US3454392A

US3454392A - Dihalophenyl-p-nitrophenyl ethers as herbicides

Info

Publication number: US3454392A
Application number: US626422A
Authority: US
Inventors: Kichiro Kato; Hiroshi Fujita; Teruhiko Toyama; Yukio Kiyohisa; Takeo Yoshimoto; Tetsuo Yanami
Original assignee: Mitsui Chemical Industry Co Ltd
Current assignee: Mitsui Chemical Industry Co Ltd
Priority date: 1966-03-30
Filing date: 1967-03-28
Publication date: 1969-07-08
Anticipated expiration: 1986-07-08
Also published as: FR1522593A; DE1642301A1; GB1147725A; BE696346A

Description

4 Int. Cl. A01n 9/20, 7/00; C07c 43/20 2 US. Cl. 71-124 Claims ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE A herbicidal composition containing as an active ingredient at least one compound represented by the formula wherein X is a member selected from the group consisting of chlorine and bromine and a method for inhibiting growth of weeds and grasses by using the above composition.

This invention relates to herbicidal compositions containing as an active ingredient at least one compound selected from 3-chloro-fluoro-4'-nitrodiphenyl ethers and 3-bromo-fluoro-4'-nitrodiphenyl ethers represented by the general formula:

(wherein X is a chloine atom or bromine atom) and a method of inhibiting the growth of Weeds and grasses with the use of said compositions.

It has been hitherto known that among dihalogeno-4'- nitrodiphenyl ethers, only those compounds in which a halogen atom is attached to the 2- and 4-positions of the phenyl ring having no nitro group have a herbicidal activity, and those compounds having a halogen atom at other positions have no or little herbicidal activity. For instance, according to the specification of Japanese Patent No. 411,235, the compounds having a chlorine or bromine atom at the 2- and 4-positions of the phenyl ring having no nitro group have a herbicidal activity, but the compounds having a chlorine atom at the 2- and 3- positions, 2- and 5-positions, or 3- and 5-positions are poor in herbicidal activity. The inventors for this application, too, have confirmed that the compounds having a chlorine atom at the 2- and '6-positions are also poor in herbicidal activity.

Herbicides containing as an effective component a dihalogeno 4'-nitrodiphenyl ether having a halogen atom at the 2- and 4-positi0ns 0f the phenyl group having no nitro group have been practically used in amounts of 20 United States Patent. 0

ice

to 40 g., calculated as effective ingredient, per are. Since herbicides are low in herbicidal eifect against grown weeds if used in such amounts, the suitable period of application is short. In addition, these herbicides are disadvantageously low in herbicidal activity against broadleafed weeds such as pickerel weed. For these reasons, they cannot be herbicides effectively used in practice.

Accordingly, an object of this invention is to provide herbicides free from the above-mentioned defects, and a herbicidal method of using such herbicides.

We have synthesized many dihalogeno-4'-nitrodiphenyl ethers having a halogen atom at positions other than 2- and 4-positions of the phenyl group having no nitro group, and estimated their herbicidal activity. Consequently, we have found that the compounds represented by the foregoing formula having a chlorine or bromine atom at the 8-position and a fluorine atom at another position, namely 3 -chloro(or bromo) fluoro 4 nitrodiphenyl ethers, have an excellent herbicidal activity. Further detailed tests in herbicidal activity of these ethers have revealed that the compounds of this group have the following merits as compared with the known herbicidally active compounds, namely 2,4-dihalogeno-4'-nitrodiphenyl ethers.

(1) 3-chloro(bromo)-fluoro-4'-nitrodipheny1 ethers exhibit a herbicidal activity against a wide range of plants in extremely small amounts. As compared with the said known compounds, they have a herbicidal ability 2 to 5 times as much towards the plants of the grass family, and 5 to 10 times as much against broad-leafed plants. They give sufficient herbicidal effect in practice even when used in amounts per are calculated as the effective ingredient of 5 to 10 g. for rice paddy field and 10 to 20 g. for an ordinary farming field.

(2) 3-chloro(bromo)-fluoro-4 nitrodiphenyl ethers have a strong herbicidal action even against grown weeds, so that the suitable period of application is long and they are advantageous for use in agriculture.

These merits will be substantiated by the following test examples.

The eifective ingredients of the herbicidal composition of this invention are as follows:

3-chloro-2-fluoro-4'-nitrodiphenyl ether, 3-ch1oro-4-fluoro-4'-nitrodiphenyl ether, 3-chloro-5-fiuoro-4'-nitrodiphenyl ether, 3-chloro-6-flu0ro-4'-nitrodiphenyl ether, 3-b.romo-2-fiuoro-4'-nitrodiphenyl ether, 3-bromo-4-fluoro-4-nitrodiphenyl ether, 3-bromo-5-fluoro-4'-nitrodiphenyl ether, 3-bromo-6-fluoro-4'-nitrodiphenyl ether.

and

EXAMPLE OF SYNTHESIS (l1) Synthesis of 3-chloro-4-fluoro-4'-nitrodiphenyl ether 18.5 grams (0.1 mole) of a potassium salt of Si-chloro- 4-fluorophenol and 15.5 g. (0.11 mole) of p-fluoronitrobenzene were mixed with each other and put into 30 g. of dimethyl sulphoxide. They were reacted with each other by heating at 150 C. for 6 hours while agitating. Potassium fluoride for-med as by-product was removed from the reaction product by filtration, and the dimethyl sulphoxide and the unreacted p-fluoronitrobenzene were recovered by distillation under reduced pressure. Then, a fraction at 198 to 200 C. at 8 mm. Hg was recovered, and 25 g. of light yellowish white 3-chl0ro-4-fluoro-4'- nitrodiphenyl ether having a melting point of 85 to 86 C. were obtained. The elemental analysis of this product gave the following results. Calculated (percent): C, 53.85; H, 2.64; CI, 13.25; Fl, 7.10; N, 5.23. Found (percent): C, 53.96; H, 2.88; Cl, 12.99; Fl, 5.43; N, 5.45.

The yield based on the potassium salt of 3-chloro-4- fluorop'henol was 93.2%.

EXAMPLE OF SYNTHESIS (2) Synthesis of 3-chl0ro-6-fluoro-4-nitrodiphenyl ether 31.4 grams (0.17 mole) of a potassium salt of 3-chloro- 6-fluorophenol and 26.0 g. (0.184 mole) of p-fluoronitrobenzene were mixed with each other, and put into 80 g. of dimethyl sulphoxide. They were reacted with each other by heating to 147 C. for 6 hours while agitating. Potassium fluoride formed as by-product was removed by filtration, and the dimethyl sulphoxide and the unreacted p-fluoronitrobenzene were recovered by distillation under reduced pressure, whereby 44.5 g. of a crude 3- c'hloro-6-fiuoro-4'-nitrodiphenyl ether having a melting point of 66.5 to 74.2 C. were obtained. This crude product was recrystallized from methanol, and 42.2 g. of light yellowish white crystals were obtained, having a melting point of 72.2 to 74.8 C. The product revealed the following elemental analysis values. Calculated (percent): C, 53.85; H, 2.64; Cl, 13.25; Fl, 7.10; N, 5.23. Found (percent): C, 54.13; H, 2.82; Cl, 14.10; Fl, 5.03; N, 5.20.

The yield based on 3-chloro-6-fluorophenol potassium salt was 92.5%.

EXAMPLE OF SYNTHESIS (3) Synthesis of 3-bromo-4-fiuoro-4-nitrodiphenyl ether 22.9 grams (0.1 mole) of a potassium salt of 3-bromo- 4-flu0rophen0l and 15.5 g. (0.11 mole) of p-fluoronitrobenzene were mixed with each other, and put into 40 g. of dimethyl sulphoxide. They were reacted with each other by heating at 130 C. for 6' hours while agitating. The same treatment as in Example of Synthesis (2) of the reaction product gave 31.1 g. of a crude 3-bromo-4- fluoro-4-nitrodiphenyl ether having a melting point of 85.5 to 93 C. This crude product was recrystallized from ethanol, and 27 g. of light yellowish white crystals were obtained, having a melting point of 91.8 to 93.2. C. The product revealed the following elemental analysis values. Calculated (percent): C, 46.18; H, 2.26; Br, 25.61; F], 6.09; N, 4.49. Found (percent): C, 47.76; H, 2.40; Br, 25.69; Fl, 5.78; N, 4.47.

The yield based on the potassium salt of 3-bromo-4- fluorophenol was 86.5%.

Herbicidal compositions of the desired form such as dust, granule, wettable powder, emulsion and liquid can be obtained according to the customary method by blending at least one of the compounds of the present invention represented by the foregoing general formula with various 'adjuvants, for instance, solid carriers such as bentonite, clay, talc and kaolin, liquid carriers such as xylene, petroleum and alcohol, and if desired, anionic, cationic and non-ionic surface active agents. The suitable amount of the compounds contained in the composition is 1 to by weight for dust and granule, and 10 to 50% by weight for wettable powder, emulsion and liquid.

The addition to the composition of this invention of other various herbicidal compounds as effective ingredients serves to increase the practical value of the composition as a herbicide. Particularly, when it is intended to continue the herbicidal effect for a long time, the addition of herbicidal compounds having high after-effect such as urea or triazine type herbicidal compounds is of advantage. It is possible, too, to incorporate into the herbicidal composition of this invention other agricultural chemicals such as an insecticide, aearicide and fungicide or such fertilizer component such as urea and complex fertilizers. Compositions in which such insecticides as gamma benzene hexachloride ('y-BHC), l-naphthyl-N- methylcarbamate (NAC), 0,0-diethyl-O-(2-isopropyl-6- methyl 4 pyrimidyl)phosphorothioate (Diazinon) are incorporated particularly contribute greatly to the saving of agricultural labor because both the weeds and obnoxious insects can be eradicated at the same time.

With a view to describing this invention specifically, some of the examples of preparation and testing of the composition of this invention will be given. In each of the examples, parts are by weight unless otherwise stated.

EXAMPLE OF PREPARATION 1 (GRANULE) The following components were mixed and pulverized:

' Parts 3-chloro-4-fluoro-4'-nitrodiphenyl ether 2 Sodium ligninsulphonate 2 Bentonite 60 Talc 36 With the addition of a suitable amount of water, the pulverized mixture was extruded through a nozzle with a diameter of 0.7 mm., dried, and granulated by milling.

The obtained composition is suitable as a herbicide for application to the rice paddy field.

EXAMPLE OF PREPARATION 2 (WETTABLE POWDER) The following components were mixed and pulverized to make a wettable powder:

Parts 3-chloro-6-fluoro-4-nitrodipheny1 ether 30 2-chloro-4,6-bis(ethylamino)-1,3,5-triazine 20 Sodium alklybenzenesulphonate 10 Clay 40 This composition is suitable as a herbicide for application to the ordinary farming field.

EXAMPLE OF PREPARATION 3 (EMULSION) The following components were mixed and dissolved to make an emulsion:

Parts 3-bromo-4-fluoro-4'-nitrodiphenyl ether 20 3-bromo-6-fluoro-4'-nitrodiphenyl ether 10 Xylene 60 Sorpol 800 (emulsifier manufactured by Toho Kagaku, Japan) 10 This composition is suitable as a herbicide for application after seeding of rice plants in a direct-sown rice culture in a paddy field.

EXAMPLE OF PREPARATION 4 (INSECTICIDAL AND HERBICIDAL COMPOSITION) The following components were mixed and pulverized:

Parts 3-chloro-2-fiuoro-4-nitrodiphenyl ether 1.5 2,6-dichlorobenzonitrile 1.5 15% 'y-BHC 40 Calcium ligninsulphonate 7 Bentonite 50 EXAMPLE OF PREPARATION 5 (HERBICIDAL FERTILIZER) One part of B-bromo-5-fluoro-4'-nitrodiphenyl ether was incorporated into 100 parts of a complex fertilizer. The composition obtained is very eifective for application to a rice paddy field before or after the transplantation of rice paddy seedlings.

EXAMPLE OF TESTING 1 (TEST IN HERBICIDAL ACTIVITY) the suspensions were poured into a petri dish with a diameter of 9 cm. in which a filter paper was placed. Each seeds of barnyard grass and rape were placed on the filter paper, and were contacted with the suspension for 10 days while the temperature was maintained at 28 C. At the end of this period, the degree of inhibition of the growth of barnyard grass and rape was examined, and the results are shown in Table 1. In Table 1, the degree of inhibition is shown in 6 grades in which 0 represents the growth to the same extent as that in the control plot (water), and 5 shows almost a complete withering. A greater number, therefore, shOWS a higher activity of the herbicidal composition. In this test, the barnyard grass and rape were chosen as the representative of the weed of grass family and broad-leafed plants, respectively. It is clear from Table 1 that the eifective ingredients of the present invention have an extremely high activity against both of these kinds of plants.

2 and 3.

TABLE 1 Degree of inhibition of growth at various concentrations Barnyard grass Rape Compounds as efiective ingredients p.p.m. 100 p.p.m. p.p.m. 10 p.p.m. 3 p.p.m. p.p.m. 30 p.p.m. 10 p.p.m. 3

1 1 F@-O-NO2 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 3 I 2 FQOQ-NOz s 5 4 3 5 5 5 2 l 3 QOQ-NO 5 5 4 1 5 5 5 1 Br 4 Q-OQ-NOZ 5 5 3 1 5 5 3 1 F l 5 Cl-QOQ-NO: 0 o o o 2 o o 0 I e ClQ-O-Q-N02 o o 0 o o 0 o F 7 o-J -No2 0 o 0 o 0 0 o 0 I E Br Br I (s) Q-o-Q-wo, o 0 0 0 o o o 0 I Br F I 9 FQ-OQ-Nm 5 0 o o 5 o 0 0 Cl 1o (HQ-DQNO; 5 4 1 1 4 2 1 0 Br 11)... BIQOQ-NOz 4 4 0 0 4 2 0 0 NOTE.Compounds (1) to (4) are the compounds of this invention, and compounds (5) to (11) are contrasts. This is the same with respect to Tables The following test was conducted with respect to a pot are and gives some phytotoxicity to the paddy rice. It is clear from the results shown in Table 2 that the herbidical compositions of this invention are markedly excellent.

TABLE 2 Weed remaining ratio (to untreated plot by percent) Amount of Applied 5 days later Applied 10 days later Phytotoxicity 1 Compounds effective as effective ingredient Weeds Broad- Weeds Broad- Applied Applied ingredient applied of grass leafed of grass leafed 5 days 10 days (2% granule) (g./are) family plants family plants later later 20. 0 0 0 0 i 10. 0 0 0 0 0 5. 0 0 0 12. 8 0 2. 20. 4 11. 6 20. 0 0 0 0 0 :l; 10. 0 0 0 7. 9 7. 6 5. 0 0. 5 0 23. 6 17. 3 2. 5 68. 8 23. 3 20. 0 0 0 0 0 =1: 10. 0 0 0 8. 8 1. 1 5. 0 0. 4 0 30. 5 2. 2 2. 5 23. 8 18. 6 20. 0 0 0 0 0 10. 0 3. 8 0 l1. 7 3. 8 5. 0 20.9 2. 2 57. 7 20. 9 2. 5 59. 7 33. 3 .2 30. 0 0 0 23. 5 36. 3 i 20. 0 3. 8 11.8 62. 7 70. 6 :l: 10, 0 20. 9 26. 6

Phytotoxicity: +=slight; i=very slight; =none. 2 Commercially available 7% granular compositions.

of are with a view to getting information about the herbicidal effect and phytotoxicity in a rice paddy field.

The pot was charged with the soil from the aquatic rice paddy field containing seeds of weeds, and filled with water. Seedlings of rice paddy (Ariake variety) were transplanted thereinto, and 5 days and 10 days later, each of the 2% granular composition prepared according to the said Example of Preparation 1 by using the compounds (1) to (4) indicated in Table 1 was applied thereto in the amounts indicated in Table 2. The depth of water was maintained at 2 to 3 cm., and after the lapse of days, the amount of remaining weeds was examined together with the observation of the degree of the phytotoxicity of the composition against the rice paddy. The results are shown in Table 2.

The weed remaining ratio mentioned in Table 2 is a ratio of the amount of remaining weeds in the untreated plot to that in the test plot in terms of percentage. A smaller numerical value shows a higher herbicidal activity.

The herbicidal composition of this invention, when applied 5 days after the transplantation, is effective against the weeds in an amount, calculated as effective ingredient, of 2.5 to 5.0 g. per are, and when applied 10 days after the transplantation, is effective in an amount, calculated as effective ingredient, of 5.0 to 10.0 g. per are, and does not give phytotoxicity to rice paddy. On the other hand, the contrast herbicidal composition (commercially available 7% granular composition) containing as effective ingredient 2,4-dichloro-4'-nitrodiphenyl ether, when applied 5' days later, must be in an amount of 20.0 g. per are calculated as effective ingredient, and when applied 10 days later, has insufficient herbicidal effect even if used in an amount calculated as effective ingredient of 30.0 g. per

EXAMPLE OF TESTING 3 (HERBICIDAL TEST IN ORDINARY FARMING FIELD) The field Was divided into 36 plots each having an area of 1 m. square. The seeds of onion, carrot, tomato, cucumber, radish, and pea were each sown in 6 plots, and covered with soils. Each of 10% emulsions prepared according to the said Example of Preparation 3 by using the compounds (1) and (2) mentioned in Table 1 was diluted with water to 50 and times its volume, 50 cubic centimeters of each of these emulsions were sprayed onto the half of each plot (in an amount calculated as effective ingredient of 20.0 g. and 10.0 g. per are), and the remaining half was used as an untreated control plot. For contrast, a commercially available emulsion containing 25% of 2,4-dichloro-4'-nitrodiphenyl ether (compound (10) in Table 1) as an effective ingredient was diluted with Water to 62.5 and times its volume, and sprayed in the same manner (in an amount calculated as effective ingredient of 40.0 g. and 20.0 g. per are). Two months later, the amount of the weeds in the treated plots was compared with that in the untreated plots. Also, the phytotoxicity against each crop was examined. The results are shown in Table 3.

It was found that the two compositions of this invention exhibit an excellent herbicidal effect by application in an amount calculated as effective ingredient of 10.0 g. to 20.0 g. per are, and have hardly any phytotoxicity against the crops other than cucumber, and that the compositions are suitable as herbicides for an ordinary farming field.

On the other hand, the contrast herbicidal composition is insufliciently effective by application in an amount of 20.0 g. per are calculated as effective ingredient, and must be applied in an amount of 40.0 g. per are. The contrast composition gave remarkable phytotoxicity to onion, tomato and cucumber.

TABLE 3 Compositions of this invention Contrast Compounds as effective ingredient (1) (2) (10) Commercial available Form of composition 10% emulsion 10% emulsion emulsion Amount of effective ingredient sprayed ar 10. 0 20. 0 10. 0 20. 0 20. 0 40. 0 Herbicidal effect weed remaining ratio (to the untreated plot, percent) 24. 0 13. 9 17. 5 13. 5 44. 5 22. 7 Phytotoxicity: 1

Onion 1 Phytotoxicity: =none; =|==very slight; +=sligl1t; =considerable; +++=enorm0us.

3,454,392 9 10 What is claimed is: and 1. A herbicidal composition consisting essentially of an inert carrier and, as an active ingredient, in a herbicidally effective amount, at least one compound selected from f the formulae:

0 -N 01 1, Q Q

d wherein X is a member selected from the group consisting of chlorine and bromine.

i 0@-N0 References Cited F UNITED STATES PATENTS 3,080,225 3/1963 Wilson et a1. 71-124 wherem X is a member selected from the group conslst- 3,131,166 4/1964 Harris et and f f f; 3,154,398 10/1964 McRae 71 11s 2. A method for inhrbltmg growth of barnyard grass 3 223 516 12/1965 Gilbert et aL 71 122 and rape which comprises applying to the locus to be protected from said weeds, in an amount sufiicient to FOREIGN PATENTS exert herbicidal action thereon and at a rate from about 1,476 163 2/1967 F 2 to about 20 grams per are, at least one compound selected from the formulae: LEWIS GOTTS, Primary Examiner. X G. HOLLRAH, Assistant Examiner.