USH2140H1 - Bio-oxidation process and apparatus - Google Patents
Bio-oxidation process and apparatus Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- USH2140H1 USH2140H1 US09/831,579 US83157902A USH2140H US H2140 H1 USH2140 H1 US H2140H1 US 83157902 A US83157902 A US 83157902A US H2140 H USH2140 H US H2140H
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- reactor
- slurry
- diffuser
- oxidation
- metals
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 238000007254 oxidation reaction Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 59
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 55
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 52
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 48
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 48
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 38
- 230000001580 bacterial effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 36
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 32
- QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N atomic oxygen Chemical compound [O] QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 29
- 229910052760 oxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 29
- 239000001301 oxygen Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 29
- 238000000605 extraction Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 27
- 238000005273 aeration Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 24
- 239000000725 suspension Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 24
- 150000002739 metals Chemical class 0.000 claims abstract description 15
- 230000035899 viability Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 239000002002 slurry Substances 0.000 claims description 70
- 241000894006 Bacteria Species 0.000 claims description 43
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 claims description 14
- CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon dioxide Chemical compound O=C=O CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 10
- CWYNVVGOOAEACU-UHFFFAOYSA-N Fe2+ Chemical compound [Fe+2] CWYNVVGOOAEACU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000001569 carbon dioxide Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 229910002092 carbon dioxide Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 5
- 235000012489 doughnuts Nutrition 0.000 claims description 5
- 244000005700 microbiome Species 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000010970 precious metal Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 241000589921 Leptospirillum ferrooxidans Species 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000004888 barrier function Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000010953 base metal Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000001737 promoting effect Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 229910052761 rare earth metal Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 2
- 150000002910 rare earth metals Chemical class 0.000 claims description 2
- 241000605118 Thiobacillus Species 0.000 claims 1
- 239000012141 concentrate Substances 0.000 description 48
- 229910052500 inorganic mineral Inorganic materials 0.000 description 45
- 235000010755 mineral Nutrition 0.000 description 45
- 239000011707 mineral Substances 0.000 description 45
- PXHVJJICTQNCMI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Nickel Chemical compound [Ni] PXHVJJICTQNCMI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 42
- 230000003647 oxidation Effects 0.000 description 41
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 25
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 25
- HCHKCACWOHOZIP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Zinc Chemical compound [Zn] HCHKCACWOHOZIP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 23
- 229910052725 zinc Inorganic materials 0.000 description 23
- 239000011701 zinc Substances 0.000 description 23
- 229910052759 nickel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 21
- RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Copper Chemical compound [Cu] RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 20
- 229910052802 copper Inorganic materials 0.000 description 20
- 239000010949 copper Substances 0.000 description 20
- 239000012528 membrane Substances 0.000 description 19
- 239000002585 base Substances 0.000 description 18
- 229910017052 cobalt Inorganic materials 0.000 description 17
- 239000010941 cobalt Substances 0.000 description 17
- GUTLYIVDDKVIGB-UHFFFAOYSA-N cobalt atom Chemical compound [Co] GUTLYIVDDKVIGB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 17
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 17
- CSNNHWWHGAXBCP-UHFFFAOYSA-L Magnesium sulfate Chemical compound [Mg+2].[O-][S+2]([O-])([O-])[O-] CSNNHWWHGAXBCP-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 16
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 16
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 15
- UCKMPCXJQFINFW-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulphide Chemical compound [S-2] UCKMPCXJQFINFW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 12
- 238000013019 agitation Methods 0.000 description 11
- 238000002386 leaching Methods 0.000 description 11
- NINIDFKCEFEMDL-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulfur Chemical compound [S] NINIDFKCEFEMDL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 10
- 239000005864 Sulphur Substances 0.000 description 10
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 10
- 235000015097 nutrients Nutrition 0.000 description 10
- 150000004763 sulfides Chemical class 0.000 description 9
- BFNBIHQBYMNNAN-UHFFFAOYSA-N ammonium sulfate Chemical compound N.N.OS(O)(=O)=O BFNBIHQBYMNNAN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 8
- 229910052921 ammonium sulfate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 8
- 239000001166 ammonium sulphate Substances 0.000 description 8
- 235000011130 ammonium sulphate Nutrition 0.000 description 8
- PCHJSUWPFVWCPO-UHFFFAOYSA-N gold Chemical compound [Au] PCHJSUWPFVWCPO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 8
- 229910052737 gold Inorganic materials 0.000 description 8
- 239000010931 gold Substances 0.000 description 8
- 229910052943 magnesium sulfate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 8
- 235000019341 magnesium sulphate Nutrition 0.000 description 8
- QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulfuric acid Chemical compound OS(O)(=O)=O QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 7
- 238000001816 cooling Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000000227 grinding Methods 0.000 description 7
- 239000001117 sulphuric acid Substances 0.000 description 7
- 235000011149 sulphuric acid Nutrition 0.000 description 7
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 7
- LWIHDJKSTIGBAC-UHFFFAOYSA-K tripotassium phosphate Chemical compound [K+].[K+].[K+].[O-]P([O-])([O-])=O LWIHDJKSTIGBAC-UHFFFAOYSA-K 0.000 description 7
- XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N Iron Chemical compound [Fe] XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 239000002253 acid Substances 0.000 description 6
- 239000002054 inoculum Substances 0.000 description 6
- 229910052683 pyrite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 6
- NIFIFKQPDTWWGU-UHFFFAOYSA-N pyrite Chemical compound [Fe+2].[S-][S-] NIFIFKQPDTWWGU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 239000011028 pyrite Substances 0.000 description 6
- 241000605222 Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans Species 0.000 description 5
- 241000605272 Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans Species 0.000 description 5
- MJLGNAGLHAQFHV-UHFFFAOYSA-N arsenopyrite Chemical compound [S-2].[Fe+3].[As-] MJLGNAGLHAQFHV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 5
- 229910052976 metal sulfide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 5
- PWHULOQIROXLJO-UHFFFAOYSA-N Manganese Chemical compound [Mn] PWHULOQIROXLJO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 229910052964 arsenopyrite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- 229910052951 chalcopyrite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- DVRDHUBQLOKMHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N chalcopyrite Chemical compound [S-2].[S-2].[Fe+2].[Cu+2] DVRDHUBQLOKMHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 4
- 229910052748 manganese Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- 239000011572 manganese Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000004033 plastic Substances 0.000 description 4
- 229920003023 plastic Polymers 0.000 description 4
- 229920000642 polymer Polymers 0.000 description 4
- 239000011148 porous material Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 4
- 229910052950 sphalerite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- VTLYFUHAOXGGBS-UHFFFAOYSA-N Fe3+ Chemical compound [Fe+3] VTLYFUHAOXGGBS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 229910052947 chalcocite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 239000002826 coolant Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000009792 diffusion process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 229910001447 ferric ion Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 229910001448 ferrous ion Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 229910052742 iron Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 239000007791 liquid phase Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000014759 maintenance of location Effects 0.000 description 3
- 229910052954 pentlandite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 229910052952 pyrrhotite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 239000011435 rock Substances 0.000 description 3
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 230000002378 acidificating effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005276 aerator Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000007864 aqueous solution Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910052948 bornite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000003245 coal Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000004090 dissolution Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005188 flotation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000005484 gravity Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 description 2
- XCAUINMIESBTBL-UHFFFAOYSA-N lead(ii) sulfide Chemical compound [Pb]=S XCAUINMIESBTBL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 description 2
- BASFCYQUMIYNBI-UHFFFAOYSA-N platinum Chemical compound [Pt] BASFCYQUMIYNBI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- KMUONIBRACKNSN-UHFFFAOYSA-N potassium dichromate Chemical compound [K+].[K+].[O-][Cr](=O)(=O)O[Cr]([O-])(=O)=O KMUONIBRACKNSN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000004513 sizing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 2
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 2
- ROKSAUSPJGWCSM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2-(7,7-dimethyl-4-bicyclo[3.1.1]hept-3-enyl)ethanol Chemical compound C1C2C(C)(C)C1CC=C2CCO ROKSAUSPJGWCSM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 235000008733 Citrus aurantifolia Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- XFXPMWWXUTWYJX-UHFFFAOYSA-N Cyanide Chemical compound N#[C-] XFXPMWWXUTWYJX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241000588914 Enterobacter Species 0.000 description 1
- MBMLMWLHJBBADN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ferrous sulfide Chemical compound [Fe]=S MBMLMWLHJBBADN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241000237858 Gastropoda Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000019738 Limestone Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- OAICVXFJPJFONN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Phosphorus Chemical compound [P] OAICVXFJPJFONN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- BQCADISMDOOEFD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silver Chemical compound [Ag] BQCADISMDOOEFD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 235000011941 Tilia x europaea Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- XEIPQVVAVOUIOP-UHFFFAOYSA-N [Au]=S Chemical compound [Au]=S XEIPQVVAVOUIOP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000004063 acid-resistant material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003929 acidic solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005054 agglomeration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002776 aggregation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003513 alkali Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- VETKVGYBAMGARK-UHFFFAOYSA-N arsanylidyneiron Chemical compound [As]#[Fe] VETKVGYBAMGARK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000003556 assay Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009412 basement excavation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000006227 byproduct Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000919 ceramic Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910010293 ceramic material Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000004927 clay Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007796 conventional method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001627 detrimental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000006185 dispersion Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920001971 elastomer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 238000001704 evaporation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008020 evaporation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011790 ferrous sulphate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000003891 ferrous sulphate Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000011152 fibreglass Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000010419 fine particle Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003517 fume Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052949 galena Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000006698 induction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910010272 inorganic material Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011147 inorganic material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011133 lead Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000004571 lime Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000006028 limestone Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910001092 metal group alloy Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000002367 phosphate rock Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052698 phosphorus Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011574 phosphorus Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052697 platinum Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000002244 precipitate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000002203 pretreatment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012066 reaction slurry Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000029058 respiratory gaseous exchange Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000717 retained effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000005060 rubber Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010008 shearing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052709 silver Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000004332 silver Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000010935 stainless steel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910001220 stainless steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000003756 stirring Methods 0.000 description 1
- VRRFSFYSLSPWQY-UHFFFAOYSA-N sulfanylidenecobalt Chemical class [Co]=S VRRFSFYSLSPWQY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000013589 supplement Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920003051 synthetic elastomer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000005061 synthetic rubber Substances 0.000 description 1
- -1 tailings Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004448 titration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 231100000331 toxic Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000002588 toxic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- MCYXWOCTIYEQRK-UHFFFAOYSA-K tripotassium dioxido-sulfanylidene-sulfido-lambda5-phosphane Chemical compound [K+].[K+].[K+].[O-]P([O-])([S-])=S MCYXWOCTIYEQRK-UHFFFAOYSA-K 0.000 description 1
- 229910001727 uranium mineral Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000002699 waste material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002023 wood Substances 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22B—PRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
- C22B3/00—Extraction of metal compounds from ores or concentrates by wet processes
- C22B3/18—Extraction of metal compounds from ores or concentrates by wet processes with the aid of microorganisms or enzymes, e.g. bacteria or algae
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22B—PRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
- C22B3/00—Extraction of metal compounds from ores or concentrates by wet processes
- C22B3/02—Apparatus therefor
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
- Y02P10/00—Technologies related to metal processing
- Y02P10/20—Recycling
Definitions
- This invention relates to bio-oxidation processes and reactors for the liberation of metals from minerals, especially sulphides, containing them.
- Metal containing minerals may be oxidised using specific types of micro-organism, especially bacteria in a bioextraction, particularly a bio-oxidation process. Oxidation of sulphide minerals may be used to put the metals into solution, from for example iron, copper, zinc, nickel and cobalt sulphides, or to release precious metals, such as gold, silver and platinum, encapsulated in metal sulphides, particularly in refractory ores. The process is known as bacterial oxidation, bioextraction, bio-oxidation, bioleaching, or bacterial leaching.
- pyrite, an iron sulphide, and arsenopyrite, an iron-arsenic sulphide are the most common minerals occluding gold in the so-called refractory gold ores and treatment of such materials by microorganisms may therefore assist in liberation of precious metals from refractory ores containing them.
- bacteria used in such processes include the mesophiles, Thiobacillus ferrooxidans, Thiobacillus thiooxidans, Leptospirillum ferrooxidans , moderate thermophiles, and thermophiles such as Sulpholobus.
- the tanks are typically 9 meters high and 9 meters diameter and agitated with axial flow impellers which are driven by large motors. Compressed air is piped into the tank and sheared by the impellers Into a fine dispersion of bubbles to maintain a desired dissolved oxygen concentration in the slurry.
- a variety of impeller types other than axial flow may be used such as turbines.
- the aeration means advantageously introduces gases to the reactor in the form of bubbles of controlled size, generally of small diameter to enhance mass transfer of oxygen to bacteria. It will be understood, in this respect, that the bacterial oxygen demand is extremely high and oxygen diffusion characteristics important. Control of bubble size by shearing is not employed.
- Suitable aeration/agitation means may particularly and advantageously include diffusers as described hereinbelow.
- Diffusers are devices that will both introduce air or other gases to the slurry by diffusion mass transfer of gas from fine bubbles—advantageously of controlled size—to the solution or slurry and maintain solids in suspension for bacterial oxidation.
- Dome, tubular, disc or doughnut type diffusers may appropriately be used in accordance with the invention.
- Aeration means may include hydraulic shear devices. In such devices, very fine bubbles are formed by dislodgment thereof before full development under the influence of shear forces.
- Surface aerators such as paddle aerators may be used to break liquid surface and assist in entrainment of gas such as air in the bulk reaction slurry.
- Reactor configuration may be varied to maximise aeration.
- a further alternative would be the use of liquid jets where a stream of liquid from a reactor is pumped through a venturi which draws air into the liquid thereby aerating it. The aerated liquid is returned to the reactor.
- a gas appropriate for maintenance of bacterial viability include oxygen containing gases, such as air, oxygen enriched air or oxygen; optionally, with addition of carbon dioxide, such as air enriched with carbon dioxide, may be introduced to the aqueous solution by aeration means, particularly diffusers.
- chemolithotrophic bacteria may be employed.
- Various categories of bacteria may be employed in these processes. These categories are as follows:
- the process may be employed exclusively for metal liberation, pre- or post- treatment by other metallurgical operations, such as CIP or CIL processes for recovery of precious metals for example, may be employed where desirable.
- Solid/liquid separation may typically follow bio-oxidation, liquor being further treated for metal recovery.
- the process may be conducted in any suitable reactor, including those types of reactor already generally known to the art, operating advantageously on a continuous basis.
- Aeration may be achieved by including, in such reactors, suitable aeration means even in large capacity systems.
- a reactor system for bio-oxidation treatment of metal containing materials including at least one rakeless reactor having a reaction volume provided with aeration means for introducing an oxygen containing gas for maintaining said metal containing material in suspension and bacterial viability.
- the reactor may take various forms, though incorporates no mechanical means of agitating the reactor volume, and may for example be in the form of tanks or vats.
- the reactor may be fabricated from suitable materials, steel, metal alloys or concrete optionally lined with an acid resistant medium. Additional materials of construction include wood, plastic, fibre-glass or any suitable aeration means may be as known in the art.
- the reactor is preferably rectangular in plan section.
- the reactor may be tapered towards either end. When viewed from an end the reactor may also be rectangular in section though other shapes may be employed.
- the walls of the reactor may be substantially vertical or sloped.
- the depth of the reactor may typically be between 4 and 8 meters, and the width between 5 and 20 meters though both dimensions could be larger or smaller.
- Very large reactors possibly having length greater than 100 meters, may be built and a number of reactors may be employed. Such reactor systems may be combined in series or operated in parallel.
- Feed may be introduced at one end of the reactor through multiple points located along the width of one end. Distribution of slurry to these points may be via a ring main or splitter of conventional type.
- FIG. 2 is a plan view of the aeration means shown in side section in FIG. 1 ;
- FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram showing flow circulation in a reactor including disc aeration means, as operated in accordance with a fourth embodiment of the process of the present invention.
- FIG. 7 is a side schematic diagram showing another embodiment of a reactor according to the present invention.
- Bubble size is to be maintained at 7.5 mm average diameter or less, preferably 5 mm average diameter or less.
- a doughnut shaped diffuser is shown in side section in FIG. 3 and plan in FIG. 4 .
- a membrane 15 is employed which has the sarne characteristics as discussed above.
- the gas supply line 10 serves further supply lines 23 feeding the doughnut shaped tube 24 , the walls of which are formed from membrane 15 thereby providing greater contact area of membrane 15 with solution or slurry.
- Diffusers may also be provided in pipelines communicating with a reactor, for example those connecting the reactor with others in the reactor system.
- gas may be introduced at these points by other suitable means. This may be especially applicable in the case of a heap or dump leaching process in which ore particles are not placed into suspension in the leach liquor.
- Materials treated by the process and reactor systems of the invention may include ores, concentrates obtained from ores, tailings, wastes and other materials having sufficient metal values present to economically remove the metal or to remove metals detrimental to the environment or other processes. It is to be understood that the present invention is not limited to the treatment of sulphides.
- Bacteria are ideally previously added to the reactor in the form of a culture with a mineral and grown in sufficient numbers so that there are preferably between 10 5 and 10 9 bacteria per milliliter of slurry.
- the bacteria may be maintained in the reactor according to accepted practice or by a method of immobilisation.
- the retention time in the reactor is 2 to 8 days.
- the retention time may be longer to allow treatment of less finely ground material, which requires a longer time to be processed, or to achieve higher levels of mineral oxidation and dissolution of the metal.
- the amount of gas introduced to the slurry may be changed in accordance with retention time but this is not essential.
- reaction may be carried out under alkaline conditions.
- the pH is to be kept at a level suitable to the specific leaching conditions.
- Typical nutrients to be introduced to the reaction zone are nitrogen, sulphur and phosphorus containing materials such as ammonium sulphate, potassium dithiophosphate and magnesium sulphate.
- other nutrients may be required for specific ores and concentrates as is known in the art.
- a cooling tower could produce cold water which feeds cooling coils, tube bundles or like means suitably located in the reactor.
- Tube bundles and coils may be preferred in the absence of strong currents generated by stirring or agitation by turbine blades.
- Evaporative cooling may be promoted by reducing depth of a reservoir and increasing the surface area.
- the coolant may be introduced at sufficient velocity to assist in maintaining solids in suspension and admitted water may counteract evaporation losses.
- a temperature control system with heating/cooling functions may be employed.
- the location and nature of temperature control system, internal or extemal, direct or indirect, may be varied to achieve the required temperature control of the reactor. For example, when thermophilic bacteria are used, heating to above 60° C. may be required.
- the process of the invention is suitable for converting ferrous ions in solution to ferric ions which may attack minerals, for example uranium minerals, to liberate metal values of economic interest.
- Manganese ores may be treated by mixing with a metal sulphide with the parameters for bacterial oxidation being as above described.
- a 10% weight percent slurry with a sizing of 90% passing 16 micrometers was maintained in uniform suspension in a tank with fine air bubbles injected from a close packed array of membrane disc diffusers of EPOM synthetic rubber commercially available from Nopol's under the trade mark PIK300.
- the diameter of the disc is 304 millimeters at the base of a 1.4 meter diameter by 4 meter high tank.
- the height of tank is similar to that used in commercial practice.
- the operating conditions with respect to air flow were set to duplicate an oxygen demand of 1.5 kilograms per cubic meter hour which is equivalent to that required for bacterial oxidation of sulphide minerals.
- a sample of gold concentrate containing arsenopyrite and pyrite was ground to a size such that 80% of the particles were less than 15 micrometers in diameter.
- the bio-oxidation reactor constructed from conventional acid resistant material, had a volume of 200 liters and was provided, at its base, with a membrane diffuser as described in Example A. Air was supplied to the diffuser at a rate which maintained the ground solids in suspension. No other agitation was used.
- the ground concentrate was mixed with water to produce a slurry at 10% solids on a weight to volume basis.
- Sulphuric acid was added to the slurry to obtain an acidity level of pH 1.2.
- Approximately five liters of an inoculum slurry containing a mixture of mineral concentrate and moderately thermophilic bacteria was added to the slurry in the reactor. Thereafter a mixture of nutrients comprising hydrated magnesium sulphate, potassium orthophosphate, and ammonium sulphate was added to the slurry.
- the reactor was then heated such that the temperature of the slurry was maintained at 48° C., in the moderate thermophile range.
- the air flowrate was controlled to allow a steady stream of bubbles to be emitted from the diffuser.
- the air was used to maintain the particles in suspension and also to supply the oxygen requirement of the bacterial culture. No additional agitation of the reactor volume was employed. Samples of the slurry were taken on a daily basis to determine the extent of oxidation of the arsenopyrite/pyrite concentrate.
- Gold was then extracted from the residue using conventional cyanide leaching.
- the residue assayed 67 g/t gold of which 99% was extracted by cyanidation.
- the ground concentrate was mixed with water to produce a slurry at 5% solids on a weight to volume basis.
- Sulphuric acid was added to the slurry to obtain an acidity level of pH 1.2.
- Approximately 5 liters of an inoculum slurry containing a mixture of mineral concentrate and moderately thermophilic bacteria was added to the slurry in the reactor. Thereafter, a mixture of nutrients comprising hydrated magnesium sulphate, potassium orthophosphate, and ammonium sulphate was added to the slurry.
- Air was introduced to the reactor from a standard compressor, through a flowmeter with a flow valve and thence into a pipe connected to the diffuser.
- the air flowrate was controlled to allow a steady stream of bubbles to be emitted from the diffuser.
- the air was used to maintain the particles in suspension and provide the oxygen requirement of the bacteria. No additional agitation of the reactor was employed. Samples of the slurry were taken on a daily basis to determine the extent of oxidation of the arsenopyrite/pyrite concentrate.
- the reactor used was 125 mm diameter and 1.7 m high.
- a diffuser as described in Example A, was installed in the base of the reactor.
- a sample of mixed polymetallic concentrate (designated “M1”) containing a mixture of mineral sulphides was bio-oxidised to extract zinc, nickel, copper and cobalt.
- the concentrate contained the nickel mineral pentlandite, as well as nickel contained within the structure of the mineral pyrrhotite. Copper was predominately present in the form of chalcopyrite though chalcocite and bornite were also present. Zinc was present as sphalerite.
- the metal cobalt was associated with the nickel minerals and as the mineral cobalt.
- the concentrate was ground to a size such that 80% of the particles were less than 15 micrometers in diameter.
- the reactor was then placed in a heated room such that the slurry temperature was maintained at 350° C.
- Air was introduced to the reactor from a standard compressor, through a flowmeter with a flow valve and thence into a pipe connected to the diffuser.
- the air flowrate was controlled to allow a steady stream of bubbles to be emitted from the diffuser.
- the air was used to maintain the particles in suspension and to supply the oxygen requirement of the bacteria. No additional agitation of the reactor was employed.
- the concentrate was oxidised with metals being released into solution. The level of extraction of the metals was determined by analysing a portion of the liquid fraction of the slurry. When the reaction was complete, the solid and the liquid phases were separated and the solution and the solids analysed.
- the reactor used was 125 mm diameter and 1.7 m high.
- a diffuser as described in Example A, was installed in the base of the reactor.
- a sample of mixed polymetallic concentrate (designated “M2”) containing a mixture of mineral sulphides was bio-oxidised to extract zinc, nickel, copper and cobalt.
- the concentrate contained the nickel mineral pentlandite, as well as nickel contained within the mineral pyrrhotite. Copper was predominately present in the form of chalcopyrite though chalcocite and bomite were also present. Zinc was present as sphalerite.
- the metal cobalt was associated with the nickel minerals and as the mineral cobalt.
- the concentrate was ground to a size such that 80% of the particles were less than 15 micrometers in diameter.
- the reactor was then placed in a heated room such that the slurry temperature was maintained at 47° C.
- Air was introduced to the reactor from a standard compressor, through a flowmeter with a flow valve and thence into a pipe connected to the diffuser.
- the air flowrate was controlled to allow a steady stream of bubbles to be emitted from the diffuser.
- the air was used to maintain the particles in suspension and to supply the oxygen requirement of the bacteria. No additional agitation of the reactor was employed.
- the concentrate was oxidised with metals being released into solution. The level of extraction of the metals was determined by analysing a portion of the liquid fraction of the slurry. When the reaction was complete, the solid and the liquid phases were separated and the solution and the solids analysed.
- the biooxidation reactor was of 40 mm diameter and 1.0 m height.
- a commercially available sintered polymer diffuser was installed in the base of the reactor.
- a sample of mixed polymetallic concentrate (designated “M3”) containing a mixture of mineral sulphides was bio-oxidised to extract zinc, nickel, copper and cobalt.
- the concentrate contained the nickel mineral pentlandite, as well as nickel contained within the mineral pyrrhotite. Copper was predominately present in the form of chalcopyrite though chalcocite and bornite were also present. Zinc was present as sphalerite. The metal cobalt was associated with the nickel minerals and as the mineral cobalt.
- the concentrate was ground to a size such that 80% of the particles were less than 15 micrometers in diameter.
- the ground concentrate was mixed with water to produce a slurry at 3% solids on a weight to volume basis.
- Sulphuric acid was added to the slurry to obtain an acidity level of pH 1.2.
- Approximately 100 ml of an inoculum slurry containing a mixture of mineral concentrate and thermophilic bacteria ( Sulpholobus ) was added to the slurry in the reactor. Thereafter, a mixture of nutrients comprising hydrated magnesium sulphate, potassium orthophosphate, and ammonium sulphate was added to the slurry.
- the reactor was then heated such that the slurry temperature was maintained at 70° C.
- Air was introduced to the reactor from a standard compressor, through a flowmeter with a flow valve and thence into a pipe connected to the diffuser.
- the air flowrate was controlled to allow a steady stream of bubbles to be emitted from the diffuser.
- the air was used to maintain the particles in suspension and to supply the oxygen requirement of the bacteria. No additional agitation of the reactor was employed.
- the concentrate was oxidised with metals being released into solution. The level of extraction of the metals was determined by analysing a portion of the liquid fraction of the slurry. When the reaction was complete, the solid and the liquid phases were separated and the solution and the solids analysed.
- the bio-oxidation reactor was of 40 mm diameter and 1.0 m height.
- a sample of zinc concentrate (designated “Z1”) containing a mixture of mineral sulphides was treated to extract zinc.
- the concentrate contained the zinc as the mineral sphalerite.
- the sample also contained lead sulphide as galena.
- the concentrate was ground to a size such that 80% of the particles were less than 15 micrometers in diameter.
- Air was introduced to the reactor from a standard compressor, through a flowmeter with a flow valve and thence into a pipe connected to the diffuser.
- the air flowrate was controlled to allow a steady stream of bubbles to be emitted from the diffuser.
- the air was used to maintain the particles in suspension and to supply the oxygen requirement of the bacteria. No additional agitation of the reactor was employed.
- the concentrate was oxidised with zinc being released into solution. The level of extraction of the zinc was determined by analysing a portion of the liquid fraction of the slurry.
- a sample of ferrous sulphate was added to the reactor and diluted with water to obtain a strength of 9 g/l iron.
- Sulphuric acid was added to the slurry in the reactor to obtain an acidity level of pH 1.2.
- Extremely thermophilic bacteria Sulpholobus , extracted onto a filter paper to separate them from other residual solution, were added to the slurry in the reactor. Thereafter, a mixture of nutrients comprising hydrated magnesium sulphate, potassium orthophosphate, and ammonium sulphate was added to the slurry.
- Air was introduced to the reactor from a standard compressor, through a flowmeter with a flow valve and thence into a pipe connected to the diffuser.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Metallurgy (AREA)
- Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
- Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
- General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Geology (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- Biotechnology (AREA)
- Microbiology (AREA)
- Preparation Of Compounds By Using Micro-Organisms (AREA)
- Manufacture And Refinement Of Metals (AREA)
- Apparatus Associated With Microorganisms And Enzymes (AREA)
Abstract
Disclosed is a process and apparatus for conducting bio-oxidation processes for the extraction of metals from metal containing materials in which aeration means, preferably a diffuser means, is employed within a bio-oxidation reactor to maintain bacterial viability and suspension of metal containing materials by introduction of an oxygen containing gas to a non-mechanically agitated reactor.
Description
This application claims the benefits under 35 U.S.C. § 365 of PCT International Application No. PCT/AU99/00917 filed 22 Oct. 1999 entitled “Bio-Oxidation Process and Apparatus” which was published in English on 25 May 2000 having International Publication No. WO 00/29629, and which claims priority to Australian Patent No. AU PP 7180 filed 18 Nov. 1998.
This invention relates to bio-oxidation processes and reactors for the liberation of metals from minerals, especially sulphides, containing them.
Metal containing minerals, especially metal sulphides, may be oxidised using specific types of micro-organism, especially bacteria in a bioextraction, particularly a bio-oxidation process. Oxidation of sulphide minerals may be used to put the metals into solution, from for example iron, copper, zinc, nickel and cobalt sulphides, or to release precious metals, such as gold, silver and platinum, encapsulated in metal sulphides, particularly in refractory ores. The process is known as bacterial oxidation, bioextraction, bio-oxidation, bioleaching, or bacterial leaching. In this respect, pyrite, an iron sulphide, and arsenopyrite, an iron-arsenic sulphide are the most common minerals occluding gold in the so-called refractory gold ores and treatment of such materials by microorganisms may therefore assist in liberation of precious metals from refractory ores containing them.
Certain kinds of bacteria used in such processes have been documented and include the mesophiles, Thiobacillus ferrooxidans, Thiobacillus thiooxidans, Leptospirillum ferrooxidans, moderate thermophiles, and thermophiles such as Sulpholobus.
The above processes are the subject of an extensive literature encompassing papers and patents. However, conventional methods of bacterial oxidation involve oxidation in agitated stirred tanks into which air is introduced or in heaps using rocks with a size of 6 mm or greater in which fine particles may have been agglomerated or heaps using pelletised fine material. An acidic bacteria containing liquor is developed and typically used to irrigate the heap and facilitate metal extraction. The heap leaching technique has been used for many years and Brierley et al have patented a process (U.S. Pat. No. 5,246,486) for a two stage agglomeration process for the recovery of gold from sulphide minerals in heaps where the mineral particles are of large size and not slurried.
Van Aswegen in the article “The Genmin Experience”, has described bacterial oxidation in tanks made of stainless steel or other lined steel which contain a slurry of concentrate and water. The tanks are typically 9 meters high and 9 meters diameter and agitated with axial flow impellers which are driven by large motors. Compressed air is piped into the tank and sheared by the impellers Into a fine dispersion of bubbles to maintain a desired dissolved oxygen concentration in the slurry. A variety of impeller types other than axial flow may be used such as turbines.
The present applicant has found that such methods suffer from a number of disadvantages. Primary among these is the high power consumption and high capital cost encountered in employing bacterial oxidation reactors agitated by impellers.
Although proposals have been made to employ diffusion means to maintain particles in suspension, notably in Envirotech U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,728,082, 4,732,608, 4,968,008, 4,974,816 and 5,007,620, it is uniformly recognised that there is a need to provide some mechanical means, for example in the form of a rake to ensure that significant quantities of solids are not deposited on the floor of the reactor vessel, reducing reactor efficiency.
It is the object of the present invention to provide an improved process and apparatus for carrying out bacterial oxidation especially of metal sulphide minerals.
With this object in view, the present invention provides, in its first aspect, a process for recovering metals from materials containing them by bio-oxidation including treating, in a non-mechanically agitated reactor, a slurry containing a metal containing material with bacteria capable of promoting extraction of metals from said metal containing material; and maintaining said material in suspension and bacterial viability in the reactor by introducing an oxygen-containing gas to the slurry within the reactor by aeration means.
The aeration means advantageously introduces gases to the reactor in the form of bubbles of controlled size, generally of small diameter to enhance mass transfer of oxygen to bacteria. It will be understood, in this respect, that the bacterial oxygen demand is extremely high and oxygen diffusion characteristics important. Control of bubble size by shearing is not employed.
Suitable aeration/agitation means may particularly and advantageously include diffusers as described hereinbelow. Diffusers are devices that will both introduce air or other gases to the slurry by diffusion mass transfer of gas from fine bubbles—advantageously of controlled size—to the solution or slurry and maintain solids in suspension for bacterial oxidation. Dome, tubular, disc or doughnut type diffusers may appropriately be used in accordance with the invention.
Aeration means may include hydraulic shear devices. In such devices, very fine bubbles are formed by dislodgment thereof before full development under the influence of shear forces.
Surface aerators such as paddle aerators may be used to break liquid surface and assist in entrainment of gas such as air in the bulk reaction slurry. Reactor configuration may be varied to maximise aeration.
A further alternative would be the use of liquid jets where a stream of liquid from a reactor is pumped through a venturi which draws air into the liquid thereby aerating it. The aerated liquid is returned to the reactor.
In a particularly preferred embodiment, a gas appropriate for maintenance of bacterial viability include oxygen containing gases, such as air, oxygen enriched air or oxygen; optionally, with addition of carbon dioxide, such as air enriched with carbon dioxide, may be introduced to the aqueous solution by aeration means, particularly diffusers.
Where a bio-oxidation process is involved, various chemolithotrophic bacteria may be employed. Various categories of bacteria may be employed in these processes. These categories are as follows:
1) mesophiles which are suitable for oxidation in the range 10° C. to 45° c.
2) moderate thermophiles, which oxidise the sulphide minerals in the range 40° C. to 60° C.; and
3) thermophiles which oxidise from above 50° C. to 90° C.
The process may be carried out employing any one or more such microorganisms, especially bacterial species, often referred to as a single or mixed culture respectively, which will oxidise sulphides or other minerals or metal containing materials in the required temperature range. Preferred mesophiles for use in bacterial oxidation are Thiobacillus ferrooxidans, Thiobacillus thiooxidans and Leptospirillum ferrooxidans. Most of the moderate thermophiles do not have specific names, but some have been referred to as Sulphobacillus thermooxidans. Preferably, the thermophilic bacteria will be of the type Sulpholobus brierleyi, Sulpholobus BC, and Sulpholobus acidocaldarius. Notwithstanding naming of species herein, similar iron and sulphur oxidising bacteria within the overall temperature range of 0° C. to 90° C. identified but not yet named are included within the scope of the present invention. The process is most advantageously conducted generally in the temperature ranges for which the bacteria are tolerant as described above. Reaction may be undertaken in the mesophilic, moderately thermophilic or extreme thermophilic temperature range.
Though the process may be employed exclusively for metal liberation, pre- or post- treatment by other metallurgical operations, such as CIP or CIL processes for recovery of precious metals for example, may be employed where desirable. Solid/liquid separation may typically follow bio-oxidation, liquor being further treated for metal recovery.
The process may be conducted in any suitable reactor, including those types of reactor already generally known to the art, operating advantageously on a continuous basis. Aeration may be achieved by including, in such reactors, suitable aeration means even in large capacity systems.
However, it is intended that no mechanical means be employed within the reactor, that the introduction of gas be employed as the sole agency by which particles are maintained in suspension without significant build-up of mineral containing particles constituting the metal containing material on the floor of the reactor. Such a reactor may be said to be rakeless.
In a particularly preferred embodiment, the metal containing material is, for example, a non-ferrous base metal sulphide ore, such as a copper, nickel, zinc, lead or cobalt containing ore, including mixed or polymetallic ores, or a refractory gold ore incorporating occluding sulphides amenable to dissolution by bacterial action. Other materials in this class may include flotation concentrates, gravity concentrates, tailings, precipitates, mattes and sulphidic fume. However, the above process is also suitable for carrying out bacterial oxidation and bioleaching of non-sulphide ores and other generally inorganic materials containing metals in economic concentrations, where suitable bacteria are available to carry out the process. For example, without intending to limit the invention in any way, bioleaching of rare earth ores, oxidic manganese ores and phosphate rock is possible in accordance with process of the invention.
In a further embodiment of the invention, there is provided a reactor system for bio-oxidation treatment of metal containing materials including at least one rakeless reactor having a reaction volume provided with aeration means for introducing an oxygen containing gas for maintaining said metal containing material in suspension and bacterial viability.
The reactor may take various forms, though incorporates no mechanical means of agitating the reactor volume, and may for example be in the form of tanks or vats. In this case, the reactor may be fabricated from suitable materials, steel, metal alloys or concrete optionally lined with an acid resistant medium. Additional materials of construction include wood, plastic, fibre-glass or any suitable aeration means may be as known in the art.
Alternatively, a reactor may take a reservoir configuration being formed by excavation above or below ground. In such a case, the reservoir may be lined with a liquid impermeable barrier, such as clay or plastic membrane, to prevent solution entering the surrounding ground or rock. The reactor may be built from rock or other suitable material above the surrounding ground surface.
In a reservoir configuration, though the following may be applicable to other types of suitable reactor, the reactor is preferably rectangular in plan section. The reactor may be tapered towards either end. When viewed from an end the reactor may also be rectangular in section though other shapes may be employed. The walls of the reactor may be substantially vertical or sloped. The depth of the reactor may typically be between 4 and 8 meters, and the width between 5 and 20 meters though both dimensions could be larger or smaller. Very large reactors, possibly having length greater than 100 meters, may be built and a number of reactors may be employed. Such reactor systems may be combined in series or operated in parallel.
The base of the reactor may be sloped so that there is a gradient from the feed end at which ore or other metal containing material is fed into the reactor to the discharge end. This slope may be a descending slope. The gradient of the reactor may be variable. This may assist in transfer of particles from feed to discharge. Volume of the reactor is calculated in dependence upon the rate at which the metal containing material or mineral is being treated.
Aerating means, or diffusers, may be located at even spacings along the base of the reactor. A concentration of diffusers may be determined as a function of oxygen demand in the reactor.
Feed may be introduced at one end of the reactor through multiple points located along the width of one end. Distribution of slurry to these points may be via a ring main or splitter of conventional type.
However, it is not intended to restrict possible reactor designs to the above configurations and other configurations could be employed.
Description of preferred embodiments of the invention now follows. The description is made with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
Referring specifically to the FIGS. 1 to 4, the gas is delivered through diffusers, i.e. a means for diffusing a gas into the liquid portion of a slurry or solution. Typically, compressed air—though other gases as described above may be suitable—is blown through gas supply line 10 to the diffuser unit 1 passing through a perforated wall 11 thereof forming air bubbles which serve to transfer oxygen and carbon dioxide into a slurry 2 in a reactor (not shown) for bacterial respiration and for oxidation of minerals. Gas supply line 10 may service a number of reactors. A slug flow introduction of air or gas to the reactor, that is, without control over bubble size at introduction to the reactor, is not desirable and is, most advantageously, to be avoided.
Diameter or size of the perforations 13 in wall 11 dictates bubble size, as desired, in a controlled manner. The smaller the bubble size the greater the surface area per unit of volume providing efficiency of gas-liquid contact allowing the high values of oxygen transfer that are necessary for efficient bacterial oxidation. Bubble size is to be maintained at 7.5 mm average diameter or less, preferably 5 mm average diameter or less.
Disc, doughnut or tubular designs may be employed, the first two types being shown in FIGS. 1 to 4.
A disc diffuser, as seen in side section in FIG. 1 and plan in FIG. 2 , is manufactured from a flexible membrane 15 that closes when no air is being delivered. This ensures that substantially no slurry enters gas supply line 10 during processing. The membrane 15 may be retained in position by a retaining device such as a clamping ring 16 which fixes the membrane in position 15 about an outlet 20 of the gas supply line 10. As the membrane 15 expands with air flow, perforations in the form of pores in the membrane open allowing air flow therethrough. The pores 13 may advantageously be microscopic, of the order of 1 to 5μ in diameter. As a result, impeller action is not required to shear air slugs to an appropriate bubble size distribution to optimum transfer of oxygen to the slurry. Further the mass transfer occurs in a readily controllable fashion and the bubble size may be controlled by selecting a membrane or other material (see below) with desired pore or hole size.
A doughnut shaped diffuser is shown in side section in FIG. 3 and plan in FIG. 4. Again, a membrane 15 is employed which has the sarne characteristics as discussed above. However, here the gas supply line 10 serves further supply lines 23 feeding the doughnut shaped tube 24, the walls of which are formed from membrane 15 thereby providing greater contact area of membrane 15 with solution or slurry.
Characteristics of membrane 15 may include flexibility, relatively low cost, durability and easy replacement. The membrane 15 may be formed from acid resistant rubber or other polymers with a pore size distribution as desired for use in the process. The membrane may be manufactured in a known manner in the field of membrane technology.
A further type of diffuser is of typically dome shape and manufactured from plastics or ceramics. The material is perforated with holes of similar diameter to that above that are fixed and open all the time allowing air to flow therethrough to form a bubble swarm in the slurry within the reactor.
A particularly effective type of diffuser is tubular with the tubular body perforated with holes for gas exit preferably having a U-shaped configuration. The tubular body may be connected to the gas supply line and may be formed from a membrane or suitable plastic or ceramic material.
Diffusers suitable for the application will typically be sized to allow a sufficient volume of gas to be diffused into the slurry to achieve between 0.5 and 15 mg/l dissolved oxygen concentration in the slurry depending upon the oxygen requirement of the bacteria used in the bio-oxidation process. There may be provided a number of diffusers as necessary to maintain solids in suspension and supply sufficient gas for oxidation.
Reactor configuration may be selected to achieve optimal aeration. Diffuser(s) 24 may be placed adjacent, that is at, or just off, the base of the reactor, if applicable, spaced at intervals—possibly with different rates of gas introduction—to give a suitable bubble distribution for the material being treated. The diffusers are fixed in position. Under different circumstances, the number of diffusers required to maintain the solids in suspension may be greater than that required for oxidation, at other times the number required may be lower. A uniform arrangement throughout the reactor base may be preferred. Conveniently, the number of aeration means or diffusers per unit area within the reactor may vary such that there is a greater proportion at the feed end of the reactor where higher rates of bacterial oxidation would be expected than at the discharge end.
A number of diffusers 224 of tubular type are located evenly spaced along the base of the reactor 200.
The tubular diffusers 224 are supplied with oxygen containing gas by a main pipe or manifold 225 of which the tubular diffusers 224 form lateral extensions covering the base of the reactor 200 as shown in FIG. 8. As the core of each diffuser 224 fills with water they will stay on the base of the reactor 200.
Diffusers may also be provided in pipelines communicating with a reactor, for example those connecting the reactor with others in the reactor system. Alternatively, gas may be introduced at these points by other suitable means. This may be especially applicable in the case of a heap or dump leaching process in which ore particles are not placed into suspension in the leach liquor.
Materials treated by the process and reactor systems of the invention may include ores, concentrates obtained from ores, tailings, wastes and other materials having sufficient metal values present to economically remove the metal or to remove metals detrimental to the environment or other processes. It is to be understood that the present invention is not limited to the treatment of sulphides.
The metal value containing material may require to be pre-treated, for example crushed, to a size sufficiently small to enable it to be ground in conventional comminution equipment such as ball mills.
Conveniently, the solids requiring oxidation are ground to a particle size sufficiently fine for the gas to be effectively used in maintaining a suspension thereof and without allowing significant build-up on the floor of the reactor. Typically, grinding to a suitable particle size distribution is necessary to meet this criterion. The size of the product after grinding is preferably 90% passing 50 microns or less. It is advantageous for the ore or other metal containing material to be ground in an ultra fine grinding machine to particle size between 80% passing 2 microns and 80% passing 30 microns in accordance with a further embodiment of the invention. The bottom particle size is as small a size as is practically attainable by grinding. The size of the particles should be chosen to be the optimum for maintaining the solids in suspension and carrying out a bacterial oxidation process.
Conveniently, after crushing and/or grinding the material concentration may occur by gravity, flotation or other beneficiation processes to increase the proportion of the sulphides or other desired minerals in the product. However, the process is equally applicable to the treatment of concentrates of residue produced by others and comminution pre-treatment is not necessarily required in each case.
The ground metal containing ore or concentrate is preferably slurried with an aqueous solution, especially water. Slurries from grinding may be diluted within additional water and pumped into the reaction zone in which the bio-oxidation process is to take place. The pulp density of the slurry introduced to the reactor of the invention may be of great importance to the attainment of the object of the invention, accordingly a range of 5 to 15% or upward may be selected. At lower pulp density, as stated, efficient bacterial activity may be achieved as toxic effects due to high ionic concentration; and/or mechanical grinding of bacteria are avoided. Leaching is enhanced by the very low shear, low ionic concentration environment. Bacteria are ideally previously added to the reactor in the form of a culture with a mineral and grown in sufficient numbers so that there are preferably between 105 and 109 bacteria per milliliter of slurry. The bacteria may be maintained in the reactor according to accepted practice or by a method of immobilisation.
Preferably the retention time in the reactor is 2 to 8 days. The retention time may be longer to allow treatment of less finely ground material, which requires a longer time to be processed, or to achieve higher levels of mineral oxidation and dissolution of the metal. The amount of gas introduced to the slurry may be changed in accordance with retention time but this is not essential.
Conveniently, the bacterial oxidation process is carried out in an acidic solution which is suitable for growth of the specific bacteria, for example thiobacilli, used. This is expected to be in the range of 0.5 to 3.0. Preferably, the pH will be in the range 0.8 to 2.5. An initial acid addition may be required at the start of the process to neutralise acid consuming minerals and maintain the pH in the required range. The process of oxidising sulphide minerals produces acidic by-products and it is likely that the pH will decrease during processing. If necessary, the pH may be maintained in the required range by controlled addition of a base or basic agent such as lime, limestone or any other suitable alkali.
Where the material to be treated is not a sulphide, reaction may be carried out under alkaline conditions. In these situations the pH is to be kept at a level suitable to the specific leaching conditions.
Support of the bacteria is likely to acquire the addition of nutrients to maintain growth. Typical nutrients to be introduced to the reaction zone are nitrogen, sulphur and phosphorus containing materials such as ammonium sulphate, potassium dithiophosphate and magnesium sulphate. In addition, other nutrients may be required for specific ores and concentrates as is known in the art.
Further, as oxidation of sulphide minerals is an exothermic process, heat will be released during bacterial oxidation. This may be a problem where ores are treated but may be especially true where an enriched sulphide concentrate is treated. In this case, the release of heat may increase the temperature of the slurry in the reactor above that tolerated by the bacteria, especially thiobacilli. Sulpholobus bacteria are more temperature tolerant. Therefore, the reactors are typically to be provided with cooling systems. Water may be a suitable coolant and the cooling system may be direct, with coolant water introduced at the base of the reactor. Alternatively, indirect cooling may be employed using conventional heat exchanger technology. For example, a cooling tower could produce cold water which feeds cooling coils, tube bundles or like means suitably located in the reactor. Tube bundles and coils may be preferred in the absence of strong currents generated by stirring or agitation by turbine blades. Evaporative cooling may be promoted by reducing depth of a reservoir and increasing the surface area. The coolant may be introduced at sufficient velocity to assist in maintaining solids in suspension and admitted water may counteract evaporation losses.
More generally, a temperature control system with heating/cooling functions may be employed. The location and nature of temperature control system, internal or extemal, direct or indirect, may be varied to achieve the required temperature control of the reactor. For example, when thermophilic bacteria are used, heating to above 60° C. may be required.
Other uses of the process may be exemplified, without limitation, as follows:
- FERRIC ION GENERATION
The process of the invention is suitable for converting ferrous ions in solution to ferric ions which may attack minerals, for example uranium minerals, to liberate metal values of economic interest.
- TREATMENT OF MANGANESE CONTAINING ORES
Manganese ores may be treated by mixing with a metal sulphide with the parameters for bacterial oxidation being as above described.
Alternatively, manganese ores may be bioleached with the organism Enterobacter at pH controlled between 4 and 8.
- SULPHUR REMOVAL FROM COAL
The mineral pyrite occurs with coal and bacterial oxidation using chemolithotrophic bacteria has been used to remove pyrite and reduce sulphur content. The process of the invention may be employed for sulphur removal with the parameters for bacterial oxidation being as above described.
In accordance with the process and reactor systems of the invention the grade of ore, concentrate or other metal containing material may be lower than that for agitated tanks and like reactor systems because of expected lower capital and operating costs.
The invention will be more fully understood from the description of the following examples.
- Inert Material
A trial was conducted on an inert mineral used to duplicate sulphide ores and concentrates.
A 10% weight percent slurry with a sizing of 90% passing 16 micrometers was maintained in uniform suspension in a tank with fine air bubbles injected from a close packed array of membrane disc diffusers of EPOM synthetic rubber commercially available from Nopol's under the trade mark PIK300. The diameter of the disc is 304 millimeters at the base of a 1.4 meter diameter by 4 meter high tank. The height of tank is similar to that used in commercial practice.
Air flows of at least 2.4 Nm3/h/diffuser was required to prevent settling of solids. The air flow rates required were within the manufacturer's recommended operating range.
Solids that settled because of a reduction or disruption in air flow were resuspended when the air flow was re-established at 2.4 Nm3/h/diffuser or higher.
These results showed that a typical ground sulphide concentrate with a sizing of 90% passing 12 micrometers would stay in suspension under the same operating conditions.
The operating conditions with respect to air flow were set to duplicate an oxygen demand of 1.5 kilograms per cubic meter hour which is equivalent to that required for bacterial oxidation of sulphide minerals.
- Leaching of Refractory Gold Sulphide Concentrate
A sample of gold concentrate containing arsenopyrite and pyrite was ground to a size such that 80% of the particles were less than 15 micrometers in diameter.
The bio-oxidation reactor, constructed from conventional acid resistant material, had a volume of 200 liters and was provided, at its base, with a membrane diffuser as described in Example A. Air was supplied to the diffuser at a rate which maintained the ground solids in suspension. No other agitation was used.
The ground concentrate was mixed with water to produce a slurry at 10% solids on a weight to volume basis. Sulphuric acid was added to the slurry to obtain an acidity level of pH 1.2. Approximately five liters of an inoculum slurry containing a mixture of mineral concentrate and moderately thermophilic bacteria was added to the slurry in the reactor. Thereafter a mixture of nutrients comprising hydrated magnesium sulphate, potassium orthophosphate, and ammonium sulphate was added to the slurry.
The reactor was then heated such that the temperature of the slurry was maintained at 48° C., in the moderate thermophile range.
Air was added to the reactor from a standard compressor, through a flowmeter with a flow valve and thence into a pipe connected to the diffuser.
The air flowrate was controlled to allow a steady stream of bubbles to be emitted from the diffuser. The air was used to maintain the particles in suspension and also to supply the oxygen requirement of the bacterial culture. No additional agitation of the reactor volume was employed. Samples of the slurry were taken on a daily basis to determine the extent of oxidation of the arsenopyrite/pyrite concentrate.
Time | Oxidation Level (%) |
(days) | Arsenic | Iron |
6 | 100 | na |
32 | 100 | 94 |
The final residue in the tank was analysed after the test had proceeded for 32 days.
Assay (wt %) |
As | Fe | S2− | ||
Initial Concentrate | 3.05 | 21.0 | 23.0 | ||
Final Residue | 0.03 | 0.4 | 0.1 | ||
Oxidation (%) | 99 | 96 | 99 | ||
S2− is the amount of sulphide sulphur present and determines the amount of total oxidation that has occurred. Based on the analysis of the residue, the oxidation extent was determined.
Gold was then extracted from the residue using conventional cyanide leaching. The residue assayed 67 g/t gold of which 99% was extracted by cyanidation.
- Leaching of Copper Concentrate
A sample of copper concentrate containing chalcopyrite (and designated “CP1”) was ground to a size such that 80% of the particles were less than 10 micrometers in diameter. Again, the bio-oxidation reactor had a maximum volume of 200 liters and a membrane diffuser, as described in Example A, was installed at the base. Air was supplied at a rate to maintain the ground solids in suspension and maintain oxygen requirement of the bacteria. No other agitation was employed.
The ground concentrate was mixed with water to produce a slurry at 5% solids on a weight to volume basis. Sulphuric acid was added to the slurry to obtain an acidity level of pH 1.2. Approximately 5 liters of an inoculum slurry containing a mixture of mineral concentrate and moderately thermophilic bacteria was added to the slurry in the reactor. Thereafter, a mixture of nutrients comprising hydrated magnesium sulphate, potassium orthophosphate, and ammonium sulphate was added to the slurry.
The reactor was then placed in a heated room such that the temperature of the slurry was maintained at 48° C.
Air was introduced to the reactor from a standard compressor, through a flowmeter with a flow valve and thence into a pipe connected to the diffuser.
The air flowrate was controlled to allow a steady stream of bubbles to be emitted from the diffuser. The air was used to maintain the particles in suspension and provide the oxygen requirement of the bacteria. No additional agitation of the reactor was employed. Samples of the slurry were taken on a daily basis to determine the extent of oxidation of the arsenopyrite/pyrite concentrate.
Conditions | CP1 | ||
Copper Content (%) | 18 | |
Copper Extraction (%) | Acid Leach only | 4 |
Copper Extraction (%) | Bacterial oxidation leach | 84 |
using moderate thermophilic bacteria | ||
- Polymetallic Concentrate
- D.1 Leaching with Mesophilic Bacteria
In this example, the reactor used was 125 mm diameter and 1.7 m high. A diffuser, as described in Example A, was installed in the base of the reactor. A sample of mixed polymetallic concentrate (designated “M1”) containing a mixture of mineral sulphides was bio-oxidised to extract zinc, nickel, copper and cobalt. The concentrate contained the nickel mineral pentlandite, as well as nickel contained within the structure of the mineral pyrrhotite. Copper was predominately present in the form of chalcopyrite though chalcocite and bornite were also present. Zinc was present as sphalerite. The metal cobalt was associated with the nickel minerals and as the mineral cobalt. The concentrate was ground to a size such that 80% of the particles were less than 15 micrometers in diameter.
The ground concentrate was mixed with water to produce a slurry at 10% solids on a weight to volume basis. Sulphuric acid was added to the slurry to obtain an acidity level of pH 1.2. Approximately half a liter of an inoculum slurry containing a mixture of mineral concentrate and mesophilic bacteria (Thiobacillus ferrooxidans and Thiobacillus thiooxidans) was added to the slurry in the reactor. Thereafter, a mixture of nutrients comprising hydrated magnesium sulphate, potassium orthophosphate, and ammonium sulphate was added to the slurry.
The reactor was then placed in a heated room such that the slurry temperature was maintained at 350° C.
Air was introduced to the reactor from a standard compressor, through a flowmeter with a flow valve and thence into a pipe connected to the diffuser.
The air flowrate was controlled to allow a steady stream of bubbles to be emitted from the diffuser. The air was used to maintain the particles in suspension and to supply the oxygen requirement of the bacteria. No additional agitation of the reactor was employed. The concentrate was oxidised with metals being released into solution. The level of extraction of the metals was determined by analysing a portion of the liquid fraction of the slurry. When the reaction was complete, the solid and the liquid phases were separated and the solution and the solids analysed.
Conditions | M1 | ||
Copper Content (%) | 5.7 | |||
Nickel Content (%) | 0.9 | |||
Cobalt Content (%) | 0.06 | |||
Zinc Content (%) | 0.21 | |||
Sulphur Oxidation (%) | 98 | |||
Copper Extraction (%) | Bacterial oxidation leach | 92 | ||
Nickel Extraction (%) | using thermotolerant bacteria | 97 | ||
Cobalt Extraction (%) | 97 | |||
Zinc Extraction (%) | 95 | |||
- D.2 Leaching with Moderate Thermophiles
In this example, the reactor used was 125 mm diameter and 1.7 m high. A diffuser, as described in Example A, was installed in the base of the reactor. A sample of mixed polymetallic concentrate (designated “M2”) containing a mixture of mineral sulphides was bio-oxidised to extract zinc, nickel, copper and cobalt. The concentrate contained the nickel mineral pentlandite, as well as nickel contained within the mineral pyrrhotite. Copper was predominately present in the form of chalcopyrite though chalcocite and bomite were also present. Zinc was present as sphalerite. The metal cobalt was associated with the nickel minerals and as the mineral cobalt. The concentrate was ground to a size such that 80% of the particles were less than 15 micrometers in diameter.
The ground concentrate was mixed with water to produce a slurry at 10% solids on a weight to volume basis. Sulphuric acid was added to the slurry to obtain an acidity level of pH 1.2. Approximately half a liter of an inoculum slurry containing a mixture of mineral concentrate and moderately thermophilic bacteria (Thiobacillus ferrooxidans and Thiobacillus thiooxidans) was added to the slurry in the reactor. Thereafter, a mixture of nutrients comprising hydrated magnesium sulphate, potassium orthophosphate, and ammonium sulphate was added to the slurry.
The reactor was then placed in a heated room such that the slurry temperature was maintained at 47° C.
Air was introduced to the reactor from a standard compressor, through a flowmeter with a flow valve and thence into a pipe connected to the diffuser.
The air flowrate was controlled to allow a steady stream of bubbles to be emitted from the diffuser. The air was used to maintain the particles in suspension and to supply the oxygen requirement of the bacteria. No additional agitation of the reactor was employed. The concentrate was oxidised with metals being released into solution. The level of extraction of the metals was determined by analysing a portion of the liquid fraction of the slurry. When the reaction was complete, the solid and the liquid phases were separated and the solution and the solids analysed.
Conditions | M2 | ||
Copper Content (%) | 7.3 | |||
Nickel Content (%) | 0.8 | |||
Cobalt Content (%) | 0.05 | |||
Zinc Content (%) | 0.24 | |||
Sulphur Oxidation (%) | 77 | |||
Copper Extraction (%) | Acid leach only | 12 | ||
Nickel Extraction (%) | 10 | |||
Cobalt Extraction (%) | 13 | |||
Zinc Extraction (%) | 24 | |||
Copper Extraction (%) | Bacterial oxidation leach | 93 | ||
Nickel Extraction (%) | using thermotolerant bacteria | 98 | ||
Cobalt Extraction (%) | 97 | |||
Zinc Extraction (%) | 96 | |||
- D.3 Leaching with Thermophiles
In this example, the biooxidation reactor was of 40 mm diameter and 1.0 m height. A commercially available sintered polymer diffuser was installed in the base of the reactor.
A sample of mixed polymetallic concentrate (designated “M3”) containing a mixture of mineral sulphides was bio-oxidised to extract zinc, nickel, copper and cobalt. The concentrate contained the nickel mineral pentlandite, as well as nickel contained within the mineral pyrrhotite. Copper was predominately present in the form of chalcopyrite though chalcocite and bornite were also present. Zinc was present as sphalerite. The metal cobalt was associated with the nickel minerals and as the mineral cobalt. The concentrate was ground to a size such that 80% of the particles were less than 15 micrometers in diameter.
The ground concentrate was mixed with water to produce a slurry at 3% solids on a weight to volume basis. Sulphuric acid was added to the slurry to obtain an acidity level of pH 1.2. Approximately 100 ml of an inoculum slurry containing a mixture of mineral concentrate and thermophilic bacteria (Sulpholobus) was added to the slurry in the reactor. Thereafter, a mixture of nutrients comprising hydrated magnesium sulphate, potassium orthophosphate, and ammonium sulphate was added to the slurry.
The reactor was then heated such that the slurry temperature was maintained at 70° C.
Air was introduced to the reactor from a standard compressor, through a flowmeter with a flow valve and thence into a pipe connected to the diffuser.
The air flowrate was controlled to allow a steady stream of bubbles to be emitted from the diffuser. The air was used to maintain the particles in suspension and to supply the oxygen requirement of the bacteria. No additional agitation of the reactor was employed. The concentrate was oxidised with metals being released into solution. The level of extraction of the metals was determined by analysing a portion of the liquid fraction of the slurry. When the reaction was complete, the solid and the liquid phases were separated and the solution and the solids analysed.
Conditions | M2 | ||
Copper Content (%) | 5.0 | |||
Nickel Content (%) | 0.78 | |||
Cobalt Content (%) | 0.07 | |||
Zinc Content (%) | 0.67 | |||
Sulphur Oxidation (%) | 84 | |||
Copper Extraction (%) | Bacterial oxidation leach | 99 | ||
Nickel Extraction (%) | using |
100 | ||
Cobalt Extraction (%) | 98 | |||
Zinc Extraction (%) | 97 | |||
- Zinc Concentrate
In this example, the bio-oxidation reactor was of 40 mm diameter and 1.0 m height. A sintered polymer diffuser, as used in Example D.3, was installed in the base of the reactor.
A sample of zinc concentrate (designated “Z1”) containing a mixture of mineral sulphides was treated to extract zinc. The concentrate contained the zinc as the mineral sphalerite. The sample also contained lead sulphide as galena. The concentrate was ground to a size such that 80% of the particles were less than 15 micrometers in diameter.
The ground concentrate was mixed with water to produce a slurry at 5% solids on a weight to volume basis. Sulphuric acid was added to the slurry to obtain an acidity level of pH 1.2. Approximately 100 ml of an inoculum slurry containing a mixture of mineral concentrate and moderately thermophilic bacteria (Thiobacillus ferrooxidans and Thiobacillus thiooxidans) was added to the slurry in the reactor. Thereafter, a mixture of nutrients comprising hydrated magnesium sulphate, potassium orthophosphate, and ammonium sulphate was added to the slurry.
The reactor was then heated such that the slurry temperature was maintained at 48° C.
Air was introduced to the reactor from a standard compressor, through a flowmeter with a flow valve and thence into a pipe connected to the diffuser.
The air flowrate was controlled to allow a steady stream of bubbles to be emitted from the diffuser. The air was used to maintain the particles in suspension and to supply the oxygen requirement of the bacteria. No additional agitation of the reactor was employed. The concentrate was oxidised with zinc being released into solution. The level of extraction of the zinc was determined by analysing a portion of the liquid fraction of the slurry.
Conditions | Z1 | ||
Zinc Content (%) | 25 | |
Sulphur Oxidation (%) | 60 | |
Zinc Extraction (%) | Bacterial oxidation leach | 97 |
using moderate thermophilic bacteria | ||
- Ferrous to Ferric Conversion
A further test was carried out in a reactor which was 25 mm diameter and 1.0 m high. A sintered polymer diffuser, as used in Examples D.3 and E, was installed in the base of the reactor.
A sample of ferrous sulphate was added to the reactor and diluted with water to obtain a strength of 9 g/l iron. Sulphuric acid was added to the slurry in the reactor to obtain an acidity level of pH 1.2. Extremely thermophilic bacteria (Sulpholobus), extracted onto a filter paper to separate them from other residual solution, were added to the slurry in the reactor. Thereafter, a mixture of nutrients comprising hydrated magnesium sulphate, potassium orthophosphate, and ammonium sulphate was added to the slurry.
The reactor was then heated such that the solution temperature was maintained at 70° C.
Air was introduced to the reactor from a standard compressor, through a flowmeter with a flow valve and thence into a pipe connected to the diffuser.
The air flowrate was controlled to allow a steady stream of bubbles to be emitted from the diffuser. The air was used to maintain the particles in suspension and to supply the oxygen requirement of the bacteria. No additional agitation of the reactor was employed.
The ferric solution was oxidised so that the ferrous ion was converted into ferric ion. The level of conversion of the ferrous ion was determined by titration with potassium dichromate.
Modifications and variations may be made to the process and reactor system of the present disclosure without departing from the scope of the invention.
Claims (15)
1. A process for recovering metals from materials containing them by bio-oxidation comprising;
a) treating, in a non-mechanically agitated reactor, a slurry comprising a metal containing material with bacteria capable of promoting extraction of metals from said metal containing material; and,
b) introducing an oxygen-containing gas to the slurry within the reactor by aeration means.
2. The process of claim 1 , wherein said oxygen-containing gas is introduced to said slurry in bubbles of controlled size.
3. The process of claim 2 , wherein said aeration means includes at least one diffuser selected from the group consisting of tubular, dome-shaped, doughnut shaped and disc shaped diffusers.
4. The process of claim 1 , wherein said reactor is rakeless.
5. The process of claim 1 , wherein gas introduced to the reactor further includes carbon dioxide.
6. The process of claim 1 , wherein said bacterial culture includes at least one microorganism selected from the group consisting of Thiobacillus ferroxidans, and Thiobaccillus thiooxidans, Leptospirillum ferroxidans, Sulphobacillus thermooxidans, Sulpholobus brierleyi, Sulpholobus BC and Sulpholobus acidocaldarius.
7. The process of claim 1 , wherein said metal containing material contains at least one metal selected from the group consisting of non-ferrous base metals, precious metals and rare earth metals.
8. A reactor system for bio-oxidation treatment of metal containing materials comprising at least one rakeless reactor having a reactor volume provided with aeration means for introducing an oxygen containing gas to the reactor volume for maintaining said metal containing material in suspension and bacterial viability.
9. The reactor system of claim 8 , wherein said at least one reactor is a tank or vat.
10. The reactor system of claim 9 , wherein said at least one reactor includes a reservoir lined with a liquid impermeable barrier.
11. The reactor system of claim 9 , wherein said at least one reactor has a feed end and a discharge end with a base of the reactor having a descending slope towards the discharge end.
12. The reactor system of claim 8 , wherein said aeration means includes at least one diffuser.
13. The reactor system of claim 12 , wherein each diffuser is placed adjacent the base of the reactor.
14. The reactor system of claim 12 , wherein said diffuser is selected from the group consisting of a tubular, dome shaped, dougnnut shaped and disc diffuser.
15. The reactor system of claim 8 , wherein said aeration means is located in a pipeline communicating with said at least one reactor.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AUPP7180A AUPP718098A0 (en) | 1998-11-18 | 1998-11-18 | Bioxidation process and apparatus |
PCT/AU1999/000917 WO2000029629A1 (en) | 1998-11-18 | 1999-10-22 | Bio-oxidation process and apparatus |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
USH2140H1 true USH2140H1 (en) | 2006-01-03 |
Family
ID=3811389
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/831,579 Abandoned USH2140H1 (en) | 1998-11-18 | 1999-10-22 | Bio-oxidation process and apparatus |
Country Status (9)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | USH2140H1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN1331759A (en) |
AU (1) | AUPP718098A0 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2350476A1 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2192975B1 (en) |
GT (1) | GT200000055A (en) |
MX (1) | MXPA01005009A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2000029629A1 (en) |
ZA (1) | ZA200103916B (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2009103025A2 (en) * | 2008-02-15 | 2009-08-20 | Biometallix, Llc | Reactor for extracting metals from metal sulfide containing materials and methods of use |
Families Citing this family (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2001018262A2 (en) * | 1999-09-07 | 2001-03-15 | Billiton Intellectual Property B.V. | Bioleaching of sulphide minerals |
US7455715B2 (en) | 2001-07-13 | 2008-11-25 | Teck Cominco Metals Ltd. | Heap bioleaching process for the extraction of zinc |
CA2353002C (en) | 2001-07-13 | 2009-12-01 | Teck Cominco Metals Ltd. | Heap bioleaching process for the extraction of zinc |
CN1318618C (en) * | 2002-02-14 | 2007-05-30 | Bhp比尔顿有限公司 | Delivery system for heap bioleaching |
ES2294958B1 (en) * | 2003-07-15 | 2009-02-16 | Mintek | OXIDATIVE LIXIVIATION PROCEDURE. |
CN102277490B (en) * | 2011-08-30 | 2013-05-29 | 内蒙古科技大学 | Biological column leaching device |
MX2011011147A (en) | 2011-10-21 | 2013-04-22 | Servicios Condumex Sa | Bioleaching bioreactor with a system for injection and diffusion of air. |
CN103173614B (en) * | 2011-12-23 | 2014-07-16 | 北京有色金属研究总院 | High-temperature biological heap leaching method of primary copper sulphide ores |
EP2952593A1 (en) * | 2014-06-06 | 2015-12-09 | L'air Liquide, Societe Anonyme Pour L'etude Et L'exploitation Des Procedes Georges Claude | Process and an installation for bioleaching |
CN107641713A (en) * | 2017-09-30 | 2018-01-30 | 新疆大学 | A kind of agitator of biological oxidation pretreatment method for golden ore concentrate hard to treat |
Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US1019003A (en) * | 1911-01-13 | 1912-02-27 | Gustav Aminoff | Absorption apparatus. |
US4571387A (en) | 1983-01-26 | 1986-02-18 | British Columbia Research Council | Biological-acid leach process |
US5007620A (en) * | 1986-02-07 | 1991-04-16 | Envirotech Corporation | Apparatus for biological processing of metal-containing ores |
US5093047A (en) * | 1990-01-18 | 1992-03-03 | Roediger Pittsburgh, Inc. | Gas diffuser |
EP0522978A1 (en) | 1991-07-10 | 1993-01-13 | Newmont Mining Corporation | Biooxidation process for recovery of metal values from sulfur-containing ore materials |
WO1998051827A1 (en) | 1997-05-16 | 1998-11-19 | Echo Bay Mines, Limited | Integrated, tank/heap biooxidation process for the lixiviation of sulfide ores |
AU7856098A (en) | 1997-07-31 | 1999-02-11 | M.I.M. Holdings Limited | Silver catalysed leaching of chalcopyrite ore |
AU1852499A (en) | 1998-03-02 | 1999-09-16 | Placer Dome Technical Services Limited | Method for initiating heap bioleaching of sulfidic ores |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
SU998549A1 (en) * | 1981-10-12 | 1983-02-23 | Уральский Ордена Трудового Красного Знамени Научно-Исследовательский И Проектный Институт Медной Промышленности "Унипромедь" | Method for leaching sulfide ores and concentrates |
US4974816A (en) * | 1986-02-07 | 1990-12-04 | Envirotech Corporation | Method and apparatus for biological processing of metal-containing ores |
US5102104A (en) * | 1990-03-05 | 1992-04-07 | U.S. Gold Corporation | Biological conversion apparatus |
US5143543A (en) * | 1991-08-23 | 1992-09-01 | U.S. Gold Corporation | Biological conversion method |
-
1998
- 1998-11-18 AU AUPP7180A patent/AUPP718098A0/en not_active Abandoned
-
1999
- 1999-10-22 CA CA002350476A patent/CA2350476A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 1999-10-22 WO PCT/AU1999/000917 patent/WO2000029629A1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1999-10-22 ES ES200150044A patent/ES2192975B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1999-10-22 MX MXPA01005009A patent/MXPA01005009A/en unknown
- 1999-10-22 CN CN99814694A patent/CN1331759A/en active Pending
- 1999-10-22 US US09/831,579 patent/USH2140H1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2000
- 2000-04-26 GT GT200000055A patent/GT200000055A/en unknown
-
2001
- 2001-05-15 ZA ZA200103916A patent/ZA200103916B/en unknown
Patent Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US1019003A (en) * | 1911-01-13 | 1912-02-27 | Gustav Aminoff | Absorption apparatus. |
US4571387A (en) | 1983-01-26 | 1986-02-18 | British Columbia Research Council | Biological-acid leach process |
US5007620A (en) * | 1986-02-07 | 1991-04-16 | Envirotech Corporation | Apparatus for biological processing of metal-containing ores |
US5093047A (en) * | 1990-01-18 | 1992-03-03 | Roediger Pittsburgh, Inc. | Gas diffuser |
EP0522978A1 (en) | 1991-07-10 | 1993-01-13 | Newmont Mining Corporation | Biooxidation process for recovery of metal values from sulfur-containing ore materials |
WO1998051827A1 (en) | 1997-05-16 | 1998-11-19 | Echo Bay Mines, Limited | Integrated, tank/heap biooxidation process for the lixiviation of sulfide ores |
AU7856098A (en) | 1997-07-31 | 1999-02-11 | M.I.M. Holdings Limited | Silver catalysed leaching of chalcopyrite ore |
AU1852499A (en) | 1998-03-02 | 1999-09-16 | Placer Dome Technical Services Limited | Method for initiating heap bioleaching of sulfidic ores |
Non-Patent Citations (5)
Title |
---|
"Biohydrometallurgy" by Rossi, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1990, pp. 82-85. |
"Compania Minera Cerro Colorado Operational Description and Technological Innovations" by Reyes et al., VI World Latin American Mining Exposure (EXPOMIN) 2000, Chilean Mining Engineers' Institue in Chile, Technological Innovation Seminar, May 2000, p. 9. |
"Detection Bypolmerase Chain Reaction-Amplification and Sequencing of an Archeon in a Comercial-Scale Copper Bioleaching Plant" by Vasquez et al., FEMS Microbiology Letter, 173, pp. 183-187. |
"Quebrada Blanca, Lessons Learned in High Altitude Leaching" by Salomon, VI World Latin American Mining Exposure (EXPOMIN) 2000, Chilean Mining Engineers' Institue in Chile, Technological Innovation Seminar, May 2000, p. 4. |
"The Bioleaching of Different Sulphide Concentrates Using Thermophilic Bacteria", by Torres et al., Met. Trans B, 26B (1995). |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2009103025A2 (en) * | 2008-02-15 | 2009-08-20 | Biometallix, Llc | Reactor for extracting metals from metal sulfide containing materials and methods of use |
WO2009103025A3 (en) * | 2008-02-15 | 2009-11-05 | Biometallix, Llc | Reactor for extracting metals from metal sulfide containing materials and methods of use |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CA2350476A1 (en) | 2000-05-25 |
AUPP718098A0 (en) | 1998-12-17 |
GT200000055A (en) | 2001-10-18 |
ZA200103916B (en) | 2003-01-29 |
ES2192975A1 (en) | 2003-10-16 |
ES2192975B1 (en) | 2005-02-01 |
WO2000029629A1 (en) | 2000-05-25 |
MXPA01005009A (en) | 2004-08-19 |
CN1331759A (en) | 2002-01-16 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
AU775052B2 (en) | Recovery of copper from copper bearing sulphide minerals by bioleaching with controlled oxygen feed | |
US8491701B2 (en) | Methods and systems for leaching a metal-bearing ore for the recovery of a metal value | |
EP1866447B1 (en) | Heap leaching of sulphide ores | |
AU2010212469B2 (en) | Bioreactor for continuous production of bioleaching solutions for inoculation and irrigation of sulfide-ore bioleaching heaps and dumps | |
US10767242B2 (en) | Methods and systems for leaching a metal-bearing ore using a bio-augmentation process | |
USH2140H1 (en) | Bio-oxidation process and apparatus | |
Gericke et al. | Bioleaching of copper sulphide concentrate using extreme thermophilic bacteria | |
Acevedo et al. | Process engineering aspects of the bioleaching of copper ores | |
RU2291909C1 (en) | Method for extracting of gold from rebellious auriferous-arsenical ores | |
US6383458B1 (en) | Biooxidation process for recovery of metal values from sulfur-containing ore materials | |
AU773999B2 (en) | A method of operating a bioleach process with control of redox potential | |
US6696283B1 (en) | Particulate of sulfur-containing ore materials and heap made therefrom | |
AU617332B2 (en) | Chemical/biological process to oxidize multimetallic sulphide ores | |
US20070264703A1 (en) | Microorganism and Method for Leaching Mineral Sulphides | |
US20040022698A1 (en) | Apparatus for processing elemental sulfur-bearing materials to produce sulfuric acid and methods of using same | |
US20040023350A1 (en) | Method for biological oxidation of elemental sulfur-bearing materials for sulfuric acid production | |
Brierley | Biooxidation pretreatment of refractory sulfidic and sulfidic-carbonaceous gold ores and concentrates | |
Mousavi et al. | Copper recovery from chalcopyrite concentrate by an indigenous Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans in an air-lift bioreactor | |
AL LEACHI | UNI VERSI DAD DE CONCEPCI ÓN | |
Sánchez | Modelling of Bacterial Leaching in Heap with Forced Aeration | |
WO2014107394A1 (en) | Processes for the enhanced bioleaching of ores |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |