US3404047A - Method for producing deep-drawing low-carbon steel sheet - Google Patents

Method for producing deep-drawing low-carbon steel sheet Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3404047A
US3404047A US515232A US51523265A US3404047A US 3404047 A US3404047 A US 3404047A US 515232 A US515232 A US 515232A US 51523265 A US51523265 A US 51523265A US 3404047 A US3404047 A US 3404047A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
carbon
sheet
steel
low
steels
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US515232A
Inventor
Stephen R Goodman
Hu Hsun
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
United States Steel Corp
Original Assignee
United States Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by United States Steel Corp filed Critical United States Steel Corp
Priority to US515232A priority Critical patent/US3404047A/en
Priority to GB54617/66A priority patent/GB1101110A/en
Priority to DE19661508455 priority patent/DE1508455C3/en
Priority to FR87930A priority patent/FR1505832A/en
Priority to NL666617890A priority patent/NL154272B/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3404047A publication Critical patent/US3404047A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21DMODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D9/00Heat treatment, e.g. annealing, hardening, quenching or tempering, adapted for particular articles; Furnaces therefor
    • C21D9/46Heat treatment, e.g. annealing, hardening, quenching or tempering, adapted for particular articles; Furnaces therefor for sheet metals
    • C21D9/48Heat treatment, e.g. annealing, hardening, quenching or tempering, adapted for particular articles; Furnaces therefor for sheet metals deep-drawing sheets
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21DMODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D1/00General methods or devices for heat treatment, e.g. annealing, hardening, quenching or tempering
    • C21D1/74Methods of treatment in inert gas, controlled atmosphere, vacuum or pulverulent material
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21DMODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D8/00Modifying the physical properties by deformation combined with, or followed by, heat treatment
    • C21D8/02Modifying the physical properties by deformation combined with, or followed by, heat treatment during manufacturing of plates or strips
    • C21D8/04Modifying the physical properties by deformation combined with, or followed by, heat treatment during manufacturing of plates or strips to produce plates or strips for deep-drawing
    • C21D8/0421Modifying the physical properties by deformation combined with, or followed by, heat treatment during manufacturing of plates or strips to produce plates or strips for deep-drawing characterised by the working steps
    • C21D8/0436Cold rolling

Definitions

  • This invention relates to low-carbon steels having improved drawability. More particularly, the invention is directedto a method of producing low-carbon sheet steel with improved deep-drawing characteristics and high yield strength.
  • Y It is well known that aluminum killed steels have excellent drawability; 'Aluminum killed steels, referred to as,,fSK grade steel, are characterized by flattened or paricake shap'ed ferrite grains which are crystallographically oriented to provide good drawability. Such grains are developed in the final sheet product by a properly controlled box annealing process during which selective growth of'the favorably oriented grains is effected by the. "aluminum 'nitride precipitate. Although the exact mechanism of the process is 'not fully known, the phenomenon that a critically dispersed second phase can markedly affect the recrystallization and grain growth is frequently observed, and in some cases, successfully employed in metallurgical applications.
  • the drawability'of'sheet material can be evaluated by simple tension tests. When a strip specimen is pulled to a greater length; its width and thickness are decreased.
  • the crystallographic orientation of the grains, and not the grain shape, is primarily responsible for the drawing properties.
  • the drawability and the R value can be correlated with the crystallographic texture of the sheet.
  • Good drawability and high R values are associated with the socalled cube-on-corner or the (111) texture, i.e. the (111) planes are parallel to the plane of the sheet.
  • Poor drawability and low R values are associated with the cube-on-face texture.
  • the cube-on-edge or the texture has intermediate drawing properties.
  • the amount of the (111) texture should be high, whereas that of the (100) texture should be low.
  • the R value varies also with the directions lying in the plane. Therefore, the ideal texture for optimum drawability is 111) fiber texture with the sheet plane normal as the fiber axis.
  • the crystallographic texture of a specimen is normally determined by the construction of complete pole figures from X-ray intensity measurements; however, for detection of small variation in the texture, a direct comparison of two pole figures cannot reveal the detailed differences quantitatively. Accordingly, we have found it best to measure the integrated peak intensities of several refiections from the plane of the sheet and express them in units of corresponding peak intensities of a random specimen. The numerical values of these relative intensities so obtained are directly proportional to the pole densities of a specific plane lying parallel to the plane of the sheet. Since the drawability of a sheet depends on the relative population of specific crystallographic planes in the plane of the sheet, this technique is very useful. The intensities of five different reflections, i.e.
  • the intensity of the (222) reflection which is the second order reflection of the (111) therefore represents the amount of (111). texture.
  • the intensityof the (200) reflection represents the amount of the (100) texture, respectively.
  • low-carbon sheet steel of good drawability without sacrificing yield strength which involves a combination of steps applied to low-carbon steels having initially greater than 0.02% carbon.
  • Our method produces a crystallographic texture with a high degree of (111) orientation and a lesser quantity of 100) orientation.
  • low-carbon steel processed according to the invention has a very favorable average R value indicating good drawability.
  • a low carbon, hot rolled plate having more than about 0.02% carbon is cold rolled to from 50% to 85% reduction into sheet gauge.
  • the cold-rolled sheet is then annealed at normal annealing temperature in the range from about 1025 F. to'about 1550 F. (below the transformation temperature) for more than 10 hours in an atmosphere containing dry hydrogen.
  • dry hydrogen refers tohydrogen having a dew point less than 30 F.
  • the sheet steel is annealed at the stated temperature for the stated time until the carbon content is in the range from about 0.004 to about 0.02% and then TABLE I.CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF STEELS C Mn Si S P A1501 N O It should be noted that compositions A and B had a desired carbon content above 0.02% whereas composi tion C had a lower initial carbon content. Each of these steels was hot rolled in a commercial mill under the following conditions.
  • compositions A and B small colonies of fine pearlite were found to exist between the grains and at three grain junctions and carbide plates were present at the grain boundaries.
  • composition C pearliteicolonies were rare; however, a few thin carbide plates existed at some of the grain boundaries.
  • crystallographic texture is controlled by precipitation of aluminum nitride.
  • the crystallographic texture is controlled utilizing the cementite normally present. This may be accomplished by various annealing treatments such as the solution and tempering treatments prior to cold rolling, or decarburization during recrystallization anneal to eliect the development of desired textures.
  • Hot-rolled plate samples of compositions A, B and C were cold rolled to 70% reduction in thickness from 0.096 to 0.029 inch for compositions ,A and B, and from 0.086 to 0.026 for composition C. Thesarnples'weredhn annealed at a temperature of 1320 F. in dry hydrogen having a dew point of approximately 90 F. The specimens were held at annealing temperature for 20 hours after which they were allowed to cool in the furnace.
  • composition C is equal ,to" those of the SK grade, but the (200) and (310) components are appreciably higher.
  • the (112) component of all three low-carbon steels are lower than that of the SK steel.
  • the extent of decarburization dependsto some extent on'the flow rate of the hydrogen-containing atmosphere and the surface exposure of the specimen. With'a' flow rate of approximately 6080 ccf/minute, the carbon content may be reduced to as low as 0.004%, if care is exercised in the placement of. the sheets. If the sheets are placed loosely in contact with each other, the carbon content can be maintained at about0.016%, Extensive testing indicates that consistently good texture, high :R values and high yield strength are. always obtained iflthe carbon content in the annealed strip is reduced' jto below 0.02%.
  • a method of producing low-carbon sheet steel of improved drawability and high yield strength which comprises cold rolling hot-rolled plate of lowcarbon steel having more than 0.02% carbon to from 50 to 85% reduction into sheet gauge, annealing said cold-rolled sheet at a temperature in the range of from about 1025 F. to about 1550 F. for more than ten hours in an atmosphere containing dry hydrogen having a dew point less than 30 F. to result in a carbon content of from 0.004 to less than 0.02% and cooling the annealed sheet.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Thermal Sciences (AREA)
  • Crystallography & Structural Chemistry (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Heat Treatment Of Sheet Steel (AREA)

Description

Sa M
- r 1 3,404,047 METHOD FOR PRODUCING DEEP-DRAWING LOW-CARBON STEEL SHEET I Stephen R. Goodman, Monroeville, andHsun Hu, Franklin Township, Westmoreland County, Pa., assignors to United States Steel Corporation, a corporation of Delaware.
No Drawing. Filed Dec. 20, 1965, Ser. No. 515,232
, {5 Claims. (Cl. 148-121) This invention relates to low-carbon steels having improved drawability. More particularly, the invention is directedto a method of producing low-carbon sheet steel with improved deep-drawing characteristics and high yield strength. Y It is well known that aluminum killed steels have excellent drawability; 'Aluminum killed steels, referred to as,,fSK grade steel, are characterized by flattened or paricake shap'ed ferrite grains which are crystallographically oriented to provide good drawability. Such grains are developed in the final sheet product by a properly controlled box annealing process during which selective growth of'the favorably oriented grains is effected by the. "aluminum 'nitride precipitate. Although the exact mechanism of the process is 'not fully known, the phenomenon that a critically dispersed second phase can markedly affect the recrystallization and grain growth is frequently observed, and in some cases, successfully employed in metallurgical applications.
However, aluminum-killed steels are relatively expensive due not only to the cost of the alloy, but also to the low yield from ingots and high conditioning costs. It is, thereforefdesirable to develop a new method for producing deep-drawing sheets of relatively less expensive'low-carbon steels. R p
' The drawability'of'sheet material can be evaluated by simple tension tests. When a strip specimen is pulled to a greater length; its width and thickness are decreased. The plastie strain ratio 'can'vserve as an indication of the degree of mechanical anisotropy of the material. This ratio is referredto as the R value and is defined as the ratio. ,of percent change in width (e the width strlainyto the. percent change in thickness (e the thickness strain), i.e. 5 V
t ne-raw Law the. width and length, respectively, of 'the, gauge section, and the'subscripts i and 1 refer tolthe' initial and'final' measurements (before and after straining): of these dimensions. This expression is based on the'fas'surnptibnthat the'volur'ne of the gauge section re inainsfconstan't during testing and it eliminates the direct'measurementjof the thickness which owing to its s'm'all' valu e in: a sheet material'yields less accurate resultsl'f The R 'value,"is therefore, a useful parameterfor indicatin'g thedegree of mechanical anisotropy of a given materi alQForfan' isotropic sheet, the R value is equal to one. If is'les's'jthan" one, the sheet thins unduly and is, thereforeimdesirable for drawing operations. For deep drawing, it is preferable to have R values equal to or gre ate-rj than about 11.5 however, for some applications, materialwith lower R valuesmaybe satisfactory.
To obtain "an, 'ayerageR value, tensile tests are conducted: on. severaljspecirnenstaken at various angles, iisuallyfatid," 45fandf 90 to the rolling direction. An average R value" of the sheet can then be obtained as follows:
Patented Oct. 1, 1968 'ice The difference among the individual R values indicates the earing tendency of the sheet in the drawing operation. The larger the difference, the stronger is the tendency for caring.
It has been found that the crystallographic orientation of the grains, and not the grain shape, is primarily responsible for the drawing properties. We have discovered that the drawability and the R value can be correlated with the crystallographic texture of the sheet. Good drawability and high R values are associated with the socalled cube-on-corner or the (111) texture, i.e. the (111) planes are parallel to the plane of the sheet. Poor drawability and low R values are associated with the cube-on-face texture. The cube-on-edge or the texture has intermediate drawing properties. Thus, for good drawing properties, the amount of the (111) texture should be high, whereas that of the (100) texture should be low. For a specific crystallographic plane, the R value varies also with the directions lying in the plane. Therefore, the ideal texture for optimum drawability is 111) fiber texture with the sheet plane normal as the fiber axis.
The crystallographic texture of a specimen is normally determined by the construction of complete pole figures from X-ray intensity measurements; however, for detection of small variation in the texture, a direct comparison of two pole figures cannot reveal the detailed differences quantitatively. Accordingly, we have found it best to measure the integrated peak intensities of several refiections from the plane of the sheet and express them in units of corresponding peak intensities of a random specimen. The numerical values of these relative intensities so obtained are directly proportional to the pole densities of a specific plane lying parallel to the plane of the sheet. Since the drawability of a sheet depends on the relative population of specific crystallographic planes in the plane of the sheet, this technique is very useful. The intensities of five different reflections, i.e. (110), (200), (112), (310) and (222) are measured. The intensity of the (222) reflection which is the second order reflection of the (111) therefore represents the amount of (111). texture. Similarly, the intensityof the (200) reflection represents the amount of the (100) texture, respectively. These two textures have, therefore, effects on drawability as do their counterparts. The correlation between R values and texture has been found to be very consistent in actual test results.
We have found a method of producing low-carbon sheet steel of good drawability without sacrificing yield strength which involves a combination of steps applied to low-carbon steels having initially greater than 0.02% carbon. Our method produces a crystallographic texture with a high degree of (111) orientation and a lesser quantity of 100) orientation. Thus, low-carbon steel processed according to the invention has a very favorable average R value indicating good drawability. In addition, however, we have found that by controlling the final carbon content and precluding undue decarburization, a high yield strength may be maintained and a low-carbon steel having both improved drawability and high strength can be produced. According to the invention, a low carbon, hot rolled plate having more than about 0.02% carbon is cold rolled to from 50% to 85% reduction into sheet gauge. The cold-rolled sheet is then annealed at normal annealing temperature in the range from about 1025 F. to'about 1550 F. (below the transformation temperature) for more than 10 hours in an atmosphere containing dry hydrogen. The term dry hydrogen as used herein refers tohydrogen having a dew point less than 30 F. The sheet steel is annealed at the stated temperature for the stated time until the carbon content is in the range from about 0.004 to about 0.02% and then TABLE I.CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF STEELS C Mn Si S P A1501 N O It should be noted that compositions A and B had a desired carbon content above 0.02% whereas composi tion C had a lower initial carbon content. Each of these steels was hot rolled in a commercial mill under the following conditions.
TABLE II.HOT ROLLING CONDITIONS Temperature, F. Finish Thick- Steel ness (in.)
Enter Finish Coil The microstructure of the hot-rolled plate from these steels consisted of equiaxed grains of about #8 ASTM grain sizes. In compositions A and B, small colonies of fine pearlite were found to exist between the grains and at three grain junctions and carbide plates were present at the grain boundaries. In composition C, pearliteicolonies were rare; however, a few thin carbide plates existed at some of the grain boundaries.
Crystallographic examinations (the results of which are reported in Table III below) of the hot rolled plate showed only minor differences between the three steels, except that the (110) intensity of composition C steel was very high and the (222) intensity was lower than in either of compositions A or B. The texture of compositions A and B were practically the same.
TABLE III.RELATIVE INTENSITIES OF SELECTED X RAY REFLECTIONS FROM HOT-ROLLED PLATE, STEELS A, B, AND C A B C In aluminum-killed steels, crystallographic texture is controlled by precipitation of aluminum nitride. In lowcarbon steels treated according to the invention, the crystallographic texture is controlled utilizing the cementite normally present. This may be accomplished by various annealing treatments such as the solution and tempering treatments prior to cold rolling, or decarburization during recrystallization anneal to eliect the development of desired textures. It'has been found that excellent R values can be obtained in low-carbon steels having initial carbon contents of more than about 0.02%, such as compositions A and B, by proper annealing in a dry hydrogen atmosphere whereby the carbon content is reduced to within the range of from 0.004 to 0.02% carbon. It has also been found, as will be shown hereinafter, that the treatment did not produce satisfactory results for composition C because the initial carbon content was already below the 0.02% limit.
Hot-rolled plate samples of compositions A, B and C were cold rolled to 70% reduction in thickness from 0.096 to 0.029 inch for compositions ,A and B, and from 0.086 to 0.026 for composition C. Thesarnples'weredhn annealed at a temperature of 1320 F. in dry hydrogen having a dew point of approximately 90 F. The specimens were held at annealing temperature for 20 hours after which they were allowed to cool in the furnace. The texture of the samples together with that of a typical aluminum-killed (SK grade) deep-drawing steel are shown in Table-IV; TABLE Iv.-RELATIvE INTENs'ITIEs, OF SELECTED RAY REFLECTIONS FROM DRY HYDRO GEN ANNEAL-E Low-CARBON sTEELs AND A TYPICAL SK STEEL A I B C It can be seen that the unfavorable texture components, i.e. (200) and of compositions A and B are sub; stantially lower than those of the SK grade, whereas the most favorable texture component (222) is higher than that of the SK grade. On the other hand, the (110) and (222) components of composition C are equal ,to" those of the SK grade, but the (200) and (310) components are appreciably higher. The (112) component of all three low-carbon steels are lower than that of the SK steel.
The R values indicating relative drawability and yield strength and grain size, as determined from duplicate samples of these steels which were also tested are shown in Table V. Corresponding data for the SK grade steel are also listed for comparison. 7 TABLE V.THE R VALUES, YIELD STRENGTH, AND
GRAIN SIZE OF DRY HYDROGEN ANNEALED LOW- CARBoN sTEELs As COMPARED WITH THOSE OF A TYPICAL SK STEEL v si; 5 1:73; 1 1.31 3 2.22; 1.64; 23.2 'as Grain size As can be seen, the R values of compositions A and B are equal or superior to those of the SKLgrad'e steel and the R values for composition C are notas satisfactory. The grains in all three carbon steels, in contr'a'stt'o the SK grade steels, are equiaxed. I
The extent of decarburization dependsto some extent on'the flow rate of the hydrogen-containing atmosphere and the surface exposure of the specimen. With'a' flow rate of approximately 6080 ccf/minute, the carbon content may be reduced to as low as 0.004%, if care is exercised in the placement of. the sheets. If the sheets are placed loosely in contact with each other, the carbon content can be maintained at about0.016%, Extensive testing indicates that consistently good texture, high :R values and high yield strength are. always obtained iflthe carbon content in the annealed strip is reduced' jto below 0.02%. On the other hand, we have found that if'the' ii'nal carbon content is greater than 0.02%, the texture and the R values of the annealed strip ,ar'einvariably poor,' The results of numerous tes'tsindicatethat during'thei'i'di'y hydrogen anneal, the desired crystallographic texture is developed through the influence of the iron carbide p'recipitate on the growth characteristics of the grains,
The effect of heating rate and soaking tirn efon" plastic strain ratio is shown in'Tablc vL 'These results showftliat at a constant soaking time theave'ra'ge'R yalues decrease slightly with increasing heating rate and with' a constant heating rate, R decreases with decreasing fs'oak i ng time". The remaining carbon content correlates withthe Rvalues and shows that poor R values 'are associated "with high carbon content, i.e. carbon contents g'reater thari0.02% The remaining carbon ,contents indicate also that the effective decarburization occurs mainly during the soaking period of the annealing treatment.
TABLE VL-EFFECT OF HEATING RATE OR SOAKING TIME ON THE AVERAGE PLASTIC STRAIN RATIO, R, AND THE REMAINING CARBON CONTENTS Heating r ate Soaking time 0, percent (time to 1,320" F.) (Hr. at 1,320 F.)
A B A B To illustrate the importance of using dry hydrogen, a series of tests were conducted which differed only in that in some dry hydrogen was employed and in others wet hydrogen was used. Although, as is known, wet hydrogen is more effective for decarburization than dry hydrogen, we have found that excessive decarburization and grain growth results with the use of wet hydrogen even though acceptable R values may be obtained. Table VII reports the results of four tests of compositions A and B, two of which were conducted with the annealing performed in dry hydrogen and two with the annealing in wet hydrogen. The results of these tests are reproduced in Table VII.
TABLE VII Dry Hydrogen Wet Hydrogen A B A B R 1. 99 1. 59 1. 73 1. Y.S. (K psi.) 17. 8 23. 2 10.0 9. 8 Grain size (ASTM N 0.) 6. 0 7. 0 6-1 7. 0 Carbon Content 0. 007 0. 004 0015 0015. 0014 As can be seen, the nitrogen content has been lowered significantly. Since unfixed nitrogen is a principal cause of strain aging of low-carbon steels, the undesirable effects of agingon mechanical properties can be minmized by this treatment.
TABLE VIIL-CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF STEEL AFTER DRY HYDROGEN ANNEAL Steel C Si S The strain aging index of dry hydrogen annealed products is shown below in Table IX.
TABLE IX.- Strain aging index of dry hydrogen annealed steels (prestrained 8%, aged 4 hrs. at 212 F., and retested) Percent increase in yield stress (Strain Aging Index):
The percent increase in yield stress when the specimen is prestrained 5% minimum or beyond discontinuous yielding, aged 4 hours at 212 F., then retested.
The above values compare favorably to the strain aging index of conventional box-annealed rimmed steels, which usually ranges between 20 to 25% It is apparent from the above that certain changes and modifications may be made without departing from the invention. It is seen, however, that it is essential for the successful practice according to the invention for the inital carbon content of the steels treated to be above 0.02% and, further, that the carbon be reduced during the dry hydrogen anneal to from between 0.016 to 0.004%. The effect of this treatment is to impart improved drawability without sacrificing yield strength. It is also shown that too extensive decarburization results in excessive grain growth which impairs the drawability and yield strength of the sheet steel. Moreover, the product is relatively nonaging as Well as deep drawable due to the fact that the dry hydrogen anneal also reduces the nitrogen content considerably, i.e., to about 0.001%.
We claim:
1. A method of producing low-carbon sheet steel of improved drawability and high yield strength which comprises cold rolling hot-rolled plate of lowcarbon steel having more than 0.02% carbon to from 50 to 85% reduction into sheet gauge, annealing said cold-rolled sheet at a temperature in the range of from about 1025 F. to about 1550 F. for more than ten hours in an atmosphere containing dry hydrogen having a dew point less than 30 F. to result in a carbon content of from 0.004 to less than 0.02% and cooling the annealed sheet.
2. A method according to claim 1 wherein said hotrolled sheet is cold rolled to from to reduction.
3. A method according to claim 1 wherein said coldrolled sheet is annealed at a temperature in the range of 1200 F. to 1400" F.
4. A method according to claim 3 wherein said coldrolled sheet is annealed for more than 15 hours.
5. A method according to claim 4 wherein said coldrolled sheet is annealed for about 20 hours.
References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,360,868 10/ 1944 Gensamer 148-16 3,239,388 3/1966 Sasaki 148-12.1 3,239,389 3/1966 Yoshida 148--12.1 3,244,565 4/1966 Mayer et al 14812.1 3,262,821 7/1966 Yoshida 14812.1 3,281,286 10/1966 Shimizu et a1. 14816 3,348,980 10/1967 Enrietto l48-l2.1
OTHER REFERENCES Low et al., vol. 158, AIME Transactions, Iron and Steel Division, p. 209 et seq.
HYLAND B IZOT, Primary Examiner.
W. W. STALLARD, Assistant Examiner.

Claims (1)

1. A METHOD OF PRODUCING LOW-CARBON SHEET STEEL OF IMPROVED DRAWABILITY AND HIGH YIELD STRENGTH WHICH COMPRISES COLD ROLLING HOT-ROLLED PLATE OF LOW-CARBON STEEL HAVING MORE THAN 0.02% CARBON TO FROM 50 TO 85% REDUCTION INTO SHEET GAUGE, ANNEALING SAID COLD-ROLLED SHEET AT A TEMPERATURE IN THE RANGE OF FROM ABOUT 1025*F. TO ABOUT 1550*F. FOR MORE THAN TEN HOURS IN AN ATMOSPHERE CONTANING DRY HYDROGEN HAVING A DEW POINT LESS THAN -30*F. TO RESULT IN A CARBON CONTENT OF FROM 0.004 TO LESS THAN 0.02% AND COOLING THE ANNEALED SHEET.
US515232A 1965-12-20 1965-12-20 Method for producing deep-drawing low-carbon steel sheet Expired - Lifetime US3404047A (en)

Priority Applications (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US515232A US3404047A (en) 1965-12-20 1965-12-20 Method for producing deep-drawing low-carbon steel sheet
GB54617/66A GB1101110A (en) 1965-12-20 1966-12-06 Method for producing deep-drawing low-carbon steel sheet
DE19661508455 DE1508455C3 (en) 1965-12-20 1966-12-13 Process for the production of steel sheets with low carbon content, improved ductility and yield strength
FR87930A FR1505832A (en) 1965-12-20 1966-12-19 Manufacturing process of low carbon steel sheets
NL666617890A NL154272B (en) 1965-12-20 1966-12-20 PROCESS FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF DEEP-DRAWABLE SHEET STEEL, AS WELL AS PROPERTIES FORMED FROM SHEET STEEL THEREFORE.

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US515232A US3404047A (en) 1965-12-20 1965-12-20 Method for producing deep-drawing low-carbon steel sheet

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3404047A true US3404047A (en) 1968-10-01

Family

ID=24050499

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US515232A Expired - Lifetime US3404047A (en) 1965-12-20 1965-12-20 Method for producing deep-drawing low-carbon steel sheet

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US3404047A (en)
FR (1) FR1505832A (en)
GB (1) GB1101110A (en)
NL (1) NL154272B (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3663310A (en) * 1969-03-13 1972-05-16 Sumitomo Metal Ind Method of producing deep drawing steel
US3959029A (en) * 1970-11-21 1976-05-25 Nippon Kokan Kabushiki Kaisha Process of making cold reduced Al-stabilized steel having high drawability
US5591531A (en) * 1994-04-19 1997-01-07 Armco Inc. Aluminized steel alloys containing chromium
EP0896069A1 (en) * 1997-08-07 1999-02-10 Sollac Method of making thin ultra-low-carbon steel strip for manufacturing deep-drawn products for packages and thin strips obtained thereby

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2360868A (en) * 1943-01-02 1944-10-24 Carnegie Illinois Steel Corp Manufacture of nonaging steel
US3239389A (en) * 1962-07-11 1966-03-08 Kawasaki Steel Co Deep drawing cold rolled rimmed steel sheet and strip and production of the same
US3244565A (en) * 1962-08-10 1966-04-05 Bethlehem Steel Corp Deep drawing steel and method of manufacture
US3262821A (en) * 1962-10-19 1966-07-26 Kawasaki Steel Co Method for producing cold rolled rimmed steel sheet or strip having non-aging property and superior deep drawability
US3281286A (en) * 1962-10-05 1966-10-25 Yawata Iron & Steel Co Double-stepped annealing for improvement of super-deep drawing property of steel sheet
US3348980A (en) * 1965-03-09 1967-10-24 Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp Process for producing non-aging steels

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2360868A (en) * 1943-01-02 1944-10-24 Carnegie Illinois Steel Corp Manufacture of nonaging steel
US3239389A (en) * 1962-07-11 1966-03-08 Kawasaki Steel Co Deep drawing cold rolled rimmed steel sheet and strip and production of the same
US3239388A (en) * 1962-07-11 1966-03-08 Kawasaki Steel Co Cold rolled rimmed steel sheet and strip having preferred orientation adapted for press forming and production of the same
US3244565A (en) * 1962-08-10 1966-04-05 Bethlehem Steel Corp Deep drawing steel and method of manufacture
US3281286A (en) * 1962-10-05 1966-10-25 Yawata Iron & Steel Co Double-stepped annealing for improvement of super-deep drawing property of steel sheet
US3262821A (en) * 1962-10-19 1966-07-26 Kawasaki Steel Co Method for producing cold rolled rimmed steel sheet or strip having non-aging property and superior deep drawability
US3348980A (en) * 1965-03-09 1967-10-24 Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp Process for producing non-aging steels

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3663310A (en) * 1969-03-13 1972-05-16 Sumitomo Metal Ind Method of producing deep drawing steel
US3959029A (en) * 1970-11-21 1976-05-25 Nippon Kokan Kabushiki Kaisha Process of making cold reduced Al-stabilized steel having high drawability
US5591531A (en) * 1994-04-19 1997-01-07 Armco Inc. Aluminized steel alloys containing chromium
EP0896069A1 (en) * 1997-08-07 1999-02-10 Sollac Method of making thin ultra-low-carbon steel strip for manufacturing deep-drawn products for packages and thin strips obtained thereby
FR2767078A1 (en) * 1997-08-07 1999-02-12 Lorraine Laminage PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION OF A THIN SHEET IN ULTRA LOW CARBON STEEL FOR THE PRODUCTION OF STAMPED PRODUCTS FOR PACKAGING AND THIN SHEET OBTAINED
US6767415B1 (en) 1997-08-07 2004-07-27 Sollac Process for producing a thin sheet of ultra-low-carbon steel for the manufacture of drawn products for packaging and thin sheet obtained

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB1101110A (en) 1968-01-31
FR1505832A (en) 1967-12-15
DE1508455B2 (en) 1975-10-16
DE1508455A1 (en) 1969-10-30
NL6617890A (en) 1967-06-21
NL154272B (en) 1977-08-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US1965559A (en) Electrical sheet and method and apparatus for its manufacture and test
US4125416A (en) Method for producing steel strip or steel sheet containing carbide and nitride forming elements
US20200017942A1 (en) Non-oriented electrical steel sheet
US2772992A (en) Process of producing stainless steel
US3404047A (en) Method for producing deep-drawing low-carbon steel sheet
Mould et al. Plastic anisotropy of low-carbon, low-manganese steels containing niobium
US3244565A (en) Deep drawing steel and method of manufacture
US3709744A (en) Method for producing low carbon steel with exceptionally high drawability
US4116729A (en) Method for treating continuously cast steel slabs
HU177279B (en) Process for producing boron-doped silicon steel having goss-texture
OKAMOTO et al. Development of bake-hardenable Al-killed steel sheet by box-annealing process
US3814636A (en) Method for production of low carbon steel with high drawability and retarded aging characteristics
JPS6114213B2 (en)
US3939013A (en) Process for producing rimmed enameling steel
US4551182A (en) Process for producing deep-drawing cold rolled steel sheets and strips
US3297434A (en) Nickel-iron magnetic sheet stock
US3655459A (en) METHOD FOR PRODUCING MINIMUM-RIDGING TYPE 430 Mo STAINLESS STEEL SHEET AND STRIP
US3513036A (en) Process for producing coiled,hotrolled,pickled steel strip
JPH11302739A (en) Production of ferritic stainless steel excellent in surface property and small in anisotropy
KR880000286B1 (en) Method of producting black plate
JPS5983725A (en) Preparation of ferrite type stainless steel thin plate free from surface flaw and low in ridging
CA1043592A (en) Drawability of deoxidized steels by the addition of phosphorus and silicon
KR790001933B1 (en) Manufacturing method for enameled low carbon cold rolled steel sheet of predominance characteristic of enameled and forming
Hu Effect of Carbon Content on Annealing Texture, Plastic Anisotropy, and Mechanical Properties of 0.07% Phosphorus Sheet Steels
US3276917A (en) Process for producing cold-rolled steel sheets to be deep drawn