US3899120A

US3899120A - Paperboard blank with crushed offset flap edges and method for forming same

Info

Publication number: US3899120A
Application number: US475790A
Authority: US
Inventors: Eli H Fradkin
Original assignee: Owens Illinois Inc
Current assignee: Georgia Pacific Corrugated LLC
Priority date: 1974-06-03
Filing date: 1974-06-03
Publication date: 1975-08-12
Anticipated expiration: 1992-08-12
Also published as: DE2523663A1; DE2523663B2; FR2272905A1; FR2272905B1; CA1018128A

Abstract

An improved paperboard blank having offset slits and an adjacent crushed area. A paperboard blank is formed with flaps attached to main panels along fold lines. The flaps are separated from one another by slit lines which are offset from the foldable connections of the main panels. A crush line, which is approximately twice as wide as the amount of offset of the offset slits, extends substantially coextensively with the slit lines. The crush line defines an area which is substantially thinner than the original thickness of the paperboard material. In addition, fold lines adjacent to those flaps which are folded first may be made deeper than other fold lines to aid in easy erection of the blank into a carton. The method for forming the blank is also disclosed.

Description

United States Patent [191 Fradkin Aug. 12, 1975 PAPERBOARD BLANK WITH CRUSIIED OFFSET FLAP EDGES AND METHOD FOR FORMING SAME [52] US. Cl. 229/32; 93/58 R; 93/58 ST; 229/DIG. 4 [51] Int. Cl B3lb 1/14; B65d 5/20 [58] Field of Search 93/1 G, 58 R, 58 ST, 58.1, 93/582 R, 58.3; 229/16 R, 32, DIG. 2, DIG.

Primary Examinerwilliam I. Price Assistant Examiner-Steven E. Lipman Attorney, Agent, or F irmSteve M. McLary; Edward J. Holler [57] ABSTRACT An improved paperboard blank having offset slits and an adjacent crushed area. A paperboard blank is formed with flaps attached to main panels along fold lines. The flaps are separated from one another by slit lines which are offset from the foldable connections of the main panels. A crush line, which is approximately twice as wide as the amount of offset of the offset slits, extends substantially c'oextensively with the slit lines. The crush line defines an area which is substantially thinner than the originalthickness of the paperboard 56] References Cited material. In addition, fold lines adjacent to those flaps which are folded first may be made deeper than other UNITED STATES PATENTS fold lines to aid in easy'erection of the blank into a B l l 8 2 carton. The method for forming the blank is also dis- I'U CI' 6 3 1 3,050,229 8/1962 Neff 229/D1G. 4 C osed 3,432,375 3/1969 Rein 93/582 R X 10 Claims, 4 Drawing Figures l 20 22 24 f e Li a 341 s tb /34e I ,34 1 as 38 4o 2s as 30 a 2g 42 f 44 46 1 PAPERBOARD BLANK WITH CRUSHED OFFSET FLA]? EDGES AND METHOD FOR FORMING SAME BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION This invention generally relates to paperboard blanks foldable into tubular cartons. More specifically, this invention relates to such blanks having offset slits to separate attached flaps from one another. Most particularly, this invention relates to such blanks having a crush line which is substantially coextensive with each offset slit.

Increasing numbers of cartons are being erected from blanks by automatic machinery. It is extremely important in such machinery that the flaps which form the bottom and/or top closure (or, in the case of open trays, the sidewalls of the tray) pivot freely during the assembly sequence. To allow this, most blanks today are formed with oversized slots which permit free movement of the flaps. While this is quite satisfactory, there are practical operational problems with such slots. During the manufacture of die cut blanks, the material cut to form the slot must be removed from the slot area. Foam rubber is used as a spring around the slot cutting rule to help force the material or tail," as

it is known in the art, out of the slot area. This is not ilIW ays successful, and the tails must often be removed by hand. In addition, the tails tend to collect around the area of the blank forming machine and present a housekeeping nuisance. Furthermore, it is not uncommon for blanks with the tails still attached to be shipped to the user of the blanks. In the users plant, these tails can fall out, again creating a nuisance. Worse yet, the tail can remain in place and eventually cause a jam in the automatic erection machinery.

The use of offset slits, rather than slots, to separate the flaps has been known in the art. However, slits have not lent themselves to automatic erection of the blank because the flaps did not have the necessary free pivoting properties provided by slots; the flaps tended to drag on one another. This was satisfactory for manual erection, but jammed automatic machines. Nonetheless, slits would be highly desirable for automatic machinery use because the above enumerated problems of the slot tails would be completely eliminated.

I have found that if an area which is substantially coextensive with a slit line is crushed to approximately half of the original thickness of the paperboard blank, an offset slit will function as well as a slot in automatic erection equipment. The crush line or crushed area should be at least twice as wide as the offset of the offset s'lit line. Thus, I can form a paperboard blank whose flaps have the free folding properties associated with slots while using slits and obtaining all of the advantages flowing therefrom. In addition, making the fold line for those flaps which are folded first deeper than the other fold lines can also aid in erection on automatic machinery.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION My invention is an improvement in a paperboard blank which may be folded into a tubular configuration. In this blank, flaps are attached to at least one main panel along fold lines. The flaps are separated from one another by offset slit lines which extend from the fold line connecting the flaps to the main panel to the outer marginal edge of the flaps. My improvement is a crush line, substantially coextensive with each of BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIG. 1 is a plan view of a paperboard blank illustrating the present invention;

FIG. 2 is an end view of the circled area designated as A in FIG. 1 on a much enlarged scale;

FIG. 3 is a fragmentary cross-sectional view of a cutting rule and crushing structure to produce the blank 7 of FIG. 1; and

FIG. 4 is a plan view of a paperboard blank for a tray illustrating the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIG. 1 shows a paperboard blank 10 illustrating the present invention. The blank 10 includes two pairs of

opposed sidewall panels

12 and 14 and 16 and 18 respectively connected to one another along

fold lines

20, 22 and 24, which may be formed by scoring or other suitable means. Bottom closure flaps 26, 28, 30 and 32 are integrally and foldably connected to the sidewall panels 12, l4, l6 and 18 along a

fold line

34a, 34b, 34c and 34d. The

flaps

26, 28, 30 and 32 are separated from one another by

offset slit lines

36, 38 and 40. Offset slit lines such as those shown at 36, 38 and 40 are known in the art of paperboard box construction. These slits are designated as offset slits because they do not align with the

foldable connections

20, 22 and 24 which connect together the main sidewall panels. The degree of offset is typically on the order of onesixteenth to one-fourth of an inch. All of the slit lines extend from the fold line 34 to the outer marginal edges of the

flaps

26, 28, 30 and 32. Again, this is conventional practice. As was previously pointed out, the difficulty with using a blank 10 which utilizes slit lines rather than slots to separate the flaps from one another is that when the blank 10 is folded into a tubular configuration, as is its intended purpose, the

flaps

26, 28, 30 and 32 tend to interfere with one another and do not readily fold inwardly into their assigned positions. This particular deficiency is not especially harmful when such cartons are assembled in a hand operation. However, when automatic folding equipment is used to erect the blank 10, this problem asserts itself in such a fashion as to make cartons utilizing slits rather than slots previously impossible to run on such automatic equipment. The result of attempting to run slitted cartons on such automatic equipment was a series of repetitive jams in the folding operation. In order to overcome this problem and allow the use of slitted cartons with all the attendant advantages previously described, I provide these flaps with crush lines designated in crosshatched area as 42, 44 and 46. The crush line in all cases is substantially coextensive with its associated

offset slit line

36, 38 or 40. The

crush lines

42, 44 and 46 define an area of the paperboard blank that is substantially thinner and is preferably between 20 and 50% thinner than the original thickness of the paperboard blank. In addition, the width of the crushed area is preferably at least twice the amount of offset of its associated offset slit. In the illustration of FIG. 1, all of the

crush lines

42, 44 and 46 are on the side of the

offset slit

36, 38 or 40 which is toward the

foldable connection

20, 22 and 24 from which the slit lines are offset. This particular configuration or positioning of the crush lines is dictated by the folding sequence of the blank in the automatic equipment on which it is run. Some folding sequences could require the crush lineto' be placed on the opposite side of the

slit lines

36, 38 and 40 from that shown in FIG. 1. This .is a simple matter to determine and is well within the ability of one skilled in the art to ascertain once the specific automatic machine and the specific configuration of the blank is known. An additional point to be remembered is that the sidewall panels l2, 14, 16 and 18 should be considered to be main panels in the most general sense. For example, in a paperboard blank for an open-top tray, there is generally only one main panel, which actually forms the bottom of the tray rather than one of the sidewalls. The sidewall panels in such a blank are actually flaps which are attached to the bottom or main panel. However, one can readily see how the present invention could be applied to such a blank. It would not be necessary to slot the various flaps which form the sidewall panels for an open-top tray, but rather these flaps could be slit to distinguish them from one another, with the crush line extending along the slit to enable easy and rapid bending of the flaps into their position asthe sidewall panels of the tray. As a final note with respect to the slit lines 36, 38 and 40, it should be noted that these slit lines run directly into the foldable connection 34. However, it is also known in the art to angle or bend the portion of the

slit line

36, 38 or 40 adjacent to the fold lines 20, 22 and 24 to actually meet with these fold lines. However, this is simply a matter of mechanical strength and may or may not be used, depending upon the circumstances involved and the sensitivity of the blank in this particular area to being torn.

I have also found that making selected fold lines deeper than the other'fold lines may also aid in automatic carton erection operations. For example, the fold lines 34a and 34b may be made with a 0.850 inch scoring rule while all the other fold lines may be made with a 0.830 inch scoring rule. The dimension given, as is the conventional practice, is the height of the rule itself and not the depth of the score. However, the relationship between rule height and score depth or fold line depth is reasonably linear. Therefore, the fold lines 34a and 34b are about 0.020 inch deeper than the remainder of the fold lines on the blank 10. By making selected fold lines deeper than others, the flaps connected by the deeper fold lines bend more easily in the carton erection sequence. Thus, one could say as a general statement that the fold lines associated with the flaps that are first folded in a carton erection sequence should be substantially deeper than the remainder of the fold lines in the blank. The deeper fold lines should be from to 35% deeper than the other fold lines.

FIG. 2 illustrates, on a very much enlarged scale, an end view of the section circled in FIG. 1 and designated as A. FIG. 2 is used to illustrate the degree of crushing exhibited along the crush line 42. As seen in FIG. 2, the paperboard blank 10 is manufactured of a corrugated paperboard material which has two outer paper layers of

liner board

48 and 50 and an inner corrugated layer of corrugating medium board 52. Note that the crush line 42 is considerably depressed below the original level of the paperboard blank 10 as illustrated by the outer or upper layer 48. In the use of this invention with corrugated paperboard, it is very difficult to specify a definite depth for the crush line, such as 42. This is because there are many types of corrugated paperboard used, the more common types being A flute, B flute, C flute and E flute. These designations all indicate specific types of corrugated paperboard having different numbers of corrugated flutes per foot and different overall thicknesses with markedly different crush resistances. Thus, the degree of crushing required for one type of corrugated paperboard might be insufficient for another to allow the flaps to pivot smoothly. Thus, it is far more descriptive of this invention to describe the depth of the crush line 42 as a percentage of the original overall thickness of the paperboard.

Paperboard blanks in commerce today are most commonly formed on either cylindrical type cutters or flat plate type cutters. In these machines, the slots are cut, and additional score lines are placed at right angles to the score lines which were placed on the blank as it was fed from the corrugating machine. In these devices, sponge rubber, having a Shore durometer hardness in the range of from 15 to 24, is normally used around both the scoring rules and the cutting rules to force the blank off of these devices when the blank is being formed. If the sponge rubber were not used, the blank would tend to stick to the cutting rule and would not eject itself from the machine properly. It is understood that there is some small degree of crushing present as a result of the sponge rubber, but this degree of crush is minor and is unacceptable in large amounts because of serious appearance problems. In FIG. 3, a portion of the die 54 for a flat press type blank die forming machine is shown. Attached to the die 54 is a cutting rule 56 having on one side thereof a piece of cork material 58 having a Shore durometer hardness in the range of 42 to 50. Note that the cork material 58 extends above the cutting rule 56. The cutting rule 56 may be used to cut any one of the slit lines 36, 38 and 40. The purpose of the cork 58 is to produce the

crush line

42, 44 or 46. Thus, the cork 58 should be of a width equivalent to the crush line that is to be produced. Note that cork is given as a specific example of a material to be used because it has a certain degree of resiliency and thus will strip the blank from the cutting rule 56. However, the cork is much harder than the sponge rubber normally used in the art today and thus will impart a significant degree of crushing to the paperboard blank. While FIG. 3 illustrates a method and apparatus for carrying out the present invention usable on a flat plate type machine, the application and modification necessary to utilize this particular technique on a rotary type blank forming machine should be obvious to those skilled in the art.

FIG. 4 illustrates a paperboard blank 60 for a tray which also incorporates the present invention. As was previously discussed, this type of blank 60 has only one main panel 62 which actually forms the bottom of the completed tray. Sidewall flaps 64 and 66 are separated from the main panel 62 by respective fold lines 68 and 70. End wall flaps 72 and 74 are separated from the main panel 62 by respective fold lines 76 and 78. There are also four end closure flaps 80, 81, 82 and 83. Offset slit

lines

84 and 86 separate the flaps and 81 from the sidewall panel 64. Fold lines and 87 separate the lines 88 and 90 separate the

flaps

82 and 83 from the sidewall panel 66. Fold

lines

89 and 91 separate the

flaps

82 and 83 from the

flaps

72 and 74. As was the case in FIG. 1, areas designated as 92, 93, 94 and 95 are crushed adjacent to the offset

slit lines

84, 86, 88 and 90. The crushed areas 92-95 all have a width about twice the amount of the offset of their associated offset slit line from its adjacent fold line. The amount of crushing is from to 50% of the original thickness of the paperboard.

In the case of the blank 60, the fold lines 76, 78, 85, 87, 89 and 91 are all made with a 0.850 inch scoring rule and the fold lines 68 and 70 are made with a 0.830 inch scoring rule. These dimensions have previously been fully explained with respect to FIG. 1. The purpose of this deeper score of from l5 to 35% of selected fold lines is again to aid in the erection sequence. The deeper fold lines have less resistance to bending and thus will fold more easily than the shallower fold lines. The deeper fold lines are adjacent to those flaps which are folded first.

What I claim is:

1. In a paperboard blank particularly adapted for use with an automatic erection machine and foldable into a tubular configuration of the type wherein flaps are connected to at least one main panel along fold lines Qhfi wherein said flaps are separated from one another by offset slit lines extending from the fold line connecting said flaps to said main panel to the outer marginal edge of said flaps, the improvement in said blank which comprises:

a crush line, substantially coextensive with said offset slit lines, said crush line defining an area of said paperboard blank that is substantially thinner than the original thickness of said paperboard blank and at least twice as wide as the amount of offset of said offset slit lines.

2. The improvement of claim 1, wherein said crush line defines an area that is between 20 and 50% thinner than the original thickness of said paperboard blank.

3. The improvement of claim 1 which further ineludes: at least one fold line in said blank that is substantially deeper than the remainder of said fold lines,

said one fold line connecting the first of said flaps to be folded by an automatic erection machine to said main panel.

4. The improvement of claim 3, wherein said deeper fold line is from 15 to 35% deeper than the remainder of said fold lines.

5. The improvement of claim 1, wherein said blank comprises: 7

a plurality of main body panels connected along fold lines and a plurality of end closure flaps connected to the lower marginal edge of said main body panels along fold lines.

6. The improvement of claim 1, wherein said blank comprises:

a single main panel and a plurality of flaps surrounding said main panel and connected thereto along fold lines.

7. In a method for forming a paperboard blank of the type foldable into a tubular configuration, wherein fold lines are impressed into said paperboard to separate flaps from at least one main panel and,"wherein offset slit lines are formed in said paperboard to separate said flaps from one another, the improvement in said method which comprises the step of:

crushing said paperboard, along substantially the entire length of each of said offset slit lines, to a thickness that is substantially less than the original thickness of said paperboard in an area at least twice as wide as the amount of offset of said offset slit lines.

8. The improved method of claim 7, wherein said crushing is to a thickness between and 50% of the original thickness of said paperboard blank.

9. The improved method of claim 7, which further includes the step of:

scoring the fold line connecting at least the first of said flaps to be folded to said main panel to a depth greater than the depth to which the remainder of said fold lines are scored.

10. The improved method of claim 9, wherein said scoring is at a depth between 15 and 35% greater than the depth to which the remainder of said fold lines are

Claims

1. In a paperboard blank particularly adapted for use with an automatic erection machine and foldable into a tubular configuration of the type wherein flaps are connected to at least one main panel along fold lines and wherein said flaps are separated from one another by offset slit lines extending from the fold line connecting said flaps to said main panel to the outer marginal edge of said flaps, the improvement in said blank which comprises: a crush line, substantially coextensive with said offset slit lines, said crush line defining an area of said paperboard blank that is substantially thinner than the original thickness of said paperboard blank and at least twice as wide as the amount of offset of said offset slit lines.

3. The improvement of claim 1 which further includes: at least one fold line in said blank that is substantially deeper than the remainder of said fold lines, said one fold line connecting the first of said flaps to be folded by an automatic erection machine to said main panel.

5. The improvement of claim 1, wherein said blank comprises: a plurality of main body panels connected along fold lines and a plurality of end closure flaps connected to the lower marginal edge of said main body panels along fold lines.

6. The improvement of claim 1, wherein said blank comprises: a single main panel and a plurality of flaps surrounding said main panel and connected thereto along fold lines.

7. In a method for forming a paperboard blank of the type foldable into a tubular configuration, wherein fold lines are impressed into said paperboard to separate flaps from at least one main panel and, wherein offset slit lines are formed in said paperboard to separate said flaps from one another, the improvement in said method which comprises the step of: crushing said paperboard, along substantially the entire length of each of said offset slit lines, to a thickness that is substantially less than the original thickness of said paperboard in an area at least twice as wide as the amount of offset of said offset slit lines.

8. The improved method of claim 7, wherein said crushing is to a thickness between 80 and 50% of the original thickness of said paperboard blank.

9. The improved method of claim 7, which further includes the step of: scoring the fold line connecting at least the first of said flaps to be folded to said main panel to a depth greater than the depth to which the remainder of said fold lines are scored.

10. The improved method of claim 9, wherein said scoring is at a depth between 15 and 35% greater than the depth to which the remainder of said fold lines are scored.