09-24 2021-04-01 Dentsply Sirona Inc. Procédé d'usinage d'une restauration dentaire avec une falsification de contour réduite
CN114401818A (zh) * 2019-09-24 2022-04-26 登士柏西诺德公司 机加工具有减小的轮廓畸变的牙科修复体的方法
US20230210643A1 (en) * 2022-01-06 2023-07-06 Zeus Tech Co., Ltd. Real-time monitoring system for artificial tooth processing machine
US11806201B2 (en) * 2022-01-06 2023-11-07 Zeus Tech Co., Ltd. Real-time monitoring system for artificial tooth processing machine

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2007110655A3 (fr) 2007-11-15
GB0606054D0 (en) 2006-05-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8893387B2 (en) Method for producing a dental shaped part
Alhadeff et al. Protocol for tool wear measurement in micro-milling
CN107529334B (zh) 通过去除材料加工刀具的方法和装置
US8673454B2 (en) System for producing a dental-shaped body
US9864362B2 (en) Method for setting and/or monitoring operating parameters of a workpiece processing machine
JP4855327B2 (ja) 工具及び工具の補正方法
EP2821870B1 (fr) Procédé de réglage en temps réel de la vitesse de rotation d'un outil de coupe rotatif et dispositif de commande
KR102502138B1 (ko) 나선형 그루브를 포함하는 공작물을 제작하는 방법 및 연삭기
Čerče et al. A new approach to spatial tool wear analysis and monitoring
WO2007110655A2 (fr) Procede d'usinage d'une piece
WO2008042897A2 (fr) Système et procédé pour la prédiction de partie active utilisant une analyse de sous-structure de couplage de réception de composants multiples
JP2007098523A (ja) ブローチの寿命判断方法、ブローチ品質管理装置、及びブローチ加工装置
CN113518688A (zh) 用于检查和更换切削刀具的自动化系统
Junior et al. The role of tool presetting in milling stability uncertainty
JP2022528842A (ja) 較正方法およびワークピース情報の取得方法
Höller et al. Direct Machining of selective laser melted components with optimized support structures
CN111037007A (zh) 监测用于锥齿轮生产的条形刀片刀盘的条形刀片卡夹和/或刀片槽的方法和设备
EP3072620B1 (fr) Machine à décharge électrique à fil comprenant une unité de réglage de position de pièce avant calibration
Gonzalez et al. Axial-compliant tools for adaptive chamfering of sharp-edges: Characterisation and modelling
EP1107080B1 (fr) Compensation d'erreur de corde
JP2004098213A (ja) 工具位置測定方法及びｎｃ加工方法並びにｎｃ工作機械
JPH0740172A (ja) 刃付けされる工具およびこの工具の使用方法
JP3694746B2 (ja) 工作機械剛性簡易評価方法及び該方法に使用するテストピース
Bissacco et al. Force analysis in micro milling Al 6082 T6 in various engagement conditions
Klauer-Dobrowolski et al. Ball end micro milling of brass: Wear behavior in field-use

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 07732251

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2

NENP Non-entry into the national phase in:

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 07732251

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2