WO1998039716A1 - Systeme et procede pour coordonner employeurs eventuels et candidats a un emploi - Google Patents

Systeme et procede pour coordonner employeurs eventuels et candidats a un emploi Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1998039716A1
WO1998039716A1 PCT/US1998/003495 US9803495W WO9839716A1 WO 1998039716 A1 WO1998039716 A1 WO 1998039716A1 US 9803495 W US9803495 W US 9803495W WO 9839716 A1 WO9839716 A1 WO 9839716A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
information
candidate
requirement
interface
candidates
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US1998/003495
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Paulette G. Hodge
Original Assignee
Electronic Data Systems Corporation
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Electronic Data Systems Corporation filed Critical Electronic Data Systems Corporation
Priority to AU61820/98A priority Critical patent/AU6182098A/en
Publication of WO1998039716A1 publication Critical patent/WO1998039716A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/06Buying, selling or leasing transactions

Definitions

  • This invention relates generally to the field of computer software systems, and more particularly, to a system and method for coordinating potential employers and candidates for employment .
  • a system and method for coordinating potential employers with suitable candidates.
  • a system and method are provided for coordinating a potential employer and a candidate for employment.
  • an interface receives candidate information and requirement information.
  • the candidate information specifies at least one qualification of the candidate.
  • the requirement information specifies at least one requirement for an available position being offered by the potential employer.
  • a processor is coupled to the interface. The processor compares the candidate information with the requirement information in order to determine whether the candidate is suitable for the available position.
  • a system for coordinating potential employers and candidates for employment.
  • the system includes an interface which receives candidate information and requirement information.
  • the candidate information specifies a qualification for each of a plurality of candidates.
  • the requirement information specifies a requirement for each of a plurality of available positions being offered by at least one potential employer.
  • a processor is coupled to the interface. The processor generates match information in response to the candidate information and the requirement information.
  • Important technical advantages of the present invention include a system and method for coordinating potential employers with suitable candidates for employment . This is accomplished by receiving requirement information from one or more potential employer and candidate information from one or more candidates. For each position available at a potential employer, the requirement information specifies various requirements. For each candidate for employment, the candidate information may specify, among other things, the candidate's identity, qualifications, skills, and preferences. The requirement information and the candidate information are stored in the same or separate databases . A processor compares the requirement information against the candidate information in order to identify suitable candidates for each available position at a potential employer. Accordingly, human error is substantially reduced or eliminated.
  • Another important technical advantage of the present invention includes providing an override feature in the automated system and method for coordinating potential employers and candidates for employment .
  • the override feature allows the requirement information of a potential employer to be modified if the number of candidates which have been identified as meeting the requirements is too few or too many.
  • Yet another important technical advantage of the present invention includes providing a central location for consolidating requirement information from a number of potential employers and candidate information from a number of candidates.
  • the consolidated requirement and candidate information can be utilized by various interested parties (including both the potential employers and the candidates themselves) to generate match information.
  • the match information can be output in a format that accommodates the needs of that party.
  • each potential employer is able to identify all candidates which meet the requirements for a particular position being offered by that employer, and each candidate is able to identify all positions for which he or she is qualified.
  • agencies e.g., a government unemployment agency
  • Still another technical advantage of the present invention includes providing a mechanism whereby a human resources department of an employing entity (e.g., corporation, firm, etc.) can be converted into a revenue generating center for the employing entity.
  • the human resources department can set-up, operate, and maintain the system and method of the present invention.
  • the human resources department may then charge each interested party described above, including potential employers and candidates, fees for use of this system and method.
  • the human resources department becomes a revenue generating center.
  • FIGURE 1 illustrates an exemplary system for coordinating potential employers and candidates for employment, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention
  • FIGURE 2 illustrates an exemplary computer-based system that can be used to implement the coordinating system shown in FIGURE 1 ;
  • FIGURE 3 is a flow chart of an exemplary method for receiving candidate information, according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIGURE 4 is a flow chart of an exemplary method for receiving requirement information, according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIGURE 5 is a flow chart of an exemplary method for coordinating potential employers and candidates for employment, according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIGURES 1-5 of the drawings like numerals used for like and corresponding parts of the various drawings.
  • CPU central processing unit
  • FIG. 1-5 the detailed description which follows is represented largely in terms of processes and symbolic representations of operations performed by conventional computer components, such as a central processing unit (“CPU") or processor associated with a general purpose computer system, memory storage devices for the processor, and connected pixel-oriented display devices.
  • CPU central processing unit
  • These operations include the manipulation of data bits by the processor and the maintenance of these bits within data structures resident in one or more of the memory storage devices.
  • Such data structures impose a physical organization upon the collection of data bits stored within computer memory and represent specific electrical or magnetic elements.
  • FIGURE 1 illustrates a system 10 for coordinating potential employers and candidates for employment, according to an embodiment of the present invention. It is contemplated that coordinating system 10 may be maintained, used, and/or operated by any one or a combination of potential employers, candidates for employment, career centers at various academic institutions, government agencies, employment agencies, professional recruiters, or any other entity, organization, or agency seeking to coordinate the employment of suitable candidates by one or more potential employers. Coordinating system 10 includes a first interface
  • first interface 12 may comprise a computer-telephone interface (CTI) , or the like, which allows coordinating system 10 to communicate with a remote database or computer system, such as a database at a university for maintaining records of enrollment and grades.
  • CTI computer-telephone interface
  • First interface 12 may also include an artificial intelligence engine interface, such as, for example, a RESUMIX" system manufactured by Resumix of Santa Clara, California, operable to scan information from a resume.
  • First interface 12 functions primarily to receive and forward candidate information 14.
  • Candidate information 14 comprises various information relating to any one or more candidates for employment, such as college students, college graduates, workers who have been laid off, people desiring a career change, or any other person seeking employment.
  • candidate information 14 may specify the candidate's name, home address and telephone number, and work address and telephone number (if applicable) .
  • candidate information 14 may include qualification information 16, skill information 18, and preference information 20 for each candidate.
  • qualification information 16 may specify a candidate's qualifications or credentials for employment. This includes information about the candidate's education, such as institution of learning (e.g., college, university, technical school, vocational school, etc.), grades, honors, awards, distinctions, accomplishments, activities, or any other suitable information relating to the education of a candidate.
  • qualification information 16 may also include information about a candidate's present or previous employment, such as name of employer, job description, years of experience, duties at such employment, responsibilities, distinctions at work, etc. Furthermore, qualification information 16 may also specify any licenses (e.g., medicine, dentistry, or law), certifications (e.g., certified public accountant (CPA) certification), ability to speak foreign languages, or the like, which may be desirable in a candidate.
  • skill information 18 includes any information relating to or specifying the candidate's skills or abilities, such as interpersonal skills, management skills, organizational skills, presentation skills, public speaking skills, etc. Skill information 18 can be generated by any suitable evaluator, such as a college or university's placement office.
  • Preference information 20 includes any information relating to the preferences of a candidate. This may include preferences for a particular city or region, type of work, salary, willingness to travel, etc. In some cases, candidate information 14 may also specify personal information, such as ethnic background, gender, and the like, about a candidate .
  • a candidate information memory 22 is coupled to first interface 12.
  • Candidate information memory 22 may reside in a suitable storage medium, such as random access memory (RAM) , ROM, disk, tape storage, or other suitable volatile and/or non-volatile data storage system.
  • RAM random access memory
  • ROM read-only memory
  • ROM read-only memory
  • tape storage or other suitable volatile and/or non-volatile data storage system.
  • Candidate information memory 22 can be a relational database.
  • Candidate information memory 22 receives, stores, and forwards candidate information 14. Separate qualification information 16, skill information 18, and preference information 20 can be maintained, and retrieved as necessary, for each candidate for employmen .
  • a second interface 24 is provided for inputting, retrieving, and forwarding requirement information 26.
  • the functionality of second interface 24 can be performed by one or more suitable input devices, such as a key pad, touch screen, input port, pointing device (e.g., mouse), and/or other device can that accept information, and one or more suitable output devices, such as a computer display, output port, speaker, or other device, for conveying information associated with the operation of coordinating system 10, including digital data, visual information, or audio information.
  • Second interface 24 may comprise a computer-telephone interface for receiving information from a remote source. Second interface 24 can be the same or separate from first interface 12.
  • Requirement information 26 received at second interface 24 generally includes information relating to the requirements of one or more potential employers for available positions.
  • potential employers can be any business (e.g., company, corporation, firm, partnership, etc.), organization (e.g., charity or foundation), institution (e.g., university or church), department or branch of government, or similar entity, or group or department within the same, that may have positions available for employment.
  • requirement information 26 specifies various requirements for the position.
  • requirement information 26 may specify academic requirements (e.g., academic institution, degree grade point, honors), work requirements (e.g., position and years of experience), licenses or certifications (e.g, commercial driving license, medical license, bar license, CPA), ability to speak a foreign language, necessary skills (e.g., interpersonal, organization, management, public speaking) and the like.
  • Requirement information 26 may also specify the position available (e.g., intern, coop, entry level, management position), location or situs for position (including city, state, and/or region), salary and/or other compensation, and the like.
  • requirement information 26 can specify preferences, such as, for example, minority or gender.
  • coordinating system 10 may be operated in conjunction with a "System and Method for Modeling Skills," such as that described in U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 08/594,563, filed on January 31, 1996 by Rosenthal, et al . ; in such case, requirement information 26 may specify one or more objects, actions, and contexts, as described therein.
  • a requirement information memory 28 is coupled to second interface 24.
  • Requirement information memory 28 may reside in a suitable storage medium, such as RAM, ROM, disk, tape storage, or other suitable volatile and/or non-volatile data storage system.
  • Requirement information memory 28 can be a relational database.
  • Requirement information memory 28 receives, stores, and forwards requirement information 26 from second interface 24. This requirement information 26 can be retrieved and forwarded as necessary.
  • a processor 30 is coupled to candidate information memory 22 and requirement information memory 28. The functionality of processor 30 can be performed by any suitable processor, such as a main- frame, file server, work station, or other suitable data processing facility running appropriate software.
  • Processor 30 is operable to retrieve candidate information 14 (including qualification information 16, skill information 18, and preference information 20) and requirement information 26 from candidate information memory 22 and requirement information memory 28, respectively. In one embodiment, processor 30 may be operable to verify the accuracy of candidate information 14.
  • Processor 30 also functions to compare candidate information 14 with requirement information 26 in order to determine whether any candidates specified in the candidate information 14 are suitable for positions specified in requirement information 26.
  • processor 30 After performing the comparison, processor 30 outputs match information 32.
  • This match information 32 may specify which candidates are most suitable for the positions being offered by various potential employers.
  • Match information 32 may be organized or configured in various formats to accommodate the needs of a user of coordinating system 10. For example, if the user is a potential employer, match information 32 may comprise a list of all suitable candidates for one or more positions being offered by the potential employer. If the user is a candidate for employment, employment information 32 may comprise a list of all available positions for which the candidate is qualified.
  • a match information memory 34 is coupled to processor 30.
  • Match information memory 34 may reside in a suitable storage medium, such as RAM, ROM, disk, tape storage, or other suitable volatile, or non-volatile data storage system, which may the separate or same from the data storage system (s) containing candidate information memory 22 and requirement information memory 28.
  • Match information memory 34 receives, stores, and forwards match information 32 generated by processor 30.
  • a third interface 36 is also coupled to processor 30. Like- first interface 12 and second interface 24, the functionality of third interface 36 can be performed by one or more suitable input devices, such as a key pad, touch screen, input port, pointing device, and/or other device that can accept information, and one or more suitable output devices, such as a computer display, output port, speaker, or other devices, for conveying information, including digital data, visual information, or audio information.
  • Third interface 36 may be the same or separate from first interface 12 and/or second interface 24. Third interface 36 functions primarily to display or otherwise present match information 32 to a user after this information has been generated by processor 30.
  • third interface 36 can be used by an operator or user to modify requirement information 26 if the match information 32 generated by processor 30 proves to be unsatisfactory. For example, if match information 32 specifies a relatively large number of candidates for a particular position (e.g., eighty-eight candidates out of a pool of ninety are listed) , then requirement information 26 may be further restricted in order to reduce the number of candidates that will appear in match information 32 after another comparison by processor 30. Likewise, if match information 32 specifies a relatively small number of candidates for a particular position (e.g., five candidates out of a pool of a thousand are listed) , then the requirement information 26 may be modified to "loosen" the requirements for that position.
  • match information 32 specifies a relatively large number of candidates for a particular position (e.g., eighty-eight candidates out of a pool of ninety are listed) , then requirement information 26 may be further restricted in order to reduce the number of candidates that will appear in match information 32 after another comparison by processor 30.
  • coordinating system 10 may be maintained and operated by any one or a combination of parties interested in matching suitable candidates to available positions at one or more potential employers.
  • coordinating system 10 can be operated by a career center of an academic institution which desires to find internships, co-op positions, or permanent employment for its students or graduates.
  • the system can be used by a government agency, such as an unemployment office, to find positions for the unemployed.
  • a human resource department of a large corporation may operate coordinating system 10 to identify candidates who are qualified to fill one or more positions available at the corporation.
  • these interested parties may cooperate to input and receive information from coordinating system 10, such as, for example, by providing or supporting direct electronic links for the transfer of information.
  • coordinating system 10 may be coupled to the interconnection of computers known as the Internet, for example, by one or a combination of an Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) , communications line, a hard-wire line, a fiber-optic line, a telephone link, or any other suitable means .
  • ISDN Integrated Services Digital Network
  • candidate information 14 may be entered at first interface 12, for example, by candidates, potential employers, employment agencies, career centers, etc. This information is stored in candidate information memory 22.
  • Requirement information 26 is entered at second interface 24, for example, by potential employers or employment agencies.
  • the requirement information 26 is stored in requirement information memory 28.
  • Processor 30 retrieves and compares candidate information 14 against requirement information 26 in order to generate match information 32, which may then be stored in match information memory 34.
  • Match information 32 may be presented or displayed at third interface 36 so that this information may be reviewed by the interested parties, such as candidates, potential employers, or the like.
  • requirement information 26 may be modified by a user of coordinating system 10 in order to generate different match information 32.
  • FIGURE 2 is a simplified diagram of an exemplary computer-based system 40 that can be used to implement coordinating system 10 shown in FIGURE 1.
  • computer-based system 40 can include a process server 42, a data storage device 44, a computer 46, a plurality of work stations or desk top computers 48, and a local file server 50.
  • Process server 42 can be implemented as a SUN SOLARIS 2.3 system.
  • Data storage device 44 can be a mass storage subsystem of tapes or disk drives, which is electronically coupled to process server 42.
  • a relational database resides in data storage device 44.
  • Candidate information 14 (including qualification information 16,- skill information 18, and preference information 20), requirement information 26, and match information 32 shown in FIGURE 1, can be contained in the relational database residing in data storage device 44.
  • Process server 42 may retrieve, process, and store the information in the relational database .
  • Computer 46 may be linked electronically to process server 42 through a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN) , for automated up-loading and downloading of information therebetween.
  • LAN local area network
  • WAN wide area network
  • Any computer which includes a central processing unit (CPU) and suitable RAM, ROM, and input/output (I/O) circuitry can be utilized for computer 46.
  • CPU central processing unit
  • RAM random access memory
  • ROM read only memory
  • I/O input/output circuitry
  • At least one work station 48 can be coupled to process server 42 by the same or a different LAN or WAN connecting computer 46.
  • each work station 48 is a desk top computer having at least a "486" processor or an operational equivalent.
  • Work stations 48 may function to receive and display candidate information 14, requirement information 26, and match information 32 to any user or operator of coordinating system 10, such as a potential employer or a candidate for employment.
  • Local file server 50 may be linked electronically to process server 42 by the same or a different LAN or WAN, or by telecommunications line through a modem (not specifically shown) . Additionally, as shown for illustrative purposes only in FIGURE 2, process server 42 can be linked by a "gateway" interface communications processor to local file server 50. Local file server 50 is preferably connected to at least a second work station 48, which provides the same functionality as the first work station 48 previously described. Consequently, computer-based system 40 may provide a distributed network that allows interaction with coordinating system 10 at multiple locations.
  • Any one or a combination of interested parties can use computer-based system 40 to collect, maintain, generate, or process candidate information 14, requirement information 26, and match information 32.
  • This information can be collected at a number of different sites via a suitable work station 48, computer 46, local processor 42, or local file server 50.
  • This information can then be relayed to a centralized location, such as process server 42, data storage device 44, or computer 46, for storage and analysis.
  • Process server 42, computer 46, work stations 48, and local file server 50 can perform the functionality of processor 30 shown in FIGURE 1.
  • FIGURE 3 is a flow chart of an exemplary method 100 for receiving and storing candidate information 14, according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • a user of coordinating system 10 such as a candidate for employment, a potential employer, or an employment agency, may interact with the system, preferably via a suitable work station 48.
  • a user can input system commands and candidate information 14 by pressing appropriate keys (typing) on a key board or "clicking" on an option in a graphical user interface (GUI) display.
  • GUI graphical user interface
  • Method 100 begins at step 102 where system 10, via first interface 12, receives qualification information 16 for a particular candidate.
  • This qualification information 16 may include any information relating to the qualifications or credentials of the candidate.
  • qualification information 16 may include information about the candidate's education (e.g., institution, grade-point, distinctions), previous or present employment (e.g., name of employer, job description, work experience) , and licenses or certifications (e.g., medical license or commercial driving license) .
  • qualification information 16 for a candidate may be received from multiple sources.
  • qualification information 16 may be gleaned from a resume submitted by the candidate.
  • first interface 12 comprises a RESUMIXTM system for scanning in information from a resume.
  • qualification information 16 can be down-loaded and received from a database maintained by a registrar's office at an academic institution which the candidate attended.
  • first interface 12 may comprise a computer-telephone interface for transfer of information.
  • Processor 30 receives the qualification information 16 from first interface 12.
  • processor 30 may verify the accuracy of the candidate information 16, for example, by comparing information received from a resume against information received directly from an academic institution. If the information from the resume is inaccurate in light of the information received from an academic institution, then at step 106 the candidate is rejected, and accordingly, no additional information will be received for the candidate; method 100 moves to step 114.
  • coordinating system 10 receives skill information 18, preferably at first interface 12.
  • Skill information 18 may specify, among other things, a candidate's strength or weakness and various skills, such as management skills, presentation skills, interpersonal skills, etc. Skill information 108 may be received from a career office which administers a test to evaluate the candidate .
  • Coordinating system 10 receives preference information 20 at step 110.
  • Preference information 20 generally relates to the preferences of the candidate.
  • Preference information 20 may specify, among other things, desired position, location of job, career path, desired salary, willingness to travel, etc.
  • Preference information 20 may be entered from a candidate's resume or, alternatively, directly entered by the candidate.
  • the qualification information 16, skill information 18, and preference information 20 received by coordinating system 10 are stored in candidate information memory 14.
  • Candidate information memory 14 is preferably a relational database, and therefore all of this information may be accessible under the candidate's name or other appropriate identifier.
  • coordinating system 10 queries whether there are more candidates for which candidate information 14 should be received.
  • FIGURE 4 is a flow chart of an exemplary method 200 for receiving requirement information 26, according to an embodiment of the present invention. During the steps of method 200, a user of coordinating system 10 may communicate with the system, preferably via a work station 48.
  • Method 200 begins at step 202 where coordinating system 10 receives, at second interface 24, requirement information 26 for a particular position that is available.
  • Requirement information 26 generally relates to the requirements that a potential employer has for the available position.
  • requirement information 26 may specify academic requirements (e.g., institution, degree, and grade point) , previous employment (e.g., level of experience needed), licenses (e.g., medical or bar license), necessary skills (e.g., public speaking or organizational) , location of job, and the like.
  • requirement information 26 is stored in requirement information memory 28.
  • coordinating system 10 queries whether there are more available positions for which requirement information 26 should be received. If there are additional positions, then coordinating system 10 returns to step 202 where requirement information 26 for another position is received. Otherwise, if there are no other positions for which requirement information 26 should be received, method 200 ends.
  • FIGURE 5 is a flow chart of an exemplary method 300 for coordinating candidates and potential employers, according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • a user of coordinating system 10 communicates with the system, for example, by pressing appropriate keys (typing) on the key board of a work station 48 or "clicking" on an option in a GUI display.
  • method 300 corresponds to the operation of coordinating system 10, whereby match information 32 is generated.
  • Method 300 begins at step 302 where a position, which is available at a potential employer, is selected.
  • Such potential employer may be any business, organization, institution, department/branch of government, or any other entity, or group or department within the same, having a position for employment available.
  • the selection of an available position may be performed automatically- -i .e . , by processor 30 of coordinating system 10--or, alternatively, in response to a command by a user of the system.
  • processor 30 retrieves requirement information 26 for the selected position from requirement information memory 28.
  • processor 30 retrieves candidate information 14 for the pool of candidates from candidate information memory 22 at step 306. This candidate information 14 may include qualification information 16, skill information 18, and preference information 20.
  • processor 30 selects one of the candidates for which candidate information 14 has been retrieved.
  • Processor 30 determines whether the selected candidate meets academic requirements for the available position at step 310. For example, this may be accomplished by comparing the qualification information 16 for such candidate against any academic requirements specified in requirement information 26. If the selected candidate does not meet academic requirements, processor 30 rejects the candidate at step 312; processor 30 then moves to step 318. On the other hand, if the selected candidate does meet academic requirements for the position at step 312, then at step 314 processor 30 determines whether the candidate meets skills requirement . This may be accomplished by comparing the required skills specified in requirement information 26 against skill information 18- that has been received for the candidate. Again, if the candidate does not meet the skills requirement, processor 30 rejects the candidate at step 312.
  • processor 30 determines at step 316 whether there is a suitable match between the candidate's preferences for a position (as specified in preference information 20) and the description of the position specified in requirement information 26. If the candidate ' s preferences are not suitably matched with the position, then processor 30 rejects the candidate at step 312. Otherwise, if the preferences are suitably matched, then processor 30 moves to step 318. It should be understood that the determinations made at steps 310, 314, and 316 are provided by way of example only. The present invention contemplates that other determinations may be performed in addition to, or instead of, any of these exemplary determinations. At step 318, processor 30 determines whether there are more candidates for employment which should be considered for the available position. If there are additional candidates, processor 30 returns to step 308 when the next candidate is selected.
  • Coordinating system 10 repeats steps 308-318 until it has either rejected or accepted each candidate within the pool.
  • processor 30 moves to step 320 where it generates a list of acceptable candidates for the position that has been selected. This list constitutes match information 32 identifying all suitable candidates for the position. Match information 32 is stored in match information memory 34 and presented or displayed at third interface 36.
  • match information 32 may specify more matches than are desirable, such as, for example, if almost all candidates in a pool are listed as a match for a particular position. In other cases, match information 32 may not specify enough matches. In either case, it may be desirable to modify the requirement information 26 for the available position in order to produce a more satisfactory listing of matches.
  • coordinating system 10 queries a user whether override of the requirement information 26 is desired. If the user or operator elects to override requirement information 26, then at step 324, the requirement information 26 may be modified. For example, a user of coordinating system 10 may utilize any suitable interface, such as third interface 36, to access and change requirement information 26. From step 324, coordinating system 10 may return to step 308 where the process of determining matches between the candidates and the available position is repeated using the modified requirement information 26. Steps 308-324 may be performed until match information 32 comprises a satisfactory list of candidates for the available position. Thus, when it is determined at step 322 that no override of requirement information 26 is necessary, method 300 ends.
  • Method 300 has been provided, by way of example only, to illustrate how the present invention can be used to identify suitable candidates for a particular position that is available. It should be understood, however, that the present invention is not limited to such an exemplary embodiment. For example, in another embodiment, the present invention can be used to identify suitable positions for a candidate seeking employment .

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
  • Finance (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

Cette invention se rapporte à un système (10) permettant de coordonner un employeur potentiel et un candidat à l'emploi. Ce système comprend une interface (12, 24) qui reçoit des informations (14) relatives à un candidat et des informations (26) relatives à des exigences. Les informations relatives au candidat (14) spécifient au moins une compétence du candidat. Les informations relatives aux exigences (26) spécifient au moins une exigence associée à un emploi disponible offert par l'employeur potentiel. Une unité de traitement (30) est couplée à ladite interface (12, 24). L'unité de traitement (30) compare les informations relatives au candidat (14) aux informations relatives aux exigences (26) de manière à évaluer si le candidat convient pour l'emploi disponible.
PCT/US1998/003495 1997-03-06 1998-02-25 Systeme et procede pour coordonner employeurs eventuels et candidats a un emploi WO1998039716A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU61820/98A AU6182098A (en) 1997-03-06 1998-02-25 System and method for coordinating potential employers and candidates for employment

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US81282597A 1997-03-06 1997-03-06
US08/812,825 1997-03-06

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1998039716A1 true WO1998039716A1 (fr) 1998-09-11

Family

ID=25210731

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US1998/003495 WO1998039716A1 (fr) 1997-03-06 1998-02-25 Systeme et procede pour coordonner employeurs eventuels et candidats a un emploi

Country Status (2)

Country Link
AU (1) AU6182098A (fr)
WO (1) WO1998039716A1 (fr)

Cited By (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1999054835A1 (fr) * 1998-06-11 1999-10-28 Resume Network Pty Ltd. Methode et systeme de selection de candidats a un emploi
WO2000026839A1 (fr) * 1998-11-04 2000-05-11 Infodream Corporation Modele evolue destine a l'extraction automatique des informations relatives au savoir-faire et aux connaissances depuis un document electronique
WO2000036535A1 (fr) * 1998-12-16 2000-06-22 Cvbase Ag Procede et systeme de traitement structure d'informations personnelles
EP1096407A1 (fr) * 1999-10-25 2001-05-02 Vanco Group Limited Système et procédé pour annoncer des postes à pourvoir utilsant des réseaux de communications
GB2359168A (en) * 1998-11-04 2001-08-15 Infodream Corp Advanced model for automatic extraction of skill and knowledge information from an electronic document
EP1198772A1 (fr) * 1999-07-02 2002-04-24 SDC Computer Services, Inc. Systeme de gestion d'informations de ressources humaines en reseau
WO2002069231A1 (fr) * 2001-02-26 2002-09-06 Kevin Scott Procede et systeme permettant de pourvoir aux postes vacants
WO2003009187A1 (fr) * 2001-07-19 2003-01-30 Sciami Paty Ltd. Systeme d'evaluation et procede associe
EP1330747A1 (fr) * 2000-09-20 2003-07-30 Outtask, INC. Procede et systeme pour le stockage et la recuperation de curriculum vitae
US7321858B2 (en) 2001-11-30 2008-01-22 United Negro College Fund, Inc. Selection of individuals from a pool of candidates in a competition system
US7818254B1 (en) 1999-04-07 2010-10-19 Juno Holdings, N.V. Application apparatus and method
US8140366B2 (en) 2008-01-04 2012-03-20 Frontline Technologies, Inc. Method, system and program product for filling job orders
US8321254B2 (en) 1999-08-20 2012-11-27 Frontline Technologies, Inc. Notification of employees via pass code accessed web pages
US9760860B2 (en) 1998-12-21 2017-09-12 Frontline Technologies Group Llc System and method for performing substitute fulfillment

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
AU718778B3 (en) * 1998-06-11 2000-04-20 Resume Network Pty Ltd Method and system for selecting candidates for employment
AU725729B2 (en) * 1998-06-11 2000-10-19 Resume Network Pty Ltd Method and system for selecting candidates for employment

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4974191A (en) * 1987-07-31 1990-11-27 Syntellect Software Inc. Adaptive natural language computer interface system
US5164897A (en) * 1989-06-21 1992-11-17 Techpower, Inc. Automated method for selecting personnel matched to job criteria

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4974191A (en) * 1987-07-31 1990-11-27 Syntellect Software Inc. Adaptive natural language computer interface system
US5164897A (en) * 1989-06-21 1992-11-17 Techpower, Inc. Automated method for selecting personnel matched to job criteria

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
EUSTACE P: "The computer recruiter", ENGINEER, 31 OCT. 1985, UK, vol. 261, no. 6762, ISSN 0013-7758, pages 21, XP002067492 *
HADDUCK C G: "An employment applications information system", AEDS-81 CONVENTION PROCEEDINGS. EXPLORING WITH COMPUTERS IN VIKINGLAND, MINNEAPOLIS, MN, USA, 5-8 MAY 1981, 1981, WASHINGTON, DC, USA, ASSOC. EDUC. DATA SYST, USA, pages 107 - 111, XP002067491 *

Cited By (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1999054835A1 (fr) * 1998-06-11 1999-10-28 Resume Network Pty Ltd. Methode et systeme de selection de candidats a un emploi
WO2000026839A1 (fr) * 1998-11-04 2000-05-11 Infodream Corporation Modele evolue destine a l'extraction automatique des informations relatives au savoir-faire et aux connaissances depuis un document electronique
GB2359168A (en) * 1998-11-04 2001-08-15 Infodream Corp Advanced model for automatic extraction of skill and knowledge information from an electronic document
WO2000036535A1 (fr) * 1998-12-16 2000-06-22 Cvbase Ag Procede et systeme de traitement structure d'informations personnelles
US9760860B2 (en) 1998-12-21 2017-09-12 Frontline Technologies Group Llc System and method for performing substitute fulfillment
US7818254B1 (en) 1999-04-07 2010-10-19 Juno Holdings, N.V. Application apparatus and method
USRE44626E1 (en) 1999-04-07 2013-12-03 Juno Holdings S.A.R.L. Application apparatus and method
EP1198772A1 (fr) * 1999-07-02 2002-04-24 SDC Computer Services, Inc. Systeme de gestion d'informations de ressources humaines en reseau
EP1198772A4 (fr) * 1999-07-02 2003-05-14 Sdc Comp Services Inc Systeme de gestion d'informations de ressources humaines en reseau
US8321254B2 (en) 1999-08-20 2012-11-27 Frontline Technologies, Inc. Notification of employees via pass code accessed web pages
EP1096407A1 (fr) * 1999-10-25 2001-05-02 Vanco Group Limited Système et procédé pour annoncer des postes à pourvoir utilsant des réseaux de communications
EP1330747A4 (fr) * 2000-09-20 2007-03-21 Openhire Inc Procede et systeme pour le stockage et la recuperation de curriculum vitae
EP1330747A1 (fr) * 2000-09-20 2003-07-30 Outtask, INC. Procede et systeme pour le stockage et la recuperation de curriculum vitae
WO2002069231A1 (fr) * 2001-02-26 2002-09-06 Kevin Scott Procede et systeme permettant de pourvoir aux postes vacants
WO2003009187A1 (fr) * 2001-07-19 2003-01-30 Sciami Paty Ltd. Systeme d'evaluation et procede associe
US7792685B2 (en) 2001-11-30 2010-09-07 United Negro College Fund, Inc. Selection of individuals from a pool of candidates in a competition system
US7321858B2 (en) 2001-11-30 2008-01-22 United Negro College Fund, Inc. Selection of individuals from a pool of candidates in a competition system
US8121851B2 (en) 2001-11-30 2012-02-21 United Negro College Fund, Inc. Selection of individuals from a pool of candidates in a competition system
US8560333B2 (en) 2001-11-30 2013-10-15 United Negro College Fund, Inc. Selection of individuals from a pool of candidates in a competition system
US8140366B2 (en) 2008-01-04 2012-03-20 Frontline Technologies, Inc. Method, system and program product for filling job orders
US8731981B2 (en) 2008-01-04 2014-05-20 Frontline Technologies, Inc. Method, system and program product for filling job orders

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU6182098A (en) 1998-09-22

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6587668B1 (en) Method and apparatus for a corporate education system
Kraemer et al. Computer-based systems for cooperative work and group decisionmaking: status of use and problems in development
WO1998039716A1 (fr) Systeme et procede pour coordonner employeurs eventuels et candidats a un emploi
US20030050811A1 (en) System and method for hiring an applicant
Addison et al. The performance architect's essential guide to the performance technology landscape
Jafari et al. Designing portals: opportunities and challenges
US20160104260A1 (en) Practitioner Career Management Assessment Interviewer Method and Tool
KR20100104831A (ko) 커리어 관리를 지원하는 구인·구직 사이트를 이용한 구인·구직 서비스 제공 방법
US20030055842A1 (en) System and method for automatically evaluating and provisionally granting educational transfer credits
US20020032599A1 (en) System and method for venture acceleration
US20030233586A1 (en) Total service support system for employees and method therefor
KR20150053345A (ko) 재능 및 경력 기반의 학사관리 시스템 및 방법
Gregory et al. Digital curation education in practice: catching up with two former fellows
KR20010095538A (ko) 인터넷을 이용한 교육 관련 정보 제공 시스템 및 그 운영방법
Patel et al. An Exploratory Study on Electronic Human Resource Management (E-HRM) Tools Implemented In Different Industry in Odisha
Shah et al. Developing people capabilities in knowledge intensive remote services
Mitchell Basic principles of information technology organization in health care institutions
JP2004227237A (ja) 教育機関支援システム、教育機関支援方法、その記録媒体およびプログラム
Kamble IT Skills for LIS Professionals in the Modern Context
Kramer et al. Systems for cooperative work and group decision-making: status of use and problems in development
EP1130543A2 (fr) Système comparatif de dissémination d'informations basé sur des connaissances
Ragsdale Staffing the library Website
JP2004227378A (ja) 従業員向け教育サービス支援システム及び教育サービス支援方法並びにプログラム及び記録媒体
Kahn et al. Where is Information Quality in Information Systems Education?
JP2002109077A (ja) 企業留学の情報管理システム

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AU BR CA JP KR MX NZ

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE

DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP

Ref document number: 1998538575

Format of ref document f/p: F

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: CA