PROCESS FOR MAKING γ-METHYLENE - 10 -DEAZAAMINOPTERIN (MDAM)
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to a novel and improved
process for synthesizing the useful antitumor agent γ-
methylene-10-
deazaaminopterin (MDAM) .
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
A. Brief History of MDAM
MDAM is a potent inhibitor of dihydrofolate
reductase (DHFR) . The therapeutic value of MDAM as an
antitumor agent has been well documented in recent
literature, as have its increased specificity and reduced
toxicity, particularly when compared to analogs, such as
methotrexate (MTX) . MDAM is currently undergoing Phase I
clinical trials at Johns Hopkins University as an
antitumor compound.
MDAM and certain derivatives thereof, are the
subject of United States Patents 4,996,207 and 5,073,554,
and is also disclosed and claimed in several overseas
patents in Europe, Canada, Mexico and Japan. MDAM has
the following structure I:
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 28)
(I)
The general formula for known active derivatives of
MDAM is seen below as Formula II:
(ID
wherein Rx is hydrogen or lower alkyl;
R2 is hydrogen or hydroxy;
R3 is hydrogen or methylene; and
the dashed line indicates a single bond or a
double bond.
MDAM is similar in structure to the known antitumor
and anti-inflammatory drug methotrexate seen below as
Formula III:
(III)
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 28)
MDAM specifically inhibits dihydrofolate reductase
to a far greater extent than MTX. Further, MDAM does not
undergo the polyglutamylation common to MTX and
derivatives, thereby reducing the toxicity of MDAM far
below that of MTX. The greater efficacy and reduced
toxicity of MDAM (compared to MTX and derivatives
thereof) has been well established for many years now.
B. Current Synthetic Procedures For Making MDAM
The current process for making MDAM involves a
complex 11 step procedure to make the key intermediate,
plus an additional three steps to produce the key
intermediate diethylγ-methylene glutamate) , and a final
coupling step, followed by the hydrolysis of the ester to
MDAM. The prior processes to make the key intermediate,
and/or MDAM or derivatives are outlined in the above
mentioned U.S. Patents, and in several publications known
in the literature, the most notable being Nair, J". Org .
Chem . , 50:1879, 1985, which publication recites the
process shown below as Scheme I .
Further, the previous process for preparing MDAM
required the nitration of 2 , 4-diamino-6-chloro-pyrimidine
(a necessary reagent), which was a difficult, time-
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 2β)
consuming, step in the process. A schematic depiction of
the prior process is shown below as Scheme 1, and is
intended to illustrate the complexity and difficulty
previously associated with synthesizing MDAM.
Scheme 1
N
II
HjN- CHjCCHjCHj- -o NO,
COgMe CCHfeCHj C02Me
UN
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 2
As shown in Scheme 1, the prior art process for
synthesizing MDAM requires a number of awkward and time-
consuming maneuvers to produce the desired product. The
most awkward and time-consuming step is the required
nitration of 2 , 4-diamino-6-chloro-pyrimidine, which is
necessary for the eighth step in the process, the
addition of the pyrimidine ring with the 5- and 6-
positions having attached nitrogen groups to enable its
later conversion to the required pteridine fused ring
group .
The prior art processes to synthesize MDAM were
further limited in their adaptability to bulk
manufacturing. Cost effectiveness, yield and purity are
significant considerations in the bulk manufacture of any
pharmaceutical product, and the prior processes employed
to synthesize MDAM were neither cost effective nor did
they generate acceptable yields of product .
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The process described by this invention delivers a
highly efficient, convergent process for the synthesis of
MDAM and useful derivatives thereof. The inventive
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 28»
process reduces the number of steps to produce the
pteroic acid intermediate from 11 to 5, and further,
significantly increases the yield and purity of the end
product when compared with prior processes employed to
synthesize these useful compounds.
As stated above, the inventive process involves a
five step process to produce the pteroic acid
intermediate, which is then coupled to an ester of γ-
methylene glutamic acid, and finally hydrolyzed to form
the desired end product in a highly pure form.
The process begins with the conversion of 2,4,5,6-
tetraaminopyrimidine to the corresponding pteridine
intermediate. After bromination and alkylation of this
6-hydroxymethyl pteridine intermediate to form a 9,10-
dehydro pteroic acid ester, reduction of the 9,10-double
bond produces pteroic acid ester, and then hydrolyzing
the ester to form pteroic acid (the key intermediate) ,
coupling with γ-methylene glutamic acid ester and
hydrolyzing the resulting compound (the diester of MDAM)
yields MDAM in very high yield.
The schemes and specific examples for carrying out
the inventive process are illustrated in the detailed
description set forth below.
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (ROLE 28i
It is an object of this invention to provide for' a
highly efficient and convergent process for synthesizing
MDAM and useful derivatives thereof.
Another object is to provide for a process for
synthesizing MDAM and derivatives, which process is
readily adaptable to GMP conditions.
Another object is to provide for a process for
synthesizing MDAM which is time efficient, cost
effective, and produces MDAM in sufficiently high yield.
Other objects will become apparent from a reading of
the following detailed description.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
The preferred embodiments herein described are not
intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to
the precise details disclosed. They have been chosen and
described to explain the principles of the invention, and
the application and practical use thereof, so that those
skilled in the art may understand its teachings.
The process of this invention is designed to
produce, in substantially pure form, the antitumor agent
γ-methylene-10-deazaaminopterin (MDAM) . The general
UBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
process described by this invention is shown below as
Scheme II
Scheme II
As shown in Scheme II, the starting material is
2 , 4, 5, 6-tetraamino pyrimidine (a) . The starting material
is preferably obtained as a salt of the actual compound.
Most preferred is the sulfate salt, which compound is
available commercially from Aldrich Chemical Company and
others .
This initial step in the process is carried out
according to published conditions in Baugh, et al , The
Journal of Organic Chemistry, Volume 29: p 3610 (1969) .
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (flic 26)
The intermediate 6-hydroxymethyl pteridine (b) is the
resultant compound, which is formed by a closure of the
fused λB' ring of the pteridine molecule by condensation
of 2 , 4 , 5 , 6-tetraamino pyrimidine and dihydroxy acetone.
The preferred reagents are those which support these
conditions and the ring formation, preferably ketols, and
in the most preferred case, 1 , 3-dihydroxy-2 -propanone .
The 6-hydroxymethyl pteridine (b) is then brominated
to facilitate the alkylation step of the process. The
bromination is achieved by reacting the 6-hydroxymethyl
intermediate (b) with an excess of a brominating reagent
which replaces the terminal hydroxy moiety with a bromine
atom. Preferred reagents for the brominating step are
identified in Piper, et al , The Journal of Organic
Chemistry, Volume 42:208 (1977). The most preferred
reagent is dibromotriphenylphosphine, and subsequent work
up and recrystallization from acetic acid and isopropanol
yields the hydrogen bromide isopropanol salt of 6-
bromomethyl pteridine (c) in high yield.
This intermediate salt (c) is then reacted with
carbonyl compounds under Wittig reaction conditions to
form the 9,10-dehydro pteroate ester intermediate (d) .
The most preferred intermediate (d) is shown as the
methyl ester of 9,10-dehydro pteroic acid. Preferred
reagents used in the reaction are triphenylphosphine and
methyl -4 -formyl benzoate, in a strong base such as sodium
methoxide, to form the intermediate (d) .
The ester (d) is then reduced to saturate the C9-C10
bond. The preferred process involves reacting the ester
intermediate (d) with palladium/carbon palladium on
alumina in an organic solvent to produce intermediate
methyl pteroate ester (e) .
The methyl pteroate ester (e) is then converted to
the key pteroic acid intermediate (f) , 4-amino-4-deoxy-
10-deaza pteroic acid. Preferably the hydrolysis is
conducted in a strong base, most preferably in aqueous
sodium hydroxide solution along with an organic solvent
2-methoxyethanol .
The pteroic acid intermediate (f) is then activated,
and coupled (as the mixed anhydride) to an ester of γ-
methylene glutamic acid to form the esterified form of
MDAM, and then hydrolyzed to the active compound (g) of
Formula I .
Scheme I la
In an alternative alkylation of intermediate (c) ,
the bromomethyl pteridine salt (c) is pH neutralized,
then reacted with a diester of homoterephthallic acid (4-
carboxybenzoic acid) to form the esterified form of the
10-carboxy intermediate (el) . Intermediate (el) is then
decarboxylated and hydrolyzed the other ester group with
a strong nucleophile to form the key pteroic acid
intermediate (f) . Preferred nucleophilic agents include
sodium cyanide, most preferably dissolved in
dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) .
The following specific examples illustrate the best
mode for carrying out the inventive process. The
examples are disclosed for illustrative purposes only,
and are not to be considered as limiting the invention to
the precise details set forth.
All NMR data are expressed in parts per million
(ppm) , and the resonances expressed as follows: s,
singlet; d, doublet; t, triplet; br.s., broad singlet;
sep, septet; c, complex set of signals, the center of
which is provided.
Example 1
2.4-diamino-6-hydroxymethyl pteridine
Tetraaminopyrimidine sulfate (10 mmoles) was taken
up in 40 mL of water and barium chloride (10 mmoles) in
10 mL of water was added. The mixture was placed in a
boiling water bath for 10 min. After cooling, the barium
chloride was removed by filtration and the solid was
washed on the filter with about 10 mL of water. The
combined washings and filtrate were made up to 50 mL with
water. The solution was added to a solution of 150 mL of
4 M sodium acetate containing dihydroxy acetone (30
mmoles) and cysteine hydrochloride monohydrate (10 mmoles
in a 1 L Erlenmeyer flask and was placed on a rotary
shaker at room temperature for 24 hours. After this
period, the flask was placed in the cold for several
12
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26}
hours, the precipitate was then collected by suction
filtration and washed with cold water. The precipitate
was resuspended in 100 mL of water and heated to boiling;
if necessary drops of IN sodium hydroxide solution were
added to effect the solution. Norit (0.5 g) was added and
the hot solution thoroughly mixed, filtered hot through
heated funnel. After cooling to room temperature, the pH
was adjusted to 6.0 with 1 N HC1 and the flask was placed
in the cold for several hours . The precipitate was
collected by filtration, washed with cold water, ethanol,
(50:50) ethanol-ether, and finally with ether, then dried
in vacuo. The yield after an additional recrystallization
from water is 55%. The compound exhibited following
proton NMR signals in DMSO-d6; (ppm) 8.8 (s, 2H,
aromatic), 7.6 and 6.6 (broad singlets, 4H, Amino), 5.5
(broad singlet, 1H, hydroxy) and 4.65 (s, 2H, benzylic) .
Example 2
2.4-diamino-6-bromomethyl pteridine
Solid hydroxymethyl pteridine (110 mmoles) was added
to a mixture of Ph3PBr2 (363 mmoles) and dimethylacetamide
13
UBSTITOTE SHEET (RULE 2d
(360 mL) in a 2L three necked flask. The mixture was
stirred at 20-25° C for 3.5 hours. The solution that
formed was treated with drop wise during 15 minutes with
7.2 mL of ethanol and stirred for 15 minutes longer
before benzene (1.17 L) was added. A dark oil
precipitated, and the mixture was stirred for 30 minutes
longer and left to stand overnight . The clear
supernatant liquid was decanted from the semi solid
precipitate, which was dissolved with stirring in hot
glacial acetic acid (600 mL, pre heated to 100°C) . The
solution was filtered while hot, and the beige,
crystalline material that separated from the cooled
filtrate was collected after 4 hours at 20-25°C. The ether
washed solid (solvated by acetic acid) was recrystallized
from isopropanol to give yellow orange platelets, which
were washed with ether and dried to yield 50% of the
theoretical yield. The compound exhibited following
proton NMR signals in DMSO-d6; (ppm) 9.3 and 9.2 (broad
singlet, 4H, amino groups), 9.0 (s, 1H, aromatic), 4.9
(s, 2H, benzylic) , 3.8 (septet, 1H, CH of isopropanol),
and 1.0 (d, 6H, methyls of isopropanol) .
Example 3
Methyl-9.10-dehydro-4-amino-4-deoxy pteroate
100 grams of the intermediate from Example 2 above
was stirred in a solution of 3.0 liters of N,N-
dimethylacetamide and one molar equivalent of
triphenylphosphine for 4 hours at 80° C. The solution was
allowed to cool to room temperature, after which two
molar equivalents of sodium methoxide and one molar
equivalent of methyl -4 -formyl benzoate were added, and
stirred for 18 more hours. The solution was then diluted
with 12.0 liters of distilled water and the precipitate
was filtered under suction and then washed successively
with 200 L of toluene and diethyl ether. The solid was
then dried under a vacuum, to yield 62.0 grams of the
title compound (75% yield) .
Η NMR: 8.85δ (s,lH); 8.0δ-7.65δ (d,4H); 7.85δ-7.5δ
(d,2H) ; 3.8δ (s,3H) .
15
SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26}
Example 4
Methyl -4 -amino-4-deoxy pteroate
40 grams of the intermediate from Example 3 above
was dissolved in 10.0 liters of glacial acetic acid, and
20.0 grams of 10% palladium on carbon catalyst added and
hydrogenated at ambient temperature and pressure. The
reaction was stopped after 24 hours and the palladium
filtered out of the solution. The filtrate was then
heated to 45° C and purged with air for four hours and
evaporated the solvent or in alternate method the
filtrate was diluted with 3.0 liters of 3% hydrogen
peroxide and stirred four more hours at room temperature.
Evaporation of the solvent at reduced pressure yielded
32.0 grams of the title compound representing a yield of
80%.
Η NMR: 8.5δ (s,lH); 7.82δ-7.4δ (d,4H); 7.45δ-6.5δ
(br.s 4H) ; 3.8δ (s,3H); 3. lδ (s,4H).
Example 5
4-Amino-4-deoxy pteroic Acid
20.0 grams of the intermediate from Example 4,
above, was dissolved and stirred in 500 mL of 0.5 N
sodium hydroxide and 500 mL of 2-methoxyethanol at room
temperature for 24 hours. The solution was concentrated
to 100 mL, filtered, and the filtrate acidified with
glacial acetic acid to pH 4.5. A copious yellow
precipitate formed and was refrigerated overnight, then
filtered, washed with distilled water and dried. The
crude product was determined to be 90% pure by HPLC, and
resulted in the recovery of 17.0 grams of the title
compound (90% yield) .
Η NMR: 8.45δ (s,lH); 7.8δ-7.3δ (d,4H); 7.5δ-6.7δ
(br.s, 4H) ; 3.1δ (s,4H) .
MS (FAB) : 310
Example 6
Methyl -4 -amino-4 -deoxy- 10 -methoxycarbonyl -pteroate
3.0 grams of dimethyl homoterephthallate is slowly
added to a stirred suspension of 1.64 grams of 35%
potassium hydride in mineral oil and 12 mL of dry N,N-
dimethyl formamide which has been cooled to 0° C. After
30 minutes the yellow solution was cooled to -40° C, and
1.42 grams of 6-bromomethyl pteridine hydrogen bromide
(0.33 molar equivalents) in 5 mL of dry DMF was added
over a period of 10 minutes. Alternatively, one molar
equivalent of 6-bromomethyl pteridine may be used. The
mixture was brought to room temperature and stirred for
two more hours. The solvent was then removed by vacuum,
and the residue was extracted with chloroform and then
dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate, then concentrated
in vacuo to yield 2.0 grams (-60% yield) of the title
compound .
Η NMR: 8.8δ (s,lH); 7.9δ-7.3δ (d,4H); 7.6δ-6.6δ
(br.s,4H); 4.62δ (t,lH); 3.5δ-3.55δ (s,6H); 3.3δ-3.5δ
(m,2H) .
Example 7
4-amino-4-deoxy-pteroic acid
0.55 grams (1.44 mmoles) of the intermediate from
Example 7 above, and 0.21 grams (4.32 mmoles) of sodium
cyanide were dissolved in 10 mL of dimethylsulfoxide and
stirred for 3 hours at 175° C-180° C for 3 hours. The
dark mixture was cooled, and the solvent removed by
vacuum. The residue was dissolved in 15 mL of distilled
water, filtered, and the filtrate acidified with glacial
acetic acid. The precipitate was collected and washed
with water to obtain 0.41 grams of crude pteroic acid in
quantitative yield.
Η NMR: 8.45δ (s,lH); 7.8δ-7.3δ (d,4H); 7.5δ-6.7δ
(br.s,4H) ; 3.lδ (s,4H) .
MS (FAB) : 310
The pteroic acid intermediate is coupled with γ-
methylene glutamic acid (or an ester thereof) to form
MDAM. The coupling process is carried out as described
in any of the above referenced patents or publications.
Further synthesis of Formula II compounds may be
carried out as disclosed in PCT Publication WO 91/10666,
published July 25, 1991.
The above description does not limit the invention
to the details given above, but may be modified within
the scope of the following claims.