WO1996038820A1 - Systeme de regulation securitaire - Google Patents

Systeme de regulation securitaire Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1996038820A1
WO1996038820A1 PCT/GB1996/001249 GB9601249W WO9638820A1 WO 1996038820 A1 WO1996038820 A1 WO 1996038820A1 GB 9601249 W GB9601249 W GB 9601249W WO 9638820 A1 WO9638820 A1 WO 9638820A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
door
image
parameter
image data
control system
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/GB1996/001249
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Michael Christopher Fairhurst
Stephen William Kelly
Martin Golding
Original Assignee
Mayor Limited
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Mayor Limited filed Critical Mayor Limited
Priority to EP96919896A priority Critical patent/EP0832472A1/fr
Priority to AU58264/96A priority patent/AU5826496A/en
Publication of WO1996038820A1 publication Critical patent/WO1996038820A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E05—LOCKS; KEYS; WINDOW OR DOOR FITTINGS; SAFES
    • E05G—SAFES OR STRONG-ROOMS FOR VALUABLES; BANK PROTECTION DEVICES; SAFETY TRANSACTION PARTITIONS
    • E05G5/00—Bank protection devices
    • E05G5/003—Entrance control
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07C—TIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • G07C9/00—Individual registration on entry or exit
    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E05—LOCKS; KEYS; WINDOW OR DOOR FITTINGS; SAFES
    • E05Y—INDEXING SCHEME ASSOCIATED WITH SUBCLASSES E05D AND E05F, RELATING TO CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, ELECTRIC CONTROL, POWER SUPPLY, POWER SIGNAL OR TRANSMISSION, USER INTERFACES, MOUNTING OR COUPLING, DETAILS, ACCESSORIES, AUXILIARY OPERATIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR, APPLICATION THEREOF
    • E05Y2900/00—Application of doors, windows, wings or fittings thereof
    • E05Y2900/10—Application of doors, windows, wings or fittings thereof for buildings or parts thereof
    • E05Y2900/13—Type of wing
    • E05Y2900/132—Doors

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a control system for use with a security door, with interlocking or synchronised doors, or with other means, such as turnstiles, flaps or other obstacles, for controlling access to a secured area.
  • a typical security door may comprise a revolving door divided into, say, four compartments by radially extending wings.
  • the wings are coupled centrally at their upper or lower end to an interlock operated by a control system and are typically motor driven, but may alternatively be pushed manually. Turnstile systems are generally free to be pushed manually.
  • the control system may operate, for example, in response to a card reader.
  • An authorised person wishing to pass through the door will then insert their pass card in the reader and, provided that their card is recognised, the control system then operates the interlock to free the revolving door so the user can pass through it. If the card is not recognised, or if an unauthorised person attempts to gain access without use of the pass card reader, then the interlock holds the wings of the revolving door against movement and so prevents passage through the door.
  • the present inventors have adopted an entirely new approach to the detection of tail-gating and piggy-backing, based on the use of video data. While the use of video data has previously been proposed for the recognition of authorised persons, as an alternative, e.g., to the use of card readers, the use of video data for piggy-backing detection (APB) has not previously been thought desirable or possible. On the face of it the complexity of the visual data which would be gathered from e.g., a revolving transparent door, and the processing overheads involved in determining from such data the number of persons present provide a major disincentive to the adoption of such techniques.
  • APB piggy-backing detection
  • APB detection generally has to be carried out in the short interval of time during which the user is passing through the door and so techniques involving large processing overheads tend to be avoided.
  • the present inventors have realised that with appropriate processing, the raw video data can be used to yield a simple parameter for comparison with a predetermined threshold, and that the use of video data in this manner allows effective APB detection in real time using a relatively low-powered processor.
  • the threshold may be for a statistic derived from a number of parameters in combination.
  • the image processor and discriminator comprise a cascaded series of modules, each module being arranged to process image data to determine a respective parameter, and to compare the parameter with a corresponding threshold.
  • the modules are arranged so that when one module is able to make a decision at a predetermined confidence level, then that module produces the said discriminatory output signal, otherwise the said module passing image data on to a subsequent module for further processing.
  • the modules are arranged generally in order of their discriminatory power, with the most powerful module receiving the image data first.
  • the discriminatory power of a module is a measure of its ability to make a discriminatory decision with a minimum processing overhead, and so at maximum speed.
  • the efficiency of the whole system is maximised by using the fastest tests firsts, and only passing on to tests with a greater processing overhead when the preceding tests fail to meet a predetermined confidence level.
  • the image processor is arranged to capture a background image of the door with no person present, and to capture a subsequent image of the door with a person present and to discard from the second said image video data which is unchanged from the background image.
  • a method of controlling a security access device including capturing video image data from a secured area of the access device, processing said image data and thereby deriving at least one parameter for discriminating the number of persons present in the secured area, and
  • the present invention also encompasses a security access device when fitted with a control system in accordance with the first aspect of the present invention.
  • a security access device including a secured region bounded by one or more wholly or partially transparent walls, characterised by a control system including a video input device arranged to view the secured region, and in that the transparent walls include filter means arranged to block or reduce the transmission of light in part of the visible/near-visible optical spectrum, and in that the video input device has a sensitivity/wavelength characteristic generally complementary to the transmission characteristic of the said filter means associated with the transparent walls, the visibility to the video input device of objects outside the transparent walls thereby being reduced or eliminated.
  • Revolving security doors for example, are commonly built with glass doors. Objects outside the secured area are therefore potentially visible to any video security control system and may "confuse" any judgement made by the control system.
  • This aspect of the present invention overcomes this problem by using walls which are transparent in one part of the visible/near-visible spectrum and a video input device which is sensitive in another part of the spectrum.
  • the walls may, for example, be covered by a film which blocks transmission in the infra-red.
  • the video device may either be selected to be inherently sensitive in the infra-red range, and insensitive outside that range, or, may be provided with an input filter giving this desired sensitivity/wavelength characteristic.
  • Figure l is a block diagram of a system embodying the present invention.
  • Figures 2a and 2b are schematic representations of captured video data at different stages of processing
  • Figure 3 shows a set of pixel masks used in processing the image data to detect the head edges shown in Figure 2b;
  • Figure 4 is a schematic illustrating the processing of the image data to derive the image height and width
  • Figure 5 is a flow diagram for the image processing in the APB control circuit
  • Figure 6 is a schematic of hardware for implementing the system of Figure 1;
  • Figures 7a - 7d are graphs showing experimental data obtained using the system of Figure 1.
  • An entry control system comprises a revolving door 1 which, in this example, has four compartments defined by radially extending wings 2a-2d.
  • the movement of the wings is controlled by an interlock 3 mounted centrally above the wings.
  • This interlock operates in a fashion conventional in revolving security doors to lock the door against movement until an appropriate control signal is received from a control unit.
  • a card reader 5 is connected to the door controller 4 and stands outside the door 1. In use, when someone wishes to pass through the door, that person inserts their card in the reader 5. Provided that the card is recognised, the reader 5 outputs an authorization signal to the door controller 4 which then operates the interlock 3 to free the door which is then driven by a motor through an angle sufficient for the authorised user to pass from the entrance to the exit of the door.
  • control system for the door further comprises a video camera 6 which is mounted above the door looking down into an underlying compartment.
  • the video data from the camera is processed in an APB control circuit 7 to produce a discriminatory output which goes to the controller 4 for the door to operate the interlock 3 to lock the door when piggy-backing or tail-gating is detected.
  • the APB control circuit has a cascaded hierarchical structure. This comprises a plurality of stages arranged generally in order of the discriminatory power of the particular parameter which is derived and used.
  • the image data is first subject to processing by the first of this hierarchy of stages. If that results in the production of a parameter having a value such that a decision on the presence or absence of a second person can be made with adequate confidence, then the processing is terminated at that stage and an appropriate output signal produced and fed to the external control unit. If, however, a decision cannot be made based on the first parameter, then the image data is passed on to the next stage in the hierarchy, for further processing and the derivation of a further parameter and so on.
  • the system is structured to maximise the processing speed and to minimise the average processing overhead for the image data.
  • a single parameter may be used for the discrimination in the majority of cases, with further parameters being derived and tested only in those marginal cases where a single parameter does not enable a decision to be made with sufficient confidence.
  • the first stage of the video control circuit is a background-subtraction stage. This firstly captures a background image of the compartment of the door prior to the entry of the user into the field of view of the camera. This background image is stored in order to provide a means of identifying changes occurring when entry into the door compartment is effected. Subsequently, as the user passes into the field of view, the system captures a second image, the "present" image. This is compared with the stored background image and those pixels which are unchanged are discarded, thereby eliminating them from the subsequent processing stages.
  • the comparison is carried out by taking the grey scale values in the range 1-255 of each pixel, subtracting one from the other and writing a value of 0 for each pixel where the result of the subtraction is 0 or is less than a predetermined small value, say 10. Where, the difference is greater than this predetermined threshold, then the value written is simply the grey scale value of the present image for that pixel. In the course of this process a count is maintained of the number of non-zero pixels produced and this is used as the first test parameter for APB detection. It is found that when two or more persons are present the difference count is characteristically higher than when a single person is present in the door. In some cases however the result of the difference count will be too close to the relevant predetermined threshold for a reliable determination to be made. In this case the video data is passed on for subsequent stages of processing and discrimination.
  • the next stage carries out edge detection using the known Sobel edge detection algorithm.
  • This algorithm is applied only to the non-zero pixels of the image output from the first stage and sets those pixels to one of two binary values producing a binary image with, for example, edges shown in black on a white ground as in Figure 2a.
  • a determination is then made of the area inside the edges. This is done by stepping a window of dimensions, e.g., 10 x 10 through the image and recording a count for each pixel which is inside the edges and for which none of the pixels of the window cross an edge. This count then is a measure of the area inside the edges and is related to the area in the view of the camera of the shoulders and head of the person passing through the door.
  • This measure of the area provides a second discriminatory parameter which as in the first stage is compared with a respective discriminatory threshold. As before, if this comparison produces a result with a sufficient degree of certainty, then the processing can be terminated at that stage and the discriminatory output passed on to the control system 7. If this is not the case, then the system passes on to the next stage of processing. As illustrated in Figure 4, this calculates the height and width of the image defined by the edges, calculates the ratio of the two, and compares this with a respective predetermined threshold.
  • the final processing module carries out what has been termed "head edge detection” .
  • This uses the aliasing characteristic of the "corners" of the detected edges.
  • the image data is compared with a set of pixel masks of the form shown in Figure 3. A count is incremented, and a mark displayed ( Figure 2b) , for each pixel where a match is found with one of the masks. The count of the number of matches is then compared with a predetermined threshold for the count to provide a further discriminatory test.
  • control system 7 may activate the -interlock to lock the door against movement, thereby trapping the users, or may drive the door in the reverse direction to expel the users.
  • the inventors have found that the discrimination of the system can be improved by calculating an additional parameter to compensate for the position of an object in the door.
  • the parameters discussed above are based on what is assumed to be a plan view from above of the person in the door. However, if the person is not directly under the camera, then the camera captures part of the side of the body too. This extra information would tend to distort the measurement and could lead to the mis-classification of a tall off-centre person as two people. To avoid this, a measurement is taken first of the position of the centre of the object. This is then compared with the actual centre of the camera and an adjustment parameter is set. The adjustment parameter takes the form of a ratio by which subsequently determined parameters are multiplied.
  • Figure 7a and Column 1 of Table l show the measurements of the position of the object used for determining the adjustment ratio for a sample of 72 test images. The higher the number the further the object is from the centre of the camera.
  • the images are a selection from the following categories: a single person; two people; people carrying large and small objects; a person carrying a large object over their head.
  • Figure 7b and Column 2 of the table show the difference count parameter, after correction by the adjustment ratio or "normalising factor" of Figure 7a.
  • images 68-70 are large objects carried over the top of the head and so result in a large difference count.
  • Figure 7c and Column 3 show the (corrected) head area parameter. This measurement is a guide to the total area available to be a head space. Images 68-70 would cause concern as the values are extremely high. These images would fall above the alarm threshold, as 2 people could fit under such a large object.
  • Figure 7d shows the height/width ratio parameter measuring the compactness of the image. The lower the value, the more likely that the imaged object is two people.
  • Table 1 below lists the data illustrated in these graphs. Columns 1 to 3 are identified above. The data contained in the other columns are as follows:
  • the Normalising Factor is used to adjust the . ratio depending on the position of the object in respect to the centre of the camera.
  • This measurement is the number of pixel patterns that match with a head indicator mask. The greater the number the larger the number of head mask matches.
  • This measurement is the number of straight lines found in the image.
  • the comparators may be arranged to make an "intelligent" decision based on a number of parameters, rather than simply applying a single threshold.
  • the system may also include a knowledge base so that it can judge each situation on the measurements of the current image and knowledge gained about the environment the system is working with..
  • Table 2 lists the subjects used for the different images listed in Table 1.
  • the following thresholds may be used by the comparators for discrimination:
  • the system described above may be modified through the use of moving images, that is to say the capturing of a series of video frames as the person moves through the door. This then produces distinctive "constants" which may be used as the basis for discriminatory parameters in an analogous fashion to the process discussed above.
  • some of the processing modules may use appropriately trained neural networks. These may be trained on the parameters produced by other modules.
  • Appropriate thresholds for the different parameters used by different modules may be obtained by inspection from real sample data such as that illustrated in Figures 7a-7d, and or from computer modelling of the environment in which the system is to be used.
  • Figure 6 illustrates one example of hardware embodying the system.
  • a camera 61 views the target scene and passes the acquired image to a frame grabber 62.
  • the camera views the target scene through an IR bandpass filter.
  • An IR bandstop filter which may be in the form of a film applied to the walls of the revolving door and which is transparent in the rest of the visual spectrum is then used to screen the extraneous visual field from the field of view of the camera.
  • a light source may be provided inside the door to provide illumination at levels appropriate to the sensitiviry of the video camera 61.
  • the image from the frame grabber is passed to a single board PC 63 which runs image processing software implementing the hierarchical modular structure discussed above. Once a decision has been made by the control program, an output is passed to the door controller 64.
  • the camera 61 is a 1/3 inch black and white El camera (RS845-184) having a 1/3 inch CS mount DD lens, 2.6mm (RS846-266) .
  • the frame grabber is that available commercially as VIDEOBLASTER SE.
  • the single board PC uses an Intel 486DX2/66 microprocessor and an ISA bus.
  • the interface to the door controller 64 is a standard PC ISA bus serial card.
  • the user interface which enables the user to set adjustable parameters for the control program may comprise a keyboard or keypad and a VDU or LCD display.
  • appendix A the source code for the image processing/discrimination program run on the single board PC 63
  • appendix B the different elements of the program are listed in pseudocode.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
  • Finance (AREA)
  • Lock And Its Accessories (AREA)
  • Burglar Alarm Systems (AREA)

Abstract

Cette invention concerne un système de régulation destiné à un dispositif d'accès sécuritaire, et notamment à des portes à tambour (1). Ce système assure la prise d'images vidéo et le traitement de ces images aux fins de l'évaluation du nombre de personnes présentes à l'intérieur d'une zone de sécurité du dispositif d'accès sécuritaire, et il permet la régulation du fonctionnement de ce dispositif d'accès sécuritaire en fonction de ce nombre de personnes.
PCT/GB1996/001249 1995-06-02 1996-05-24 Systeme de regulation securitaire WO1996038820A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP96919896A EP0832472A1 (fr) 1995-06-02 1996-05-24 Systeme de regulation securitaire
AU58264/96A AU5826496A (en) 1995-06-02 1996-05-24 Security control system

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GBGB9511140.7A GB9511140D0 (en) 1995-06-02 1995-06-02 Security control system
GB9511140.7 1995-06-02

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1996038820A1 true WO1996038820A1 (fr) 1996-12-05

Family

ID=10775379

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/GB1996/001249 WO1996038820A1 (fr) 1995-06-02 1996-05-24 Systeme de regulation securitaire

Country Status (4)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0832472A1 (fr)
AU (1) AU5826496A (fr)
GB (1) GB9511140D0 (fr)
WO (1) WO1996038820A1 (fr)

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1999055995A1 (fr) * 1998-04-29 1999-11-04 Malcolm William Thomas Systeme de commande d'acces
WO2003088157A1 (fr) * 2002-04-08 2003-10-23 Newton Security Inc. Detection d'acces a califourchon et d'ecriture contrepassee, alarme, enregistrement et prevention utilisant une vision artificielle
EP1686544A3 (fr) * 2005-01-31 2006-12-06 Optex Co., Ltd. Appareil de surveillance du trafic
US7397929B2 (en) 2002-09-05 2008-07-08 Cognex Technology And Investment Corporation Method and apparatus for monitoring a passageway using 3D images
US7400744B2 (en) 2002-09-05 2008-07-15 Cognex Technology And Investment Corporation Stereo door sensor
US7623674B2 (en) 2003-11-05 2009-11-24 Cognex Technology And Investment Corporation Method and system for enhanced portal security through stereoscopy
US8326084B1 (en) 2003-11-05 2012-12-04 Cognex Technology And Investment Corporation System and method of auto-exposure control for image acquisition hardware using three dimensional information
ITMI20120686A1 (it) * 2012-04-24 2013-10-25 Cometa S P A Apparecchiatura di rivelazione di passaggio
EP3203447A1 (fr) * 2016-02-04 2017-08-09 Holding Assessoria I Lideratge, S.L. (HAL SL) Détection d'accès frauduleux à des grilles de commande

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3564132A (en) * 1966-01-17 1971-02-16 Mardix Apparatus for controlling the passage of persons and objects between two areas utilizing closed circuit television
WO1981001213A1 (fr) * 1979-10-16 1981-04-30 Otis Elevator Co Systeme de comptage d'objets et de personnes
DE3740115A1 (de) * 1986-11-26 1988-06-09 Matsushita Electric Works Ltd Personenzahl-erfassungsanordnung
EP0431363A1 (fr) * 1989-12-05 1991-06-12 GALLENSCHÜTZ METALLBAU GmbH Sas de sécurité pour personnes
WO1994027408A1 (fr) * 1993-05-14 1994-11-24 Rct Systems, Inc. Moniteur de trafic video pour surfaces de vente au detail et emplacements similaires

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3564132A (en) * 1966-01-17 1971-02-16 Mardix Apparatus for controlling the passage of persons and objects between two areas utilizing closed circuit television
WO1981001213A1 (fr) * 1979-10-16 1981-04-30 Otis Elevator Co Systeme de comptage d'objets et de personnes
DE3740115A1 (de) * 1986-11-26 1988-06-09 Matsushita Electric Works Ltd Personenzahl-erfassungsanordnung
EP0431363A1 (fr) * 1989-12-05 1991-06-12 GALLENSCHÜTZ METALLBAU GmbH Sas de sécurité pour personnes
WO1994027408A1 (fr) * 1993-05-14 1994-11-24 Rct Systems, Inc. Moniteur de trafic video pour surfaces de vente au detail et emplacements similaires

Cited By (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1999055995A1 (fr) * 1998-04-29 1999-11-04 Malcolm William Thomas Systeme de commande d'acces
WO2003088157A1 (fr) * 2002-04-08 2003-10-23 Newton Security Inc. Detection d'acces a califourchon et d'ecriture contrepassee, alarme, enregistrement et prevention utilisant une vision artificielle
US7382895B2 (en) 2002-04-08 2008-06-03 Newton Security, Inc. Tailgating and reverse entry detection, alarm, recording and prevention using machine vision
US7397929B2 (en) 2002-09-05 2008-07-08 Cognex Technology And Investment Corporation Method and apparatus for monitoring a passageway using 3D images
US7400744B2 (en) 2002-09-05 2008-07-15 Cognex Technology And Investment Corporation Stereo door sensor
US7623674B2 (en) 2003-11-05 2009-11-24 Cognex Technology And Investment Corporation Method and system for enhanced portal security through stereoscopy
US8326084B1 (en) 2003-11-05 2012-12-04 Cognex Technology And Investment Corporation System and method of auto-exposure control for image acquisition hardware using three dimensional information
US7536253B2 (en) 2005-01-31 2009-05-19 Optex Co., Ltd. Traffic monitoring apparatus
EP1686544A3 (fr) * 2005-01-31 2006-12-06 Optex Co., Ltd. Appareil de surveillance du trafic
ITMI20120686A1 (it) * 2012-04-24 2013-10-25 Cometa S P A Apparecchiatura di rivelazione di passaggio
EP2657885A1 (fr) * 2012-04-24 2013-10-30 Cometa S.p.A. Détection de passage dans une porte tambour
EP3203447A1 (fr) * 2016-02-04 2017-08-09 Holding Assessoria I Lideratge, S.L. (HAL SL) Détection d'accès frauduleux à des grilles de commande
WO2017133902A1 (fr) * 2016-02-04 2017-08-10 Holding Assessoria I Lideratge, S.L. (Hal Sl) Détection d'accès frauduleux au niveau de portillons de contrôle
US11315374B2 (en) 2016-02-04 2022-04-26 Holding Assessoria I Lideratge, S.L. Detection of fraudulent access at control gates

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB9511140D0 (en) 1995-07-26
AU5826496A (en) 1996-12-18
EP0832472A1 (fr) 1998-04-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5937092A (en) Rejection of light intrusion false alarms in a video security system
US7536037B2 (en) Apparatus and method for human distinction using infrared light
US4872203A (en) Image input device for processing a fingerprint prior to identification
EP1346327B1 (fr) Appareil et procede de resolution de conflits d'entree/sortie pour des systemes de surveillance de securite
US7215798B2 (en) Method for forgery recognition in fingerprint recognition by using a texture classification of gray scale differential images
CN107679471B (zh) 基于视频监控平台的室内人员空岗检测方法
CN109409315B (zh) 一种atm机面板区域遗留物检测方法及系统
Ziliani et al. Image analysis for video surveillance based on spatial regularization of a statistical model-based change detection
KR20090086898A (ko) 비디오 카메라를 사용한 연기 검출
EP1010130A1 (fr) Systeme de securite video a faible taux de fausses alertes utilisant la classification d'objets
EP2546807B1 (fr) Dispositif de surveillance de trafic
CN111127810A (zh) 机房明火自动告警方法及系统
CN112396011A (zh) 一种基于视频图像心率检测及活体检测的人脸识别系统
EP0832472A1 (fr) Systeme de regulation securitaire
JPH07181012A (ja) 画像データの特徴量検出装置
JP2003051076A (ja) 侵入監視装置
JP2599701B2 (ja) エレベータの待機乗客数の検出方法
CN107221056B (zh) 基于人体识别来进行阻挡的方法
JP2002304651A (ja) 入退室管理装置とその方法、およびこの方法の実行プログラムとこの実行プログラムを記録した記録媒体
KR102211903B1 (ko) 컴퓨터비전 기술을 이용한 주행차량 내 승차인원을 검지하기 위한 촬영 방법 및 장치
KR20190072323A (ko) 영상 감시 시스템 및 영상 감시방법
JP3813023B2 (ja) アイリス認識装置
CN107221058A (zh) 智能化通道阻挡系统
JPH0869523A (ja) 人体認識装置
KR100338473B1 (ko) 다-차원 신경 회로망을 이용한 얼굴 검출 방법 및 그 장치

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AM AT AU AZ BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CZ DE DK EE ES FI GB GE HU IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LK LR LS LT LU LV MD MG MK MN MW MX NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK TJ TM TR TT UA UG US UZ VN AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): KE LS MW SD SZ UG AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN

DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1996919896

Country of ref document: EP

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1996919896

Country of ref document: EP

REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: CA

WWR Wipo information: refused in national office

Ref document number: 1996919896

Country of ref document: EP

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Ref document number: 1996919896

Country of ref document: EP