US5418722A - SIR deployment method with rough road immunity - Google Patents
SIR deployment method with rough road immunity Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US5418722A US5418722A US08/205,464 US20546494A US5418722A US 5418722 A US5418722 A US 5418722A US 20546494 A US20546494 A US 20546494A US 5418722 A US5418722 A US 5418722A
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- deployment
- reset
- acceleration
- rough road
- calculation
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60R—VEHICLES, VEHICLE FITTINGS, OR VEHICLE PARTS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B60R21/00—Arrangements or fittings on vehicles for protecting or preventing injuries to occupants or pedestrians in case of accidents or other traffic risks
- B60R21/01—Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents
- B60R21/013—Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents including means for detecting collisions, impending collisions or roll-over
- B60R21/0132—Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents including means for detecting collisions, impending collisions or roll-over responsive to vehicle motion parameters, e.g. to vehicle longitudinal or transversal deceleration or speed value
- B60R21/01332—Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents including means for detecting collisions, impending collisions or roll-over responsive to vehicle motion parameters, e.g. to vehicle longitudinal or transversal deceleration or speed value by frequency or waveform analysis
- B60R21/01336—Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents including means for detecting collisions, impending collisions or roll-over responsive to vehicle motion parameters, e.g. to vehicle longitudinal or transversal deceleration or speed value by frequency or waveform analysis using filtering
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60R—VEHICLES, VEHICLE FITTINGS, OR VEHICLE PARTS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B60R21/00—Arrangements or fittings on vehicles for protecting or preventing injuries to occupants or pedestrians in case of accidents or other traffic risks
- B60R21/01—Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents
- B60R21/013—Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents including means for detecting collisions, impending collisions or roll-over
- B60R21/0132—Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents including means for detecting collisions, impending collisions or roll-over responsive to vehicle motion parameters, e.g. to vehicle longitudinal or transversal deceleration or speed value
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60R—VEHICLES, VEHICLE FITTINGS, OR VEHICLE PARTS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B60R21/00—Arrangements or fittings on vehicles for protecting or preventing injuries to occupants or pedestrians in case of accidents or other traffic risks
- B60R21/01—Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents
- B60R21/013—Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents including means for detecting collisions, impending collisions or roll-over
- B60R2021/01304—Electrical circuits for triggering passive safety arrangements, e.g. airbags, safety belt tighteners, in case of vehicle accidents or impending vehicle accidents including means for detecting collisions, impending collisions or roll-over monitoring rough road condition
Definitions
- This invention relates to a control method for deploying a motor vehicle supplemental inflatable restraint, and more particularly, to a control method having immunity to false deployment due to acceleration input arising from rough road conditions.
- SIR state-of-the-art supplemental inflatable restraint
- SIR algorithms use various boundaries or measures to determine if the air bag needs to be deployed. These boundaries and measures are set to only deploy on crash events, not rough road. Although a crash generally exhibits much larger vehicle acceleration than a rough road, there are some road conditions which generate accelerations close to crash conditions, and which, when multiplied by a factor of 2, as a standard immunity goal, cannot be reliably separated from high speed crashes using these boundaries and measures.
- the invention employs a specific measure to tell the SIR algorithm when an event being measured is a rough road.
- the algorithm can then use this information to prevent deployment.
- This specific measure is a history of recent enables or resets.
- a crash event as a result of measured acceleration reaching a threshold, an algorithm is enabled to calculate whether and when to deploy the air bag. After enablement, either deployment results or the algorithm is reset to await another enabling threshold.
- On a rough road an algorithm may be enabled or reset many times without reaching a determination that deployment is in order.
- a history is established which can indicate that the current event is part of a rough road sequence. If an event starts and no history of recent enables/resets is present, a crash is indicated. Thus deployment decisions are made using not only current data but the recent past history as well.
- the rough road history indicator is complemented with measures which allow the algorithm to determine if, on a rough road, a crash has started. If a high acceleration inconsistent with rough road noise is measured, or the current event is continuing longer than expected for rough road noise, a crash is indicated instead of a mere rough road, and the history is disregarded.
- a brief time delay may be inserted during the calculations to enable additional acceleration data to be gathered and employed, yet the system remains poised to quickly deploy. If greatly increased acceleration occurs at that point deployment can be rapidly commanded, but if acceleration diminishes deployment can be further withheld or aborted.
- FIG. 1 is a system diagram of the SIR system
- FIG. 2 is a flow chart illustrating the program methodology for the micro-controller of FIG. 1, according to the invention.
- FIG. 3 is a flow-chart illustrating a portion of the FIG. 2 chart.
- FIG. 1 shows a SIR system comprising an accelerometer 10, a hardware low-pass filter 12, a micro-controller 14, and a SIR deployment system 16.
- the elements 10-16 may be generally conventional, except for the functionality of the micro-controller 14 under the direction of the control software described herein.
- Accelerometer 10 is rigidly mounted to a vehicle frame element (not shown) to provide an analog electrical signal corresponding to the acceleration, positive or negative, along the longitudinal axis of the vehicle.
- the acceleration signal is applied to filter 12 to form a filtered acceleration signal ACCEL, which is applied as an input to an A/D input port 18 of micro-controller 14 for analysis according to this invention and further according to previously known SIR methods.
- micro-controller 14 comprises conventional electronic componentry, including a microprocessor, random-access and read-only memories, and a suitable output port 20 for issuing a deployment command to the deployment system 16 when warranted by the acceleration signal analysis.
- the deployment system 16 Upon receipt of a deployment command on line 22, the deployment system 16 triggers air bag inflation to arrest the displacement of the vehicle occupants.
- the micro-controller is programmed to sample the acceleration data, enable a deployment algorithm when acceleration reaches a certain threshold level, reset or disable the deployment algorithm if prescribed conditions occur, maintain an updated history of recent reset events, and adjust the deployment algorithm in accordance with the history in a manner to afford time to collect and evaluate additional acceleration data before issuing a deployment command.
- the program is executed at 1 ms intervals so that for each loop through the program new acceleration data is sampled and processed and, if enabled, deployment calculations are updated.
- FIG. 2 is a flow chart representing the micro-controller program. Beginning with the acceleration input 30, acceleration samples are filtered in block 32. An ENABLED flag is tested in block 34; initially the flag will be zero. Then the acceleration sample is compared in block 36 with a threshold Th1 which is an acceleration value sufficiently high, say, 2 to 5 Gs, to indicate that a crash event is possibly beginning. If the threshold is not attained, the program returns to the acceleration input 30 via a flag and timer update block 38 which keeps the reset history current. If the threshold is attained in block 36 the deployment calculation is enabled, an enable timer is started in block 39 to measure the time elapsed since enablement, and the reset history is validated by block 40.
- Th1 is an acceleration value sufficiently high, say, 2 to 5 Gs
- the block 40 validation includes two tests to verify that a history of recent resets is a valid indicator of rough road or if a crash event has superseded the rough road information.
- One test is that if the current acceleration sample is greater than a threshold Th2 which is set at a value higher than that which is attainable by rough road conditions.
- Th2 which is set at a value higher than that which is attainable by rough road conditions.
- a severe crash will have very high G spikes of input acceleration. By themselves they are not sufficient information to command deployment.
- high G spikes are not present in rough road events and if seen, they indicate that this is no longer a rough road event and an actual crash is probable.
- the second test examines the enable timer to determine if the time elapsed since enablement is greater than a threshold.
- a rough road event is expected to enable and reset within about 20 ms and therefore if the time from enable attains 25 or 30 ms it is no longer considered to be a rough road event. If either test reveals that a crash is in progress, the reset history is ignored by the deployment calculation. On the other hand if RESET flags are present, no high G spikes are detected and the time from enablement is short, the current event is considered to be a continuation of the rough road environment.
- block 42 executes the calculation for deployment, one example of which is further discussed below. If a decision is made to deploy the air bag blocks 44 and 46 issue a deployment command. Otherwise, reset block 48 examines the available data to determine whether the crash event is continuing and thus whether the deployment calculation should continue. In the preferred embodiment there are three ways to reset; two of them are based on a measure called "predicted velocity at 100 ms.” That is, using the current acceleration, the current accumulated velocity, and the time from enable, an estimate of velocity at 100 ms from enablement is made. The first reset test is that if after a minimum of 10 ms from enablement the predicted velocity at 100 ms is below a preset threshold such as 3 mph, reset is commanded.
- a preset threshold such as 3 mph
- the second test requires that peaks of the predicted velocity be detected; if the current predicted velocity at 100 ms is a preset percentage below its last peak, reset is commanded. For example, if the percentage is set at 50% and the predicted velocity rises to 10 mph and then drops to 5 mph, the test is satisfied.
- the third reset test is via a heavily filtered value of acceleration: if that value reaches a first threshold, say, 3 G, and subsequently falls below a second lower threshold such as 2 G, reset is commanded.
- the first two tests which are based on predicted velocity, are effective in resetting during rough road events shortly after enablement, and the third test is designed to reset the algorithm after the event has ended and no deployment was determined.
- block 50 sets a RESET flag and a corresponding flag timer, and sets the ENABLED flag to zero, and the program returns to the acceleration input with the program in its pre-enable state.
- the flag timer is updated at block 38 until a preset limit, typically 150 to 200 ms, is reached and the flag is cleared. If prior to the timer reaching its limit the block 36 again enables the algorithm, the RESET flag and its timer are maintained. If subsequently a second reset occurs while the first flag is still set, a second RESET flag is set and its timer is started. Up to four coexisting RESET flags are permitted, each with its independent timer.
- block 38 effects storing the RESET flags in memory along with associated time values and clears each flag when its time expires.
- the number N of unexpired RESET flags in memory at a given time is the measure of rough road condition useful for adjusting the deployment calculation.
- block 52 sets the ENABLED flag to 1 and the program proceeds to block 38.
- the block 34 will recognize the ENABLE flag and bypass the enable test in block 36 and the timer set in block 39.
- TTW time-to-wait
- severity calculation block 62.
- the input acceleration ACCEL is integrated, averaged, and filtered to predict the occupant displacement a predetermined time in the future, where the predetermined time (30 ms) corresponds to the time required to inflate the air bag once a deployment command is issued.
- the severity phase of the control (block 62) is initiated to estimate the effective vehicle velocity of the crash event at SIR inflation, referred to as effective velocity. If the effective velocity exceeds a predetermined threshold, the crash is severe enough to warrant deployment, and a deployment command is issued.
- a time delay (block 64) is inserted between the two stages 60, 62, the time delay being determined by the product of the number N of RESET flags in memory and a constant time increment T which may for example be 5 ms.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Air Bags (AREA)
Priority Applications (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US08/205,464 US5418722A (en) | 1994-03-04 | 1994-03-04 | SIR deployment method with rough road immunity |
EP94203648A EP0670248B1 (fr) | 1994-03-04 | 1994-12-15 | Dispositif de contrÔle d'un système de retenue gonflable supplémentaire |
DE69419002T DE69419002T2 (de) | 1994-03-04 | 1994-12-15 | Steuerungsvorrichtung einer ergänzenden, aufblasbaren Rückhaltevorrichtung |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US08/205,464 US5418722A (en) | 1994-03-04 | 1994-03-04 | SIR deployment method with rough road immunity |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US5418722A true US5418722A (en) | 1995-05-23 |
Family
ID=22762293
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US08/205,464 Expired - Lifetime US5418722A (en) | 1994-03-04 | 1994-03-04 | SIR deployment method with rough road immunity |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US5418722A (fr) |
EP (1) | EP0670248B1 (fr) |
DE (1) | DE69419002T2 (fr) |
Cited By (18)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0715991A1 (fr) * | 1994-12-08 | 1996-06-12 | General Motors Corporation | Procédé de filtrage de données de décélération d'un véhicule |
WO1997032756A1 (fr) * | 1996-03-08 | 1997-09-12 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Systeme servant a declencher un dispositif de retenue pour la protection en cas de collision laterale dans un vehicule a moteur |
US5668740A (en) * | 1994-12-20 | 1997-09-16 | General Motors Corporation | Method for detecting a rough road surface |
US5684701A (en) * | 1995-06-07 | 1997-11-04 | Automotive Technologies International, Inc. | Method and apparatus for sensing a vehicle crash |
US5964817A (en) * | 1998-11-09 | 1999-10-12 | Delco Electronics Corp. | Impact characterizing deployment control method for an automotive restraint system |
US6154698A (en) * | 1998-07-30 | 2000-11-28 | Delco Electronics Corp. | Supplemental restraint deployment method providing rough road immunity |
US6216070B1 (en) * | 1997-09-29 | 2001-04-10 | Calsonic Kansei Corporation | Passenger protecting apparatus |
US6430489B1 (en) * | 1998-11-23 | 2002-08-06 | Delphi Technologies, Inc. | Restraint deployment control method with feed-forward adjustment of deployment threshold |
US6532408B1 (en) | 1997-05-29 | 2003-03-11 | Automotive Technologies International, Inc. | Smart airbag system |
US20030057685A1 (en) * | 2001-09-27 | 2003-03-27 | Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft | Method of triggering a vehicle occupant restraining device |
US6549836B1 (en) | 2000-06-07 | 2003-04-15 | Trw Inc. | Method and apparatus for controlling an actuatable restraint device using a velocity/displacement based safing function with immunity box |
US20040036261A1 (en) * | 1995-06-07 | 2004-02-26 | Breed David S. | Method and apparatus for sensing a vehicle crash |
US20060038387A1 (en) * | 2004-08-17 | 2006-02-23 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Separation of abuse conditions and crash events to control occupant restraint devices |
US20060232052A1 (en) * | 1995-06-07 | 2006-10-19 | Automotive Technologies International, Inc. | Vehicular Bus Including Crash Sensor or Occupant Protection System Control Module |
US20130090780A1 (en) * | 2011-03-29 | 2013-04-11 | Jaguar Cars Limited | Speed and severity trigger for an active device of a vehicle |
US9457754B1 (en) * | 2015-07-13 | 2016-10-04 | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | Method and system for identifying vehicle collisions using sensor data |
WO2018086799A1 (fr) * | 2016-11-10 | 2018-05-17 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Procédé de commande d'un dispositif de protection des personnes |
US20200384935A1 (en) * | 2019-06-04 | 2020-12-10 | B/E Aerospace, Inc. | Safety system initiator with electronically adjustable fire time |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5189311A (en) * | 1990-01-29 | 1993-02-23 | Sensor Technology Co., Ltd. | Crash sensor |
US5216607A (en) * | 1989-05-30 | 1993-06-01 | Trw Vehicle Safety Systems Inc. | Method and apparatus for sensing a vehicle crash using energy and velocity as measures of crash violence |
US5251161A (en) * | 1992-02-25 | 1993-10-05 | Automatic Systems Laboratory, Inc. | Method of generating model crash waveforms for testing vehicle crash detection systems |
US5282134A (en) * | 1991-08-19 | 1994-01-25 | Automotive Systems Laboratory, Inc. | Slant transform/signal space crash discriminator |
Family Cites Families (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE3816590A1 (de) * | 1988-05-16 | 1989-11-23 | Messerschmitt Boelkow Blohm | Einrichtung zur ausloesung einer passiven sicherheitseinrichtung |
DE3829784A1 (de) * | 1988-09-02 | 1990-03-15 | Bosch Gmbh Robert | Auswerteverfahren fuer sensorausgangssignale |
DE3924507A1 (de) * | 1989-02-18 | 1990-08-23 | Bosch Gmbh Robert | Verfahren zur ausloesung von rueckhaltemitteln |
GB9005168D0 (en) * | 1990-03-08 | 1990-05-02 | Autoliv Dev | Improvements in or relating to an accelerometer arrangement |
DE69215426T2 (de) * | 1991-04-23 | 1997-03-27 | Nippon Denso Co | Auslösesystem für eine Kraftfahrzeuginsassen-Schutzeinrichtung |
US5339242A (en) * | 1991-11-26 | 1994-08-16 | Delco Electronics Corp. | Method and apparatus for vehicle crash discrimination based on oscillation and energy content |
JP2793084B2 (ja) * | 1992-05-29 | 1998-09-03 | 三菱電機株式会社 | 乗員保護装置の起動装置 |
US5566974A (en) * | 1993-03-22 | 1996-10-22 | Trw Vehicle Safety Systems Inc. | Method and apparatus for restraining an occupant during a side impact |
-
1994
- 1994-03-04 US US08/205,464 patent/US5418722A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1994-12-15 DE DE69419002T patent/DE69419002T2/de not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1994-12-15 EP EP94203648A patent/EP0670248B1/fr not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5216607A (en) * | 1989-05-30 | 1993-06-01 | Trw Vehicle Safety Systems Inc. | Method and apparatus for sensing a vehicle crash using energy and velocity as measures of crash violence |
US5189311A (en) * | 1990-01-29 | 1993-02-23 | Sensor Technology Co., Ltd. | Crash sensor |
US5282134A (en) * | 1991-08-19 | 1994-01-25 | Automotive Systems Laboratory, Inc. | Slant transform/signal space crash discriminator |
US5251161A (en) * | 1992-02-25 | 1993-10-05 | Automatic Systems Laboratory, Inc. | Method of generating model crash waveforms for testing vehicle crash detection systems |
Cited By (30)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0715991A1 (fr) * | 1994-12-08 | 1996-06-12 | General Motors Corporation | Procédé de filtrage de données de décélération d'un véhicule |
US5668740A (en) * | 1994-12-20 | 1997-09-16 | General Motors Corporation | Method for detecting a rough road surface |
US20060232052A1 (en) * | 1995-06-07 | 2006-10-19 | Automotive Technologies International, Inc. | Vehicular Bus Including Crash Sensor or Occupant Protection System Control Module |
US5684701A (en) * | 1995-06-07 | 1997-11-04 | Automotive Technologies International, Inc. | Method and apparatus for sensing a vehicle crash |
US7832762B2 (en) * | 1995-06-07 | 2010-11-16 | Automotive Technologies International, Inc. | Vehicular bus including crash sensor or occupant protection system control module |
US7284769B2 (en) | 1995-06-07 | 2007-10-23 | Automotive Technologies International, Inc. | Method and apparatus for sensing a vehicle crash |
US20040036261A1 (en) * | 1995-06-07 | 2004-02-26 | Breed David S. | Method and apparatus for sensing a vehicle crash |
WO1997032756A1 (fr) * | 1996-03-08 | 1997-09-12 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Systeme servant a declencher un dispositif de retenue pour la protection en cas de collision laterale dans un vehicule a moteur |
US6532408B1 (en) | 1997-05-29 | 2003-03-11 | Automotive Technologies International, Inc. | Smart airbag system |
US6216070B1 (en) * | 1997-09-29 | 2001-04-10 | Calsonic Kansei Corporation | Passenger protecting apparatus |
US6154698A (en) * | 1998-07-30 | 2000-11-28 | Delco Electronics Corp. | Supplemental restraint deployment method providing rough road immunity |
US5964817A (en) * | 1998-11-09 | 1999-10-12 | Delco Electronics Corp. | Impact characterizing deployment control method for an automotive restraint system |
US6430489B1 (en) * | 1998-11-23 | 2002-08-06 | Delphi Technologies, Inc. | Restraint deployment control method with feed-forward adjustment of deployment threshold |
US6549836B1 (en) | 2000-06-07 | 2003-04-15 | Trw Inc. | Method and apparatus for controlling an actuatable restraint device using a velocity/displacement based safing function with immunity box |
US6848712B2 (en) * | 2001-09-27 | 2005-02-01 | Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft | Method of triggering a vehicle occupant restraining device |
US20030057685A1 (en) * | 2001-09-27 | 2003-03-27 | Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft | Method of triggering a vehicle occupant restraining device |
US20060038387A1 (en) * | 2004-08-17 | 2006-02-23 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Separation of abuse conditions and crash events to control occupant restraint devices |
US8186711B2 (en) | 2004-08-17 | 2012-05-29 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Separation of abuse conditions and crash events to control occupant restraint devices |
US20130090780A1 (en) * | 2011-03-29 | 2013-04-11 | Jaguar Cars Limited | Speed and severity trigger for an active device of a vehicle |
US9346465B2 (en) * | 2011-03-29 | 2016-05-24 | Jaguar Land Rover Limited | Speed and severity trigger for an active device of a vehicle |
US9925940B1 (en) | 2015-07-13 | 2018-03-27 | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | Method and system for identifying vehicle collisions using sensor data |
US9457754B1 (en) * | 2015-07-13 | 2016-10-04 | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | Method and system for identifying vehicle collisions using sensor data |
US10399523B1 (en) * | 2015-07-13 | 2019-09-03 | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | Method and system for identifying vehicle collisions using sensor data |
US10814812B1 (en) * | 2015-07-13 | 2020-10-27 | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | Method and system for identifying vehicle collisions using sensor data |
US10829071B1 (en) * | 2015-07-13 | 2020-11-10 | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | Method and system for identifying vehicle collisions using sensor data |
WO2018086799A1 (fr) * | 2016-11-10 | 2018-05-17 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Procédé de commande d'un dispositif de protection des personnes |
JP2019535572A (ja) * | 2016-11-10 | 2019-12-12 | ロベルト・ボッシュ・ゲゼルシャフト・ミト・ベシュレンクテル・ハフツングRobert Bosch Gmbh | 乗員保護装置を制御する方法 |
US11247626B2 (en) * | 2016-11-10 | 2022-02-15 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Method for controlling a passenger protection device |
US20200384935A1 (en) * | 2019-06-04 | 2020-12-10 | B/E Aerospace, Inc. | Safety system initiator with electronically adjustable fire time |
US11034318B2 (en) * | 2019-06-04 | 2021-06-15 | B/E Aerospace, Inc. | Safety system initiator with electronically adjustable fire time |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP0670248A2 (fr) | 1995-09-06 |
DE69419002T2 (de) | 1999-10-07 |
DE69419002D1 (de) | 1999-07-15 |
EP0670248A3 (fr) | 1996-12-11 |
EP0670248B1 (fr) | 1999-06-09 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US5418722A (en) | SIR deployment method with rough road immunity | |
US5430649A (en) | SIR deployment method based on occupant displacement and crash severity | |
US5521822A (en) | Method for controlling actuation of a vehicle safety device using filtered vehicle deceleration data | |
US5483449A (en) | Inflatable restraint system and method of controlling deployment thereof | |
US5394326A (en) | Air bag deployment control system and method | |
US6219606B1 (en) | Restraint deployment control method having a delayed adaptable deployment threshold | |
US5702124A (en) | Method and apparatus for sensing a vehicle crash using a displacement velocity metric | |
US5339242A (en) | Method and apparatus for vehicle crash discrimination based on oscillation and energy content | |
EP0823356A1 (fr) | Procédé de commande pour le gonflage à niveau variable d'un cousin d'air | |
US5538099A (en) | Method and apparatus for controlling an air bag restraint system | |
US7349783B2 (en) | Supplemental restraint deployment method with anticipatory crash classification | |
US6496764B1 (en) | Vehicle impact-sensing method with improved severity discrimination | |
WO1991013784A1 (fr) | Agencement d'accelerometre | |
US5964817A (en) | Impact characterizing deployment control method for an automotive restraint system | |
US5508918A (en) | Predictor/check crash discriminator | |
US6363308B1 (en) | Satellite crash sensor and method with constant and dynamic thresholds for multi-stage restraint deployment | |
EP1140565B1 (fr) | Systeme concu pour faire la distinction entre des evenements de declenchement d'un airbag | |
JP3872103B2 (ja) | 衝突識別測定値を調節するためのシステムと方法 | |
JPH05213153A (ja) | 膨張可能な拘束システムおよびシステム展開方法 | |
US5490066A (en) | Method for discriminating long-period, low-velocity crashes | |
US6157881A (en) | Supplemental restraint rear impact deployment control method | |
US6553294B1 (en) | Dual stage occupant restraint deployment control for motor vehicle | |
US6154698A (en) | Supplemental restraint deployment method providing rough road immunity | |
EP0711232B1 (fr) | Procédé et système de distinction entre des accidents de longue durée et faible vitesse | |
US20030114971A1 (en) | Vehicle occupant restraint deployment control with lateral velocity responsive upgrade |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: DELCO ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, INDIANA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:CASHLER, ROBERT JOHN;REEL/FRAME:006915/0784 Effective date: 19940217 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: DELPHI TECHNOLOGIES INC., MICHIGAN Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:DELCO ELECTRONICS CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:017115/0208 Effective date: 20050930 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: DBD CREDIT FUNDING, LLC, NEW YORK Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MARATHON PATENT GROUP, INC.;LOOPBACK TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;REEL/FRAME:034873/0255 Effective date: 20150129 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: LOOPBACK TECHNOLOGIES, INC., VIRGINIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:DELPHI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;REEL/FRAME:035311/0212 Effective date: 20131218 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: DBD CREDIT FUNDING LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT, NEW Y Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MOTHEYE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC;SYNCHRONICITY IP LLC;TRAVERSE TECHNOLOGIES CORP.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:041333/0001 Effective date: 20170110 |