WO2006132000A1 - Random traceability layer-based average contrastive analysis method and x-r control chart function unit program and random traceability layer-based average contrastive cause analysis program - Google Patents

Random traceability layer-based average contrastive analysis method and x-r control chart function unit program and random traceability layer-based average contrastive cause analysis program Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2006132000A1
WO2006132000A1 PCT/JP2005/018990 JP2005018990W WO2006132000A1 WO 2006132000 A1 WO2006132000 A1 WO 2006132000A1 JP 2005018990 W JP2005018990 W JP 2005018990W WO 2006132000 A1 WO2006132000 A1 WO 2006132000A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
traceability
average
records
characteristic
random
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/JP2005/018990
Other languages
French (fr)
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Masao Tsuruoka
Original Assignee
Masao Tsuruoka
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Masao Tsuruoka filed Critical Masao Tsuruoka
Publication of WO2006132000A1 publication Critical patent/WO2006132000A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B19/00Programme-control systems
    • G05B19/02Programme-control systems electric
    • G05B19/418Total factory control, i.e. centrally controlling a plurality of machines, e.g. direct or distributed numerical control [DNC], flexible manufacturing systems [FMS], integrated manufacturing systems [IMS] or computer integrated manufacturing [CIM]
    • G05B19/41875Total factory control, i.e. centrally controlling a plurality of machines, e.g. direct or distributed numerical control [DNC], flexible manufacturing systems [FMS], integrated manufacturing systems [IMS] or computer integrated manufacturing [CIM] characterised by quality surveillance of production
    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B2219/00Program-control systems
    • G05B2219/30Nc systems
    • G05B2219/31From computer integrated manufacturing till monitoring
    • G05B2219/31469Graphical display of process as function of detected alarm signals
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P90/00Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
    • Y02P90/02Total factory control, e.g. smart factories, flexible manufacturing systems [FMS] or integrated manufacturing systems [IMS]

Definitions

  • Random traceability stratified mean contrast analysis method and X-R control chart functional part program and random traceability stratified mean contrast cause analysis program TECHNICAL FIELD The present invention relates to information processing and statistical processing for cause analysis. Regarding the program. Background Art In the cause analysis, it is necessary to record the characteristics of the elements together with traceability (birth) records of production elements such as parts, materials and process parameters, and operating elements such as fuel and equipment parameters. The records must be consistent. This traceability and identification management is also a guideline of ISO-9000, and it goes without saying that this management range and management accuracy have an effect on quality control. Need feedback.
  • This method is a method of analyzing the cause by effectively utilizing the expertise that can be possessed, and requires the user's own technical judgment. Even if information is collected and analyzed, as mentioned above, it can help even if it cannot be observed due to the minute fluctuations in the standard or the interaction of biased element characteristics. Even if you use the application software for each function alone to analyze the product characteristics, vs. element characteristics on a one-to-one basis, it will take many thoughts and errors to reach the cause while producing on-site. It takes time and effort. It is one method to narrow down the factors (candidates) from the logic and make engineers capable of analysis using the L12 direct experiment design method, etc. resident in the process, but it can be applied to any kind of product or industry. Usable, expert engineers, even those who have a little technical skill and are not good at logical considerations.Easy to operate with standard performance monitoring of conventional product performance characteristics. Therefore, there is a need for program software that can analyze the causes of chronic defects and troubles.
  • Patent Document 1 Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2001-153988
  • Patent Document 2 JP-A-2005-38098
  • Non-patent document 1 US, Kebna Itrigo, 1977, ATS (Analytics, Trouble, Showing) method
  • the traceability and identification processes which are the management items in the ISO 9000 guidelines, are recorded in the quality control of parts, materials, processes, and finished products over the entire quality process, and the mutual relationship between components In order to offset the effects of action and bias and improve statistical accuracy, mass production that randomly mixes possible traceability in the production of parts, materials, and processes, and products with the same uniform random element traceability from accumulated records
  • the quality records of the ATS method of Non-Patent Document 1 are not included in the calculation results of the same artificial simulator as the premise of the ATS method in Non-Patent Document 1, and only traceable fact data and actual measurement records of the same aspect as the ATS method Provide the basic data for the cause analysis of this program.
  • the group average of each element characteristic such as the component size, material composition ratio, process condition parameter, etc. constituting the element and the problem characteristic to be analyzed Confirm the correlation between group averages and identify the element characteristics of the cause candidates that show the most correlation. Then, a regression evaluation is performed between the specified element characteristic average and the analysis target characteristic average, and the results are reviewed to determine the allowable standard and offset amount of the specified element characteristic to correct the occurrence and variation of the analysis target characteristic defect. It is used for the calculation of users.
  • a secondary database function is provided to temporarily store the stratified data by sorting the database records into eyes (keywords) for traceability identification at each analysis stage.
  • a statistical comparison table is used to monitor the statistical standard deviation, average, maximum and minimum values of both database and secondary database records. A functional part is provided.
  • both the database and the secondary database are displayed on the monitor with the standard deviation and the estimated defect rate of the records, and a histogram function is provided to represent the frequency distribution of the problem characteristics to be analyzed.
  • a histogram function is provided to represent the frequency distribution of the problem characteristics to be analyzed.
  • the average transition of element characteristics such as part dimensions, material and fuel component ratios, process and equipment operation setting condition parameters, etc. are displayed on the same graph, and the conventional single characteristic monitoring function is achieved.
  • the random traceability stratified average contrast analysis method is used to control the operation of devices with computers such as satellites, aircraft, automobiles, and LCD televisions.
  • computers such as satellites, aircraft, automobiles, and LCD televisions.
  • set the parameters of all the devices in a regular manner make random changes to the devices themselves, record and accumulate each output characteristic change, and correlate and correlate with the effects of individual device characteristics on all device output characteristics.
  • Brief Description of Drawings Figure 1 Random Traceability Stratified Average Control Analysis Method and Cause Analysis Program
  • FIG. 1 A first figure.
  • Figure 2 This is the database function part monitor screen.
  • FIG. 3 Monitor screen of secondary database function section.
  • Fig. 4 Statistical comparison table function section monitor screen.
  • Figure 5 Histogram function monitor screen.
  • Figure 6 X-R control chart function section monitor screen.
  • Figure 7 Scatter plot function section monitor screen. BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
  • the general public can understand the analysis process, and the method and programming for use on a personal computer can be realized by utilizing traceability and identification information.
  • Example 1 Production date and sample number of product traceability identification (1) shown in Figure 2 and component B. CV (part B model number) and component C. CV of component traceability identification item (2)
  • the data that can be broadly divided into four types, namely, the characteristic D and characteristic E of the product characteristic item (3) and the dimension item of the component B of the component element characteristic item (4) of the component, This is an example of a real record taken for cause analysis on a monitor.
  • Traceability and identification management which are the management items of ISO—9000 guidelines, are managed throughout the quality process, and what is the serial number of products, operating equipment, parts, materials, and fuel components (What) Code, number, date of production of when made, production location, production factory, line name, production process number, machine number and type of machine (1) and (2) are records that can be traced to 'Raceability' items, and how (Product) inspection characteristics records and operational evaluation characteristics records are (3) records. dimensions and component ratio and the material, quantity, also recorded [_ 3 ⁇ 4S elements characteristic recording elements of operating condition parameters adjustment processing and operating machinery or equipment inside the device (4) + - Ru
  • the discrimination reading in the traceability identification process is performed by reading the barcode of the product, the packaging of the parts and materials, the IC tag, the label attached to the product, etc.
  • the characteristics records in (3) and (4) linked to the traceability in (2) and (2) have created a system in which traceability breakdown records for each quality process stage can be easily obtained via network mail.
  • the element characteristic record only needs to be obtained only for the necessary elements at the time of analysis. Computerization is not necessarily a precondition for each recording, but if it is arranged, the acquisition time can be reduced in today's widespread network.
  • Flow diagram 1 mixed traceability production, refers to the components in Fig. 2 where data is collected to investigate the mold effect among the differences in the components, materials, and production process parameters that are components of the product. This is to collect a complete characteristic record of a product in which the difference in traceability such as the model number used in the production of each part of the item (2) is identified at random.
  • Flow chart of analysis of basic records for analysis Fig. 2 of the screen monitoring the database function (part) recording example shows the characteristic items (3) that were constantly monitored as the product defect rate expanded.
  • the production traceability records of the parts are obtained and the database function is used. It is a datasheet screen of the name in this program input to (Part). In this program, the statistical range is specified by arbitrarily coloring the column (cell) of the No. and product characteristic item name in this Datasheet table.
  • the dimension record in (4) is the function that the database function (part) has after identifying the component B that is the most variable influencing element.
  • Figure 2 (2) shows the traceability identification items of the component B that is randomly incorporated.
  • CV model number
  • another dimensional measurement record that was recorded during inspection of part B was copied, distributed, and written manually, and entered according to the random identification. In that case, it takes an enormous amount of time, but with the inherent functions, input can be done in an instant.
  • Figure 2 is thinned out and illustrated as an example. Can do.
  • the table conversion incorporation function (part) is located in front of the database function (part), although it is not in the explanation flow diagram 1.
  • the secondary database function (part) in the flow diagram 1 is used to input the product quality records consisting of random element traceability stored in the database function (part) as shown in Figure 3 and the input field for the item name to be sorted (5) Parts entered in ⁇ ⁇ Sort by CV item 'Production mold number of part B entered in keyword input field (6) is recorded in layers (keywords) and sorted as shown in the list of records (7) It is a function (part) that temporarily stores records classified by sort layer according to the analysis stage and monitors them in the SortSheet screen called this program.
  • Table (7) is an example. The number of item columns is thinned out, and the number of rows below is cut halfway. Actually, you can scroll up, down, left, and right to see the whole picture.
  • the statistical comparison table function (part) in the flow chart 1 is a secondary database as shown in Figure 4.
  • the histogram function (part) in the flow diagram 1 confirms the peculiarity of the characteristic distribution of the secondary database that has been sorted in advance with arbitrary traceability, so that the product characteristics and output characteristics in the statistical comparison table in Figure 4 described in the previous section Select and double-click the property name field (cell) for either of the element characteristics and the element characteristics.
  • the histogram between the maximum and minimum values of the analysis target characteristics of the database ( Figure 5) 8), Histogram between specified values of database target characteristics (9), Histogram between maximum and minimum values of target characteristics of secondary database (10), Histogram between specified values of target characteristics of secondary database (10) 1 1) alongside the standard deviation, maximum, minimum, average of both, and the estimated failure rate of the analyte characteristics of the database (12). It represents the rate (13) is a function to allow the monitor.
  • Figure 5 is a histogram of product problem characteristics E, which is the result of sorting production records of part B with model number 2 into a secondary database, and 2 of the types of part B from 1 to 8 It can be seen from the fact that the estimated defect rate (13) of the analysis target characteristic in the secondary database is zero, indicating that the number type does not produce defects.
  • the purpose is to confirm the distribution of the characteristics of the production characteristics with some traceability of factors of the factors and causes in the original population, and the consistency of the results of identifying the factors and causes.
  • the purpose of use is to determine the availability of each traceability such as part lot and model number.
  • the X-R control chart function (part) in the flow diagram 1 is, first of all, a replacement for the conventional X-R control chart.
  • the scatter chart function (part) in the flow chart 1 monitors the correlation state between the two characteristics confirmed by the X—R control chart function (part) as shown in the scatter chart in FIG. 7, and the correlation index R square value
  • the actual adjustment time starts from the average space coordinates of the adjustment completion results.
  • the measurement space coordinate point of each axis randomly combined so that the moving average of each axis coordinate becomes the center of the axis movable range of the automatic machine, and the shortest connecting the space point
  • the route is determined in advance, the effect of optical characteristics is measured for each spatial point for each pair of lens and lens frame, and the adjustment range is narrowed down according to the regression evaluation of each axis coordinate. In order to prevent strays, perform efficient automatic adjustment work quickly and quickly.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • General Factory Administration (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

A program which can monitor by highlighting an effect contrast, for each element in an accuracy region, that has conventionally been failed to be discriminated due to bias or mutual action even if a within-standard component is used, and can analyze causes for chronic characteristics deficiency problems during production on job site. The records of a traceability mixed production or an equivalent production in which the probable traceabilities of production processes, components and materials that are all the product quality elements ranging from materials to completed products are uniformly and randomly mixed are collected factitiously, the records are, as shown in flows in Fig. 1, are classified into layers based on the traceability discrimination of one element, one axis is added to a conventional X-R control chart, product problem characteristics average trend and average trend of element characteristics such as components sizes are monitored on the same graph, the correlation between those characteristics averages are confirmed, element characteristics items are auto-piloted, and the candidate cause of mostly correlated element characteristics is automatically judged and reported as well as in voice.

Description

明細謇 ランダムトレーサビリ亍ィ層别平均対照分析方法と X— R管理図機能部プログラ ムとランダムトレーサビリティ層别平均対照原因分析プログラム 技術分野 本発明は、原因分析をするための情報処理と統計処理のプログラムに関する。 背景技術 原因分析では、部品や材料そして工程パラメータなどの生産要素、燃料や機 器パラメータなどの運転要素の、トレーサビリティ (出生)記録と合せて、その要 素の特性記録が必要であり、更に、それら記録に整合性がなければならない。 このトレーサビリティと識別管理は ISO— 9000の指針項目でもあり、この管 理範囲と管理精度が品質コントロールに影響していることは言うまでもなぐそこ で、トレーサビリティ記録データを綿密に分析して要素パラメータ'コントロールへ フィードバックする必要がある。  Description 謇 Random traceability stratified mean contrast analysis method and X-R control chart functional part program and random traceability stratified mean contrast cause analysis program TECHNICAL FIELD The present invention relates to information processing and statistical processing for cause analysis. Regarding the program. Background Art In the cause analysis, it is necessary to record the characteristics of the elements together with traceability (birth) records of production elements such as parts, materials and process parameters, and operating elements such as fuel and equipment parameters. The records must be consistent. This traceability and identification management is also a guideline of ISO-9000, and it goes without saying that this management range and management accuracy have an effect on quality control. Need feedback.
CADを使った設計やシミュレータ確認そして高精度な測定ツールの進歩もあつ て要素精度も上がリ、要求規格を著しく割るような工程上の不良発生も少なくな つて来ているが、昨今では技術の発達と伴に製品の多機能高性能化から構成 要素の働きも複雑化、微妙化しており、標準化規格内要素であれ、相互作用な どで見えないでいるか、生産当初、影響が微小であると判断されて管理対象に 含まれないでいるかして生ずる慢性化した問題が少なくもなぐ特許文献 1の、 発明の詳細な説明の 0004項記載の燃料設計の標準化で、プラント要因と燃料 要因の要因区別の期待ができるといったような状況ではなく、特許文献 2の、発 明の詳細な説明の 0015項や 0038項記載のように統計精度を上げる手立て が必要にせまられている。 しかしながら、その特許文献 2の方法のように、全て の要素特性を土 σ範囲内でのみ統計しても、偏りや相互作用をオフセット仕切 れてはいないので、更に精度を上げる方法が求められている。  With the advancement of design and simulator confirmation using CAD and high-precision measurement tools, the element accuracy has improved, and the occurrence of defects in the process that significantly divides the required standards has been reduced. With the development of products, the functions of the components have become complicated and subtle due to the multi-functional performance of products, and even if it is an element within the standardized standard, it is not visible due to interaction, etc. The standardization of the fuel design described in 0004 of the detailed description of the invention in Patent Document 1, where there are not many chronic problems that may be caused by being judged to be not included in the management target. However, there is a need to improve the statistical accuracy as described in paragraphs 0015 and 0038 of the detailed description of the invention in Patent Document 2. However, as in the method of Patent Document 2, even if all element characteristics are statistically only within the range of the soil σ, there is no offset partitioning of the bias and interaction. Yes.
何で (What)不良発生して何で発生していないか、何処 (Where)で不良発生し て何処で発生していないか、いつ (When)不良発生していつ発生していないか、 どのよう(How)に不良発生して、どのように発生していないか、それらの側面で、 実測、事実情報を収集し、区別点、変化点を捜し出し、区別と変化の差を生じせ しめる原因案を幾つか推定し、その区別点、変化点、そして、それら側面の情報 との矛盾の有無を確認し、一つとして矛盾点の無い案を最原因案とする、原因分 祈に於ける普遍的バイブル的な手順を、教育訓練及び実務のための標準的に 表フォーム化した非特許文献 1の ATS手法がある。  What (What) the defect has occurred and why it has not occurred, where (Where) the defect has occurred and where it has not occurred, (When) the defect has occurred and when it has not occurred, and how ( In this aspect, we collect actual measurements and factual information, search for distinction points and change points, and propose a cause of the difference between distinction and change. Estimate several points, confirm the distinction points, change points, and whether there is any inconsistency with the information on those aspects, and make the one with no contradiction as the most probable cause as the universal cause in prayer There is a non-patent document 1 ATS method in which a bible procedure is standardized as a table for education and training.
その手法は、持ち得る専門技術を効果的に活かして原因分析を行なう方法で あり、ユーザー自身の技術的な判断が必要で、更に、昨今では、この手法に沿 い、相応の技術情報と実状情報を収集して分析しても、前記の如く、規格内の 微細な変動や偏った要素特性の相互作用で観えない場合も手伝い、慢性化した 不良問題では、既存の表計算やグラフ化アプリケーションソフトを機能単独に駆 使して、製品特性、対、要素特性を 1対 1で分析しても、更に現場で生産をしなが らでは、原因へたどり着くには、多くの思考錯誤と手間を必要とする。 論理から因子 (要因候補)を絞り、 L12直行実験計画法などを駆使して分析 可能な技術者を、工程へ常駐させることも一方法ではあるが、製品の種類や産 業分野の何にでも使え、専門技術者でも、少々専門技術が無く論理考察が不利 な者でも、分け隔てな《いつもの生産管理の中で標準的に、従来の製品性能 特性の出来栄え監視と伴に、操作が簡単で、慢性不良やトラブルの特性原因の 分析ができるプログラムソフトが求められている。 This method is a method of analyzing the cause by effectively utilizing the expertise that can be possessed, and requires the user's own technical judgment. Even if information is collected and analyzed, as mentioned above, it can help even if it cannot be observed due to the minute fluctuations in the standard or the interaction of biased element characteristics. Even if you use the application software for each function alone to analyze the product characteristics, vs. element characteristics on a one-to-one basis, it will take many thoughts and errors to reach the cause while producing on-site. It takes time and effort. It is one method to narrow down the factors (candidates) from the logic and make engineers capable of analysis using the L12 direct experiment design method, etc. resident in the process, but it can be applied to any kind of product or industry. Usable, expert engineers, even those who have a little technical skill and are not good at logical considerations.Easy to operate with standard performance monitoring of conventional product performance characteristics. Therefore, there is a need for program software that can analyze the causes of chronic defects and troubles.
特許文献 1 : 特開 2001 -153988号公報  Patent Document 1: Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2001-153988
特許文献 2: 特開 2005-38098号公報  Patent Document 2: JP-A-2005-38098
非特許文献 1: 米国、ケブナ一トリゴー社、 1977年著、 ATS (アナリテイツク、 トラブル、シユー亍イング)手法  Non-patent document 1: US, Kebna Itrigo, 1977, ATS (Analytics, Trouble, Showing) method
発明の開示 発明が解決しょうとする課題 部品、材料、工程の製品品質要素の規格内変動など微小であったり、相互作用 で、統計処理しても観えないでいる、多数要因要素の統計的偏りを防ぎ、一要素 の影響対照 (コントラスト)を際立てる分析方法を提供する。 Disclosure of the Invention Problems to be Solved by the InventionStatistics of multiple factor elements that are not visible even after statistical processing due to minute variations such as within-standard fluctuations in product quality elements of parts, materials, and processes It provides an analytical method that prevents bias and highlights one-factor influence contrasts.
標準偏差や相関計算そして散布図などのグラフ作成の単独機能なプログラム は市場には沢山有り、それらを使い原因分析作業も少々容易になったが、それ でも複雑化した現在では膨大な分析操作時間を要している。そこで、前記の要素 影響の対照を際立てる方法と伴に、それら既存の単独機能を体系的に連係動作 させ、日々の生産管理に於ける製品性能特性の出来栄えを監視しながら、管理 限界へ近づいた製品特性の変化、また、慢性化した不良特性問題の原因要素 特性を、簡単操作で分析途中経過を観ながら、容易につかめるようにした統計 的な原因分析プログラムを提供する。 課題を解決するための手段  There are many independent programs for creating graphs such as standard deviation, correlation calculation, and scatter plots, and using them, the cause analysis work has become a little easier, but now it has become complicated and the analysis operation time is enormous. Is needed. Therefore, in conjunction with the above-mentioned method of contrasting the influence of factors, these existing single functions are systematically linked to monitor the performance of product performance characteristics in daily production management and approach the control limit. We provide a statistical cause analysis program that makes it easy to grasp the changes in product characteristics and the causal element characteristics of a chronic failure characteristic problem while monitoring the progress of the analysis with simple operations. Means for solving the problem
ISO— 9000指針での管理項目であるトレーサビリ亍ィと識別畲理を全品質ェ 程に渡り、部品、材料、工程、完成製品の品質管理に於いて記録し、そして、構 成要素間の相互作用や偏りの影響をオフセットし、統計上の精度を上げるため、 部品、材料、工程の生産上、有り得るトレーサビリティ違いをランダム均等に混 ぜた量産、また蓄積記録から同様の均等ランダム要素トレーサビリティな製品の 品質記録を作為的に採取し、非特許文献 1の ATS手法の前提と同じ 人為的 なシミュレータなどの計算結果を含まず、前記 ATS手法同様な側面のトレーサビ リティの事実データと実測記録のみで 本プログラム原因分析の基礎データへ 供する。  The traceability and identification processes, which are the management items in the ISO 9000 guidelines, are recorded in the quality control of parts, materials, processes, and finished products over the entire quality process, and the mutual relationship between components In order to offset the effects of action and bias and improve statistical accuracy, mass production that randomly mixes possible traceability in the production of parts, materials, and processes, and products with the same uniform random element traceability from accumulated records The quality records of the ATS method of Non-Patent Document 1 are not included in the calculation results of the same artificial simulator as the premise of the ATS method in Non-Patent Document 1, and only traceable fact data and actual measurement records of the same aspect as the ATS method Provide the basic data for the cause analysis of this program.
確認対象外要素の相互作用を有り得る量産変動の中心で固定して、確認対 象外要素の変動や偏り影響をオフセットし、層別統計の精度を上げて、確認要 素トレーサビリ亍ィの影響対照 (コントラスト)を際立たせるため、そのランダムな 要素トレーサビリティで構成した製品の品質記録をデータベースへ入力し、部品、 材料、工程の要素卜レーサビリティの識別を目(キーワード)に層别グループ分け し、分析対象の製品検査や運転出力評価特性のグループ平均を求め、 全ての 要素ごと、同じくトレーサビリティ層别を繰り返し、その分析対象の特性平均のグ ループ間変動が最も有ったトレーサビリティ 'グループ目に相当する主要因要素 である部品、材料、工程を特定する。 そのあと、特定した主要因要素の特定時 と同じトレーサビリティ目の層別で、その要素を構成する部品寸法、材料成分率、 工程条件パラメータなどの各要素特性のグループ平均とその分析対象問題特性 のグループ平均間の相関確認を行い、最も相関を示す原因候補の要素特性を 特定する。 そして、その特定した要素特性平均とその分析対象特性平均間の 回帰評価を行ない、その結果を、分析対象特性の不良発生やバラツキを是正す る為の特定した要素特性の許容規格とオフセット量見直しのユーザーの計算に 供する。 The interaction of non-confirmed elements is fixed at the center of possible mass production fluctuations, the fluctuations and bias effects of non-confirmed elements are offset, the accuracy of stratified statistics is increased, and the effect of confirmation element traceability is controlled. In order to make (contrast) stand out, the product quality record composed of the random element traceability is input to the database, and the identification of the element / raceability of parts, materials, and processes is divided into groups (keywords). Obtain the group average of the product inspection and operating output evaluation characteristics of the analysis target, repeat the traceability stratification for each element, and set the characteristics average of the analysis target. Traceability with the greatest inter-loop variation 'Identify parts, materials, and processes that are the main factor elements corresponding to the group. After that, with the same traceability stratification as when the identified main factor element was identified, the group average of each element characteristic such as the component size, material composition ratio, process condition parameter, etc. constituting the element and the problem characteristic to be analyzed Confirm the correlation between group averages and identify the element characteristics of the cause candidates that show the most correlation. Then, a regression evaluation is performed between the specified element characteristic average and the analysis target characteristic average, and the results are reviewed to determine the allowable standard and offset amount of the specified element characteristic to correct the occurrence and variation of the analysis target characteristic defect. It is used for the calculation of users.
以上の処理をコンピュータに行なわせ、ランダムトレーサビリティな要素記録か ら主要因要素特性である原因候補を特定し、自動回答させ、更に検証確認し、 そして原因の対策を取るための回帰評価をするため、データベース機能部、 2次 データベース機能部、統計比較表機能部、ヒストグラム機能部、 X— R管理図機 能部、散布図機能部の 6つの機能部を以下に本プログラムへ構築する。  In order to allow the computer to perform the above processing, identify cause candidates that are main factor element characteristics from random traceable element records, automatically answer them, verify and confirm them, and perform regression evaluation to take countermeasures for the causes The following six functions are built into this program: database function, secondary database function, statistical comparison table function, histogram function, X-R control chart function, and scatter chart function.
第一に、製品シリアル番号や機台番号と運転年月日時を含め記録した、製品 特性や機器運転特性データへ附した卜レーサビリ亍ィ識別の記録、 製品や運転 機器毎へ組み込まれた部品、材料、燃料、工程の要素のトレーサビリ亍ィ識別記 録、 製品性能検査や機器運転出力評価結果の特性データ記録、そして、組み 込み要素のトレーサビリティ識別記録へリンクした部品の寸法、材料や燃料成分 率、工程ないし運転条件、パラメータなどの要素特性の記録、 それら整合した First, record the product serial number, machine number, and operation date, including the product serial number and machine operating characteristic data, the record of lacerability identification attached to the product characteristics, the parts incorporated into each product and operating equipment, Traceability identification record of material, fuel and process elements, characteristic data record of product performance inspection and equipment operation output evaluation result, and component dimensions, material and fuel component ratio linked to embedded element traceability identification record Record of element characteristics such as process or operating conditions, parameters, etc.
4種類の記録を整理保管するデータベース機能部を設ける。 第二に、そのデー タベース記録を分析段階ごとにトレーサビリティ識別を目(キーワード)にソートし て層別したデータを一時保管する 2次データベース機能部を設ける。 第三に、デ ータベースからソートした 2次データベース記録の特異性を観るため、データべ一 スと 2次データベース双方記録の統計標準偏差、平均、最大、最小値を比較モニ タ,する統計比較表機能部を設ける。 Establish a database function section that organizes and stores four types of records. Second, a secondary database function is provided to temporarily store the stratified data by sorting the database records into eyes (keywords) for traceability identification at each analysis stage. Third, in order to observe the peculiarities of secondary database records sorted from the database, a statistical comparison table is used to monitor the statistical standard deviation, average, maximum and minimum values of both database and secondary database records. A functional part is provided.
第四に、原因の整合確認のために、そのデータベースと 2次データべ ス双方 記録の標準偏差および推定不良率を伴にモニターへ表し、分析対象問題特性の 度数分布を表わすヒストグラム機能部を設ける。 第五に、 X— R管理図上で、 年月日時の時間軸と限らず、確認したいトレーサビリティを推移の横軸として、ま た、管理特性である製品性能特性や運転出力特性などの一特性平均の推移の みであらず、部品寸法、材料や燃料成分率、工程や機器運転設定条件パラメ一 タなどの要素特性の平均推移とを同一グラフ上へ表わし、従来の一特性監視機 能へ合わせて、その要素特性推移との相乗関係をモニター出来るようにし、要素 特性と分析対象特性との層别平均間で最も相関を示す原因候補の主要因要素 特性名と相関指数 (係数)をモニター表示とメッセージダイヤグラム、そして音声 で回答する、 X—R管理図機能部を設ける。 そして、第六に、その X— R管理図 機能部で相関確認した分析対象特性と主要因要素特性の層别平均間の回帰評 価を行ないモニター表示する、散布図機能部を設ける。 発明の効果 特許文献 1が申請されている原子力発電の現埸、それと特許文献 2の発電所 関係とは限らず、どこの産業現場でも、外れる程は違えど予定通り事が運ばな いことが現実であり、いずれの対策でも原因の特定が前提であり、従来では観え なかった精度域の要因と原因分析が可能となり、精度ある生産品質向上が図れ 薬事医療分析、農業や工業を問わず、慢性不良問題の原因対策ができる。 Fourth, in order to confirm the cause match, both the database and the secondary database are displayed on the monitor with the standard deviation and the estimated defect rate of the records, and a histogram function is provided to represent the frequency distribution of the problem characteristics to be analyzed. . Fifth, on the X-R control chart, not only the time axis of year, month, date and time, but also the traceability to be confirmed is the horizontal axis of the transition, and other characteristics such as product performance characteristics and operational output characteristics that are management characteristics In addition to the average transition, the average transition of element characteristics such as part dimensions, material and fuel component ratios, process and equipment operation setting condition parameters, etc. are displayed on the same graph, and the conventional single characteristic monitoring function is achieved. At the same time, it is possible to monitor the synergistic relationship with the transition of element characteristics, and monitor the main factor element characteristic name and correlation index (coefficient) of the cause candidate that shows the most correlation between the stratified averages of element characteristics and analysis target characteristics. An X-R control chart function is provided to respond by display, message diagram, and voice. Sixth, a scatter diagram function unit is provided that performs a regression evaluation between the stratified averages of the analysis target characteristics and the main factor element characteristics confirmed by the XR control chart function unit and displays them on a monitor. Effect of the invention The current state of nuclear power generation for which Patent Document 1 has been applied for, and the power plant relationship of Patent Document 2, are not necessarily related to the power plant in any industrial site, but it may not be carried as planned. It is a reality and the premise is to identify the cause of any countermeasure. It is possible to analyze the cause and cause of the accuracy range that did not exist, and to improve the production quality with accuracy. Regardless of pharmaceutical analysis, agriculture or industry, the cause of the chronic failure problem can be taken.
のみならず、正確な要因分析に伴う新分野への事業開拓や新製品の開発時の 見極めへも活かし得、 機器個別の運転限界の明瞭化に伴う事前の危機予防も 前進し、そして、機器の高性能化と小型化が出来、しいては、資源の無駄な消費 の削減へも貢献する。 In addition, it can be used for business development in new fields with accurate factor analysis and identification during the development of new products, advancement of risk prevention in advance by clarifying the operating limits of individual equipment, and equipment Can be improved in performance and size, and contribute to the reduction of wasteful consumption of resources.
今や、パソコンはスーパー化すると伴に普及は当然に日常のツールと化したが、 一側面、十分に活かされていない部分もあり、 紙の上でも容易に手害きできた 従来の X—R管理図は製品性能特性などの特性推移の監視に役立って来たが、 更に X— R管理図機能部のモニターグラフは製品を構成する要素特性である部品 寸法や材料や肥料の成分率、工程条件パラメータなどを一つのテーブル上で取リ 扱うことによって、要素特性の推移を同一グラフ上で代わる代わるモニターでき、 製品性能特性の異常や変化の原因や要因である要素特性を容易に判別できる ようになった。 故に、製品や産業分野の分け隔てなぐ更に効率的な生産工程 管理ができるようになった。  Now that PCs have become supermarkets, the spread of them has naturally become a daily tool, but on one side, there are parts that are not fully utilized, and the conventional X-R that could easily be damaged even on paper Control charts have been useful for monitoring product performance characteristics and other characteristic transitions, but monitor charts in the X-R control chart function section are the component characteristics that make up products, such as component dimensions, material and fertilizer composition ratios, and processes. By handling conditional parameters on a single table, the transition of element characteristics can be monitored instead of on the same graph, and the element characteristics that are the cause and cause of abnormalities and changes in product performance characteristics can be easily identified. Became. Therefore, it has become possible to manage production processes more efficiently without dividing products and industrial fields.
製品や機器固体ごと、構成する要素の特性値は違うので、人工衛星や航空機 や自動車、液晶テレビなどあらゆるコンピュータを有す機器の運転制御へ、ラン ダムトレーサビリティ層別平均対照分析方法を仕組み、機器内全デバイスのパラ メータ設定を、支障ない時に定期に、無差別にランダム変更を機器自身にさせ各 出力特性変化を記録蓄積し、全機器出力特性への機内デバイス特性個別の影 響と相関を読み、 当然に要求条件に優先して従い、無理のない全デバイスの パラメータ設定を機器自身にさせることにより、 設計者も気付かない関係も明ら かになリ、 機器のオペレーション経緯に合せて、危機時のみでなぐ次席の要因 や代行デバイスが有れば働かせることも可能であり、そして、安全の確保ととも に、効率的な運転から機器の延命効果をもたらし、 同様にして生産用自動組み 立て機では自動調整機能の能率向上などへも役立つ。 図面の簡単な説明 図 1 ランダムトレーサビリティ層別平均対照分析方法と原因分析プログラム  Since the characteristic values of the constituent elements differ for each product and device, the random traceability stratified average contrast analysis method is used to control the operation of devices with computers such as satellites, aircraft, automobiles, and LCD televisions. When there is no problem, set the parameters of all the devices in a regular manner, make random changes to the devices themselves, record and accumulate each output characteristic change, and correlate and correlate with the effects of individual device characteristics on all device output characteristics. Read and obey the requirements as a matter of course, and let the device itself set the parameters of all devices without difficulty, so that the relationship that the designer does not notice is also obvious, according to the operation history of the device, It is possible to work if there is a next-seat factor or substitute device only in the event of a crisis. Resulted in a life-prolonging effect, also help to such as efficiency improvement of automatic adjustment function in a similar manner production for automatic set fresh machine. Brief Description of Drawings Figure 1 Random Traceability Stratified Average Control Analysis Method and Cause Analysis Program
の関係フロー図である。  FIG.
図 2:データベース機能部モニタ一画面である。 Figure 2: This is the database function part monitor screen.
図 3 : 2次データベース機能部モニター画面である。 Figure 3: Monitor screen of secondary database function section.
図 4:統計比較表機能部モニター画面である。 Fig. 4: Statistical comparison table function section monitor screen.
図 5 :ヒストグラム機能部モニタ一画面である。, Figure 5: Histogram function monitor screen. ,
図 6 : X— R管理図機能部モニター画面である。 Figure 6: X-R control chart function section monitor screen.
図 7 :散布図機能部モニター画面である。 発明を実施するための最良の形態 一般の者も分析過程を理解でき、又、パソコンで身近に使うための方法とプロ グラム化を、トレ一サビリティと識別情報を活すことにより実現できた。 実施例 1 図 2に示す製品のトレーサビリティ識別(1 )の生産月日と標本番号と、構成要 素のトレーサビリティ識別項目(2)の部品 B. CV (部品 Bの型番号)と部品 C. CV と、製品の特性項目(3)の特性 Dと特性 Eと、構成要素の要素特性項目(4)の部 品 Bの寸法項目の、 4種類に大別できるデータは、本プログラム上のデータべ一 スへ原因分析のために取り込んだ実記録をモニター表示した例である。 Figure 7: Scatter plot function section monitor screen. BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION The general public can understand the analysis process, and the method and programming for use on a personal computer can be realized by utilizing traceability and identification information. Example 1 Production date and sample number of product traceability identification (1) shown in Figure 2 and component B. CV (part B model number) and component C. CV of component traceability identification item (2) The data that can be broadly divided into four types, namely, the characteristic D and characteristic E of the product characteristic item (3) and the dimension item of the component B of the component element characteristic item (4) of the component, This is an example of a real record taken for cause analysis on a monitor.
ISO— 9000指針の管理項目でもあるトレーサビリティと識別管理を、品質 工程のすべてに渡り管理し、 製品や運転機器と部品や材料そして燃料の構成 要素の各シリアル番号の何 (What)かを特定する符号や番号、 そして、何時 (When)造ったかの生産年月日時、 そして、何処 (Where)で造ったかの生産 地、生産工場、ライン名、生産工程番号、使用機械や型の番号である、それらト レーサビリティ'アイテムを遡及できる識別記録が (1 )と (2)の記録に当たり、 そして、どのように (How)の、製品完成検査特性記録や運転評価特性記録が (3) の記録に当たり、部品や材料の寸法や成分率、量、また、加工や運転機械や機 器内部デバイスの運転条件パラメータ調整の構成要素の要素特性記録が (4)の 録【_¾s+ -る Traceability and identification management, which are the management items of ISO—9000 guidelines, are managed throughout the quality process, and what is the serial number of products, operating equipment, parts, materials, and fuel components (What) Code, number, date of production of when made, production location, production factory, line name, production process number, machine number and type of machine (1) and (2) are records that can be traced to 'Raceability' items, and how (Product) inspection characteristics records and operational evaluation characteristics records are (3) records. dimensions and component ratio and the material, quantity, also recorded [_ ¾S elements characteristic recording elements of operating condition parameters adjustment processing and operating machinery or equipment inside the device (4) + - Ru
図 2の(1 )と (2)のトレーサビリティ識別の工程上での判別読み取りは、製品 や、部品、材料の包装のバーコードや I Cタグや品へ付けたラベル等で読み取 リ、 (1 )や(2)のトレーサビリティにリンクした (3)と (4)の特性記録は、ネットヮ ークゃメールを通じて、各品質工程段階のトレーサビリティ内訳の記録が容易に 入手できる体制を造り、図 2の要素特性項目(4)の部品 Bのみの寸法のように 要素特性記録は分析時に必要な要素のみの項目だけ取寄せられればよい。各 記録に際してコンピュータ化は必ずしも前提条件ではないが、整えば、ネットヮー クが普及した今日では、取り寄せ時間を短縮することができる。  In the traceability identification process shown in (2) and (2) of Fig. 2, the discrimination reading in the traceability identification process is performed by reading the barcode of the product, the packaging of the parts and materials, the IC tag, the label attached to the product, etc. (1) The characteristics records in (3) and (4) linked to the traceability in (2) and (2) have created a system in which traceability breakdown records for each quality process stage can be easily obtained via network mail. As with the dimensions of only the part B of the characteristic item (4), the element characteristic record only needs to be obtained only for the necessary elements at the time of analysis. Computerization is not necessarily a precondition for each recording, but if it is arranged, the acquisition time can be reduced in today's widespread network.
フロー図 1の、トレーサビリティ混合生産とは、製品の構成要素である部品、材 料、生産工程パラメータの違いの中で、型影響を調査するためにデータを取 y寄 せた図 2の構成要素の卜レーサビリティ識別項目(2)の部品毎の生産の際に使 用した型番号の如ぐそのトレーサビリティ違いを製品毎にランダムに組み付け た製品の完成特性記録を採取することである。  Flow diagram 1, mixed traceability production, refers to the components in Fig. 2 where data is collected to investigate the mold effect among the differences in the components, materials, and production process parameters that are components of the product. This is to collect a complete characteristic record of a product in which the difference in traceability such as the model number used in the production of each part of the item (2) is identified at random.
生産帰歴に有する要素トレーサビリティをランダムに組み込む製品組立指示 表を作り、蓄積データから、その要素トレーサビリティの組み合せが一致する製 品の記録を選択し、不足する場合は、その製品組立指示表に従うランダムトレ 一サビリティな要素で追加生産し製品特性記録を採取することである。  Create a product assembly instruction table that randomly incorporates element traceability in the production history, select records of products that match the combination of element traceability from the accumulated data, and if there is a shortage, randomly follow the product assembly instruction table It is an additional production with traceability factors and product characteristic records are collected.
分析用の基礎記録を納めるフロー図 1のデータベース機能 (部)の記録例をモ 二ターした画面の図 2は、製品の不良率拡大が認められ、常時監視していた特 性項目(3)内の特性 Eが偏リバラついているので、どの部品と、どの寸法が、そ の特性 Eのノ\ 'ラツキの原因であるかを分析するために、部品の生産トレーサビ リティ記録を取寄せてデータベース機能 (部)へ入力した本プログラム内呼称の Datasheet画面である。 本例プログラムでは、この Datasheet表中の No.と製品特性項目名の欄 (セル) へ、ユーザーの任意で色付けして、統計範囲を指定するようになっている。 Flow chart of analysis of basic records for analysis Fig. 2 of the screen monitoring the database function (part) recording example shows the characteristic items (3) that were constantly monitored as the product defect rate expanded. In order to analyze which parts and which dimensions cause the fluctuations in the characteristic E, the production traceability records of the parts are obtained and the database function is used. It is a datasheet screen of the name in this program input to (Part). In this program, the statistical range is specified by arbitrarily coloring the column (cell) of the No. and product characteristic item name in this Datasheet table.
(4)の寸法記録は、最変動影響要素である部品 Bを特定したのちに、データべ ース機能 (部)に有する機能で、ランダムに組み込んだ部品 Bのトレーサビリティ 識別項目の図 2(2)の部品 B. CV (型番号)へ合せて、別に部品 Bの生産時に 検査記録した寸法測定記録を写し、振り分けして書き込んだもので、そのランダ ムな識別へ合わせて入力する手作業であっては、膨大な時間を要するが、内在 する機能では一瞬で入力が出来る。 実際には、(1 ) (2) (3) (4)の項目数は他 に多数有るが、図 2は間引きして例えに写してあり、実際では上下左右スクロー ルして全容を観ることができる。 また、各種サーバーでの記録では TXTタイプが 多いので、説明フロー図 1には無いが表変換採り込み機能 (部)がデータベース 機能 (部)の前に位置して有る。  The dimension record in (4) is the function that the database function (part) has after identifying the component B that is the most variable influencing element.Figure 2 (2) shows the traceability identification items of the component B that is randomly incorporated. ) In part B. CV (model number), another dimensional measurement record that was recorded during inspection of part B was copied, distributed, and written manually, and entered according to the random identification. In that case, it takes an enormous amount of time, but with the inherent functions, input can be done in an instant. Actually, there are many other items in (1), (2), (3), and (4), but Figure 2 is thinned out and illustrated as an example. Can do. In addition, since there are many TXT types of records on various servers, the table conversion incorporation function (part) is located in front of the database function (part), although it is not in the explanation flow diagram 1.
フロー図 1の 2次データベース機能 (部)は、図 3のようにデータべース機能 (部) に保管したランダムな要素トレーサビリティで成る製品品質記録をソート対象項 目名の入力欄 (5)へ入力した部品 Β· CV項目で、ソート 'キーワード入力欄 (6) へ入力した部品 Bの生産金型番号を目(キーワード)に層別して記録し、ソートし た記録一覧 (7)の如く、分析段階に応じたソート層別した記録を一時的に保管し、 本プログラム内呼称 SortSheet画面でモニターする機能 (部)である。 図 3表 (7)は例えに写したもので、項目列数を間引き、下方の行数を中途でカットしてあ リ実際では上下左右スクロールして全容を観ることができる。  The secondary database function (part) in the flow diagram 1 is used to input the product quality records consisting of random element traceability stored in the database function (part) as shown in Figure 3 and the input field for the item name to be sorted (5) Parts entered in Β · Sort by CV item 'Production mold number of part B entered in keyword input field (6) is recorded in layers (keywords) and sorted as shown in the list of records (7) It is a function (part) that temporarily stores records classified by sort layer according to the analysis stage and monitors them in the SortSheet screen called this program. Fig. 3 Table (7) is an example. The number of item columns is thinned out, and the number of rows below is cut halfway. Actually, you can scroll up, down, left, and right to see the whole picture.
フロー図 1の統計比較表機能 (部)は、図 4のように 2次データベース  The statistical comparison table function (part) in the flow chart 1 is a secondary database as shown in Figure 4.
(SortSheet)と元のデータベース (Datasheet)、双方の製品特性や出力特性およ び要素特性の分布偏差を数値で確認し、ソートした 2次データベースのデータの 特異性を観察するために、各特性規格の上限下限の入力欄と、全特性の標準 偏差、最大、最小、平均の数値表をモニターするようにした機能である。次に説 する、ヒストグラムを作成する前準備の機能部とも言える。 当モニターは上下に スクロールしてデータの全容を観ることができる。 (SortSheet) and the original database (Datasheet), both product characteristics, output characteristics and element characteristics distribution deviations are confirmed numerically, and each characteristic is observed to observe the specificity of the sorted secondary database data. This is a function that monitors the upper and lower limits of the standard and the numerical table of standard deviation, maximum, minimum, and average of all characteristics. It can be said that this is a functional part for preparing before creating a histogram, as described below. This monitor can be scrolled up and down to see the whole data.
フロー図 1のヒストグラム機能 (部)は、予め任意のトレーサビリティでソートした 2次デー ベースの特性分布の特異性を確認するため、前項記載図 4の統計比 較表の中の製品特性や出力特性および要素特性いずれかの特性名欄 (セル)を 選びダブルクリックすると、元のデータベースの同特性の度数分布を一緒に、 図 5のように、データベースの分析対象特性の最大最小値間のヒストグラム (8)、 データベースの分析対象特性の指定値間のヒストグラム (9)、2次データベース の分析対象特性の最大最小値間のヒストグラム (10)、 2次データベースの分析 対象特性の指定値間のヒストグラム (1 1 )と並べて表示し、双方の標準偏差、最 大、最小、平均そしてデータベースの分析対象特性の推定不良率 (12)、 2次デ ータベースの分析対象特性の推定不良率 (13)を表わし、モニターできるようにし た機能である。 図 5は部品 Bを型番号 2で組んだ生産記録を 2次データベース へ、ソートして観た製品問題特性 Eのヒストグラムであリ、 1番から 8番まである 部品 Bの型の内、 2番型は不良を出さないことが、 2次データベースの分析対象 特性の推定不良率(13)の表示がゼロであることから判る。用途は、このように、 要因や原因の要素の一部の卜レーサビリティでの生産特性品質が元の母集団の、 どの分布位置に存在するか、要因や原因の特定結果の整合を確認し、部品ロット や型番号などのトレーサビリティ毎の使用可否の判断をする使用目的がある。 フロー図 1の X— R管理図機能 (部)は、まず第一に、従来の X— R管理図に代 えて、図 6のように時系列と限らず、グラフ推移横軸の識別項目名の表示欄(14 へ表わされた部品 B. CVの、グラフ推移横軸ラベル(15)に附された金型番号の、 ソート層別目と同じ、部品、材料、工程の要素トレーサビリティを推移の横軸とし、 全ての要素トレーサビリティを自動参照巡回して、問題の分析対象特性の平均推 移 (18)の製品特性 Eの変動をモニターし、最も変動するグラフ推移横軸の識別 項目名の表示欄(14)に現れた要素トレ一サビリティ識別項目に相当する、部品、 材料、工程の要素を特定する。 そして第二に、例えに写した図 6画面では見え ないがスクロールした画面下方の設定する場所で、その特定最大影響要素に該 当する要素特性項目の参照範囲を指定し、その範囲の部品寸法、材料成分率、 工程条件パラメータなどの要素特性項目を、その最大影響要素を特定した時と 同じトレーサビリティの識別目を推移の横軸で自動参照巡回し、グラフに現れた 相闋確認要素特性の平均推移 (21 )と分析対象特性の平均推移(18)との相関 を確認し、相関確認要素特性名の入力欄 (19)に表れた最も相関のある要素特 性項目の原因候補名を特定し、分析対象特性とその要素特性間の相関指数 The histogram function (part) in the flow diagram 1 confirms the peculiarity of the characteristic distribution of the secondary database that has been sorted in advance with arbitrary traceability, so that the product characteristics and output characteristics in the statistical comparison table in Figure 4 described in the previous section Select and double-click the property name field (cell) for either of the element characteristics and the element characteristics. Together with the frequency distribution of the same characteristics of the original database, the histogram between the maximum and minimum values of the analysis target characteristics of the database (Figure 5) 8), Histogram between specified values of database target characteristics (9), Histogram between maximum and minimum values of target characteristics of secondary database (10), Histogram between specified values of target characteristics of secondary database (10) 1 1) alongside the standard deviation, maximum, minimum, average of both, and the estimated failure rate of the analyte characteristics of the database (12). It represents the rate (13) is a function to allow the monitor. Figure 5 is a histogram of product problem characteristics E, which is the result of sorting production records of part B with model number 2 into a secondary database, and 2 of the types of part B from 1 to 8 It can be seen from the fact that the estimated defect rate (13) of the analysis target characteristic in the secondary database is zero, indicating that the number type does not produce defects. In this way, the purpose is to confirm the distribution of the characteristics of the production characteristics with some traceability of factors of the factors and causes in the original population, and the consistency of the results of identifying the factors and causes. The purpose of use is to determine the availability of each traceability such as part lot and model number. The X-R control chart function (part) in the flow diagram 1 is, first of all, a replacement for the conventional X-R control chart. As shown in Fig. 6, not only the time series but also the display column of the identification item name on the horizontal axis of the graph transition (part B. CV shown in Fig. 14 is attached to the graph transition horizontal axis label (15). Same as the sort layer of the model number, with the element traceability of parts, materials, and processes as the horizontal axis of the transition, all element traceability is automatically referenced and the average transition of the analysis target characteristics of the problem (18) Monitor the fluctuations in product characteristics E, and identify the elements of parts, materials, and processes that correspond to the element traceability identification items that appear in the identification item name display column (14) on the horizontal axis of the most fluctuating graph. Second, specify the reference range of the element characteristic item that corresponds to the specific maximum influence element at the position to be set at the bottom of the scrolled screen that is not visible in the screen shown in Fig. 6, and the component dimensions in that range. , Material component ratio, process condition parameters The element traceability item is automatically referenced on the horizontal axis of the transition to identify the same traceability as when the largest influential element was identified. Confirm the correlation with the average transition (18), identify the cause candidate name of the most correlated element characteristic item in the input field (19) of the correlation confirmation element characteristic name, and select the analysis target characteristic and its element characteristic. Correlation index between
(22)をグラフ下方へ表し、原因候補の検索結果報告メッセージダイヤグラム  (22) is displayed below the graph, and the search results report message diagram for possible causes
(23)と音声で分析報告する。 また、 ISOr-9000指針に沿い、品質工程全般 に渡り、トレーサビリティの記録管理が取れていれば、日常生産管理に、従来の X— R管理図の代わり本例プログラムを使用し、従来同様に毎日、数台を抜き取 リ、製品トレーサビリティと組み込み要素トレーサビリ亍ィと製品性能特性の記録 を、 データべース (Datasheet)へ残しておれば、急なノ ラッキ増や変化の原因 要素の部品や材料、そして工程の敏速な特定が、この X— R管理図機能部で可 能である。 なお、原因要素特性の部品寸法や材料成分率そして工程条件パラ メータ設定などの、正確な精度での規格見直しのための回帰評価には、既に説 明のランダムなトレーサビリティの要素で生産した製品記録が必要であり、蓄積 が不足であればランダム組立指示表に従い生産を行なう。  Analyze and report as (23). In addition, if traceability records can be managed throughout the quality process in accordance with the ISOr-9000 guidelines, this example program can be used for daily production management instead of the conventional X-R control chart. If you keep a record of product traceability, built-in element traceability, and product performance characteristics in the datasheet, you can remove a few devices, Rapid identification of materials and processes is possible with this X-R control chart function. In addition, for the regression evaluation to review the standard with accurate accuracy, such as the component dimensions of the causal element characteristics, the material component ratio, and the process condition parameter settings, the product records produced with the random traceability elements already described are used. If the accumulation is insufficient, production is performed according to the random assembly instruction table.
フロー図 1の散布図機能 (部)は、 X— R管理図機能 (部)で確認した両特性間 の相関状態を図 7の散布図のようにモニターするものであり、相関指数 R二乗値 The scatter chart function (part) in the flow chart 1 monitors the correlation state between the two characteristics confirmed by the X—R control chart function (part) as shown in the scatter chart in FIG. 7, and the correlation index R square value
(24) (25)の高い方の回帰線式(26) (27)を、原因候補や要因の要素特性の 許容規格とオフセット量の見直し計算へ供する。 (24) The higher regression line formula (26) (27) of (25) is used for the revision calculation of the allowable specification and offset amount of the element characteristics of the cause candidates and factors.
産業上の利用可能性 現在では、コンピュータを使い機器の複数の出力特性の各関連デバイスをマル チに制御することは当然になっているが、それに、このランダムトレーサビリティ 層别平均対照分析方法を加え、要求条件優先型で機器内要素デバイスの設定 パラメータの自己自由設定型な制御を構築する。人工衛星や航空機、液晶亍レ ビなどあらゆる機器で、全ての出力や速度や輝度などの出力特性データと、時点 で加えた構成要素側の、燃料や電力などの入力量、内部デバイスのパラメータ 設定や特性、及び外気温、明るさなどの環境測定データをコンピュータ中の一枚 テーブルに載せて、この対照分析方法を使い、定期的に支障ないタイミング範囲 で関係の有り無しを無差別に機内、全ての構成するデバイスのパラメータ設定を 同時にランダム及びフルレンジ内で変更し、機器の複数出力特性への影響を同 時に測定する自己テストを試みるか、蓄積から同様なランダムな構成のデータを 選び出し、算出された時点の出力特性と各パラメータ設定とめ相関とその回帰評 価を行なう。 その結果の能力の限界内で、出力と効率などの要求条件を最優先 に従い、機内複数要因デバイスそれぞれのパラメータ設定を自己制御させ、機内 デバイス一つ毎の負担を軽減し、効率よく働かせて延命効果を得るとともに、一 部デバイスが故障なリ劣化した危機時では、急遽、少しでも働ける代替デバイスを 働かせ窮場をしのぎ、その間の記録は修理サービスや新設計へ活かす。 また、製品自動調整組立機にもいろいろあるが、例えば多軸調芯のある光学 レンズとレンズ枠の光学球軸調芯接着固定組立では、調整完了実績の平均空間 座標からスタートして実績調整時間が平均して一番短かった方向へ移動スタート を切る、それまでの経験則を利用した方法があるが、レンズとレンズ枠それぞれ 一個ごとの寸法や形状も違うので、迷走も多ぐ折角の自動化のメリットも乏しく なるケースも少なくもない。 そこで、ランダムトレーサビリティ層別平均対照分析 方法を使い、各軸座標の移動平均が自動機の軸可動範囲の中心になるように 各軸のランダム組み合わせな測定空間座標点と、その空間点を結ぶ最短の巡回 ルートを予め決めておいて、レンズとレンズ枠の一組み毎にその空間点ごとに光 学特性の影響を計り、それらの各軸座標との回帰評価に従い調整範囲を絞る方 法で確実に迷走を防止し、急がば回れで能率的な自動調整作業を行なう。 Industrial Applicability At present, it is natural to use a computer to control each related device of multiple output characteristics of an instrument, but this random traceability stratified average control analysis method is added. In addition, a self-free setting type control of the setting parameters of the element device in the equipment in the requirement condition priority type is constructed. For all devices such as satellites, aircraft, and LCD TVs, output characteristics data such as all outputs, speed, and brightness, input quantities such as fuel and power, and internal device parameter settings added at the time The environmental analysis data such as the ambient temperature, brightness, etc. are placed on a single table in the computer and this comparison analysis method is used. Change the parameter settings of all the constituent devices at the same time in random and full range, and try self-test to measure the influence on the multiple output characteristics of the device at the same time, or select and calculate the data of the same random configuration from the accumulation The output characteristics at the point in time, each parameter setting, and the correlation and regression evaluation are performed. Requirements such as output and efficiency are given top priority within the limits of the resulting capacity In accordance with the above, self-control of the parameter settings of each in-flight multi-factor device reduces the burden on each in-flight device and works efficiently to obtain a life-prolonging effect. Use a substitute device that can work even a little, surpass the ground, and use the records during that time for repair services and new designs. There are also various automatic adjustment assembly machines. For example, in the case of an optical lens with a multi-axis alignment and an optical ball axis alignment and fixing assembly of the lens frame, the actual adjustment time starts from the average space coordinates of the adjustment completion results. There is a method that uses the rule of thumb until then to start moving in the direction that was the shortest on average, but because the size and shape of each lens and lens frame are different, automation of the folding angle with many strays There are not a few cases where the merit of this becomes poor. Therefore, using the random traceability layer average contrast analysis method, the measurement space coordinate point of each axis randomly combined so that the moving average of each axis coordinate becomes the center of the axis movable range of the automatic machine, and the shortest connecting the space point The route is determined in advance, the effect of optical characteristics is measured for each spatial point for each pair of lens and lens frame, and the adjustment range is narrowed down according to the regression evaluation of each axis coordinate. In order to prevent strays, perform efficient automatic adjustment work quickly and quickly.

Claims

請求の範囲 The scope of the claims
1. 製品や運転する機器の構成要素である要素のトレーサビリティ違いがランダム 均等に混じる生産や運転記録を作為的に採取し、その集団記録を、一要素のト レーサビリティの識別をキーワードにして層别グループ分けし、分析対象特性と その一要素の要素特性の各グループ平均を出し、その平均間の相関及び回帰 評価を行なうランダムトレーサビリティ層別平均対照分析方法で、原因分析を行 なうため、 1. The production and operation records in which the traceability differences of the components that are components of the product and the equipment to be operated are randomly and evenly collected are collected, and the group records are layered using the identification of the traceability of one element as a keyword. In order to perform cause analysis by means of a random traceability stratified average control analysis method in which each group average of the analysis target characteristic and the element characteristic of one element is calculated, and correlation and regression evaluation between the averages are performed.
対象の生産また運転のトレーサビリティ記録、 それらを構成した要素のトレー サビリティ記録、 分析対象特性の実測記録、 そして、要素トレーサビリティにリ ンクした要素特性の実測記録の、 4種類の記録を整理保管する、データベース 機能部、  Organize and store 4 types of records: traceability records of target production or operation, traceability records of the elements that compose them, measured records of analysis target characteristics, and measured records of element characteristics linked to element traceability. Database function part,
データベースの記録をトレーサビリティ識別でソートして層別した記録を一時保 管するための、 2次データベース機能部、  Secondary database function unit for temporarily storing records stratified by sorting database records by traceability identification,
データベースと、任意にソートした記録の 2次データベース、双方の全特性の 統計値の特異比較をするための、統計比較表機能部、 Database and, recording the secondary database sorted optionally for the specificity comparison of statistics for all characteristics of both statistical comparison table function unit,
統計比較表機能部と伴に原因や要因の検証をするため、データベースと特定 した原因候補要素のトレ一サビリティでデータべースからソートした記録を保管し た 2次データベースの、双方の分析対象問題特性の度数分布を比較モニターす る、ヒストグラム機能部、  Analyze both the database and the secondary database that stores records sorted from the database with traceability of the identified cause elements in order to verify the causes and factors together with the statistical comparison table function part Histogram function section for comparative monitoring of frequency distribution of problem characteristics,
生産物や事象の評価や機器運転出力の特性推移の管理をするための X— R 管理図の推移横軸を時系列の年月日時と限らず確認したいトレーサビリティ項目 に置き換えられるようにし、トレーサビリティ違いに依る管理特性の変動推移をモ 二ター観察できるようにし、 そして 2次データベース機能部を働かせ要素トレ一 サビリティで層別グループ化した管理特性のグループ平均のグループ間変動を 確認し、全要素トレーサビリティによって、その管理特性の変動推移を自動参照 巡回し、最も管理特性が変動をきたすトレーサビリティの要素を特定し、 また、 従来の一管理特性の平均推移だけでなく、更に、一軸追加し要素特性の平均 推移とを伴に同一グラフ上へ表し、双方の相乗関係をモニター観察できるように し、加えて、その双方特性平均間の相関確認をする機能を付加しグラフ下方へ 相関指数 (係数)を表し、そして、問題とする管理特性が最も変動する要素のトレ 一サビリティでソート層別させた 2次データベース内の同要素の全要素特性項目 を自動参照巡回し、その問題特性と同要素の各要素特性との相関を明らかにし、 その中から、最大相関を示す要素特性である原因候補を特定して、その相関指 数 (係数)と伴にモニター表示とメッセージダイヤグラムそして音声で報告する、 Transition of the X-R control chart for managing product and event evaluation and equipment operation output characteristic transitions The horizontal axis can be replaced with the traceability items that you want to check without being limited to time, year, month, and date. Monitoring changes in the management characteristics depending on the level, and using the secondary database function section to check the group-wide fluctuations of the management characteristics grouped by element traceability to confirm all element traceability. Automatically traces the changes in the management characteristics, identifies the traceability elements that cause the most fluctuations in the management characteristics, and adds not only the average transition of the conventional management characteristics but also an additional axis. It is shown on the same graph along with the average trend so that the synergistic relationship between the two can be monitored and monitored. A function for confirming the correlation between the averages is added, and the correlation index (coefficient) is displayed at the bottom of the graph, and the same in the secondary database is sorted by the traceability of the element whose management characteristics are most fluctuating. Automatic reference patrol of all element characteristic items of the element, clarify the correlation between the problem characteristic and each element characteristic of the same element, identify the cause candidate that is the element characteristic showing the maximum correlation, and correlate the correlation Report with monitor display, message diagram and voice with index (coefficient),
X一 D管理図機能部、 X 1 D control chart function part,
そして原因や要因の要素特性の許容値やオフセット量をユーザーが計算する ための、 X— R管理図機能部で相関確認した特性間の回师評価を行なう、散布図 機能部  Scatter chart function section that performs recovery evaluation between the characteristics confirmed in the X-R control chart function section for the user to calculate the allowable value and offset amount of the cause and factor element characteristics
それら六つの機能部を設け、その処理結果をモニターディスプレイしながら、 上記に説明した、バラツキや変動問題の分析対象特性へ、最大に影響する最大 に相関のある要素特性で主要因でもある原因を自動分析する、  These six functional units are provided, and the processing results are displayed on the monitor, and the factors that are the most correlated element characteristics that affect the maximum to the analysis target characteristics of the variation and fluctuation problems described above are the main causes. Automatic analysis,
ランダムトレーサビリティ層別平均対照原因分析プログラム  Random Traceability Stratified Average Control Cause Analysis Program
2. 製品の品質や機器運転出力の評価の特性推移の管理をするための X— R管理 図の確認推移の横軸項目を時系列の年月日時と限らず確認したし、トレーサビリ ティ項目に置き換えられるようにし、要素トレーサビリティ違いに依る管理特性の ^ 変動推移をモニター観察できるようにし、 2. X—R control for managing product quality and device operation output evaluation characteristic transitions The horizontal axis of the confirmation transitions in the charts is not limited to the chronological year, month, day, date, and traceability. To monitor the changes in management characteristics due to differences in element traceability,
また、従来の一管理特性の平均推移だけでなぐ更に一軸追加し要素特性の 平均推移とを伴に同一グラフ上へ表し、双方の相乗関係をモニター観察できるよ うにし、  In addition, a single axis is added in addition to the average transition of one conventional management characteristic, and it is displayed on the same graph together with the average transition of element characteristics so that the synergistic relationship between the two can be monitored.
加えて、その双方特性平均間の相関確認をする機能を付加しグラフ下方へ相 関指数 (係数)を表わし、  In addition, a function to confirm the correlation between the averages of both characteristics is added, and the correlation index (coefficient) is displayed below the graph
要因分析を容易にした、ランダムトレーサビリティ層别平均対照原因分析プロ グラムの構成部分である、 X— R管理図機能部プログラム  X-R control chart function program that is a component of the random traceability layered average control cause analysis program that facilitates factor analysis
3. 評価環境や要素特性の偏った/ ラツキや相互作用による影響で、分析対象 3. Evaluation target and biased / impact of element characteristics
特性への一要素特性の統計的な影響評価を妨げないように、各要素のトレーサ ピリティとそれぞれの要素特性を記録し、その要素トレーサビリティ違いがランダ 厶均等に混じる生産や運転記録を作為的に採取し、  Record the traceability of each element and each element characteristic so that the statistical impact assessment of one element characteristic on the characteristic is not hindered, and create a production and operation record where the differences in element traceability are mixed evenly. Collected,
その記録を、一要素のトレーサビリティの識別を目(キーワード)に層別グルー プ分けし、分析対象特性のグループごと平均を出し、  The records are divided into stratified groups with the identification of traceability of one element as an eye (keyword), and an average is calculated for each group of characteristics to be analyzed.
グループ目に相当しないグループ内の要素トレーサビリティはそれぞれランダム 均等なことから、常に各グループ内の其の要素の要素特性の平均は有り得る変 動範囲の中央で同一なため、分析対象特性の各グループ平均へ其の要素特性 が与える平均的影響も同一であり、  Since element traceability within a group that does not correspond to a group is random and uniform, the average of the element characteristics of each element within each group is always the same in the middle of the possible range of variation. The average effect of the element characteristics is the same,
分析対象特性の各グループ平均が受ける影響の違いは、グループ目の要素の 要素特性のグループ間のグループ平均の差のみとなリ、  The difference in the influence of each group average of the characteristics to be analyzed is only the difference of the group average between the group of element characteristics of the element of the group,
その結果、一要素特性ごとの分析対象特性への影響対照 (コントラスト)を明瞭 にすることができるので、その分析対象特性と要素特性のグループ平均値を使い、 従来の無作為情報を単に層别統計する方法では不可能であった精度域の分析 対象特性と要素特性間の相関そして回帰の統計評価を可能とした、ランダムトレ 一サビリティ層別平均対照原因分析プログラムの構成要素である、  As a result, it is possible to clarify the influence contrast (contrast) on the analysis target characteristics for each element characteristic, and simply use the group average value of the analysis target characteristics and element characteristics to categorize conventional random information. Analysis of accuracy range that was not possible with statistical methods.This is a component of the mean-contrast cause analysis program by random traceability stratification that enables statistical evaluation of correlation and regression between target characteristics and element characteristics.
ランダムトレーサビリティ層別平均対照分析方法  Random Traceability Stratified Average Control Analysis Method
PCT/JP2005/018990 2005-06-10 2005-10-11 Random traceability layer-based average contrastive analysis method and x-r control chart function unit program and random traceability layer-based average contrastive cause analysis program WO2006132000A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2005-199396 2005-06-10
JP2005199396A JP4172042B2 (en) 2005-06-10 2005-06-10 Random traceability stratified mean contrast cause analysis system and program

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2006132000A1 true WO2006132000A1 (en) 2006-12-14

Family

ID=37498211

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/JP2005/018990 WO2006132000A1 (en) 2005-06-10 2005-10-11 Random traceability layer-based average contrastive analysis method and x-r control chart function unit program and random traceability layer-based average contrastive cause analysis program

Country Status (2)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4172042B2 (en)
WO (1) WO2006132000A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN116822998A (en) * 2023-08-30 2023-09-29 山东太祥阀门有限公司 All-welded ball valve production data analysis method based on big data

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP7000905B2 (en) * 2018-02-16 2022-01-19 カシオ計算機株式会社 Information processing equipment, personnel analysis support methods and programs

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH11354396A (en) * 1998-06-05 1999-12-24 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Method and device for controlling semiconductor process
JP2000222033A (en) * 1999-01-28 2000-08-11 Hitachi Ltd System and method for specifying abnormality cause

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH11354396A (en) * 1998-06-05 1999-12-24 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Method and device for controlling semiconductor process
JP2000222033A (en) * 1999-01-28 2000-08-11 Hitachi Ltd System and method for specifying abnormality cause

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN116822998A (en) * 2023-08-30 2023-09-29 山东太祥阀门有限公司 All-welded ball valve production data analysis method based on big data
CN116822998B (en) * 2023-08-30 2023-11-14 山东太祥阀门有限公司 All-welded ball valve production data analysis method based on big data

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP4172042B2 (en) 2008-10-29
JP2006344193A (en) 2006-12-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Glock et al. Decision support models for production ramp-up: a systematic literature review
Kibira et al. Methods and tools for performance assurance of smart manufacturing systems
Cheng et al. Traceability in manufacturing systems
Giachetti et al. Analysis of the structural measures of flexibility and agility using a measurement theoretical framework
US9069352B2 (en) Automated fault analysis and response system
Gothwal et al. Analyzing the factors affecting the flexibility in FMS using weighted interpretive structural modeling (WISM) approach
Koh et al. Translating knowledge of supply chain uncertainty into business strategy and actions
Ungermann et al. Data analytics for manufacturing systems–a data-driven approach for process optimization
Upton et al. Extending Ecological Interface Design principles: A manufacturing case study
Ayağ A hybrid approach to machine-tool selection through AHP and simulation
Hwang The practices of integrating manufacturing execution system and six sigma methodology
Kenett et al. Industrial statistics: A computer-based approach with Python
Tarhan et al. Investigating the effect of variations in the test development process: a case from a safety-critical system
WO2006132000A1 (en) Random traceability layer-based average contrastive analysis method and x-r control chart function unit program and random traceability layer-based average contrastive cause analysis program
CN115689126A (en) Data processing method, device, equipment and medium
Staron et al. Milestone-Oriented Usage of Key Performance Indicators–An Industrial Case Study
JP2007323623A (en) Random traceability layer-based average contrast cause analysis program
Daniels et al. Quality glossary
JP2005301566A (en) Process management device and method
Rath & Strong Rath & Strong's Six Sigma Pocket Guide
Martins Maintenance management of a production line-a case study in a furniture industry
Kralikova et al. Framework for applying six sigma methods within environmental management
Nakhaeinejad Design of single-sampling inspection-plan approach by mathematical programming and linear assignment method
Edgar et al. NSF Workshop on Research needs in Advanced Sensors, Controls, Platforms, and Modeling (ASCPM) for Smart Manufacturing
Telukdarie MES to ERP integration: Rapid deployment toolset

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Country of ref document: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 05793264

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1