US20230394406A1 - Systems and methods to effectuate sets of automated actions outside and/or within a collaboration environment based on trigger events occurring outside and/or within the collaboration environment - Google Patents

Systems and methods to effectuate sets of automated actions outside and/or within a collaboration environment based on trigger events occurring outside and/or within the collaboration environment Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20230394406A1
US20230394406A1 US18/453,864 US202318453864A US2023394406A1 US 20230394406 A1 US20230394406 A1 US 20230394406A1 US 202318453864 A US202318453864 A US 202318453864A US 2023394406 A1 US2023394406 A1 US 2023394406A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
collaboration environment
work
information
environment
occurrence
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
US18/453,864
Inventor
Eric Seth Pelz
Micah Hanan Fenner
Abigail Lorean Kelly
Cvetomir I. Cankov
Alexander Thomas Ryan
Adrian Van Yen
John Wesley Graham
Anna Marie Clifton
Lili Jiang Rachowin
Sika Gasinu
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Asana Inc
Original Assignee
Asana Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Asana Inc filed Critical Asana Inc
Priority to US18/453,864 priority Critical patent/US20230394406A1/en
Assigned to Asana, Inc. reassignment Asana, Inc. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: GASINU, SIKA, RACHOWIN, LILI JIANG, YEN, ADRIAN VAN, RYAN, ALEXANDER THOMAS, CLIFTON, ANNA MARIE, GRAHAM, JOHN WESLEY, CANKOV, CVETOMIR I., FENNER, MICAH HANAN, KELLY, ABIGAIL LOREAN, PELZ, ERIC SETH
Publication of US20230394406A1 publication Critical patent/US20230394406A1/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0631Resource planning, allocation, distributing or scheduling for enterprises or organisations
    • G06Q10/06316Sequencing of tasks or work
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0631Resource planning, allocation, distributing or scheduling for enterprises or organisations
    • G06Q10/06313Resource planning in a project environment

Definitions

  • the present disclosure relates to systems and methods to effectuate sets of automated actions outside and/or within a collaboration environment based on trigger events occurring outside and/or within the collaboration environment.
  • Collaboration environments may enable users to assign projects, tasks, or other assignments to assignees (e.g., other users) to complete.
  • a collaboration environment may comprise an environment in which a virtual team of users does its work.
  • a collaboration environment may enable users to work in a more organized and efficient manner.
  • a collaboration environment may integrate features and/or functionality such as web-based conferencing and collaboration, desktop videoconferencing, and/or instant message into a single easy-to-use, intuitive interface.
  • Collaboration environments may require users to manually interact within the collaboration environment and/or applications/services outside of the collaboration environment in response to actions of other users and/or other events occurring within the collaboration environment.
  • the responsive interactions outside the collaboration environment may include, for example, calendaring events into a personal calendar application, drafted and/or sending emails, sending personal messages over a messaging application and/or service separate from the collaboration environment, effectuating electronic payments, and/or other interactions.
  • the users may tend to follow patterns with how they react to certain events and/or actions within the collaboration environment. This may create a negative experience for users who may tire of the potentially repetitive work. Requiring such repetitive manual interaction may increase friction within and/or outside of the collaboration environment.
  • One or more implementations of the systems and methods presented herein may create less friction and/or more efficient use of the collaboration environment and one or more applications and/or services outside the collaboration environment by effectuating automatic sequences of actions outside the collaboration environment in response to trigger events occurring within the collaboration environment, and vice versa.
  • the automated actions and/or trigger events may be user specified.
  • One or more implementations of a system configured to effectuate sets of automated actions outside a collaboration environment based on trigger events occurring within the collaboration environment may include one or more hardware processors configured by machine-readable instructions.
  • the processor(s) may be configured to manage environment state information maintaining a collaboration environment. Managing may include one or more of obtaining, sending, receiving, storing, updating, deleting, archiving, reporting, and/or other processes.
  • the collaboration environment may be configured to facilitate interaction by users with the collaboration environment.
  • the environment state information may specify values of environment parameters and/or other information.
  • the environment parameters may include one or more of user parameters, work unit parameters, and/or other parameters.
  • the values of the user parameters may describe one or more of the users, user actions of the users within the collaboration environment, user settings of the users, and/or other information about the users.
  • the values of work unit parameters may describe units of work managed, created, and/or assigned within the collaboration environment, and/or other information about units of work.
  • the processor(s) may be configured to generate automation information and/or other information.
  • the automation information may be generated based on user entry and/or selection of the automation information into a user interface.
  • the automation information may specify sets of automated actions to carry out outside of the collaboration environment in response to occurrence of trigger events within the collaboration environment.
  • the user entry and/or selection of the automation information may include entry and/or selection of one or more of individual automated actions in individual sets of automated actions, individual trigger events, and/or other information.
  • the automation information may specify a first set of automated actions to carry out outside of the collaboration environment in response to a first trigger event occurring within the collaboration environment.
  • the processor(s) may be configured to detect occurrence of the trigger events within the collaboration environment.
  • the occurrence of the trigger events may be based on changes in the values of the environment parameters and/or other events occurring within the collaboration environment.
  • an occurrence of the first trigger event may be detected based on a first change in a first value of a first environment parameter to a second value.
  • the first trigger event may be associated with the first change (e.g., a state change of the first environment parameter).
  • the first trigger event may be associated with the second value (e.g., a data change of the first environment parameter).
  • the processor(s) may be configured to effectuate individual sets of automated actions outside the collaboration environment.
  • the effectuation of the individual sets of automated actions may be responsive to the detection of the occurrence of individual trigger events.
  • the first set of automated actions may be effectuated outside the collaboration environment.
  • One or more implementations of the system effectuate sets of automated actions within a collaboration environment based on trigger events occurring outside the collaboration environment may include one or more hardware processors configured by machine-readable instructions.
  • the processor(s) may be configured to manage environment state information maintaining a collaboration environment.
  • the collaboration environment may be configured to facilitate interaction by users within the collaboration environment.
  • the environment state information may specify values of environment parameters and/or other information.
  • the environment parameters may include one or more of user parameters, work unit parameters, and/or other parameters.
  • the values of the user parameters may describe one or more of the users, user actions of the users within the collaboration environment, user settings of the users, and/or other information about the users.
  • the values of work unit parameters may describe units of work managed, created, and/or assigned within the collaboration environment, and/or other information about units of work.
  • the processor(s) may be configured to generate automation information and/or other information.
  • the automation information may be generated based on user entry and/or selection of the automation information into a user interface.
  • the automation information may specify sets of automated actions to carry out within the collaboration environment in response to occurrence of trigger events outside the collaboration environment.
  • the user entry and/or selection of the automation information may include entry and/or selection of one or more of individual automated actions in individual sets of automated actions, individual trigger events, and/or other information.
  • the automation information may specify a first set of automated actions to carry out within the collaboration environment in response to a first trigger event occurring outside the collaboration environment.
  • the processor(s) may be configured to obtain information indicating occurrence of the trigger events outside the collaboration environment.
  • first information may be obtaining indicating an occurrence of the first trigger event outside the collaboration environment.
  • the processor(s) may be configured to effectuate individual sets of automated actions within the collaboration environment.
  • the effectuation of the individual sets of automated actions may be responsive to obtaining the information indicating the occurrence of the trigger events outside the collaboration environment.
  • the processor(s) may be configured to effectuate the first set of automated actions within the collaboration environment.
  • any association (or relation, or reflection, or indication, or correspondence) involving servers, processors, client computing platforms, and/or another entity or object that interacts with any part of the system and/or plays a part in the operation of the system, may be a one-to-one association, a one-to-many association, a many-to-one association, and/or a many-to-many association or N-to-M association (note that N and M may be different numbers greater than 1).
  • the term “obtain” may include active and/or passive retrieval, determination, derivation, transfer, upload, download, submission, and/or exchange of information, and/or any combination thereof.
  • the term “effectuate” may include active and/or passive causation of any effect.
  • the term “determine” may include measure, calculate, compute, estimate, approximate, generate, and/or otherwise derive, and/or any combination thereof.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a system configured to effectuate sets of automated actions outside and/or within a collaboration environment based on trigger events occurring outside and/or within the collaboration environment, in accordance with one or more implementations.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a method to effectuate sets of automated actions outside a collaboration environment based on trigger events occurring within the collaboration environment, in accordance with one or more implementations.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates a method to effectuate sets of automated actions within a collaboration environment based on trigger events occurring outside the collaboration environment, in accordance with one or more implementations
  • FIG. 4 illustrates an exemplary user interface, in accordance with one or more implementations.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates an exemplary user interface, in accordance with one or more implementations.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a system 100 configured to effectuate sets of automated actions within and/or outside a collaboration environment based on trigger events occurring within and/or outside the collaboration environment, in accordance with one or more implementations.
  • system 100 may be configured to effectuate sets of automated actions outside a collaboration environment based on trigger events occurring within the collaboration environment.
  • system 100 may be configured to effectuate sets of automated actions within a collaboration environment based on trigger events occurring outside the collaboration environment.
  • One or more implementations of the systems and methods presented herein may create less friction and/or more efficient use of the collaboration environment and/or other applications/services by users by effectuating automatic sequences of actions in response to trigger events.
  • the actions and/or triggers may be user specified.
  • automated actions may be carried out outside the collaboration environment in response to trigger events within the collaboration environment.
  • automated actions may be carried out within the collaboration environment in response to trigger events occurring outside the collaboration environment.
  • automated actions may be carried out outside the collaboration environment in response to trigger events occurring outside the collaboration environment.
  • Individual external resources of one or more external resources 126 may be sources of triggers and/or targets of automated actions.
  • system 100 may be configured to communicate with one or more external resources 126 such that individual external resources may communicate reports indicating the occurrence of trigger events by the individual external resources.
  • system 100 may include one or more of one or more servers 102 , one or more client computing platforms 104 , one or more external resources 126 , and/or other components.
  • Server(s) 102 may be configured to communicate with one or more client computing platforms 104 and/or one or more external resources 126 according to a client/server architecture and/or other architectures.
  • Client computing platform(s) 104 may be configured to communicate with other client computing platforms via server(s) 102 and/or according to a peer-to-peer architecture and/or other architectures. Users may access system 100 via client computing platform(s) 104 .
  • individual external resources of one or more external resources 126 may include individual applications providing one or more services outside of system 100 .
  • An application may include one or more of a calendar application, a payment application, an electronic communication application, a social media application, restaurant-reservation application, on-demand delivery application, a project management application, a customer relationship management application, a ticketing application, a partner relationship management application, a web form application, and/or other applications outside of the system providing one or more services. It is noted that this list of applications providing one or more services outside of system 100 is provided for illustrative purposes only and not to be considered limiting. Instead, it is to be understood that other applications providing one or more services outside of system 100 may be considered which are within the scope of the present disclosure.
  • external resources and/or other considerations of applications providing one or more services outside of system 100 may be considered as such by virtue of otherwise being unaffiliated with system 100 .
  • external resources and/or other considerations of applications providing one or more services outside of system 100 may be considered as such by virtue of utilizing other servers, processors, and/or other components which may be separate and distinct from system 100 .
  • external resources and/or other considerations of applications providing one or more services outside of system 100 may be considered as such by virtue of being created and/or administered by entities that may be separate and distinct from creators and/or administers of system 100 .
  • a calendar application may comprise a software application configured to provide users with an electronic version of a calendar.
  • the calendar application may provide an appointment book, address book, contact list, and/or other features and/or functionality.
  • a calendar application may provide functionality of setting calendar events, setting reminders, and/or other functionality.
  • a payment application may comprise an e-commerce payment application, electronic payment application, peer-to-peer payments application, an electronic wallet application, and/or other applications that facilitate the sending and/or receiving of electronic payments and/or other online transactions.
  • An electronic communication application may comprise an application for providing electronic communication services.
  • Electronic communication services may include one or more of electronic mail, instant messaging, private messaging, and/or other communications.
  • An electronic communication application may provide functionality of one or more of compiling, sending, receiving, archiving, deleting, and/or performing other actions with respect to electronic communications.
  • a social media application may comprise an application configured to facilitate the creation and/or sharing of information via virtual communities and/or networks.
  • a social media application may provide functionality of compiling, posting, reviewing, deleting, searching, and/or performing other actions with respect to information created and/or shared via virtual communities and/or networks.
  • a restaurant-reservation application may include an application configured to set and/or request reservations and restaurants in response to web-based requests for reservations.
  • the restaurant-reservation application may be specific to a given restaurant and/or an application that services many restaurants.
  • a restaurant-reservation application may provide the functionality of searching restaurants, searching availability of reservations, communicating with restaurants, setting reservations, sending confirmations, and/or other features and/or functionality.
  • An on-demand delivery application may comprise an application configured to effectuate real-world deliveries of real-world goods and/or services in response to web-based requests for those goods and/or services.
  • the on-demand delivery application may be associated with what may commonly be referred to as a “gig economy” application.
  • an on-demand delivery application may be directed to food delivery, consumer items, and/or other goods and/or services.
  • a project management application may comprise an application configured to facilitate planning, organizing, and/or otherwise managing resources.
  • a project management application may provide functionality of estimation and planning, scheduling, cost control and budget management, resource allocation, communication, decision-making, quality management, time management and documentation, administration systems, and/or other functionality.
  • Server(s) 102 may include one or more of non-transitory electronic storage 128 , one or more processors 130 configured by machine-readable instructions 106 , and/or other components.
  • Machine-readable instructions 106 may include one or more instruction components.
  • the instruction components may include computer program components. Executing the machine-readable instructions 106 may cause server(s) 102 to facilitate effectuating sets of automated actions outside a collaboration environment based on trigger events occurring within the collaboration environment and/or effectuating sets of automated actions within a collaboration environment based on trigger events occurring outside the collaboration environment.
  • the instruction components may include one or more of an environment state component 108 , an automation component 110 , a conflict component 112 , a user interface component 114 , and/or other instruction components.
  • Environment state component 108 may be configured to manage environment state information and/or other information used in maintaining a collaboration environment.
  • the environment state information may include values of one or more environment parameters.
  • the environment parameters may include one or more of user parameters, work unit parameters, and/or other parameters.
  • the values of the user parameters may specify user information and/or other information.
  • the values of the work unit parameters may specify work information and/or other information.
  • the values of the user parameters may be organized in user records corresponding to users interacting with and/or viewing the collaboration environment.
  • the values of the user parameters associated with the users interacting with and/or viewing the collaboration environment may include information describing the users, user actions of the users within the collaboration environment, their settings, and/or other user information; and/or metadata associated with the users, their actions within the environment, their settings, and/or other user information.
  • Individual ones of the users may be associated with individual ones of the user records.
  • a user record may define values of the user parameters associated with a given user interacting with and/or viewing the collaboration environment.
  • the values of the user parameters may, by way of non-limiting example, specify one or more of: a user name, a group parameter, a user account, a user role, a user department, descriptive user content, a to-email, a from-email, a photo, an organization, a workspace, one or more projects (which may include project parameters defined by one or more work unit records), one or more portfolios of projects, one or more items of work (which may include one or more unit of work parameters defined by one or more unit of work records), one or more user comments, one or more teams the user belongs to, one or more of the user display settings (e.g., colors, size, project order, task order, other unit of work order, etc.), one or more authorized applications, one or more interaction parameters (e.g., indicating a user is working on/worked on a given unit of work, a given user viewed a given work unit of work, a given user selected a given unit of work, a timeframe a given user last interacted with and
  • the values of the work unit parameters may be organized in work unit records corresponding to units of work managed, created, and/or assigned within the collaboration environment.
  • a given work unit may have one or more assignees and/or team members working on the given work unit.
  • Work units may include one or more to-do items, action items, objectives, and/or other units of work one or more users should accomplish and/or plan on accomplishing. Units of work may be created by a given user for the given user and/or created by the given user and assigned to one or more other users.
  • a given unit of work may include one or more of a project, a task, a sub-task, a conversation (e.g., a message posting within a message board and/or other considerations), and/or other unit of work assigned to and/or associated with one or more users.
  • users may be identified based on one or more of specific user identification (e.g., by name, username, and/or other information), descriptive user information (e.g., role, department, availability, and/or other information), and/or other considerations.
  • the one or more work unit parameters may include one or more of a work assignment parameter, a work management parameter, work creation parameter, and/or other parameters.
  • the values of the work assignment parameter may describe units of work assigned to the individual users.
  • the values of the work management parameter may describe units of work managed by the individual users.
  • the values of the work creation parameter may describe units of work created by the individual users.
  • the units of work may be described based on one or more of a unit of work name, a unit of work description, one or more unit of work dates (e.g., a start date, a due date, a completion date, and/or dates), one or more members associated with a unit of work (e.g., an owner, one or more other project/task members, member access information, and/or other unit of work members and/or member information), a status parameter (e.g., an update, a hardcoded status update, a completed/uncomplete/mark complete, a measured status, a progress indication, quantity of sub-work units remaining for a given unit of work, completed work units in a given project, and/or other status parameter), one or more user comment parameters (e.g., permission for who may comments such as a creator, a recipient, one or more followers, and/or one or more other interested parties; content of the comments; one or more times; presence or absence of the functionality of up-votes; one or more hard-code
  • the values of the work assignment parameter describing units of work assigned to the individual users may be determined based on one or more interactions by one or more users with a collaboration environment.
  • one or more users may create and/or assign one or more unit of work to themselves and/or an other user.
  • a user may be assigned a unit of work and the user may effectuate a reassignment of the unit of work from the user or one or more other users.
  • values of the work assignment parameter may indicate that a status parameter of a unit of work has changed from “incomplete” to “marked complete” and/or “complete”.
  • a status of complete for a unit of work may be associated with the passing of an end date associated with the unit of work.
  • a status of “marked complete” may be associated with a user providing input via the collaboration environment at the point in time the user completes the unit of work (which may be before or after an end date).
  • user actions within the collaboration environment may include effectuating one or more changes in one or more values of one or more of the environment parameters.
  • User actions may be facilitated through a user interface presenting the collaboration environment.
  • a user action may include marking a unit of work “complete.” Marking a unit of work complete may change a value of a work unit parameter for the unit of work from “incomplete” to “marked complete.”
  • User actions may include other changes to other values of other environment parameters described herein.
  • the automation component 110 may be configured to generate automation information and/or other information.
  • the automation information may be generated based on user entry and/or selection of the automation information into a user interface (see, e.g., user interface component 114 , FIG. 4 , and/or FIG. 5 ).
  • automation information may specify sets of automated actions to carry out outside the collaboration environment in response to occurrence of trigger events within the collaboration environment.
  • automation information may specify sets of automated actions to carry out within the collaboration environment in response to occurrence of trigger events outside the collaboration environment.
  • automation information may specify sets of automated actions to carry out outside the collaboration environment in response to occurrence of trigger events outside the collaboration environment.
  • the user entry and/or selection of the automation information may include entry and/or selection of one or more of individual automated actions in individual sets of automated actions, individual trigger events, and/or other information.
  • the automation information may specify a first set of automated actions to carry out in response to a first trigger event.
  • the first set of automated actions and/or the first trigger event may be generated based on input by a first user into a user interface.
  • the first set of automated actions may include one or more automated actions to carry out outside the collaboration environment.
  • the first trigger event may include an event occurring within the collaboration environment.
  • the automation information may specify a second set of automated actions to carry out in response to a second trigger event.
  • the second set of automated actions and/or the second trigger event may be generated based on input by a first user into a user interface.
  • the second set of automated actions may include one or more automated actions to carry out within the collaboration environment.
  • the second trigger event may include an event occurring outside the collaboration environment.
  • the automation component 110 may be configured to detect occurrence of the trigger events within the collaboration environment based on changes in the values of the environment parameters and/or other information. Detection may be based on monitoring environment state information, user actions, and/or other components of system 100 . By way of non-limiting illustration, an occurrence of the first trigger event may be detected based on a first change in a first value of a first environment parameter to a second value.
  • the automation component 110 may be configured to obtain information indicating occurrence of trigger events outside the collaboration environment.
  • information indicating occurrence of trigger events outside the collaboration environment may be obtained by virtue of individual external resources communicating the information to system 100 .
  • the communicated information may include status reports and/or other information.
  • the communication of the information may be based on automation component 110 sending requests for the information.
  • the communication of the information may be based on individual external resources performing scheduled and/or predetermined reporting protocols (e.g., push notifications and/or other protocols).
  • automation component 110 may be configured to obtain first information indicating an occurrence the second trigger event outside the collaboration environment.
  • an individual automated action within the collaboration environment may include effectuating one or more of creation of, change in, and/or specification of, one or more values of one or more of the environment parameters.
  • the creation of, change in, and/or specification of values of environment parameters may be accomplished by accessing a corresponding record (e.g., user record, work unit record, and/or other records).
  • creation of, change in, and/or specification of an individual value may be reflected in views of the collaboration environment accessed by users.
  • individual automated actions within the collaboration environment may be classified by individual action types.
  • An action type may dictate the extent in which an automation action effects the collaboration environment.
  • An action type may include one or more of a record creation type, value specification type, and/or other types.
  • a record creation type automated action may include creating one or more of a user record, work unit record, and/or other records.
  • the creation of a record may include generating an instance of the record in the collaboration environment.
  • the creation of the record by a record creation type automated action may not specifically define values of the environment parameters within the record and/or may set values to one or more of default values, null values, and/or other values.
  • a value specification type automated action may include changing, and/or specifying, one or more values of one or more of the environment parameters contained within a record.
  • value specification type automated action may further be classified by one or more action subtypes based on the individual values of the individual environment parameters associated with the individual automated actions.
  • An action subtype may include one or more of a time-based subtype, privacy and/or permissions subtype, accessibility subtype, interaction subtype, and/or other subtype.
  • An automated action of the time-based subtype may effectuate change in, and/or specification of, one or more values of one or more of the environment parameters related to time.
  • this may include one or more unit of work dates (e.g., a start date, a due date, a completion date, and/or dates).
  • this may include one or more of a start of employment date, an end of employment date, a length of employment period, a length of vacation period, and/or other information.
  • An automated action of the privacy and/or permissions subtype may correspond to values of environment parameters related to privacy and/or permissions.
  • an automated action performed on a user record being of the privacy and/or permissions subtype may include change of, and/or specification of, one or more of one or more teams a user belongs to, one or more user display settings (e.g., colors, size, project order, task order, other unit of work order, etc.), one or more authorized applications, application access information (e.g., username/password for one or more third-party applications), one or more favorites and/or priorities, and/or other information for the user.
  • an automated action performed on a work unit record being of the privacy and/or permissions subtype may include change of, and/or specification of, one or more of one or more user comment parameters (e.g., permission for who may comments such as a creator, a recipient, one or more followers, and/or one or more other interested parties; content of the comments; one or more times; presence or absence of the functionality of up-votes; one or more hard-coded responses; and/or other parameters), notification settings, privacy settings, dependencies between one or more work units, and/or other values.
  • user comment parameters e.g., permission for who may comments such as a creator, a recipient, one or more followers, and/or one or more other interested parties
  • notification settings e.g., privacy settings, dependencies between one or more work units, and/or other values.
  • An automated action of the accessibility subtype may correspond to values of environment parameters which may be required in a record (user and/or work unit) in order for the record to take effect within the collaboration environment.
  • Values of environment parameters which may be required in a record in order for the record to take effect may refer to values that, if left undefined, would not provide any meaningful use within the collaboration environment.
  • the values of environment parameters which may be required in a record in order for the record to take effect may refer to a minimum quantity of environment parameters which may need to be specified in order to allow users to interact with and/or access the record.
  • an automated action performed on a user record being of the accessibility subtype may include change of, and/or specification of, one or more of a user name, a user account, a user role, a user department, descriptive user content, a to-email, a from-email, a photo, an organization, and/or other values.
  • an automated action performed on a work unit record being of the accessibility subtype may include change of, and/or specification of, one or more of a unit of work description, one or more members associated with a unit of work (e.g., an owner, one or more other project/task members, member access information, one or more assignees, and/or other information), an associated URL, and/or other values.
  • An automated action of the interaction subtype may correspond to values of environment parameters which may be specified in a record (user and/or work unit) in order to provide further functionality and/or accessibility within the collaboration environment.
  • Values of environment parameters which may be specified in a record (user and/or work unit) in order to provide further functionality and/or accessibility may refer to values other than those associated with the time-based subtype, privacy and/or permissions subtype, accessibility subtype, and/or other subtypes.
  • an individual automated action may be carried out simultaneously (or near simultaneously) with an individual detection of an individual occurrence of an individual trigger event and/or within a specified time frame following an individual detection of an individual occurrence of an individual trigger event.
  • a specified time frame may include a “waiting” period of time before an action is carried out.
  • the waiting period of time may be satisfied by one or more of the passage of the period of time, some other trigger event, and/or other events and/or actions within the collaboration environment.
  • individual trigger events may be specified as individual occurrences of change of the values of the environment parameters. Occurrences of change may convey a state change of an environment parameter. The state change may not consider what the change is, but instead that a change occurred.
  • a trigger event may include an occurrence of a reassignment of a unit of work from one user to an other user.
  • the first trigger event may be associated with the first change.
  • individual trigger events may be specified as individual values of the environment parameters. Changes to specific values may be referred to as data state changes.
  • the data state change may refer to a change of a parameter to a specific value from an other value (and/or from a state of being unspecified).
  • a trigger event may include an occurrence of a reassignment of a unit of work from one user to another specific user.
  • a trigger event may include a comment having one or more specific words and/or phrases.
  • the first trigger event may be associated with the second value and/or other values.
  • a set of automated actions may be associated with one or more of a sequence in which automated actions in the set are to be carried out, concurrent carrying out of two or more of the automated actions in the set, and/or other features and/or functionality.
  • the automated actions within a set of automated actions may have a specified ordered sequence in which the automated actions are to be carried out.
  • one or more actions may be followed by, and/or preceded by, a specified waiting period.
  • a set of automation actions may specify that two or more actions may be carried out concurrently.
  • a user may specify a combination and/or sequence of multiple triggers and/or multiple automated actions as a multi-step “workflow” that may include branching logic.
  • a chain of trigger/action pairs of a given sequence may result in facilitating a workflow.
  • the automation component 110 may be configured to, responsive to the detection of the occurrence of individual trigger events, effectuate individual sets of automated actions outside the collaboration environment.
  • automation component 110 may be configured to effectuate the first set of automated actions outside the collaboration environment.
  • effectuating individual sets of automated actions outside the collaboration environment may include communicating instructions to effectuate the action to an external resource outside the collaboration environment.
  • effectuating individual sets of automated actions outside the collaboration environment may include performing an application programming interface (API) call and/or other interaction with the external resource to cause the external resource to execute one or more routines in accordance with the instructions.
  • API interaction may include one or more of Remote Procedure Call, Representational State Transfer, GraphQL, and/or other interaction.
  • the automation component 110 may be configured to, responsive to obtaining the information indicating the occurrence of the trigger events outside the collaboration environment, effectuate individual sets of automated actions within the collaboration environment.
  • automation component 110 may be configured to effectuate the second set of automated actions within the collaboration environment.
  • individual sets of automated actions and associated individual trigger events may be stored in individual automation records.
  • An automation record may define one or more of individual actions, individual trigger events, and/or other information. Individual actions may be defined by a target component, an action component, and/or other information.
  • the target component of an automation record may include the environment parameter (or parameters) to which an action is to be carried out on and/or an external resource to which the action is to be carried out with.
  • the action component of an automation record may define what change is to be made on the environment parameter(s) and/or instructions to effectuate the action by the external resource defined by the target component.
  • Individual trigger events may be defined by a source component, an event component, and/or other information.
  • the source component of an automation record may include the environment parameter(s) and/or external resource(s) from which occurrences of a trigger event may be derived.
  • the event component may include the value (or change in the value) for the environment parameter(s) and/or the information indicating occurrence of an event within the external resource defined by the source component from which occurrences of a trigger event may be derived.
  • individual automation records may store counts of occurrences of individual trigger events and/or occurrences of carrying out individual automation actions in the sets of automation actions.
  • Logic may include, for example, Boolean logic.
  • logic operators such as “AND”, “OR”, “NOT”, and/or other operations may be utilized to generate more complex trigger combinations for sets of automated actions.
  • the use of logic operators may allow for fewer discrete trigger events to be defined yet still have more complex behavior available to users.
  • a trigger event may be defined by “when task assigned” combined with the operator “NOT”.
  • the Boolean logic may facilitate multistage automation.
  • logic may include “if-then-then” and/or other operators.
  • a user may specify a set, or pool, of trigger events to trigger one or more automated actions.
  • user may specify that one or more of the trigger events in the set may individually and/or in combination trigger the one or more automated actions. This way, a user may specify multiple options of trigger events which may trigger one or more automated actions. Further, an individual trigger event may trigger multiple automated actions.
  • the automation component 110 may be configured to determine individual sets of repeated user actions by the individual users. The determination may be based on monitoring environment state information (e.g., change in values of environment parameters and/or other monitoring), user actions, information indicating occurrence of the trigger events outside the collaboration environment, and/or other information generated by and/or accessible to system 100 .
  • determining individual sets of repeated user actions by the individual users may include determining one or more actions and/or events occurring within and/or outside the collaboration environment which precede the individual sets of repeated user actions.
  • a set of user actions may be deemed “repeated” after the set of user actions occur more than once.
  • the automation component 110 may be configured to generate recommendations for automation information based on individual sets of repeated user actions and/or other information.
  • the recommendations may include individual recommended sets of automated actions and/or individual recommended trigger events which correspond to the individual sets of repeated user actions.
  • recommended trigger events may include the actions and/or events occurring within and/or outside the collaboration environment which precede the individual sets of repeated user actions.
  • individual recommended sets of automated actions may include the individual sets of repeated user actions.
  • a recommendation may include a notification (e.g., pop-up message, email, and/or other notification) describing one or more of the individual sets of repeated user actions, the individual recommended sets of automated actions, the individual recommended trigger events, and/or other information.
  • a set of repeated user actions for a given user may include generating a specific task, assigning the specific task to a specific person (or persons), adding a comment to the task, causing an external application of an external resource to perform some action, and/or other actions.
  • the automation component 110 may determine that the set of repeated user actions for the given user is preceded by an other specific task being marked completed.
  • the automation component 100 may be configured to generate a recommendation for automation information including a set of recommended automated actions including generating the specific task, assigning the specific task to the specific person (or persons), adding a comment to the task, generating and/or sending instructions to effectuate the action by the external application, and/or other actions.
  • the automation component 110 may be configured such that the recommendation includes a recommended trigger event including the other specific task being “marked complete.”
  • automation component 110 may be configured to obtain and/or generate one or more automation templates.
  • An automation template may specify a predetermined set of automated actions to carry out in and/or outside the collaboration environment in response to occurrence of a predetermined trigger event.
  • the one or more automation templates may be stored by electronic storage 128 and/or other storage device.
  • an automation template may represent sets of actions users may commonly carry out in response to an action and/or occurrence within and/or outside the collaboration environment.
  • automation templates may be created by system administrators, other users, based on repeated user actions, and/or created in other ways.
  • the automation templates may be stored in a library for access and/or implementation by individual users.
  • the conflict component 112 may be configured to analyze automation information to identify conflicts within the sets of automated actions and/or the trigger events.
  • analyzing automation information may include simulating execution of the automation information in a testing environment to determine a potential outcome of the automation information.
  • conflicts may include one or more of repeating and/or ongoing automated actions (e.g., where a set of automated actions may not have a finite end), an instance when an individual automated action comprises an individual trigger event (e.g., resulting in a looping of trigger-action-trigger-action, etc.), and/or other conflicts.
  • analyzing automation information may further include only allowing the execution of automated actions after a triggering event if the state specified in the actions are not already true. If they are already true, conflict component 112 may recognize this as a conflict and not execute the action(s) again.
  • a user may use a user interface to construct and manipulate a representation of an automation record, rather than editing information within the automation record itself. This may allow conflict component 112 to prevent conflicts in the execution of the automation records being edited in the “live” versions of the automated records. Further, conflict component 112 may validate the representations and prevent configuration errors before saving them to the system 100 .
  • conflict component 112 may be configured to analyze automation information as a user is specifying the automation information within a user interface (see, e.g., user interface component 114 ) and/or after the automation information has been specified and saved.
  • the user interface may be configured to present errors at a number of possible failure points as the user is interacting with the user interface in real-time and/or near-real time.
  • the possible failure points may include one or more of configuration failures, run time failures, cadence failures, container failures, editing failures, invalid permissions to an external resource, and/or other information.
  • the configuration failures may be related to if a user constructs a representation of an automation record that contains some sort of conflict and/or is invalid, conflict component 112 may validate that representation before saving or executing it, and notify the user contextually about the fixes that should be made in order to save and enable the automation record.
  • the run time failures may be related to determining that an automation record may be misconfigured when it attempts to execute the record.
  • the conflict component 112 may send notifications (e.g., email, on-screen notifications, and/or other notification) containing information about the configuration error, and/or how to resolve it.
  • notifications e.g., email, on-screen notifications, and/or other notification
  • a similar notification may also be sent by conflict component 112 if the execution fails due to some sort of system issue. In this case, the user may be notified that they do not need to take any action to resolve this failure.
  • the cadence failures may be related to when a trigger event may be misconfigured, the associated set of automated actions would never be executed because the trigger event may never be activated.
  • the conflict component 112 may be configured to run checks on a regular cadence of the automation records within the system 100 . This cadence check may iterate through the triggers and/or actions on individual automation records, and notify an appropriate user.
  • the container failures may be related to when a user visits a container object (e.g., project, portfolio, etc.).
  • the conflict component 112 may present the user with pertinent status information about automation records associated with the container object, allowing them to fix any problems that may have arisen even without having seen any of the relevant notifications in other areas.
  • the editing failures may be related to editing an automation record with invalid components.
  • a user may be directed through the user interface towards the specific components and/or associated inputs that may be causing an automation record to be invalid. This guided process may allow users to easily address and fix those issues so an automation record may resume operation.
  • the conflict component 112 may be configured to generate conflict reports based on the analysis.
  • a conflict report may include a description of one or more conflicts and/or an indication of nonexistence of conflicts.
  • a conflict report may provide an indication of elements of an automated action and/or trigger event which may comprise a source of conflict.
  • conflict component 112 may be configured to rate limit automated actions of one or more automation records. Rate limiting may include canceling and/or throttling execution of one or more automated actions based on one or more conditions.
  • rate limiting may include canceling and/or throttling execution of one or more automated actions based on one or more conditions.
  • conflict component 112 may be configured to cancel one or more executions in that Y-second window.
  • the values of X and/or Y may be user specified and/or specified by the system 100 .
  • conflict component 112 may be configured to cancel one or more executions in that B-second window.
  • the values of A and/or B may be user specified and/or specified by the system 100 .
  • User interface component 114 may be configured to effectuate presentation of individual user interfaces on individual client computing platforms of one or more client computing platforms 104 .
  • the individual client computing platforms may access a user interface over network 116 .
  • a given user interface may be configured to facilitate user specification of sets of automated actions and/or trigger events.
  • user interface component 114 may be configured to prevent presentation of individual user interfaces configured to facilitate user specification (and/or modification) of sets of automated actions and/or trigger events by users who may not be authorized within system 100 .
  • the user interface component 114 may be configured to effectuate presentation of a user interface through which users may specify and/or select one or more of one or more automated actions, one or more trigger events, one or more automation templates, and/or other information.
  • a user interface may display one or more conflict reports and/or other prompts and/or notifications to a user.
  • users may provide entry and/or selection of a period of time or times when an automation record may be active (e.g., configured to be executed) and/or paused (e.g., configured to not be executed).
  • a user interface element may comprise an “active/paused” toggle button.
  • the user interface may include one or more user interface portions.
  • a user interface may include one or more input portions and/or other components.
  • Individual portions may include one or more user interface elements configured to facilitate user interaction with the user interface.
  • user interface elements may include one or more of text input fields, drop down menus, check boxes, display windows, virtual buttons, and/or other elements configured to facilitate user interaction.
  • An input portion of a user interface may be configured to obtain user input comprising one or more of user entry and/or selection of environment parameters to carry out actions on, entry and/or selection of values to apply to the entered and/or selected environment parameters, entry and/or selection of environment parameters associated with trigger events, entry and/or selection of values of environment parameters associated with trigger events, user entry and/or selection of one or more automation templates, entry and/or selection of external resource(s) to carry out actions on, entry and/or selection of action(s) within selected external resource(s) to carry out, entry and/or selection of external resource(s) associated with trigger events, entry and/or selection of occurrence(s) within external resource(s) which may comprise trigger events, and/or other information.
  • the user interface in response to entry and/or selection of an external resource (for either an action and/or trigger), may present a prompt confirming the use of the external resource. This may be a safeguard against inadvertently carrying out actions on items outside the collaboration environment. A user may confirm and/or deny the prompt, via, for example, selecting a virtual button and/or an authentication procedure.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates an exemplary user interface 400 , in accordance with one or more implementations.
  • the user interface 400 may be configured to obtain user entry and/or selection of automation information and/or other information.
  • the user entry and/or selection may be in the form of specification of automated actions, trigger events, and/or other information.
  • automated actions may be specified based on entry and/or selection of one or more of individual external resources, individual actions for the individual external resources to carry out, and/or other information.
  • trigger events may be specified based on one or more of entry and/or selection of environment parameters associated with trigger events, entry and/or selection of values of environment parameters associated with trigger events, and/or other information.
  • automated actions may be specified based on entry and/or selection of environment parameters to carry out actions on, entry and/or selection of values to apply to the entered and/or selected environment parameters, and/or other information.
  • trigger events may be specified based on one or more of entry and/or selection one or more of individual external resources from which trigger events may be derived, individual actions by the individual external resources from which occurrence of the trigger events may be derived, and/or other information.
  • the user interface 400 may include a trigger input portion 404 to obtain entry and/or selection of a trigger event.
  • the trigger input portion 404 may include a user interface element 408 configured to obtain information identifying a unit of work associated with the trigger event, a user interface element 410 configured to obtain entry and/or selection of an environment parameter associated with the trigger event, and a user interface element 412 configured to obtain entry and/or selection of a value for the environment parameter associated with the trigger event.
  • the trigger event in FIG. 4 may refer to the status of the task named “Task1” being “marked complete.”
  • the user interface 400 may include an automated action input portion 414 to obtain entry and/or selection of a set of automated actions.
  • the automated action input portion 414 may include a user interface element 420 configured to obtain entry and/or selection of an identification of an external resource (e.g., a name of an external application of the external resource).
  • an external resource e.g., a name of an external application of the external resource.
  • the external resource may be identified as “MyCalendar” which may be an external calendar application.
  • the automated action input portion 414 may include user interface element 424 configured to obtain entry and/or selection of an action to carry out in the identified external resource.
  • the action to carry out may include “Set a reminder.”
  • the automated action input portion 414 may include a user interface element 428 configured to obtain entry and/or selection of a further specification of the action to carry out in the identified external resource.
  • the further specification may include setting the content of the reminder to “Follow up.”
  • FIG. 4 is for illustrative purposes only and is not to be considered limiting. Instead, it is to be understood that the user interface 400 may be configured in other ways and/or including other elements in accordance with one or more implementations of the system 100 presented herein.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates a user interface 500 , in accordance with one or more implementations.
  • the user interface 500 may include one or more user interface elements configured to facilitate user interaction with the user interface 500 .
  • the user interaction may include input to select one or more automation templates.
  • the user interface 500 may include a first user interface element 502 , a second user interface element 506 , and/or other user interface elements.
  • the first user interface element 502 may be selected to effectuate a first template 504 .
  • the second user interface element 506 may be selected to effectuate a second template 508 .
  • FIG. 5 is for illustrative purposes only and is not to be considered limiting. Instead, it is to be understood that the user interface 500 may be configured in other ways and/or including other elements in accordance with one or more implementations of the system 100 presented herein.
  • server(s) 102 , client computing platform(s) 104 , and/or external resource(s) 126 may be operatively linked via one or more electronic communication links.
  • electronic communication links may be established, at least in part, via a network 116 such as the Internet and/or other networks. It will be appreciated that this is not intended to be limiting, and that the scope of this disclosure includes implementations in which server(s) 102 , client computing platform(s) 104 , and/or external resource(s) 126 may be operatively linked via some other communication media.
  • a given client computing platform may include one or more processors configured to execute computer program components.
  • the computer program components may be configured to enable an expert or user associated with the given client computing platform to interface with system 100 and/or external resources 126 , and/or provide other functionality attributed herein to client computing platform(s) 104 .
  • the given client computing platform 104 may include one or more of a desktop computer, a laptop computer, a handheld computer, a tablet computing platform, a NetBook, a Smartphone, a gaming console, and/or other computing platforms.
  • External resource(s) 126 may include sources of information outside of system 100 , external entities participating with system 100 , and/or other resources. In some implementations, some or all of the functionality attributed herein to external resource(s) 126 may be provided by resources included in system 100 .
  • Server(s) 102 may include electronic storage 128 , one or more processors 130 , and/or other components. Server(s) 102 may include communication lines, or ports to enable the exchange of information with a network 116 and/or other computing platforms. Illustration of server(s) 102 in FIG. 1 is not intended to be limiting. Server(s) 102 may include a plurality of hardware, software, and/or firmware components operating together to provide the functionality attributed herein to server(s) 102 . For example, server(s) 102 may be implemented by a cloud of computing platforms operating together as server(s) 102 .
  • Electronic storage 128 may comprise non-transitory storage media that electronically stores information.
  • the electronic storage media of electronic storage 128 may include one or both of system storage that is provided integrally (i.e., substantially non-removable) with server(s) 102 and/or removable storage that is removably connected to server(s) 102 via, for example, a port (e.g., a USB port, a firewire port, etc.) or a drive (e.g., a disk drive, etc.).
  • a port e.g., a USB port, a firewire port, etc.
  • a drive e.g., a disk drive, etc.
  • Electronic storage 128 may include one or more of optically readable storage media (e.g., optical disks, etc.), magnetically readable storage media (e.g., magnetic tape, magnetic hard drive, floppy drive, etc.), electrical charge-based storage media (e.g., EEPROM, RAM, etc.), solid-state storage media (e.g., flash drive, etc.), and/or other electronically readable storage media.
  • Electronic storage 128 may include one or more virtual storage resources (e.g., cloud storage, a virtual private network, and/or other virtual storage resources).
  • Electronic storage 128 may store software algorithms, information determined by processor(s) 130 , information received from server(s) 102 , information received from client computing platform(s) 104 , and/or other information that enables server(s) 102 to function as described herein.
  • Processor(s) 130 may be configured to provide information processing capabilities in server(s) 102 .
  • processor(s) 130 may include one or more of a digital processor, an analog processor, a digital circuit designed to process information, an analog circuit designed to process information, a state machine, and/or other mechanisms for electronically processing information.
  • processor(s) 130 is shown in FIG. 1 as a single entity, this is for illustrative purposes only.
  • processor(s) 130 may include a plurality of processing units. These processing units may be physically located within the same device, or processor(s) 130 may represent processing functionality of a plurality of devices operating in coordination.
  • Processor(s) 130 may be configured to execute components 108 , 110 , 112 , 114 , and/or other components.
  • Processor(s) 130 may be configured to execute components 108 , 110 , 112 , and/or 114 , and/or other components by software; hardware; firmware; some combination of software, hardware, and/or firmware; and/or other mechanisms for configuring processing capabilities on processor(s) 130 .
  • the term “component” may refer to any component or set of components that perform the functionality attributed to the component. This may include one or more physical processors during execution of processor readable instructions, the processor readable instructions, circuitry, hardware, storage media, or any other components.
  • components 108 , 110 , 112 , and/or 114 are illustrated in FIG. 1 as being implemented within a single processing unit, in implementations in which processor(s) 130 includes multiple processing units, one or more of components 108 , 110 , 112 , and/or 114 may be implemented remotely from the other components.
  • the description of the functionality provided by the different components 108 , 110 , 112 , and/or 114 described below is for illustrative purposes, and is not intended to be limiting, as any of components 108 , 110 , 112 , and/or 114 may provide more or less functionality than is described.
  • processor(s) 130 may be configured to execute one or more additional components that may perform some or all of the functionality attributed below to one of components 108 , 110 , 112 , and/or 114 .
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a method 200 to effectuate sets of automated actions outside a collaboration environment based on trigger events occurring within the collaboration environment, in accordance with one or more implementations.
  • the operations of method 200 presented below are intended to be illustrative. In some implementations, method 200 may be accomplished with one or more additional operations not described, and/or without one or more of the operations discussed. Additionally, the order in which the operations of method 200 are illustrated in FIG. 2 and described below is not intended to be limiting.
  • method 200 may be implemented in one or more processing devices (e.g., a digital processor, an analog processor, a digital circuit designed to process information, an analog circuit designed to process information, a state machine, and/or other mechanisms for electronically processing information).
  • the one or more processing devices may include one or more devices executing some or all of the operations of method 200 in response to instructions stored electronically on an electronic storage medium.
  • the one or more processing devices may include one or more devices configured through hardware, firmware, and/or software to be specifically designed for execution of one or more of the operations of method 200 .
  • An operation 202 may manage environment state information maintaining a collaboration environment.
  • the collaboration environment may be configured to facilitate interaction by users with the collaboration environment.
  • the environment state information may specify values of environment parameters and/or other information.
  • the environment parameters may include one or more of user parameters, work unit parameters, and/or other parameters.
  • the values of the user parameters may describe one or more of the users, user actions of the users within the collaboration environment, user settings of the users, and/or other information about the users.
  • the values of work unit parameters may describe units of work managed, created, and/or assigned within the collaboration environment, and/or other information about units of work.
  • Operation 202 may be performed by one or more hardware processors configured by machine-readable instructions including a component that is the same as or similar to environment state component 108 , in accordance with one or more implementations.
  • An operation 204 may generate automation information and/or other information.
  • the automation information may be generated based on user entry and/or selection of the automation information into a user interface.
  • the automation information may specify sets of automated actions to carry out outside of the collaboration environment in response to occurrence of trigger events within the collaboration environment.
  • the user entry and/or selection of the automation information may include entry and/or selection of one or more of individual automated actions in individual sets of automated actions, individual trigger events, and/or other information.
  • the automation information may specify a first set of automated actions to carry out outside of the collaboration environment in response to a first trigger event occurring within the collaboration environment.
  • the first set of automated actions and/or the first trigger event may be generated based on input by a first user into a user interface.
  • Operation 204 may be performed by one or more hardware processors configured by machine-readable instructions including a component that is the same as or similar to automation component 110 , in accordance with one or more implementations.
  • An operation 206 may detect occurrence of the trigger events within the collaboration.
  • the occurrence of the trigger events within the collaboration may be based on changes in the values of the environment parameters and/or other events occurring within the collaboration environment.
  • an occurrence of the first trigger event may be detected based on a first change in a first value of a first environment parameter to a second value.
  • the first trigger event may be associated with the first change (e.g., a state change of the first environment parameter).
  • the first trigger event may be associated with the second value (e.g., a data change of the first environment parameter).
  • Operation 206 may be performed by one or more hardware processors configured by machine-readable instructions including a component that is the same as or similar to automation component 110 , in accordance with one or more implementations.
  • An operation 208 may effectuate individual sets of automated actions outside the collaboration environment.
  • the effectuation of the individual sets of automated actions outside the collaboration environment may be responsive to the detection of the occurrence of individual trigger events within the collaboration environment.
  • the first set of automated actions may be effectuated outside the collaboration environment.
  • Operation 208 may be performed by one or more hardware processors configured by machine-readable instructions including a component that is the same as or similar to automation component 110 , in accordance with one or more implementations.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates a method 300 to effectuate sets of automated actions within a collaboration environment based on trigger events occurring outside the collaboration environment, in accordance with one or more implementations.
  • the operations of method 300 presented below are intended to be illustrative. In some implementations, method 300 may be accomplished with one or more additional operations not described, and/or without one or more of the operations discussed. Additionally, the order in which the operations of method 300 are illustrated in FIG. 3 and described below is not intended to be limiting.
  • method 300 may be implemented in one or more processing devices (e.g., a digital processor, an analog processor, a digital circuit designed to process information, an analog circuit designed to process information, a state machine, and/or other mechanisms for electronically processing information).
  • the one or more processing devices may include one or more devices executing some or all of the operations of method 300 in response to instructions stored electronically on an electronic storage medium.
  • the one or more processing devices may include one or more devices configured through hardware, firmware, and/or software to be specifically designed for execution of one or more of the operations of method 300 .
  • An operation 302 may manage environment state information maintaining a collaboration environment.
  • the collaboration environment may be configured to facilitate interaction by users with the collaboration environment.
  • the environment state information may specify values of environment parameters and/or other information.
  • the environment parameters may include one or more of user parameters, work unit parameters, and/or other parameters.
  • the values of the user parameters may describe one or more of the users, user actions of the users within the collaboration environment, user settings of the users, and/or other information about the users.
  • the values of work unit parameters may describe units of work managed, created, and/or assigned within the collaboration environment, and/or other information about units of work.
  • Operation 302 may be performed by one or more hardware processors configured by machine-readable instructions including a component that is the same as or similar to environment state component 108 , in accordance with one or more implementations.
  • An operation 304 may generate automation information and/or other information.
  • the automation information may be generated based on user entry and/or selection of the automation information into a user interface.
  • the automation information may specify sets of automated actions to carry out within of the collaboration environment in response to occurrence of trigger events outside the collaboration environment.
  • the user entry and/or selection of the automation information may include entry and/or selection of one or more of individual automated actions in individual sets of automated actions, individual trigger events, and/or other information.
  • the automation information may specify a first set of automated actions to carry out within of the collaboration environment in response to a first trigger event occurring outside the collaboration environment.
  • the first set of automated actions and/or the first trigger event may be generated based on input by a first user into a user interface.
  • Operation 304 may be performed by one or more hardware processors configured by machine-readable instructions including a component that is the same as or similar to automation component 110 , in accordance with one or more implementations.
  • An operation 306 may obtain information indicating occurrence of the trigger events outside the collaboration environment.
  • first information may be obtained.
  • the first information may indicate an occurrence of the first trigger event outside the collaboration environment.
  • Operation 306 may be performed by one or more hardware processors configured by machine-readable instructions including a component that is the same as or similar to automation component 110 , in accordance with one or more implementations.
  • An operation 308 may effectuate individual sets of automated actions within the collaboration environment.
  • the effectuation of the individual sets of automated actions outside the collaboration environment may be responsive to obtaining the information indicating the occurrence of the trigger events outside the collaboration environment.
  • the first set of automated actions may be effectuated within the collaboration environment.
  • Operation 308 may be performed by one or more hardware processors configured by machine-readable instructions including a component that is the same as or similar to automation component 110 , in accordance with one or more implementations.

Abstract

Systems and methods for effectuating sets of automated actions within and/or outside a collaboration environment based on trigger events occurring within and/or outside the collaboration environment are disclosed. Exemplary implementations may: manage environment state information maintaining a collaboration environment, the collaboration environment being configured to facilitate interaction by users with the collaboration environment, the environment state information including values of environment parameters; generate automation information based on user entry and/or selection of the automation information into a user interface, the automation information specifying sets of automated actions to carry out outside the collaboration environment in response to occurrence of trigger events occurring within the collaboration environment; detect occurrence of the trigger events based on changes in the values of the environment parameters; responsive to the detection of the occurrence of individual trigger events, effectuate individual sets of automated actions outside the collaboration environment; and/or perform other operations.

Description

    FIELD OF THE DISCLOSURE
  • The present disclosure relates to systems and methods to effectuate sets of automated actions outside and/or within a collaboration environment based on trigger events occurring outside and/or within the collaboration environment.
  • BACKGROUND
  • Collaboration environments, sometimes referred to as integrated collaboration environments, may enable users to assign projects, tasks, or other assignments to assignees (e.g., other users) to complete. A collaboration environment may comprise an environment in which a virtual team of users does its work. A collaboration environment may enable users to work in a more organized and efficient manner. A collaboration environment may integrate features and/or functionality such as web-based conferencing and collaboration, desktop videoconferencing, and/or instant message into a single easy-to-use, intuitive interface.
  • SUMMARY
  • One aspect of the present disclosure relates to a system configured to effectuate sets of automated actions outside a collaboration environment based on trigger events occurring within the collaboration environment. Another aspect of the present disclosure relates to a system configured to effectuate sets of automated actions within a collaboration environment based on trigger events occurring outside the collaboration environment. Yet another aspect of the present disclosure relates to a system configured to effectuate sets of automated actions outside a collaboration environment based on trigger events occurring outside the collaboration environment.
  • Collaboration environments may require users to manually interact within the collaboration environment and/or applications/services outside of the collaboration environment in response to actions of other users and/or other events occurring within the collaboration environment. The responsive interactions outside the collaboration environment may include, for example, calendaring events into a personal calendar application, drafted and/or sending emails, sending personal messages over a messaging application and/or service separate from the collaboration environment, effectuating electronic payments, and/or other interactions. Over time, the users may tend to follow patterns with how they react to certain events and/or actions within the collaboration environment. This may create a negative experience for users who may tire of the potentially repetitive work. Requiring such repetitive manual interaction may increase friction within and/or outside of the collaboration environment. One or more implementations of the systems and methods presented herein may create less friction and/or more efficient use of the collaboration environment and one or more applications and/or services outside the collaboration environment by effectuating automatic sequences of actions outside the collaboration environment in response to trigger events occurring within the collaboration environment, and vice versa. The automated actions and/or trigger events may be user specified.
  • One or more implementations of a system configured to effectuate sets of automated actions outside a collaboration environment based on trigger events occurring within the collaboration environment may include one or more hardware processors configured by machine-readable instructions. The processor(s) may be configured to manage environment state information maintaining a collaboration environment. Managing may include one or more of obtaining, sending, receiving, storing, updating, deleting, archiving, reporting, and/or other processes. The collaboration environment may be configured to facilitate interaction by users with the collaboration environment. The environment state information may specify values of environment parameters and/or other information. The environment parameters may include one or more of user parameters, work unit parameters, and/or other parameters. The values of the user parameters may describe one or more of the users, user actions of the users within the collaboration environment, user settings of the users, and/or other information about the users. The values of work unit parameters may describe units of work managed, created, and/or assigned within the collaboration environment, and/or other information about units of work.
  • The processor(s) may be configured to generate automation information and/or other information. The automation information may be generated based on user entry and/or selection of the automation information into a user interface. The automation information may specify sets of automated actions to carry out outside of the collaboration environment in response to occurrence of trigger events within the collaboration environment. The user entry and/or selection of the automation information may include entry and/or selection of one or more of individual automated actions in individual sets of automated actions, individual trigger events, and/or other information. By way of non-limiting illustration, the automation information may specify a first set of automated actions to carry out outside of the collaboration environment in response to a first trigger event occurring within the collaboration environment.
  • The processor(s) may be configured to detect occurrence of the trigger events within the collaboration environment. The occurrence of the trigger events may be based on changes in the values of the environment parameters and/or other events occurring within the collaboration environment. By way of non-limiting illustration, an occurrence of the first trigger event may be detected based on a first change in a first value of a first environment parameter to a second value. In some implementations, the first trigger event may be associated with the first change (e.g., a state change of the first environment parameter). In some implementations, the first trigger event may be associated with the second value (e.g., a data change of the first environment parameter).
  • The processor(s) may be configured to effectuate individual sets of automated actions outside the collaboration environment. The effectuation of the individual sets of automated actions may be responsive to the detection of the occurrence of individual trigger events. By way of non-limiting illustration, responsive to the detection of the first trigger event, the first set of automated actions may be effectuated outside the collaboration environment.
  • One or more implementations of the system effectuate sets of automated actions within a collaboration environment based on trigger events occurring outside the collaboration environment may include one or more hardware processors configured by machine-readable instructions. The processor(s) may be configured to manage environment state information maintaining a collaboration environment. The collaboration environment may be configured to facilitate interaction by users within the collaboration environment. The environment state information may specify values of environment parameters and/or other information. The environment parameters may include one or more of user parameters, work unit parameters, and/or other parameters. The values of the user parameters may describe one or more of the users, user actions of the users within the collaboration environment, user settings of the users, and/or other information about the users. The values of work unit parameters may describe units of work managed, created, and/or assigned within the collaboration environment, and/or other information about units of work.
  • The processor(s) may be configured to generate automation information and/or other information. The automation information may be generated based on user entry and/or selection of the automation information into a user interface. The automation information may specify sets of automated actions to carry out within the collaboration environment in response to occurrence of trigger events outside the collaboration environment. The user entry and/or selection of the automation information may include entry and/or selection of one or more of individual automated actions in individual sets of automated actions, individual trigger events, and/or other information. By way of non-limiting illustration, the automation information may specify a first set of automated actions to carry out within the collaboration environment in response to a first trigger event occurring outside the collaboration environment.
  • The processor(s) may be configured to obtain information indicating occurrence of the trigger events outside the collaboration environment. By way of non-limiting illustration, first information may be obtaining indicating an occurrence of the first trigger event outside the collaboration environment.
  • The processor(s) may be configured to effectuate individual sets of automated actions within the collaboration environment. The effectuation of the individual sets of automated actions may be responsive to obtaining the information indicating the occurrence of the trigger events outside the collaboration environment. By way of non-limiting illustration, responsive to obtaining the information indicating the occurrence of the first trigger event outside the collaboration environment, the processor(s) may be configured to effectuate the first set of automated actions within the collaboration environment.
  • As used herein, any association (or relation, or reflection, or indication, or correspondence) involving servers, processors, client computing platforms, and/or another entity or object that interacts with any part of the system and/or plays a part in the operation of the system, may be a one-to-one association, a one-to-many association, a many-to-one association, and/or a many-to-many association or N-to-M association (note that N and M may be different numbers greater than 1).
  • As used herein, the term “obtain” (and derivatives thereof) may include active and/or passive retrieval, determination, derivation, transfer, upload, download, submission, and/or exchange of information, and/or any combination thereof. As used herein, the term “effectuate” (and derivatives thereof) may include active and/or passive causation of any effect. As used herein, the term “determine” (and derivatives thereof) may include measure, calculate, compute, estimate, approximate, generate, and/or otherwise derive, and/or any combination thereof.
  • These and other features, and characteristics of the present technology, as well as the methods of operation and functions of the related elements of structure and the combination of parts and economies of manufacture, will become more apparent upon consideration of the following description and the appended claims with reference to the accompanying drawings, all of which form a part of this specification, wherein like reference numerals designate corresponding parts in the various figures. It is to be expressly understood, however, that the drawings are for the purpose of illustration and description only and are not intended as a definition of the limits of the invention. As used in the specification and in the claims, the singular form of “a”, “an”, and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a system configured to effectuate sets of automated actions outside and/or within a collaboration environment based on trigger events occurring outside and/or within the collaboration environment, in accordance with one or more implementations.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a method to effectuate sets of automated actions outside a collaboration environment based on trigger events occurring within the collaboration environment, in accordance with one or more implementations.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates a method to effectuate sets of automated actions within a collaboration environment based on trigger events occurring outside the collaboration environment, in accordance with one or more implementations
  • FIG. 4 illustrates an exemplary user interface, in accordance with one or more implementations.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates an exemplary user interface, in accordance with one or more implementations.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a system 100 configured to effectuate sets of automated actions within and/or outside a collaboration environment based on trigger events occurring within and/or outside the collaboration environment, in accordance with one or more implementations. In some implementations, system 100 may be configured to effectuate sets of automated actions outside a collaboration environment based on trigger events occurring within the collaboration environment. In some implementations, system 100 may be configured to effectuate sets of automated actions within a collaboration environment based on trigger events occurring outside the collaboration environment.
  • One or more implementations of the systems and methods presented herein may create less friction and/or more efficient use of the collaboration environment and/or other applications/services by users by effectuating automatic sequences of actions in response to trigger events. The actions and/or triggers may be user specified. In some implementations, automated actions may be carried out outside the collaboration environment in response to trigger events within the collaboration environment. In some implementations, automated actions may be carried out within the collaboration environment in response to trigger events occurring outside the collaboration environment. In some implementations, automated actions may be carried out outside the collaboration environment in response to trigger events occurring outside the collaboration environment. Individual external resources of one or more external resources 126 may be sources of triggers and/or targets of automated actions. In some implementations, system 100 may be configured to communicate with one or more external resources 126 such that individual external resources may communicate reports indicating the occurrence of trigger events by the individual external resources.
  • In some implementations, system 100 may include one or more of one or more servers 102, one or more client computing platforms 104, one or more external resources 126, and/or other components. Server(s) 102 may be configured to communicate with one or more client computing platforms 104 and/or one or more external resources 126 according to a client/server architecture and/or other architectures. Client computing platform(s) 104 may be configured to communicate with other client computing platforms via server(s) 102 and/or according to a peer-to-peer architecture and/or other architectures. Users may access system 100 via client computing platform(s) 104.
  • In some implementations, individual external resources of one or more external resources 126 may include individual applications providing one or more services outside of system 100. An application may include one or more of a calendar application, a payment application, an electronic communication application, a social media application, restaurant-reservation application, on-demand delivery application, a project management application, a customer relationship management application, a ticketing application, a partner relationship management application, a web form application, and/or other applications outside of the system providing one or more services. It is noted that this list of applications providing one or more services outside of system 100 is provided for illustrative purposes only and not to be considered limiting. Instead, it is to be understood that other applications providing one or more services outside of system 100 may be considered which are within the scope of the present disclosure. In some implementations, external resources and/or other considerations of applications providing one or more services outside of system 100 may be considered as such by virtue of otherwise being unaffiliated with system 100. In some implementations, external resources and/or other considerations of applications providing one or more services outside of system 100 may be considered as such by virtue of utilizing other servers, processors, and/or other components which may be separate and distinct from system 100. In some implementations, external resources and/or other considerations of applications providing one or more services outside of system 100 may be considered as such by virtue of being created and/or administered by entities that may be separate and distinct from creators and/or administers of system 100.
  • A calendar application may comprise a software application configured to provide users with an electronic version of a calendar. The calendar application may provide an appointment book, address book, contact list, and/or other features and/or functionality. In some implementations, a calendar application may provide functionality of setting calendar events, setting reminders, and/or other functionality.
  • A payment application may comprise an e-commerce payment application, electronic payment application, peer-to-peer payments application, an electronic wallet application, and/or other applications that facilitate the sending and/or receiving of electronic payments and/or other online transactions.
  • An electronic communication application may comprise an application for providing electronic communication services. Electronic communication services may include one or more of electronic mail, instant messaging, private messaging, and/or other communications. An electronic communication application may provide functionality of one or more of compiling, sending, receiving, archiving, deleting, and/or performing other actions with respect to electronic communications.
  • A social media application may comprise an application configured to facilitate the creation and/or sharing of information via virtual communities and/or networks. A social media application may provide functionality of compiling, posting, reviewing, deleting, searching, and/or performing other actions with respect to information created and/or shared via virtual communities and/or networks.
  • A restaurant-reservation application may include an application configured to set and/or request reservations and restaurants in response to web-based requests for reservations. The restaurant-reservation application may be specific to a given restaurant and/or an application that services many restaurants. A restaurant-reservation application may provide the functionality of searching restaurants, searching availability of reservations, communicating with restaurants, setting reservations, sending confirmations, and/or other features and/or functionality.
  • An on-demand delivery application may comprise an application configured to effectuate real-world deliveries of real-world goods and/or services in response to web-based requests for those goods and/or services. The on-demand delivery application may be associated with what may commonly be referred to as a “gig economy” application. By way of non-limiting illustration, an on-demand delivery application may be directed to food delivery, consumer items, and/or other goods and/or services.
  • A project management application may comprise an application configured to facilitate planning, organizing, and/or otherwise managing resources. A project management application may provide functionality of estimation and planning, scheduling, cost control and budget management, resource allocation, communication, decision-making, quality management, time management and documentation, administration systems, and/or other functionality.
  • Server(s) 102 may include one or more of non-transitory electronic storage 128, one or more processors 130 configured by machine-readable instructions 106, and/or other components. Machine-readable instructions 106 may include one or more instruction components. The instruction components may include computer program components. Executing the machine-readable instructions 106 may cause server(s) 102 to facilitate effectuating sets of automated actions outside a collaboration environment based on trigger events occurring within the collaboration environment and/or effectuating sets of automated actions within a collaboration environment based on trigger events occurring outside the collaboration environment. The instruction components may include one or more of an environment state component 108, an automation component 110, a conflict component 112, a user interface component 114, and/or other instruction components.
  • Environment state component 108 may be configured to manage environment state information and/or other information used in maintaining a collaboration environment. The environment state information may include values of one or more environment parameters. The environment parameters may include one or more of user parameters, work unit parameters, and/or other parameters. The values of the user parameters may specify user information and/or other information. The values of the work unit parameters may specify work information and/or other information.
  • The values of the user parameters may be organized in user records corresponding to users interacting with and/or viewing the collaboration environment. The values of the user parameters associated with the users interacting with and/or viewing the collaboration environment may include information describing the users, user actions of the users within the collaboration environment, their settings, and/or other user information; and/or metadata associated with the users, their actions within the environment, their settings, and/or other user information. Individual ones of the users may be associated with individual ones of the user records. A user record may define values of the user parameters associated with a given user interacting with and/or viewing the collaboration environment.
  • The values of the user parameters may, by way of non-limiting example, specify one or more of: a user name, a group parameter, a user account, a user role, a user department, descriptive user content, a to-email, a from-email, a photo, an organization, a workspace, one or more projects (which may include project parameters defined by one or more work unit records), one or more portfolios of projects, one or more items of work (which may include one or more unit of work parameters defined by one or more unit of work records), one or more user comments, one or more teams the user belongs to, one or more of the user display settings (e.g., colors, size, project order, task order, other unit of work order, etc.), one or more authorized applications, one or more interaction parameters (e.g., indicating a user is working on/worked on a given unit of work, a given user viewed a given work unit of work, a given user selected a given unit of work, a timeframe a given user last interacted with and/or worked on a given unit of work, a time period that a given unit of work has been idle, and/or other interaction parameters), a presence parameter (e.g., indicating presence and/or interaction level at an environment level, unit of work level, project level, task level, application level, etc.), one or more notification settings, one or more progress parameters, status information for one or more work units the user is associated with (units of work assigned to the user, assigned to other users by the user, completed by the user, past-due date, and/or other information), application access information (e.g., username/password for one or more third-party applications), one or more favorites and/or priorities, one or more values of one or more workload parameters (e.g., one or more measures of current and future workload associated with units of work assigned to a user), and/or other information for the given user.
  • The values of the work unit parameters may be organized in work unit records corresponding to units of work managed, created, and/or assigned within the collaboration environment. A given work unit may have one or more assignees and/or team members working on the given work unit. Work units may include one or more to-do items, action items, objectives, and/or other units of work one or more users should accomplish and/or plan on accomplishing. Units of work may be created by a given user for the given user and/or created by the given user and assigned to one or more other users. A given unit of work may include one or more of a project, a task, a sub-task, a conversation (e.g., a message posting within a message board and/or other considerations), and/or other unit of work assigned to and/or associated with one or more users. In some implementations, users may be identified based on one or more of specific user identification (e.g., by name, username, and/or other information), descriptive user information (e.g., role, department, availability, and/or other information), and/or other considerations.
  • By way of non-limiting illustration, the one or more work unit parameters may include one or more of a work assignment parameter, a work management parameter, work creation parameter, and/or other parameters. The values of the work assignment parameter may describe units of work assigned to the individual users. The values of the work management parameter may describe units of work managed by the individual users. The values of the work creation parameter may describe units of work created by the individual users.
  • In some implementations, the units of work may be described based on one or more of a unit of work name, a unit of work description, one or more unit of work dates (e.g., a start date, a due date, a completion date, and/or dates), one or more members associated with a unit of work (e.g., an owner, one or more other project/task members, member access information, and/or other unit of work members and/or member information), a status parameter (e.g., an update, a hardcoded status update, a completed/uncomplete/mark complete, a measured status, a progress indication, quantity of sub-work units remaining for a given unit of work, completed work units in a given project, and/or other status parameter), one or more user comment parameters (e.g., permission for who may comments such as a creator, a recipient, one or more followers, and/or one or more other interested parties; content of the comments; one or more times; presence or absence of the functionality of up-votes; one or more hard-coded responses; and/or other parameters), one or more interaction parameters (e.g., indicating a given unit of work is being worked on/was worked on, given work unit of work was viewed, a given unit of work was selected, how long the given unit of work has been idle, a last interaction parameter indicating when and what user last interacted with the given unit of work, users that interacted with the given unit of work, and/or other interaction parameters indicating sources of the interactions, context of the interactions, content of the interactions and/or time for the interactions), one or more file attachments, notification settings, privacy, an associated URL, one or more interaction parameters (e.g., sources of the interactions, context of the interactions, content of the interactions, time for the interactions, and/or other interaction parameters), updates, ordering of units of work within a given unit of work (e.g., tasks within a project, subtasks within a task, etc.), state of a workspace for a given unit of work (e.g., application state parameters, application status, application interactions, user information, and/or other parameters related to the state of the workspace for a unit of work), dependencies between one or more work units, one or more custom fields (e.g., priority, cost, stage, and/or other custom fields), and/or other values of work unit parameters.
  • The values of the work assignment parameter describing units of work assigned to the individual users may be determined based on one or more interactions by one or more users with a collaboration environment. In some implementations, one or more users may create and/or assign one or more unit of work to themselves and/or an other user. In some implementations, a user may be assigned a unit of work and the user may effectuate a reassignment of the unit of work from the user or one or more other users.
  • In some implementations, values of the work assignment parameter may indicate that a status parameter of a unit of work has changed from “incomplete” to “marked complete” and/or “complete”. In some implementations, a status of complete for a unit of work may be associated with the passing of an end date associated with the unit of work. In some implementations, a status of “marked complete” may be associated with a user providing input via the collaboration environment at the point in time the user completes the unit of work (which may be before or after an end date).
  • In some implementations, user actions within the collaboration environment may include effectuating one or more changes in one or more values of one or more of the environment parameters. User actions may be facilitated through a user interface presenting the collaboration environment. By way of non-limiting illustration, a user action may include marking a unit of work “complete.” Marking a unit of work complete may change a value of a work unit parameter for the unit of work from “incomplete” to “marked complete.” User actions may include other changes to other values of other environment parameters described herein.
  • The automation component 110 may be configured to generate automation information and/or other information. The automation information may be generated based on user entry and/or selection of the automation information into a user interface (see, e.g., user interface component 114, FIG. 4 , and/or FIG. 5 ). In some implementations, automation information may specify sets of automated actions to carry out outside the collaboration environment in response to occurrence of trigger events within the collaboration environment. In some implementations, automation information may specify sets of automated actions to carry out within the collaboration environment in response to occurrence of trigger events outside the collaboration environment. In some implementations, automation information may specify sets of automated actions to carry out outside the collaboration environment in response to occurrence of trigger events outside the collaboration environment.
  • The user entry and/or selection of the automation information may include entry and/or selection of one or more of individual automated actions in individual sets of automated actions, individual trigger events, and/or other information. By way of non-limiting illustration, the automation information may specify a first set of automated actions to carry out in response to a first trigger event. The first set of automated actions and/or the first trigger event may be generated based on input by a first user into a user interface. The first set of automated actions may include one or more automated actions to carry out outside the collaboration environment. The first trigger event may include an event occurring within the collaboration environment. By way of non-limiting illustration, the automation information may specify a second set of automated actions to carry out in response to a second trigger event. The second set of automated actions and/or the second trigger event may be generated based on input by a first user into a user interface. The second set of automated actions may include one or more automated actions to carry out within the collaboration environment. The second trigger event may include an event occurring outside the collaboration environment.
  • The automation component 110 may be configured to detect occurrence of the trigger events within the collaboration environment based on changes in the values of the environment parameters and/or other information. Detection may be based on monitoring environment state information, user actions, and/or other components of system 100. By way of non-limiting illustration, an occurrence of the first trigger event may be detected based on a first change in a first value of a first environment parameter to a second value.
  • The automation component 110 may be configured to obtain information indicating occurrence of trigger events outside the collaboration environment. In some implementations, information indicating occurrence of trigger events outside the collaboration environment may be obtained by virtue of individual external resources communicating the information to system 100. The communicated information may include status reports and/or other information. In some implementations, the communication of the information may be based on automation component 110 sending requests for the information. In some implementations, the communication of the information may be based on individual external resources performing scheduled and/or predetermined reporting protocols (e.g., push notifications and/or other protocols). By way of non-limiting illustration, automation component 110 may be configured to obtain first information indicating an occurrence the second trigger event outside the collaboration environment.
  • In some implementations, an individual automated action within the collaboration environment may include effectuating one or more of creation of, change in, and/or specification of, one or more values of one or more of the environment parameters. In some implementations, the creation of, change in, and/or specification of values of environment parameters may be accomplished by accessing a corresponding record (e.g., user record, work unit record, and/or other records). In some implementations, creation of, change in, and/or specification of an individual value may be reflected in views of the collaboration environment accessed by users.
  • In some implementations, individual automated actions within the collaboration environment may be classified by individual action types. An action type may dictate the extent in which an automation action effects the collaboration environment. An action type may include one or more of a record creation type, value specification type, and/or other types. A record creation type automated action may include creating one or more of a user record, work unit record, and/or other records. The creation of a record may include generating an instance of the record in the collaboration environment. The creation of the record by a record creation type automated action may not specifically define values of the environment parameters within the record and/or may set values to one or more of default values, null values, and/or other values. A value specification type automated action may include changing, and/or specifying, one or more values of one or more of the environment parameters contained within a record.
  • In some implementations, value specification type automated action may further be classified by one or more action subtypes based on the individual values of the individual environment parameters associated with the individual automated actions. An action subtype may include one or more of a time-based subtype, privacy and/or permissions subtype, accessibility subtype, interaction subtype, and/or other subtype.
  • An automated action of the time-based subtype may effectuate change in, and/or specification of, one or more values of one or more of the environment parameters related to time. For a work unit record, this may include one or more unit of work dates (e.g., a start date, a due date, a completion date, and/or dates). For a user record, this may include one or more of a start of employment date, an end of employment date, a length of employment period, a length of vacation period, and/or other information.
  • An automated action of the privacy and/or permissions subtype may correspond to values of environment parameters related to privacy and/or permissions. By way of non-limiting illustration, an automated action performed on a user record being of the privacy and/or permissions subtype may include change of, and/or specification of, one or more of one or more teams a user belongs to, one or more user display settings (e.g., colors, size, project order, task order, other unit of work order, etc.), one or more authorized applications, application access information (e.g., username/password for one or more third-party applications), one or more favorites and/or priorities, and/or other information for the user. By way of non-limiting illustration, an automated action performed on a work unit record being of the privacy and/or permissions subtype may include change of, and/or specification of, one or more of one or more user comment parameters (e.g., permission for who may comments such as a creator, a recipient, one or more followers, and/or one or more other interested parties; content of the comments; one or more times; presence or absence of the functionality of up-votes; one or more hard-coded responses; and/or other parameters), notification settings, privacy settings, dependencies between one or more work units, and/or other values.
  • An automated action of the accessibility subtype may correspond to values of environment parameters which may be required in a record (user and/or work unit) in order for the record to take effect within the collaboration environment. Values of environment parameters which may be required in a record in order for the record to take effect may refer to values that, if left undefined, would not provide any meaningful use within the collaboration environment. In other words, the values of environment parameters which may be required in a record in order for the record to take effect may refer to a minimum quantity of environment parameters which may need to be specified in order to allow users to interact with and/or access the record. By way of non-limiting illustration, an automated action performed on a user record being of the accessibility subtype may include change of, and/or specification of, one or more of a user name, a user account, a user role, a user department, descriptive user content, a to-email, a from-email, a photo, an organization, and/or other values. By way of non-limiting illustration, an automated action performed on a work unit record being of the accessibility subtype may include change of, and/or specification of, one or more of a unit of work description, one or more members associated with a unit of work (e.g., an owner, one or more other project/task members, member access information, one or more assignees, and/or other information), an associated URL, and/or other values.
  • An automated action of the interaction subtype may correspond to values of environment parameters which may be specified in a record (user and/or work unit) in order to provide further functionality and/or accessibility within the collaboration environment. Values of environment parameters which may be specified in a record (user and/or work unit) in order to provide further functionality and/or accessibility may refer to values other than those associated with the time-based subtype, privacy and/or permissions subtype, accessibility subtype, and/or other subtypes.
  • It is noted that the classification of automated actions into action types and/or subtypes, and/or the descriptions of the different actions types and/or subtypes are provided for illustrative purposes only. Instead, it is to be understood that action types and/or subtype may be described in other ways, and/or automated actions may be classified in other ways.
  • In some implementations, an individual automated action may be carried out simultaneously (or near simultaneously) with an individual detection of an individual occurrence of an individual trigger event and/or within a specified time frame following an individual detection of an individual occurrence of an individual trigger event. In some implementations, a specified time frame may include a “waiting” period of time before an action is carried out. In some implementations, the waiting period of time may be satisfied by one or more of the passage of the period of time, some other trigger event, and/or other events and/or actions within the collaboration environment.
  • In some implementations, individual trigger events may be specified as individual occurrences of change of the values of the environment parameters. Occurrences of change may convey a state change of an environment parameter. The state change may not consider what the change is, but instead that a change occurred. For example, a trigger event may include an occurrence of a reassignment of a unit of work from one user to an other user. By way of non-limiting illustration, the first trigger event may be associated with the first change.
  • In some implementations, individual trigger events may be specified as individual values of the environment parameters. Changes to specific values may be referred to as data state changes. The data state change may refer to a change of a parameter to a specific value from an other value (and/or from a state of being unspecified). For example, a trigger event may include an occurrence of a reassignment of a unit of work from one user to another specific user. For example, a trigger event may include a comment having one or more specific words and/or phrases. By way of non-limiting illustration, the first trigger event may be associated with the second value and/or other values.
  • In some implementations, a set of automated actions may be associated with one or more of a sequence in which automated actions in the set are to be carried out, concurrent carrying out of two or more of the automated actions in the set, and/or other features and/or functionality. The automated actions within a set of automated actions may have a specified ordered sequence in which the automated actions are to be carried out. In some implementations, one or more actions may be followed by, and/or preceded by, a specified waiting period. A set of automation actions may specify that two or more actions may be carried out concurrently. In some implementations, a user may specify a combination and/or sequence of multiple triggers and/or multiple automated actions as a multi-step “workflow” that may include branching logic. By way of non-limiting illustration, a chain of trigger/action pairs of a given sequence may result in facilitating a workflow.
  • The automation component 110 may be configured to, responsive to the detection of the occurrence of individual trigger events, effectuate individual sets of automated actions outside the collaboration environment. By way of non-limiting illustration, responsive to the detection of the first trigger event, automation component 110 may be configured to effectuate the first set of automated actions outside the collaboration environment.
  • In some implementations, effectuating individual sets of automated actions outside the collaboration environment may include communicating instructions to effectuate the action to an external resource outside the collaboration environment. In some implementations, effectuating individual sets of automated actions outside the collaboration environment may include performing an application programming interface (API) call and/or other interaction with the external resource to cause the external resource to execute one or more routines in accordance with the instructions. An API interaction may include one or more of Remote Procedure Call, Representational State Transfer, GraphQL, and/or other interaction.
  • The automation component 110 may be configured to, responsive to obtaining the information indicating the occurrence of the trigger events outside the collaboration environment, effectuate individual sets of automated actions within the collaboration environment. By way of non-limiting illustration, responsive to obtaining the first information indicating occurrence of the second trigger event, automation component 110 may be configured to effectuate the second set of automated actions within the collaboration environment.
  • In some implementations, individual sets of automated actions and associated individual trigger events may be stored in individual automation records. An automation record may define one or more of individual actions, individual trigger events, and/or other information. Individual actions may be defined by a target component, an action component, and/or other information. The target component of an automation record may include the environment parameter (or parameters) to which an action is to be carried out on and/or an external resource to which the action is to be carried out with. The action component of an automation record may define what change is to be made on the environment parameter(s) and/or instructions to effectuate the action by the external resource defined by the target component.
  • Individual trigger events may be defined by a source component, an event component, and/or other information. The source component of an automation record may include the environment parameter(s) and/or external resource(s) from which occurrences of a trigger event may be derived. The event component may include the value (or change in the value) for the environment parameter(s) and/or the information indicating occurrence of an event within the external resource defined by the source component from which occurrences of a trigger event may be derived.
  • In some implementations, individual automation records may store counts of occurrences of individual trigger events and/or occurrences of carrying out individual automation actions in the sets of automation actions.
  • It is noted that while some descriptions presented herein may be directed to an individual trigger event causing an individual set of automated actions to be carried out, this is for illustrative purposes only and not to be considered limiting. For example, in some implementations, multiple trigger events may be combined together through some logic criteria, that when satisfied, may cause an individual set of automated actions to be carried out within and/or outside the collaboration environment. Logic may include, for example, Boolean logic. By way of non-limiting illustration, logic operators such as “AND”, “OR”, “NOT”, and/or other operations may be utilized to generate more complex trigger combinations for sets of automated actions. In some implementations, the use of logic operators may allow for fewer discrete trigger events to be defined yet still have more complex behavior available to users. For example, there may not need to specify a trigger event of “when task is unassigned”, since through the use of a logic operator “NOT”, a trigger event may be defined by “when task assigned” combined with the operator “NOT”. Further, the Boolean logic may facilitate multistage automation. By way of non-limiting illustration, instead of input “than-if-then” or “if-and-if-then”, logic may include “if-then-then” and/or other operators. In some implementations, a user may specify a set, or pool, of trigger events to trigger one or more automated actions. In some implementations, user may specify that one or more of the trigger events in the set may individually and/or in combination trigger the one or more automated actions. This way, a user may specify multiple options of trigger events which may trigger one or more automated actions. Further, an individual trigger event may trigger multiple automated actions.
  • The automation component 110 may be configured to determine individual sets of repeated user actions by the individual users. The determination may be based on monitoring environment state information (e.g., change in values of environment parameters and/or other monitoring), user actions, information indicating occurrence of the trigger events outside the collaboration environment, and/or other information generated by and/or accessible to system 100. In some implementations, determining individual sets of repeated user actions by the individual users may include determining one or more actions and/or events occurring within and/or outside the collaboration environment which precede the individual sets of repeated user actions. In some implementations, a set of user actions may be deemed “repeated” after the set of user actions occur more than once.
  • The automation component 110 may be configured to generate recommendations for automation information based on individual sets of repeated user actions and/or other information. The recommendations may include individual recommended sets of automated actions and/or individual recommended trigger events which correspond to the individual sets of repeated user actions. In some implementations, recommended trigger events may include the actions and/or events occurring within and/or outside the collaboration environment which precede the individual sets of repeated user actions. In some implementations, individual recommended sets of automated actions may include the individual sets of repeated user actions. In some implementations, a recommendation may include a notification (e.g., pop-up message, email, and/or other notification) describing one or more of the individual sets of repeated user actions, the individual recommended sets of automated actions, the individual recommended trigger events, and/or other information. By way of non-limiting illustration, a set of repeated user actions for a given user may include generating a specific task, assigning the specific task to a specific person (or persons), adding a comment to the task, causing an external application of an external resource to perform some action, and/or other actions. The automation component 110 may determine that the set of repeated user actions for the given user is preceded by an other specific task being marked completed. The automation component 100 may be configured to generate a recommendation for automation information including a set of recommended automated actions including generating the specific task, assigning the specific task to the specific person (or persons), adding a comment to the task, generating and/or sending instructions to effectuate the action by the external application, and/or other actions. The automation component 110 may be configured such that the recommendation includes a recommended trigger event including the other specific task being “marked complete.”
  • In some implementations, automation component 110 may be configured to obtain and/or generate one or more automation templates. An automation template may specify a predetermined set of automated actions to carry out in and/or outside the collaboration environment in response to occurrence of a predetermined trigger event. The one or more automation templates may be stored by electronic storage 128 and/or other storage device. In some implementations, an automation template may represent sets of actions users may commonly carry out in response to an action and/or occurrence within and/or outside the collaboration environment. In some implementations, automation templates may be created by system administrators, other users, based on repeated user actions, and/or created in other ways. In some implementations, the automation templates may be stored in a library for access and/or implementation by individual users.
  • The conflict component 112 may be configured to analyze automation information to identify conflicts within the sets of automated actions and/or the trigger events. In some implementations, analyzing automation information may include simulating execution of the automation information in a testing environment to determine a potential outcome of the automation information. In some implementations, conflicts may include one or more of repeating and/or ongoing automated actions (e.g., where a set of automated actions may not have a finite end), an instance when an individual automated action comprises an individual trigger event (e.g., resulting in a looping of trigger-action-trigger-action, etc.), and/or other conflicts.
  • In some implementations, analyzing automation information may further include only allowing the execution of automated actions after a triggering event if the state specified in the actions are not already true. If they are already true, conflict component 112 may recognize this as a conflict and not execute the action(s) again.
  • In some implementations, a user may use a user interface to construct and manipulate a representation of an automation record, rather than editing information within the automation record itself. This may allow conflict component 112 to prevent conflicts in the execution of the automation records being edited in the “live” versions of the automated records. Further, conflict component 112 may validate the representations and prevent configuration errors before saving them to the system 100.
  • In some implementations, conflict component 112 may be configured to analyze automation information as a user is specifying the automation information within a user interface (see, e.g., user interface component 114) and/or after the automation information has been specified and saved. The user interface may be configured to present errors at a number of possible failure points as the user is interacting with the user interface in real-time and/or near-real time. The possible failure points may include one or more of configuration failures, run time failures, cadence failures, container failures, editing failures, invalid permissions to an external resource, and/or other information.
  • The configuration failures may be related to if a user constructs a representation of an automation record that contains some sort of conflict and/or is invalid, conflict component 112 may validate that representation before saving or executing it, and notify the user contextually about the fixes that should be made in order to save and enable the automation record.
  • The run time failures may be related to determining that an automation record may be misconfigured when it attempts to execute the record. The conflict component 112 may send notifications (e.g., email, on-screen notifications, and/or other notification) containing information about the configuration error, and/or how to resolve it. A similar notification may also be sent by conflict component 112 if the execution fails due to some sort of system issue. In this case, the user may be notified that they do not need to take any action to resolve this failure.
  • The cadence failures may be related to when a trigger event may be misconfigured, the associated set of automated actions would never be executed because the trigger event may never be activated. To prevent this silent failure, the conflict component 112 may be configured to run checks on a regular cadence of the automation records within the system 100. This cadence check may iterate through the triggers and/or actions on individual automation records, and notify an appropriate user.
  • The container failures may be related to when a user visits a container object (e.g., project, portfolio, etc.). The conflict component 112 may present the user with pertinent status information about automation records associated with the container object, allowing them to fix any problems that may have arisen even without having seen any of the relevant notifications in other areas.
  • The editing failures may be related to editing an automation record with invalid components. A user may be directed through the user interface towards the specific components and/or associated inputs that may be causing an automation record to be invalid. This guided process may allow users to easily address and fix those issues so an automation record may resume operation.
  • The conflict component 112 may be configured to generate conflict reports based on the analysis. In some implementations, a conflict report may include a description of one or more conflicts and/or an indication of nonexistence of conflicts. In some implementations, a conflict report may provide an indication of elements of an automated action and/or trigger event which may comprise a source of conflict.
  • In some implementations, conflict component 112 may be configured to rate limit automated actions of one or more automation records. Rate limiting may include canceling and/or throttling execution of one or more automated actions based on one or more conditions. By way of non-limiting illustration, if one or more automated actions are triggered to execute more than X times in Y seconds, conflict component 112 may be configured to cancel one or more executions in that Y-second window. The values of X and/or Y may be user specified and/or specified by the system 100. In some implementations, if one or more automated actions at a project level are executed more than A times in B seconds, conflict component 112 may be configured to cancel one or more executions in that B-second window. The values of A and/or B may be user specified and/or specified by the system 100.
  • User interface component 114 may be configured to effectuate presentation of individual user interfaces on individual client computing platforms of one or more client computing platforms 104. For example, the individual client computing platforms may access a user interface over network 116. A given user interface may be configured to facilitate user specification of sets of automated actions and/or trigger events. In some implementations, user interface component 114 may be configured to prevent presentation of individual user interfaces configured to facilitate user specification (and/or modification) of sets of automated actions and/or trigger events by users who may not be authorized within system 100.
  • The user interface component 114 may be configured to effectuate presentation of a user interface through which users may specify and/or select one or more of one or more automated actions, one or more trigger events, one or more automation templates, and/or other information. In some implementations, a user interface may display one or more conflict reports and/or other prompts and/or notifications to a user. In some implementations, users may provide entry and/or selection of a period of time or times when an automation record may be active (e.g., configured to be executed) and/or paused (e.g., configured to not be executed). By way of non-limiting illustration, a user interface element may comprise an “active/paused” toggle button.
  • The user interface may include one or more user interface portions. By way of non-limiting illustration, a user interface may include one or more input portions and/or other components. Individual portions may include one or more user interface elements configured to facilitate user interaction with the user interface. By way of non-limiting illustration, user interface elements may include one or more of text input fields, drop down menus, check boxes, display windows, virtual buttons, and/or other elements configured to facilitate user interaction.
  • An input portion of a user interface may be configured to obtain user input comprising one or more of user entry and/or selection of environment parameters to carry out actions on, entry and/or selection of values to apply to the entered and/or selected environment parameters, entry and/or selection of environment parameters associated with trigger events, entry and/or selection of values of environment parameters associated with trigger events, user entry and/or selection of one or more automation templates, entry and/or selection of external resource(s) to carry out actions on, entry and/or selection of action(s) within selected external resource(s) to carry out, entry and/or selection of external resource(s) associated with trigger events, entry and/or selection of occurrence(s) within external resource(s) which may comprise trigger events, and/or other information. In some implementations, in response to entry and/or selection of an external resource (for either an action and/or trigger), the user interface may present a prompt confirming the use of the external resource. This may be a safeguard against inadvertently carrying out actions on items outside the collaboration environment. A user may confirm and/or deny the prompt, via, for example, selecting a virtual button and/or an authentication procedure.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates an exemplary user interface 400, in accordance with one or more implementations. The user interface 400 may be configured to obtain user entry and/or selection of automation information and/or other information. The user entry and/or selection may be in the form of specification of automated actions, trigger events, and/or other information.
  • In some implementations, automated actions may be specified based on entry and/or selection of one or more of individual external resources, individual actions for the individual external resources to carry out, and/or other information. In some implementations, trigger events may be specified based on one or more of entry and/or selection of environment parameters associated with trigger events, entry and/or selection of values of environment parameters associated with trigger events, and/or other information.
  • In some implementations, automated actions may be specified based on entry and/or selection of environment parameters to carry out actions on, entry and/or selection of values to apply to the entered and/or selected environment parameters, and/or other information. In some implementations, trigger events may be specified based on one or more of entry and/or selection one or more of individual external resources from which trigger events may be derived, individual actions by the individual external resources from which occurrence of the trigger events may be derived, and/or other information.
  • The user interface 400 may include a trigger input portion 404 to obtain entry and/or selection of a trigger event. The trigger input portion 404 may include a user interface element 408 configured to obtain information identifying a unit of work associated with the trigger event, a user interface element 410 configured to obtain entry and/or selection of an environment parameter associated with the trigger event, and a user interface element 412 configured to obtain entry and/or selection of a value for the environment parameter associated with the trigger event. For illustrative purposes, the trigger event in FIG. 4 may refer to the status of the task named “Task1” being “marked complete.”
  • The user interface 400 may include an automated action input portion 414 to obtain entry and/or selection of a set of automated actions. The automated action input portion 414 may include a user interface element 420 configured to obtain entry and/or selection of an identification of an external resource (e.g., a name of an external application of the external resource). For illustrative purposes, the external resource may be identified as “MyCalendar” which may be an external calendar application.
  • The automated action input portion 414 may include user interface element 424 configured to obtain entry and/or selection of an action to carry out in the identified external resource. For illustrative purposes, the action to carry out may include “Set a reminder.”
  • The automated action input portion 414 may include a user interface element 428 configured to obtain entry and/or selection of a further specification of the action to carry out in the identified external resource. For illustrative purposes, the further specification may include setting the content of the reminder to “Follow up.”
  • It is noted that FIG. 4 is for illustrative purposes only and is not to be considered limiting. Instead, it is to be understood that the user interface 400 may be configured in other ways and/or including other elements in accordance with one or more implementations of the system 100 presented herein.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates a user interface 500, in accordance with one or more implementations. The user interface 500 may include one or more user interface elements configured to facilitate user interaction with the user interface 500. The user interaction may include input to select one or more automation templates. By way of non-limiting illustration, the user interface 500 may include a first user interface element 502, a second user interface element 506, and/or other user interface elements. The first user interface element 502 may be selected to effectuate a first template 504. The second user interface element 506 may be selected to effectuate a second template 508.
  • It is noted that FIG. 5 is for illustrative purposes only and is not to be considered limiting. Instead, it is to be understood that the user interface 500 may be configured in other ways and/or including other elements in accordance with one or more implementations of the system 100 presented herein.
  • In FIG. 1 , in some implementations, server(s) 102, client computing platform(s) 104, and/or external resource(s) 126 may be operatively linked via one or more electronic communication links. For example, such electronic communication links may be established, at least in part, via a network 116 such as the Internet and/or other networks. It will be appreciated that this is not intended to be limiting, and that the scope of this disclosure includes implementations in which server(s) 102, client computing platform(s) 104, and/or external resource(s) 126 may be operatively linked via some other communication media.
  • A given client computing platform may include one or more processors configured to execute computer program components. The computer program components may be configured to enable an expert or user associated with the given client computing platform to interface with system 100 and/or external resources 126, and/or provide other functionality attributed herein to client computing platform(s) 104. By way of non-limiting example, the given client computing platform 104 may include one or more of a desktop computer, a laptop computer, a handheld computer, a tablet computing platform, a NetBook, a Smartphone, a gaming console, and/or other computing platforms.
  • External resource(s) 126 may include sources of information outside of system 100, external entities participating with system 100, and/or other resources. In some implementations, some or all of the functionality attributed herein to external resource(s) 126 may be provided by resources included in system 100.
  • Server(s) 102 may include electronic storage 128, one or more processors 130, and/or other components. Server(s) 102 may include communication lines, or ports to enable the exchange of information with a network 116 and/or other computing platforms. Illustration of server(s) 102 in FIG. 1 is not intended to be limiting. Server(s) 102 may include a plurality of hardware, software, and/or firmware components operating together to provide the functionality attributed herein to server(s) 102. For example, server(s) 102 may be implemented by a cloud of computing platforms operating together as server(s) 102.
  • Electronic storage 128 may comprise non-transitory storage media that electronically stores information. The electronic storage media of electronic storage 128 may include one or both of system storage that is provided integrally (i.e., substantially non-removable) with server(s) 102 and/or removable storage that is removably connected to server(s) 102 via, for example, a port (e.g., a USB port, a firewire port, etc.) or a drive (e.g., a disk drive, etc.). Electronic storage 128 may include one or more of optically readable storage media (e.g., optical disks, etc.), magnetically readable storage media (e.g., magnetic tape, magnetic hard drive, floppy drive, etc.), electrical charge-based storage media (e.g., EEPROM, RAM, etc.), solid-state storage media (e.g., flash drive, etc.), and/or other electronically readable storage media. Electronic storage 128 may include one or more virtual storage resources (e.g., cloud storage, a virtual private network, and/or other virtual storage resources). Electronic storage 128 may store software algorithms, information determined by processor(s) 130, information received from server(s) 102, information received from client computing platform(s) 104, and/or other information that enables server(s) 102 to function as described herein.
  • Processor(s) 130 may be configured to provide information processing capabilities in server(s) 102. As such, processor(s) 130 may include one or more of a digital processor, an analog processor, a digital circuit designed to process information, an analog circuit designed to process information, a state machine, and/or other mechanisms for electronically processing information. Although processor(s) 130 is shown in FIG. 1 as a single entity, this is for illustrative purposes only. In some implementations, processor(s) 130 may include a plurality of processing units. These processing units may be physically located within the same device, or processor(s) 130 may represent processing functionality of a plurality of devices operating in coordination. Processor(s) 130 may be configured to execute components 108, 110, 112, 114, and/or other components. Processor(s) 130 may be configured to execute components 108, 110, 112, and/or 114, and/or other components by software; hardware; firmware; some combination of software, hardware, and/or firmware; and/or other mechanisms for configuring processing capabilities on processor(s) 130. As used herein, the term “component” may refer to any component or set of components that perform the functionality attributed to the component. This may include one or more physical processors during execution of processor readable instructions, the processor readable instructions, circuitry, hardware, storage media, or any other components.
  • It should be appreciated that although components 108, 110, 112, and/or 114 are illustrated in FIG. 1 as being implemented within a single processing unit, in implementations in which processor(s) 130 includes multiple processing units, one or more of components 108, 110, 112, and/or 114 may be implemented remotely from the other components. The description of the functionality provided by the different components 108, 110, 112, and/or 114 described below is for illustrative purposes, and is not intended to be limiting, as any of components 108, 110, 112, and/or 114 may provide more or less functionality than is described. For example, one or more of components 108, 110, 112, and/or 114 may be eliminated, and some or all of its functionality may be provided by other ones of components 108, 110, 112, and/or 114. As another example, processor(s) 130 may be configured to execute one or more additional components that may perform some or all of the functionality attributed below to one of components 108, 110, 112, and/or 114.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a method 200 to effectuate sets of automated actions outside a collaboration environment based on trigger events occurring within the collaboration environment, in accordance with one or more implementations. The operations of method 200 presented below are intended to be illustrative. In some implementations, method 200 may be accomplished with one or more additional operations not described, and/or without one or more of the operations discussed. Additionally, the order in which the operations of method 200 are illustrated in FIG. 2 and described below is not intended to be limiting.
  • In some implementations, method 200 may be implemented in one or more processing devices (e.g., a digital processor, an analog processor, a digital circuit designed to process information, an analog circuit designed to process information, a state machine, and/or other mechanisms for electronically processing information). The one or more processing devices may include one or more devices executing some or all of the operations of method 200 in response to instructions stored electronically on an electronic storage medium. The one or more processing devices may include one or more devices configured through hardware, firmware, and/or software to be specifically designed for execution of one or more of the operations of method 200.
  • An operation 202 may manage environment state information maintaining a collaboration environment. The collaboration environment may be configured to facilitate interaction by users with the collaboration environment. The environment state information may specify values of environment parameters and/or other information. The environment parameters may include one or more of user parameters, work unit parameters, and/or other parameters. The values of the user parameters may describe one or more of the users, user actions of the users within the collaboration environment, user settings of the users, and/or other information about the users. The values of work unit parameters may describe units of work managed, created, and/or assigned within the collaboration environment, and/or other information about units of work. Operation 202 may be performed by one or more hardware processors configured by machine-readable instructions including a component that is the same as or similar to environment state component 108, in accordance with one or more implementations.
  • An operation 204 may generate automation information and/or other information. The automation information may be generated based on user entry and/or selection of the automation information into a user interface. The automation information may specify sets of automated actions to carry out outside of the collaboration environment in response to occurrence of trigger events within the collaboration environment. The user entry and/or selection of the automation information may include entry and/or selection of one or more of individual automated actions in individual sets of automated actions, individual trigger events, and/or other information. By way of non-limiting illustration, the automation information may specify a first set of automated actions to carry out outside of the collaboration environment in response to a first trigger event occurring within the collaboration environment. The first set of automated actions and/or the first trigger event may be generated based on input by a first user into a user interface. Operation 204 may be performed by one or more hardware processors configured by machine-readable instructions including a component that is the same as or similar to automation component 110, in accordance with one or more implementations.
  • An operation 206 may detect occurrence of the trigger events within the collaboration. The occurrence of the trigger events within the collaboration may be based on changes in the values of the environment parameters and/or other events occurring within the collaboration environment. By way of non-limiting illustration, an occurrence of the first trigger event may be detected based on a first change in a first value of a first environment parameter to a second value. In some implementations, the first trigger event may be associated with the first change (e.g., a state change of the first environment parameter). In some implementations, the first trigger event may be associated with the second value (e.g., a data change of the first environment parameter). Operation 206 may be performed by one or more hardware processors configured by machine-readable instructions including a component that is the same as or similar to automation component 110, in accordance with one or more implementations.
  • An operation 208 may effectuate individual sets of automated actions outside the collaboration environment. The effectuation of the individual sets of automated actions outside the collaboration environment may be responsive to the detection of the occurrence of individual trigger events within the collaboration environment. By way of non-limiting illustration, responsive to the detection of the first trigger event, the first set of automated actions may be effectuated outside the collaboration environment. Operation 208 may be performed by one or more hardware processors configured by machine-readable instructions including a component that is the same as or similar to automation component 110, in accordance with one or more implementations.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates a method 300 to effectuate sets of automated actions within a collaboration environment based on trigger events occurring outside the collaboration environment, in accordance with one or more implementations. The operations of method 300 presented below are intended to be illustrative. In some implementations, method 300 may be accomplished with one or more additional operations not described, and/or without one or more of the operations discussed. Additionally, the order in which the operations of method 300 are illustrated in FIG. 3 and described below is not intended to be limiting.
  • In some implementations, method 300 may be implemented in one or more processing devices (e.g., a digital processor, an analog processor, a digital circuit designed to process information, an analog circuit designed to process information, a state machine, and/or other mechanisms for electronically processing information). The one or more processing devices may include one or more devices executing some or all of the operations of method 300 in response to instructions stored electronically on an electronic storage medium. The one or more processing devices may include one or more devices configured through hardware, firmware, and/or software to be specifically designed for execution of one or more of the operations of method 300.
  • An operation 302 may manage environment state information maintaining a collaboration environment. The collaboration environment may be configured to facilitate interaction by users with the collaboration environment. The environment state information may specify values of environment parameters and/or other information. The environment parameters may include one or more of user parameters, work unit parameters, and/or other parameters. The values of the user parameters may describe one or more of the users, user actions of the users within the collaboration environment, user settings of the users, and/or other information about the users. The values of work unit parameters may describe units of work managed, created, and/or assigned within the collaboration environment, and/or other information about units of work. Operation 302 may be performed by one or more hardware processors configured by machine-readable instructions including a component that is the same as or similar to environment state component 108, in accordance with one or more implementations.
  • An operation 304 may generate automation information and/or other information. The automation information may be generated based on user entry and/or selection of the automation information into a user interface. The automation information may specify sets of automated actions to carry out within of the collaboration environment in response to occurrence of trigger events outside the collaboration environment. The user entry and/or selection of the automation information may include entry and/or selection of one or more of individual automated actions in individual sets of automated actions, individual trigger events, and/or other information. By way of non-limiting illustration, the automation information may specify a first set of automated actions to carry out within of the collaboration environment in response to a first trigger event occurring outside the collaboration environment. The first set of automated actions and/or the first trigger event may be generated based on input by a first user into a user interface. Operation 304 may be performed by one or more hardware processors configured by machine-readable instructions including a component that is the same as or similar to automation component 110, in accordance with one or more implementations.
  • An operation 306 may obtain information indicating occurrence of the trigger events outside the collaboration environment. By way of non-limiting illustration, first information may be obtained. The first information may indicate an occurrence of the first trigger event outside the collaboration environment. Operation 306 may be performed by one or more hardware processors configured by machine-readable instructions including a component that is the same as or similar to automation component 110, in accordance with one or more implementations.
  • An operation 308 may effectuate individual sets of automated actions within the collaboration environment. The effectuation of the individual sets of automated actions outside the collaboration environment may be responsive to obtaining the information indicating the occurrence of the trigger events outside the collaboration environment. By way of non-limiting illustration, responsive to obtaining the information indicating the occurrence of the first trigger event outside the collaboration environment, the first set of automated actions may be effectuated within the collaboration environment. Operation 308 may be performed by one or more hardware processors configured by machine-readable instructions including a component that is the same as or similar to automation component 110, in accordance with one or more implementations.
  • Although the present technology has been described in detail for the purpose of illustration based on what is currently considered to be the most practical and preferred implementations, it is to be understood that such detail is solely for that purpose and that the technology is not limited to the disclosed implementations, but, on the contrary, is intended to cover modifications and equivalent arrangements that are within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. For example, it is to be understood that the present technology contemplates that, to the extent possible, one or more features of any implementation can be combined with one or more features of any other implementation.

Claims (20)

What is claimed is:
1. A system configured to effectuate automated actions outside a collaboration environment based on trigger events occurring within the collaboration environment, the system comprising:
one or more physical processors configured by machine-readable instructions to:
manage environment state information maintaining a collaboration environment, and automation information characterizing user-defined automations, the collaboration environment being configured to facilitate interaction by users with the collaboration environment, the environment state information including work unit records, the work unit records including work information describing units of work created and assigned within the collaboration environment, the units of work being described based on one or more actions that the users assigned to the units of work are expected to accomplish in order to mark the units of work as complete, the automation information specifying a first automated action to carry out by a payment application resource outside of the collaboration environment in response to a first trigger event occurring within the collaboration environment; and
responsive to detection of occurrence of the first trigger event:
establish a connection with the payment application resource that is managed outside of the collaboration environment; and
cause the payment application resource to perform the first automated action outside the collaboration environment, the first automated action including sending one or more electronic payments.
2. The system of claim 1, wherein the first automated action is defined by a target component and an action component, the target component identifying the payment application resource outside the collaboration environment to which an action is to be carried out with, and the action component defining instructions to effectuate the action by the payment application resource outside the collaboration environment.
3. The system of claim 2, wherein the instructions to effectuate the action by the payment application resource outside the collaboration environment includes performing an application programming interface call to the payment application resource to cause the payment application resource to execute a routine in accordance with the action.
4. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more physical processors are further configured by the machine-readable instructions to:
generate the automation information based on user entry or selection of the automation information into a user interface.
5. The system of claim 1, wherein the first trigger event is associated with individual occurrences of change to first work information of a first work unit record of a first unit of work, and wherein the one or more physical processors are further configured by the machine-readable instructions to:
detect the occurrence of the first trigger event based on occurrence of the change to the first work information.
6. The system of claim 1, wherein the first trigger event is associated with a specific change to first work information of a first work unit record of a first unit of work, and wherein the one or more physical processors are further configured by the machine-readable instructions to:
detect the occurrence of the first trigger event based on occurrence of the specific change to the first work information.
7. The system of claim 1, wherein the first automated action is carried out immediately or within a specified time frame following the detection of the occurrence of the first trigger event.
8. The system of claim 1, further comprising non-transitory electronic storage storing one or more automation templates, an automation template specifying a predetermined set of automated actions to carry out outside the collaboration environment in response to occurrence of a predetermined trigger event occurring within the collaboration environment.
9. The system of claim 1, wherein the first trigger event is a due date change to a first unit of work described by a first work unit record, and wherein the one or more physical processors are further configured by the machine-readable instructions to:
detect the occurrence of the first trigger event based on occurrence of the due date change.
10. The system of claim 1, wherein the first trigger event is a completion state change to a first unit of work described by a first work unit record, and wherein the one or more physical processors are further configured by the machine-readable instructions to:
detect the occurrence of the first trigger event based on occurrence of the completion state change.
11. A method to effectuate automated actions outside a collaboration environment based on trigger events occurring within the collaboration environment, the method comprising:
managing environment state information maintaining a collaboration environment, and automation information characterizing user-defined automations, the collaboration environment being configured to facilitate interaction by users with the collaboration environment, the environment state information including work unit records, the work unit records including work information describing units of work created and assigned within the collaboration environment, the units of work being described based on one or more actions that the users assigned to the units of work are expected to accomplish in order to mark the units of work as complete, the automation information specifying a first automated action to carry out by a payment application resource outside of the collaboration environment in response to a first trigger event occurring within the collaboration environment; and
responsive to detection of occurrence of the first trigger event:
establishing a connection with the payment application resource that is managed outside of the collaboration environment; and
causing the payment application resource to perform the first automated action outside the collaboration environment, the first automated action including sending one or more electronic payments.
12. The method of claim 11, wherein the first automated action is defined by a target component and an action component, the target component identifying the payment application resource outside the collaboration environment to which an action is to be carried out with, and the action component defining instructions to effectuate the action by the payment application resource outside the collaboration environment.
13. The method of claim 12, wherein the instructions to effectuate the action by the payment application resource outside the collaboration environment includes performing an application programming interface call to the payment application resource to cause the payment application resource to execute a routine in accordance with the action.
14. The method of claim 11, further comprising generating the automation information based on user entry or selection of the automation information into a user interface.
15. The method of claim 11, wherein the first trigger event is associated with individual occurrences of change to first work information of a first work unit record of a first unit of work, and wherein the method further comprises:
detecting the occurrence of the first trigger event based on occurrence of the change to the first work information.
16. The method of claim 11, wherein the first trigger event is associated with a specific change to first work information of a first work unit record of a first unit of work, and wherein the method further comprises:
detecting the occurrence of the first trigger event based on occurrence of the specific change to the first work information.
17. The method of claim 11, wherein the first automated action is carried out immediately or within a specified time frame following the detection of the occurrence of the first trigger event.
18. The method of claim 11, further comprising storing one or more automation templates, an automation template specifying a predetermined set of automated actions to carry out outside the collaboration environment in response to occurrence of a predetermined trigger event occurring within the collaboration environment.
19. The method of claim 11, wherein the first trigger event is a due date change to a first unit of work described by a first work unit record, and wherein the method further comprises:
detecting the occurrence of the first trigger event based on occurrence of the due date change.
20. The method of claim 11, wherein the first trigger event is a completion state change to a first unit of work described by a first work unit record, and wherein the method further comprises:
detecting the occurrence of the first trigger event based on occurrence of the completion state change.
US18/453,864 2020-02-11 2023-08-22 Systems and methods to effectuate sets of automated actions outside and/or within a collaboration environment based on trigger events occurring outside and/or within the collaboration environment Pending US20230394406A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US18/453,864 US20230394406A1 (en) 2020-02-11 2023-08-22 Systems and methods to effectuate sets of automated actions outside and/or within a collaboration environment based on trigger events occurring outside and/or within the collaboration environment

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US16/787,400 US11783253B1 (en) 2020-02-11 2020-02-11 Systems and methods to effectuate sets of automated actions outside and/or within a collaboration environment based on trigger events occurring outside and/or within the collaboration environment
US18/453,864 US20230394406A1 (en) 2020-02-11 2023-08-22 Systems and methods to effectuate sets of automated actions outside and/or within a collaboration environment based on trigger events occurring outside and/or within the collaboration environment

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US16/787,400 Continuation US11783253B1 (en) 2020-02-11 2020-02-11 Systems and methods to effectuate sets of automated actions outside and/or within a collaboration environment based on trigger events occurring outside and/or within the collaboration environment

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20230394406A1 true US20230394406A1 (en) 2023-12-07

Family

ID=88242373

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US16/787,400 Active 2040-03-24 US11783253B1 (en) 2020-02-11 2020-02-11 Systems and methods to effectuate sets of automated actions outside and/or within a collaboration environment based on trigger events occurring outside and/or within the collaboration environment
US18/453,864 Pending US20230394406A1 (en) 2020-02-11 2023-08-22 Systems and methods to effectuate sets of automated actions outside and/or within a collaboration environment based on trigger events occurring outside and/or within the collaboration environment

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US16/787,400 Active 2040-03-24 US11783253B1 (en) 2020-02-11 2020-02-11 Systems and methods to effectuate sets of automated actions outside and/or within a collaboration environment based on trigger events occurring outside and/or within the collaboration environment

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (2) US11783253B1 (en)

Family Cites Families (420)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5233687A (en) 1987-03-25 1993-08-03 Xerox Corporation User interface with multiple workspaces for sharing display system objects
EP0300456A3 (en) 1987-07-24 1990-08-08 Bruce H. Faaland Improved scheduling method and system
JPH05197573A (en) 1991-08-26 1993-08-06 Hewlett Packard Co <Hp> Task controlling system with task oriented paradigm
US5623404A (en) 1994-03-18 1997-04-22 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company System and method for producing schedules of resource requests having uncertain durations
WO1997041819A1 (en) 1996-05-02 1997-11-13 Les Laboratoires Asana Inc. Proprioceptive sole or pedal device containing crystals for treatment of statural disorders
EP0848334A4 (en) 1996-07-01 2007-08-29 Fujitsu Ltd Device and method of controlling intergroup resource utilization
US5721770A (en) 1996-07-02 1998-02-24 Lucent Technologies Inc. Agent vectoring programmably conditionally assigning agents to various tasks including tasks other than handling of waiting calls
GB2321322B (en) 1996-10-28 2001-10-10 Altera Corp Remote software technical support
US6256651B1 (en) 1997-06-20 2001-07-03 Raja Tuli Time management workflow software
US6292830B1 (en) 1997-08-08 2001-09-18 Iterations Llc System for optimizing interaction among agents acting on multiple levels
US6621505B1 (en) 1997-09-30 2003-09-16 Journee Software Corp. Dynamic process-based enterprise computing system and method
US7020697B1 (en) 1999-10-01 2006-03-28 Accenture Llp Architectures for netcentric computing systems
US7086062B1 (en) 1999-10-11 2006-08-01 I2 Technologies Us, Inc. System and method for handling a unit of work
US6629081B1 (en) 1999-12-22 2003-09-30 Accenture Llp Account settlement and financing in an e-commerce environment
US6922685B2 (en) 2000-05-22 2005-07-26 Mci, Inc. Method and system for managing partitioned data resources
US6850939B2 (en) 2000-11-30 2005-02-01 Projectvillage System and method for providing selective data access and workflow in a network environment
US20020082889A1 (en) 2000-12-20 2002-06-27 Electronic Data Systems Corporation System and method for project management and assessment
US20020143594A1 (en) 2000-12-23 2002-10-03 Atub, Inc. System, method and article of manufacture for alerting a manager of a critical outstanding task
US7159178B2 (en) 2001-02-20 2007-01-02 Communispace Corp. System for supporting a virtual community
US7330895B1 (en) 2001-03-15 2008-02-12 Microsoft Corporation Representation, decision models, and user interface for encoding managing preferences, and performing automated decision making about the timing and modalities of interpersonal communications
BR0209259B1 (en) 2001-04-30 2011-03-09 hub.
US7418482B1 (en) 2001-05-17 2008-08-26 Palmsource, Inc. Web-based task assistants for wireless personal devices
US7191140B2 (en) 2001-05-29 2007-03-13 Navitaire, Inc. Method and system for generating optimal solutions for open pairings through one-way fixes and matching transformations
US8108241B2 (en) 2001-07-11 2012-01-31 Shabina Shukoor System and method for promoting action on visualized changes to information
US7289966B2 (en) 2001-08-14 2007-10-30 Norman Ken Ouchi Method and system for adapting the execution of a workflow route
US7039904B2 (en) 2001-08-24 2006-05-02 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Frameworks for generation of Java macro instructions for storing values into local variables
US20030097410A1 (en) 2001-10-04 2003-05-22 Atkins R. Travis Methodology for enabling multi-party collaboration across a data network
US6859523B1 (en) 2001-11-14 2005-02-22 Qgenisys, Inc. Universal task management system, method and product for automatically managing remote workers, including assessing the work product and workers
US20030126001A1 (en) 2001-12-28 2003-07-03 Margo Northcutt Process for managing requests for work within an organization through a centralized workflow management system
US7039596B1 (en) 2002-01-18 2006-05-02 America Online, Inc. Calendar overlays
US6769013B2 (en) 2002-02-02 2004-07-27 E-Wings, Inc. Distributed system for interactive collaboration
US7917855B1 (en) 2002-04-01 2011-03-29 Symantec Operating Corporation Method and apparatus for configuring a user interface
WO2003085525A2 (en) 2002-04-02 2003-10-16 Collabo-Technology, Inc. Method and apparatus for synchronous project collaboration
US7395221B2 (en) 2002-05-09 2008-07-01 International Business Machines Corporation Intelligent free-time search
AU2003239385A1 (en) 2002-05-10 2003-11-11 Richard R. Reisman Method and apparatus for browsing using multiple coordinated device
US20030233268A1 (en) 2002-06-17 2003-12-18 Ehsan Taqbeem Multi-dimensional interdependency based project management
US20030233265A1 (en) 2002-06-17 2003-12-18 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system and program product for interactive electronic meeting scheduling
US8639650B1 (en) 2003-06-25 2014-01-28 Susan Pierpoint Gill Profile-responsive system for information exchange in human- and device-adaptive query-response networks for task and crowd management, distributed collaboration and data integration
US7350188B2 (en) 2002-07-31 2008-03-25 Sap Aktiengesellschaft Aggregation of private and shared workflows
US7805327B1 (en) 2002-07-31 2010-09-28 Sap Aktiengesellschaft Transformations between combined and individual workflows
US7653562B2 (en) 2002-07-31 2010-01-26 Sap Aktiengesellschaft Workflow management architecture
US20040030992A1 (en) 2002-08-06 2004-02-12 Trandafir Moisa System and method for management of a virtual enterprise
US20060167736A1 (en) 2002-10-01 2006-07-27 Weiss Paul F Schedule chart for project management
US7346526B2 (en) 2002-10-16 2008-03-18 Ita Software, Inc. System and method for entering flexible travel queries with layover description
TW200407735A (en) 2002-11-08 2004-05-16 Hon Hai Prec Ind Co Ltd System and method for controlling task assignment and work schedule of projects
US20040098291A1 (en) 2002-11-14 2004-05-20 International Business Machines Corporation Apparatus and method for visualizing resource consumption
US7676542B2 (en) 2002-12-02 2010-03-09 Sap Ag Establishing a collaboration environment
US7325198B2 (en) 2002-12-31 2008-01-29 Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. Calendar-based interfaces for browsing and manipulation of digital images
US20040230447A1 (en) 2003-03-14 2004-11-18 Sven Schwerin-Wenzel Collaborative workspaces
DE10315744B4 (en) 2003-04-04 2007-05-31 Sennheiser Electronic Gmbh & Co. Kg Microphone with RF transmitter
EP1639440A4 (en) 2003-04-25 2009-03-11 Apple Inc Graphical user interface for browsing, searching and presenting media items
US20030191681A1 (en) 2003-05-06 2003-10-09 Gallion Kirk P. Method for managing a business process related to a document publishing project
US8335705B2 (en) 2003-07-01 2012-12-18 Sap Ag Managing resources for projects
US20070041542A1 (en) 2003-07-14 2007-02-22 Schramm Steven D Connection management in communications systems
CN100584183C (en) 2003-07-18 2010-01-20 富士机械制造株式会社 Management apparatus
US20050137925A1 (en) 2003-10-23 2005-06-23 Lakritz Kenneth B. Resource scheduling and monitoring
WO2005071564A1 (en) 2004-01-21 2005-08-04 Rnc Global Projects A project management method and system
US7349920B1 (en) 2004-02-13 2008-03-25 Microsoft Corporation Simultaneous display of multiple calendar systems
JP4177280B2 (en) 2004-03-25 2008-11-05 東芝ソリューション株式会社 Planning work management support system and planning work management support program
US7370282B2 (en) 2004-04-06 2008-05-06 Cary James C Grouping and displaying multiple tasks within an event object of an electronic calendar
US7640511B1 (en) 2004-04-29 2009-12-29 Paul Erich Keel Methods and apparatus for managing and inferring relationships from information objects
US20060028917A1 (en) 2004-08-05 2006-02-09 International Business Machines Corp. Milestone bar calender
JP4239932B2 (en) 2004-08-27 2009-03-18 株式会社日立製作所 production management system
US7747966B2 (en) 2004-09-30 2010-06-29 Microsoft Corporation User interface for providing task management and calendar information
US20060085245A1 (en) 2004-10-19 2006-04-20 Filenet Corporation Team collaboration system with business process management and records management
US7519924B2 (en) 2004-11-03 2009-04-14 Research In Motion Limited Handheld electronic device including appointment and meeting conflict notification, and associated method
US8499300B2 (en) 2004-12-20 2013-07-30 Bank Of America Corporation System and method for task management of rule based tasks
US20070255674A1 (en) 2005-01-10 2007-11-01 Instant Information Inc. Methods and systems for enabling the collaborative management of information based upon user interest
US20080046471A1 (en) 2005-02-01 2008-02-21 Moore James F Calendar Synchronization using Syndicated Data
EP1913534A4 (en) 2005-02-11 2010-07-07 Volt Inf Sciences Inc Project work change in plan/scope administrative and business information synergy system and method
EP1703350B1 (en) 2005-03-17 2019-05-08 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Diagnostics of an automation system
US7406689B2 (en) 2005-03-22 2008-07-29 International Business Machines Corporation Jobstream planner considering network contention & resource availability
US20060224430A1 (en) 2005-04-05 2006-10-05 Cisco Technology, Inc. Agenda based meeting management system, interface and method
WO2006113717A2 (en) 2005-04-18 2006-10-26 Poulsen Jay H Project manager system and method
JP2007179351A (en) 2005-12-28 2007-07-12 Sony Corp File management device and image display device
EP2247067B1 (en) 2005-06-09 2016-05-11 Whirlpool Corporation Appliance with embedded virtual router
US8417782B2 (en) 2005-07-14 2013-04-09 Yahoo! Inc. Universal calendar event handling
US20070038494A1 (en) 2005-08-15 2007-02-15 Cognetics Corporation Team management system and method
US8103533B2 (en) 2005-08-26 2012-01-24 United Space Alliance, Llc Automated resource planning tool and user interface
JP2007094467A (en) 2005-09-27 2007-04-12 Hitachi Software Eng Co Ltd Progress management system
US8849908B2 (en) * 2005-10-13 2014-09-30 Kaydon A. Stanzione Internet based data, voice and video alert notification communications system
US7853467B2 (en) 2005-10-26 2010-12-14 At&T Intellectual Property Ii, L.P. Worklist integration of logical and physical tasks
US10157355B2 (en) 2005-11-15 2018-12-18 General Electric Company Method to view schedule interdependencies and provide proactive clinical process decision support in day view form
US20070143169A1 (en) 2005-12-21 2007-06-21 Grant Chad W Real-time workload information scheduling and tracking system and related methods
US20070245300A1 (en) 2006-03-22 2007-10-18 Benjamin Chan Apparatus, system, and method for presenting project scheduling information in combination with workflow information
US7590413B2 (en) 2006-04-03 2009-09-15 Research In Motion Limited Free busy calendar interface
US20070255715A1 (en) 2006-04-26 2007-11-01 Bayhub, Inc. Collaborative hub system for accessing and managing shared business content
US8886553B2 (en) 2006-05-02 2014-11-11 Microsoft Corporation Visual workflow process notation and layout
EP2076874A4 (en) 2006-05-13 2011-03-09 Sap Ag Consistent set of interfaces derived from a business object model
US9350560B2 (en) 2006-05-31 2016-05-24 International Business Machines Corporation Selective information sharing across team spaces
US20070288283A1 (en) 2006-06-09 2007-12-13 Devshop Inc. Method for project management
US20070294344A1 (en) 2006-06-14 2007-12-20 Aspect Software Automatic scheduling system
US20080126930A1 (en) 2006-06-28 2008-05-29 Research In Motion Limited Method and apparatus for dynamically varying one or more properties of a display element in response to variation in an associated characteristic
US20080005235A1 (en) 2006-06-30 2008-01-03 Microsoft Corporation Collaborative integrated development environment using presence information
US7890921B2 (en) 2006-07-31 2011-02-15 Lifecylce Technologies, Inc. Automated method for coherent project management
US8005705B2 (en) 2006-09-07 2011-08-23 International Business Machines Corporation Validating a baseline of a project
US7904324B2 (en) 2006-09-28 2011-03-08 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for assessing schedule performance issues of a project
US20080079730A1 (en) 2006-09-29 2008-04-03 Microsoft Corporation Character-level font linking
US20080189638A1 (en) 2006-10-16 2008-08-07 Invensys Systems, Inc. Bridging human machine interface technologies in a process automation and information management environment
US8522240B1 (en) 2006-10-19 2013-08-27 United Services Automobile Association (Usaa) Systems and methods for collaborative task management
US20100169802A1 (en) 2006-11-08 2010-07-01 Seth Goldstein Methods and Systems for Storing, Processing and Managing User Click-Stream Data
US20080155547A1 (en) 2006-12-22 2008-06-26 Yahoo! Inc. Transactional calendar
US7869941B2 (en) 2006-12-29 2011-01-11 Aol Inc. Meeting notification and modification service
KR100724141B1 (en) 2006-12-29 2007-05-31 주식회사 네오패드 Apparatus for Hangul output and method thereof
US20080221946A1 (en) 2007-01-05 2008-09-11 Robert Balon Method and system for evaluating and summarizing weekly project progress
US20080175104A1 (en) 2007-01-23 2008-07-24 Microsoft Corporation Flexible electronic calendar integrating tasks and appointments
US9213950B2 (en) 2007-02-09 2015-12-15 Anthony Keith Randell Method and system for managing a plurality of processes or tasks
US7996774B1 (en) 2007-02-28 2011-08-09 Emc Corporation Hierarchical display of project information in a collaboration environment
CA2681355A1 (en) 2007-03-20 2008-09-25 Tungle Corporation Method and apparatus for sharing calendar information
US20080268876A1 (en) 2007-04-24 2008-10-30 Natasha Gelfand Method, Device, Mobile Terminal, and Computer Program Product for a Point of Interest Based Scheme for Improving Mobile Visual Searching Functionalities
US20080270198A1 (en) 2007-04-25 2008-10-30 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Systems and Methods for Providing Remediation Recommendations
US20080270240A1 (en) 2007-04-30 2008-10-30 Viva Chu Systems and methods of managing tasks assigned to an individual
US7996744B2 (en) 2007-04-30 2011-08-09 Nokia Corporation Method and apparatus for providing a data retransmission scheme
US20080281665A1 (en) 2007-05-08 2008-11-13 Verizon Laboratories, Inc. Automated Calendar Concierge
US9230228B2 (en) 2007-06-12 2016-01-05 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for providing a bi-directional feedback loop between project management and personal calendar systems
US8006223B2 (en) 2007-06-13 2011-08-23 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for estimating project plans for packaged software applications
US9026409B2 (en) 2007-08-06 2015-05-05 Design Ready Controls, Inc. Systems, methods, and software for automated design and manufacturing of HVAC control panels
US7865384B2 (en) 2007-08-17 2011-01-04 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for identifying and reducing costs of information technology actions in real time
US8095472B2 (en) 2007-08-20 2012-01-10 Sap Ag Business object acting as a logically central source for collaboration on objectives
US9953282B2 (en) 2007-09-04 2018-04-24 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for providing automatic task assignment and notification
US20090076878A1 (en) 2007-09-19 2009-03-19 Matthias Woerner Efficient project staffing
US8645182B2 (en) 2007-10-02 2014-02-04 International Business Machines Corporation Integrated calendar and task scheduler
US8146104B2 (en) 2007-10-09 2012-03-27 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for programmatically generating to-do list and creating notification between calendar and other applications
US8185827B2 (en) 2007-10-26 2012-05-22 International Business Machines Corporation Role tailored portal solution integrating near real-time metrics, business logic, online collaboration, and web 2.0 content
US20100145801A1 (en) 2007-11-01 2010-06-10 Jagannadha Raju Chekuri Methods and systems for a time-aware or calendar-aware facilitator to improve utilization of time-sensitive or perishable resources
US20090133027A1 (en) 2007-11-21 2009-05-21 Gunning Mark B Systems and Methods for Project Management Task Prioritization
US20090167553A1 (en) 2007-12-30 2009-07-02 Jin Hong Open Mobile Online Reservation and Ordering Systems
US20090187454A1 (en) 2008-01-22 2009-07-23 International Business Machines Corporation Computer Program Product For Efficient Scheduling Of Meetings
US20090199192A1 (en) 2008-02-05 2009-08-06 Robert Laithwaite Resource scheduling apparatus and method
WO2009102728A1 (en) 2008-02-11 2009-08-20 Clearshift Corporation Online work management system
US20090204463A1 (en) 2008-02-13 2009-08-13 Lockheed Martin Corporation Method, tool, and system for analyzing a project
US9208262B2 (en) 2008-02-22 2015-12-08 Accenture Global Services Limited System for displaying a plurality of associated items in a collaborative environment
US20090234699A1 (en) 2008-03-15 2009-09-17 Microsoft Corporation User Interface For Scheduling Resource Assignments
US20130215116A1 (en) 2008-03-21 2013-08-22 Dressbot, Inc. System and Method for Collaborative Shopping, Business and Entertainment
US20090241053A1 (en) 2008-03-21 2009-09-24 Augustine Nancy L Systems and methods for displaying rolling sequences
US8019863B2 (en) 2008-03-28 2011-09-13 Ianywhere Solutions, Inc. Synchronizing events between mobile devices and servers
US8276144B2 (en) 2008-04-15 2012-09-25 International Business Machines Corporation Electronic device workspace restriction
US20090287523A1 (en) 2008-05-19 2009-11-19 Microsoft Corporation Showing and correcting irregularities in a schedule
US8345849B2 (en) 2008-05-27 2013-01-01 Avaya Inc. Telecommunications endpoint that prompts a user to focus on a monitored call
US20090299808A1 (en) 2008-05-30 2009-12-03 Gilmour Tom S Method and system for project management
US20100005087A1 (en) 2008-07-01 2010-01-07 Stephen Basco Facilitating collaborative searching using semantic contexts associated with information
CN101339642B (en) 2008-07-29 2011-12-21 李宝龙 Multi-party interactive automatized electronic business system
US20100070888A1 (en) 2008-09-13 2010-03-18 Mark Watabe Device and method for graphical user interface having time based visualization and manipulation of data
US20100088137A1 (en) 2008-10-06 2010-04-08 Klaus Weiss Work lists and cockpit to control complex processes
US8527287B1 (en) 2008-10-08 2013-09-03 Intuit Inc. Method and system for attending a meeting
US8429540B1 (en) 2008-10-10 2013-04-23 Adobe Systems Incorporated End user created collaborative and non-collaborative workspace application container system and method
US20100269049A1 (en) 2008-10-13 2010-10-21 Regen Fearon System and method for managing events in a multiple schedule environment
US8788309B2 (en) 2008-10-23 2014-07-22 International Business Machines Corporation Application of cost constraints in event scheduling
US20100115523A1 (en) 2008-10-30 2010-05-06 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for allocating tasks and resources for a project lifecycle
US9466049B2 (en) 2008-11-26 2016-10-11 Red Hat, Inc. Analyzing activity patterns in online communities
US20100169146A1 (en) 2008-12-30 2010-07-01 International Business Machines Corporation Automated scheduling of to-do items within a calendar
US8341189B2 (en) 2009-03-31 2012-12-25 Microsoft Corporation Extending collaboration capabilities to external data
US8160911B2 (en) 2009-05-19 2012-04-17 Microsoft Corporation Project management applications utilizing summary tasks for top-down project planning
US20110054968A1 (en) 2009-06-04 2011-03-03 Galaviz Fernando V Continuous performance improvement system
US20100313151A1 (en) 2009-06-04 2010-12-09 Microsoft Corporation Representing data on configurable timeline with filter
US8321253B2 (en) 2009-06-09 2012-11-27 Accenture Global Services Limited Technician control system
US20110015961A1 (en) 2009-07-15 2011-01-20 Danny Chan Method and system for an event scheduler
US20110022662A1 (en) 2009-07-23 2011-01-27 International Business Machines Corporation Event triggered notifications for collaborative processes
US20110055177A1 (en) 2009-08-26 2011-03-03 International Business Machines Corporation Collaborative content retrieval using calendar task lists
US8712820B2 (en) 2009-09-20 2014-04-29 Blackberry Limited Mobile application for calendar sharing and scheduling
US20110072372A1 (en) 2009-09-21 2011-03-24 Research In Motion Limited Electronic device and method of controlling the same for determination of free time periods
US20110071893A1 (en) 2009-09-23 2011-03-24 Harshita Malhotra system and method for interactively connecting users and third party providers to individual or aggregated to-do list task items of users within the task management system
US20110093538A1 (en) 2009-10-15 2011-04-21 International Business Machines Corporation Collaborative calendar and workflow management
US20110093619A1 (en) 2009-10-16 2011-04-21 Ianywhere Solutions, Inc. Synchronizing Tasks between Mobile Devices and Servers
US8776008B2 (en) 2009-10-30 2014-07-08 Realization Technologies, Inc. Post facto identification and prioritization of causes of buffer consumption
US20110113365A1 (en) 2009-11-09 2011-05-12 Microsoft Corporation Scrolling large data sets
JP5400599B2 (en) 2009-12-18 2014-01-29 株式会社日立製作所 GUI customization method, system, and program
US20110161128A1 (en) 2009-12-31 2011-06-30 Mckesson Financial Holdings Limited Scheduling and Assigning Units of Work
US8375034B2 (en) 2010-01-27 2013-02-12 Google Inc. Automatically schedule and re-schedule meetings using reschedule factors for conflicting calendar events
US9152668B1 (en) 2010-01-29 2015-10-06 Asana, Inc. Asynchronous computation batching
US8572477B1 (en) 2010-01-29 2013-10-29 Asana, Inc. Web-based incremental computing
US8627199B1 (en) 2010-01-29 2014-01-07 Asana, Inc. Incremental computing of changes to computer user interfaces
US9940594B1 (en) 2010-02-19 2018-04-10 Elance, Inc. Digital workroom
WO2011105768A2 (en) 2010-02-23 2011-09-01 엘지전자 주식회사 Refrigerator including a terminal, and method for controlling same
US9471648B2 (en) 2010-03-01 2016-10-18 Salesforce.Com, Inc. System, method and computer program product for displaying one or more data sets to a user
US8429521B2 (en) 2010-04-12 2013-04-23 Google Inc. Scrolling in large hosted data set
US20110270644A1 (en) 2010-04-29 2011-11-03 Selex Sistemi Integrati S.P.A. System and method to estimate the effects of risks on the time progression of projects
CA2738428A1 (en) 2010-04-30 2011-10-30 Iliv Technologies Inc. Collaboration tool
US20170116552A1 (en) 2010-06-04 2017-04-27 Sapience Analytics Private Limited System and Method to Measure, Aggregate and Analyze Exact Effort and Time Productivity
US20140058801A1 (en) 2010-06-04 2014-02-27 Sapience Analytics Private Limited System And Method To Measure, Aggregate And Analyze Exact Effort And Time Productivity
US8843832B2 (en) 2010-07-23 2014-09-23 Reh Hat, Inc. Architecture, system and method for a real-time collaboration interface
US20120030194A1 (en) 2010-07-29 2012-02-02 Research In Motion Limited Identification and scheduling of events on a communication device
US20120035942A1 (en) 2010-08-06 2012-02-09 Sven Graupner Managing business relationships using a third-party service
US20120066030A1 (en) 2010-09-09 2012-03-15 Limpert Bruce R Performance Management System And Dashboard
US20120072251A1 (en) 2010-09-20 2012-03-22 Cristian Mircean Method, management procedure, process, an instrument and apparatus for delay estimation and mitigation of delay risks in projects and program
US20120079449A1 (en) 2010-09-29 2012-03-29 General Electric Company Systems and methods for facilitating visual management of an agile development process
US20130103412A1 (en) 2011-03-14 2013-04-25 ClearCare, Inc. System and apparatus for generating work schedules
US9824334B2 (en) 2011-07-11 2017-11-21 ClearCare, Inc. System for updating a calendar or task status in home care scheduling via telephony
EP2451141B1 (en) 2010-11-09 2018-11-07 BlackBerry Limited Methods and apparatus to display mobile device contents
US20120131191A1 (en) 2010-11-19 2012-05-24 Research In Motion Limited Mobile communication device, server, and method of facilitating resource reservations
US9454623B1 (en) 2010-12-16 2016-09-27 Bentley Systems, Incorporated Social computer-aided engineering design projects
US8463902B2 (en) 2010-12-17 2013-06-11 Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. Work unit adapter for content processing with third party network elements
US9201952B1 (en) 2010-12-21 2015-12-01 Google Inc. User interface for activity status and history
EP2659363A4 (en) 2010-12-30 2016-06-29 Kyle Kleinbart System and method for online communications management
WO2012099617A1 (en) 2011-01-20 2012-07-26 Box.Net, Inc. Real time notification of activities that occur in a web-based collaboration environment
US9165289B2 (en) 2011-02-28 2015-10-20 Ricoh Company, Ltd. Electronic meeting management for mobile wireless devices with post meeting processing
US8554832B1 (en) 2011-03-01 2013-10-08 Asana, Inc. Server side user interface simulation
US9659260B2 (en) 2011-03-15 2017-05-23 Dan Caligor Calendar based task and time management systems and methods
US9383917B2 (en) 2011-03-28 2016-07-05 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Predictive tiling
WO2012131962A1 (en) 2011-03-30 2012-10-04 富士通株式会社 Task execution control device, task execution control system, and task execution control method
US8732151B2 (en) 2011-04-01 2014-05-20 Microsoft Corporation Enhanced query rewriting through statistical machine translation
US9558013B2 (en) 2011-04-12 2017-01-31 Citrix Systems, Inc. Responsive scroller controls in server-hosted applications
JP5787606B2 (en) 2011-05-02 2015-09-30 キヤノン株式会社 Information processing apparatus, information processing method, and program
US20120296982A1 (en) 2011-05-17 2012-11-22 International Business Machines Corporation Automatic Scheduling Tool
US8683473B2 (en) 2011-05-27 2014-03-25 International Business Machines Corporation Dynamic task association between independent, unrelated projects
US8954431B2 (en) 2011-06-09 2015-02-10 Xerox Corporation Smart collaborative brainstorming tool
US8601198B2 (en) 2011-06-30 2013-12-03 Intel Corporation Controllable transaction synchronization for merging peripheral devices
GB2503625A (en) 2011-07-08 2014-01-01 Box Inc Collaboration sessions in a workspace on cloud-based content management system
US9652741B2 (en) 2011-07-08 2017-05-16 Box, Inc. Desktop application for access and interaction with workspaces in a cloud-based content management system and synchronization mechanisms thereof
US9009096B2 (en) 2011-07-12 2015-04-14 Ebay Inc. Recommendations in a computing advice facility
US9195971B2 (en) 2011-07-12 2015-11-24 Salesforce.Com, Inc. Method and system for planning a meeting in a cloud computing environment
US9179035B2 (en) 2011-07-19 2015-11-03 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method of editing static digital combined images comprising images of multiple objects
EP2560134A1 (en) 2011-08-19 2013-02-20 Agor Services BVBA A platform and method enabling collaboration between value chain partners
US8384726B1 (en) 2011-08-31 2013-02-26 Google Inc. Selective rendering of off-screen content
US9195968B2 (en) 2011-09-09 2015-11-24 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Cloud-based broker service for digital assistants
US20130066944A1 (en) 2011-09-13 2013-03-14 International Business Machines Corporation Social gathering of distributed knowledge
WO2013059924A1 (en) 2011-10-26 2013-05-02 Godwin Liu System and method for managing project, process, and meeting tasks over a network
US20140200944A1 (en) 2011-11-08 2014-07-17 Matchware A/S Automation of meeting scheduling and task list access permissions within a meeting series
US8990307B2 (en) 2011-11-16 2015-03-24 Box, Inc. Resource effective incremental updating of a remote client with events which occurred via a cloud-enabled platform
US20170323350A1 (en) 2011-11-17 2017-11-09 Tonya Laderer Cloud-based workflow management platform defined by permission-based roles and relationships for administering, creating, and processing commercial advertising work orders
US20130151421A1 (en) 2011-12-08 2013-06-13 Oracle International Corporation Real-time project progress entry: applying project team member-entered progress immediately to the project plan
US8868655B2 (en) 2011-12-09 2014-10-21 Kabam, Inc. User affiliations spanning multiple virtual spaces
US20130173486A1 (en) 2011-12-29 2013-07-04 Sap Ag Collaboration cloud
US9904435B2 (en) 2012-01-06 2018-02-27 Box, Inc. System and method for actionable event generation for task delegation and management via a discussion forum in a web-based collaboration environment
US20130179208A1 (en) 2012-01-11 2013-07-11 Microsoft Corporation Workflow tasks
US9965745B2 (en) 2012-02-24 2018-05-08 Box, Inc. System and method for promoting enterprise adoption of a web-based collaboration environment
US9565246B1 (en) * 2012-03-14 2017-02-07 Comindware Ltd. System and method for project and process management by synchronizing custom objects between an application and external server
US20130246110A1 (en) 2012-03-15 2013-09-19 Microsoft Corporation Visualizing resource requirements along a timeline
CN104380222B (en) 2012-03-28 2018-03-27 泰瑞·克劳福德 Sector type is provided and browses the method and system for having recorded dialogue
US9024752B2 (en) 2012-04-05 2015-05-05 Amadeus S.A.S. Traveler hurry status monitor
US20130275229A1 (en) * 2012-04-16 2013-10-17 Madhav Moganti Apparatus and method for universal personal data portability
US8699691B2 (en) 2012-04-18 2014-04-15 Avaya Inc. Multi-tasking relief
US8768751B2 (en) 2012-04-25 2014-07-01 Sap Ag Enterprise gamification system for awarding employee performance
US20130317871A1 (en) 2012-05-02 2013-11-28 MobileWorks, Inc. Methods and apparatus for online sourcing
US9990636B1 (en) 2012-05-24 2018-06-05 Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Enterprise fulfillment system with dynamic prefetching, secured data access, system monitoring, and performance optimization capabilities
US20130321467A1 (en) 2012-06-01 2013-12-05 Microsoft Corporation Using snapshots to represent slow applications
US9251484B2 (en) 2012-06-01 2016-02-02 International Business Machines Corporation Predicting likelihood of on-time product delivery, diagnosing issues that threaten delivery, and exploration of likely outcome of different solutions
US20130339099A1 (en) 2012-06-15 2013-12-19 Daood Aidroos Method and system for business program and service planning, delivery and management
US20130339831A1 (en) 2012-06-15 2013-12-19 Microsoft Corporation Dynamic reports connected to project data
EP2865202B1 (en) 2012-06-22 2017-04-12 Google, Inc. Presenting information for a current location or time
US20140007005A1 (en) 2012-06-29 2014-01-02 Evernote Corporation Scrollable calendar with combined date and time controls
US20140012603A1 (en) 2012-07-09 2014-01-09 James Scanlon Capacity planning and modeling for optimization of task outcomes
US8863021B1 (en) 2012-07-26 2014-10-14 Google Inc. Scheduling calendar events for tasks
US20140036639A1 (en) 2012-08-02 2014-02-06 Cozi Group Inc. Family calendar
US20140040780A1 (en) 2012-08-06 2014-02-06 Punch Technologies, Inc. System and method for providing collaboration information around projects and activities using remote time triggers
US20140156539A1 (en) 2012-08-17 2014-06-05 CrowdCare Corporation Device Profile-Based Rule Making for Customer Care
US8800422B2 (en) 2012-08-20 2014-08-12 Ra Brands, L.L.C. Bolt assembly for firearms
JP2015531505A (en) 2012-09-10 2015-11-02 プライベート セクレタリー リミテッド Conference coordination system and method
US9361594B2 (en) 2012-09-24 2016-06-07 Sap Se Generating time slot for managing time across multiple time zones
US9959420B2 (en) 2012-10-02 2018-05-01 Box, Inc. System and method for enhanced security and management mechanisms for enterprise administrators in a cloud-based environment
US20140101310A1 (en) 2012-10-04 2014-04-10 Box, Inc. Seamless access, editing, and creation of files in a web interface or mobile interface to a collaborative cloud platform
US20140236663A1 (en) * 2012-11-13 2014-08-21 Terry Smith System and method for providing unified workflows integrating multiple computer network resources
US9575998B2 (en) 2012-12-12 2017-02-21 Adobe Systems Incorporated Adaptive presentation of content based on user action
US20140172478A1 (en) 2012-12-13 2014-06-19 TCT Hungqary Kft. Methods and system for automatic work logging and tracking
US10579228B2 (en) 2013-01-11 2020-03-03 Synacor, Inc. Method and system for configuring selection of contextual dashboards
US8639552B1 (en) 2013-01-24 2014-01-28 Broadvision, Inc. Systems and methods for creating and sharing tasks
US9111091B2 (en) 2013-01-29 2015-08-18 International Business Machines Corporation Automatic extraction, modeling, and code mapping of application user interface display screens and components
US9900396B2 (en) 2013-02-14 2018-02-20 Comcast Cable Communications, Llc Predictive content caching
US9002763B2 (en) 2013-02-14 2015-04-07 International Business Machines Corporation Work-item notification classifier
US20140244334A1 (en) 2013-02-26 2014-08-28 Oracle International Corporation Facilitating allocation of resources to tasks
US9405532B1 (en) 2013-03-06 2016-08-02 NetSuite Inc. Integrated cloud platform translation system
US20140257892A1 (en) 2013-03-07 2014-09-11 International Business Machines Corporation Social project collaboration through self-organizing teams
US9426216B2 (en) 2013-03-10 2016-08-23 Dropbox, Inc. Content item sharing and synchronization system with team shared folders
US9600136B1 (en) 2013-03-11 2017-03-21 Workday, Inc. Data object extensibility
US20140279294A1 (en) 2013-03-14 2014-09-18 Nordstrom, Inc. System and methods for order fulfillment, inventory management, and providing personalized services to customers
US20140310047A1 (en) 2013-04-12 2014-10-16 Oracle International Corporation Simplifying scheduling of dependent tasks in a collaborative project management environment
US20140310050A1 (en) 2013-04-12 2014-10-16 International Business Machines Corporation Methods And Apparatus For Project Portfolio Management
CN105247548B (en) 2013-05-21 2019-09-10 思杰系统有限公司 User in collaboration workspace system based on application defines workflow
JP6092718B2 (en) 2013-06-11 2017-03-08 株式会社日立製作所 Operation planning support system and method
US9304648B2 (en) 2013-06-26 2016-04-05 Google Inc. Video segments for a video related to a task
US9772754B2 (en) 2013-06-27 2017-09-26 Progressly, Inc. Collaborative network-based graphical progress management tool
JP2015014939A (en) 2013-07-05 2015-01-22 富士通株式会社 Work management method and work management program
US20150058053A1 (en) 2013-08-20 2015-02-26 Oracle International Corporation Shifting a group of tasks along a timeline
US10509527B2 (en) 2013-09-13 2019-12-17 Box, Inc. Systems and methods for configuring event-based automation in cloud-based collaboration platforms
WO2015036817A1 (en) 2013-09-15 2015-03-19 Yogesh Chunilal Rathod Structured updated status, requests, user data & programming based presenting & accessing of connections
US9298506B2 (en) 2013-09-30 2016-03-29 Teradata Us, Inc. Assigning resources among multiple task groups in a database system
US9491249B2 (en) 2013-10-25 2016-11-08 Dorin ROSENSHINE Integrating offsite activities related to chat and text messaging with online data records
US20150134393A1 (en) 2013-11-14 2015-05-14 Oracle International Corporation Enhanced control to users in placement of tasks along a timeline
US20150188862A1 (en) 2013-12-27 2015-07-02 Entefy Inc. Apparatus and Method for Multi-Format Communication Composition
US20150213410A1 (en) 2014-01-24 2015-07-30 T Minus 5 Llc Meeting Management
US20170098197A1 (en) 2014-02-21 2017-04-06 Rna Labs Inc. Systems and Methods for Automatically Collecting User Data and Making a Real-World Action for a User
US20150262111A1 (en) 2014-03-12 2015-09-17 Nanyang Technological University Apparatus and method for efficient task allocation in crowdsourcing
US9344573B2 (en) 2014-03-14 2016-05-17 Twilio, Inc. System and method for a work distribution service
US9928241B2 (en) 2014-03-18 2018-03-27 Smartsheet Inc. Systems and methods for analyzing electronic communications to dynamically improve efficiency and visualization of collaborative work environments
US20160342927A1 (en) 2014-03-28 2016-11-24 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development Lp Systems and methods for providing an information technology interface
US10091287B2 (en) 2014-04-08 2018-10-02 Dropbox, Inc. Determining presence in an application accessing shared and synchronized content
US20150312375A1 (en) 2014-04-25 2015-10-29 Microsoft Corporation Pre-fetching grid blocks by user intent
US9418348B2 (en) 2014-05-05 2016-08-16 Oracle International Corporation Automatic task assignment system
US20150339006A1 (en) 2014-05-21 2015-11-26 Facebook, Inc. Asynchronous Preparation of Displayable Sections of a Graphical User Interface
WO2015183247A1 (en) 2014-05-28 2015-12-03 Hitachi Data Systems Corporation System and method of collision management in a namespace of a storage system
US10062045B2 (en) 2014-06-12 2018-08-28 International Business Machines Corporation Project workspace prioritization
WO2015200681A1 (en) 2014-06-25 2015-12-30 James Noland Method, system, and medium for workflow management of document processing
US10192181B2 (en) 2014-06-26 2019-01-29 Oracle International Corporation Resource demand-based project team staffing
US20160012368A1 (en) 2014-07-14 2016-01-14 Rocket Lawyer Incorporated Real-Time User Interface for Prioritized Professional Work Queue
US20180260081A1 (en) 2014-07-30 2018-09-13 Google Inc. Task switching or task launching based on a ranked list of tasks
US20160048408A1 (en) * 2014-08-13 2016-02-18 OneCloud Labs, Inc. Replication of virtualized infrastructure within distributed computing environments
JP6025154B2 (en) 2014-08-14 2016-11-16 インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレーションInternational Business Machines Corporation System, method and program for managing a project
US20160063449A1 (en) 2014-08-28 2016-03-03 Fmr Llc Method and system for scheduling a meeting
WO2016033493A1 (en) 2014-08-29 2016-03-03 Akana, Inc. Dynamic ontology schema generation and asset management for standards for exchanging data
US9894119B2 (en) * 2014-08-29 2018-02-13 Box, Inc. Configurable metadata-based automation and content classification architecture for cloud-based collaboration platforms
US10217528B2 (en) 2014-08-29 2019-02-26 General Electric Company Optimizing state transition set points for schedule risk management
US10063507B2 (en) 2014-09-08 2018-08-28 Accenture Global Services Limited Digital collaboration process enablement tool
US20160110670A1 (en) 2014-10-20 2016-04-21 Sap Se Relational analysis of business objects
US9720737B2 (en) 2014-10-31 2017-08-01 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Controlling resource allocation with automated consumption against a work breakdown structure
US20160140501A1 (en) 2014-11-17 2016-05-19 Oleg Figlin Collaborative project execution in the cloud
US20160140474A1 (en) 2014-11-18 2016-05-19 Tenore Ltd. System and method for automated project performance analysis and project success rate prediction
US10810222B2 (en) 2014-11-24 2020-10-20 Asana, Inc. Continuously scrollable calendar user interface
US20160148157A1 (en) 2014-11-25 2016-05-26 Sanju Walia Managing activities in an organization
US20160180277A1 (en) 2014-12-17 2016-06-23 Avaya Inc. Automated responses to projected contact center agent fatigue and burnout
US20160182311A1 (en) 2014-12-19 2016-06-23 Tagatoo, Inc. Method, systems, media, and platforms for improved workflow management
US20160180298A1 (en) 2014-12-19 2016-06-23 Greg McClement Task map visualization
CA2974568A1 (en) 2015-01-21 2016-07-28 Solufy Information Technologies Inc. Project and resource planning methods and systems
US20160224939A1 (en) 2015-02-04 2016-08-04 Broadvision, Inc. Systems and methods for managing tasks
US10373084B2 (en) 2015-03-18 2019-08-06 Adp, Llc Integrated resource tracking system
US10496943B2 (en) 2015-03-30 2019-12-03 Oracle International Corporation Visual task assignment system
US10001911B2 (en) 2015-04-10 2018-06-19 International Business Machines Corporation Establishing a communication link between plural participants based on preferences
US11057388B2 (en) 2015-05-08 2021-07-06 Craig Technical Consulting, Inc. Method and computer program product for creating enterprise management systems
US10083412B2 (en) 2015-05-14 2018-09-25 Atlassian Pty Ltd Systems and methods for scheduling work items
US9882976B1 (en) 2015-06-16 2018-01-30 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Supporting heterogeneous environments during code deployment
US9904714B2 (en) 2015-06-30 2018-02-27 International Business Machines Corporation Crowd sourcing of device sensor data for real time response
CN106337237B (en) 2015-07-07 2020-02-18 恩智浦美国有限公司 Woven signal routing substrate for wearable electronic devices
CN105072018A (en) 2015-07-10 2015-11-18 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 Working state prompt method and device
US10261669B2 (en) 2015-07-14 2019-04-16 Adobe Inc. Publishing electronic documents utilizing navigation information
JP2017027116A (en) 2015-07-16 2017-02-02 富士ゼロックス株式会社 Process control device and process control program
CA2937092A1 (en) 2015-08-05 2017-02-05 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Productivity evaluation systems and methods
US10308992B2 (en) 2015-08-20 2019-06-04 Ford Motor Company Method and system for selectively softening hot stamped parts by induction heating
US20210110347A1 (en) 2015-08-22 2021-04-15 Salim B. KHALIL Automated, integrated and complete computer program/project management solutions standardizes and optimizes management processes and procedures utilizing customizable and flexible systems and methods
US20170061341A1 (en) 2015-09-01 2017-03-02 Go Daddy Operating Company, LLC Workflow management for crowd worker tasks with fixed throughput and budgets
CA2916503C (en) 2015-09-09 2023-06-13 Patrick Edward Norton Work project systems and methods
US10320797B2 (en) 2015-09-25 2019-06-11 International Business Machines Corporation Enabling a multi-dimensional collaborative effort system
GB201517437D0 (en) 2015-10-02 2015-11-18 Pekama Ltd An access control system and method
US11775937B2 (en) 2015-10-08 2023-10-03 Arris Enterprises Llc Dynamic capacity ranges for workforce routing
US10496940B2 (en) 2015-12-01 2019-12-03 Sap Se Presenting resource utilization in a user interface
US10437828B2 (en) 2015-12-18 2019-10-08 Sap Se Controlled reference process extensibility framework
US20170192642A1 (en) 2015-12-31 2017-07-06 Opentv, Inc. Systems and methods for enabling transitions between items of content based on swipe gestures
US10074066B2 (en) 2016-01-16 2018-09-11 International Business Machines Corporation Two phase predictive approach for supply network optimization
US20170223069A1 (en) 2016-02-01 2017-08-03 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Meetings Conducted Via A Network
JP6675229B2 (en) 2016-02-29 2020-04-01 東芝テック株式会社 Work assignment support device, terminal device, and program
US9814420B2 (en) 2016-03-09 2017-11-14 International Business Machines Corporation Burnout symptoms detection and prediction
US20170316367A1 (en) 2016-04-29 2017-11-02 Progressly, Inc. Collaborative Network-Based Graphical Progress Management Platform for Integration with a Collaborative Software Tool
US20170317898A1 (en) 2016-04-29 2017-11-02 Progressly, Inc. Collaborative Network-Based Graphical Progress Management Platform for Providing Data Monitoring and Data Analysis of Third Party Services
KR101760051B1 (en) 2016-05-04 2017-07-24 엔에이치엔엔터테인먼트 주식회사 System and method for providing a work allocation, and collaborative
US10733556B2 (en) 2016-05-09 2020-08-04 Mighty AI LLC Automated tasking and accuracy assessment systems and methods for assigning and assessing individuals and tasks
US20170344931A1 (en) 2016-05-27 2017-11-30 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Automatic task flow management across multiple platforms
US10346635B2 (en) 2016-05-31 2019-07-09 Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories, Inc. System and method for data management and task routing based on data tagging
US10706484B1 (en) 2016-06-15 2020-07-07 Resource Environmental Solutions, LLC Methods, systems, and computer readable media for combining pollution source information with geographic and/or temporal information for a land disturbing construction site
US10382501B2 (en) 2016-06-29 2019-08-13 Ricoh Company, Ltd. Multifunction collaboration within an electronic meeting
US20180032524A1 (en) 2016-07-29 2018-02-01 International Business Machines Corporation Document Recommendation Method Based on Skill
US10671692B2 (en) 2016-08-12 2020-06-02 Adobe Inc. Uniquely identifying and tracking selectable web page objects
US20180052943A1 (en) 2016-08-18 2018-02-22 Qualcomm Incorporated Systems and methods for controlling webpage pre-rendering
US10387811B2 (en) 2016-08-29 2019-08-20 International Business Machines Corporation Optimally rearranging team members in an agile environment
US10560417B2 (en) 2016-08-31 2020-02-11 Yva.Ai, Inc. Task assistant
JP6870242B2 (en) 2016-08-31 2021-05-12 株式会社リコー Conference support system, conference support device, and conference support method
US10332073B2 (en) 2016-09-08 2019-06-25 International Business Machines Corporation Agile team structure and processes recommendation
US10733553B2 (en) 2016-09-15 2020-08-04 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Action item extraction for work item creation
US20180088754A1 (en) 2016-09-29 2018-03-29 Moovila, LLC Electronic ecosystem platform
US20180095938A1 (en) 2016-09-30 2018-04-05 Sap Se Synchronized calendar and timeline adaptive user interface
US10419311B2 (en) 2016-10-18 2019-09-17 Citrix Systems, Inc. Template-based declarative and composable configuration of network functions
US10235156B2 (en) 2016-12-01 2019-03-19 Entit Software Llc Versioned extension points of graphical user interfaces
US10460277B2 (en) 2016-12-14 2019-10-29 Business Objects Software Limited Business intelligence language macros
WO2018109589A1 (en) 2016-12-15 2018-06-21 Walkme Ltd. Updating data records by adding editing functions to non-editable display elements
US10796255B2 (en) 2016-12-29 2020-10-06 Dropbox, Inc. Managing project tasks using content items
US10614419B2 (en) 2016-12-30 2020-04-07 Dropbox, Inc. Managing tasks in a content management system
US10803541B2 (en) 2017-02-03 2020-10-13 Jasci LLC Systems and methods for warehouse management
US20180247352A1 (en) 2017-02-27 2018-08-30 Ncr Corporation Chatbot order submission
JP6859795B2 (en) 2017-03-28 2021-04-14 富士通株式会社 Relay communication method, relay communication program, and relay communication device
CN106970992A (en) 2017-03-31 2017-07-21 上海小蚁科技有限公司 A kind of page cache method and device
US10423443B2 (en) 2017-04-03 2019-09-24 Oracle International Corporation Task management interface
US20180316636A1 (en) 2017-04-28 2018-11-01 Hrb Innovations, Inc. Context-aware conversational assistant
US20180331842A1 (en) 2017-05-15 2018-11-15 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Generating a transcript to capture activity of a conference session
US11194551B2 (en) 2017-06-07 2021-12-07 Ab Initio Technology Llc Dataflow graph configuration
US10404636B2 (en) 2017-06-15 2019-09-03 Google Llc Embedded programs and interfaces for chat conversations
CN107273031B (en) 2017-06-23 2020-10-16 阿里巴巴(中国)有限公司 Information flow page loading method and device
US20190005048A1 (en) 2017-06-29 2019-01-03 Uber Technologies, Inc. Optimizing media presentation within an application
CN109240677B (en) 2017-07-07 2020-10-16 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 Layer processing method and device
US10977434B2 (en) 2017-07-11 2021-04-13 Asana, Inc. Database model which provides management of custom fields and methods and apparatus therfor
US10423307B2 (en) 2017-07-12 2019-09-24 The Toronto-Dominion Bank System and method for indicating data transfer method selection
US11079899B2 (en) 2017-07-26 2021-08-03 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Dynamic eye-gaze dwell times
US11700137B2 (en) 2017-08-26 2023-07-11 Vmware, Inc. Collaborative access to virtual desktops
US20190080289A1 (en) 2017-09-08 2019-03-14 Gliffy, Inc. Graphical project management tool
US10867128B2 (en) 2017-09-12 2020-12-15 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Intelligently updating a collaboration site or template
US11531940B2 (en) 2017-09-27 2022-12-20 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Implicit status tracking of tasks and management of task reminders based on device signals
JP6847801B2 (en) 2017-09-28 2021-03-24 株式会社日立製作所 Design support device and design support method
US11720813B2 (en) 2017-09-29 2023-08-08 Oracle International Corporation Machine learning platform for dynamic model selection
US10282405B1 (en) 2017-11-03 2019-05-07 Dropbox, Inc. Task management in a collaborative spreadsheet environment
US10296577B1 (en) 2017-11-03 2019-05-21 Dropbox, Inc. Spreadsheet comment navigation
US20190138961A1 (en) 2017-11-07 2019-05-09 Indidesk, S.L. (fna Smart Canvas Solutions Espana, S.L.) System and method for project management using artificial intelligence
US10380558B2 (en) 2017-11-08 2019-08-13 International Business Machines Corporation Intelligent self-service delivery advisor
US11182706B2 (en) 2017-11-13 2021-11-23 International Business Machines Corporation Providing suitable strategies to resolve work items to participants of collaboration system
US11140174B2 (en) 2017-12-13 2021-10-05 Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Time and location controlled centralized access management system
US10831486B2 (en) 2017-12-14 2020-11-10 Adobe Inc. Automation of sequences of actions
WO2019139778A2 (en) 2018-01-10 2019-07-18 Walmart Apollo, Llc System for relational-impact based task management
US10623359B1 (en) 2018-02-28 2020-04-14 Asana, Inc. Systems and methods for generating tasks based on chat sessions between users of a collaboration environment
US11138021B1 (en) 2018-04-02 2021-10-05 Asana, Inc. Systems and methods to facilitate task-specific workspaces for a collaboration work management platform
US10613735B1 (en) 2018-04-04 2020-04-07 Asana, Inc. Systems and methods for preloading an amount of content based on user scrolling
US10824995B2 (en) 2018-05-03 2020-11-03 International Business Machines Corporation Communication enrichment recommendation
US11074284B2 (en) 2018-05-07 2021-07-27 International Business Machines Corporation Cognitive summarization and retrieval of archived communications
US10796259B2 (en) 2018-05-08 2020-10-06 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Risk and dependency tracking and control system
US20190370320A1 (en) 2018-06-05 2019-12-05 Bank Of America Corporation System and method for provisioning multiple forms in an interface
US10785046B1 (en) 2018-06-08 2020-09-22 Asana, Inc. Systems and methods for providing a collaboration work management platform that facilitates differentiation between users in an overarching group and one or more subsets of individual users
US20210264372A1 (en) 2018-07-04 2021-08-26 Imi Material Handling Logistics Inc. Automated human resources management and engagement system and method
US20200019907A1 (en) 2018-07-13 2020-01-16 One Network Enterprises, Inc. System and computer program for multi-party project schedule collaboration, synchronization and execution
US20200059539A1 (en) 2018-08-20 2020-02-20 Landmark Graphics Corporation Cloud-native reservoir simulation
US10891571B2 (en) 2018-08-23 2021-01-12 Capital One Services, Llc Task management platform
US10846105B2 (en) 2018-09-29 2020-11-24 ILAN Yehuda Granot User interface advisor
US10616151B1 (en) 2018-10-17 2020-04-07 Asana, Inc. Systems and methods for generating and presenting graphical user interfaces
US11153152B2 (en) * 2018-11-21 2021-10-19 Cisco Technology, Inc. System and methods to validate issue detection and classification in a network assurance system
US10956845B1 (en) 2018-12-06 2021-03-23 Asana, Inc. Systems and methods for generating prioritization models and predicting workflow prioritizations
US11113667B1 (en) 2018-12-18 2021-09-07 Asana, Inc. Systems and methods for providing a dashboard for a collaboration work management platform
US10684870B1 (en) 2019-01-08 2020-06-16 Asana, Inc. Systems and methods for determining and presenting a graphical user interface including template metrics
US11204683B1 (en) 2019-01-09 2021-12-21 Asana, Inc. Systems and methods for generating and tracking hardcoded communications in a collaboration management platform
EP3686748B1 (en) 2019-01-22 2022-05-04 PRMA Consulting Limited Synchronizing content blocks between multiple electronic documents
WO2020223247A1 (en) 2019-04-29 2020-11-05 Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Systems and methods for data-driven infrastructure controls
US11271762B2 (en) 2019-05-10 2022-03-08 Citrix Systems, Inc. Systems and methods for virtual meetings
US11588764B2 (en) 2019-10-30 2023-02-21 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Extensible framework for constructing autonomous workflows
US11341445B1 (en) 2019-11-14 2022-05-24 Asana, Inc. Systems and methods to measure and visualize threshold of user workload
US11095468B1 (en) 2020-02-13 2021-08-17 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Meeting summary service
US11568339B2 (en) 2020-08-18 2023-01-31 Asana, Inc. Systems and methods to characterize units of work based on business objectives
US20220207489A1 (en) 2020-12-29 2022-06-30 Atlassian Pty Ltd. Video conferencing interface for analyzing and visualizing issue and task progress managed by an issue tracking system
US11627009B2 (en) 2021-01-22 2023-04-11 Dell Products L.P. Session management of content driven meeting summaries, action items, meeting context continuity, and segment audio-video (AV) replay for collaboration solutions

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US11783253B1 (en) 2023-10-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11734625B2 (en) Systems and methods to characterize units of work based on business objectives
US11561677B2 (en) Systems and methods for generating and tracking hardcoded communications in a collaboration management platform
US11694140B2 (en) Systems and methods for generating prioritization models and predicting workflow prioritizations
US11288081B2 (en) Systems and methods for determining and presenting a graphical user interface including template metrics
US20240031188A1 (en) Systems and methods for providing a collaboration work management platform that facilitates differentiation between users in an overarching group and one or more subsets of individual users
US20120227044A1 (en) Automated workflow manager
US11551186B2 (en) Systems and methods to generate agendas for one-on-one meetings
US11847613B2 (en) Systems and methods to attribute automated actions within a collaboration environment
US11720858B2 (en) Systems and methods to facilitate user engagement with units of work assigned within a collaboration environment
US20230252415A1 (en) Systems and methods to recommend templates for project-level graphical user interfaces within a collaboration environment
US20220147943A1 (en) Systems and methods to generate agendas for group meetings
US20230195299A1 (en) Systems and methods to provide personalized graphical user interfaces within a collaboration environment
US11783253B1 (en) Systems and methods to effectuate sets of automated actions outside and/or within a collaboration environment based on trigger events occurring outside and/or within the collaboration environment
US11756000B2 (en) Systems and methods to effectuate sets of automated actions within a collaboration environment including embedded third-party content based on trigger events
US11863601B1 (en) Systems and methods to execute branching automation schemes in a collaboration environment
US11763259B1 (en) Systems and methods to generate units of work in a collaboration environment
US20230118369A1 (en) Systems and methods for generating status requests for units of work
US11809222B1 (en) Systems and methods to generate units of work within a collaboration environment based on selection of text
US20240095619A1 (en) Systems and methods to prioritize units of work within a collaboration environment
US11900323B1 (en) Systems and methods to generate units of work within a collaboration environment based on video dictation
US20230259839A1 (en) System for workflow management

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: ASANA, INC., CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:PELZ, ERIC SETH;FENNER, MICAH HANAN;KELLY, ABIGAIL LOREAN;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20200117 TO 20200211;REEL/FRAME:064669/0457

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION