US3914123A - Segregation process for beneficiating nickel, copper, or cobalt oxidic ore - Google Patents

Segregation process for beneficiating nickel, copper, or cobalt oxidic ore Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3914123A
US3914123A US207272A US20727271A US3914123A US 3914123 A US3914123 A US 3914123A US 207272 A US207272 A US 207272A US 20727271 A US20727271 A US 20727271A US 3914123 A US3914123 A US 3914123A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
ore
nickel
segregation
cobalt
copper
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US207272A
Inventor
Raymond John Davidson
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nilux Holding SA
Original Assignee
Nilux Holding SA
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from ZA708391A external-priority patent/ZA708391B/en
Application filed by Nilux Holding SA filed Critical Nilux Holding SA
Publication of USB207272I5 publication Critical patent/USB207272I5/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3914123A publication Critical patent/US3914123A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22BPRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
    • C22B23/00Obtaining nickel or cobalt
    • C22B23/02Obtaining nickel or cobalt by dry processes
    • C22B23/021Obtaining nickel or cobalt by dry processes by reduction in solid state, e.g. by segregation processes

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to the beneficiation of oxidic materials containing nickel, cobalt, and copper, such oxidised ores of nickel cobalt or copper, by the segregation process.
  • the invention provides the improvement of increasing the active iron oxide content by adding ferrous or ferric oxide to the oxidic material.
  • the active iron oxide content can be increased by adding ferrous or ferric oxide per se or an ore containing ferrous or ferric oxide to the oxidic material.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of a reactor for carrying out the invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a graph illustrating the effect of the addition of magnetic concentrate to ore B prior to segregation at 900C: CaCl /2% coke used as reagents, allowing 1 hour reaction time.
  • FIG. 3 is a graph illustrating the response of seven different gamierite-type ores to segregation at 900C.
  • FIG. 4 is a graph illustrating the effect of the addition of ferric oxide to demagnetized ore B prior to segregation at 900C for 1 hour.
  • FIG. 5 is a graph illustrating the effect of the addition of ferric oxide to ore G prior to segregation at 900C for one hour.
  • FIG. 6 is a graph illustrating the effect of the addition of ferric oxide to ore F prior to segregation at 900C for 1 hour..
  • FIG. 7 is a graph of reaction time data for segregation at 900C of ore B blended with 20% of a nickeliferous laterite (1.6% Ni; 84% Fe O
  • FIG. 8 is a graph of reaction time data for segregation at l000C of ore B blended with 20% of a nickeliferous laterite.
  • FIG. 9 is. a graph showing nickel segregation as a function of temperature for ore B blended with 25% of a nickeliferous laterite.
  • FIG. 10 is a graph illustrating the effect of various halide salts on the reaction of magnetized ore D with 25% ferric oxide at 800C in the presence of 3% coke.
  • FIG. 11 is a graph illustrating the effect of various halide salts on the reaction of magnetized ore D with 25% ferric oxide at 900C in the presence of 3% coke.
  • vapour phase recovery process used in the following examples was the segregation process which was carried out in the silica tube reactor illustrated schematically in FIG. 1.
  • the reactor allowed for the addition of the segregation reagents at operational temperatures and in this reactor the ore samples were mechanically fluidised.
  • the reactor consists of a silica tube 10 into which the charge 12 is placed.
  • the tube 10 is fitted with a Quick fit stopper 14 and heat is supplied by a tube furnace 16.
  • a thermocouple 18 is provided to measure temperature.
  • the tube 10 is vibrated by means of a vibro stirrer 20.
  • EXAMPLES 1 to 9 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE Seven garnierite-type ores, ground to pass a 65 mesh screen, were used. The relevant mineralogical and chemical compositions of the ores are shown in the table.
  • the percentage fayalite in the olivine phase of the pre-roasted ore samples was determined using a Philips X-ray diffractometer, calibration being carried out according to the method of Yoder and Sahama. (Mineralogist 1957 Vol. 42 P. 473).
  • the Ni/Fe ratios in the olivine phase of the pre-roasted ore samples were determined using an electronprobe X-ray microanalyzer.
  • a pre-mixed calcium chloride/coke reagent (stored at 130C) was then added to the reactor which was immediately stoppered with a well-greased Quickfit stopper, which was then secured in place. Vibration amplitude was increased by applying 180V for a further one minute in order to mix in the reagents, after which vibration was decreased by reducing the voltage to 100V. The reaction was allowed to continue for the desired time.
  • the stopper was securely seated so as to avoid any subsequent ingress of air.
  • the reactor with its contents was then quenched in water and allowed to cool.
  • the quenched product was wet-ground for 15 minutesin a mechanical mortar, and magnetic concentration of the segregated nickel-iron alloy produced carried out on the complete charge.
  • EXAMPLE 1 A small magnetite/chromite fraction (6% by weight.
  • EXAMPLE 2 The seven sample ores were subjected to segregation at 900C. The results are shown in FIG. 3 which illustrates their respective responses as a function of reaction time. It is immediately apparent that ore A with the highest free ferric-iron oxide content segregates most efficiently under the prescribed conditions, while ore G containing the lowest free iron oxide content displays the poorest segregation characteristics.
  • EXAMPLE 3 In order to confirm the above findings and to assess the part played by the mineralogical composition and more specifically the role played by iron oxide in nickel segregation, further investigation entailed the addition of ferric oxide to a selection of ores prior to segregation. In the first instance, three ores were selected on the basis of microprobe analysis in which the Ni/Fe ratios in the serpentine phase were widely divergent viz. high, medium and low. Ores F, B and G were thus chosen. Ore B, however, was demagnetized using a.
  • FIGS. 4, 5 and 6 The effect on segregation of the addition of ferric oxide to the above ores prior to segregation at 900C is shown in FIGS. 4, 5 and 6.
  • demagnetized ore B (FIG. 4) an almost linear increase in nickel recovery from 54 to may be noted as the iron oxide concentration in the system is increased.
  • the response of ore G to similar additions of ferric oxide (FIG. 5) is even more marked with nickel recoveries increasing from 51 to 84%. A corresponding increase in reduction to metallic nickel may also be noted in each case.
  • FIGS. 7 and 8 illustrate the segregation of ore B blended with 20% of a lines in FIGS. 7 and 8), a very significant increase in re 7 action rates is observed.
  • EXAMPLE 5 The recovery of nickel, as a function of temperature, from a garnierite-type ore containing optimum additions of iron oxide was investigated between 730 and i 890C (FIG. 9).
  • ore B has been blended with 25% of a nickeliferous laterite 1.6% Ni; 84% Fe O Segregation was carried out for minutes using 5% coke and 5% of a fusion mixture of calcium chloride and sodium chloride (80 mole CaCl m.p. 660C).
  • a higher coke addition was indicated in this case, because of the lower'segregation temperatures employed.
  • a lower melting point halide salt was used so as not to confuse the resulting data with any melting point effects (CaCl m.p. 772C).
  • FIGS. 10 and 11 show the effect of reacting demagnetized ore D (6.0% Fe O 37.3% MgO; 39.7% SiO with 25% ferric oxide at 800 and 900C respectively in the presence of 3% coke using various other chloridizing agents (the concentration of the halide salt was maintained at 5%). From the resulting kinetics, it is immediately apparent that calcium chloride is far more efficient in promoting the formation of fayalite than either sodium or magnesium chloride under the prescribed reaction conditions. Similar findings were also observed at 1000C.
  • both magnesium and sodium chloride are not capable of promoting the reaction beyond 24% fayalite.
  • EXAMPLE 7 The blending of a nickeliferous laterite with ore B prior to segregation has already been described in Example 4 and significant increases in reaction rates were observed when compared with the unadulterated ore B. Subsequent experiments in which ore B was blended with (a) a pre-roasted nickeliferous magnetite (1.0% Ni; 92% Fe O and (b) a pre-roasted pyrrhotite concentrate (2.0% Ni; 45% Fe) also yielded similar improvements in nickel recoveries after segregation. The pre-roasting of the ores was found to be necessary in each instance in order to convert the iron present into a readily active oxide.
  • EXAMPLE 9 In an experiment a Bechtel magnetite concentrate containing 1% nickel from asbestos tailings, was preroasted for 16 hours at ll00C to oxidise to hematite i.e., a conversion from Fe O to Fe O This pretreated Bechtel ore was then added to demagnetised Wedza l ore, containing about 1.57% Ni.
  • Tati rougher concentrate was roasted in the presence of air up to 900 in order to remove sulphur.
  • the composition of the roasted ore was as follows:
  • the cobalt recovery was 54% and the copper recov ery 96%.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Manufacture And Refinement Of Metals (AREA)

Abstract

An oxide ore or ore concentrate of nickel, cobalt or copper is beneficiated by means of a vapour phase process. The beneficiation is enhanced by increasing the level of the active iron oxide content to a level higher than that contained in the starting material.

Description

United States Patent 1191 Davidson Oct. 21, 1975 [54] SEGREGATION PROCESS FOR 1,679,337 7/1928 Moulden et al 75/117 x BENEFICIATING NICKEL, COPPER, ()R m ter}: g I):
, 1 c e COBALT OXIDIC ORE 2,733,983 2/1956 Daubenspeck 75/82 x [75] Inventor: Raymond John Davidson, 3,453,101 7/1969 Takahashi et a1 75/82 X Johannesburg South Africa Aramendia et al. X 3,466,169 9/1969 Nowak et al 75/113 x [73] Ass1gnee: Nllux Hol ing S 0c1ete Anonyme, 3,725,043 4/1973 Kawai et al. 75/72 Luxembourg 22 i Dec. 13 1971 FOREIGN PATENTS OR APPLICATIONS 18,763 1903 United Kingdom 75/112 [211 297,272 377,705 7 1932 United Kingdom... 75/112 44 Published under the Trial voluntary Protest 301,342 11/1928 United Kingdom 75/112 Program on January 28, 1975 as document no. B Primary ExaminerA. B. Curtis [30] Foreign Application Priority Data Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Young & Thompson Dec. 11, 1970 ,South Africa 70/8391 A 8,1971 S th A!" ..712269 pr I 57] ABSTRACT (51.2 75(/:l2;2Z35/l An oxide ore ore concentrate of nickel cobalt or [58] Field [111413 copper is beneficiated by means of a vapour phase process. The beneficiation is enhanced by increasing the level of the active iron oxide content to a level [56] References Cited higher than that contained in the starting material.
UNITED STATES PATENTS 1,368,885 2/1921 Bradford 75/113 4 Claims, 11 Drawing Figures US. Patent Oct.21,1975 Sheet 1 of 6 U.S. Patent Oct. 21, 1975 Sheet2of6 3,914,123
o 0 0 w B 6 L 3.; mm was 2 we 65 was 3282 cozuauwm Reaction time (mins) Sheet 3 of 6 US. Patent Oct. 21, 1975 Ferric oxide addition (70) L l i -m 0- m 6 w 2 0 0 z 3 uwocm ucu boSufistnuom US. Patent Oct. 21, 1975 Reduction,recovery and grade of Ni and Fe (79) Reduction, recovery and grade of Ni and Fe Sheet 4 of 6 /xx so & -*-Ni Reduction -*Ni Recovery 4 *Ni Grade -Fe Grade Ferric oxide addition (7.)
US. Patent Oct. 21, 1975 Sheet 5of6 3,914,123
Reaction time (minsi -XNi Reduction Ni Recovery x -Ni Grade Fe Grade l I l 750 800 650 900 Temperature ('C) recovery and grade of Ni and Fe (/o N b m 9 I Reduction,
U.S. Patent Oct. 21, 1975 Sheet 6 of6 3,914,123
5 0 5 m 5 m 5 0 3 3 2 I Am g E 523923 2:2
Reaction time (mins) Reaction' fi'rnia (mins) I Q E co moqEou 23:0
SEGREGATION PROCESS FOR BENEFICIATING NICKEL, COPPER, OR COBALT OXIDIC ORE The present invention relates to the beneficiation of oxidic materials containing nickel, cobalt, and copper, such oxidised ores of nickel cobalt or copper, by the segregation process. I
The segregation process is disclosed in US Pat. No. 1,679,337.
It is an object of the present invention to improve the beneficiation of such materials.
In a method of beneficiating an oxidic material containing nickel cobalt or copper, such as an oxide ore or ore concentrate of nickel, cobalt or copper, by the segregation process, comprising mixing the oxidic material with a halide salt and a suitable reductant while at an elevated temperature, the invention provides the improvement of increasing the active iron oxide content by adding ferrous or ferric oxide to the oxidic material.
The active iron oxide content can be increased by adding ferrous or ferric oxide per se or an ore containing ferrous or ferric oxide to the oxidic material.
The present invention is further discussed with reference to the following examples and accompanying drawings, in which:
FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of a reactor for carrying out the invention.
FIG. 2 is a graph illustrating the effect of the addition of magnetic concentrate to ore B prior to segregation at 900C: CaCl /2% coke used as reagents, allowing 1 hour reaction time.
FIG. 3 is a graph illustrating the response of seven different gamierite-type ores to segregation at 900C.
FIG. 4 is a graph illustrating the effect of the addition of ferric oxide to demagnetized ore B prior to segregation at 900C for 1 hour.
FIG. 5 is a graph illustrating the effect of the addition of ferric oxide to ore G prior to segregation at 900C for one hour.
FIG. 6 is a graph illustrating the effect of the addition of ferric oxide to ore F prior to segregation at 900C for 1 hour..
FIG. 7 is a graph of reaction time data for segregation at 900C of ore B blended with 20% of a nickeliferous laterite (1.6% Ni; 84% Fe O FIG. 8 is a graph of reaction time data for segregation at l000C of ore B blended with 20% of a nickeliferous laterite.
FIG. 9 is. a graph showing nickel segregation as a function of temperature for ore B blended with 25% of a nickeliferous laterite.
FIG. 10 is a graph illustrating the effect of various halide salts on the reaction of magnetized ore D with 25% ferric oxide at 800C in the presence of 3% coke.
FIG. 11 is a graph illustrating the effect of various halide salts on the reaction of magnetized ore D with 25% ferric oxide at 900C in the presence of 3% coke.
The vapour phase recovery process used in the following examples was the segregation process which was carried out in the silica tube reactor illustrated schematically in FIG. 1. The reactor allowed for the addition of the segregation reagents at operational temperatures and in this reactor the ore samples were mechanically fluidised.
The reactor consists of a silica tube 10 into which the charge 12 is placed. The tube 10 is fitted with a Quick fit stopper 14 and heat is supplied by a tube furnace 16. A thermocouple 18 is provided to measure temperature. The tube 10 is vibrated by means of a vibro stirrer 20.
EXAMPLES 1 to 9 EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE Seven garnierite-type ores, ground to pass a 65 mesh screen, were used. The relevant mineralogical and chemical compositions of the ores are shown in the table. The percentage fayalite in the olivine phase of the pre-roasted ore samples was determined using a Philips X-ray diffractometer, calibration being carried out according to the method of Yoder and Sahama. (Mineralogist 1957 Vol. 42 P. 473). The Ni/Fe ratios in the olivine phase of the pre-roasted ore samples were determined using an electronprobe X-ray microanalyzer.
TABLE THE CHEMICAL AND MINERALOGICAL COMPOSITION OF SEVEN GARNIERITE-TYPE ORES Ore sample (in order of segregation efficiency a see FIG. 3)
B C I F G The ore samples were subjected to segregation in the tube reactor of FIG. 1. The vibration amplitude of the I reactor was controlled by a variable transformer (-220V), coupled to a 220V, vibro-stirrer vibrating at a frequency of 100 cycles per sec.
20gm of the ore was slowly added to the reactor (controlled at 50C above the requiredoperating temperature) over a period of 2 minutes, while applying 60V to the vibrator 20. This resulted in an initial lowering of the reactor temperature to the required value. The furnace controller was then reset to the desired temperature and the ore sample pre-roasted for minutes while applying 100V to the vibrator. The Quickfit stopper 14 was left off during pre-roasting.
A pre-mixed calcium chloride/coke reagent (stored at 130C) was then added to the reactor which was immediately stoppered with a well-greased Quickfit stopper, which was then secured in place. Vibration amplitude was increased by applying 180V for a further one minute in order to mix in the reagents, after which vibration was decreased by reducing the voltage to 100V. The reaction was allowed to continue for the desired time. A
At the termination of the reaction, and before removing the reactor from the furnace, the stopper was securely seated so as to avoid any subsequent ingress of air. The reactor with its contents was then quenched in water and allowed to cool. The quenched product was wet-ground for 15 minutesin a mechanical mortar, and magnetic concentration of the segregated nickel-iron alloy produced carried out on the complete charge.
Unless otherwise stated, segregation was carried out using 5% GP. calcium chloride and 3% minus 100 plus 200 mesh coke (4.2% volatile content).
EXAMPLE 1 A small magnetite/chromite fraction (6% by weight.
and containing 33% Fe and 8% Cr O was removed magnetically from ore B prior to segregation in an attempt to effect higher nickel grades. However, this removal to the contrary resulted in nickel recoveries decreasing considerably on subsequent segregation at both 900C and 1000C. At 1000C recoveries fell from 92 to 75%, while at 900C a decrease from 64 to 61% was observed. Reduction to metallic nickel was likewise also adversely affected, although nickel grades were marginally better. Conversely, the addition of the same magnetic concentrate to ore B prior to segregation at 900C resulted in nickel recoveries increasing from 61 to 79% (FIG. 2). Nickel reduction also appeared to increase substantially, but nickel grades were not affected to any great degree.
EXAMPLE 2 The seven sample ores were subjected to segregation at 900C. The results are shown in FIG. 3 which illustrates their respective responses as a function of reaction time. It is immediately apparent that ore A with the highest free ferric-iron oxide content segregates most efficiently under the prescribed conditions, while ore G containing the lowest free iron oxide content displays the poorest segregation characteristics.
EXAMPLE 3 In order to confirm the above findings and to assess the part played by the mineralogical composition and more specifically the role played by iron oxide in nickel segregation, further investigation entailed the addition of ferric oxide to a selection of ores prior to segregation. In the first instance, three ores were selected on the basis of microprobe analysis in which the Ni/Fe ratios in the serpentine phase were widely divergent viz. high, medium and low. Ores F, B and G were thus chosen. Ore B, however, was demagnetized using a.
Jones Magnetic separator resulting in the total iron content decreasing from 8.3 to 4.7% Fe O Secondly, chemical grade ferric oxide was used as a source of iron oxide rather than a magnetic concentrate to allow a better assessment of the subsequent response of the above ores to segregation.
The effect on segregation of the addition of ferric oxide to the above ores prior to segregation at 900C is shown in FIGS. 4, 5 and 6. In the case of demagnetized ore B (FIG. 4) an almost linear increase in nickel recovery from 54 to may be noted as the iron oxide concentration in the system is increased. The response of ore G to similar additions of ferric oxide (FIG. 5) is even more marked with nickel recoveries increasing from 51 to 84%. A corresponding increase in reduction to metallic nickel may also be noted in each case.
The response of ore F to iron oxide additions (FIG. 6.) illustrates a marked difference when compared with the above findings. Not only are the relative increases in nickel recoveries and reductions very much smaller on adding up to 10% ferric oxide, but further additions of ferric oxide actually result in decreased recoveries and reductions. While nickel grades are not adversely affected by high ferric oxide additions in the case of ores B and G (FIGS. 4 and 5), nickel gradesare seriously affected by such additions in the case of ore F. This poor response of ore F to ferric oxide additions may be attributed to the unreactive nature of the large primary olivine phase already containing 5% fayalite found to be present in the original ore. The above results adequately demonstrate that iron oxide additions result in increased nickel recoveries at 900C.
EXAMPLE 4 The effect of iron oxides on the kinetics of the segregation reaction was also examined. FIGS. 7 and 8 illustrate the segregation of ore B blended with 20% of a lines in FIGS. 7 and 8), a very significant increase in re 7 action rates is observed.
EXAMPLE 5 The recovery of nickel, as a function of temperature, from a garnierite-type ore containing optimum additions of iron oxide was investigated between 730 and i 890C (FIG. 9). Here ore B has been blended with 25% of a nickeliferous laterite 1.6% Ni; 84% Fe O Segregation was carried out for minutes using 5% coke and 5% of a fusion mixture of calcium chloride and sodium chloride (80 mole CaCl m.p. 660C). In the light of experience gained a higher coke addition was indicated in this case, because of the lower'segregation temperatures employed. Likewise a lower melting point halide salt was used so as not to confuse the resulting data with any melting point effects (CaCl m.p. 772C).
The results shown in FIG. 9 show nickel recoveries increasing from at 730C to 89% at 890C with a marked break in the overall data trends between 770 and 790C.
EXAMPLE 6 FIGS. 10 and 11 show the effect of reacting demagnetized ore D (6.0% Fe O 37.3% MgO; 39.7% SiO with 25% ferric oxide at 800 and 900C respectively in the presence of 3% coke using various other chloridizing agents (the concentration of the halide salt was maintained at 5%). From the resulting kinetics, it is immediately apparent that calcium chloride is far more efficient in promoting the formation of fayalite than either sodium or magnesium chloride under the prescribed reaction conditions. Similar findings were also observed at 1000C.
It may be also noted that whereas calcium chloride effects a fayalite content of up to 33% which corresponds approximately with the complete reaction of the added ferric oxide, both magnesium and sodium chloride are not capable of promoting the reaction beyond 24% fayalite.
EXAMPLE 7 The blending of a nickeliferous laterite with ore B prior to segregation has already been described in Example 4 and significant increases in reaction rates were observed when compared with the unadulterated ore B. Subsequent experiments in which ore B was blended with (a) a pre-roasted nickeliferous magnetite (1.0% Ni; 92% Fe O and (b) a pre-roasted pyrrhotite concentrate (2.0% Ni; 45% Fe) also yielded similar improvements in nickel recoveries after segregation. The pre-roasting of the ores was found to be necessary in each instance in order to convert the iron present into a readily active oxide.
EXAMPLE 8 When Malagasy laterite was added to Wedza ore it was found that the recovery of nickel in the segregation process at 950C increased from 81 to 91%. The optimum proportions for the mixture seem to be Malagasy laterite to 80% Wedza ore.
It would also seem that the use of iron oxide enables lower temperatures to be used in the segregation process. At 850C the normal recovery of nickel is very poor, about 47%. However, with the addition of 20% of Malagasy laterite the nickel recovery was increased from 47 to 81%.
EXAMPLE 9 In an experiment a Bechtel magnetite concentrate containing 1% nickel from asbestos tailings, was preroasted for 16 hours at ll00C to oxidise to hematite i.e., a conversion from Fe O to Fe O This pretreated Bechtel ore was then added to demagnetised Wedza l ore, containing about 1.57% Ni.
and the mixture segregated at 1000C for 60 mins. using the segregation process.
The results obtained are set forth in the following table:
% Bechtel Ore Added Overall Ni Recovery Ni Grade The above table shows that an increase in the amount of pretreated Bechtel ore concentrate added results in a corresponding increase in the nickel recovery for the range covered. However this improvement was not observed using Bechtel which was not pretreated.
It has also now been found that if a preroasted sample of a sulphide type ore, e.g. pyrrhite is added to a gamierite type ore, an improvement in the overall recovery of nickel is obtained.
EXAMPLE 10 In an example Tati rougher concentrate was roasted in the presence of air up to 900 in order to remove sulphur. The composition of the roasted ore was as follows:
45% Fe; 2.04% Ni; 0.34% Cu and 0.09% S.
EXAMPLE I 1 Tenke Fungurume ore was segregated at 900C for 1 hour in a one stage process using 3% CaCl and 5% coke.
The cobalt recovery was 54% and the copper recov ery 96%. The addition of 10% Fe O and the subsequent segregation under identical conditions yielded a cobalt recovery of 79% and a copper recovery of 97%.
Thus the addition of Fe O led to an increase in both cobalt and copper recoveries.
EXAMPLE l2 Tenke Fungurume ore was segregated at 950C for 1 hour using 5%CaCl and 5% coke, with various additions of Fe o The results are tabulated below.
% Fe=0 Co. recovery Cu recovery The results show an increase of both cobalt and copper recoveries with additions of Fe O 2. A method as claimed in claim 1, in which said ferrous or ferric oxide which is added is contained in an ore. I
3. A method as claimed in claim 1, in which said oxidic material is an oxidized ore of nickel.
4. A method as claimed in claim 1, in which said halide salt is calcium chloride.

Claims (4)

1. IN A METHOD OF BENEFICATING AN OXIDE ORE OR ORE CONCENTRATE MATERIAL CONTAINING SILICATE MINERALS AND NICKEL, COPPER OR COBALT BY THE SEGREGATION PROCESS COMPRISING MIXING THE OXIDIC MATERIAL WITH A HALIDE SALT AND A REDUCING AGENT WHILE AT AN ELEVATED TEMPERATURE, THE IMPROVEMENT COMPRISING ADDING FERRIC OXIDE TO THE OXIDIC MATERIAL TO INCREASE THE ACTIVE IRON CONTENT OF THEREOF AND TO FORM FAYALITE.
2. A method as claimed in claim 1, in which said ferrous or ferric oxide which is added is contained in an ore.
3. A method as claimed in claim 1, in which said oxidic material is an oxidized ore of nickel.
4. A method as claimed in claim 1, in which said halide salt is calcium chloride.
US207272A 1970-12-11 1971-12-13 Segregation process for beneficiating nickel, copper, or cobalt oxidic ore Expired - Lifetime US3914123A (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
ZA708391A ZA708391B (en) 1970-12-11 1970-12-11 Beneficiation of oxidic materials
ZA712269 1971-04-08

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
USB207272I5 USB207272I5 (en) 1975-01-28
US3914123A true US3914123A (en) 1975-10-21

Family

ID=27131024

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US207272A Expired - Lifetime US3914123A (en) 1970-12-11 1971-12-13 Segregation process for beneficiating nickel, copper, or cobalt oxidic ore

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US3914123A (en)
AU (1) AU3667971A (en)
CA (1) CA956119A (en)
FR (1) FR2118024B1 (en)
GB (1) GB1375006A (en)
ZM (1) ZM18371A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4295878A (en) * 1977-07-08 1981-10-20 Ici Australia Limited Processes of iron segregation

Citations (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB190318763A (en) * 1903-08-31 1904-06-16 Allg Elektro Metallurg Ges A Process for the Extraction of Heavy Metals by Means of Chlorine
US1368885A (en) * 1918-11-18 1921-02-15 Robert H Bradford Metallurgical process
US1679337A (en) * 1924-10-29 1928-07-31 Metals Production Company Of N Heat treatment and concentration of copper ores
GB301342A (en) * 1927-08-24 1928-11-26 Ig Farbenindustrie Ag Improvements in the recovery of metals and metal compounds which are soluble in ammoniacal liquors
GB377705A (en) * 1930-10-08 1932-07-25 Meyer Mineral Separation Compa Improvements in or relating to processes for recovering metal values from ores and other metalliferous materials
US1943337A (en) * 1931-04-06 1934-01-16 Lafayette M Hughes Method of treating sulphide ores to chloridize the same
US2085114A (en) * 1934-11-05 1937-06-29 Hughes Mitchell Processes Inc Method of treating an ore material
US2733983A (en) * 1956-02-07 fecij
US3453101A (en) * 1963-10-21 1969-07-01 Fuji Iron & Steel Co Ltd Process for treating nickeliferous ore
US3457037A (en) * 1967-08-15 1969-07-22 Nat Lead Co Method for producing titanium dioxide concentrate from massive ilmenite ores
US3466169A (en) * 1964-12-31 1969-09-09 Halomet Ag Process for the production of metallic chlorides from substances containing metallic oxides
US3725043A (en) * 1970-05-26 1973-04-03 Mitsui Mining & Smelting Co Method for segregating metals contained in the oxide ores thereof

Patent Citations (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2733983A (en) * 1956-02-07 fecij
GB190318763A (en) * 1903-08-31 1904-06-16 Allg Elektro Metallurg Ges A Process for the Extraction of Heavy Metals by Means of Chlorine
US1368885A (en) * 1918-11-18 1921-02-15 Robert H Bradford Metallurgical process
US1679337A (en) * 1924-10-29 1928-07-31 Metals Production Company Of N Heat treatment and concentration of copper ores
GB301342A (en) * 1927-08-24 1928-11-26 Ig Farbenindustrie Ag Improvements in the recovery of metals and metal compounds which are soluble in ammoniacal liquors
GB377705A (en) * 1930-10-08 1932-07-25 Meyer Mineral Separation Compa Improvements in or relating to processes for recovering metal values from ores and other metalliferous materials
US1943337A (en) * 1931-04-06 1934-01-16 Lafayette M Hughes Method of treating sulphide ores to chloridize the same
US2085114A (en) * 1934-11-05 1937-06-29 Hughes Mitchell Processes Inc Method of treating an ore material
US3453101A (en) * 1963-10-21 1969-07-01 Fuji Iron & Steel Co Ltd Process for treating nickeliferous ore
US3466169A (en) * 1964-12-31 1969-09-09 Halomet Ag Process for the production of metallic chlorides from substances containing metallic oxides
US3457037A (en) * 1967-08-15 1969-07-22 Nat Lead Co Method for producing titanium dioxide concentrate from massive ilmenite ores
US3725043A (en) * 1970-05-26 1973-04-03 Mitsui Mining & Smelting Co Method for segregating metals contained in the oxide ores thereof

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4295878A (en) * 1977-07-08 1981-10-20 Ici Australia Limited Processes of iron segregation

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB1375006A (en) 1974-11-27
USB207272I5 (en) 1975-01-28
AU3667971A (en) 1973-06-14
FR2118024B1 (en) 1975-10-10
CA956119A (en) 1974-10-15
FR2118024A1 (en) 1972-07-28
ZM18371A1 (en) 1973-06-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Zhou et al. Extraction and separation of copper and iron from copper smelting slag: A review
Shawabkeh Hydrometallurgical extraction of zinc from Jordanian electric arc furnace dust
Tang et al. Phosphorus removal of high phosphorus iron ore by gas-based reduction and melt separation
Nagamori et al. Thermodynamics of copper matte converting: Part I. Fundamentals of the noranda process
US4002463A (en) Upgrading the nickel content from low grade nickel lateritic iron ores
Gargul et al. Leaching of lead and copper from flash smelting slag by citric acid
US3453101A (en) Process for treating nickeliferous ore
AU651048B2 (en) Low temperature thermal upgrading of lateritic ores
Tshiongo et al. Effect of cooling rate on base metals recovery from copper matte smelting slags
US4490174A (en) Process for the preparation of a ferronickel concentrate
CN108070687B (en) Solid-phase oxidation modification method for converter steel slag
Kelamanov et al. Research possibility of involvement Kazakhstani nickel ore in the metallurgical treatment
CN112877545A (en) Method for recycling nickel, cobalt and iron by cooperatively treating waste nickel-hydrogen batteries through nickel smelting slag
Yu et al. Effect of chemical composition on the element distribution, phase composition and calcification roasting process of vanadium slag
Luo et al. Cleaning of high antimony smelting slag from an oxygen-enriched bottom-blown by direct reduction
Chen et al. PREPARATION AND RECOVERY OF IRON CARBIDE FROM PYRITE CINDER VIA A CARBURIZATION-MAGNETIC SEPARATION TECHNOLOGY
US3503734A (en) Beneficiation of nickel-containing lateritic ores
US3914123A (en) Segregation process for beneficiating nickel, copper, or cobalt oxidic ore
Gargul et al. Alkaline leaching of low zinc content iron-bearing sludges
CN109652657A (en) A kind of method of the low-grade sulfate slag comprehensive utilization of cupric, lead, zinc, sulphur
Lopez et al. Electric arc furnace flue dust: characterisation and toxicity with Photobacterium phosphoreum
Potysz et al. Secondary metal recovery from Slags
US1741544A (en) Process for briquetting flue dust
Shuai et al. Efficient enrichment of nickel and iron in laterite nickel ore by deep reduction and magnetic separation
US2573153A (en) Recovery of nickel from nickel silicate ore