WO2007021256A1 - Compositions dentales en résine acrylique avec viscosité et odeur de rangement améliorées - Google Patents

Compositions dentales en résine acrylique avec viscosité et odeur de rangement améliorées Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2007021256A1
WO2007021256A1 PCT/US2005/028404 US2005028404W WO2007021256A1 WO 2007021256 A1 WO2007021256 A1 WO 2007021256A1 US 2005028404 W US2005028404 W US 2005028404W WO 2007021256 A1 WO2007021256 A1 WO 2007021256A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
composition
curing
storage
light
acrylate
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2005/028404
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Li Feng
Byoung I. Suh
Original Assignee
Bisco, Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Bisco, Inc. filed Critical Bisco, Inc.
Priority to PCT/US2005/028404 priority Critical patent/WO2007021256A1/fr
Publication of WO2007021256A1 publication Critical patent/WO2007021256A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K6/00Preparations for dentistry
    • A61K6/20Protective coatings for natural or artificial teeth, e.g. sealings, dye coatings or varnish
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K6/00Preparations for dentistry
    • A61K6/80Preparations for artificial teeth, for filling teeth or for capping teeth
    • A61K6/884Preparations for artificial teeth, for filling teeth or for capping teeth comprising natural or synthetic resins
    • A61K6/887Compounds obtained by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds

Definitions

  • the invention relates to dental composite materials, and more specifically, to dental composite materials containing multifunctional acrylate compounds and having improved viscosity and storage odor.
  • Dental sealants and adhesives are widely used in clinical settings. Desirable properties include safety, efficacy, durability, and favorable cosmetic properties. It is preferred that dental compositions be shelf stable, easy to formulate, have low viscosity to allow for easy application, and not set so rapidly as to make them difficult to apply to a patient. It is also desirable that the compositions lack unpleasant odors, particularly if the compositions are to be used in a patient's mouth.
  • Dental compositions frequently contain monomers that are polymerized by the dentist or technician (e.g. by light, self-cure, or dual-cure).
  • many dental compositions form a problematic "oxygen inhibited layer” (OIL) or "uncured layer” on their surface.
  • OIL oxygen inhibited layer
  • This layer's polymerization is inhibited due to the presence of molecular oxygen radicals in ambient air.
  • incomplete polymerization occurs.
  • Such a layer often render the surface sticky or tacky, making the dental composition more difficult to mold or shape.
  • Such incomplete polymerization also tends to lead to lower hardness of the surface and/or no curing if a thin surface is present.
  • Extoral is a visible-light cured dental resin formulation sold by AFR Imaging Corp. (Portland, OR). Extoral can be used for surface treatment or as a denture resin. Extoral cures rapidly and produces a glossy, hard surface upon irradiation with normal dental light. Extoral is significant in that it does not have an "oxygen inhibited layer," even when cured with low intensity light.
  • One difficulty with using Extoral is its volatility, leading to a very strong odor. The smell is objectionable to both patients and dentists/technicians, making it difficult to use in a laboratory, and nearly impossible to use in a clinical setting. Another difficulty is the very brittle surface created by Extoral, which may limit its use in certain dental applications such as surfaces subject to compressive forces.
  • Methyl methacrylate is a volatile compound used in several dental products. In addition to its unpleasant smell, exposure to methyl methacrylate has been linked to various health concerns. Numbness, paraesthesia, reduced pulmonary function, and reduced respiratory function have been observed in dental technicians who have been chronically exposed to methyl methacrylate (Sadoh, D. R. et al., British DentalJ 186(8): 380-381, 1999; Nishiwaki, Y. et al., J Occup. Health 43: 375-378, 2001). The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency describes methyl methacrylate as an irritant of the nose and throat, and mentions that exposure for short periods of time can cause headache and fatigue (EPA 749-F-95-014 Fact Sheet, November 1994).
  • An embodiment of the invention is directed towards dental acrylic compositions containing a multiacrylate compound and an initiator. Curing of the compositions results in surfaces lacking an oxygen inhibition layer (“OIL").
  • the multiacrylate compound contains at least three acrylate units per molecule.
  • ethanol or other alcohols are used as a solvent and the presence of a storage odor is minimized by minimizing the potential catalysts for trans- esterification. This may be done by minimizing water in the composition, by neutralizing acids, by removing impurities from the acrylate monomer, and by a combination of any or all of these methods of minimizing the potential catalysts.
  • the formulations can further comprise other acrylate compounds, solvents, fillers, nanofillers, diluents, or other materials useful in dental formulations.
  • the formulations are useful in applications such as dental coatings, dental sealants, and fingernail/toenail repair.
  • the formulations When used as a dental coating or sealant, the formulations may be used on restoratives outside of the mouth or may be used in the mouth on restoratives or natural tooth material, or a combination of restoratives and natural tooth material.
  • An embodiment of the invention is directed toward dental acrylic material compositions that cure to form surfaces that lack an oxygen inhibition layer ("OIL").
  • the compositions preferably do not contain methyl methacrylate.
  • the compositions preferably cure rapidly to form stable, hard, glossy surfaces.
  • the compositions preferably lack an unpleasant odor and remain relatively odor-free after significant storage time, illustratively for 3 months to 2 years.
  • One embodiment of the invention is a dental composition
  • a dental composition comprising a multiacrylate compound, an initiator and a solvent.
  • the multiacrylate compound is a chemical compound comprising at least three acrylate functionalities per molecule.
  • the composition preferably does not contain methyl methacrylate.
  • the composition upon curing, preferably does not form an oxygen inhibition layer.
  • initiators are phosphine oxide photoinitiators and camphorquinone.
  • examples of such initiators include 2,4,6- trimethylbenzoyldiphenylphosphine oxide (TPO), TPO-L, Irgacure 819, Darocure 4265, and camphorquinone. It is expected that other initiators capable of photocleavage with or without the need for amine co-initiators will have utility according to the present invention.
  • the initiator can generally be present at any concentration in the composition.
  • the initiator is preferably present at a concentration that will not noticeably discolor the cured composition.
  • Example concentration ranges of the initiator include about 1 weight percent of the composition or less, at least about 1 weight percent of the composition, at least about 2 weight percent of the composition, at least about 3 weight percent of the composition, at least about 4 weight percent of the composition, at least about 5 weight percent of the composition, at least about 6 weight percent of the composition, or at least about 7 weight percent of the composition up to saturation levels of initiator in the composition.
  • Example concentrations of the initiator include about 3 weight percent of the composition, about 6 weight percent of the composition, and about 7 weight percent of the composition up to saturation levels of initiator in the composition. It is also expected that lower concentrations can be provided in the presence of a volatile dental solvent such that, upon evaporation, the desired higher effective initiator concentration is present in the composition.
  • the solvent may be any solvent known in the art, including water, butyl acetate, ethyl acetate, chloroform, acetone, ethanol, isopropanol, other lower alcohols, and mixtures thereof.
  • Ethanol is particularly well suited as a solvent for dental compositions. Ethanol provides a low viscosity, allowing easy application of the composition, and ethanol is not as volatile as acetone, providing sufficient time for application of the product. Thus, the use of ethanol as a solvent provides a good balance between volatility and viscosity concerns. Further, ethanol has a low toxicity as compared other commonly used solvents.
  • the solvent may be present at any concentration to achieve the desired viscosity, illustratively about 0 weight percent, 20 weight percent, about 30 weight percent, about 40 weight percent, about 50 weight percent, about 60 weight percent, about 70 weight percent, about 80 weight percent, about 90 weight percent, about 95 weight percent of the composition, and any weight percent in between these weight percents.
  • Example concentration ranges include at least about 20 weight percent of the composition and at least about 30 weight percent of the composition, illustratively 40 to 60 weight percent of the composition. It has been found that the viscosity of multiacrylate compositions can be reduced to below 100 centipoise when the composition comprises 40 to 60 weight percent of ethanol.
  • the solvent may be provided free of water, illustratively in absolute form.
  • the multiacrylate compound can generally be any multiacrylate compound having at least three acrylate functionalities per molecule in relatively close spatial proximity to one another.
  • multiacrylate compounds include a hexafunctional aromatic urethane acrylate oligomer, a caprolactone modified dipentaerythritol hexaacrylate, dipentaerythritol pentaacrylate, di-trimethylolpropane tetraacrylate, trimethylolpropane triacrylate, and ethoxylated trimethylolpropane triacrylate.
  • multiacrylate compounds comprising three acrylate functionalities per molecule, compounds comprising four acrylate functionalities per molecule, compounds comprising five acrylate functionalities per molecule, compounds comprising six acrylate functionalities per molecule, compounds comprising seven acrylate functionalities per molecule, compounds comprising eight acrylate functionalities per molecule, compounds comprising nine acrylate functionalities per molecule, and compounds comprising ten acrylate functionalities per molecule in relatively close spatial proximity to one another are also expected to have utility according to the present invention. Larger number of oligo-acrylates or polyacrylates could be added to the compositions.
  • the multiacrylate compound can generally be present at any concentration of the composition.
  • Example concentration ranges include at least about 20 weight percent of the composition and at least about 30 weight percent of the composition. Specific concentration examples include about 20 weight percent, about 30 weight percent, about 40 weight percent, about 50 weight percent, about 60 weight percent, about 70 weight percent, about 80 weight percent, about 90 weight percent, and about 95 weight percent of the composition.
  • Many commercially available multiacrylate compounds contain impurities that can serve as catalysts for trans-esterification in the presence of ethanol, resulting in production of ethyl acrylate.
  • the multiacrylate compound is purified to remove the impurities. Extraction, illustratively using water or NaOH may be used to remove the impurities. Other methods of purification are within the scope of this invention.
  • compositions can further comprise a co-monomer.
  • the co-monomer preferably polymerizes with the multiacrylate compound.
  • the co-monomer can generally be any type of co-monomer, and preferably is a non-volatile acrylate compound with a surface tension that is similar to or higher than that of the selected multifunctional acrylate compound(s) present in the composition.
  • Presently preferred co-monomers include a monoacrylate compound, diacrylate compound, a triacrylate compound, or a tetraacrylate compound.
  • An example monoacrylate is caprolactone acrylate.
  • Example diacrylate compounds are tripropylene glycol diacrylate, ethoxylated bisphenol A diacrylate, polyethylene glycol diacrylate, epoxy diacrylate, urethane dimethacrylate, and urethane diacrylate.
  • An example triacrylate compound is trimethylolpropane triacrylate.
  • An example tetraacrylate is ditrimethylolpropane tetraacrylate. Ethoxylated forms of such acrylates may be preferred due to their relatively higher surface tension.
  • the compositions can further comprise fillers, nanofillers, glass particles, or other dental materials. Examples of such fillers include Ox-50, silane-treated Ox-50, glass ionomer powder EXG 1944 RGW from Ferro, which is also a fluoride release agent.
  • compositions can further comprise desiccants and drying agents such as CaSO 4 , alumina, silica, calcium chloride, and calcium oxide, which may need to be filtered out.
  • desiccants and drying agents such as CaSO 4 , alumina, silica, calcium chloride, and calcium oxide, which may need to be filtered out.
  • Other desiccants are known in the art and may be used within the scope of this invention.
  • compositions can further include a base for neutralization.
  • a base for neutralization An amine, illustratively 2- amino-2-methyl- 1,3 -propanediol (AMP), may be used.
  • Other bases as are known in the art, may be used.
  • trans-esterif ⁇ cation of the multiacrylate compound in the presence of ethanol may be minimized by the selection of the multiacrylate compound, purification of the multiacrylate compound, removal of residual water, or neutralization of acids present in the composition. A combination of any or all of these methods may be used.
  • compositions can further comprise one or more flavorings.
  • One illustrative flavoring is menthol, illustratively in a peppermint or spearmint flavor. Eucalyptus, wintergreen, cinnamon, and other flavorings may be used.
  • a method of sealing a surface can comprise obtaining a surface; applying to the surface a composition comprising a multiacrylate compound and an initiator; and curing the composition to obtain a sealed surface.
  • the sealed surface preferably does not contain an oxygen inhibition layer and does not have an unpleasant odor, even after significant storage time.
  • the surface can generally be any surface to be sealed, and is presently preferred to be a dental surface, a tooth, a dental implant, an artificial tooth, a bone, a fingernail, or a toenail. Additionally, the surface may be that of a previously applied dental composition such as a dental composite.
  • the sealed surface may be a dental restorative that has been sealed prior to placement in the mouth of a patient, or the sealed surface may be a dental restorative, natural tooth material, or a combination of the dental restorative and natural tooth material, and optionally may be used inside a patient's mouth.
  • the curing can generally be performed by any means sufficient to rapidly cure the composition.
  • the curing step is presently preferred to comprise light curing.
  • the light curing can be performed at low light intensity or at high light intensity.
  • the intensity of light is preferably an intensity suitable for use in a dental laboratory or in a dentist's office.
  • Examples of light intensity ranges include less than about 50 mW/cm 2 , less than about 100 mW/cm 2 , about 200 mW/cm 2 or less, about 300 mW/cm 2 or less, about 400 mW/cm 2 or less, about 500 mW/cm 2 or less, about 600 mW/cm 2 or less, about 800 mW/cm 2 or less, and about 2000 mW/cm 2 or less, it being understood that higher light intensities can also be employed.
  • light intensities include about 50 mW/cm 2 , about 100 mW/cm 2 , about 150 mW/cm 2 , about 200 mW/cm 2 , about 250 mW/cm 2 , about 300 mW/cm 2 , about 350 mW/cm 2 , about 400 mW/cm 2 , about 450 mW/cm 2 , about 500 mW/cm 2 , about 600 mW/cm 2 , about 800 mW/cm 2 , and about 2000 mW/cm 2 . Higher light intensities may also be used. In one embodiment, visible light is used.
  • the visible light may be of any wavelength, illustratively in the blue range (400- 500nm) or may be a mixture of various wavelengths, illustratively, white light.
  • the intensity of light used may be chosen based on the wavelength of the light used.
  • Bisco's VIPTM Dental Light Curing system using a blue wavelength light source may be employed by the dentist.
  • Light-curing systems for dental laboratories such as the Jeneric-Pentron Cure-Lite Plus light box system or the Triad light box system from Dentsply, Inc. may also be used for dental appliances.
  • Bisco's NTLTM System utilizing its light source without the nitrogen environment may also be used.
  • the time of light curing can generally be any time.
  • Presently preferred time ranges include about two minutes or less, about one minute or less, less than about 30 seconds, less than about 20 seconds, less than about 15 seconds, less than about 10 seconds, and less than about 5 seconds.
  • Specific examples of light curing times include about one minute, about 30 seconds, about 20 seconds, about 15 seconds, about 10 seconds, about 5 seconds, about 3 seconds, about 2 seconds, and about 1 second.
  • Shorter light cure times are generally preferably to shorten patient time for the procedure and for the convenience of the dental practitioner.
  • Example 1 Abbreviations Used in the Examples
  • Table 1 lists the chemical compounds and abbreviations used throughout the Examples section.
  • Extoral is a commercial product, its composition and ingredients are not publicly known. The strong objectionable odor suggested that Extoral contains methyl methacrylate. The following analytical experiments were performed in an attempt to determine the chemical composition of Extoral.
  • Extoral Evaporation of the volatile components of Extoral produced a viscous resin. About 40% by weight of the composition evaporated. This was assumed to be primarily methyl methacrylate.
  • UV/Vis spectra comparing Extoral with a TPO standard allowed estimated identification and quantification of TPO in Extoral to be about 4%.
  • compositions were prepared using CN-975, a hexafunctional aromatic urethane acrylate, MMA, and other compounds. Numbers in Table 2 represent the amount of each compound in the composition by weight percent.
  • compositions AC-IO and AC-11 had sticky surfaces upon curing at 500 mW/cm 2 for 5 seconds using the VIP light source.
  • FTIR showed that the surface conversion was 47.3% for AC-10 and 47.5% for AC-11, about 16% lower than for Extoral (63.2%).
  • the higher TPO concentration in AC-IOA and AC-I IA enhanced the curability.
  • the surface conversion was 65.7% for AC-IOA and 58.7% for AC-I IA.
  • the surface of cured AC-I IA resembles cured Extoral: non-sticky, slick, hard, and glossy.
  • NOIL compositions contain at least two components: a multifunctional acrylate and a photo-initiator (such as phosphine oxide).
  • a diluent such as ethoxylated di- or tri- acrylate
  • the compositions can contain additional materials such as solvents, polymerizable co-monomers, inhibitors, surfactants, glass filler, fluorescent or phosphorescent compounds, dyes, colorants, fluoride compounds, and other materials used in the dental and orthodontic fields.
  • a mixture of multifunctional-acrylate, diluents, TPO or other initiator, and optionally MEHQ are blended together.
  • the mixture may be heated at 60° C - 62° C for four hours with stirring or shaking to afford a clear or hazy solution.
  • the haziness, if any, will fade over a few days.
  • Unfilled resin and filler such as OX 50 are combined as a slurry.
  • the slurry is ground for 30 minutes.
  • the grinding process often introduces air bubbles into the mixture.
  • the bubbles can be removed by centrifugation at >1000 x g for 30 minutes to afford an essentially clear solution.
  • Example 7 Illustrative monomers for Use in "No Oxygen Inhibited Layer” (NOIL) ' Compositions Multifunctional acrylates and acrylated diluent co-monomers have been found to be effective ingredients in NOIL compositions. Table 3 lists exemplary compounds that have been found to be useful.
  • NOIL No Oxygen Inhibited Layer
  • Example 8 Preparation of Volatile MMA Compositions Containing a Tetrafunctional Acrylate (AC-23 and -33)
  • a composition containing 3 g SR355 (ditrimethylolpropane tetraacrylate), 2 g MMA volatile co-monomer, 0.25 g TPO, and 3.5 mg MEHQ was prepared ("AC-23").
  • the composition had the characteristic strong odor of a composition containing methyl methacrylate (MMA).
  • the composition was coated on white paper and exposed to VIP light source set at 600 mW/cm 2 intensity for an exposure time of 30 seconds. An oxygen inhibition layer was detected by finger touch, which revealed a soft surface even after waiting 10 minutes after exposure to the light source.
  • composition had the characteristic strong odor of a composition containing methyl methacrylate (MMA). This composition could not be cured tack-free in less than 60 seconds exposure to the VIP light gun set at 600 mW/cm 2 , and was easily scratchable even after exposure to that intensity light for 60 seconds.
  • MMA methyl methacrylate
  • Example 9 Preparation of a Volatile MMA Composition Containing a Pentafunctional Acrylate (AC-24)
  • a composition containing 3 g SR399 (dipentaerythritol pentaacrylate esters), 2 g MMA volatile co-monomer, 0.25 g TPO, and 3.5 mg MEHQ was prepared.
  • the composition had the characteristic strong odor of a composition containing methyl methacrylate (MMA).
  • the composition was coated on Pyramid composite, shade 3.5 (Bisco, Inc.) and cured by exposure to the VIP light gun output for 10 seconds at 300 mW/cm 2 . No oxygen inhibition layer was detected by finger touch, suggesting that a pentafunctional acrylate in the presence of a volatile co-monomer MMA is sufficient to prevent formation of an oxygen inhibition layer.
  • AC-15C A filled mixture of 75% AC-15C and 25% OX50 filler by weight was also prepared.
  • the AC-15C compositions contain a hexafunctional diacrylate (CN 975) and no MMA. No MMA odor or other appreciable odor was detected.
  • AC-15C exhibited better light curing sensitivity than Extoral, with twice the double-bond conversion rate.
  • AC-15 was curable scratch-free and mar free after 20 seconds exposure to 500 mW/cm 2 light source using VIP, or 40 seconds at 200 mW/cm 2 using the same curing light source. Addition of 10% methyl blue colorant in ethanol did not adversely affect the curing.
  • the conversion rate of AC-15C in air and in a nitrogen environment was the same, indicating that it lacked an OIL layer.
  • the Barcol hardness of AC-15C was 77 after curing 40 seconds at 200 mW/cm 2 exposure using the Cure-Lite Plus light box system.
  • a composition containing 3.22 g CN975, 1.38 g CN383, 0.4 g TPO, and 2.5 mg MEHQ was prepared.
  • AC-35 formed a scratch-free to human fingernail and tack-free surface to touch after 10 seconds cured at 300 mW/cm 2 on Pyramid shade 3.5 composite using the VP system.
  • AC-36 prepared containing the same amounts of TPO and MEHQ but 2.76 g CN 975 and 1.84 g CN 383, was curable scratch-free to fingernail scratching and tack-free to touch using the same composite base and light cure system after 20 seconds exposure at 300 mW/cm 2 .
  • Example 12 Preparation of Non- Volatile NOIL Compositions AC-40 and AC-40A
  • a composition containing 8.9 g CN975, 10.3 g SR349, 7.8 g SR610, 0.9 g CD9052, 2.1 g TPO, and 15 mg MEHQ was prepared.
  • the composition cured into a scratch-free surface after 20 seconds exposure on Pyramid shade 3.5 composite using the VIP curing system set at 500 mW/cm 2 .
  • the AC-40 composition also exhibited good stability after storage under water at 60° C, curing in 20 seconds at 300 mW/cm 2 on Pyramid composite shade 3.5 after 30 days and 47 days, the latter being comparable to storage for 472 days at 20° C.
  • composition (AC-40A)
  • Addition of 5% CN 383 to the composition (AC-40A) caused a scratch-free surface to form after curing at 300 mW/cm 2 for 15-20 seconds, or 10 seconds at 500 mW/cm 2 exposure on Pyramid composite using the VIP curing light system.
  • this composition may also be attractive as a deep cavity filler due to its relatively high viscosity (around 1200 cps at 22° C).
  • AC-40 also exhibits good compressive strength of about 282 MPa ⁇ 27 MPa.
  • Compressive strength is determined by preparing a sample in a 6 mm high by 4 mm diameter stainless steel split mold. The sample is cured at 500 ⁇ 50 mW/cm 2 for 60 seconds per side. The disc is heated at 37° Cfor 15 minutes. The disc is placed in a 30 ml Nalgene bottle filled with deionized water, and heated for 23 hours at 37° C. The disc is removed, blotted dry, and cooled to room temperature for one hour. An Instron Universal Testing Instrument (model 4465) is used to determine the load reading (kg) at which the sample breaks. The compressive strength is calculated as (load reading (kg) x 0.0624)/sample diameter (cm).
  • AC-40 passed a cytotoxicity assay performed with mouse fibroblast cells on a solid agarose surface. Toxicity, or the lack thereof, was determined by measuring the zone of lysis (if any) around the test sample after incubation at 37° C in 5% carbon dioxide for 24 hours.
  • Example 13 Preparation of a Non-Volatile NOIL Composition DP20-5
  • the composition cured very rapidly, forming a scratch-free surface after 3-6 seconds at 500 mW/cm 2 , 5-10 seconds at 300 mW/cm 2 , and 60 seconds at 50-100 mW/cm 2 on white paper using the VIP curing light system
  • the DP-20-5 compound also had good compressive strength (51 ⁇ 9 MPa as determined using the Instron test system described in the previous Example). It also exhibits a relatively lower viscosity (410 cps at 22° C) than AC-40. This composition is attractive for use as a protective coating under and around orthodontic application on enamel, or as a margin sealant where rapid curing and flowablity are important considerations
  • compositions of 10% filler, 20% filler, 30% filler, and 40% filler, and 90%, 80%, 70% and 60% DP-20-5 were made by mixing the appropriate weight amount of filler with the DP20-5 composition described in Example 13 above.
  • the filler used was OX-50 or silanated OX-50.
  • the sample containing 20% OX-50 filled DP20-5 was scratch free after irradiation for 5 seconds at 300 mW/cm 2 or for 2 seconds at 500 mW/cm 2 .
  • the pencil hardness was >5H.
  • Example 15 Preparation of Non- Volatile, NOIL Composition DP60-5
  • a composition containing 15 g DP60, 4.5 g SR349, 4.5 g SR459, 3 g CN383, 0.9 g CD9052, 2.1 g TPO, and 15 mg MEHQ was prepared.
  • the composition cured to a scratch-free surface in 15 seconds at 500 mW/cm 2 and 20 seconds at 300 mW/cm 2 exposure using the VIP light gun and after coating the composition on Pyramid shade 3.5 composite.
  • This composition can be used as a flexible coating on dental prosthetic devices, or on dentures.
  • the composition can also be used as a narrow gap filler, where flexibility is desirable.
  • Example 16 Preparation of Non- Volatile NOIL Compositions AC-25 Containing Pentaacrylate and AC-26
  • a pentaacrylate and two diacrylate composition containing 3 g SR 399, 3 g SR349, 3 g SR610, 0.3 g CD9052, 0.7 g TPO, and 5 mg MEHQ was prepared (AC-25).
  • a similar composition containing a hexaacrylate and two diacrylates was prepared by combining 3 g CN975, 3 g SR349, 3 g SR610, 0.3 g CD9052, 0.7 g TPO, and 5 mg
  • the suitability of NOIL sealants as orthodontic sealants was evaluated using a scratch resistance assay.
  • a surface is rubbed using pencils containing graphite of different hardnesses in an attempt to scratch the surface.
  • the surface is evaluated by what hardness of graphite is required to create a detectable scratch.
  • This assay is based on ASTM D 3383-00.
  • the sealant was brushed onto a composite disc, and was cured.
  • the pencils were obtained from a Kimberly Graphite Drawing Kit, and had hardnesses according to the following table. Table 5
  • the assay further distinguishes between gouges and scratches. Scratching refers to the hardness needed to indent the surface. Gouging refers to the hardness required to scrape the adhesive from the surface. Oxygen inhibition layers often are easier to scratch than the rest of the cured adhesive, so the scratch/gouge assay is useful to detect the presence of an air inhibition layer on a surface.
  • the following adhesive compositions were evaluated: (DP20-5, DP-20-5 with a fluorescing agent (DP-20-5F), DP-20-5 with a fluorescing agent and 20% glass ionomer (DP-20-5-FG), Bisco One Step Adhesive System, Filled L/C Sealant, and L/C Sealant.
  • the adhesive compositions were brushed on composite disks made from Bisco Renew Shade A2 Translucent and cured for 2, 5, 10, 20, 30, and 40 seconds using the VIP curing light system before evaluating.
  • the first value in Table 6 is for gouging, the second value is for scratching.
  • the absorptivity is the absorbance in the range of 400-500 nm in acetonitrile normalized by mass. The higher the value, the higher the absorption in the visible light range.
  • the first three initiators undergo unimolecular bond cleavage upon irradiation.
  • the last three initiators require a co-initiator, such as an amine, to undergo a bimolecular reaction. It is understood that the choice of initiator is selected based on the desired wavelength of the light used to initiate the cure, and that any of the initiators may be used with any of the acrylate monomers discussed herein, to provide desired characteristics.
  • the initiators (and EDMAB amine if required) were added to the resin.
  • Samples were coated on a white mixing pad, evaporated for greater than 60 seconds, and irradiated at 500 mW/cm 2 using a Bisco VIP light curing system. Samples were irradiated for 5 seconds, 10 seconds, 30 seconds, and 10 seconds in the absence of air. The "no air" cure was performed between two Mylar slips, each 0.25 mm thick. The actual concentration of initiator in the resin was double that shown in the table due to the evaporation of the acetone. The surface was evaluated for percent degree of conversion as indicated in Table 8.
  • Resins were prepared and coated on composite disks. After evaporation of the acetone for greater than 60 seconds, the coatings were irradiated for 30 seconds at 300 mW/cm 2 white light. The pencil hardness was measured, as shown in Table 10. All surfaces were found to be tack and fingernail scratch free.
  • NOIL DP20-5 NOEL compositions and L/C Bonding resins were evaluated for their shear strength.
  • NOIL DP20-5 was prepared with and without 0.75 Lumilux Blue (a fluorescent additive) and 20% glass lonomer (X1B44RWG). Bond strength was compared against unfilled and filled L/C Bonding resins.
  • the fluoride release properties of NOIL compositions were compared against L/C sealants.
  • the NOIL sample was DP20-5 containing 20% glass ionomer for fluoride release and 0.75% Lumilux blue for phosphorescence.
  • Shade disks of DP-20-5 and LC Sealant were prepared as follows. A round stainless steel mold held between polyethylene sheets and glass slabs were used to prepare discs of a fixed size. The discs were cured using two light guns set at 500 ⁇ 50 mW/cm 2 . A single light gun was positioned over the center of the disc, and irradiated the disc for 20 seconds. Next, the two light guns were positioned at opposing ends of the circle (across the diameter), and irradiated the disc for 10 seconds.
  • the two light guns were moved around the circle to irradiate the disc for a total of four times of 10 seconds (position of the two light guns around the circular discs: 0 and 180 degrees, then 90 and 270 degrees, then 135 and 315 degrees, and finally 45 and 225 degrees), in addition to the 20 second irradiation in the center).
  • the top glass plate was removed, and the curing process repeated.
  • the specimen was heated at 37 ⁇ 3° C for 15 ⁇ 1 minutes.
  • a diamond burr was used to drill a hole near the edge of the disks.
  • the disk was sonicated in acetone to remove any air inhibited layer that may be present.
  • the diameter and height of the disk was measured with a caliper, and the mass of the disk was determined using an analytical balance.
  • a wire was threaded through the hole and twisted/turned such that the disk can be propped upright within a vial.
  • An aqueous solution of sodium chloride (0.2M, 10 ml) was added to each vial, the vials were capped, and placed at 37° C for 1 hour. Fluoride release was determined using a fluoride sensitive electrode immersed in a 50/50 TISAB/sample mixture. Three tests of each sample were performed. The results are shown in Table 12.
  • NOIL sealants such as DP-20-5 with fluoride glass can release significantly more fluoride than the conventional L/C sealant. NOIL sealants can therefore be used in applications where fluoride release is desirable or required.
  • Example 22 Use of NOIL as a Top Surface Over a Composite
  • a composite can be placed appropriately in a dental restoration procedure according to the manufacturer's instructions.
  • the final layer of composite is placed and adapted to the cavosurface margin, shaped, and contoured to the desired final form.
  • a thin coating of a NOIL composition such as AC-40 or DP-20-5 is gently applied using a soft brush over the surface of the composite and the surrounding enamel.
  • the NOIL- coated surface is then light cured using an appropriate light source and time of irradiation (e.g. visible blue light from a VIP light gun at 600 mW/sec 2 for 20-40 seconds or less).
  • the produced surface will have a smooth, glossy surface.
  • Example 23 Use of NOIL Over a Low Viscosity Composite
  • a low viscosity or flowable composite can be placed appropriately in a dental restoration procedure.
  • the final layer of composite is placed and adapted to the cavosurface margin, shaped, and contoured to the desired final form.
  • the composite is light cured for a short period of time such as 5 seconds to eliminate flow of the composite material.
  • a thin coating of NOIL (such as DP-20-5) is gently applied using a soft brush over the surface of the composite and the surrounding enamel.
  • the surface is then light cured using an appropriate light source and time of irradiation (e.g. visible blue light at 600 mW/sec 2 ).
  • the produced surface will have a smooth, glossy surface.
  • Example 24 Use of NOIL as a Root Surface Coating
  • a root surface requiring desensitization can be isolated, and scrubbed with a pumice and cavity cleanser slurry using a cotton pellet, foam pellet, or microbrush.
  • the root surface can additionally be etched with phosphoric acid for 15 seconds if desired.
  • a thin coating of NOIL (such as DP-20-5) or a filled sample for non-slumping purposes is gently applied using a soft brush over the root surface.
  • the NOIL surface is thinned with a gentle stream of air, and light cured using an appropriate light source and time of irradiation (e.g. for 10 seconds with visible blue light at 600 mW/sec 2 using the VIP curing light system)
  • Shear bond strength (SBS) of NOIL formulas AC-40 and DP20-5 were tested and compared to that of Fortify ® Plus (Bisco, Inc., Schaumburg, IL).
  • the following substrates were tested: enamel, dentin, composite, uncured composite, Rex III, porcelain, amalgam, acrylic, and Itself. The following techniques were used.
  • Enamel-Enamel was pumiced, rinsed and dried. Enamel was etched with 37% phosphoric acid semi-gel for 15 seconds before rinsing and drying. One coat of Fortify ® Plus, AC-40 or DP20-5 was applied and light cured for 20 seconds, 20 seconds and 5 seconds respectively at 500 mW/cm 2 . Post was bonded and sheared after being stored in 37° C. water for two hours. Dentin—Dentin was polished on moistened 600 grit sanding paper for 30 seconds, rinsed and dried. Dentin was etched for 15 seconds using 32% phosphoric acid semi-gel. Dentin was rinsed and kept moist.
  • Amalgam and Rex III ⁇ Amalgam and Rex III were polished on moistened 600 grit sanding paper for 30 seconds, rinsed and dried. Surface was microetched using the Accuprep to achieve a uniform surface.
  • One coat of Fortify Plus, AC-40 or DP20-5 was applied and light cured for 20 seconds, 20 seconds and 5 seconds respectively at 500 mW/cm 2 . Post was bonded and sheared after being stored in 37° C water for two hours.
  • Composite and Acrylic-Composite and acrylic were polished on moistened 600 grit sanding paper for 30 seconds, rinsed and dried. Surface was microetched using the Accuprep to achieve a uniform surface.
  • Porcelain Porcelain was polished on moistened 600 grit sanding paper for 30 seconds, rinsed and dried. The surface was microetched using the Accuprep to achieve a uniform surface. The surface was etched with 4% hydrofluoric acid semi gel for 4 minutes, rinsed and dried. Generous amounts of porcelain primer was applied to the surface and allowed to air-dry. One coat of Fortify ® Plus, AC-40 or DP20-5 was applied and light cured for 20 seconds, 20 seconds and 5 seconds respectively at 500 mW/cm 2 . Post was bonded and sheared after being stored in 37° C water for two hours. Uncured composite ⁇ A preparation was done in acrylic using a high speed handpiece and burr.
  • the preparation was etched with Accuprep and 32% phosphoric acid semi-gel. Etched surface was treated with One Step according to manufacturers instructions. Renew A2 Translucent was filled into the preparation. One coat of Fortify Plus, AC-40 or DP20-5 was applied and light cured for 40s at 500 mW/cm 2 . Post was bonded and sheared after being stored in 37° C water for two hours.
  • SBS shear bond strength
  • DP20-5 and AC-40 performed as well or better than Fortify ® Plus, within experimental error.
  • DP-20-5 was tested as a fingernail repair composition as follows. A thin layer of DP20-5 was coated on a human fingernail with brushing until a smooth surface was obtained. The composition was exposed to 500 mW/cm 2 light intensity using VIP curing light system for about 5 seconds. The composition cured into a smooth shiny surface that was hard to the touch.
  • ethanol provides a good balance between volatility and viscosity, and ethanol has relatively low toxicity
  • ethanol is a preferred solvent for multi-functional acrylate dental compositions.
  • a storage odor was detectable by the next day. It is believed that the storage odor is due to ethyl acrylate, a product of trans- esterification between the acrylate monomers and ethanol.
  • amines were added to neutralize any residual acid, as shown in Table 15, thereby reducing catalysts of trans-esterification. Drierite was also added to one composition to remove residual water. Table 15
  • amine or Drierite was added to the EtOH. After 2 hours, the remaining components were added to the mixture and the composition was stored at room temperature. There was no discernable odor the next day. A mild storage odor developed after 24 hour storage at 60 0 C in all samples. Similar results were obtained using 2- amino-2-methyl- 1,3 -propanediol (AMP) as the amine.
  • AMP 2- amino-2-methyl- 1,3 -propanediol
  • compositions were prepared using different multi-functional acrylate monomers, as shown in Table 16.
  • AC -86 provided a scratch free surface after curing for 4-5 s at 500 mW/cm 2
  • AC-87 provided a scratch free surface after curing for 12 s at 500 mW/cm 2 at 400-500 nra.
  • the multifunctional acrylate may be purified by water or NaOH extraction, or by other means, as are known in the art.
  • purification of 5.00 g SR399 was performed using 14.0 g of 0.02 N NaOH (or DI water) and 2.00 ethyl acetate to decrease viscosity, for 10 min with constant shaking. The mixture was allowed to stand for 2 hr and then centrifuged. The top water layer was removed with a pipette and rinsed with DI water one time and 0.02 N NaOH three times. The resulting composition had a mild ethyl acetate odor.
  • Table 17 Several compositions were made, as shown in Table 17.
  • a surfactant such as Additive 29, may be used to promote leveling.
  • the surfactant comprises 0.01 to 1.0 percent by weight of the composition, for example 0.05 to 0.10 percent.
  • Other components may be added, as are known in the art.
  • Both AC-86B1 and AC86B2 have very low viscosity (below 10 centipoise), both provide a scratch free surface after curing for 5 s at 500 mW/cm 2 , and both have a slight ethyl acetate odor.
  • the mild ethyl acetate odor may be masked by adding one or more flavors to the final composition.
  • COE-Soft GC America, Alsip, EL
  • a 1:1 ratio of final composition to COE-Soft results in a pleasing flavor. It is understood that a more pleasing composition may be obtained by adding a flavor to the composition.
  • the flavor may be used to mask an odor or simply to provide for a more pleasant product.
  • Illustrative flavors include essential oils such as thymol, spearmint, peppermint, eucalyptus, wintergreen, and cinnamon. These and other flavors are known in the art and may be used in any of the compositions of the present invention.
  • compositions and/or methods disclosed and claimed herein can be made and executed without undue experimentation in light of the present disclosure. While the compositions and methods of this invention have been described in terms of preferred embodiments, it will be apparent to those of skill in the art that variations may be applied to the compositions and/or methods and in the steps or in the sequence of steps of the methods described herein without departing from the concept, spirit and scope of the invention. More specifically, it will be apparent that certain agents which are both chemically and physiologically related may be substituted for the agents described herein while the same or similar results would be achieved. All such similar substitutes and modifications apparent to those skilled in the art are deemed to be within the spirit, scope and concept of the invention.

Abstract

La présente invention concerne une composition dentale et ses méthodes d’utilisation, les compositions comprenant un composé multi-acrylique, un initiateur et un alcool, qui font qu’aucune odeur de rangement significative n’est détectée au bout d’une période prolongée de rangement de l’article.
PCT/US2005/028404 2005-08-10 2005-08-10 Compositions dentales en résine acrylique avec viscosité et odeur de rangement améliorées WO2007021256A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/US2005/028404 WO2007021256A1 (fr) 2005-08-10 2005-08-10 Compositions dentales en résine acrylique avec viscosité et odeur de rangement améliorées

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/US2005/028404 WO2007021256A1 (fr) 2005-08-10 2005-08-10 Compositions dentales en résine acrylique avec viscosité et odeur de rangement améliorées

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2007021256A1 true WO2007021256A1 (fr) 2007-02-22

Family

ID=37757839

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2005/028404 WO2007021256A1 (fr) 2005-08-10 2005-08-10 Compositions dentales en résine acrylique avec viscosité et odeur de rangement améliorées

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2007021256A1 (fr)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2011004255A3 (fr) * 2009-07-10 2011-04-21 Kuros Biosurgery Ag Compositions pour augmentation de tissu

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4540722A (en) * 1982-01-15 1985-09-10 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Dentin and enamel adhesive
US5749733A (en) * 1995-02-02 1998-05-12 Bisco, Inc. One-component primer/bonding-resin system
US6391940B1 (en) * 1993-04-19 2002-05-21 Dentsply Research & Development Corp. Method and composition for adhering to metal dental structure
US6572693B1 (en) * 1999-10-28 2003-06-03 3M Innovative Properties Company Aesthetic dental materials
US6599958B2 (en) * 1999-12-17 2003-07-29 Gel Products, Inc. Radiation curable nail coatings

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4540722A (en) * 1982-01-15 1985-09-10 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Dentin and enamel adhesive
US6391940B1 (en) * 1993-04-19 2002-05-21 Dentsply Research & Development Corp. Method and composition for adhering to metal dental structure
US5749733A (en) * 1995-02-02 1998-05-12 Bisco, Inc. One-component primer/bonding-resin system
US6572693B1 (en) * 1999-10-28 2003-06-03 3M Innovative Properties Company Aesthetic dental materials
US6599958B2 (en) * 1999-12-17 2003-07-29 Gel Products, Inc. Radiation curable nail coatings

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2011004255A3 (fr) * 2009-07-10 2011-04-21 Kuros Biosurgery Ag Compositions pour augmentation de tissu

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7081485B2 (en) Non-volatile dental compositions containing multifunctional acrylate compounds and lacking an oxygen-inhibited layer
CA2808332C (fr) Compositions dentaires a base de resine durcissable a la lumiere, auto-mordancantes et auto-adhesives
US20050288387A1 (en) Acrylate dental compositions with improved viscosity and storage odor
AU2002331653B2 (en) Non-volatile dental compositions
EP2146679B1 (fr) Compositions dentaires de revêtement des prothèses et de la surface des dents
CA2621018C (fr) Compositions dentaires contenant des particules de silice de taille nanometrique utilisees comme resines de scellement
KR100911843B1 (ko) 비휘발성 치과용 조성물
JPWO2005087179A1 (ja) 歯科用歯面コーティングキット
US8987345B2 (en) Dental bonding agent and coating agent
WO2007021256A1 (fr) Compositions dentales en résine acrylique avec viscosité et odeur de rangement améliorées
EP2049066A2 (fr) Acrylates durcissables par diodes electroluminescentes a jaunissement reduit
JPH06345614A (ja) 歯科用充填修復材料及び義歯床用樹脂組成物
Cefaly et al. Effectiveness of surface protection of resin modified glass ionomer cements evaluated spectrophotometrically
WO2009097152A1 (fr) Acrylates multifonctionnels utilisés comme réticulants dans des adhésifs de liaison à auto-attaque dentaires et biomédicaux
Jensen Dentin bonding agents
EP2410942B1 (fr) Compositions adhésives durcissables à base de zircone pour restaurations dentaires
Fontes et al. Resin-dentin bond strength of 10 contemporary etch-and-rinse adhesive systems after one year of water storage
JP4583035B2 (ja) 接着性組成物
JP2023095551A (ja) 歯科充填用キット
WO2005074863A1 (fr) Materiaux dentaires polymerisables a changement de couleur et d'opacite

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 05809809

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1