US20230249864A1 - Apparatus and Method for Testing Liner and Label Separation - Google Patents

Apparatus and Method for Testing Liner and Label Separation Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20230249864A1
US20230249864A1 US17/669,022 US202217669022A US2023249864A1 US 20230249864 A1 US20230249864 A1 US 20230249864A1 US 202217669022 A US202217669022 A US 202217669022A US 2023249864 A1 US2023249864 A1 US 2023249864A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
liner
label
printer
peel
peel bar
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
US17/669,022
Inventor
Timothy Darren Livingston
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Iconex LLC
Original Assignee
Iconex LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Iconex LLC filed Critical Iconex LLC
Priority to US17/669,022 priority Critical patent/US20230249864A1/en
Assigned to ICONEX LLC reassignment ICONEX LLC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: LIVINGSTON, TIMOTHY DARREN
Priority to PCT/US2023/062319 priority patent/WO2023154820A2/en
Priority to AU2023219715A priority patent/AU2023219715A1/en
Assigned to JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT reassignment JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT SECURITY INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: ICONEX LLC, MAX INTERNATIONAL CONVERTERS INC., MAXStick Products Ltd.
Publication of US20230249864A1 publication Critical patent/US20230249864A1/en
Assigned to JEFFERIES FINANCE LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT reassignment JEFFERIES FINANCE LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT TERM LOAN PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: APPVION, LLC, ICONEX LLC, MAXStick Products Ltd.
Assigned to WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT reassignment WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT ABL PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: APPVION, LLC, ICONEX LLC, MAXStick Products Ltd.
Assigned to MAXStick Products Ltd., MAX INTERNATIONAL CONVERTERS INC., ICONEX LLC reassignment MAXStick Products Ltd. RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B65CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
    • B65CLABELLING OR TAGGING MACHINES, APPARATUS, OR PROCESSES
    • B65C9/00Details of labelling machines or apparatus
    • B65C9/0006Removing backing sheets
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B65CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
    • B65CLABELLING OR TAGGING MACHINES, APPARATUS, OR PROCESSES
    • B65C9/00Details of labelling machines or apparatus
    • B65C9/40Controls; Safety devices
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B65CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
    • B65CLABELLING OR TAGGING MACHINES, APPARATUS, OR PROCESSES
    • B65C9/00Details of labelling machines or apparatus
    • B65C9/08Label feeding
    • B65C9/18Label feeding from strips, e.g. from rolls
    • B65C9/1865Label feeding from strips, e.g. from rolls the labels adhering on a backing strip
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B65CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
    • B65CLABELLING OR TAGGING MACHINES, APPARATUS, OR PROCESSES
    • B65C9/00Details of labelling machines or apparatus
    • B65C9/0006Removing backing sheets
    • B65C2009/0009Removing backing sheets by means of a peeling tip
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B65CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
    • B65CLABELLING OR TAGGING MACHINES, APPARATUS, OR PROCESSES
    • B65C9/00Details of labelling machines or apparatus
    • B65C9/40Controls; Safety devices
    • B65C2009/402Controls; Safety devices for detecting properties or defects of labels

Definitions

  • Printers image the face of the labels and dispense the labels for application at business sites.
  • the printers typically come with built-in peel bars that enable the labels to automatically separate from the liner substrate after imaging and dispensing from the printers.
  • the waste liner is then wound back into a spool for subsequent disposal.
  • Each business has their own printer and corresponding built-in peel bar. Many factors determine whether a label face sheet will separate properly from the liner substrate when dispensed from a given printer. If the label does not separate from the liner, then the liner does not wind properly into a waste spool causes disruptions during operation of the printer for the business. When this happens, the business is likely to switch to a different label-liner combination before investigating or before even considering a new printer.
  • Label manufacturers have to manage business customers with different printers and ensure that manufacturer's label-liner products will work for their customers; otherwise, these customers will seek business elsewhere. In addition, the manufacturers have to manage expenses associated with components of their label-liner products, such as the strength and placement of the adhesive used on the backside of the label, the features associated with the release coating that is applied to the front side of the liner, the strength and quality of the substrate used for the label, and the features associated with any thermal imaging coatings applied to the front side of the label.
  • manufacturers have no way of knowing when business customers might obtain different printers, such that previous label-liner products that separated properly when dispensed from the business customers' printers will no longer separate properly with the new/replacement printers.
  • manufacturers have no way of knowing when designing new label-liner products or when replacing components of existing label-liner products whether the liners of the new products or the components of the modified products are going to permit proper separation from the labels when printed and dispensed by their customers' printers.
  • an apparatus and a method for testing liner and label separation are provided.
  • an apparatus comprising a base element, a roller, and printer peel bars.
  • the roller is integrated into the base element and each printer peel bar is adapted to be placed in and removed from the base element.
  • Each printer peel bar comprises a different radius.
  • the apparatus is adapted to determine a specific printer peel bar having a specific radius at which separation between a label and a liner of a given label-liner product occurs when a web of the given label-liner product is fed under the roller, over a disengage edge of the specific printer peel bar, and out of the base element.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram of an apparatus for testing liner and label separation, according to an example embodiment.
  • FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating a printer peel bar with proper liner and label separation, according to an example embodiment.
  • FIG. 3 A is a diagram of another printer peel bar with proper liner and label separation, according to an example embodiment.
  • FIG. 3 B is a diagram of still another printer peel bar with no separation between the liner and label, according to an example embodiment
  • FIG. 4 is a diagram of a method for operating the apparatus, according to an example embodiment.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram of an apparatus 100 for testing liner and label separation, according to an example embodiment. It is noted that the diagram is shown in greatly simplified form with only the components necessary for understanding the apparatus shown. Other components may be added and/or the shown components may be rearranged without departing from the teachings and beneficial aspects of testing liner and label separation.
  • a “liner” comprises a substrate made of a translucent or film and is coated with a release coating before being aligned and affixed to a backside of a label.
  • the terms and phrases “liner” and “liner substrate” may be used synonymously and interchangeably herein and below.
  • a “label” comprises a separate substrate from the liner and a backside of the label is coated with an adhesive before being aligned and affixed to a front side of a liner.
  • the label may or may not also include additional coatings on the front side of label, such as and by way of example only, thermal sensitive coatings to permit a front side and/or portions of a backside of the label to be thermal imaged by thermal printers.
  • additional coatings on the front side of label such as and by way of example only, thermal sensitive coatings to permit a front side and/or portions of a backside of the label to be thermal imaged by thermal printers.
  • the terms and phrases “label,” “face stock,” “face,” and “label substrate” may be used synonymously and interchangeably herein and below.
  • Apparatus 100 comprises replaceable peel bars of various radiuses 101 , a base component 110 , and a roller 120 . Apparatus 100 may also comprise a calibrated weight 300 .
  • Roller 120 is arranged and oriented within base 100 to receive a label-liner web 200 under a bottom portion of roller 120 and direct a leading edge of web 200 at a predefined angle over replaceable peel bar 101 and out of base 110 (egress or dispense point of apparatus 100 ).
  • web 200 is fed under roller 120 and pulled over a selected replaceable peel bar 101 through and out away from the base 110 .
  • a calibrated weight 300 is attached to a string 301 and the string 301 is affixed to the underside and backside of the liner 202 (see FIG. 2 ).
  • the calibrated weight 300 is 12 grams.
  • an operator of apparatus 100 holds a leasing edge of web 200 by label or face portion for label 201 (see FIG. 2 ) and pulls the web 200 out away from apparatus 100 .
  • the liner 202 falls down along a front side wall of peel bar 101 and separates from the label 201 .
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a printer peel bar 101 with proper liner 202 and label 201 separation from web 200 , according to an example embodiment.
  • Peel bar 101 has a predefined radius 105 (illustrated by the arrow above 105 in top leftmost corner of peel bar 101 ). The smaller the radius 105 is the sharper the angle is over dispense edge 106 .
  • Web 200 comprises the face stock 201 (label substrate 201 ) and the liner 202 (liner substrate 202 ). The web 200 is urged over a top surface 103 of peel bar 101 while a leading edge of the face stock 201 is pulled.
  • String 301 with weight 300 exerts a known and measurable force on liner 202 downward along a front side wall of peel bar 101 and liner 202 separates from label 201 .
  • FIG. 2 illustrates that the stiffness of label substrate 201 is sufficient to over come the bond (the release force) needed to separate liner 202 from label 201 and optimal to allow liner 202 and label 201 to separate with peel bar 101 having radius 105 .
  • Weight 300 is a constant known peel force applied to the back side of liner 202
  • the release coating on the front side of liner 202 is also known during testing for the web 200 as is the adhesive coating on the backside of label 201
  • the only variable changed during operation of apparatus 100 for testing label 201 and liner 202 separation of a given web 200 (label-liner product) is the radius 105 (angle over dispense edge 106 ) of peel bar 101 . If liner 202 does not separate from label 201 with a given peel bar of a given radius 105 , then a peel bar 101 having a different radius 105 is inserted into apparatus 100 and the test continues with the next radius 105 .
  • the release force has to be decreased between the label 201 and the liner 202 , the face stock 201 has to be changed to one that is less stiff, or a combination is needed for a lower release force and a less stiff face stock 201 for the given web 200 and given peel bar 101 with the given radius.
  • FIG. 3 A is a diagram of another printer peel bar 101 with proper liner 202 and label 201 separation, according to an example embodiment.
  • radius 105 of peel bar 101 permits separation of liner 202 from label 201 from web 200 with liner web 202 falling down towards weight 300 along the front edge and surface of peel bar 101 . This indicates that for any printers having a peel bar 101 with a radius of 105 when using web 200 , label 202 will separate from liner 202 and permit liner 202 to be wound in a liner waste spool within the printer.
  • liner 202 travels around dispense edge 106 and the stiffness of the face stock 201 overcomes the bond between the adhesive on the backside of label 201 and the release coating on the front side of liner 202 permitting label 201 to travel in a straight line and dispensing away liner 202 ; and liner 202 is properly wound in a liner waste spool within a printer.
  • FIG. 3 B is a diagram of still another printer peel bar 101 with no separation between the liner 202 and label 202 , according to an example embodiment.
  • a larger radius causes the face stock 201 to follow liner 202 over the dispense edge 106 of peel bar 101 and not separate.
  • the face stock 201 stiffness is insufficient to overcome the bond between the adhesive of the face stock 201 and the release coating of liner 202 .
  • Apparatus 100 permits testing of label-liner products 200 for specific printers having specific peel bars with specific radiuses. Testing enables a label manufacturer to determine whether the release coating, adhesive coating, and/or stiffness in the face stock 201 of the products 200 need to be modified. Modifications to the release coating and/or adhesive coating alters the release force or bond between the backside of label 201 and the front side of liner 202 .
  • the release coatings and/or adhesive coatings can be changed to achieve a weaker bond (require less release force) between label 201 and liner 202 .
  • both increased or decreased face stock/label 201 stiffness and/or weakened bonds via the release and adhesive coatings can be changed in a label-liner produce when a known peel bar 101 having a known radius 105 of a given printer is required.
  • Apparatus 100 permits peel bars 101 of variable radiuses to be swapped in and out of base 110 for purposes of testing a proper dispensing of a label 201 for a given label-liner product 200 .
  • the industry has been unable to provide such a label dispensability testing mechanism and as such label manufacturers may find that significant investments in new or changed label-liner products are unable to properly dispense from their customer printers before the products or product changes are released.
  • Apparatus 100 permits label manufactures to know (not guess or hope) in advance whether a new or changed label-liner product 200 will dispense for their customers' printers such that if changes are needed for label dispensing the changes can be made before release of the products 200 .
  • Apparatus 100 also permits label manufacturers to customize label-liner products 200 for specific printers for optimal operation of such printers when dispensing labels 201 and when spooling liner 202 .
  • apparatus 100 comprises a motor that drives roller 120 urging web 200 automatically towards peel bar 101 and over dispense edge 106 .
  • apparatus 100 comprises an adhesive chain under peel bar 101 that adheres to a backside of liner 202 on one end and the other end applies or comprises force (weight 300 ).
  • roller 120 is a 2 inch in diameter roller with bearings.
  • weight 300 can be changed as needed.
  • an optimal label 201 and liner 202 separation for any given label-liner product 200 is one in which the separation occurs with a peel bar 101 having a radius of 0.04 or higher.
  • apparatus 100 is used to test any stiffness of face stock 201 and any bond between face stock 201 and liner 202 for all released changed or new label-liner products 200 to ensure label 201 and liner 202 separation on any peel bar 101 having the radius of . 04 or higher and modifications are made when no separation is achieved in the stiffness and/or the bond (via the release coating and/or adhesive coatings).
  • FIG. 4 is a diagram of a method 800 for operating apparatus 100 , according to an example embodiment.
  • a leading edge of a label-liner web 200 is aligned under a roller 120 of an apparatus 100 .
  • the leading edge of web 200 is urged under the roller 120 and up at a predefined angle within the apparatus 100 over a disengage edge 106 of a replaceable printer peel bar 101 inserted into the apparatus 100 .
  • a first end of a string 301 is affixed to a backside of a liner portion 202 of the web 200 past the disengage edge 106 .
  • a second end of the string 301 is affixed to a weight 300 .
  • a label portion 201 of the web 200 is urged up and away from the disengage edge 106 to determine whether the label portion 201 of the web 200 separates from the liner portion 202 during 450 .
  • the peel bar 101 is replaced with a different peel bar 101 having a different radius from that which was associated with the original peel bar 101 when the liner portion 202 fails to separate from the label portion 201 during 450 .
  • 450 is repeated with the different peel bar 101 .
  • 460 and 450 are iterated until a specific peel bar 101 with a specific radius results in the liner portion 202 separating from the label portion 201 during 450 .

Landscapes

  • Labeling Devices (AREA)

Abstract

An apparatus for testing label-liner separation is provided. The apparatus comprises a roller, a plurality of replaceable printer peel bars, and a weight. Each peel bar associated with its own unique radius for its disengage edge. A label-liner web is fed under the roller and up to a given peel bar of a given radius over the corresponding disengage edge. A string is attached on one end to a liner portion of the web and the weight is attached to the other end of the string with the weight freely hanging unsupported under the liner portion. A label portion of the web is pulled over the disengage edge to determine whether the label portion separates from the liner portion of the web during the pulling. If no separation occurs a different peel bar with a different radius is selected and tried. This repeats until separation is achieved.

Description

    BACKGROUND
  • Many business situations require the use of labels affixed to liners. Printers image the face of the labels and dispense the labels for application at business sites. The printers typically come with built-in peel bars that enable the labels to automatically separate from the liner substrate after imaging and dispensing from the printers. The waste liner is then wound back into a spool for subsequent disposal.
  • Each business has their own printer and corresponding built-in peel bar. Many factors determine whether a label face sheet will separate properly from the liner substrate when dispensed from a given printer. If the label does not separate from the liner, then the liner does not wind properly into a waste spool causes disruptions during operation of the printer for the business. When this happens, the business is likely to switch to a different label-liner combination before investigating or before even considering a new printer.
  • Label manufacturers have to manage business customers with different printers and ensure that manufacturer's label-liner products will work for their customers; otherwise, these customers will seek business elsewhere. In addition, the manufacturers have to manage expenses associated with components of their label-liner products, such as the strength and placement of the adhesive used on the backside of the label, the features associated with the release coating that is applied to the front side of the liner, the strength and quality of the substrate used for the label, and the features associated with any thermal imaging coatings applied to the front side of the label.
  • Currently, the manufacturers have no way of knowing when business customers might obtain different printers, such that previous label-liner products that separated properly when dispensed from the business customers' printers will no longer separate properly with the new/replacement printers. Moreover, manufacturers have no way of knowing when designing new label-liner products or when replacing components of existing label-liner products whether the liners of the new products or the components of the modified products are going to permit proper separation from the labels when printed and dispensed by their customers' printers.
  • SUMMARY
  • In various embodiments, an apparatus and a method for testing liner and label separation are provided.
  • Specifically, and in an embodiment, an apparatus is provided. The apparatus comprises a base element, a roller, and printer peel bars. The roller is integrated into the base element and each printer peel bar is adapted to be placed in and removed from the base element. Each printer peel bar comprises a different radius. The apparatus is adapted to determine a specific printer peel bar having a specific radius at which separation between a label and a liner of a given label-liner product occurs when a web of the given label-liner product is fed under the roller, over a disengage edge of the specific printer peel bar, and out of the base element.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram of an apparatus for testing liner and label separation, according to an example embodiment.
  • FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating a printer peel bar with proper liner and label separation, according to an example embodiment.
  • FIG. 3A is a diagram of another printer peel bar with proper liner and label separation, according to an example embodiment.
  • FIG. 3B is a diagram of still another printer peel bar with no separation between the liner and label, according to an example embodiment,
  • FIG. 4 is a diagram of a method for operating the apparatus, according to an example embodiment.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram of an apparatus 100 for testing liner and label separation, according to an example embodiment. It is noted that the diagram is shown in greatly simplified form with only the components necessary for understanding the apparatus shown. Other components may be added and/or the shown components may be rearranged without departing from the teachings and beneficial aspects of testing liner and label separation.
  • As used herein a “liner” comprises a substrate made of a translucent or film and is coated with a release coating before being aligned and affixed to a backside of a label. The terms and phrases “liner” and “liner substrate” may be used synonymously and interchangeably herein and below.
  • A “label” comprises a separate substrate from the liner and a backside of the label is coated with an adhesive before being aligned and affixed to a front side of a liner. The label may or may not also include additional coatings on the front side of label, such as and by way of example only, thermal sensitive coatings to permit a front side and/or portions of a backside of the label to be thermal imaged by thermal printers. The terms and phrases “label,” “face stock,” “face,” and “label substrate” may be used synonymously and interchangeably herein and below.
  • Apparatus 100 comprises replaceable peel bars of various radiuses 101, a base component 110, and a roller 120. Apparatus 100 may also comprise a calibrated weight 300.
  • Roller 120 is arranged and oriented within base 100 to receive a label-liner web 200 under a bottom portion of roller 120 and direct a leading edge of web 200 at a predefined angle over replaceable peel bar 101 and out of base 110 (egress or dispense point of apparatus 100).
  • In an embodiment, web 200 is fed under roller 120 and pulled over a selected replaceable peel bar 101 through and out away from the base 110.
  • A calibrated weight 300 is attached to a string 301 and the string 301 is affixed to the underside and backside of the liner 202 (see FIG. 2 ).
  • In an embodiment, the calibrated weight 300 is 12 grams.
  • In an embodiment, an operator of apparatus 100 holds a leasing edge of web 200 by label or face portion for label 201 (see FIG. 2 ) and pulls the web 200 out away from apparatus 100. Assuming the combination of label stiffness and adhesive with release coatings are sufficient, the liner 202 falls down along a front side wall of peel bar 101 and separates from the label 201.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a printer peel bar 101 with proper liner 202 and label 201 separation from web 200, according to an example embodiment. Peel bar 101 has a predefined radius 105 (illustrated by the arrow above 105 in top leftmost corner of peel bar 101). The smaller the radius 105 is the sharper the angle is over dispense edge 106. Web 200 comprises the face stock 201 (label substrate 201) and the liner 202 (liner substrate 202). The web 200 is urged over a top surface 103 of peel bar 101 while a leading edge of the face stock 201 is pulled. String 301 with weight 300 exerts a known and measurable force on liner 202 downward along a front side wall of peel bar 101 and liner 202 separates from label 201.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates that the stiffness of label substrate 201 is sufficient to over come the bond (the release force) needed to separate liner 202 from label 201 and optimal to allow liner 202 and label 201 to separate with peel bar 101 having radius 105.
  • Weight 300 is a constant known peel force applied to the back side of liner 202, the release coating on the front side of liner 202 is also known during testing for the web 200 as is the adhesive coating on the backside of label 201, thus, the only variable changed during operation of apparatus 100 for testing label 201 and liner 202 separation of a given web 200 (label-liner product) is the radius 105 (angle over dispense edge 106) of peel bar 101. If liner 202 does not separate from label 201 with a given peel bar of a given radius 105, then a peel bar 101 having a different radius 105 is inserted into apparatus 100 and the test continues with the next radius 105.
  • There is a direct correlation between the radius 105 chosen for a given peel bar 101 and both the release force needed to separate liner 202 from label 201 and/or the stiffness of the face stock 201 (label 201). This is illustrated in FIG. 1 at the top of the diagram under the various replaceable peel bars 101 with varying radiuses. For example, if a given web 200 (label-liner product 200) is being tested through operation of apparatus 100 with a given peel bar 101 having a given radius and fails to allow liner 202 to separate from liner 202 either the mixture or composition of the release and adhesive coatings have to be changed to decrease the release force and/or the stiffness of the face stock 201 has to change. That is in this situation, the release force has to be decreased between the label 201 and the liner 202, the face stock 201 has to be changed to one that is less stiff, or a combination is needed for a lower release force and a less stiff face stock 201 for the given web 200 and given peel bar 101 with the given radius.
  • FIG. 3A is a diagram of another printer peel bar 101 with proper liner 202 and label 201 separation, according to an example embodiment. As the web 200 is pulled over the top surface 103 to dispense a given label 201 over dispense edge 106, radius 105 of peel bar 101 permits separation of liner 202 from label 201 from web 200 with liner web 202 falling down towards weight 300 along the front edge and surface of peel bar 101. This indicates that for any printers having a peel bar 101 with a radius of 105 when using web 200, label 202 will separate from liner 202 and permit liner 202 to be wound in a liner waste spool within the printer.
  • In FIG. 3A because the radius 105 of peel bar 101 is small (sharp angle), liner 202 travels around dispense edge 106 and the stiffness of the face stock 201 overcomes the bond between the adhesive on the backside of label 201 and the release coating on the front side of liner 202 permitting label 201 to travel in a straight line and dispensing away liner 202; and liner 202 is properly wound in a liner waste spool within a printer.
  • FIG. 3B is a diagram of still another printer peel bar 101 with no separation between the liner 202 and label 202, according to an example embodiment. A larger radius (gradual curved angle) causes the face stock 201 to follow liner 202 over the dispense edge 106 of peel bar 101 and not separate. In this cases the face stock 201 stiffness is insufficient to overcome the bond between the adhesive of the face stock 201 and the release coating of liner 202. This means that the bond between the release coating and the adhesive coating needs to be decreased if the peel bar 101 with radius 105 is needed for a given printer and/or the stiffness of face stock 201 needs increased.
  • Apparatus 100 permits testing of label-liner products 200 for specific printers having specific peel bars with specific radiuses. Testing enables a label manufacturer to determine whether the release coating, adhesive coating, and/or stiffness in the face stock 201 of the products 200 need to be modified. Modifications to the release coating and/or adhesive coating alters the release force or bond between the backside of label 201 and the front side of liner 202.
  • As the radius 105 of replaceable peel bars 101 get smaller (sharper dispense angle 106) without label 201 and liner 202 separation from a given web 200 using apparatus 100, the more stiffness is needed in the face stock/label 201.
  • As the radius of 105 of replaceable peel bars 102 get larger without label 201 and liner 202 separation from a given web 200 using apparatus 100, the less stiffness is needed in the face stock/label 201.
  • In addition, when a given radius of a replaceable peel bar 102 fails to obtain label 201 and liner 202 separation from a given web 200 using apparatus, the release coatings and/or adhesive coatings can be changed to achieve a weaker bond (require less release force) between label 201 and liner 202.
  • So both increased or decreased face stock/label 201 stiffness and/or weakened bonds via the release and adhesive coatings can be changed in a label-liner produce when a known peel bar 101 having a known radius 105 of a given printer is required.
  • Apparatus 100 permits peel bars 101 of variable radiuses to be swapped in and out of base 110 for purposes of testing a proper dispensing of a label 201 for a given label-liner product 200. The industry has been unable to provide such a label dispensability testing mechanism and as such label manufacturers may find that significant investments in new or changed label-liner products are unable to properly dispense from their customer printers before the products or product changes are released. Apparatus 100 permits label manufactures to know (not guess or hope) in advance whether a new or changed label-liner product 200 will dispense for their customers' printers such that if changes are needed for label dispensing the changes can be made before release of the products 200. Apparatus 100 also permits label manufacturers to customize label-liner products 200 for specific printers for optimal operation of such printers when dispensing labels 201 and when spooling liner 202.
  • In an embodiment, apparatus 100 comprises a motor that drives roller 120 urging web 200 automatically towards peel bar 101 and over dispense edge 106.
  • In an embodiment, apparatus 100 comprises an adhesive chain under peel bar 101 that adheres to a backside of liner 202 on one end and the other end applies or comprises force (weight 300).
  • In an embodiment, roller 120 is a 2 inch in diameter roller with bearings.
  • In an embodiment, weight 300 can be changed as needed.
  • In an embodiment, a position of roller 120 and correspondingly an angle with which web 200 is fed from roller 120 to peel bar 101 and over dispense edge 106 s adjustable within base 110 of apparatus 100.
  • In an embodiment, an optimal label 201 and liner 202 separation for any given label-liner product 200 is one in which the separation occurs with a peel bar 101 having a radius of 0.04 or higher. In an embodiment, apparatus 100 is used to test any stiffness of face stock 201 and any bond between face stock 201 and liner 202 for all released changed or new label-liner products 200 to ensure label 201 and liner 202 separation on any peel bar 101 having the radius of .04 or higher and modifications are made when no separation is achieved in the stiffness and/or the bond (via the release coating and/or adhesive coatings).
  • FIG. 4 is a diagram of a method 800 for operating apparatus 100, according to an example embodiment.
  • At 410, a leading edge of a label-liner web 200 is aligned under a roller 120 of an apparatus 100.
  • At 420, the leading edge of web 200 is urged under the roller 120 and up at a predefined angle within the apparatus 100 over a disengage edge 106 of a replaceable printer peel bar 101 inserted into the apparatus 100.
  • At 430, a first end of a string 301 is affixed to a backside of a liner portion 202 of the web 200 past the disengage edge 106.
  • At 440, a second end of the string 301 is affixed to a weight 300.
  • At 450, a label portion 201 of the web 200 is urged up and away from the disengage edge 106 to determine whether the label portion 201 of the web 200 separates from the liner portion 202 during 450.
  • In an embodiment, at 460, the peel bar 101 is replaced with a different peel bar 101 having a different radius from that which was associated with the original peel bar 101 when the liner portion 202 fails to separate from the label portion 201 during 450. 450 is repeated with the different peel bar 101. 460 and 450 are iterated until a specific peel bar 101 with a specific radius results in the liner portion 202 separating from the label portion 201 during 450.
  • Although the present invention has been described with particular reference to certain preferred embodiments thereof, variations and modifications of the present invention can be affected within the spirit and scope of the following claims.

Claims (20)

1. An apparatus, comprising:
a base element;
a roller integrated into the base element; and
printer peel bars, wherein each printer peel bar comprises a different radius and each printer peel bar adapted to be placed in the base element and removed from the base element;
wherein the apparatus is adapted to determine a specific printer peel bar having a specific radius at which separation between a label and a liner of a given label-liner product occurs when a web of the given label-liner product is fed under the roller, over a disengage edge of the specific printer peel bar, and out of the base element.
2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the printer peel bars range between a starting radius of 0.01 inches and ending at 0.10 inches.
3. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein the printer peel bars comprise 10 printer peel pars each printer peel bar has a radius that is 0.01 inches greater than a previous printer peel bar.
4. The apparatus of claim 1 further comprising a string attached at one end to a backside of the liner fed over the disengage edge and attached at a second end to a hanging weight.
5. The apparatus of claim 4, wherein the hanging weight is 12 grams.
6. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the roller has a 2-inch diameter with bearings.
7. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein a smaller radius of a corresponding peel bar indicates a sharper angle over the disengage edge and a larger radius of the corresponding peel bar indicates a smoother angle over the disengage edge.
8. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the roller is oriented within the base element under a location associated with a given printer peel bar placed within the base element and a predefined angle to the location.
9. The apparatus of claim 1 further comprising, a track from an infeed of the base element to under the roller adapted to receive the given label-liner product and align the given label-liner product under the roller.
10. The apparatus of claim 9 further comprising, a motor that drives the roller to urge the given label-liner product along the track from the infeed under the roller towards a given printer peel bar at a predefined angle.
11. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the printer peel bars have stepped radiuses.
12. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the apparatus is adapted to be manually fed the given label-liner product under the roller and over the disengage edge out of the base element while a label portion associated with the liner of the given label-liner product is pulled up and away from the disengage edge with a predefined and a constant weight attached and hanging from a backside of a liner portion associated with the liner of the given label-liner product.
13. An apparatus, comprising:
a roller situated below a disengage edge and at a predefined angle from the disengage edge, wherein the disengage edge is associated with a replaceable printer peel bar having a predefined radius;
a weight attached to a string on a bottom end of the string; and
the string attached on a top end to a backside of a liner portion associated with a label-liner web fed under the roller and up and over the disengage edge at the predefined angle;
wherein the apparatus is adapted to determine a particular replaceable printer peel bar having a particular predefined radius that permits the liner to separate from a label portion of the label-liner web when the label portion is pulled over the corresponding disengage edge of the particular replaceable printer peel bar and a downward force of the weight is being constantly applied to the backside of the liner portion.
14. The apparatus of claim 13 further comprising, a plurality of replaceable peel bars with stepped radiuses, the replaceable printer peel bar and the particular replaceable printer peel bar are two of 10 of the plurality of replaceable peel bars.
15. The apparatus of claim 13 further comprising, a shelf to hold a selectable one of the plurality of replaceable peel bars when placed in the apparatus.
16. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein the shelf is situated above the roller at the predefined angle and is adapted to hold the selectable one of the plurality of replaceable peel bars.
17. The apparatus of claim 16 further comprising, a base element or a housing that comprises the roller and the shelf.
18. The apparatus of claim 13, wherein the weight is 12 grams that hangs freely from the bottom end of the string.
19. A method, comprising:
aligning a leading edge of a label-liner web under a roller of an apparatus;
urging the leading edge of the label-liner web from under the roller and up at a predefined angle within the apparatus over a disengage edge of a replaceable printer peel bar inserted into the apparatus;
affixing a first end of a string to a backside of a liner portion of the label-liner web past the disengage edge;
affixing a second end of the string to a weight; and
urging a label portion of the label-liner web up and away from the disengage edge to determine whether the label portion of the label-liner web separates from the liner portion of the label-liner web during the urging.
20. The method of claim 19 further comprising, replacing the replaceable printer peel bar with a different replaceable peel bar having a different radius from that which was associated with the replaceable printer peel bar when the liner portion fails to separate from the label portion during the urging and repeating the urging with the different replaceable peel bar, and iterating the replacing and the urging until a specific replaceable printer peel bar with a specific radius results in the liner portion separating from the label portion during the urging.
US17/669,022 2022-02-10 2022-02-10 Apparatus and Method for Testing Liner and Label Separation Pending US20230249864A1 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US17/669,022 US20230249864A1 (en) 2022-02-10 2022-02-10 Apparatus and Method for Testing Liner and Label Separation
PCT/US2023/062319 WO2023154820A2 (en) 2022-02-10 2023-02-09 Apparatus and method for testing liner and label separation
AU2023219715A AU2023219715A1 (en) 2022-02-10 2023-02-09 Apparatus and method for testing liner and label separation

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US17/669,022 US20230249864A1 (en) 2022-02-10 2022-02-10 Apparatus and Method for Testing Liner and Label Separation

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20230249864A1 true US20230249864A1 (en) 2023-08-10

Family

ID=87521601

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US17/669,022 Pending US20230249864A1 (en) 2022-02-10 2022-02-10 Apparatus and Method for Testing Liner and Label Separation

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US20230249864A1 (en)
AU (1) AU2023219715A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2023154820A2 (en)

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6431397B1 (en) * 2000-06-09 2002-08-13 Sherman S. Fishman Method and means for dispensing releasable labels from roll-stock substrate
CN103991269A (en) * 2014-05-23 2014-08-20 华中科技大学 Stripping device and stripping method of multilayer flexible film

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5040461A (en) * 1989-11-17 1991-08-20 Avery International Corporation Label printing and dispensing apparatus
US6182730B1 (en) * 1997-04-11 2001-02-06 Grand Rapids Label Company Label cutting apparatus
US6349756B1 (en) * 1998-10-23 2002-02-26 Zih Corporation Peel assembly for a printer
US6962292B1 (en) * 2004-05-10 2005-11-08 Markem Corporation Peel bar for selective label application
GB2461922B8 (en) * 2008-07-18 2013-04-24 Pitney Bowes Ltd Reconfigurable tabbing apparatus

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6431397B1 (en) * 2000-06-09 2002-08-13 Sherman S. Fishman Method and means for dispensing releasable labels from roll-stock substrate
CN103991269A (en) * 2014-05-23 2014-08-20 华中科技大学 Stripping device and stripping method of multilayer flexible film

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
"The Effect of Peeling Rate and Peeling Angle on the Peeling Strength", Yue Wang, May 2014, The University of Akron. (Year: 2014) *
K Tool International, 72462A Magnetic Toolbox Shelf, available to the public since May 10th 2018. Accessed at <https://www.amazon.com/International-DMG001-Magnetic-Toolbox-Trays/dp/B07CZS1FSC/ref=sr_1_29?crid=1WT2OP5SY4L1F&keywords=placeabl%E2%80%A6> (Year: 2018) *
Laniakea, 2 Pack 1.5 Inch Diameter Conveyor Rollers, available to the public since November 2nd, 2020. Accessed at <https://www.amazon.com/LANIAKEA-Diameter-Conveyor-Galvanized-Stainless/dp/B08MFHYF1P/ref=sr_1_11?keywords=Conveyor+Rollers&qid=168%E2%80%A6> (Year: 2020) *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2023154820A3 (en) 2023-09-28
WO2023154820A2 (en) 2023-08-17
AU2023219715A1 (en) 2024-08-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10265968B2 (en) Label printer for linerless labels
AU676336B2 (en) Printing system for linerless labels
US20220238045A1 (en) Adhesive label and roll
EA023868B1 (en) Label ejection device
US20230249864A1 (en) Apparatus and Method for Testing Liner and Label Separation
US20020096264A1 (en) Label applying unit for a labeling machine and suitable for applying labels of different lengths
DE10337402A1 (en) Method for labeling of a product e.g. drinks containers and food packaging etc. with labels having adhesive coating on underside, and application of inactive adhesive and subsequent adhesive application
EP3771652B1 (en) Labeling apparatus
US5071030A (en) Adhesive label separator
US20230286243A1 (en) Linerless label
JP6380275B2 (en) Printer, packaging equipment
EP3570265B1 (en) A label for a baggage and a label web, a label roll and an arrangement for providing labels
EP2189291B1 (en) Device for processing labels and/or paper rolls
JP2009000973A (en) Printer
NL9100728A (en) CASSETTE-LABEL HOLDER FOR LABELS.
CN114728532A (en) Label marking machine
JP4696833B2 (en) Labeling device
JPH09156256A (en) Physical distribution label
JPS6387275A (en) Label printing system
US20240208253A1 (en) Media web tensioning
JP7054911B2 (en) Pasting equipment, packaging equipment
JP4903602B2 (en) Stencil printing machine
JP6059547B2 (en) Printing device
JPH05170239A (en) Control method for automatic labeling device
US10082993B2 (en) Method for scheduling a depletion of supply material in a printing system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: ICONEX LLC, GEORGIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:LIVINGSTON, TIMOTHY DARREN;REEL/FRAME:058976/0123

Effective date: 20220210

AS Assignment

Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT, ILLINOIS

Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ICONEX LLC;MAX INTERNATIONAL CONVERTERS INC.;MAXSTICK PRODUCTS LTD.;REEL/FRAME:064179/0848

Effective date: 20230630

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: ADVISORY ACTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

AS Assignment

Owner name: JEFFERIES FINANCE LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT, NEW YORK

Free format text: TERM LOAN PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:ICONEX LLC;MAXSTICK PRODUCTS LTD.;APPVION, LLC;REEL/FRAME:068763/0472

Effective date: 20240823

Owner name: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT, MARYLAND

Free format text: ABL PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:ICONEX LLC;MAXSTICK PRODUCTS LTD.;APPVION, LLC;REEL/FRAME:068763/0433

Effective date: 20240823

Owner name: MAXSTICK PRODUCTS LTD., PENNSYLVANIA

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:068762/0334

Effective date: 20240823

Owner name: MAX INTERNATIONAL CONVERTERS INC., PENNSYLVANIA

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:068762/0334

Effective date: 20240823

Owner name: ICONEX LLC, GEORGIA

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:068762/0334

Effective date: 20240823

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED