US2675347A - Plating of tin-zinc alloys - Google Patents
Plating of tin-zinc alloys Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US2675347A US2675347A US251312A US25131251A US2675347A US 2675347 A US2675347 A US 2675347A US 251312 A US251312 A US 251312A US 25131251 A US25131251 A US 25131251A US 2675347 A US2675347 A US 2675347A
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- tin
- zinc
- potassium
- cyanide
- plating
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C25—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25D—PROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PRODUCTION OF COATINGS; ELECTROFORMING; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25D3/00—Electroplating: Baths therefor
- C25D3/02—Electroplating: Baths therefor from solutions
- C25D3/56—Electroplating: Baths therefor from solutions of alloys
- C25D3/60—Electroplating: Baths therefor from solutions of alloys containing more than 50% by weight of tin
Definitions
- Tin and zinc can be deposited in all proportions from electrolyte solution but a most serviceable composition from the viewpoint of the protection afforded to the steel is around 80% tin, 20% zinc with a tolerance of about either way.
- the S50-20 tin-zinc alloy deposited has an appearance much like pure tin, that is a satiny white matte iinish and has many other -properties which make it a desirable replacement for cadmium.
- the throwing and covering powers of the electrolyte bath are approximately equal to those of stannate tin, i. e. excellent, and therefore somewhat better than zinc or cadmium, and (4) it is economical to apply compared with cadmium.
- the electrodeposition of the tin-zinc alloy has been accomplished from electrolytic solutions containing sodium stannate, sodium hydroxide, sodium zinc cyanide and free sodium cyanide.
- electrolytic solutions containing sodium stannate, sodium hydroxide, sodium zinc cyanide and free sodium cyanide.
- alloy anodes of the same composition as the alloy to be deposited were employed.
- the upper current density permitted with practicality is about 30 amperes per square foot. Attempts to increase this current density and therefore the rate of plating are nullied by a rapid falling 01T of cathode efliciency and a change in the proportions of tin and zinc in the deposit.
- potassium compounds instead of the sodium compounds in the electrolyte bath permits the electroplating operation to be performed at higher current densities up to 60 amperes per square foot and also makes the alloy deposition less dependent on the current densities.
- the deposition can thereby be controlled by the alloy anode and bath composition.
- the use of potassium compounds therefore permits the attainment of higher plating speeds and renders the process less critical in control.
- the curve of Figure 3 illustrates current density versus minutes to deposit for potassium compounds.
- the solutions used in accordance with the present invention comprises basically potassium stannate plus a small amount of zinc cyanide, larger quantities of potassium cyanide and a small amount of free potassium hydroxide.
- the plating bath may comprise approximately between 32 and 45 grams per liter of tin, added as potassium stannate, between 3.5 and 9.0 grams per liter of zinc added as zinc cyanide, between 30 and 50 grams per liter of total potassium cyanide and between 5 and 11 grams per liter of ree potassium hydroxide.
- a typical formulation is as follows:
- potassium. cyanide by analysis differs from potassium cyanide actually added due to cyanide added as zinc cyanide. Thus analysis determines the total cyanide, which is free potassium cyanide plus the cyanide in the complex K2Zn(CN)4 or 2KCN.Zn(CN)2.
- Example I is particularly useful for plating in still tanks.
- the following formulation may be employed:
- Anodes of the same composition as the deposit are employed, namely 80% tin and 20% zinc.
- the anodes must be lmed for satisfactory operation.
- thecompositioniof the alloy 'deposited is less dependent. on theproportion of ingredients of the electrolytic bath.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Electrochemistry (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Metallurgy (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Electroplating And Plating Baths Therefor (AREA)
Description
April 13, 1954 F. A. LOWEN HEIM `FLATING OF TIN-ZINC ALLOYS Filed Oct. l5, 1951 HAT/1V?" SPEE 9 9 Si IN VEN TDR. 'PEae'/ca/ 4 l 0mm/45141 Patented Apr. 13, 1954 PLATING OF TIN-ZINC ALLOYS Frederick A. Lowenheim, Plainield, N. J., assignor to Metal & Thermit Corporation, New York, N. Y., a corporation of New Jersey Application october 15, 1951, seriarNo. 251,312 1 Claim. (C1. coi- 43) The present invention relates to a process of electrodepositing alloys of tin and zinc.
It has been found that an alloy of tin and zinc, electrodeposited on metals such as steel, affords excellentprotection against corrosion. Tin and zinc can be deposited in all proportions from electrolyte solution but a most serviceable composition from the viewpoint of the protection afforded to the steel is around 80% tin, 20% zinc with a tolerance of about either way. The S50-20 tin-zinc alloy deposited has an appearance much like pure tin, that is a satiny white matte iinish and has many other -properties which make it a desirable replacement for cadmium. For example, (1) it has excellent corrosion resistance properties, (2) it is easily solderable even without flux, (3) the throwing and covering powers of the electrolyte bath are approximately equal to those of stannate tin, i. e. excellent, and therefore somewhat better than zinc or cadmium, and (4) it is economical to apply compared with cadmium.
Hitherto, the electrodeposition of the tin-zinc alloy has been accomplished from electrolytic solutions containing sodium stannate, sodium hydroxide, sodium zinc cyanide and free sodium cyanide. For replenishing the metal content of the electrolytic bath, alloy anodes of the same composition as the alloy to be deposited were employed. Y
With such a solution, the upper current density permitted with practicality is about 30 amperes per square foot. Attempts to increase this current density and therefore the rate of plating are nullied by a rapid falling 01T of cathode efliciency and a change in the proportions of tin and zinc in the deposit.
It has been found in accordance with the present invention that the use of potassium compounds instead of the sodium compounds in the electrolyte bath permits the electroplating operation to be performed at higher current densities up to 60 amperes per square foot and also makes the alloy deposition less dependent on the current densities. The deposition can thereby be controlled by the alloy anode and bath composition. The use of potassium compounds therefore permits the attainment of higher plating speeds and renders the process less critical in control.
The accompanying Figures 1-3 illustrate the advantages of the invention, wherein:
The curves of Figure 1 compare sodium and potassium compounds for current density versus cathode efficiency,
The curve of Figure 2 illustrates current density versus plating speed for potassium compounds, and
The curve of Figure 3 illustrates current density versus minutes to deposit for potassium compounds.
The solutions used in accordance with the present invention comprises basically potassium stannate plus a small amount of zinc cyanide, larger quantities of potassium cyanide and a small amount of free potassium hydroxide. For a deposit of an alloy containing between 15 and 25% of zinc andV between 75 and 85% of tin, the plating bath may comprise approximately between 32 and 45 grams per liter of tin, added as potassium stannate, between 3.5 and 9.0 grams per liter of zinc added as zinc cyanide, between 30 and 50 grams per liter of total potassium cyanide and between 5 and 11 grams per liter of ree potassium hydroxide. A typical formulation is as follows:
Example I Control Make-up, Limits (by grams/liter analysis),
grams/liter Potassium Stannate (corresponds to tin Z"i"fa" 430 37 A5 mc yan1 e correspon s o z c content) 5.o 3-5`60 Potassium Cyanide 19.0 30 45 Free Potassium Hydroxide 5 5.0- 8.0
It should be noted that potassium. cyanide by analysis differs from potassium cyanide actually added due to cyanide added as zinc cyanide. Thus analysis determines the total cyanide, which is free potassium cyanide plus the cyanide in the complex K2Zn(CN)4 or 2KCN.Zn(CN)2.
It should also be noted that the Wide control limits for the KCN are due partially to the permissible variation in zinc content because of the above relationship. The actual free cyanide should preferably vary only between 15 and 20 grams per liter.
The formulation in Example I is particularly useful for plating in still tanks. For barrel plating the following formulation may be employed:
Example II Control Make-up, Limits (by grams/liter analysis),
grams/liter Potassium Stannate (corresponds to tiu)- 32-40 Zinc Cyanide (corresponds to zinc) 7 9 Potassium Cyanide 15. 0 38-50 Free Potassium Hydroxide 101. 0 8-11 In both Examples I and II, the temperature of operation is 150 F., controlled to i5". Cathode current densities are inthe range of -75 amperes per square foot and preferably in the range of 30-50-aniperesper'square foot, `andanode current densities are about k--25 amperes'per square foot.
Anodes of the same composition as the deposit are employed, namely 80% tin and 20% zinc. The anodes must be lmed for satisfactory operation.
somewhat higher than the normaloperatingcurrent is impressed upon the anodes for-ashott time (usually less than a minute is suiicient), and then the current is outback to'the proper operating value. Formation of the lmacanbe noted by a rise in the voltage reading and/or a Y decrease in the ammeter reading. The anodes shouldjgas slightly, .an indication that .oxygen is being evolved and that the iilm is present.
.In the absence of the .anode lm, .the tin dissolves as stannous tin which will cause rough and spongy deposits and will also throw the bath composition out of balance.
A typical operation with potassium compounds Y in accordance with the present invention .gave the following results:
A curve following substantially this characteristie is indicated in Fig. 1.
.A typical operation, employing sodium compounds and in accordance with the prior art, gave the following results:v
\ Current Density Ilelmt Prlm `A curve-lfollowing:substantially this characteristc is indicated Fig. 1 for the purpose of-cornparison. Y
`The important advantageswhich are gained `by the use oiV potassium compounds insteadr of so- .current density 'tvlrhichtcansbe used :isgabout 30 amperes per square foot. Any current densities .beyond this level causes sudden drop in cathode In order to form ,the.lm, r.a :current Y eicieny beyond the limits of practical opera- 3tion. '@nfthe other hand,with potassium com- .RO-unds, eurrent...densities up to V amperes per .square iootv` caribe. employed at practically operableneciencies With potassium compounds in the electrolytic bath, the Icomposition of the alloy deposited is less-dependent on current density, asindicated in the comparative test data set forth above. Also,
withpotassium compounds, thecompositioniof the alloy 'deposited is less dependent. on theproportion of ingredients of the electrolytic bath.
InFig. 2; the Acurve indicates plating speed in Y ations j performed in the vpresence of potassium com-pounds' in the electrolyte'- bath.
While the invention has-been `describedl with particular reference to'specific embodiments, it vis-tobe understood that'it is not to be limited thereto' but is to be construed"broadlyand lrestricted solely by lthe lscope of 'the appended claim.
What is claimed is:
'A process/for the -electrolytic depositionof tin- Zinc @alloyv containing f 1522596l zinc andV A-"-'75'% tin which vcomprises subjectingl anarticle to be plated, yas a cathode,E to electrolysis inan aqueous platingI bath. containingv 32 to45-grams vper liter of tin in thelform-'of' potassium-stannate, V3.5 yto 9,0 grams per liter of zinc in the form'fof zinc cyanide, 3D1 toi-50 grams per' liter 'of 'totalfpotassiumfcyanidefand 5 to'lllrgrams peri liter of `free potassium l hydroxide, `While A`maintain-ingl acurrent density Aof between 30 f and50-1ampere's per square footp and' afbath temperature of between Al: andL155LF.
References cited in the fue of this vpatent UNITED sTATEsfPATENTs
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US251312A US2675347A (en) | 1951-10-15 | 1951-10-15 | Plating of tin-zinc alloys |
GB8266/52A GB711403A (en) | 1951-10-15 | 1952-04-01 | Electrodeposition of tin-zinc alloys |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US251312A US2675347A (en) | 1951-10-15 | 1951-10-15 | Plating of tin-zinc alloys |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US2675347A true US2675347A (en) | 1954-04-13 |
Family
ID=22951401
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US251312A Expired - Lifetime US2675347A (en) | 1951-10-15 | 1951-10-15 | Plating of tin-zinc alloys |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US2675347A (en) |
GB (1) | GB711403A (en) |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2898274A (en) * | 1955-08-08 | 1959-08-04 | Sylvania Electric Prod | Electroplating of zinc-tin alloys |
US2907702A (en) * | 1954-04-27 | 1959-10-06 | Sylvania Electric Prod | Anodes for electroplating bath |
EP0879901A1 (en) * | 1997-05-22 | 1998-11-25 | SOCIETE NATIONALE D'ETUDE ET DE CONSTRUCTION DE MOTEURS D'AVIATION -Snecma | Protective coating for metal pieces with a good resistance against corrosion in a saline atmosphere and metal pieces with such a protective coating |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB548009A (en) * | 1941-12-16 | 1942-09-21 | Victor Alexander Lowinger | Improvements in the electrodeposition of tin-zinc alloys |
US2424472A (en) * | 1942-08-12 | 1947-07-22 | Metal & Thermit Corp | Tin plating from potassium stannate baths |
-
1951
- 1951-10-15 US US251312A patent/US2675347A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
1952
- 1952-04-01 GB GB8266/52A patent/GB711403A/en not_active Expired
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB548009A (en) * | 1941-12-16 | 1942-09-21 | Victor Alexander Lowinger | Improvements in the electrodeposition of tin-zinc alloys |
US2424472A (en) * | 1942-08-12 | 1947-07-22 | Metal & Thermit Corp | Tin plating from potassium stannate baths |
Cited By (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2907702A (en) * | 1954-04-27 | 1959-10-06 | Sylvania Electric Prod | Anodes for electroplating bath |
US2898274A (en) * | 1955-08-08 | 1959-08-04 | Sylvania Electric Prod | Electroplating of zinc-tin alloys |
EP0879901A1 (en) * | 1997-05-22 | 1998-11-25 | SOCIETE NATIONALE D'ETUDE ET DE CONSTRUCTION DE MOTEURS D'AVIATION -Snecma | Protective coating for metal pieces with a good resistance against corrosion in a saline atmosphere and metal pieces with such a protective coating |
FR2763605A1 (en) * | 1997-05-22 | 1998-11-27 | Snecma | PROTECTIVE COATING OF METAL PARTS HAVING GOOD CORROSION RESISTANCE IN SALINE ATMOSPHERE, AND METAL PARTS COMPRISING SUCH A PROTECTIVE COATING |
US5989735A (en) * | 1997-05-22 | 1999-11-23 | Societe Nationale D'etude Et De Construction De Moteurs D'aviation "Snecma" | Protective coating for metal components providing good corrosion resistance in a saline atmosphere, and method of producing said coating |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
GB711403A (en) | 1954-06-30 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US3917517A (en) | Chromium plating electrolyte and method | |
US3677909A (en) | Palladium-nickel alloy plating bath | |
US3663384A (en) | Bath for electroplating tin-bismuth alloy | |
US2436316A (en) | Bright alloy plating | |
US2250556A (en) | Electrodeposition of copper and bath therefor | |
US3764489A (en) | Electrodeposition of gold alloys | |
US2732336A (en) | Electroplating composition for copper | |
US2511395A (en) | Process for the electrodeposition of tin alloys | |
US2675347A (en) | Plating of tin-zinc alloys | |
US2397522A (en) | Process for the electrodeposition of tin alloys | |
US3920526A (en) | Process for the electrodeposition of ductile palladium and electroplating bath useful therefor | |
US2555375A (en) | Process of plating bright silver alloy | |
US2435967A (en) | Bright alloy plating | |
US2793990A (en) | Electrodeposition of alloys containing copper and tin | |
US1904732A (en) | Alloy plated iron and steel and process of making the same | |
US3522155A (en) | Method of electrodepositing a tinbismuth alloy and compositions therefor | |
US2497988A (en) | Indium plating | |
US2414438A (en) | Electrodeposition of selenium | |
US3668083A (en) | Process of electroplating rhenium and bath for this process | |
US2380044A (en) | Process for producing electrodeposits | |
US2751341A (en) | Electrodeposition of lead and lead alloys | |
US2778787A (en) | Electrodeposition of iron zinc alloys | |
US3347757A (en) | Electrolytes for the electrodeposition of platinum | |
US3984291A (en) | Electrodeposition of tin-lead alloys and compositions therefor | |
US1919000A (en) | Process for the electrodeposition of tin |