WO1995011316A1 - METHODE DIAGNOSTIQUE DE L'ACIDE NUCLEIQUE RECOURANT AUX RIBOSONDES, A LA DIGESTION DE LA RNAse ET A LA CHROMATOGRAPHIE PAR EXCLUSION DE POIDS MOLECULAIRE - Google Patents

METHODE DIAGNOSTIQUE DE L'ACIDE NUCLEIQUE RECOURANT AUX RIBOSONDES, A LA DIGESTION DE LA RNAse ET A LA CHROMATOGRAPHIE PAR EXCLUSION DE POIDS MOLECULAIRE Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1995011316A1
WO1995011316A1 PCT/US1994/012044 US9412044W WO9511316A1 WO 1995011316 A1 WO1995011316 A1 WO 1995011316A1 US 9412044 W US9412044 W US 9412044W WO 9511316 A1 WO9511316 A1 WO 9511316A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
nucleic acid
probe
target
dna
hpv
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US1994/012044
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Francis H. Martin
Frederick W. Jacobsen
Calvert L. Green
Original Assignee
Amgen Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Amgen Inc. filed Critical Amgen Inc.
Priority to AU80853/94A priority Critical patent/AU8085394A/en
Priority to EP94931951A priority patent/EP0738331A1/fr
Priority to NZ275286A priority patent/NZ275286A/en
Publication of WO1995011316A1 publication Critical patent/WO1995011316A1/fr
Priority to NO963901A priority patent/NO963901D0/no

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12QMEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q1/00Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
    • C12Q1/68Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving nucleic acids
    • C12Q1/6813Hybridisation assays
    • C12Q1/6816Hybridisation assays characterised by the detection means

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to diagnostic methods for detecting specific nucleotide sequences.
  • the method employs detectable, single stranded ribonucleic acid probes complementary to a target nucleotide sequence.
  • Nucleic acid hybridization is one of the most important physical phenomena to be exploited by molecular biologists.
  • the ability of a single stranded nucleic acid molecule to hybridize with another nucleic acid molecule encoding a complementary nucleotide sequence to form a double stranded hybrid was first recognized in 1953 by James Watson and Francis Crick in their model of the double helical nature of DNA.
  • Hal et al . [Proc . Nat ' 1 . Acad . Sci . , USA, vol . 47, p. 131] described in detail the ability of complementary nucleic acid molecules to form double-stranded hybrids with high efficiency and remarkable specificity from a mixture containing an abundance of non-complementary nucleic acids .
  • nucleic acid hybridization has become a fundamental technique used in some form by many, if not all, molecular biologists. For instance, nucleic acid probes are now utilized to diagnose the presence of human, plant, and animal pathogens, to identify and isolate specific genes, to study gene function and structure, to diagnose genetic disorders or a genetic predisposition to certain diseases, for forensic purposes, and to detect specific nucleic acids in tissues and cells by in situ hybridization.
  • Another method used to detect the presence of a specific virus is the immunoassay, a technique that enables the simultaneous testing of large numbers of specimens using standardized reagents.
  • this technique depends on the availability of an antigenic viral element for either direct detection or production of a specific antibody.
  • nucleic acid hybridization is one such method.
  • Nucleic acid hybridization can also be used to detect bacterial pathogens.
  • Conventional bacterial diagnostic methods are based on staining and microscopic analysis of a sample. While this method is rapid, it may be insensitive and non-specific. Because of this, most samples are cultured to amplify and identify the particular bacterial pathogen. Antibody reactivity, chemical reactivity, and/or growth on selective or different media is then conducted to reach a conclusion as to the bacteria present. As these methods depend on cultivation of the bacteria, identification can require from one day to several weeks. Beyond the time and cost factors evident in such conventional bacterial diagnostic methods, failure of a particular specimen to grow or lack of a specific antibody response may lead to a misdiagnosis. Clearly, more rapid, accurate, and cost effective diagnostic methods are needed.
  • nucleic acid hybridization affords the ability to detect the presence of specific nucleotide sequences in nucleic acids. Accordingly, in medicine, this technique can be used to assist in the diagnosis of genetic diseases .
  • diseases arise due to alterations in an individual's DNA, ranging from single nucleotide mutations, be they deletions, insertions, or substitutions (as in sickle cell anemia) to gross chromosomal abnormalities visible under light microscopy, such as trisomy 21 (associated with Down's syndrome) or large scale translocations or deletions, which may be associated with certain neoplastic disorders, such as leukemia, and other diseases.
  • Nucleic acid probes can, among other things, assist in the diagnosis of abnormal phenotypes, in assessing one's predisposition to certain heritable disorders, in ascertaining whether a person is the carrier of a gene or genes for a particular genetic disorder, and in prenatal diagnosis.
  • nucleic acid hybridization is also a powerful research tool, enabling scientists to study the fundamental aspects of gene structure, function, and organization. This technique has enabled the identification and isolation of previously undiscovered genes as well as providing a means for the analysis of transcriptional regulation of known genes.
  • temperature also effects the hybridization rate .
  • the maximum rate for sufficiently lengthy strands is usually achieved when hybridization is conducted approximately 15° to 30°C below the TM (the 'melting' temperature: the temperature at which 50% of the double-stranded molecules are dissociated into single strands) .
  • Nucleic acid hybridization reaction rates are also affected by ionic strength below 0.4 M for electrolytes such as NaCl, while salt concentration above that level has less impact on such rates .
  • extremely high salt concentrations such as 2 - 4 M or higher, have been found to substantially increase nucleic acid hybridization rates. For instance, see European Patent Application No. 0 229 442, published 07/22/87.
  • the target nucleic acid usually DNA
  • a suitable substrate such as nitrocellulose or a nylon membrane
  • additional steps requiring considerable time and skill must also be conducted. These include placing the sample containing the target nucleic acid on the filter, denaturing the target nucleic acid and permanently affixing it to the substrate, conducting the hybridization reaction with the probe nucleic acid, washing to remove unhybridized probe, and finally visualization of hybrids (typically accomplished by autoradiography when radiolabeled probes are employed) .
  • solution (or liquid) hybridization may be performed.
  • Nobrega et al . [(1983) Anal . Biochem . , vol . 131 pp: 141 - 151] describe a method for detecting RNA transcripts during RNA processing by using DNA probes in solution hybridizations, after which unhybridized probe molecules are separated from double-stranded probe- target hybrids by agarose gel electrophoresis. The hybrid nucleic acids are then detected by autoradiography.
  • RNA probes were found to be advantageous because RNAse treatment following filtration could be used to eliminate complexes between probe and non- complementary target molecules.
  • 0 278 220 published on August 17, 1988, describes a quantitative nucleic acid hybridization assay for detecting a DNA or RNA target nucleic acid molecule in a biological sample.
  • the method utilizes either a crude or purified pool of target nucleic acids. Probes of almost any specified length are prepared by the primer extension method, wherein the length of a given probe is controlled by limiting the concentration of one of the nucleotides. A particular probe molecule is then hybridized in solution to the target pool.
  • the hybridization reaction's ionic strength ranges from 0.15 - 0.9 M and hybridizations typically run 16 hours.
  • unhybridized probe is separated from probe-target duplexes by gel exclusion chromatography, permitting the differential detection of probe bound to target without unhybridized probe causing excessive background.
  • the volume excluded from the column is then counted by scintillation to measure the measure the radioactivity present.
  • the present invention provides a method to sensitively detect a target nucleic acid, be it DNA or RNA, in a crude, unpurified biological sample in one day or less, using a specific RNA probe in a solution hybridization reaction, followed by RNAse digestion, column chromatography, and detection of the probe-target hybrids.
  • a target nucleic acid be it DNA or RNA
  • Hybridization generally concerns the annealing of any two nucleic acid molecules comprising complementary nucleotide sequences, each nucleic acid molecule having originated from a different source.
  • Rapid refers to the reassociation of two complementary, single stranded nucleic acid molecules denatured previously.
  • Stringent hybridization refers to hybridization under conditions promoting the annealing of nucleic acid molecules having complementary nucleotide sequences but retarding the annealing of noncomplementary molecules. Factors influencing hybridization include probe size and nucleotide composition, temperature, salt, ionic strength, pH, reactant concentration, the presence of other molecules, including chaotropic agents, etc.
  • Hybrid refers to a double stranded nucleic acid molecule formed as the result of the hybridization a "target” nucleic acid molecule and a “probe” nucleic acid molecule.
  • “hybrid” includes RNA:DNA and RNA:RNA duplexes unless otherwise specified.
  • the target nucleic acid molecule may be comprised either DNA or RNA.
  • the probe nucleic acid molecule is comprised of RNA and can also include a number of nucleotide analogs and/or non-nucleotide adducts.
  • a “pool” of nucleic acid molecules is a collection of nucleic acid molecules encoding one or potentially many more nucleotide sequences.
  • the “pool” may or may not contain the sought after, or "target,” nucleotide sequence. It is only after hybridization with a particular probe nucleic acid molecule and subsequent assay steps that the presence, and, if desired, quantity, of a particular target nucleic acid molecule in the pool can be deduced.
  • the invention involves a method comprising: (1) combining, in solution, a pool of nucleic acid molecules and an RNA probe designed to hybridize to molecules encoding the target nucleic acid sequence, under stringent conditions so as to produce double stranded probe-target hybrid nucleic acid molecules; (2) degrading unhybridized probe molecules with RNAse; (3) separating the hybrid nucleic acids from other solution components; (4) and recovering and detecting probe-target hybrids.
  • the target nucleic acid sequence may be encoded by DNA, while in another, it may be encoded by RNA. In either case, the pool of nucleic acid molecules may be derived from a biological sample . In one particular embodiment, the target nucleic acid sequence indicates the presence of a pathogen, particularly a pathogen of viral, bacterial, or fungal origin.
  • a the presence or absence of a particular target nucleic acid sequence enables detection of a neoplasm, be it benign or malignant. Furthermore, the quantity of target nucleic acid present can be assayed. In another embodiment, a particular target nucleic acid sequence might indicate the existence of a heritable genetic disorder, or a genetic marker. Further, a specific genetic marker may be linked to a particular heritable genetic disorder. Yet other embodiments involve using the methods of the invention in forensic analysis and in analyzing gene expression, in terms of both location and quantity. Another aspect of the invention concerns covalently attaching a detectable label substance to the RNA probe. The presence of probe.'target hybrids can then be detected by detecting the label substance. Suitable detectable label substances include, but are not limited to: radioisotopes; fluorescent molecules; chemiluminescent molecules; and members of specific binding pairs .
  • One embodiment of the invention entails - li ⁇
  • Radioisotopes useful in accordance with the disclosed methods include 3 H, 125 I, 32 P and 35 S.
  • 35 S serves as the detectable label, while in another such embodiment, 32 P may be used.
  • an alternative embodiment may utilize a specific binding pair, especially avidin or streptavidin, which may then be complexed with biotin.
  • An additional aspect of this invention relates to the conditions under which the solution hybridization reaction are conducted. Conditions such as temperature, pH, and electrolyte concentration play an important role.
  • the temperature of the solution hybridization reaction ranges from about 15° C to 30° C below the melting temperature of the probe- target hybrid
  • the pH ranges from about 6.6 to 7.2
  • the electrolyte concentration is from about 2.0 M to 3.5.
  • the pH is about 6.9 ⁇ 0.2, especially about 6.9 ⁇ 0.05
  • the electrolyte concentration is approximately 2.75 ⁇ 0.2 M for RNA, especially 2.75 ⁇ 0.05 M.
  • the target nucleic acid is DNA
  • the electrolyte concentration is often somewhat lower, generally 2.5 ⁇ 0.2 M.
  • the temperature of the solution hybridization is about 84 "C ⁇ 4 * C when the target nucleic acid comprises RNA, and when DNA comprises the target nucleic acid, about 72"C ⁇ 4°C.
  • time period required for the solution hybridization reaction involves the time period required for the solution hybridization reaction.
  • time period ranging form approximately one to eight hours, and particularly about two hours, is employed.
  • Another aspect of the invention relates to separation of the probe-target hybrid nucleic acids from other solution components.
  • molecular weight exclusion chromatography is employed to perform this separation.
  • a further aspect of the invention concerns the method employed to detect the probe-target hybrids.
  • liquid scintillation is used.
  • FIGURE 1 shows a typical limit of detection calculation. Particularly illustrated is the detection limit of 0.04 amol of target nucleic acid pSP65:HPV16 when probed with HPV16 B fragment riboprobe according to the methods described herein.
  • FIGURE 2 graphically represents the effect of varying concentrations of Na 1 . 5 H 1 . 5 PO 4 on the efficiency of detection of a DNA target nucleic acid.
  • FIGURE 3 depicts the elution profile of a riboprobe-column assay using the column matrix S200 to separate probe-target hybrids, wherein the target nucleic acid comprises RNA, from other solution components, including degraded, unhybridized probe fragments.
  • FIGURE 4 illustrates the elution profile of a riboprobe-column assay using CL-4B resin to separate probe-target, wherein the target nucleic acid comprises DNA, hybrids from other solution components, including degraded, unhybridized probe fragments.
  • FIGURE 5 graphically depicts PF 4 mRNA expression levels in HEL cells treated with various concentrations of PMA.
  • FIGURE 6 shows PF 4 mRNA expression levels at different times following PMA induction.
  • This invention provides a rapid, sensitive, quantitative assay for detecting the presence of a target nucleic acid in a biological sample using a detectably labeled RNA probe in a solution hybridization procedure.
  • the biological sample which contains the pool of target nucleic acid molecules, need not be purified prior to performing the described methods . However, purified or partially purified samples are also suitable for these methods. In the event the sample is crude or only partially purified, it is treated with detergent (s) and/or protease (s) to solubilize and release the contained nucleic acids.
  • the target nucleic acid sequence is double stranded, it must be denatured prior to hybridization to the probe nucleic acid. For instance, denaturation may be performed under alkaline conditions or by heating.
  • the target nucleic acid is rendered single stranded, it is hybridized in solution to a specific probe nucleic acid molecule comprised of RNA.
  • RNA specific probe nucleic acid molecule comprised of RNA.
  • General hybridization considerations and methods are described in Molecular Cloning, Second Edition, Sambrook et al . eds., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1989, as are numerous other techniques used in this invention. Following hybridization, unhybridized single stranded RNA probe molecules can be degraded by use of RNase.
  • the target nucleic acid is RNA
  • single- stranded regions of the resulting hybrid are likely to be degraded.
  • the RNA:RNA hybrids so obtained may be relatively short, in contrast to situations where the same target nucleic acid sequence is comprised of DNA, which is resistant to degradation according to the instant methods .
  • the solution is subjected to molecular weight exclusion chromatography to separate double stranded probe-target hybrid nucleic acid molecules from degraded probe fragments.
  • the probe-target hybrids if any, may then be recovered, detected, and quantified.
  • This nucleic acid diagnostic method is extremely sensitive. Furthermore, these methods are extremely rapid, enabling the entire procedure to be performed by one person in less than one working day. As a result of its sensitivity and speed, this invention has many potential uses. For instance, it can be used to ascertain the presence or quantity of a particular pathogen, be of bacterial, fungal, or viral origin, or group of pathogens, in a tissue sample; to diagnose genetic or neoplastic disorders or predispositions to certain diseases; and for forensic purposes. Additionally, this method can be used in molecular biological research to detect and measure the level of expression of a specific gene in tissues or cell lines, and to study regulation of gene expression.
  • HPVs are small, naked viruses which contain a circular, episomal genome of about 8,000 base pairs.
  • a number of HPV subtypes are known to exist. HPV classification is based on nucleic acid homology to other subtypes of known DNA sequence. A new HPV type is defined when it cross hybridizes (DNA:DNA) with known subtypes to less than 50% under stringent conditions. More than 50 HPV subtypes have been identified, and complete nucleotide sequences have been obtained for at least eight of these.
  • HPV diagnostic assay development of an antibody-based HPV diagnostic assay has proved elusive, due largely to the inability to propagate the virus in cell cultures.
  • nucleic acid hybridization is the preferred HPV diagnostic technique.
  • spot blots, sandwich blots, in situ hybridization, and Southern blots have been used.
  • each of these methods required filter hybridization.
  • in situ hybridization allows for histological analysis as well, the technique is laborious and sometimes encounters serious background problems. It is known that HPV types 6, 11, 16, 18 and
  • HPV types 16 and 18 occur in about 80% of cancers of the cervix, vulva, and penis, while types 6 and 11 are more frequently associated with genital warts and benign lesions [Hypia et al . , supra ] .
  • hybridization studies reveal that HPV types 6 and 11 are closely related, whereas types 16, 18, 31, and 33 are more distantly related and cross-hybridize poorly.
  • the infecting HPV strain has transforming potential depends largely on whether or not the HPV DNA becomes integrated or remains episomal. Benign lesions are most often associated with episomal HPV DNA, whereas invasive genital cancers correlate with integrated forms of the virus [Dubt et al . , (1985), J. Gen . Viral . , vol . 66, p. 1515] .
  • HPV infection Present therapy for HPV infection includes surgical, i . e . , cryogenic, laser, etc . , removal of the affected areas. When performed at an early stage, the prognosis is good. However, recurrence happens frequently and thus determination of the HPV type present is important for proper treatment. Clearly, an accurate, sensitive, and inexpensive diagnostic test is needed to assist in the diagnosis and treatment of individuals afflicted with HPV infection.
  • the riboprobe methods of the instant invention are much more specific and have lower backgrounds than corresponding DNA probe-based diagnostics.
  • the detection limit, or sensitivity, of an HPV diagnostic employing the instant methods is less than 0.1 copies of HPV per human genome.
  • regions of relatively low sequence homology, i.e., high type-specificity, in the HPV genome it is possible to generate HPV type-specific nucleic acid probes.
  • an initial HPV diagnosis may be made by employing either a mixture of probes specific for particular HPV types or probes which hybridize to highly conserved regions of the HPV genome. Identification of the particular HPV type present can then be made by employing type-specific probes directed to HPV genome regions of high type- specificity.
  • nucleic acid assays may be developed according to the methods provided herein for a multitude of infectious agents.
  • a fast, efficient, and inexpensive mechanism is described enabling the development of diagnostics capable of distinguishing between subtypes of a given pathogen.
  • the invention has applicability outside the arena of medical and/or forensic diagnostics. For instance, these methods can also be applied in studies of gene expression and regulation. Because many genes are expressed at different times and/or at different rates during an organism's lifetime, much interest is focused on what factors and conditions affect and regulate this differential expression of genes.
  • all mammals possess a hematopoietic system that replaces the multiplicity of all blood types found in a healthy animal, including white blood cells (neutrophils, macrophages, and basophil/ ast cells) , clot forming cells (megakaryocytes, platelets) , and red blood cells (erythrocytes) .
  • white blood cells neurotrophils, macrophages, and basophil/ ast cells
  • clot forming cells megakaryocytes, platelets
  • red blood cells erythrocytes
  • combinations of specific polypeptides growth factors and colony stimulating factors
  • megakaryocytes are components of the hematopoietic system.
  • megakaryocytes produce and/or display on their surfaces a number of platelet-related proteins .
  • platelet factor 4 PF 4
  • PDGF platelet- derived growth factor
  • megakaryocyte maturation is broken into stages based on expression of platelet- specific proteins or morphological features, although these stages are not discrete, thereby making the study of their progressive development difficult.
  • immortalized cell lines such as human erythroleukemic cells (HEL) [Martin et al . , (1982), Science, vol . 216, p. 233] that express phenotypic and biochemical markers for megakaryocytic lineages have been used for in vitro study. It is known that in HEL cells treated with phorbol esters, there is a dramatic increase in PF 4 expression [Tebilio et al . , (1984), EMBO, vol . 3, p. 453] .
  • PF 4 is a protein synthesized in megakaryocytes and packaged into platelet alpha granules sometime prior to platelet release. Because megakaryocyte maturation is apparently regulated by polypeptide growth factors, PF 4 mRNA expression levels were examined following treatment with a variety of growth factors and phorbal 12-myristate 13-acetate
  • nucleic acid hybridization methods described herein have wide applicability throughout the field of molecular biology, from medical diagnostics for pathogenic infection and heritable diseases to more research-oriented studies of gene expression.
  • the following procedures may be used in conjunction with the instant invention.
  • Probe Characterization A probe used in accordance with the methods of this invention is comprised of RNA and is complementary to the target nucleic acid to be identified. Probes may be prepared according to any number of techniques. See Sambrook et al . , supra . In a preferred embodiment, RNA polymerase is used to transcribe a DNA molecule, either cloned or resulting from polymerase chain amplification, encoding a probe nucleotide sequence. As several bacteriophage RNA polymerases and their specific promoters are known, a variety of transcription cloning vectors harboring these sequences are now commercially available or otherwise known in the art .
  • Such vectors may contain promoters for a single bacteriophage RNA polymerase, or for two different polymerases, adjacent to a multiple cloning site into which the DNA encoding the probe nucleotide sequence is cloned. Transcription with the appropriate RNA polymerase in the presence of ribonucleotides, one or more of which is labeled with a detectable label substance, enables the production of a large quantity of high specific activity riboprobe corresponding to either the coding or non-coding strand of the inserted DNA molecule.
  • the following procedures were used to generate each of the riboprobes used in the examples below.
  • the plasmid pGEM-3 (Promega, Madison, WI, 1989/90 cat. no. P2131) was used as the transcription vector and T7 RNA polymerase was used to transcribe each riboprobe.
  • Each T7 RNA polymerase transcription reaction described herein occurred under the following conditions: 40 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5; 6 mM MgCl 2 ; 2 mM spermidine; 10 mM NaCl, 10 mM DTT; 15 ⁇ M 35 S-UTP (New England Nuclear, cat. no. NEG-039H) ; 500 ⁇ M CTP, ATP, and GTP; and 75 - 100 ng of isolated DNA template with a functionally associated T7 promoter isolated from the transcription vector following digestion with an appropriate restriction endonuclease and agarose gel electrophoresis. It should be noted that the RNA synthesis rate rapidly decreases when the UTP concentration is less than 12 ⁇ M.
  • RNA transcripts produced is dependent on the concentration of nucleotide precursors.
  • the typical transcription reaction can be performed as follows: In a 500 ⁇ Eppendorf tube, 120 pmol (picomoles) of 35 S-UTP was completely dried.
  • the 35 S-UTP was resuspended in a premix comprising: 3.3 ⁇ L 1 DePC-treated H 2 O; 1.6 ⁇ L 5X transcription buffer (200 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5 (measured at 37°C) , 30 mM MgCl2, 10 mM spermidine, and 50 mM NaCl); 0.8 ⁇ L 100 mM DTT; and 0.4 ⁇ L of 40 units/ ⁇ L RNasin (Promega) .
  • the DNA template was digested by adding 2.7 ⁇ L (2.7 units) of RNase-free DNase (Promega Biotech) and 0.8 ⁇ L of 5X transcription buffer, supra, and incubating the reaction at 37°C. After 20 min., 0.6 ⁇ L 2% SDS was added, followed by a 20 min. incubation at 72°C. At that point, 34 ⁇ L of TE + 10 mM NaCl, 4 ⁇ L RNasin, and 0.8 ⁇ L of 500 mM DTT was added to complete the final reaction mixture.
  • RNase-free DNase Promega Biotech
  • a small volume, typically 1 - 10%, of a runoff transcription reaction may be diluted and chromatographed. Frequently, 1% of this diluted solution is employed in the chromatography procedure by spotting it onto a particular location on the chromatography matrix.
  • Suitable chromatography matrices include paper, such as DE81 (Whatman, Clifton, NJ) , or silica gel on glass plates (thin layer chromatography, TLC) .
  • Typical 35 S-UTP incorporation into riboprobe using the herein-described methods is about 80%.
  • Multiplication of the calculated incorporation rate by the measured radioactivity of a particular quantity of a given riboprobe synthesis reaction reveals the amount of the signal attributable to the riboprobe itself, exclusive of unincorporated label.
  • This procedure may be used to quantitate 35 S-UTP incorporation into riboprobes that are either unpurified or purified following synthesis. Purification, if conducted, may involve column chromatography to remove unincorporated, labeled ribonucleotides. See Berger et al . , (1987) Methods in Enzymology, vol . 152, pp. 638 - 639.
  • the amount of 35 S-UTP (or other radioisotope) incorporated in each riboprobe synthesis can be calculated by removing 1 ⁇ L of the above final reaction mixture and adding it to 49 ⁇ L TE + 10 mM NaCl. 0.5 ⁇ L of this solution is then spotted onto a DE81 paper strip approximately 15 cm x 1 cm. The DE81 paper is then chromatographed in 0.3 M ammonium formate until the solvent front migrates about 80 - 90% of the length of the paper. The strip is next cut into several pieces and each piece is placed in a separate scintillation vial. 15 mL of Liquiscint® (National Diagnostics) is then added to each vial, the vials are counted in a Beckman liquid scintillation counter, and the percent incorporation calculated from the results.
  • Liquiscint® National Diagnostics
  • An alternative percent incorporation determination can be performed using thin layer chromatography.
  • a piece of PEI-Cellulose F (E. Merck reagent 5579-7) approximately 8 cm x 4 cm is initially soaked in 100% ethanol and then dried.
  • 0.5 ⁇ L of a 1/50 dilution of the final reaction mixture (as described in the previous percent incorporation procedure) is spotted adjacent to a 0.5 ⁇ L spot of 1/250 dilution of the 35 S-UTP label used in the transcription reaction.
  • the samples are then chromatographed using a 1 M LiCl solution. After the solvent front migrates approximately 3 cm, the cellulose is dried and autoradiographed. Scanning the resultant film with a densitometer (Gilford Response II, Ciba-Corning Diagnostics Corp., Pleasanton, CA) enables a determination of the amount of 35 S-UTP incorporation into the probe.
  • a densitometer Garford Response II, Ciba-Corning Diagnostics Corp.
  • a standard curve can be developed by conducting a series of hybridization (or titration) assays employing a constant amount of radiolabeled probe (measured in cpm) and varying amounts of target nucleic acid of known size, concentration, and sequence.
  • a convenient source of DNA target molecules complementary to a given riboprobe is the DNA clone or fragment that serves as the template for synthesis of the riboprobe.
  • the target DNA concentration can be quantitated by spectroscopic or fluorescent methods prior to dilution into the hybridization solutions.
  • RNA target molecules complementary to the riboprobe is to transcribe the opposite strand of the same DNA molecule that served as the riboprobe template in the presence of trace quantities of label, such as the radiolabel 35 S- UTP. This may be accomplished either by using a clone harboring the template DNA molecule in the opposite orientation from that used to generate the probe (and thereby use the same type of RNA polymerase as was used to make the probe) or to utilize the same clone and two different types of RNA polymerase .
  • one strand of the DNA template is transcribed by one RNA polymerase that recognizes a promoter adjacent to the one end of the template, while the other strand is transcribed by a different type of RNA polymerase that recognizes and binds to a different promoter adjacent to the other end of the inserted DNA template.
  • the plasmid vector pGEM-3 and other vectors of similar makeup afford the ready implementation of this latter approac .
  • the concentration of target RNA produced can be calculated from the amount and specific activity of the input UTP, the measured fraction of UTP incorporated into target, and the number of U residues in each RNA target molecule.
  • the concentration of incorporated 35 S- UTP in cpm (counts per minute) per ⁇ L can be calculated by taking the product of the measured 35 S-UTP percent incorporation and the number of cpm per ⁇ L of reaction.
  • the sensitivity (in cpm/amol) of the probe assay may then be determined by hybridizing a fixed amount of probe (as measured by cpm) with varying amounts (including none) of target (the probe complement) . Following hybridization, RNAse digestion, and probe-target purification of each sample, the signal obtained in the assays lacking target is subtracted from the signal detected for each sample containing target . This corrected signal is then divided by the number of amol of target in each sample to give the signal per amol of target. Alternatively, a standard curve is generated by plotting corrected signal versus amol of target; or slope and intercept are calculated by use of linear regression on logarithms of the two quantities.
  • the various riboprobes were standardized against 2.0, 0.5, and 0.0 amol of target, namely the plasmid vector from which the various probes were derived.
  • the various pools of target molecules were prepared in 1.5 mL Sarstedt centrifuge tubes as follows: The 2.0 amol pool comprised 24 ⁇ L of TE(+) (5.0 ⁇ L 20% SDS, 8.9 ⁇ L 2.25 M DTT, 986 ⁇ L TE) ; 6.0 ⁇ L of 1.0 amol/ ⁇ L plasmid target; and 120 ⁇ L of HP + TE(+) [62.5 ⁇ L of 2 ⁇ g/ ⁇ L HPDNA (human placental DNA, Sigma, St.
  • the 0.5 amol target pool comprised 28.5 ⁇ L TE(+), 1.5 ⁇ L of 1.0 amol/ ⁇ L plasmid target stock, and 120 ⁇ L of HP + TE(+); while the 0.0 amol target pool was made up of 30 ⁇ L TE(-f) and 120 ⁇ L of HP + TE(+) .
  • the target DNA was degraded and denatured by adding 15 ⁇ L of 2 M HC1 to each tube.
  • the solutions were incubated at room temperature for 1 min. before 15 ⁇ L of 4M NaOH was added, after which the solutions were incubated for 2 min. in a boiling water bath.
  • the tubes were then cooled for 2 min. before a 10 sec. centrifugation. Duplicate 60 ⁇ L aliquots of each sample were then removed and placed into fresh, separate tubes for hybridization.
  • a sensitivity limit (limit of detection) for a given riboprobe assay performed in accordance with this invention can be calculated using various known quantities of the target nucleic acid in conjunction with a fixed amount (measured in cpm) of probe. As an example, 0.0 amol, 0.5 amol, and 2.0 amol of target may be useful target quantities for determining the detection limit of the assay.
  • the background reading of the counting device employed such a liquid scintillation counter, must be determined along with the standard deviation of that background signal. This may be accomplished by taking the average of several scintillation fluid-only cpm measurements.
  • the corrected signal for each sample is calculated by subtracting the counter background (cB) from the signal obtained for each sample (preferably the average signal of two equivalent samples) .
  • the normalized signal for the samples is then determined by subtracting the corrected signal without target (containing 0.0 amol target) from the corrected signal with target and then dividing that result by the amount (amol) of target.
  • the limit of detection for a given amount of target may then be deduced by taking the sum of the corrected signal without target and the counter's standard deviation multiplied by a factor of three (selected for statistical purposes to achieve a confidence level of greater than or equal to 99%) and dividing that sum by the normalized signal obtained for a given amount of target.
  • An example of a such a detection limit calculation for 0.5 amol of target is provided in FIG. 1. This information, coupled with the knowledge of how many cells were used in an assay, can then be used to calculate the minimum number of DNA or mRNA molecules/cell that can be detected using the procedures described herein.
  • the signal to noise ratio for a given amount of target can be ascertained by dividing the corrected signal for a given amount of target by the corrected signal measured for 0.0 amol of target. Limits of detection ranging down to as few as 0.2 amol of target nucleic acid molecules when RNA is the target, and 0.03 amol when DNA harbors the target sequence, are readily achievable when the instant methods are employed.
  • Each hybridization performed in accordance with the present invention is a solution hybridization.
  • the rate of hybridization is dependent upon temperature, salt and ionic strength, pH, reactant concentration, and the presence of other molecules, such as dextran sulfate, polyethylene glycol, etc .
  • the effects of varying Na 1 . 5 H 1 . 5 PO 4 concentrations on the practice of the invention are provided in FIG. 2.
  • Each standardization hybridization was conducted by adding 86 ⁇ L of 4.8 M Na 1 .5H 1 . 5 PO 4 to each 60 ⁇ L aliquot of denatured target DNA, followed by vortexing.
  • RNA is used as the probe in the practice of the invention
  • digestion with RNase may be utilized following hybridization to degrade unhybridized probe molecules and thus reduce background attributable to unhybridized probe molecules .
  • numerous reaction conditions are possible for the RNase digestion reaction.
  • RNase digestions were conducted by adding 12 ⁇ L of RNase Mix [10 mM Tris, pH 8, 1 mM EDTA, 5700 units/ L RNase Tl (Boehringer Mannheim, cat. no. 109 207), and 40 ⁇ g/mL RNase A (Sigma Type 1-A, cat. no. R 4875)] to each sample following hybridization.
  • Molecular weight exclusion chromatography enables the separation of compounds based upon differences in molecular weight.
  • a granular matrix composed of polyacrylamide, sepharose, cross-linked sepharose, agarose, cross-linked agarose, dextran, or other similar materials, is used to separate probe-target hybrids from ribonucleotides generated by the RNase-mediated degradation of unhybridized single stranded riboprobes.
  • This separation occurs due to the porosity of the matrix material utilized.
  • a matrix having small pores allows small molecules, such as free nucleotides, to enter the matrix, while larger molecules, such as probe-target hybrids, are excluded. When the matrix is packed in a chromatography column, this excluded volume passes through quickly. In contrast, smaller molecules in solution enter the matrix and their movement is delayed as an inverse function of their effective molecular weight.
  • Products suitable for use in this invention as the column matrix include Sephadex® G50, G100, and G200 (Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ) , Sepharose® CL-2B, CL-4B, CL-6B, S-200, S-400, and S-1000 (Pharmacia), and P-20, P-60, P-100, and P-200 (BioRad Corp., Hercules, CA) .
  • the matrix selected for any particular experiment will depend upon the size of the expected probe-target hybrids. Hybrid size is often determined by whether the target nucleic acid is comprised of RNA or DNA. When RNA comprises the target and the riboprobe employed is shorter than the target, overhanging, unhybridized, single stranded portions of the target, along with unhybridized probe molecules, will be degraded during the RNAse treatment. An equivalent (in terms of nucleotide sequence) but DNA-based target will not be so degraded, leaving a larger probe-target hybrid. As a result of this, different column matrices may need to be employed to achieve proper separation between probe- target hybrids and unhybridized, degraded probe molecules.
  • FIG. 3 shows the results of a PF 4-specific riboprobe comprised of 163 ribonucleotides hybridized to its complementary RNA target.
  • the solution components were separated using an S200 column.
  • the S200 column had a bed volume of 4.4 mL in a 0.7 cm x 11.5 cm column.
  • FIG. 4 shows the results obtained when a HPV18-specific riboprobe comprised 1944 ribonucleotides was hybridized to its complementary DNA target.
  • the solution components were separated using a 10.6 mL CL-4B bed in a 1 cm x 16 cm column.
  • a column containing the desired molecular sieving matrix may be prepared for each sample as follows during the 2 hr. hybridization: 22 mL of a 50% slurry of Sepharose CL-4B [prewashed in Column Buffer (TE + 10 mM NaCl) ] is poured into a 1 cm x 20 cm column (BioRad, cat. no. 737- 1020) . Each column is washed with 12 mL of Column Buffer and allowed to drain until the Column Buffer reaches the upper surface of chromatography matrix, at which point the column bottoms are capped.
  • probe- target hybrids Following collection, the presence of probe- target hybrids is assayed and/or quantitated.
  • the detection method employed depends upon the detectable label utilized.
  • the label is a radioisotope, gamma or photographic detection, autoradiography, and particularly liquid scintillation counting, may be used.
  • one member of a specific binding pair including antibodies and their specific antigens
  • the second member of the pair can be used for detection and quantitation.
  • the label is an enzyme or enzyme inhibitor, reactions assaying for the presence or absence of enzymatic activity may be used.
  • other detectable label substances such as fluorescent or chemilumenescent markers, etc. , other appropriate means of detection and quantitation can be utilized.
  • Liquid scintillation is the preferred detection and quantitation method when radioisotopes are employed as the detectable label substance. For example, when a sample comprising the 2.5 mL void volume is collected from a column in a 20 mL glass liquid scintillation vial, 5 mL of a fluor, preferably Liquiscint® (National Diagnostics, Manville, NJ) , is added to each vial (when 35 S is the radiolabel) . The vials are then capped, the contents vortexed, and the samples counted for 20 minutes in a Beckman LS 100 scintillation counter with a window setting of 100 - 1000.
  • a fluor preferably Liquiscint® (National Diagnostics, Manville, NJ)
  • Examples 1 and 2 are specifically directed to diagnostic methods for detecting the presence of HPV in clinical samples using riboprobes, while Example 3 illustrates application of the invention to methods of assaying mRNA levels in an in vitro model of gene expression in megakaryocytes.
  • RNA probes complementary to HPV regions of high type-specificity Four RNA probes, each specific to a particular HPV type (6, 11, 16 and 18), were employed.
  • HPV 6 [Schwartz et al . , (1983) EMBO J. , vol . 2, pp. 2361 - 2368]
  • HPV 11 [Dartmann et al . , (1986) Virol . , vol . 151, pp. 124 - 130]
  • HPV 16 [Seedorf et al . , (1985) Virol . , vol . 145, pp. 181 - 185]
  • HPV 18 [Cole et al . , (1987) J. Mol . Biol . , vol . 193, pp. 599 - 608] .
  • HPV DNA from clones harboring the nucleotide sequences of the various HPV subtypes was cloned into plasmids capable of directing the synthesis of mRNA from inserted DNA molecules as described below.
  • the reaction products were packaged into infectious phage particles using the Gigapack® (Vector Research Systems) in vitro packaging system. Using this system, packaging efficiencies of 0.2 x 10 8 to 1.0 x 10 8 plaque forming units (pfu) per ⁇ g ⁇ DNA were typically obtained. The packaged phage particles were then used to transfect E . coli strain LE392 (A.T.C.C. accession no. 33572) harboring integrated P2 phage.
  • each filter was transferred to a piece of Whatman 3MM paper barely saturated with neutralizing solution (1.5 M NaCl, 0.5 M Tris-HCl, pH 7.4) for 5 min. Following neutralization, the filters were rinsed in a shallow tray containing 2X SSC (0.3 M NaCl, 0.03 M sodium citrate) and then laid out, DNA-side up, to dry an Whatman 3MM paper. Duplicate filters were generated for each plate following the same procedure, except that each duplicate filter was allowed to whet for 3 min. on each plate.
  • the filters were sandwiched between layers of Whatman 3MM paper and baked at 80'C under vacuum for 2 hr.
  • the filters were allowed to cool to room temperature, after which they were completely wetted in a shallow tray containing 2X SSC.
  • the filters were then prehybridized together in about 2 mL of prehybridization buffer (6X SSC, 0.1% SDS, 5X Denhardts, 50 ⁇ g/mL sheered salmon sperm DNA) per filter at 55 * C for 4 hr. with gentle agitation.
  • the prehybridization buffer was then removed and replaced with hybridization buffer, which comprised the same components as the prehybridization buffer.
  • Each plug was then titrated to determine the number of plaque forming units present. Titration was accomplished by serially diluting 100 ⁇ L of each plug in 1 mL of SM. 50 ⁇ L of each serial dilution was then used to transfect 0.3 mL of fresh LE392 as described above. Following adsorbtion, each solution was combined with 3 mL of top agarose and plated on 90 mm LB plates. Outgrowth at 37 * C for 12 hr. enabled the determination of the number of plaque forming units (pfu) in each plug. Using this number, another transfection designed to produce 500 well separated plaques on a 90 mm plate was conducted according to the previously described method. Plaque lifts from these plates were performed as before, followed by filter hybridization using the same probe. This plaque purification process resulted in four purified ⁇ L47 clones possibly containing the HPV 6 genome.
  • DNA from the various clones was purified according to the plate lysate method [Sambrook et al . , supra] .
  • the resultant DNAs were digested with Bam HI and electrophoresed on a 0.7% agarose gel.
  • a Southern blot [Sambrook et al . , supra; Southern, E.M. (1975) J. Mol . Biol . , vol . 98, p. 503] was then performed.
  • the same oligonucleotide probe as was used to determine which ⁇ L47 clones contained HPV 6 DNA was hybridized to the blot, and autoradiography revealed each of the four clones contained HPV 6 DNA.
  • E. coli strain DH1 (A.T.C.C. accession no. 33849) and plated onto LB media plates containing 100 ⁇ g/mL ampicillin.
  • pGEM-3:HPV6 (+) was selected for further use.
  • Subclones of pGEM-3:HPV6 (+) were prepared by digestion with Sau 961. Sticky ends were blunted with T4 DNA polymerase [Sambrook et al . , supra] . These fragments were then ligated into Sma I- digested pGEM-3, which contains the T7 and SP6 promoter sequences at opposite ends of the multiple cloning site.
  • Riboprobes were then prepared from the various subclones. Initially, plasmid DNA was cleaved with Pvu II and Hind III to release inserts comprising the HPV 6 DNA in functional association with the T7 RNA polymerase promoter. The digestion products were then electrophoresed through a 1% agarose gel. High specific activity RNA-based probes were prepared after isolating (by electrolelution) and purifying the desired PvuII - Hind III fragments and transcribing 0.2 - 1.0 ⁇ g of DNA at room temperature as previously described.
  • plaque lifts were performed as described above. However, in this case, one duplicate from each plate was to be screened with a probe specific for HPV "early” genes, while the other duplicate was to be screened with a probe specific for HPV11 "late” genes. Those filters to be screened with the "early” probe were prehybridized and then probed separately from the duplicates to be probed with "late” probe. In each instance, the filter bound DNA was prehybridized overnight in 50 mL of prehybridization buffer with gentle agitation at 55 * C.
  • hybridization solution comprising about 916,000 cpm/mL of 5' 32 P-endlabeled oligonucleotide "late" probe [SEQ ID NO: 2; 5' - CTG TGG TAG ATA CCA CAC GCA GTA C - 3 ' ] , was exchanged for the prehybridization solution for the filter set to be probed with the "late" probe.
  • the filters were then washed twice (45 min./wash) at room temperature in 2X SSC, 0.1% SDS. Autoradiography revealed more stringent washing conditions were required, so the filters were rewashed with gentle agitation in 2X SSC for 4 hr. at 60 * C, followed by a 10 hr. wash at the same temperature in 0.2X SSC.
  • the 7.93 kb band corresponding in size to the viral genome was cut from the gel, eluted as described previously, and cloned into a Bam Hi-cleaved, BAP- treated pSP65 plasmid vector (Promega; Melton et al . , (1984) Nucl . Acids Res . , vol . 12, pp. 7035 - 7056) .
  • pSP65.11.5 (+) was retained.
  • pSP65.11.5 (+) was then digested with Fok I.
  • pGEM-3 The 3' exonuclease activity of T4 D ⁇ A polymerase was used to blunt the 3' overhangs resulting from the Fok I digestion.
  • Subgenomic clones were generated in pGEM-3 from two regions of relatively high type specificity.
  • One clone, designated pGEM-3:11.1.3, contained a Fok I - Hpa I fragment spanning nucleotides 2415 - 4157 (as reported by Dartmann et al . , supra) of the HPV 11 genome.
  • pGEM-3:ll .1.3 yielded a highly specific riboprobe (prepared by digesting pGEM-3 : 11.1.3 with Pvu II and Hind III, isolating the resultant DNA fragment, and transcribing the DNA molecule as described, supra) used in all further experiments.
  • the vector used to synthesize HPV 16-specific riboprobes was generated in a fashion similar to those for the HPV 6 and HPV 11 vectors.
  • 10 ⁇ g of total cellular 16 DNA was isolated from an oral lesion tissue sample having a morphology consistent with HPV infection. This DNA was then restricted with Bam HI and cloned into Bam Hi-digested ⁇ L47. The resultant DNA was then packaged into infectious phage particles as described above, followed by infection of LE392P2. After plaque formation, plaque lifts were performed. The filters were then hybridized at 60"C with two oligonucleotide probes specific for "early" and "late” regions of the HPV16 genome.
  • pGEM- 3:HPV16B(-) One subclone comprising 1211 nucleotides, designated pGEM- 3:HPV16B(-), spanning from nucleotide position 683 through nucleotide position 7376 of the 7904 bp HPV 16 genome as reported by Seedorf et al . , supra, was selected for use in synthesizing riboprobes from the adjacent T7 promoter.
  • RNA probes were generated from pGEM:HPV16B(-) by digesting the plasmid with Pvu II to release a fragment containing 1081 base pairs of the HPV 16 genome in functional association with the T7 promoter from pGEM-3. After isolating this fragment, RNA probes were synthesized as described, supra . d . HPV 18
  • HPV 18 which often integrates into the human genome, as opposed to remaining in episomal form, were also prepared.
  • HeLa cells (A.T.C.C. accession no. CCL 2) are known to contain several integrated subgenomic copies of HPV 18 DNA in Hind III fragment of three different lengths. Sequence and mapping information about HPV 18 in HeLa cells presented at the Papilloma Virus Workshop (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., September 1986) was used to generate and screen a library of HeLa DNA in ⁇ L47 as follows .
  • the filters were then hybridized in 50 mL of hybridization buffer for about 60 hr. Those filters that had been exposed to the plates initially were probed with a mixture of two 32 P-kinased, HPV 18-specific oligonucleotides (96-21 [SEQ ID NO: 6] and 96-22 [SEQ ID NO: 7]) at 42°C. The duplicate filters were probed with the HPV 18-specific oligonucleotides 96-19 (SEQ ID NO: 8) and 96-23 (SEQ ID NO: 9) at 38 * C. After hybridization, the filters were washed once at room temperature and twice at their respective hybridization temperatures in 6X SSC, 0.5% SDS, followed by two 4 hr.
  • pHPV18H also comprised two copies of pGEM-3. pHPV18H was subjected to a variety of restriction enzyme digests and the various fragments cloned into Hind III/Pst I digested pGEM-3. Several subclones were identified as useful by restriction mapping and by sequence homology to corresponding regions of HPV 18.
  • pHPV18-92 One subclone, designated pHPV18-92 and comprising about 3.5 kb of the HPV 18 genome, was found to yield RNA probes of superior specificity (lowest human DNA cross-hybridization) when the Pvu II fragment (comprising the T7 promoter and 1944 bp of HPV 18, spanning nucleotides 6766 to 853 of the 7857 bp HPV 18 genome as reported by Cole et al . , supra) was used to generate riboprobes by the procedures described previously for the HPV 6, HPV 11, and HPV 16 RNA probes. pHPV18-92 also contained no human DNA.
  • tissue samples from obtained during cervical exams of 172 women were assayed for HPV infection using slot blots and the riboprobe-column assay of this invention. 98 of the samples were obtained from women at high risk for HPV infection. These women were classified as "high risk” because they were patients at the University of Alabama, Birmingham's sexually transmitted disease clinic. The other 74 samples studied were obtained from women assessed as being at low risk for HPV infection, i.e., members of the general public.
  • each of the 172 samples were split into two parts. One group was used for slot blot analysis. The other was assayed using the riboprobe- column assay described of the invention. Both sets of samples were lysed as follows . Each clinical sample was placed into a 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube and centrifuged 30 sec. at 12,000 x g to pellet the cells. Supernatants were discarded and each pellet was resuspended in 1.0 mL of PBS (10 mM Na 2 P0 , 138 mM NaCl, pH 7.4) . The cells were again pelleted by a 30 sec. centrifugation at 12,000 x g and the supernatants discarded. The pellets were resuspended in 300 ⁇ L Lysis Buffer (10 mM Tris, pH 8, 1 mM EDTA, 20 mM DTT, 0.1% SDS, and 50 ⁇ g/mL
  • Proteinase K by vortexing. The cells were lysed by allowing the samples to incubate 15 min. at room temperature. Cellular debris was pelleted by centrifugation at 12,000 x g for 1 min. For the samples to be assayed by slot blot, subsequent to pelleting cell debris, each supernatant was extracted two times with phenol, once with phenol/chloroform, and once with chloroform. After transferring the aqueous phases to new tubes, DNA was precipitated by adding 0.1 volume 3 M sodium acetate and two volumes of ethanol.
  • the blots were then washed for a total of 1.5 hr. in 0.IX SSC, 0.1% SDS at 56 * C, after which they were autoradiographed. Of the 74 low risk samples, four hybridized to the probe mixture in this slot blot assay, while in the high risk group, 26 samples out of 98 samples hybridized.
  • DNA present in each of the 50 ⁇ L aliquots of the various samples was denatured by the addition of 10 ⁇ L of 1 M NaOH, followed by a 5 min. room temperature incubation. Following denaturation, 86 ⁇ L of 4.8 M Na 1 . 5 H 1 . 5 PO 4 was added to each tube, the contents of which were then vortexed. Next, 4 ⁇ L of 35 S-labeled RNA probe, made of riboprobes specific for HPV 6, 11, 16, and 18 (approximately 20 amol and 15,000 cpm of each), was added and mixed with each sample, followed by a 10 sec. centrifugation. The hybridization reactions were conducted for 2 hr. at 72°C.
  • the limit of detection of the riboprobe-column assays was determined to be 21 cpm. Thus, those samples producing 22 or more cpm were considered positive for HPV infection.
  • the riboprobe-column assays were also detected by the riboprobe-column assay.
  • the instant method also identified one additional patient as having an HPV infection that was not detected by the slot blot assay. This result was subsequently verified (see below) .
  • riboprobe-column diagnostic procedures are an improvement over existing nucleic acid hybridization-based diagnostic methods, such as slot blotting, in terms of both speed and sensitivity.
  • rescreening was done with riboprobes specific for HPV 16 and 18 due to the correlation between the location of the infection and HPV subtypes.
  • Duplicates of each HPV-positive sample were rescreened by the riboprobe-column method as described above. However, in these assays, each sample was screened using only one HPV type-specific riboprobe, either for HPV 16 or HPV 18.
  • the second riboprobe-column assay HPV detection method, infra is a simplification of the first method. Its purpose is to lessen both the total of time and the hands-on time required to conduct the assays.
  • the first method supra, requires about 290 min. from start to finish (when conducted by one familiarized with the procedure) , with approximately 130 min. of that requiring actual participation by the individual conducting the assays.
  • the simplified method shortens total assay time to about 235 min. and hands-on time to 85 min., thereby saving about 55 min. in total time and reducing hands-on time by nearly 0.75 hr.
  • a clinical sample is collected directly in 500 ⁇ L of Lysis Buffer, supra, minus Proteinase K.
  • Cells are lysed by adding Proteinase K to a final concentration of 50 ⁇ L/mL (through the addition of a stock solution comprising 10 ⁇ g/mL Proteinase K) and vortexing. Cell lysis occurs during the subsequent 15 min. incubation at room temperature. Cell debris is then pelleted by centrifuging the samples 1 min. at 12,000 x g. Next, 150 ⁇ L of each sample's supernatant is transferred to a 1.5 mL screw cap Sarstedt centrifuge tube and the remainder of each sample stored at -80°C.
  • Hybridizations are conducted by adding 270 ⁇ L of a premix comprised of 258 ⁇ L of 4.8 M Na 1 . 5 H 1 . 5 PO 4 and 12 ⁇ L of 35 S-labeled riboprobe (approximately 15,000 cpm) . After mixing the solutions, the hybridization reactions are conducted for 2 hr. at 72°C, followed by the addition of 12 ⁇ L of RNAse mix, supra, a 10 sec. centrifugation and a 10 min. incubation at 37°C, followed by the addition of 460 ⁇ L Formamide-dye mix, supra, to each sample. These samples, despite the slightly larger hybridization volume, are then chromatographed through Sepharose® CL-4B and counted as described in the first method.
  • HEL cells which express phenotypic and biochemical markers for megakaryocytic cell lineages, among others, were studied by treating the cells with chemicals and various growth factors. Basal, low-level PF 4 mRNA expression is known to be significantly increased by phorbal esters [Tabilio et al . , (1984) Embo, J. , vol . 3, p. 445] .
  • HEL cells used in the following experiments were maintained at 37°C and 5% CO 2 in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf-serum, 200 ⁇ M glutamine, and the antibiotics penicillin (100 units/mL) and streptomycin (100 ⁇ g/mL) .
  • PF 4 mRNA induction was studied using phorbol
  • PMA 12-myristate 13-acetate
  • the PMA used in these experiments was previously prepared as a 10 -3 M solution in ethanol and stored at 80°C.
  • 2 x 10 5 HEL cells were inoculated into 2 mL of RPMI-1640 supplemented with 200 ⁇ M glutamine and the antibiotics penicillin (100 units/mL) and streptomycin (100 ⁇ g/mL) , 2% fetal calf serum, and 0, 10 -7 , 10 -8 , 10 -9 , and 10 _10 M PMA.
  • the cultures were incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 72 hr.
  • the cells were harvested and placed in microfuge tubes. Any cells adhering to the plates were released with a solution of 0.05% (w:v) trypsin. Viable cells were enumerated by trypan blue exclusion. The cells were then pelleted at room temperature and the supernatant discarded. Based on the trypan blue exclusion cell counts, the cell pellets were resuspended in a volume of lysis buffer (0.2% SDS, 10 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA, 20 mM DTT, and 100 ⁇ g/mL Proteinase K) so that an anticipated cell concentration of 3 x 10 3 cells/ ⁇ L was obtained. Lysates were either used immediately or stored at -80°C until further use.
  • lysis buffer (0.2% SDS, 10 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA, 20 mM DTT, and 100 ⁇ g/mL Proteinase K
  • RNA probes utilized were prepared as follows: A double stranded DNA molecule encoding a nucleotide sequence identical to that for base pairs 106 - 266 of the published human PF 4 DNA sequence [Poncz et al . , (1987) Blood, vol . 69. pp. 219- 223] was generated by preparing two oligonucleotides having complementary regions of 22 bp at their 3' termini. The hybrid was made completely double-stranded by treating it with the Klenow fragment of E. coli DNA polymerase I in the presence of all four nucleotides according to procedures in Sambrook et al . , supra .
  • pSP65 contains the bacteriophage SP6 promoter immediately adjacent to the multiple closing site into which the 160 bp fragment was cloned.
  • R12 and R4 DNA sequence analysis of each clone revealed that R12 would be used to produce RNA probe molecules, while R4 would be used to produce RNA molecules complementary to the probe.
  • RNA probes were generated by runoff transcription as follows. Initially, R12 was digested to completion with Hind III to linearize the plasmid just 3' to the insert. The reaction was then extracted with phenol:chloroform to remove the restriction enzyme. After the phenol :chloroform treatment, the solution was extracted with chloroform. The DNA was then precipitated and resuspended in water (or 10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA) at a concentration of 0.25 ⁇ g/ ⁇ L.
  • Each probe-generating run-off transcription reaction occurred in either 100, 20, or 3 ⁇ L total volume depending upon the amount of probe needed. Solutions and reagents were added in the following order and the reaction maintained at room temperature, not 4°C, during the component additions.
  • a 100 ⁇ L transcription reaction was conducted as follows: In a sterilized 0.5 mL Eppendorf tube, DePC-treated water [prepared as a 100 mL stock solution by adding 10 mL of 10% DePC (diethylpyrocarbonate) in absolute ethanol to 100 mL H 2 O in a sterile container, allowing the solution to stand at room temperature for 5 min., followed by heating to 90°C for 5 min.
  • DePC-treated water prepared as a 100 mL stock solution by adding 10 mL of 10% DePC (diethylpyrocarbonate) in absolute ethanol to 100 mL H 2 O in a sterile container, allowing the solution to stand at room temperature for 5 min., followed by heating to 90°C for 5 min.
  • RNA probe was obtained per ⁇ g of DNA template.
  • RNA probe synthesis procedure As an alternative to the RNA probe synthesis procedure described above, another procedure may be used. Again, solution and reagents were added at room temperature and the reaction mixture is not kept on ice. Initially, DePC-treated water was added to a sterile reaction tube so that a final volume of 20 ⁇ L was attained. 4.0 ⁇ L of 5X transcription buffer was then added, followed by 2.0 ⁇ L 100 mM DTT. 0.8 ⁇ L of RNasinTM was then added.
  • the reaction was incubated at 37°C - 40°C for 60 min.
  • the R12 DNA template was degraded by adding RNase-free DNase to a concentration of 1 unit/ ⁇ g DNA.
  • the DNA digestion reaction was placed at 37°C for 15 min., after which it was subjected to phenol:chloroform extraction, followed by a chloroform-only extraction.
  • the RNA probes were then precipitated by adding 0.1 volume of 3 M sodium acetate and 2.5 volumes of ethanol and in incubating at -20°C for 1 hr. Probe was recovered by centrifugation at 12,500 rpm for 15 min. in a microfuge.
  • the pelleted riboprobe was washed twice with 70% ethanol and then dried in a speed vac (Savant) .
  • the riboprobe-containing pellet was next resuspended in 50 ⁇ L DePC-H 2 0 in the presence of 20 mM DTT 50 ⁇ g/ ⁇ L partially hydrolyzed polyadenylic acid, and 1 unit/ ⁇ L RNasinTM. At this point, the solution typically contained 2.5 x 10 6 cpm/ ⁇ L.
  • RNA molecule having a ribonucleotide sequence complementary to that produced from R12 was made by run- off transcription of R .
  • the same procedures as described above for producing the RNA probe were used to generate the quantitation probe, except that only trace amounts of 35 S-UTP were employed in conjunction with 0.2 mM (final concentration) unlabeled UTP.
  • Quantitation of the R12-derived probe was conducted by performing a series of titration assays. Each titration assay employed the same amount of probe, namely about 20,000 cpm, and increasing amounts of target (here the quantitation probe derived from R4) .
  • each assay probe having a specific activity of 2 x 10 9 cpm/ ⁇ g was present in excess.
  • Each titration solution hybridization was conducted in a final volume of 100 ⁇ L and contained the following components: 2.7 M Na 1 . 5 H 1 .5PO 4 , 50 ⁇ g/mL partially hydrolyzed polyadenylic acid, and 20 mM DTT. The hybridizations were conducted for 2 hr.
  • the hybrid-containing samples were then subjected to liquid scintillation counting after the addition of 5 mL (approximately 2 volumes) of Liquiscint®.
  • This titration data was used to produce a standard curve showing the amount of signal generated per given mass of target mRNA. And because the target and probe were of known size, the signal generated could be correlated with the number of target RNA molecules complexed in probe-target hybrids .
  • Cellular PF 4 mRNA levels were quantified by adding 70 ⁇ L of probe mix to 30 ⁇ L of cell lysate so that the solution hybridization conditions were equivalent to those used in the titration assays.
  • the hybridizations, followed by RNase treatment and then molecular exclusion chromatography, were conducted as described above. This procedure allowed the detection of as few as two PF 4 mRNAs per cell.
  • FIG. 5 The results in FIG. 5 indicate that PF 4 mRNA expression in HEL cells was stimulated by PMA. PF 4 mRNA expression increased linearly with logarithmic increases in PMA concentration.
  • the kinetics of PMA induction of HEL cell PF 4 mRNA expression was also examined by conducting solution hybridizations as described above in HEL cells stimulated with PMA for various time periods. Induction of PF 4 mRNA expression was initiated and reached maximal levels between 24 and 48 hr. after stimulation. See FIG. 6. The kinetics of the response were not influenced by PMA concentration. This delayed expression indicated that PF 4 mRNA synthesis was possibly a secondary consequence of PMA treatment. This hypothesis was confirmed by stimulating HEL cells with 10" 8 M PMA in the presence (2 ⁇ g/mL) or absence of cycloheximide. Table 2 PF 4 mRNA Levels

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Measuring Or Testing Involving Enzymes Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)

Abstract

Méthode améliorée de détection de séquences particulières d'acide nucléique par hybridation de l'acide nucléique et méthode de diagnostic où des ribosondes détectables par marquage sont hybridées en solution à des séquences complémentaires d'acide nucléique codées par des molécules cibles d'acide nucléique. Après l'hybridation, la digestion de la RNAse sert à dégrader les molécules sondes non hybridées après quoi on recourt à la séparation chromatographique pour isoler les hybrides de sondes-cibles. Cette méthode améliore les limites de détection de l'hybridation de l'acide nucléique et présente une utilité générale en matière de diagnostic médical, de chimie légale et de recherche en biologie moléculaire.
PCT/US1994/012044 1993-10-22 1994-10-19 METHODE DIAGNOSTIQUE DE L'ACIDE NUCLEIQUE RECOURANT AUX RIBOSONDES, A LA DIGESTION DE LA RNAse ET A LA CHROMATOGRAPHIE PAR EXCLUSION DE POIDS MOLECULAIRE WO1995011316A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU80853/94A AU8085394A (en) 1993-10-22 1994-10-19 A nucleic acid diagnostic method using riboprobes, rnase digestion, and molecular weight exclusion chromatography
EP94931951A EP0738331A1 (fr) 1993-10-22 1994-10-19 METHODE DIAGNOSTIQUE DE L'ACIDE NUCLEIQUE RECOURANT AUX RIBOSONDES, A LA DIGESTION DE LA RNAse ET A LA CHROMATOGRAPHIE PAR EXCLUSION DE POIDS MOLECULAIRE
NZ275286A NZ275286A (en) 1993-10-22 1994-10-19 Detecting target nucleic acid sequences using labelled rna probe hybridization and rnase digestion
NO963901A NO963901D0 (no) 1993-10-22 1996-09-18 Fremgangsmåte for nukleinsyrediagnostisering under anvendelse av riboprober, RNase-fordöyelse og molekylvektutelukkelseskromatografi

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US14171193A 1993-10-22 1993-10-22
US08/141,711 1993-10-22

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1995011316A1 true WO1995011316A1 (fr) 1995-04-27

Family

ID=22496882

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US1994/012044 WO1995011316A1 (fr) 1993-10-22 1994-10-19 METHODE DIAGNOSTIQUE DE L'ACIDE NUCLEIQUE RECOURANT AUX RIBOSONDES, A LA DIGESTION DE LA RNAse ET A LA CHROMATOGRAPHIE PAR EXCLUSION DE POIDS MOLECULAIRE

Country Status (6)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0738331A1 (fr)
AU (1) AU8085394A (fr)
CA (1) CA2182194A1 (fr)
HU (1) HUT75069A (fr)
NZ (1) NZ275286A (fr)
WO (1) WO1995011316A1 (fr)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2737502A1 (fr) * 1995-07-31 1997-02-07 Genset Sa Procede de detection d'acides nucleiques utilisant des sondes nucleotidiques permettant a la fois une capture specifique et une detection
WO2006105487A1 (fr) * 2005-03-31 2006-10-05 Amgen Inc. Procede de blocage selectif de l'amplification de l'arn dans l'hemoglobine
US20210198655A1 (en) * 2009-09-16 2021-07-01 Life Technologies Corporation Lysis buffers for extracting nucleic acids

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0229442A1 (fr) * 1986-01-07 1987-07-22 Gen-Probe Incorporated Procédé de réassociation accélérée d'acide nucléique
WO1992018649A1 (fr) * 1991-04-12 1992-10-29 Microprobe Corporation Compositions et procedes d'extraction et d'hybridation ameliorees d'acide nucleique

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0229442A1 (fr) * 1986-01-07 1987-07-22 Gen-Probe Incorporated Procédé de réassociation accélérée d'acide nucléique
WO1992018649A1 (fr) * 1991-04-12 1992-10-29 Microprobe Corporation Compositions et procedes d'extraction et d'hybridation ameliorees d'acide nucleique

Non-Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
A.M. TURNER ET AL.: "Nonhematopoietic tumor cell lines express stem cell factor and display c-kit receptors", BLOOD, vol. 80, no. 2, 15 July 1992 (1992-07-15), SAUNDERS, NEW YORK, US;, pages 374 - 381 *
D.A. MELTON ET AL.: "Efficient in vitro synthesis of biological active RNA and RNA hybridization probe from plasmids containing a bacteriophage SP6 promoter", NUCL. ACIDS RES., vol. 12, no. 17, 11 September 1984 (1984-09-11), IRL PRESS, OXFORD, ENGLAND;, pages 7035 - 7056 *
E.T. SCHENBORN ET AL.: "A novel transcription property of SP6 and T7 polymerases: dependence on template structure", NUCL. ACIDS RES., vol. 13, no. 17, 11 September 1985 (1985-09-11), IRL PRESS, OXFORD, ENGLAND;, pages 6223 - 6236 *
J. THOMPSON AND D. GILLESPIE: "Molecular hybridization with RNA probes in concentrated solutions of guanidine thiocyanate", ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, vol. 163, June 1987 (1987-06-01), ACADEMIC PRESS, INC., NEW YORK, US;, pages 281 - 291 *
K.R. LUEHRSEN AND M.P. BAUM: "In vitro synthesis of biotinylated RNA probes from A-T rich templates: Problems and solutions", BIOTECHNIQUES, vol. 5, no. 7, October 1987 (1987-10-01), EATON PUBL. CO., MA,US;, pages 660 - 670 *
R.W. RICHARDSON AND R.I. GUMPORT: "Biotin and fluorescent labeling of RNA using T4 RNA ligase", NUCL. ACIDS RES., vol. 11, no. 18, 24 September 1983 (1983-09-24), IRL PRESS, OXFORD, ENGLAND;, pages 6167 - 6184 *

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2737502A1 (fr) * 1995-07-31 1997-02-07 Genset Sa Procede de detection d'acides nucleiques utilisant des sondes nucleotidiques permettant a la fois une capture specifique et une detection
WO1997005277A1 (fr) * 1995-07-31 1997-02-13 Genset Procede de detection d'acides nucleiques utilisant des sondes nucleotidiques permettant a la fois une capture specifique et une detection
US6228580B1 (en) 1995-07-31 2001-05-08 Genset Nucleic acid detection method using nucleotide probes enabling both specific capture and detection
WO2006105487A1 (fr) * 2005-03-31 2006-10-05 Amgen Inc. Procede de blocage selectif de l'amplification de l'arn dans l'hemoglobine
US20210198655A1 (en) * 2009-09-16 2021-07-01 Life Technologies Corporation Lysis buffers for extracting nucleic acids
US11820978B2 (en) * 2009-09-16 2023-11-21 Life Technologies Corporation Lysis buffers for extracting nucleic acids

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
NZ275286A (en) 1998-08-26
HU9602069D0 (en) 1996-09-30
CA2182194A1 (fr) 1995-04-27
HUT75069A (en) 1997-04-28
EP0738331A1 (fr) 1996-10-23
AU8085394A (en) 1995-05-08

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP3331178B2 (ja) ポリメラーゼ連鎖反応を利用する核酸の定量用のプラスミド及びキット
JP2651483B2 (ja) ポリメラーゼ連鎖反応によるヒト乳頭腫ウイルスの検出
US4886741A (en) Use of volume exclusion agents for the enhancement of in situ hybridization
JP2846018B2 (ja) 核酸配列の増幅および検出
IE902727A1 (en) Methods and compositions for chromosome-specific staining
EP0338067A4 (en) Human papillomavirus type diagnosis with nucleotide probes
CA2032203C (fr) Essai de capture par amplification
Heino et al. Detection of human papilloma virus (HPV) DNA in genital biopsy specimens by in situ hybridization with digoxigenin-labeled probes
JP3167138B2 (ja) 単純ヘルペスウイルスの型特異的検出方法
Nicholls et al. Nucleic acid analysis by sandwich hybridization
Van Gijlswijk et al. Horseradish peroxidase-labeled oligonucleotides and fluorescent tyramides for rapid detection of chromosome-specific repeat sequences
JPH01501339A (ja) 改良された核酸ハイブリダイゼーション方法及びそれに用いるキット
Narayanan Overview of principles and current uses of DNA probes in clinical and laboratory medicine
Qian et al. In situ hybridization: basic approaches and recent development
EP0738331A1 (fr) METHODE DIAGNOSTIQUE DE L'ACIDE NUCLEIQUE RECOURANT AUX RIBOSONDES, A LA DIGESTION DE LA RNAse ET A LA CHROMATOGRAPHIE PAR EXCLUSION DE POIDS MOLECULAIRE
US6180344B1 (en) 5′ Upstream region sequences of the MyoD1 gene and uses thereof
KR20110126076A (ko) 인유두종바이러스 검출 및 유전형 확인 방법
JP5898831B2 (ja) ヒトパピローマウイルスの検出
JP5476989B2 (ja) ゲノムdna断片の増幅または欠失の検出方法
JP3401722B2 (ja) 核酸ハイブリッド形成アッセイにおける、またはそれに関する改良
Link et al. Detection of cytomegalovirus‐infected cells by flow cytometry and fluorescence in suspension hybridisation (FLASH) using DNA probes labeled with biotin by polymerase chain reaction
Stoler et al. Nucleic acid blotting techniques for virus detection
Tchernitsa et al. Effects of Ras signaling on gene expression analyzed by customized microarrays
JP3536934B2 (ja) ヒトヘルペスウイルス検出用オリゴヌクレオチドおよびその用途
CN114196788A (zh) 利用荧光原位检测技术快速检测非洲猪瘟病毒的方法

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AM AT AU BB BG BR BY CA CH CN CZ DE DK ES FI GB GE HU JP KE KG KP KR KZ LK LT LU LV MD MG MN MW NL NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SI SK TJ TT UA UZ VN

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): KE MW SD SZ AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN ML MR NE SN TD TG

DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2182194

Country of ref document: CA

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 275286

Country of ref document: NZ

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1994931951

Country of ref document: EP

REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1994931951

Country of ref document: EP

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Ref document number: 1994931951

Country of ref document: EP