WO2002025996A1 - Appareil de correction auditive muni d'un filtre adaptatif pouvant eliminer la reaction acoustique - Google Patents

Appareil de correction auditive muni d'un filtre adaptatif pouvant eliminer la reaction acoustique Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2002025996A1
WO2002025996A1 PCT/DK2001/000604 DK0100604W WO0225996A1 WO 2002025996 A1 WO2002025996 A1 WO 2002025996A1 DK 0100604 W DK0100604 W DK 0100604W WO 0225996 A1 WO0225996 A1 WO 0225996A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
hearing aid
filter
signal
electrical signal
signals
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/DK2001/000604
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Thomas Kaulberg
Original Assignee
Widex A/S
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=26073700&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=WO2002025996(A1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Priority claimed from EP00610097A external-priority patent/EP1191813A1/fr
Application filed by Widex A/S filed Critical Widex A/S
Priority to JP2002528238A priority Critical patent/JP3899023B2/ja
Priority to AU2001289592A priority patent/AU2001289592B2/en
Priority to AU8959201A priority patent/AU8959201A/xx
Priority to CA2417803A priority patent/CA2417803C/fr
Publication of WO2002025996A1 publication Critical patent/WO2002025996A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets, i.e. electro-acoustic or electro-mechanical hearing aids; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
    • H04R25/45—Prevention of acoustic reaction, i.e. acoustic oscillatory feedback
    • H04R25/453—Prevention of acoustic reaction, i.e. acoustic oscillatory feedback electronically
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R2430/00—Signal processing covered by H04R, not provided for in its groups
    • H04R2430/03—Synergistic effects of band splitting and sub-band processing
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets, i.e. electro-acoustic or electro-mechanical hearing aids; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
    • H04R25/35—Deaf-aid sets, i.e. electro-acoustic or electro-mechanical hearing aids; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception using translation techniques
    • H04R25/353—Frequency, e.g. frequency shift or compression
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets, i.e. electro-acoustic or electro-mechanical hearing aids; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
    • H04R25/50—Customised settings for obtaining desired overall acoustical characteristics
    • H04R25/505—Customised settings for obtaining desired overall acoustical characteristics using digital signal processing

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a hearing aid with an adaptive filter for suppression of acoustic feedback in the hearing aid.
  • Acoustic feedback occurs when the input transducer of a hearing aid receives and detects the acoustic output signal generated by the output transducer. Amplification of the detected signal may lead to generation of a stronger acoustic output signal and eventually the hearing aid may oscillate.
  • the adaptive filter estimates the transfer function from output to input of the hearing aid including the acoustic propagation path from the output transducer to the input transducer.
  • the input of the adaptive filter is connected to the output of the hearing aid and the output signal of the adaptive filter is subtracted from the input transducer signal to compensate for the 5 acoustic feedback.
  • a hearing aid of this type is disclosed in US 5,402,496.
  • the adaptive filter operates to remove correlation from the input signal, however, signals representing speech and music are signals with significant auto-correlation.
  • the adaptive filter cannot be allowed to adapt too quickly since removal of correlation from signals representing speech and music will distort the signals, and such distortion is of 0 course undesired. Therefore, the convergence rate of adaptive filters in known hearing aids is a compromise between a desired high convergence rate that is able to cope with sudden changes in the acoustic environment and a desired low convergence rate that ensures that signals representing speech and music remain undistorted.
  • the lack of speed of adaptation may still lead to generation of undesired acoustic signals due to 5 acoustic feedback.
  • Generation of undesired acoustic signals is most likely to occur at frequencies with a high feedback loop gain.
  • the loop gain is the attenuation in the acoustic feedback path multiplied by the gain of the hearing aid from input to output.
  • the acoustic environment of the hearing aid changes over time, and often changes rapidly over time, in such a way that propagation of sound from the output transducer of the hearing aid to its input transducer changes drastically.
  • changes may be caused by changes in position of the user in a room, e.g. from a free field position in the middle of the room to a position close to a wall that reflects sound.
  • Changes may also be generated if the user yawns or if the user puts the receiver of a telephone to the ear.
  • Such changes some of which may be almost instantaneous, are known to involve changes in attenuation of the feedback path of more than 20 dB.
  • a hearing aid including a measuring system for determining the characteristics of the acoustic feedback path.
  • a test signal is transmitted through the system in order to determine the characteristics of the feedback path.
  • the respective measuring systems are rather complicated and the duration of the determination is relatively long, and the normal function of the hearing aid is interrupted during the determination.
  • the determination is performed at certain occasions only, e.g. when the user switches the hearing aid on.
  • a relatively high safety margin for the gain is needed to cope with changes in the acoustic environment between determinations.
  • a hearing aid with an adaptive filter and a continuously operating measuring system is disclosed.
  • a pseudo random noise signal is injected into the output signal.
  • a monitoring system controls the gain of the hearing aid so that the loop-gain is kept below a constant value which may be frequency dependent.
  • the filter coefficients of the adaptive filter are monitored and their update rate is adjusted according to a statistical analysis which complicates the system. It is another disadvantage of the system that a noise generator is needed and that the generated noise signal is always present. Moreover, the system increases the adaptation rate and thus deteriorates the signal quality when a change in acoustic environment is detected also in situations where the hearing aid is not operating close to resonance.
  • a method of suppressing acoustic feedback in a hearing aid comprising the steps of: transforming an acoustic input signal into a first electrical signal, dividing the first electrical signal into a set of bandpass filtered first electrical signals, processing each of the bandpass filtered first electrical signals individually, adding the processed electrical signals into a second electrical signal, transforming the second electrical signal into an acoustic output signal, dividing the second electrical signal into a set of bandpass filtered second electrical signals, estimating acoustic feedback by generation of third electrical signals by adaptive filtering of the bandpass filtered second electrical signals and adapting the filtered signals to respective signals on the input side of the processor with respective first convergence rates, and compensating for acoustic feedback by determining a first parameter of an acoustic feedback loop of the hearing aid, and adjusting a second parameter of the hearing aid in response to the first parameter whereby generation of undesired sounds, such as howling, signal distortion, etc,
  • a hearing aid with an adaptive filter for compensation of acoustic feedback.
  • the adaptive filter operates to estimate the transfer function from output to input of the hearing aid including the acoustic propagation path from the output transducer to the input transducer.
  • the input of the adaptive filter is connected to the electric output of the hearing aid and the output signal of the adaptive filter may be subtracted from the input transducer signal to compensate for the acoustic feedback.
  • the hearing aid further comprises an input transducer for transforming an acoustic input signal into a first electrical signal, a first filter bank with bandpass filters for dividing the first electrical signal into a set of bandpass filtered first electrical signals, a processor for generation of a second electrical signal by individual processing of each of the bandpass filtered first electrical signals and adding the processed electrical signals into the second electrical signal, and an output transducer for transforming the second electrical signal into an acoustic output signal.
  • the hearing aid may also comprise a second filter bank with bandpass filters for dividing the second electrical signal into a set of bandpass filtered second electrical signals, a first set of adaptive filters with first filter coefficients for estimation of acoustic feedback by generation of third electrical signals by filtering of the bandpass filtered second electrical signals and adapting the respective third signals to respective signals on the input side of the processor with respective first convergence rates.
  • the hearing aid further comprises a controller that is adapted to compensate for acoustic feedback by determination of a first parameter of an acoustic feedback loop of the hearing aid and adjustment of a second parameter of the hearing aid in response to the first parameter whereby generation of undesired sounds is substantially avoided.
  • the frequency ranges of the bandpass filters are also denoted channels.
  • the hearing aid is a single channel hearing aid, i.e. the hearing aid processes incoming signals in one frequency band only.
  • the first filter bank consists of a single bandpass filter
  • the single bandpass filter may be constituted by the bandpass filter that is inherent in the electronic circuit, i.e. no special circuitry provides the bandpass filter.
  • the adding in the processor of processed electrical signals is reduced to the task of providing the single processed electrical signal at the output of the processor.
  • the second filter bank consists of a single bandpass filter
  • the first set of adaptive filters consists of a single adaptive filter.
  • the processor is preferably divided into a plurality of channels so that individual frequency bands may be processed differently, e.g. amplified with different gains.
  • the hearing aid may comprise a first set of adaptive filters with a plurality of adaptive filters for individual filtering of signals in respective frequency bands whereby a capability of individually controlling acoustic feedback in each channel of the hearing aid is provided.
  • the frequency bands of the first set of adaptive filters are substantially identical to the frequency bands of the first filter bank so that the bandpass filters do not deteriorate the operation of the adaptive filters.
  • the first set of adaptive filters subtracts the electrical output of the hearing aid from the input to the processor and the difference signal is used for modification of the filter coefficients as explained below.
  • the difference signal is not used for modification of the input signal to the processor whereby distortion of the signal is avoided.
  • the first adaptive filter is used for estimation of the acoustic feedback signal without distortion of the processed signal.
  • at least one of the adaptive filters of the first set of adaptive filters may operate on a respective decimated bandpass filtered second electrical signal whereby signal processing power requirement is minimised without requiring additional further filters since the adaptive filter output signal does not affect the processed signal directly.
  • the first set of adaptive filters subtracts the electrical output of the hearing aid from the electrical signal from the input transducer and the difference signal is used for modification of the filter coefficients and is fed to the input of the processor whereby the acoustic feedback signal is substantially removed from the signal before processing by the processor.
  • decimation of signals may be employed in the processor and in the first set of adaptive filters if a third filter bank that is substantially identical to the first filter bank is added in the processor before summation of the individual processed signals from each processor channel to the output signal from the processor.
  • Generation of undesired sounds may be avoided by monitoring of the loop gain of the acoustic feedback loop, i.e. the gain of the acoustic feedback path from the output transducer to the input transducer including the transfer functions of the transducers plus the gain of the electronic circuitry included in the signal path from input to output of the hearing aid.
  • the loop gain approaches one, certain actions may be taken to prevent generation of unwanted sounds.
  • the first set of adaptive filters generates a signal that corresponds to the signal generated by acoustic feedback
  • monitoring of attenuation in the first set of adaptive filters and of gains in corresponding channels of the processor provides an indication of the loop gain of the acoustic feedback loop.
  • the controller may be adapted to monitor attenuation in the first set of adaptive filters, e.g. by determination of the individual ratios between the magnitude of the signal at the inputs of the individual filters and the signals at the corresponding outputs of the individual filters. Further, the controller may be adapted to monitor the gains of the individual channels of the processor, e.g. by a similar determination of input and output signal levels of individual processor channels, or by reading values from registers in the processor containing current gain values of individual processor channels. Typically, the processor channel gains are different for different channels and they are input level dependent.
  • a second parameter of the hearing aid may be adjusted to prevent generation of undesired sounds. For example, the gain of at least one processor channel may be modified, e.g. lowered, to keep the acoustic feedback loop gain below one.
  • the second parameter may be a maximum gain limit G max that the gain of the processor is not allowed to exceed within a specific channel.
  • the adaptation rate of the first set of adaptive filters may be kept constant while the maximum gain limit G max of a specific channel of the processor is lowered whenever the hearing aid approaches a state in that channel with a high risk of generating undesired sounds, e.g. caused by a sudden change in the acoustic environment.
  • the maximum gain limit G max of a specific channel is lowered while the first adaptive filter adapts to a changed acoustic environment, and is restored to the original value when the adaptive filter has adapted to the new situation.
  • no distortion of the desired signal is generated.
  • the operating gain of the hearing aid may be very high without a risk of generating undesired sounds since the gain is automatically lowered if the feedback loop approaches resonance.
  • a gain safety margin is substantially not required.
  • each channel may be individually controlled based on a determination in that channel whereby reduction of gain by influence from frequencies outside the channel in question may be avoided.
  • the second parameter may be a first convergence or adaptation rate of the first set of adaptive filters.
  • the adaptation rate of the filter may be made dependent on the operating processor gain in such a way that whenever the hearing aid approaches a state with a high risk of generating undesired sounds, e.g. caused by a sudden change in the acoustic environment, the adaptation rate of the first adaptive filter is increased to rapidly compensate for the change.
  • the convergence rate of the first set of adaptive filters may be adjusted by modifying the algorithm for updating the filter coefficients of the adaptive filter.
  • the algorithm may comprise one or more scaling factors that may be adjusted in response to the determination of the first parameter.
  • the one or more scaling factors may be adjusted as a predetermined function of the operating gains of the processor.
  • the operating gain of the hearing aid may be very high without a risk of generating undesired sounds since the closer the acoustic feedback loop gain approaches resonance the faster the adaptive filter will adapt to the situation.
  • the fast adaptation of the adaptive filter may cause the desired signal to be distorted as previously described. However, as soon as the adaptive filter has adapted, the convergence rate is lowered and the desired signal is no longer distorted. Further, the distortion may take place in a frequency band that does not affect the intelligibility of the received sound signal.
  • a gain interval from G 0 to G a may be provided in the hearing aid.
  • G 0 is a predetermined lower gain limit below which feedback resonance and generation of undesired sounds can not occur.
  • Go may be determined during the fitting procedure.
  • G a is an adjustable upper gain limit that is adjusted according to desired sound quality. Preferably, G a is adjusted during the fitting procedure.
  • the convergence rate may vary as a predetermined function, such as a linear or a non-linear function, of the gain of the processor, e.g. in the range from G 0 to G a .
  • one or more scaling factors of the updating algorithm of the adaptive filter may vary as a predetermined function, such as a linear or a non-linear function, of the gain of the processor, e.g. in the range from G 0 to G a .
  • the transmission characteristics of the feedback path is measured. Based on these characteristics, the values of G 0 and G a with appropriate safety margins are determined and stored in the hearing aid. For determination of Go there are several factors to take into consideration.
  • the feedback path characteristics are, as already mentioned, not constant.
  • the characteristics of the acoustic feedback path have been stable for a certain period it is possible to estimate the characteristics of the feedback path accurately since in such a situation the relation between the signals at the inputs of the first set of adaptive filters and the signals at the outputs of the first set of adaptive filters is a precise measure for such characteristics, e.g. the attenuation, of the acoustic feedback path.
  • Knowing the gain characteristics of the digital processor and of the acoustic feedback signal an estimate for the acoustic feedback loop may be provided. From this knowledge, a dynamically changing value of Go may be incorporated in the hearing aid.
  • the interval from G 0 to G a may have a fixed size, independent of the changes in G 0 , i.e. the entire interval is shifted in accordance with changes of G 0 .
  • the hearing aid further comprises a second set of adaptive filters operating in parallel with, i.e. on the same signals as, the first set of adaptive filters but with second convergence rates that are lower than the first convergence rates of the first set of adaptive filters.
  • the outputs of the second set of adaptive filters are fed to the corresponding inputs of the processor whereby the acoustic feedback signal is substantially removed from the signal before processing by the processor.
  • the outputs of the first set of adaptive filters are not used for modification of the processor input signals.
  • the controller is adapted to estimate the amount of acoustic feedback by determination of a parameter of the first set of adaptive filters.
  • the high first convergence rate allows the first adaptive filter to track the acoustic feedback more closely over time than the second adaptive filter. Further, since the output signal of the first adaptive filter is not subtracted from the input transducer signal, the desired signal is not distorted by the first adaptive filter.
  • a hearing aid further comprising a set of second adaptive filters with second filter coefficients for suppression of feedback in the hearing aid by filtering the bandpass filtered second electrical signals into respective fourth electrical signals, a combining node for generation of fifth electrical signals by subtraction of the fourth electrical signals from the respective bandpass filtered first electrical signals and for feeding the fifth electrical signals to the processor, and wherein the second filter coefficients are updated with a second convergence rate that is lower than the first convergence rate.
  • the amount of acoustic feedback may be estimated by determination of the ratio between the magnitude of the signals at the inputs of the first set of adaptive filters and the signals at the respective outputs of the first set of adaptive filters. This approach provides a quick response to changes in the acoustic feedback path and requires very little processor power.
  • the second parameter may be a second convergence or adaptation rate of the second set of adaptive filters.
  • the adaptation rate of the filtering may be made dependent on the operating gain of the processor or, the attenuation of the first set of adaptive filters or, a combination of the two, in such a way that whenever the hearing aid approaches a state with a high risk of generating undesired sounds, e.g. caused by a sudden change in the acoustic environment, the adaptation rate of the second adaptive filter is increased to rapidly compensate for the change.
  • the convergence rate of the second set of adaptive filters may be adjusted by modifying the algorithm for updating the filter coefficients of the adaptive filters.
  • the algorithm may comprise one or more scaling factors that may be adjusted in response to the determination of the first parameter.
  • the one or more scaling factors may be set ' as a predetermined function of the operating gains of the processor.
  • the second set of adaptive filters provides individual filtering of signals in respective frequency bands.
  • the frequency bands of the second set of adaptive filters are substantially identical to the frequency bands of the first filter bank.
  • the frequency bands of the second set of adaptive filters may differ in number and range from the frequency bands of the first filter bank and the first set of adaptive filters.
  • the first filter bank comprises a plurality of bandpass filters while the second set of adaptive filters consists of a single adaptive filter providing modification of the processor input signal in a single frequency band whereby a hearing aid with a frequency dependent hearing aid compensation capability is provided with a simple single band acoustic feedback compensation loop.
  • a hearing aid further comprising a second adaptive filter with second filter coefficients for suppression of feedback in the hearing aid by filtering the second electrical signal into a fourth electrical signal, a combining node for generation of a fifth electrical signal by subtraction of the fourth electrical signal from the first electrical signal and for feeding the fifth electrical signal to the respective bandpass filters of the first filter bank, and wherein the second filter coefficients are updated with a second convergence rate that is lower than the first convergence rate.
  • the processor and the first adaptive filter are divided into channels covering the same frequency bands while the second adaptive filter is not divided into a plurality of channels.
  • the controller may be adapted to control the individual maximum gain limits G max of each processor channel in response to determination of the attenuation of the corresponding first adaptive filter channel.
  • the controller may further be adapted to increase a second convergence rate of a filter of the second set of adaptive filters when the corresponding processor channel gain is limited by a G max limit so that the duration of the gain limitation may be decreased.
  • the controller may be adapted to adjust the gain limit and/or the convergence rate in accordance with the current mode of operation of the hearing aid. The term mode of operation will be explained below.
  • At least one adaptive filter is a finite impulse response (FIR) filter
  • at least one adaptive filter is a warped filter, such as a warped FIR filter, a warped infinite impulse response (1TR) filter, etc.
  • a first order allpass section has the z-transform:
  • ⁇ is a warping parameter.
  • the fixed delays in a FIR filter are substituted by frequency dependent delays leading to large delays at low frequencies and smaller delays at high frequencies.
  • the allpass elements are internally recursive and therefore warped FIR filters have infinite impulse responses.
  • wa ⁇ ed FIR is somewhat contradictory but describes well the structural analogy to transversal FIR filters.
  • the order of a wa ⁇ ed FIR filter may be considerably lower than the order of a FIR filter with comparable specifications.
  • a wa ⁇ ed FIR filter is capable of providing better filter characteristics than a FIR filter.
  • the wa ⁇ ing parameter ⁇ may be used as a control parameter for controlling the transfer function, i.e. the positioning of resonances and cut-off frequencies in the frequency spectrum, whereby the spectrum of the error signal e(n), i.e. the difference between the filter output signal and the desired signal, may be minimised within a desired frequency range.
  • u is an N dimensional vector containing the latest N samples of the signal u and c is a vector containing the N coefficients of the N'th order filter.
  • T is the sampling period.
  • u(t) is the actual value at the actual time t
  • u(t-iT) is the signal value at i sampling periods prior to the actual time t.
  • a shorthand notation is often used where the symbol u(i) indicates the signal value at the time t-iT, i.e. u(t-iT) in the equation above.
  • Uj is a set of signal values derived from the output signal of digital processor in the n'th sampling period and the i-1 preceding sampling periods
  • Ci is a set of filter coefficients
  • e is the current value of the error signal
  • ⁇ and ⁇ are scaling factors.
  • the value of ⁇ is typically in the magnitude of 10 "6 and the value of ⁇ is typically approximately 0.99.
  • ⁇ is denoted leakage and when ⁇ l, the filter coefficients will drift towards their respective initial values Cj(0).
  • ⁇ is the convergence rate and determines the rate with which the adaptive filter adapts to a change. The adaptation rate increases with increasing values of ⁇ .
  • nLMS normalised Least Mean Square
  • ⁇ is a predetermined constant that determines the rate with which the P u estimate changes.
  • the algorithm is referred to as a power normalised Least Mean Square algorithm.
  • the power estimate may also be based on the output signal from the input transducer so that the influence from sudden changes in the power of the input signal on the adaptation algorithm is minimised.
  • a third update algorithm may be used for updating the adaptive filter coefficients denoted a leaky sign least mean square algorithm:
  • Ci (n+1) ⁇ (Ci(n)-Ci(0)) + c ; (0) + ⁇ s Ui(n)
  • ⁇ s is the sign of the e(n) signal multiplied by ⁇ .
  • a fourth update algorithm that may be used for the adaptive filter coefficients denoted a leaky sign-sign least mean square algorithm:
  • Ci (n+1) ⁇ (Ci(n)- C1 (0)) + c ; (0) + ⁇ s sgn(ui(n))
  • the filter coefficients may be updated based on a difference signal that is processed, e.g. combined with another signal, averaged or otherwise filtered, etc. Filtering may be performed in a focussed manner as known in the art.
  • the adaptive filters of the channels need not have identical number of taps. For example, it may be desirable to include more taps in adaptive filters operating in low-frequency channels.
  • the controller may adjust ⁇ and ⁇ in response to the determination of a first parameter of the acoustic feedback loop of the hearing aid.
  • Various sets of parameters of the hearing aid may be provided for various respective types of sound, e.g. speech, music, etc, that the user desires to hear and various respective types of acoustic environment, e.g. silence, noise, echo, crowd, open air, room, head set, etc, in which the user is situated.
  • various gain settings as a function of frequency may be provided, various gain settings as a function of input signal level may be provided, and various convergence rates as a function of operating processor gain may be provided, etc.
  • Each set of parameters defines a specific mode of operation of the hearing aid and when the hearing aid operates with a specific set of parameters it is said to operate in the corresponding mode.
  • specific parameter values of the hearing aid are set for appropriately processing of corresponding specific sounds in a specific acoustic environment.
  • automatic adjustment of the parameters may be performed in accordance with the current mode of operation.
  • the type of sound may be selected by the user or, it may be automatically detected by the hearing aid, e.g. by a frequency analysis, analysis of signal to noise ratio at various frequencies, analysis of sound dynamics, speech recognition, recognition by neural networks, etc.
  • the type of acoustic environment may be selected by the user or, it may be automatically detected by the hearing aid, e.g. by a frequency analysis, analysis of signal to noise ratio at various frequencies, analysis of sound dynamics, recognition by neural networks, etc.
  • the user may desire to listen to music.
  • the first convergence rate of the first adaptive filter may then be set to a value that is in conformance with the auto-correlation of music.
  • gain adjustments or adjustments of the first convergence rate may also be performed in conformance with the auto-correlation of music.
  • the function may be selected from a set of functions, each of which is adapted for use in a specific acoustic environment with certain sounds, such as music, speech, etc, that the user has decided to listen to.
  • adjustments may also be performed in accordance with the rate of change of measured parameters, e.g. of the acoustic feedback path, e.g. the feedback gain, etc, etc.
  • Fig. 1 is a block diagram of a hearing aid according to the present invention
  • Fig. 2 is a block diagram of a multichannel hearing aid in which each channel corresponds to the hearing aid shown in Fig. 1,
  • Fig. 3 is a block diagram of a hearing aid inco ⁇ orating a measuring system according to the invention.
  • Fig. 4 is a block diagram of a multichannel hearing aid in which each channel corresponds to the hearing aid shown in Fig. 3,
  • Fig. 5 is a block diagram of a multichannel hearing aid with a single band adaptive filter
  • Fig. 6 is a block diagram illustrating an LMS type FIR filter implementing the update algorithms according to the invention
  • Fig. 7 is a block diagram illustrating an LMS type wa ⁇ ed FIR filter implementing the update algorithms according to the invention
  • Fig. 8 is a plot of an impulse response of a FIR filter compared to an impulse response of a wa ⁇ ed FIR filter
  • Fig. 9 is a plot of the deviation from a desired transfer function of a FIR filter and a wa ⁇ ed FIR filter
  • Fig. 10 is a diagram representing possible variations in the filter coefficients in dependence of the gain in the digital processor.
  • Fig. 11 is a diagram illustrating the improvement in maximum possible gain achieved with the present invention.
  • Fig. 1 is a schematic block diagram of an embodiment of the present invention. It will be obvious for the person skilled in the art that the circuits indicated in Fig. 1 may be realised using digital or analogue circuitry or any combination hereof.
  • digital signal processing is employed and thus, the processor 7 and the adaptive filter 10 are digital signal processing circuits.
  • all the digital circuitry of the hearing aid may be provided on a single digital signal processing chip or, the circuitry may be distributed on a plurality of integrated circuit chips in any appropriate way.
  • an input transducer 1 such as a microphone, is provided for reception of sound signals and conversion of the sound signals into corresponding electrical signals representing the received sound signals.
  • the hearing aid may comprise a plurality of input transducers 1, e.g. whereby certain direction sensitive characteristics may be provided.
  • the input transducer 1 has a transfer function H m .
  • the input transducer 1 converts the sound signal to an analogue signal.
  • the analogue signal is sampled and digitised by an A/D converter (not shown) into a digital signal 4 for digital signal processing in the hearing aid.
  • the digital signal 4 is fed to a combining node 9 where it is combined with a feedback compensation signal 85 which will be explained later.
  • the combining node 9 outputs an output signal 86 which is fed to a digital signal processor 7 for amplification of the output signal 86 according to a desired frequency characteristic and compressor function to provide an output signal 80 suitable for compensating the hearing deficiency of the user.
  • the output signal 80 is fed to an output transducer 5 and an optional delay ⁇ and the delayed signal 83 is fed to an adaptive filter 10.
  • the output transducer 5 converts the output signal 80 to an acoustic output signal 6.
  • a part of the acoustic signal propagates to the input transducer 1 along a feedback path having a transfer function H f o.
  • the time delay of the delay line ⁇ is substantially equal to the transit time of the signal 6 from the output transducer 5 to the input transducer 1.
  • Other time delays may be selected. However, shorter time delays or zero time delay complicates the filtering, e.g. when the filters are Finite Impulse Response filters longer filters will be necessary, i.e. filters with more taps.
  • a further delay may be inserted in the circuit at the output of the processor 7 and feeding a delayed signal to the output transducer 5 and the optional delay ⁇ thereby decreasing the correlation between input signal 4 and filtered signal 85.
  • the delayed signal 83 is filtered in order to provide a filtered signal 85 that is an estimate of the acoustic feedback, i.e. the filtered signal 85 is an estimate of the part of the transducer generated signal 4 that is generated by reception of sound originating from the output transducer 5.
  • the filtered signal 85 is subtracted from the digital input signal 4 in the combining node 9 whereby a feedback compensated signal 86 is provided and input to the digital processor 7.
  • the filter coefficients of the adaptive filter 10 are continuously updated so that the filtered signal 85 stays substantially identical to the feedback signal 6.
  • the filter 10 is a finite impulse response (FIR) filter or a wa ⁇ ed FIR filter with a leaky sign- sign least mean square algorithm as disclosed above.
  • the controller adjusts ⁇ and ⁇ in response to the actual gain in the processor 7.
  • a plot of the scaling factors ⁇ and ⁇ as functions of the gain is shown in Fig. 10. It should be noted that these functions may depend on the mode of operation of the hearing aid.
  • a set of selectable subsets of functions as those shown in Fig. 10 may be provided that may be selected by the controller 13 in accordance with the current mode of operation of the hearing aid. Further, the functions may be selected in accordance with the rate of change of a measured parameter, e.g. attenuation in the acoustic feedback path.
  • the controller 13 receives information from the digital processor 7 via a line 15. According to the information received via line 15 about the current operating gain in the digital processor 7, the controller adjusts the adaptation rate for the filter coefficients of the adaptive filter 10. It should be noted that in the present drawing, dashed lines and arrows indicate control lines that do not form part of the signal path of the processed signal.
  • a FIR filter embodiment of the filter 10 is shown in more detail in Fig. 6. For simplicity only the first four taps are shown, but the filter may comprise any appropriate number of taps. If the operator H is set to 1 and the operator 13 is set to ⁇ (e(n)), a leaky least mean square algorithm is achieved. If ⁇ is set to 1 , a simple least mean square algorithm is achieved. If H is set to 1 and is set to ⁇ sgn(e(n)), a leaky sign least mean square algorithm is achieved. Finally H may be set to sgn(uj(n)) and may be set to ⁇ sgn(e(n)) thus achieving a leaky sign-sign LMS algorithm.
  • the filter coefficients may also be calculated using recursive least square algorithms.
  • Fig. 8 shows a plot of the infinite impulse response of a wa ⁇ ed FIR filter and the finite response of a FIR filter. The plot indicates that a wa ⁇ ed FIR filter inherently has a better capability of approximating a desired transfer function than a FIR filter.
  • Fig. 9 shows a blocked diagram of a test circuit 100 for determination of the transfer function H a of an adaptive filter 102 adapting to a desired transfer function H of another filter 104.
  • the plotted curves shows the power spectrum 108 of the error signal 106 when the adaptive filter 102 is a wa ⁇ ed FIR filter together with the power spectrum 110 of the error signal 106 when the adaptive filter 102 is a FIR filter.
  • the FIR filter and the wa ⁇ ed FIR filter have the same number of tabs. It is seen that below 6-7 kHz the wa ⁇ ed FIR filter improves the error signal by up to 15 dB.
  • the performance of the wa ⁇ ed FIR filter above 8 kHz is unimportant. It should be noted that changes in the sampling frequency will shift the frequency values indicated along the frequency axis. It is also noted that ⁇ may be adjusted for optimising the spectrum of the error signal 106 for a specific application, such as a specific type of hearing deficiency.
  • Fig. 2 shows a multichannel embodiment of a hearing aid according to the present invention in which each channel generally operates in the same way as the single channel embodiment shown in Fig. 1.
  • Corresponding parts of Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 are referenced by the same reference numbers except that indexes are added to the reference numbers of Fig. 2.
  • indexes are added to the reference numbers of Fig. 2.
  • the hearing aid may contain any appropriate number of channels as also indicated in the figure.
  • the multichannel embodiment of the invention according to Fig. 2 comprises the same parts as the single channel embodiment shown in Fig. 1 in addition to a filter bank 3 that outputs bandpass filtered signals 4a, 4i, 4n.
  • a filter bank 3 that outputs bandpass filtered signals 4a, 4i, 4n.
  • the respective signals 4a, 4i, 4n are combined to form respective signals 86a, 86i, 86n.
  • the signals 86a, 86i, 86n are fed to the multichannel digital processor 7 for processing according to the multichannel digital processor 7 for processing according to the multichannel digital processor 7 for processing according to the multichannel digital processor 7 for processing according to a desired characteristic that matches the hearing deficiency of the user. This may involve adjustment of different gain settings in the individual channels. Further the processing may also involve compressor functions. Still further, other functions such as noise reduction may be performed by the signal processor.
  • the output signal from the digital signal processor 7 is fed to a filter bank 16 were it is split into bandpass filtered signals 83a, 83i, 83n corresponding to the different frequency bands or channels in the set of adaptive filters 10a, lOi, lOn.
  • the filter bank 16 comprises a digital fourth order filter.
  • an optional delay line ⁇ may delay the output signal 80.
  • the delay is substantially equal to the maximum propagation time of sound from the output transducer 5 to the input transducer 1.
  • the processor 7 combines the signals of its channels into a single output signal 80.
  • the adaptation rates of the respective channels may be different from each others.
  • the controller 13 controls the adaptation rate of the filter coefficients in the adaptive filter 10, 10a, lOi, 1 On as a function of the actual operating gains in the processor in a gain interval from Go to G a .
  • the hearing aid illustrated in Fig. 3 corresponds to the hearing aid of Fig. 1 with an added measuring system. Corresponding parts are referenced by identical reference numbers and explanation of their operation is not repeated.
  • the hearing aid shown in Fig. 3 further comprises a second adaptive filter 11 operating in parallel with, i.e. on the same signals as, the first adaptive filter 10 but with a second convergence rate that is lower than the first convergence rate of the first adaptive filter 10.
  • the output 85 of the second adaptive filter 11 are fed to the combining node 9 for subtraction from the signal 4 and generation of the signal 86 input to the processor 7 whereby the acoustic feedback signal is substantially removed from the signal before processing by the processor 7. It should be noted that the output 89 of the first adaptive filter 10 is not used for modification of the processor input.
  • the controller 13 is adapted to estimate the amount of acoustic feedback by determination of a parameter of the first adaptive filter 10.
  • the high first convergence rate allows the first adaptive filter 10 to track the acoustic feedback more closely over time than the second adaptive filter 11. Further, since the output signal 89 of the first adaptive filter 10 is not subtracted from the input transducer signal 4, the desired signal is not distorted by the first adaptive filter 10.
  • the second adaptive filter 11 may be any kind of adaptive filter, but is preferably a FIR filter or a wa ⁇ ed FIR filter using a power-normalised Least Mean Square (power-nLMS) algorithm.
  • the second adaptive filter 11 outputs a filtered signal 89 to a second combining node 12 where it is combined with the signal 86 from the first combining node 9.
  • the output signal 90 from the combining node 12 is input to the second adaptive filter 11 for adjustment of the filter coefficients.
  • the output signal generated by the first adaptive filter 10 is not fed into the main signal path from the input transducer 1 to the output transducer 5.
  • the main signal path comprises the input transducer 1, the digital conversion means (not shown), the combining node 9, the digital processor 7 and the output transducer 5. Consequently, the signal processing by the first adaptive filter 10 does not affect the signal in the main signal path directly.
  • no signal distortion of signals in the main signal path is created by the first adaptive filter 10, and thus the adaptation rate of the first adaptive filter 10 may be substantially higher than that of the second adaptive filter 11.
  • the adaptation rate of the first adaptive filter 10 may be significantly higher than that of the second adaptive filter 11, the feedback path can be monitored much more closely over time for changes by the first adaptive filter 10 than by the second adaptive filter 11.
  • the first adaptation rate is a fixed high adaptation rate, but the adaptation rate may be adjusted, e.g. by modifying one or more of the scaling factors. For example, it may be preferred to adjust the adaptation rate of the first adaptive filter in accordance with the actual gain in the processor or the input power level.
  • Adjustment of adaptation rate may differ for different modes of operation.
  • the second adaptive filter 11 of Fig. 3 will not be able to immediately adapt to and compensate for the changes. Accordingly, uncompensated feedback signals will start to emerge.
  • the first adaptive filter 10, however, is much faster than the second adaptive filter 11 and will adapt to the change in the feedback path.
  • the controller controls the adaptation rate in the second adaptive filter 11, e.g. controlling the value of ⁇ , based on the rapid response of the first adaptive filter 10 to changes in the feedback path.
  • the second adaptive filter 11 is controlled accordingly, i.e. by increasing the adaptation rate of the second adaptive filter 11 if the gain is close to the feedback limit.
  • the increased adaptation rate of the second adaptive filter 11 allows it to compensate for the change in acoustic feedback more rapidly, e.g. before the acoustic feedback leads to generation of undesired sounds.
  • the amount of acoustic feedback may be estimated preferably by determination of a parameter of the first adaptive filter 10 or, alternatively or additionally, by determination of a parameter of the second adaptive filter 11.
  • the ratio between the input and the output signal of the respective adaptive filter 10, 11 may be determined since the ratio constitutes an estimate of the attenuation of the feedback path including the acoustical feedback path.
  • an average of the desired properties may be determined.
  • a power estimate of the above-mentioned type is used for each signal.
  • a parameter of one of the adaptive filters 10, 11 may be determined by appropriate transformation of the filter coefficients.
  • the controller lowers the gain in the digital processor if a change in feedback is detected by the first adaptive filter 10. In particular this may be performed selectively in the different channels of the digital processor.
  • the controller may calculate a maximum gain value G max that the processor is not allowed to exceed in order to avoid generation of undesired sound signals.
  • G max a maximum gain value that the processor is not allowed to exceed in order to avoid generation of undesired sound signals.
  • G max a maximum gain value that the processor is not allowed to exceed in order to avoid generation of undesired sound signals.
  • there may be an individual G max -value for each channel.
  • the controller changes the gain interval from G 0 to G a .
  • this information may be used to lower the lower gain limit G 0 thereby shifting the whole gain interval downwards or expanding the gain interval if it is desired to keep G a at a specific level. If only the lower gain limit Go is changed the curves for ⁇ and ⁇ will preferably be changed so as to cover the different interval.
  • Fig. 4 shows a multichannel embodiment of a hearing aid according to the present invention in which each channel generally operates in the same way as the single channel embodiment shown in Fig. 3.
  • Corresponding parts of Fig. 3 and Fig. 4 are referenced by the same reference numbers except that indexes are added to the reference numbers of Fig. 3.
  • the hearing aid may contain any appropriate number of channels as also indicated in the figure.
  • control lines have been omitted in Fig. 4.
  • the multichannel embodiment of the invention according to Fig. 4 comprises the same parts as the single channel embodiment shown in Fig.
  • a filter bank 16 that outputs bandpass filtered signals 83a, 83i, 83n to a second set of adaptive filters 1 la, 1 li, 1 In.
  • the respective adaptive filters 11a, Hi, 1 In provide filtered signals to respective combining nodes 12a, 12i, 12n for combination with respective signals 86a, 86i, 86, from the combining nodes 9a, 9i, 9n.
  • the multichannel embodiment shown in Fig. 4 provides a more detailed estimation of the transfer function of the feedback path.
  • signal processing may be performed at lower sampling frequencies in lower frequency bands, a technique known as decimation.
  • Decimation is particularly simple to use in the first set of adaptive filters since no anti-aliasing filter is needed in the system because the output signals from these filters are not fed into the main signal path.
  • the embodiment shown in Fig. 4 may be controlled in the same way as the embodiment shown in Fig. 3. However, the embodiment shown in Fig. 4 allows selective reduction of the gain in each individual channel and selective adjustment of the adaptation rate of each individual adaptive filter of the second set of adaptive filters 11a, Hi, 1 In. This has the further advantage that the gain may be maintained at a high value and the distortion may be maintained at a low level at frequencies where feedback resonance is not likely to occur.
  • Fig. 5 shows a multichannel embodiment that is similar to and operates in a similar way as the embodiment shown in Fig. 4. However, the embodiment shown in Fig. 5 is simpler since it has a second set of adaptive filters that consists of a single adaptive filter 11 and also, the combining node 9 is a single combining node.
  • Many other embodiments may be provided with varying numbers of channels in the processor and the first and second sets of adaptive filters. Also the number of channels in the processor may be different from the number of filters in the first set of adaptive filters that again may be different from the number of filters in the second set of adaptive filters.
  • a digital signal processor 7 having relatively few channels and a second set of adaptive filters containing more filters.
  • the individual adaptive filters of the second set of filters may operate on a combination of channels in the digital signal processor 7, e.g. two or more channels in the digital signal processor 7 may operate with the same G max determined by a specific adaptive filter of the first set of adaptive filters or, a channel in the digital signal processor 7 may operate with a G max that is the lowest gain of two or more gains determined by adaptive filters of the first set of adaptive filters.
  • the embodiment with a single second adaptive filter 11 and a multichannel first set of adaptive filters 10 is preferred.
  • Fig. 11 a plot of operating gains as a function of frequency is shown.
  • the upper solid curve shows the maximum operating gain that can be obtained with a hearing aid according to the present invention without generation of undesired sounds, and the lower dashed curves shows the corresponding gain for a known hearing aid.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Neurosurgery (AREA)
  • Otolaryngology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Filters That Use Time-Delay Elements (AREA)
  • Tone Control, Compression And Expansion, Limiting Amplitude (AREA)
  • Circuit For Audible Band Transducer (AREA)

Abstract

La présente invention concerne un appareil de correction auditive muni d'un filtre adaptatif pouvant éliminer la réaction acoustique dans l'appareil. L'appareil de correction auditive comprend également un organe de contrôle conçu pour corriger la réaction acoustique par détermination d'un premier paramètre d'une boucle de réaction acoustique de l'appareil, et par réglage d'un second paramètre de L'appareil de correction auditive en réponse au premier paramètre, ce qui permet d'éviter sensiblement la production de sons indésirés. On réduit ainsi considérablement une exigence en matière de marge de sûreté du gain.
PCT/DK2001/000604 2000-09-25 2001-09-20 Appareil de correction auditive muni d'un filtre adaptatif pouvant eliminer la reaction acoustique WO2002025996A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2002528238A JP3899023B2 (ja) 2000-09-25 2001-09-20 音響帰還を抑制する適応フィルタを備えた補聴器
AU2001289592A AU2001289592B2 (en) 2000-09-25 2001-09-20 A hearing aid with an adaptive filter for suppression of acoustic feedback
AU8959201A AU8959201A (en) 2000-09-25 2001-09-20 A hearing aid with an adaptive filter for suppression of acoustic feedback
CA2417803A CA2417803C (fr) 2000-09-25 2001-09-20 Appareil de correction auditive muni d'un filtre adaptatif pouvant eliminer la reaction acoustique

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP00610097.8 2000-09-25
EP00610097A EP1191813A1 (fr) 2000-09-25 2000-09-25 Prothèse auditive avec un filtre adaptatif pour la suppression de la réaction acoustique
EP00610124.0 2000-12-01
EP00610124.0A EP1191814B2 (fr) 2000-09-25 2000-12-01 Prothèse auditive multibande avec filtres adaptatifs multibandes pour la suppression de la rétroaction acoustique .

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2002025996A1 true WO2002025996A1 (fr) 2002-03-28

Family

ID=26073700

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/DK2001/000604 WO2002025996A1 (fr) 2000-09-25 2001-09-20 Appareil de correction auditive muni d'un filtre adaptatif pouvant eliminer la reaction acoustique

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (2) EP2066139A3 (fr)
JP (1) JP3899023B2 (fr)
AU (2) AU8959201A (fr)
CA (1) CA2417803C (fr)
WO (1) WO2002025996A1 (fr)

Cited By (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR20050119758A (ko) * 2004-06-17 2005-12-22 한양대학교 산학협력단 잡음 및 궤환 신호 제거 기능을 구비한 디지털 보청기 및신호 처리 방법
WO2006063624A1 (fr) * 2004-12-16 2006-06-22 Widex A/S Audiophone avec estimation de gain modele d'effet larsen
WO2007101477A1 (fr) * 2006-03-09 2007-09-13 Widex A/S Appareil auditif à suppression du retour adaptative
WO2007113282A1 (fr) * 2006-04-01 2007-10-11 Widex A/S Appareil auditif et procédé permettant de commander la vitesse d'adaptation dans des systèmes anti-rétroaction pour appareils auditifs
WO2007112777A1 (fr) 2006-03-31 2007-10-11 Widex A/S Appareil auditif et procédé permettant d'estimer la limitation de gain dynamique dans un appareil auditif
WO2008065209A2 (fr) * 2008-01-22 2008-06-05 Phonak Ag Procédé de détermination d'un gain maximal dans un dispositif auditif, et dispositif auditif
US7756276B2 (en) 2003-08-20 2010-07-13 Phonak Ag Audio amplification apparatus
US7778426B2 (en) 2003-08-20 2010-08-17 Phonak Ag Feedback suppression in sound signal processing using frequency translation
EP2317778A2 (fr) 2006-03-03 2011-05-04 Widex A/S Prothèse auditive et procédé d'utilisation de limitation de gain dans une prothèse auditive
US8351626B2 (en) 2004-04-01 2013-01-08 Phonak Ag Audio amplification apparatus
US20140185847A1 (en) * 2012-12-28 2014-07-03 Gn Resound A/S Hearing aid with improved localization
US9100762B2 (en) 2013-05-22 2015-08-04 Gn Resound A/S Hearing aid with improved localization
US9148733B2 (en) 2012-12-28 2015-09-29 Gn Resound A/S Hearing aid with improved localization
US9148735B2 (en) 2012-12-28 2015-09-29 Gn Resound A/S Hearing aid with improved localization
US9432778B2 (en) 2014-04-04 2016-08-30 Gn Resound A/S Hearing aid with improved localization of a monaural signal source
US10284978B2 (en) 2005-10-18 2019-05-07 Widex A/S Equipment for programming a hearing aid and a hearing aid

Families Citing this family (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP4681163B2 (ja) * 2001-07-16 2011-05-11 パナソニック株式会社 ハウリング検出抑圧装置、これを備えた音響装置、及び、ハウリング検出抑圧方法
US7277554B2 (en) * 2001-08-08 2007-10-02 Gn Resound North America Corporation Dynamic range compression using digital frequency warping
DE10242700B4 (de) * 2002-09-13 2006-08-03 Siemens Audiologische Technik Gmbh Rückkopplungskompensator in einem akustischen Verstärkungssystem, Hörhilfsgerät, Verfahren zur Rückkopplungskompensation und Anwendung des Verfahrens in einem Hörhilfsgerät
DE10245667B4 (de) * 2002-09-30 2004-12-30 Siemens Audiologische Technik Gmbh Rückkopplungkompensator in einem akustischen Verstärkungssystem, Hörhilfsgerät, Verfahren zur Rückkopplungskompensation und Anwendung des Verfahrens in einem Hörhilfsgerät
EP1602259A2 (fr) 2003-03-04 2005-12-07 Oticon A/S Filtre numerique et dispositif d'audition
US7092532B2 (en) 2003-03-31 2006-08-15 Unitron Hearing Ltd. Adaptive feedback canceller
DK1665882T3 (da) * 2003-08-21 2010-01-25 Widex As Høreapparat med ophævelse af akustisk feedback
WO2005091675A1 (fr) * 2004-03-23 2005-09-29 Oticon A/S Aide auditive avec systeme anti-retroaction
DE102004050304B3 (de) † 2004-10-14 2006-06-14 Siemens Audiologische Technik Gmbh Verfahren zur Reduktion von Rückkopplungen bei einem Akustiksystem und Signalverarbeitungsvorrichtung
WO2007042025A1 (fr) 2005-10-11 2007-04-19 Widex A/S Prothèse auditive et procédé de traitement de signaux d'entrée dans une prothèse auditive
AU2005232314B2 (en) 2005-11-11 2010-08-19 Phonak Ag Feedback compensation in a sound processing device
US8280088B2 (en) 2006-05-19 2012-10-02 Siemens Audiologische Technik Gmbh Hearing apparatus with feedback detection and corresponding method
DE102006023723A1 (de) 2006-05-19 2007-11-22 Siemens Audiologische Technik Gmbh Hörvorrichtung mit Rückkopplungsdetektion und entsprechendes Verfahren
EP3429232B1 (fr) * 2007-06-12 2023-01-11 Oticon A/s Système anti-feedback en ligne pour appareil d'aide auditive
SG189747A1 (en) * 2008-04-18 2013-05-31 Dolby Lab Licensing Corp Method and apparatus for maintaining speech audibility in multi-channel audio with minimal impact on surround experience
US10602282B2 (en) * 2008-12-23 2020-03-24 Gn Resound A/S Adaptive feedback gain correction
DK2217007T3 (da) 2009-02-06 2014-08-18 Oticon As Høreapparat med adaptiv tilbagekoblingsundertrykkelse
WO2010040863A2 (fr) * 2010-01-15 2010-04-15 Phonak Ag Procédé d'utilisation d'un dispositif auditif et ce dispositif auditif lui-même
DK2649813T3 (en) 2010-12-08 2017-09-04 Widex As HEARING AND A PROCEDURE FOR IMPROVED SOUND RENDERING
US8675901B2 (en) * 2011-10-14 2014-03-18 Panasonic Corporation Howling suppression device, hearing aid, howling suppression method, and integrated circuit
US9712908B2 (en) 2013-11-05 2017-07-18 Gn Hearing A/S Adaptive residual feedback suppression
DK3273608T3 (da) * 2016-07-20 2022-03-14 Sennheiser Electronic Gmbh & Co Kg Adaptiv filterenhed til anvendelse som en ekkokompensator
US11503415B1 (en) 2021-04-23 2022-11-15 Eargo, Inc. Detection of feedback path change

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5500902A (en) * 1994-07-08 1996-03-19 Stockham, Jr.; Thomas G. Hearing aid device incorporating signal processing techniques
EP0814639A2 (fr) * 1996-06-20 1997-12-29 AudioLogic, Incorporated Transposition spectrale d'un signal numérique audio
WO1998047313A2 (fr) * 1997-04-16 1998-10-22 Dspfactory Ltd. Structure de banc de filtres et procede servant a filtrer et a separer un signal d'information en differentes bandes, en particulier pour des signaux sonores dans des protheses auditives
WO1998056210A1 (fr) * 1997-06-06 1998-12-10 Audiologic Hearing Systems, L.P. Compresseur audio de dynamique fonctionnant en frequence continue

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5016280A (en) 1988-03-23 1991-05-14 Central Institute For The Deaf Electronic filters, hearing aids and methods
US5402496A (en) 1992-07-13 1995-03-28 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Auditory prosthesis, noise suppression apparatus and feedback suppression apparatus having focused adaptive filtering
DK169958B1 (da) 1992-10-20 1995-04-10 Gn Danavox As Høreapparat med kompensation for akustisk tilbagekobling
JPH10501951A (ja) † 1995-04-03 1998-02-17 フィリップス エレクトロニクス ネムローゼ フェンノートシャップ 自動イコライザを有する信号増幅システム
US6434246B1 (en) † 1995-10-10 2002-08-13 Gn Resound As Apparatus and methods for combining audio compression and feedback cancellation in a hearing aid
DE19802568C2 (de) 1998-01-23 2003-05-28 Cochlear Ltd Hörhilfe mit Kompensation von akustischer und/oder mechanischer Rückkopplung

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5500902A (en) * 1994-07-08 1996-03-19 Stockham, Jr.; Thomas G. Hearing aid device incorporating signal processing techniques
EP0814639A2 (fr) * 1996-06-20 1997-12-29 AudioLogic, Incorporated Transposition spectrale d'un signal numérique audio
WO1998047313A2 (fr) * 1997-04-16 1998-10-22 Dspfactory Ltd. Structure de banc de filtres et procede servant a filtrer et a separer un signal d'information en differentes bandes, en particulier pour des signaux sonores dans des protheses auditives
WO1998056210A1 (fr) * 1997-06-06 1998-12-10 Audiologic Hearing Systems, L.P. Compresseur audio de dynamique fonctionnant en frequence continue

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
HARMA A: "Implementation of frequency-warped recursive filters", SIGNAL PROCESSING, AMSTERDAM, NL, vol. 80, no. 3, March 2000 (2000-03-01), pages 543 - 548, XP004188172, ISSN: 0165-1684 *
KARJALAINEN M ET AL: "COMPARISON OF LOUDSPEAKER EQUALIZATION METHODS BASED ON DSP TECHNIQUES", JOURNAL OF THE AUDIO ENGINEERING SOCIETY, AUDIO ENGINEERING SOCIETY. NEW YORK, US, vol. 47, no. 1/2, January 1999 (1999-01-01), pages 14 - 30, XP000823370, ISSN: 0004-7554 *
LUNNER T ET AL: "A DIGITAL FILTERBANK HEARING AIDDESIGN, IMPLEMENTATION AND EVALUATION", INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH & SIGNAL PROCESSING. ICASSP,US,NEW YORK, IEEE, vol. CONF. 16, 14 May 1991 (1991-05-14), pages 3661 - 3664, XP000242759, ISBN: 0-7803-0003-3 *

Cited By (30)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7756276B2 (en) 2003-08-20 2010-07-13 Phonak Ag Audio amplification apparatus
US7778426B2 (en) 2003-08-20 2010-08-17 Phonak Ag Feedback suppression in sound signal processing using frequency translation
US8351626B2 (en) 2004-04-01 2013-01-08 Phonak Ag Audio amplification apparatus
KR20050119758A (ko) * 2004-06-17 2005-12-22 한양대학교 산학협력단 잡음 및 궤환 신호 제거 기능을 구비한 디지털 보청기 및신호 처리 방법
WO2006063624A1 (fr) * 2004-12-16 2006-06-22 Widex A/S Audiophone avec estimation de gain modele d'effet larsen
US8019104B2 (en) 2004-12-16 2011-09-13 Widex A/S Hearing aid with feedback model gain estimation
AU2004325701B2 (en) * 2004-12-16 2009-08-20 Widex A/S Hearing aid with feedback model gain estimation
US10284978B2 (en) 2005-10-18 2019-05-07 Widex A/S Equipment for programming a hearing aid and a hearing aid
US8068629B2 (en) 2006-03-03 2011-11-29 Widex A/S Hearing aid and method of utilizing gain limitation in a hearing aid
EP2317778A2 (fr) 2006-03-03 2011-05-04 Widex A/S Prothèse auditive et procédé d'utilisation de limitation de gain dans une prothèse auditive
WO2007101477A1 (fr) * 2006-03-09 2007-09-13 Widex A/S Appareil auditif à suppression du retour adaptative
US8379894B2 (en) 2006-03-09 2013-02-19 Widex A/S Hearing aid with adaptive feedback suppression
WO2007112777A1 (fr) 2006-03-31 2007-10-11 Widex A/S Appareil auditif et procédé permettant d'estimer la limitation de gain dynamique dans un appareil auditif
US8594354B2 (en) 2006-03-31 2013-11-26 Widex A/S Hearing aid and method of estimating dynamic gain limitation in a hearing aid
US8744102B2 (en) 2006-04-01 2014-06-03 Widex A/S Hearing aid, and a method for control of adaptation rate in anti-feedback systems for hearing aids
WO2007113282A1 (fr) * 2006-04-01 2007-10-11 Widex A/S Appareil auditif et procédé permettant de commander la vitesse d'adaptation dans des systèmes anti-rétroaction pour appareils auditifs
AU2007233675B2 (en) * 2006-04-01 2010-11-25 Widex A/S Hearing aid, and a method for control of adaptation rate in anti-feedback systems for hearing aids
JP2009532924A (ja) * 2006-04-01 2009-09-10 ヴェーデクス・アクティーセルスカプ 補聴器，および補聴器のためのアンチ・フィードバック・システムにおける適応速度の制御方法
US8295520B2 (en) 2008-01-22 2012-10-23 Phonak Ag Method for determining a maximum gain in a hearing device as well as a hearing device
WO2008065209A2 (fr) * 2008-01-22 2008-06-05 Phonak Ag Procédé de détermination d'un gain maximal dans un dispositif auditif, et dispositif auditif
WO2008065209A3 (fr) * 2008-01-22 2008-12-04 Phonak Ag Procédé de détermination d'un gain maximal dans un dispositif auditif, et dispositif auditif
CN103916806A (zh) * 2012-12-28 2014-07-09 Gn瑞声达A/S 具有改进定位的助听器
US9148733B2 (en) 2012-12-28 2015-09-29 Gn Resound A/S Hearing aid with improved localization
US9148735B2 (en) 2012-12-28 2015-09-29 Gn Resound A/S Hearing aid with improved localization
US9338561B2 (en) * 2012-12-28 2016-05-10 Gn Resound A/S Hearing aid with improved localization
CN109089200A (zh) * 2012-12-28 2018-12-25 Gn瑞声达A/S 确定助听器的参数的方法以及助听器
US20140185847A1 (en) * 2012-12-28 2014-07-03 Gn Resound A/S Hearing aid with improved localization
CN109089200B (zh) * 2012-12-28 2020-05-19 Gn瑞声达A/S 确定助听器的参数的方法以及助听器
US9100762B2 (en) 2013-05-22 2015-08-04 Gn Resound A/S Hearing aid with improved localization
US9432778B2 (en) 2014-04-04 2016-08-30 Gn Resound A/S Hearing aid with improved localization of a monaural signal source

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2004509543A (ja) 2004-03-25
AU2001289592B2 (en) 2005-04-14
CA2417803C (fr) 2010-11-23
EP2066139A2 (fr) 2009-06-03
AU8959201A (en) 2002-04-02
EP1191814A1 (fr) 2002-03-27
JP3899023B2 (ja) 2007-03-28
EP1191814B2 (fr) 2015-07-29
CA2417803A1 (fr) 2002-03-28
EP2066139A3 (fr) 2010-06-23
EP1191814B1 (fr) 2009-09-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1191814B1 (fr) Prothèse auditive avec un filtre adaptatif pour la suppression de la réaction acoustique
US6898293B2 (en) Hearing aid
AU2001289592A1 (en) A hearing aid with an adaptive filter for suppression of acoustic feedback
EP1080606B1 (fr) Ameliorations apportees a l'annulation de la reaction acoustique
EP1068773B1 (fr) Appareil et procedes permettant de combiner la compression audio et la suppression de l'effet larsen dans une prothese auditive
US6498858B2 (en) Feedback cancellation improvements
EP2203000B1 (fr) Correction adaptatif de gain de rétroaction
EP1730992B1 (fr) Aide auditive avec systeme anti-retroaction
EP2082615B1 (fr) Aide auditive équipée d'une unité de réduction d'occlusion et procédé de réduction d'occlusion
AU2004201374B2 (en) Audio amplification apparatus
JP2004509543A5 (fr)
DK1068773T4 (en) Apparatus and method for combining audio compression and feedback suppression in a hearing aid

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ CZ DE DE DK DK DM DZ EC EE EE ES FI FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ PH PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VN YU ZA ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2417803

Country of ref document: CA

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2001289592

Country of ref document: AU

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2002528238

Country of ref document: JP

REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase
WWG Wipo information: grant in national office

Ref document number: 2001289592

Country of ref document: AU