US9461886B2 - Self-organizing network function interaction - Google Patents

Self-organizing network function interaction Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US9461886B2
US9461886B2 US14/380,248 US201314380248A US9461886B2 US 9461886 B2 US9461886 B2 US 9461886B2 US 201314380248 A US201314380248 A US 201314380248A US 9461886 B2 US9461886 B2 US 9461886B2
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
function
son
network
balancing
load
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
US14/380,248
Other languages
English (en)
Other versions
US20150043386A1 (en
Inventor
András Rácz
Mehdi AMIRIJOO
Fredrik Gunnarsson
Harald Kallin
Johan Moe
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson AB
Original Assignee
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson AB
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson AB filed Critical Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson AB
Priority to US14/380,248 priority Critical patent/US9461886B2/en
Assigned to TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET L M ERICSSON (PUBL) reassignment TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET L M ERICSSON (PUBL) ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: AMIRIJOO, MEHDI, GUNNARSSON, FREDRIK, MOE, JOHAN, RÁCZ, András, KALLIN, HARALD
Publication of US20150043386A1 publication Critical patent/US20150043386A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US9461886B2 publication Critical patent/US9461886B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L41/00—Arrangements for maintenance, administration or management of data switching networks, e.g. of packet switching networks
    • H04L41/08—Configuration management of networks or network elements
    • H04L41/0876—Aspects of the degree of configuration automation
    • H04L41/0886—Fully automatic configuration
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L41/00—Arrangements for maintenance, administration or management of data switching networks, e.g. of packet switching networks
    • H04L41/04—Network management architectures or arrangements
    • H04L41/044—Network management architectures or arrangements comprising hierarchical management structures
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L41/00—Arrangements for maintenance, administration or management of data switching networks, e.g. of packet switching networks
    • H04L41/08—Configuration management of networks or network elements
    • H04L41/0803—Configuration setting
    • H04L41/0813—Configuration setting characterised by the conditions triggering a change of settings
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L41/00—Arrangements for maintenance, administration or management of data switching networks, e.g. of packet switching networks
    • H04L41/08—Configuration management of networks or network elements
    • H04L41/0803—Configuration setting
    • H04L41/0823—Configuration setting characterised by the purposes of a change of settings, e.g. optimising configuration for enhancing reliability
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W24/00—Supervisory, monitoring or testing arrangements
    • H04W24/02—Arrangements for optimising operational condition
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W88/00—Devices specially adapted for wireless communication networks, e.g. terminals, base stations or access point devices
    • H04W88/18—Service support devices; Network management devices

Definitions

  • the present disclosure relates generally to Self-Organizing Network (SON) functions, and in particular to methods of interaction between hierarchical SON functions and to network nodes configured to carry out such methods.
  • SON Self-Organizing Network
  • Wireless communication networks are ubiquitous, and are becoming increasingly complex as new standards and protocols are established to increase the number of subscribers, data rates, efficiency, and the number and variety of services delivered to subscribers.
  • FIG. 1 depicts a functional block diagram of a LTE network, including a core network (i.e., the evolved packet core) and a Radio Access network (i.e., the Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Network, or E-UTRAN).
  • the evolved packet core network nodes include those having the functionality of a Mobile Management Entity (MME) and a Signalling Gateway (S-GW).
  • MME Mobile Management Entity
  • S-GW Signalling Gateway
  • the E-UTRAN nodes include evolved Node B's (eNB). The eNBs connect to each other over the logical X2 interface, and to the MME/SGWs over the logical S1 interface.
  • the node elements also known as an eNodeB or eNB
  • NE node elements
  • DM domain manager
  • NM network manager
  • the management system may configure the network elements, as well as receive observations associated to features in the network elements. For example, DM observes and configures NEs, while NM observes and configures DM, as well as NE via DM.
  • the management system is hierarchical, with a high-level NM receiving information from, and controlling, lower-level DM functions and NEs. Any function that automatically optimizes NE parameters can in principle execute in the NE, DM, or the NM.
  • SON functions Functions that automatically monitor network operations and parameters, and user actions, and automatically take actions to optimize network operations are referred to as Self-Organizing Network (SON) functions.
  • SON functions are also structured hierarchically—with a high-level SON function (for example, a NM) operating to optimize the overall network, and a plurality of lower-level SON functions (for example, at each NE) locally optimizing the NE, under the control and direction of the high-level SON function.
  • the terms “high-level SON function,” “network manager (NM)” or “network management system (NMS),” and “centralized SON function” are used synonymously herein.
  • “lower-level SON functions” are sometimes referred to as “network element (NE)” SON functions or “distributed” SON functions.
  • the SON functions may vary depending on the time scale on which they operate (e.g., ranging from seconds/minutes level to hours/days level), the target parameter set, and the type of optimization that they execute. For example, SON functions that require fast operation and/or dealing with individual per user actions are typically deployed in the network, close to the radio interface. Other functions that operate on a longer time scale and dealing with cell level optimizations can be deployed higher up in the management system.
  • the 3GPP standard also defines notification procedures on the Itf-N interface, which can be used by the DM to notify the NM when some configuration parameters have been changed in the network. This can help the NM to get an up-to-date view of the network configuration, covering, for instance, cases when the NE SON function has changed certain cell parameters. However, the indication does not reveal which function has changed this parameter (e.g., which SON function) or the specific reason of the change.
  • load balancing may be executed by forced handover of users between neighboring cells, which can be executed by a SON function in the RAN or it could be executed by changing the cell sizes via antenna tilting from the OAM system.
  • a set of reporting features are specified that could be implemented by lower-level SON functions to support the observation of network SON algorithms by high-level SON functions (e.g., OAM functions).
  • the lower-level SON functions may be operative to adjust local parameters (e.g., related to the network element serving area and/or capacity).
  • the reported SON algorithm events and/or measurements may be defined such that they can be used by the higher-level SON function to resolve conflicts and control the lower-level SON functions.
  • Some embodiments specify SON function reporting features and their configuration in the framework of the 3GPP defined Itf-N interface specification.
  • One embodiment relates to a method, by a high-level SON function in a hierarchical structure of SON functions in a network, of interaction with one or more lower-level SON functions.
  • Information regarding network conditions or subscriber activity is received from one or more lower-level SON functions, the information including the identity of the one or more lower-level SON functions and any network optimization actions performed by the lower-level SON function.
  • the information received from the one or more lower-level SON functions is analyzed.
  • One or more actions to optimize the network are performed in response to the information analysis.
  • the information may include a network optimization action performed by the one or more lower-level SON functions.
  • the information regarding network condition may pertain to conditions of the one or more lower-level SON functions.
  • conditions of the one or more lower-level SON functions may pertain to an internal status of the one or more lower-level SON functions (such as SON function states, SON targets, possible impacts of actions taken or to be taken by the lower-level SON functions, SON coordination policies, and so on).
  • the information may additionally or alternatively include one or more network optimization recommendations.
  • the network optimization recommendation may be performed by the lower-level SON functions.
  • the network optimization recommendation is a suggested configuration parameter for the one or more lower-level SON functions.
  • the method step of performing one or more actions to optimize the network may include adjusting one or more operation parameters of the network. Adjusting the one or more operation parameters of the network may alter the geographic serving area of one or more network elements operative to provide wireless communication services to one or more subscribers or the capacity of one or more network elements operative to provide wireless communication services to one or more subscribers.
  • the one or more operation parameters may include a configuration parameter for the one or more lower-level SON functions.
  • the information includes a description of a problem detected by the one or more lower-level SON function and/or details of the problem.
  • the description of the problem may further include an anticipated source of the problem and/or a suggested solution to the problem.
  • the one or more operation parameters includes whether the one or more lower-level SON functions are activated or deactivated.
  • the information is received over a 3GPP Itf-N interface, wherein the interface may include the Itf-N SON Policy Network Resource Model Integration Reference Point, the Itf-N Performance Management Integration Reference Point, and/or the Itf-N trace Integration Reference Point.
  • the information may include load balancing reporting, handover statistics, and/or individual User Equipment actions.
  • Another embodiment relates to a method, by a lower-level SON function in a hierarchical structure of SON functions in a network, of interaction with a high-level SON function.
  • Information regarding network conditions or subscriber activity e.g., related to a network element operative to provide wireless communication services to subscribers
  • the information including the identity of the lower-level SON function, is sent to a high-level SON function in the network.
  • the method may further include performing one or more network optimization actions, and wherein the information includes the actions performed.
  • the method may further include maintaining information about at least one of the actions taken by and/or the status of the lower-level SON function.
  • the information may be maintained locally in a database or any other data repository. Furthermore, the maintained information may be regularly updated as needed.
  • the information additionally includes one or more network optimization recommendations.
  • the network optimization recommendation may be performed by the lower-level SON functions.
  • the network optimization recommendation is a suggested configuration parameter for the one or more lower-level SON functions.
  • the information regarding networks conditions may in one variant pertain to conditions of the one or more lower-level SON functions, such as an internal status of the one or more lower-level SON functions.
  • the method may further include receiving, from the high-level SON function, one or more target parameters, and performing local network optimization according to the target parameters.
  • the method may also include receiving, from the high-level SON function, an indication to activate or deactivate a network optimization or not, in response to the indication.
  • the method may include detecting a problem associated with the network element, wherein the information includes a description and/or details of the problem.
  • the description of the problem may further include an anticipated source of the problem and/or a suggested solution to the problem.
  • sending the information includes sending the information over a 3GPP Itf-N interface.
  • the interface may include the Itf-N SON Policy Network Resource Model Integration Reference Point, the Itf-N Performance Management Integration Reference Point, and/or the Itf-N trace Integration Reference Point.
  • the information may include load balancing reporting, handover statistics, and/or individual User Equipment actions.
  • a network node includes a network interface, a controller operatively connected to a memory and the network interface.
  • the memory is operative to store computer program code containing instructions operative to cause the controller to implement the functionality of a high-level Self-Organizing Network “SON” function, the high-level SON function in a hierarchical structure of SON functions in a network, to interact with one or more lower-level SON functions.
  • SON Self-Organizing Network
  • the controller is operable to receive, from one or more lower-level SON functions, information regarding network conditions or subscriber activity, the information including the identity of the one or more lower-level SON functions, analyze the information received from the one or more lower-level SON functions, and perform one or more actions to optimize the network in response to the information analysis.
  • the information may include a network optimization action performed by the one or more lower-level SON functions.
  • the information regarding network conditions pertained to conditions of the one or more lower-level SON functions such as an internal status of or any parameter pertaining to the one or more lower-level SON functions.
  • the information may additionally include one or more network optimization recommendations.
  • the network optimization recommendation may be performed by the lower-level SON functions.
  • the network optimization recommendation is a suggested configuration parameter for the one or more lower-level SON functions.
  • the one or more actions to optimize the network may include adjusting one or more operation parameters of the network. Adjusting the one or more operation parameters of the network may alter the geographic serving area of one or more network elements operative to provide wireless communication services to one or more subscribers or the capacity of one or more network elements operative to provide wireless communication services to one or more subscribers.
  • the one or more operation parameters may include a configuration parameter for the one or more lower-level SON functions.
  • the information includes a description of a problem detected by the one or more lower-level SON function and/or details of the problem.
  • the description of the problem may further includes an anticipated source of the problem and/or a suggested solution to the problem.
  • the one or more operation parameters includes whether the one or more lower-level SON functions are activated or deactivated.
  • the information is received over a 3GPP Itf-N interface, wherein the interface may include the Itf-N SON Policy Network Resource Model Integration Reference Point, the Itf-N Performance Management Integration Reference Point, and/or the Itf-N trace Integration Reference Point.
  • the information may include load balancing reporting, handover statistics, and/or individual User Equipment actions.
  • An access network node includes a network interface, a transceiver operative to transmit and receive signals via one or more antennas, the one or more antennas, a controller operatively connected to a memory, the network interface, and the transceiver.
  • the memory is operative to store computer program code containing instructions operative to cause the controller to implement the functionality of a lower-level Self-Organizing Network “SON” function, the lower-level SON function in a hierarchical structure of SON functions in a network, to interact with a high-level SON function.
  • SON Self-Organizing Network
  • the controller is operable to gather information regarding network conditions or subscriber activity (e.g., related to a network element operative to provide wireless communication services to one or more subscribers), and send the information, which includes the identity of the lower-level SON function, to a high-level SON function in a network.
  • network conditions or subscriber activity e.g., related to a network element operative to provide wireless communication services to one or more subscribers
  • the controller is further operable to perform one or more network optimization actions, and wherein the information includes the actions performed.
  • the information additionally includes one or more network optimization recommendations.
  • the network optimization recommendation may be performed by the lower-level SON functions.
  • the network optimization recommendation is a suggested configuration parameter for the one or more lower-level SON functions.
  • the information regarding the network conditions may pertain to conditions of the lower-level SON function. Such conditions may comprise an internal status of or any other parameter pertaining to the lower-level SON function.
  • the controller is operable to receive, from the high-level SON function, one or more target parameters, and perform local network optimization according to the target parameters.
  • the controller may be operable to receive, from the high-level SON function, an indication to activate or deactivate a network optimization or not, in response to the indication.
  • the controller is operable to detect a problem associated with the network element, wherein the information includes a description and/or details of the problem.
  • the description of the problem may further include an anticipated source of the problem and/or a suggested solution to the problem.
  • sending the information includes sending the information over a 3GPP Itf-N interface, wherein the interface may include the Itf-N SON Policy Network Resource Model Integration Reference Point, the Itf-N Performance Management Integration Reference Point, and/or the Itf-N trace Integration Reference Point.
  • the information may include load balancing reporting, handover statistics, and/or individual User Equipment actions.
  • FIG. 1 is a functional block diagram of a LTE network.
  • FIG. 2 is a functional block diagram of hierarchical network management.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram depicting HO oscillation.
  • FIG. 4 is a signaling diagram depicting handover signaling.
  • FIG. 5 is a signaling diagram depicting information exchange.
  • FIG. 6 is a flow diagram of cooperative SON function operation.
  • FIG. 7 depicts functional block diagrams of network nodes.
  • FIG. 8 is a flow diagram of SON function operation.
  • SON functions at both hierarchical levels are performing network optimization actions on their own and in addition, the high-level SON function is observing the operation of the lower-level SON function. The observation is used to detect conflicting or suboptimal situations when coordination would be needed between the different layers.
  • the high-level SON function can execute the coordination either by changing target parameters of the lower-level SON function, activating/deactivating certain lower-level SON functions, or simply executing a high-level SON optimization itself, which reconfigures the domain in which lower-level SON function operates.
  • a diagram of this mode of operation is depicted in FIG. 6 .
  • the lower-level SON function is used only for the detection of a network problem, which is reported to higher-level SON function.
  • the higher-level SON function then performs some network optimization action(s).
  • One reason for such a deployment is that the lower-level SON function can utilize detailed information to detect and observe the network situation in real-time, while the high-level SON function can consider multiple sources of information (e.g., reports from multiple lower-level SON functions, each operating in a different cell) to make the best overall network optimization decision(s).
  • the detection of a main interferer can be done in the network, e.g., in the base station close to the radio interface where such measurements are steadily available, while the resolution of the problem is best solved at a centralized, higher level where multi-cell information is available.
  • This mode of operation is similar to that depicted in FIG. 6 ; however, the distributed optimization function only takes and reports measurements and network events to the centralized network optimization function.
  • actions taken by lower-level SON functions are reported to a high-level SON function.
  • the actions can be reported on an event level (i.e., each action taken by the lower-level SON function, e.g., each load balancing based handover execution) or as an aggregate of the actions (e.g., ratio of load balancing based handovers).
  • problems detected by lower-level SON functions are reported to the high-level SON function.
  • the lower-level SON function detects the problem based on detailed information available in the NE and passes the problem description to the high-levels SON function, along with the details of the detected problem.
  • the lower-level SON function may also provide information related to the expected source of the problem, and one or more possible solutions.
  • the lower-level SON function may have identified a critical load imbalance between two cells, but the users are located far from the cell borders, or the radio conditions are such that the lower-level SON function cannot do anything about the imbalance by forcing handoffs to a neighboring cell.
  • the lower-level SON function can provide all of this information to the high-level SON function, which may alter cell boundaries by adjusting power levels and antenna tilt.
  • Load balancing or “traffic steering” works by moving users one by one from highly loaded cells to less load cells in order to improve the user performance, e.g., user bit rate.
  • a user being a good candidate for load balancing action e.g., being located at the cell edge with relatively good link conditions to the neighboring cell, may be moved to the neighboring cell in order to balance the load between the two cells.
  • the Handover Margin (HOM) (described more thoroughly later herein) of the UEs in a cell may be altered in order to trigger measurements of candidate cells either closer or further away from the serving cell, depending on the relative loads of the serving and candidate cells. UEs triggering such measurements are considered to be handed over to the reported candidate cell.
  • the HOM may be regularly altered with the goal to even out the load between cells, or changed when one cell is considered to be in an overload situation or fails to meet the QoS of served users, and a candidate cell is not in an overload situation. In this case the overload cell may hand over several UEs satisfying the HOM criteria to alleviate the overload situation.
  • SON functions may be utilized to achieve load balancing and sharing between cells in many ways: fast or slow, distributed or centralized, via antenna reorientation or reference signal power levels via cell individual offsets affecting cell selection and mobility, via distributed traffic steering mechanisms, and the like.
  • a lower-level SON function moves individual users between cells, for example by considering individual cell offsets. This may counteract the negative impact of sudden peak loads, moving some users from one cell to another, perhaps for a few seconds.
  • the high-level SON function continuously monitors the load in each cell to make long-term adjustments to the cell borders via antenna and reference signal power parameters. Typically, this update will happen once or few times a day to handle natural load fluctuation due to changes in traffic patterns.
  • the actions of these two SON functions will contribute to the overall target—balancing the load and sharing the resources to optimize end user performance.
  • the implementation is not straightforward.
  • the high-level SON function must consider the actions made by the lower-level SON functions in each network element to effect distributed load balancing and sharing, since these mitigate or even compensate for the load imbalance between two cells. Analyzing only the load situation in the cells, the centralized algorithm may conclude that there is no load imbalance between the cells. Such distributed load balancing incurs the cost of increased interference, which will not result in an optimal network capacity performance.
  • Another example is when the distributed load balancing and sharing has identified a load imbalance and has made attempts to share the load more evenly but failed. It may be due to the radio conditions that makes load sharing or mobile terminals intractable.
  • distributed SON observability informs the centralized SON function about actions taken in the decentralized network element SON function. This means that the decentralized network element load balancing and sharing need to be monitored by the centralized SON function.
  • the distributed load balancing and sharing should report on topics including:
  • Handover statistics due to load balancing and sharing, related to a specific neighbor cell, carrier, RAT with information including: the number of attempted load balancing handovers; the number of successful load balancing handovers; and the number of intended load balancing handover attempts blocked by too low geometry.
  • the information could be sent as individual events or be aggregated as counters, KPIs.
  • the permanence of the cell borders may be realized via antenna reorientation (tilt, azimuth, beamwidth), or via reference signal power adjustments.
  • the centralized SON function can use the reported load balancing and sharing information as indications of whether individual cells should be expanded or reduced in size.
  • the centralized SON function for antenna parameter configuration When the centralized SON function for antenna parameter configuration receives the statistics (and/or individual handover event reports) about the succeeded and attempted number of load balancing handovers, it may evaluate whether the average rate of LB related HOs (attempted or succeeded) is above some threshold from Cell A to Cell B. If that is the case, the centralized antenna optimization algorithm (i.e., the Coverage Capacity Optimization algorithm) could use it as a trigger to increase coverage area of Cell B and decrease coverage area of Cell A.
  • the trigger could be used as one specific rule in a rule based optimization engine, for example, where multiple rules are typically present and the aggregated sum of triggered rules give the actionable output.
  • the centralized load balancing considers aggregated and averaged cell size adjustments by the distributed SON function to derive new desired cell coverage regions.
  • the centralized SON function also considers handover failure statistics, to derive cell size adjustments that correspond to successful handovers.
  • too early handover meaning that a UE is handed over to a candidate cell too early with a radio link or handover failure as a result.
  • the UE returns soon to the source cell via re-establishment procedures.
  • too late handover meaning that the UE is handed over too late to the target cell, so that the link to the source cell breaks before completing the handover.
  • the MRO mechanism may adjust one or more of the following handover parameters controlling the event driven reporting of the UE: Threshold indicating how much stronger a certain candidate cell needs to be before it is reported to the serving cell; Filter coefficient applied to the measurement before evaluation triggers are considered; and Time to trigger meaning the time window within which the triggering condition needs to be continuously met in order to trigger the reporting event in the UE.
  • a higher ‘too early handover’ ratio than desired can be counter-acted by increasing the threshold, delaying the report event trigger.
  • a higher ‘handover to wrong cell’ ratio than desired can be counter-acted by increasing the threshold towards the first, unwanted, target cell.
  • Topics related to MRO include HO Oscillation, Handover Margin and Time-to-Trigger, HO Cause, and RLF Report.
  • Handover (HO) Oscillation is defined with respect to FIG. 3 . If T ⁇ T osc , then the HO is considered to be an oscillation.
  • the oscillation rate can be defined as the ratio between the number of oscillations and the total number of HOs. There is an upper boundary for an acceptable oscillation rate originating from e.g., core network load. Also, the oscillation rate is related to end-user performance. On one hand oscillation are harmful as this induces additional signalling and delays, and on the other hand, oscillations allow the user to be connected to the best cell. This needs to be balanced in order for the end-user to experience the best performance.
  • the handover margin is the difference between the radio quality of the serving cell and the radio quality needed before attempting a handover.
  • the radio quality is measured either using RSRP or RSRQ. See 3GPP TS 36.305 for further information.
  • the UE triggers the intra-frequency handover procedure by sending an eventA3 report to the eNB. This event occurs when the UE measures that the target cell is better than the serving cell with a margin “HOM.”
  • HOM is calculated from the following configurable parameters:
  • the HOM can thus be changed by modifying one or more of these parameters.
  • Time-to-trigger is the time period required before triggering a handover attempt. During this time the neighbor cell shall have better radio quality, and then the handover attempt is triggered. These are further explained in 3GPP TS 36.300.
  • the source cell performs a HO Request over X2AP, as depicted in FIG. 4 (see 3GPP TS 36.423 for further information).
  • the source eNB In the HANDOVER REQUEST message, the source eNB must indicate the cause of the HO, which can be, e.g., Handover Desirable for Radio Reasons; Resource Optimisation Handover; or Reduce Load in Serving Cell.
  • the target eNB knows that the HO is due to resource optimization or to reduce the load in the serving cell.
  • a similar signalling can be routed via S1 links and the MME, see S1AP, 3GPP TS 36.413.
  • the eNB may request a report from the UE. Following an RRC Connection Reestablishment as a result of an RLF, the eNB may send a UEInformationRequest message to the UE, as shown in FIG. 5 . See 3GPP TS 36.331 for more information. If the eNB requests for an RLF report in the UEInformationRequest message and the UE has such information, then the UE provides the following information to the eNB: The E-CGI of the last cell that served the UE (in case of RLF) or the target of the handover (in case of handover failure).
  • RLF Radio Link Failure
  • the PCI and frequency information are used instead; the E-CGI of the cell at which the re-establishment attempt was made; the E-CGI of the cell that served the UE at the last handover initialization, i.e. when message 7 (RRC Conn. Reconf.) was received by the UE, as presented in FIG. 10.1 . 2 . 1 . 1 - 1 ; the time elapsed since the last handover initialization until connection failure; an indication whether the connection failure was due to RLF or handover failure; and RSRP and RSRQ of the serving cell and the neighboring cells detected by UE at the RLF event.
  • the eNB can deduce whether the RLF was due to incorrect HO parameters (too early, too late) or due to a coverage hole (no cell with sufficient signal strength).
  • reported actions and measurements taken by the mobility robustness optimization SON function in the network element include:
  • the network element MRO function may have attempted to adjust handover parameters to counteract too early and/or too late handovers, but these counters cannot be improved. This means that MRO is unable to meet the targets on handover success rates etc.
  • distributed MRO indicates its problems with successfully adjusting handover parameters by sending the “Failed handover parameter optimization” message to the higher level SON function. This information is considered in centralized MRO function, and interpreted as a need for a more comprehensive cell overlap retuning between the two cells. This can be accomplished by antenna parameter adjustments, calculated by the central SON function and reconfigured in the network.
  • the distributed MRO function may be able to find a parameter configuration at which the desired handover performance targets are fulfilled.
  • the given parameter configuration may be sub-optimal from other aspects, e.g., causing too high inter-cell interference and users being served in bad interference situations.
  • the higher level SON function can detect this situation based on the reported performance metrics and HO parameter values as set by the lower level SON function. Based on this information, the higher level SON function may place restrictions on the parameter range that can be tuned by the lower level SON function and/or may decide to change cell sizes and coverage area by adjusting antenna parameters.
  • Inter-cell interference coordination was introduced in Release-8/9 of the 3GPP LTE standards.
  • the basic idea of ICIC is keeping the inter-cell interferences under control by radio resource management (RRM) methods.
  • RRM radio resource management
  • ICIC is inherently a multi-cell RRM function that needs to take into account information (e.g. the resource usage status and traffic load situation) from multiple cells.
  • Distributed ICIC may have attempted to coordinate interference between two cells, but the reported cell-edge performance is still not satisfactory and the inter-cell interference is still too high.
  • the distributed SON indicates the inability to resolve persistent interference situation to centralized SON, which considers this as an indication to reduce cell overlap between the two cells, for example via antenna adjustments or by reconfiguring the ICIC algorithm in the network element, e.g., by switching it to fixed reuse-N operation from reuse-1.
  • Reported action and measurements by ICIC SON function may include:
  • the first step in resolving such conflict situation is to detect the collision.
  • the NE receiving measurement reports from the UEs can detect when two or more cells have the same PCI assigned, for example by ordering the UEs to report both PCI and the globally unique cell identifier (GUCI).
  • GUI globally unique cell identifier
  • the solution could be a redesign of the PCI allocation to the cells.
  • the detection of the conflict can be done based on information collected and available in the NE, a reallocation of PCI codes needs to be done in a coordinated way with other cells.
  • a coordinated reallocation of the PCI codes should be done from an entity with multi-cell, global knowledge, which is best done from the OAM system. Note that the initial allocation of PCI and SC codes is also determined from OAM during deployment phase.
  • Reported indication from NE PCI function may be the following:
  • Energy efficiency (EE) mechanisms may temporary affect the capacity of the network element in order to save energy. For example, some antenna ports may be disabled during times of low loads. This will impact the cell load in terms of utilization of the available resources. A coverage and capacity optimizing centralized solution needs to be aware of the energy savings actions in order to correctly evaluate cell load via resource utilization.
  • Reported actions and measurements by energy efficiency SON function may include:
  • Energy saving action invoked by network EE function including: Cell switched on/off; Frequency band/carrier switched on/off; Sectorization switched on/off; and the like.
  • the centralized SON function does not consider statistics from cells that has been operating under energy efficiency adjustments.
  • the centralized SON function adjusts the load in terms of resource utilization to correspond to a more comprehensive network element operation, for example with all antenna ports enabled.
  • the reporting of network element SON functions can be realized on the Itf-N standardized interface as defined by 3GPP (see FIG. 2 for the location of this interface in the logical architecture).
  • the Itf-N functions are grouped and defined in so called Integration Reference Points (IRPs), which specify the information object classes and their attributes that are available on the given IRP. They also specify interactions, e.g., notifications, read/write of attributes etc., that are available on the IRP.
  • IRPs Integration Reference Points
  • the “SON Policy Network Resource Model IRP” is already defined, which supports the controlling of network element SON functions, e.g., by setting targets and also the sending of notification to upwards, e.g., when certain attribute values have been changed. See 3GPP TS 32.522 for the detailed specification.
  • IRPs defined for instance, for PM which includes reporting of counters, KPIs on cell level and for trace, where the trace IRP enables the collection of more detailed events, messages, measurements on per UE level.
  • CM Notification IRP TS 32.302
  • CM Configuration Management
  • Some of the SON reporting features introduced by embodiments of the present invention may be added as standardized notification procedures within the “SON Policy and Network Resource Model IRP,” while others could be added into the PM reporting IRP.
  • Reporting features related to the actions of network element SON functions may be added into the SON IRP, for example in case of SON load balancing reporting, each of the following reporting features could be added as a separate notification in 32.522: Change of individual cell relation offsets considered for handover; and Detection of load unbalance situations.
  • Reporting features related to individual UE related actions may be best added to the trace IRP on Itf-N.
  • the reported event would appear as yet another event in the collected trace record, such as Individual handover events related to load balancing action.
  • Yet another group of the introduced SON reporting features may be best defined as part of the PM IRP, in terms of counters, including for example the following (in case of load balancing SON): Handover statistics due to load balancing and sharing, related to a specific neighbor cell, carrier, RAT.
  • the higher-level SON functions may be executed in network nodes in the core network, while the lower-level SON functions are preferably executed in access network nodes, such as the eNB.
  • FIG. 7 depicts block diagrams of these nodes in a network 100 .
  • the network node 102 in the core networkOperation and Maintenance system (or, generally, a core network), includes a controller 104 operatively connected to memory 106 and a network interface 110 . Functional blocks not germane to the present discussion are omitted for clarity.
  • the processor 104 may comprise any sequential state machine operative to execute machine instructions stored as machine-readable computer programs in the memory 106 , such as one or more hardware-implemented state machines (e.g., in discrete logic, FPGA, ASIC, etc.); programmable logic together with appropriate firmware; one or more stored-program, general-purpose processors, such as a microprocessor or Digital Signal Processor (DSP), together with appropriate software; or any combination of the above.
  • hardware-implemented state machines e.g., in discrete logic, FPGA, ASIC, etc.
  • programmable logic together with appropriate firmware
  • one or more stored-program, general-purpose processors such as a microprocessor or Digital Signal Processor (DSP), together with appropriate software; or any combination of the above.
  • DSP Digital Signal Processor
  • the memory 106 may comprise any nontransient machine-readable media known in the art or that may be developed, including but not limited to magnetic media (e.g., floppy disc, hard disc drive, etc.), optical media (e.g., CD-ROM, DVD-ROM, etc.), solid state media (e.g., SRAM, DRAM, DDRAM, ROM, PROM, EPROM, Flash memory, etc.), or the like.
  • the memory 106 is operative to store computer program code 108 containing instructions operative to cause the controller 104 to implement the functionality of a high-level SON function.
  • the network interface 110 may take the form of a modem, modem bank, Ethernet device, universal serial bus (USB) interface device, serial interface, token ring device, fiber distributed data interface (FDDI) device, wireless local area network (WLAN) device, and/or other well-known devices for connecting to networks and exchanging data with other nodes in the network.
  • the network interface 110 may enable the processor 104 to communicate with a broad array of networks and devices, but in particular is operative to implement communication with a plurality of eNode B nodes 120 .
  • the node 120 in the radio access network (such as a RAN), which may for example comprise an eNode B in an LTE RAN or a node in a core network, includes a controller 130 operatively connected to memory 124 , a network interface 128 , and a transceiver 130 which is in turn connected to one or more antennas 132 .
  • a controller 130 operatively connected to memory 124 , a network interface 128 , and a transceiver 130 which is in turn connected to one or more antennas 132 .
  • Functional blocks not germane to the present discussion are omitted for clarity.
  • the processor 122 , memory 124 , and network interface 128 may comprise any hardware and/or software modules as described above for corresponding functionality in the network node 102 .
  • the memory 124 is operative to store computer program code 126 containing instructions operative to cause the controller 122 to implement the functionality of a lower-level SON function.
  • the transceiver 130 is operative to transmit and receive signals to and from UEs in the RAN, via the antenna(s) 132 , according to a known wireless communication protocol, such as 3GPP LTE.
  • a known wireless communication protocol such as 3GPP LTE.
  • the transceiver 130 may operate according to code division multiple access (CDMA) protocols (e.g., UTRA, CDMA2000, WCDMA), global system for mobile communications (GSM), worldwide interoperability for microwave access (WiMAX), and/or other well-known wireless communication protocols.
  • CDMA code division multiple access
  • UTRA Universal Terrestriality
  • CDMA2000 Code Division Multiple Access 2000
  • WCDMA global system for mobile communications
  • WiMAX worldwide interoperability for microwave access
  • FIG. 8 is a flow diagram of a SON function operation.
  • a high-level SON function in a hierarchical structure of SON functions in a network, interacts with one or more lower-level SON functions. For example, information regarding network conditions or subscriber activity is received from one or more lower-level SON functions, the information including the identity of the lower-level SON function.
  • network conditions may relate to conditions of the one or more lower-level SON functions. Such conditions may in one variant relate to an internal status of the one or more lower-level SON functions. In a specific example, the conditions may pertain to a possible impact of an action taken or to be taken by the one or more lower-level SON functions, SON targets underlying a specific action, SON function priorities, SON coordination policies, SON function states, and so on.
  • Network conditions and/or subscriber activity may also include a state or states of a managed object (e.g., an eNode B).
  • a managed object e.g., an eNode B
  • the information received from one or more lower-level SON functions is analyzed.
  • One or more actions to optimize the network are performed in response to the information analysis.
  • the information received from one or more lower-level SON functions is analyzed.
  • One or more actions to optimize the network are performed in response to the information analysis.
  • Embodiments of the present invention provide for different SON function to cooperate without really interacting directly. Instead a SON function makes its action visible with detailed information on its actions. This information together with what is normally available makes it possible for higher-level SON functions to make a correct decision.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)
  • Organic Low-Molecular-Weight Compounds And Preparation Thereof (AREA)
  • Transition And Organic Metals Composition Catalysts For Addition Polymerization (AREA)
US14/380,248 2012-02-22 2013-02-22 Self-organizing network function interaction Active US9461886B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US14/380,248 US9461886B2 (en) 2012-02-22 2013-02-22 Self-organizing network function interaction

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201261601861P 2012-02-22 2012-02-22
US14/380,248 US9461886B2 (en) 2012-02-22 2013-02-22 Self-organizing network function interaction
PCT/EP2013/053595 WO2013124435A1 (en) 2012-02-22 2013-02-22 Self-organizing network function interaction

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20150043386A1 US20150043386A1 (en) 2015-02-12
US9461886B2 true US9461886B2 (en) 2016-10-04

Family

ID=47749825

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/380,248 Active US9461886B2 (en) 2012-02-22 2013-02-22 Self-organizing network function interaction

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (1) US9461886B2 (es)
EP (2) EP2817997B1 (es)
CN (1) CN104137595B (es)
DK (1) DK2817997T3 (es)
ES (2) ES2919663T3 (es)
PL (2) PL2817997T3 (es)
WO (1) WO2013124435A1 (es)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20160212758A1 (en) * 2013-10-16 2016-07-21 Empire Technology Development Llc Dynamic frequency and power resource allocation with granular policy management
US10797955B2 (en) * 2016-01-08 2020-10-06 Nec Corporation System and method for operating a network
WO2022063404A1 (en) * 2020-09-24 2022-03-31 Nokia Solutions And Networks Oy Automated setup of multi-level, multi-domain network automation functions

Families Citing this family (37)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8995255B2 (en) * 2012-08-03 2015-03-31 Intel Corporation Coverage adjustment in E-UTRA networks
US10142242B2 (en) 2012-08-30 2018-11-27 T-Mobile Usa, Inc. Network support node traffic reduction for self-organizing networks
US10506460B2 (en) 2012-08-30 2019-12-10 T-Mobile Usa, Inc. Self-organizing network mechanism for energy saving during an outage
US10506558B2 (en) 2012-08-30 2019-12-10 T-Mobile Usa, Inc. Performance-based optimization of QoS factors
US10499259B2 (en) 2012-08-30 2019-12-03 T-Mobile Usa, Inc. Special events module for self-organizing networks
US10243794B2 (en) 2012-08-30 2019-03-26 T-Mobile Usa, Inc. Open architecture for self-organizing networks
CN110191491B (zh) 2012-09-21 2022-12-23 北京三星通信技术研究有限公司 一种支持指示失败事件给源接入系统的方法
WO2014168526A1 (en) * 2013-04-08 2014-10-16 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) A radio network node, a base station and methods therein
CN105230063B (zh) * 2013-05-02 2019-11-12 华为技术有限公司 网络优化的方法、网络优化的装置和网络优化的设备
CN105409277A (zh) * 2013-05-29 2016-03-16 诺基亚通信公司 用于控制son功能的网络实体和方法
US9686360B2 (en) * 2013-06-04 2017-06-20 Airhop Communications, Inc. Protocols, interfaces, and pre/post-processing for enabling son entities and features in base stations and wireless networks
US10004008B2 (en) * 2013-10-01 2018-06-19 Qualcomm, Incorporated Hybrid management of handovers in a self organizing network (SON)
US9826412B2 (en) * 2013-10-24 2017-11-21 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Facilitating adaptive key performance indicators in self-organizing networks
ES2728733T3 (es) * 2013-10-30 2019-10-28 Huawei Tech Co Ltd Método de asignación de espectro y equipo para asignación de espectro
CN105874845B (zh) 2013-12-19 2019-05-28 华为技术有限公司 确定通信网络的性能指标的方法和装置
CN105409268B (zh) * 2013-12-26 2020-01-31 华为技术有限公司 一种网络容量与覆盖的优化方法和装置
US9301218B1 (en) * 2014-01-10 2016-03-29 Sprint Communications Company L.P. Overcoming handover failure due to out-of-date neighbor list
US9326196B1 (en) 2014-01-10 2016-04-26 Sprint Communications Company L.P. Updating an out-of-date source neighbor list
US9294970B1 (en) 2014-01-10 2016-03-22 Sprint Communications Company L.P. Self-healing algorithm to overcome handover failure due to out-of-date neighbor list
JP6439036B2 (ja) * 2014-03-18 2018-12-19 ノキア ソリューションズ アンド ネットワークス オサケユキチュア 移動ネットワークにおいてポリシーを実施するための方法及びネットワーク要素
US9521576B2 (en) * 2014-04-28 2016-12-13 Intel IP Corporation System and method of performance measurements for wireless local area network access points
US9906993B2 (en) * 2014-05-16 2018-02-27 Qualcomm Incorporated Handover-related measurements and events for power adaptation
US20160057679A1 (en) * 2014-08-22 2016-02-25 Qualcomm Incorporated Cson-aided small cell load balancing based on backhaul information
US10999404B2 (en) * 2014-08-29 2021-05-04 Nokia Solutions And Networks Oy Method, apparatus and system for SON coordination depending on SON function priority
US20160135067A1 (en) * 2014-11-11 2016-05-12 Cellmining Ltd. Call detail record-based multiple network optimization
CN107409315A (zh) * 2015-02-03 2017-11-28 T移动美国公司 基于性能的QoS因子优化
US9681314B2 (en) 2015-05-21 2017-06-13 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Self organizing radio access network in a software defined networking environment
US10117142B2 (en) * 2015-08-28 2018-10-30 Viavi Solutions Uk Limited Modeling mobile network performance
US10893427B2 (en) * 2015-09-25 2021-01-12 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Communication terminal, radio network node and methods therein
US10219261B2 (en) 2015-12-08 2019-02-26 At&T Mobility Ii Llc Method and apparatus for transmitting a control signal to a self organizing network controller
TWI625064B (zh) * 2016-03-07 2018-05-21 財團法人工業技術研究院 管理發送通知訊息的通訊方法及應用其的電子裝置及系統
CN109947763B (zh) * 2017-09-07 2021-09-17 大唐移动通信设备有限公司 一种基于自优化网络son的处理方法及装置
JP7013570B2 (ja) * 2017-09-28 2022-01-31 中▲興▼通▲訊▼股▲ふぇん▼有限公司 メッセージを無線ネットワーク内で交換するための方法およびシステム
US10979932B2 (en) * 2018-06-06 2021-04-13 The Board Of Regents Of The University Of Oklahoma Enhancement of capacity and user quality of service (QoS) in mobile cellular networks
US20220104300A1 (en) * 2019-02-14 2022-03-31 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Reporting From User Equipment to the Network for Radio Link Monitoring, Beam Failure Detection, and Beam Failure Recovery
US11568345B1 (en) * 2021-08-20 2023-01-31 Dish Wireless L.L.C. Cognitive-defined network management
US20230318794A1 (en) 2022-03-23 2023-10-05 Sterlite Technologies Limited Optimizing physical cell id assignment in a wireless communication network

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100232318A1 (en) * 2009-03-10 2010-09-16 Qualcomm Incorporated Random access channel (rach) optimization for a self-organizing network (son)
US20110171952A1 (en) * 2008-09-24 2011-07-14 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Cell load balancing method, cell load measuring method, and devices thereof
US20110280157A1 (en) * 2009-02-02 2011-11-17 Clemens Suerbaum Communicating a Network Event
US20120066377A1 (en) * 2009-03-20 2012-03-15 Yuping Li Managed device and self-optimization method and system
US20120213057A1 (en) * 2009-11-02 2012-08-23 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Coordination Processing Method and Device for Self Organizing Operation and Communication System
US20120282968A1 (en) * 2009-10-29 2012-11-08 Antti Anton Toskala Enhanced Network Performance Monitoring
US20130229914A1 (en) * 2010-11-11 2013-09-05 Nokia Siemens Networks Oy Network management
US20150071118A1 (en) * 2011-11-16 2015-03-12 Nokia Solutions And Networks Oy Network coordination apparatus

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7855968B2 (en) * 2004-05-10 2010-12-21 Alcatel Lucent Alarm indication and suppression (AIS) mechanism in an ethernet OAM network
CN101267363A (zh) * 2008-04-24 2008-09-17 杭州华三通信技术有限公司 环回测试方法、系统及装置
CN101998454A (zh) * 2009-08-24 2011-03-30 中兴通讯股份有限公司 路测方法及系统、操作维护运行、管理和维护实体

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20110171952A1 (en) * 2008-09-24 2011-07-14 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Cell load balancing method, cell load measuring method, and devices thereof
US20110280157A1 (en) * 2009-02-02 2011-11-17 Clemens Suerbaum Communicating a Network Event
US20100232318A1 (en) * 2009-03-10 2010-09-16 Qualcomm Incorporated Random access channel (rach) optimization for a self-organizing network (son)
US20120066377A1 (en) * 2009-03-20 2012-03-15 Yuping Li Managed device and self-optimization method and system
US20120282968A1 (en) * 2009-10-29 2012-11-08 Antti Anton Toskala Enhanced Network Performance Monitoring
US20120213057A1 (en) * 2009-11-02 2012-08-23 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Coordination Processing Method and Device for Self Organizing Operation and Communication System
US20130229914A1 (en) * 2010-11-11 2013-09-05 Nokia Siemens Networks Oy Network management
US20150071118A1 (en) * 2011-11-16 2015-03-12 Nokia Solutions And Networks Oy Network coordination apparatus

Non-Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Schmelz, L et al., "A Coordination Framework for Self-Organisation in LTE Networks", 2011 IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management, Dublin, Ireland, May 23-27, 2011, pp. 193-200.
Unknown, Author, "3GPP TS 32.522, V11.1.0 (Dec. 2011)", 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Telecommunication management; Self-Organizing Networks (SON) Policy Network Resource Model (NRM) Integration Reference Point (IRP); Information Service (IS) (Release 11), Dec. 2011, pp. 1-32.
Unknown, Author, "3GPP TS 32.662, V10.0.0 (Mar. 2011)", 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; Telecommunication management; Configuration Management (CM); Kernel CM Information Service (IS) (Release 10), Mar. 2011, pp. 1-22.
Unknown, Author, "Generic Solution for SON Coordination", 3GPP TSG SA WG5 (Telecom Management) Meeting #81, S5-110112, Dresden, Germany, Jan. 6-10, 2012, pp. 1-2.
Unknown, Author, "Handling of Attribute Ranges at Domain Borders for SON Coordination", 3GPP TSG-SA5 (Telecom Management), S5-113020, Nanjing, China, Oct. 10-14, 2011, pp. 1-6.

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20160212758A1 (en) * 2013-10-16 2016-07-21 Empire Technology Development Llc Dynamic frequency and power resource allocation with granular policy management
US9986580B2 (en) * 2013-10-16 2018-05-29 Empire Technology Development Llc Dynamic frequency and power resource allocation with granular policy management
US10797955B2 (en) * 2016-01-08 2020-10-06 Nec Corporation System and method for operating a network
WO2022063404A1 (en) * 2020-09-24 2022-03-31 Nokia Solutions And Networks Oy Automated setup of multi-level, multi-domain network automation functions

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20150043386A1 (en) 2015-02-12
DK2817997T3 (da) 2020-08-24
PL3737143T3 (pl) 2022-08-22
PL2817997T3 (pl) 2020-11-30
WO2013124435A1 (en) 2013-08-29
CN104137595A (zh) 2014-11-05
ES2919663T3 (es) 2022-07-27
EP2817997A1 (en) 2014-12-31
EP3737143A1 (en) 2020-11-11
ES2813528T3 (es) 2021-03-24
EP3737143B1 (en) 2022-05-04
EP2817997B1 (en) 2020-07-15
CN104137595B (zh) 2018-07-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9461886B2 (en) Self-organizing network function interaction
EP2721860B1 (en) Method of coordinating fault detection responses by access nodes of a network
US9860126B2 (en) Method and system for coordinating cellular networks operation
US8738004B2 (en) Method and apparatus for excluding non-mobility data from mobility key performance indicators
EP2804418B1 (en) Mobile terminal, network entity, method and microprocessor related thereto
Østerbø et al. Benefits of self-organizing networks (SON) for mobile operators
US20130331079A1 (en) Self-Organizing Network
EP2827635B1 (en) Wireless communications system, wireless station, network operation management device, and network optimization method
US20210235343A1 (en) Hand-In with Topology Hiding
US20130070679A1 (en) Method and Device for Data Processing in a Wireless Network
WO2015066098A1 (en) Backhaul management of a small cell
WO2013015725A1 (en) Radio base station, radio network node and methods therein for detecting a faulty antenna
WO2016206964A1 (en) Backhaul aware cell range optimization of small cells in heterogenous networks
US20110070883A1 (en) System and Method for Automatic Carrier Change Detection in a Wireless Communications System
Watanabe et al. Inter-eNB coordination-free algorithm for mobility robustness optimization in LTE HetNet
Decarreau Self-Organization in Pre-5G Communication Networks
Menon et al. SON for government spectrum applications
Naseer‐ul‐Islam et al. Self‐Organization in Pre‐5 G Communication Networks
Sartori et al. Self‐Organizing Networks (SON)
Kakadia et al. Self organizing networks (SON)
Krishnamurthy et al. Self-Organizing Networks in LTE Deployment

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET L M ERICSSON (PUBL), SWEDEN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:AMIRIJOO, MEHDI;GUNNARSSON, FREDRIK;KALLIN, HARALD;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20130412 TO 20130415;REEL/FRAME:033583/0764

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

CC Certificate of correction
MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1551); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 4

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 8