US9450739B2 - Method and device for avoiding macro interference - Google Patents

Method and device for avoiding macro interference Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US9450739B2
US9450739B2 US14/411,756 US201314411756A US9450739B2 US 9450739 B2 US9450739 B2 US 9450739B2 US 201314411756 A US201314411756 A US 201314411756A US 9450739 B2 US9450739 B2 US 9450739B2
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
femtocell
base station
macrocell
frame
relay
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active, expires
Application number
US14/411,756
Other languages
English (en)
Other versions
US20150195078A1 (en
Inventor
Jung Hyoung Kwon
Young Jin SANG
Kwang Soon Kim
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Wireless Alliance LLC
Original Assignee
Intellectual Discovery Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Intellectual Discovery Co Ltd filed Critical Intellectual Discovery Co Ltd
Assigned to INTELLECTUAL DISCOVERY CO., LTD. reassignment INTELLECTUAL DISCOVERY CO., LTD. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: SANG, YOUNG JIN, KWON, JUNG HYOUNG, KIM, KWANG SOON
Publication of US20150195078A1 publication Critical patent/US20150195078A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US9450739B2 publication Critical patent/US9450739B2/en
Assigned to WIRELESS ALLIANCE, LLC reassignment WIRELESS ALLIANCE, LLC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: INTELLECTUAL DISCOVERY CO. LTD
Active legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L5/00Arrangements affording multiple use of the transmission path
    • H04L5/003Arrangements for allocating sub-channels of the transmission path
    • H04L5/0058Allocation criteria
    • H04L5/0073Allocation arrangements that take into account other cell interferences
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04BTRANSMISSION
    • H04B15/00Suppression or limitation of noise or interference
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L5/00Arrangements affording multiple use of the transmission path
    • H04L5/003Arrangements for allocating sub-channels of the transmission path
    • H04L5/0053Allocation of signaling, i.e. of overhead other than pilot signals
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W16/00Network planning, e.g. coverage or traffic planning tools; Network deployment, e.g. resource partitioning or cells structures
    • H04W16/24Cell structures
    • H04W16/32Hierarchical cell structures
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W28/00Network traffic management; Network resource management
    • H04W28/02Traffic management, e.g. flow control or congestion control
    • H04W28/0231Traffic management, e.g. flow control or congestion control based on communication conditions
    • H04W28/0236Traffic management, e.g. flow control or congestion control based on communication conditions radio quality, e.g. interference, losses or delay
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W48/00Access restriction; Network selection; Access point selection
    • H04W48/20Selecting an access point
    • H04W72/082
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W72/00Local resource management
    • H04W72/50Allocation or scheduling criteria for wireless resources
    • H04W72/54Allocation or scheduling criteria for wireless resources based on quality criteria
    • H04W72/541Allocation or scheduling criteria for wireless resources based on quality criteria using the level of interference
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W88/00Devices specially adapted for wireless communication networks, e.g. terminals, base stations or access point devices
    • H04W88/08Access point devices
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W84/00Network topologies
    • H04W84/02Hierarchically pre-organised networks, e.g. paging networks, cellular networks, WLAN [Wireless Local Area Network] or WLL [Wireless Local Loop]
    • H04W84/04Large scale networks; Deep hierarchical networks
    • H04W84/042Public Land Mobile systems, e.g. cellular systems
    • H04W84/045Public Land Mobile systems, e.g. cellular systems using private Base Stations, e.g. femto Base Stations, home Node B

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to communication in a heterogeneous cellular network system and, more particularly, to a method and apparatus for avoiding uplink interference in a macrocell included in the heterogeneous cellular network system.
  • a heterogeneous cellular network may be a cellular network including a macrocell and a femtocell.
  • the heterogeneous cellular network may be realized by disposing a femtocell in an indoor region and a shadow region in the macrocell, thereby enhancing a terminal communication performance.
  • the femtocell may be classified into 1) a closed femtocell allowing access to only an authorized terminal and 2) an open femtocell allowing access to any terminal.
  • the closed femtocell may enhance a performance of the authorized terminal and robust to a security.
  • the closed femtocell may be widely used for the heterogeneous cellular network.
  • interference occurring between a macrocell and a femtocell may be an issue causing degradation in the performance of the femtocell.
  • a number of methods may be used to solve this issue.
  • frequency resources of the macrocell and frequency resources of the femtocell may be allocated so as to be orthogonal to one another.
  • the method may cause interference between the macrocell and the femtocell.
  • a performance for each of the macrocell and the femtocell may be limited due to restrictions on a use of the frequency resources.
  • a portion of frequency resources may be allocated as shared frequency resources to be used by the macrocell and the femtocell, and remaining frequency resources may be allocated as exclusive frequency resources used by the macrocell or the femtocell.
  • one of the macrocell and the femtocell may not be allowed to use all frequency resources.
  • An aspect of the present invention provides a method and apparatus for switching ordinal positions between a femtocell uplink frame and a femtocell downlink frame when uplink interference occurring in a macrocell is strong.
  • Another aspect of the present invention also provides a method and apparatus for switching ordinal positions of a femtocell uplink frame and a femtocell downlink frame and relaying macrodata to be transmitted from a macro terminal to a macro base station.
  • a communication method of a femtocell base station including determining whether an operation is to be performed by switching ordinal positions of a femtocell uplink frame and a femtocell downlink frame in a femtocell based on a degree to which macro uplink interference affects a performance of the femtocell in the femtocell base station, processing a transmission of the femtocell uplink frame based on the switched ordinal positions, and processing a transmission of the femtocell downlink frame based on the switched ordinal positions.
  • the determining may include calculating the degree based on a reception signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for each point in time within a predetermined time interval.
  • SNR reception signal-to-noise ratio
  • the determining may include determining whether a gain of the performance is achieved by switching the ordinal positions of the femtocell uplink frame and the femtocell downlink frame.
  • the communication method may further include transmitting a request for information associated with a macrocell terminal to a macrocell base station, and receiving a response to the request from the macrocell base station.
  • the communication method may further include transmitting, to a macrocell base station, information on whether the ordinal positions of the femtocell uplink frame and the femtocell downlink frame are switched.
  • the femtocell uplink frame may include femtocell uplink data transmitted from a femtocell terminal to the femtocell base station.
  • the femtocell downlink frame may include femtocell downlink data transmitted from the femtocell base station to the femtocell terminal.
  • the transmission of the femtocell uplink frame based on the switched ordinal positions may be performed during a process of transmitting a macrocell downlink frame in a macrocell base station.
  • the transmission of the femtocell downlink frame based on the switched ordinal positions may be performed during a process of transmitting a macrocell uplink frame in the macrocell base station.
  • the communication method may further include receiving, from a macrocell base station, a request to relay macrodata to be transmitted from a macrocell terminal to the macrocell base station.
  • the communication method may further include receiving the macrodata from the macrocell terminal, and transmitting the macrodata to the macrocell base station.
  • the processing of the transmission of the femtocell downlink frame and the transmitting of the macrodata to the macrocell base station may be concurrently performed based on a superposition coding scheme.
  • a femtocell base station including a processor to determine whether an operation is to be performed by switching ordinal positions of a femtocell uplink frame and a femtocell downlink frame in a femtocell based on a degree to which macro uplink interference affects a performance of the femtocell in the femtocell base station, and a networking unit to process a transmission of the femtocell uplink frame and a transmission of the femtocell downlink frame based on the switched ordinal positions.
  • a communication method of a macrocell base station including receiving information on whether ordinal positions of a femtocell uplink frame and a femtocell downlink frame are switched, from each of a plurality of femtocell base stations, selecting one of femtocell base stations transmitting the information among the plurality of femtocell base stations, as a relay femtocell base station to relay macrodata, transmitting the request to the relay femtocell base station, and transmitting information associated with the relay femtocell base station to a macrocell terminal, wherein the macrodata is data to be transmitted from the macro terminal to the macrocell base station.
  • the relay femtocell base station may be a femtocell base station corresponding to a maximum SNR among SNRs of the macrocell base station to each of femtocell base stations transmitted the information indicating that the ordinal positions of the femtocell uplink frame and the femtocell downlink frame are switched.
  • a macrocell base station including a networking unit to receive information on whether ordinal positions of a femtocell uplink frame and a femtocell downlink frame are switched, from each of a plurality of femtocell base stations, and a processor to select one of femtocell base stations transmitting the information among the plurality of femtocell base stations, as a relay femtocell base station to relay macrodata, wherein the networking unit transmits a request to relay the macrodata to the relay femtocell base station and transmits information associated with the relay femtocell base station to a macrocell terminal, and wherein the macrodata is data to be transmitted from the macro terminal to the macrocell base station.
  • a femtocell base station may recognize interference affecting a performance of the femtocell base station and avoid the interference, thereby enhancing the performance of the femtocell base station.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a heterogeneous cellular network system according to an example embodiment.
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating a femtocell base station (fBS) according to an example embodiment.
  • fBS femtocell base station
  • FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating a macrocell base station (mBS) according to an example embodiment.
  • mBS macrocell base station
  • FIG. 4 is a signal flowchart illustrating a communication method of a heterogeneous cellular network system according to an example embodiment.
  • FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating frames in a heterogeneous cellular network system according to an example embodiment.
  • FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating a method of dividing a time slot allocated to a femtocell uplink (UL) frame according to an example embodiment.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a heterogeneous cellular network system according to an example embodiment.
  • a heterogeneous cellular network system 100 may include a macrocell base station (mBS) 110 , at least one femtocell base station (fBS), and at least one mobile station (MS).
  • mBS macrocell base station
  • fBS femtocell base station
  • MS mobile station
  • a dashed arrow represents communication performed based on a scheme proposed in an example embodiment of the present invention
  • a solid arrow represents communication performed based on a general scheme.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a first fBS 120 , a second fBS 130 , and a third fBS 140 as the at least one fBS.
  • the first fBS 120 , the second fBS 130 , and the third fBS 140 may be an fBS of a first femtocell 122 , an fBS of a second femtocell 132 , and an fBS of a third femtocell 142 .
  • a terminal of the heterogeneous cellular network may be, for example, a macro mobile station (mMS) communicating with the mBS 110 and a femto mobile station (fMS) communicating with an fBS.
  • FIG. 1 also illustrates an mBS 150 , a first fMS 160 of the first femtocell 122 , a second fMS 170 of the second femtocell 132 , and a third fMS 180 of the third femtocell 132 .
  • a macro uplink (UL) between the mMS 150 and the mBS 110 may cause interference affecting a femtocell.
  • a solid arrow between the mMS 150 and the mBS 110 may represent communication for the macro UL.
  • a degree of the interference affecting a performance for each femtocell may vary based on a distance between the mMS 150 and the at least one fBS.
  • a degree of interference significantly affecting the performance for each femtocell may be referred to as strong interference.
  • the performance for each femtocell may be performance for data communication of an fBS or a femtocell.
  • the macro UL may cause the strong interference affecting the first femtocell 122 and the second femtocell 132 .
  • An fBS of the femtocell strongly interfered with the macro UL may communicate with at least one of the fMS, the mMS, and the mBS based on the scheme proposes in an example embodiment of the present invention as described hereinafter.
  • An fBS of a femtocell not strongly interfered with the macro UL may communicate with at least one of the mBS 110 , the mMS 150 , and the fMS based on the general scheme.
  • An fBS may be selected from among fBSs performing communication based on the scheme proposed in an example embodiment of the present invention.
  • the selected fBS may relay data communication from the mMS 150 to the mBS 110 .
  • the first fBS 120 may be selected as the fBS to relay the data communication.
  • a dashed arrow from the mMS 150 to the first fBS 120 and a dashed arrow from the first fBS 120 to the mBS 110 may represent communication related to the relaying.
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating an fBS according to an example embodiment.
  • An fBS 200 may be, for example, the first fBS 120 , the second fBS 130 , and the third fBS 140 of FIG. 1 .
  • the fBS 200 may include a processor 210 and a networking unit 220 .
  • the processor 210 may be, for example, a general processor, a processor for communication, a system chip, and a server.
  • the processor 210 may perform a process to operate the fBS 200 .
  • the networking unit 220 may be, for example, a network chip and an antenna.
  • the networking unit 220 may also be, for example, an antenna for wireless communication.
  • the networking unit 220 may process an operation for data transmission and reception of the fBS 200 , and transmit or receive a signal for the data transmission and reception.
  • the processor 210 may transmit and receive data to operate the fBS 200 by controlling the networking unit 220 .
  • FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating a macrocell base station (mBS) according to an example embodiment.
  • mBS macrocell base station
  • An mBS 300 may include a processor 310 and a networking unit 320 .
  • the mBS 300 may be, for example, the mBS 110 of FIG. 1 .
  • the processor 310 may be, for example, a general processor, a processor for communication, a system chip, and a server.
  • the processor 310 may perform a process to operate the mBS 300 .
  • the networking unit 210 may be a network chip or an antenna.
  • the networking unit 320 may also be, for example, an antenna for wireless communication.
  • the networking unit 320 may process an operation for data transmission and reception of the fBS 200 , and transmit or receive a signal for data transmission and reception.
  • the processor 310 may transmit or receive data to operate the mBS 300 by controlling the networking unit 320 .
  • FIG. 4 is a signal flowchart illustrating a communication method of a heterogeneous cellular network system according to an example embodiment.
  • the processor 210 of the fBS 200 may determine whether an operation is performed by switching ordinal positions between a femtocell UL frame and a femtocell downlink (DL) frame of a femtocell, based on a degree to which interference caused by a macro UL affects a performance of the femtocell.
  • DL downlink
  • the processor 210 of the fBS 200 may calculate a degree of interference due to the macro UL in the heterogeneous cellular network system 100 and affecting the performance of the femtocell of the fBS 200 .
  • the degree of interference due to the macro UL in the heterogeneous cellular network system 100 and affecting the performance of the femtocell of the fBS 200 may also be referred to as a degree of interference.
  • the performance of the femtocell may be a performance for communication performed in the femtocell.
  • the performance of the femtocell may be at least one of a data rate of a femtocell UL and a data rate of a femtocell DL.
  • the processor 210 may calculate the degree of interference using Equation 1.
  • ⁇ (t) denotes an indicator function through which a result value is determined based on whether a reception interference-to-noise ratio (INR) is greater than a threshold value at a point in time t.
  • interference at the) reception INR may be macro UL interference.
  • a value of ⁇ (t) may be “1” when the reception INR is greater than the threshold value at the point in time t, and may be “0” in an inverse case.
  • the point in time t may be a predetermined time.
  • T may be a length of a predetermined time interval.
  • T may be a predetermined time interval used as a measurement reference.
  • the point in time t may be a predetermined point in time within T.
  • the processor 210 may calculate the degree of interference based on a number of reception INRs greater than the threshold value at corresponding points in time within a predetermined time interval. For example, the processor 210 may calculate the degree of interference due to the macro UL and affecting the femtocell of the fBS 200 , based on the reception INRs.
  • the processor 210 may determine whether the interference due to the macro UL is strong interference based on the calculated degree of interference.
  • the processor 210 may determine that the interference due to the macro UL is the strong interference when a value of Equation 1,
  • ⁇ t 1 T ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ( t ) , is greater than a false alarm probability ⁇ required for a heterogeneous cellular network.
  • the processor 210 may determine that the interference due to the macro UL is not the strong interference in an inverse case.
  • the fBS 200 may communicate with at least one of the mBS 110 , the mMS 150 , and the fMS based on a general scheme.
  • operations 420 through 485 may be performed.
  • the networking unit 220 of the fBS 200 may transmit a request for information associated with a predetermined mMS causing the strong interference, to the networking 320 of the mBS 300 .
  • the predetermined mMS may include the mMS 150 .
  • the fBS 200 may transmit information to the mBS 110 such that the mBS 110 verifies an mMS causing the strong interference.
  • the information may include a time or a frequency domain affected by interference.
  • the networking unit 320 of the mBS 300 may transmit a response to the request for the information associated with the mMS 150 , to the networking unit 220 of the fBS 200 .
  • the information associated with the mMS 150 may include at least one of 1) a terminal identifier (ID) of the mMS 150 , 2) information on an operation time of the mMS 150 , 3) information on a frequency used by the mMS 150 , 4) a frequency number used by the mMS 150 , and 5) a data rate of the mMS 150 .
  • ID terminal identifier
  • the information associated with the mMS 150 may include at least one of 1) a terminal identifier (ID) of the mMS 150 , 2) information on an operation time of the mMS 150 , 3) information on a frequency used by the mMS 150 , 4) a frequency number used by the mMS 150 , and 5) a data rate of the mMS 150 .
  • the information associated with the mMS 150 may be used in operations 430 through 435 as described hereinafter.
  • the processor 210 of the fBS 200 may switch ordinal positions of the femtocell UL frame and the femtocell DL frame to determine whether a gain for a performance of the femtocell is achieved.
  • the processor 210 may compare a value of Equation 2 and a value of Equation 3 to determine whether the gain for the performance of the femtocell is achieved. When the value of Equation 2 is greater than the value of Equation 3, the processor 210 may determine that the gain is achieved. When the value of Equation 2 is less than or equal to the value of Equation 3, the processor 210 may determine that the gain is not achieved. ⁇ tilde over (R) ⁇ zf * [Equation 2] R zf [Equation 3]
  • Equation 2 ⁇ tilde over (R) ⁇ zf *denotes an expected data rate from the fMS 405 f to the fBS 200 z, which may be achieved by switching the ordinal positions of the femtocell UL frame and the femtocell DL frame.
  • R zf denotes an average data rate from the fMS 405 f to the fBS 200 z, which is measured before the ordinal positions of the femtocell UL frame and the femtocell DL frame are switched.
  • the processor 210 may determine whether the ordinal positions of the femtocell UL frame and the femtocell DL frame are switched, based on a result of the determining performed in operation 430 .
  • the processor 210 may determine to switch the ordinal positions of the femtocell UL frame and the femtocell DL frame. In response to the determining, operations 440 through 485 may be performed. In response to a determination that the gain for the performance of the femtocell is not achieved, the processor 210 may determine not to switch the ordinal positions of the femtocell UL frame and the femtocell DL frame. In response to the determining, operations 440 through 485 may not be performed.
  • the networking unit 220 of the fBS 200 may transmit information indicating whether the ordinal positions of the femtocell UL frame and the femtocell DL frame are switched, to the networking unit 320 of the mBS 300 .
  • the processor 210 of the fBS 200 may transmit the information using the networking unit 220 only when the ordinal positions of the femtocell UL frame and the femtocell DL frame are switched.
  • the processor 310 of the mBS 300 may select a relay femtocell or a relay fBS to relay macrodata.
  • the macrodata may be, for example, macrocell UL data.
  • the macrodata may need to be transmitted from the mMS 150 to the networking unit 320 of the mBS 300 .
  • a relay of the macrodata may refer to a process in which the networking unit 220 of the fBS 200 receives the macrodata from the mMS 150 and transfers the received macrodata to the networking unit 330 of the mBS 300 .
  • the fBS 200 may be provided in a plural form.
  • the fBS 200 may be the first fBS 120 , the second fBS 130 , and the third fBS 140 of FIG. 1 .
  • the fMS 405 may be, for example, the first fMS 160 , the second fMS 170 , and the third fMS 180 of FIG. 1 .
  • Operations 410 , 415 , 420 , 425 , 430 , 435 , 440 , 460 , 465 , 470 , 475 , 480 , and 485 related to the fBS 200 may be performed by each of a plurality of fBSs.
  • networking units of the plurality of fBSs may transmit the information indicating whether the ordinal positions of the femtocell UL frame and the femtocell DL frame to the networking unit 320 of the mBS 300 .
  • the processor 310 of the mBS 300 may select an fBS from fBSs transmitting the information indicating whether the ordinal positions of the femtocell UL frame and the femtocell DL frame among the plurality of fBSs, as the relay fBS to relay the macrodata.
  • the processor 310 of the mBS 300 may select the relay femtocell based on Equation 4.
  • an fBS z may be the fBS of the fBSs transmitting the information indicating that the ordinal positions of the femtocell UL frame and the femtocell DL frame among the plurality of fBSs.
  • ⁇ zb t may be an SNR from the fBS z to an mBS b. t may be a point in time used as a reference for selecting the relay femtocell.
  • the processor 310 may select the relay fBS based on Equation 4. For example, the processor 310 may select, as the relay fBS, an fBS corresponding to a maximum SNR of SNRs from each of fBSs transmitting information indicating that ordinal positions of frames are switched, to the mBS 110 .
  • the networking unit 320 of the mBS 300 may transmit a request to the mMS 150 and the networking unit 220 of the fBS 200 to operate based on the switched ordinal positions.
  • the request may be a request to switch the ordinal positions of the femtocell UL frame and the femtocell DL frame.
  • the request may include information on a scheduling point in time at which the operating is performed.
  • the fBS 200 may switch the ordinal positions of the femtocell UL frame and the femtocell DL frame to operate.
  • the scheduling point in time may be, for example, a time slot corresponding to predetermined consecutive femtocell UL frame and femtocell DL frame.
  • the request to operate based on the switched ordinal positions may include a request for the relay of the macrodata.
  • the networking unit 320 may transmit the request to the relay fBS to relay the macrodata.
  • the request transmitted to the mMS 150 to operate based on the switched ordinal positions may include information associated with the relay fBS.
  • the mMS 150 may identify the fBS 200 to transmit the macrodata based on the information associated with the relay fBS in operation 470 .
  • the networking unit 220 of the fBS 200 may transfer the request to the fMS 405 to operate based on the switched ordinal positions.
  • the networking unit 220 of the fBS 200 may process the relay of the macrodata in operations 470 and 485 .
  • the mMS 150 may transmit the macrodata to the networking unit 220 of the fBS 200 corresponding to the relay fBS to relay the macrodata.
  • the networking unit 220 of the fbS 200 may transmit the femtocell UL frame based on the switched ordinal positions.
  • the femtocell UL frame may include femtocell UL data transmitted from the fMS 405 to the fBS 200 .
  • the fMS 405 may transmit the femtocell UL data to the networking unit 220 of the fBS 200 .
  • the fB 200 may divide a portion of the time slot allocated to the femtocell UF frame to use the divided portion of the time slot to relay and transmit the macrodata. Descriptions about a method of dividing the time slot allocated to the femtocell UL frame into time slots for transmitting the femtocell UL data and the macrodata will be described with reference to FIG. 6 .
  • the networking unit 220 of the fBS 200 may transmit the femtocell DL frame based on the switched ordinal positions.
  • the femtocell DL frame may include femtocell DL data transmitted from the fBS 200 to the fMS 405 .
  • the networking unit 220 of the fBS 200 may transmit the femtocell DL data to the fMS 405 .
  • the fBS 200 corresponding to the relay fBS to relay the macrodata may transmit the macrodata to the mBS 300 .
  • Operations 480 and 485 may be concurrently performed based on a superposition coding scheme.
  • the processor 210 may transmit the macrodata to the mBS 300 while processing the transmitting of the femtocell DL frame concurrently.
  • the processor 210 may determine power allocation for the overlap coding scheme based on Equation 5.
  • the power allocation may be performed by determining a ratio between first power used to transmit the femtocell DL data and second power used to transmit the macrodata.
  • ⁇ (t) denotes an allocation ratio of the first power to a total amount of power at a point in time t.
  • ⁇ zb t denotes an SNR from the fBS 200 z to the mBS 300 b at the point in time t.
  • ⁇ fz t denotes an INR from the fMS 405 f to the fBS 200 z at the point in time t.
  • ⁇ mb denotes an average signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) from the mMS 150 m to the mBS 300 b in a predetermined time interval T.
  • SINR signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio
  • the allocation ratio of the first power to a total amount of power and an allocation ratio of the second power to the total amount of power may be determined based on at least one of ⁇ zb t , ⁇ fz t , and ⁇ mb .
  • Operations 410 through 485 may be performed repetitively. Also, operations 420 , 425 , 440 , 460 , and 465 may be performed in operations 465 through 485 . For example, operation 465 may be processed through operation 480 performed previously.
  • FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating frames in a heterogeneous cellular network system according to an example embodiment.
  • an x axis may be a time axis.
  • a time slot may be divided based on scheduling points in time S 1 , S 2 , S 3 , and S 4 .
  • Rows on a y axis may represent frames of the mBS 110 , frames of the first fBS 120 , frames of the second fBS 130 , and frames of the third fBS 140 .
  • Each block of FIG. 5 may indicate a frame.
  • UL indicated above a block indicates that a corresponding frame is a UL frame.
  • DL indicated above a block indicates that a corresponding frame is a DL frame.
  • the first fBS 120 and the second fBS 130 may switch ordinal positions of a femtocell UL frame and a femtocell DL frame at a scheduling point in time S 3 .
  • the third fBS 140 may maintain original orders of the femtocell DL frame and the femtocell UL frame.
  • t a may be a point in time of performing operation 460 in which the networking unit 320 of the mBS 300 transmits a request to each of the mMS 150 and the networking unit 220 of the fBS 200 to operate based on the switched ordinal positions.
  • S 3 may be a scheduling point in time at which an operation is performed based on the switched ordinal positions.
  • the first fBS 120 and the second fBS 130 receiving a request to operate based on the switched ordinal positions in operation 460 may switch the ordinal positions of the femtocell UL frame and the femtocell DL frame at the scheduling point in time S 3 .
  • a first frame 512 may be a frame including macrodata transmitted from the mMS 150 to the first fBS 120 in operation 470 .
  • a second frame 514 may be a femtocell UL frame including femtocell UL data transmitted from the fMS 405 to the first fBS 120 in operation 475 .
  • a time slot assigned to the femtocell UL frame may be divided for the first frame 512 and the second frame 514 . Description about a method of dividing the time slot will be provided with reference to FIG. 6 .
  • a third frame 516 may be a frame transmitted using an overlap coding scheme in operations 480 and 485 concurrently.
  • the frame may include femtocell data transmitted from the first fBS 120 to the fMS 405 and macrodata transmitted from the first fBS 120 to the mBS 300 .
  • the frame may be, for example, the femtocell DL frame.
  • a fourth frame 522 may be a femtocell UL frame including femtocell UL data transmitted from the fMS 405 to the second fBS 130 in operation 475 .
  • a fifth frame 524 may be a femtocell DL frame including femtocell DL data transmitted from the second fBS 130 to the fMS 405 in operation 480 .
  • a transmission of the femtocell UL frame may be performed while a macrocell UL frame is being transmitted, and a transmission of the femtocell DL frame may be performed while a macrocell DL frame is being transmitted based on original, for example, unswitched ordinal positions of the femtocell UL frame and the femtocell DL frame.
  • the femtocell UL frame may be transmitted based on the switched ordinal positions while the macrocell DL frame is being transmitted.
  • the femtocell DL frame may be transmitted based on the switched ordinal positions while the macrocell UL frame is being transmitted.
  • FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating a method of dividing a time slot allocated to a femtocell UL frame according to an example embodiment.
  • the time slot allocated to the femtocell UL frame may be divided for the first frame 512 and the second frame 514 of FIG. 5 .
  • may indicate a ratio of a time slot allocated to the first frame 512 to the time slot allocated to the femtocell UL frame.
  • 1 ⁇ may indicate a ratio of a time slot allocated to the second frame 514 to the time slot allocated to the femtocell UL frame.
  • may be calculated using Equation 6.
  • R mz * denotes an expected data rate from the mMS 150 m to the fBS 200 z in a UL frame time.
  • R mb denotes an average data rate from the mMS 150 m to the mBS 300 b, which is measured during the UL frame time.
  • a ratio of a time slot divided to transmit macrodata to an entire time slot allocated to the femtocell UL frame may be calculated and determined based on at least one of R mz * and R mb .
  • the units described herein may be implemented using hardware components and software components.
  • the hardware components may include microphones, amplifiers, band-pass filters, audio to digital convertors, and processing to devices.
  • a processing device may be implemented using one or more general-purpose or special purpose computers, such as, for example, a processor, a controller and an arithmetic logic unit, a digital signal processor, a microcomputer, a field programmable array, a programmable logic unit, a microprocessor or any other device capable of responding to and executing instructions in a defined manner.
  • the processing device may run an operating system (OS) and one or more software applications that run on the OS.
  • the processing device also may access, store, manipulate, process, and create data in response to execution of the software.
  • OS operating system
  • a processing device may include multiple processing elements and multiple types of processing elements.
  • a processing device may include multiple processors or a processor and a controller.
  • different processing configurations are possible, such a parallel processors.
  • the software may include a computer program, a piece of code, an instruction, or some combination thereof, to independently or collectively instruct or configure the processing device to operate as desired.
  • Software and data may be embodied permanently or temporarily in any type of machine, component, physical or virtual equipment, computer storage medium or device, or in a propagated signal wave capable of providing instructions or data to or being interpreted by the processing device.
  • the software also may be distributed over network coupled computer systems so that the software is stored and executed in a distributed fashion.
  • the software and data may be stored by one or more non-transitory computer readable recording mediums.
  • the methods described above can be written as a computer program, a piece of code, an instruction, or some combination thereof, for independently or collectively to instructing or configuring the processing device to operate as desired.
  • Software and data may be embodied permanently or temporarily in any type of machine, component, physical or virtual equipment, computer storage medium or device that is capable of providing instructions or data to or being interpreted by the processing device.
  • the software also may be distributed over network coupled computer systems so that the software is stored and executed in a distributed fashion.
  • the software and data may be stored by one or more non-transitory computer readable recording mediums.
  • the non-transitory computer readable recording medium may include any data storage device that can store data that can be thereafter read by a computer system or processing device.
  • non-transitory computer readable recording medium examples include read-only memory (ROM), random-access memory (RAM), Compact Disc Read-only Memory (CD-ROMs), magnetic tapes, USBs, floppy disks, hard disks, optical recording media (e.g., CD-ROMs, or DVDs), and PC interfaces (e.g., PCI, PCI-express, WiFi, etc.).
  • ROM read-only memory
  • RAM random-access memory
  • CD-ROMs Compact Disc Read-only Memory
  • CD-ROMs Compact Disc Read-only Memory
  • magnetic tapes examples
  • USBs floppy disks
  • floppy disks e.g., floppy disks
  • hard disks e.g., floppy disks, hard disks
  • optical recording media e.g., CD-ROMs, or DVDs
  • PC interfaces e.g., PCI, PCI-express, WiFi, etc.
  • functional programs, codes, and code segments for accomplishing the example disclosed herein can

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
  • Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)
US14/411,756 2012-06-29 2013-07-01 Method and device for avoiding macro interference Active 2033-07-19 US9450739B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
KR10-2012-0071071 2012-06-29
KR1020120071071A KR101429339B1 (ko) 2012-06-29 2012-06-29 매크로 간섭 회피를 위한 방법 및 장치
PCT/KR2013/005806 WO2014003504A1 (ko) 2012-06-29 2013-07-01 매크로 간섭 회피를 위한 방법 및 장치

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20150195078A1 US20150195078A1 (en) 2015-07-09
US9450739B2 true US9450739B2 (en) 2016-09-20

Family

ID=49783549

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/411,756 Active 2033-07-19 US9450739B2 (en) 2012-06-29 2013-07-01 Method and device for avoiding macro interference

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US9450739B2 (ko)
KR (1) KR101429339B1 (ko)
WO (1) WO2014003504A1 (ko)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20210282116A1 (en) * 2020-03-03 2021-09-09 Qualcomm Incorporated Superposition of sidelink and uplink transmissions

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9692468B2 (en) * 2015-11-11 2017-06-27 Smartsky Networks, Llc Spectrum scrubber
KR102662509B1 (ko) 2021-06-08 2024-05-08 주식회사 큐셀네트웍스 펨토셀 환경에서 매크로셀의 간섭을 고려한 동적 하향링크 할당 방법

Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100097965A1 (en) 2008-10-22 2010-04-22 Tae Soo Kwon Data communication control
KR100986649B1 (ko) 2010-05-24 2010-10-08 인하대학교 산학협력단 다중 셀 상향링크 시스템에서 부분 공간 간섭 정렬의 사용자 선택 방법
KR20110092708A (ko) 2010-02-10 2011-08-18 삼성전자주식회사 계층적 셀 구조의 무선통신시스템에서 신호 간섭을 제거하기 위한 장치 및 방법
US20110237243A1 (en) * 2010-03-29 2011-09-29 Ntt Docomo Inc System and method for inter-cell interference avoidance in co-channel networks
US20110250897A1 (en) 2008-12-29 2011-10-13 Seo Han Byul Method and apparatus for transmitting signal in wireless communication system
US20110312317A1 (en) 2010-06-21 2011-12-22 Ntt Docomo Inc. Inter-carrier interference management in dedicated channel femtocell networks
US20120176955A1 (en) * 2011-01-06 2012-07-12 Hitachi, Ltd. Radio system and radio communication method
US20130194982A1 (en) * 2012-01-27 2013-08-01 Jong-Kae Fwu Interference management for dynamic uplink and downlink configuration
US20130243241A1 (en) * 2012-03-16 2013-09-19 Csr Technology Inc. Method, apparatus, and manufacture for smiling face detection
US20130272170A1 (en) * 2012-04-13 2013-10-17 Debdeep CHATTERJEE Adaptive ul-dl tdd configurations in a heterogneous network

Patent Citations (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100097965A1 (en) 2008-10-22 2010-04-22 Tae Soo Kwon Data communication control
KR20100044666A (ko) 2008-10-22 2010-04-30 삼성전자주식회사 펨토셀 기지국 장치 및 그 제어 방법
US20110250897A1 (en) 2008-12-29 2011-10-13 Seo Han Byul Method and apparatus for transmitting signal in wireless communication system
KR20110092708A (ko) 2010-02-10 2011-08-18 삼성전자주식회사 계층적 셀 구조의 무선통신시스템에서 신호 간섭을 제거하기 위한 장치 및 방법
US20110237243A1 (en) * 2010-03-29 2011-09-29 Ntt Docomo Inc System and method for inter-cell interference avoidance in co-channel networks
KR100986649B1 (ko) 2010-05-24 2010-10-08 인하대학교 산학협력단 다중 셀 상향링크 시스템에서 부분 공간 간섭 정렬의 사용자 선택 방법
US20110312317A1 (en) 2010-06-21 2011-12-22 Ntt Docomo Inc. Inter-carrier interference management in dedicated channel femtocell networks
JP2012005131A (ja) 2010-06-21 2012-01-05 Ntt Docomo Inc 専用チャネルのフェムトセルネットワークにおけるキャリア間干渉の管理
US8428519B2 (en) 2010-06-21 2013-04-23 Ntt Docomo, Inc. Inter-carrier interference management in dedicated channel femtocell networks
US20120176955A1 (en) * 2011-01-06 2012-07-12 Hitachi, Ltd. Radio system and radio communication method
US20130194982A1 (en) * 2012-01-27 2013-08-01 Jong-Kae Fwu Interference management for dynamic uplink and downlink configuration
US20130243241A1 (en) * 2012-03-16 2013-09-19 Csr Technology Inc. Method, apparatus, and manufacture for smiling face detection
US20130272170A1 (en) * 2012-04-13 2013-10-17 Debdeep CHATTERJEE Adaptive ul-dl tdd configurations in a heterogneous network

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20210282116A1 (en) * 2020-03-03 2021-09-09 Qualcomm Incorporated Superposition of sidelink and uplink transmissions
US11582721B2 (en) * 2020-03-03 2023-02-14 Qualcomm Incorporated Superposition of sidelink and uplink transmissions

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
KR20140003179A (ko) 2014-01-09
KR101429339B1 (ko) 2014-08-12
WO2014003504A1 (ko) 2014-01-03
US20150195078A1 (en) 2015-07-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20200336194A1 (en) Joint beam reporting for wireless networks
US9066224B2 (en) Multi-antenna distribution of wireless broadband in a building
US9485737B2 (en) Controlling radio units to transmitting signal with different transmission power
US9220102B2 (en) Low power base station and communication control method
CN102577476A (zh) 在多小区环境中检测牺牲终端并执行干扰协调的通信系统
EP3681211A1 (en) User device and transmission power control method
US20170026990A1 (en) Method in a Network and Network Node for Co-Scheduling in a Network
US9357505B2 (en) Processing digital signal
US9450739B2 (en) Method and device for avoiding macro interference
EP3035758B1 (en) Coexistence of cellular and non-cellular systems
CN111385039B (zh) 一种小区广播波束参数的调整方法及装置
US20220263615A1 (en) Synchronization signaling block compatible interference coordination patterns to reduce interference in wireless networks
US11844031B2 (en) Component carrier management service
EP3035764B1 (en) Reducing collision between cellular and non-cellular transmissions
US20140161106A1 (en) Method and apparatus for resource allocation based on buffer status information of neighboring cell
Radaydeh et al. Adaptive interference-aware multichannel assignment for shared overloaded small-cell access points under limited feedback
US9320052B2 (en) Resolving spectral allocation conflicts in mobile networks
US20240292445A1 (en) Ran applications for inter-cell interference mitigation for massive mimo in a ran
EP3235321B1 (en) Full duplex in a wireless communication network
KR101945784B1 (ko) 기준 신호 전송 장치 및 방법과 전달 함수 결정 방법
WO2024207250A1 (en) Accuracy and capabilities for cross frequency-range beam prediction
WO2024207394A1 (en) Indication of a training data set for lifecycle management
WO2023283844A1 (en) Methods, devices and computer storage media for communication
WO2022262467A1 (zh) 一种信息传输方法及通信装置
US20240356783A1 (en) Detection of pulsed radar signal

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: INTELLECTUAL DISCOVERY CO., LTD., KOREA, REPUBLIC

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:KWON, JUNG HYOUNG;SANG, YOUNG JIN;KIM, KWANG SOON;SIGNING DATES FROM 20141224 TO 20141227;REEL/FRAME:034594/0164

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: ENTITY STATUS SET TO UNDISCOUNTED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: BIG.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1551); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 4

AS Assignment

Owner name: WIRELESS ALLIANCE, LLC, TEXAS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:INTELLECTUAL DISCOVERY CO. LTD;REEL/FRAME:054637/0207

Effective date: 20201110

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 8