US20230039146A1 - Solar energy system and geared drive system - Google Patents

Solar energy system and geared drive system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20230039146A1
US20230039146A1 US17/883,666 US202217883666A US2023039146A1 US 20230039146 A1 US20230039146 A1 US 20230039146A1 US 202217883666 A US202217883666 A US 202217883666A US 2023039146 A1 US2023039146 A1 US 2023039146A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
modules
electrical output
inverter
irradiance
irradiance data
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
US17/883,666
Inventor
Gil Kroyzer
Israel Kroizer
Greg Ravikovich
Moshe Horowitz
Morag Am Shallem
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Solargik Ltd
Original Assignee
Solargik Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Solargik Ltd filed Critical Solargik Ltd
Priority to US17/883,666 priority Critical patent/US20230039146A1/en
Publication of US20230039146A1 publication Critical patent/US20230039146A1/en
Assigned to Solargik Ltd reassignment Solargik Ltd ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: KROIZER, ISRAEL, Am Shallem, Morag, HOROWITZ, MOSHE, KROYZER, GIL, Ravikovich, Greg
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H02GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02SGENERATION OF ELECTRIC POWER BY CONVERSION OF INFRARED RADIATION, VISIBLE LIGHT OR ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT, e.g. USING PHOTOVOLTAIC [PV] MODULES
    • H02S20/00Supporting structures for PV modules
    • H02S20/30Supporting structures being movable or adjustable, e.g. for angle adjustment
    • H02S20/32Supporting structures being movable or adjustable, e.g. for angle adjustment specially adapted for solar tracking
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F16ENGINEERING ELEMENTS AND UNITS; GENERAL MEASURES FOR PRODUCING AND MAINTAINING EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF MACHINES OR INSTALLATIONS; THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL
    • F16HGEARING
    • F16H19/00Gearings comprising essentially only toothed gears or friction members and not capable of conveying indefinitely-continuing rotary motion
    • F16H19/08Gearings comprising essentially only toothed gears or friction members and not capable of conveying indefinitely-continuing rotary motion for interconverting rotary motion and oscillating motion
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F24HEATING; RANGES; VENTILATING
    • F24SSOLAR HEAT COLLECTORS; SOLAR HEAT SYSTEMS
    • F24S30/00Arrangements for moving or orienting solar heat collector modules
    • F24S30/40Arrangements for moving or orienting solar heat collector modules for rotary movement
    • F24S30/42Arrangements for moving or orienting solar heat collector modules for rotary movement with only one rotation axis
    • F24S30/425Horizontal axis
    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B19/00Programme-control systems
    • G05B19/02Programme-control systems electric
    • G05B19/04Programme control other than numerical control, i.e. in sequence controllers or logic controllers
    • G05B19/042Programme control other than numerical control, i.e. in sequence controllers or logic controllers using digital processors
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H02GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02JCIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS OR SYSTEMS FOR SUPPLYING OR DISTRIBUTING ELECTRIC POWER; SYSTEMS FOR STORING ELECTRIC ENERGY
    • H02J3/00Circuit arrangements for ac mains or ac distribution networks
    • H02J3/004Generation forecast, e.g. methods or systems for forecasting future energy generation
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H02GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02JCIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS OR SYSTEMS FOR SUPPLYING OR DISTRIBUTING ELECTRIC POWER; SYSTEMS FOR STORING ELECTRIC ENERGY
    • H02J3/00Circuit arrangements for ac mains or ac distribution networks
    • H02J3/38Arrangements for parallely feeding a single network by two or more generators, converters or transformers
    • H02J3/381Dispersed generators
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H02GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02JCIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS OR SYSTEMS FOR SUPPLYING OR DISTRIBUTING ELECTRIC POWER; SYSTEMS FOR STORING ELECTRIC ENERGY
    • H02J3/00Circuit arrangements for ac mains or ac distribution networks
    • H02J3/38Arrangements for parallely feeding a single network by two or more generators, converters or transformers
    • H02J3/46Controlling of the sharing of output between the generators, converters, or transformers
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H02GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02SGENERATION OF ELECTRIC POWER BY CONVERSION OF INFRARED RADIATION, VISIBLE LIGHT OR ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT, e.g. USING PHOTOVOLTAIC [PV] MODULES
    • H02S40/00Components or accessories in combination with PV modules, not provided for in groups H02S10/00 - H02S30/00
    • H02S40/30Electrical components
    • H02S40/32Electrical components comprising DC/AC inverter means associated with the PV module itself, e.g. AC modules
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F16ENGINEERING ELEMENTS AND UNITS; GENERAL MEASURES FOR PRODUCING AND MAINTAINING EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF MACHINES OR INSTALLATIONS; THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL
    • F16HGEARING
    • F16H19/00Gearings comprising essentially only toothed gears or friction members and not capable of conveying indefinitely-continuing rotary motion
    • F16H19/08Gearings comprising essentially only toothed gears or friction members and not capable of conveying indefinitely-continuing rotary motion for interconverting rotary motion and oscillating motion
    • F16H2019/085Gearings comprising essentially only toothed gears or friction members and not capable of conveying indefinitely-continuing rotary motion for interconverting rotary motion and oscillating motion by using flexible members
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F24HEATING; RANGES; VENTILATING
    • F24SSOLAR HEAT COLLECTORS; SOLAR HEAT SYSTEMS
    • F24S30/00Arrangements for moving or orienting solar heat collector modules
    • F24S2030/10Special components
    • F24S2030/11Driving means
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F24HEATING; RANGES; VENTILATING
    • F24SSOLAR HEAT COLLECTORS; SOLAR HEAT SYSTEMS
    • F24S30/00Arrangements for moving or orienting solar heat collector modules
    • F24S2030/10Special components
    • F24S2030/13Transmissions
    • F24S2030/133Transmissions in the form of flexible elements, e.g. belts, chains, ropes
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F24HEATING; RANGES; VENTILATING
    • F24SSOLAR HEAT COLLECTORS; SOLAR HEAT SYSTEMS
    • F24S30/00Arrangements for moving or orienting solar heat collector modules
    • F24S2030/10Special components
    • F24S2030/13Transmissions
    • F24S2030/136Transmissions for moving several solar collectors by common transmission elements
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F24HEATING; RANGES; VENTILATING
    • F24SSOLAR HEAT COLLECTORS; SOLAR HEAT SYSTEMS
    • F24S30/00Arrangements for moving or orienting solar heat collector modules
    • F24S2030/10Special components
    • F24S2030/19Movement dampening means; Braking means
    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B2219/00Program-control systems
    • G05B2219/20Pc systems
    • G05B2219/26Pc applications
    • G05B2219/2639Energy management, use maximum of cheap power, keep peak load low
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02EREDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E10/00Energy generation through renewable energy sources
    • Y02E10/40Solar thermal energy, e.g. solar towers
    • Y02E10/47Mountings or tracking
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02EREDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E10/00Energy generation through renewable energy sources
    • Y02E10/50Photovoltaic [PV] energy

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to solar energy systems and in particular to devices and methods for mechanically clipping the electrical output of photovoltaic (PV) assemblies using tracking systems configured to pivot the PV assemblies away from direct on-sun orientations.
  • PV photovoltaic
  • PV photovoltaic
  • PV arrays serve to generate electricity when solar illumination is incident upon the arrays. Generated electricity is typically fed into an electrical grid of the city/locality.
  • Sunlight collected by PV arrays is often categorized into two types:
  • DNR Direct Normal Radiation
  • DNI Direct Normal irradiation
  • Diffused Irradiation which when measured on a flat surface is equivalent to Diffused Horizontal Irradiation (DHI) and, when the PV array is inclined, is called Diffused Tilted Irradiation (DTI).
  • Diffused irradiation can include reflected (albedo) irradiance, which is sometimes considered a separate, third type of solar radiation.
  • PV arrays One way to significantly increase electrical generation obtained from PV arrays is to have the PV arrays in orientations as close as possible to normal to the sun. This captures a maximal portion of the direct normal solar irradiance incident upon the PV panel, and be done by mounting the arrays on a solar tracker mechanism to effectively track the sun during the day and reduce ‘cosine’ losses. Cosine losses are so-called because the direct component of the solar irradiance incident on the PV arrays is received by the PV panel in accordance with the cosine of the angle between the incidence vector of the direct normal solar radiation and a vector that is normal to the active, or receiving, face of each PV panel.
  • Electricity produced by the PV arrays is commonly conducted to one or more inverters which convert the DC electricity to AC and deliver it to a load such as a utility transmission grid.
  • Solar energy systems are commonly configured such that a maximum output rating of the PV arrays is higher than that of the inverter(s) so as to avoid investing in inverter capacity for only a relatively small number of peak output hours.
  • Inverters are often equipped with an electronic/electrical ‘clipping’ function in which the electrical output from the PV arrays is reduced, e.g., by changing the working point (current/voltage) of the arrays to make the electrical generation less efficient and thereby produce less electricity from the same solar radiation.
  • a method for operating a solar energy system.
  • the solar energy system comprises a plurality of photovoltaic (PV) modules, respective motor assemblies configured to pivot the plurality of PV modules about respective longitudinal axes, and an inverter having an inverter rating.
  • the method comprises: (a) determining that a calculated electrical output of the plurality of PV modules exceeds the inverter rating; and (b) pivoting one or more PV modules of the plurality of PV modules so as to reduce real-time electrical output from at least a direct normal component of real-time solar irradiance incident on the one or more PV modules.
  • the calculated electrical output can comprise future electrical output.
  • the calculated electrical output can be calculated using irradiance data.
  • the method can additionally comprise accessing irradiance data, to be performed before step (a), i.e., determining that a calculated electrical output of the plurality of PV modules exceeds the inverter rating.
  • the accessed irradiance data can include historical irradiance data. In some embodiments, the accessed irradiance data can include current irradiance data. In some embodiments, the accessed irradiance data can include forecasted irradiance data. In some embodiments, the accessed irradiance data can include at least two types of irradiance data selected from historical irradiance data, current irradiance data, and forecasted irradiance data.
  • the pivoting can include pivoting at least one of the one or more PV modules so as to reduce the direct normal component by at least 70%. In some embodiments, the pivoting can include pivoting at least one of the one or more PV modules so as to reduce the direct normal component by at least 50%. In some embodiments, the pivoting can include pivoting at least one of the one or more PV modules so as to reduce the direct normal component by at least 10%.
  • the pivoting can reduce real-time electrical output of the plurality of PV modules to be not more than the inverter rating.
  • the pivoting reduces the real-time electrical output of the plurality of PV modules to be more than the inverter rating, and/or (ii) the inverter additionally performs a clipping function.
  • the accessing can include acquiring an irradiance forecast for an imminent future time period characterized by having a length of not more than 15 minutes.
  • a control system in communication with one or more motor assemblies is configured to pivot, about respective longitudinal axes, a plurality of PV modules of a solar energy system.
  • the solar energy system additionally comprises an inverter having an inverter rating.
  • the control system comprises program code (i) for determining that a calculated electrical output of the plurality of PV modules exceeds the inverter rating, and (ii) for causing one or more PV modules of the plurality of PV modules to pivot so as to reduce real-time electrical output from at least a direct normal component of real-time solar irradiance incident on the one or more PV modules.
  • the program code can additionally be for accessing irradiance data, and/or the calculated electrical output can be calculated using the irradiance data.
  • the accessed irradiance data can include forecasted irradiance data of an irradiance forecast for an imminent future time period characterized by having a length of not more than 15 minutes.
  • a solar energy system can comprise a plurality of photovoltaic (PV) modules, respective motor assemblies configured to pivot the plurality of PV modules about respective longitudinal axes, an inverter having an inverter rating, and the control system of any of the embodiments disclosed hereinabove.
  • PV photovoltaic
  • FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of a solar energy system, according to embodiments of the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 shows a schematic layout of selected components of a solar energy system according to embodiments of the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 shows a block diagram of a control system for a solar energy system, according to embodiments of the present invention.
  • FIG. 4 shows a block diagram relating to a forecasting process, according to embodiments of the present invention.
  • FIGS. 5 A and 5 B show flowcharts of methods and method steps for operating a solar energy system, according to embodiments of the present invention.
  • FIG. 6 is a schematic illustration of a PV module tracking the position of the sun, according to embodiments of the present invention.
  • FIGS. 7 , 8 A, 8 B, 9 , and 10 are schematic illustrations of the PV module of FIG. 6 pivoted to an orientation in which real-time electrical output is reduced, according to embodiments of the present invention.
  • FIG. 11 shows a graph, based on computer modeling, of irradiance values equivalent to delivered quantities of energy, illustrating the effect of reducing real-time electrical output, e.g., to the level of an inverter rating, according to embodiments of the present invention.
  • FIG. 12 shows a graph, based on computer modeling, of irradiance values equivalent to delivered quantities of energy, schematically illustrating the effect of reducing real-time electrical output, e.g., to a level above an inverter rating, according to embodiments of the present invention.
  • Embodiments disclosed herein relate to mechanically clipping the electrical output of an array of photovoltaic (PV) modules of a solar energy system when the electrical output exceeds or is projected to exceed the rating of an inverter.
  • Mechanisms as the term is used herein means mechanically adjusting the orientation of PV modules to receive less solar radiation, thereby reducing the DC electrical output of the PV array.
  • a ‘solar energy system’ as used herein means a system for generating electricity using an array of (PV) modules.
  • the system can include an inverter for converting the direct-current (DC) electricity generated by the PV modules to alternating current (AC) electricity, e.g., for delivery to an electricity grid.
  • DC direct-current
  • AC alternating current
  • “Clipping’ means limiting or reducing the amount of DC electricity converted to AC electricity by the inverter so as not to exceed an AC output rating of the inverter.
  • An inverter rating can be expressed, e.g., in terms of its maximum AC output, or in terms of the amount of DC input equivalent to a maximum level. The rating can be a variable dependent upon factors such as (and not exhaustively) the amount of DC input, or environmental factors such as temperature and humidity.
  • an inverter rating is referred to as a constant rather than a variable for purposes of brevity and clarity, but within the scope of any of the disclosed embodiments of the present invention, the rating can be alternatively and more precisely regarded as a variable, and the resulting calculations and determinations can be adjusted accordingly, including in real time.
  • Solar energy systems are frequently deployed with inverters having ratings up to 10%, up to 20%, up to 30% or even a higher percentage below the equivalent DC output of the PV array.
  • the PV array operates at or close to its maximum output capacity a limited number of hours per year, making the incremental investment in raising the inverter rating less worthwhile.
  • a solar energy system 100 includes a PV array 95 comprising a plurality of PV modules 57 (shown in FIG. 2 ).
  • the PV array 95 includes a tracking component, i.e., a solar tracker, for increasing cumulative electricity generated over the course of a period of time.
  • a solar tracker is an arrangement that changes the orientation of the PV panels so as to capture, i.e., convert, a higher proportion of the direct irradiance falling on the panels over the course of nearly any given period of time. Capture and conversion of the diffuse radiation component is largely unaffected by the tracking.
  • a single-axis tracker is one that rotates PV panels around a single axis, usually from east to west over the course of a day around a north-south axis.
  • a double-axis tracker is one that is designed to generally have the PV panels ‘face’ the sun directly at all times so as to capture and convert the entire amount of available direct irradiance.
  • Some double-axis trackers operate using Euler angles and are not, strictly speaking, rotating the PV panels about two Cartesian axes, but the results are substantially the same.
  • the embodiments disclosed herein are described in terms of single-axis tracking, but their application, mutatis mutandis, to double-axis tracking, is within the scope of the present invention.
  • the solar system 100 of FIG. 1 additionally includes an inverter 190 for conversion of DC electricity to AC.
  • An inverter can include electronic circuitry, for example for synchronizing the phase, and for matching the voltage and frequency of the power output to those of the grid.
  • the PV array typically has an output rating in kilowatts peak (kWp) which is the maximum DC power output rating for a given set of standard of environmental and operating conditions such as, e.g., temperature.
  • an inverter 190 can have a rating that is lower than the output rating of the array of PV modules. This is usually because the PV array 95 may have a sharp output peak in midday, and configuring the inverter 190 to convert and deliver all of the peak energy would mean that the inverter 190 is not fully utilized during most hours of the day—and of the year. Thus, the inverter 190 can be configured to ‘clip’ the peak output of the PV array so as to achieve better utilization of the inverter.
  • An inverter may perform the clipping functionally electronically and/or electrically, for example by changing the electrical working point (current and voltage) of the PV array to make the PV modules less efficient.
  • FIG. 1 further illustrates a non-limiting example of a power flow scheme for a solar energy system 100 : power generated by the PV array 95 flows to a charge controller 40 as indicated by arrow 901 . Two-way power flow takes place between the charge controller 40 and an energy storage device 165 , as indicated by two-way arrow 902 . Power from the PV array 95 and the energy storage device 165 flows through the charge controller 40 to the inverter 190 , as indicated by arrow 903 . The inverter 190 can deliver energy to the electric grid 15 , as indicated by arrow 904 .
  • a solar energy system 100 includes one or more PV modules 57 .
  • the PV module 57 includes an array of n PV panels 55 1 through 55 n , joined to a support subassembly 58 .
  • the support subassembly 58 includes an array of frames 56 for mounting the PV panels 55 , and a central elongated member 59 to which the frames 56 are joined.
  • the central elongated member 59 serves to transfer a torque to rotate the frames 56 as a unit together with the central elongated member 59 and the PV panels 55 .
  • the PV module 57 is rotated about a central longitudinal axis indicated in FIG.
  • the central elongated member 59 is pivotably supported by ground supports 12 . As shown by axes 1000 , the panels are facing generally east, indicating that FIG. 2 shows a morning orientation.
  • the tracking of the PV module 57 is shown as being east-west tracking as is the case in the vast majority of current installations of PV modules, but the principles disclosed here are equally applicable to north-south tracking systems, mutatis mutandis.
  • a control system 150 for a solar energy system 100 is illustrated schematically in FIG. 3 to show selected components.
  • the exemplary control system 150 of FIG. 2 includes one or more computer processors 155 , a computer-readable storage medium 158 , a communications module 157 , and a power source 159 .
  • the computer-readable storage medium 158 can include transient and/or transient storage, and can include one or more storage units, all in accordance with desired functionality and design choices.
  • the storage 158 can be used for any one or more of: storing program instructions, in firmware and/or software, for execution by the one or more processors 155 of the control system 150 .
  • the stored program instructions include program instructions for operating a solar energy system 100 .
  • Data storage 154 can be provided for historical data, e.g., actual irradiance and/or forecast values, e.g., forecasted irradiance values, and other data related to the operation of the solar energy system 100 .
  • the two storage modules 154 , 158 form a single module.
  • the communications module 159 is configured to establish communications links, e.g., via communication arrangements 70 with a forecasting system 200 (described below and illustrated schematically in FIG. 3 ), and with the charge controller 40 via communications arrangements 75 .
  • a control system 150 does not necessarily include all of the components shown in FIG. 2 .
  • communications arrangements or similar terms such as “communications links” as used herein mean any wired connection or wireless connection via which data communications can take place.
  • suitable technologies for providing communications arrangements include any short-range point-to-point communication system such as IrDA, RFID (Radio Frequency Identification), TransferJet, Wireless USB, DSRC (Dedicated Short Range Communications), or Near Field Communication; wireless networks (including sensor networks) such as: ZigBee, EnOcean; Wi-fi, Bluetooth, TransferJet, or Ultra-wideband; and wired communications bus technologies such as.
  • CAN bus Controller Area Network, Fieldbus, FireWire, HyperTransport and InfiniBand.
  • FIG. 4 shows examples of components, according to embodiments, provided for working with a short-term forecasting system 200 .
  • the non-exhaustive list of components includes one or more irradiance sensors 81 , local meteorological sensors 82 , and a source of satellite imagery 83 .
  • a future time period having a short-term forecast available from the forecasting system 200 can be as short as 5, 10 or 15 minutes, or as long as 30, 45 or 60 minutes.
  • the solar energy system 100 comprises a plurality of PV modules 57 and an inverter 190 having an inverter rating.
  • the method comprises at least the two method steps S 01 and S 02 .
  • Step S 01 includes: determining that a calculated electrical output of the plurality of PV modules 57 exceeds the inverter rating.
  • the calculated electrical output comprises future electrical output, e.g., electrical output of a future period or an imminent future period.
  • the calculated electrical output is calculated using irradiance data.
  • the irradiance data can include historical irradiance data and/or current irradiance data and/or forecasted irradiance data.
  • the irradiance data includes at least two types of data selected from historical, current and forecasted data.
  • the forecasted irradiance data is acquired from a forecasting system 200 such as the forecasting system 200 of FIG. 4 .
  • Step S 02 includes: pivoting one or more PV modules 57 of the plurality of PV modules 57 so as to reduce real-time electrical output from at least a direct normal component of real-time solar irradiance incident on the one or more PV modules 57 .
  • pivoting the PV modules 57 from tracking the sun to be in an ‘on-sun’ position e.g., as illustrated in FIG. 6
  • being ‘off-sun’ e.g., as illustrated in FIGS. 7 - 10
  • Step S 02 includes pivoting at least one of the one or more PV modules 57 so as to reduce the direct normal component by at least 70%, or at least 50%, or at least 10%.
  • a smaller number of PV modules 57 e.g., at least one PV module 57 and at most half
  • a higher direct normal component reduction per module is necessary, e.g., at least 50%, or at least 60%, or at least 70%, or at least 80%, or at least 90%.
  • a larger number of PV modules 57 (e.g., at least half and up to all of the PV modules 57 of the solar energy system 100 ) is included in the group of pivoted modules 57 and a lower direct normal component reduction per module is necessary, e.g., at least 10%, or at least 20%, or at least 30%, or at least 40%.
  • the number or percentage of PV modules 57 selected for pivoting to an off-sun position for reducing electrical output is selectable by the user, or by the control system 150 , as long as a total desired reduction in electrical output can be achieved for the solar energy system 100 by the selected PV modules.
  • not all PV modules 57 need be pivoted to the same degree.
  • a first group of PV modules 57 can be pivoted to reduce the direct normal component by at least 70%, and a second group of PV modules 57 is pivoted to reduce the direct normal component by about 10%.
  • the method additionally comprises method step S 03 , which is illustrated by the flow chart in FIG. 5 B :
  • Step S 03 includes: accessing irradiance data. According to the embodiments, Step S 03 is performed before Step S 01 .
  • irradiance data can include any one, two or three of the three types of irradiance data: historical (including recent), current, and future (forecasted).
  • some or all of the steps of the method can be carried out by a control system 150 of the solar energy system 100 , e.g., the control system 150 of FIG. 3 .
  • FIGS. 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , and 10 which illustrate, inter alia, the concept of reducing electrical output by pivoting PV panels 55 in order to deliberately create or increase ‘cosine losses’.
  • FIGS. 6 - 10 shows a schematic end view, i.e., parallel to axis 900 ) of selected components of a PV module 57 , including a PV panel 55 supported by a ground support 12 .
  • the amount of direct normal irradiance actually incident on the active face of a PV panel 55 is proportional to the cosine between the angle of incidence of direct normal irradiance, indicated in each of FIGS. 6 - 10 by an arrow 600 , and a normal vector, i.e., normal to the active face of the PV panel 55 , indicated by arrow 500 in each of the figures.
  • cosine losses The difference between the electricity output available by facing the sun directly and the electricity output of the PV panel 55 when it is oriented such that there is a non-zero angle between incidence and normal vectors 600 , 500 , is referred to as cosine losses.
  • This simple formula ignores, and only for purposes of simplifying the discussion herein, the fact that there can also be a small increase in optical losses in a PV panel not facing the sun directly resulting from the direct radiation having a longer path through the covering, non-active layer of the panel, e.g., a glass layer.
  • the additional optical losses can generally be assumed to be much smaller than the cosine losses, e.g., an order of magnitude smaller, or even smaller.
  • the formula also ignores, and also only for the purpose of simplifying the discussion, additional cosine losses from the PV panels 55 being slightly off-sun in the north-south axis (i.e., in an east-west tracking solar energy system 100 such as is illustrated in FIG. 2 ).
  • the vectors 500 , 600 drawn in FIGS. 6 - 10 are really the east-west component vectors of the actual respective vectors, and the actual respective vectors can additionally have a north-south component vector. In this way, the teachings of FIGS. 6 - 10 are applicable to two-axis trackers as well as the single-axis trackers shown.
  • FIG. 6 shows in an end-view illustration a zero angle between incidence and normal vectors 600 , 500
  • a corresponding side view might show a non-zero angle.
  • the cosine of the actual angle equals the cosine of the east-west vector multiplied by the cosine of the north-south vector.
  • Pivoting the PV modules 57 east-to-west (or vice versa) on a single axis as per arrows 1100 of FIG. 2 does not change the north-south vector of the angle determining cosine losses (the vector parallel to the longitudinal axis 900 of the PV module 57 ). Therefore the north-south cosine loss need not be taken into account—the north-south cosine loss was already accounted for in the calculation of expected electrical output before the reduction caused by the east-west pivoting.
  • the PV module 57 can be installed with a north-south tilt, e.g., having higher ground supports 12 at a northern end than the ground supports at the southern end (in the northern hemisphere and the reverse in the southern hemisphere), in order to generally reduce average cosine losses over the course of the year.
  • a north-south tilt e.g., having higher ground supports 12 at a northern end than the ground supports at the southern end (in the northern hemisphere and the reverse in the southern hemisphere), in order to generally reduce average cosine losses over the course of the year.
  • this type of implementation can increase cosine losses at some times and reduce cosine losses at other times.
  • Other types of implementation can include a variable north-south tilt. Nonetheless, for purposes of this simplified discussion, only changes in the east-west vector of the angle between incidence and normal vectors 600 , 500 are addressed.
  • FIG. 6 the panel 55 faces the sun 1 directly.
  • the normal vector 500 is therefore parallel to the direct normal radiation 600 .
  • the full surface area of the panel 55 faces the sun 1 .
  • FIG. 7 shows the PV module 57 of FIG. 6 with the panel 55 having been pivoted 90° counter-clockwise, as indicated by pivot-direction arrow 550 , resulting in an angle of 90° between the direct normal radiation vector 600 and the normal vector 500 .
  • the panel 55 of FIG. 7 receives no direct solar radiation, and the pivoting of the panel 55 has resulted in a 100% reduction in the direct normal component of the solar irradiance that would be incident on the panel 55 had it remained in the orientation of FIG. 6 .
  • a 90° rotation of the PV panel 55 is equivalent to a 100% reduction in the portion of the electrical output from photovoltaic conversion of direct normal irradiance, as the zero-angle cosine of 1.0 between incidence and normal vectors 600 , 500 (in FIG. 6 ) has been reduced all the way to zero (in FIG. 7 ).
  • pivot-direction arrow 550 shows that the PV panel 55 is rotated counter-clockwise from its orientation before the mechanical-clipping rotation.
  • the direction of rotation is not substantially relevant to the reduction in electrical output, and other operational factors may be taken into account when deciding in which direction to pivot: for example, it may be desirable for the off-sun position to be closer in terms of rotation to the orientation to which the PV panel 55 will be rotating.
  • a PV module 57 may be geared to rotate faster in one direction than the other.
  • FIGS. 8 and 9 show the PV panel 55 of FIG. 6 as having been rotated by 72°—clockwise in FIG. 8 A and counter-clockwise in FIG. 8 B .
  • the rotation reduces electrical output generated from the direct normal component of the solar radiation by about 70%, because the cosine of 72° is about 0.3, and the direction of rotation is not substantially relevant to the cosine loss induced by the pivoting.
  • FIG. 9 shows the PV panel 55 as having been rotated by 60°—the cosine of 0.5 being effective to reduce the quantity of direct normal radiation received by 50%.
  • FIG. 10 shows the PV panel 55 rotated by 26°—the cosine of 0.9 being effective to reduce the quantity of direct normal radiation received by 10%.
  • the mechanical clipping procedure i.e., the pivoting of selected PV modules 57 to respective off-sun orientations can be targeted to fully address the difference between an inverter rating (e.g., a maximum rating for a given set of environmental conditions) and the electrical output, e.g., for an imminent future forecasting period.
  • an inverter rating e.g., a maximum rating for a given set of environmental conditions
  • the electrical output e.g., for an imminent future forecasting period.
  • the mechanical clipping procedure can be targeted to partially address the excess electrical output in excess of the inverter rating, e.g., half or most or most of the electrical output in excess of the inverter rating, and then leaving the ‘remaining’ excess electrical output, e.g., current or forecasted electrical output to the inverter to clip, e.g., by changing an electrical set point of the PV modules 57 .
  • FIGS. 11 and 12 show graphs of computer-modeled output of a solar energy system according to embodiments.
  • the x-axis shows time (in minutes) from sunrise over the course of a 12-hour solar day
  • the y-axis shows the solar radiance in W/m 2 (watts per square meter) that is equivalent to the electrical output with and without reduction from mechanical clipping.
  • W/m 2 watts per square meter
  • FIG. 11 shows a solar radiation curve with clear-sky irradiance peaking at 900 W/m 2 during the middle of the day. This produces the electrical output without mechanical-clipping reduction represented by the solid line.
  • the dashed line shows the solar radiation equivalent of electrical output that reduced to the level of an inverter rating equivalent to a maximum irradiance of 800 W/m 2 .
  • some or all of the plurality of PV modules of the solar energy system are pivoted away from their on-sun orientation to increase cosine losses (including pivoting to 90° from the direct normal vector) for the modules involved.
  • FIG. 12 illustrates an embodiment in which the inverter rating is the electrical-output equivalent of a maximum irradiance of about 750 W/m 2 (dotted line).
  • the PV modules are again controlled to be pivoted away from their on-sun orientation to increase cosine losses for the modules involved. This ‘mechanical clipping’ is sufficient in the example of FIG.
  • the inverter 12 to reduce electrical output to an electrical output level equivalent to a maximum irradiance of 800 W/m 2 .
  • the inverter additionally performs an inverter clipping function to reduce electrical output further, equivalent to a maximum irradiance of 750 W/m 2 , i.e., the inverter rating.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Power Engineering (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Sustainable Development (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Sustainable Energy (AREA)
  • Thermal Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Photovoltaic Devices (AREA)

Abstract

A control system for a solar energy system causes motor assemblies to pivot the photovoltaic (PV) arrays of the solar energy system about respective longitudinal axes, e.g., to track the sun across the sky. The solar energy system also has an inverter with a known inverter rating, e.g., for a given output level and ambient temperature. The control system is programmed, inter alia, to determine when a calculated electrical output of the PV arrays, e.g., a future electrical output during an imminent future time period, exceeds the inverter rating. The control system then causes some or all of the PV arrays to pivot out of regular solar tracking mode into a position that introduces higher cosine losses, so as to reduce real-time electrical output from at least the direct normal component of real-time solar irradiance incident on the PV arrays involved in order not to exceed the inverter rating, or to exceed it less.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This patent application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 63/260,068, filed on Aug. 9, 2021, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to solar energy systems and in particular to devices and methods for mechanically clipping the electrical output of photovoltaic (PV) assemblies using tracking systems configured to pivot the PV assemblies away from direct on-sun orientations.
  • BACKGROUND
  • Achieving a diversified low-carbon emissions energy economy has been limited by economic and technological limitations. Solar energy systems comprising photovoltaic (PV) arrays are commonly deployed to capture energy from both direct and diffuse (including reflected) solar irradiance. Tracking PV systems are deployed in which PV arrays are pivoted to reduce the cosine losses of the direct irradiance component, so-called because the energy absorbed is a function of the cosine of the angle between the incidence vector and a normal vector of the PV array.
  • PV arrays serve to generate electricity when solar illumination is incident upon the arrays. Generated electricity is typically fed into an electrical grid of the city/locality.
  • Sunlight collected by PV arrays is often categorized into two types:
  • 1. Direct Normal Radiation (DNR), sometimes referred to as Direct Normal irradiation (DNI), and
  • 2. Diffused Irradiation, which when measured on a flat surface is equivalent to Diffused Horizontal Irradiation (DHI) and, when the PV array is inclined, is called Diffused Tilted Irradiation (DTI). Diffused irradiation can include reflected (albedo) irradiance, which is sometimes considered a separate, third type of solar radiation.
  • One way to significantly increase electrical generation obtained from PV arrays is to have the PV arrays in orientations as close as possible to normal to the sun. This captures a maximal portion of the direct normal solar irradiance incident upon the PV panel, and be done by mounting the arrays on a solar tracker mechanism to effectively track the sun during the day and reduce ‘cosine’ losses. Cosine losses are so-called because the direct component of the solar irradiance incident on the PV arrays is received by the PV panel in accordance with the cosine of the angle between the incidence vector of the direct normal solar radiation and a vector that is normal to the active, or receiving, face of each PV panel.
  • Electricity produced by the PV arrays is commonly conducted to one or more inverters which convert the DC electricity to AC and deliver it to a load such as a utility transmission grid. Solar energy systems are commonly configured such that a maximum output rating of the PV arrays is higher than that of the inverter(s) so as to avoid investing in inverter capacity for only a relatively small number of peak output hours. Inverters are often equipped with an electronic/electrical ‘clipping’ function in which the electrical output from the PV arrays is reduced, e.g., by changing the working point (current/voltage) of the arrays to make the electrical generation less efficient and thereby produce less electricity from the same solar radiation. However, this arrangement, inter alia, may have the disadvantage of shortening the life of the inverters, which often have to be replaced several times during the lifespan of the PV arrays. Another disadvantage is that operating at a less efficient set point means that more heat is generated in PV panels, thus shortening the life of the PV panels as well. Alternative arrangements do not yet exist in which PV arrays themselves are equipped to limit their own output by reducing the amount of electricity generated at peak insolation levels, without generating excess heat.
  • SUMMARY
  • According to embodiments of the present invention, a method is disclosed for operating a solar energy system. The solar energy system comprises a plurality of photovoltaic (PV) modules, respective motor assemblies configured to pivot the plurality of PV modules about respective longitudinal axes, and an inverter having an inverter rating. The method comprises: (a) determining that a calculated electrical output of the plurality of PV modules exceeds the inverter rating; and (b) pivoting one or more PV modules of the plurality of PV modules so as to reduce real-time electrical output from at least a direct normal component of real-time solar irradiance incident on the one or more PV modules.
  • In some embodiments, the calculated electrical output can comprise future electrical output.
  • In some embodiments, the calculated electrical output can be calculated using irradiance data.
  • In some embodiments, the method can additionally comprise accessing irradiance data, to be performed before step (a), i.e., determining that a calculated electrical output of the plurality of PV modules exceeds the inverter rating.
  • In some embodiments, the accessed irradiance data can include historical irradiance data. In some embodiments, the accessed irradiance data can include current irradiance data. In some embodiments, the accessed irradiance data can include forecasted irradiance data. In some embodiments, the accessed irradiance data can include at least two types of irradiance data selected from historical irradiance data, current irradiance data, and forecasted irradiance data.
  • In some embodiments, the pivoting can include pivoting at least one of the one or more PV modules so as to reduce the direct normal component by at least 70%. In some embodiments, the pivoting can include pivoting at least one of the one or more PV modules so as to reduce the direct normal component by at least 50%. In some embodiments, the pivoting can include pivoting at least one of the one or more PV modules so as to reduce the direct normal component by at least 10%.
  • In some embodiments, the pivoting can reduce real-time electrical output of the plurality of PV modules to be not more than the inverter rating.
  • In some embodiments, it can be that (i) the pivoting reduces the real-time electrical output of the plurality of PV modules to be more than the inverter rating, and/or (ii) the inverter additionally performs a clipping function.
  • In some embodiments, the accessing can include acquiring an irradiance forecast for an imminent future time period characterized by having a length of not more than 15 minutes.
  • According to embodiments of the present invention, a control system in communication with one or more motor assemblies is configured to pivot, about respective longitudinal axes, a plurality of PV modules of a solar energy system. The solar energy system additionally comprises an inverter having an inverter rating. The control system comprises program code (i) for determining that a calculated electrical output of the plurality of PV modules exceeds the inverter rating, and (ii) for causing one or more PV modules of the plurality of PV modules to pivot so as to reduce real-time electrical output from at least a direct normal component of real-time solar irradiance incident on the one or more PV modules.
  • In some embodiments, the program code can additionally be for accessing irradiance data, and/or the calculated electrical output can be calculated using the irradiance data.
  • In some embodiments, the accessed irradiance data can include forecasted irradiance data of an irradiance forecast for an imminent future time period characterized by having a length of not more than 15 minutes.
  • In some embodiments of the present invention, a solar energy system can comprise a plurality of photovoltaic (PV) modules, respective motor assemblies configured to pivot the plurality of PV modules about respective longitudinal axes, an inverter having an inverter rating, and the control system of any of the embodiments disclosed hereinabove.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The invention will now be described further, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which the dimensions of components and features shown in the figures are chosen for convenience and clarity of presentation and not necessarily to scale. In the drawings:
  • FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of a solar energy system, according to embodiments of the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 shows a schematic layout of selected components of a solar energy system according to embodiments of the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 shows a block diagram of a control system for a solar energy system, according to embodiments of the present invention.
  • FIG. 4 shows a block diagram relating to a forecasting process, according to embodiments of the present invention.
  • FIGS. 5A and 5B show flowcharts of methods and method steps for operating a solar energy system, according to embodiments of the present invention.
  • FIG. 6 is a schematic illustration of a PV module tracking the position of the sun, according to embodiments of the present invention.
  • FIGS. 7, 8A, 8B, 9, and 10 are schematic illustrations of the PV module of FIG. 6 pivoted to an orientation in which real-time electrical output is reduced, according to embodiments of the present invention.
  • FIG. 11 shows a graph, based on computer modeling, of irradiance values equivalent to delivered quantities of energy, illustrating the effect of reducing real-time electrical output, e.g., to the level of an inverter rating, according to embodiments of the present invention.
  • FIG. 12 shows a graph, based on computer modeling, of irradiance values equivalent to delivered quantities of energy, schematically illustrating the effect of reducing real-time electrical output, e.g., to a level above an inverter rating, according to embodiments of the present invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE ILLUSTRATED EMBODIMENTS
  • The invention is herein described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings. With specific reference now to the drawings in detail, it is stressed that the particulars shown are by way of example and for purposes of illustrative discussion of the preferred embodiments of the present invention only, and are presented in the cause of providing what is believed to be the most useful and readily understood description of the principles and conceptual aspects of the invention. In this regard, no attempt is made to show structural details of the invention in more detail than is necessary for a fundamental understanding of the invention, the description taken with the drawings making apparent to those skilled in the art how the several forms of the invention may be embodied in practice. Throughout the drawings, like-referenced characters are generally used to designate like elements.
  • Embodiments disclosed herein relate to mechanically clipping the electrical output of an array of photovoltaic (PV) modules of a solar energy system when the electrical output exceeds or is projected to exceed the rating of an inverter. ‘Mechanical clipping’ as the term is used herein means mechanically adjusting the orientation of PV modules to receive less solar radiation, thereby reducing the DC electrical output of the PV array.
  • A ‘solar energy system’ as used herein means a system for generating electricity using an array of (PV) modules. The system can include an inverter for converting the direct-current (DC) electricity generated by the PV modules to alternating current (AC) electricity, e.g., for delivery to an electricity grid.
  • ‘Clipping’ (as opposed to ‘mechanical clipping’) means limiting or reducing the amount of DC electricity converted to AC electricity by the inverter so as not to exceed an AC output rating of the inverter. An inverter rating can be expressed, e.g., in terms of its maximum AC output, or in terms of the amount of DC input equivalent to a maximum level. The rating can be a variable dependent upon factors such as (and not exhaustively) the amount of DC input, or environmental factors such as temperature and humidity. Throughout this specification, an inverter rating is referred to as a constant rather than a variable for purposes of brevity and clarity, but within the scope of any of the disclosed embodiments of the present invention, the rating can be alternatively and more precisely regarded as a variable, and the resulting calculations and determinations can be adjusted accordingly, including in real time. Solar energy systems are frequently deployed with inverters having ratings up to 10%, up to 20%, up to 30% or even a higher percentage below the equivalent DC output of the PV array. Typically, the PV array operates at or close to its maximum output capacity a limited number of hours per year, making the incremental investment in raising the inverter rating less worthwhile. It can be desirable, according to the embodiments disclosed herein, to shift a least a part of the clipping burden to the PV array itself. An illustrative benefit of employing such a strategy is that by implementing the ‘mechanical clipping’ disclosed herein, one may extend the operating life of the inverters of a solar energy system, which already can have shorter lifespans than the PV arrays and which may need to be replaced one or more times during the life of the solar energy system.
  • . Referring now to the figures, and in particular to FIG. 1 , a solar energy system 100 according to embodiments includes a PV array 95 comprising a plurality of PV modules 57 (shown in FIG. 2 ). In embodiments, the PV array 95 includes a tracking component, i.e., a solar tracker, for increasing cumulative electricity generated over the course of a period of time.
  • A solar tracker, or simply ‘tracker’, is an arrangement that changes the orientation of the PV panels so as to capture, i.e., convert, a higher proportion of the direct irradiance falling on the panels over the course of nearly any given period of time. Capture and conversion of the diffuse radiation component is largely unaffected by the tracking. A single-axis tracker is one that rotates PV panels around a single axis, usually from east to west over the course of a day around a north-south axis. A double-axis tracker is one that is designed to generally have the PV panels ‘face’ the sun directly at all times so as to capture and convert the entire amount of available direct irradiance. Some double-axis trackers operate using Euler angles and are not, strictly speaking, rotating the PV panels about two Cartesian axes, but the results are substantially the same. The embodiments disclosed herein are described in terms of single-axis tracking, but their application, mutatis mutandis, to double-axis tracking, is within the scope of the present invention.
  • The solar system 100 of FIG. 1 additionally includes an inverter 190 for conversion of DC electricity to AC. An inverter can include electronic circuitry, for example for synchronizing the phase, and for matching the voltage and frequency of the power output to those of the grid. The PV array typically has an output rating in kilowatts peak (kWp) which is the maximum DC power output rating for a given set of standard of environmental and operating conditions such as, e.g., temperature.
  • As is known in the art, an inverter 190 can have a rating that is lower than the output rating of the array of PV modules. This is usually because the PV array 95 may have a sharp output peak in midday, and configuring the inverter 190 to convert and deliver all of the peak energy would mean that the inverter 190 is not fully utilized during most hours of the day—and of the year. Thus, the inverter 190 can be configured to ‘clip’ the peak output of the PV array so as to achieve better utilization of the inverter. An inverter may perform the clipping functionally electronically and/or electrically, for example by changing the electrical working point (current and voltage) of the PV array to make the PV modules less efficient.
  • FIG. 1 further illustrates a non-limiting example of a power flow scheme for a solar energy system 100: power generated by the PV array 95 flows to a charge controller 40 as indicated by arrow 901. Two-way power flow takes place between the charge controller 40 and an energy storage device 165, as indicated by two-way arrow 902. Power from the PV array 95 and the energy storage device 165 flows through the charge controller 40 to the inverter 190, as indicated by arrow 903. The inverter 190 can deliver energy to the electric grid 15, as indicated by arrow 904.
  • Referring now to FIG. 2 , a solar energy system 100 according to embodiments includes one or more PV modules 57. The PV module 57 includes an array of n PV panels 55 1 through 55 n, joined to a support subassembly 58. The support subassembly 58 includes an array of frames 56 for mounting the PV panels 55, and a central elongated member 59 to which the frames 56 are joined. The central elongated member 59 serves to transfer a torque to rotate the frames 56 as a unit together with the central elongated member 59 and the PV panels 55. The PV module 57 is rotated about a central longitudinal axis indicated in FIG. 2 by dashed line 900, and the rotation is schematically represented by arrows 1100. The central elongated member 59 is pivotably supported by ground supports 12. As shown by axes 1000, the panels are facing generally east, indicating that FIG. 2 shows a morning orientation. The tracking of the PV module 57 is shown as being east-west tracking as is the case in the vast majority of current installations of PV modules, but the principles disclosed here are equally applicable to north-south tracking systems, mutatis mutandis.
  • A control system 150 for a solar energy system 100, according to embodiments, is illustrated schematically in FIG. 3 to show selected components. The exemplary control system 150 of FIG. 2 includes one or more computer processors 155, a computer-readable storage medium 158, a communications module 157, and a power source 159. The computer-readable storage medium 158 can include transient and/or transient storage, and can include one or more storage units, all in accordance with desired functionality and design choices. The storage 158 can be used for any one or more of: storing program instructions, in firmware and/or software, for execution by the one or more processors 155 of the control system 150. In embodiments, the stored program instructions include program instructions for operating a solar energy system 100. Data storage 154, if separate from storage 158, can be provided for historical data, e.g., actual irradiance and/or forecast values, e.g., forecasted irradiance values, and other data related to the operation of the solar energy system 100. In some embodiments, the two storage modules 154, 158 form a single module. The communications module 159 is configured to establish communications links, e.g., via communication arrangements 70 with a forecasting system 200 (described below and illustrated schematically in FIG. 3 ), and with the charge controller 40 via communications arrangements 75. In some embodiments, a control system 150 does not necessarily include all of the components shown in FIG. 2 . The terms “communications arrangements” or similar terms such as “communications links” as used herein mean any wired connection or wireless connection via which data communications can take place. Non-limiting and non-exhaustive examples of suitable technologies for providing communications arrangements include any short-range point-to-point communication system such as IrDA, RFID (Radio Frequency Identification), TransferJet, Wireless USB, DSRC (Dedicated Short Range Communications), or Near Field Communication; wireless networks (including sensor networks) such as: ZigBee, EnOcean; Wi-fi, Bluetooth, TransferJet, or Ultra-wideband; and wired communications bus technologies such as. CAN bus (Controller Area Network, Fieldbus, FireWire, HyperTransport and InfiniBand.
  • In embodiments, it can be desirable to access forecasted irradiance data, e.g., for calculating electrical output of a PV array for an imminent future time period, e.g., a future time period beginning immediately following the time of the forecasting. This is sometimes called ‘now-casting’, or simply ‘short-term forecasting’. FIG. 4 shows examples of components, according to embodiments, provided for working with a short-term forecasting system 200. The non-exhaustive list of components includes one or more irradiance sensors 81, local meteorological sensors 82, and a source of satellite imagery 83. A future time period having a short-term forecast available from the forecasting system 200 can be as short as 5, 10 or 15 minutes, or as long as 30, 45 or 60 minutes.
  • Referring now to FIG. 5A, a method is disclosed for operating a solar energy system 100, e.g., the solar energy system 100 of FIG. 1 . According to the method, the solar energy system 100 comprises a plurality of PV modules 57 and an inverter 190 having an inverter rating. As illustrated by the flow chart in FIG. 5A, the method comprises at least the two method steps S01 and S02.
  • Step S01 includes: determining that a calculated electrical output of the plurality of PV modules 57 exceeds the inverter rating. In some embodiments, the calculated electrical output comprises future electrical output, e.g., electrical output of a future period or an imminent future period. In some embodiments, the calculated electrical output is calculated using irradiance data. The irradiance data can include historical irradiance data and/or current irradiance data and/or forecasted irradiance data. In some embodiments, the irradiance data includes at least two types of data selected from historical, current and forecasted data. In embodiments, the forecasted irradiance data is acquired from a forecasting system 200 such as the forecasting system 200 of FIG. 4 .
  • Step S02 includes: pivoting one or more PV modules 57 of the plurality of PV modules 57 so as to reduce real-time electrical output from at least a direct normal component of real-time solar irradiance incident on the one or more PV modules 57. As will be explained in greater detail in the discussion of FIGS. 6-10 , pivoting the PV modules 57 from tracking the sun to be in an ‘on-sun’ position (e.g., as illustrated in FIG. 6 ) to being ‘off-sun’ (e.g., as illustrated in FIGS. 7-10 ), reduces the electrical output of the PV modules 57 by presenting a reduced surface to the direct radiation that is incident on the faces of the PV modules 57. In some embodiments, Step S02 includes pivoting at least one of the one or more PV modules 57 so as to reduce the direct normal component by at least 70%, or at least 50%, or at least 10%. In some embodiments, a smaller number of PV modules 57 (e.g., at least one PV module 57 and at most half) is included in the group of pivoted PV modules 57 and a higher direct normal component reduction per module is necessary, e.g., at least 50%, or at least 60%, or at least 70%, or at least 80%, or at least 90%. In some embodiments, a larger number of PV modules 57 (e.g., at least half and up to all of the PV modules 57 of the solar energy system 100) is included in the group of pivoted modules 57 and a lower direct normal component reduction per module is necessary, e.g., at least 10%, or at least 20%, or at least 30%, or at least 40%. In other words, the number or percentage of PV modules 57 selected for pivoting to an off-sun position for reducing electrical output is selectable by the user, or by the control system 150, as long as a total desired reduction in electrical output can be achieved for the solar energy system 100 by the selected PV modules. Further, not all PV modules 57 need be pivoted to the same degree. In an illustrative example of performing Step S02, a first group of PV modules 57 can be pivoted to reduce the direct normal component by at least 70%, and a second group of PV modules 57 is pivoted to reduce the direct normal component by about 10%.
  • In some embodiments, the method additionally comprises method step S03, which is illustrated by the flow chart in FIG. 5B:
  • Step S03 includes: accessing irradiance data. According to the embodiments, Step S03 is performed before Step S01. As described hereinabove, irradiance data can include any one, two or three of the three types of irradiance data: historical (including recent), current, and future (forecasted).
  • In embodiments, some or all of the steps of the method can be carried out by a control system 150 of the solar energy system 100, e.g., the control system 150 of FIG. 3 .
  • We now refer to FIGS. 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 , which illustrate, inter alia, the concept of reducing electrical output by pivoting PV panels 55 in order to deliberately create or increase ‘cosine losses’. Each of FIGS. 6-10 shows a schematic end view, i.e., parallel to axis 900) of selected components of a PV module 57, including a PV panel 55 supported by a ground support 12. The amount of direct normal irradiance actually incident on the active face of a PV panel 55 is proportional to the cosine between the angle of incidence of direct normal irradiance, indicated in each of FIGS. 6-10 by an arrow 600, and a normal vector, i.e., normal to the active face of the PV panel 55, indicated by arrow 500 in each of the figures.
  • The difference between the electricity output available by facing the sun directly and the electricity output of the PV panel 55 when it is oriented such that there is a non-zero angle between incidence and normal vectors 600, 500, is referred to as cosine losses. This simple formula ignores, and only for purposes of simplifying the discussion herein, the fact that there can also be a small increase in optical losses in a PV panel not facing the sun directly resulting from the direct radiation having a longer path through the covering, non-active layer of the panel, e.g., a glass layer. The additional optical losses can generally be assumed to be much smaller than the cosine losses, e.g., an order of magnitude smaller, or even smaller.
  • The formula also ignores, and also only for the purpose of simplifying the discussion, additional cosine losses from the PV panels 55 being slightly off-sun in the north-south axis (i.e., in an east-west tracking solar energy system 100 such as is illustrated in FIG. 2 ). The vectors 500, 600 drawn in FIGS. 6-10 are really the east-west component vectors of the actual respective vectors, and the actual respective vectors can additionally have a north-south component vector. In this way, the teachings of FIGS. 6-10 are applicable to two-axis trackers as well as the single-axis trackers shown.
  • When, for example, FIG. 6 shows in an end-view illustration a zero angle between incidence and normal vectors 600, 500, a corresponding side view might show a non-zero angle. Just as the actual angle between incidence and normal vectors 600, 500 can be broken down into east-west and north-south vectors, the cosine of the actual angle equals the cosine of the east-west vector multiplied by the cosine of the north-south vector. Pivoting the PV modules 57 east-to-west (or vice versa) on a single axis as per arrows 1100 of FIG. 2 does not change the north-south vector of the angle determining cosine losses (the vector parallel to the longitudinal axis 900 of the PV module 57). Therefore the north-south cosine loss need not be taken into account—the north-south cosine loss was already accounted for in the calculation of expected electrical output before the reduction caused by the east-west pivoting.
  • In some implementations, the PV module 57 can be installed with a north-south tilt, e.g., having higher ground supports 12 at a northern end than the ground supports at the southern end (in the northern hemisphere and the reverse in the southern hemisphere), in order to generally reduce average cosine losses over the course of the year. When the north-south tilt is fixed, this type of implementation can increase cosine losses at some times and reduce cosine losses at other times. Other types of implementation can include a variable north-south tilt. Nonetheless, for purposes of this simplified discussion, only changes in the east-west vector of the angle between incidence and normal vectors 600, 500 are addressed.
  • In FIG. 6 , the panel 55 faces the sun 1 directly. The normal vector 500 is therefore parallel to the direct normal radiation 600. In this orientation, the full surface area of the panel 55 faces the sun 1. In contrast, FIG. 7 shows the PV module 57 of FIG. 6 with the panel 55 having been pivoted 90° counter-clockwise, as indicated by pivot-direction arrow 550, resulting in an angle of 90° between the direct normal radiation vector 600 and the normal vector 500. It can be clearly seen that the panel 55 of FIG. 7 receives no direct solar radiation, and the pivoting of the panel 55 has resulted in a 100% reduction in the direct normal component of the solar irradiance that would be incident on the panel 55 had it remained in the orientation of FIG. 6 . A 90° rotation of the PV panel 55 is equivalent to a 100% reduction in the portion of the electrical output from photovoltaic conversion of direct normal irradiance, as the zero-angle cosine of 1.0 between incidence and normal vectors 600, 500 (in FIG. 6 ) has been reduced all the way to zero (in FIG. 7 ).
  • In the example of FIG. 7 , pivot-direction arrow 550 shows that the PV panel 55 is rotated counter-clockwise from its orientation before the mechanical-clipping rotation. The direction of rotation is not substantially relevant to the reduction in electrical output, and other operational factors may be taken into account when deciding in which direction to pivot: for example, it may be desirable for the off-sun position to be closer in terms of rotation to the orientation to which the PV panel 55 will be rotating. In another example, a PV module 57 may be geared to rotate faster in one direction than the other.
  • FIGS. 8 and 9 show the PV panel 55 of FIG. 6 as having been rotated by 72°—clockwise in FIG. 8A and counter-clockwise in FIG. 8B. In both cases, the rotation reduces electrical output generated from the direct normal component of the solar radiation by about 70%, because the cosine of 72° is about 0.3, and the direction of rotation is not substantially relevant to the cosine loss induced by the pivoting. FIG. 9 shows the PV panel 55 as having been rotated by 60°—the cosine of 0.5 being effective to reduce the quantity of direct normal radiation received by 50%. FIG. 10 shows the PV panel 55 rotated by 26°—the cosine of 0.9 being effective to reduce the quantity of direct normal radiation received by 10%.
  • In some embodiments, the mechanical clipping procedure, i.e., the pivoting of selected PV modules 57 to respective off-sun orientations can be targeted to fully address the difference between an inverter rating (e.g., a maximum rating for a given set of environmental conditions) and the electrical output, e.g., for an imminent future forecasting period. In some embodiments, the mechanical clipping procedure can be targeted to partially address the excess electrical output in excess of the inverter rating, e.g., half or most or most of the electrical output in excess of the inverter rating, and then leaving the ‘remaining’ excess electrical output, e.g., current or forecasted electrical output to the inverter to clip, e.g., by changing an electrical set point of the PV modules 57.
  • We now refer to FIGS. 11 and 12 , which show graphs of computer-modeled output of a solar energy system according to embodiments. For both of the figures, the x-axis shows time (in minutes) from sunrise over the course of a 12-hour solar day, and the y-axis shows the solar radiance in W/m2 (watts per square meter) that is equivalent to the electrical output with and without reduction from mechanical clipping. The figures are simplified and ignore, for example the effect of temperature on solar panel conversion efficiency and other factors unrelated to the disclosed embodiments. Thus, FIG. 11 shows a solar radiation curve with clear-sky irradiance peaking at 900 W/m2 during the middle of the day. This produces the electrical output without mechanical-clipping reduction represented by the solid line. The dashed line shows the solar radiation equivalent of electrical output that reduced to the level of an inverter rating equivalent to a maximum irradiance of 800 W/m2. As described above, some or all of the plurality of PV modules of the solar energy system are pivoted away from their on-sun orientation to increase cosine losses (including pivoting to 90° from the direct normal vector) for the modules involved. FIG. 12 illustrates an embodiment in which the inverter rating is the electrical-output equivalent of a maximum irradiance of about 750 W/m2 (dotted line). The PV modules are again controlled to be pivoted away from their on-sun orientation to increase cosine losses for the modules involved. This ‘mechanical clipping’ is sufficient in the example of FIG. 12 to reduce electrical output to an electrical output level equivalent to a maximum irradiance of 800 W/m2. The inverter additionally performs an inverter clipping function to reduce electrical output further, equivalent to a maximum irradiance of 750 W/m2, i.e., the inverter rating.
  • The present invention has been described using detailed descriptions of embodiments thereof that are provided by way of example and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention. The described embodiments comprise different features, not all of which are required in all embodiments of the invention. Some embodiments of the present invention utilize only some of the features or possible combinations of the features. Variations of embodiments of the present invention that are described and embodiments of the present invention comprising different combinations of features noted in the described embodiments will occur to persons skilled in the art to which the invention pertains.

Claims (18)

1. A method of operating a solar energy system, the solar energy system comprising a plurality of photovoltaic (PV) modules, respective motor assemblies configured to pivot the plurality of PV modules about respective longitudinal axes, and an inverter having an inverter rating, the method comprising:
a. determining that a calculated electrical output of the plurality of PV modules exceeds the inverter rating; and
b. pivoting one or more PV modules of the plurality of PV modules so as to reduce real-time electrical output from at least a direct normal component of real-time solar irradiance incident on the one or more PV modules.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the calculated electrical output comprises future electrical output.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the calculated electrical output is calculated using irradiance data.
4. The method of claim 3, additionally comprising, before the determining:
accessing irradiance data.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the accessed irradiance data includes historical irradiance data.
6. The method of claim 4, wherein the accessed irradiance data includes current irradiance data.
7. The method of claim 4, wherein the accessed irradiance data includes forecasted irradiance data.
8. The method of claim 4, wherein the accessed irradiance data includes at least two types of irradiance data selected from historical irradiance data, current irradiance data, and forecasted irradiance data.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein the pivoting includes pivoting at least one of the one or more PV modules so as to reduce the direct normal component by at least 70%.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein the pivoting includes pivoting at least one of the one or more PV modules so as to reduce the direct normal component by at least 50%.
11. The method of claim 1, wherein the pivoting includes pivoting at least one of the one or more PV modules so as to reduce the direct normal component by at least 10%.
12. The method of claim 1, wherein the pivoting reduces real-time electrical output of the plurality of PV modules to be not more than the inverter rating.
13. The method of claim 1, wherein (i) the pivoting reduces the real-time electrical output of the plurality of PV modules to be more than the inverter rating, and (ii) the inverter additionally performs a clipping function.
14. The method of claim 7, wherein the accessing includes acquiring an irradiance forecast for an imminent future time period characterized by having a length of not more than 15 minutes.
15. A control system in communication with one or more motor assemblies configured to pivot, about respective longitudinal axes, a plurality of PV modules of a solar energy system, the solar energy system additionally comprising an inverter having an inverter rating, the control system comprising program code for determining that a calculated electrical output of the plurality of PV modules exceeds the inverter rating, and for causing one or more PV modules of the plurality of PV modules to pivot so as to reduce real-time electrical output from at least a direct normal component of real-time solar irradiance incident on the one or more PV modules.
16. The control system of claim 15, wherein the program code is additionally for accessing irradiance data, and wherein the calculated electrical output is calculated using the irradiance data.
17. The control system of claim 16, wherein the accessed irradiance data includes forecasted irradiance data of an irradiance forecast for an imminent future time period characterized by having a length of not more than 15 minutes.
18. A solar energy system comprising a plurality of photovoltaic (PV) modules, respective motor assemblies configured to pivot the plurality of PV modules about respective longitudinal axes, an inverter having an inverter rating, and the control system of claim 15.
US17/883,666 2021-08-09 2022-08-09 Solar energy system and geared drive system Pending US20230039146A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US17/883,666 US20230039146A1 (en) 2021-08-09 2022-08-09 Solar energy system and geared drive system

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US202163260068P 2021-08-09 2021-08-09
US17/883,666 US20230039146A1 (en) 2021-08-09 2022-08-09 Solar energy system and geared drive system

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20230039146A1 true US20230039146A1 (en) 2023-02-09

Family

ID=85152958

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US17/845,196 Active US11817816B2 (en) 2021-08-09 2022-06-21 Solar energy system and geared drive system
US17/883,666 Pending US20230039146A1 (en) 2021-08-09 2022-08-09 Solar energy system and geared drive system

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US17/845,196 Active US11817816B2 (en) 2021-08-09 2022-06-21 Solar energy system and geared drive system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (2) US11817816B2 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20230178991A1 (en) * 2021-12-07 2023-06-08 Ohmium International, Inc. Integrated solar to long term energy storage system with weather sensing
US11817816B2 (en) 2021-08-09 2023-11-14 Solargik Ltd Solar energy system and geared drive system
US11824363B2 (en) 2021-06-17 2023-11-21 Solargik Ltd Methods and systems for smoothing output of a solar energy system

Family Cites Families (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
AU2003903335A0 (en) 2003-07-01 2003-07-17 Solar Heat And Power Pty. Ltd. Carrier and Drive Arrangement for a Solar Energy reflector System
EP2171371A1 (en) 2007-06-21 2010-04-07 voltwerk electronics GmbH Modular pivotable solar collector arrangement
US20130048049A1 (en) 2011-08-22 2013-02-28 Kent Flanery Method and apparatus for controlling photovoltaic plant output using lagging or leading tracking angle
US20140360555A1 (en) 2013-06-10 2014-12-11 Sunedison Llc Photovoltaic power curtailment methods and systems
US10079317B2 (en) 2013-07-15 2018-09-18 Constantine Gonatas Device for smoothing fluctuations in renewable energy power production cause by dynamic environmental conditions
US20160233679A1 (en) 2013-10-18 2016-08-11 State Grid Corporation Of China A method and system for control of smoothing the energy storage in wind phtovolatic power fluctuation based on changing rate
CN104682435B (en) 2015-03-17 2016-12-28 国网新疆电力公司电力科学研究院 The operation of a kind of micro-capacitance sensor with the energy-storage system that can stabilize power swing and monitoring method
US10541643B2 (en) 2015-12-21 2020-01-21 Raydyne Energy, Inc. Two-axis solar concentrator system
AU2018226784B2 (en) * 2017-03-02 2020-09-17 Array Technologies, Inc. Spring counter-balance assemblies and solar trackers incorporating spring counter-balance assemblies
WO2019084454A1 (en) 2017-10-27 2019-05-02 First Solar, Inc. Tracker based systems and methods for photovoltaic power management
CN108110791A (en) 2017-12-29 2018-06-01 西交利物浦大学 Reduce the photovoltaic output power smooth control method and system of energy storage system capacity
US11283395B2 (en) * 2018-03-23 2022-03-22 Nextracker Inc. Multiple actuator system for solar tracker
CN109787260B (en) 2019-01-31 2022-03-04 中国电力科学研究院有限公司 Energy storage system control method and system for smooth distributed photovoltaic power generation short-term fluctuation
US11817816B2 (en) 2021-08-09 2023-11-14 Solargik Ltd Solar energy system and geared drive system

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11824363B2 (en) 2021-06-17 2023-11-21 Solargik Ltd Methods and systems for smoothing output of a solar energy system
US11817816B2 (en) 2021-08-09 2023-11-14 Solargik Ltd Solar energy system and geared drive system
US20230178991A1 (en) * 2021-12-07 2023-06-08 Ohmium International, Inc. Integrated solar to long term energy storage system with weather sensing
US12021386B2 (en) * 2021-12-07 2024-06-25 Ohmium International, Inc. Integrated solar to long term energy storage system with weather sensing

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20230044525A1 (en) 2023-02-09
US11817816B2 (en) 2023-11-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20230039146A1 (en) Solar energy system and geared drive system
Sumathi et al. Solar tracking methods to maximize PV system output–A review of the methods adopted in recent decade
Quesada et al. Tracking strategy for photovoltaic solar systems in high latitudes
Seme et al. A novel prediction algorithm for solar angles using second derivative of the energy for photovoltaic sun tracking purposes
US20140239722A1 (en) Photovoltaic power generation system, control method and control program for photovoltaic power generation system
US20080295883A1 (en) Adaptive solar concentrator system
WO2010057250A1 (en) Method and apparatus for managing power output of an electrical power generation system
WO2019084454A1 (en) Tracker based systems and methods for photovoltaic power management
Lahnaoui et al. Tilt angle and orientation impact on the techno-economic performance of photovoltaic battery systems
Chang Performance study on the east–west oriented single-axis tracked panel
Lee et al. A novel algorithm for single-axis maximum power generation sun trackers
Thakur et al. Maximizing the Solar Gain of a Grid‐Interactive Solar Photovoltaic Power Plant
Alktranee et al. Power output enhancement of grid-connected PV system using dual-axis tracking
Balal et al. The influence of tilt angle on output for a residential 4 kw solar pv system
McIntosh et al. The optimal tilt angle of monofacial and bifacial modules on single-axis trackers
Badr et al. Performance assessment of a dual‐axis solar tracker for concentrator photovoltaic systems
Mouli et al. Optimal system design for a solar powered EV charging station
Narasimman et al. Experimental investigation of ridge concentrator PV-based solar water pumping system for small-scale applications
WO2024110777A1 (en) Methods and systems for mechanically clipping electrical output of a pv array
Veena et al. Solar water pumping system using IOT monitoring system
US20240186941A1 (en) Shading mitigation for photovoltaic arrays
Al-Najjar Experimental evaluation of the performance of one-axis daily tracking and fixed PV module in Baghdad, Iraq
Naeimi et al. Calculation of the optimal installation angle for seasonal adjusting of PV panels based on solar radiation prediction
Yilmaz et al. The analysis on the impact of the roof angle on electricity energy generation of photovoltaic panels in Kahramanmaras, Turkey—A case study for all seasons
Durusu et al. Comparative Study of Photovoltaic Array Optimum Tilt Angle and Orientation with Multi-Objective Consideration

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION

AS Assignment

Owner name: SOLARGIK LTD, ISRAEL

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:KROYZER, GIL;KROIZER, ISRAEL;RAVIKOVICH, GREG;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20230625 TO 20230724;REEL/FRAME:064455/0653