US20040054472A1 - Controlling aircraft from collisions with off limits facilities - Google Patents

Controlling aircraft from collisions with off limits facilities Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20040054472A1
US20040054472A1 US10245619 US24561902A US2004054472A1 US 20040054472 A1 US20040054472 A1 US 20040054472A1 US 10245619 US10245619 US 10245619 US 24561902 A US24561902 A US 24561902A US 2004054472 A1 US2004054472 A1 US 2004054472A1
Authority
US
Grant status
Application
Patent type
Prior art keywords
aircraft
signal
distance
pilot
limits facility
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US10245619
Inventor
Lawrence Koncelik
Original Assignee
Koncelik Lawrence J.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05DSYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING OR REGULATING NON-ELECTRIC VARIABLES
    • G05D1/00Control of position, course or altitude of land, water, air, or space vehicles, e.g. automatic pilot
    • G05D1/0055Control of position, course or altitude of land, water, air, or space vehicles, e.g. automatic pilot with safety arrangements
    • G05D1/0061Control of position, course or altitude of land, water, air, or space vehicles, e.g. automatic pilot with safety arrangements for transition from automatic pilot to manual pilot and vice versa
    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05DSYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING OR REGULATING NON-ELECTRIC VARIABLES
    • G05D1/00Control of position, course or altitude of land, water, air, or space vehicles, e.g. automatic pilot
    • G05D1/0011Control of position, course or altitude of land, water, air, or space vehicles, e.g. automatic pilot associated with a remote control arrangement

Abstract

A signal is received from an off limits facility and it is determined from the signal whether an aircraft is within a distance of the off limits facility. The course and/or flight of the aircraft is changed if the aircraft is within the distance of the off limits facility. A signal is received from an airport and it is determined from the signal whether an aircraft will be allowed to take off from the airport. The aircraft is prevented from taking off if the signal from the airport indicates that the aircraft should be prevented from taking off. A signal is received from a satellite and it is determined from the signal whether an aircraft is within a distance of an off limits facility. The course and/or flight of the aircraft if the aircraft is changed if the aircraft is within the distance of the off limits facility.

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • This invention relates to improved methods and apparatus concerning avoiding disasters as a result of aircraft crashing into off limits facilities. [0001]
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • Typically in the prior art there are inadequate protections available to prevent an aircraft from crashing intentionally into an off limits facilities. While it is known to provide devices, which help protect aircraft from colliding with other aircraft, such as a device disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,314,366, typically these devices merely provide assistance to pilots who exercise the ultimate control over the flight and course of the aircraft. [0002]
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention in one embodiment provides an apparatus comprising a receiver and a processor typically located on an aircraft. The receiver and the processor are connected by a communications link. The receiver receives a signal from an off limits facility and provides the signal to the processor. The processor determines from the signal whether an aircraft is within a distance of the off limits facility and changes a course of the aircraft if the aircraft is within the distance of the off limits facility. The off limits facility may be, for example, a building, a military installation, a nuclear power plant, or a landmark. The off limits facility may be a movable object such as an aircraft or a ship. [0003]
  • The apparatus may be further comprised of a pilot input device. The pilot input device allows a pilot on the aircraft to change the course of the aircraft when the aircraft is not within the distance of the off limits facility. The processor disables the pilot input device, so that the pilot on the aircraft cannot control the flight and/or the course of the aircraft when the aircraft is within the distance of the off limits facility. The pilot input device may include a device for manually controlling the flight and/or the course of the aircraft and a device for automatically controlling flight and/or the course of the aircraft by setting a course or a flight pattern for an automatic pilot to follow. [0004]
  • In a further embodiment of the present invention a receiver receives a signal from an airport and provides the signal to a processor. The processor determines from the signal whether an aircraft will be allowed to take off from the airport. The processor prevents the aircraft from taking off, if the signal from the airport indicates that the aircraft should be prevented from taking off. The apparatus may be further comprised of a transmitter. The transmitter may send a signal from the aircraft indicating that the aircraft has an operational device for altering the course of the aircraft when the aircraft is within a distance of an off limits facility. [0005]
  • In a further embodiment of the present invention an apparatus is provided comprising a global positioning satellite receiver located on an aircraft. The global positioning satellite receiver provides a signal to a processor, which indicates the position of the aircraft. The processor determines from the signal whether the aircraft is within a distance of an off limits facility. The processor changes the flight and/or course of the aircraft if the aircraft is within the distance of the off limits facility. [0006]
  • The present invention also includes a method comprising the steps of receiving a signal from an off limits facility; determining from the signal whether an aircraft is within a distance of the off limits facility; and changing the course and/or flight of the aircraft if the aircraft is within the distance of the off limits facility. A method is also provided comprising the steps of receiving a signal from an airport; determining from the signal whether an aircraft will be allowed to take off from the airport; and preventing the aircraft from taking off, if the signal from the airport indicates that the aircraft should be prevented from taking off. The present invention also includes a method comprising the steps of receiving a signal from a satellite; determining from the signal whether the aircraft is within a distance of an off limits facility; and changing the course and/or flight of the aircraft if the aircraft is within the distance of the off limits facility.[0007]
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of an apparatus in accordance with a first embodiment of the present invention; [0008]
  • FIG. 2 shows a block diagram of a flight control device for use with the embodiment of FIG. 1; [0009]
  • FIG. 3 shows a block diagram of an apparatus in accordance another embodiment of the present invention; [0010]
  • FIG. 4 shows a flow chart of a method for use with the apparatus of FIG. 1; [0011]
  • FIG. 5 shows a flow chart of a method for use with the apparatus of FIG. 3; [0012]
  • FIG. 6 shows a block diagram of an apparatus in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention; and [0013]
  • FIG. 7 shows a flow chart of a method for use with the apparatus of FIG. 6.[0014]
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of an apparatus [0015] 10 in accordance with a first embodiment of the present invention. The apparatus 10 includes an off limits facility 12 and an aircraft 20. The off limits facility 12 has a transmitter 14 associated with the off limits facility 12 which is located on or in the immediate vicinity of the off limits facility 12. The off limits facility 12 may be, for example, a military installation, a landmark, or a nuclear power station. The off limits facility 12 may be a tall building, such as the Empire State building. The off limits facility 12 in certain embodiments may also be a movable object such as an aircraft or a ship.
  • The aircraft [0016] 20 has a receiver 22, a transmitter 24, a processor 26, a flight control device 28., and a pilot input device 29. The transmitter 14 associated with the off limits facility 12 and the transmitter 24 of the aircraft 20 may transmit any type of known signal such as electromagnetic, wireless, optical, or radio. The processor 26 may be a typical computer processor. The receiver 22 and the transmitter 24 are electrically connected to the processor 26 via busses 22 a and 24 a, respectively. The processor 26 is electrically connected to the flight control device 28 by bus 26 a. The pilot input device 29 may be electrically connected to the flight control device 28 by bus 29 a and to the processor by bus 26 b. The pilot input device 29 may be comprised of any controls typically found on an airplane for allowing a pilot to control the flight of the aircraft 20, such as through manual control or by setting data or a course for an automatic pilot. The electrical connections provided by busses 22 a, 24, 26 a, 26 b, and 29 a may be or may be replaced by wireless connections, optical connections, software connections, electromagnetic connections and any other communication connections or links.
  • The flight control device [0017] 28 may be comprised of a manual control device 30, which is typically used for manually controlling the flight of aircraft and an automatic control device 32 or automatic pilot, which is also typically used for automatically controlling the flight of aircraft when activated by a pilot of the aircraft.
  • FIG. 4 shows a flow chart of a method [0018] 200 for use with the apparatus 10 of FIG. 1. The method 200 includes steps 202, 204, and 206. At step 202 a location, warning, or off limits facility signal is transmitted from the off limits facility 12 or from the general vicinity of the off limits facility 12. The off limits facility signal travels from the transmitter 14 to the receiver 22 via communications link or wireless link 14 a. Wireless link 14 a may merely be the airwaves.
  • At step [0019] 204 the receiver 22 of the aircraft 20 in FIG. 1 receives the off limits facility signal. In one embodiment if the off limits facility signal is strong enough, such as of sufficient amplitude, then the processor 26, at step 206, causes the aircraft 20 to change its course away from the off limits facility signal 12 by controlling flight control device 28. In one embodiment of the present invention, the manual control device 30 is overridden and the automatic control device 32 is controlled by the processor 26 so that the flight of the aircraft 20 is completely controlled by the processor 26 and set to a course which is away from the off limits facility 12. In this embodiment, the pilot input device 29 is disabled by the processor 26 preventing the pilot from changing the course set by the processor 26. In alternative embodiments the pilot may be able to input a code into the pilot input device 29 to re-establish control of the aircraft 20. After the course and/or flight of the aircraft 20 has been controlled so that the aircraft 20 is again a sufficient distance away from the off limits facility, control can be returned to a pilot on board the aircraft 20, i.e. the pilot on board will be again be able to control the flight and/or course of the aircraft 20 through the pilot input device 29.
  • In alternative embodiments, the processor [0020] 26 may determine if the off limits facility signal has a specific frequency or has some other particular characteristic. If the off limits facility signal has a particular characteristic the processor 26 will take control of the aircraft.
  • FIG. 3 shows a block diagram of an apparatus [0021] 100 in accordance another embodiment of the present invention. The apparatus is comprised of an airport 102 and/or its vicinity and an aircraft 110. The airport 102 has a receiver 104, a transmitter 106 and a take off control device 108 which may be located at the airport 102 or its vicinity. The receiver 104 and the transmitter 106 may be electrically connected to the take off control device 108 by busses 108 a and 108 b.
  • The aircraft [0022] 110 includes a receiver 112, a transmitter 114, a processor 116, a flight control device 118, and a pilot input device 119. The receiver 112, transmitter 114, pilot input device 119 and the flight control device 118 are electrically connected by busses 112 a, 114 a, 116 b, and 116 a, respectively, to the processor 116. The pilot input device 119 may be similar to pilot input device 29 in FIG. 1. The pilot input device 119 is also electrically connected to the flight control device 118 by bus 119 a. As for FIG. 1, the busses may be any type any type of communication link or connection, such as a wireless, optical or electrical connection.
  • FIG. 5 shows a flow chart [0023] 300 of a method for use with the apparatus 100 of FIG. 3. FIG. 5 includes step 302, at which the transmitter 114 sends a first aircraft signal over communications link 104 a (which may be the airwaves) to the receiver 104 of the airport 102. At step 304, the airport 102 receives the first aircraft signal. At step 306, the take off control device 108 determines whether the first aircraft signal is acceptable. The first aircraft signal will be acceptable if it indicates that the processor 116 of the aircraft 110 is in a ready condition so that it will be able to steer the aircraft 110 away from a restricted area or facility. If the first aircraft signal is acceptable, then the aircraft 110 is allowed to take off from the airport 102 at step 308.
  • If the first aircraft signal is not acceptable, then the airport transmitter [0024] 106 sends a stop signal via communications link 106 a (which may be the airwaves) to the receiver 112 of the aircraft 110. The stop signal is interpreted by processor 116 at step 312 and the processor 116 prevents the take off of the aircraft 110 by controlling the flight control device 118 to prevent any flight and by disabling the pilot input device 119. The pilot input device 119 can be enabled after the aircraft 110 has sent an appropriate signal to the airport 102.
  • FIG. 6 shows a block diagram of an aircraft [0025] 400 in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention. The aircraft 400 is comprised of a GPS (global positioning satellite) receiver 402, a transmitter 404, a processor 406, a pilot input device 407, and a flight control device 408. The GPS receiver 402, transmitter 404, processor 406, the pilot input device 407, and the flight control device 408 are electrically connected by busses 402 a, 404 a, 406 b, and 406 a to the processor 406. The pilot input device 407 is electrically connected to the flight control device 408 by the bus 407 a. The busses of the present invention generally may be any type of communications link or connection.
  • FIG. 7 shows a flow chart [0026] 500 of a method for use with the aircraft 400 of FIG. 6. At step 502 a GPS signal is received by the GPS receiver 402 from a satellite. The GPS signal typically provides data, which specifies the position of at least the aircraft 400. The GPS signal from the satellite may be provided in response to a signal sent from the aircraft 400 to the satellite via transmitter 404. The transmitter 404 may periodically request an updated GPS signal from the satellite to determine the aircraft's latest or updated position.
  • At step [0027] 504 the aircraft processor 406 receives the GPS signal from the GPS receiver 402 and the aircraft processor 406 compares the aircraft 400 current position with known positions of off limits facilities, buildings, aircraft or vehicles. Off limit facilities may include military installations, landmarks, nuclear power plants, and other off limits facilities. The off limit facilities may include a movable object such as an aircraft or a battleship, if the current position of the movable object is known.
  • At step [0028] 506 the aircraft processor 406 changes the course of the aircraft 400 if the aircraft 400 is too close to an off limits facility. In order to accomplish this, the aircraft processor 406 would send a signal to the flight control device 408 via bus 406 a to cause the course of the aircraft 400 to change. In at least one embodiment of the present invention, the processor 406 would also disable the pilot input device 407 via bus 406 b so that no person or pilot on board the aircraft 400 could control the aircraft 400 in any manner. The pilot input device 407 can be enabled after the aircraft 400 has gone beyond the appropriate distance from the off limits facility.
  • Any one of receivers [0029] 26, 112, or 402, and/or transmitters 24, 114, and 404 may be, or may be replaced by a combination transmitter/receiver or transceiver such as a TACAN transceiver (TACAN stands for Tactical Air Navigation System) which may provide both receiving and transmitting functions. TACAN type signals may be emitted by the off limits facility 12, for example, which may be in the form of azimuth signals which can be used by the processor 26 to steer the aircraft 20 via flight control device 28 (or automatic pilot which may be part of flight control device 28) to a preselected altitude and speed profile away from the off limits facility 12. U.S. Pat. No. 3,992,613 deals with the processing of such azimuth signals and is incorporated by reference herein. U.S. Pat. No. 6,314,366 is also incorporated by reference herein.
  • Although the invention has been described by reference to particular illustrative embodiments thereof, many changes and modifications of the invention may become apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. It is therefore intended to include within this patent all such changes and modifications as may reasonably and properly be included within the scope of the present invention's contribution to the art. [0030]

Claims (22)

    I claim:
  1. 1. An apparatus comprising:
    a receiver; and
    a processor connected by a communications link to the receiver;
    wherein the receiver receives a signal from an off limits facility and provides the signal to the processor;
    wherein the processor determines from the signal whether an aircraft is within a distance of the off limits facility;
    and wherein the processor changes a course of the aircraft if the aircraft is within the distance of the off limits facility.
  2. 2. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein
    The off limits facility is a building.
  3. 3. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein
    The off limits facility is a military installation.
  4. 4. The apparatus of claim 1 further comprising
    a pilot input device;
    wherein the pilot input device allows a pilot on the aircraft to change the course of the aircraft when the aircraft is not within the distance of the off limits facility;
    and wherein the processor disables the pilot input device, so that the pilot on the aircraft cannot control the course of the aircraft when the aircraft is within the distance of the off limits facility.
  5. 5. The apparatus of claim 4 wherein
    the pilot input device includes a device for manually controlling flight of the aircraft and a device for automatically controlling flight of the aircraft by setting a course for an automatic pilot to follow.
  6. 6. An apparatus comprising
    a receiver; and
    a processor connected by a communications link to the receiver;
    wherein the receiver receives a signal from an airport and provides the signal to the processor;
    wherein the processor determines from the signal whether an aircraft will be allowed to take off from the airport;
    and wherein the processor prevents the aircraft from taking off, if the signal from the airport indicates that the aircraft should be prevented from taking off.
  7. 7. The apparatus of claim 6 further comprising
    a transmitter; and
    wherein the transmitter sends a signal from the aircraft indicating that the aircraft has an operational device for altering the course of the aircraft when the aircraft is within a distance of an off limits facility.
  8. 8. The apparatus of claim 6 wherein
    the processor prevents the aircraft from taking off, at least in part, by disabling a pilot input device so that a pilot on the aircraft cannot control the flight of the aircraft.
  9. 9. An apparatus comprising:
    a global positioning satellite receiver located on an aircraft; and
    a processor connected by a communications link to the receiver;
    wherein the global positioning satellite receiver receives a signal from a satellite, wherein the signal indicates the position of the aircraft, and the global positioning satellite receiver provides the signal to the processor;
    wherein the processor determines from the signal whether an aircraft is within a distance of an off limits facility;
    and wherein the processor changes a course of the aircraft if the aircraft is within the distance of the off limits facility.
  10. 10. The apparatus of claim 9 wherein
    the off limits facility is a building.
  11. 11. The apparatus of claim 9 wherein
    the processor prevents a pilot on the aircraft from controlling the flight of the aircraft if the aircraft is within the distance of the off limits facility.
  12. 12. A method comprising the steps of:
    receiving a signal from an off limits facility;
    determining from the signal whether an aircraft is within a distance of the off limits facility;
    and changing the course of the aircraft if the aircraft is within the distance of the off limits facility.
  13. 13. The method of claim 12 wherein
    the off limits facility is a building.
  14. 14. The method of claim 12 wherein
    the off limits facility is a military installation.
  15. 15. The method of claim 12 further comprising:
    preventing a pilot on the aircraft from controlling the flight of the aircraft when the aircraft is within the distance of the off limits facility.
  16. 16. The method of claim 15 wherein
    the pilot is prevented from controlling the flight of the aircraft by disabling a pilot input device which when the aircraft is not within the distance of the off limits facility allows the pilot to control the flight of the aircraft.
  17. 17. The method of claim 16
    wherein the pilot input device allows the pilot to control the flight of the aircraft either manually or by setting a course for an automatic pilot to follow when the aircraft is not within the distance of the off limits facility.
  18. 18. A method comprising the steps of:
    receiving a signal from an airport;
    determining from the signal whether an aircraft will be allowed to take off from the airport;
    preventing the aircraft from taking off, if the signal from the airport indicates that the aircraft should be prevented from taking off.
  19. 19. The method of claim 18 further comprising
    sending a signal from the aircraft indicating that the aircraft has an operational device for altering the course of the aircraft when the aircraft is within a distance of an off limits facility.
  20. 20. A method comprising the steps of
    receives a signal from a satellite, wherein the signal can be used to determine a position of an aircraft;
    determining from the signal whether the aircraft is within a distance of an off limits facility;
    and changing the course of the aircraft if the aircraft is within the distance of the off limits facility.
  21. 21. The method of claim 20 further comprising
    preventing a pilot on the aircraft from controlling the flight of the aircraft if the aircraft is within the distance of the off limits facility.
  22. 22. The method of claim 21 wherein
    the step of preventing the pilot on the aircraft from controlling the flight of the aircraft included disabling a flight control device which allows a pilot to control the flight of the aircraft when the aircraft is not within the distance of the off limits facility.
US10245619 2002-09-17 2002-09-17 Controlling aircraft from collisions with off limits facilities Abandoned US20040054472A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10245619 US20040054472A1 (en) 2002-09-17 2002-09-17 Controlling aircraft from collisions with off limits facilities

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10245619 US20040054472A1 (en) 2002-09-17 2002-09-17 Controlling aircraft from collisions with off limits facilities
US10302363 US6738694B2 (en) 2002-09-17 2002-11-21 Remotely controlling a servant aircraft
US10753988 US6915188B2 (en) 2002-09-17 2004-01-08 Controlling aircraft from collisions with off limits facilities
US10754752 US7035721B2 (en) 2002-09-17 2004-01-09 Remotely controlling a servant aircraft

Related Child Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10302363 Continuation-In-Part US6738694B2 (en) 2002-09-17 2002-11-21 Remotely controlling a servant aircraft
US10753988 Division US6915188B2 (en) 2002-09-17 2004-01-08 Controlling aircraft from collisions with off limits facilities
US10754752 Continuation-In-Part US7035721B2 (en) 2002-09-17 2004-01-09 Remotely controlling a servant aircraft

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20040054472A1 true true US20040054472A1 (en) 2004-03-18

Family

ID=22927418

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10245619 Abandoned US20040054472A1 (en) 2002-09-17 2002-09-17 Controlling aircraft from collisions with off limits facilities
US10753988 Expired - Fee Related US6915188B2 (en) 2002-09-17 2004-01-08 Controlling aircraft from collisions with off limits facilities

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10753988 Expired - Fee Related US6915188B2 (en) 2002-09-17 2004-01-08 Controlling aircraft from collisions with off limits facilities

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (2) US20040054472A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20070273537A1 (en) * 2006-04-18 2007-11-29 Dolphin International Resources, Llc, Combined system for tracking offender rehabilitation
GB2460954B (en) * 2008-06-20 2011-03-02 David Zammit-Mangion A method and system for resolving traffic conflicts in take-off and landing

Citations (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4646244A (en) * 1984-02-02 1987-02-24 Sundstrand Data Control, Inc. Terrain advisory system
US5933099A (en) * 1997-02-19 1999-08-03 Mahon; James Collision avoidance system
US5995043A (en) * 1996-12-06 1999-11-30 The Boeing Company Aircraft satellite navigation precision-approach system including CDMA datalink
US6064939A (en) * 1997-02-27 2000-05-16 Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd. Individual guidance system for aircraft in an approach control area under automatic dependent surveillance
US6133867A (en) * 1998-01-02 2000-10-17 Eberwine; David Brent Integrated air traffic management and collision avoidance system
US6161063A (en) * 1996-06-07 2000-12-12 Sextant Avionique Method for controlling an aerodyne for the vertical avoidance of a zone
US6173219B1 (en) * 1996-06-07 2001-01-09 Sextant Avionique Method for automatically controlling a vehicle for the lateral avoidance of a fixed zone
US6185430B1 (en) * 1997-11-26 2001-02-06 Motorola, Inc. Voice call group function for a satellite based air traffic control system
US6199008B1 (en) * 1998-09-17 2001-03-06 Noegenesis, Inc. Aviation, terrain and weather display system
US6282417B1 (en) * 1998-05-08 2001-08-28 David K. Ward Communication radio method and apparatus
US6381538B1 (en) * 2000-05-26 2002-04-30 Aerotech Research (U.S.A.), Inc. Vehicle specific hazard estimation, presentation, and route planning based on meteorological and other environmental data
US6401032B1 (en) * 1997-05-13 2002-06-04 Scott R. Jamison Automated touring information systems and methods
US6456941B1 (en) * 2001-03-26 2002-09-24 William Gutierrez System and method for aircraft and watercraft control and collision prevention
US20030016159A1 (en) * 2001-07-20 2003-01-23 Stayton Greg T. Formation surveillance and collision avoidance
US20030016158A1 (en) * 2001-07-20 2003-01-23 Aviation Communication & Surveillance Systems, Llc Integrated surveillance display
US20030055564A1 (en) * 2001-09-20 2003-03-20 Tart Keith Raymond Aircraft control system
US20030055540A1 (en) * 2001-09-20 2003-03-20 Hansen James K. Anti-terrorism aircraft flight control system
US6708091B2 (en) * 2002-05-31 2004-03-16 Steven Tsao Automated terrain awareness and avoidance system

Family Cites Families (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3992613A (en) 1975-10-03 1976-11-16 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy TACAN flying target control system
US5375058A (en) * 1991-12-20 1994-12-20 University Of Central Florida Surface detection system for airports
US5530440A (en) * 1992-12-15 1996-06-25 Westinghouse Norden Systems, Inc Airport surface aircraft locator
US5714948A (en) * 1993-05-14 1998-02-03 Worldwide Notifications Systems, Inc. Satellite based aircraft traffic control system
US6314366B1 (en) 1993-05-14 2001-11-06 Tom S. Farmakis Satellite based collision avoidance system
US5983161A (en) 1993-08-11 1999-11-09 Lemelson; Jerome H. GPS vehicle collision avoidance warning and control system and method
US5493309A (en) * 1993-09-24 1996-02-20 Motorola, Inc. Collison avoidance communication system and method
JP2786809B2 (en) 1994-03-08 1998-08-13 株式会社トキメック Marine navigation support apparatus
JP2801883B2 (en) * 1996-03-29 1998-09-21 株式会社東芝 Aircraft traffic control support system
JP3344923B2 (en) 1997-04-14 2002-11-18 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Initial correction device in the tire pressure drop detecting device
US6278965B1 (en) * 1998-06-04 2001-08-21 The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration Real-time surface traffic adviser
US6545601B1 (en) * 1999-02-25 2003-04-08 David A. Monroe Ground based security surveillance system for aircraft and other commercial vehicles
US6392692B1 (en) * 1999-02-25 2002-05-21 David A. Monroe Network communication techniques for security surveillance and safety system
US6262679B1 (en) * 1999-04-08 2001-07-17 Honeywell International Inc. Midair collision avoidance system
US6381541B1 (en) * 2000-11-06 2002-04-30 Lance Richard Sadler Airplane ground location methods and systems
US6606563B2 (en) * 2001-03-06 2003-08-12 Honeywell International Inc. Incursion alerting system
WO2003022647A9 (en) * 2001-09-11 2003-12-18 Kevin Orton Aircraft flight security system and method
US6584383B2 (en) * 2001-09-28 2003-06-24 Pippenger Phillip Mckinney Anti-hijacking security system and apparatus for aircraft
US6614397B2 (en) * 2001-11-14 2003-09-02 The Boeing Company Wrong runway alert system and method
US20030135327A1 (en) * 2002-01-11 2003-07-17 Seymour Levine Low cost inertial navigator
US6943701B2 (en) * 2002-06-06 2005-09-13 Advanced American Enterprises, Llc Vehicular safety system and method

Patent Citations (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4646244A (en) * 1984-02-02 1987-02-24 Sundstrand Data Control, Inc. Terrain advisory system
US6161063A (en) * 1996-06-07 2000-12-12 Sextant Avionique Method for controlling an aerodyne for the vertical avoidance of a zone
US6173219B1 (en) * 1996-06-07 2001-01-09 Sextant Avionique Method for automatically controlling a vehicle for the lateral avoidance of a fixed zone
US5995043A (en) * 1996-12-06 1999-11-30 The Boeing Company Aircraft satellite navigation precision-approach system including CDMA datalink
US5933099A (en) * 1997-02-19 1999-08-03 Mahon; James Collision avoidance system
US6064939A (en) * 1997-02-27 2000-05-16 Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd. Individual guidance system for aircraft in an approach control area under automatic dependent surveillance
US6401032B1 (en) * 1997-05-13 2002-06-04 Scott R. Jamison Automated touring information systems and methods
US6185430B1 (en) * 1997-11-26 2001-02-06 Motorola, Inc. Voice call group function for a satellite based air traffic control system
US6133867A (en) * 1998-01-02 2000-10-17 Eberwine; David Brent Integrated air traffic management and collision avoidance system
US6282417B1 (en) * 1998-05-08 2001-08-28 David K. Ward Communication radio method and apparatus
US6199008B1 (en) * 1998-09-17 2001-03-06 Noegenesis, Inc. Aviation, terrain and weather display system
US6381538B1 (en) * 2000-05-26 2002-04-30 Aerotech Research (U.S.A.), Inc. Vehicle specific hazard estimation, presentation, and route planning based on meteorological and other environmental data
US6456941B1 (en) * 2001-03-26 2002-09-24 William Gutierrez System and method for aircraft and watercraft control and collision prevention
US20030016159A1 (en) * 2001-07-20 2003-01-23 Stayton Greg T. Formation surveillance and collision avoidance
US20030016158A1 (en) * 2001-07-20 2003-01-23 Aviation Communication & Surveillance Systems, Llc Integrated surveillance display
US20030055564A1 (en) * 2001-09-20 2003-03-20 Tart Keith Raymond Aircraft control system
US20030055540A1 (en) * 2001-09-20 2003-03-20 Hansen James K. Anti-terrorism aircraft flight control system
US6708091B2 (en) * 2002-05-31 2004-03-16 Steven Tsao Automated terrain awareness and avoidance system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date Type
US6915188B2 (en) 2005-07-05 grant
US20040193335A1 (en) 2004-09-30 application

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5392052A (en) Position reporting emergency location system
US7126534B2 (en) Minimum safe altitude warning
US6871124B1 (en) Method and system for guiding an aircraft along a preferred flight path having a random origin
US7024309B2 (en) Autonomous station keeping system for formation flight
US20030033084A1 (en) Incursion alerting system
US5714948A (en) Satellite based aircraft traffic control system
US5043903A (en) System for aiding the movement of moving units in group formation
US20060167618A1 (en) Aircraft traffic warning system using an ad-hoc radio network
US5716032A (en) Unmanned aerial vehicle automatic landing system
US20080039988A1 (en) Assisted flight computer program and method
US20100030401A1 (en) Flight deck communication and display system
US7127334B2 (en) System and methods for preventing the unauthorized use of aircraft
US20040167685A1 (en) Runway overrun monitor and method for monitoring runway overruns
US20130080043A1 (en) Method and Apparatus for Generating Flight-Optimizing Trajectories
US20070050101A1 (en) Automatic flight protection system for an aircraft
US5554993A (en) Global position determining system and method
US5351194A (en) Apparatus and method for closing flight plans and locating aircraft
US4481516A (en) Low visibility runway monitor
US5608393A (en) Differential ground station repeater
US20060253254A1 (en) Ground-based Sense-and-Avoid Display System (SAVDS) for unmanned aerial vehicles
US20070222665A1 (en) Airborne Situational Awareness System
US7099752B1 (en) Safelander
US6456940B1 (en) Minimum safe altitude system and method
US20060032978A1 (en) Method and system for controlling a hijacked aircraft
US20080109163A1 (en) Systems and methods for providing aircraft runway guidance