US20040054472A1 - Controlling aircraft from collisions with off limits facilities - Google Patents
Controlling aircraft from collisions with off limits facilities Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20040054472A1 US20040054472A1 US10/245,619 US24561902A US2004054472A1 US 20040054472 A1 US20040054472 A1 US 20040054472A1 US 24561902 A US24561902 A US 24561902A US 2004054472 A1 US2004054472 A1 US 2004054472A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- aircraft
- signal
- pilot
- distance
- limits facility
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 22
- RZVHIXYEVGDQDX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 9,10-anthraquinone Chemical compound C1=CC=C2C(=O)C3=CC=CC=C3C(=O)C2=C1 RZVHIXYEVGDQDX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 17
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 claims description 10
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 7
- 101100536250 Homo sapiens TMEM120A gene Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 102100028548 Ion channel TACAN Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000004224 protection Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05D—SYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING OR REGULATING NON-ELECTRIC VARIABLES
- G05D1/00—Control of position, course, altitude or attitude of land, water, air or space vehicles, e.g. using automatic pilots
- G05D1/0055—Control of position, course, altitude or attitude of land, water, air or space vehicles, e.g. using automatic pilots with safety arrangements
- G05D1/0061—Control of position, course, altitude or attitude of land, water, air or space vehicles, e.g. using automatic pilots with safety arrangements for transition from automatic pilot to manual pilot and vice versa
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05D—SYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING OR REGULATING NON-ELECTRIC VARIABLES
- G05D1/00—Control of position, course, altitude or attitude of land, water, air or space vehicles, e.g. using automatic pilots
- G05D1/0011—Control of position, course, altitude or attitude of land, water, air or space vehicles, e.g. using automatic pilots associated with a remote control arrangement
Definitions
- This invention relates to improved methods and apparatus concerning avoiding disasters as a result of aircraft crashing into off limits facilities.
- the present invention in one embodiment provides an apparatus comprising a receiver and a processor typically located on an aircraft.
- the receiver and the processor are connected by a communications link.
- the receiver receives a signal from an off limits facility and provides the signal to the processor.
- the processor determines from the signal whether an aircraft is within a distance of the off limits facility and changes a course of the aircraft if the aircraft is within the distance of the off limits facility.
- the off limits facility may be, for example, a building, a military installation, a nuclear power plant, or a landmark.
- the off limits facility may be a movable object such as an aircraft or a ship.
- the apparatus may be further comprised of a pilot input device.
- the pilot input device allows a pilot on the aircraft to change the course of the aircraft when the aircraft is not within the distance of the off limits facility.
- the processor disables the pilot input device, so that the pilot on the aircraft cannot control the flight and/or the course of the aircraft when the aircraft is within the distance of the off limits facility.
- the pilot input device may include a device for manually controlling the flight and/or the course of the aircraft and a device for automatically controlling flight and/or the course of the aircraft by setting a course or a flight pattern for an automatic pilot to follow.
- a receiver receives a signal from an airport and provides the signal to a processor.
- the processor determines from the signal whether an aircraft will be allowed to take off from the airport.
- the processor prevents the aircraft from taking off, if the signal from the airport indicates that the aircraft should be prevented from taking off.
- the apparatus may be further comprised of a transmitter.
- the transmitter may send a signal from the aircraft indicating that the aircraft has an operational device for altering the course of the aircraft when the aircraft is within a distance of an off limits facility.
- an apparatus comprising a global positioning satellite receiver located on an aircraft.
- the global positioning satellite receiver provides a signal to a processor, which indicates the position of the aircraft.
- the processor determines from the signal whether the aircraft is within a distance of an off limits facility.
- the processor changes the flight and/or course of the aircraft if the aircraft is within the distance of the off limits facility.
- the present invention also includes a method comprising the steps of receiving a signal from an off limits facility; determining from the signal whether an aircraft is within a distance of the off limits facility; and changing the course and/or flight of the aircraft if the aircraft is within the distance of the off limits facility.
- a method is also provided comprising the steps of receiving a signal from an airport; determining from the signal whether an aircraft will be allowed to take off from the airport; and preventing the aircraft from taking off, if the signal from the airport indicates that the aircraft should be prevented from taking off.
- the present invention also includes a method comprising the steps of receiving a signal from a satellite; determining from the signal whether the aircraft is within a distance of an off limits facility; and changing the course and/or flight of the aircraft if the aircraft is within the distance of the off limits facility.
- FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of an apparatus in accordance with a first embodiment of the present invention
- FIG. 2 shows a block diagram of a flight control device for use with the embodiment of FIG. 1;
- FIG. 3 shows a block diagram of an apparatus in accordance another embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 4 shows a flow chart of a method for use with the apparatus of FIG. 1;
- FIG. 5 shows a flow chart of a method for use with the apparatus of FIG. 3;
- FIG. 6 shows a block diagram of an apparatus in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 7 shows a flow chart of a method for use with the apparatus of FIG. 6.
- FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of an apparatus 10 in accordance with a first embodiment of the present invention.
- the apparatus 10 includes an off limits facility 12 and an aircraft 20 .
- the off limits facility 12 has a transmitter 14 associated with the off limits facility 12 which is located on or in the immediate vicinity of the off limits facility 12 .
- the off limits facility 12 may be, for example, a military installation, a landmark, or a nuclear power station.
- the off limits facility 12 may be a tall building, such as the Empire State building.
- the off limits facility 12 in certain embodiments may also be a movable object such as an aircraft or a ship.
- the aircraft 20 has a receiver 22 , a transmitter 24 , a processor 26 , a flight control device 28 ., and a pilot input device 29 .
- the transmitter 14 associated with the off limits facility 12 and the transmitter 24 of the aircraft 20 may transmit any type of known signal such as electromagnetic, wireless, optical, or radio.
- the processor 26 may be a typical computer processor.
- the receiver 22 and the transmitter 24 are electrically connected to the processor 26 via busses 22 a and 24 a , respectively.
- the processor 26 is electrically connected to the flight control device 28 by bus 26 a .
- the pilot input device 29 may be electrically connected to the flight control device 28 by bus 29 a and to the processor by bus 26 b .
- the pilot input device 29 may be comprised of any controls typically found on an airplane for allowing a pilot to control the flight of the aircraft 20 , such as through manual control or by setting data or a course for an automatic pilot.
- the electrical connections provided by busses 22 a , 24 , 26 a , 26 b , and 29 a may be or may be replaced by wireless connections, optical connections, software connections, electromagnetic connections and any other communication connections or links.
- the flight control device 28 may be comprised of a manual control device 30 , which is typically used for manually controlling the flight of aircraft and an automatic control device 32 or automatic pilot, which is also typically used for automatically controlling the flight of aircraft when activated by a pilot of the aircraft.
- FIG. 4 shows a flow chart of a method 200 for use with the apparatus 10 of FIG. 1.
- the method 200 includes steps 202 , 204 , and 206 .
- a location, warning, or off limits facility signal is transmitted from the off limits facility 12 or from the general vicinity of the off limits facility 12 .
- the off limits facility signal travels from the transmitter 14 to the receiver 22 via communications link or wireless link 14 a .
- Wireless link 14 a may merely be the airwaves.
- the receiver 22 of the aircraft 20 in FIG. 1 receives the off limits facility signal.
- the processor 26 at step 206 , causes the aircraft 20 to change its course away from the off limits facility signal 12 by controlling flight control device 28 .
- the manual control device 30 is overridden and the automatic control device 32 is controlled by the processor 26 so that the flight of the aircraft 20 is completely controlled by the processor 26 and set to a course which is away from the off limits facility 12 .
- the pilot input device 29 is disabled by the processor 26 preventing the pilot from changing the course set by the processor 26 .
- the pilot may be able to input a code into the pilot input device 29 to re-establish control of the aircraft 20 .
- control can be returned to a pilot on board the aircraft 20 , i.e. the pilot on board will be again be able to control the flight and/or course of the aircraft 20 through the pilot input device 29 .
- the processor 26 may determine if the off limits facility signal has a specific frequency or has some other particular characteristic. If the off limits facility signal has a particular characteristic the processor 26 will take control of the aircraft.
- FIG. 3 shows a block diagram of an apparatus 100 in accordance another embodiment of the present invention.
- the apparatus is comprised of an airport 102 and/or its vicinity and an aircraft 110 .
- the airport 102 has a receiver 104 , a transmitter 106 and a take off control device 108 which may be located at the airport 102 or its vicinity.
- the receiver 104 and the transmitter 106 may be electrically connected to the take off control device 108 by busses 108 a and 108 b.
- the aircraft 110 includes a receiver 112 , a transmitter 114 , a processor 116 , a flight control device 118 , and a pilot input device 119 .
- the receiver 112 , transmitter 114 , pilot input device 119 and the flight control device 118 are electrically connected by busses 112 a , 114 a , 116 b , and 116 a , respectively, to the processor 116 .
- the pilot input device 119 may be similar to pilot input device 29 in FIG. 1.
- the pilot input device 119 is also electrically connected to the flight control device 118 by bus 119 a .
- the busses may be any type any type of communication link or connection, such as a wireless, optical or electrical connection.
- FIG. 5 shows a flow chart 300 of a method for use with the apparatus 100 of FIG. 3.
- FIG. 5 includes step 302 , at which the transmitter 114 sends a first aircraft signal over communications link 104 a (which may be the airwaves) to the receiver 104 of the airport 102 .
- the airport 102 receives the first aircraft signal.
- the take off control device 108 determines whether the first aircraft signal is acceptable. The first aircraft signal will be acceptable if it indicates that the processor 116 of the aircraft 110 is in a ready condition so that it will be able to steer the aircraft 110 away from a restricted area or facility. If the first aircraft signal is acceptable, then the aircraft 110 is allowed to take off from the airport 102 at step 308 .
- the airport transmitter 106 sends a stop signal via communications link 106 a (which may be the airwaves) to the receiver 112 of the aircraft 110 .
- the stop signal is interpreted by processor 116 at step 312 and the processor 116 prevents the take off of the aircraft 110 by controlling the flight control device 118 to prevent any flight and by disabling the pilot input device 119 .
- the pilot input device 119 can be enabled after the aircraft 110 has sent an appropriate signal to the airport 102 .
- FIG. 6 shows a block diagram of an aircraft 400 in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention.
- the aircraft 400 is comprised of a GPS (global positioning satellite) receiver 402 , a transmitter 404 , a processor 406 , a pilot input device 407 , and a flight control device 408 .
- the GPS receiver 402 , transmitter 404 , processor 406 , the pilot input device 407 , and the flight control device 408 are electrically connected by busses 402 a , 404 a , 406 b , and 406 a to the processor 406 .
- the pilot input device 407 is electrically connected to the flight control device 408 by the bus 407 a .
- the busses of the present invention generally may be any type of communications link or connection.
- FIG. 7 shows a flow chart 500 of a method for use with the aircraft 400 of FIG. 6.
- a GPS signal is received by the GPS receiver 402 from a satellite.
- the GPS signal typically provides data, which specifies the position of at least the aircraft 400 .
- the GPS signal from the satellite may be provided in response to a signal sent from the aircraft 400 to the satellite via transmitter 404 .
- the transmitter 404 may periodically request an updated GPS signal from the satellite to determine the aircraft's latest or updated position.
- the aircraft processor 406 receives the GPS signal from the GPS receiver 402 and the aircraft processor 406 compares the aircraft 400 current position with known positions of off limits facilities, buildings, aircraft or vehicles.
- Off limit facilities may include military installations, landmarks, nuclear power plants, and other off limits facilities.
- the off limit facilities may include a movable object such as an aircraft or a battleship, if the current position of the movable object is known.
- the aircraft processor 406 changes the course of the aircraft 400 if the aircraft 400 is too close to an off limits facility.
- the aircraft processor 406 would send a signal to the flight control device 408 via bus 406 a to cause the course of the aircraft 400 to change.
- the processor 406 would also disable the pilot input device 407 via bus 406 b so that no person or pilot on board the aircraft 400 could control the aircraft 400 in any manner.
- the pilot input device 407 can be enabled after the aircraft 400 has gone beyond the appropriate distance from the off limits facility.
- receivers 26 , 112 , or 402 , and/or transmitters 24 , 114 , and 404 may be, or may be replaced by a combination transmitter/receiver or transceiver such as a TACAN transceiver (TACAN stands for Tactical Air Navigation System) which may provide both receiving and transmitting functions.
- TACAN type signals may be emitted by the off limits facility 12 , for example, which may be in the form of azimuth signals which can be used by the processor 26 to steer the aircraft 20 via flight control device 28 (or automatic pilot which may be part of flight control device 28 ) to a preselected altitude and speed profile away from the off limits facility 12 .
- U.S. Pat. No. 3,992,613 deals with the processing of such azimuth signals and is incorporated by reference herein.
- U.S. Pat. No. 6,314,366 is also incorporated by reference herein.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
- Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
- Remote Sensing (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- Traffic Control Systems (AREA)
Abstract
A signal is received from an off limits facility and it is determined from the signal whether an aircraft is within a distance of the off limits facility. The course and/or flight of the aircraft is changed if the aircraft is within the distance of the off limits facility. A signal is received from an airport and it is determined from the signal whether an aircraft will be allowed to take off from the airport. The aircraft is prevented from taking off if the signal from the airport indicates that the aircraft should be prevented from taking off. A signal is received from a satellite and it is determined from the signal whether an aircraft is within a distance of an off limits facility. The course and/or flight of the aircraft if the aircraft is changed if the aircraft is within the distance of the off limits facility.
Description
- This invention relates to improved methods and apparatus concerning avoiding disasters as a result of aircraft crashing into off limits facilities.
- Typically in the prior art there are inadequate protections available to prevent an aircraft from crashing intentionally into an off limits facilities. While it is known to provide devices, which help protect aircraft from colliding with other aircraft, such as a device disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,314,366, typically these devices merely provide assistance to pilots who exercise the ultimate control over the flight and course of the aircraft.
- The present invention in one embodiment provides an apparatus comprising a receiver and a processor typically located on an aircraft. The receiver and the processor are connected by a communications link. The receiver receives a signal from an off limits facility and provides the signal to the processor. The processor determines from the signal whether an aircraft is within a distance of the off limits facility and changes a course of the aircraft if the aircraft is within the distance of the off limits facility. The off limits facility may be, for example, a building, a military installation, a nuclear power plant, or a landmark. The off limits facility may be a movable object such as an aircraft or a ship.
- The apparatus may be further comprised of a pilot input device. The pilot input device allows a pilot on the aircraft to change the course of the aircraft when the aircraft is not within the distance of the off limits facility. The processor disables the pilot input device, so that the pilot on the aircraft cannot control the flight and/or the course of the aircraft when the aircraft is within the distance of the off limits facility. The pilot input device may include a device for manually controlling the flight and/or the course of the aircraft and a device for automatically controlling flight and/or the course of the aircraft by setting a course or a flight pattern for an automatic pilot to follow.
- In a further embodiment of the present invention a receiver receives a signal from an airport and provides the signal to a processor. The processor determines from the signal whether an aircraft will be allowed to take off from the airport. The processor prevents the aircraft from taking off, if the signal from the airport indicates that the aircraft should be prevented from taking off. The apparatus may be further comprised of a transmitter. The transmitter may send a signal from the aircraft indicating that the aircraft has an operational device for altering the course of the aircraft when the aircraft is within a distance of an off limits facility.
- In a further embodiment of the present invention an apparatus is provided comprising a global positioning satellite receiver located on an aircraft. The global positioning satellite receiver provides a signal to a processor, which indicates the position of the aircraft. The processor determines from the signal whether the aircraft is within a distance of an off limits facility. The processor changes the flight and/or course of the aircraft if the aircraft is within the distance of the off limits facility.
- The present invention also includes a method comprising the steps of receiving a signal from an off limits facility; determining from the signal whether an aircraft is within a distance of the off limits facility; and changing the course and/or flight of the aircraft if the aircraft is within the distance of the off limits facility. A method is also provided comprising the steps of receiving a signal from an airport; determining from the signal whether an aircraft will be allowed to take off from the airport; and preventing the aircraft from taking off, if the signal from the airport indicates that the aircraft should be prevented from taking off. The present invention also includes a method comprising the steps of receiving a signal from a satellite; determining from the signal whether the aircraft is within a distance of an off limits facility; and changing the course and/or flight of the aircraft if the aircraft is within the distance of the off limits facility.
- FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of an apparatus in accordance with a first embodiment of the present invention;
- FIG. 2 shows a block diagram of a flight control device for use with the embodiment of FIG. 1;
- FIG. 3 shows a block diagram of an apparatus in accordance another embodiment of the present invention;
- FIG. 4 shows a flow chart of a method for use with the apparatus of FIG. 1;
- FIG. 5 shows a flow chart of a method for use with the apparatus of FIG. 3;
- FIG. 6 shows a block diagram of an apparatus in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention; and
- FIG. 7 shows a flow chart of a method for use with the apparatus of FIG. 6.
- FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of an
apparatus 10 in accordance with a first embodiment of the present invention. Theapparatus 10 includes an offlimits facility 12 and anaircraft 20. The offlimits facility 12 has atransmitter 14 associated with the offlimits facility 12 which is located on or in the immediate vicinity of the offlimits facility 12. The offlimits facility 12 may be, for example, a military installation, a landmark, or a nuclear power station. The offlimits facility 12 may be a tall building, such as the Empire State building. The offlimits facility 12 in certain embodiments may also be a movable object such as an aircraft or a ship. - The
aircraft 20 has areceiver 22, atransmitter 24, aprocessor 26, a flight control device 28., and apilot input device 29. Thetransmitter 14 associated with theoff limits facility 12 and thetransmitter 24 of theaircraft 20 may transmit any type of known signal such as electromagnetic, wireless, optical, or radio. Theprocessor 26 may be a typical computer processor. Thereceiver 22 and thetransmitter 24 are electrically connected to theprocessor 26 viabusses processor 26 is electrically connected to theflight control device 28 bybus 26 a. Thepilot input device 29 may be electrically connected to theflight control device 28 bybus 29 a and to the processor bybus 26 b. Thepilot input device 29 may be comprised of any controls typically found on an airplane for allowing a pilot to control the flight of theaircraft 20, such as through manual control or by setting data or a course for an automatic pilot. The electrical connections provided bybusses - The
flight control device 28 may be comprised of amanual control device 30, which is typically used for manually controlling the flight of aircraft and anautomatic control device 32 or automatic pilot, which is also typically used for automatically controlling the flight of aircraft when activated by a pilot of the aircraft. - FIG. 4 shows a flow chart of a method200 for use with the
apparatus 10 of FIG. 1. The method 200 includessteps limits facility 12 or from the general vicinity of the offlimits facility 12. The off limits facility signal travels from thetransmitter 14 to thereceiver 22 via communications link orwireless link 14 a.Wireless link 14 a may merely be the airwaves. - At
step 204 thereceiver 22 of theaircraft 20 in FIG. 1 receives the off limits facility signal. In one embodiment if the off limits facility signal is strong enough, such as of sufficient amplitude, then theprocessor 26, atstep 206, causes theaircraft 20 to change its course away from the offlimits facility signal 12 by controllingflight control device 28. In one embodiment of the present invention, themanual control device 30 is overridden and theautomatic control device 32 is controlled by theprocessor 26 so that the flight of theaircraft 20 is completely controlled by theprocessor 26 and set to a course which is away from the offlimits facility 12. In this embodiment, thepilot input device 29 is disabled by theprocessor 26 preventing the pilot from changing the course set by theprocessor 26. In alternative embodiments the pilot may be able to input a code into thepilot input device 29 to re-establish control of theaircraft 20. After the course and/or flight of theaircraft 20 has been controlled so that theaircraft 20 is again a sufficient distance away from the off limits facility, control can be returned to a pilot on board theaircraft 20, i.e. the pilot on board will be again be able to control the flight and/or course of theaircraft 20 through thepilot input device 29. - In alternative embodiments, the
processor 26 may determine if the off limits facility signal has a specific frequency or has some other particular characteristic. If the off limits facility signal has a particular characteristic theprocessor 26 will take control of the aircraft. - FIG. 3 shows a block diagram of an
apparatus 100 in accordance another embodiment of the present invention. The apparatus is comprised of anairport 102 and/or its vicinity and anaircraft 110. Theairport 102 has areceiver 104, atransmitter 106 and a take offcontrol device 108 which may be located at theairport 102 or its vicinity. Thereceiver 104 and thetransmitter 106 may be electrically connected to the take offcontrol device 108 bybusses - The
aircraft 110 includes areceiver 112, atransmitter 114, aprocessor 116, aflight control device 118, and apilot input device 119. Thereceiver 112,transmitter 114,pilot input device 119 and theflight control device 118 are electrically connected bybusses processor 116. Thepilot input device 119 may be similar topilot input device 29 in FIG. 1. Thepilot input device 119 is also electrically connected to theflight control device 118 bybus 119 a. As for FIG. 1, the busses may be any type any type of communication link or connection, such as a wireless, optical or electrical connection. - FIG. 5 shows a
flow chart 300 of a method for use with theapparatus 100 of FIG. 3. FIG. 5 includesstep 302, at which thetransmitter 114 sends a first aircraft signal over communications link 104 a (which may be the airwaves) to thereceiver 104 of theairport 102. Atstep 304, theairport 102 receives the first aircraft signal. Atstep 306, the take offcontrol device 108 determines whether the first aircraft signal is acceptable. The first aircraft signal will be acceptable if it indicates that theprocessor 116 of theaircraft 110 is in a ready condition so that it will be able to steer theaircraft 110 away from a restricted area or facility. If the first aircraft signal is acceptable, then theaircraft 110 is allowed to take off from theairport 102 atstep 308. - If the first aircraft signal is not acceptable, then the
airport transmitter 106 sends a stop signal via communications link 106 a (which may be the airwaves) to thereceiver 112 of theaircraft 110. The stop signal is interpreted byprocessor 116 atstep 312 and theprocessor 116 prevents the take off of theaircraft 110 by controlling theflight control device 118 to prevent any flight and by disabling thepilot input device 119. Thepilot input device 119 can be enabled after theaircraft 110 has sent an appropriate signal to theairport 102. - FIG. 6 shows a block diagram of an aircraft400 in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention. The aircraft 400 is comprised of a GPS (global positioning satellite)
receiver 402, atransmitter 404, a processor 406, apilot input device 407, and aflight control device 408. TheGPS receiver 402,transmitter 404, processor 406, thepilot input device 407, and theflight control device 408 are electrically connected bybusses pilot input device 407 is electrically connected to theflight control device 408 by thebus 407 a. The busses of the present invention generally may be any type of communications link or connection. - FIG. 7 shows a
flow chart 500 of a method for use with the aircraft 400 of FIG. 6. At step 502 a GPS signal is received by theGPS receiver 402 from a satellite. The GPS signal typically provides data, which specifies the position of at least the aircraft 400. The GPS signal from the satellite may be provided in response to a signal sent from the aircraft 400 to the satellite viatransmitter 404. Thetransmitter 404 may periodically request an updated GPS signal from the satellite to determine the aircraft's latest or updated position. - At
step 504 the aircraft processor 406 receives the GPS signal from theGPS receiver 402 and the aircraft processor 406 compares the aircraft 400 current position with known positions of off limits facilities, buildings, aircraft or vehicles. Off limit facilities may include military installations, landmarks, nuclear power plants, and other off limits facilities. The off limit facilities may include a movable object such as an aircraft or a battleship, if the current position of the movable object is known. - At
step 506 the aircraft processor 406 changes the course of the aircraft 400 if the aircraft 400 is too close to an off limits facility. In order to accomplish this, the aircraft processor 406 would send a signal to theflight control device 408 viabus 406 a to cause the course of the aircraft 400 to change. In at least one embodiment of the present invention, the processor 406 would also disable thepilot input device 407 viabus 406 b so that no person or pilot on board the aircraft 400 could control the aircraft 400 in any manner. Thepilot input device 407 can be enabled after the aircraft 400 has gone beyond the appropriate distance from the off limits facility. - Any one of
receivers transmitters off limits facility 12, for example, which may be in the form of azimuth signals which can be used by theprocessor 26 to steer theaircraft 20 via flight control device 28 (or automatic pilot which may be part of flight control device 28) to a preselected altitude and speed profile away from theoff limits facility 12. U.S. Pat. No. 3,992,613 deals with the processing of such azimuth signals and is incorporated by reference herein. U.S. Pat. No. 6,314,366 is also incorporated by reference herein. - Although the invention has been described by reference to particular illustrative embodiments thereof, many changes and modifications of the invention may become apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. It is therefore intended to include within this patent all such changes and modifications as may reasonably and properly be included within the scope of the present invention's contribution to the art.
Claims (22)
1. An apparatus comprising:
a receiver; and
a processor connected by a communications link to the receiver;
wherein the receiver receives a signal from an off limits facility and provides the signal to the processor;
wherein the processor determines from the signal whether an aircraft is within a distance of the off limits facility;
and wherein the processor changes a course of the aircraft if the aircraft is within the distance of the off limits facility.
2. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein
The off limits facility is a building.
3. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein
The off limits facility is a military installation.
4. The apparatus of claim 1 further comprising
a pilot input device;
wherein the pilot input device allows a pilot on the aircraft to change the course of the aircraft when the aircraft is not within the distance of the off limits facility;
and wherein the processor disables the pilot input device, so that the pilot on the aircraft cannot control the course of the aircraft when the aircraft is within the distance of the off limits facility.
5. The apparatus of claim 4 wherein
the pilot input device includes a device for manually controlling flight of the aircraft and a device for automatically controlling flight of the aircraft by setting a course for an automatic pilot to follow.
6. An apparatus comprising
a receiver; and
a processor connected by a communications link to the receiver;
wherein the receiver receives a signal from an airport and provides the signal to the processor;
wherein the processor determines from the signal whether an aircraft will be allowed to take off from the airport;
and wherein the processor prevents the aircraft from taking off, if the signal from the airport indicates that the aircraft should be prevented from taking off.
7. The apparatus of claim 6 further comprising
a transmitter; and
wherein the transmitter sends a signal from the aircraft indicating that the aircraft has an operational device for altering the course of the aircraft when the aircraft is within a distance of an off limits facility.
8. The apparatus of claim 6 wherein
the processor prevents the aircraft from taking off, at least in part, by disabling a pilot input device so that a pilot on the aircraft cannot control the flight of the aircraft.
9. An apparatus comprising:
a global positioning satellite receiver located on an aircraft; and
a processor connected by a communications link to the receiver;
wherein the global positioning satellite receiver receives a signal from a satellite, wherein the signal indicates the position of the aircraft, and the global positioning satellite receiver provides the signal to the processor;
wherein the processor determines from the signal whether an aircraft is within a distance of an off limits facility;
and wherein the processor changes a course of the aircraft if the aircraft is within the distance of the off limits facility.
10. The apparatus of claim 9 wherein
the off limits facility is a building.
11. The apparatus of claim 9 wherein
the processor prevents a pilot on the aircraft from controlling the flight of the aircraft if the aircraft is within the distance of the off limits facility.
12. A method comprising the steps of:
receiving a signal from an off limits facility;
determining from the signal whether an aircraft is within a distance of the off limits facility;
and changing the course of the aircraft if the aircraft is within the distance of the off limits facility.
13. The method of claim 12 wherein
the off limits facility is a building.
14. The method of claim 12 wherein
the off limits facility is a military installation.
15. The method of claim 12 further comprising:
preventing a pilot on the aircraft from controlling the flight of the aircraft when the aircraft is within the distance of the off limits facility.
16. The method of claim 15 wherein
the pilot is prevented from controlling the flight of the aircraft by disabling a pilot input device which when the aircraft is not within the distance of the off limits facility allows the pilot to control the flight of the aircraft.
17. The method of claim 16
wherein the pilot input device allows the pilot to control the flight of the aircraft either manually or by setting a course for an automatic pilot to follow when the aircraft is not within the distance of the off limits facility.
18. A method comprising the steps of:
receiving a signal from an airport;
determining from the signal whether an aircraft will be allowed to take off from the airport;
preventing the aircraft from taking off, if the signal from the airport indicates that the aircraft should be prevented from taking off.
19. The method of claim 18 further comprising
sending a signal from the aircraft indicating that the aircraft has an operational device for altering the course of the aircraft when the aircraft is within a distance of an off limits facility.
20. A method comprising the steps of
receives a signal from a satellite, wherein the signal can be used to determine a position of an aircraft;
determining from the signal whether the aircraft is within a distance of an off limits facility;
and changing the course of the aircraft if the aircraft is within the distance of the off limits facility.
21. The method of claim 20 further comprising
preventing a pilot on the aircraft from controlling the flight of the aircraft if the aircraft is within the distance of the off limits facility.
22. The method of claim 21 wherein
the step of preventing the pilot on the aircraft from controlling the flight of the aircraft included disabling a flight control device which allows a pilot to control the flight of the aircraft when the aircraft is not within the distance of the off limits facility.
Priority Applications (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/245,619 US20040054472A1 (en) | 2002-09-17 | 2002-09-17 | Controlling aircraft from collisions with off limits facilities |
US10/302,363 US6738694B2 (en) | 2002-09-17 | 2002-11-21 | Remotely controlling a servant aircraft |
US10/753,988 US6915188B2 (en) | 2002-09-17 | 2004-01-08 | Controlling aircraft from collisions with off limits facilities |
US10/754,752 US7035721B2 (en) | 2002-09-17 | 2004-01-09 | Remotely controlling a servant aircraft |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/245,619 US20040054472A1 (en) | 2002-09-17 | 2002-09-17 | Controlling aircraft from collisions with off limits facilities |
Related Child Applications (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/302,363 Continuation-In-Part US6738694B2 (en) | 2002-09-17 | 2002-11-21 | Remotely controlling a servant aircraft |
US10/753,988 Division US6915188B2 (en) | 2002-09-17 | 2004-01-08 | Controlling aircraft from collisions with off limits facilities |
US10/754,752 Continuation-In-Part US7035721B2 (en) | 2002-09-17 | 2004-01-09 | Remotely controlling a servant aircraft |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20040054472A1 true US20040054472A1 (en) | 2004-03-18 |
Family
ID=22927418
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/245,619 Abandoned US20040054472A1 (en) | 2002-09-17 | 2002-09-17 | Controlling aircraft from collisions with off limits facilities |
US10/753,988 Expired - Fee Related US6915188B2 (en) | 2002-09-17 | 2004-01-08 | Controlling aircraft from collisions with off limits facilities |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/753,988 Expired - Fee Related US6915188B2 (en) | 2002-09-17 | 2004-01-08 | Controlling aircraft from collisions with off limits facilities |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US20040054472A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20070273537A1 (en) * | 2006-04-18 | 2007-11-29 | Dolphin International Resources, Llc, | Combined system for tracking offender rehabilitation |
GB2460954B (en) * | 2008-06-20 | 2011-03-02 | David Zammit-Mangion | A method and system for resolving traffic conflicts in take-off and landing |
Citations (18)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4646244A (en) * | 1984-02-02 | 1987-02-24 | Sundstrand Data Control, Inc. | Terrain advisory system |
US5933099A (en) * | 1997-02-19 | 1999-08-03 | Mahon; James | Collision avoidance system |
US5995043A (en) * | 1996-12-06 | 1999-11-30 | The Boeing Company | Aircraft satellite navigation precision-approach system including CDMA datalink |
US6064939A (en) * | 1997-02-27 | 2000-05-16 | Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd. | Individual guidance system for aircraft in an approach control area under automatic dependent surveillance |
US6133867A (en) * | 1998-01-02 | 2000-10-17 | Eberwine; David Brent | Integrated air traffic management and collision avoidance system |
US6161063A (en) * | 1996-06-07 | 2000-12-12 | Sextant Avionique | Method for controlling an aerodyne for the vertical avoidance of a zone |
US6173219B1 (en) * | 1996-06-07 | 2001-01-09 | Sextant Avionique | Method for automatically controlling a vehicle for the lateral avoidance of a fixed zone |
US6185430B1 (en) * | 1997-11-26 | 2001-02-06 | Motorola, Inc. | Voice call group function for a satellite based air traffic control system |
US6199008B1 (en) * | 1998-09-17 | 2001-03-06 | Noegenesis, Inc. | Aviation, terrain and weather display system |
US6282417B1 (en) * | 1998-05-08 | 2001-08-28 | David K. Ward | Communication radio method and apparatus |
US6381538B1 (en) * | 2000-05-26 | 2002-04-30 | Aerotech Research (U.S.A.), Inc. | Vehicle specific hazard estimation, presentation, and route planning based on meteorological and other environmental data |
US6401032B1 (en) * | 1997-05-13 | 2002-06-04 | Scott R. Jamison | Automated touring information systems and methods |
US6456941B1 (en) * | 2001-03-26 | 2002-09-24 | William Gutierrez | System and method for aircraft and watercraft control and collision prevention |
US20030016159A1 (en) * | 2001-07-20 | 2003-01-23 | Stayton Greg T. | Formation surveillance and collision avoidance |
US20030016158A1 (en) * | 2001-07-20 | 2003-01-23 | Aviation Communication & Surveillance Systems, Llc | Integrated surveillance display |
US20030055540A1 (en) * | 2001-09-20 | 2003-03-20 | Hansen James K. | Anti-terrorism aircraft flight control system |
US20030055564A1 (en) * | 2001-09-20 | 2003-03-20 | Tart Keith Raymond | Aircraft control system |
US6708091B2 (en) * | 2002-05-31 | 2004-03-16 | Steven Tsao | Automated terrain awareness and avoidance system |
Family Cites Families (22)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3992613A (en) | 1975-10-03 | 1976-11-16 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | TACAN flying target control system |
US5375058A (en) * | 1991-12-20 | 1994-12-20 | University Of Central Florida | Surface detection system for airports |
US5530440A (en) * | 1992-12-15 | 1996-06-25 | Westinghouse Norden Systems, Inc | Airport surface aircraft locator |
US6314366B1 (en) | 1993-05-14 | 2001-11-06 | Tom S. Farmakis | Satellite based collision avoidance system |
US5714948A (en) * | 1993-05-14 | 1998-02-03 | Worldwide Notifications Systems, Inc. | Satellite based aircraft traffic control system |
US5983161A (en) | 1993-08-11 | 1999-11-09 | Lemelson; Jerome H. | GPS vehicle collision avoidance warning and control system and method |
US5493309A (en) * | 1993-09-24 | 1996-02-20 | Motorola, Inc. | Collison avoidance communication system and method |
JP2786809B2 (en) | 1994-03-08 | 1998-08-13 | 株式会社トキメック | Ship navigation support device |
JP2801883B2 (en) * | 1996-03-29 | 1998-09-21 | 運輸省船舶技術研究所長 | Aircraft control support system |
JP3344923B2 (en) | 1997-04-14 | 2002-11-18 | 住友電気工業株式会社 | Initial correction device in tire pressure drop detection device |
US6278965B1 (en) * | 1998-06-04 | 2001-08-21 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration | Real-time surface traffic adviser |
US6392692B1 (en) * | 1999-02-25 | 2002-05-21 | David A. Monroe | Network communication techniques for security surveillance and safety system |
US6545601B1 (en) * | 1999-02-25 | 2003-04-08 | David A. Monroe | Ground based security surveillance system for aircraft and other commercial vehicles |
US6262679B1 (en) * | 1999-04-08 | 2001-07-17 | Honeywell International Inc. | Midair collision avoidance system |
US6381541B1 (en) * | 2000-11-06 | 2002-04-30 | Lance Richard Sadler | Airplane ground location methods and systems |
US20040078118A1 (en) * | 2000-12-15 | 2004-04-22 | Jurgen Binder | Method and device for monitoring equipment |
US6606563B2 (en) * | 2001-03-06 | 2003-08-12 | Honeywell International Inc. | Incursion alerting system |
US6897790B2 (en) * | 2001-09-11 | 2005-05-24 | Kevin Orton | Aircraft flight security system and method |
US6584383B2 (en) * | 2001-09-28 | 2003-06-24 | Pippenger Phillip Mckinney | Anti-hijacking security system and apparatus for aircraft |
US6614397B2 (en) * | 2001-11-14 | 2003-09-02 | The Boeing Company | Wrong runway alert system and method |
US20030135327A1 (en) * | 2002-01-11 | 2003-07-17 | Seymour Levine | Low cost inertial navigator |
US6943701B2 (en) * | 2002-06-06 | 2005-09-13 | Advanced American Enterprises, Llc | Vehicular safety system and method |
-
2002
- 2002-09-17 US US10/245,619 patent/US20040054472A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2004
- 2004-01-08 US US10/753,988 patent/US6915188B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (18)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4646244A (en) * | 1984-02-02 | 1987-02-24 | Sundstrand Data Control, Inc. | Terrain advisory system |
US6161063A (en) * | 1996-06-07 | 2000-12-12 | Sextant Avionique | Method for controlling an aerodyne for the vertical avoidance of a zone |
US6173219B1 (en) * | 1996-06-07 | 2001-01-09 | Sextant Avionique | Method for automatically controlling a vehicle for the lateral avoidance of a fixed zone |
US5995043A (en) * | 1996-12-06 | 1999-11-30 | The Boeing Company | Aircraft satellite navigation precision-approach system including CDMA datalink |
US5933099A (en) * | 1997-02-19 | 1999-08-03 | Mahon; James | Collision avoidance system |
US6064939A (en) * | 1997-02-27 | 2000-05-16 | Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd. | Individual guidance system for aircraft in an approach control area under automatic dependent surveillance |
US6401032B1 (en) * | 1997-05-13 | 2002-06-04 | Scott R. Jamison | Automated touring information systems and methods |
US6185430B1 (en) * | 1997-11-26 | 2001-02-06 | Motorola, Inc. | Voice call group function for a satellite based air traffic control system |
US6133867A (en) * | 1998-01-02 | 2000-10-17 | Eberwine; David Brent | Integrated air traffic management and collision avoidance system |
US6282417B1 (en) * | 1998-05-08 | 2001-08-28 | David K. Ward | Communication radio method and apparatus |
US6199008B1 (en) * | 1998-09-17 | 2001-03-06 | Noegenesis, Inc. | Aviation, terrain and weather display system |
US6381538B1 (en) * | 2000-05-26 | 2002-04-30 | Aerotech Research (U.S.A.), Inc. | Vehicle specific hazard estimation, presentation, and route planning based on meteorological and other environmental data |
US6456941B1 (en) * | 2001-03-26 | 2002-09-24 | William Gutierrez | System and method for aircraft and watercraft control and collision prevention |
US20030016159A1 (en) * | 2001-07-20 | 2003-01-23 | Stayton Greg T. | Formation surveillance and collision avoidance |
US20030016158A1 (en) * | 2001-07-20 | 2003-01-23 | Aviation Communication & Surveillance Systems, Llc | Integrated surveillance display |
US20030055540A1 (en) * | 2001-09-20 | 2003-03-20 | Hansen James K. | Anti-terrorism aircraft flight control system |
US20030055564A1 (en) * | 2001-09-20 | 2003-03-20 | Tart Keith Raymond | Aircraft control system |
US6708091B2 (en) * | 2002-05-31 | 2004-03-16 | Steven Tsao | Automated terrain awareness and avoidance system |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20040193335A1 (en) | 2004-09-30 |
US6915188B2 (en) | 2005-07-05 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CA2261265C (en) | Integrity monitoring method and apparatus for gps and dgps receivers | |
US8437956B2 (en) | Unmanned aerial system position reporting system and related methods | |
KR101732357B1 (en) | System and method for controlling landing and takeoff of dron | |
US6950036B2 (en) | Station identification for a local area augmentation system on a visual display | |
RU2692306C2 (en) | Tracking system for unmanned aerial vehicles | |
US20180026705A1 (en) | Communications system for use with unmanned aerial vehicles | |
US6654687B1 (en) | System and method for aircraft and watercraft control and collision prevention | |
US6381541B1 (en) | Airplane ground location methods and systems | |
US6708090B2 (en) | Method, apparatus and computer program product for managing line-of-sight communications | |
US7256728B1 (en) | Aircraft avoidance system for prohibiting an aircraft from entering an exclusion zone | |
US20080065275A1 (en) | Method and system for controlling manned and unmanned aircraft using speech recognition tools | |
US10991260B2 (en) | Intelligent non-disruptive automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast (ADS-B) integration for unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) | |
RU2005103593A (en) | AERONAUTICAL ELECTRONICS SYSTEM AND A TERRESTRIAL STATION FOR MANAGING DEPARTURED FROM THE ROUTE BY THE AIRCRAFT AND FOR SECURING AN EMERGENCY COMMUNICATION | |
US6738694B2 (en) | Remotely controlling a servant aircraft | |
JP6544415B2 (en) | Control method of control system for satellite positioning utilizing vehicle | |
US7035721B2 (en) | Remotely controlling a servant aircraft | |
US8812223B2 (en) | Systems and methods for alerting aircraft crew members of a runway assignment for an aircraft takeoff sequence | |
US6915188B2 (en) | Controlling aircraft from collisions with off limits facilities | |
EP3018834B1 (en) | Systems for and methods of providing indicators useful for piloting an aircraft | |
CA3007560A1 (en) | Autonomous distress tracking device | |
Kunze et al. | Concept for a Geo-Awareness-System for Civilian Unmanned Aerial Systems | |
US20030182060A1 (en) | Device and system for preventing collision of aircraft | |
JPH05166100A (en) | Airport control system | |
US11222547B2 (en) | Intelligent non-disruptive automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast (ADS-B) integration for unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) | |
US20110032124A1 (en) | Taxiway aircraft location monitoring system |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |