US5372477A - Gaseous fluid aspirator or pump especially for smoke detection systems - Google Patents

Gaseous fluid aspirator or pump especially for smoke detection systems Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US5372477A
US5372477A US07/952,536 US95253692A US5372477A US 5372477 A US5372477 A US 5372477A US 95253692 A US95253692 A US 95253692A US 5372477 A US5372477 A US 5372477A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
inlet
impeller
throat
gaseous fluid
blade
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
US07/952,536
Inventor
Martin T. Cole
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Vision Systems Ltd
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US5372477A publication Critical patent/US5372477A/en
Assigned to VISION SYSTEMS LIMITED reassignment VISION SYSTEMS LIMITED ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: COLE, MARTIN TERENCE
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F04POSITIVE - DISPLACEMENT MACHINES FOR LIQUIDS; PUMPS FOR LIQUIDS OR ELASTIC FLUIDS
    • F04DNON-POSITIVE-DISPLACEMENT PUMPS
    • F04D29/00Details, component parts, or accessories
    • F04D29/26Rotors specially for elastic fluids
    • F04D29/28Rotors specially for elastic fluids for centrifugal or helico-centrifugal pumps for radial-flow or helico-centrifugal pumps
    • F04D29/281Rotors specially for elastic fluids for centrifugal or helico-centrifugal pumps for radial-flow or helico-centrifugal pumps for fans or blowers
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F04POSITIVE - DISPLACEMENT MACHINES FOR LIQUIDS; PUMPS FOR LIQUIDS OR ELASTIC FLUIDS
    • F04DNON-POSITIVE-DISPLACEMENT PUMPS
    • F04D29/00Details, component parts, or accessories
    • F04D29/26Rotors specially for elastic fluids
    • F04D29/28Rotors specially for elastic fluids for centrifugal or helico-centrifugal pumps for radial-flow or helico-centrifugal pumps
    • F04D29/30Vanes
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F05INDEXING SCHEMES RELATING TO ENGINES OR PUMPS IN VARIOUS SUBCLASSES OF CLASSES F01-F04
    • F05DINDEXING SCHEME FOR ASPECTS RELATING TO NON-POSITIVE-DISPLACEMENT MACHINES OR ENGINES, GAS-TURBINES OR JET-PROPULSION PLANTS
    • F05D2240/00Components
    • F05D2240/20Rotors
    • F05D2240/30Characteristics of rotor blades, i.e. of any element transforming dynamic fluid energy to or from rotational energy and being attached to a rotor
    • F05D2240/303Characteristics of rotor blades, i.e. of any element transforming dynamic fluid energy to or from rotational energy and being attached to a rotor related to the leading edge of a rotor blade

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to improvements relating to a gaseous fluid aspirator or pump particularly but not exclusively to an aspirator for an optical air pollution apparatus particularly a very early warning smoke detector apparatus adapted to summon human intervention before smoke levels become dangerous to life or delicate equipment. It can cause early or orderly shut down of power supplies and it can operate automatic fire suppression systems.
  • Smoke detection apparatus of the type described in applicants U.S. Pat. No. 4,608,556 directed to a heat-sensitive/gas-sampling device in a smoke detector system including sampling pipes and an apertured housing in association with a smoke detection device of the type described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,665,311 which has a sampling chamber as illustrated in FIG. 1 of the drawings therein.
  • FIG. 7 of the U.S. Pat. No. 4,608,556 there is shown schematically a reticulation fluid/smoke mixture transport system of sampling pipes leading to various sampling areas to continuously sample air from those various areas.
  • the transport system leads back to a sampling chamber of the type for example that is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,665,311.
  • the smoke detector utilizes an airtight chamber through which a representative sample of air within the zone to be monitored, is drawn continuously by an aspirator.
  • the air sample is stimulated by an intense, wide band light pulse.
  • a minuscule proportion of the incident light is scattered off airborne particles towards a very sensitive receiver, producing a signal which is processed to represent the level of pollution in this instance of smoke.
  • the instrument is extremely sensitive, so much so that light scattered off air molecules alone may be detected. Therefore, minor pollution is readily detectable as an increased signal. Therefore, the detector which is utilizable in commercial situations, is extremely sensitive and yet has a low incidence of false alarms.
  • the means for obtaining a continuous sample of the air to be monitored is reliable, efficient, consumes only a small amount of power and has a long life. It is also important that the aspirator develops a relatively high pressure and pressure and draws a relatively large volume of air given its low power rating in order that there is little or no delay in the detection of smoke or like pollution in a dangerous situation.
  • a more specific objective is to provide an efficient aspirator of the order of 20% efficiency, having a capacity of the order of 60 liters per minute at a pressure of the order of 300 Pascals with an input of about 2 watts and having a long reliable life.
  • a gaseous fluid aspirator/pump apparatus including an impeller with a plurality of blades, the impeller comprising a pair of shrouds being mounted in a housing having a gaseous fluid inlet and outlet said pair of shrouds providing an inlet throat, said inlet throat having an inlet and an outlet in which gaseous fluid moving from the throat inlet to the throat outlet is turned from axial flow to radial flow into the impeller blades, said impeller being configured in matching curvate conical form in the area of the inlet throat wherein the inlet throat is shaped to maintain a substantially constant cross-sectional flow area throughout the curved volume of the inlet throat until the blade passage is reached.
  • the impeller inlet includes an inlet configuration of curvate form in which the cross-sectional flow area is maintained constant by projecting a truncated conical section around the inlet throat until the blade passage is reached.
  • Turbulent eddies are minimized and uniform velocity distribution is achieved.
  • the impeller blade inlet angle can be set by conventional velocity-triangle means and the number of blades is optionally set at 12.
  • FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view of the aspirator showing the configuration of the impeller and housing inlet.
  • FIG. 2 is a frontal view of the impeller blades.
  • FIG. 3 shows a measured comparison of performance curves between a conventional aspirator and the aspirator of the invention.
  • FIG. 4 shows comparative response times for a given length of pipe.
  • FIGS. 5 and 6 show schematically the derivation of impeller throat dimensions and composition of inlet boss profile.
  • FIG. 7 shows impeller inlet area calculation according to Eck.
  • FIG. 8 shows impeller blade leading-edge profiles.
  • FIG. 9 shows inlet area reduction caused by rounded leading-edge.
  • FIG. 10 shows modification of blade leading-edge.
  • the aspirator shown in FIG. 1 includes an impeller 10 and inlets throughout 11 forming a curvate inlet cavity with surfaces 15, 16 presenting a constant cross-sectioned area to the fluid stream for receiving incoming air and turning it through 90° into impeller blades to travel to the peripheral chamber 14, forming a rounded trapezoidal volute.
  • the impeller includes a cavity 17 for housing a small DC brushless motor (not shown). To minimize temperature rise, and therefore improve bearing life, a cooling fan is preferably incorporated for the motor. To minimize friction losses labyrinth seals 18, 19 are provided.
  • the blades 20 of the impeller are of minimum thickness (1 mm) to reduce energy losses.
  • the leading edges 21 of the blades are rounded parabolically to avoid a narrowing of the channel width to minimize acceleration of the air stream.
  • the blade inlet angle was set by conventional velocity-triangle means, and the number of blades was set at 12.
  • the blades are designed with minimum thickness (1 mm). However, when set at the required angle, their effective thickness is 2.7 mm. With 12 blades their combined thickness would constitute a significant reduction in the inlet cross-sectional area, so the channel depth is increased (with a smooth transition) at the leading-edge to maintain a constant mean air velocity. Moreover, the blade leading-edges are rounded parabolically (see FIG. 10) (rather than a conventional wedge-shape) to remove a narrowing of the channel width which would also accelerate the airstream, thus incurring loss.
  • the blade channel is preferably maintained at a constant depth of 3.3 mm by parallel shrouds.
  • the blades are preferably curved to achieve radially extending tips thereby producing a maximum static head matched by a dynamic head component that must be converted to static head in the outlet diffuser attached to the spiral volute.
  • the spiral volute geometry has an expanding rounded-trapezoidal design modified to fit within the available space, complete with an 8° diffuser nozzle for which a trapezoidal to circular transition was required. It is possible to match the inlet and outlet couplings exactly to mate with the standard 25 mm pipe work carrying the gaseous fluid for sampling. This enables the staging of multiple aspirators where higher pressures may be needed and facilitates the attachment of an exhaust pipe to overcome room pressure differentials that sometimes occur, for example in computer rooms.
  • the airstream should be directed to flow parallel to the walls of the throat. Accordingly, the cross-sectional area should be measured perpendicular to that flow, i.e. perpendicular to the throat walls.
  • the throat walls themselves turning through 90°
  • the throat walls cannot be parallel if a uniform cross-sectional area is to be achieved.
  • the extent to which the second (boss) wall might not be parallel was not yet known.
  • the vertical coordinates, y and y' are determined by the value of x, because of the circular curvature of the first throat wall and congruency of the triangles:
  • the solution lies with shaping the blade passage entry according to the shape of the leading-edge of the blades.
  • the passage width should expand smoothly from the required throat width to the required blade width, maintaining a uniform cross-sectional area. This expansion taper should be completed within the length of the blade shaping.
  • FIG. 8 compares the effects of using the chisel-shaped leading-edge of Eck, with a rounded shape which is preferred. This rounded shape is more practicable to mold and should reduce the entry shock losses including flow separation behind the blade, particularly at flow rates significantly below the rated capacity of the impeller (where a rounded shape would adapt more readily to differing velocity angles).
  • leading-edge should be “sharpened” as indicated in FIG. 10, to avoid the momentary narrowing of the blade passage area.
  • the other side of the blade is similarly treated to achieve symmetry.
  • the sudden transitions (sharp edges) produced by this sharpening should be smoothed by using appropriate curves as shown (dashed).
  • the resulting shape more closely resembles a classical aerodynamic profile.
  • the blade width at the impeller inlet should be:
  • the pump housing incorporates isolation of the aspirated air from the ambient air to enable operation in hazardous areas.
  • the motor labyrinth is designed as a flame trap to comply with Australian standards.
  • FIGS. 3 and 4 give graphical representations of the performance of the aspirator as described herein as compared with the conventional aspirator currently utilized in the early warning smoke detection apparatus.
  • the increased pressure possible with the new aspirator is shown and in one example with a 100 meter pipe a pressure rise in excess of 300 Pascals at a speed of 3,800 rpm was achieved at a power train of only 2 watts which is less than half that of the original aspirator.
  • the sustained good performance at relatively high flow rates provides a distinct advantage for use with large numbers of pipes and sampling holes without compromising the operation of single pipe systems.
  • this shows the drastically improved response times of the aspirator according to the invention as against the length of pipe whereby in a 100 meter pipe the smoke transport time is reduced by a factor of 4. With shorter less restrictive pipes the improvement is less dramatic but nevertheless the time is halved for a 50 meter pipe.
  • the parts of the aspirator can be injection molded thereby allowing automatic production and assurance of repeatable quality. These factors significantly increase factory capacity committing a rapid response to increasing market demand while assisting to maintain an internationally competitive cost structure.
  • the invention provides an improved system performance for early fire detection, however, the scope of application for the aspirator is considerably widened where low power input and fast response are required such as in battery-powered or solar-powered air pollution monitoring applications.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Structures Of Non-Positive Displacement Pumps (AREA)
  • Reciprocating Pumps (AREA)
  • Solid-Sorbent Or Filter-Aiding Compositions (AREA)
  • Compressors, Vaccum Pumps And Other Relevant Systems (AREA)

Abstract

A gaseous fluid aspirator/pump apparatus including a rotary impeller (10) with radially extending blades, the impeller being mounted in a housing having a gaseous fluid inlet and outlet wherein gaseous fluid moving from the inlet (15) to the outlet (14) is turned from axial flow into the impeller to radial flow from the impeller, said impeller and an associated portion of the housing (16) being shaped to prevent flow separation and turbulence in the gaseous fluid stream while under the influence of the impeller. The impeller inlet (15) includes an inlet configuration of curvate conical from matching the configuration of the housing (16) in the area of the inlet opening. This configuration acting to prevent flow separation while turning the fluid flow through a large angle of approximately 90° and acceleration and deceleration of the fluid flow is substantially prevented.

Description

The present invention relates to improvements relating to a gaseous fluid aspirator or pump particularly but not exclusively to an aspirator for an optical air pollution apparatus particularly a very early warning smoke detector apparatus adapted to summon human intervention before smoke levels become dangerous to life or delicate equipment. It can cause early or orderly shut down of power supplies and it can operate automatic fire suppression systems.
The present invention will be described with reference to an aspirator for use with very early warning smoke detection apparatus. Smoke detection apparatus of the type described in applicants U.S. Pat. No. 4,608,556 directed to a heat-sensitive/gas-sampling device in a smoke detector system including sampling pipes and an apertured housing in association with a smoke detection device of the type described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,665,311 which has a sampling chamber as illustrated in FIG. 1 of the drawings therein. With reference to FIG. 7 of the U.S. Pat. No. 4,608,556 there is shown schematically a reticulation fluid/smoke mixture transport system of sampling pipes leading to various sampling areas to continuously sample air from those various areas. The transport system leads back to a sampling chamber of the type for example that is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,665,311. However, it will be equally applicable to other apparatus requiring efficient long-lived operation of an aspirator at low power consumptions.
The smoke detector utilizes an airtight chamber through which a representative sample of air within the zone to be monitored, is drawn continuously by an aspirator. The air sample is stimulated by an intense, wide band light pulse. A minuscule proportion of the incident light is scattered off airborne particles towards a very sensitive receiver, producing a signal which is processed to represent the level of pollution in this instance of smoke. The instrument is extremely sensitive, so much so that light scattered off air molecules alone may be detected. Therefore, minor pollution is readily detectable as an increased signal. Therefore, the detector which is utilizable in commercial situations, is extremely sensitive and yet has a low incidence of false alarms.
It is extremely important that the means for obtaining a continuous sample of the air to be monitored is reliable, efficient, consumes only a small amount of power and has a long life. It is also important that the aspirator develops a relatively high pressure and pressure and draws a relatively large volume of air given its low power rating in order that there is little or no delay in the detection of smoke or like pollution in a dangerous situation.
Existing aspirator systems as currently used, utilize an axial flow fan providing relatively low cost and long life coupled with ready availability. However, known equipment has a very low efficiency of less than 2% at flow rates of 40 liters per minute. Such low efficiency is considered unsatisfactory particularly if increased flow rates with reduced power input is to be attainable.
Thus it is an objective of the present invention to provide a gaseous fluid aspirator/pump having relatively high pressure output with increased efficiency and decreased power requirements.
A more specific objective is to provide an efficient aspirator of the order of 20% efficiency, having a capacity of the order of 60 liters per minute at a pressure of the order of 300 Pascals with an input of about 2 watts and having a long reliable life.
There is provided according to the present invention a gaseous fluid aspirator/pump apparatus including an impeller with a plurality of blades, the impeller comprising a pair of shrouds being mounted in a housing having a gaseous fluid inlet and outlet said pair of shrouds providing an inlet throat, said inlet throat having an inlet and an outlet in which gaseous fluid moving from the throat inlet to the throat outlet is turned from axial flow to radial flow into the impeller blades, said impeller being configured in matching curvate conical form in the area of the inlet throat wherein the inlet throat is shaped to maintain a substantially constant cross-sectional flow area throughout the curved volume of the inlet throat until the blade passage is reached.
Specifically the impeller inlet includes an inlet configuration of curvate form in which the cross-sectional flow area is maintained constant by projecting a truncated conical section around the inlet throat until the blade passage is reached.
Thus flow separation is prevented while turning the fluid flow through 90° and acceleration and deceleration of the fluid flow is substantially prevented, minimizing losses.
Turbulent eddies are minimized and uniform velocity distribution is achieved. The impeller blade inlet angle can be set by conventional velocity-triangle means and the number of blades is optionally set at 12.
The invention will be described in greater detail having reference to the accompanying drawings in which FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view of the aspirator showing the configuration of the impeller and housing inlet. FIG. 2 is a frontal view of the impeller blades.
FIG. 3 shows a measured comparison of performance curves between a conventional aspirator and the aspirator of the invention.
FIG. 4 shows comparative response times for a given length of pipe.
FIGS. 5 and 6 show schematically the derivation of impeller throat dimensions and composition of inlet boss profile.
FIG. 7 shows impeller inlet area calculation according to Eck.
FIG. 8 shows impeller blade leading-edge profiles.
FIG. 9 shows inlet area reduction caused by rounded leading-edge.
FIG. 10 shows modification of blade leading-edge.
The aspirator shown in FIG. 1 includes an impeller 10 and inlets throughout 11 forming a curvate inlet cavity with surfaces 15, 16 presenting a constant cross-sectioned area to the fluid stream for receiving incoming air and turning it through 90° into impeller blades to travel to the peripheral chamber 14, forming a rounded trapezoidal volute.
The impeller includes a cavity 17 for housing a small DC brushless motor (not shown). To minimize temperature rise, and therefore improve bearing life, a cooling fan is preferably incorporated for the motor. To minimize friction losses labyrinth seals 18, 19 are provided.
With reference to FIG. 2 of the drawings the blades 20 of the impeller are of minimum thickness (1 mm) to reduce energy losses. The leading edges 21 of the blades are rounded parabolically to avoid a narrowing of the channel width to minimize acceleration of the air stream.
No detailed information can be found regarding the design of the impeller inlet throat geometry (including the boss profile), its importance being all-too-readily dismissed by others. However, this can hold the key to high efficiency so a method was derived from first principles, to minimize energy loss by:
* preventing flow separation while turning the airflow through 90°,
* preventing acceleration or deceleration of the airflow, and by preparing the airstream for presentation to the blade channel entrance in such a manner that, within the blade channels:
* flow separation and eddies would be minimized, and
* a uniform velocity distribution would be achieved.
This method resulted in a parabolic boss profile in which it was possible to emulate this shape to a high accuracy by specifying a short circular arc.
The blade inlet angle was set by conventional velocity-triangle means, and the number of blades was set at 12.
To minimize energy loss caused by the blade leading-edges, the blades are designed with minimum thickness (1 mm). However, when set at the required angle, their effective thickness is 2.7 mm. With 12 blades their combined thickness would constitute a significant reduction in the inlet cross-sectional area, so the channel depth is increased (with a smooth transition) at the leading-edge to maintain a constant mean air velocity. Moreover, the blade leading-edges are rounded parabolically (see FIG. 10) (rather than a conventional wedge-shape) to remove a narrowing of the channel width which would also accelerate the airstream, thus incurring loss.
The blade channel is preferably maintained at a constant depth of 3.3 mm by parallel shrouds. The blades are preferably curved to achieve radially extending tips thereby producing a maximum static head matched by a dynamic head component that must be converted to static head in the outlet diffuser attached to the spiral volute. The spiral volute geometry has an expanding rounded-trapezoidal design modified to fit within the available space, complete with an 8° diffuser nozzle for which a trapezoidal to circular transition was required. It is possible to match the inlet and outlet couplings exactly to mate with the standard 25 mm pipe work carrying the gaseous fluid for sampling. This enables the staging of multiple aspirators where higher pressures may be needed and facilitates the attachment of an exhaust pipe to overcome room pressure differentials that sometimes occur, for example in computer rooms.
With reference to FIGS. 1, 5 and 6, details of the formation of the inlet throat 15,16 will be described.
For minimum loss the airstream should be directed to flow parallel to the walls of the throat. Accordingly, the cross-sectional area should be measured perpendicular to that flow, i.e. perpendicular to the throat walls. In practice however, the throat walls themselves (turning through 90°) cannot be parallel if a uniform cross-sectional area is to be achieved. Moreover, in computing the throat area, only one wall shape was defined in the first instance, so the extent to which the second (boss) wall might not be parallel, was not yet known. To obtain a cross-sectional area measured at an angle which averaged perpendicularity to both walls (i.e. perpendicular to a centreline), would require an iterative process.
However, this extra effort could be counter-productive because it is possible that the airstream would flow partially in shear, due to incomplete turning. Moreover, at the pipe-throat interface, the bulk of the mass flow is biased towards the first wall (simply because the cross-sectional area of any annular ring of given width is proportional to the annular radius squared). Therefore it would seem most appropriate to calculate the cross-sectional area perpendicular to this first wall.
In visualising this area three-dimensionally, it was discovered that the cross-section at any point along the throat is described by the surface of a truncated cone (see FIG. 5).
Available literature provided differing formulae for the sloping-surface area (excluding the base) of a regular cone, e.g.: S=pi r (r+h). However, this formula was found incorrect, failing the simple test of mathematically comparing (say) the area of a known semicircle, pulled into the shape of a cone or "Indian teepee".
An alternative formula was derived from first principles and was subjected to rigorous testing. Accordingly, the surface area As of a cone of base radius r and height h is given by:
A.sub.s =pi r h (1+(r/h).sup.2)·.sup.5
And for a truncated cone the surface area becomes:
A.sub.s =pi (r.sub.2 h.sub.2 -r.sub.1 h.sub.1) (1+(r.sub.2 /h.sub.2).sup.2)·.sup.5
By application of this formula to the impeller configuration as illustrated in FIG. 5, it has been possible to derive the following equation which has also been rigorously tested by "longhand" calculations:
r.sub.b =((r.sub.1 -x).sup.2 -r.sub.0.sup.2 x/(r.sub.1 -r.sub.0))·.sup.5
This general solution may be simplified by substitution of r0 =10.5 and r1 =20 which have been determined for this particular impeller design:
r.sub.b =((20-x).sup.2 -11.6 x)·.sup.5
which may be solved for various values of x. However, the resulting values for rb may be more easily handled by convening to x', where:
x'=r.sub.1 -r.sub.b =20-r.sub.b =20-((20-x).sup.2 -11.6 x)·.sup.5
The vertical coordinates, y and y' are determined by the value of x, because of the circular curvature of the first throat wall and congruency of the triangles:
y=(r.sup.2 -x.sup.2)·.sup.5 =(90-x.sup.2)·.sup.5
y'=y x'/x
By plotting the coordinates (x',y') obtained for several values of x, it is possible to determine the curve of best fit, as illustrated in FIG. 6.
Fortunately, a satisfactory fit to this parabola was achieved using a circular curve. In the case of this impeller, the best-fit radius of curvature was found to be 22 mm, drawn tangentially to the blade channel. Conveniently this approach requires that the part-circle is constructed with its centre at the set distance r1 =20 mm from the impeller centerline.
Whereas the curve of best fit requires a very sharp central tip for the boss, to assist with die fabrication and to allow the extraction of each molded part without breakage, and to provide a more-conventionally aerodynamic leading edge, it is proposed that the central point should be rounded 24 as indicated in FIG. 6. It is expected that in practice, this minor rounding would have a negligible effect upon any aspect of the impeller performance. Indeed, this type of rounding (though with a much greater radius) is reminiscent of the round-headed impeller-retaining nuts commonly used in larger cast metal centrifugal pumps.
BLADE PASSAGE ENTRY
Now, at the leading edge of the blades there exists the potential for a sudden change in area which would introduce losses. This change in area arises from the thickness of the blades. If the throat width immediately ahead of the blades was made equal to the blade width, there would be a reduction in area upon entering the blade passage. Alternatively, if the throat width were reduced so that the throat area equalled the blade passage area, there could be an equally lossy discontinuity because of the necessary difference in widths.
The solution lies with shaping the blade passage entry according to the shape of the leading-edge of the blades. As the airflow encounters the blade leading-edge, the passage width should expand smoothly from the required throat width to the required blade width, maintaining a uniform cross-sectional area. This expansion taper should be completed within the length of the blade shaping.
It would seem ideal to ensure that the shaping and the taper were made complementary throughout the transition, but this would suggest wedge shapes and in practice it is expected that the simple provision of smooth curves in both dimensions would minimize loss.
As illustrated in FIG. 6, it is desirable to provide the expansion taper 22 on one shroud only, i.e. the motor side. This simplifies the design, by leaving the inlet-side shroud unaltered. More importantly, a tapered expansion of the inlet shroud would tend to promote flow separation within the blade passage.
With reference to FIGS. 7 to 10 detailed description of the blade entry design will be made.
According to Eck the effective thickness (t') of each blade is larger than the actual thickness (t), depending upon the acuteness of the inlet angle (B1). This is illustrated in FIG. 7, where for simplicity the inlet circle has been straightened-out (Eck uses different symbols, namely s=t, sigma=t'). The effective thickness is easily obtained by geometry:
t'=t/sin(B.sub.1)=1/sin(25)=2.4 mm
FIG. 8 compares the effects of using the chisel-shaped leading-edge of Eck, with a rounded shape which is preferred. This rounded shape is more practicable to mold and should reduce the entry shock losses including flow separation behind the blade, particularly at flow rates significantly below the rated capacity of the impeller (where a rounded shape would adapt more readily to differing velocity angles).
It can be shown (with reference to FIG. 8) that in the case of a rounded shape, the effective thickness is obtained by a modified equation:
t'=t (1+1/sin(B.sub.1))/2=1*(1+1/sin(25))/2 =1.7 mm
Unfortunately, it can be seen from FIG. 9 that Eck's concept of straightening-out the inlet circle disguises another effect. In practice the blades cannot be regarded as parallel and there is a degree of narrowing of the blade passage as the airstream passes the rounded leading-edge. Any such narrowing would cause a momentary increase in air velocity (acceleration), resulting in loss. This narrowing is caused by the acute angle of the back of the next blade. In the case of a 12-blade impeller, the next blade is advanced by 360/12=30°.
Therefore the leading-edge should be "sharpened" as indicated in FIG. 10, to avoid the momentary narrowing of the blade passage area. This is achieved by constructing a line parallel to the next blade (30° advanced), intersecting with the inlet tangent (at 20 mm radius), as shown at point "a". This line is inclined to the inlet tangent at the required rake angle of (B1 +360/z)=55°, intersecting with the edge of the blade at point "b". The other side of the blade is similarly treated to achieve symmetry.
Ideally the sudden transitions (sharp edges) produced by this sharpening should be smoothed by using appropriate curves as shown (dashed). The resulting shape more closely resembles a classical aerodynamic profile.
Although it was initially regarded as important to utilize a semicircular leading-edge for simplicity in mold fabrication, such a narrow (1.0 mm) blade thickness would require spark-erosion milling in any case, so the aerodynamic profile would be only slightly more expensive to mill.
It is interesting to note that for the range of possible values of B1 (0° to 90° ), for an impeller with 12 blades there is no sharpening required if B1 exceeds 60°. The maximum sharpening (30° rake) occurs for B1 =0.
According to the leading-edge profile of FIG. 10 it is possible to retain the previously-calculated effective blade thickness, namely 1.7 mm. Utilizing this figure, the useable inlet circumference reduces to:
C.sub.1 '=C.sub.1 -z t'=126-12*1.7=106 mm
To produce an inlet area equal to the pipe area, the blade width at the impeller inlet should be:
W.sub.1 =A.sub.0 /C.sub.1 '=346/106=3.3 mm
Additional constructional features provided in the pump housing incorporates isolation of the aspirated air from the ambient air to enable operation in hazardous areas. To achieve this, the motor labyrinth is designed as a flame trap to comply with Australian standards.
FIGS. 3 and 4 give graphical representations of the performance of the aspirator as described herein as compared with the conventional aspirator currently utilized in the early warning smoke detection apparatus.
With reference to FIG. 3, the increased pressure possible with the new aspirator is shown and in one example with a 100 meter pipe a pressure rise in excess of 300 Pascals at a speed of 3,800 rpm was achieved at a power train of only 2 watts which is less than half that of the original aspirator. The sustained good performance at relatively high flow rates provides a distinct advantage for use with large numbers of pipes and sampling holes without compromising the operation of single pipe systems.
With reference to FIG. 4, this shows the drastically improved response times of the aspirator according to the invention as against the length of pipe whereby in a 100 meter pipe the smoke transport time is reduced by a factor of 4. With shorter less restrictive pipes the improvement is less dramatic but nevertheless the time is halved for a 50 meter pipe.
Calculations have shown that the peak total efficiency of the aspirator was in fact 21%. Therefore, taking into account the known motor efficiency, the peak impeller efficiency proved to be 49% which for an impeller pump of such low specific speed as in the present example, such results are well in advance of normal expectations. Moreover it has been found that the impeller achieves an internal efficiency of 81% given the special attention made to the inlet throat geometry and blade design.
The parts of the aspirator can be injection molded thereby allowing automatic production and assurance of repeatable quality. These factors significantly increase factory capacity committing a rapid response to increasing market demand while assisting to maintain an internationally competitive cost structure. The invention provides an improved system performance for early fire detection, however, the scope of application for the aspirator is considerably widened where low power input and fast response are required such as in battery-powered or solar-powered air pollution monitoring applications.

Claims (4)

I claim:
1. A gaseous fluid aspirator/pump apparatus including an impeller having a plurality of blades, said impeller comprising a pair of shrouds mounted in a housing having a gaseous fluid inlet and outlet, said pair of shrouds providing an inlet throat having an inlet and outlet in which gaseous fluid moving from the throat inlet to the throat outlet is turned from axial flow to radial flow into the impeller blades, said impeller being configured in matching curvate conical form in the vicinity of the inlet throat wherein the inlet throat is shaped to maintain a substantially constant cross-sectional flow area throughout the curved volume of the inlet throat until the blade passage is reached, the inlet throat being curved substantially parabolically so that said substantially constant cross-sectional flow area is maintained to minimize acceleration and deceleration of the gaseous stream and restrict flow separation and turbulence in the fluid stream, and said blades having leading edges confronting incoming gaseous fluid from the throat outlet, the leading edges being rounded substantially parabolically to resemble an aerodynamic profile and substantially avoid a narrowing of the blade passage caused by the blade thickness.
2. The apparatus according to claim 1 wherein the blade passage in the shrouds is increased to compensate for area reduction caused by the finite blade thickness thereby to prevent flow separation and maintain a substantially constant mean velocity of the gas stream.
3. A smoke detection system including apparatus according to claim 2.
4. A smoke detection system including apparatus according to claim 1.
US07/952,536 1990-06-19 1991-06-19 Gaseous fluid aspirator or pump especially for smoke detection systems Expired - Fee Related US5372477A (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AUPK0709 1990-06-19
AUPK070990 1990-06-19
PCT/AU1991/000261 WO1991019906A1 (en) 1990-06-19 1991-06-19 Gaseous fluid aspirator or pump

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US5372477A true US5372477A (en) 1994-12-13

Family

ID=3774766

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US07/952,536 Expired - Fee Related US5372477A (en) 1990-06-19 1991-06-19 Gaseous fluid aspirator or pump especially for smoke detection systems

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (1) US5372477A (en)
EP (1) EP0535102B1 (en)
JP (1) JPH05507781A (en)
AT (1) ATE130910T1 (en)
CA (1) CA2085009A1 (en)
DE (1) DE69115038T2 (en)
WO (1) WO1991019906A1 (en)

Cited By (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5599169A (en) * 1994-09-07 1997-02-04 Behr Gmbh & Co. Radial impeller for a cooling system of a motor vehicle
US5730582A (en) * 1997-01-15 1998-03-24 Essex Turbine Ltd. Impeller for radial flow devices
US5926098A (en) * 1996-10-24 1999-07-20 Pittway Corporation Aspirated detector
US20030011770A1 (en) * 2000-02-10 2003-01-16 Cole Martin Terence Smoke detectors particularly ducted smoke detectors
US6585497B2 (en) * 2001-10-05 2003-07-01 Adda Corporation Cooling fan dust seal
US6589015B1 (en) 2002-05-08 2003-07-08 Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. Discrete passage diffuser
US7044720B1 (en) * 2004-12-10 2006-05-16 Toshiba Home Technology Corporation Fan motor
US20070024459A1 (en) * 2003-10-23 2007-02-01 Cole Martin T Particle monitors and method(s) therefor
US20080117065A1 (en) * 2006-11-20 2008-05-22 Honeywell International, Inc. Sensing Chamber with Enhanced Ambient Atmospheric Flow
US20100077768A1 (en) * 2008-09-26 2010-04-01 Andre Leblanc Diffuser with enhanced surge margin
US20150354587A1 (en) * 2013-02-01 2015-12-10 Borgwarner Inc. Elliptical compressor cover for a turbocharger
US9926942B2 (en) 2015-10-27 2018-03-27 Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. Diffuser pipe with vortex generators
US10217341B2 (en) * 2016-01-18 2019-02-26 Xenex Disinfection Services, Llc. Smoke detector shields and related methods
US10282956B2 (en) 2016-03-04 2019-05-07 Xenex Disinfection Services, Llc. Smoke detectors with light shields and alarm systems including such
US10570925B2 (en) 2015-10-27 2020-02-25 Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. Diffuser pipe with splitter vane
US10823197B2 (en) 2016-12-20 2020-11-03 Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. Vane diffuser and method for controlling a compressor having same

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE4220227A1 (en) * 1992-06-20 1993-12-23 Bosch Gmbh Robert Impeller for a radial fan
JP3796186B2 (en) * 2002-03-14 2006-07-12 ホーチキ株式会社 sensor
CN108291556A (en) * 2015-12-01 2018-07-17 博格华纳公司 centrifugal pump and its radial impeller
JP6312338B2 (en) * 2016-02-26 2018-04-18 ミネベアミツミ株式会社 Centrifugal fan

Citations (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2165808A (en) * 1937-05-22 1939-07-11 Murphy Daniel Pump rotor
US2796836A (en) * 1947-12-30 1957-06-25 Buchi Alfred Rotors for compressing machines such as centrifugal blowers and pumps
US2827261A (en) * 1953-08-21 1958-03-18 Garrett Corp Fluid propulsion apparatus
US2874922A (en) * 1956-08-24 1959-02-24 Richard T Whitcomb Fuselage shaping to reduce the strength of shock waves about airplanes at transonic and supersonic speeds
US3181471A (en) * 1961-06-23 1965-05-04 Babcock & Wilcox Co Centrifugal pump construction
US3260443A (en) * 1964-01-13 1966-07-12 R W Kimbell Blower
GB1043168A (en) * 1962-06-29 1966-09-21 Licentia Gmbh Improvements in or relating to turbo-compressors
SU382849A1 (en) * 1971-03-12 1973-05-25 WORKING WHEEL CENTRIFUGAL FAN
US3788765A (en) * 1971-11-18 1974-01-29 Laval Turbine Low specific speed compressor
US3806067A (en) * 1971-08-30 1974-04-23 Gen Electric Area ruled nacelle
US3964841A (en) * 1974-09-18 1976-06-22 Sigma Lutin, Narodni Podnik Impeller blades
US4171183A (en) * 1976-09-24 1979-10-16 United Technologies Corporation Multi-bladed, high speed prop-fan
US4677828A (en) * 1983-06-16 1987-07-07 United Technologies Corporation Circumferentially area ruled duct

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR462607A (en) * 1912-12-09 1914-01-31 Emile Mertz Centrifugal fan
GB517293A (en) * 1938-07-19 1940-01-25 Victor Vladimirovitch Dibovsky Improvements in or relating to rotary blowers
FR907976A (en) * 1943-10-18 1946-03-27 Sulzer Ag Centrifugal compressor
FR1141406A (en) * 1955-06-03 1957-09-02 Winkelstrater G M B H Geb Centrifugal fan
GB841011A (en) * 1957-05-08 1960-07-13 Mitsubishi Shipbuilding And En Improvements relating to centrifugal compressors, blowers, or the like
US4519746A (en) * 1981-07-24 1985-05-28 United Technologies Corporation Airfoil blade

Patent Citations (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2165808A (en) * 1937-05-22 1939-07-11 Murphy Daniel Pump rotor
US2796836A (en) * 1947-12-30 1957-06-25 Buchi Alfred Rotors for compressing machines such as centrifugal blowers and pumps
US2827261A (en) * 1953-08-21 1958-03-18 Garrett Corp Fluid propulsion apparatus
US2874922A (en) * 1956-08-24 1959-02-24 Richard T Whitcomb Fuselage shaping to reduce the strength of shock waves about airplanes at transonic and supersonic speeds
US3181471A (en) * 1961-06-23 1965-05-04 Babcock & Wilcox Co Centrifugal pump construction
GB1043168A (en) * 1962-06-29 1966-09-21 Licentia Gmbh Improvements in or relating to turbo-compressors
US3260443A (en) * 1964-01-13 1966-07-12 R W Kimbell Blower
SU382849A1 (en) * 1971-03-12 1973-05-25 WORKING WHEEL CENTRIFUGAL FAN
US3806067A (en) * 1971-08-30 1974-04-23 Gen Electric Area ruled nacelle
US3788765A (en) * 1971-11-18 1974-01-29 Laval Turbine Low specific speed compressor
US3964841A (en) * 1974-09-18 1976-06-22 Sigma Lutin, Narodni Podnik Impeller blades
US4171183A (en) * 1976-09-24 1979-10-16 United Technologies Corporation Multi-bladed, high speed prop-fan
US4677828A (en) * 1983-06-16 1987-07-07 United Technologies Corporation Circumferentially area ruled duct

Cited By (38)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5599169A (en) * 1994-09-07 1997-02-04 Behr Gmbh & Co. Radial impeller for a cooling system of a motor vehicle
US5926098A (en) * 1996-10-24 1999-07-20 Pittway Corporation Aspirated detector
US6166648A (en) * 1996-10-24 2000-12-26 Pittway Corporation Aspirated detector
US5730582A (en) * 1997-01-15 1998-03-24 Essex Turbine Ltd. Impeller for radial flow devices
US7075646B2 (en) 2000-02-10 2006-07-11 Martin Terence Cole Smoke detectors particularly ducted smoke detectors
US20030011770A1 (en) * 2000-02-10 2003-01-16 Cole Martin Terence Smoke detectors particularly ducted smoke detectors
US7508313B2 (en) 2000-02-10 2009-03-24 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Smoke detectors particularly ducted smoke detectors
US20070285264A1 (en) * 2000-02-10 2007-12-13 Cole Martin T Smoke detectors particularly ducted smoke detectors
US20060114112A1 (en) * 2000-02-10 2006-06-01 Cole Martin T Smoke detectors particularly ducted smoke detectors
US6585497B2 (en) * 2001-10-05 2003-07-01 Adda Corporation Cooling fan dust seal
US7628583B2 (en) * 2002-05-08 2009-12-08 Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. Discrete passage diffuser
US20050118019A1 (en) * 2002-05-08 2005-06-02 Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. Discrete passage diffuser
US6589015B1 (en) 2002-05-08 2003-07-08 Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. Discrete passage diffuser
US7738098B2 (en) 2003-10-23 2010-06-15 Siemens Schweiz Ag Particle monitors and method(s) therefor
US20080001768A1 (en) * 2003-10-23 2008-01-03 Cole Martin T Particle monitors and method(s) therefor
US20080001767A1 (en) * 2003-10-23 2008-01-03 Cole Martin T Particle monitors and method(s) therefor
US7551277B2 (en) 2003-10-23 2009-06-23 Siemens Schweiz Ag Particle monitors and method(s) therefor
US20070024459A1 (en) * 2003-10-23 2007-02-01 Cole Martin T Particle monitors and method(s) therefor
US7724367B2 (en) 2003-10-23 2010-05-25 Siemens Schweiz Ag Particle monitors and method(s) therefor
US7044720B1 (en) * 2004-12-10 2006-05-16 Toshiba Home Technology Corporation Fan motor
US20080117065A1 (en) * 2006-11-20 2008-05-22 Honeywell International, Inc. Sensing Chamber with Enhanced Ambient Atmospheric Flow
US7656302B2 (en) 2006-11-20 2010-02-02 Honeywell International Inc. Sensing chamber with enhanced ambient atmospheric flow
US8235648B2 (en) 2008-09-26 2012-08-07 Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. Diffuser with enhanced surge margin
US8556573B2 (en) 2008-09-26 2013-10-15 Pratt & Whitney Cananda Corp. Diffuser with enhanced surge margin
US20100077768A1 (en) * 2008-09-26 2010-04-01 Andre Leblanc Diffuser with enhanced surge margin
US20150354587A1 (en) * 2013-02-01 2015-12-10 Borgwarner Inc. Elliptical compressor cover for a turbocharger
US9915270B2 (en) * 2013-02-01 2018-03-13 Borgwarner Inc. Turbocharger compressor with an elliptical diffuser wall
US11215196B2 (en) 2015-10-27 2022-01-04 Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. Diffuser pipe with splitter vane
US9926942B2 (en) 2015-10-27 2018-03-27 Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. Diffuser pipe with vortex generators
US10502231B2 (en) 2015-10-27 2019-12-10 Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. Diffuser pipe with vortex generators
US10570925B2 (en) 2015-10-27 2020-02-25 Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. Diffuser pipe with splitter vane
US10217341B2 (en) * 2016-01-18 2019-02-26 Xenex Disinfection Services, Llc. Smoke detector shields and related methods
US10490048B2 (en) 2016-01-18 2019-11-26 Xenex Disinfection Services Inc. Smoke detector shields and related methods
US11282359B2 (en) 2016-01-18 2022-03-22 Xenex Disinfection Services Inc. Smoke detector shields and related methods
US10282956B2 (en) 2016-03-04 2019-05-07 Xenex Disinfection Services, Llc. Smoke detectors with light shields and alarm systems including such
US11227474B2 (en) 2016-03-04 2022-01-18 Xenex Disinfection Services Inc. Smoke detectors with light shields and alarm systems including such
US10510236B2 (en) 2016-03-04 2019-12-17 Xenex Disinfection Services, Llc. Smoke detectors with light shields and alarm systems including such
US10823197B2 (en) 2016-12-20 2020-11-03 Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. Vane diffuser and method for controlling a compressor having same

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ATE130910T1 (en) 1995-12-15
DE69115038T2 (en) 1996-05-15
CA2085009A1 (en) 1991-12-20
JPH05507781A (en) 1993-11-04
EP0535102A4 (en) 1993-06-30
WO1991019906A1 (en) 1991-12-26
DE69115038D1 (en) 1996-01-11
EP0535102B1 (en) 1995-11-29
EP0535102A1 (en) 1993-04-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5372477A (en) Gaseous fluid aspirator or pump especially for smoke detection systems
Greitzer et al. A fundamental criterion for the application of rotor casing treatment
Dong et al. Three-dimensional flows and loss reduction in axial compressors
Hunziker et al. The operational stability of a centrifugal compressor and its dependence on the characteristics of the subcomponents
US4349314A (en) Compressor diffuser and method
US7097414B2 (en) Inducer tip vortex suppressor
US8425186B2 (en) Centrifugal compressor
Sixsmith et al. A regenerative compressor
AU653735B2 (en) Gaseous fluid aspirator or pump
KR20180108462A (en) Compressor for a turbocharger
Adachi et al. Study on the performance of a sirocco fan (flow around the runner blade)
Adachi et al. Study on the performance of a sirocco fan (optimum design of blade shape)
JP6109635B2 (en) Diffuser processing method and diffuser adjustment method
Ubben et al. Experimental Investigation of the Diffuser Vane Clearance Effect in a Centrifugal Compressor Stage With Adjustable Diffuser Geometry: Part I—Compressor Performance Analysis
JP2001248597A (en) Turbo compressor and turbo blower
Dou Investigation of the prediction of losses in radial vaneless diffusers
Hunziker et al. The Operational Stability of a Centrifugal Compressor and its Dependence on the Characteristics of the Subcomponents
Ochiai et al. Flow Characteristics of Axial-Flow Fans With an Upstream/Downstream Blockage Disk
Lakshminarayana et al. Laser-Doppler velocimeter measurement of annulus wall boundary layer development in a compressor rotor
Tsukamoto et al. Effect of Impeller Outlet Flow Affected by Casing Treatment on Rotating Stall in Vane-Less Diffuser in Centrifugal Turbomachinery
Li et al. Experimental and numerical investigation of the unsteady tip leakage flow in axial compressor cascade
HESSAMI et al. A combined noise-Laser Doppler velocimetry study of the squirrel-cage fan
CN114321015B (en) Stabilized vane for stabilizing a vaned diffuser and vaned diffuser
Bammert et al. The influence on the meridional impeller shape on the energy-transfer in centrifugal compressors
Bwalya et al. Experimental measurements in a centrifugal pump impeller

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY

CC Certificate of correction
AS Assignment

Owner name: VISION SYSTEMS LIMITED, AUSTRALIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:COLE, MARTIN TERENCE;REEL/FRAME:008392/0216

Effective date: 19970112

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

REMI Maintenance fee reminder mailed
LAPS Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees
STCH Information on status: patent discontinuation

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362

FP Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee

Effective date: 20021213