WO2005109270A1 - 知的財産管理支援プログラム - Google Patents
知的財産管理支援プログラム Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2005109270A1 WO2005109270A1 PCT/JP2005/008698 JP2005008698W WO2005109270A1 WO 2005109270 A1 WO2005109270 A1 WO 2005109270A1 JP 2005008698 W JP2005008698 W JP 2005008698W WO 2005109270 A1 WO2005109270 A1 WO 2005109270A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- intellectual property
- future
- cost
- classification
- condition
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/10—Office automation; Time management
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
Definitions
- the present invention relates to an intellectual property management support program and an intellectual property management support program for managing intellectual property such as inventions, devices, designs, trademarks, and circuit arrangements of integrated circuits, which are subject to intellectual property rights.
- the present invention relates to a recording medium on which is recorded. Background art
- the present invention has been made in view of such circumstances, and uses a computer to evaluate and judge each intellectual property possessed by the computer, including not only past performance but also future expectations.
- a computer uses a computer to evaluate and judge each intellectual property possessed by the computer, including not only past performance but also future expectations.
- An intellectual property management support program capable of contributing to the effective use of intellectual property and supporting a strategy for intellectual property and a recording medium recording the intellectual property management support program It is intended to provide. Disclosure of the invention
- the intellectual property management support program of the present invention is designed to provide the past income and expenses of the intellectual property to be managed, the expected future income and expenses, and
- the computer can be used for past, future, and past A means for reading out the income and the cost in at least one of the lifetimes in the future, obtaining comparison results comparing the income and the cost, inquiring at least the comparison result, and taking into account the comparison result,
- Classification means for classifying the intellectual property into one of a plurality of groups indicating the final treatment of the intellectual property, indicating the intellectual property by the final treatment of the intellectual property
- Output means for outputting a classification result of classification to any of a plurality Dar-loop this function as, And features.
- the intellectual property management support program of the present invention it is possible to evaluate and classify any intellectual property in consideration of profits and costs of the intellectual property in at least one of past, future, and lifetime. It becomes. By using this result as a guideline for the final treatment of the intellectual property, it is possible to facilitate the organization of the intellectual property and facilitate the effective use of the intellectual property.
- the intellectual property management support program of the present invention provides an intellectual property management support program which stores intellectual property data on intellectual property to be managed as data that can be used in the intellectual property management support program.
- the computer as the classification means is queried for the intellectual property data, and considering the intellectual property data together with the result of the comparison between the profit and the cost, the intellectual property is classified into a plurality of groups indicating the final treatment. It is characterized by being classified into any one of the following.
- the intellectual property management support program of the present invention it is possible to perform more appropriate evaluation and classification of an arbitrary intellectual property in consideration of further intellectual property data. By using this result as a guideline for the final treatment of the intellectual property, it is possible to facilitate the organization of intellectual property and facilitate the effective use of intellectual property.
- the intellectual property management support program of the present invention causes the computer as the classification means to determine whether or not a predetermined condition is satisfied, and as a result, indicates the type of the final treatment. It is characterized by being classified into one of a plurality of groups.
- an intellectual property that has already contributed to profits an intellectual property that is likely to contribute to profits, or profitability is poor (or absent) in its own business. It is possible to set the conditions that can be classified into the power that is the intellectual property that is expected to be used, or the other four categories (Daruup).
- Condition 1 Intellectual property is used in the company's products, and past and future revenues exceed costs.
- Condition 2 Your intellectual property is used in your product, and future revenue exceeds costs, And the profit for the lifetime exceeds the cost.
- Condition 3 Intellectual property is used to defend the company's products, and past and future revenues exceed costs.
- Condition 4 The intellectual property is used to defend the company's products, the future revenue exceeds the cost, and the lifetime revenue exceeds the cost.
- Condition 5 The intellectual property is used in the product by another company, and the past and future virtual royalty revenue exceeds the cost.
- Condition 6 The intellectual property is used in the product by another company, the future virtual royalty revenue exceeds the cost, and the lifetime virtual royalty revenue exceeds the cost.
- Condition 7 The license is granted to another company, and the past and future royalties exceed the costs.
- Condition 8 A license is granted to another company for implementation, and future royalty income exceeds expenses, and lifetime royalty income exceeds expenses.
- Condition 9 Funds are raised, and the amount of past and future financing exceeds costs.
- Condition 10 Funds are raised, and the amount of future funding exceeds the cost, and the amount of funding for the lifetime exceeds the cost.
- the intellectual property management support program of the present invention if any of the following conditions 11 to 14 is satisfied, the intellectual property management support program is assigned to one of a plurality of groups indicating different types of the final treatment. It is characterized by being classified.
- Condition 11 In the near future, intellectual property will be used for the company's products, and future profits will exceed costs, and lifetime profits will exceed costs.
- Condition 12 In the near future, intellectual property will be used to defend its products, future revenues will exceed costs, and lifetime revenues will exceed costs.
- Condition 13 In the future, intellectual property is going to be used for the company's products, and future revenue exceeds cost, and lifetime revenue exceeds cost.
- Condition 14 In the future, intellectual property will be used to defend its products, future revenues will exceed costs, and lifetime revenues will exceed costs.
- the intellectual property management support program of the present invention when any of the following conditions 15 to 19 is satisfied, the intellectual property management support program is classified into one of a plurality of groups indicating different types of the final treatment. It is characterized by making it.
- Condition 15 Profit for the future is expected, but the profit does not exceed the cost.
- Condition 16 Lifetime profit is expected, but the profit does not exceed the cost.
- Condition 17 Future earnings are not expected, but there are points to be evaluated in the technical evaluation data
- the intellectual property management program of the present invention when the following condition 18 is satisfied, the intellectual property management program is classified into one of a plurality of groups indicating different types of the final treatment. .
- Condition 18 Future earnings are not expected and there is no point to be evaluated in the technical evaluation data.
- the final treatment of intellectual property for each intellectual property is considered in consideration of intellectual property income and cost and intellectual property data.
- the classification work can be executed accurately while improving the work efficiency.
- Classification condition 1 Past revenue of the intellectual property exceeds cost, and future revenue also exceeds cost.
- Classification condition 2 The intellectual property has a profit in the past but is lower than the cost. However, future revenues outweigh costs, and lifetime revenues outweigh costs. Classification condition 3: The past profit of the intellectual property is 0. The future profit exceeds the cost, and the lifetime profit also exceeds the cost.
- Classification condition 4 Future revenue of the intellectual property is lower than cost.
- Classification condition 5 Lifetime profit of the intellectual property falls below cost.
- the intellectual property management support program of the present invention when the intellectual property to be classified satisfies any of the classification conditions 1 to 3, the intellectual property data on the intellectual property is used for the intellectual property. An evaluation item that indicates the nature of the property is extracted, and the relationship between income and cost in the evaluation item that indicates the nature is
- Classification condition 1 Past revenue of the intellectual property exceeds cost, and future revenue also exceeds cost.
- Classification condition 2 The intellectual property has a profit in the past but is lower than the cost. However, future revenues outweigh costs, and lifetime revenues outweigh costs. Classification condition 3: The past profit of the intellectual property is 0. The future profit exceeds the cost, and the lifetime profit also exceeds the cost.
- the intellectual property management support program of the present invention when the relationship between the total income and the total cost of the intellectual property to be classified does not satisfy any of the classification conditions 1 to 5, Then, referring to the evaluation items of the intellectual property data on the intellectual property to be classified, determining whether or not there is a point to be evaluated in the classification process, and assigning each group indicating the final treatment It is characterized by performing a classification process.
- the technical evaluation data of the intellectual property of other intellectual property is If there are points to be evaluated in the evaluation items, they can be classified into the group of fluid utilization, and if there are no points to be evaluated, they can be classified into the group of recommended abandonment.
- the data relating to the profit of the intellectual property is either the tangible profit or the potential profit, and the computer as the comparison means and the classification means performs each processing for the tangible profit and Z or the potential profit. And the output means can output one classification result.
- the data relating to the profit of the intellectual property is two of the actual profit and the potential profit
- the computer as the comparing means and the classification means stores at least one of the real profit and the potential profit. Then, each process is executed, and the computer as the output means can output two classification results.
- the above-mentioned benefits are known in consideration of not only the three aspects of the past, the future, and the life, but also the actual and latent aspects.
- a final classification of the final property can be performed.
- the intellectual property management support program of the present invention converts the intellectual property data including the product identification data of the product to which the intellectual property relates to the intellectual property management support program.
- a computer is searched for, based on the product identification data, a search means for detecting an intellectual property related to the product, and a profit and a profit of the searched intellectual property, respectively.
- the total profit and the total cost are obtained by summing them, and the total profit is divided by the total cost to calculate investment efficiency and function as output means for outputting the investment efficiency.
- the investment efficiency of intellectual property related to the product can be obtained simply and reliably. This result can be effectively used as a material for intellectual property management strategies.
- the intellectual property management support program of the present invention provides at least the product identification data of the product to which the intellectual property is related, the sales of the product, and the intellectual property to be managed.
- the combi- ator detects all intellectual property related to the product based on the identification data. Search means, and for each intellectual property found, sum up the technical evaluation points of all intellectual property found Calculating the total technical evaluation points, dividing the total technical evaluation points by the sales of the product to calculate a product defense ratio, and functioning as output means for outputting the product defense ratio.
- the product defense rate of the intellectual property related to the product can be easily and reliably obtained. This result can be effectively used as a material for management strategies of intellectual property.
- a balance sheet is created based on the investment efficiency and the product defense rate of the intellectual property obtained as described above, it can be used as a visual intellectual property strategy material.
- the recording medium storing the intellectual property management support program of the present invention is characterized in that the above-mentioned intellectual property management support program is recorded in a computer-readable manner.
- the above-described intellectual property management support program of the present invention is incorporated into a general computer having at least a processing unit, a storage unit, an operation unit, a display unit, and an output unit, and is operated. Can be.
- the result of classifying intellectual property by final treatment can be shown, and by using this result, intellectual property can be easily arranged.
- intellectual property strategy investment efficiency and product defense ratio can be obtained, and by using these results, the intellectual property strategy, including promotion and suspension of R & D, can be facilitated.
- the present invention can contribute to smooth effective use of intellectual property.
- FIG. 1 is a system configuration diagram of a computer incorporating an intellectual property management support program according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- the computer includes a processing unit 1, a storage unit 2, an operation unit 3, a display unit 4, and an input / output interface 5, and these units 1 to 5 are connected by a node. I have.
- the processing unit 1 includes an intellectual property evaluation management unit 10 that performs a process for classifying intellectual property cases by final treatment for each case.
- the storage unit 2 includes an intellectual property database unit 20, an expense database unit 21, a profit database unit 22, and a problem patent database 23 that store various data used for evaluation and management of intellectual property.
- the operation unit 3 includes an input device such as a keyboard and a mouse for the operator to input data.
- the display unit 4 is a display device (CRT (CRT)
- the input / output interface 5 is connected to an external device such as a printing device or a reading / writing device for a recording medium (such as a flexible disk) to input / output data. Further, the input / output interface 5 may be provided with a communication function and connected to an external computer via a communication line to transmit and receive data.
- an external device such as a printing device or a reading / writing device for a recording medium (such as a flexible disk) to input / output data.
- the input / output interface 5 may be provided with a communication function and connected to an external computer via a communication line to transmit and receive data.
- the processing unit 1 shown in FIG. 1 may be realized by dedicated hardware, and the processing unit 1 is configured by a memory and a CPU (central processing unit).
- the function may be realized by loading a program for realizing the function into a memory and executing the program.
- the storage unit 2 includes a non-volatile memory such as a hard disk device, a magneto-optical disk device, a flash memory, a recording medium such as a CD-ROM, which can only be read, and a volatile memory such as a DRAM (DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY). Or a combination of these memories.
- the storage unit 2 is built in the computer body of the computer, but is located in another device (database server) not shown, and the computer body accesses these storage units through communication. You may.
- FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing an arrangement configuration of the profit database unit 22 (each database constituting the same), the intellectual property database unit 20 and the problem patent database 23.
- the intellectual property database unit 20 will be described. The following describes an example in which the intellectual property to be managed is an invention.
- the intellectual property database unit 20 accumulates various intellectual property data on intellectual property to be managed. For example, a management number is associated with each intellectual property, and applied product data, R & D theme information, technology evaluation data, asset data, rights information stage information, and intellectual property management information are stored. .
- the intellectual property management number is information for specifying a case to be managed. For example, an invention before application is assigned a management number unique to the manager. For the invention (patent application) after the application, the application number can be used as the control number. This control number is used when registering the management of intellectual property. After being given an appropriate one, it is input and stored in the intellectual property database unit 20.
- the applied product data is product identification data for specifying a product to which the intellectual property is applied, and its applicable period information.
- the product identification data includes, for example, a product name, a product code, a product group code, and product sales.
- Applicable period information is information that specifies the effective period (product life period) in which the product generates revenue. This product life is the period in which intellectual property can be applied and effective. Note that intellectual property is applied to a product when the intellectual property is actually applied to the product and when the intellectual property is used to attack the product by another person (such as entry of another company into a similar product). Both used to defend. This applied product information is appropriately input and stored in the intellectual property database unit 20.
- the research and development theme information is information for specifying the research and development theme for which intellectual property was created. For example, the theme name, R & D code, etc. This R & D theme information is entered at the time of intellectual property management registration and entered into the intellectual property database section 20.
- the technical evaluation data is evaluation data obtained by evaluating intellectual property according to predetermined evaluation items. Details of the evaluation items will be described later. After this technical evaluation data is created by the evaluator, it is input by an operator (including the case where the evaluator is the same person) and stored in the intellectual property database unit 20.
- the asset data is evaluation data including the cost required for acquiring and maintaining the intellectual property, and the profit obtained from the intellectual property.
- the profits and expenses of the past and future (for example, up to five years later) and the past life of the intellectual property are stored. Further, as the above-mentioned earnings, earnings in two patterns of actual earnings and potential earnings are stored for each of the past, future, and lifetime. Details of actual and potential revenues will be described later.
- the cost is calculated by a cost calculator 11 described later and stored in the intellectual property database 20.
- the profit is calculated by the profit calculation unit 13 described later and stored in the intellectual property database unit 20.
- the rights information stage information is information indicating which stage is currently in the process of obtaining rights of intellectual property.
- the stages of patenting the invention include the stage before filing the application (not yet filed), the stage where the application has been filed but before the publication of the application (application), the stage where the application has been published but before the registration of the right (publication), the right A registered pitch (registration) is defined.
- the information on the stage of the right authorization is input as appropriate by the operator according to the change in the status of the right authorization process, and is stored in the intellectual property database unit 20.
- the intellectual property management information is various kinds of information on intellectual property management, and includes the name of the intellectual property (name of the invention, etc.), the type of application (patent, utility model, design, trademark, etc.) and the duration of the right. Includes information such as application date and application number, publication date and publication number, registration date and registration number of the right, end date of the right, presence or absence of corresponding foreign application, and application country name.
- This intellectual property management information is appropriately input by the operator according to a change in the management status, and is stored in the intellectual property database unit 20.
- the technical evaluation rank is set as the evaluation items, such as technical aspects, feasibility, marketability, versatility, contract status, the presence or absence of financing, the possibility of rights, and the like.
- the evaluation items and the evaluation factors of each item can be changed as appropriate.
- the technical superiority of intellectual property is determined. Specifically, judgment is made from the viewpoint of the target part of intellectual property, comparison with alternative technologies and infringement discoverability, and if there is a point to be evaluated, check (check) the data. to manage. Since better technology contributes more to profits, the results of technical evaluations are important information in calculating profits from intellectual property.
- the intellectual property is currently used in its own products (hereinafter, the relevant intellectual property is referred to as “currently applied patent”), and the intellectual property is currently used for defense of its products.
- the relevant intellectual property is referred to as “present defense patent”
- the relevant intellectual property is referred to as Can be used for defense of own products in the near future (hereinafter referred to as “near-future defense patents”) or used in future (one year or more) for in-house products Planned (hereinafter the relevant intellectual property is referred to as a “future patent”) or will be used in the future to defend its products.
- the cost database unit 21 stores cost data (cost) used for calculating the cost required for acquiring and maintaining the intellectual property described above for the intellectual property classified by the classification operation unit 14 described later. Related data). For example, of the expenses spent on R & D themes that generated intellectual property (R & D expenses), the expenses of the intellectual property department and labor costs (personnel expenses), Costs for maintenance and management operations (hereinafter referred to as IP department costs), intellectual property rights acquisition costs (application costs, interim processing costs, etc.) and rights maintenance costs (patent fees, etc.) (hereinafter, rights acquisition costs) Cost), compensation money to be paid to the creator of intellectual property, and return costs such as rewards.
- cost data used for calculating the cost required for acquiring and maintaining the intellectual property described above for the intellectual property classified by the classification operation unit 14 described later.
- IP department costs Costs for maintenance and management operations
- intellectual property rights acquisition costs application costs, interim processing costs, etc.
- rights maintenance costs patent fees, etc.
- the profit database 22 stores profit data (profit-related data) used for calculating the profit of the intellectual property described above for the intellectual property classified by the classification operation unit 14 described later. accumulate.
- the profit-related data includes, for example, the cumulative total sales of products to which the intellectual property is applied up to now (including the actual profits obtained by intellectual property defending its own products. The same as above), the average profit rate of the accumulated sales, (these are stored in the product database 221), the past license revenue (accumulated in the license database 222), the past cross license revenue (Stored in cross-license database 223), past financing by intellectual property collateral (stored in intellectual property collateral database 224), and actual loyalty revenue by other parties (stored in attack patent database 225) Multiply).
- the estimated future sales of products to which intellectual property is applied (the amount of revenue that would be obtained by intellectual property defending its products) Includes the expected amount. The same applies to the following.), The average expected profit margin of the accumulated sales (these accumulate in the product database 221), and the estimated future license revenue (accumulates in the license database 222). , Expected future cross-license revenue (accumulated in cross-license database 223), expected future funding by IP collateral (accumulated in IP collateral database 224), and the like.
- the profit-related data is converted to the degree of contribution of intellectual property to profit. For example, if there are three influences on profits, namely, sales power, capital power and intellectual power, 1Z3 is used as the standard value. In addition, since a plurality of intellectual properties are usually applied to one product, the accumulated sales, average profit ratio, accumulated sales forecast, and average expected profit ratio described above are not applied to a specific product. The value from the property group is used.
- the problem patent database unit 23 stores the data used as the negative profit when calculating the profit of the intellectual property described above for the intellectual property classified by the classification operation unit 14 described later. accumulate. Specifically, it includes the actual amount of royalty payment due to the existence of the problem patent and the estimated amount of royalty payment due to the existence of the problem patent.
- FIG. 3 is a block diagram showing a main functional configuration of a computer having the above-described system configuration.
- FIG. 3 shows a block configuration in which the function of the intellectual property evaluation management unit 10 is expanded among the functions of the processing unit 1 realized by the hardware configuration shown in FIG.
- the cost calculation unit 11 extracts necessary information from the cost database unit 21, and calculates the cost required for acquiring and maintaining and managing the intellectual property to be managed.
- the cost calculation unit 11 receives cost-related data related to intellectual property classified by the classification calculation unit 14 described later, together with the intellectual property management number of the classification target. Then, the amount of the cost obtained here is stored in the asset data of the intellectual property database unit 20 as the cost data of the intellectual property to be classified.
- the point calculation unit 12 converts the technology evaluation data stored in the intellectual property database unit 20 into data. Evaluate the contribution of intellectual property based on The intellectual property management number to be classified is input to the point calculation unit 12. This evaluation result is output to the profit calculation unit 13 as intellectual property points. The evaluation results are stored as intellectual property points in the technical evaluation data of the intellectual property database unit 20.
- the profit calculation unit 13 calculates the profit of the intellectual property to be managed according to the evaluation result by the point calculation unit 12.
- the profit-related data relating to the intellectual property classified by the classification calculation unit 14 to be described later is input to the profit calculation unit 13 together with the intellectual property management number of the classification target.
- the classification operation unit 14 compares the cost and the profit described above, and, based on the comparison result, the profit contribution classes (group A or B) that contribute to the profit of the intellectual property holder, the intellectual property Classify intellectual property as either fluid utilization (Group C), which should be used for persons other than the owner, or disposal recommendation (Group D), which should be disposed of.
- the classification calculation unit 14 refers to the technical evaluation data of the intellectual property and considers its contents.
- the data (classification data) of the classification result by the classification operation unit 14 is stored in the intellectual property database unit 20.
- classification data display output on the screen of the display unit 4, print output by a printing device as an external device, output to an external computer by communication, and the like are possible.
- These output functions may be provided exclusively for the output of the classification data by the intellectual property evaluation management unit 10, or may be provided as standard in the processing unit 1!
- Groups A1 to A5, B1 to B4 are classified into the above-mentioned profit contribution classes.
- Groups A1 to A5 are intellectual property that has already contributed to profits.
- Group A1 Intellectual property that directly contributes to profits through its implementation.
- Group A2 Defense-related intellectual property that can prevent the entry of other companies and consequently contributes to profits.
- Group A3 Intellectual property that is not implemented in-house but is implemented by other companies and indirectly contributes to profits.
- Group A4 Intellectual property that directly contributes to profits through licensing to other companies.
- Group A5 Directly contribute to earnings through financing!
- the financing includes financing through investment and the like in addition to the collateral and the pledge.
- Groups B1 to B4 are intellectual properties that are expected to contribute to profits in the future.
- Group B1 Intellectual property that will be implemented in your business in the near future (for example, less than a year) and will contribute directly to profits.
- Group B2 Intellectual property that is expected to contribute to revenue in the near future (for example, less than one year) for the purpose of defending its business.
- Group B3 Intellectual property that may be implemented and contribute to earnings in the future (eg, between one year and less than five years).
- Group B4 Intellectual property that has the potential to contribute to profits for its own business in the future (eg, one year to less than five years) for defense purposes.
- the above-mentioned liquidity utilization (Group Cl, 2) is classified into intellectual properties that have low (or no) profitability in their own business, but are expected to be utilized by other companies.
- the intellectual property categorized in this type of fluid utilization is subject to distribution of intellectual property. However, those with a short remaining term, for example, those with less than two years, are excluded from distribution.
- Group C1 Intellectual property that has revenue but does not contribute to scarce revenue.
- Group C2 An intellectual property that has a focus on technical evaluations such as marketability, but does not generate profits.
- the above-mentioned disposal recommendations include intellectual property related to obsolete technology, utilization of other companies, and intellectual property that is not expected to contribute to profits from intellectual property. births are classified. Also includes intellectual property that is classified in Group C and that has a short remaining term of the right, for example, those with a remaining term of 2 years or less.
- Group D Intellectual property that does not require attention to technical evaluation such as marketability that can generate profit.
- FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing the flow of the cost calculation process performed by the cost calculation unit 11 shown in FIG.
- the cost calculation unit 11 refers to the intellectual property database unit 20 and The total number of intellectual property with the same R & D theme as the intellectual property of the control number is obtained (step S101).
- step S102 the research and development cost per intellectual property is calculated by dividing the research and development cost included in the input cost-related data by the total number obtained in step S101 (step S102).
- the cost calculation unit 11 obtains the total number of all intellectual properties to be managed, that is, the total number of intellectual properties registered in the intellectual property database unit 20 (step S103).
- the IP department cost (one year) included in the acquisition-related data is divided by the total number of cases obtained in step S103 to calculate the IP department cost for one year per intellectual property, Based on the IP department cost for one year, the total of the IP department cost is calculated by distinguishing between the past and future costs (step S104).
- the total cost of the intellectual property department first, based on the intellectual property management information in the intellectual property database section 20, the intellectual property to be classified Obtain the maintenance years. Then, the total number of past IP department costs is calculated by multiplying the past maintenance years by the calculated IP department costs for one year. Further, the total amount of future IP department costs is calculated by multiplying the future maintenance years by the calculated IP department costs for one year.
- the cost calculation unit 11 obtains the distinction between the past portion and the future portion from the rightization cost included in the acquisition-related data (step S 105).
- the cost calculation unit 11 calculates the cost separately for the past portion and the future portion (Step S106).
- the past cost is obtained by summing the research and development cost per intellectual property, the total cost of the past intellectual property department, and the past cost of rights.
- the future cost is obtained by adding the total of the future costs of the IP department and the future cost of entitlement. Further, the cost for the lifetime is obtained by adding the cost for the past and the cost for the future.
- the cost calculation unit 11 uses the obtained past cost, future cost, and lifetime cost as part of the asset data corresponding to the intellectual property management number of the classification target as an intellectual property database. It is stored in the section 20 (step S107).
- FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing a flow of an intellectual property evaluation process performed by the point calculation unit 12 shown in FIG.
- the point calculation unit 12 acquires the technology evaluation data of the intellectual property from the intellectual property database unit 20 (step S20).
- a technology evaluation point is calculated based on the technology evaluation rank, which is technology evaluation data included in the technology evaluation data (step S202).
- This technical evaluation point calculation method is, for example, when the technical evaluation rank is a five-level evaluation of A to E, A rank is 5 points, B rank is 4 points, C rank is 3 points, D rank Is 2 points,
- E rank is 1 point. In addition, instead of using ranks, it is better to assign points for each item of technical evaluation and calculate calories.
- step S203 the point calculation unit 12 obtains, from the intellectual property database unit 20, information on the stage of granting the intellectual property to be classified (step S203).
- Step S204 the technology evaluation points are weighted based on the rightization stage!.
- the weighting of the technology evaluation points is performed by multiplying the technology evaluation points by a predetermined weighting coefficient in accordance with the right-making stage and the presence / absence of implementation.
- weighting is performed at the stage of right authorization.
- An example of this would be 1/5 if the rights were not made public, 3/5 if it was already published, and 1 if it was registered.
- the technique evaluation point weighting method may be changeable for each technical field.
- step S205 the point calculation unit 12 performs weighting of the technical evaluation points in step S204 according to the length of the implementation period or the defense period (cover period) of the intellectual property to be classified.
- the modified technology evaluation points are further weighted (step S205). In this weighting, the past Z future is distinguished and weighted, and the past execution point and the future execution point are obtained.
- the coverage period is based on the applicable period information in the applicable product information on the intellectual property to be classified in the intellectual property database unit 20 and the duration of the right and the filing date in the intellectual property management information. Ask.
- the coverage period for the past shall be determined as the period of the applicable term that overlaps with the applicable term that has elapsed up to the present. Coverage period for the future The period is calculated as a certain period (for example, 5 years) of the term of the right that overlaps the applicable term that will newly elapse in the future.
- the execution point for the past is determined by setting the length of the past cover period in step S20.
- a future point is obtained by multiplying the length of the future cover period by the modified technology evaluation point after weighting in step S204.
- the unit of the length of the cover period is, for example, years.
- steps S201 to S205 described above are processes for calculating intellectual property points for individual intellectual property by distinguishing between past and future intellectual property points. By the processing up to this point, the past intellectual property points and the future intellectual property points of the individual intellectual property to be classified are calculated.
- the point calculation unit 12 refers to the intellectual property database unit and determines whether there is another intellectual property applicable to the same product as the intellectual property to be classified based on keys such as a product identification number. Is determined (step S206).
- steps S201 to S205 are performed on the relevant intellectual property, and the intellectual property points for each intellectual property are stored in the past. And the future minutes are calculated separately. This process is performed for all other intellectual property applicable to the same product (step S207).
- step S207 when the processing of step S207 is completed for all other intellectual properties applied to the same product (YES in step S207), the point calculation unit 12 sets the intellectual property group applied to the same product (classification target). The intellectual property points (including intellectual property) are summed to calculate the total intellectual property points (step S208). Next, the intellectual property points of the individual intellectual property to be classified are divided by the total intellectual property points in step S208 to calculate the contribution ratio of the individual intellectual property to be classified (step S209). The calculation of the contribution ratio is performed separately for the past portion and the future portion. The contribution ratio (past and future) of each intellectual property to be classified is output to the revenue calculation unit 13. [0109] Next, the operation of the profit calculation unit 13 will be described.
- the profit calculation unit 13 uses the contribution ratio of each intellectual property to be classified input from the point calculation unit 12 to calculate the profit of each intellectual property to be classified from the input profit-related data. calculate. This profit is calculated separately for the past and future.
- the term “expected income” refers to the income, which does not take into account the amount of the royalty income that has not yet been determined and the payment and amount of the royalty!
- Past revenue (cumulative sales of applicable product to date x average profit rate)
- Past revenue (cumulative sales of applicable products to date X average profit rate
- Future earnings (cumulative expected future sales of applicable products x average expected profit margin)
- Future revenue (cumulative sales of applicable products to date X average profit margin
- the profit calculating unit 13 calculates the profit for the lifetime by adding the profit for the past and the profit for the future.
- the profit calculation unit 13 uses the past profit, future profit, and lifetime profit obtained by the above equations as a part of the asset data corresponding to the intellectual property management number of the classification target. Stored in the Intellectual Property Database Department 20.
- the classification operation unit 14 will be described.
- the processing section of the computer functions as the classification calculation section 14 in particular.
- the classification operation unit 14 obtains the properties of the intellectual property to be classified from the intellectual property database unit 14, such as technology, feasibility, marketability, versatility, contract status, financing status, and the like. Whether or not evaluation items such as potential profits are checked, and the asset data include past costs, future costs, and lifetime costs calculated by the cost calculation unit 11 and the income calculation unit 13. Refer to the asset data that includes the past, future and lifetime returns calculated by.
- the classification operation unit 14 compares the income and the expense for the past, future, or lifetime of the acquired asset data (function as a comparison means). Classify the property as profitable, flowable, or recommended for disposal (function as a classification means) and output the result as a separate treatment for final treatment (function as an output means) .
- FIG. 7 is a flowchart showing a flow of the intellectual property evaluation classification process performed by the classification operation unit 14 shown in FIG.
- the “currently-executed patent”, “near-future-executed patent”, “futurely-executed patent”, “current defense patent”, “near-future patent” Pay particular attention to whether any of the following is checked: defense patents, future defense patents, offensive patents, license patents, and financing patents. And more about that revenue and cost Focuses on whether the following classification condition is satisfied.
- Classification condition 1 Past revenue of the intellectual property exceeds cost, and future revenue also exceeds cost.
- Classification condition 2 The intellectual property has a profit in the past but is lower than the cost. However, the future revenue exceeds the cost, and the lifetime revenue exceeds the cost. Classification condition 3: The past revenue of the intellectual property is 0, but the future revenue exceeds the cost and the lifetime Revenues outweigh costs.
- Classification condition 4 The future revenue of the intellectual property is lower than the cost.
- Classification condition 5 Lifetime profit of the intellectual property falls below cost.
- classification conditions constitute the following classification conditions, and are stored in the intellectual property database unit 20 in advance.
- the classification calculation unit 14 first determines whether the intellectual property manager determines the classification of the intellectual property to be classified based on the value of the above-mentioned actual revenue or potential revenue.
- the total of the income and expenses of the relevant intellectual property to be classified is obtained from the Intellectual Property Database Division 20, and the relationship between the total income and the total cost satisfies one of the classification conditions 1 to 3. It is determined whether or not it is (step S301).
- the relationship between the income and the cost in the single item of this property corresponds to the classification condition 3 (in the case of Yes), it corresponds to at least one of B1 to B4 of the classification data.
- the corresponding classification data is also selected (step S305).
- step S304 if the relationship between income and cost in a single item of the property of the intellectual property does not correspond to the classification condition 3 (in the case of No), the item is selected.
- One of the classification data A1 to A5 is output (step S311), and the processing ends.
- step S302 if the relationship between the income and the cost in the single item of the property of the intellectual property does not correspond to any of the classification conditions 1 and 2 (No), the information is notified. Refers to the Goods Database Department 14, and the property of the intellectual property is checked as one of "near-future patents,” “future-executed patents,” “near-future defense patents,” and “future defense patents.” Powerability Power-relationship between profit and cost in a single item of the checked property Power It is determined whether the classification condition 3 is satisfied (step S321).
- step S322 since it corresponds to one of B1 to B4 of the classification data, the corresponding classification data is selected (step S322).
- step S323 the selected classification data out of B1 to B4 of the classification data is output (step S323), and the processing is terminated.
- step S321 if the relationship between the income and the cost in the single item of the property of the intellectual property does not satisfy the classification condition 3 (No), the intellectual property database unit 14 And refer to the “currently-executed patent”, “currently-defended patent”, “nearly-futured patent”, “futurely-executed patent”, “nearly-future defense patent”, “futurely-defended patent”, “ Among the nine properties of "sense patent”, "attack patent”, and “financing patent”, the item of the property having the largest lifetime profit of the intellectual property is extracted (step S331). Then, one of the corresponding classification data of A1 to A5 and B1 to: B4 is selected (step S332).
- step S333 the classification data is output (step S333), and the process ends. Furthermore, in step S301, if the relationship between the total revenue and the total cost of the intellectual property does not satisfy any of the classification conditions 1 to 3 (No), the intellectual property is further It is determined whether the relationship between the total revenue and the total cost satisfies the classification condition 4 or 5 (step S341).
- step S341 when the relationship between the total revenue and the total cost of the intellectual property does not satisfy any of the classification conditions 4 and 5 (No), the intellectual property in the entirety of the intellectual property is The future profit is determined to be 0 (step S351). Next, it is determined whether or not there is a point to be evaluated in the evaluation items (for example, marketability, versatility, etc.) of other technical evaluation data of the intellectual property (step S352).
- step S353 when there is a point to be evaluated (in the case of Yes), C2 of the classification data is selected (step S353), the selected classification data is output (step S354), and the process is terminated. Let me do it.
- step S361 D of the classification data is selected (step S361), the selected classification data is output (step S362), and the process ends. .
- the classification operation unit 14 refers to the intellectual property data and the asset data of the intellectual property to be classified, and the intellectual property has already contributed to the profit by implementation or the like.
- Intellectual property is classified into Group A, which contributes to earnings.
- the classification calculation unit 14 directly contributes to the profit by implementing the in-house.
- Group A1 is classified as intellectual property.
- Condition 1 Intellectual property is used in the company's products, and past and future revenues exceed costs.
- Condition 2 The intellectual property is used in the company's products, the future revenue exceeds the cost, and the lifetime revenue exceeds the cost.
- Condition 3 Intellectual property is used to defend its products, and past and future revenues exceed expenses.
- Condition 4 Intellectual property is used to defend the company's products, and future revenue exceeds cost, and lifetime revenue exceeds cost.
- Condition 5 The intellectual property is used in the product by another company, and the past and future virtual reality revenue exceeds the cost.
- Condition 6 The intellectual property is used in the product by another company, the future virtual royalty revenue exceeds the cost, and the lifetime virtual royalty revenue exceeds the cost.
- condition 7 or condition 8 below the intellectual property is directly contributing to revenue by licensing to other companies.
- Condition 7 An execution license is granted to another company, and the past and future royalties revenues exceed the costs.
- Condition 8 A license is granted to another company for implementation, and future royalty income exceeds expenses, and lifetime royalty income exceeds expenses.
- Condition 9 Funding is being carried out, and the amount of past and future financing exceeds the cost.
- Condition 10 Financing is being carried out, and the amount of future financing exceeds the cost, and the amount of financing for a lifetime exceeds the cost.
- the classification operation unit 14 refers to the intellectual property data of the intellectual property to be classified, and Productivity Intellectual property that is expected to contribute to profits through implementation in the future is classified as profit contribution group B.
- the classification calculation unit 14 executes the intellectual property in its own business in the near future (for example, less than one year) and generates direct revenue. It will be classified as Group B1 as intellectual property that is expected to contribute.
- Condition 11 In the near future, intellectual property is expected to be used in its products, with future revenues exceeding costs and lifetime revenues exceeding costs.
- the intellectual property to be classified satisfies the following condition 12
- the intellectual property is expected to contribute to profits for the defense purpose of its business in the near future (for example, less than one year). It will be classified as Group B2.
- Condition 12 In the near future, intellectual property will be used to defend its products, with future revenues exceeding costs and lifetime revenues exceeding costs.
- the intellectual property to be classified satisfies the following condition 13, it may be implemented in its own business in the future (for example, one year or more and less than five years) and contribute to profits It will be classified as Group B3 as intellectual property.
- Condition 13 In the future, intellectual property is expected to be used in the company's products, and future revenues will exceed costs, and lifetime revenues will exceed costs.
- the intellectual property to be classified satisfies the following condition 14
- the intellectual property that is expected to contribute to profits in the future for example, one year to less than five years
- the intellectual property that is expected to contribute to profits in the future for example, one year to less than five years
- Condition 14 In the future, intellectual property will be used to defend its own products, and future revenues will exceed costs, and lifetime revenues will exceed costs.
- the classification calculation unit 14 refers to the technical evaluation data of the intellectual property data of the intellectual property to be classified, and searches for the past, future, or lifetime of the acquired asset data. Comparing the revenue and expenses respectively, the intellectual property to be classified meets the conditions 15 or 16 below. If applicable, it will be classified into the group of fluid utilization group C1.
- Condition 15 Future revenue is expected, but the revenue does not exceed cost.
- Condition 16 Lifetime profit is expected, but the profit does not exceed the cost.
- Condition 17 Future earnings are not expected, but there are points to be evaluated in the technology evaluation data (for example, marketability).
- Condition 18 Future earnings are not expected, and there are no points to be evaluated in the technology evaluation data (for example, marketability).
- the distinction between the group C2 of the fluid utilization class and the group D of the abandonment recommendation class is based on the technical evaluation data such as marketability of applicable products included in the technical evaluation data of the intellectual property. It will be done based on.
- the final intellectual property of an arbitrary intellectual property is considered in consideration of intellectual property income and cost and intellectual property data.
- the classification work for each treatment can be executed accurately while improving the work efficiency.
- the classification as the intellectual property group is performed in the same manner as the individual intellectual property classification described above, and based on the classification result of the intellectual property group, the intellectual property classification is performed. Correct the kind result.
- the costs and profits of a plurality of intellectual property groups, each of which is applied to the same product, are calculated separately for the past and future.
- the intellectual property group is classified according to the classification method described above.
- the intellectual property group is classified as a contribution to profits, the intellectual property included in the intellectual property group is classified into a flowable class or a waste Even if it is a recommended class, it is forcibly included in the revenue contributing class.
- the value as an intellectual property group is maintained by this correction processing.
- a warning to that effect may be issued. Specifically, if there is transfer security or pledge right setting data included in the technical evaluation data of the intellectual property, the transfer or abandonment of the intellectual property right will be restricted by law, so a warning A message or warning sound is output to notify the intellectual property manager. The occurrence of this warning can prevent legal mishandling such as transfer of rights or waiver of rights.
- the intellectual property strategy can be planned by using the above-mentioned intellectual property data power, intellectual property investment efficiency, and in-house product defense ratio, and using them as management indicators.
- Investment efficiency is an index to judge whether or not the company is making useless investment in intellectual property.
- its product defense ratio is the ratio of intellectual property to sales of products related to intellectual property. The ability to cover, specifically, an index to determine the strength against attacks from other companies.
- the intellectual property evaluation management unit 10 of the processing unit 1 of the computer is searched by the search unit that detects intellectual property related to the product based on the product identification data of the intellectual property data.
- the intellectual property search unit identifies a product related to the intellectual property from the intellectual property database unit 20, and based on the product identification number or the like of the product. Then, search whether there is another intellectual property that applies to the same product as the intellectual property to be classified. to decide.
- the investment efficiency calculation unit obtains the total profit and the total cost by respectively adding the profit and the profit of the searched intellectual property, and obtains the total profit and the total profit. Is divided by the total cost to calculate the investment efficiency.
- the output unit performs display output on the screen of the display unit 4, print output by a printing device as an external device, or output to an external computer by communication, on the obtained investment efficiency.
- the intellectual property evaluation management unit 10 of the processing unit 1 of the computer is provided with an intellectual property search unit that detects intellectual property related to the product based on the identification data.
- the defense rate calculation unit that calculates the defense rate of the product functions as an output unit that outputs the in-house product defense rate.
- the defense ratio calculation unit obtains a technology evaluation point for each searched intellectual property based on the respective technology evaluation ranks, adds together the searched technology evaluation points of all intellectual properties, and calculates The evaluation points are obtained, and the total technical evaluation points are divided by the sales of the product to calculate the in-house product defense ratio.
- the intellectual property search unit identifies a product related to the intellectual property from the intellectual property database unit 20, and identifies the product identification number of the product. Search for and determine whether there is any other intellectual property applicable to the same product as the intellectual property to be classified based on the issue number.
- the defense ratio calculation unit obtains a technology evaluation point based on the technology evaluation rank for each of the searched intellectual properties, and searches for it.
- Total technical evaluation points are obtained by adding the technical evaluation points of Divide the total technical evaluation points by the sales of the product to calculate the in-house product defense ratio.
- the output unit performs display output on the screen of the display unit 4, print output by a printing device as an external device, or output to an external computer by communication, based on the obtained investment efficiency.
- the in-house product defense ratio (technical evaluation point Z sales) thus obtained is an appropriate numerical value equal to or more than a certain value, it indicates that the business condition regarding intellectual property is good. In addition, if the value is lower than a certain value, it indicates that the value of intellectual property is low relative to sales, and there is concern that it is vulnerable to attacks from other companies. It can show management indicators such as striving to increase intellectual property resistant to attacks from the company. Further, for example, when there are a plurality of products, it is also possible to obtain the in-house product defense ratio for each product and convert the in-house product defense ratio to a deviation value to obtain the deviation value for each product. is there.
- the vertical axis represents the investment efficiency
- the horizontal axis represents the product defense ratio (deviation). If you create a balance sheet that takes the value, you can use it as a material for your intellectual property strategy that is easy to grasp the current situation and has excellent visual characteristics.
- computer may include hardware such as an OS and peripheral devices.
- the term “computer” also includes a homepage providing environment (or a display environment) if a WWW system is used.
- “computer-readable recording medium” refers to a writable non-volatile memory such as a flexible disk, a magneto-optical disk, a ROM, a flash memory, a portable medium such as a CD-ROM, or a computer system. Storage device such as a hard disk.
- a "computer-readable recording medium” is a volatile memory (inside a computer system which is a server client when a program is transmitted via a network such as the Internet or a communication line such as a telephone line). For example, it is assumed that a program that holds a program for a certain period of time, such as DRAM (DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY), is also included.
- DRAM DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY
- the program may be transmitted from a computer system storing the program in a storage device or the like to another computer system via a transmission medium or by a transmission wave in the transmission medium.
- the “transmission medium” for transmitting a program refers to a medium having a function of transmitting information, such as a network (communication network) such as the Internet or a communication line (communication line) such as a telephone line.
- the program may be for realizing a part of the functions described above. Further, the functions described above may be realized in combination with a program already recorded in the computer system, or a so-called difference file (difference program).
- the present invention provides an intellectual property management support program and an intellectual property management support program for managing intellectual property such as inventions, inventions, designs, trademarks, and circuit arrangements of integrated circuits that are subject to intellectual property rights. It is useful as a recording medium on which is recorded.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a hardware configuration of a computer main body according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 2 is a diagram showing a configuration example of an intellectual property database unit.
- FIG. 3 is a diagram showing an example of evaluation items for obtaining technical evaluation data and evaluation elements of each item.
- FIG. 4 is a block diagram showing a main functional configuration of an intellectual property accounting management device according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing a flow of a cost calculation process performed by a cost calculation unit shown in FIG. 4.
- FIG. 6 is a flowchart showing a flow of an intellectual property evaluation process performed by the point calculation unit shown in FIG. 4.
- FIG. 7 is a flowchart showing a flow of intellectual property classification processing performed by the classification calculation unit shown in FIG. 4.
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
- Finance (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2004-142202 | 2004-05-12 | ||
JP2004142202A JP2005326936A (ja) | 2004-05-12 | 2004-05-12 | 知的財産管理支援プログラム、並びに知的財産管理支援プログラムを記録した記録媒体 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2005109270A1 true WO2005109270A1 (ja) | 2005-11-17 |
Family
ID=35320402
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2005/008698 WO2005109270A1 (ja) | 2004-05-12 | 2005-05-12 | 知的財産管理支援プログラム |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
JP (1) | JP2005326936A (ja) |
WO (1) | WO2005109270A1 (ja) |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2002024528A (ja) * | 2000-07-07 | 2002-01-25 | Privee Zurich Securities Co Ltd | 特許権等の知的財産権を投資対象としたファンド情報処理装置および方法 |
JP2002169957A (ja) * | 2000-12-02 | 2002-06-14 | Yuichi Ishizaka | 不良債権土地処理のためのデータ処理システム及び装置 |
JP2002230231A (ja) * | 2000-12-01 | 2002-08-16 | Konica Corp | 所定の公共機関から付与される権利や認可に関する情報を出力する電子機器、システム、及び、プログラム |
-
2004
- 2004-05-12 JP JP2004142202A patent/JP2005326936A/ja not_active Withdrawn
-
2005
- 2005-05-12 WO PCT/JP2005/008698 patent/WO2005109270A1/ja active Application Filing
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2002024528A (ja) * | 2000-07-07 | 2002-01-25 | Privee Zurich Securities Co Ltd | 特許権等の知的財産権を投資対象としたファンド情報処理装置および方法 |
JP2002230231A (ja) * | 2000-12-01 | 2002-08-16 | Konica Corp | 所定の公共機関から付与される権利や認可に関する情報を出力する電子機器、システム、及び、プログラム |
JP2002169957A (ja) * | 2000-12-02 | 2002-06-14 | Yuichi Ishizaka | 不良債権土地処理のためのデータ処理システム及び装置 |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JP2005326936A (ja) | 2005-11-24 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US11509464B2 (en) | System and method using a fitness-gradient blockchain consensus and providing advanced distributed ledger capabilities via specialized data records | |
Kobren et al. | Paper matching with local fairness constraints | |
Fallah et al. | Competitive closed-loop supply chain network design under uncertainty | |
WO2020214880A1 (en) | Systems, methods, and storage media for configuring a data storage and retrieval system for managing data relating to tokenized assets | |
US7962511B2 (en) | Method and system for rating patents and other intangible assets | |
US11941714B2 (en) | Analysis of intellectual-property data in relation to products and services | |
US11887201B2 (en) | Analysis of intellectual-property data in relation to products and services | |
Watson et al. | Circular business models in the mobile phone industry | |
US20050021434A1 (en) | System and method for whole company securitization of intangible assets | |
US11803927B2 (en) | Analysis of intellectual-property data in relation to products and services | |
US11348195B2 (en) | Analysis of intellectual-property data in relation to products and services | |
Mohammadivojdan et al. | Procurement portfolio planning for a newsvendor with supplier delivery uncertainty | |
CA3145812A1 (en) | Analysis of intellectual-property data in relation to products and services | |
JP2023021403A (ja) | 収益予測管理装置、収益予測管理方法、および、収益予測管理プログラム | |
WO2005109270A1 (ja) | 知的財産管理支援プログラム | |
Bajgani et al. | Designing a reverse supply chain network with quality control for returned products: Strategies to mitigate free-riding effect and ensure compliance with technology licensing requirements | |
Pithadia et al. | Data Assets: Tokenization and Valuation | |
Scheider et al. | Exploring design elements of personal data markets | |
JP2005115831A (ja) | 知的財産評価管理装置、知的財産評価管理方法、知的財産評価管理プログラム | |
Lennon | Drafting technology patent license agreements | |
JP2002133087A (ja) | 知的所有権資産運用システム、知的所有権申請装置、知的所有権資産利用推進装置、権利維持判定装置、権利阻止判定装置、権利侵害対応装置、リスク対策装置、知的所有権資産運用方法及び記録媒体 | |
Dolderer et al. | Identification of Dimensions for the Description of Blockchain-based Token Systems | |
WO2023076117A1 (en) | Systems and methods for consensus in a blockchain network | |
US20150046344A1 (en) | Method of creating value from intangible assets | |
Li et al. | Distribute Service Components into Multi-level Architecture from Legacy Applications |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BW BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE EG ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS KE KG KM KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NA NG NI NO NZ OM PG PH PL PT RO RU SC SD SE SG SK SL SM SY TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VC VN YU ZA ZM ZW |
|
AL | Designated countries for regional patents |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): GM KE LS MW MZ NA SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
WWW | Wipo information: withdrawn in national office |
Country of ref document: DE |
|
122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |