WO1985000356A1 - Method for producing glass fiber - Google Patents

Method for producing glass fiber Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1985000356A1
WO1985000356A1 PCT/US1984/000592 US8400592W WO8500356A1 WO 1985000356 A1 WO1985000356 A1 WO 1985000356A1 US 8400592 W US8400592 W US 8400592W WO 8500356 A1 WO8500356 A1 WO 8500356A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
rotor
superalloy
fibers
orifices
spinner
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US1984/000592
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Inventor
Mohinder Singh Bhatti
Original Assignee
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US06/513,890 external-priority patent/US4511383A/en
Priority claimed from US06/513,894 external-priority patent/US4518408A/en
Application filed by Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation filed Critical Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation
Publication of WO1985000356A1 publication Critical patent/WO1985000356A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C03GLASS; MINERAL OR SLAG WOOL
    • C03BMANUFACTURE, SHAPING, OR SUPPLEMENTARY PROCESSES
    • C03B37/00Manufacture or treatment of flakes, fibres, or filaments from softened glass, minerals, or slags
    • C03B37/01Manufacture of glass fibres or filaments
    • C03B37/04Manufacture of glass fibres or filaments by using centrifugal force, e.g. spinning through radial orifices; Construction of the spinner cups therefor
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C03GLASS; MINERAL OR SLAG WOOL
    • C03BMANUFACTURE, SHAPING, OR SUPPLEMENTARY PROCESSES
    • C03B37/00Manufacture or treatment of flakes, fibres, or filaments from softened glass, minerals, or slags
    • C03B37/01Manufacture of glass fibres or filaments
    • C03B37/04Manufacture of glass fibres or filaments by using centrifugal force, e.g. spinning through radial orifices; Construction of the spinner cups therefor
    • C03B37/047Selection of materials for the spinner cups
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C03GLASS; MINERAL OR SLAG WOOL
    • C03BMANUFACTURE, SHAPING, OR SUPPLEMENTARY PROCESSES
    • C03B37/00Manufacture or treatment of flakes, fibres, or filaments from softened glass, minerals, or slags
    • C03B37/08Bushings, e.g. construction, bushing reinforcement means; Spinnerettes; Nozzles; Nozzle plates
    • C03B37/0805Manufacturing, repairing, or other treatment of bushings, nozzles or bushing nozzle plates

Definitions

  • the invention disclosed herein relates to the centrifugal production of glass fibers or filaments by post fabrication treatment of the spinner to improve the physical attributes of the spinner ana to improve the quality of the glass filaments produced thereby.
  • the requirements for the rotor alloys include nigh temperature strength and creep resistance as well as oxidation resistance and corrosion resistance to molten glass.
  • the strongest alloys generally exhibit poor corrosion resistance, and the more corrosion resistant alloys are, as a practical matter, limited to service in the fiberization of traditional insulation forming glasses which generally exhibit a low fiberization temperature, i.e., glasses having a liquidus temperature of less than about 971°C (1780°F) and a viscosity of about 316 poise at 1199°C (2190°F) or less.
  • some of the present rotors exhibit a 20-40 hour (or more) break-in period. During the break-in period, the fibers produced from such spinners are generally brashy and of low quality. Also, an objectionable amount of dust is produced during the break-in period which, along with the low quality fibers, produce a glass wool mat or pack having a lower thermal resistance than that of a dust free, high quality fiber wool pack.
  • This invention pertains to a method of producing glass fibers wherein the spinner employed in a rotary process is subjected to post fabrication treatments of hot isostatic pressing and/or electropolishing to improve the properties and performance of the rotor and to improve the quality of the glass fibers and glass fiber pack produced therefrom.
  • FIG. 1 is a semi-schematic, front elevational view of a rotary fiber-forming system for producing glass wool.
  • FIG. 2 is an enlarged cross-sectional view of the spinner shown in FIG. 1.
  • FIG. 3 is a photograph of the mi crostructure of a cross-section of a standard or "untreated” spinner.
  • FIG. 4 is a photograph of the microstructure of a spinner of the same alloy composition as that shown in FIG. 3 which has been treated by hot isostatic pressing (HIP) according to the principles of this invention.
  • HIP hot isostatic pressing
  • FIG. 5 is a histogram of the fiber diameter distribution produced on a standard spinner after 20 minutes of operation.
  • FIG. 6 is a histogram of the fiber diameter distribution produced by spinner receiving a HIP treatment according to tna principles of this invention after 20 minutes of operation.
  • FIG. 7 is a histogram of the fiber diameter distribution produced on a standard spinner after 100 hours of operation.
  • FIG. 8 is a histogram of the fiber diameter distribution produced by spinner receiving a HIP treatment after 100 hours of operation.
  • FIG. 9 is a photograph of a portion of a pack of glass fibers produced on a standard or untreated spinner after 15 minutes of operation.
  • FIG. 10 is a photograph of a portion of a mat or pack of glass fibers produced on an electropolished spinner according to tha principles of this invention after 15 minutes of operation.
  • FIG. 11 is a histogram of the fiber diameter distribution produced on a standard spinner after 15 minutes of operation.
  • FIG. 12 is a nistogram of the fiber diameter distribution produced by a spinner receiving an electropolishing treatment according to the principles of this invention after 15 minutes of operation.
  • rotary or centrifugal fiberforming system 40 is comprised of a flow means or channel 42 having a body of molten inorganic material 44, such as glass, therein.
  • a stream of molten glass 46 is supplied to the rotor or spinner 50 from channel 42, as is known in the art.
  • Spinner 50 which is adapted to be rotated at high speeds is comprised of a quill 52 and a circumferential stream defining or working wall 54 having a plurality of orifices 55 therethrough to supply plurality of pre-filament or primary streams of molten and inorganic material to be fiberized.
  • a shroud 56 and circumferential blower or fluid attenuation means 57 a r e adapted to fluidically assist in the attenuation of the streams of molten material into fibers or filaments 60.
  • a binder material or coating may be applied to the fibers 50 by means of binder applicators 58 as is known in the art.
  • the fibers than may be collected as a pack or mat to produce "wool" type glass fiber insulation.
  • spinner 50 receives a post-fabrication treatment (i.e., a treatment subsequent to the formation of the thousands of orifices 55 in the circumferential wall 54) of hot isostatic pressing and/or electropolishing to improve the physical properties and performance of the spinner and/or improve the quality of tne fibers and wool pack produced therefrom.
  • a post-fabrication treatment i.e., a treatment subsequent to the formation of the thousands of orifices 55 in the circumferential wall 54
  • the alloy may be HIP'd prior to the formation of orifices 55, if desired, to achieve the strengthening of the alloy.
  • Rotor 50 may be of any of the alloys conventionally employed in a rotary fiber forming process such as a cobalt (Co) based superalloy, or nickel (Ni) based superalloy or iron (Fe) based suberalloy which contain carbon and carbide formers.
  • Exemplary carbide formers are tungsten (W), chromium (Cr), vanadium (Va), tantalum (Ta), hafnium (Hf), zirconium (Zr) and titanium
  • the rotor is a nickel based superalloy or a cobalt based superalloy with the latter being preferred.
  • the HIP treatment of such superalloys provides a mechanically stronger spinner having greater high-temperature service capability than an un-HIP'd spinner of the same alloy composition. With such improved high-temperature service capabilities, HIP treated spinners are capable of fiberizing not only traditional insulation forming glasses but also glasses which are of a higher liquidus temperature and of higher viscosity. The service life of un-HIP'd spinners on such higher liquidus glasses is unacceptably brief.
  • the improved high-temperature strengtn is provided by redistribution of the metallic carbides in the alloys through precipitation hardening.
  • the metallic carbides precipitate along grain boundaries to provide grain boundary locking to reduce the amount of dislocation movement.
  • Merely heating the rotor does not produce tne tight, regular network of precipitated carbides as can be seen in FIG. 4.
  • FIGS. 3 and 4 are photos of enlarged cross-sections of spinners fabricated from a cobalt based superalloy containing about 45% cobalt (Co), 31% chromium (Cr), 12% nickel (N1) and containing lessor amounts of tungsten (W), tantalum (Ta), carbon (C), silicon (Si), zirconium (Zr), and boron (8).
  • FIG. 3 shows the m icroscructure of an unused and un-HIP'd spinner of such an alloy
  • FIG. 4 shows the mi crostructure of an unused spinner after HIP treatment at 1204oC (2200°F) and 103.42 MPa (15,000 psi) for two hours.
  • the pressure applied during the HIP'ing treatment snould be greater than the yield strength of the material at that temperature to render the orifices in the rotor wall more uniform and to provide the strength improvement in the material itself.
  • temperatures within the range from about 1093 to 1204oC (2000 to 2200oF) pressures within the range from about 68.95 M P a (10,000 psi) to about 206.84 MPa (30,000 psi), and times of about 1 to about 4 nours are exemplary to produce the metallurgical changes and orifice uniformity improvement heretofore discussed.
  • the HIP chamber is purged of its working fluid, usually an inert gas such as argon, and tne oxygen containing atmosphere is permitted to enter tne HIP chamber. Since the spinners a re still extremely hot, it is believed the oxygen in the air reacts with the surface of the al.loy to form a thin metallic oxide coating thereon, including the walls of the orifices themselves. For example, for the aforementioned cobalt base alloy, which contains Cr, an oxide of Cr is believed formed, which is less susceptible to the corrosive attack of the molten glass.
  • FIGS. 5 and 6 show the percent frequency distribution of filaments produced, from traditional insulation forming glasses, after 20 minutes of operation from HIP'd and un-HIP'd spinners of the aforementioned cobalt based superalloy.
  • FIG. 5 shows the fiber diameter distribution produced from tne untreated spinner. Analysis indicates that the mean fiber diameter collected was 5.9 microns, and the standard deviation therefrom was 4.8 microns.
  • the fiber diameter distribution of the HIP treated spinner is shown in FIG. 6, with a mean fiber diameter of 4.1 microns, and a standard deviation therefrom of 4.3 microns. With each of these spinners being fabricated essentially identical to one another, with the exception of the HIP treatment, it can be seen that the diameter of the fibers produced from the HIP'd spinners are more uniform than the un-HIP'd spinners.
  • FIGS. 7 and 8 are similar percent frequency histograms of the fiber diameters produced by HIP'd and un-HIP'd spinners after 100 hours of operation employing traditional insulation forming glasses.
  • FIG. 7 shows the fiber distribution produced from standard or un-HIP'd spinner of the aforementioned cobalt base super alloy. The fibers produced therefrom had a mean fiber diameter of 7.64 microns with a standard deviation of 5.13 microns.
  • FIG. 8 shows the fiber distribution of filaments produced on a substantially identical spinner to that represented in FIG. 7, witn the exception of a post-fabrication HIP treatment according to the principles of this invention.
  • the fibers produced therefrom had a mean diameter of 5.69 microns with a standard deviation of 3.75 microns.
  • the diameter of the fibers produced by the HIP'd spinner are more uniform than the fibers produced on the untreated spinner.
  • measurements of orifice diameters taken at selected sections along a spinner wall before and after HIP treatment also show that the hole diameters are rendered more uniform as a result of the HIP treatment.
  • orifice diameters were rendered smaller after HIP'ing from about 0.0 cm (0.0") (i.e., no change) to about 0.00254 cm (0.001"), with an average orifice diameter decrease of about 3% being observed.
  • fibers having a narrower diameter distribution are produced as represented in the comparisons provided in FIGS. 5 through. 8. It is also interesting to note that the HIP treated spinners produced fewer larger diameter filaments which accounts in part, at least, for the reduction in the mean fiber diameter for such spinners.
  • the untreated specimens had a creep rate of 6.6 x 10 -4 cm per cm per hour whereas the HIP treated specimens had a creep rate of 4.2 x 10 -4 cm per cm per hour.
  • HIP treated spinners had approximately an 18 percent reduction in hole wear as compared to the standard or un-HIP'd spinners of the aforementioned cobalt base superalloy.
  • Such a reduction in hole wear may be based in part on the toughening of the metal itself and in part based upon the formation of an oxide coating on the alloy surface as a result of the HIP treatment process as discussed previously herein.
  • the k-value or thermal conductance of the insulation pack produced by the HIP treated spinner is lower than that produced by the un-HIP'd spinner.
  • An explanation may be found in the fact that for the HIP'd spinner the fiber distribution parameter or (which actually is the standard deviation from the mean fiber diameter) has a lower value. This reduces the equivalent radiation conductivity k rad for the pack.
  • FIGS. 5 through 8 clearly indicate that for the HIP'd spinner, has a lower value.
  • electropolishing as a post-fabrication treatment (i.e., after the orifices 55 are formed in rotor 50) has been shown to (a) virtually eliminate any break-in period normally associated with such spinners and to (b) provide a glass fiber pack of improved quality.
  • Electropolishing which is the opposite of the electroplating process, is particularly effective since electropolishing preferentially attacks or dissolves the sharp edges or discontinuities in the orifices or at the edges of the orifices, which occur as a result of the orifice formation process.
  • the electrolytic cell was suitably filled with an electrolyte composition of 75.76 percent (by volume) methonol, 15.15 percent phosphoric acid (H 3 PO 4 ), and 9.09 percent sulfuric acid (H 2 SO 4 ), and energized to suitably polish the orifices of the spinner.
  • Current density is desirably held within the range from about 0.11 amps/cm 2 to about 0.14 amp/cm 2 for about 30 minutes. Typically, times may vary, but they usually fall within the range from about 10 minutes to about 50 minutes for suitable polishing to take place.
  • the spinner should be thoroughly cleaned of any residue and/or foreign material by means of solvent washing and/or vapor honing and the like to achieve the maximum electropolishing rate.
  • the electropolished spinners immediately began producing glass fibers having a surface smoothness or texture similar to that produced by seasoned spinners, without the electropolishing treatment. It is known that new standard or untreated spinners generally produce mats of glass fibers having a brasny feel. Such an undesirable brashy feel dissipates as the spinner is seasoned during operation. In addition, the el ectropol ished spinners produced a pack of fibers that has a significantly reduced dust content as compared to unpolished, new spinners.
  • FIG. 9 is a pnoto of a mat or pack of glass fibers produced from a standard or untreated spinner after 15 minutes of operation. It is clear that there are a number of ultrafine fibers in the pack, a number of which are fused or bonded to tne surface of the larger diameter fibers.
  • FIG. 10 is an enlarged photo of a Dack of glass fibers produced on a spinner after receiving the post fabrication electropolishing treatment. Clearly, the number of ultrafine filaments is substantially reduced.
  • spinners associated with FIGS. 9-12 such soinners were of the aforementioned cobalt-based superalloy, and the photos and histograms are based upon samples taken approximately after 15 minutes of operation.
  • FIG. 11 is a histogram of the percent frequency distribution of the filament diameters produced by standard or untreated spinner
  • FIG. 12 is a Histogram of the percent frequency distribution of the filament diameters produced by an electropoIished spinner according to the principles of this invention.
  • the percentage of the fibers having a diameter of 1 micron or less, (i.e. those in the submicron range) are substantially reduced.
  • the number of filaments in the range from 0 to 3 microns are also substantially reduced.
  • Tne fibers produced from the electrobolished spinner exhibited a mean filament diameter of 6.94 microns with a standard deviation therefrom of 5.04 microns.
  • an analysis of product samples indicates that the standard spinners produce a wool pack having submicron filaments which comprise from about 2 to about 4.4 percent of the mat or pack.
  • the electropolished spinners produced a pack of glass fibers having from about .4 to about 2.8 percent filaments in the submicron range.
  • the standard spinner produced a pack of glass fibers having from about 18.8 to about 27.3 percent filaments having a diameter of 3 microns or less.
  • the electropolished spinner produced a pack of glass fibers naving from about 15.3 to about 25.2 percent filaments having a diameter of 3 microns or less.
  • the pack does not exhibit the same brashy feel to the touch as exhibited by the untreated spinner at startup.
  • the reduction of the ultrafine and submicron diameter filaments contributes in large part to the reduction in the "dust" produced by untreated spinners.
  • the quality of the glass filaments and pack produced from such spinners is surprisingly and significantly improved by the application of an electropolishing treatment to the fabricated spinner prior to operation of the spinner for the production of fibers.
  • the k-value of the insulation pack is also decreased since the fiber distribution parameter is decreased as a result of the electropolishing treatment.
  • the thermal resistance of the pack increased as compared to a pack produced employing non-electropolished spinners.
  • the not isostatic pressing treatment and the electropolishing treatment may be used alone or desirably in combination with one another to achieve tne various benefits noted herein.
  • the electropolishing treatment precede the HIP'ing treatment for maximum benefit. Otherwise, the surface discontinuities and sharp edges may be more difficult to remove by electropolishing if the HIP'ing treatment precedes the electropolishing treatment.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Inorganic Fibers (AREA)
  • Manufacture, Treatment Of Glass Fibers (AREA)
PCT/US1984/000592 1983-07-14 1984-04-16 Method for producing glass fiber WO1985000356A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US51388683A 1983-07-14 1983-07-14
US513,886 1983-07-14
US513,890 1983-07-14
US06/513,890 US4511383A (en) 1983-07-14 1983-07-14 Method for producing glass fiber
US513,894 1983-07-14
US06/513,894 US4518408A (en) 1983-07-14 1983-07-14 Method for producing glass fiber

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1985000356A1 true WO1985000356A1 (en) 1985-01-31

Family

ID=27414561

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US1984/000592 WO1985000356A1 (en) 1983-07-14 1984-04-16 Method for producing glass fiber

Country Status (7)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0148848A1 (ko)
KR (1) KR850001126A (ko)
AU (1) AU2860684A (ko)
CA (1) CA1203382A (ko)
EG (1) EG16094A (ko)
IT (1) IT1176206B (ko)
WO (1) WO1985000356A1 (ko)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR101854648B1 (ko) 2016-05-04 2018-06-20 한국세라믹기술원 생체활성 유리 패브릭형 골 형성체 및 그 제조방법
KR102005757B1 (ko) 2017-06-02 2019-07-31 한국세라믹기술원 생체활성 유리 섬유를 이용한 구조체용 생체 세라믹 및 그 제조방법
KR102000455B1 (ko) 2017-06-02 2019-07-16 한국세라믹기술원 생체활성 유리 섬유가 포함된 패브릭형 골 형성체 및 그 제조방법

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2086942A (en) * 1980-11-07 1982-05-19 Amfu Ltd Coating Fine Bores by Laser Beam Melting
US4342578A (en) * 1981-04-20 1982-08-03 Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation Method of forming apparatus for forming glass fibers
US4343636A (en) * 1981-04-20 1982-08-10 Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation Method and apparatus for forming glass fibers

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2086942A (en) * 1980-11-07 1982-05-19 Amfu Ltd Coating Fine Bores by Laser Beam Melting
US4342578A (en) * 1981-04-20 1982-08-03 Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation Method of forming apparatus for forming glass fibers
US4343636A (en) * 1981-04-20 1982-08-10 Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation Method and apparatus for forming glass fibers

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU2860684A (en) 1985-02-07
EP0148848A1 (en) 1985-07-24
IT1176206B (it) 1987-08-18
EG16094A (en) 1988-10-31
IT8421090A0 (it) 1984-05-24
CA1203382A (en) 1986-04-22
KR850001126A (ko) 1985-03-16
IT8421090A1 (it) 1985-11-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0317579B1 (en) Glass corrosion resistant cobalt-based alloy having high strength
US4511383A (en) Method for producing glass fiber
CN111118493A (zh) 一种钛合金表面含铜钛基耐磨激光熔覆层及其制备方法
US4518408A (en) Method for producing glass fiber
US4668265A (en) Corrosion resistant cobalt-base alloy and method of making fibers
CN110340343A (zh) 采用prep tc4粉末的激光熔化沉积增材制造及热处理方法
WO1985000356A1 (en) Method for producing glass fiber
US4904290A (en) Cobalt based alloys with critical carbon content for making and using in glass fiber production
KR20210060452A (ko) 섬유-형성 플레이트를 위한 합금
CA2159432C (en) Processes for preparing milled graphite fibers
JP4731645B2 (ja) 超硬合金および被覆超硬合金とその製造方法
US4765817A (en) Corrosion resistant cobalt-base alloy containing hafnium
US4668266A (en) Corrosion resistant cobalt-base alloy having a high chromium content and method of making fibers
US4767432A (en) Corrosion resistant cobalt-base alloy containing hafnium and a high proportion of chromium
JP4537501B2 (ja) 超硬合金およびその製造方法
US4305761A (en) Ni-base Eutectic alloy article and heat treatment
CN114250519A (zh) 降低高铼镍基单晶高温合金固溶孔洞含量固溶热处理方法
JPH0577737B2 (ko)
US4761169A (en) Corrosion resistant cobalt-base alloy containing hafnium and a high proportion of chromium and method of making fibers
Johnson et al. Microstructure and fatigue of a Ni, Cr, Al-TaC eutectic composite
JPH09195002A (ja) 継目無管製造用プラグおよび継目無管の製造方法
Lee et al. The Effects of Internal Stresses in Electrodeposited Nickel and Nickel-Cobalt Alloys on the Fatigue Properties of Mild Steel
Ovcharenko et al. Reinforcement of nickel with carbide-coated carbon fibers
JPH03193848A (ja) 耐摩耗性ロール及びその製造法
JP2735570B2 (ja) 高強度焼結高速度鋼及びその製造方法

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Designated state(s): AU DK FI JP NO

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB NL SE