US3014585A - Flotation process for concentrating niobium-bearing minerals - Google Patents

Flotation process for concentrating niobium-bearing minerals Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3014585A
US3014585A US821112A US82111259A US3014585A US 3014585 A US3014585 A US 3014585A US 821112 A US821112 A US 821112A US 82111259 A US82111259 A US 82111259A US 3014585 A US3014585 A US 3014585A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
flotation
bicarbonate
minerals
ore
water
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US821112A
Inventor
Harvey L Noblitt
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US821112A priority Critical patent/US3014585A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3014585A publication Critical patent/US3014585A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03DFLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D1/00Flotation
    • B03D1/001Flotation agents
    • B03D1/002Inorganic compounds
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03DFLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D1/00Flotation
    • B03D1/001Flotation agents
    • B03D1/004Organic compounds
    • B03D1/01Organic compounds containing nitrogen
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03DFLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D2201/00Specified effects produced by the flotation agents
    • B03D2201/02Collectors
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03DFLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D2203/00Specified materials treated by the flotation agents; Specified applications
    • B03D2203/02Ores

Definitions

  • This invention relates to processes of concentrating valuable minerals by froth flotation from ores containing such minerals, and is particularly applicable to those ores whose valuable minerals may be successfully floated after treatment with a combination of an amine or a diamine and a wetting agent or several amines or diamines and wetting agents.
  • Minerals included in this category comprise pyrochlore, betafite, perovskite, magnetite, sulphides, niocalite, biotite and other micas, diopside, monticellite, melilite, sphene, garnet, potash feldspar, and nephelite. All or most of these minerals are usually found in association with alkaline rocks in which niobium minerals are present. Minerals not so included comprise calcite, dolomite and apatite.
  • diamine or diamines and a wettingagent is used to effect the separation of several minerals including pyrochlore from calcite and apatite.
  • the flotation reagent is defined in Patent 2,951,585 as selected from the group consisting of monoamines and diamines containing 14 to 22 carbon atoms in the molecule. This process is quite satisfactory in the treating of ores of carbonatite nature where there is a minimum of ferromagnesian minerals such as pyroxenes and amphiboles. When applied to ores from cer- ,tain North American occurrences results are not so satisfactory since the reagent combination tends to float the ferromagnesian minerals along with .pyrochlore thereby reducing the amount and grade of the desired product.
  • the anionic and cationic'portions of the bicarbonates in accordance with the invention have a direct effect.
  • the bicarbonate ion when present in the concentrations used in primary flotation, has a buffering effect.
  • the pH is steady at8.0 to 8.1. Maintenance of such a pH would therefore not be capable of making a separation between pyrochlore, perovskite, mica, and the like on the one hand and calcite, dolomite and'apatite on the other. In other w'ords, it is not to be supposed that if a pH of 8.0 to 8.1 were maintained with any other reagent the same separation would result.
  • the reagent combination has a cationic effect, i.e., the active collector-coatingforming ions are positive. This means that they attach .to negative bonds'on the minerals surfaces, not to positive charges. Hence, there can be no attachment of a cationic reagent to calcium or magnefsium since they are mutually repellent.
  • the bicarbonate ion is negative and can compete for surface positions by attachment to calcium and magnesium. Minerals having .a bicarbonate coating are not fioatable. Attachment of bicarbonate to calcium is due, of course,
  • Calcium bicarbonate has a low solubility and, moreover, while it can have a decided effect on anionic collectors, it has very little effect on cationic collectors'such as are employed in the flotation process of the present invention.
  • surface waters are not saturated with calcium bicarbonate.
  • raw Ottawa River water contains about 0.17 pound per ton bicarbonate calculated as sodium bicarbonate.
  • themaximum to be expected as calcium bicarbonate would be of the same order and this is too small to have anybeneficial action.
  • the useful bicarbonates for the purpose of the present invention may be defined as those having a solubility in Water of at least 50 pounds per ton and use of the expression water-soluble bicarbonates in this specification and claims means those bicarbonates having such a solubility factor. 7
  • bicarbonates of sodium, ammonium and potassium come within this definition of useful bicarbonates.
  • lithium and rubidium are also water-soluble bicarbonates within the meaning of the present invention.
  • the preferred bicarbonates arethose of sodium, ammonium and potassium.
  • Ammonia being a gas, eventually bubbles through the flotation pulp solution to the surface and, thence to the air. There is, therefore, a slow but steady loss of bicarbonate from the solution when ammonium bicarbonate is used and at all times there is an odor of ammonia about the flotation cells.
  • the invention is best carried out by selecting the particular bicarbonate on the basis of availability, cost and suitability to the specific ore under treatment and by dissolving it in the water that is being supplied to the grinding and flotation circuits.
  • the amount of bicarbonate employed is in the range of 0.5 pound to pounds per ton of solution, the preferred range being 2 pounds to 8 pounds per ton of solution.
  • Bicarbonate may be recovered from the end products by filtration and the filtrate containing the bicarbonate reused.
  • Example I identical flotation tests were carried out on three pyrochlore-containing ores. are given in Table II.
  • Duomeen T is the trade name of a commercial flotation reagent and is a diamine made from tallow.
  • Ultrawet DS is the trade name of a commercial wetting agent and is an aryl alkyl sulfonate.
  • Amine 220 is the trade name of a commercial flotation reagent and is believed to be 1-hydroxyethyl-2-heptadeceny1 glyoxalidine.
  • Ore A was mostly dolomite with a very little mica and pyrite; it was deeply weathered and iron-stained. It contained approximately 0.18% Nb O Ore B was a fresh ore consisting of very little mica but much calcite and pyroxene (aegirinaugite) and magnetite. It contained from 0.22 to 0.25% Nb O Ore C consisted of 60% calcite, much biotite and di- The results of each test opside, about 6% apatite, and lesser amounts of monticellite, melilite, nephelite, garnet, sphene, perovskite and soda-amphibole.
  • Example III Approximately 30 tons of ore C were treated by continuous flotation over hours at approximately 450 pounds per hour. In the first thirteen hours 6.78 lb. per ton of KHCO were used in solution with about 2.35 lb. per ton of ore of the combination of diamines :and wetting agent described in Example I. This resulted in an average recovery of 87.7% at a grade of 4.2% with four cleaning steps. Rejection of waste was 93.2%.
  • NH HCO was used at a concentration of 5.66 lb. per ton of solution.
  • the average collector addition was 2.67 lb. per ton of ore.
  • NaHCO was added at a rate of 5.66 lb. per ton of solution.
  • the reagent addition was at the rate of 3.33 lb. per ton of ore.
  • the average recovery was 89.5% at a grade of 3.62% with five cleanings. Waste rejection was 91.35%.
  • NH I-ICO was used at a concentration of 5 .66 lb. per ton of solution.
  • the average amount of collector added was 2.41 lb. per ton of ore.
  • the average recovery was 90.7% at an average grade of 4.0% with seven cleaning steps. Rejection of waste was 93.9%.
  • the overall recovery was 90.0% at a grade of 3.89% with a waste rejection of 92.85% 'of the feed having an average grade of 0.031%.
  • ammonium bicarbonate the pHof the flotation pulp varied from 8.0 to 8.1.
  • Example IV Ore C was ground with 0.8 lb. per ton of a commercial flotation reagent known .under the trade .name Rosin Amine D Acetate (as the collector for pyrochlore) and distilled water. Rosin Amine D Acetate is the salt re sulting from neutralization with acetic acid of amine made from rosin, properly known as abietylamine. The pulp was floated with three additions of 0.4 lb. of the amine per ton and the froth was collected and cleaned once with distilled water. The following results were An experiment was carried out as in Example IV except that only two additions of the amine were made to the fioat (1.6 lb. per ton in all) and all water was conditioned with 6 lb. per ton of ammonium bicarbonate. The following resultswere obtained:
  • Percent Percent Percent Percent Product Weight N13201 Distribution N bz Rougher Tailing. M. 64 0.032 2.93 Cleaner Tailing 25. 48 0.035 3. 31 Concentrate 49. 88 0. 505 93. 76
  • Rosin Amine D Acetate is not specific for pyrochlore and it tends to float almost all the minerals present except calcite and apatite.
  • the results of Examples IV and V indicate the value of ammonium bicarbonate additions since the collectoncoating is much more stable when it is used as a water modifier. With the bicarbon ate Water there is no tendency for the pyrochlore to drop out on cleaning, while without it the cleaning step reduces the recovery of thepyrochlore to an uneconomic value.
  • the present invention is not specifically concerned with the particular amine or diamine or combinations thereof used as the flotation reagent or the particular wetting agent employed.
  • amine or diamine flotation reagents there are given those known under the trade names Amine 1180, Duomeen T, Amine 220, and Rosin Amine D Acetate, some which have been previously mentioned.
  • commercially available wetting agents there are given those known under the trade names Ultrawet 40A, Calsolene Oil H5, and Lissapol N.
  • Amine 1180 is a fully saturated (no double bonds) primary amine having the majority of its molecules with a carbon chain of 18 atoms.
  • Calsolene Oil H5 is believed to be anionic reagent, a water solution of the sodium salt of a highly sulphated oil.
  • Lissapol N is a nonionic reagent, believed to be a water solution of an alkylated phenol ethylene oxide condensate.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Manufacture And Refinement Of Metals (AREA)

Description

United States atent 3,014,585 Patented DecQZS, 1961 No Drawing. Filed June 18, 1959, Ser. No. 821,112 3. Claims. (Cl. 209-167) This invention relates to processes of concentrating valuable minerals by froth flotation from ores containing such minerals, and is particularly applicable to those ores whose valuable minerals may be successfully floated after treatment with a combination of an amine or a diamine and a wetting agent or several amines or diamines and wetting agents.
Minerals included in this category comprise pyrochlore, betafite, perovskite, magnetite, sulphides, niocalite, biotite and other micas, diopside, monticellite, melilite, sphene, garnet, potash feldspar, and nephelite. All or most of these minerals are usually found in association with alkaline rocks in which niobium minerals are present. Minerals not so included comprise calcite, dolomite and apatite.
In copending application, Serial No. 759,768, filed September 8, 1958, Herbert G. Burks, now Patent 2,951,585, there is described a flotation process in which a combination of an amineand a wetting agent, one or more diamines and a wetting agent or a combination of amine,
. diamine or diamines and a wettingagent is used to effect the separation of several minerals including pyrochlore from calcite and apatite. The flotation reagent is defined in Patent 2,951,585 as selected from the group consisting of monoamines and diamines containing 14 to 22 carbon atoms in the molecule. This process is quite satisfactory in the treating of ores of carbonatite nature where there is a minimum of ferromagnesian minerals such as pyroxenes and amphiboles. When applied to ores from cer- ,tain North American occurrences results are not so satisfactory since the reagent combination tends to float the ferromagnesian minerals along with .pyrochlore thereby reducing the amount and grade of the desired product.
It is an object of this invention to provide an improved process .for the flotation of niobium-bearing minerals from alkaline ores wherein the flotation of said minerals is enhanced and the amount of waste floated is decreased.
It has now been found that, in the flotation of niobiumbearing minerals from alkaline ores utilizing as a collector one or more amines or diamines, when a modifying agent comprising a water-soluble bicarbonate is present in the flotation solution, a surprisingly and significantly higher recovery and better grade of product is obtained.
.Both the anionic and cationic'portions of the bicarbonates in accordance with the invention have a direct effect. The bicarbonate ion, when present in the concentrations used in primary flotation, has a buffering effect. During the treatment of some 80'tons of rock, as will presently appear, the pH is steady at8.0 to 8.1. Maintenance of such a pH would therefore not be capable of making a separation between pyrochlore, perovskite, mica, and the like on the one hand and calcite, dolomite and'apatite on the other. In other w'ords, it is not to be supposed that if a pH of 8.0 to 8.1 were maintained with any other reagent the same separation would result. The reagent combination has a cationic effect, i.e., the active collector-coatingforming ions are positive. This means that they attach .to negative bonds'on the minerals surfaces, not to positive charges. Hence, there can be no attachment of a cationic reagent to calcium or magnefsium since they are mutually repellent. The bicarbonate ion, however, is negative and can compete for surface positions by attachment to calcium and magnesium. Minerals having .a bicarbonate coating are not fioatable. Attachment of bicarbonate to calcium is due, of course,
to the low solubility of calcium carbonate. If, for instance, a sulphate were used instead of a bicarbonate it appears that due to the lower solubility of calcium sulphate all calcium minerals would be covered with a sulphate coating and would not float. This would depress pyrochlore and perovskite and thus defeat the purpose of the treatment. A full carbonate behaves as if it were between the bicarbonate and the sulphate in effect because carbonate is in equilibrium with the bicarbonate. The following table gives particulars of solubilities of typical bicarbonates:
TABLE I Solubility in Atmosphere Bicarbonate Water (lbs. (at 20 0.)
per ton) 1. (a) Hydrogen (Carbonic Acid) 4. 76 00 (1)) Hydrogen 0. 0022 Air. 2. 3.32 .Air. 3. 96 Air. 4. 210 Air. 5. Potass 1 249 Air.
It will be observed that the concentration of bicarbonate from carbon dioxide dissolved in water exposed to air is 100 small to be effective.
Calcium bicarbonate has a low solubility and, moreover, while it can have a decided effect on anionic collectors, it has very little effect on cationic collectors'such as are employed in the flotation process of the present invention. Normally, surface waters are not saturated with calcium bicarbonate. For instance, raw Ottawa River water contains about 0.17 pound per ton bicarbonate calculated as sodium bicarbonate. Thus, themaximum to be expected as calcium bicarbonate would be of the same order and this is too small to have anybeneficial action.
The useful bicarbonates for the purpose of the present invention may be defined as those having a solubility in Water of at least 50 pounds per ton and use of the expression water-soluble bicarbonates in this specification and claims means those bicarbonates having such a solubility factor. 7
It will be observed that the bicarbonates of sodium, ammonium and potassium come within this definition of useful bicarbonates. lithium and rubidium are also water-soluble bicarbonates within the meaning of the present invention. However, since the latter group of bicarbonates are of a costly nature, the preferred bicarbonates arethose of sodium, ammonium and potassium.
Of the three preferred bicarbonates, two are relatively stable in a flotation pulp solution. However, all three combine with water to some extent as follows:
Ammonia, being a gas, eventually bubbles through the flotation pulp solution to the surface and, thence to the air. There is, therefore, a slow but steady loss of bicarbonate from the solution when ammonium bicarbonate is used and at all times there is an odor of ammonia about the flotation cells.
it has been observed that potassium bicarbonate results in flotation of more of the pyrochlore than sodium bicarbonate but it has a lower depressing effect on iron The bicarbonates of cesium,
minerals. In other words, sodium bicarbonate with most ores floats a little less pyrochlore than the potassium salt but rejects more gangue material.
The invention is best carried out by selecting the particular bicarbonate on the basis of availability, cost and suitability to the specific ore under treatment and by dissolving it in the water that is being supplied to the grinding and flotation circuits. The amount of bicarbonate employed is in the range of 0.5 pound to pounds per ton of solution, the preferred range being 2 pounds to 8 pounds per ton of solution. Bicarbonate may be recovered from the end products by filtration and the filtrate containing the bicarbonate reused.
The following examples are illustrative of the process of the present invention:
Example I identical flotation tests were carried out on three pyrochlore-containing ores. are given in Table II. In each test, 500 g. of the ore, crushed to pass a screen having .10 mesh to the inch, were ground with approximately 330 ml. of distilled water, to which the modifying agent in the form of a watersoluble bicarbonate was added, as well as 2.8 pounds per ton of feed of a combination of 1 part Duomeen T, 1 part Ultrawet DS and 2 parts Amine 220 dissolved therein.
Duomeen T is the trade name of a commercial flotation reagent and is a diamine made from tallow. Ultrawet DS is the trade name of a commercial wetting agent and is an aryl alkyl sulfonate. Amine 220 is the trade name of a commercial flotation reagent and is believed to be 1-hydroxyethyl-2-heptadeceny1 glyoxalidine.
Grinding was continued for 7 to 8 minutes after which all +35 mesh particles were removed. The pulp was charged to a Fagergren flotation machine and froth was removed until no further dark minerals appeared in the froth. The froth was diluted with water modified by the addition of a water-soluble bicarbonate and refioated once in the same machine. All three products, rougher tailing, cleaner tailing and cleaned concentrate, were filtered, dried, weighed, sampled and analysed for niobium pentoxide (Nb O TABLE II Lb. per Percent Percent Percent Modifier ton of Reeov- Nbz05 Weightsolution ery Floated ORE A 1. Distilled H2O 48. 82 2.05 4.83 2. Sulphuric Acid. 0.85 84. 23 0. 91 17. 96 3. NHrHCO 6 84. 83 2. 85 6. 62 4. 6 81. 26 5. 70 2. 37 5. 7. 5 85. 89 2. 45 6. 32
Ore A was mostly dolomite with a very little mica and pyrite; it was deeply weathered and iron-stained. It contained approximately 0.18% Nb O Ore B was a fresh ore consisting of very little mica but much calcite and pyroxene (aegirinaugite) and magnetite. It contained from 0.22 to 0.25% Nb O Ore C consisted of 60% calcite, much biotite and di- The results of each test opside, about 6% apatite, and lesser amounts of monticellite, melilite, nephelite, garnet, sphene, perovskite and soda-amphibole. It contained about 0.31% Nb O As was expected, the different ores responded in different ways in these tests. With ore A, the bicarbonates gave good recovery and good grade; the distilled water gave very poor recovery; and the acidified float gave good recovery but poor grade. With ore B, the grade was lower due to the flotation of green silicates; ammonium bicarbonate showed definite superiority in recovery. With ore C, ammonium bicarbonate also gave best results.
Example .11
In order to provide a comparison with modifying agents other than a water-soluble bicarbonate, a further ten flotation tests were carried out in the manner described in Example I using ore C. The results are listed below:
TABLE III Lb. per Percent Percent Percent Modifier ton of Reeov- N bz05 Weight solution ery Flea-ted 1. Acid- .1 0. 85. 18 1. 02 27.18
2. Aeid-l-quebracho O. 85 76. 14 1. 72 15. 4 3. azC a 1.3 81. 22 1.47 17.16 4. Na2CO3- 4. 5 77. 04 1. 59 15. 2B 5. K 003--- 1. 8 91. 06 1. 45 18. 57 6. KOl-L.-. 0. 22 91.04 0.70 40.31 7. K2CO3+fuel oil. 1. 8 68. 20 2. 38 9.19 s. mooa-Nanoo i: 2 s7. 24 1. 01 24. 97 9. KgCOz-j-riVGI Water 1. 1 75. 30 1. 46 15. 87 1o. K7CO3-N3HCO3 3 88. 91 o. 95 27.98
Example III Approximately 30 tons of ore C were treated by continuous flotation over hours at approximately 450 pounds per hour. In the first thirteen hours 6.78 lb. per ton of KHCO were used in solution with about 2.35 lb. per ton of ore of the combination of diamines :and wetting agent described in Example I. This resulted in an average recovery of 87.7% at a grade of 4.2% with four cleaning steps. Rejection of waste was 93.2%.
In the next 64 hours, NH HCO was used at a concentration of 5.66 lb. per ton of solution. The average collector addition was 2.67 lb. per ton of ore. The recovery averaged 90.5% at a grade of 3.65% with five cleaning steps. Rejection of waste was 92.12%.
For the next 12 hours, NaHCO was added at a rate of 5.66 lb. per ton of solution. The reagent addition was at the rate of 3.33 lb. per ton of ore. The average recovery was 89.5% at a grade of 3.62% with five cleanings. Waste rejection was 91.35%.
For the remainder of the test NH I-ICO was used at a concentration of 5 .66 lb. per ton of solution. The average amount of collector added was 2.41 lb. per ton of ore. The average recovery was 90.7% at an average grade of 4.0% with seven cleaning steps. Rejection of waste was 93.9%.
The overall recovery was 90.0% at a grade of 3.89% with a waste rejection of 92.85% 'of the feed having an average grade of 0.031%. With ammonium bicarbonate, the pHof the flotation pulp varied from 8.0 to 8.1.
Example IV Ore C was ground with 0.8 lb. per ton of a commercial flotation reagent known .under the trade .name Rosin Amine D Acetate (as the collector for pyrochlore) and distilled water. Rosin Amine D Acetate is the salt re sulting from neutralization with acetic acid of amine made from rosin, properly known as abietylamine. The pulp was floated with three additions of 0.4 lb. of the amine per ton and the froth was collected and cleaned once with distilled water. The following results were An experiment was carried out as in Example IV except that only two additions of the amine were made to the fioat (1.6 lb. per ton in all) and all water was conditioned with 6 lb. per ton of ammonium bicarbonate. The following resultswere obtained:
Percent Percent Percent Product Weight N13201: Distribution N bz Rougher Tailing. M. 64 0.032 2.93 Cleaner Tailing 25. 48 0.035 3. 31 Concentrate 49. 88 0. 505 93. 76
Rosin Amine D Acetate is not specific for pyrochlore and it tends to float almost all the minerals present except calcite and apatite. The results of Examples IV and V indicate the value of ammonium bicarbonate additions since the collectoncoating is much more stable when it is used as a water modifier. With the bicarbon ate Water there is no tendency for the pyrochlore to drop out on cleaning, while without it the cleaning step reduces the recovery of thepyrochlore to an uneconomic value.
It will be observed that a marked improvement in grade and recovery is obtained when the flotation solution is modified by the presence of a water-soluble bicarbonate.
The present invention is not specifically concerned with the particular amine or diamine or combinations thereof used as the flotation reagent or the particular wetting agent employed. As examples of amine or diamine flotation reagents there are given those known under the trade names Amine 1180, Duomeen T, Amine 220, and Rosin Amine D Acetate, some which have been previously mentioned. As examples of commercially available wetting agents there are given those known under the trade names Ultrawet 40A, Calsolene Oil H5, and Lissapol N.
Amine 1180 is a fully saturated (no double bonds) primary amine having the majority of its molecules with a carbon chain of 18 atoms. Calsolene Oil H5 is believed to be anionic reagent, a water solution of the sodium salt of a highly sulphated oil. Lissapol N is a nonionic reagent, believed to be a water solution of an alkylated phenol ethylene oxide condensate.
I claim:
1. In a flotation process for the flotation of niobiumbearing minerals from an alkaline ore containing said minerals, the step which comprises modifying the flotation solution containing said ore and as a collector at least one of the group consisting of monoamines and- References Cited in the file of this patent UNITED STATES PATENTS Sheridan et al. July 4, 1922 Last et al. Mar. 3, 1959 OTHER REFERENCES Gaudin: Flotation, second edition, 1957, pages 217, 218.

Claims (1)

1. IN A FLOTATION PROCESS FOR THE FLOTATION OF NIOBIUMBEARING MINERALS FROM AN ALKALINE ORE CONTAINING SAID MINERALS, THE STEP WHICH COMPRISES MODIFYING THE FLOTATION SOLUTION CONTAINING SAID ORE AND AS A COLLECTOR AT LEAST ONE OF THE GROUP CONSISTING OF MONOAMINES AND DIAMINES CONTAINING 14 TO 22 CARBON ATOMS IN THE MOLECULE, BY ADDING TO SAID SOLUTION AT LEAST ONE WATER-SOLUBLE BICARBONATE.
US821112A 1959-06-18 1959-06-18 Flotation process for concentrating niobium-bearing minerals Expired - Lifetime US3014585A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US821112A US3014585A (en) 1959-06-18 1959-06-18 Flotation process for concentrating niobium-bearing minerals

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US821112A US3014585A (en) 1959-06-18 1959-06-18 Flotation process for concentrating niobium-bearing minerals

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3014585A true US3014585A (en) 1961-12-26

Family

ID=25232547

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US821112A Expired - Lifetime US3014585A (en) 1959-06-18 1959-06-18 Flotation process for concentrating niobium-bearing minerals

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US3014585A (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3910836A (en) * 1972-01-29 1975-10-07 Soquem Pyrochlore flotation
US3985645A (en) * 1973-10-11 1976-10-12 Canadian Patents And Development Limited Scheelite flotation
US4342648A (en) * 1981-05-05 1982-08-03 Les Services Tmg Inc. Direct flotation of pyrochlore
US4493817A (en) * 1983-07-06 1985-01-15 Teck Corporation Process for recovering pyrochlore mineral containing niobium and tantalum

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1421585A (en) * 1921-01-13 1922-07-04 Guy E Sheridan Concentration of ores by flotation
US2875896A (en) * 1957-10-10 1959-03-03 Kennecott Copper Corp Process of concentrating columbium minerals by froth flotation

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1421585A (en) * 1921-01-13 1922-07-04 Guy E Sheridan Concentration of ores by flotation
US2875896A (en) * 1957-10-10 1959-03-03 Kennecott Copper Corp Process of concentrating columbium minerals by froth flotation

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3910836A (en) * 1972-01-29 1975-10-07 Soquem Pyrochlore flotation
US3985645A (en) * 1973-10-11 1976-10-12 Canadian Patents And Development Limited Scheelite flotation
US4342648A (en) * 1981-05-05 1982-08-03 Les Services Tmg Inc. Direct flotation of pyrochlore
US4493817A (en) * 1983-07-06 1985-01-15 Teck Corporation Process for recovering pyrochlore mineral containing niobium and tantalum

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5962828A (en) Enhanced flotation reagents for beneficiation of phosphate ores
US4908125A (en) Froth flotation process for the recovery of minerals and a collector composition for use therein
US2341046A (en) Flotation
US2569672A (en) Flotation of slimes from sylvinite ore with hydroxyethyl cellulose
US4192737A (en) Froth flotation of insoluble slimes from sylvinite ores
US2337118A (en) Beneficiation of ores
US3014585A (en) Flotation process for concentrating niobium-bearing minerals
US3710934A (en) Concentration of spodumene using flotation
US2959281A (en) Flotation of niobium-bearing minerals
US3910836A (en) Pyrochlore flotation
US2951585A (en) Separation of pyrochlore from calcite, apatite and silica
US2278060A (en) Mineral concentration
US2011176A (en) Ore concentration
US3462017A (en) Phosphate flotation process
US4220525A (en) Beneficiation of metallic ores by froth flotation using polyhydroxy amine depressants
US2298281A (en) Process of flotation separation of ore
US3844939A (en) Flotation separation of feldspar
US3985645A (en) Scheelite flotation
US2857051A (en) Method of recovering white mica
US3361257A (en) Phosphate flotation
US4253614A (en) Flotation of non-sulfide zinc materials
US3309029A (en) Activation of sulfide ores for froth flotation
US2364272A (en) Mineral concentration
US3097162A (en) Method for concentrating aluminum silicates and zircon from beach sand
US2811254A (en) Method for the beneficiation of phosphate ores