WO1985003566A1 - Terrain advisory system - Google Patents

Terrain advisory system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1985003566A1
WO1985003566A1 PCT/US1985/000089 US8500089W WO8503566A1 WO 1985003566 A1 WO1985003566 A1 WO 1985003566A1 US 8500089 W US8500089 W US 8500089W WO 8503566 A1 WO8503566 A1 WO 8503566A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
recited
vehicle
warning system
warning
cone
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US1985/000089
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Charles D. Bateman
Michael M. Grove
Original Assignee
Sundstrand Data Control, Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Sundstrand Data Control, Inc. filed Critical Sundstrand Data Control, Inc.
Priority to DE8585901148T priority Critical patent/DE3584553D1/en
Publication of WO1985003566A1 publication Critical patent/WO1985003566A1/en
Priority to FI853790A priority patent/FI853790L/en

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G08—SIGNALLING
    • G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
    • G08G5/00—Traffic control systems for aircraft, e.g. air-traffic control [ATC]
    • G08G5/04—Anti-collision systems
    • G08G5/045—Navigation or guidance aids, e.g. determination of anti-collision manoeuvers
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01C—MEASURING DISTANCES, LEVELS OR BEARINGS; SURVEYING; NAVIGATION; GYROSCOPIC INSTRUMENTS; PHOTOGRAMMETRY OR VIDEOGRAMMETRY
    • G01C5/00—Measuring height; Measuring distances transverse to line of sight; Levelling between separated points; Surveyors' levels
    • G01C5/005—Measuring height; Measuring distances transverse to line of sight; Levelling between separated points; Surveyors' levels altimeters for aircraft
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G08—SIGNALLING
    • G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
    • G08G5/00—Traffic control systems for aircraft, e.g. air-traffic control [ATC]
    • G08G5/0073—Surveillance aids
    • G08G5/0086—Surveillance aids for monitoring terrain

Definitions

  • This invention relates generally to systems for advising the pilot of a vehicle such as an aircraft or a submarine of the proximity of obstacles or terrain in the path of the vehicle, and more particularly to navigationally based terrain advisory systems that advise of the presence of terrain or other obstacles in the vicinity of the vehicle based on navigationally derived position as well as altitude, ground speed, ground track and vertical speed of the vehicle.
  • Various systems that provide warnings or advisory indications of the presence of terrain or obstacles are Known.
  • those systems include systems generally known as ground proximity warning systems for aircraft.
  • Such systems monitor the flight conditions of an aircraft and provide a warning if the flight conditions are such that an inadvertent contact with the ground is imminent.
  • the flight conditions monitored by such systems are radio altitude and rate, barometric altitude and rate, airspeed, and flap and gear positions.
  • the aforementioned parameters are monitored, and an advisory indication or a warning is generated when the relationship between the afore- said conditions or parameters is such that ground impact is likely to occur.
  • Typical examples of such systems are disclosed in United States Patent Nos.
  • a memory device is employed to store minimum safe altitudes by geographic coordinate areas.
  • a navigational computer is used to determine the posi ⁇ tion of the aircraft, and a warning is given if the aircraft descends below the stored minimum safe alti- tude for the coordinate area in which the aircraft is flying.
  • the system has a "worst case” and a “tactical” mode of operation.
  • the minimum safe altitude is determined as a function of the highest terrain feature or obstacle within the geographic coordinate area of interest.
  • current flight conditions such as position, ground speed and ground track are used to define a minimum safe altitude based on the heights of terrain.and obstacles immediately ahead of the projected flight path.
  • geographical data representative of terrain and other obstacles, both natural and man- made are stored in memory as a function of geographic location.
  • the boundaries of restricted areas, such as, for example, military installations may also be stored in the memory.
  • the shapes and contours of the terrain and obstacles are approximated by simple geometric shapes such as cones, connected cones, in ⁇ verted cones and other simple shapes that can be de ⁇ fined by a few bits of information. This permits a mountain or a mountain range to be defined by a very few bits defining the height and slope of a cone or connected cones.
  • the shapes may be defined algebraically, but geometric shapes are pre ⁇ ferable because they are easier to manipulate mathe ⁇ matically.
  • a navigation system which may include, for example, a flight management system that receives signals from, for example, an inertial navigation system and other signals such as signals from a satel ⁇ lite navigation receiver, VLF/OMEGA, Loran C, VOR/DME, and DME/DME, is employed to determine the present latitude and longitude of the aircraft. If no flight management system is used, the signal may be obtained from the various navigation systems directly. Search logic that is responsive to the latitude and longitude signals is used to retrieve data representative of the terrain in the vicinity of the present position of the aircraft.
  • a predictive terrain/obstacle warning envel ⁇ ope generator receives the terrain representative data as well as data representative of the ground speed, ground track, altitude and vertical speed of the aircraft to generate a warning envelope which is a function of aircraft speed, ground track, altitude and vertical speed, in addition, the size of the envelope may be tailored to provide any desired warn- ing time.
  • the point of reference may be selected so that the envelope is defined either about the aircraft, or about the various obstacles. If the warning envel ⁇ ope is defined about the aircraft, a warning or an advisory is generated each time an obstacle pene- trates the warning envelope. If the envelope is de ⁇ fined about the terrain or obstacle, the warning is generated whenever the position of the aircraft is such that it penetrates the envelope.
  • the envelope signal from the predic- tive terrain/obstacle warning envelope generator is compared with the position of the aircraft or of the terrain/obstacle, and an advisory is issued when the envelope is penetrated.
  • data from the envelope generator may be used to control a voice generator and a visual display.
  • the voice generator may be programmed to instruct the pilot of the type and location of the terrain or obstacle and the type of action required to avoid it.
  • the data may also be presented visually either in the form of a map display or an attitude display to. permit the pilot visually to fly around the terrain/obstacle or restricted area.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a preferred embodiment of the terrain/obstacle advisory system according to the invention
  • FIGS. 2 and 3 illustrate how terrain features are approximated by simple geometric shapes by the system according to the invention
  • FIG. 3A illustrates how a restricted area may be defined
  • FIG. 3B illustrates how an inverted cone may be used to define rising terrain about a plateau or an airport
  • FIGS. 4-6 illustrate various approaches to deriving warning envelopes based on terrain/obstacle locations and aircraft position and flight parameters
  • FIGS. 7 and 8 show how the geometric shapes defining the terrain obstacles may be expanded as a function of aircraft flight parameters to define a safe approach distance;
  • FIG. 9 shows an expansion similar to the expansions illustrated in FIGS. 7 and 8 in three dimen ⁇ sions;
  • FIG. 10 is a block diagram of the predictive terrain/obstacle warning envelope generator illustrated in FIG. 1;
  • FIG. 11 is a block diagram of the envelope functions generator illustrated in FIG. 10.
  • FIG. 12 is a block diagram of an alternative embodiment of the terrain advisory system according to the invention.
  • FIG. 1 there is illustrated " a preferred embodiment of the system according to the invention generally designated by reference numeral 10.
  • the system 10 utilizes data from an air data computer 12 or from a barometric altimeter and rate circuit present on the aircraft and from a navi ⁇ gation system which may include a flight management system 14, also present in the aircraft, in order to determine the location of the aircraft and to advise the pilot of dangerous proximity to terrain or to other obstacles.
  • the navigation data may be obtained directly from the navigation system, which may include an inertial navigation system, a satellite navigation receiver, VLF/OMEGA, Loran C, VOR/DME or DME/DME, particularly when no flight manage- ment system is used.
  • the system will be discussed in an aircraft environ ⁇ ment; however, the system is also usable for other vehicles that must navigate around terrain, such as, for example, submarines.
  • the signals from the air data computer 12 and flight management system 14 are applied to a predictive terrain/obstacle warning envelope generator 16 along with terrain data which is retrieved from a terrain memory 18 by location search logic 20.
  • a system particularly suitable for the search logic 20 is disclosed in United States patent application serial No.
  • envelope control data is applied to the envelope generator 16.
  • Data representative of the climb performance of the aircraft is also applied to the envelope generator 16 from an aircraft performance input 22.
  • the envelope generated by the envelope generator 16 is compared with the position (latitude and longitude) of the aircraft provided by the flight management system 14 by a comparator 24 that compares the envelope and position signals.
  • the comparator 24 illustrated in FIG. 1 may be a comparator that compares, for example, voltages or currents, or simply a summing junction. In a digital system, a digital comparator may be ' used.
  • the comparator 24 controls a voice generator 26 which generates a voice advisory signal and applies it to a transducer 28, which may be part of the cockpit communication system in order to provide an advisory indication of the presence of terrain or obstacles whenever the envelope generated by the envelope genera ⁇ tor 16 is penetrate ⁇ .
  • the envelope genera- tor causes the voice generator 26 to advise the pilot of the nature and location of the terrain or obstacle by selecting the appropriate message to indicate to the pilot whether he should turn left or right, and whether the object is terrain or a man-made obstacle.
  • display data is generated by the warning envelope generator and applied to an attitude display generator 30 -and a map display generator 32 which generate attitude and map displays that are applied to a pair of displays, such as cathode ray tubes 34 and 36.
  • the attitude display displays an image show ⁇ ing the terrain and obstacles that lie in the flight path forward of the aircraft.
  • the map display dis ⁇ plays the same terrain below the aircraft.
  • a signal from the comparator 24 is also applied to the display generators 30 and 32 to permit them to indicate a hazardous condition visually, for example, by a change in color.
  • a system suitable for providing such dis ⁇ plays is described in Aviation Week and Space Technology, September 12, 1983, pages 88-95.
  • Other systems suitable for providing such displays are multi ⁇ function displays that provide, for example, a map display that shows the position of the aircraft rela ⁇ tive to a navigational waypoint and a weather radar display. Such displays are presently used on modern transport aircraft such as the Boeing 757 and 767 aircraft and the European A310 Airbus.
  • the air data computer 12 pro ⁇ vides signals representative of the barometric altitude, or height above sea level, of the aircraft and the vertical speed of the aircraft in the form of a baro ⁇ metric rate signal H D to the predictive terrain/obstacle warning generator 16.
  • the vertical speed signal may be a Z-velocity signal obtained from an inertial navigation system 37.
  • the flight management system provides signals representative of ground speed and the ground track of the aircraft to the envelope generator 16.
  • the ground track signal which is a vector representing the direction of the aircraft along the ground is differentiated by a differentiator 38 and applied to the envelope generator 16 to provide infor ⁇ mation to the envelope generator 16 representative of changes in direction of the aircraft.
  • a position signal representing the latitude and longitude of the aircraft is also applied to the generator 16 as well as to the location search logic 20.
  • the location search logic 20 is responsive to the position signal and causes- data representative of terrain within a predetermined distance from the position of the air ⁇ craft to be retrieved from the terrain memory 18 and applied to the envelope generator 16.
  • the envelope generator 16 responds to the various altitude, posi ⁇ tion, track and speed signals to generate the various display data, and to advise the pilot of the proxi ⁇ mity of terrain and obstacles.
  • the operation of the envelope generator will be discussed in greater detail in a subsequent portion of the detailed description.
  • data representative of the terrain and obstacle around predetermined critical geographic areas such as, for example, airports and restricted areas, must be stored.
  • the terrain and obstacles can be approximated by a series of standard shapes that can readily be defined by a few bits. These standard shapes may include simple geometric shapes such as cones, truncated cones, connected cones and other simple shapes that can be defined by a few bits.
  • Algebraic shapes such as quadratic surfaces and other surfaces that may be readily defined by an algebraic equation may also be used.
  • geometric shapes are used as the standard shapes, and mountains, for example, may readily be approximated by cones as shown in FIG. 2.
  • the size, shape and location of such cones may be defined by only four numbers, for example, the height above sea level of the peak of the cone, h, the radius of the base of the cone, r, and the latitude and longitude of the center of the cone, X 0 , Y 0 .
  • mountain ridges may be defined by two or more connected cones as is shown in FIG. 3. For flat-topped mountains and for plateaus the cones may also be truncated as in FIG. 3.
  • the plateau illustrated in FIG. 3 can be defined by only 10 numbers, namely the truncated and untruncated heights of the cones, h ⁇ _, h]_', and 2, h2 * , the radii of the bases of the two cones r ⁇ _ and r2, and locations of the centers of the cones X ⁇ _, i* and X2, 2 « Re ⁇ stricted areas, such as, for example, military instal- lations may be store ⁇ as a geographical boundary 40
  • the wall 42 may extend to a minimum flight ceiling 44 above which flight is permitted, or may simply define a restricted area boundary that must not be penetrated at any alti ⁇ tude.
  • Minimum safe altitudes about a plateau 46 may be defined by an inverted cone 48 (Fig. 3B) or by connect ⁇ ed inverted cones.
  • the slope of the sides of the cone 48 would be selected such that the sides of the cone clear surrounding obstacles and terrain, or so that they approximate the angle of the glide slope beam.
  • the terrain and obstacle data can be utilized to warn the pilot if he approaches the ter ⁇ rain or obstacles too closely.
  • the safe approach distances as a function of the various flight conditions of the aircraft.
  • an envelope that, defines a constant time to impact such as, for example, 90 seconds.
  • Such an envelope would be de ⁇ fined as a function of altitude above sea level, ver- tical speed, ground speed and ground track and the desired time to impact.
  • the envelope could be defined around each obstacle or terrain feature; and whenever the aircraft penetrated the envelope a warning or advisory indication would be given.
  • any warning time could be selected, and consequently longer warning times than had previously been possible can be achieved. More ⁇ over, knowing the warning time permits a pilot to adjust his course appropriately without having to take hasty and possibly ill-conceived evasive maneuvers.
  • an envelope for example, a constant time to impact envelope 54 may be defined about the cone 50.
  • the envelope 54 is a dynamic envelope whose boundaries are a function of not only the shape of the cone 50, but also of the altitude above sea level, vertical speed, ground speed and ground track of the aircraft 52, as well as the desired time to impact.. Thus, for an aircraft travel ⁇ ing at high speed, the boundary 54 extends farther from the cone 50 than for an aircraft traveling at low speed. Moreover, the direction of extension of the envelope 54 from the cone 50 is determined by the position and ground track of the aircraft. Because the envelope 54 is dynamic and defines the time to impact boundary as a function of both the characteris- tics of the cone 50 and the operating conditions of the aircraft 52, it is not necessary to predict the course of the aircraft 52. All that is necessary is to compare the position of the aircraft 52 with the boundary of the envelope 54, and to issue an advisory warning if the aircraft 52 penetrates the boundary 54.
  • the constant time to impact envelope may be referenced to the aircraft as shown in FIG. 5.
  • a warning envelope 54 » is defined such that under the present flying conditions of an aircraft 52', any object within the envelope 54' will be struck by the aircraft within a predetermined time to impact time.
  • the envelope 54' is a dynamic envelope defined by the operating condi ⁇ tions of the aircraft.
  • the envelope 54* will be smaller for a lower speed aircraft than for faster aircraft.
  • the locations of the various terrain features and obstacles are compared with the boundary of the envelope 54', and an advisory warning is issued if the boundary of the envelope 54' is penetrated.
  • a warning is gener ⁇ ated-if the boundary 54' crosses the surface of the- cone- 5-0'. _
  • the criteria for determining the shapes of the envelope boundaries 54 and 54' illustrated in FIGS. 4 and 5 are described in greater detail in a subsequent portion of the detailed description.
  • FIG. 6 Yet another approach to defining a warning envelope is illustrated in FIG. 6.
  • a projected flight path 56 is predicted based on tne current flying conditions of an aircraft 52' ' .
  • the length of the projected flight path 56 is determined by the desired time to impact, and its shape is determined by the flight conditions of the aircraft.
  • An envelope 54' ' is defined about the projected flight path 53.
  • the envelope 54'' increases in width along the length of the projecte ⁇ flight path 56 to account for inaccuracies that occur in predicting flight paths over longer distances.
  • the position of the envelope 54' * is compared with the terrain features in the proximity of the projected flight path, and an advisory warning is given if the envelope 54* * is penetrated.
  • an advisory warning will be issued.
  • FIG. 7 One-method of defining the envelope about terrain or an obstacle is illustrated in FIG. 7.
  • the aircraft 52 is flying level and at the radius of the cone 50, r Q , is the radius at the altitude at which the aircraft 52 is flying.
  • the boundary of the warn ⁇ ing envelope 54 is a function of the magnitude of the component of the aircraft speed in the direction toward the center of the obstacle or terrain multiplied by the desired time to impact.
  • This velocity component can.be obtained by knowing the relative position of the aircraft with respect to the obstacle as well as the ground track of the aircraft.
  • the heading of the ground track of the aircraft is obtained from, for example, the flight management system 14 of FIG. 1, and defined by the angle .
  • the position of the aircraft as defined by the latitude and longitude coordinates X and Y is obtained from the flight management system or from one of the navigation systems on the aircraft.
  • the position of the peak of the cone 50, X 0 # ⁇ 0 , and its radius, r 0 , at the flight altitude of the aircraft 52 are obtained from the terrain memory 18.
  • the angle 6 between the position of the aircraft and the position of the cone 50 can be calculated.
  • the angle ⁇ may be ' calculated. Knowing the angle ⁇ , the component of the velocity in the direction in the center of the cone 50 may be obtained by multiplication with the cosine of the angle ⁇
  • a constant time to impact warning envelope can readily be defined by multiplying the component of the velocity of the aircraft in the direction of the center of the cone 50 and adding it to the radius of the cone 50 at the altitude at which the aircraft is flying. This can be accomplished as follows:
  • V the velocity of the aircraft
  • T the desired time to impact.
  • the equation defines the value of the envel ⁇ ope 54 only for the face of the cone 50 facing the direction of travel of the aircraft 52. Because there is no expansion of tne envelope when the aircraft is traveling away from the terrain, f( ⁇ ) is set to r 0 for values of ⁇ greater than or equal to 90° .
  • the cosine function tends to slow down computation time, particularly when a relatively small microprocessor is used.
  • the envelope may be tailored to provide either greater sensitivity to flybys in order to increase the warning time, or to provide a lesser sens-itivity in order to reduce nuisance warnings.
  • the predictive terrain/obstacle warning envelope generator 16 is illustrated in greater detail in FIG. 10.
  • the envelope generator 16 contains an envelope function generator 60 that contains data defining the basic shapes of the various terrain fea ⁇ tures and obstacles, as well as the logic required to alter those shapes as a function of aircraft flying conditions.
  • the envelope functions generator 60 re ⁇ ceives signals representative of the position of the aircraft with respect to terrain from a comparator 62 that compares signals representative of the position of the aircraft from the flight management system 14 (FIG. 1) .
  • Terrain data received from the memory 18 via the location search logic 20 is used by the com- parator 62 to determine the position of the aircraft with respect to terrain.
  • the terrain data is also applied to the envelope functions generator 60, as is data representative of the ground track of the air ⁇ craft.
  • a comparator 64 compares the terrain data with the ground track data to generate a signal repre ⁇ sentative of the ground track with respect to terrain and applies it to the envelope functions generator 60. Signals representative of the ground speed of the aircraft as well as its altitude above sea level are also applied to the envelope functions generator 60.
  • An envelope control signal provides various con ⁇ trol signals to the envelope functions generator such as, the shape of the terrain, i.e. whether the terrain is to be represented by a cone, a truncated cone, connected cones, etc. as well as the desired time to impact.
  • the e'nvelope functions generator 60 operates on the received data to generate a static envelope which is modified by the descent rate of the aircraft and the rate of change of its ground track by a dynamic biasing circuit to provide a dynamic envelope.
  • the static envelope generated by the envelope functions generator 60 is basically the envelope 54 described in conjunction with FIG. 7 and the vertical rate sig- nal serves to raise the envelope as the aircraft descends and the ground track rate signal serves to adjust the orientation of the envelope to maintain a constant time to impact as a function of aircraft speed.
  • Right left climb information is also generated by the envelope functions generator 60.
  • the envelope functions generator 60 provides a "turn right" signal when ⁇ (FIG. 7) is positive and a "turn left” signal when ⁇ is negative.
  • a visual alert logic circuit 61 receives the position and ground track data from the comparators 62 and 64, as well as envelope data from the envelope functions generator 60 and operates on the received data to generate the display data that is applied to the attitude and map display generators 30 and 32 (FIG. 1), respectively. Such data could, for example, cause the position of the aircraft to be displayed with respect to the terrain.
  • the display data could be used in conjunction with the signal from the comparator 24 to indicate a hazardous flight condition. Such a condition could be indicated by displaying a projected flight path into terrain, or by a change in the color of the terrain to a color such as red to indicate a hazardously close approach.
  • the envelope functions generator 60 is illus ⁇ trated in greater detail in FIG. 11.
  • equations for a cone function are illustrated, but the same principles apply to other shapes.
  • the terrain data, X 0 , Y 0 , r and h defining a cone is applied to an arithmetic circuit 63 that solves the cone equation for the altitude at which the air ⁇ craft is flying, as determined by the altitude above sea level signal, in-order to generate the radius r 0 at the altitude of the aircraft, as illustrated in FIG. 11.
  • Another arithmetic circuit 65 defines the shape of the envelope expansion 54 (FIG. 7) based on a signal representative of the desired shape of the envelope as well as a signal representative of the direction of the ground track of the aircraft with respect to terrain, which corresponds to the angle ⁇ of FIG. 7.
  • the direction with respect to terrain is generated by comparing the angle of the aircraft with respect to terrain ( ⁇ in FIG. 7) with the angle of the ground track ⁇ in FIG. 7) to generate ⁇ .
  • the ground track with respect to terrain (FIG. 10) signal may be applied to the arithmetic circuit 65.
  • the unit 65 generates the shape of the expansion envelope and applies it to a scaling circuit 66 that alters the magnitude of the envelope as a function of the velocity of the aircraft and the de ⁇ sired time to impact.
  • the output of the scaling cir ⁇ cuit 67 as well as the output of the circuit 63 are combined in an adder 68 to generate the static envelope.
  • FIG. 12 there is shown an alternative embodiment of the system according to the invention.
  • the system illustrated in FIG. 12 predicts the flight path of the aircraft and generates a warning if the predicted flight path should encounter an ob- stacle, as is illustrated in FIG. 6.
  • Many of the components of the system illustrated in FIG. 12 are similar to those illustrated in FIG. 1, and consequent ⁇ ly, will be assigned like reference numerals; however, such components will be designated by primed numbers in FIG. 12.
  • the system illustrated in FIG. 12 is similar to that illustrated in FIG. 1 with the exception of the addition of a flight " path and projected path gener ⁇ ator 100 which, based on signals representative of the altitude of the aircraft above sea level, its vertical speed, its position and ground track, as well as its rate of change of ground track determines the flight path and a projected flight patn for a predetermined time forward.
  • the flight path and pro- jected flight path are displayed on the monitors 34' and 36', and a signal representative of the projected flight path is also applied to the warning envelope generator 16'.
  • This envelope can be modified by ter ⁇ rain and speed considerations and compared by the comparator 24' to generate a voice warning.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
  • Remote Sensing (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
  • Traffic Control Systems (AREA)
  • Navigation (AREA)
  • Separation By Low-Temperature Treatments (AREA)
  • Chairs Characterized By Structure (AREA)
  • Paper (AREA)

Abstract

A terrain advisory system (10) utilizes stored data (18) representative of terrain and other obstacles in predeterminded geographical areas of interest to provide advisory warnings of the proximity of terrain, obstacles and restricted areas as they are approached. When used in a vehicle such as an aircraft, the system monitors (12, 13) the position, altitude, ground speed, ground track and the vertical speed of the vehicle and provides advisory indications of the position and path of travel of the vehicle with respect to obstacles and terrain. Such advisory indications may take the form of voice warnings (26) describing the nature and position of any obstacles, or a visual display (34, 36) showing the position of the obstacles and terrain with respect to the vehicle.

Description

TER AIN ADVISORY SYSTEM
Technical Field This invention relates generally to systems for advising the pilot of a vehicle such as an aircraft or a submarine of the proximity of obstacles or terrain in the path of the vehicle, and more particularly to navigationally based terrain advisory systems that advise of the presence of terrain or other obstacles in the vicinity of the vehicle based on navigationally derived position as well as altitude, ground speed, ground track and vertical speed of the vehicle.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Various systems that provide warnings or advisory indications of the presence of terrain or obstacles are Known. Among those systems include systems generally known as ground proximity warning systems for aircraft. Such systems monitor the flight conditions of an aircraft and provide a warning if the flight conditions are such that an inadvertent contact with the ground is imminent. Among the flight conditions monitored by such systems are radio altitude and rate, barometric altitude and rate, airspeed, and flap and gear positions. The aforementioned parameters are monitored, and an advisory indication or a warning is generated when the relationship between the afore- said conditions or parameters is such that ground impact is likely to occur. Typical examples of such systems are disclosed in United States Patent Nos. 3,715.,718, 3,925,751, 3,934,221, 3,934,222, 3,936,796, 3,944,968, 3,947,808, 3,947,810, 3,958,218, 3,958,219, 4,016,565, 4,030,065, 4,058,710, 4,060,793, 4,067,520, 4,071,894, 4,093,938, 4,107,681, 4,112,413, 4,121,287, 4,122,529, 4,135,143, 4,,189,777, 4,215,334, 4,293,840, 4,319,218, 4,336,976 and 4,369,425, and Canadian Patent No. 1,033,828. . ' .. - - While'the above-described systems provide advisory and warning signals in the event of proximity to terrain, such systems generate warnings based solely on the flight conditions of the aircraft, and do not utilize navigation information. Consequently, the sensitivity of such systems must be adjusted to pro¬ vide adequate warnings when a hazardous flight condi¬ tion exists without generating false or nuisance warn¬ ings when there is no danger. Such an adjustment results in a compromise that may still cause nuisance warnings when flying over, terrain unique to particular geographic areas and reduced warning times in other areas. One approach to improve the performance of such systems has been to modify the warning envelopes of the ground proximity warning system in accordance with the geographic location of the aircraft in order to optimize the warning criteria for the particular geographic area over which the aircraft is flying. An example of such a system is described in United States Patent application Serial No. 448,862, filed December 10, 1982 by Bateman, et al. and assigned to the same assignee of the assignee of the present inven¬ tion. In the system disclosed in the aforesaid appli¬ cation, the warning criteria are optimized to suit the terrain characteristics about various geographic areas, particularly the airports from which the air¬ craft is taking off or landing.
Another approach utilizing a geographical input is disclosed in United States Patent No. 4,224,669. In the system disclosed in the aforesaid patent, a memory device is employed to store minimum safe altitudes by geographic coordinate areas. A navigational computer is used to determine the posi¬ tion of the aircraft, and a warning is given if the aircraft descends below the stored minimum safe alti- tude for the coordinate area in which the aircraft is flying. The system has a "worst case" and a "tactical" mode of operation. In the "worst case" mode, the minimum safe altitude is determined as a function of the highest terrain feature or obstacle within the geographic coordinate area of interest. In the "tac¬ tical" -mode of operation, current flight conditions such as position, ground speed and ground track are used to define a minimum safe altitude based on the heights of terrain.and obstacles immediately ahead of the projected flight path.
While these systems do provide warnings of the proximity of terrain or obstacles, none of the above-described systems provides information relating to the exact location or nature of the terrain or obstacle, nor of the type of action required to avoid the obstacle. Thus, when a warning representative of the proximity of terrain, or of a descent below a minimum safe altitude is provided by the above systems, the evasive action that is normally called for is for the pilot to pull up. While pulling up may be suffi¬ cient evasive action to avoid impact in many or most cases, there are cases where turning right or turning left in addition to or instead of pulling up would provide a greater margin of safety.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION Thus, it is an object of the present inven¬ tion to provide a terrain or obstacle advisory system that improves the performance of ground proximity warning systems.
It is another object of the present inven¬ tion to provide a terrain or obstacle advisory system that provides an indication of the nature and location of obstacles and terrain in the vicinity of the vehicle. It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a terrain advisory system that provides terrain avoidance guidance to the pilot. It is another object of the invention to provide a system that advises the pilot of an aircraft of flight into a restricted area.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide aural terrain avoidance guidance to the pilot. It is another object of the present invention to provide a visual display of terrain and obstacles.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a terrain advisory system that predicts the flight path of an aircraft with respect to obstacles or terrain and provides an alert if the flight path of the aircraft is such that it is likely to result in an impact with the terrain or an obstacle within a predetermined time interval.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a warning system that provides longer warning times than those provided by the prior art systems.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a terrain advisory system capable of providing several minutes of warning time of an impending impact with terrain or an obstacle.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a terrain advisory system that minimizes the number of nuisance warnings generated. It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a system that stores geographical features of terrain as well as the location of man- made obstacles, and retrieves the stored terrain and obstacle information to provide an alert in the event of close proximity to the terrain or an obstacle. It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a system that minimizes the memory capacity required to store the terrain and obstacle information. It is yet another object of the present invention to alter the warning criteria required for the system to generate a warning as a function of the - ground track, ground speed and vertical speed of the aircraft. It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a system that predictively "looks ahead" of the vehicle without using forward looking radar.
It is still another object of the present invention to provide a system that "looks ahead" of the vehicle by utilizing navigation information and stored terrain and obstacle data to predict a flight path and to display any obstacles or terrain within the predicted flight path. Thus, in accordance with a preferred embodi¬ ment of the invention, geographical data representative of terrain and other obstacles, both natural and man- made are stored in memory as a function of geographic location. In addition, the boundaries of restricted areas, such as, for example, military installations may also be stored in the memory. In order to mini¬ mize the amount of storage required to store the ter¬ rain and obstacle information, the shapes and contours of the terrain and obstacles are approximated by simple geometric shapes such as cones, connected cones, in¬ verted cones and other simple shapes that can be de¬ fined by a few bits of information. This permits a mountain or a mountain range to be defined by a very few bits defining the height and slope of a cone or connected cones. Alternatively, the shapes may be defined algebraically, but geometric shapes are pre¬ ferable because they are easier to manipulate mathe¬ matically.
A navigation system which may include, for example, a flight management system that receives signals from, for example, an inertial navigation system and other signals such as signals from a satel¬ lite navigation receiver, VLF/OMEGA, Loran C, VOR/DME, and DME/DME, is employed to determine the present latitude and longitude of the aircraft. If no flight management system is used, the signal may be obtained from the various navigation systems directly. Search logic that is responsive to the latitude and longitude signals is used to retrieve data representative of the terrain in the vicinity of the present position of the aircraft.
A predictive terrain/obstacle warning envel¬ ope generator receives the terrain representative data as well as data representative of the ground speed, ground track, altitude and vertical speed of the aircraft to generate a warning envelope which is a function of aircraft speed, ground track, altitude and vertical speed, in addition, the size of the envelope may be tailored to provide any desired warn- ing time. The point of reference may be selected so that the envelope is defined either about the aircraft, or about the various obstacles. If the warning envel¬ ope is defined about the aircraft, a warning or an advisory is generated each time an obstacle pene- trates the warning envelope. If the envelope is de¬ fined about the terrain or obstacle, the warning is generated whenever the position of the aircraft is such that it penetrates the envelope.
In order to determine whether the envelope is penetrated, the envelope signal from the predic- tive terrain/obstacle warning envelope generator is compared with the position of the aircraft or of the terrain/obstacle, and an advisory is issued when the envelope is penetrated. In addition, data from the envelope generator may be used to control a voice generator and a visual display. The voice generator may be programmed to instruct the pilot of the type and location of the terrain or obstacle and the type of action required to avoid it. The data may also be presented visually either in the form of a map display or an attitude display to. permit the pilot visually to fly around the terrain/obstacle or restricted area. DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING These and other objects and advantages of the present invention will become readily apparent upon consideration of the following detailed descrip¬ tion and attached drawing wherein:
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a preferred embodiment of the terrain/obstacle advisory system according to the invention;
FIGS. 2 and 3 illustrate how terrain features are approximated by simple geometric shapes by the system according to the invention;
FIG. 3A illustrates how a restricted area may be defined;
FIG. 3B illustrates how an inverted cone may be used to define rising terrain about a plateau or an airport;
FIGS. 4-6 illustrate various approaches to deriving warning envelopes based on terrain/obstacle locations and aircraft position and flight parameters;
FIGS. 7 and 8 show how the geometric shapes defining the terrain obstacles may be expanded as a function of aircraft flight parameters to define a safe approach distance; FIG. 9 shows an expansion similar to the expansions illustrated in FIGS. 7 and 8 in three dimen¬ sions;
FIG. 10 is a block diagram of the predictive terrain/obstacle warning envelope generator illustrated in FIG. 1;
FIG. 11 is a block diagram of the envelope functions generator illustrated in FIG. 10; and
FIG. 12 is a block diagram of an alternative embodiment of the terrain advisory system according to the invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
Referring now to the drawing with particular attention to FIG. 1, there is illustrated" a preferred embodiment of the system according to the invention generally designated by reference numeral 10. Although the system according to the invention is illustrated as a series of functional blocks for purposes of clarity, it is to be understood that the actual imple- mentation of the system may be other than that speci¬ fically shown in FIG. 1, with various analog and digi¬ tal implementations being possible. The system 10 according to the invention utilizes data from an air data computer 12 or from a barometric altimeter and rate circuit present on the aircraft and from a navi¬ gation system which may include a flight management system 14, also present in the aircraft, in order to determine the location of the aircraft and to advise the pilot of dangerous proximity to terrain or to other obstacles. Alternatively, the navigation data may be obtained directly from the navigation system, which may include an inertial navigation system, a satellite navigation receiver, VLF/OMEGA, Loran C, VOR/DME or DME/DME, particularly when no flight manage- ment system is used. In the discussion of the present invention, the system will be discussed in an aircraft environ¬ ment; however, the system is also usable for other vehicles that must navigate around terrain, such as, for example, submarines. The signals from the air data computer 12 and flight management system 14 are applied to a predictive terrain/obstacle warning envelope generator 16 along with terrain data which is retrieved from a terrain memory 18 by location search logic 20. A system particularly suitable for the search logic 20 is disclosed in United States patent application serial No. 560,073 filed on December 9, 1983 by Lyle James Noland entitled "Ground Proximity Warning System Geographic Area Determination", but other search logic may be used. In addition, envelope control data is applied to the envelope generator 16. Data representative of the climb performance of the aircraft is also applied to the envelope generator 16 from an aircraft performance input 22. The envelope generated by the envelope generator 16 is compared with the position (latitude and longitude) of the aircraft provided by the flight management system 14 by a comparator 24 that compares the envelope and position signals. The comparator 24 illustrated in FIG. 1 may be a comparator that compares, for example, voltages or currents, or simply a summing junction. In a digital system, a digital comparator may be' used. The comparator 24 controls a voice generator 26 which generates a voice advisory signal and applies it to a transducer 28, which may be part of the cockpit communication system in order to provide an advisory indication of the presence of terrain or obstacles whenever the envelope generated by the envelope genera¬ tor 16 is penetrateα. In addition, the envelope genera- tor causes the voice generator 26 to advise the pilot of the nature and location of the terrain or obstacle by selecting the appropriate message to indicate to the pilot whether he should turn left or right, and whether the object is terrain or a man-made obstacle. In addition, display data is generated by the warning envelope generator and applied to an attitude display generator 30 -and a map display generator 32 which generate attitude and map displays that are applied to a pair of displays, such as cathode ray tubes 34 and 36. The attitude display displays an image show¬ ing the terrain and obstacles that lie in the flight path forward of the aircraft. The map display dis¬ plays the same terrain below the aircraft. A signal from the comparator 24 is also applied to the display generators 30 and 32 to permit them to indicate a hazardous condition visually, for example, by a change in color. A system suitable for providing such dis¬ plays is described in Aviation Week and Space Technology, September 12, 1983, pages 88-95. Other systems suitable for providing such displays are multi¬ function displays that provide, for example, a map display that shows the position of the aircraft rela¬ tive to a navigational waypoint and a weather radar display. Such displays are presently used on modern transport aircraft such as the Boeing 757 and 767 aircraft and the European A310 Airbus.
In operation, . the air data computer 12 pro¬ vides signals representative of the barometric altitude, or height above sea level, of the aircraft and the vertical speed of the aircraft in the form of a baro¬ metric rate signal HD to the predictive terrain/obstacle warning generator 16. Alternatively, the vertical speed signal may be a Z-velocity signal obtained from an inertial navigation system 37. The flight management system provides signals representative of ground speed and the ground track of the aircraft to the envelope generator 16. In addition, the ground track signal, which is a vector representing the direction of the aircraft along the ground is differentiated by a differentiator 38 and applied to the envelope generator 16 to provide infor¬ mation to the envelope generator 16 representative of changes in direction of the aircraft. A position signal representing the latitude and longitude of the aircraft is also applied to the generator 16 as well as to the location search logic 20. The location search logic 20 is responsive to the position signal and causes- data representative of terrain within a predetermined distance from the position of the air¬ craft to be retrieved from the terrain memory 18 and applied to the envelope generator 16. The envelope generator 16 responds to the various altitude, posi¬ tion, track and speed signals to generate the various display data, and to advise the pilot of the proxi¬ mity of terrain and obstacles. The operation of the envelope generator will be discussed in greater detail in a subsequent portion of the detailed description. In order for the system to operate, data representative of the terrain and obstacle around predetermined critical geographic areas such as, for example, airports and restricted areas, must be stored. In addition, it is desirable to store data representa¬ tive of potentially dangerous terrain, such as, for example, mountain ranges. However, in order to store data representative of such terrain and obstacles would require an inordinate amount of memory capacity in the terrain memory 18. Consequently, some form of data compaction must be provided. Therefore, in accordance with an important aspect of the present invention, rather than storing all of the irregularities and insignificant features of terrain and obstacles, the terrain and obstacles can be approximated by a series of standard shapes that can readily be defined by a few bits. These standard shapes may include simple geometric shapes such as cones, truncated cones, connected cones and other simple shapes that can be defined by a few bits. Algebraic shapes such as quadratic surfaces and other surfaces that may be readily defined by an algebraic equation may also be used. Preferably, geometric shapes are used as the standard shapes, and mountains, for example, may readily be approximated by cones as shown in FIG. 2. The size, shape and location of such cones may be defined by only four numbers, for example, the height above sea level of the peak of the cone, h, the radius of the base of the cone, r, and the latitude and longitude of the center of the cone, X0, Y0. Similarly, mountain ridges may be defined by two or more connected cones as is shown in FIG. 3. For flat-topped mountains and for plateaus the cones may also be truncated as in FIG. 3. Thus, the plateau illustrated in FIG. 3 can be defined by only 10 numbers, namely the truncated and untruncated heights of the cones, hτ_, h]_', and 2, h2* , the radii of the bases of the two cones rτ_ and r2, and locations of the centers of the cones Xτ_, i* and X2, 2« Re¬ stricted areas, such as, for example, military instal- lations may be storeα as a geographical boundary 40
(FIG. 3A) or an approximation thereof and an imaginary wall 42 defined around the boundary 42. The wall 42 may extend to a minimum flight ceiling 44 above which flight is permitted, or may simply define a restricted area boundary that must not be penetrated at any alti¬ tude.
Minimum safe altitudes about a plateau 46, for example, a plateau containing an airport, may be defined by an inverted cone 48 (Fig. 3B) or by connect¬ ed inverted cones. In such instances, the slope of the sides of the cone 48 would be selected such that the sides of the cone clear surrounding obstacles and terrain, or so that they approximate the angle of the glide slope beam.
Once the terrain and obstacle data has been stored in the terrain memory 18, such data can be utilized to warn the pilot if he approaches the ter¬ rain or obstacles too closely. There are many cri- teria for determining what distance is too close to an obstacle or terrain. For example, if a pilot is flying alongside or away from a mountain, he may safely approach much closer than if he were flying toward the mountain. Similarly, if the pilot is approaching a mountain at a relatively high altitude, he may safely approach the mountain more closely than if he were flying at a lower altitude.
Therefore, it has been found advantageous to define the safe approach distances as a function of the various flight conditions of the aircraft. For example, it is possible to define an envelope that, defines a constant time to impact such as, for example, 90 seconds. Such an envelope would be de¬ fined as a function of altitude above sea level, ver- tical speed, ground speed and ground track and the desired time to impact. The envelope could be defined around each obstacle or terrain feature; and whenever the aircraft penetrated the envelope a warning or advisory indication would be given. Such a system has the advantage that any warning time could be selected, and consequently longer warning times than had previously been possible can be achieved. More¬ over, knowing the warning time permits a pilot to adjust his course appropriately without having to take hasty and possibly ill-conceived evasive maneuvers. However, in some instances it has been found that a constant time to impact envelope is too sensitive and may cause nuisance warnings. Consequent¬ ly, it has been found advantageous to modify the con- stant time to impact envelope to make it more sensi¬ tive when the aircraft is heading directly at an object, and less sensitive when the aircraft is pas¬ sing by the object. Examples of such envelopes are discussed in a subsequent portion of the specification. There are various ways to define envelopes that provide the desired warning criteria. Perhaps the easiest approach to understand conceptually is illustrated in FIG. 4. In FIG. 4, there is illus¬ trated a cone 50 defining a terrain feature or obstacle that is being approached by an aircraft 52. In the example illustrated in FIG. 4, an envelope, for example, a constant time to impact envelope 54 may be defined about the cone 50. The envelope 54 is a dynamic envelope whose boundaries are a function of not only the shape of the cone 50, but also of the altitude above sea level, vertical speed, ground speed and ground track of the aircraft 52, as well as the desired time to impact.. Thus, for an aircraft travel¬ ing at high speed, the boundary 54 extends farther from the cone 50 than for an aircraft traveling at low speed. Moreover, the direction of extension of the envelope 54 from the cone 50 is determined by the position and ground track of the aircraft. Because the envelope 54 is dynamic and defines the time to impact boundary as a function of both the characteris- tics of the cone 50 and the operating conditions of the aircraft 52, it is not necessary to predict the course of the aircraft 52. All that is necessary is to compare the position of the aircraft 52 with the boundary of the envelope 54, and to issue an advisory warning if the aircraft 52 penetrates the boundary 54.
Rather than referencing the constant time to impact envelope to a terrain feature or to an obstacle, the constant time to impact envelope may be referenced to the aircraft as shown in FIG. 5. In the system illustrated in FIG. 5, a warning envelope 54» is defined such that under the present flying conditions of an aircraft 52', any object within the envelope 54' will be struck by the aircraft within a predetermined time to impact time. As in the case of the envelope 54 (FIG. 4), the envelope 54' (FIG. 5) is a dynamic envelope defined by the operating condi¬ tions of the aircraft. Thus, the envelope 54* will be smaller for a lower speed aircraft than for faster aircraft. To determine whether a warning is to be given, the locations of the various terrain features and obstacles are compared with the boundary of the envelope 54', and an advisory warning is issued if the boundary of the envelope 54' is penetrated. In the system illustrated in FIG. 5, a warning is gener¬ ated-if the boundary 54' crosses the surface of the- cone- 5-0'. _ The criteria for determining the shapes of the envelope boundaries 54 and 54' illustrated in FIGS. 4 and 5 are described in greater detail in a subsequent portion of the detailed description.
Yet another approach to defining a warning envelope is illustrated in FIG. 6. In the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 6, a projected flight path 56 is predicted based on tne current flying conditions of an aircraft 52' ' . The length of the projected flight path 56 is determined by the desired time to impact, and its shape is determined by the flight conditions of the aircraft. An envelope 54' ' is defined about the projected flight path 53. The envelope 54'' increases in width along the length of the projecteα flight path 56 to account for inaccuracies that occur in predicting flight paths over longer distances. The position of the envelope 54' * is compared with the terrain features in the proximity of the projected flight path, and an advisory warning is given if the envelope 54* * is penetrated. In the example illus¬ trated in FIG. 6, if the surface of a cone 50' ' pene¬ trates the envelope 54'', an advisory warning will be issued.
One-method of defining the envelope about terrain or an obstacle is illustrated in FIG. 7. In the illustration of FIG. -7, it is assumed that the aircraft 52 is flying level and at the radius of the cone 50, rQ, is the radius at the altitude at which the aircraft 52 is flying. The boundary of the warn¬ ing envelope 54 is a function of the magnitude of the component of the aircraft speed in the direction toward the center of the obstacle or terrain multiplied by the desired time to impact. This velocity component can.be obtained by knowing the relative position of the aircraft with respect to the obstacle as well as the ground track of the aircraft. In the illustration of FIG. 7, the heading of the ground track of the aircraft is obtained from, for example, the flight management system 14 of FIG. 1, and defined by the angle . The position of the aircraft as defined by the latitude and longitude coordinates X and Y is obtained from the flight management system or from one of the navigation systems on the aircraft. The position of the peak of the cone 50, X0# ^0 , and its radius, r0, at the flight altitude of the aircraft 52 are obtained from the terrain memory 18. By taking the difference in the X-coordinates and the Y-coordi- nates of the aircraft and the center of the cone 50, the angle 6 between the position of the aircraft and the position of the cone 50 can be calculated. Know¬ ing the angles φ and δ, the angle θ may be 'calculated. Knowing the angle θ, the component of the velocity in the direction in the center of the cone 50 may be obtained by multiplication with the cosine of the angle θ
A constant time to impact warning envelope can readily be defined by multiplying the component of the velocity of the aircraft in the direction of the center of the cone 50 and adding it to the radius of the cone 50 at the altitude at which the aircraft is flying. This can be accomplished as follows:
f (θ) = r0 + V T cos (θ)
which is equal to:
Figure imgf000021_0001
which is equal to:
f(θ) = r0 + V T cos [jzJ-arc tan( (X-X0)/(Y-Y0) )]
wherein: V = the velocity of the aircraft
T = the desired time to impact. The equation defines the value of the envel¬ ope 54 only for the face of the cone 50 facing the direction of travel of the aircraft 52. Because there is no expansion of tne envelope when the aircraft is traveling away from the terrain, f(θ) is set to r0 for values of θ greater than or equal to 90° .
Although the above equations provide a con¬ stant time to impact function, the cosine function tends to slow down computation time, particularly when a relatively small microprocessor is used. In addition, as previously discussed, it is sometimes desirable to modify the constant time to impact envel¬ ope to reduce nuisance warnings or for other reasons. Thus, in order to simplify computation and to optimize the shape of the warning envelope, the cosine func¬ tion is approximated by a linear function wherein the cosine term is replaced by the term (90-θ)/90) to generate the following equation: f(θ) = r0 + V T[(90-θ)/(90)3
The above equation -provides a close approximation to the envelope generated by the cosine function; however, square and square root functions may also be used to provide a broader or a narrower warning envelope, respectively.
In the square function, the envelope is defined by the following equation: f(θ) = r0 + V T[ (90-θ)/{90)]2 and in the square root function, the envelope is de- fined by the following equation: f(θ) = r0 + V T[ (90-θ)/(90)]1/2 Thus, the envelope may be tailored to provide either greater sensitivity to flybys in order to increase the warning time, or to provide a lesser sens-itivity in order to reduce nuisance warnings.
Examples of the linear, square and square root functions are illustrated by the graphs 55, 56 and 57, respectively, of FIG. 8. Presently, it appears that the square function provides the best results of the three equations. The above described example assumed that the aircraft is flying in level flight. In the event that the aircraft is not flying in level flight, the warning envelope must be modified accordingly. This may be readily accomplished by raising and lowering the effective envelope as is illustrated in FIG. 9. This is accomplished by simply raising the height of the envelope by an amount Δh required to maintain the constant time to impact during descent conditions. The addition of Δh to the height of the envelope will result in an increase in the diameter, Δ r0, at the base of the cone. The values Δh and Δ r0 may be readily computed by the following equations:
Figure imgf000023_0001
Δr = Δh r0/h0
wherein: k = a constant having units of time and is determined" by the desired time to impact h0 = the initial height of the object prior to expan¬ sion, hb = the barometric descent rate or the Z-velocity or vertical velocity of the aircraft.
The predictive terrain/obstacle warning envelope generator 16 is illustrated in greater detail in FIG. 10. The envelope generator 16 contains an envelope function generator 60 that contains data defining the basic shapes of the various terrain fea¬ tures and obstacles, as well as the logic required to alter those shapes as a function of aircraft flying conditions. The envelope functions generator 60 re¬ ceives signals representative of the position of the aircraft with respect to terrain from a comparator 62 that compares signals representative of the position of the aircraft from the flight management system 14 (FIG. 1) . Terrain data received from the memory 18 via the location search logic 20 is used by the com- parator 62 to determine the position of the aircraft with respect to terrain. The terrain data is also applied to the envelope functions generator 60, as is data representative of the ground track of the air¬ craft. A comparator 64 compares the terrain data with the ground track data to generate a signal repre¬ sentative of the ground track with respect to terrain and applies it to the envelope functions generator 60. Signals representative of the ground speed of the aircraft as well as its altitude above sea level are also applied to the envelope functions generator 60. An envelope control signal provides various con¬ trol signals to the envelope functions generator such as, the shape of the terrain, i.e. whether the terrain is to be represented by a cone, a truncated cone, connected cones, etc. as well as the desired time to impact.
The e'nvelope functions generator 60 operates on the received data to generate a static envelope which is modified by the descent rate of the aircraft and the rate of change of its ground track by a dynamic biasing circuit to provide a dynamic envelope. The static envelope generated by the envelope functions generator 60 is basically the envelope 54 described in conjunction with FIG. 7 and the vertical rate sig- nal serves to raise the envelope as the aircraft descends and the ground track rate signal serves to adjust the orientation of the envelope to maintain a constant time to impact as a function of aircraft speed. Right left climb information is also generated by the envelope functions generator 60. Basically, the envelope functions generator 60 provides a "turn right" signal when θ (FIG. 7) is positive and a "turn left" signal when θ is negative.
A visual alert logic circuit 61 receives the position and ground track data from the comparators 62 and 64, as well as envelope data from the envelope functions generator 60 and operates on the received data to generate the display data that is applied to the attitude and map display generators 30 and 32 (FIG. 1), respectively. Such data could, for example, cause the position of the aircraft to be displayed with respect to the terrain. In addition, the display data could be used in conjunction with the signal from the comparator 24 to indicate a hazardous flight condition. Such a condition could be indicated by displaying a projected flight path into terrain, or by a change in the color of the terrain to a color such as red to indicate a hazardously close approach. The envelope functions generator 60 is illus¬ trated in greater detail in FIG. 11. In the illustra¬ tion of FIG. 11, equations for a cone function are illustrated, but the same principles apply to other shapes. The terrain data, X0, Y0, r and h defining a cone is applied to an arithmetic circuit 63 that solves the cone equation for the altitude at which the air¬ craft is flying, as determined by the altitude above sea level signal, in-order to generate the radius r0 at the altitude of the aircraft, as illustrated in FIG. 11.
Another arithmetic circuit 65 defines the shape of the envelope expansion 54 (FIG. 7) based on a signal representative of the desired shape of the envelope as well as a signal representative of the direction of the ground track of the aircraft with respect to terrain, which corresponds to the angle θ of FIG. 7. The direction with respect to terrain is generated by comparing the angle of the aircraft with respect to terrain (δ in FIG. 7) with the angle of the ground track {φ in FIG. 7) to generate θ. Alter¬ natively, the ground track with respect to terrain (FIG. 10) signal may be applied to the arithmetic circuit 65. The unit 65 generates the shape of the expansion envelope and applies it to a scaling circuit 66 that alters the magnitude of the envelope as a function of the velocity of the aircraft and the de¬ sired time to impact. The output of the scaling cir¬ cuit 67 as well as the output of the circuit 63 are combined in an adder 68 to generate the static envelope. Referring to FIG. 12, there is shown an alternative embodiment of the system according to the invention. The system illustrated in FIG. 12 predicts the flight path of the aircraft and generates a warning if the predicted flight path should encounter an ob- stacle, as is illustrated in FIG. 6. Many of the components of the system illustrated in FIG. 12 are similar to those illustrated in FIG. 1, and consequent¬ ly, will be assigned like reference numerals; however, such components will be designated by primed numbers in FIG. 12.
The system illustrated in FIG. 12 is similar to that illustrated in FIG. 1 with the exception of the addition of a flight "path and projected path gener¬ ator 100 which, based on signals representative of the altitude of the aircraft above sea level, its vertical speed, its position and ground track, as well as its rate of change of ground track determines the flight path and a projected flight patn for a predetermined time forward. The flight path and pro- jected flight path are displayed on the monitors 34' and 36', and a signal representative of the projected flight path is also applied to the warning envelope generator 16'. This envelope can be modified by ter¬ rain and speed considerations and compared by the comparator 24' to generate a voice warning.
Obviously, many modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. Thus, it is to be understood that, within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically des¬ cribed above.
What is claimed and desired to be secured by Letters Patent of the United States is:

Claims

1. A warning system for warning the operator of a vehicle of the location of obstacles in the path of travel, comprising: means for storing representations of the locations and physical characteristics of obstacles; means for determining the speed, position and direction of travel of said vehicle; means responsive to said storing means and to said determining means for defining safe approach boundaries between said vehicle and said obstacles as a function of the location and physical characteris¬ tics of said obstacles ana the speed, position and direction of travel of the vehicle; and means responsive to said determining means and to said defining means when the distance between the vehicle and the obstacle is less than the distance defined by the safe approach boundary.
2. A warning system as recited in claim 1 wherein said storing means includes means for storing approximations of the shapes and sizes of the obstacles
3. The warning system recited in claim 2 wherein said shape approximations include cones and the sizes include the heights and slopes of said cones.
4. The warning system recited in claim 3 wherein said approximations include truncated cones.
5. The system recited in claim 3 wherein said approximations include connected cones.
6. The system recited in claim 3 wherein said approximations include inverted cones.
7. A warning system as recited in claim 1 wherein said defining means includes means for defining safe approach boundaries around said obstacles.
8. A warning system as recited in claim 7 wherein said obstacle is approximated by a cone and wherein said boundaries are defined by the equation:
f (θ) = r0 + VT [(90-θ)/90]
wherein: r0 = the radius of the cone at the altitude of the vehicle
V = the velocity of the vehicle
T = a function of the time to impact.
9. A warning system as recited in claim 7 wherein said obstacle is approximated by a cone and wherein said boundaries are defined by the equation:
f (θ) = r0 + VT [{90-θ)/90]2
wherein: r0 = the radius of the cone at the altitude of the vehicle
V = the velocity of the vehicle
T = a function of the time to impact.
10. A warning system as recited in claim 7 wherein said obstacle is approximated by a cone and wherein said boundaries are defined by the equation:
f (θ) = r0 + vT [90-θ/90]V2 wherein : rQ = the radius of the cone at the altitude of the vehicle V = the velocity of the vehicle T = a function of the time to impact.
11. A warning system as recited in claim 7 wherein said obstacle is approximated by a cone and wherein said boundaries are defined by the equation:
(θ) = r0 + VT COS θ
wherein: r0 = the radius of the cone at the altitude of the vehicle V = the velocity of the vehicle T = a function of the time to impact.
12. A warning system as recited in claim 1 wherein said defining means includes means for defin¬ ing a safe approach boundary around said vehicle.
13. A warning system as recited in claim 1 wherein said defining means includes means for predict¬ ing the path of travel of said vehicle and for defin¬ ing a safe approach boundary around said path of travel
14. A warning system as. recited in claim 13 wherein said predicting means includes means res¬ ponsive to said speed, direction of travel and the rate of change of the direction of travel of said vehicle for predicting the path of travel of said vehicle.
15. A warning system as recited in claim 1 wherein said boundary defining means includes means for defining said boundary as a function of time to impact.
16. A warning system as recited in claim
15 wherein said boundary defining means includes means for defining said boundary as a constant time to impact boundary.
17. A warning system as recited in claim 1 further including means for advising the operator of the relative position of said vehicle and said obstacles.
18. A warning system as recited in claim
17 wherein said advising means includes a visual dis¬ play.
19. A warning system as recited in claim
18 wherein said visual display is a color display, and wherein the color of the display changes as a function of the proximity of the vehicle to an obstacle.
20. A warning system as recited in claim 18 wherein said display is a map display.
21. A warning system as recited in claim 18 wherein said display is an attitude display.
22. A warning system as recited in claim 17 wherein said advising means includes means for providing an aural announcement.
23. A warning system as recited in claim 22 wherein said aural announcement providing means includes means for announcing to the operator the locations of the obstacle.
24. A warning system as recited in claim 22 wherein said aural announcement providing means includes means for announcing to the operator the corrective action to be taken.
25. A warning system for warning the opera¬ tor of a vehicle of the location of obstacles near the path of travel, comprising: means for storing representations of the locations and physical characteristics of obstacles, said representations being stored as predetermined standard shapes and the locations and sizes thereof; means for determining the speed, position and direction of travel of the vehicle and altering the shapes and sizes of said predetermined standard shapes as a function of speed, position and direction of travel of the vehicle to generate altered shapes; and means for providing an indication when the vehicle enters one of said altered shapes.
26. The system recited in claim 25 wherein said predetermined standard shapes are three dimen¬ sional shapes having horizontal and vertical compo¬ nents and wherein said vehicle is capable of moving horizontally and vertically, and wherein the horizon¬ tal and vertical components of the shapes are altered as a function of tne horizontal and vertical movement of the vehicle, respectively.
27. The system recited in claim 25 wherein said standard shapes include geometric shapes.
28. The system as recited in claim 27 wherein said geometric shapes include cones having predetermined heights and radii, where the heights and radii of the cones are altered as a function of the horizontal and vertical movement of the vehicle, respectively.
29. The system recited in claim 27 wherein said geometric shapes include cones and the sizes include the heights and radii of said cones.
30. The system recited in claim 27 wherein said geometric shapes include truncated cones.
31. The system recited in claim 27 wherein said geometric shapes include connected cones.
32. The system recited in claim 27 wherein said geometric shapes include inverted cones.
33. The system recited in claim 25 wherein said altered shape generating means includes means for defining safe approach boundaries around said obstacles.
34. The system recited in claim 25 wherein the physical characteristics of an obstacle is approximated by a cone and wherein said boundaries are defined by the equation:
f (θ) = r0 + VT [ (90-θ)/90]
wherein:
*o = the radius of the cone at the altitude of the vehicle V = the velocity of the vehicle
T = a function of the time to impact.
35. The system recited in claim 25 wherein the physical characteristics of an obstacle are approximated by a cone and wherein said boundaries are defined by the equation:
f(θ) = r0 + VT [(90-Θ./90.2
wherein: r0 = the radius of the cone at the altitude of the vehicle
V = the velocity of the vehicle
T = a function of the time to impact.
36. The system recited in claim 25 wherein the physical characteristics of an obstacle is approximated by a cone and wherein said boundaries are defined by the equation:
f (θ) = rQ + vT [90-Θ/90]1/2
wherein: r0 = the radius of the cone at the altitude of the vehicle
V = the velocity of the vehicle
T = a function of the time to impact.
37. The system reciteo in claim 25 wherein the physical characteristics of an obstacle is approximated by a cone and wherein said boundaries are defined by the equation: f (θ) = rQ + VT COS θ
wherein: r0 = the radius of the cone at the. altitude of the vehicle V = the velocity of the vehicle T = a function of the time to impact.
38. The system recited in claim 25 wherein said altered shape generating means includes means for defining a safe approach boundary around the obstacle as a function of time to impact.
39. The system recited in claim 38 wherein said safe approach boundary defining means includes means for defining said boundary as a constant time to impact boundary.
40. The system recited in claim 25 further including means for advising the operator of the rela¬ tive position of said vehicle and said obstacles.
41. The system recited in claim 40 wherein said advising means includes a visual display.
42. The system recited in claim 41 wherein said visual display is a color display, and wherein the color of the display changes as' a function of the proximity of the vehicle to an obstacle.
43. The system recited in claim 30 wherein said dispaly is a map display.
44. The system recited in claim 41 wherein said display is an attitude display.
45. The system recited in claim 40 wherein said advising means includes means for providing an aural announcement.
46. The system recited in claim 45 wherein said aural announcement providing means includes means for announcing to the operator the locations of the obstacle.
47. The system .recited in claim 45 wherein said aural announcement providing means includes means for announcing to the operator the corrective action to be taken.
48. A warning system for providing a warning to the operator of a vehicle a predetermined time prior to a projected impact with an obstacle, compris¬ ing: means for storing data representative of the location and boundaries of obstacles; means for determining the velocity and posi¬ tion of the vehicle; means responsive to said data storing means and said determining for defining warning boundaries between the vehicle and said obstacles, said warning boundaries being a function of the location and boundaries of said obstacles and the position and velocity of said vehicle; and means for generating a warning when one of said warning boundaries is penetrated.
49. A warning system as recited in claim 48 wherein said warning boundaries define a predeter¬ mined time to impact.
50. A warning system as recited in claim 49 wherein said warning boundaries define a constant time to impact.
51. A warning system as recited in claim 48 wherein said storing means includes means for storing approximations of the shapes and sizes of the obstacles.
52. A warning system as recited in claim 51 wherein said approximations include algebraic approximations.
53. A warning system as recited in claim 51 wherein said approximations include geometric approximations.
54. The warning system recited in claim 53 wherein said geometric approximations include cones and the sizes include the heignts and slopes of said cones.
55. The warning system recited in claim 53 wherein said geometric approximations include trun¬ cated cones.
56. The system recited in claim 53 wherein said geometric approximations include connected cones.
57. The system recited in claim 53 wherein said approximations include inverted cones.
58. A warning system as recited in claim 48 wherein said defining means includes means for defining safe approach boundaries around said obstacles.
59. A warning system as recited in claim 58 wherein said obstacle is approximated by a cone and wherein said boundaries are defined by the equa¬ tion:
f(θ) = r0 + VT U90-Θ./90]
wherein: r0 = the radius of the cone at the altitude of the vehicle
V = the velocity of the vehicle
T = a function of the time to impact.
60. A warning system as recited in claim 58 wherein said obstacle is approximated by a cone and wherein said boundaries are defined by the equa¬ tion:
f(θ) = rσ + VT [(90-θ)/90]2
wherein: r0 = the radius of the cone at the altitude of the vehicle
V = the velocity of the vehicle
T = a function of the time to impact.
61. A warning system as recited in claim 58 wherein said obstacle is approximated by a cone and wherein said boundaries are defined by the equa¬ tion:
f (θ) = r0 + vT [90-6 90] 2 wherein: r0 = the radius of the cone at the altitude of the vehicle
V = the velocity of the vehicle
T = a function of the time to impact.
62. A warning system as recited in claim 58 wherein said obstacle is approximated by a cone and wherein said boundaries are defined by the equa¬ tion:
f (θ) = r0 + VT COS θ
wherein: r0 = the radius of the cone at the altitude of the vehicle
V = the velocity of the vehicle
T = a function of the time to impact.
63. A warning system as recited in claim 48 wherein said defining means includes means for defining a safe approach boundary around said vehicle
64. A warning system as recited in claim 48 wherein said defining means includes means for predicting the path of travel of said vehicle and for defining a safe approach boundary around said path of travel.
65. A warning system as recited in claim 64 wherein said predicting means includes means res¬ ponsive to said speed, direction of travel and the rate of change of the direction of travel of said vehicle for predicting the path of travel of said vehicle.
66. A warning system as recited in claim 48 wherein said warning boundary defining means includes means for defining said boundary as a function of time to impact.
67. A warning system as recited in claim 66 wherein said warning boundary defining means in¬ cludes means for defining said warning boundary as a constant time to impact boundary.
68. A warning system as recited in claim 48 further including means for advising the operator of the relative position of said vehicle and said obstacles.
69. A warning system as recited in claim
68 wherein said advising means includes a visual dis¬ play.
70. A warning system as recited in claim
69 wherein said visual display is a color display, and wherein the color of the display changes as a function of the proximity of the vehicle to an obstacle.
71. A warning system as recited in claim 69 wherein said display is a map display.
72. A warning system as recited in claim 69 wherein said display is an attitude display.
73. A warning system as recited in claim 68 wherein said advising means includes means for providing an aural announcement.
74. A warning system as recited in claim 73 wherein said aural announcement providing means includes means for announcing to the operator the locations of the obstacle.
75. A warning system as recited in claim 73 wherein said aural announcement providing means includes means for announcing to the operator the corrective action to be taken.
76. A warning system for warning the operator of a vehicle of the location of restricted areas in the path of travel, comprising: means for storing representations of the locations of restricted areas; means for determining the speed, position and direction of travel of said vehicle; means responsive to said storing means and to said determining means for defining safe approach boundaries between said vehicle ano said restricted areas as a function of the location of said restricted areas and the speed, position and direction of travel of the vehicle; and means responsive to said determining means and to said defining means when the distance between the vehicle and the restricted area is less than the distance defined by the safe approach boundary.
77. A warning system as recited in claim 76 wherein said storing means includes means for storing approximations of the shapes and.sizes of the restricted areas.
PCT/US1985/000089 1984-02-02 1985-01-22 Terrain advisory system WO1985003566A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE8585901148T DE3584553D1 (en) 1984-02-02 1985-01-22 INFORMATION SYSTEM FOR TERRAIN.
FI853790A FI853790L (en) 1984-02-02 1985-10-01 ALARMSYSTEM FOER YTSKIKT.

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US576,450 1984-02-02
US06/576,450 US4646244A (en) 1984-02-02 1984-02-02 Terrain advisory system

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1985003566A1 true WO1985003566A1 (en) 1985-08-15

Family

ID=24304475

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US1985/000089 WO1985003566A1 (en) 1984-02-02 1985-01-22 Terrain advisory system

Country Status (11)

Country Link
US (1) US4646244A (en)
EP (1) EP0172221B1 (en)
JP (1) JPS61501283A (en)
AU (1) AU563701B2 (en)
CA (1) CA1238398A (en)
DE (1) DE3584553D1 (en)
FI (1) FI853790L (en)
IL (1) IL74045A0 (en)
IT (1) IT1182170B (en)
NZ (1) NZ210815A (en)
WO (1) WO1985003566A1 (en)

Cited By (25)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1986005022A1 (en) * 1985-02-22 1986-08-28 Sundstrand Data Control, Inc. Altitude loss after take-off warning system utilizing time and altitude
WO1992021077A1 (en) * 1991-05-22 1992-11-26 Gec-Marconi Limited Aircraft terrain and obstacle avoidance systems
FR2689668A1 (en) * 1992-04-07 1993-10-08 Dassault Electronique Aircraft ground collision avoidance method and device
GB2266286A (en) * 1992-04-24 1993-10-27 Sagem Method of piloting an aircraft to avoid its colliding with the ground.
EP0674299A1 (en) * 1994-03-24 1995-09-27 Sextant Avionique Method and device for the avoidance of collisions between aircraft and relief obstacles
FR2721130A1 (en) * 1994-06-14 1995-12-15 Sextant Avionique Collision avoidance appts. for aircraft
EP0717330A1 (en) * 1994-12-15 1996-06-19 Aerospatiale Societe Nationale Industrielle Method and apparatus for providing one information, alarm or warning for an aircraft at ground proximity
FR2747492A1 (en) * 1996-04-15 1997-10-17 Dassault Electronique TERRAIN ANTI-COLLISION DEVICE FOR AIRCRAFT WITH TURN PREDICTION
WO1998004883A1 (en) * 1996-07-30 1998-02-05 Alliedsignal Inc. Aircraft terrain information system
GB2322611A (en) * 1997-02-26 1998-09-02 British Aerospace Indicating air traffic and terrain collision threat to aircraft
US5839080A (en) * 1995-07-31 1998-11-17 Alliedsignal, Inc. Terrain awareness system
US5864307A (en) * 1996-02-19 1999-01-26 Gec Marconi Limited Aircraft terrain advisory system
WO1999032850A1 (en) * 1997-12-23 1999-07-01 Alliedsignal Inc. Aircraft terrain warning system
US6092009A (en) * 1995-07-31 2000-07-18 Alliedsignal Aircraft terrain information system
US6138060A (en) * 1995-07-31 2000-10-24 Alliedsignal Inc. Terrain awareness system
US6380870B1 (en) 1999-02-01 2002-04-30 Honeywell International, Inc. Apparatus, methods, and computer program products for determining a look ahead distance value for high speed flight
US6445310B1 (en) 1999-02-01 2002-09-03 Honeywell International, Inc. Apparatus, methods, computer program products for generating a runway field clearance floor envelope about a selected runway
US6469664B1 (en) 1999-10-05 2002-10-22 Honeywell International Inc. Method, apparatus, and computer program products for alerting surface vessels to hazardous conditions
US6477449B1 (en) 1999-02-01 2002-11-05 Honeywell International Inc. Methods, apparatus and computer program products for determining a corrected distance between an aircraft and a selected runway
US6484071B1 (en) 1999-02-01 2002-11-19 Honeywell International, Inc. Ground proximity warning system, method and computer program product for controllably altering the base width of an alert envelope
US6606034B1 (en) 1995-07-31 2003-08-12 Honeywell International Inc. Terrain awareness system
US6691004B2 (en) 1995-07-31 2004-02-10 Honeywell International, Inc. Method for determining a currently obtainable climb gradient of an aircraft
US6707394B2 (en) 1999-02-01 2004-03-16 Honeywell, Inc. Apparatus, method, and computer program product for generating terrain clearance floor envelopes about a selected runway
US6734808B1 (en) 1999-10-05 2004-05-11 Honeywell International Inc. Method, apparatus and computer program products for alerting submersible vessels to hazardous conditions
US7634335B2 (en) * 2004-04-20 2009-12-15 Thales Distance estimating method for aircraft taking air navigation restrictions into account

Families Citing this family (163)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
NO164137C (en) * 1984-07-10 1990-08-29 Norges Teknisk Naturvitenskape SYSTEM FOR THE DETECTION OF OBJECTS FOR GRID, KNOWN CATARCH CHARACTERISTICS, ON A BACKGROUND.
GB8512340D0 (en) * 1985-05-15 1986-10-29 Gec Avionics Measuring dynamic system
GB8606978D0 (en) * 1986-03-20 1986-10-29 British Aerospace Stabilizing air to ground radar
IL83184A0 (en) * 1986-07-15 1987-12-31 Sundstrand Data Control Method and apparatus for memory mapping topographical data
US4835537A (en) * 1986-07-16 1989-05-30 Manion James H Telemetry burst collision avoidance system
US4914436A (en) * 1987-04-06 1990-04-03 Sundstrand Data Control, Inc. Ground proximity approach warning system without landing flap input
US4812990A (en) * 1987-04-29 1989-03-14 Merit Technology Incorporated System and method for optimizing aircraft flight path
US6009373A (en) * 1987-06-01 1999-12-28 Furuno Electric Company, Limited Ship track and underwater conditions indicating system
JPS6436400A (en) * 1987-07-31 1989-02-07 Japan Radio Co Ltd Front warning device
EP0316471B1 (en) * 1987-11-17 1993-07-28 LITEF GmbH Method for increasing error detection at the speed measurement of aircraft by means of a doppler radar
US4903216A (en) * 1988-04-11 1990-02-20 Hughes Aircraft Company Method for displaying intervisibility data
US4876651A (en) * 1988-05-11 1989-10-24 Honeywell Inc. Digital map system
US5136512A (en) * 1988-06-26 1992-08-04 Cubic Defense Systems, Inc. Ground collision avoidance system
US5058024A (en) * 1989-01-23 1991-10-15 International Business Machines Corporation Conflict detection and resolution between moving objects
US5086396A (en) * 1989-02-02 1992-02-04 Honeywell Inc. Apparatus and method for an aircraft navigation system having improved mission management and survivability capabilities
US5157615A (en) * 1990-01-09 1992-10-20 Ryan International Corporation Aircraft traffic alert and collision avoidance device
GB9026451D0 (en) * 1990-12-05 1991-01-23 Smiths Industries Plc Aircraft display systems
US5173861A (en) * 1990-12-18 1992-12-22 International Business Machines Corporation Motion constraints using particles
JP2749727B2 (en) * 1991-03-08 1998-05-13 三菱電機株式会社 Route prediction device
GB2258362A (en) * 1991-07-27 1993-02-03 Gec Ferranti Defence Syst A collision warning system
JPH05209954A (en) * 1992-01-31 1993-08-20 Nec Corp Accurately measuring radar indicating device incorporating safe altitude limit indicating function
FR2903771B1 (en) * 1992-03-24 2011-12-30 Thomson Csf METHOD FOR ACTIVATING AN ALTIMETRIC TRIGGER AND DEVICE FOR IMPLEMENTING SAID METHOD
FR2690754B1 (en) * 1992-04-30 1994-06-10 Thomson Csf METHOD FOR DETECTION AND LOCATION OF OBJECTS ON A RELATIVELY PLANAR SOIL AND DEVICE FOR IMPLEMENTING SAME.
US5530650A (en) * 1992-10-28 1996-06-25 Mcdonnell Douglas Corp. Computer imaging system and method for remote in-flight aircraft refueling
FR2697796B1 (en) * 1992-11-10 1994-12-09 Sextant Avionique Collision avoidance device for aircraft, in particular with the ground.
IL104542A (en) * 1993-01-28 1996-05-14 Israel State Airborne obstacle collision avoidance apparatus
US5410317A (en) * 1993-04-06 1995-04-25 Alliedsignal Inc. Terrain clearance generator
US5465142A (en) * 1993-04-30 1995-11-07 Northrop Grumman Corporation Obstacle avoidance system for helicopters and other aircraft
US20030193414A1 (en) * 1993-05-18 2003-10-16 Jones M. Kelly User-definable communications methods and systems
JP3109701B2 (en) * 1993-08-17 2000-11-20 キヤノン株式会社 Communication device, information processing device having communication function, communication management device, and control method thereof
FR2712251B1 (en) * 1993-11-10 1996-01-26 Eurocopter France Method and device for assisting the piloting of an aircraft.
FR2717934B1 (en) * 1994-03-22 1996-04-26 Sextant Avionique Collision avoidance device for aircraft in particular with the ground by approach slope control.
US5654890A (en) 1994-05-31 1997-08-05 Lockheed Martin High resolution autonomous precision approach and landing system
US6865477B2 (en) 1994-05-31 2005-03-08 Winged Systems Corporation High resolution autonomous precision positioning system
US5581250A (en) * 1995-02-24 1996-12-03 Khvilivitzky; Alexander Visual collision avoidance system for unmanned aerial vehicles
FR2731824B1 (en) * 1995-03-17 1997-05-16 Sextant Avionique COLLISION AVOIDANCE DEVICE FOR AIRCRAFT, PARTICULARLY WITH THE GROUND
EP0750238B1 (en) * 1995-06-20 2000-03-01 Honeywell Inc. Integrated ground collision avoidance system
US5745053A (en) * 1995-12-08 1998-04-28 Fleming, Iii; Hoyt A. Landing gear warning apparatus and method for pilots approaching a runway with retracted landing gear
US5781146A (en) * 1996-03-11 1998-07-14 Imaging Accessories, Inc. Automatic horizontal and vertical scanning radar with terrain display
US5828332A (en) * 1996-03-11 1998-10-27 Imaging Accessories, Inc. Automatic horizontal and vertical scanning radar with terrain display
WO1997040401A1 (en) * 1996-04-23 1997-10-30 Alliedsignal Inc. Integrated hazard avoidance system
US6043759A (en) * 1996-07-29 2000-03-28 Alliedsignal Air-ground logic system and method for rotary wing aircraft
US5781126A (en) * 1996-07-29 1998-07-14 Alliedsignal Inc. Ground proximity warning system and methods for rotary wing aircraft
US5838262A (en) * 1996-12-19 1998-11-17 Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Aircraft virtual image display system and method for providing a real-time perspective threat coverage display
JP3054685B2 (en) * 1997-06-05 2000-06-19 運輸省船舶技術研究所長 Onboard navigation device with terrain display function
US5936552A (en) * 1997-06-12 1999-08-10 Rockwell Science Center, Inc. Integrated horizontal and profile terrain display format for situational awareness
US6021374A (en) * 1997-10-09 2000-02-01 Mcdonnell Douglas Corporation Stand alone terrain conflict detector and operating methods therefor
US5987379A (en) * 1997-10-30 1999-11-16 Trimble Navigation Limited Creation and monitoring of variable buffer zones
WO2000023967A1 (en) * 1998-10-16 2000-04-27 Universal Avionics Systems Corporation Flight plan intent alert system and method
US7570214B2 (en) 1999-03-05 2009-08-04 Era Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for ADS-B validation, active and passive multilateration, and elliptical surviellance
US7495612B2 (en) 1999-03-05 2009-02-24 Era Systems Corporation Method and apparatus to improve ADS-B security
US7782256B2 (en) * 1999-03-05 2010-08-24 Era Systems Corporation Enhanced passive coherent location techniques to track and identify UAVs, UCAVs, MAVs, and other objects
US7423590B2 (en) 1999-03-05 2008-09-09 Era Systems Corporation Method and apparatus for improving ADS-B security
US7739167B2 (en) * 1999-03-05 2010-06-15 Era Systems Corporation Automated management of airport revenues
US6885340B2 (en) * 2000-02-29 2005-04-26 Rannoch Corporation Correlation of flight track data with other data sources
US20100079342A1 (en) * 1999-03-05 2010-04-01 Smith Alexander E Multilateration enhancements for noise and operations management
US7437250B2 (en) * 1999-03-05 2008-10-14 Era Systems Corporation Airport pavement management system
US7576695B2 (en) * 1999-03-05 2009-08-18 Era Systems Corporation Multilateration enhancements for noise and operations management
US7889133B2 (en) 1999-03-05 2011-02-15 Itt Manufacturing Enterprises, Inc. Multilateration enhancements for noise and operations management
US8446321B2 (en) 1999-03-05 2013-05-21 Omnipol A.S. Deployable intelligence and tracking system for homeland security and search and rescue
US7612716B2 (en) * 1999-03-05 2009-11-03 Era Systems Corporation Correlation of flight track data with other data sources
US7375683B2 (en) * 1999-03-05 2008-05-20 Era Systems Corporation Use of geo-stationary satellites to augment wide— area multilateration synchronization
US7477193B2 (en) * 1999-03-05 2009-01-13 Era Systems Corporation Method and system for elliptical-based surveillance
US7429950B2 (en) * 1999-03-05 2008-09-30 Era Systems Corporation Method and apparatus to extend ADS performance metrics
US7908077B2 (en) * 2003-06-10 2011-03-15 Itt Manufacturing Enterprises, Inc. Land use compatibility planning software
US7777675B2 (en) * 1999-03-05 2010-08-17 Era Systems Corporation Deployable passive broadband aircraft tracking
US8203486B1 (en) 1999-03-05 2012-06-19 Omnipol A.S. Transmitter independent techniques to extend the performance of passive coherent location
US7667647B2 (en) * 1999-03-05 2010-02-23 Era Systems Corporation Extension of aircraft tracking and positive identification from movement areas into non-movement areas
US7126534B2 (en) * 1999-03-05 2006-10-24 Rannoch Corporation Minimum safe altitude warning
US6785594B1 (en) * 1999-03-25 2004-08-31 Honeywell International Inc. Ground proximity warning system and method having a reduced set of input parameters
US6421603B1 (en) 1999-08-11 2002-07-16 Honeywell International Inc. Hazard detection for a travel plan
SE515860C2 (en) * 2000-02-14 2001-10-22 Saab Dynamics Ab Installation and procedure for navigating a vehicle
US6469660B1 (en) 2000-04-13 2002-10-22 United Parcel Service Inc Method and system for displaying target icons correlated to target data integrity
US6381538B1 (en) * 2000-05-26 2002-04-30 Aerotech Research (U.S.A.), Inc. Vehicle specific hazard estimation, presentation, and route planning based on meteorological and other environmental data
US8135500B1 (en) 2000-05-26 2012-03-13 Aerotech Research (Usa), Inc. Wake vortex detection and reporting system
US8131407B1 (en) 2000-05-26 2012-03-06 Aerotech Research (Usa), Inc. Transmission, receipt, combination, sorting, reporting, and presentation of vehicle specific environmental conditions and hazards information utilizing a ground station
US7471995B1 (en) 2000-05-26 2008-12-30 Aerotech Research (Usa), Inc. Transmission, receipt, combination, sorting, and presentation of vehicle specific environmental conditions and hazards information
US6833797B2 (en) 2000-05-26 2004-12-21 Honeywell International Inc. Method, apparatus and computer program product for displaying terrain in rotary wing aircraft
US6650972B1 (en) 2000-05-26 2003-11-18 Aerotech Research (U.S.A.), Inc. Estimation, transmission, receipt, and presentation of vehicle specific environmental conditions and hazards information
US6583733B2 (en) 2000-05-26 2003-06-24 Honeywell International Inc. Apparatus, method and computer program product for helicopter ground proximity warning system
US7463955B1 (en) 2000-05-26 2008-12-09 Aerotech Research (Usa), Inc. Transmission, receipt, combination, sorting, and presentation of vehicle specific environmental conditions and hazards information
EP1299742A2 (en) 2000-07-10 2003-04-09 United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. Method for determining conflicting paths between mobile airbone vehicles and associated system
EP1317652B1 (en) 2000-09-14 2010-11-10 Honeywell International Inc. Method, apparatus and computer program product for helicopter tail strike warning
US6700482B2 (en) 2000-09-29 2004-03-02 Honeywell International Inc. Alerting and notification system
WO2003071371A1 (en) * 2001-10-11 2003-08-28 Sandel Avionics, Inc. Method and apparatus for predictive altitude display
CN1476593A (en) * 2000-10-25 2004-02-18 美国联合包装服务有限公司 Pilot-Programmable altitude range filter for cockpit traffic display
ATE338297T1 (en) * 2001-01-24 2006-09-15 Honeywell Int Inc CHANGEABLE PREDICTIVE OFFSET AND SUB-OFFSET FOR AN IMPROVED GROUND PROXIMITY WARNING SYSTEM
US6431730B1 (en) * 2001-02-08 2002-08-13 Emerald Innovations, L.L.C. Decorative light curtain
US6983206B2 (en) * 2001-03-06 2006-01-03 Honeywell International, Inc. Ground operations and imminent landing runway selection
US8145367B2 (en) 2001-03-06 2012-03-27 Honeywell International Inc. Closed airport surface alerting system
US7587278B2 (en) * 2002-05-15 2009-09-08 Honeywell International Inc. Ground operations and advanced runway awareness and advisory system
US7117089B2 (en) * 2001-03-06 2006-10-03 Honeywell International Inc. Ground runway awareness and advisory system
US7702461B2 (en) * 2001-03-06 2010-04-20 Honeywell International Inc. Ground operations and imminent landing runway selection
US6492934B1 (en) * 2001-08-06 2002-12-10 Rockwell Collins Method of deriving ground speed for descending aircraft
US6525674B1 (en) * 2001-08-08 2003-02-25 Rockwell Collins, Inc. Conditional hazard alerting display
US6452511B1 (en) * 2001-08-08 2002-09-17 Rockwell Collins, Inc. Method and system for providing ground proximity warnings
DE10244149A1 (en) * 2001-09-25 2003-04-30 Werner Keber Preventing prohibited approaches by aircraft to ground objects to be protected involves virtual prohibited zones providing adequate horizontal separation, minimum vertical separation
US6584383B2 (en) * 2001-09-28 2003-06-24 Pippenger Phillip Mckinney Anti-hijacking security system and apparatus for aircraft
US6484072B1 (en) 2001-09-28 2002-11-19 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Embedded terrain awareness warning system for aircraft
CN101033957B (en) * 2001-10-11 2012-01-04 山德尔埃维翁尼克斯有限公司 Method and device for predicting high and displaying same
JP4174559B2 (en) * 2001-10-26 2008-11-05 独立行政法人 宇宙航空研究開発機構 Advanced visibility information providing system and method using satellite image and flight obstacle recognition system and method
US20040054472A1 (en) * 2002-09-17 2004-03-18 Koncelik Lawrence J. Controlling aircraft from collisions with off limits facilities
FR2847700B1 (en) * 2002-11-22 2005-01-14 Thales Sa METHOD OF SYNTHESIZING A THREE DIMENSIONAL INTERVISIBILITY IMAGE
US6745115B1 (en) 2003-01-07 2004-06-01 Garmin Ltd. System, method and apparatus for searching geographic area using prioritized spacial order
US7386373B1 (en) * 2003-01-07 2008-06-10 Garmin International, Inc. System, method and apparatus for searching geographic area using prioritized spatial order
US6970104B2 (en) * 2003-01-22 2005-11-29 Knecht William R Flight information computation and display
US7382287B1 (en) 2003-06-03 2008-06-03 Garmin International, Inc Avionics system, method and apparatus for selecting a runway
NO333526B1 (en) 2003-06-12 2013-07-01 Vestas Wind Sys As System to prevent collision between aircraft and an obstacle
US7376494B2 (en) 2003-06-26 2008-05-20 Michael Arnouse Apparatus, system and method for aircraft security and anti-hijacking intervention
US7379795B2 (en) * 2003-06-26 2008-05-27 Michael Arnouse Apparatus, system and method for aircraft security and anti-hijacking intervention
DE102004040249A1 (en) * 2003-08-30 2005-05-25 Eads Deutschland Gmbh Low-level guidance system, low-level guidance warning system, low-level command warning generator and low-level guidance method
US7379796B2 (en) * 2003-08-30 2008-05-27 Eads Deutschland Gmbh Low-altitude flight guidance system, warning system for low-altitude flight guidance, warning generator for low-altitude flight guidance and method for low-altitude flight guidance
US7268703B1 (en) 2003-09-18 2007-09-11 Garmin Ltd. Methods, systems, and devices for cartographic alerts
US7386392B1 (en) * 2003-09-18 2008-06-10 Garmin Ltd. Methods, systems, and devices for condition specific alerts
FR2860292B1 (en) * 2003-09-26 2005-12-02 Thales Sa DISTANCE ESTIMATING METHOD FOR A MOBILE SUBJECT TO DYNAMIC TRAVEL CONSTRAINTS
US7619513B2 (en) * 2003-10-03 2009-11-17 Satellite Tracking Of People Llc System and method for tracking movement of individuals
FR2867559B1 (en) * 2004-03-12 2006-05-26 Thales Sa TOPOGRAPHIC MAP DISPLAY DEVICE FOR AIRCRAFT
FR2870605B1 (en) * 2004-05-18 2010-10-08 Airbus France METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR AUTOMATICALLY GUIDING AN AIRCRAFT FOR LOW-ALTITUDE AT LEAST PART FLIGHT
US7699457B2 (en) * 2004-09-13 2010-04-20 Ricoh Company, Ltd. Recording ink, ink cartridge, ink record, inkjet recording apparatus, and inkjet recording method
FR2875899B1 (en) * 2004-09-24 2006-12-01 Thales Sa DEVICE AND METHOD FOR SIGNALING SIDE MARGINS OF MANEUVER
FR2884020B1 (en) * 2005-04-04 2011-06-10 Airbus France METHOD AND DEVICE FOR AIDING NAVIGATION ON THE GROUND OF AN AIRCRAFT ON AN AIRPORT
US7551990B2 (en) * 2005-04-21 2009-06-23 Honeywell International Inc. System and method for management of a ground obstacle display
US7831381B2 (en) * 2005-08-04 2010-11-09 Microsoft Corporation Data engine for ranking popularity of landmarks in a geographical area
EP1764759A1 (en) * 2005-09-14 2007-03-21 Honeywell International Inc. System and method for displaying protected or restricted airspace inside an aircraft
US7783612B2 (en) * 2005-09-21 2010-08-24 The Boeing Company Creation of optimized terrain databases
US20070112511A1 (en) * 2005-11-17 2007-05-17 Digital Cyclone, Inc. Mobile geo-temporal information manager
FR2897448B1 (en) * 2006-02-14 2008-03-14 Airbus France Sas METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR AIDING THE CONTROL OF AN AIRCRAFT.
US20110029162A1 (en) * 2006-03-06 2011-02-03 Honeywell International, Inc. Systems and methods for selectively altering a ground proximity message
US8050863B2 (en) * 2006-03-16 2011-11-01 Gray & Company, Inc. Navigation and control system for autonomous vehicles
FR2898972B1 (en) * 2006-03-21 2008-06-27 Thales Sa METHOD AND DEVICE FOR MONITORING THE MINIMUM FLIGHT ALTITUDE OF AN AIRCRAFT
US7965227B2 (en) * 2006-05-08 2011-06-21 Era Systems, Inc. Aircraft tracking using low cost tagging as a discriminator
FR2902537B1 (en) * 2006-06-20 2016-04-29 Eurocopter France SYSTEM FOR DETECTING OBSTACLES IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD OF A POSITION POINT
US9354633B1 (en) 2008-10-31 2016-05-31 Rockwell Collins, Inc. System and method for ground navigation
US9024805B1 (en) 2012-09-26 2015-05-05 Rockwell Collins, Inc. Radar antenna elevation error estimation method and apparatus
US9733349B1 (en) 2007-09-06 2017-08-15 Rockwell Collins, Inc. System for and method of radar data processing for low visibility landing applications
US9939526B2 (en) 2007-09-06 2018-04-10 Rockwell Collins, Inc. Display system and method using weather radar sensing
US7965225B1 (en) 2008-07-02 2011-06-21 Rockwell Collins, Inc. Radar antenna stabilization enhancement using vertical beam switching
US8558731B1 (en) 2008-07-02 2013-10-15 Rockwell Collins, Inc. System for and method of sequential lobing using less than full aperture antenna techniques
DE102008032394A1 (en) * 2008-07-09 2010-01-21 Mtu Friedrichshafen Gmbh Method for regulating ship speed, involves regulating engine speed by engine speed control circuit as internal regulator circuit, where ship speed is regulated by ship speed-regulator circuit as external regulator circuit
US8077078B1 (en) * 2008-07-25 2011-12-13 Rockwell Collins, Inc. System and method for aircraft altitude measurement using radar and known runway position
US8570211B1 (en) * 2009-01-22 2013-10-29 Gregory Hubert Piesinger Aircraft bird strike avoidance method and apparatus
US8401774B2 (en) * 2009-01-23 2013-03-19 The Boeing Company System and method for detecting and preventing runway incursion, excursion and confusion
US8773299B1 (en) * 2009-09-29 2014-07-08 Rockwell Collins, Inc. System and method for actively determining obstacles
US8531293B2 (en) * 2009-12-23 2013-09-10 Lockheed Martin Corporation Predictive geofence crossing
FR2957447B1 (en) * 2010-03-15 2012-10-26 Eurocopter France METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR FLYING WITH LOW ALTITUDE AIRCRAFT IN A SECURE MANNER
US8731810B2 (en) * 2010-12-10 2014-05-20 The Boeing Company Aircraft path conformance monitoring
US8624757B2 (en) * 2011-06-27 2014-01-07 General Electric Company Method for visually indicating an advisory from the traffic collision avoidance system on a flight display
US9019145B1 (en) 2011-07-14 2015-04-28 Rockwell Collins, Inc. Ground clutter rejection for weather radar
US8989925B2 (en) * 2012-03-19 2015-03-24 L-3 Communications Corporation Method and apparatus for conversion of GPS heading data for use by electronic flight director
US20140285661A1 (en) * 2013-03-22 2014-09-25 Honeywell International Inc Methods and systems for colorizing an enhanced image during alert
US9262932B1 (en) 2013-04-05 2016-02-16 Rockwell Collins, Inc. Extended runway centerline systems and methods
US8972082B2 (en) * 2013-07-25 2015-03-03 Honeywell International Inc. Aircraft flight deck displays and systems and methods for displaying integrated minimum safe altitude and minimum vectoring altitude information on a display device in an aircraft
US9533769B1 (en) * 2014-08-20 2017-01-03 Rockwell Collins, Inc. Terrain warning systems and methods
US10928510B1 (en) 2014-09-10 2021-02-23 Rockwell Collins, Inc. System for and method of image processing for low visibility landing applications
US10713859B1 (en) * 2014-09-12 2020-07-14 World Wide Walkie Talkie (Mbt) Wireless flight data recorder with satellite network method for real time remote access and black box backup
US10705201B1 (en) 2015-08-31 2020-07-07 Rockwell Collins, Inc. Radar beam sharpening system and method
US10228460B1 (en) 2016-05-26 2019-03-12 Rockwell Collins, Inc. Weather radar enabled low visibility operation system and method
US10353068B1 (en) 2016-07-28 2019-07-16 Rockwell Collins, Inc. Weather radar enabled offshore operation system and method
US10473781B2 (en) 2016-09-14 2019-11-12 Garmin Switzerland Gmbh Determining a boundary enclosing a region of interest for a body of water
US10347141B2 (en) * 2017-04-26 2019-07-09 Honeywell International Inc. System and method for transmitting obstacle alerts to aircraft from a ground based database
JP6929211B2 (en) * 2017-12-12 2021-09-01 朝日航洋株式会社 Methods, programs and equipment for determining the safety of an aircraft's flight path
FR3081596A1 (en) * 2018-05-23 2019-11-29 Marc Labrucherie METHOD FOR AUTOMATICALLY BACKING THE FLIGHT OF AN AIRCRAFT WITH ELECTRIC FLIGHT CONTROLS
US11348468B1 (en) 2019-03-15 2022-05-31 Rockwell Collins, Inc. Systems and methods for inhibition of terrain awareness and warning system alerts

Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3787845A (en) * 1972-10-05 1974-01-22 Furuno Electric Co Collision alarming system
US3958219A (en) * 1975-03-06 1976-05-18 Sundstrand Data Control, Inc. Terrain closure warning system with altitude rate signal conditioning
US4030065A (en) * 1976-07-19 1977-06-14 Sundstrand Corporation Terrain clearance warning system for aircraft
US4063073A (en) * 1974-11-29 1977-12-13 Strayer Larry G Computer system to prevent collision between moving objects such as aircraft moving from one sector to another
US4167006A (en) * 1976-10-22 1979-09-04 Toyo Tsushinki Kabushiki Kaisha Collision avoidance system of aircraft
US4224669A (en) * 1977-12-22 1980-09-23 The Boeing Company Minimum safe altitude monitoring, indication and warning system
US4253150A (en) * 1978-09-29 1981-02-24 Scovill Royal J Pictorial navigation computer
US4283705A (en) * 1979-05-30 1981-08-11 Robert James System for providing an integrated display of instantaneous information relative to aircraft attitude, heading, altitude, and horizontal situation
US4369425A (en) * 1981-06-08 1983-01-18 Sperry Corporation Voiced alerting system
US4495580A (en) * 1981-03-30 1985-01-22 E-Systems, Inc. Navigation system

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2461305B1 (en) * 1979-07-06 1985-12-06 Thomson Csf MAP INDICATOR SYSTEM MORE PARTICULARLY FOR AIR NAVIGATION

Patent Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3787845A (en) * 1972-10-05 1974-01-22 Furuno Electric Co Collision alarming system
US4063073A (en) * 1974-11-29 1977-12-13 Strayer Larry G Computer system to prevent collision between moving objects such as aircraft moving from one sector to another
US3958219A (en) * 1975-03-06 1976-05-18 Sundstrand Data Control, Inc. Terrain closure warning system with altitude rate signal conditioning
US4030065A (en) * 1976-07-19 1977-06-14 Sundstrand Corporation Terrain clearance warning system for aircraft
US4167006A (en) * 1976-10-22 1979-09-04 Toyo Tsushinki Kabushiki Kaisha Collision avoidance system of aircraft
US4224669A (en) * 1977-12-22 1980-09-23 The Boeing Company Minimum safe altitude monitoring, indication and warning system
US4253150A (en) * 1978-09-29 1981-02-24 Scovill Royal J Pictorial navigation computer
US4283705A (en) * 1979-05-30 1981-08-11 Robert James System for providing an integrated display of instantaneous information relative to aircraft attitude, heading, altitude, and horizontal situation
US4495580A (en) * 1981-03-30 1985-01-22 E-Systems, Inc. Navigation system
US4369425A (en) * 1981-06-08 1983-01-18 Sperry Corporation Voiced alerting system

Cited By (45)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5283574A (en) * 1985-02-22 1994-02-01 Sundstrand Data Control, Inc. Altitude loss after take-off warning system utilizing time and altitude
WO1986005022A1 (en) * 1985-02-22 1986-08-28 Sundstrand Data Control, Inc. Altitude loss after take-off warning system utilizing time and altitude
WO1992021077A1 (en) * 1991-05-22 1992-11-26 Gec-Marconi Limited Aircraft terrain and obstacle avoidance systems
FR2689668A1 (en) * 1992-04-07 1993-10-08 Dassault Electronique Aircraft ground collision avoidance method and device
EP0565399A1 (en) * 1992-04-07 1993-10-13 Dassault Electronique Method and device for collision avoidance of aircraft on the ground
GB2266286A (en) * 1992-04-24 1993-10-27 Sagem Method of piloting an aircraft to avoid its colliding with the ground.
US5515286A (en) * 1994-03-24 1996-05-07 Sextant Avionique Method and device for preventing aerodynes from colliding with relief obstacles
EP0674299A1 (en) * 1994-03-24 1995-09-27 Sextant Avionique Method and device for the avoidance of collisions between aircraft and relief obstacles
FR2717935A1 (en) * 1994-03-24 1995-09-29 Sextant Avionique Method and device for preventing aerodyne collisions with terrain obstacles
FR2721130A1 (en) * 1994-06-14 1995-12-15 Sextant Avionique Collision avoidance appts. for aircraft
EP0688004A1 (en) * 1994-06-14 1995-12-20 Sextant Avionique Apparatus for aircraft collision avoidance, particularly with the ground, with reduced energy balance
US5677842A (en) * 1994-06-14 1997-10-14 Sextant Avionique Collision avoidance device with reduced energy balance for aircraft, notably for avoiding collisions with the ground
EP0717330A1 (en) * 1994-12-15 1996-06-19 Aerospatiale Societe Nationale Industrielle Method and apparatus for providing one information, alarm or warning for an aircraft at ground proximity
WO1996018935A1 (en) * 1994-12-15 1996-06-20 Aerospatiale Societe Nationale Industrielle Method and device for providing ground proximity information, and a warning or alarm system for aircraft
FR2728374A1 (en) * 1994-12-15 1996-06-21 Aerospatiale METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROVIDING INFORMATION, ALERT, OR ALARM FOR AN AIRCRAFT NEAR THE GROUND
US5798712A (en) * 1994-12-15 1998-08-25 Aerospatiale Societe Nationale Industrielle Method and device for supplying information, an alert or alarm for an aircraft in proximity to the ground
US6092009A (en) * 1995-07-31 2000-07-18 Alliedsignal Aircraft terrain information system
US6292721B1 (en) 1995-07-31 2001-09-18 Allied Signal Inc. Premature descent into terrain visual awareness enhancement to EGPWS
US6606034B1 (en) 1995-07-31 2003-08-12 Honeywell International Inc. Terrain awareness system
US6691004B2 (en) 1995-07-31 2004-02-10 Honeywell International, Inc. Method for determining a currently obtainable climb gradient of an aircraft
US5839080A (en) * 1995-07-31 1998-11-17 Alliedsignal, Inc. Terrain awareness system
US6710723B2 (en) 1995-07-31 2004-03-23 Honeywell International Inc. Terrain data retrieval system
US6347263B1 (en) 1995-07-31 2002-02-12 Alliedsignal Inc. Aircraft terrain information system
US6088634A (en) * 1995-07-31 2000-07-11 Alliedsignal Inc. Method and apparatus for alerting a pilot to a hazardous condition during approach to land
US6219592B1 (en) 1995-07-31 2001-04-17 Alliedsignal Inc. Method and apparatus for terrain awareness
US6122570A (en) * 1995-07-31 2000-09-19 Alliedsignal Inc. System and method for assisting the prevention of controlled flight into terrain accidents
US6138060A (en) * 1995-07-31 2000-10-24 Alliedsignal Inc. Terrain awareness system
US5864307A (en) * 1996-02-19 1999-01-26 Gec Marconi Limited Aircraft terrain advisory system
US6480120B1 (en) 1996-04-15 2002-11-12 Dassault Electronique Airborne terrain collision prevention device with prediction of turns
FR2747492A1 (en) * 1996-04-15 1997-10-17 Dassault Electronique TERRAIN ANTI-COLLISION DEVICE FOR AIRCRAFT WITH TURN PREDICTION
EP0802469A1 (en) * 1996-04-15 1997-10-22 Dassault Electronique Device for aircraft ground collision avoidance with turn prediction
WO1998004883A1 (en) * 1996-07-30 1998-02-05 Alliedsignal Inc. Aircraft terrain information system
GB2322611B (en) * 1997-02-26 2001-03-21 British Aerospace Apparatus for indicating air traffic and terrain collision threat to an aircraft
GB2322611A (en) * 1997-02-26 1998-09-02 British Aerospace Indicating air traffic and terrain collision threat to aircraft
US6538581B2 (en) 1997-02-26 2003-03-25 Bae Systems Plc Apparatus for indicating air traffic and terrain collision threat to an aircraft
WO1999032850A1 (en) * 1997-12-23 1999-07-01 Alliedsignal Inc. Aircraft terrain warning system
US6484071B1 (en) 1999-02-01 2002-11-19 Honeywell International, Inc. Ground proximity warning system, method and computer program product for controllably altering the base width of an alert envelope
US6477449B1 (en) 1999-02-01 2002-11-05 Honeywell International Inc. Methods, apparatus and computer program products for determining a corrected distance between an aircraft and a selected runway
US6445310B1 (en) 1999-02-01 2002-09-03 Honeywell International, Inc. Apparatus, methods, computer program products for generating a runway field clearance floor envelope about a selected runway
US6707394B2 (en) 1999-02-01 2004-03-16 Honeywell, Inc. Apparatus, method, and computer program product for generating terrain clearance floor envelopes about a selected runway
US6380870B1 (en) 1999-02-01 2002-04-30 Honeywell International, Inc. Apparatus, methods, and computer program products for determining a look ahead distance value for high speed flight
US6469664B1 (en) 1999-10-05 2002-10-22 Honeywell International Inc. Method, apparatus, and computer program products for alerting surface vessels to hazardous conditions
US6734808B1 (en) 1999-10-05 2004-05-11 Honeywell International Inc. Method, apparatus and computer program products for alerting submersible vessels to hazardous conditions
US6750815B2 (en) 1999-10-05 2004-06-15 Honeywell International Inc. Method, apparatus, and computer program products for alerting surface vessels to hazardous conditions
US7634335B2 (en) * 2004-04-20 2009-12-15 Thales Distance estimating method for aircraft taking air navigation restrictions into account

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA1238398A (en) 1988-06-21
FI853790A0 (en) 1985-10-01
IL74045A0 (en) 1985-04-30
AU563701B2 (en) 1987-07-16
NZ210815A (en) 1988-10-28
EP0172221B1 (en) 1991-10-30
AU3939685A (en) 1985-08-27
IT8547632A0 (en) 1985-02-01
EP0172221A1 (en) 1986-02-26
DE3584553D1 (en) 1991-12-05
US4646244A (en) 1987-02-24
FI853790L (en) 1985-10-01
IT8547632A1 (en) 1986-08-01
EP0172221A4 (en) 1989-10-27
IT1182170B (en) 1987-09-30
JPS61501283A (en) 1986-06-26

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
AU563701B2 (en) Terrain advisory system
US6940427B2 (en) Pitch alerting angle for enhanced ground proximity warning system (EGPWS)
EP0309578B1 (en) Ground proximity approach warning system without landing flap input
US6021374A (en) Stand alone terrain conflict detector and operating methods therefor
US4825374A (en) Aircraft descent guide system and method for creating descent guidance information
US6347263B1 (en) Aircraft terrain information system
US6691004B2 (en) Method for determining a currently obtainable climb gradient of an aircraft
US6980892B1 (en) Avionics system and method for providing altitude alerts during final landing approach
US5677842A (en) Collision avoidance device with reduced energy balance for aircraft, notably for avoiding collisions with the ground
EP1203201B1 (en) Hazard detection for flight plans and the like
US6879886B2 (en) Flight guidance system providing perspective flight guidance symbology
US7010398B2 (en) Control system providing perspective flight guidance
US8280622B2 (en) Terrain avoidance system for transport aircraft
US6710723B2 (en) Terrain data retrieval system
US7698058B2 (en) System, method and apparatus for searching geographic area using prioritized spatial order
EP0750238B1 (en) Integrated ground collision avoidance system
US6538581B2 (en) Apparatus for indicating air traffic and terrain collision threat to an aircraft
EP0256124B1 (en) Wind shear detection and alerting system
EP1360457B1 (en) Egpws cutoff altitude for helicopters
Hewitt et al. A ground and obstacle collision avoidance technique (GOCAT)
Breen 17.1 Enhanced Ground Proximity Warning System

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Designated state(s): AU FI JP

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB LU NL SE

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1985901148

Country of ref document: EP

Ref document number: 853790

Country of ref document: FI

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1985901148

Country of ref document: EP

CFP Corrected version of a pamphlet front page
CR1 Correction of entry in section i
WWG Wipo information: grant in national office

Ref document number: 1985901148

Country of ref document: EP