WO2000064402A1 - Dental casting alloy - Google Patents

Dental casting alloy Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2000064402A1
WO2000064402A1 PCT/CA2000/000454 CA0000454W WO0064402A1 WO 2000064402 A1 WO2000064402 A1 WO 2000064402A1 CA 0000454 W CA0000454 W CA 0000454W WO 0064402 A1 WO0064402 A1 WO 0064402A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
alloy
dental
casting
cast
casting alloy
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/CA2000/000454
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Victor Gjunter
Original Assignee
Biorthex Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Biorthex Inc. filed Critical Biorthex Inc.
Priority to EP00922364A priority Critical patent/EP1175196A1/en
Priority to JP2000613393A priority patent/JP2002542271A/en
Priority to AU42793/00A priority patent/AU4279300A/en
Priority to CA002369991A priority patent/CA2369991A1/en
Priority to KR1020017013784A priority patent/KR20020010137A/en
Publication of WO2000064402A1 publication Critical patent/WO2000064402A1/en
Priority to US10/039,712 priority patent/US20020146342A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C19/00Alloys based on nickel or cobalt
    • C22C19/03Alloys based on nickel or cobalt based on nickel
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K6/00Preparations for dentistry
    • A61K6/80Preparations for artificial teeth, for filling teeth or for capping teeth
    • A61K6/84Preparations for artificial teeth, for filling teeth or for capping teeth comprising metals or alloys
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C14/00Alloys based on titanium

Definitions

  • This invention relates to a dental technique and alloy that can be used in orthopaedic stomatology, and especially in dental castings, restorations and cast removable partial devices, including dental prostheses and dentures.
  • the prosthetic device or false tooth application allows to solve tooth defects of the enamel and restore the integrity of the dental arch.
  • the prosthesis design is selected on the basis of what is already currently used in modern dental, prosthodontic practice.
  • the important requirement for a dental casting alloy is its technological effectiveness when a prosthesis is fabricated.
  • parameters such as: the preparation of the alloy and the ratio of components, the purity of the furnace environment, the casting settings and so on play a key function in producing quality castings.
  • the production cost and consumer prices are directly related to the limits on possible variations of these parameters.
  • Ni; 23% of Cr; 5% of Si, Mn, Al, Nb and the rest is Fe.
  • this alloy has improved corrosion resistance and fluidity which is important for casting of prosthetic devices of small dimensions and volume.
  • the disadvantage of this material is the low level of biomechanical compatibility.
  • the alloy is characterized by high yield point, high hardness, possibility to be machined with drills of usual instrumental steel, high-tensile oxide film under good adhesion toward metallic basis and ceramic coating.
  • the disadvantages of this alloy are the low biomechanical compatibility, high specific gravity, and the complexity of technology that requires the formation of a deep vacuum.
  • the prosthetic devices made of this prior prototype alloy practically have no shrinkage, they fit on to gypsum models easily thus allowing to reduce the thickness and degree of teeth preparation intended for use with prosthetic devices. Also, these prosthetic devices are not affected by oxidation, thus increasing their service life.
  • the disadvantages of the prototype alloy are low elasticity and low biomechanical compatibility.
  • the fine-structured elements of the prosthetic devices are affected by high-level mechanical loads, for example, the frames of removable partial prosthetic devices, and since they are not elastic, they are weak. In order to increase the strength of the partial prosthetic devices it would be necessary to increase the volume of material and thus to increase the weight of the prostheses.
  • the technical advantages of the invention are an increase in the elastic properties of the new alloy, its related biomechanical compatibility, strength characteristics and strain wear resistance.
  • Figs. 1, 2 and 3 are views of partial metal frames of the removable prosthetic devices cast from the alloy of the invention.
  • Fig. 4 is a view of a partial prosthetic device cast from the invented casting alloy.
  • the dental casting alloy of the invention comprises, in weight %:
  • Co 0.1 - 0.5%, preferably 0.2 to 0.4%
  • Amounts of Mo below the aforementioned lower limit render the alloy difficult to machine or extrude while amounts above the aforementioned upper limit render the alloy too brittle.
  • Amounts of Fe below the aforementioned lower limit reduces the plasticity unfavourably, while amounts above the aforementioned upper limit increase the plasticity to an unfavourable level.
  • the available physical and mechanical merits of the invented alloy influences its consumer preference: a) The cast removable partial prosthetic devices exhibit stable and lasting retention of the clasps on the residual supporting teeth. b) There is an improvement on uniformity and the distribution of the masticatory forces along the length of the tooth arch and alveolar ridge. c) There is a possibility to abandon the dampers or resilient attachments used to reduce the masticatory forces for patients with gum or periodontal disease. d) There is a reduction of the harmful action of the prosthetic device retentive clasps or loading on the supporting teeth.
  • the invented dental casting alloy was employed in an experimental trial.
  • the composition was as follows in weight %: Ti - 45 %; Mo - 1.0 %; Fe - 0.5 %; Cu - 0.5 %; Co - 0.3 %; the balance to 100% was Ni.
  • This alloy was processed by means of induction casting.
  • the prepared alloy was poured into a unit-cast removable prosthetic device or mold with T-shaped so- called "clammers”.
  • the teeth with the mobility levels of III were extracted.
  • the cast prosthetic device was applied using supports from rests on three teeth, formula 4,2 _L 5 (with mobilities of II and 1/3 of radicular bone loss).
  • Patent No. 2,111,722, A61 13/20 Method to produce cast metallic frame of Dental Prosthesis (prototype).

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • Epidemiology (AREA)
  • Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery (AREA)
  • Dental Preparations (AREA)

Abstract

A dental casting alloy based on Ni and Ti and having addition of cast of Mo, Fe, Cu and Co has the following composition in weight %:Ti: 40 - 50 % Mo: 0.2 - 2.0 % Fe: 0.1 - 1.5 % Cu: 0.1 - 1.0 % Co: 0.1 - 0.5 % Ni balance to a total of 100 %; the alloy has advantages over prior alloys for dental castings including a high level of fluidity, a low shrinkage percentage, a low melting temperature and super elasticity.

Description

DENTAL CASTING ALLOY
TECHNICAL FIELD
This invention relates to a dental technique and alloy that can be used in orthopaedic stomatology, and especially in dental castings, restorations and cast removable partial devices, including dental prostheses and dentures.
BACKGROUND ART
The prosthetic device or false tooth application allows to solve tooth defects of the enamel and restore the integrity of the dental arch. Depending on the pathology, its severity and progression, the prosthesis design is selected on the basis of what is already currently used in modern dental, prosthodontic practice.
Considerations of the requirements of dental alloys used for prosthetic devices are: their strength, wear resistance, hygienic and esthetic properties, biocompatibility with the dental tissues, cost aspects and a number of others.
The alloys used until now are in certain ways acceptable with respect to the above- mentioned requirements, in relation to specific tooth defects and types of prosthetic device.
On the other hand, there are substantial disadvantages associated with currently used alloys that diminish their applications and the patients' satisfaction. For example, various alloys used in the same patient have different galvanic potentials which can be harmful to human health.
The important requirement for a dental casting alloy is its technological effectiveness when a prosthesis is fabricated. Currently, parameters such as: the preparation of the alloy and the ratio of components, the purity of the furnace environment, the casting settings and so on play a key function in producing quality castings. The production cost and consumer prices are directly related to the limits on possible variations of these parameters.
Material science offers new and more perfected casting alloys and casting materials that characterize the technical level for the proposed invention. There is known the stomatological cast alloy [1] that contains 23% of
Ni; 23% of Cr; 5% of Si, Mn, Al, Nb and the rest is Fe. As compared to stainless steel this alloy has improved corrosion resistance and fluidity which is important for casting of prosthetic devices of small dimensions and volume. The disadvantage of this material is the low level of biomechanical compatibility.
There is also known the stomatological cast alloy [2] "BUGOGEN... CCS VAC" (KXC) that contains in its composition the following components: Co - 63%; Cr - 27 %; Mo - 5%; Ni - 3.5%; Si, Mn, C - 1.5%. This alloy is oriented to manufacture a unit-cast high-duty removable partial prosthetic device including splinting apparatuses, crowns and tooth bridges. An advantage is the optimal correlation on high ultimate strength and plasticity. The oxide film which is formed on surface of the alloy allows deposition of a ceramic coating on it. The disadvantages are the low biomechanical compatibility and high specific gravity. This alloy is not exposed to stamping, bending or soldering. There is known the stomatological cast alloy [1] "NiCr - DENT No S vas", that contains in its composition the following components: Cr - 25%; Mo - 9.5%; Si, Mn, S - 4%; the remainder being Ni. The alloy is characterized by high yield point, high hardness, possibility to be machined with drills of usual instrumental steel, high-tensile oxide film under good adhesion toward metallic basis and ceramic coating. The disadvantages of this alloy are the low biomechanical compatibility, high specific gravity, and the complexity of technology that requires the formation of a deep vacuum.
Taking into consideration the mentioned criteria for the choice of stomatological or dental casting alloys, the presence of titanium in their composition may improve their properties. A dental casting alloy [3] composed of Ni and Ti, in a ratio of approximately 50 % each, was chosen as a prototype for the alloy of the invention.
The prosthetic devices made of this prior prototype alloy practically have no shrinkage, they fit on to gypsum models easily thus allowing to reduce the thickness and degree of teeth preparation intended for use with prosthetic devices. Also, these prosthetic devices are not affected by oxidation, thus increasing their service life. The disadvantages of the prototype alloy are low elasticity and low biomechanical compatibility. The fine-structured elements of the prosthetic devices are affected by high-level mechanical loads, for example, the frames of removable partial prosthetic devices, and since they are not elastic, they are weak. In order to increase the strength of the partial prosthetic devices it would be necessary to increase the volume of material and thus to increase the weight of the prostheses.
DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION The technical advantages of the invention are an increase in the elastic properties of the new alloy, its related biomechanical compatibility, strength characteristics and strain wear resistance.
These technical advantageous results are achieved by a dental casting alloy based on Ni and Ti, with additions of the following alloying elements or components: Mo, Fe, Cu and Co at the following weight percentages:
Ti: 40 - 50%
Mo: 0.2 - 2.0%
Fe: 0.1 - 1.5%
Cu: 0.1 - 1.0% Co: 0.1 - 0.5%
Ni the remainder to 100%
Thus in one aspect of the invention there is provided a dental casting alloy of the aforementioned composition.
In another aspect of the invention there is provided a dental prosthesis cast from the dental alloy of the invention.
In another aspect of the invention there is provided use of the dental alloy of the invention in the manufacture of a dental prosthesis.
In another aspect of the invention there is provided in a method of implanting a dental prosthesis in a patient in need of such prosthesis, the improvement where the prosthesis is of a dental alloy of the invention. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
Figs. 1, 2 and 3 are views of partial metal frames of the removable prosthetic devices cast from the alloy of the invention.
Fig. 4 is a view of a partial prosthetic device cast from the invented casting alloy.
DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Suitably the dental casting alloy of the invention comprises, in weight %:
Ti : 44 - 46%, preferably about 45% Mo: 0.2 - 2.0%, preferably 0.5 to 1.5%
Fe: 0.1 - 1.5%, preferably 0.3 to 1 %
Cu: 0.1 - 1.0%, preferably 0.3 to 0.8%
Co: 0.1 - 0.5%, preferably 0.2 to 0.4%
Ni balance to 100%)
Amounts of Mo below the aforementioned lower limit render the alloy difficult to machine or extrude while amounts above the aforementioned upper limit render the alloy too brittle.
Amounts of Fe below the aforementioned lower limit reduces the plasticity unfavourably, while amounts above the aforementioned upper limit increase the plasticity to an unfavourable level.
The presence of the elements Mo, Fe, Cu and Co in this Ni-Ti alloy imparts properties which are different and superior to those of the prototype. This provides the attainability of the mentioned results. The complex study and testing for this alloy, the comparative evaluation of its technical characteristics have defined its several technological and functional merits:
1. High level of fluidity. This allows the casting of removable prosthetic devices of intricate and thin configurations (Fig. 1-3) without a vacuum and under high homogeneity of the alloy structure. Low shrinkage percentage. This provides the possibility to maximize the technological accuracy of the alloy to fit dental models, and the intra-oral fitting of the prosthetic devices including the supporting surfaces of the teeth. The shrinkage is essentially zero. Lower melting temperature. This results in less demand on mold materials and on casting settings, the melting temperature is 1130 to 1210°C.
Superelasticity. This terminology corresponds to a rubber-like behavior of the alloy when alternating strain loads are applied and relieved. The value of the maximum strain of the invented alloy that is returned after the load release may reach up to 2.5% and it may correspond to the elasticity of live tissues. This coincidence (relating to strain characteristics), minimizes and practically excludes macro displacements and overloads on the interface "alloy - organism tissue". In turn, this elasticity property reduces damage to the surrounding tissues of the prosthesis, including damage that takes place with repeated loads. This elasticity allows for the reduction of the volume of the alloy which is required to perform the function and thus reduces the weight of the prosthetic device. This last advantage is amplified with a lower specific gravity of the invented alloy.
2. The available physical and mechanical merits of the invented alloy influences its consumer preference: a) The cast removable partial prosthetic devices exhibit stable and lasting retention of the clasps on the residual supporting teeth. b) There is an improvement on uniformity and the distribution of the masticatory forces along the length of the tooth arch and alveolar ridge. c) There is a possibility to abandon the dampers or resilient attachments used to reduce the masticatory forces for patients with gum or periodontal disease. d) There is a reduction of the harmful action of the prosthetic device retentive clasps or loading on the supporting teeth. EXAMPLE
The achieved technical results using the invented casting alloy for dental prosthetic devices are confirmed by the Engineering Medical Centre (Tomsk), the Scientific and Research Institute of Medical Materials of the Siberian Physical and Technical Institute (Tomsk) and at the Siberian Medical University.
An example on the use of the invented alloy is shown with the case history of patient identified as SCH, 45 years old, who sought a dental consultation. The diagnosis after examination was: - Generalized disease of the gum (periodontitis) of the upper jaw which is complicated with a bilateral (Class II) partial absence of the posterior teeth of the lower jaw and mobility levels II & III (advanced mobilities) of the remaining teeth of the maxilla.
As part of the dental treatment, the invented dental casting alloy was employed in an experimental trial. The composition was as follows in weight %: Ti - 45 %; Mo - 1.0 %; Fe - 0.5 %; Cu - 0.5 %; Co - 0.3 %; the balance to 100% was Ni. This alloy was processed by means of induction casting.
Using the method of induction centrifugal casting the prepared alloy was poured into a unit-cast removable prosthetic device or mold with T-shaped so- called "clammers".
After accomplishing the anti-inflammation treatment of periodontal therapy, the teeth with the mobility levels of III (advanced mobilities) were extracted. The cast prosthetic device was applied using supports from rests on three teeth, formula 4,2 _L 5 (with mobilities of II and 1/3 of radicular bone loss).
Good retention of the partial prosthetic device was achieved and normal function during the mastication was restored. The positive results were documented over 9 months. REFERENCES
Literature used for invention disclosure:
1. Stomatological cast alloys. Reclama TOO "Denta", Novosibirsk, Ob'edineniya str., 39;
2. CD. Bogoslovski, High quality casting in Dental Prosthesis Technique, Moscow, "Medecina" 1977, page 25;
3. Patent No. 2,111,722, A61 13/20, Method to produce cast metallic frame of Dental Prosthesis (prototype).

Claims

1. A dental casting alloy based on Ni and Ti and having an addition of each of Mo, Fe, Cu and Co has the following composition in weight %:
Ti: 40 - 50%
Mo: 0.2 - 2.0%
Fe: 0.1 - 1.5%
Cu: 0.1 - 1.0%
Co: 0.1 - 0.5%
Ni balance to a total of 100%.
2. A dental casting alloy according to claim 1 containing 44 to 46 % of said Ti.
3. A dental casting alloy according to claim 1 or 2 containing:
0.5 to 1.5% of said Mo 0.3 to l% of said Fe 0.3 to 0.8% of said Cu 0.2 to 0.4% of said Co.
4. A dental alloy according to claim 1 containing in weight %
Ti 45%
Mo 1%
Fe 0.5%
Cu 0.
5%
Co 0.3%
Ni balance to 100%)
A dental prosthesis cast from an alloy of claim 1, 2, 3 or 4.
6. Use of an alloy as defined in claim 1, 2, 3 or 4 in the manufacture of a dental prosthesis.
7. In a method of implanting a dental prosthesis, the improvement wherein the prosthesis is of a dental casting alloy as defined in claim 1, 2, 3 or 4.
PCT/CA2000/000454 1999-04-27 2000-04-26 Dental casting alloy WO2000064402A1 (en)

Priority Applications (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP00922364A EP1175196A1 (en) 1999-04-27 2000-04-26 Dental casting alloy
JP2000613393A JP2002542271A (en) 1999-04-27 2000-04-26 Dental cast alloy
AU42793/00A AU4279300A (en) 1999-04-27 2000-04-26 Dental casting alloy
CA002369991A CA2369991A1 (en) 1999-04-27 2000-04-26 Dental casting alloy
KR1020017013784A KR20020010137A (en) 1999-04-27 2000-04-26 Dental casting alloy
US10/039,712 US20020146342A1 (en) 1999-04-27 2001-10-26 Dental casting alloy

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
RU99109384 1999-04-27
RU99109384/14A RU2162667C2 (en) 1999-04-27 1999-04-27 Casting dentistry alloy

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/039,712 Continuation US20020146342A1 (en) 1999-04-27 2001-10-26 Dental casting alloy

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2000064402A1 true WO2000064402A1 (en) 2000-11-02

Family

ID=20219427

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/CA2000/000454 WO2000064402A1 (en) 1999-04-27 2000-04-26 Dental casting alloy

Country Status (8)

Country Link
US (1) US20020146342A1 (en)
EP (1) EP1175196A1 (en)
JP (1) JP2002542271A (en)
KR (1) KR20020010137A (en)
AU (1) AU4279300A (en)
CA (1) CA2369991A1 (en)
RU (1) RU2162667C2 (en)
WO (1) WO2000064402A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR100972151B1 (en) * 2010-04-13 2010-07-26 (주)국민통신 Connector for a cable of a terminal box and the method of construction designed by the connector
KR101033644B1 (en) * 2010-11-11 2011-05-12 주식회사 한국코아엔지니어링 Cable junction system for information communication
CN106265088A (en) * 2014-11-10 2017-01-04 蒋春花 A kind of hardness is high, have the baking-ceramic tooth composite of fungistatic effect
CN105349830A (en) * 2015-08-18 2016-02-24 孙春红 Material used for preparing medical false tooth
CN107630151B (en) * 2016-07-18 2019-12-03 中国科学院金属研究所 A kind of beta titanium alloy with antibacterial and promotion knitting function
RU2687581C1 (en) * 2018-05-17 2019-05-15 Наринэ Адольфовна Узунян Method of dental implantation

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0271735A (en) * 1988-09-06 1990-03-12 Tokin Corp Orthodontic tool
EP0465030A2 (en) * 1990-06-29 1992-01-08 Ormco Corporation Orthodontic appliances for moving teeth
JPH05271032A (en) * 1992-03-30 1993-10-19 Daido Steel Co Ltd Artificial dental root
JPH0987783A (en) * 1995-09-20 1997-03-31 Daido Steel Co Ltd Low melting point titanium alloy for dental treatment

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0271735A (en) * 1988-09-06 1990-03-12 Tokin Corp Orthodontic tool
EP0465030A2 (en) * 1990-06-29 1992-01-08 Ormco Corporation Orthodontic appliances for moving teeth
JPH05271032A (en) * 1992-03-30 1993-10-19 Daido Steel Co Ltd Artificial dental root
JPH0987783A (en) * 1995-09-20 1997-03-31 Daido Steel Co Ltd Low melting point titanium alloy for dental treatment

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
DATABASE WPI Section Ch Week 199016, Derwent World Patents Index; Class D21, AN 1990-120585, XP002145468 *
DATABASE WPI Section Ch Week 199346, Derwent World Patents Index; Class D21, AN 1993-365106, XP002145467 *
DATABASE WPI Section Ch Week 199723, Derwent World Patents Index; Class D21, AN 1997-255964, XP002145466 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
KR20020010137A (en) 2002-02-02
US20020146342A1 (en) 2002-10-10
AU4279300A (en) 2000-11-10
RU2162667C2 (en) 2001-02-10
EP1175196A1 (en) 2002-01-30
JP2002542271A (en) 2002-12-10
CA2369991A1 (en) 2000-11-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Smith et al. Biomechanical criteria for evaluating prefabricated post-and-core systems: a guide for the restorative dentist.
Kim et al. Comparison of cast Ti-Ni alloy clasp retention with conventional removable partial denture clasps
Proussaefs et al. Immediate loading of hydroxyapatite-coated implants in the maxillary premolar area: three-year results of a pilot study
Manda et al. Observations on an in‐vivo failure of a titanium dental implant/abutment screw system: a case report
Whitters et al. Dental materials: 1997 literature review
Hulterström et al. Cobalt-chromium as a framework material in implant-supported fixed prostheses: a preliminary report.
Hulterström et al. Cobalt-Chromium as a Framework Material in Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses: A 3-year Follow-up.
Dahl et al. In vivo wear ranking of some restorative materials.
Christensen Clinical and research advancements in cast-gold restorations
Tao et al. Fit of metal ceramic crowns cast in Au-1.6 wt% Ti alloy for different abutment finish line curvature
US4210447A (en) Dental restorations using castings of non-precious metals
US20020146342A1 (en) Dental casting alloy
Strang et al. Dental materials: 1996 literature review
KR102292582B1 (en) Cobalt/chromium based dental alloy for porcelain having excellent bond strength between the ceramic and the dental alloy, and dental restoration manufactured using the same
GB2038359A (en) Dental Restorations Using Castings of Non-precious Metals
Sorrentino et al. CAD/CAM cobalt-chromium alloy single crowns in posterior regions: 4-year prospective clinical study
Hansen et al. Esthetic and biomechanical considerations in reconstructions using dental implants
JP2000144287A (en) Titanium alloy for living body excellent in wear resistance
Barman et al. Fabrication of tooth supported overdenture using customized metal short copings: A case report
Jiang et al. Effects of clasp retention forces and abrasion on different cast crowns
Schneider Custom metal occlusal surfaces for acrylic resin denture teeth
RU2224809C1 (en) Deformable alloy based on nickel for ceramic-metal dental prosthetics with increased physico-mechanical characteristics
Nakai et al. Dental Metallic Materials
Yu et al. The processing of dental medical devices
Hemmings Removable prosthodontics

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VN YU ZA ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2369991

Country of ref document: CA

Kind code of ref document: A

Ref document number: 2369991

Country of ref document: CA

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 10039712

Country of ref document: US

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1020017013784

Country of ref document: KR

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2000 613393

Country of ref document: JP

Kind code of ref document: A

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2000922364

Country of ref document: EP

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 2000922364

Country of ref document: EP

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1020017013784

Country of ref document: KR

REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Ref document number: 2000922364

Country of ref document: EP

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Ref document number: 1020017013784

Country of ref document: KR

DPE2 Request for preliminary examination filed before expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed from 20040101)