US20220378047A1 - Carbamoyl triazolinone based herbicide combinations and methods of use - Google Patents

Carbamoyl triazolinone based herbicide combinations and methods of use Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20220378047A1
US20220378047A1 US17/868,013 US202217868013A US2022378047A1 US 20220378047 A1 US20220378047 A1 US 20220378047A1 US 202217868013 A US202217868013 A US 202217868013A US 2022378047 A1 US2022378047 A1 US 2022378047A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
amicarbazone
composition
weed
crop
tenacity
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
US17/868,013
Inventor
Hideo Nakatani
Noel Burchell Leibbrandt
Joao M. Miyaski
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Arysta LifeScience Corp
Original Assignee
Arysta LifeScience Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US12/796,511 external-priority patent/US20100311589A1/en
Application filed by Arysta LifeScience Corp filed Critical Arysta LifeScience Corp
Priority to US17/868,013 priority Critical patent/US20220378047A1/en
Publication of US20220378047A1 publication Critical patent/US20220378047A1/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01N—PRESERVATION OF BODIES OF HUMANS OR ANIMALS OR PLANTS OR PARTS THEREOF; BIOCIDES, e.g. AS DISINFECTANTS, AS PESTICIDES OR AS HERBICIDES; PEST REPELLANTS OR ATTRACTANTS; PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS
    • A01N43/00—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing heterocyclic compounds
    • A01N43/64—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing heterocyclic compounds having rings with three nitrogen atoms as the only ring hetero atoms
    • A01N43/647—Triazoles; Hydrogenated triazoles
    • A01N43/653—1,2,4-Triazoles; Hydrogenated 1,2,4-triazoles
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01N—PRESERVATION OF BODIES OF HUMANS OR ANIMALS OR PLANTS OR PARTS THEREOF; BIOCIDES, e.g. AS DISINFECTANTS, AS PESTICIDES OR AS HERBICIDES; PEST REPELLANTS OR ATTRACTANTS; PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS
    • A01N43/00—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing heterocyclic compounds
    • A01N43/72—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing heterocyclic compounds having rings with nitrogen atoms and oxygen or sulfur atoms as ring hetero atoms
    • A01N43/80—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing heterocyclic compounds having rings with nitrogen atoms and oxygen or sulfur atoms as ring hetero atoms five-membered rings with one nitrogen atom and either one oxygen atom or one sulfur atom in positions 1,2
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01N—PRESERVATION OF BODIES OF HUMANS OR ANIMALS OR PLANTS OR PARTS THEREOF; BIOCIDES, e.g. AS DISINFECTANTS, AS PESTICIDES OR AS HERBICIDES; PEST REPELLANTS OR ATTRACTANTS; PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS
    • A01N47/00—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing organic compounds containing a carbon atom not being member of a ring and having no bond to a carbon or hydrogen atom, e.g. derivatives of carbonic acid
    • A01N47/08—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing organic compounds containing a carbon atom not being member of a ring and having no bond to a carbon or hydrogen atom, e.g. derivatives of carbonic acid the carbon atom having one or more single bonds to nitrogen atoms
    • A01N47/28—Ureas or thioureas containing the groups >N—CO—N< or >N—CS—N<
    • A01N47/38—Ureas or thioureas containing the groups >N—CO—N< or >N—CS—N< containing the group >N—CO—N< where at least one nitrogen atom is part of a heterocyclic ring; Thio analogues thereof
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01P—BIOCIDAL, PEST REPELLANT, PEST ATTRACTANT OR PLANT GROWTH REGULATORY ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR PREPARATIONS
    • A01P13/00—Herbicides; Algicides

Definitions

  • the invention relates to herbicidal, active compound combinations composed of known carbamoyltriazolinones and herbicidally active compounds, which can be used successfully for controlling weeds.
  • Herbicides play an important role for weed control in crop production. Applying combinations of herbicidal compounds may enhance the herbicidal effectiveness.
  • FIG. 1 shows a carbamoyltriazolinone of the general formula (I).
  • FIG. 2 A shows a bar graph plot showing the injury effect of amicarbazone (4-amino-5-oxo-3-propan-2-yl-n-tert-butyl-1,2,4-triazole-1-carboxamide) and mesotrione (2-[4-(methylsulfonyl)-2-nitrobenzoyl]-1,3-cyclohexanedione) alone and in combination at different concentrations on Mustard ( Sinapsis sp.) ten days after application.
  • FIG. 2 B shows a bar graph plot showing the bleaching effect of amicarbazone and mesotrione alone and in combination at different concentrations on Mustard ( Sinapsis sp.) seven days after application.
  • FIG. 3 A shows a bar graph plot showing the injury effect of amicarbazone and mesotrione alone and in combination at different concentrations on Poa annua at 10, 14, and 20 days after application.
  • FIG. 3 B shows a bar graph plot showing the injury effect of amicarbazone and mesotrione alone and in combination at different concentrations on Poa annua at 24, 31, and 41 days after application.
  • FIG. 4 A shows a bar graph plot showing the injury effect of amicarbazone and mesotrione alone and in combination at different concentrations on Green Foxtail at 7 and 14 days after application.
  • FIG. 4 B shows another bar graph plot showing the injury effect of amicarbazone and mesotrione alone and in combination at different concentrations on Green Foxtail at 7 and 14 days after application.
  • FIG. 4 C shows a bar graph plot showing the bleaching effect of amicarbazone and mesotrione alone and in combination at different concentrations on Green Foxtail at 10, 14, and 20 days after application.
  • FIG. 5 A shows a bar graph plot showing the injury effect of amicarbazone and mesotrione alone and in combination at different concentrations on Crabgrass sp. at 7, 14, and 24 days after application.
  • FIG. 5 B shows another bar graph plot showing the injury effect of amicarbazone and mesotrione alone and in combination at different concentrations on Crabgrass sp. at 7, 14, and 24 days after application.
  • FIG. 5 C shows a bar graph plot showing the bleaching effect of amicarbazone and mesotrione alone and in combination at different concentrations on Crabgrass sp. at 7, 14, and 20 days after application.
  • FIG. 5 D shows a bar graph plot showing the effect on density of amicarbazone and mesotrione alone and in combination at different concentrations on Crabgrass sp. at 31 days after application.
  • FIG. 6 A shows a comparative weed control chart with tank mixtures of DINAMIC® 700 WDG (amicarbazone, 700 g/kg) at 75 g/ha with Galago (mesotrione, 480 g/L) and with Galago plus TOLLA 840 S (metolachlor, i.e. chloroacetamide, 840 g/L+Safener (dichlormid, i.e. 2,2-dichloro-N,N-di-2-propenyl acetamide)).
  • Weed species are Bidens pilosa (BIDPI), Portulaca oleracea (POROL), Anoda cristata (ANOCR), and Convolvulus arvensis (CONAR).
  • FIG. 6 B shows a comparative weed control chart with tank mixtures of DINAMIC® 700 WDG at 100 g/ha with Galago and with Galago plus TOLLA 840 S. Weed species are the same as in FIG. 6 A .
  • FIG. 6 C shows a comparative weed control chart with tank mixtures of DINAMIC® 700 WDG at 125 g/ha with Galago and with Galago plus TOLLA 840 S. Weed species are the same as in FIG. 6 A .
  • FIG. 6 D shows a comparative weed control chart with tank mixtures of DINAMIC® 700 WDG with Galago plus TOLLA 840 S versus a standard tank mixture of CALLISTO® (mesotrione, 480 g/L) plus DUAL S GOLD® (S-metolachlor, 915 g/L+Safener). Weed species are the same as in FIG. 6 A .
  • FIG. 6 E shows a comparative grain yield chart of 13 different tank mixture combinations employing DINAMIC® 700 WDG (Lanes 1-13). Lane 14 is CALLISTO® plus DUAL S GOLD®. Lane 15 is an untreated control.
  • FIG. 7 A shows another comparative weed control chart with tank mixtures of DINAMIC® 700 WDG at 75 g/ha with Galago and with Galago plus TOLLA 840 S.
  • Weed species are Datura ferox (DATFE), Portulaca oleracea , (POROL), Schkuhria pinnata (SCHPI), and Bidens pilosa (BIDPI).
  • FIG. 7 B shows another comparative weed control chart with tank mixtures of DINAMIC® 700 WDG at 100 g/ha with Galago and with Galago plus TOLLA 840 S. Weed species are the same as in FIG. 7 A .
  • FIG. 7 C shows another comparative weed control chart with tank mixtures of DINAMIC® 700 WDG at 125 g/ha with Galago and with Galago plus TOLLA 840 S. Weed species are the same as in FIG. 7 A .
  • FIG. 7 D shows another comparative weed control chart with tank mixtures of DINAMIC®700 WDG with Galago plus TOLLA 840 S versus a standard tank mixture of CALLISTO® plus DUAL S GOLD®. Weed species are the same as in FIG. 7 A .
  • FIG. 7 E shows another comparative grain yield chart of 13 different tank mixture combinations employing DINAMIC® 700 WDG (Lanes 1-13). Lane 14 is CALLISTO® plus DUAL S GOLD®. Lane 15 is an untreated control.
  • FIG. 8 A shows another comparative weed control chart with tank mixtures of DINAMIC® 700 WDG at 75 g/ha with Galago and with Galago plus TOLLA.
  • Weed species are Bidens pilosa (BIDPI), Amaranthus hybridus (AMAHY), Tagetes minuta (TAGMI), and Digitaria sanquinalis (DIGSA).
  • FIG. 8 B shows another comparative weed control chart with tank mixtures of DINAMIC®700 WDG at 100 g/ha with Galago and with Galago plus TOLLA 840 S. Weed species are the same as in FIG. 8 A .
  • FIG. 8 C shows another comparative weed control chart with tank mixtures of DINAMIC® 700 WDG at 125 g/ha with Galago and with Galago plus TOLLA 840 S. Weed species are the same as in FIG. 8 A .
  • FIG. 8 D shows another comparative weed control chart with tank mixtures of DINAMIC®700 WDG with Galago plus TOLLA 840 S versus a standard tank mixture of CALLISTO® plus DUAL S GOLD®. Weed species are the same as in FIG. 8 A .
  • FIG. 8 E shows anothcr comparative grain yicld chart of 13 different tank mixture combinations employing DINAMIC® 700 WDG (Lanes 1-13). Lane 14 is CALLISTO® plus DUAL S GOLD®. Lane 15 is an untreated control.
  • FIG. 9 A shows another comparative weed control chart with tank mixtures of DINAMIC®700 WDG at 75 g/ha with Galago plus Wet-All (alcohol ethoxylate, non-ionic surfactant) and with Galago plus TOLLA 960 (metolachlor, 960 g/L) plus Wet-All.
  • Weed specics are Datura ferox (DATFE), Schkuhria pinnata (SCHPI), Portulaca oleracea (POROL) and Cyperus esculentus (CYPES).
  • FIG. 9 B shows another comparative weed control chart with tank mixtures of DINAMIC® 700 WDG at 100 g/ha with Galago plus Wet-All and with Galago plus TOLLA 960 plus Wet-All. Weed species are the same as in FIG. 9 A .
  • FIG. 9 C shows another comparative weed control chart with tank mixtures of DINAMIC®700 WDG at 125 g/ha with Galago plus Wet-All and with Galago plus TOLLA 960 plus Wet-All. Weed species are the same as in FIG. 9 A .
  • FIG. 9 D shows another comparative weed control chart with tank mixtures of DINAMIC®700 WDG with Galago plus TOLLA 960 plus Wet-All versus a standard tank mixture of CALLISTO® plus GARDO® Gold (S-metolachlor plus terbuthylazine (N-tert-butyl-6-chloro-N-ethyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine)) plus COMPLEMENT® Super (Polyether-polymethylsiloxane copolymer, 1000 g/L). Weed species are the same as in FIG. 9 A .
  • FIG. 9 E shows another comparative grain yield chart of 13 different tank mixture combinations employing DINAMIC® 700 WDG (Lanes 1-13). Lane 14 is CALLISTO® plus GARDO® Gold plus COMPLEMENT® Super. Lane 15 is an untreated control.
  • FIG. 10 A shows another comparative weed control chart with tank mixtures of DINAMIC® 700 WDG at 75 g/ha with Galago plus Wet-All and with Galago plus TOLLA 960 plus Wet-All.
  • Weed species are Amaranthus hybridus (AMAHY), Bidens pilosa (BIDPI), Tagetes minuta (TAGMI), Portulaca oleracea (POROL), and Commelina benghalensis (COMBE).
  • FIG. 10 B shows another comparative weed control chart with tank mixtures of DINAMIC® 700 WDG at 100 g/ha with Galago plus Wet-All and with Galago plus TOLLA 960 plus Wet-All. Weed species are the same as in FIG. 10 A .
  • FIG. 10 C shows another comparative weed control chart with tank mixtures of DINAMIC® 700 WDG at 125 g/ha with Galago plus Wet-All and with Galago plus TOLLA 960 plus Wet-All. Weed species are the same as in FIG. 10 A .
  • FIG. 10 D shows another comparative weed control chart with tank mixtures of DINAMIC® 700 WDG with Galago plus TOLLA 960 plus Wet-All versus a standard tank mixture of CALLISTO® plus GARDO® Gold plus COMPLEMENT® Super. Weed species are the same as in FIG. 10 A .
  • FIG. 10 E shows another comparative grain yield chart of 13 different tank mixture combinations employing DINAMIC® 700 WDG (1-13).
  • Lane 14 is CALLISTO® plus GARDO@Gold plus COMPLEMENT® Super.
  • Lane 15 is an untreated control.
  • FIG. 11 A shows another comparative weed control chart with tank mixtures of DINAMIC® 700 WDG at 75 g/ha with Galago plus Wet-All and with Galago plus TOLLA 960 plus Wet-All.
  • Weed species are Bidens pilosa (BIDPI), Portulaca oleracea (POROL), Convolvulus anvensis (CONAR), and Anoda cristata (ANOCR).
  • FIG. 11 B shows another comparative weed control chart with tank mixtures of DINAMIC® 700 WDG at 100 g/ha with Galago plus Wet-All and with Galago plus TOLLA 960 plus Wet-All. Weed species are the same as FIG. 11 A .
  • FIG. 11 C shows another comparative weed control chart with tank mixtures of DINAMIC® 700 WDG at 125 g/ha with Galago plus Wet-All and with Galago plus TOLLA 960 plus Wet-All. Weed species are the same as FIG. 11 A .
  • FIG. 11 D shows another comparative weed control chart with tank mixtures of DINAMIC® 700 WDG with Galago plus TOLLA 960 plus Wet-All versus a standard tank mixture of CALLISTO® plus GARDO® Gold plus COMPLEMENT® Super. Weed species are the same as in FIG. 11 A .
  • FIG. 11 E shows another comparative grain yield chart of 13 different tank mixture combinations employing DINAMIC® 700 WDG (Lanes 1-13). Lane 14 is CALLISTO® plus GARDO® Gold plus COMPLEMENT® Super. Lane 15 is an untreated control.
  • compositions comprising a synergistic effective amount of a combination of a first compound and a second component, wherein said first compound is a compound of the formula (I)
  • R 1 is selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, hydroxyl, amino, or in each case optionally substituted alkyl, alkenyl, alkinyl, alkoxy, alkenyloxy, alkinyloxy, alkylamino, alkenylamino, alkenylamino, alkylideneamino, dialkylamino, cycloalkyl, cycloalkylalkyl, aryl and arylalkyl, any of which may be optionally substituted;
  • R 2 is selected from the group consisting of alkyl, alkenyl, alkinyl, alkoxy, alkenyloxy, alkinyloxy, alkylthio, alkenylthio, alkinylthio, alkylamino, alkenylamino, alkinylamino, dialkylamino, cycloalkyl, cycloalkyloxy, cycloalkylalkyl, aryl, aryloxy, arylthio, arylamino and arylalkyl, any of which may be optionally substituted;
  • R 3 is selected from the group consisting of alkyl, alkenyl, alkinyl, cycloalkyl, cycloalkylalkyl, arylalkyl, arylalkenyl and arylalkinyl, any of which may be optionally substituted; and
  • said second component is selected from 2-[(2-chlorophenyl)methyl]-4,4-dimethyl-3-isoxazolidinone, 3-cyclohexyl-6-dimethylamino-1-methyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4(1H,3H)-dione, 4-methyl-2-chlorophenoxyacetic acid, 2-chloro-4-(ethylamine)-6-(isopropylamine)-s-triazine, 2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-[(1-methylethoxy)methyl]acetamide, an herbicide of the chloroacetamide class, (aka, the chloroacetanilide class) and mixtures thereof.
  • an herbicide of the chloroacetamide class include 2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-[(1-methylethoxy)methyl]acetamide (Propisochlor), 2-chloro-N-ethoxymethyl-6′-ethylacet-o-toluidide (Acetochlor), 2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl)acetamide, (Metolachlor), 2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-[(1S)-2-methoxy-1-methylethyl]acetamide (S-Metolachlor), 2-chloro-N-(2,6-diethylphenyl)-N-(methoxymethyl)acetamide (Alachlor), and N-(butoxymethyl)-2-chloro-N-(2,6-diethylphenyl)-
  • R 1 is an optionally substituted amino. In a further embodiment, R 1 , is NH 2 . In one embodiment, R 2 is an optionally substituted alkyl. In a further embodiment, R 2 is i-propyl. In one embodiment, R 3 is an optionally substituted alkyl. In a further embodiment, R 3 is t-butyl.
  • a first compound is 4-amino-5-isopropyl-2-(tert-butyl-aminocarbonyl)-2,4-dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazol-3-one.
  • a second component is 2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-[(1-methylethoxy)methyl]acetamide.
  • a second component is 2-[(2-chlorophenyl)methyl]-4,4-dimethyl-3-isoxazolidinone and 3-cyclohexyl-6-dimethylamino-1-methyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4(1H,3H)-dione.
  • a second component is 4-methyl-2-chlorophenoxyacetic acid.
  • a composition further includes an adjuvant.
  • an adjuvant is an ethoxylated propoxylated fatty amine or a polyether-polymethylsiloxane-copolymer.
  • a composition further includes a herbicidally acceptable diluent or carrier.
  • a second component is present in the composition in an amount ranging from 0.001 to 1000 parts by weight per part by weight of the first component. In a further embodiment, a second component is present in the composition in an amount ranging from 0.02 to 500 parts by weight per part by weight of the first component. In yet a further embodiment, a second component is present in the composition in an amount ranging from 0.05 to 100 parts by weight per part by weight of the first component.
  • a composition in another embodiment, is in a solid or liquid form of an emulsifiable concentrate, wettable powder, granule, dust, oil spray or aerosol.
  • compositions described herein provides synergistic control of one or more weeds.
  • a weed is Amaranthus, Digitaria, Cyperus or Euphorbia.
  • Embodiments herein also provide methods for selective control of weeds.
  • a method includes contacting a composition comprising a synergistic effective amount of a combination of a first compound and a second component onto a crop plant or a non-crop area in need of weed control or at risk of undesirable weeds, in an amount effective to provide weed control in the crop, wherein said first compound is a compound of the formula (I)
  • R 1 is selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, hydroxyl, amino, or in each case optionally substituted alkyl, alkenyl, alkinyl, alkoxy, alkenyloxy, alkinyloxy, alkylamino, alkenylamino, alkenylamino, alkylideneamino, dialkylamino, cycloalkyl, cycloalkylalkyl, aryl and arylalkyl, any of which may be optionally substituted;
  • R 2 is selected from the group consisting of alkyl, alkenyl, alkinyl, alkoxy, alkenyloxy, alkinyloxy, alkylthio, alkenylthio, alkinylthio, alkylamino, alkenylamino, alkinylamino, dialkylamino, cycloalkyl, cycloalkyloxy, cycloalkylalkyl, aryl, aryloxy, arylthio, arylamino and arylalkyl, any of which may be optionally substituted;
  • R 3 is selected from the group consisting of alkyl, alkenyl, alkinyl, cycloalkyl, cycloalkylalkyl, arylalkyl, arylalkenyl and arylalkinyl, any of which may be optionally substituted; and
  • said second component is selected from 2-[(2-chlorophenyl)methyl]-4,4-dimethyl-3-isoxazolidinone, 3-cyclohexyl-6-dimethylamino-1-methyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4(1H,3H)-dione, 4-methyl-2-chlorophenoxyacetic acid, 2-chloro-4-(ethylamine)-6-(isopropylamine)-s-triazine, N-ethyl-N′-(1-methylethyl)-6-(methylthio)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine, N-(3,4-dichlophenyl)-N,N-dimethyl urea, 5-cyclopropyl-4-(2-methylsulfonyl-4-trifluoromethylbenzoyl)isoxazole, 4-amino-6-tert-butyl-4,5-dihydro-3-methyltio-1,2,4
  • an herbicide of the chloroacetamide class includes 2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphcnyl)-N-[(1-methylethoxy)methyl]acetamide (Propisochlor), 2-chloro-N-ethoxymethyl-6′-ethylacet-o-toluidide (Acetochlor), 2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl)acetamide(Metolachlor), 2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-[(1S)-2-methoxy-1-methylethyl]acetamide (S-Metolachlor), 2-chloro-N-(2,6-diethylphenyl)-N-(methoxymethyl)acetamide (Alachlor), and N-(butoxymethyl)-2-chloro-N-(2,6-diethyl
  • a crop plant is selected from cereals, rice, maize, sorghum, sugar cane, cotton, canola, turf, barley, potato, sweet potato, sunflower, rye, oats, wheat, corn, soybean, sugar beet, tobacco, safflower, tomato, alfalfa, pineapple and cassava.
  • a second component is selected from N-ethyl-N′-(1-methylethyl)-6-(methylthio)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine, N-(3,4-dichlophenyl)-N,N-dimethyl urea, 5-cyclopropyl-4-(2-methylsulfonyl-4-trifluoromethylbenzoyl)isoxazole and 4-amino-6-tert-butyl-4,5-dihydro-3-methyltio-1,2,4-triazin-5-one.
  • a crop plant is selected from the group consisting of sugar cane, pineapple, cassava, turf and pasture.
  • a composition further comprises 2-[(2-chlorophenyl)methyl]-4,4-dimethyl-3-isoxazolidinone and/or 3-cyclohexyl-6-dimethylamino-1-methyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4(1H,3H)-dione.
  • a crop plant is sugar cane, turf and pasture.
  • a composition further comprises 4-methyl-2-chlorophenoxyacetic acid.
  • a composition further includes an adjuvant.
  • an adjuvant is an ethoxylated propoxylated fatty amine or a polyether-polymethylsiloxane-copolymer.
  • a crop plant is sugar cane, turf and pasture.
  • a first compound is 4-amino-5-isopropyl-2-(tert-butyl-aminocarbonyl)-2,4-dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazol-3-one.
  • a composition is contacted at an application rate of from 0.01 kg/ha to 5.00 kg/ha of the first compound and from 0.5 kg/ha to 10.00 kg/ha of the second component to the crop. In a further embodiment, a composition is contacted at an application rate of from 0.03 kg/ha to 3.00 kg/ha of the first compound to the crop. In yet a further embodiment, a composition is contacted at an application rate of from 0.05 kg/ha to 5.00 kg/ha of the second component to the crop.
  • application rate refers to the amount of a synergistic treatment composition applied over an area, that is, “application rate” is nominally an application coverage. “Application rate” is not intended to encompass an application amount per unit time as might be implied by the term “rate.”
  • a composition is applied as a pre-emergence treatment. In another embodiment, the composition is applied as a post-emergence treatment.
  • a weed is Amaranthus, Digitaria, Cyperus or Euphorbia.
  • a composition comprises a synergistic amount of a combination of amicarbazone (4-amino-N-tert-butyl-4,5-dihydro-3-isopropyl-5-oxo-1H-1,2,4-triazole-1-carboxamide) and mesotrione (2-[4-(Methylsulfonyl)-2-nitrobenzoyl]cyclohexane-1,3-dione), wherein the composition is an effective herbicide.
  • the composition further comprises an adjuvant.
  • the adjuvant is an ethoxylated propoxylated fatty amine or a polyether-polymethylsiloxane-copolymer.
  • the composition further comprises a herbicidally acceptable diluent or carrier.
  • the composition comprises a solid or liquid form. In some embodiments, the composition comprises an emulsifiable concentrate, wettable powder, granule, dust, oil spray or aerosol.
  • the composition provides synergistic control of one or more weeds.
  • the one or more weeds is a broadleaf weed.
  • the one or more weeds is selected from the group consisting of mustard, Poa annua , green foxtail, crabgrass, blackjack, pigweed, khaki weed, crab-finger grass, large thornapple, purslane, dwarf marigold, field bindweed, anoda weed, Rottboelia exaltata, Ipomeoea purpurea, Eleusine indica, Amaranthus spinosus , and Commelina benghalensis.
  • the mesotrione and amicarbazone are present in a ratio within a range of from about 16:1 to about 4:3, such ratios being weight ratios. In some such embodiments, the ratio of mesotrione and amicarbazone is within a range of from about 8:1 to about 4:3.
  • a method for selective control of weeds comprises contacting a weed with the above described compositions.
  • the method is employed to control weeds present within a crop.
  • the crop is selected from the group consisting of cereals, rice, maize, sorghum, sugar cane, cotton, canola, grass, turf grass, barley, potato, sweet potato, sunflower, rye, oats, wheat, corn, soybean, sugar beet, tobacco, safflower, tomato, alfalfa, pineapple and cassava.
  • the weed is a broadleaf weed.
  • the weed is selected from the group consisting of mustard, Poa annua , green foxtail, crabgrass, blackjack, pigweed, khaki weed, crab-finger grass, large thornapple, purslane, dwarf marigold, field bindweed, anoda weed, Rottboelia exaltata, Ipomeoea purpurea, Eleusine indica, Amaranthus spinosus , and Commelina benghalensis , and combinations thereof.
  • methods apply the composition as a pre-emergence treatment. In other embodiments, methods apply the composition is applied as a post-emergence treatment.
  • methods apply the composition at an application rate of from about 0.035 kg/ha to about 0.210 kg/ha of amicarbazone and from about 0.280 kg/ha to about 0.560 kg/ha of mesotrione to the crop. In some such embodiments, the composition is applied at an application rate of about 0.210 kg/ha of amicarbazone and about 0.560 kg/ha of mesotrione to the crop. In other such embodiments, the composition is applied at an application rate of about 0.210 kg/ha of amicarbazone and about 0.280 kg/ha of mesotrione to the crop.
  • the composition exhibits reduced bleaching of one or more weeds as compared to application of mesotrione alone.
  • “Bleaching,” as used herein, refers to the discoloration of weeds causing it to be visually more conspicuous to the eye of an observer. This may appear as a lightening of an existing color or a washing out of pigmentation observed as a whitening of the weed.
  • compositions characterized by an effective content of composition comprising
  • R 1 represents hydrogen, hydroxyl, amino, or in each case optionally substituted alkyl, alkenyl, alkinyl, alkoxy, alkenyloxy, alkinyloxy, alkylamino, alkenylamino, alkenylamino, alkylideneamino, dialkylamino, cycloalkyl, cycloalkylalkyl, aryl and arylalkyl, any of which may be optionally substituted,
  • R 2 represents alkyl, alkenyl, alkinyl, alkoxy, alkenyloxy, alkinyloxy, alkylthio, alkenylthio, alkinylthio, alkylamino, alkenylamino, alkinylamino, dialkylamino, cycloalkyl, cycloalkyloxy, cycloalkylalkyl, aryl, aryloxy, arylthio, arylamino and arylalkyl, any of which may be optionally substituted, and
  • R 3 represents alkyl, alkenyl, alkinyl, cycloalkyl, cycloalkylalkyl, arylalkyl, arylalkenyl and arylalkinyl, any of which may be optionally substituted.
  • R r represents hydrogen, hydroxyl, amino, or represents alkyl, alkenyl, alkinyl, alkoxy, alkenyloxy, alkinyloxy, alkylamino, alkenylamino, alkinylamino, alkylideneamino or dialkylamino, each of which has up to 6 carbon atoms and each of which is optionally substituted by halogen or cyano, or represents cycloalkyl, cycloalkylalkyl, each of which has 3 to 6 carbon atoms in the cycloalkyl groups and, if appropriate, 1 to 4 carbon atoms in the alkyl group and each of which is optionally substituted by halogen, cyano or C 1 -C 4 -alkyl, or represents phenyl or phenyl-C 1 -C 4 -alkyl, each of which is optionally substituted by halogen, cyano, C 1 -C 4 -alkyl or C
  • R 2 represents alkyl, alkenyl, alkinyl, alkoxy, alkenyloxy, alkinyloxy, alkylthio, alkenylthio, alkinylthio, alkylamino, alkenylamino, alkinylamino or dialkylamino, each of which has up to 6 carbon atoms and each of which is optionally substituted by halogen, cyano, C 1 -C 4 -alkoxy or C 1 -C 4 -alkylthio, or represents cycloalkyl, cycloalkyloxy or cycloalkylalkyl, each of which has 3 to 6 carbon atoms in the cycloalkyl groups and, if appropriate, 1 to 4 carbon atoms in the alkyl group and each of which is optionally substituted by halogen, cyano or C 1 -C 4 -alkyl, or represents phenyl, phenoxy, phenylthio, phen
  • R 3 represents alkyl, alkenyl or alkinyl, each of which has up to 10 carbon atoms and each of which is optionally substituted by halogen, cyano, C 1 -C 4 -alkoxy, C 1 -C 4 -alkylthio, C 1 -C 4 -alkylsulphinyl, C 1 -C 4 -alkylsulphonyl, C 1 -C 4 -alkylamino or di-(C 1 -C 4 -alkyl) amino, or represents cycloalkyl or cycloalkylalkyl, each of which has 3 to 6 carbon atoms in the cycloalkyl moiety and, if appropriate,) to 4 carbon atoms in the alkyl moiety and each of which is optionally substituted by halogen, cyano or C 1 -C 4 -alkyl, or represents phenyl-C 1 -C 6 -alkyl, phenyl
  • R 1 represents hydrogen, hydroxyl, amino, or represents methyl, ethyl, n- or i-propyl, n-, i-, s- or t-butyl, propenyl, butenyl, propinyl or butinyl, methoxy, ethoxy, n- or i-propoxy, n-, i-, s- or t-butoxy, propenyloxy, butenyloxy, propinyloxy or butinyloxy, methylamino, ethylamino, n- or i-propylamino, n-, i-, s- or t-butylamino, propenylamino, butenylamino, propiny-lamino or butinylamino, ethylideneamino, propylideneamino, butylideneamino, dimethylamino or diethyl
  • R 2 represents methyl, ethyl, n- or i-propyl, n-, i-, s- or t-butyl, propenyl, butenyl, propinyl, butinyl, methoxy, ethoxy, n- or i-propoxy, n-, i-, s- or t-butoxy, propenyloxy, butenyloxy, propinyloxy, butinyloxy, methylthio, ethylthio, n or i-propylthio, n-, i-, s- or t-butylthio, propenylthio, butenylthio, propinylthio, butinylthio, propinylthio, butinylthio, methylamino, ethylamino, n- or i-propylamino, n-, i-, s- or t-but
  • R 3 represents methyl, ethyl, n- or i-propyl, n-, i-, s- or t-butyl, propenyl, butenyl, pentenyl, hexenyl, propinyl, butinyl, pentinyl or hexinyl, each of which is optionally substituted by fluorine, cyano, methoxy, ethoxy, n- or i-propoxy, n-, i-, s- or t-butoxy, methylthio, ethylthio, n- or i-propylthio, n-, i-, s-, or t-butylthio, methylsulphinyl, ethylsulphinyl, methylsulphonyl, ethylsulphonyl, methylamino, ethylamino, n- or i-propy
  • R 1 represents hydrogen, amino, or represents methyl, ethyl, n- or i-propyl, propenyl, butenyl, propinyl or butinyl, methoxy, ethoxy, n- or i-propoxy, propenyloxy or propinyloxy, each of which is optionally substituted by fluorine or chlorine, or represents methylamino, ethylamino, n- or i-propylamino, propeny-lamino or propinylamino, dimethylamino or diethylamino, or represents cyclopropyl or cyclopropylmethyl, each of which is optionally substituted by fluorine, chlorine, cyano or methyl.
  • R 2 represents methyl, ethyl, n- or i-propyl, n-, i-, s- or t-butyl, propenyl, butenyl, propinyl, butinyl, methoxy, ethoxy, n- or i-propoxy, n-, i-, s- or t-butoxy, propenyloxy, butenyloxy, propinyloxy, butinyloxy, methylthio, ethylthio, n- or i-propylthio, n-, i-, s- or t-butylthio, propenylthio, butenylthio, propinylthio, butinylthio, propinylthio, butinylthio, methylamino, ethylamino, n- or i-propylamino, n-, i-, s- or t-
  • R 3 represents methyl, ethyl, n- or i-propyl, n-, i-, s- or t-butyl, propenyl, butenyl, pentenyl, hexenyl, propinyl, butinyl, pentinyl or hexinyl, each of which is optionally substituted by fluorine, cyano, methoxy, ethoxy, n- or i-propoxy, methylthio, ethylthio, n- or i-propylthio, methylsulphinyl, ethylsulphinyl, methylsulphonyl, ethylsulphonyl, methylamino, ethylamino, n- or i-propylamino, dimethylamino or diethylamino, or represents cyclopropyl, cyclobutyl, cyclopentyl,
  • Non-limiting examples of individually compounds of the formula (I) to be used as components according to the invention in mixtures are:
  • a family of compositions comprising a first compound and a second component, wherein said first compound is a compound of the formula (I)
  • R 1 is an optionally substituted amino. In certain embodiments, R 1 , is NH 2 . In certain embodiments, R 2 is an optionally substituted alkyl. In certain embodiments, R 2 is i-propyl. In certain embodiments, R 3 is an optionally substituted alkyl. In certain embodiments, R 3 is t-butyl. In certain embodiments, the first compound is 4-amino-5-isopropyl-2-(tert-butyl-aminocarbonyl)-2,4-dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazol-3-one (Amicarbazone).
  • the second component is 2-[(2-chlorophenyl)methyl]-4,4-dimethyl-3-isoxazolidinone and 3-cyclohexyl-6-dimethylamino-1-methyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4(1H,3H)-dione.
  • the second component is 4-methyl-2-chlorophenoxyacetic acid.
  • the second component is one or more of N-ethyl-N′-(1-methylethyl)-6-(methylthio)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine, N-(3,4-dichlophenyl)-N,N-dimethyl urea, 5-cyclopropyl-4-(2-methylsulfonyl-4-trifluoromethylbenzoyl)isoxazole or 4-amino-6-tert-butyl-4,5-dihydro-3-methyltio-1,2,4-triazin-5-one.
  • Examples of a combination composition according to the invention include, but are not limited to:
  • a composition can include an adjuvant.
  • An adjuvant may be used with the composition to enhance or improve herbicidal performance.
  • Adjuvants may be added to the composition at the time of formulation, or by the applicator to the spray mix just prior to treatment.
  • Adjuvants include surfactants, compatibility agents, anti-foaming agents and spray colorants (dyes), and drift control agents.
  • the adjuvant is an ethoxylated propoxylated fatty amine or a polyether-polymethylsiloxane-copolymer.
  • the compound combinations in addition to being well tolerated by crops, have herbicidal activities and can be used in a variety of crops for selectively controlling weed.
  • crops include maize, wheat, sugar cane, barley, rice, citrus, palm trees, pineapple, cucurbits, beans, soybeans, agave, cassava, turf and pasture.
  • the compound combinations can also be used for controlling undesired vegetation in non-crop areas, e.g. fallow agricultural land.
  • non-crop area used herein refers to areas where a crop, or any intentionally planted vegetation, is not grown.
  • far agricultural land used herein refers to a piece of land where no crop or pasture is growing. A fallow agricultural land that is not used for crops, may be left unused in order to restore its natural fertility.
  • herbicidal activity of a composition according to the invention exceeds the total of the activities of the individual active compounds. If there are two active compounds, the activity will be greater than the same of the single active compound alone.
  • herbicidal compositions include compositions synergistic for control of one or more weeds.
  • compositions of the invention have been found to be active herbicides in possessing herbicidal activity against one or more species of weeds.
  • weed refers to plants which grow in locations in which they are not desired.
  • a weed is a plant in which in the context of a crop is undesirable due to competition for water, nutrients, sunlight, soil, etc.
  • herbicide refers to a compound which adversely control, or modifies (e.g. limits or reduces) the growth of plants, particularly of undesirable plants.
  • a “herbicidally effective amount” is meant an amount of compound which causes an adverse effect on the growth of plants, such as weeds.
  • the herbicide can affect pre- or post-emergent growth or both.
  • plants is meant to include germinant seeds, emerging seedlings, and established vegetation, including roots and above-ground portions (for example, leaves, stalks, flowers, fruits, etc.) Such adverse modifying and controlling effects may include all deviations from natural plant development, including killing the weed.
  • compositions of the invention can be used, for example, in control of one or more of following plants (weeds):
  • Monocotyledonous weeds include the genera: Aegilops, Agropyron, Agrostis, Alopecurus, Apera, Avena, Brachiaria, Bromus, Cenchrus, Commelina, Cynodon, Cyperus, Dactyloctenium, Digitaria, Echinochloa, Eleocharis, Eleusine, Eragrostis, Eriochloa, Festuca, Fimbristylis, Heteranthera, Imperata, Ischacmum, Leptochloa, Lolium, Monochoria, Panicum, Paspalum, Phalaris, Phleum, Poa, Rottboellia, Sagittaria, Scirpus, Setaria, Sorghum.
  • Dicotyledonous weeds include the genera: Abutilon, Amaranthus, Ambrosia, Anoda, Anthemis, Aphanes, Atriplex, Bellis, Bidens, Capsella, Carduus, Cassia, Centaurea, Chenopodium, Cirsium, Convolvulus, Croton, Datura, Desmodium, Emex, Erysimum, Euphorbia, Galeopsis, Galinsoga, Galium, Hibiscus, Ipomoea, Kochia, Iamium, Lepidium, Lindernia, Matricaria, Mentha, Mercurialis, Merremia, Momordica, Mullugo, Myosotis, Papaver, Pharbitis, Plantago, Polygonum, Portulaca, Ranunculus, Raphanus, Ricinus, Rorippa, Rotala, Rumex, Salsola, Senecio, Sesbania, Sida, Sinapis, Solanum, Sonchu
  • the herbicidal compositions are suitable for selective weed control in crops, for example, cereals, rice, maize, sorghum, sugar cane, cotton, canola, soya, turf, barley, potato, sweet potato, sunflower, rye, oats, wheat, corn, soybean, sugar beet, safflower, alfalfa, cassava, cucurbits, pineapple and pastures.
  • crops for example, cereals, rice, maize, sorghum, sugar cane, cotton, canola, soya, turf, barley, potato, sweet potato, sunflower, rye, oats, wheat, corn, soybean, sugar beet, safflower, alfalfa, cassava, cucurbits, pineapple and pastures.
  • Specific weed species encountered in corn include, but not limited to, Ixophorus unisetus, Amaranthus hybridu, Ipomoea purpurea , and Sicyos angulata.
  • Specific weed species encountered in sugar cane include, but not limited to, Acalypha sp., Boerhavia erecta, Trianthema portulacastrum, Amaranthus hybridus , and Amaranthus lividus.
  • a synergistic effect of the compound combinations according to the invention is present.
  • the term “synergism” means that the herbicidal action of the active compound combination exceeds the action of the active compounds when applied individually on a given weed, either pre- or post-emergent.
  • the ratios by weight of an active compound (e.g. group a and group b) in the active compound combinations can be varied within relatively wide ranges. In general, 0.001 to 1000 parts by weight, 0.02 to 500 parts by weight, 0.05 to 100 by weight, 0.01 to 100 parts by weight, or 0.1 to 10 parts by weight of one or more active compound(s) of the second component (group b) are used per part by weight of the first compound (group a).
  • the application rate is from 0.01 kg/ha to 5.00 kg/ha or from 0.03 kg/ha to 3.00 kg/ha of the first compound, and from 0.5 kg/ha to 10.00 kg/ha or from 0.05 kg/ha to 5.00 kg/ha of the second component.
  • the herbicidal compositions can be in customary formulations, such as solutions, emulsions, wettable powders, suspensions, powders, dusts, pastes, soluble powders, granules, suspo-emulsion concentrates, emulsifiable concentrate, oil spray, aerosol, natural and synthetic materials impregnated with active compound, and very fine capsules in polymeric substances.
  • the compositions is in a form of an emulsifiable concentrate, wettable powder, granule, dust, oil spray or aerosol.
  • formulations can be produced, for example by mixing the active compounds with extenders, that is liquid solvents and/or solid carriers, optionally with the use of surface-active agents, such as emulsifying agents and/or dispersing agents and/or foam-forming agents.
  • extenders that is liquid solvents and/or solid carriers
  • surface-active agents such as emulsifying agents and/or dispersing agents and/or foam-forming agents.
  • organic solvents can, for example, also be used as auxiliary solvents.
  • Liquid solvents include aromatics, such as xylene, toluene or alkylnaphthalenes, chlorinated aromatics and chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons, such as chlorobenzenes, chloroethylenes or methylene chloride, ali-phatic hydrocarbons, such as cyclohexane or paraffins, for example petroleum fractions, mineral and vegetable oils, alcohols, such as butanol or glycol as well as their ethers and esters, ketones, such as acetone, methyl ethyl ketone, methyl isobutyl ketone or cyclohexanone, strongly polar solvents, such as dimethylformamide and dimethyl sulphoxide, as well as water.
  • aromatics such as xylene, toluene or alkylnaphthalenes
  • chlorinated aromatics and chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons
  • solid carriers there are suitable, for example, ammonium salts and ground natural minerals, such as kaolins, clays, talc, chalk, quartz, attapulgite, mont-morillonite or diatomaceous earth, and ground synthetic minerals, such as finely divided silica, alumina and silicates, as solid carriers for granules there are suitable: for example crushed and fractionated natural rocks such as calcite, marble, pumice, sepiolite and dolomite, as well as synthetic granules of inorganic and organic meals, and granules of organic material such as sawdust, coconut shells, maize cobs and tobacco stalks; as emulsifying and/or foam-forming agents there are suitable: for example nonionic and anionic emulsifiers, such as polyoxyethylene fatty acid esters, poly-oxyethylene fatty alcohol ethers, for example alkylaryl polyglycol ethers, alkylsulphonates, alkyl sulphates, ary
  • Adhesives such as carboxymethylcellulose and natural and synthetic polymers in the form of powders, granules or latexes, such as gum arabic, polyvinyl alcohol and polyvinyl acetate, as well as natural phospholipids, such as cephalins and lecithins, and synthetic phospholipids, can be used in the formulations. Further additives may be mineral and vegetable oils.
  • Colourants can also included in the formulations.
  • inorganic pigments such as iron oxide, titanium oxide and Prussian Blue
  • organic dyestuffs such as alizarin dyestuffs, azo dye-stuffs and metal phthalocyanine dyestuffs, and trace nutrients such as salts of iron, manganese, boron, copper, cobalt, molybdenum and zinc.
  • the formulations in general comprise between 0.1 and 95 per cent by weight, or between 0.5 and 90 per cent by weight, of each of the active compounds from group a (or the first compound) and group b (or the second component).
  • Herbicidal compositions according to the invention can be applied in the form of ready mixes. Herbicidal compositions can also be formulated individually and mixed upon use, i.e. applied in the form of tank mixes.
  • Herbicidal compositions can be used as such or in the form of their formulations, and furthermore also as mixtures with other known herbicides, ready mixes or tank mixes. They may also be mixed with other known active compounds, such as fungicides, insecticides, acaricides, nematicides, bird repellents, growth substances, plant nutrients and agents which improve soil structure.
  • active compounds such as fungicides, insecticides, acaricides, nematicides, bird repellents, growth substances, plant nutrients and agents which improve soil structure.
  • formulations such as mineral or vegetable oils which are tolerated by plants (for example the commercial product “Olco DuPont 11E”) or ammonium salts such as, for example, ammonium sulphate or ammonium thiocyanate, as further additives can be included.
  • Herbicidal compositions can be used as such, in the form of their formulations or in the forms prepared therefrom by dilution of a concentrated form, such as ready-to-use or concentrated solutions, suspensions, emulsions, powders, pastes and granules. They are used in the customary manner, for example by watering, spraying, atomizing, dusting or scattering.
  • Herbicidal compositions according to the invention can be applied before and after the plants have emerged, that is to say pre-emergence and post-emergence. They can also be incorporated into the soil before, during or after sowing seeds of a crop.
  • a method includes applying to a crop where control of such vegetation is desired, an herbicidally effective amount of a composition.
  • Such methods include a composition of the invention, optionally together with an adjuvant, an inert diluent or a carrier suitable for use with an herbicide.
  • a method includes contacting a composition of the invention onto a crop plant in need of weed control or at risk of undesirable weeds, in an amount effective to provide weed control in the crop.
  • Herbicidal activity of the compound combinations can be seen from the examples which follow. While the individual active compounds show less activity with regard to herbicidal activity, certain combinations have a herbicidal activity which exceeds a simple sum of the activity of the individual active compounds.
  • Activity for a given combination of two active compounds can be calculated as follows (cf. COLBY. S. R.: “Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations”. Weeds 15, Pages 20-22. 1967):
  • X % damage by herbicide A (active compound of group a) at an application rate of p kg/ha
  • Y % damage by herbicide B (active compound of group b) at an application rate of q kg/ha
  • X % damage by herbicide A (active compound of group a) at an application rate of p kg/ha
  • Y % damage by herbicide B1 (a first active compound of group b) at an application rate of q kg/ha,
  • Y % damage by herbicide B2 (a second active compound of group b) at an application rate of r kg/ha,
  • E the expected % damage of herbicides A+B1+B2 at an application rate of p+q+r kg/ha
  • references to a range of 90-100% includes 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 95%, 97%, etc., as well as 91.1%, 91.2%, 91.3%, 91.4%, 91.5%, etc., 92.1%, 92.2%, 92.3%, 92.4%, 92.5%, etc., and so forth.
  • the invention is generally disclosed herein using affirmative language to describe the numerous embodiments.
  • the invention also specifically includes embodiments in which particular subject matter is excluded, in full or in part, such as substances or materials, method steps and conditions, protocols, procedures, assays or analysis.
  • the invention is generally not expressed herein in terms of what the invention does not include aspects that are not expressly included in the invention are nevertheless disclosed herein.
  • the herbicide study was conducted at Aburahi Agricultural Research Trial Grass house in Shiga Prefecture, Japan.
  • Various mixtures of DINAMIC® (Amicarbazone 70 DF) and Proponit (Propisochlor 720 EC) was applied pre-emergence using foliar application by manual sprayer in this study.
  • the mixture was diluted in water immediately prior to application, and applied at the concentration in Table 1-1.
  • the application rate was 1000 L water/ha. Digitaria ciliaris was grown in square plastic pots (10 cm ⁇ 10 cm) and replicated three times.
  • the herbicidal effect was observed by comparing the extent of Digitaria ciliaris treated with the compounds against that occurring in similar non-treated control. Herbicidal effect was visually assessed and recorded at 5, 8, 14, 21 and 28 days after treatment (DAT). Damage by the herbicidal compositions was evaluated with reference to a scale of 0% to 100% in comparison with untreated control. 0% means no damage and 100% means complete destruction of the plants.
  • the herbicide effect of amicarbazone was small on Disitaria ciliaris at the one-leaf stage.
  • the herbicide effect of propisochlor was less apparent on Disitaria ciliaris at the one-leaf stage, for example, the weeding effect index was less than 50% at 5 DAT observation at all tested dose rate.
  • treatments with the herbicidal mixtures significantly increase the % damage on the weed.
  • Assessment of the synergistic effect was evaluated using the Colby method.
  • the herbicidal mixtures (amicarbazone+propisochlor) exert a greater herbicidal action than expected according to Colby on the basis of the observed effects of the individual components when used alone. Therefore, a synergistic effect between amicarbazone and propisochlor was confirmed on Disitaria ciliaris .
  • DINAMIC® amicarbazone
  • Discover clomazone 400 g/kg+hexazinone 100 g/kg
  • the formulations for DINAMIC® and Discover were 700 g active ingredient a.i./kg and 500 g active ingredient a.i./kg respectively.
  • the herbicidal effect was observed by comparing the extent of Cyperus esculentus treated with the compounds against that occurring in similar non-treated control. Herbicidal effect was visually assessed and recorded at 27, 43, 46, 60, 63, 77, 83, 97 and 124 days after treatment (DAT). Damage by the herbicidal compositions was evaluated with reference to a scale of 0% to 100% in comparison with untreated control. 0% means no damage and 100% means complete destruction of the plants.
  • Table 2 The results in Table 2 indicate synergistic effects between amicarbazone and the clomazone/hexazinone partner. Assessment of the synergistic effect was evaluated using the Colby method. The theoretical herbicidal effect index were calculated based on Colby and the values were indicated in bracket ( ) in Table 2-1. The herbicidal mixtures (amicarbazone+(clomazone/hexazinone)) exert a greater herbicidal action than expected according to Colby on the basis of the observed effects of the individual components when used alone.
  • the herbicidal effect was observed by comparing the extent of Cyperus esculentus treated with the compounds against that occurring in similar non-treated control. Herbicidal effect was visually assessed and recorded at 4, 8, 18 and 34 days after treatment (DAT). Damage by the herbicidal compositions was evaluated with reference to a scale of 0% to 100% in comparison with untreated control. 0% means no damage and 100% means complete destruction of the plants.
  • Table 3-2 provides post-emergence treatment effects on Cyperus esculentus between amicarbazone and 4-methyl-2-chlorophenoxyacetic acid with an adjuvant.
  • the herbicidal effect was observed by comparing the extent of Euphorbia heterophylla (EPHHL) treated with the compounds against that occurring in similar non-treated control. Herbicidal effect was visually assessed and recorded at 14, 23, 36, 49, 65 and 77 days after treatment (DAT). Damage by the herbicidal compositions was evaluated with reference to a scale of 0% to 100% in comparison with untreated control. 0% means no damage and 100% means complete destruction of the plants.
  • Table 4-2 indicate synergistic effects in the herbicidal treatments with (Amicarbazone+Karmex) mixtures and (Amicarbazone+Sencor) mixtures on Euphorbia heterophylla .
  • Assessment of the synergistic effect was evaluated using the Colby method.
  • the theoretical herbicidal effect index were calculated based on Colby and the values were indicated in bracket ( ) in Table 4-2. Both of the herbicidal mixtures (amicarbazone+Karmex) and (amicarbazone+Sencor) exert a greater herbicidal action than expected according to Colby on the basis of the observed effects of the individual components when used alone.
  • the observed herbicidal effects are greater than the theoretical herbicidal effects at DAT 49, 65 and 77, therefore, there exist synergistic effects.
  • the underlined values in the table indicate that the observed weed killing is greater than calculated from the Colby formula and therefore indicates a synergistic weed killing effect or activity.
  • the herbicidal effect was observed by comparing the extent of Ipomoea gradifolia (IAOGR) treated with the compounds against that occurring in similar non-treated control. Herbicidal effect was visually assessed and recorded at 14, 23, 36, 49, 65 and 77 days after treatment (DAT). Damage by the herbicidal compositions was evaluated with reference to a scale of 0% to 100% in comparison with untreated control. 0% means no damage and 100% means complete destruction of the plants. The results of the observed herbicidal effect and the theoretical herbicidal effected were shown in Table 4-3. Assessment of the synergistic effect was evaluated using the Colby method. The theoretical herbicidal effect index were calculated based on Colby and the values were indicated in bracket ( ).
  • the herbicidal effect was observed by comparing the extent of Croton glandulosus (CROTON) treated with the compounds against that occurring in similar non-treated control. Herbicidal effect was visually assessed and recorded at 14, 23, 36, 49, 65 and 77 days after treatment (DAT). Damage by the herbicidal compositions was evaluated with reference to a scale of 0% to 100% in comparison with untreated control. 0% means no damage and 100% means complete destruction of the plants. The results of the observed herbicidal effect and the theoretical herbicidal effected were shown in Table 4-4. Assessment of the synergistic effect was evaluated using the Colby method. The theoretical herbicidal effect index were calculated based on Colby and the values were indicated in bracket ( ).
  • the experiments in this Example were designed to determine whether amicarbazone could decrease mesotrione-induced bleaching of Kentucky bluegrass, St. Augustinegrass, tall fescue and selected turf weed species and whether the combination of amicarbazone and mesotrione could increase the speed and degree of kill of common turf weeds.
  • the experiments in this Example were also designed to determine if amicarbazone plus mesotrione tank-mixes enhance weed control over treatments with mesotrione or amicarbazone alone.
  • This Example shows the synergistic effect of the combination of amicarbazone and mesotrione on injury and bleaching effects on Mustard ( Sinapsis sp.), Poa annua , Green Foxtail, and Crabgrass sp.
  • Containers were watered as needed based on species and water usage.
  • the greenhouse was heated to keep temperatures above 50° F. (10° C.) and ventilated as needed to keep temperatures below 100° F. (38° C.).
  • Typical daytime temperatures in the greenhouse were 80-90° F. (27-32° C.) and nightime temperatures were between 50-60° F. (10-16° C.).
  • the soil employed was Promix BX potting soil. Overall moisture conditions were normal and the closest weather station was on-site. Conditions and equipment employed in this Example are tabulated below in Tables 5-1 and 5-2.
  • Bleaching of St. Augustine was minimal regardless of treatment. Decreased bleaching, faster activity and greater control were related to the rate of amicarbazone and mesotrione. The higher rate of control by each product the more complete control and faster control of weeds sensitive to either amicarbazone or mesotrione. The decrease in the degree of bleaching was also dependent on the rate of each product; the higher the rate of amicarbazone, the less bleaching occurred.
  • Table 5-3 summarizes the treatment parameters for Treatment numbers 1-9 in Tables 5-4 through 5-11 that follow.
  • Replications employed include 4, Untreated treatments: 1, Design: Randomized Complete Block, Treatment units: US standard, Treated plot size Width: 4 feet, Treated plot size Length: 4 feet, Application volume: 50 gal/ac, Mix size: 0.5562 liters, Mix overage: 100%. Format definitions: G-A117.DEF, G-A117.FRM. The results of these treatments are summarized below in Tables 5-4 to 5-11.
  • Treatments shown in Table 6-1 were conducted at pre emergence stage 1 day after planting seed. Application of the treatments was conducted over a 24 hour period. Over this time period, dry bulb temperature was about 30° C., wet bulb temperature was about 26° C., relative humidity was about 70%, cloud cover was about 100%, wind speed was about 1 m/s, and the wind was out of the east. Treatments were administered with a multi-spray gas sprayer with a 4 ⁇ flat fan 03F80 nozzle. Spacing was 50 cm, with a height of 50 cm, pressure 2.8 Bar, at a ground speed of 1 m/s, and a calibration mean output of 330 L/ha. The soil temperature over the application period averaged to about 28° C. and the soil remained moist and fine.
  • Crop condition Actively growing Crop stage 4 Leaves BBCH scale 14 Soil moisture Moist Rain since last visit 28 mm
  • Crop condition Actively growing Crop stage 6 Leaves BBCH scale 16 Soil moisture Wet Rain since last visit 6 mm
  • Control and weed cover at 2, 4, and 6 weeks for the indicated species are summarized below in Tables 6-5 through 6-7. 80% is considered acceptable control.
  • DINAMIC® 700WDG at 100 g/ha alone showed marginal control of Amaranthus hybridus , but the rest of the spectrum was insufficiently controlled by rates up to 300 g/ha.
  • Galago 480SC at 100 mL/ha showed marginal control of Ipomoea purpurea and Amaranthus hybridus , but could also not control Rottboellia exaltata .
  • the combination (DINAMIC® at 75 g/ha+Galago at 100 mL/ha) resulted in marginal control of Amaranthus hybridus and Ipomoea purpurea .
  • DINAMIC® at 250 g/ha+Galago at 300 mL/ha was the only treatment which could control Rottboellia exaltata with satisfactory results. There were no visual signs of phytotoxicity were noticed throughout the growing season.
  • DINAMIC® at 300 g/ha can be used to control Amaranthus hybridus and Ipomoea purpurea .
  • Galago at 200 mL/ha can be used to control Amaranthus hybridus and Ipomoea purpurea .
  • DINAMIC® at 75 g/ha+Galago at 100 mL/ha can be used to control Amaranthus hybridus and Ipomoea purpurea .
  • DINAMIC® at 250 g/ha+Galago at 300 mL/ha can be used to control Amaranthus hybridus, Ipomoea purpurea and Rottboellia exaltata.
  • Treatments shown in Table 6-8 were conducted at pre emergence stage 1 day after planting seed. Application of the treatments was conducted over a 24 hour period. Over this time period, dry bulb temperature was about 26° C., wet bulb temperature was about 23° C., relative humidity was about 70%, cloud cover was about 50%, wind speed was about 0 m/s. Treatments were administered with a multi-spray gas sprayer with a 4 ⁇ flat fan 03F80 nozzle. Spacing was 50 cm, with a height of 50 cm, pressure 2.8 Bar, at a ground speed of 1 m/s, and a calibration mean output of 330 L/ha. The soil temperature over the application period averaged to about 24° C. and the soil remained moist and fine.
  • Crop condition Actively growing Crop stage 3-4 Leaves BBCH scale 13 Soil moisture Moist Rain since last visit 0 mm
  • Crop condition Actively growing Crop stage 6 Leaves BBCH scale 16 Soil moisture Wet Rain since last visit 18 mm
  • Control and weed cover at 2, 4, and 6 weeks for the indicated species are summarized below in Tables 6-12 through 6-14. 80% is considered acceptable control.
  • DINAMIC® 700WDG at 125 g/ha alone showed marginal control of Amaranthus hybridus , but the rest of the spectrum was insufficiently controlled by rates as high as 300 g/ha.
  • the combination (DINAMIC® at 75 g/ha+Galago at 150 mL/ha) resulted in satisfactory control of Amaranthus hybridus only.
  • the DINAMIC® rate of this combination was increased to 100 g/ha Commilina benghalensis was also controlled satisfactorily.
  • DINAMIC® Portulaca oleracea was added to the controlled spectrum. Digitaria sanguinalis could be controlled by the high rate (DINAMIC® at 250 g/ha+Galago at 300 mL/ha). No visual signs of phytotoxicity were noticed throughout the growing season. DINAMIC® can be applied in combination with Galago to give the following control: DINAMIC® at 100 g/ha+Galago at 150 mL/ha to control Amaranthus hybridus and Commilina benghalensis .
  • the higher dosage rate (DINAMIC® at 250 g/ha+Galago at 300 mL/ha can be used to control the entire spectrum.
  • Crop condition Actively .growing Crop stage 3 Leaves BBCH scale 13 Soil moisture Moist Rain since last visit 16 mm
  • Crop condition Actively growing Crop stage 5 Leaves BBCH scale 15 Soil moisture Wet Rain since last visit 30 mm
  • Crop condition Actively growing Crop stage 8 leaves BBCH scale: 18 Soil moisture Moist Rain since last visit 22 mm
  • Control and weed cover at 2, 4, and 6 weeks for the indicated species are summarized below in Tables 6-19 through 6-21. 80% is considered acceptable control.
  • DINAMIC® 700WDG at 300 g/ha showed satisfactory control of Amaranthus spinosus, Eleusine indica and Ipomoea purpurea but could not control Commilina benghalensis.
  • Galago 480SC at 200 mL/ha showed sufficient of the entire weed spectrum. The combinations at the higher dosage rates resulted in excellent control.
  • DINAMIC® at 125 g/ha+Galago at 100 mL/ha showed good control over the entire weed spectrum. No visual signs of phytotoxicity were noticed throughout the growing season.
  • DINAMIC® at 300 g/ha alone or Galago 480SC at 200 mL/ha can be used to control Amaranthus spinosus, Eleusine indica and Ipomoea purpurea .
  • DINAMIC® at 125 g/ha+Galago at 100 mL/ha can be used to control Amaranthus spinosus, Eleusine indica, Ipomoea purpurea and Commilina
  • Treatments shown in Table 6-22 were conducted at pre emergence stage 1 day after planting seed. Application of the treatments was conducted over a 24 hour period. Over this time period, dry bulb temperature was about 26° C., wet bulb temperature was about 16° C., relative humidity was about 65%-70%, cloud cover was about 100%, and wind speed was about 1 nm/s out of the east. Treatments were administered with a multi-spray gas sprayer with a 4 ⁇ flat fan 031F80 nozzle. Spacing was 50 cm, with a height of 50 cm, pressure 2.8 Bar, at a ground speed of 1 m/s, and a calibration mean output of 330 L/ha. The soil temperature over the application period averaged to about 28° C. and the soil remained moist and fine.
  • Crop condition Actively growing Crop stage 4 Leaves BBCH scale 14 Soil moisture Moist Rain since last visit 28 mm
  • Crop condition Actively growing Crop stage 6 Leaves BBCH scale 16 Soil moisture Wet Rain since last visit 6 mm
  • Control and weed cover at 2, 4, and 6 weeks for the indicated species are summarized below in Tables 6-26 through 6-28. 80% is considered acceptable control.
  • DINAMIC® 700WDG at 125 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 100 mL/ha showed satisfactory control of Amaranthus hybridus and marginal control of Ipomoea purpurea but Rottboellia exaltata was insufficiently controlled even by the higher rate of Galago 480SC (150 mL/ha).
  • the higher rate of this combination (DINAMIC® 700WDG at 125 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 150 mL/ha) performed on par with the standard CALLISTO® at 260 mL/ha+DUAL S GOLD® at 710 mL/ha.
  • the addition of TOLLA showed a significant improvement to efficacy of the DINAMIC®+Galago mixture.
  • DINAMIC®700WDG at 75 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 100 mL/ha+TOLLA 840S at 1000 mL/ha resulted in satisfactory control of Amaranthus hybridus and marginal control of Ipomoea purpurea.
  • DINAMIC®700WDG at 125 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 150 mL/ha+TOLLA 840S at 1000 mL/ha resulted in satisfactory control of Rottboellia exaltata which could not be achieved by the standard CALLISTO® at 260 mL/ha+DUAL S GOLD® at 710 mL/ha.
  • DINAMIC® 700WDG at 125 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 150 mL/ha can be used to control Amaranthus hybridus and Ipomoea purpurea.
  • DINAMIC® 700WDG at 75 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 150 mL/ha+TOLLA 840S at 1000 mL/ha can be used to control Amaranthus hybridus and Ipomoea purpurea .
  • To control Rottboellia exaltata DINAMIC® 700WDG at 125 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 150 mL/ha+TOLLA 840S at 1000 mL/ha can be used.
  • Treatments shown in Table 6-29 were conducted at pre emergence stage 1 day after planting seed. Application of the treatments was conducted over a 24 hour period. Over this time period, dry bulb temperature was about 26° C., wet bulb temperature was about 23° C., relative humidity was about 70%, cloud cover was about 50%, and wind speed was about 0 m/s. Treatments were administered with a multi-spray gas sprayer with a 4 ⁇ flat fan 03F80 nozzle. Spacing was 50 cm, with a height of 50 cm, pressure 2.8 Bar, at a ground speed of 1 m/s, and a calibration mean output of 330 L/ha. The soil temperature over the application period averaged to about 24° C. and the soil remained moist and fine.
  • Crop condition Actively growing Crop stage 3-4 Leaves BBCH scale 13 Soil moisture Moist Rain since last visit 0 mm
  • Crop condition Actively growing Crop stage 6 Leaves BBCH scale 16 Soil moisture Wet Rain since last visit 18 mm
  • Control and weed cover at 2, 4, and 6 weeks for the indicated species are summarized below in Tables 6-33 through 6-35. 80% is considered acceptable control.
  • DINAMIC®700WDG at 125 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 100 mL/ha showed satisfactory control of Digitaria sanguinalis, Portulaca oleracea, Amaranthus hybridus and Commilina benghalensis .
  • This combination compared favorably with the standard CALLISTO® at 260 mL/ha+DUAL S GOLD® at 710 mL/ha.
  • the addition of TOLLA improved the efficacy of the DINAMIC®+Galago mixture.
  • DINAMIC®700WDG at 100 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 100 mL/ha+TOLLA 840S at 1000 mL/ha resulted in 100% control of Digitaria sanguinalis, Portulaca oleracea and Commilina benghalensis , and satisfactory control of Amaranthus hybridus .
  • This combination compared favorably with the standard CALLISTO® at 260 mL/ha+DUAL S GOLD® at 710 mL/ha. No visual signs of phytotoxicity were noticed throughout the growing season.
  • DINAMIC®700WDG at 125 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 100 mL/ha can be used to control Digitaria sanguinalis, Portulaca oleracea, Amaranthus hybridus and Commilina benghalensis .
  • DINAMIC® 700WDG at 100 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 100 mL/ha+TOLLA 840S at 1000 mL/ha can be used to control Digitaria sanguinalis, Portulaca oleracea, Amaranthus hybridus and Commilina benghalensis.
  • Treatments shown in Table 6-29 were conducted at pre emergence stage 3 days after planting seed. Application of the treatments was conducted over a 24 hour period. Over this time period, dry bulb temperature was about 22° C., wet bulb temperature was about 18° C., relative humidity was about 65%, cloud cover was about 30%, and wind speed was about 0 m/s. Treatments were administered with a multi-spray gas sprayer with a 4 ⁇ flat fan 03F80 nozzle. Spacing was 50 cm, with a height of 50 cm, pressure 2.8 Bar, at a ground speed of 1 m/s, and a calibration mean output of 330 L/ha. The soil temperature over the application period averaged to about 22° C. and the soil remained moist and fine.
  • Crop condition Actively growing Crop stage 3 Leaves BBCH scale 13 Soil moisture Moist Rain since last visit 16 mm
  • Crop condition Actively growing Crop stage 5 Leaves BBCH scale 15 Soil moisture Wet Rain since last visit 30 mm
  • Control and weed cover at 2,4, and 6 weeks for the indicated species are summarized below in Tables 6-40 through 6-42. 80% is considered acceptable control.
  • DINAMIC® 700WDG at 125 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 100 mL/ha showed satisfactory control of Amaranthus spinosus, Eleusine indica, Ipomoea purpurea and Commilina benghalensis.
  • the addition of TOLLA to the above mixture appears to be a good practice.
  • DINAMIC® 700WDG at 75 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 100 mL/ha+TOLLA 840S at 1000 mL/ha performed excellently on Amaranthus spinosus, Eleusine indica and Commilina benghalensis .
  • DINAMIC®700WDG at 125 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 100 mL/ha can be used to control Amaranthus spinosus, Eleusine indica, Ipomoea purpurea and Commilina benghalensis .
  • DINAMIC® 700WDG at 75 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 100 mL/ha+TOLLA 840S at 1000 mL/ha can be used to control Amaranthus spinosus, Eleusine indica, Ipomoea purpurea and Commilina benghalensis.
  • Treatments shown in Table 6-43 were conducted at post emergence stage 15 days after planting. Application of the treatments was conducted over a 24 hour period. Over this time period, dry bulb temperature was about 30° C., wet bulb temperature was about 24° C., relative humidity was about 55%, cloud cover was about 0%, and wind speed was about 0 m/s. Treatments were administered with a multi-spray gas sprayer with a 4 ⁇ flat fan 03F80 nozzle. Spacing was 50 cm, with a height of 50 cm, pressure 2.8 Bar, at a ground speed of 1 m/s, and a calibration mean output of 330 L/ha. The soil temperature over the application period averaged to about 29° C. and the soil remained moist and fine. Crops stage at the outset was about 4 leaves with a BBCH scale of 14. Crop and weeds were actively growing. Weed stage was about 3-5 leaves.
  • Crop condition Actively growing Crop stage 5-6 Leaves BBCH scale 15-16 Soil moisture Wet Rain since last visit 18 mm
  • Crop condition Actively growing Crop stage 8 Leaves BBCH scale 18 Soil moisture Wet Rain since last visit 38 mm
  • Control and weed cover at 2, 4, and 6 weeks for the indicated species are summarized below in Tables 6-47 through 6-49. 80% is considered acceptable control.
  • DINAMIC®+Galago without a wetter DINAMIC® 700WDG at 100 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 150 mL/ha showed satisfactory control of Amaranthus hybridus and Ipomoea purpurea. Rottboellia exaltata was insufficiently controlled by this mixture. It was however marginally controlled by DINAMIC® 700WDG at 125 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 150 mL/ha. DINAMIC®+Galago with a wetter: It is clear that a wetter improved efficacy.
  • DINAMIC®700WDG at 75 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 150 mL/ha+Wet-All at 0.1% resulted in satisfactory control of Amaranthus hybridus and Ipomoea purpurea in comparison to the equivalent treatment without a wetter (treatment 2).
  • Rottboellia exaltata could still not be controlled by this mixture and needed higher rates (DINAMIC®700WDG at 100 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 150 mL/ha+Wet-All at 0.1%) to be controlled satisfactory.
  • Signs of phytotoxicity were noticed in the plots were DINAMIC®700WDG at 250 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 300 mL/ha+Wet-All at 0.1% was sprayed.
  • DINAMIC® 700WDG at 75 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 100 mL/ha+Wet-All at 0.1% can be used to control Amaranthus hybridus and Ipomoea purpurea .
  • To control Rottboellia exaltata DINAMIC®700WDG at 100 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 150 mL/ha+Wet-All at 0.1% can be used.
  • Treatments shown in Table 6-50 were conducted at post emergence stage 14 days after planting. Application of the treatments was conducted over a 24 hour period. Over this time period, dry bulb temperature was about 24-26° C., wet bulb temperature was about 20° C., relative humidity was about 60%, cloud cover was about 70%, and wind speed was about 0 m/s. Treatments were administered with a multi-spray gas sprayer with a 4 ⁇ flat fan 03F80 nozzle. Spacing was 50 cm, with a height of 50 cm, pressure 2.8 Bar, at a ground speed of 1 m/s, and a calibration mean output of 330 L/ha. The soil temperature over the application period averaged to about 23° C. and the soil remained moist and fine. Crops stage at the outset was about 4 leaves with a BBCH scale of 14. Crop and weeds were actively growing. Weed stage was about 2-5 leaves.
  • Crop condition Actively growing Crop stage 6 Leaves BBCH scale 16 Soil moisture Moist Rain since last visit 8 mm
  • Crop condition Actively growing Crop stage 7 Leaves BBCH scale 17 Soil moisture Wet Rain since last visit 44 mm
  • Control and weed cover at 2, 4, and 6 weeks for the indicated species are summarized below in Tables 6-54 through 6-56. 80% is considered acceptable control.
  • the higher Galago rate improves control when used as a mixing partner for DINAMIC®.
  • DINAMIC®+Galago without a wetter DINAMIC® 700WDG at 125 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 150 mL/ha showed satisfactory control of Digitaria sanguinalis and Portulaca oleracea and marginal control of Amaranthus hybridus . It could however not control Commilina benghalensis except with higher rates.
  • DINAMIC®+Galago with a wetter A wetter should be used with these mixtures (see treatment 1 vs. treatment 8).
  • DINAMIC® 700WDG at 75 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 100 mL/ha+Wet-All at 0.1% resulted in 100% control of Amaranthus spinosus and Portulaca oleracea in comparison to 65% and 60% respectively without a wetter (treatment 1).
  • Commilina benghalensis could not be controlled by this mixture and needed higher rates (DINAMIC®700WDG at 100 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 150 mL/ha+Wet-All at 0.1%) to be controlled satisfactory. No visual signs of phytotoxicity were noticed throughout the growing season.
  • DINAMIC® 700WDG at 75 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 100 mL/ha+Wet-All at 0.1% can be used to control Digitaria sanguinalis, Portulaca oleracea and Amaranthus hybridus .
  • DINAMIC® 700WDG at 100 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 150 mL/ha+Wet-All at 0.1% can be used.
  • Treatments shown in Table 6-57 were conducted at post emergence stage 18 days after planting. Application of the treatments was conducted over a 24 hour period. Over this time period, dry bulb temperature was about 31° C., wet bulb temperature was about 28° C., relative humidity was about 80%, cloud cover was about 100%, and wind speed was about 0 m/s. Treatments were administered with a multi-spray gas sprayer with a 4 ⁇ flat fan 03F80 nozzle. Spacing was 50 cm, with a height of 50 cm, pressure 2.8 Bar, at a ground speed of 1 m/s, and a calibration mean output of 330 L/ha. The soil temperature over the application period averaged to about 29° C. and the soil remained moist and fine. Crops stage at the outset was about 4 leaves with a BBCH scale of 14. Crop and weeds were actively growing. Weed stage was about 2-6 leaves.
  • Crop condition Actively growing Crop stage 6 Leaves BBCH scale 16 Soil moisture Moist Rain since last visit 16 mm
  • Crop condition Actively growing Crop stage 8 Leaves BBCH scale 18 Soil moisture Wet Rain since last visit 30 mm
  • Control and weed cover at 2, 4, and 6 weeks for the indicated species are summarized below in Tables 6-61 through 6-63. 80% is considered acceptable control.
  • the higher Galago rate improves control when used as a mixing partner for DINAMIC®.
  • a wetter is beneficially used with this mixture.
  • DINAMIC®+Galago with a wetter DINAMIC® 700WDG at 75 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 100 mL/ha+Wet-All at 0.1% resulted in excellent control of Amaranthus spinosus, Commilina benghalensis and Eleusine indica , but Ipomoea purpurea was marginally controlled. Signs of phytotoxicity were noticed in the plots were DINAMIC® 700WDG at 250 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 300 mL/ha+Wet-All at 0.1% was sprayed.
  • DINAMIC® 700WDG at 125 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 150 mL/ha can be used to control Amaranthus spinosus, Eleusine indica, Ipomoea purpurea and Commilina benghalensis .
  • DINAMIC® 700WDG at 75 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 100 mL/ha+Wet-All at 0.1% can be used to control Amaranthus spinosus, Eleusine indica, Ipomoea purpurea and Commilina benghalensis.
  • Treatments shown in Table 6-64 were conducted at post emergence stage 15 days after planting. Application of the treatments was conducted over a 24 hour period. Over this time period, dry bulb temperature was about 32° C., wet bulb temperature was about 25° C., relative humidity was about 50%, cloud cover was about 0%, and wind speed was about 0 m/s. Treatments were administered with a multi-spray gas sprayer with a 4 ⁇ flat fan 03F80 nozzle. Spacing was 50 cm, with a height of 50 cm, pressure 2.8 Bar, at a ground speed of 1 m/s, and a calibration mean output of 330 L/ha. The soil temperature over the application period averaged to about 29° C. and the soil remained moist and fine. Crops stage at the outset was about 4 leaves with a BBCH scale of 14. Crop and weeds were actively growing. Weed stage was about 3-5 leaves.
  • Crop condition Actively growing Crop stage 5-6 Leaves BBCH scale 15-16 Soil moisture Wet Rain since last visit 18 mm
  • Crop condition Actively growing Crop stage 8 Leaves BBCH scale 18 Soil moisture Wet Rain since last visit 38 mm
  • Control and weed cover at 2, 4, and 6 weeks for the indicated species are summarized below in Tables 6-68 through 6-70. 80% is considered acceptable control.
  • DINAMIC®+Galago+Wet-All Rottboellia exaltata could not be controlled by any dosage rates of this mixture.
  • DINAMIC® 700WDG at 75 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 100 mL/ha+Wet-All at 0.1% resulted in satisfactory control of Amaranthus hybridus and Ipomoea purpurea .
  • Rottboellia exaltata DINAMIC® 700WDG at 125 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 150 mL/ha+Wet-All at 0.1% compared with the standard CALLISTO® 480 SC at 260 mL/ha+Gardo Gold at 1562 mL/ha+Compliment at 0.1%.
  • Rottboellia exaltata was 100% controlled by the standard treatment.
  • DINAMIC®+Galago+TOLLA+Wet-All DINAMIC® 700WDG at 75 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 100 mL/ha+TOLLA 960EC at 1000 mL/ha+Wet-All at 0.1% showed acceptable control of the entire weed spectrum after 6 weeks.
  • DINAMIC®700WDG at 125 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 150 mL/ha+TOLLA 960EC at 000 mL/ha+Wet-All at 0.1% showed similar results to the standard CALLISTO® 480 SC at 260 mL/ha+Gardo Gold at 1562 mL/ha+Compliment at 0.1%. Signs of phytotoxicity were noticed in the plots were DINAMIC® 700WDG at 250 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 300 mL/ha+TOLLA 960EC at 1000 mL/ha+Wet-All at 0.1% was sprayed.
  • DINAMIC® 700WDG at 75 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 150 mL/ha+TOLLA 960EC at 1000 mL/ha+Wet-All at 0.1% can safely be used to control of Amaranthus hybridus, Ipomoea purpurea and Rottboellia exaltata.
  • Treatments shown in Table 6-71 were conducted at post emergence stage 14 days after planting. Application of the treatments was conducted over a 24 hour period. Over this time period, dry bulb temperature was about 26° C., wet bulb temperature was about 21° C., relative humidity was about 65%, cloud cover was about 50%, and wind speed was about 0 m/s. Treatments were administered with a multi-spray gas sprayer with a 4 ⁇ flat fan 03F80 nozzle. Spacing was 50 cm, with a height of 50 cm, pressure 2.8 Bar, at a ground speed of 1 m/s, and a calibration mean output of 330 L/ha. The soil temperature over the application period averaged to about 23° C. and the soil remained moist and fine. Crops stage at the outset was about 4 leaves with a BBCH scale of 14. Crop and weeds were actively growing. Weed stage was about 2-5 leaves.
  • Crop condition Actively growing Crop stage 6 Leaves BBCH scale 16 Soil moisture Moist Rain since last visit 8 mm
  • Crop condition Actively growing Crop stage 7 Leaves BBCH scale 17 Soil moisture Wet Rain since last visit 44 mm
  • Control and weed cover at 2, 4, and 6 weeks for the indicated species are summarized below in Tables 6-75 through 6-77. 80% is considered acceptable control.
  • DINAMIC®+Galago+Wet-All DINAMIC® 700WDG at 100 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 100 mL/ha+Wet-All at 0.1% resulted in satisfactory control of Digitaria sanguinalis, Portulaca oleracea and Amaranthus hybridus. Commilina benghalensis was insufficiently controlled but as soon as the Galago rate was increased to 100 mL/ha satisfactory control was achieved. DINAMIC®+Galago+TOLLA+Wet-All: The addition of TOLLA showed a drastic improvement on control.
  • DINAMIC® 700WDG at 75 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 100 mL/ha+TOLLA 960EC at 1000 mL/ha+Wet-All at 0.1% showed excellent control of the entire weed spectrum after 6 weeks.
  • This mixture performed on par with the standard CALLISTO® 480 SC at 260 mL/ha+Gardo Gold at 1562 mL/ha+Compliment at 0.1%._No visual signs of phytotoxicity were noticed throughout the growing season.
  • DINAMIC® 700WDG at 75 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 100 mL/ha+TOLLA 960EC at 1000 mL/ha+Wet-All at 0.1% can be used for to control Digitaria sanguinalis, Portulaca oleracea, Amaranthus hybridus and Commilina benghalensis.
  • Treatments shown in Table 6-78 were conducted at post emergence stage 18 days after planting. Application of the treatments was conducted over a 24 hour period. Over this time period, dry bulb temperature was about 31° C., wet bulb temperature was about 28° C., relative humidity was about 80%, cloud cover was about 100%, and wind speed was about 0 m/s. Treatments were administered with a multi-spray gas sprayer with a 4 ⁇ flat fan 03F80 nozzle. Spacing was 50 cm, with a height of 50 cm, pressure 2.8 Bar, at a ground speed of 1 m/s, and a calibration mean output of 330 L/ha. The soil temperature over the application period averaged to about 29° C. and the soil remained moist and fine. Crops stage at the outset was about 4 leaves with a BBCH scale of 14. Crop and weeds were actively growing. Weed stage was about 2-6 leaves.
  • Crop condition Actively growing Crop stage 6 Leaves BBCH scale 16 Soil moisture Moist Rain since last visit 16 mm
  • Crop condition Actively growing Crop stage 8 Leaves BBCH scale 18 Soil moisture Wet Rain since last visit 30 mm
  • Control and weed cover at 2, 4, and 6 weeks for the indicated species are summarized below in Tables 6-82 through 6-84. 80% is considered acceptable control.
  • DINAMIC® 700WDG at 250 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 300 mL/ha+TOLLA 960EC at 1000 mL/ha+Wet-All at 0.1% was sprayed.
  • DINAMIC® 700WDG at 75 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 100 mL/ha+TOLLA 960EC at 1000 mL/ha+Wet-All at 0.1% can be used to control of Amaranthus spinosus, Eleusine indica, Ipomoea purpurea and Commilina benghalensis.
  • This Example compares the herbicidal selectivity and efficacy of DINAMIC® 700WDG applied in combination with Galago and TOLLA 840S as a pre-emergence application with regards to both crop and weeds in dry land maize. Treatments and conditions are tabulated below.
  • the trial was conducted on a commercial maize crop produced under dry land conditions.
  • the DINAMIC® 700WDG formulation was evaluated for herbicidal activity and crop selectivity when applied as a pre-emergence spray program in tank-mix combination with Galago and TOLLA 840S.
  • Treatments were applied pre-emergence of crop and weeds as broadcast applications over the maize rows. Treatments were applied one day after planting. First rains (10 mm) were recorded at 6 days following application. Weather conditions were dry with infrequent showers of rain occurring for the duration of the trial. At 30 days following application heavy rains (140 mm) were recorded. Thereafter dry conditions prevailed for the remainder of the trial.
  • the weed spectrum at the trial site consisted of broadleaved weeds and a single grass weed (DIGSA).
  • the broadleaved weed spectrum was composed of Blackjack (BIDPI), Pigweed (AMAHY) and Khaki weed (TAGMI). Efficacy evaluations were conducted at 14, 28, 42 and 56 days following application, respectively.
  • Tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago displayed a typical dosage related efficacy response between the rates of 75-125 g/ha applied. Higher rates DINAMIC® 700WDG gave improved activity against broadleaved weeds, while an increase in the rate of Galago improved herbicidal activity against broadleaved weeds and grasses.
  • the tank-mix combination of DINAMIC®+Galago applied at 125 g/ha+150 ml/ha exhibited commercially acceptable levels of herbicidal activity against the entire broadleaved weed spectrum consisting of BIDPI, AMAHY and TAGMI.
  • DINAMIC® applied at the rate of 100 g/ha in combination with Galago at 150 m/ha displayed commercial levels of herbicidal activity against the broadleaved weeds AMAHY and TAGMI at the final assessment.
  • TOLLA 840S to the tank-mix combination of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago greatly enhanced the herbicidal activity against the grass weed DIGSA, with all tank-mix combinations exhibiting commercial control of DIGSA at the final assessment conducted at 56 DAA.
  • DINAMIC® 700WDG treatments applied between the rates of 75-125 g/ha in combination with Galago at 150 ml/ha and TOLLA 840S at 1.0l/ha exhibited commercially acceptable levels of herbicidal activity against the entire weed spectrum consisting of the grass weed DIGSA and the broadleaved weeds, BIDPI, AMAHY and TAGMI, respectively.
  • Tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago displayed a typical dosage related efficacy response between the rates of 75-125 g/ha applied.
  • TOLLA 840S to the tank-mix combination of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago greatly enhanced the herbicidal activity against the grass weed DIGSA.
  • This Example compares the herbicidal selectivity and efficacy of DINAMIC® 700WDG applied in combination with Galago and TOLLA 840S as a pre-emergence application with regards to both crop and weeds in irrigated maize. Treatments are conditions are tabulated below.
  • the trial was conducted on a commercial maize crop produced under irrigated conditions.
  • the DINAMIC® 700WDG formulation was evaluated for herbicidal activity and crop selectivity when applied as a pre-emergence spray program in tank-mix combination with Galago and TOLLA 840S. Treatments were applied pre-emergence of crop and weeds as broadcast applications over the maize rows. Weather conditions were dry with infrequent showers of rain occurring for the duration of the trial.
  • Visual symptoms of phytotoxicity in the form of stunting and yellowing were observed in treatments receiving the DINAMIC® 700WDG formulation applied at the rates of 100 g/ha and 125 g/ha in combination with Galago and Galago+TOLLA 840S at 14 DAA.
  • Visual symptoms of phytotoxicity were dosage related and ranged from negligible to moderate (class 2 to class 3) according to the BBA visual phytotoxicity rating scale (refer to appendix for details on scale). Slight chlorosis (yellowing) was only observed at 14 DAA.
  • Visual symptoms of stunting were observed at the assessments conducted at 14, 28 and 42 DAA with a decrease in severity of stunting observed at the final visual phytotoxicity assessment conducted at 42 DAA.
  • the weed spectrum at the trial site consisted of broadleaved weeds only.
  • the broadleaved weed spectrum was composed of Large thornapple (DATFE), Purslane (POROL), Dwarf marigold (SCHPI) and Blackjack (BIDPI). Efficacy evaluations were conducted at 14, 28, 42 and 56 days following application, respectively.
  • the tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago were efficacious and displayed excellent levels of herbicidal activity against the broadleaved weed spectrum at the trial site.
  • Commercially acceptable levels of herbicidal activity were achieved across the entire weed spectrum where DINAMIC® 700WDG was applied at rates exceeding 75 g/ha in combination with Galago applied at either 100 mL/ha or 150 ml/ha, respectively.
  • Commercial control of the entire broadleaved weed spectrum was observed in all treatments where Galago was applied at the rate of 150 ml/ha, regardless of the rate of DINAMIC® 700WDG applied.
  • TOLLA 840S to the tank-mix combination of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago greatly enhanced the herbicidal activity against the small-seeded broadleaved weeds (POROL, SCHPI and BIDPI). All of the tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 840S exhibited commercially acceptable levels of herbicidal activity against the broadleaved weeds DATFE, POROL, SCHPI and BIDPI at the final assessment conducted at 56 DAA.
  • Visual symptoms of phytotoxicity in the form of stunting were observed on treatments receiving the tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago and DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 840S in all cases where DINAMIC® 700WDG was applied at rates exceeding 75 g/ha. Visual symptoms of stunting were dosage related and ranged from negligible to distinct damage (class 2 to class 5) according to the BBA visual phytotoxicity rating scale.
  • DINAMIC®+Galago combinations displayed commercially acceptable levels of herbicidal activity against the broadleaved weed spectrum consisting of DATFE, POROL, SCHPI and BIDPI in all tank-mix treatments where DINAMIC® 700WDG was applied at rates exceeding 75 g/ha, or in tank-mix treatments where Galago was applied at the rate of 150 mL/ha.
  • Tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 840S were efficacious and exhibited commercial control of DATFE, POROL, SCHPI and BIDPI across all rates applied.
  • the tank-mix combination of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 840S applied at 100-125 g/ha+150 ml/ha+1.0 l/ha achieved comparable levels of herbicidal activity as the standard tank-mix combination of CALLISTO®+Dual Gold applied at 260 ml/ha+710 ml/ha.
  • This Example compares the herbicidal selectivity and efficacy of DINAMIC® 700WDG applied in combination with Galago and TOLLA 840S as a pre-emergence application with regards to both crop and weeds in irrigated maize. Treatments and conditions are tabulated below.
  • the trial was conducted on a commercial maize crop produced under irrigated conditions.
  • the DINAMIC® 700WDG formulation was evaluated for herbicidal activity and crop selectivity when applied as a pre-emergence spray program in tank-mix combination with Ga/ago and TOLLA 840S. Treatmients were applied pre-emergence of crop and weeds as broadcast applications over the maize rows.
  • the tank-mix combination of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 840S exhibited symptoms of phytotoxicity in the form of stunting in treatments receiving the DINAMIC® 700WDG formulation applied at the rate of 125 g/ha and the double rate of 250 g/ha, respectively.
  • 125 g/ha stunting was only observed at the first assessment conducted at 14 DAA.
  • 250 g/ha stunting was observed at each of the assessments conducted.
  • No visual symptoms of phytotoxicity were observed in tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 840S where the DINAMIC® 700WDG formulation was applied at rates of 75 g/ha and 100 g/ha, respectively.
  • tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago and DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 840S did not significantly increase or decrease yield compared to the untreated control treatments and the standard tank-mix combination of
  • the weed spectrum at the trial site consisted mainly of broadleaved weeds namely; Blackjack (BIDPI), Purslane (POROL), Anoda weed (ANOCR) and Field bindweed (CONAR). Efficacy evaluations were conducted at 14, 28, 42 and 56 days following application, respectively. Blackjack (BIDPI) and Purslane (POROL) were well represented in each plot with 15-25% soil cover of each weed observed in the untreated control strips at the final assessment, respectively. The weeds ANOCR and CONAR represented a smaller portion of the weed population with 5-15% and 5-10% soil cover of each weed observed in the untreated control strips at the final assessment conducted at 56 DAA, respectively.
  • the tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago exhibited commercially acceptable levels of herbicidal activity against the broadleaved weed POROL across all rates applied.
  • Commercially acceptable levels of herbicidal activity were achieved for BIDPI and ANOCR where DINAMIC® 700WDG was applied at rates exceeding 75 g/ha in combination with Galago applied at either 100 m/ha or 150 ml/ha, respectively.
  • weed control was greatest with increasing rates of Galago applied and commercial control of the entire broadleaved weed spectrum was observed in all treatments where Galago was applied at the rate of 150 mL/ha, regardless of the rate of DINAMIC® 700WDG applied.
  • TOLLA 840S to the tank-mix combination of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago greatly enhanced the herbicidal activity against the small-seeded broadleaved weeds (POROL and BIDPI). All of the tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 840S exhibited commercially acceptable levels of herbicidal activity against the broadleaved weeds BIDPI, POROL and CONAR at the final assessment conducted at 56 DAA.
  • the broadleaved weed CONAR was commercially controlled by all tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 840S where Galago was applied at the rate of 150 ml/ha or where the rate of DINAMIC® 700WDG exceeded 75 g/ha.
  • the tank-mix combination of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 840S applied at 125 g/ha+150 ml/ha+1.0 l/ha achieved comparable levels of herbicidal activity as the standard tank-mix combination of CALLISTO®+Dual Gold applied at 260 ml/ha+710 ml/ha.
  • the tank-mix combination of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 840S exhibited symptoms of phytotoxicity in the form of stunting in treatments receiving the DINAMIC® 700WDG formulation applied at the rate of 125 g/ha and the double rate of 250 g/ha, respectively. No visual symptoms of phytotoxicity were observed in tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 840S where the DINAMIC® 700WDG formulation was applied at rates of 75 g/ha and 100 g/ha, respectively.
  • Tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 840S were efficacious and exhibited commercial control of BIDPI, POROL and CONAR across all rates applied.
  • CONAR was commercially controlled by all tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 840S where Galago was applied at the rate of 150 ml/ha or where the rate of DINAMIC® 700WDG exceeded 75 g/ha.
  • the tank-mix combination of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 840S applied at 125 g/ha+150 m/ha+1.0 l/ha achieved comparable levels of herbicidal activity as the standard tank-mix combination of CALLISTO®+Dual Gold applied at 260 ml/ha+710 ml/ha.
  • Tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago and DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 840S did not significantly increase or decrease yield compared to the untreated control treatments and the standard tank-mix combination of CALLISTO®+DUAL S GOLD®.
  • This Example compares the herbicidal selectivity and efficacy of DINAMIC®700WDG applied in combination with Galago and TOLLA 960 as a post-emergence application with regards to both crop and weeds in irrigated maize. Treatments and conditions are tabulated below.
  • the trial was conducted on a commercial maize crop produced under sprinkler irrigation.
  • the DINAMIC® 700WDG formulation was evaluated for herbicidal activity and crop selectivity when applied as a post-emergence spray program in tank-mix combination with Galago and TOLLA 960.
  • the adjuvant Wet-All was applied to all treatments receiving DINAMIC® 700WDG as standard practice. Treatments were applied post-emergence of crop and weeds as broadcast applications over the maize rows when the maize crop was in the 4-5 leaf stage.
  • the weed spectrum at the trial site was composed of yellow nutsedge (CYPES) and broadleaved weeds namely Large thornapple (DATFE), Dwarf marigold (SCHPI) and Purslane (POROL).
  • CYPES yellow nutsedge
  • DATFE Large thornapple
  • SCHPI Dwarf marigold
  • POROL Purslane
  • the broadleaved weed POROL was in an advanced growth stage at application and considered to be beyond acceptable post-emergence application size. Efficacy evaluations were conducted at 14, 28 and 56 days following application, respectively.
  • Tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+Wet-all exhibited commercially acceptable levels of herbicidal activity against the broadleaved weeds DATFE and SCHPI across all rates applied. None of the treatments exhibited commercially acceptable levels of herbicidal activity against CYPES and POROL.
  • Tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 960+Wet-All were efficacious and exhibited commercially acceptable levels of herbicidal activity against the broadleaved weeds DATFE and SCHPI across all rates applied.
  • the broadleaved weed POROL was suppressed (efficacy between 80-89%) in treatments receiving DINAMIC® 700WDG applied at the rate of 125 g/ha in combination with Galago at 150 ml/ha.
  • Tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 960+Wet-All were efficacious and exhibited commercially acceptable levels of herbicidal activity against the broadleaved weeds DATFE and SCHPI across all rates applied.
  • Yellow nutsedge (CYPES) was only controlled by the double rate of DINAMIC®+Galago+TOLLA 960+Wet-All and the standard tank-mix combination of CALLISTO®+Gardo Gold+COMPLEMENT® Super as a result of the higher rate of mesotrione in these treatments.
  • This Example compares the herbicidal selectivity and efficacy of DINAMIC® 700WDG applied in combination with Galago and TOLLA 960 as a post-emergence application with regards to both crop and weeds in dry land maize. Treatments and conditions are tabulated below.
  • the trial was conducted on a commercial maize crop produced under dry land conditions.
  • the DINAMIC® 700WDG formulation was evaluated for herbicidal activity and crop selectivity when applied as a post-emergence spray program in tank-mix combination with Galago and TOLLA 960.
  • the adjuvant Wet-All was applied to all treatments receiving DINAMIC® 700WDG as standard practice. Treatments were applied post-emergence of crop and weeds as broadcast applications over the maize rows when the maize crop was in the 6-7 leaf stage.
  • the weed spectrum at the trial site was dominated by broadleaved weeds namely Blackjack (BIDPI), Pigweed (AMAHY), Khaki weed (TAGMI) and Wandering jew (COMBE).
  • BIDPI broadleaved weeds namely Blackjack
  • AMAHY Pigweed
  • TAGMI Khaki weed
  • COMBE Wandering jew
  • the broadleaved weed POROL was in an advanced growth stage at application and considered to be beyond acceptable post-emergence application size. Efficacy evaluations were conducted at 14, 28 and 56 days following application, respectively.
  • Tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+Wet-all exhibited commercially acceptable levels of herbicidal activity against the broadleaved weeds BIDPI and TAGMI in treatments receiving DINAMIC® 700WDG applied at the higher rates of 100 g/ha and 125 g/ha.
  • the broadleaved weed AMAHY was only commercially controlled at the higher tank-mix rate of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago applied at 125 g/ha+150 ml/ha. None of the treatments displayed commercially acceptable levels of herbicidal activity against the broadleaved weeds COMBE and POROL.
  • Tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 960+Wet-All were efficacious and exhibited commercially acceptable levels of herbicidal activity against the broadleaved weeds BIDPI and TAGMI across all rates applied.
  • the broadleaved weed AMAHY was commercially controlled by all tank-mix combinations where DINAMIC® 700WDG was applied at rates exceeding 75 g/ha or where Galago was applied at 150 ml/ha.
  • the broadleaved weeds POROL and COMBE were only commercially controlled by the double rate of DINAMIC®+Galago+TOLLA+Wet-All applied at 250 g/ha+300 ml/ha+2.0 l/ha+200 ml/100l and the standard tank-mix combination of CALLISTO®+Gardo Gold+COMPLEMENT® Super applied at 260 ml/ha+1562 ml/ha+100 ml/100l due to the higher rate of the active ingredient Mesotrione in these treatments.
  • Tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 960+Wet-All were efficacious and exhibited commercially acceptable levels of herbicidal activity against the broadleaved weeds BIDPI and TAGMI across all rates applied.
  • AMAHY was commercially controlled by all tank-mix combinations where DINAMIC® 700WDG was applied at rates exceeding 75 g/ha or where Galago was applied at 150 ml/ha.
  • the broadleaved weeds POROL and COMBE were only commercially controlled by the double rate of DINAMIC®+Galago+TOLLA+Wet-All and the standard tank-mix combination of CALLISTO®+Gardo Gold+COMPLEMENTS Super.
  • This Example compares the herbicidal selectivity and efficacy of DINAMIC® 700WDG applied in combination with Galago and TOLLA 960 as a post-emergence application with regards to both crop and weeds in irrigated maize. Treatments and conditions are tabulated below.
  • DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 960 + 14 DAA 100 100 100 90 Wet-All 28 DAA 100 100 100 99 100 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l + 100 ml/100 ml 56 DAA 100 100 100 90 11.
  • the trial was conducted on a commercial maize crop produced under centre pivot irrigation.
  • the DINAMIC® 700WDG formulation was evaluated for herbicidal efficacy and crop selectivity when applied as a post-emergence spray program in tank-mix combination with Galago and TOLLA 960.
  • the adjuvant Wet-All was applied to all treatments containing DINAMIC® 700WDG as standard practice. Treatments were applied post-emergence of crop and weeds as broadcast applications over the maize rows when the maize crop was in the 4-5 leaf stage. Weather conditions on the day of application were overcast and cool.
  • Tank-mix combinations of the test product DINAMIC® 700WDG applied between the rates of 75-125 g/ha did not exhibit significantly different yields compared to the standard tank-mix combination of CALLISTO®+Gardo Gold+COMPLEMENT® Super and the untreated control treatment.
  • the weed spectrum at the trial site was dominated by broadleaved weeds namely Blackjack (BIDPI), Field bindweed (CONAR), Anoda weed (ANOCR) and Purslane (POROL).
  • BIDPI Blackjack
  • CONAR Field bindweed
  • ANOCR Anoda weed
  • POROL Purslane
  • the weed spectrum varied from 2-6 leaf stage at application. Efficacy evaluations were conducted at 14, 28 and 56 days following application, respectively.
  • Tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+Wet-all exhibited commercially acceptable levels of herbicidal activity against the broadleaved weeds BIDPI, CONAR and ANOCR across all rates applied.
  • the broadleaved weed POROL was only commercially controlled at the higher tank-mix rate of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+Wet-All applied at 125 g/ha+150 m/ha+100 m/100l.
  • Tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 960+Wet-All were efficacious and exhibited total control (100% efficacy) of the broadleaved weeds BIDPI, CONAR and ANOCR across all rates applied.
  • the broadleaved weed POROL was commercially controlled by all tank-mix combinations where DINAMIC® 700WDG was applied at rates exceeding 75 g/ha. Herbicidal activity was greatest where DINAMIC® 700WDG was applied in tank-mix combinations with Galago at the higher rate of 150 ml/ha.
  • the tank-mix combination of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 960+Wet-All applied at the rate of 125 g/ha+150 m/ha+1.0l/ha+100 ml/100l displayed a similar level of herbicidal activity as the standard tank-mix combination of CALLISTO®+Gardo Gold+COMPLEMENT® Super applied at the registered rate of 260 ml/ha+1562 ml/ha+100 ml/ha.
  • Tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 960+Wet-All were efficacious and exhibited commercially acceptable levels of herbicidal activity against the broadleaved weeds BIDPI, CONAR and ANOCR across all rates applied.
  • POROL was commercially controlled by all tank-mix combinations where DINAMIC® 700WDG was applied at rates exceeding 75 g/ha.
  • tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+Wet-all exhibited commercially acceptable levels of herbicidal activity against the broadleaved weeds BIDPI, CONAR and ANOCR across all rates applied.
  • the broadleaved weed POROL was only commercially controlled at the higher tank-mix rate of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+Wet-All applied at 125 g/ha+150 ml/ha+100 ml/100l.
  • Example 5 shows the synergism in the use of the combination of amicarbazone and mesotrione.
  • the data from Example 5 above were converted to % of control. This was done based on the data provided on a 1-9 scale detailed in Example 5.
  • Rate Rate Treatment (lbs ai/A) (oz/A) 1 Exp 2 Exp 3 Exp 3/27 Exp Control — 100 100 100 100 Amicarbazone 0.022 0.5 100 100 100 100 Amicarbazone 0.13 3 100 100 100 100 94 Tenacity 0.125 4 100 100 100 100 100 100 Tenacity 0.25 8 100 100 91 91 Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.125 + 0.022 4 + 0.5 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.125 + 0.13 4 + 3 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 97 94 Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.25 + 0.022 8 + 0.5 100 100 100 100 100 100 91 97 91 Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.25 + 0.13 8 + 3 100 100 100 100 100 100 91 97 85
  • Rate Rate Treatment (lbs ai/A) (oz/A) 1 Exp 2 Exp 3 Exp Control — 100 100 100 Amicarbazone 0.022 0.5 85 85 100 Amicarbazone 0.13 3 55 53 83 Tenacity 0.125 4 67 66 91 Tenacity 0.25 3 77 81 89 Tenacity + 0.125 + 0.022 4 + 0.5 74 57 76 56 97 91 Amicarbazone Tenacity + 0.125 + 0.13 4 + 3 31 37 41 35 55 75 Amicarbazone Tenacity + 0.25 + 0.022 8 + 0.5 61 65 61 69 87 90 Amicarbazone Tenacity + 0.25 + 0.13 8 + 3 3 42 7 43 0 74 Amicarbazone
  • Rate Rate Treatment (lbs ai/A) (oz/A) 1 Exp 2 Exp 3 Exp 4 Exp 5 Exp 6 Exp Control — 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Amicarbazone 0.022 0.5 100 100 100 100 97 100 Amicarbazone 0.13 3 97 97 97 100 100 100 100 Tenacity 0.125 4 94 94 100 100 94 100 Tenacity 0.25 3 97 97 97 97 100 100 Tenacity + 0.125 + 0.022 4 + 0.5 97 94 97 94 94 100 100 100 94 91 100 100 Amicarbazone Tenacity + 0.125 + 0.13 4 + 3 97 91 97 97 97 94 100 97 94 100 100 Amicarbazone Tenacity + 0.125 + 0.13 4 + 3 97 91 97 91 97 97 97 94 100 97 94 100 100 Amicarbazone Tenacity + 0.25 + 0.022 8 + 0.5 91 97 91 91 97 91 97 97 97 94
  • Rate Treatment Rate (lbs ai/A) (oz/A) 1 Exp 2 Exp 3 Exp 4 Exp 4/2 Exp Control — 100 100 100 100 100 Amicarbazone 0.022 0.5 100 100 100 107 100 Amicarbazone 0.13 3 100 100 91 94 88 Tenacity 0.125 4 100 100 97 91 94 Tenacity 0.25 3 97 97 91 83 91 Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.125 + 0.022 4 + 0.5 97 100 94 100 78 97 82 97 88 94 Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.125 + 0.13 4 + 3 100 100 100 100 84 88 87 85 84 82 Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.25 + 0.022 8 + 0.5 100 97 100 97 91 91 93 89 94 91 Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.25 + 0.13 8 + 3
  • Rate Treatment Rate (lbs ai/A) (oz/A) 1 Exp 2 Exp 3 Exp 4 Exp 5 Exp Control — 100 100 100 100 100 100 Amicarbazone 0.022 0.5 104 104 108 96 90 Amicarbazone 0.13 3 71 61 67 53 52 Tenacity 0.125 4 100 104 113 104 97 Tenacity 0.25 3 88 89 104 93 86 Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.125 + 0.022 4 + 0.5 84 104 71 107 83 122 64 100 70 87 Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.125 + 0.13 4 + 3 61 72 50 63 46 75 33 55 28 50 Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.25 + 0.022 8 + 0.5 81 91 68 92 71 113 60 90 59 78 Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.25 + 0.13 8 + 3 38
  • Rate Treatment Rate (lbs ai/A) (oz/A) 1 Exp 2 Exp 3 Exp 4 Exp 5 Exp Control — 100 100 100 100 100 100 Amicarbazone 0.022 0.5 100 104 104 104 160 Amicarbazone 0.13 3 100 104 104 104 106 Tenacity 0.125 4 50 52 65 80 142 Tenacity 0.25 3 41 38 49 71 159 Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.125 + 0.022 4 + 0.5 78 50 81 54 81 68 94 83 164 227 Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.125 + 0.13 4 + 3 100 50 104 54 100 68 100 83 109 151 Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.25 + 0.022 8 + 0.5 78 41 84 40 77 51 90 73 164 256 Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.25 + 0.13 8 + 3 97 41 97
  • Rate Treatment Rate (lbs ai/A) (oz/A) 1 Exp 2 Exp 3 Exp 4 Exp 5 Exp Control — 100 100 100 100 100 100 Amicarbazone 0.022 0.5 97 94 97 97 102 Amicarbazone 0.13 3 67 69 81 84 77 Tenacity 0.125 4 74 66.
  • Rate Treatment Rate (lbs ai/A) (oz/A) 1 Exp 2 Exp n Exp 4 Exp 5 Exp Control — 100 100 100 100 100 Amicarbazone 0.022 0.5 100 100 100 100 100 100 Amicarbazone 0.13 3 100 100 100 100 100 97 Tenacity 0.125 4 97 88 75 78 78 Tenacity 0.25 3 88 78 63 66 53 Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.125 + 0.022 4 + 0.5 88 97 84 88 69 75 78 78 63 78 Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.125 + 0.13 4 + 3 97 97 91 88 81 75 88 78 84 76 Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.25 + 0.022 8 + 0.5 88 88 72 78 56 63 69 66 69 53 Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.25 + 0.022 8 + 0.5 88 88 72 78 56 63 69 66 69 53 Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.25 +
  • Rate Treatment Rate (lbs ai/A) (oz/A) 1 Exp 2 Exp 3 Exp 4 Exp 5 Exp 6 Exp 7 Exp 8 Exp Control — 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Amicarbazone 0.022 0.5 100 100 100 100 100 100 94 100 100 Amicarbazone 0.13 3 94 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Tenacity 0.125 4 88 88 94 100 100 100 94 100 Tenacity 0.25 8 88 88 69 81 75 75 81 100 Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.125 + 0.022 4 + 0.5 88 88 88 88 81 94 88 100 88 100 81 94 81 94 100 100 Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.125 + 0.13 4 + 3 94 82 94 88 88 94 94 100 88 100 88 100 94 100 100 100 Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.125 + 0.13 4 + 3 94 82 94 88 88 94 94 100 88 100 88 100
  • the Kentucky bluegrass data shows that the high rate of Tenacity+Amicarbazone is injurious and synergistic to Kentucky bluegrass.
  • the high rate of amicarbazone appears to be the driver of this response.
  • Bleaching in mustard was reduced by the combination treatment, indicating that amicarbazone prevents some of the bleaching responses typical from mesotrione.
  • Injury data shows some synergism initially.
  • Annual bluegrass clearly shows synergism, particularly from the low rate of amicarbazone. The high rate of amicarbazone was sufficient to get reasonable control of annual bluegrass by itself.
  • Green foxtail results indicate synergism, both in terms of increased injury from the combination treatments and in terms of reduction in bleaching from the combination.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Environmental Sciences (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Plant Pathology (AREA)
  • Pest Control & Pesticides (AREA)
  • Dentistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Agronomy & Crop Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Agricultural Chemicals And Associated Chemicals (AREA)

Abstract

The invention relates to herbicidal active compound combinations comprising, carbamoyltriazolinones, and herbicidally active compounds, which combinations are suitable for controlling weeds.

Description

    RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This application is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 12/796,511, filed Jun. 8, 2010, and claims priority to application Ser. No. 61/747,963, filed Dec. 31, 2012, and application Ser. No. 61/185,363, filed Jun. 9, 2009, each of which applications are expressly incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
    • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The invention relates to herbicidal, active compound combinations composed of known carbamoyltriazolinones and herbicidally active compounds, which can be used successfully for controlling weeds.
    • Introduction
  • Herbicides play an important role for weed control in crop production. Applying combinations of herbicidal compounds may enhance the herbicidal effectiveness.
    • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
  • FIG. 1 shows a carbamoyltriazolinone of the general formula (I).
  • FIG. 2A shows a bar graph plot showing the injury effect of amicarbazone (4-amino-5-oxo-3-propan-2-yl-n-tert-butyl-1,2,4-triazole-1-carboxamide) and mesotrione (2-[4-(methylsulfonyl)-2-nitrobenzoyl]-1,3-cyclohexanedione) alone and in combination at different concentrations on Mustard (Sinapsis sp.) ten days after application.
  • FIG. 2B shows a bar graph plot showing the bleaching effect of amicarbazone and mesotrione alone and in combination at different concentrations on Mustard (Sinapsis sp.) seven days after application.
  • FIG. 3A shows a bar graph plot showing the injury effect of amicarbazone and mesotrione alone and in combination at different concentrations on Poa annua at 10, 14, and 20 days after application.
  • FIG. 3B shows a bar graph plot showing the injury effect of amicarbazone and mesotrione alone and in combination at different concentrations on Poa annua at 24, 31, and 41 days after application.
  • FIG. 4A shows a bar graph plot showing the injury effect of amicarbazone and mesotrione alone and in combination at different concentrations on Green Foxtail at 7 and 14 days after application.
  • FIG. 4B shows another bar graph plot showing the injury effect of amicarbazone and mesotrione alone and in combination at different concentrations on Green Foxtail at 7 and 14 days after application.
  • FIG. 4C shows a bar graph plot showing the bleaching effect of amicarbazone and mesotrione alone and in combination at different concentrations on Green Foxtail at 10, 14, and 20 days after application.
  • FIG. 5A shows a bar graph plot showing the injury effect of amicarbazone and mesotrione alone and in combination at different concentrations on Crabgrass sp. at 7, 14, and 24 days after application.
  • FIG. 5B shows another bar graph plot showing the injury effect of amicarbazone and mesotrione alone and in combination at different concentrations on Crabgrass sp. at 7, 14, and 24 days after application.
  • FIG. 5C shows a bar graph plot showing the bleaching effect of amicarbazone and mesotrione alone and in combination at different concentrations on Crabgrass sp. at 7, 14, and 20 days after application.
  • FIG. 5D shows a bar graph plot showing the effect on density of amicarbazone and mesotrione alone and in combination at different concentrations on Crabgrass sp. at 31 days after application.
  • FIG. 6A shows a comparative weed control chart with tank mixtures of DINAMIC® 700 WDG (amicarbazone, 700 g/kg) at 75 g/ha with Galago (mesotrione, 480 g/L) and with Galago plus TOLLA 840 S (metolachlor, i.e. chloroacetamide, 840 g/L+Safener (dichlormid, i.e. 2,2-dichloro-N,N-di-2-propenyl acetamide)). Weed species are Bidens pilosa (BIDPI), Portulaca oleracea (POROL), Anoda cristata (ANOCR), and Convolvulus arvensis (CONAR).
  • FIG. 6B shows a comparative weed control chart with tank mixtures of DINAMIC® 700 WDG at 100 g/ha with Galago and with Galago plus TOLLA 840 S. Weed species are the same as in FIG. 6A.
  • FIG. 6C shows a comparative weed control chart with tank mixtures of DINAMIC® 700 WDG at 125 g/ha with Galago and with Galago plus TOLLA 840 S. Weed species are the same as in FIG. 6A.
  • FIG. 6D shows a comparative weed control chart with tank mixtures of DINAMIC® 700 WDG with Galago plus TOLLA 840 S versus a standard tank mixture of CALLISTO® (mesotrione, 480 g/L) plus DUAL S GOLD® (S-metolachlor, 915 g/L+Safener). Weed species are the same as in FIG. 6A.
  • FIG. 6E shows a comparative grain yield chart of 13 different tank mixture combinations employing DINAMIC® 700 WDG (Lanes 1-13). Lane 14 is CALLISTO® plus DUAL S GOLD®. Lane 15 is an untreated control.
  • FIG. 7A shows another comparative weed control chart with tank mixtures of DINAMIC® 700 WDG at 75 g/ha with Galago and with Galago plus TOLLA 840 S. Weed species are Datura ferox (DATFE), Portulaca oleracea, (POROL), Schkuhria pinnata (SCHPI), and Bidens pilosa (BIDPI).
  • FIG. 7B shows another comparative weed control chart with tank mixtures of DINAMIC® 700 WDG at 100 g/ha with Galago and with Galago plus TOLLA 840 S. Weed species are the same as in FIG. 7A.
  • FIG. 7C shows another comparative weed control chart with tank mixtures of DINAMIC® 700 WDG at 125 g/ha with Galago and with Galago plus TOLLA 840 S. Weed species are the same as in FIG. 7A.
  • FIG. 7D shows another comparative weed control chart with tank mixtures of DINAMIC®700 WDG with Galago plus TOLLA 840 S versus a standard tank mixture of CALLISTO® plus DUAL S GOLD®. Weed species are the same as in FIG. 7A.
  • FIG. 7E shows another comparative grain yield chart of 13 different tank mixture combinations employing DINAMIC® 700 WDG (Lanes 1-13). Lane 14 is CALLISTO® plus DUAL S GOLD®. Lane 15 is an untreated control.
  • FIG. 8A shows another comparative weed control chart with tank mixtures of DINAMIC® 700 WDG at 75 g/ha with Galago and with Galago plus TOLLA. Weed species are Bidens pilosa (BIDPI), Amaranthus hybridus (AMAHY), Tagetes minuta (TAGMI), and Digitaria sanquinalis (DIGSA).
  • FIG. 8B shows another comparative weed control chart with tank mixtures of DINAMIC®700 WDG at 100 g/ha with Galago and with Galago plus TOLLA 840 S. Weed species are the same as in FIG. 8A.
  • FIG. 8C shows another comparative weed control chart with tank mixtures of DINAMIC® 700 WDG at 125 g/ha with Galago and with Galago plus TOLLA 840 S. Weed species are the same as in FIG. 8A.
  • FIG. 8D shows another comparative weed control chart with tank mixtures of DINAMIC®700 WDG with Galago plus TOLLA 840 S versus a standard tank mixture of CALLISTO® plus DUAL S GOLD®. Weed species are the same as in FIG. 8A.
  • FIG. 8E shows anothcr comparative grain yicld chart of 13 different tank mixture combinations employing DINAMIC® 700 WDG (Lanes 1-13). Lane 14 is CALLISTO® plus DUAL S GOLD®. Lane 15 is an untreated control.
  • FIG. 9A shows another comparative weed control chart with tank mixtures of DINAMIC®700 WDG at 75 g/ha with Galago plus Wet-All (alcohol ethoxylate, non-ionic surfactant) and with Galago plus TOLLA 960 (metolachlor, 960 g/L) plus Wet-All. Weed specics are Datura ferox (DATFE), Schkuhria pinnata (SCHPI), Portulaca oleracea (POROL) and Cyperus esculentus (CYPES).
  • FIG. 9B shows another comparative weed control chart with tank mixtures of DINAMIC® 700 WDG at 100 g/ha with Galago plus Wet-All and with Galago plus TOLLA 960 plus Wet-All. Weed species are the same as in FIG. 9A.
  • FIG. 9C shows another comparative weed control chart with tank mixtures of DINAMIC®700 WDG at 125 g/ha with Galago plus Wet-All and with Galago plus TOLLA 960 plus Wet-All. Weed species are the same as in FIG. 9A.
  • FIG. 9D shows another comparative weed control chart with tank mixtures of DINAMIC®700 WDG with Galago plus TOLLA 960 plus Wet-All versus a standard tank mixture of CALLISTO® plus GARDO® Gold (S-metolachlor plus terbuthylazine (N-tert-butyl-6-chloro-N-ethyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine)) plus COMPLEMENT® Super (Polyether-polymethylsiloxane copolymer, 1000 g/L). Weed species are the same as in FIG. 9A.
  • FIG. 9E shows another comparative grain yield chart of 13 different tank mixture combinations employing DINAMIC® 700 WDG (Lanes 1-13). Lane 14 is CALLISTO® plus GARDO® Gold plus COMPLEMENT® Super. Lane 15 is an untreated control.
  • FIG. 10A shows another comparative weed control chart with tank mixtures of DINAMIC® 700 WDG at 75 g/ha with Galago plus Wet-All and with Galago plus TOLLA 960 plus Wet-All. Weed species are Amaranthus hybridus (AMAHY), Bidens pilosa (BIDPI), Tagetes minuta (TAGMI), Portulaca oleracea (POROL), and Commelina benghalensis (COMBE).
  • FIG. 10B shows another comparative weed control chart with tank mixtures of DINAMIC® 700 WDG at 100 g/ha with Galago plus Wet-All and with Galago plus TOLLA 960 plus Wet-All. Weed species are the same as in FIG. 10A.
  • FIG. 10C shows another comparative weed control chart with tank mixtures of DINAMIC® 700 WDG at 125 g/ha with Galago plus Wet-All and with Galago plus TOLLA 960 plus Wet-All. Weed species are the same as in FIG. 10A.
  • FIG. 10D shows another comparative weed control chart with tank mixtures of DINAMIC® 700 WDG with Galago plus TOLLA 960 plus Wet-All versus a standard tank mixture of CALLISTO® plus GARDO® Gold plus COMPLEMENT® Super. Weed species are the same as in FIG. 10A.
  • FIG. 10E shows another comparative grain yield chart of 13 different tank mixture combinations employing DINAMIC® 700 WDG (1-13). Lane 14 is CALLISTO® plus GARDO@Gold plus COMPLEMENT® Super. Lane 15 is an untreated control.
  • FIG. 11A shows another comparative weed control chart with tank mixtures of DINAMIC® 700 WDG at 75 g/ha with Galago plus Wet-All and with Galago plus TOLLA 960 plus Wet-All. Weed species are Bidens pilosa (BIDPI), Portulaca oleracea (POROL), Convolvulus anvensis (CONAR), and Anoda cristata (ANOCR).
  • FIG. 11B shows another comparative weed control chart with tank mixtures of DINAMIC® 700 WDG at 100 g/ha with Galago plus Wet-All and with Galago plus TOLLA 960 plus Wet-All. Weed species are the same as FIG. 11A.
  • FIG. 11C shows another comparative weed control chart with tank mixtures of DINAMIC® 700 WDG at 125 g/ha with Galago plus Wet-All and with Galago plus TOLLA 960 plus Wet-All. Weed species are the same as FIG. 11A.
  • FIG. 11D shows another comparative weed control chart with tank mixtures of DINAMIC® 700 WDG with Galago plus TOLLA 960 plus Wet-All versus a standard tank mixture of CALLISTO® plus GARDO® Gold plus COMPLEMENT® Super. Weed species are the same as in FIG. 11A.
  • FIG. 11E shows another comparative grain yield chart of 13 different tank mixture combinations employing DINAMIC® 700 WDG (Lanes 1-13). Lane 14 is CALLISTO® plus GARDO® Gold plus COMPLEMENT® Super. Lane 15 is an untreated control.
    •  SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • Embodiments herein, accordingly, provides compositions comprising a synergistic effective amount of a combination of a first compound and a second component, wherein said first compound is a compound of the formula (I)
  • Figure US20220378047A1-20221201-C00001
  • wherein:
  • R1 is selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, hydroxyl, amino, or in each case optionally substituted alkyl, alkenyl, alkinyl, alkoxy, alkenyloxy, alkinyloxy, alkylamino, alkenylamino, alkenylamino, alkylideneamino, dialkylamino, cycloalkyl, cycloalkylalkyl, aryl and arylalkyl, any of which may be optionally substituted;
  • R2 is selected from the group consisting of alkyl, alkenyl, alkinyl, alkoxy, alkenyloxy, alkinyloxy, alkylthio, alkenylthio, alkinylthio, alkylamino, alkenylamino, alkinylamino, dialkylamino, cycloalkyl, cycloalkyloxy, cycloalkylalkyl, aryl, aryloxy, arylthio, arylamino and arylalkyl, any of which may be optionally substituted;
  • R3 is selected from the group consisting of alkyl, alkenyl, alkinyl, cycloalkyl, cycloalkylalkyl, arylalkyl, arylalkenyl and arylalkinyl, any of which may be optionally substituted; and
  • said second component is selected from 2-[(2-chlorophenyl)methyl]-4,4-dimethyl-3-isoxazolidinone, 3-cyclohexyl-6-dimethylamino-1-methyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4(1H,3H)-dione, 4-methyl-2-chlorophenoxyacetic acid, 2-chloro-4-(ethylamine)-6-(isopropylamine)-s-triazine, 2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-[(1-methylethoxy)methyl]acetamide, an herbicide of the chloroacetamide class, (aka, the chloroacetanilide class) and mixtures thereof.
  • In various aspects, an herbicide of the chloroacetamide class include 2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-[(1-methylethoxy)methyl]acetamide (Propisochlor), 2-chloro-N-ethoxymethyl-6′-ethylacet-o-toluidide (Acetochlor), 2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl)acetamide, (Metolachlor), 2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-[(1S)-2-methoxy-1-methylethyl]acetamide (S-Metolachlor), 2-chloro-N-(2,6-diethylphenyl)-N-(methoxymethyl)acetamide (Alachlor), and N-(butoxymethyl)-2-chloro-N-(2,6-diethylphenyl)acetamide (Butachlor), N-[[(2Z)-2-butenyloxy]methyl]-2-chloro-N-(2,6-diethylphenyl)acetamide (Butenachlor), 2-chloro-N-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)-N-[(2-methylpropoxy)methyl]acetamide (Delachlor), N-(chloroacetyl)-N-(2,6-diethylphenyl)glycine(Diethatyl), 2-chloro-N-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxyethyl)acetamide (Dimethachlor), 2-chloro-N-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)-N-(1H-pyrazol-1-ylmethyl)acetamide (Metazachlor), 2-chloro-N-(2,6-diethylphenyl)-N-(2-propoxyethyl)acetamide (Pretilachlor), 2-chloro-N-(1-methylethyl)-N-phenylacetamide (Propachlor), 2-chloro-N-(1-methyl-2-propynyl)-N-phenylacetamide (Prynachlor), N-(butoxymethyl)-2-chloro-N-[2-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-6-methylphenyl]acetamidc (Terbuchlor), 2-chloro-N-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)-N-[(3-methoxy-2-thienyl)methyl]acetamide (Thenylchlor), and 2-chloro-N-(2,3-dimethylphenyl)-N-(1-methylethyl)acetamide (Xylachlor).
  • In one embodiment, R1 is an optionally substituted amino. In a further embodiment, R1, is NH2. In one embodiment, R2 is an optionally substituted alkyl. In a further embodiment, R2 is i-propyl. In one embodiment, R3 is an optionally substituted alkyl. In a further embodiment, R3 is t-butyl.
  • In certain embodiments, a first compound is 4-amino-5-isopropyl-2-(tert-butyl-aminocarbonyl)-2,4-dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazol-3-one. In certain embodiments, a second component is 2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-[(1-methylethoxy)methyl]acetamide. In certain embodiments, a second component is 2-[(2-chlorophenyl)methyl]-4,4-dimethyl-3-isoxazolidinone and 3-cyclohexyl-6-dimethylamino-1-methyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4(1H,3H)-dione. In certain embodiments, a second component is 4-methyl-2-chlorophenoxyacetic acid.
  • In another embodiment, a composition further includes an adjuvant. In a further embodiment, an adjuvant is an ethoxylated propoxylated fatty amine or a polyether-polymethylsiloxane-copolymer. In yet a further embodiment, a composition further includes a herbicidally acceptable diluent or carrier.
  • In one embodiment, a second component is present in the composition in an amount ranging from 0.001 to 1000 parts by weight per part by weight of the first component. In a further embodiment, a second component is present in the composition in an amount ranging from 0.02 to 500 parts by weight per part by weight of the first component. In yet a further embodiment, a second component is present in the composition in an amount ranging from 0.05 to 100 parts by weight per part by weight of the first component.
  • In another embodiment of the invention, a composition is in a solid or liquid form of an emulsifiable concentrate, wettable powder, granule, dust, oil spray or aerosol.
  • In embodiments, compositions described herein provides synergistic control of one or more weeds. In one embodiment, a weed is Amaranthus, Digitaria, Cyperus or Euphorbia.
  • Embodiments herein also provide methods for selective control of weeds. In one aspect, a method includes contacting a composition comprising a synergistic effective amount of a combination of a first compound and a second component onto a crop plant or a non-crop area in need of weed control or at risk of undesirable weeds, in an amount effective to provide weed control in the crop, wherein said first compound is a compound of the formula (I)
  • Figure US20220378047A1-20221201-C00002
  • wherein:
  • R1 is selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, hydroxyl, amino, or in each case optionally substituted alkyl, alkenyl, alkinyl, alkoxy, alkenyloxy, alkinyloxy, alkylamino, alkenylamino, alkenylamino, alkylideneamino, dialkylamino, cycloalkyl, cycloalkylalkyl, aryl and arylalkyl, any of which may be optionally substituted;
  • R2 is selected from the group consisting of alkyl, alkenyl, alkinyl, alkoxy, alkenyloxy, alkinyloxy, alkylthio, alkenylthio, alkinylthio, alkylamino, alkenylamino, alkinylamino, dialkylamino, cycloalkyl, cycloalkyloxy, cycloalkylalkyl, aryl, aryloxy, arylthio, arylamino and arylalkyl, any of which may be optionally substituted;
  • R3 is selected from the group consisting of alkyl, alkenyl, alkinyl, cycloalkyl, cycloalkylalkyl, arylalkyl, arylalkenyl and arylalkinyl, any of which may be optionally substituted; and
  • said second component is selected from 2-[(2-chlorophenyl)methyl]-4,4-dimethyl-3-isoxazolidinone, 3-cyclohexyl-6-dimethylamino-1-methyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4(1H,3H)-dione, 4-methyl-2-chlorophenoxyacetic acid, 2-chloro-4-(ethylamine)-6-(isopropylamine)-s-triazine, N-ethyl-N′-(1-methylethyl)-6-(methylthio)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine, N-(3,4-dichlophenyl)-N,N-dimethyl urea, 5-cyclopropyl-4-(2-methylsulfonyl-4-trifluoromethylbenzoyl)isoxazole, 4-amino-6-tert-butyl-4,5-dihydro-3-methyltio-1,2,4-triazin-5-one, 1-(5-tert-butyl-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)-1,3-dimethylurea, 2′,4′-dichloro-5′-(4-difluoromethyl-4,5-dihydro-3-methyl-5-oxo-1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)methanesulfonanilide, 2-(4-mesyl-2-nitrobenzoyl)cyclohexane-1,3-dione, N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine, dimethylamine salt of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, an herbicide of the chloroacetamide class, and mixtures thereof.
  • In various aspects, an herbicide of the chloroacetamide class includes 2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphcnyl)-N-[(1-methylethoxy)methyl]acetamide (Propisochlor), 2-chloro-N-ethoxymethyl-6′-ethylacet-o-toluidide (Acetochlor), 2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl)acetamide(Metolachlor), 2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-[(1S)-2-methoxy-1-methylethyl]acetamide (S-Metolachlor), 2-chloro-N-(2,6-diethylphenyl)-N-(methoxymethyl)acetamide (Alachlor), and N-(butoxymethyl)-2-chloro-N-(2,6-diethylphenyl)acetamide (Butachlor), N-[[(2Z)-2-butenyloxy]methyl]-2-chloro-N-(2,6-diethylphenyl)acetamide (Butenachlor), 2-chloro-N-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)-N-[(2-methylpropoxy)methyl]acetamide (Delachlor), N-(chloroacetyl)-N-(2,6-diethylphenyl)glycine(Diethatyl), 2-chloro-N-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxyethyl)acetamide (Dimethachlor), 2-chloro-N-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)-N-(1H-pyrazol-1-ylmethyl)acetamide (Metazachlor), 2-chloro-N-(2,6-diethylphenyl)-N-(2-propoxyethyl)acetamide (Pretilachlor), 2-chloro-N-(1-methylethyl)-N-phenylacetamide (Propachlor), 2-chloro-N-(1-methyl-2-propynyl)-N-phenylacetamide (Prynachlor), N-(butoxymethyl)-2-chloro-N-[2-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-6-methylphenyl]acetamide (Terbuchlor), 2-chloro-N-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)-N-[(3-methoxy-2-thienyl)methyl]acetamide (Thenylchlor), and 2-chloro-N-(2,3-dimethylphenyl)-N-(1-methylethyl)acetamide (Xylachlor).
  • In certain embodiments, a crop plant is selected from cereals, rice, maize, sorghum, sugar cane, cotton, canola, turf, barley, potato, sweet potato, sunflower, rye, oats, wheat, corn, soybean, sugar beet, tobacco, safflower, tomato, alfalfa, pineapple and cassava.
  • In one embodiment, a second component is selected from N-ethyl-N′-(1-methylethyl)-6-(methylthio)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine, N-(3,4-dichlophenyl)-N,N-dimethyl urea, 5-cyclopropyl-4-(2-methylsulfonyl-4-trifluoromethylbenzoyl)isoxazole and 4-amino-6-tert-butyl-4,5-dihydro-3-methyltio-1,2,4-triazin-5-one. In one embodiment, a crop plant is selected from the group consisting of sugar cane, pineapple, cassava, turf and pasture.
  • In one embodiment, a composition further comprises 2-[(2-chlorophenyl)methyl]-4,4-dimethyl-3-isoxazolidinone and/or 3-cyclohexyl-6-dimethylamino-1-methyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4(1H,3H)-dione. In one embodiment, a crop plant is sugar cane, turf and pasture.
  • In one embodiment, a composition further comprises 4-methyl-2-chlorophenoxyacetic acid. In an additional embodiment, a composition further includes an adjuvant. In a further embodiment, an adjuvant is an ethoxylated propoxylated fatty amine or a polyether-polymethylsiloxane-copolymer. In one embodiment, a crop plant is sugar cane, turf and pasture.
  • In one embodiment, a first compound is 4-amino-5-isopropyl-2-(tert-butyl-aminocarbonyl)-2,4-dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazol-3-one.
  • In one embodiment, a composition is contacted at an application rate of from 0.01 kg/ha to 5.00 kg/ha of the first compound and from 0.5 kg/ha to 10.00 kg/ha of the second component to the crop. In a further embodiment, a composition is contacted at an application rate of from 0.03 kg/ha to 3.00 kg/ha of the first compound to the crop. In yet a further embodiment, a composition is contacted at an application rate of from 0.05 kg/ha to 5.00 kg/ha of the second component to the crop.
  • As used herein, “application rate” refers to the amount of a synergistic treatment composition applied over an area, that is, “application rate” is nominally an application coverage. “Application rate” is not intended to encompass an application amount per unit time as might be implied by the term “rate.”
  • In one embodiment, a composition is applied as a pre-emergence treatment. In another embodiment, the composition is applied as a post-emergence treatment.
  • In certain embodiments, a weed is Amaranthus, Digitaria, Cyperus or Euphorbia.
  • In some embodiments, a composition comprises a synergistic amount of a combination of amicarbazone (4-amino-N-tert-butyl-4,5-dihydro-3-isopropyl-5-oxo-1H-1,2,4-triazole-1-carboxamide) and mesotrione (2-[4-(Methylsulfonyl)-2-nitrobenzoyl]cyclohexane-1,3-dione), wherein the composition is an effective herbicide.
  • In some embodiments, the composition further comprises an adjuvant. In some embodiments, the adjuvant is an ethoxylated propoxylated fatty amine or a polyether-polymethylsiloxane-copolymer.
  • In some embodiments, the composition further comprises a herbicidally acceptable diluent or carrier.
  • In some embodiments, the composition comprises a solid or liquid form. In some embodiments, the composition comprises an emulsifiable concentrate, wettable powder, granule, dust, oil spray or aerosol.
  • In some embodiments, the composition provides synergistic control of one or more weeds. In some embodiments, the one or more weeds is a broadleaf weed. In some embodiments, the one or more weeds is selected from the group consisting of mustard, Poa annua, green foxtail, crabgrass, blackjack, pigweed, khaki weed, crab-finger grass, large thornapple, purslane, dwarf marigold, field bindweed, anoda weed, Rottboelia exaltata, Ipomeoea purpurea, Eleusine indica, Amaranthus spinosus, and Commelina benghalensis.
  • In some embodiments, the mesotrione and amicarbazone are present in a ratio within a range of from about 16:1 to about 4:3, such ratios being weight ratios. In some such embodiments, the ratio of mesotrione and amicarbazone is within a range of from about 8:1 to about 4:3.
  • In some embodiments, a method for selective control of weeds comprises contacting a weed with the above described compositions.
  • In some embodiments, the method is employed to control weeds present within a crop. In some such embodiments, the crop is selected from the group consisting of cereals, rice, maize, sorghum, sugar cane, cotton, canola, grass, turf grass, barley, potato, sweet potato, sunflower, rye, oats, wheat, corn, soybean, sugar beet, tobacco, safflower, tomato, alfalfa, pineapple and cassava. In some such embodiments, the weed is a broadleaf weed. In some such embodiments, the weed is selected from the group consisting of mustard, Poa annua, green foxtail, crabgrass, blackjack, pigweed, khaki weed, crab-finger grass, large thornapple, purslane, dwarf marigold, field bindweed, anoda weed, Rottboelia exaltata, Ipomeoea purpurea, Eleusine indica, Amaranthus spinosus, and Commelina benghalensis, and combinations thereof.
  • In some embodiments, methods apply the composition as a pre-emergence treatment. In other embodiments, methods apply the composition is applied as a post-emergence treatment.
  • In some embodiments, methods apply the composition at an application rate of from about 0.035 kg/ha to about 0.210 kg/ha of amicarbazone and from about 0.280 kg/ha to about 0.560 kg/ha of mesotrione to the crop. In some such embodiments, the composition is applied at an application rate of about 0.210 kg/ha of amicarbazone and about 0.560 kg/ha of mesotrione to the crop. In other such embodiments, the composition is applied at an application rate of about 0.210 kg/ha of amicarbazone and about 0.280 kg/ha of mesotrione to the crop.
  • In any of the aforementioned composition or methods, the composition exhibits reduced bleaching of one or more weeds as compared to application of mesotrione alone. “Bleaching,” as used herein, refers to the discoloration of weeds causing it to be visually more conspicuous to the eye of an observer. This may appear as a lightening of an existing color or a washing out of pigmentation observed as a whitening of the weed.
    • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • A series of active compounds from the carbamoyltriazolinone series, used jointly with herbicidally active compounds from various classes of substances, show a synergistic activity with regard to the action against weeds and can be employed as products for controlling (e.g. limiting growth) monocotyledonous (e.g. glasses) or dicotyledonous weeds (e.g. board leaves) in crops of useful plants such as, for example, in barley, maize, rice, soya beans, sunflowers, wheat, pineapple, Cassava, sugar cane, corn and Agave. but also for the selective, semi- and non-selective control of monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous weeds.
  • Disclosed herein are herbicidal compositions, characterized by an effective content of composition comprising
  • (a) a carbamoyltriazolinone of the general formula (I)
  • Figure US20220378047A1-20221201-C00003
  • wherein:
  • R1 represents hydrogen, hydroxyl, amino, or in each case optionally substituted alkyl, alkenyl, alkinyl, alkoxy, alkenyloxy, alkinyloxy, alkylamino, alkenylamino, alkenylamino, alkylideneamino, dialkylamino, cycloalkyl, cycloalkylalkyl, aryl and arylalkyl, any of which may be optionally substituted,
  • R2 represents alkyl, alkenyl, alkinyl, alkoxy, alkenyloxy, alkinyloxy, alkylthio, alkenylthio, alkinylthio, alkylamino, alkenylamino, alkinylamino, dialkylamino, cycloalkyl, cycloalkyloxy, cycloalkylalkyl, aryl, aryloxy, arylthio, arylamino and arylalkyl, any of which may be optionally substituted, and
  • R3 represents alkyl, alkenyl, alkinyl, cycloalkyl, cycloalkylalkyl, arylalkyl, arylalkenyl and arylalkinyl, any of which may be optionally substituted.
  • (active compounds of group a)
  • (b) one or more compounds from a second component of herbicides containing the active compounds mentioned herein below; 2-[(2-chlorophenyl)methyl]-4,4-dimethyl-3-isoxazolidinone (Clomazone), 3-cyclohexyl-6-dimethylamino-1-methyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4(1H,3H)-dione (Hexazinone), 4-methyl-2-chlorophenoxyacetic acid (MCPA), 2-chloro-4-(ethylamine)-6-(isopropylamine)-s-triazine (Atrazine), N-ethyl-N′-(1-methylethyl)-6-(methylthio)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine (Ametryn), N-(3,4-dichlophenyl)-N,N-dimethyl urea (Diuron), 5-cyclopropyl-4-(2-methylsulfonyl-4-trifluoromethylbenzoyl)isoxazole (Isoxaflutole), 4-amino-6-tert-butyl-4,5-dihydro-3-methyltio-1,2,4-triazin-5-one (Metribuzin), 1-(5-tert-butyl-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)-1,3-dimethylurea (Tebuthiuron), 2′,4′-dichloro-5′-(4-difluoromethyl-4,5-dihydro-3-methyl-5-oxo-1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)methanesulfonanilide (Sulfentrazone), 2-(4-mesyl-2-nitrobenzoyl)cyclohexane-1,3-dione (Mesotrione), N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine (Glyphosate), dimethylamine salt of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D Amine), an herbicide of the chloroacetamide class, for example, 2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphcnyl)-N-[(1-methylethoxy)methyl]acetamide (Propisochlor), 2-chloro-N-ethoxymethyl-6′-ethylacet-o-toluidide (Acetochlor), 2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl)acetamide (Metolachlor), 2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-[(1S)-2-methoxy-1-methylethyl]acetamide (S-Metolachlor), 2-chloro-N-(2,6-diethylphenyl)-N-(methoxymethyl)acetamide (Alachlor), and N-(butoxymethyl)-2-chloro-N-(2,6-diethylphenyl)acetamide (Butachlor), N-[[(2Z)-2-butenyloxy]methyl]-2-chloro-N-(2,6-diethylphenyl)acetamide (Butenachlor), 2-chloro-N-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)-N-[(2-methylpropoxy)methyl]acetamide (Delachlor), N-(chloroacetyl)-N-(2,6-diethylphenyl)glycine(Diethatyl), 2-chloro-N-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxyethyl)acetamide (Dimethachlor), 2-chloro-N-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)-N-(1H-pyrazol-1-ylmethyl)acetamide (Metazachlor), 2-chloro-N-(2,6-diethylphenyl)-N-(2-propoxyethyl)acetamide (Pretilachlor), 2-chloro-N-(l-methylethyl)-N-phenylacetamide (Propachlor), 2-chloro-N-(1-methyl-2-propynyl)-N-phenylacetamide (Prynachlor), N-(butoxymethyl)-2-chloro-N-[2-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-6-methylphenyl]acetamide (Terbuchlor), 2-chloro-N-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)-N-[(3-methoxy-2-thienyl)methyl]acetamide (Thenylchlor), and 2-chloro-N-(2,3-dimethylphenyl)-N-(1-methylethyl)acetamide (Xylachlor), and mixtures thereof.
  • (Active Compounds of Group b)
  • The meanings of the radicals mentioned in the above formula (I) are illustrated hereinbelow.
  • In certain embodiments, Rr represents hydrogen, hydroxyl, amino, or represents alkyl, alkenyl, alkinyl, alkoxy, alkenyloxy, alkinyloxy, alkylamino, alkenylamino, alkinylamino, alkylideneamino or dialkylamino, each of which has up to 6 carbon atoms and each of which is optionally substituted by halogen or cyano, or represents cycloalkyl, cycloalkylalkyl, each of which has 3 to 6 carbon atoms in the cycloalkyl groups and, if appropriate, 1 to 4 carbon atoms in the alkyl group and each of which is optionally substituted by halogen, cyano or C1-C4-alkyl, or represents phenyl or phenyl-C1-C4-alkyl, each of which is optionally substituted by halogen, cyano, C1-C4-alkyl or C1-C4-alkoxy.
  • In certain embodiments, R2 represents alkyl, alkenyl, alkinyl, alkoxy, alkenyloxy, alkinyloxy, alkylthio, alkenylthio, alkinylthio, alkylamino, alkenylamino, alkinylamino or dialkylamino, each of which has up to 6 carbon atoms and each of which is optionally substituted by halogen, cyano, C1-C4-alkoxy or C1-C4-alkylthio, or represents cycloalkyl, cycloalkyloxy or cycloalkylalkyl, each of which has 3 to 6 carbon atoms in the cycloalkyl groups and, if appropriate, 1 to 4 carbon atoms in the alkyl group and each of which is optionally substituted by halogen, cyano or C1-C4-alkyl, or represents phenyl, phenoxy, phenylthio, phenylamino or phenyl-C1-C4-alkyl, each of which is optionally substituted by halogen, cyano, C1-C4-alkyl or C1-C4-alkoxy.
  • In certain embodiments, R3 represents alkyl, alkenyl or alkinyl, each of which has up to 10 carbon atoms and each of which is optionally substituted by halogen, cyano, C1-C4-alkoxy, C1-C4-alkylthio, C1-C4-alkylsulphinyl, C1-C4-alkylsulphonyl, C1-C4-alkylamino or di-(C1-C4-alkyl) amino, or represents cycloalkyl or cycloalkylalkyl, each of which has 3 to 6 carbon atoms in the cycloalkyl moiety and, if appropriate,) to 4 carbon atoms in the alkyl moiety and each of which is optionally substituted by halogen, cyano or C1-C4-alkyl, or represents phenyl-C1-C6-alkyl, phenyl-C2-C6-alkenyl or phenyl-C2-C6-alkinyl, each of which is optionally substituted by halogen, cyano, C1-C4-alkyl or C1-C4-alkoxy.
  • In certain embodiments, R1, represents hydrogen, hydroxyl, amino, or represents methyl, ethyl, n- or i-propyl, n-, i-, s- or t-butyl, propenyl, butenyl, propinyl or butinyl, methoxy, ethoxy, n- or i-propoxy, n-, i-, s- or t-butoxy, propenyloxy, butenyloxy, propinyloxy or butinyloxy, methylamino, ethylamino, n- or i-propylamino, n-, i-, s- or t-butylamino, propenylamino, butenylamino, propiny-lamino or butinylamino, ethylideneamino, propylideneamino, butylideneamino, dimethylamino or diethylamino, each of which is optionally substituted by fluorine, chlorine or cyano, or represents cyclopropyl, cyclobutyl, cyclopentyl, cyclohexyl, cyclopropylmethyl, cyclobutylmethyl, cyclopentylmethyl or cyclohexylmethyl, each of which is optionally substituted by fluorine, chlorine, bromine, cyano, methyl, ethyl, n- or i-propyl, or represents phenyl or benzyl, each of which is optionally substituted by fluorine, chlorine, bromine, cyano, methyl, ethyl, n- or i-propyl, n-, i-, s- or t-butyl, methoxy or ethoxy.
  • In certain embodiments, R2 represents methyl, ethyl, n- or i-propyl, n-, i-, s- or t-butyl, propenyl, butenyl, propinyl, butinyl, methoxy, ethoxy, n- or i-propoxy, n-, i-, s- or t-butoxy, propenyloxy, butenyloxy, propinyloxy, butinyloxy, methylthio, ethylthio, n or i-propylthio, n-, i-, s- or t-butylthio, propenylthio, butenylthio, propinylthio, butinylthio, methylamino, ethylamino, n- or i-propylamino, n-, i-, s- or t-butylamino, propenylamino, butenylamino, propinylamino, butinylamino, dimethy-lamino or diethylamino, each of which is optionally substituted by fluorine, chlorine, cyano, methoxy, ethoxy, n- or i-propoxy, methylthio, ethylthio, n- or i-propylthio, or represents cyclopropyl, cyclobutyl, cyclopentyl, cyclohexyl, cyclopropyloxy, cyclobutyloxy, cyclopentyloxy, cyclohexyloxy, cyclopropylmethyl, cyclobutylmethyl, cyclopentylmethyl or cyclohexylmethyl, each of which is optionally substituted by fluorine, chlorine, bromine, cyano, methyl, ethyl, n- or i-propyl, or represents phenyl, phenoxy, phenylthio, phe-nylamino or benzyl, each of which is optionally substituted by fluorine, chlorine, bromine, cyano, methyl, ethyl, n- or i-propyl, n-, i-, s- or t-butyl, methoxy or ethoxy.
  • In certain embodiments, R3 represents methyl, ethyl, n- or i-propyl, n-, i-, s- or t-butyl, propenyl, butenyl, pentenyl, hexenyl, propinyl, butinyl, pentinyl or hexinyl, each of which is optionally substituted by fluorine, cyano, methoxy, ethoxy, n- or i-propoxy, n-, i-, s- or t-butoxy, methylthio, ethylthio, n- or i-propylthio, n-, i-, s-, or t-butylthio, methylsulphinyl, ethylsulphinyl, methylsulphonyl, ethylsulphonyl, methylamino, ethylamino, n- or i-propylamino, n-, i-, s- or t-butylamino, dimethylamino, diethylamino, dipropylamino or dibutylamino, or represents cyclopropyl, cyclobutyl, cyclopentyl, cyclohexyl, cyclopropylmethyl, cyclobutylmethyl, cyclopentylmethyl, cyclohexylmethyl, cyclohexylethyl or cyclohexylpropyl, each of which is optionally substituted by fluorine, chlorine, bromine, cyano, methyl, ethyl, n- or i-propyl, or represents benzyl, phenylethyl, phenylpropyl, phenylbutyl, phenylethenyl, phenylpropenyl, phenylbutenyl, phenylethinyl, phenyl-propinyl or phenylbutinyl, each of which is optionally substituted by fluorine, chlorine, bromine, cyano, methyl, ethyl, n- or i-propyl, n-, i-, s- or t-butyl, methoxy or ethoxy.
  • In certain embodiments, R1, represents hydrogen, amino, or represents methyl, ethyl, n- or i-propyl, propenyl, butenyl, propinyl or butinyl, methoxy, ethoxy, n- or i-propoxy, propenyloxy or propinyloxy, each of which is optionally substituted by fluorine or chlorine, or represents methylamino, ethylamino, n- or i-propylamino, propeny-lamino or propinylamino, dimethylamino or diethylamino, or represents cyclopropyl or cyclopropylmethyl, each of which is optionally substituted by fluorine, chlorine, cyano or methyl.
  • In certain embodiments, R2 represents methyl, ethyl, n- or i-propyl, n-, i-, s- or t-butyl, propenyl, butenyl, propinyl, butinyl, methoxy, ethoxy, n- or i-propoxy, n-, i-, s- or t-butoxy, propenyloxy, butenyloxy, propinyloxy, butinyloxy, methylthio, ethylthio, n- or i-propylthio, n-, i-, s- or t-butylthio, propenylthio, butenylthio, propinylthio, butinylthio, methylamino, ethylamino, n- or i-propylamino, n-, i-, s- or t-butylamino, propenylamino, butenylamino, propinylamino, butinylamino, dimethy-lamino or diethylamino, each of which is optionally substituted by fluorine, chlorine, cyano, methoxy, ethoxy, methylthio or ethylthio, or represents cyclopropyl, cyclo-propyloxy or cyclopropylmethyl, each of which is option-ally substituted by fluorine, chlorine, cyano or methyl.
  • In certain embodiments, R3 represents methyl, ethyl, n- or i-propyl, n-, i-, s- or t-butyl, propenyl, butenyl, pentenyl, hexenyl, propinyl, butinyl, pentinyl or hexinyl, each of which is optionally substituted by fluorine, cyano, methoxy, ethoxy, n- or i-propoxy, methylthio, ethylthio, n- or i-propylthio, methylsulphinyl, ethylsulphinyl, methylsulphonyl, ethylsulphonyl, methylamino, ethylamino, n- or i-propylamino, dimethylamino or diethylamino, or represents cyclopropyl, cyclobutyl, cyclopentyl, cyclohexyl, cyclopropylmethyl, cyclobutylmethyl, cyclopentylmethyl, cyclohexylmethyl, cyclohexylethyl or cyclohexylpropyl, each of which is optionally substituted by fluorine, chlorine, bromine, cyano, methyl, ethyl, n- or i-propyl, or represents benzyl, phenylethyl, phenylpropyl, phenylbutyl, phenylethenyl, phenylpropenyl, phenylbutenyl, phenylethinyl, phenyl-propinyl or phenylbutinyl, each of which is optionally substituted by fluorine, chlorine, bromine, cyano, methyl, ethyl, n- or i-propyl, n-, i-, s- or t-butyl, methoxy or ethoxy.
  • Non-limiting examples of individually compounds of the formula (I) to be used as components according to the invention in mixtures are:
  • 4-amino-5-methyl-2-(1,1-dimethyl-ethyl-aminocarbonyl)-2,4-dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazol-3-one, 4-amino-5-ethyl-2-(1,1-dimethyl-ethyl-aminocarbonyl)-2, 4-dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazol-3-one, 4-amino-5-n-propyl-2-(1, 1-dimethyl-ethyl-aminocarbonyl)-2,4-dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazol-3-one, 4-amino-5-i-propyl-2-(1,1-dimethyl-ethyl-aminocarbonyl)-2,4-dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazol-3-one, 4-amino-5-methoxy-2-(1,1-dimethyl-ethyl-aminocarbonyl)-2,4-dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazol-3-one, 4-amino-5-ethoxy-2-(I, 1-dimethyl-ethyl-aminocarbonyl)-2,4-dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazol-3-one, 4-amino-5-methyl-2-(2-fluoro-1,1-dimethyl-ethyl-aminocarbonyl)-2,4-dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazol-3-one, 4-amino-5-ethyl-2-(2-fluoro-1,1-dimethyl-ethyl-aminocarbonyl)-2,4-dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazol-3-one, 4-amino-5-n-propyl-2-(2-fluoro-1,1-dimethyl-ethyl-aminocarbonyl)-2,4-dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazol-3-one, 4-amino-5-i-propyl-2-(2-fluoro-1,1-dimethyl-ethyl-aminocarbonyl)-2,4dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazol-3-one, 4-amino-5-methoxy-2-(2-fluoro-1,1-dimethyl-ethyl-aminocarbonyl)-2,4-dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazol-3-one, 4-amino-5-ethoxy-2-(2-fluoro-1,1-dimethyl-ethyl-amino-carbonyl)-2,4-dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazol-3-one, 4-amino-5-methyl-2-(2-chloro-1,1-dimethyl-ethyl-aminocarbonyl)-2, 4-dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazol-3-one, 4-amino-5-ethyl-2-(2-chloro-1,1-dimethyl-ethyl-aminocarbonyl)-2,4-dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazol-3-one, 4-amino-5-n-propyl-2-(2-chloro-1,1-dimethyl-ethyl-aminocarbonyl)-2,4-dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazol-3-one, 4-amino-5-i-propyl-2-(2-chloro-1,1-dimethyl-ethyl-amino-carbonyl)-2,4-dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazol-3-one, 4-amino-5-methoxy-2-(2-chloro-1,1-dimethylethyl-aminocarbonyl)-2,4-dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazol-3-one, 4-amino-5-ethoxy-2-(2-chloro-1,1-dimethyl-ethyl-aminocarbonyl)-2,4-dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazol-3-one, 4-amino-5-i-propyl-2-i-propyl-aminocarbonyl-2,4-dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazol-3-one, 4-amino-5-dimethylamino-2-(1,1-dimethyl-ethyl-aminocarbonyl)-2,4-dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazol-3-one, 4-amino-5-dimethylamino-2-(2-fluoro-1,1-dimethyl-ethyl-aminocarbonyl)-2,4-dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazol-3-one, 4-amino-5-dimethylamino-2-(2-chloro-1,1-dimethyl-ethyl-aminocarbonyl)-2,4-dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazol-3-one and 4-methyl-5-methoxy-2-(1,1-dimethyl-ethyl-aminocarbonyl)-2,4-dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazol-3-one.
  • The compound 4-amino-5-(1-methyl-ethyl)-2-(1,1-dimethyl-ethyl-aminocarbonyl)-2,4-dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazol-3-one-in accordance with Chem. Abstracts also to be termed 4-amino-N-(1,1-dimethyl-ethyl)-4,5-dihydro-3-(1-methyl-ethyl)-5-oxo-1H-1,2,4-triazole-1-carboxamide (CAS-Reg. No.: 129909-90-6, Compound (I-1) of the use examples, proposed common name: “amicarbazone”)-is a component of the formula (I) in the mixture.
  • A family of compositions comprising a first compound and a second component, wherein said first compound is a compound of the formula (I)
  • Figure US20220378047A1-20221201-C00004
  • In certain embodiments, R1 is an optionally substituted amino. In certain embodiments, R1, is NH2. In certain embodiments, R2 is an optionally substituted alkyl. In certain embodiments, R2 is i-propyl. In certain embodiments, R3 is an optionally substituted alkyl. In certain embodiments, R3 is t-butyl. In certain embodiments, the first compound is 4-amino-5-isopropyl-2-(tert-butyl-aminocarbonyl)-2,4-dihydro-3H-1,2,4-triazol-3-one (Amicarbazone).
  • In certain embodiments, the second component is 2-[(2-chlorophenyl)methyl]-4,4-dimethyl-3-isoxazolidinone and 3-cyclohexyl-6-dimethylamino-1-methyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4(1H,3H)-dione. In certain embodiments, the second component is 4-methyl-2-chlorophenoxyacetic acid. In certain embodiments, the second component is one or more of N-ethyl-N′-(1-methylethyl)-6-(methylthio)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine, N-(3,4-dichlophenyl)-N,N-dimethyl urea, 5-cyclopropyl-4-(2-methylsulfonyl-4-trifluoromethylbenzoyl)isoxazole or 4-amino-6-tert-butyl-4,5-dihydro-3-methyltio-1,2,4-triazin-5-one.
  • Examples of a combination composition according to the invention include, but are not limited to:
  • Amicarbazone+clomazone+hexazinone; amicarbazone+MCPA+ethoxylated propoxylated fatty amines; amicarbazone+MCPA+polyether-polymethylsiloxane-copolymers; amicarbazone+ametryn+amtrazine; amicarbazone+diuron; amicarbazone+isoxaflutole; amicarbazone+metribuzin; amicarbazone+hexazinone; amicarbazone+hexazinone+diuron; and amicarbazone+ametrine+diuron; amicarbazone+tebuthiuron; and amicarbazone+propisochlor, amicarbazone+acetochlor, amicarbazone+metolachlor, amicarbazone+S-Metolachlor, amicarbazone+alachlor, amicarbazone+butachlor, amicarbazone+butenachlor, amicarbazone+delachlor, amicarbazone+diethatyl, amicarbazone+dimethachlor, amicarbazone+metazachlor, amicarbazone+pretilachlor, amicarbazone+propachlor, amicarbazone+prynachlor, amicarbazone+terbuchlor, amicarbazone+thenylchlor, and amicarbazone+xylachlor.
  • Optionally, a composition can include an adjuvant. An adjuvant may be used with the composition to enhance or improve herbicidal performance. Adjuvants may be added to the composition at the time of formulation, or by the applicator to the spray mix just prior to treatment. Adjuvants include surfactants, compatibility agents, anti-foaming agents and spray colorants (dyes), and drift control agents. In certain embodiments, the adjuvant is an ethoxylated propoxylated fatty amine or a polyether-polymethylsiloxane-copolymer.
  • As disclosed herein, the compound combinations, in addition to being well tolerated by crops, have herbicidal activities and can be used in a variety of crops for selectively controlling weed. Non-limiting examples of crops include maize, wheat, sugar cane, barley, rice, citrus, palm trees, pineapple, cucurbits, beans, soybeans, agave, cassava, turf and pasture.
  • The compound combinations can also be used for controlling undesired vegetation in non-crop areas, e.g. fallow agricultural land. The term “non-crop area” used herein refers to areas where a crop, or any intentionally planted vegetation, is not grown. The term “fallow agricultural land” used herein refers to a piece of land where no crop or pasture is growing. A fallow agricultural land that is not used for crops, may be left unused in order to restore its natural fertility.
  • In various embodiments, the herbicidal activity of a composition according to the invention exceeds the total of the activities of the individual active compounds. If there are two active compounds, the activity will be greater than the same of the single active compound alone. Thus, in various embodiments, herbicidal compositions include compositions synergistic for control of one or more weeds.
  • The compositions of the invention have been found to be active herbicides in possessing herbicidal activity against one or more species of weeds. In the broadest sense, the term “weed” refers to plants which grow in locations in which they are not desired. In other words, a weed is a plant in which in the context of a crop is undesirable due to competition for water, nutrients, sunlight, soil, etc.
  • As used herein the term “herbicide” refers to a compound which adversely control, or modifies (e.g. limits or reduces) the growth of plants, particularly of undesirable plants. A “herbicidally effective amount” is meant an amount of compound which causes an adverse effect on the growth of plants, such as weeds. The herbicide can affect pre- or post-emergent growth or both.
  • The term “plants” is meant to include germinant seeds, emerging seedlings, and established vegetation, including roots and above-ground portions (for example, leaves, stalks, flowers, fruits, etc.) Such adverse modifying and controlling effects may include all deviations from natural plant development, including killing the weed.
  • The compositions of the invention can be used, for example, in control of one or more of following plants (weeds):
  • Monocotyledonous weeds include the genera: Aegilops, Agropyron, Agrostis, Alopecurus, Apera, Avena, Brachiaria, Bromus, Cenchrus, Commelina, Cynodon, Cyperus, Dactyloctenium, Digitaria, Echinochloa, Eleocharis, Eleusine, Eragrostis, Eriochloa, Festuca, Fimbristylis, Heteranthera, Imperata, Ischacmum, Leptochloa, Lolium, Monochoria, Panicum, Paspalum, Phalaris, Phleum, Poa, Rottboellia, Sagittaria, Scirpus, Setaria, Sorghum.
  • Dicotyledonous weeds include the genera: Abutilon, Amaranthus, Ambrosia, Anoda, Anthemis, Aphanes, Atriplex, Bellis, Bidens, Capsella, Carduus, Cassia, Centaurea, Chenopodium, Cirsium, Convolvulus, Croton, Datura, Desmodium, Emex, Erysimum, Euphorbia, Galeopsis, Galinsoga, Galium, Hibiscus, Ipomoea, Kochia, Iamium, Lepidium, Lindernia, Matricaria, Mentha, Mercurialis, Merremia, Momordica, Mullugo, Myosotis, Papaver, Pharbitis, Plantago, Polygonum, Portulaca, Ranunculus, Raphanus, Ricinus, Rorippa, Rotala, Rumex, Salsola, Senecio, Sesbania, Sida, Sinapis, Solanum, Sonchus, Sphenoclea, Stellaria, Stizolobium, Taraxacum, Thlaspi, Trifolium, Urtica, Veronica, Viola, Xanthium.
  • The use of the active compound combinations according to the invention is in no way restricted to these genera, but also extends in the same manner to other plants.
  • Depending on the concentration, the herbicidal compositions are suitable for selective weed control in crops, for example, cereals, rice, maize, sorghum, sugar cane, cotton, canola, soya, turf, barley, potato, sweet potato, sunflower, rye, oats, wheat, corn, soybean, sugar beet, safflower, alfalfa, cassava, cucurbits, pineapple and pastures.
  • Specific weed species encountered in corn include, but not limited to, Ixophorus unisetus, Amaranthus hybridu, Ipomoea purpurea, and Sicyos angulata.
  • Specific weed species encountered in sugar cane include, but not limited to, Acalypha sp., Boerhavia erecta, Trianthema portulacastrum, Amaranthus hybridus, and Amaranthus lividus.
  • In particular embodiments, a synergistic effect of the compound combinations according to the invention is present. As used herein, the term “synergism” means that the herbicidal action of the active compound combination exceeds the action of the active compounds when applied individually on a given weed, either pre- or post-emergent.
  • The ratios by weight of an active compound (e.g. group a and group b) in the active compound combinations can be varied within relatively wide ranges. In general, 0.001 to 1000 parts by weight, 0.02 to 500 parts by weight, 0.05 to 100 by weight, 0.01 to 100 parts by weight, or 0.1 to 10 parts by weight of one or more active compound(s) of the second component (group b) are used per part by weight of the first compound (group a).
  • In the treatment of crops, in general, the application rate is from 0.01 kg/ha to 5.00 kg/ha or from 0.03 kg/ha to 3.00 kg/ha of the first compound, and from 0.5 kg/ha to 10.00 kg/ha or from 0.05 kg/ha to 5.00 kg/ha of the second component.
  • The herbicidal compositions can be in customary formulations, such as solutions, emulsions, wettable powders, suspensions, powders, dusts, pastes, soluble powders, granules, suspo-emulsion concentrates, emulsifiable concentrate, oil spray, aerosol, natural and synthetic materials impregnated with active compound, and very fine capsules in polymeric substances. In certain embodiments, the compositions is in a form of an emulsifiable concentrate, wettable powder, granule, dust, oil spray or aerosol.
  • These formulations can be produced, for example by mixing the active compounds with extenders, that is liquid solvents and/or solid carriers, optionally with the use of surface-active agents, such as emulsifying agents and/or dispersing agents and/or foam-forming agents.
  • In the case of the use of water as an extender, organic solvents can, for example, also be used as auxiliary solvents. Liquid solvents include aromatics, such as xylene, toluene or alkylnaphthalenes, chlorinated aromatics and chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons, such as chlorobenzenes, chloroethylenes or methylene chloride, ali-phatic hydrocarbons, such as cyclohexane or paraffins, for example petroleum fractions, mineral and vegetable oils, alcohols, such as butanol or glycol as well as their ethers and esters, ketones, such as acetone, methyl ethyl ketone, methyl isobutyl ketone or cyclohexanone, strongly polar solvents, such as dimethylformamide and dimethyl sulphoxide, as well as water.
  • As solid carriers there are suitable, for example, ammonium salts and ground natural minerals, such as kaolins, clays, talc, chalk, quartz, attapulgite, mont-morillonite or diatomaceous earth, and ground synthetic minerals, such as finely divided silica, alumina and silicates, as solid carriers for granules there are suitable: for example crushed and fractionated natural rocks such as calcite, marble, pumice, sepiolite and dolomite, as well as synthetic granules of inorganic and organic meals, and granules of organic material such as sawdust, coconut shells, maize cobs and tobacco stalks; as emulsifying and/or foam-forming agents there are suitable: for example nonionic and anionic emulsifiers, such as polyoxyethylene fatty acid esters, poly-oxyethylene fatty alcohol ethers, for example alkylaryl polyglycol ethers, alkylsulphonates, alkyl sulphates, aryl-sulphonates as well as protein hydrolysates; as dispersing agents there are suitable: for example lignin-sulphite waste liquors and methylcellulose.
  • Adhesives such as carboxymethylcellulose and natural and synthetic polymers in the form of powders, granules or latexes, such as gum arabic, polyvinyl alcohol and polyvinyl acetate, as well as natural phospholipids, such as cephalins and lecithins, and synthetic phospholipids, can be used in the formulations. Further additives may be mineral and vegetable oils.
  • Colourants can also included in the formulations. Non-limiting examples are inorganic pigments, such as iron oxide, titanium oxide and Prussian Blue, and organic dyestuffs, such as alizarin dyestuffs, azo dye-stuffs and metal phthalocyanine dyestuffs, and trace nutrients such as salts of iron, manganese, boron, copper, cobalt, molybdenum and zinc.
  • The formulations in general comprise between 0.1 and 95 per cent by weight, or between 0.5 and 90 per cent by weight, of each of the active compounds from group a (or the first compound) and group b (or the second component).
  • Herbicidal compositions according to the invention can be applied in the form of ready mixes. Herbicidal compositions can also be formulated individually and mixed upon use, i.e. applied in the form of tank mixes.
  • Herbicidal compositions can be used as such or in the form of their formulations, and furthermore also as mixtures with other known herbicides, ready mixes or tank mixes. They may also be mixed with other known active compounds, such as fungicides, insecticides, acaricides, nematicides, bird repellents, growth substances, plant nutrients and agents which improve soil structure. For particular application purposes, in particular when applied post-emergence, formulations such as mineral or vegetable oils which are tolerated by plants (for example the commercial product “Olco DuPont 11E”) or ammonium salts such as, for example, ammonium sulphate or ammonium thiocyanate, as further additives can be included.
  • Herbicidal compositions can be used as such, in the form of their formulations or in the forms prepared therefrom by dilution of a concentrated form, such as ready-to-use or concentrated solutions, suspensions, emulsions, powders, pastes and granules. They are used in the customary manner, for example by watering, spraying, atomizing, dusting or scattering.
  • Herbicidal compositions according to the invention can be applied before and after the plants have emerged, that is to say pre-emergence and post-emergence. They can also be incorporated into the soil before, during or after sowing seeds of a crop.
  • The invention also provides methods for controlling undesirable plants or vegetation. In one embodiment, a method includes applying to a crop where control of such vegetation is desired, an herbicidally effective amount of a composition. Such methods include a composition of the invention, optionally together with an adjuvant, an inert diluent or a carrier suitable for use with an herbicide.
  • The invention also provides methods for selective control of weeds. In one embodiment, a method includes contacting a composition of the invention onto a crop plant in need of weed control or at risk of undesirable weeds, in an amount effective to provide weed control in the crop.
  • Herbicidal activity of the compound combinations can be seen from the examples which follow. While the individual active compounds show less activity with regard to herbicidal activity, certain combinations have a herbicidal activity which exceeds a simple sum of the activity of the individual active compounds.
  • Activity for a given combination of two active compounds can be calculated as follows (cf. COLBY. S. R.: “Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations”. Weeds 15, Pages 20-22. 1967):
    • If:
  • X=% damage by herbicide A (active compound of group a) at an application rate of p kg/ha,
  • Y=% damage by herbicide B (active compound of group b) at an application rate of q kg/ha,
  • E=the expected % damage of herbicides A+B at an application rate of p+q kg/ha, then

  • E=X+Y−(X*Y/100).
  • Similarly, according to Colby, the activity for a given combination of three active compounds can be calculated as follows (cf. COLBY. S. R.: “Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations”. Weeds 15, Pages 20-22. 1967):
    • If:
  • X=% damage by herbicide A (active compound of group a) at an application rate of p kg/ha,
  • Y=% damage by herbicide B1 (a first active compound of group b) at an application rate of q kg/ha,
  • Y=% damage by herbicide B2 (a second active compound of group b) at an application rate of r kg/ha,
  • E=the expected % damage of herbicides A+B1+B2 at an application rate of p+q+r kg/ha,
  • then

  • E=X+Y+Z−(X*Y+X*Z+Y*Z)/100)+X*Y*Z/10,000.
  • If the actual damage exceeds the calculated value (E), the combination is considered to have synergistic effect activity.
  • It can be seen from the use examples herein below that the found herbicidal action of the active compound combinations according to the invention exceeds the calculated value, that is to say that the new active compound combinations have a synergistic effect.
  • Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. Although methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice or testing of the invention, suitable methods and materials are described herein.
  • All applications, publications, patents and other references, citations cited herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety. In case of conflict, the specification, including definitions, will control.
  • As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “and,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.
  • As used herein, all numerical values or numerical ranges include integers within such ranges and fractions of the values or the integers within ranges unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to a range of 90-100%, includes 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 95%, 97%, etc., as well as 91.1%, 91.2%, 91.3%, 91.4%, 91.5%, etc., 92.1%, 92.2%, 92.3%, 92.4%, 92.5%, etc., and so forth.
  • The invention is generally disclosed herein using affirmative language to describe the numerous embodiments. The invention also specifically includes embodiments in which particular subject matter is excluded, in full or in part, such as substances or materials, method steps and conditions, protocols, procedures, assays or analysis. Thus, even though the invention is generally not expressed herein in terms of what the invention does not include aspects that are not expressly included in the invention are nevertheless disclosed herein.
  • A number of embodiments of the invention have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the following examples are intended to illustrate but not limit the scope of invention described in the claims.
    • EXAMPLES
  • Herbicidal Activity Studies
    • Example 1
  • Evaluation of synergistic action between amicarbazone and propisochlor on Digitaria ciliaris.
  • The herbicide study was conducted at Aburahi Agricultural Research Trial Grass house in Shiga Prefecture, Japan. Various mixtures of DINAMIC® (Amicarbazone 70 DF) and Proponit (Propisochlor 720 EC) was applied pre-emergence using foliar application by manual sprayer in this study. The mixture was diluted in water immediately prior to application, and applied at the concentration in Table 1-1. The application rate was 1000 L water/ha. Digitaria ciliaris was grown in square plastic pots (10 cm×10 cm) and replicated three times.
  • The herbicidal effect was observed by comparing the extent of Digitaria ciliaris treated with the compounds against that occurring in similar non-treated control. Herbicidal effect was visually assessed and recorded at 5, 8, 14, 21 and 28 days after treatment (DAT). Damage by the herbicidal compositions was evaluated with reference to a scale of 0% to 100% in comparison with untreated control. 0% means no damage and 100% means complete destruction of the plants.
  • The herbicide effect of amicarbazone, in particular, at 50 g/ha and 100 g/ha, was small on Disitaria ciliaris at the one-leaf stage. Similarly, the herbicide effect of propisochlor was less apparent on Disitaria ciliaris at the one-leaf stage, for example, the weeding effect index was less than 50% at 5 DAT observation at all tested dose rate. Surprisingly, treatments with the herbicidal mixtures significantly increase the % damage on the weed. Assessment of the synergistic effect was evaluated using the Colby method. The herbicidal mixtures (amicarbazone+propisochlor) exert a greater herbicidal action than expected according to Colby on the basis of the observed effects of the individual components when used alone. Therefore, a synergistic effect between amicarbazone and propisochlor was confirmed on Disitaria ciliaris.
  • TABLE 1-1
    Pre-emergence treatment effects on Digitaria ciliaris
    (one leaf-stage of weeds) with various mixtures of
    amicarbazone and propisochlor, expressed as percentage control
    Propisochlor (Rate/ha)
    DAT 0 g 50 g 100 g 200 g
    Amicarbazone (Rate/ha) 0 g 5 0 28 42 44
    8 0 70 78 80
    14 0 76 86 90
    21 0 88 94 98
    28 0 82 92 98
    50 g 5 24 70 68 84
    (45.3) (55.9) (57.4)
    8 38 78 84 86
    (81.4) (86.4) (87.6)
    14 34 88 94 94
    (84.2) (90.8) (93.4)
    21 34 94 98 98
    (92.1) (96.0) (98.7)
    28 26 96 100 100
    (86.7) (94.1) (98.5)
    100 g 5 70 94 94 96
    (78.4) (82.6 (83.2)
    8 78 98 98 98
    (93.4) (95.2) (95.6)
    14 82 98 100 100
    (95.7) (97.5) (98.2)
    21 74 100 100 100
    (96.9) (98.4) (99.5)
    28 66 100 100 100
    (93.9) (97.3) (99.3)
    200 g 5 92 100 100 100
    (94.2) (95.4) (95.5)
    8 96 100 100 100
    (98.8) (99.1) (99.2)
    14 98 100 100 100
    (99.5) (99.7) (99.8)
    21 86 100 100 100
    (98.3) (99.2) (99.7)
    28 86 100 100 100
    (97.5) (98.9) (99.7)
    ( ) indicates the calculated expected percent damage according to Colby method E, wherein E = a + b (100-a)/100
    A: Herbicidal effect of Propisochlor as single application
    B: Herbicidal effect of Amicarbazone as single application
    Herbicidal effect index: 0 (No efficacy) - 100 (Complete kill)
    • Example 2
  • Evaluation of synergistic action between amicarbazone and clomazone/hexazinone on Cyperus esculentus.
  • DINAMIC® (amicarbazone) and Discover (clomazone 400 g/kg+hexazinone 100 g/kg) alone or in combination were applied pre-emergence in this study. The formulations for DINAMIC® and Discover were 700 g active ingredient a.i./kg and 500 g active ingredient a.i./kg respectively.
  • The herbicidal effect was observed by comparing the extent of Cyperus esculentus treated with the compounds against that occurring in similar non-treated control. Herbicidal effect was visually assessed and recorded at 27, 43, 46, 60, 63, 77, 83, 97 and 124 days after treatment (DAT). Damage by the herbicidal compositions was evaluated with reference to a scale of 0% to 100% in comparison with untreated control. 0% means no damage and 100% means complete destruction of the plants.
  • The results in Table 2 indicate synergistic effects between amicarbazone and the clomazone/hexazinone partner. Assessment of the synergistic effect was evaluated using the Colby method. The theoretical herbicidal effect index were calculated based on Colby and the values were indicated in bracket ( ) in Table 2-1. The herbicidal mixtures (amicarbazone+(clomazone/hexazinone)) exert a greater herbicidal action than expected according to Colby on the basis of the observed effects of the individual components when used alone. In both Trials 1 and 2, the observed herbicidal effects are greater than the theoretical herbicidal effects at DAT 77 and DAT 124 respectively, therefore, there exist synergistic effects between amicarbazone and the clomazone/hexazinone partner on Cyperus esculentus. The underlined values in the table indicate that the observed weed killing is greater than calculated from the Colby formula and therefore indicates a synergistic weed killing effect or activity.
  • TABLE 2-1
    Pre-emergence treatment effects on Cyperus esculentus, expressed as percentage
    control
    Application
    Rate Days After Treatment (DAT)
    Active Ingredient(s) (kg/ha) 27 43 46 60 63 77 83 97 124
    Trial 1
    Amicarbazone 1.5 40 62 65
    Clomazone/Hexazinone 2.0 0 0 0
    Amicarbazone + 1.5 + 2.0 83 94 96
    (Clomazone/Hexazinone) (65)
    Trial 2
    Amicarbazone 1.5 37 53 57 68 53 23
    Clomazone/Hexazinone 2.0 45 40 17 17 5 0
    Amicarbazone + 1.5 + 2.0 22 86 82 84 85 77
    (Clomazone/Hexazinone) (23)
    ( ) indicates the calculated expected percent damage according to Colby method E, wherein E = a + b (100-a)/100
    A: Herbicidal effect of Clomazone/Hexazinone as single application
    B: Herbicidal effect of Amicarbazone as single application
    Herbicidal effect index: 0 (No efficacy) - 100 (Complete kill)
    • Example 3
  • Evaluation of synergistic action between amicarbazone and other herbicides on Cyperus rotundus.
  • DINAMIC® (amicarbazone) in combination of various herbicides listed in Table 3-1 were tested for herbicidal activity.
  • TABLE 3-1
    Herbicides used in combination of amicarbazone
    Name Active Ingredients Source
    Volcano-blend Ethoxylated propoxylated Volcano Agroscience
    (adjuvant) fatty amines 1000 g/L
    Break Thru Polyether-polymethylsiloxane- Goldschmidt Chemical
    (adjuvant) copolymer 100% Corporation
    MCPA 4-Methyl-2-chlorophenoxyacetic acid Volcano Agroscience
  • The herbicidal effect was observed by comparing the extent of Cyperus esculentus treated with the compounds against that occurring in similar non-treated control. Herbicidal effect was visually assessed and recorded at 4, 8, 18 and 34 days after treatment (DAT). Damage by the herbicidal compositions was evaluated with reference to a scale of 0% to 100% in comparison with untreated control. 0% means no damage and 100% means complete destruction of the plants.
  • Table 3-2 provides post-emergence treatment effects on Cyperus esculentus between amicarbazone and 4-methyl-2-chlorophenoxyacetic acid with an adjuvant.
  • TABLE 3-2
    Post-emergence treatment effects on Cyperus esculentus, expressed as percentage
    (by volume) control
    Application Rate Days After Treatment (DAT)
    Active Ingredient(s) (kg/ha or L/ha) 4 8 18 34
    Amicarbazone + Volcano-Blend (adjuvant) 1.0 + 0.2% 0 5 0 0
    Amicarbazone + MCPA + Volcano-Blend 1.0 + 3.5 + 0.2% 0 50 70 0
    (adjuvant)
    Amicarbazone + Break Thru (adjuvant) 1.0 + 0.1% 0 5 0 0
    Amicarbazone + MCPA + Break Thru 1.0 + 3.5 + 0.1% 0 50 75 50
    (adjuvant)
    • Example 4
  • Evaluation of synergistic action between amicarbazone and other herbicides on Cyperus rotundus.
  • DINAMIC® (amicarbazone) in combination of various herbicides listed in Table 4-1 were tested for herbicidal activity.
  • TABLE 4-1
    Herbicides used in combination of amicarbazone
    Name Active Ingredients Source
    Gesapax Ametryn: N-ethyl-N′-(1- Syngenta
    methylethyl)-6-(methylthio)-
    1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine,
    500 g/L
    Karmex Diuron: N-(3,4-dichlophenyl)-N,N- Goldschmidt
    dimethyl urea, 800 g/kg Chemical Corporation
    DuPont (in Brazil)
    Provence Isoxaflutole: 5-cyclopropyl-4- Bayer Group
    isoxazolyl)[2-(methylsulfonyl)-4-
    (trifluoromethyl)phenyl]methanone,
    750 g/kg
    Sencor Metribuzin: 4-amino-6-(1,1- Bayer Group
    dimethylethyl)-3-(methylthio)-1,2,4-
    triazin-5(4H)-one, 480 g/kg
  • The herbicidal effect was observed by comparing the extent of Euphorbia heterophylla (EPHHL) treated with the compounds against that occurring in similar non-treated control. Herbicidal effect was visually assessed and recorded at 14, 23, 36, 49, 65 and 77 days after treatment (DAT). Damage by the herbicidal compositions was evaluated with reference to a scale of 0% to 100% in comparison with untreated control. 0% means no damage and 100% means complete destruction of the plants.
  • The results in Table 4-2 indicate synergistic effects in the herbicidal treatments with (Amicarbazone+Karmex) mixtures and (Amicarbazone+Sencor) mixtures on Euphorbia heterophylla. Assessment of the synergistic effect was evaluated using the Colby method. The theoretical herbicidal effect index were calculated based on Colby and the values were indicated in bracket ( ) in Table 4-2. Both of the herbicidal mixtures (amicarbazone+Karmex) and (amicarbazone+Sencor) exert a greater herbicidal action than expected according to Colby on the basis of the observed effects of the individual components when used alone. The observed herbicidal effects are greater than the theoretical herbicidal effects at DAT 49, 65 and 77, therefore, there exist synergistic effects. On the other hand, antagonic effects were observed in the herbicidal treatments with (Amicarbazone+Gesapax) mixtures and (Amicarbazone+Provence) mixtures on Euphorbia heterophylla, as the observed herbicidal effects were smaller than the theoretical herbicidal effects at any of the DAT tested (i.e. DAT=14, 23, 36, 49, 65 and 77). The underlined values in the table indicate that the observed weed killing is greater than calculated from the Colby formula and therefore indicates a synergistic weed killing effect or activity.
  • TABLE 4-2
    Pre-emergence treatment effects on Euphorbia heterophylla, expressed as
    percentage control
    Application Rate Days After Treatment (DAT)
    Active Ingredient(s) (kg/ha or L/ha) 14 23 36 49 65 77
    Amicarbazone 1.50 98 98 96 96 96 90
    Amicarbazone 1.00 96 96 96 79 79 75
    Amicarbazone + Gesapax 1.00 + 3.00 96 96 96 86 86 85
    (100) (99) (99) (89) (88) (86)
    Gesapax 3.00 96 84 80 47 45 45
    Gesapax 5.00 96 72 66 50 47 47
    Amicarbazone + Karmex 1.00 + 3.00 96 94 96 90 90 90
    (100) (98) (98) (86) (84) (81)
    Karmex 3.00 96 60 60 35 23 23
    Karmex 5.00 98 80 80 50 50 35
    Amicarbazone + Provence 1.00 + 0.15 96 96 96 82 80 82
    (100) (98) (98) (84) (88) (85)
    Provence 0.15 90 60 60 45 42 40
    Provence 0.20 96 82 80 80 66 65
    Amicarbazone + Sencor 1.00 + 2.00 96 96 96 96 90 90
    (100) (99) (99) (88) (85) (85)
    Sencor 2.00 96 85 75 41 40 40
    Sencor 3.50 96 85 85 56 50 50
    ( ) indicates the calculated expected percent damage according to Colby method E, wherein E = a + b (100-a)/100
    A: Herbicidal effect of the second active ingredients (i.e. Gesapax, Karmex, Provence or Sencor) as single application
    B: Herbicidal effect of Amicarbazone as single application
    Herbicidal effect index: 0 (No efficacy) - 100 (Complete kill)
  • The herbicidal effect was observed by comparing the extent of Ipomoea gradifolia (IAOGR) treated with the compounds against that occurring in similar non-treated control. Herbicidal effect was visually assessed and recorded at 14, 23, 36, 49, 65 and 77 days after treatment (DAT). Damage by the herbicidal compositions was evaluated with reference to a scale of 0% to 100% in comparison with untreated control. 0% means no damage and 100% means complete destruction of the plants. The results of the observed herbicidal effect and the theoretical herbicidal effected were shown in Table 4-3. Assessment of the synergistic effect was evaluated using the Colby method. The theoretical herbicidal effect index were calculated based on Colby and the values were indicated in bracket ( ). Most of the observed herbicidal effects were smaller than the theoretical herbicidal effects in most of the tested results, which indicate antagonic effects. Some of the observed herbicidal effects were the same as the theoretical herbicidal effects, which indicate additive effects. The underlined values in the table indicate that the observed weed killing is greater than calculated from the Colby formula and therefore indicates a synergistic weed killing effect or activity.
  • TABLE 4-3
    Pre-emergence treatment effects on Ipomoea gradifolia, expressed as percentage
    control
    Application Rate Days After Treatment (DAT)
    Active Ingredient(s) (kg/ha or L/ha) 14 23 36 49 65 77
    Amicarbazone 1.50 98 98 98 98 96 97
    Amicarbazone 1.00 100 98 96 96 93 93
    Amicarbazone + Gesapax 1.00 + 3.00 100 98 96 96 98 96
    (100) (100) (99) (98) (96) (96)
    Gesapax 3.00 99 87 85 60 47 45
    Gesapax 5.00 100 96 96 60 60 58
    Amicarbazone + Karmex 1.00 + 3.00 99 96 96 97 94 96
    (100) (100) (100) (100) (98) (98)
    Karmex 3.00 99 97 96 77 70 70
    Karmex 5.00 98 96 96 79 70 60
    Amicarbazone + Provence 1.00 + 0.15 100 96 96 98 93 96
    (100) (99) (98) (98) (96) (96)
    Provence 0.15 90 67 60 47 45 45
    Provence 0.20 96 94 90 90 64 64
    Amicarbazone + Sencor 1.00 + 2.00 100 96 96 96 96 96
    (100) (100) (100) (100) (99) (98)
    Sencor 2.00 100 96 96 96 84 70
    Sencor 3.50 100 96 96 96 80 67
    ( ) indicates the calculated expected percent damage according to Colby method E, wherein E = a + b (100-a)/100
    A: Herbicidal effect of the second active ingredients (i.e. Gesapax, Karmex, Provence or Sencor) as single application
    B: Herbicidal effect of Amicarbazone as single application
    Herbicidal effect index: 0 (No efficacy) - 100 (Complete kill)
  • The herbicidal effect was observed by comparing the extent of Croton glandulosus (CROTON) treated with the compounds against that occurring in similar non-treated control. Herbicidal effect was visually assessed and recorded at 14, 23, 36, 49, 65 and 77 days after treatment (DAT). Damage by the herbicidal compositions was evaluated with reference to a scale of 0% to 100% in comparison with untreated control. 0% means no damage and 100% means complete destruction of the plants. The results of the observed herbicidal effect and the theoretical herbicidal effected were shown in Table 4-4. Assessment of the synergistic effect was evaluated using the Colby method. The theoretical herbicidal effect index were calculated based on Colby and the values were indicated in bracket ( ). Some of the observed herbicidal effects were the same as the theoretical hervicidal effects, which indicate additive effects. The underlined values in the table indicate that the observed weed killing is greater than calculated from the Colby formula and therefore indicates a synergistic weed killing effect or activity.
  • TABLE 4-4
    Pre-emergence treatment effects on Croton glandulofius, expressed as percentage
    control
    Application Rate Days After Treatment (DAT)
    Active Ingredient(s) (kg/ha or L/ha) 14 23 36 49 65 77
    Amicarbazone 1.50 100 99 99 99 99 99
    Amicarbazone 1.00 100 99 99 95 99 99
    Amicarbazone + Gesapax 1.00 + 3.00 100 99 99 99 99 99
    (100) (99) (99) (97) (99) (99)
    Gesapax 3.00 96 60 60 40 40 40
    Gesapax 5.00 100 84 80 62 62 62
    Amicarbazone + Karmex 1.00 + 3.00 100 99 99 99 99 99
    (100) (99) (99) (99) (99) (99)
    Karmex 3.00 100 92 90 87 87 80
    Karmex 5.00 100 92 92 88 88 75
    Amicarbazone + Provence 1.00 + 0.15 100 99 99 99 93 90
    (100) (99) (99) (97) (99) (99)
    Provence 0.15 100 65 65 42 42 40
    Provence 0.20 99 90 90 60 60 60
    Amicarbazone + Sencor 1.00 + 2.00 100 99 99 99 99 99
    (100) (99) (99) (99) (99) (99)
    Sencor 2.00 100 96 96 98 99 98
    Sencor 3.50 100 96 96 96 96 96
    ( ) indicates the calculated expected percent damage according to Colby method E, wherein E = a + b (100-a)/100
    A: Herbicidal effect of the second active ingredients (i.e. Gesapax, Karmex, Provence or Sencor) as single application
    B: Herbicidal effect of Amicarbazone as single application
    Herbicidal effect index: 0 (No efficacy) - 100 (Complete kill)
    • Example 5
  • Evaluation of synergistic action between amicarbazone and mesotrione on Mustard (Sinapsis sp.), Poa annua, Green Foxtail, and Crabgrass sp.
  • The experiments in this Example were designed to determine whether amicarbazone could decrease mesotrione-induced bleaching of Kentucky bluegrass, St. Augustinegrass, tall fescue and selected turf weed species and whether the combination of amicarbazone and mesotrione could increase the speed and degree of kill of common turf weeds. The experiments in this Example were also designed to determine if amicarbazone plus mesotrione tank-mixes enhance weed control over treatments with mesotrione or amicarbazone alone. This Example shows the synergistic effect of the combination of amicarbazone and mesotrione on injury and bleaching effects on Mustard (Sinapsis sp.), Poa annua, Green Foxtail, and Crabgrass sp. The combination of amicarbazone and mesotrione in a tank mixture decreased the objectionable bleaching associated with mesotrione, increased the speed of complete kill of weeds and enhanced weed control. The results disclosed in this Example were achieved without the aid of non-ionic surfactants.
  • Field Preparation/Maintenance
  • Containers were watered as needed based on species and water usage. The greenhouse was heated to keep temperatures above 50° F. (10° C.) and ventilated as needed to keep temperatures below 100° F. (38° C.). Typical daytime temperatures in the greenhouse were 80-90° F. (27-32° C.) and nightime temperatures were between 50-60° F. (10-16° C.). The soil employed was Promix BX potting soil. Overall moisture conditions were normal and the closest weather station was on-site. Conditions and equipment employed in this Example are tabulated below in Tables 5-1 and 5-2.
  • TABLE 5-1
    Application Description
    A
    Time of Day: 12-3 pm
    Application Method: SPRAY
    Application Timing: POSPOS
    Air Temperature, Unit: 69.4
    % Relative Humidity: 71
  • TABLE 5-2
    Application Equipment
    A
    Appl. Equipment: CO2 sprayer
    Operating Pressure, Unit: 30 PSI
    Nozzle Type: EV
    Nozzle Size: 8003
    Nozzle Spacing, Unit: 24 IN
    Nozzles/Row: 2
  • All containers were moved outdoors from the greenhouse and arranged in blocks by treatment for the herbicide applications. A single spray application was applied to each block containing four repetitions of each species for each treatment. Plants were then immediately returned to the greenhouse and irrigated with approximately ¼″ water 1-3 hrs after treatment with a hose end sprayer. Only the Poa plants were trimmed with scissors two days prior to treatment at a height of approximately 3 inches.
  • Transplanted tillering Kentucky Bluegrass was 5 to 6 months old, transplanted Poa annua was 5 to 6 months old. Tall fescue was seeded into the crabgrass pots. St. Augustine plants (Floratam and Saphire) were shipped from Port St. Lucie, Fla. Only two replicates of Saphire St. Augustine grass were used due to plant availability.
  • Both seedling and tillering stages of Kentucky bluegrass were examined. There were no treatment effects with regard to bleaching because virtually no bleaching occurred on any of the Kentucky bluegrass plants. Since Kentucky bluegrass is tolerant to both amicarbazone and mesotrione, no treatment effects were observed indicating that amicarbazone or mesotrione applied alone or in tank mixture are safe to Kentucky Bluegrass. No treatment effects were evident on the tillering bluegrass at any rating period. However, amicarbazone at the 3 oz/Acre rate and the combination of the two products using the 3 oz/acre rate of amicarbazone injured Kentucky Bluegrass seedlings, resulting in decreased stand density at 31 days after application for treatments. It has been observed that a 3 oz/acre rate of amicarbazone is injurious to seedling Kentucky Bluegrass.
  • Referring to FIGS. 2A-B, 3A-C, 4A-C, and 5A-D, all ratings of injury or bleaching are based on a scale from 1 to 9. In bleaching measurements, 1 indicates no bleaching while 9 indicates that the entire plant is white. Any bleaching measurement 4 and above was considered unacceptable for desirable turf species. In injury measurements, 1 indicates no injury while 9 indicates a dead plant. Any injury measurement 4 and above was considered unacceptable for desirable turf species). Density correlates with percent cover where 1 indicates no grass while 9 indicates a full pot.
  • In general, as evidenced in FIGS. 2A-B, 3A-C, 4A-C, and 5A-D, combinations of amicarbazone with mesotrione resulted in greater efficacy and less bleaching of weeds. Mustard (FIGS. 2A-B), green foxtail (FIGS. 4A-C), and crabgrass (FIGS. 5A-D) control was enhanced with the combination of amicarbazone and mesotrione compared to the application of each product alone. Decreased bleaching appeared to be due, in part, to the increased rate of weed desiccation. Mesotrione alone bleached weeds plants for an extended period of time before turning brown, while the treatments including amicarbazone caused almost immediate desiccation without going through the bleaching phase. Poa annua (FIGS. 3A-C) control was enhanced with the combination treatments. The light-colored leaves of the Poa plants made bleaching and general desiccation somewhat challenging to distinguish.
  • Bleaching of St. Augustine (Saphire or Floratam) was minimal regardless of treatment. Decreased bleaching, faster activity and greater control were related to the rate of amicarbazone and mesotrione. The higher rate of control by each product the more complete control and faster control of weeds sensitive to either amicarbazone or mesotrione. The decrease in the degree of bleaching was also dependent on the rate of each product; the higher the rate of amicarbazone, the less bleaching occurred.
  • The results of this Example demonstrate that combinations of amicarbazone and mesotrione are synergistic in decreasing the bleaching of sensitive weeds. The combination treatments also increased the speed and completeness of kill of sensitive weeds without causing increased phytotoxicity to desirable turf species. The data further tabulated below, along with FIGS. 2A-B, 3A-C, 4A-C, and 5A-D clearly demonstrate the synergistic activity of the combination of amicarbazone and mesotrione.
  • Concerning the optimum rate of each herbicide product for best control and least bleaching, 1 oz/acre of Xonerate 70 WDG (amicarbazone) plus 4 fl. oz/Acre Tenacity 4 SC (mesotrione) (0.044 lb. active ingredient per acre amicarbazone plus 0.125 lb. active ingredient per acre mesotrione) combined with 4 fl oz/acre Tenacity (40% mesotrione) can provide commercially viable benefits over the use of each herbicide alone. Likewise, 2 oz/Acre Xonerate (0.088 lb. active ingredient per acre amicarbazone) in combination with 4 fl. oz/Acre Tenacity (0.125 lb. active ingredient per acre mesotrione) can provide benefits over the individual use of each product alone. The specific combination for optimum synergy and control without undue bleaching depends on the exact turf type and the species of weeds being targeted.
  • Table 5-3 below summarizes the treatment parameters for Treatment numbers 1-9 in Tables 5-4 through 5-11 that follow.
  • TABLE 5-3
    Treatment Parameters
    Trt Treatment Form Form Rate Other Other Appl
    No. Type Name Conc Type Rate Unit Rate Rate Unit Code
    1 CHK Untreated Check
    2 HERB Amicarbazone 70 WG 0.0219 lb ai/a 0.5 oz/a A
    3 HERB Amicarbazone 70 WG 0.131 lb ai/a 3.0 oz/a A
    4 HERB Tenacity 4 SC 0.125 lb ai/a 4.0 oz/a A
    5 HERB Tenacity 4 SC 0.25 lb ai/a 8.0 oz/a A
    6 HERB Tenacity 4 SC 0.125 lb ai/a 4.0 oz/a A
    HERB Amicarbazone 70 WG 0.0219 lb ai/a 0.5 oz/a A
    7 HERB Tenacity 4 SC 0.125 lb ai/a 4.0 oz/a A
    HERB Amicarbazone 70 WG 0.131 lb ai/a 3.0 oz/a A
    8 HERB Tenacity 4 SC 0.25 lb ai/a 8.0 oz/a A
    HERB Amicarbazone 70 WG 0.0219 lb ai/a 0.5 oz/a A
    9 HERB Tenacity 4 SC 0.25 lb ai/a 8.0 oz/a A
    HERB Amicarbazone 70 WG 0.131 lb ai/a 3.0 oz/a A
    Type: CHK = Check or Untreated (control);
    IHRB = Herbicide
    Treatment Name: Untreated Check is not treated|
    Form Type: WG = Water dispersible granules (a formulation consisting of granules to be applied after disintegration and dispersion in water); SC = Suspension concentrate (flowable concentrate): a stable suspension of active ingredient(s) in water, intended for dilution with water before use;
    Rate Unit: lb ai/a = pounds active ingredient per acre (Metric = Kg ai/ha (hectare)) A
    Other Rate Unit: oz/a = ounces product per acre
  • Replications employed include 4, Untreated treatments: 1, Design: Randomized Complete Block, Treatment units: US standard, Treated plot size Width: 4 feet, Treated plot size Length: 4 feet, Application volume: 50 gal/ac, Mix size: 0.5562 liters, Mix overage: 100%. Format definitions: G-A117.DEF, G-A117.FRM. The results of these treatments are summarized below in Tables 5-4 to 5-11.
  • TABLE 5-4
    Kentucky Bluegrass Seedling
    Crop Code POAPR POAPR POAPR POAPR POAPR POAPR POAPR POAPR POAPR POAPR
    BBCH Scale BGRM BGRM BGRM BGRM BGRM BGRM BGRM BGRM BGRM BGRM
    Crop Name Kentucky Kentucky Kentucky Kentucky Kentucky Kentucky Kentucky Kentucky Kentucky Kentucky
    bl> bl> bl> bl> bl> bl> bl> bl> bl> bl>
    Crop Variety — — — — — — — —
    Description Seedling Seedling Seedling Seedling Seedling Seedling Seedling Seedling Seedling Seedling
    Rating Data Type Bleaching Bleaching Injury Bleaching Bleaching Injury Bleaching % Cover % Cover % Cover
    Days After First/Last 6 6 7 7 10 10 10 10 14 14 14 14 20 20 20 20 24 24 31 31
    Applic.
    Trt-Eval Interval 6 DA-A 7 DA-A 10 DA-A 10 DA-A 14 DA-A 14 DA-A 20 DA-A 20 DA-A 24 DA-A 31 DA-A
    Trt Treatment
    No. Name 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    1 Untreated Check 1.0 a 1.0 a 1.0 c 1.0 a 1.0 a 1.3 c 1.0 b 7.8 a 8.0 a 8.8 a
    2 Amicarbazone 1.0 a 1.0 a 1.0 c 1.0 a 1.0 a 1.3 c 1.0 b 6.5 ab 6.8 ab 8.8 a
    3 Amicarbazone 1.0 a 1.0 a 1.8 c 1.0 a 1.5 a 2.5 c 1.5 a 4.8 b 4.8 be 7.5 a
    4 Tenacity 1.0 a 1.0 a 1.0 c 1.0 a 1.0 a 1.3 c 1.0 b 5.5 b 5.5 be 8.0 a
    5 Tenacity 1.0 a 1.0 a 1.5 c 1.8 a 1.8 a 2.0 c 1.0 b 6.3 ab 6.8 ab 8.0 a
    6 Tenacity 1.0 a 1.0 a 1.3 c 1.0 a 1.0 a 1.8 c 1.0 b 5.8 b 6.0 b 8.5 a
    Amicarbazone
    7 Tenacity 1.0 a 1.0 a 4.0 b 1.0 a 1.3 a 4.5 b 1.0 b 3.0 c 3.8 c 5.3 b
    Amicarbazone
    8 Tenacity 1.0 a 1.0 a 2.3 c 1.0 a 1.3 a 2.8 c 1.0 b 5.3 b 5.3 bc 7.8 a
    Amicarbazone
    9 Tenacity 1.0 a 1.0 a 8.0 a 1.0 a 1.3 a 8.5 a 1.0 b 1.3 d 1.5 d 1.3 c
    Amicarbazone
    LSD (P = .10) 0.00 0.00 1.29 0.60 0.48 1.45 0.23 1.31 1.30 1.56
    Standard Deviation 0.00 0.00 1.07 0.50 0.40 1.20 0.19 1.09 1.08 1.29
    CV 0.0 0.0 44.2 46.15 32.46 42.01 18.23 21.24 20.11 18.2
    Bartlett's X2 0.0 0.0 11.088 0.0 0.099 17.602 0.0 7.214 7.444 15.439
    P(Bartlett's X2) — — 0.05* — 0.999 0.024* — 0.514 0.49 0.051
    Replicate F 0.000 0.000 1.128 1.000 0.471 0.942 1.000 3.458 2.829 3.181
    Replicate Prob(F) 1.0000 1.0000 0.3576 0.4098 0.7056 0.4357 0.4098 0.0322 0.0599 0.0422
    Treatment F 0.000 0.000 18.566 1.000 1.765 15.365 3.000 12.843 12.538 14.214
    Treatment Prob(F) 1.0000 1.0000 0.0001 0.4613 0.1345 0.0001 0.0176 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001
    Means followed by same letter do not si gnificantly differ (P = .10, Student-Newman-Keuls)
    Mean comparisons performed only when AOV Treatment P(F) is significant at mean comparison OSL.
  • TABLE 5-5
    Kentucky Bluegrass Tillering
    Crop Code POAPR POAPR POAPR POAPR POAPR POAPR
    BBCH Scale BGRM BGRM BGRM BGRM BGRM BGRM
    Crop Name Kentucky Kentucky Kentucky Kentucky Kentucky Kentucky
    bl> bl> bl> bl> bl> bl>
    Crop Variety Tillering Tillering Tillering Tillering Tillering Tillering
    Description
    Rating Data Type Bleaching Bleaching Bleaching Bleaching Bleaching Bleaching
    Days After First/Last 6 6 7 7 10 10 14 14 20 20 31 31
    Applic.
    Trt-Eval Interval 6 DA-A 7 DA-A 10 DA-A 14 DA-A 20 DA-A 31 DA-A
    Trt Treatment
    No. Name 11 12 13 14 15 16
    1 Untreated Check 1.0 a 1.0 a 1.0 a 1.0 a 1.0 a 1.0 a
    2 Amicarbazone 1.0 a 1.0 a 1.0 a 1.0 a 1.3 a 1.0 a
    3 Amicarbazone 1.3 a 1.3 a 1.3 a 1.0 a 1.0 a 1.0 a
    4 Tenacity 1.5 a 1.5 a 1.0 a 1.0 a 1.5 a 1.0 a
    5 Tenacity 1.3 a 1.3 a 1.3 a 1.3 a 1.0 a 1.0 a
    6 Tenacity 1.3 a 1.3 a 1.5 a 1.0 a 1.5 a 1.0 a
    Amicarbazone
    7 Tenacity 1.3 a 1.3 a 1.3 a 1.5 a 1.3 a 1.0 a
    Amicarbazone
    8 Tenacity 1.8 a 1.8 a 1.5 a 1.5 a 1.5 a 1.0 a
    Amicarbazone
    9 Tenacity 1.3 a 1.3 a 1.5 a 1.8 a 1.5 a 1.0 a
    Amicarbazone
    LSD (P = .10) 0.55 0.55 0.65 0.56 0.73 0.00
    Standard Deviation 0.45 0.45 0.54 0.46 0.60 0.00
    CV 35.52 35.52 43.03 37.55 47.18 0.0
    Bartlett's X2 0.105 0.105 2.518 1.577 3.311 0.0
    P(Bartlett's X2) 1.00 1.00 0.774 0.665 0.652 0.000
    Replicate F 0.899 0.899 0.352 0.703 2.548 1.0000
    Replicate Prob(F) 0.4562 0.4562 0.7881 0.5594 0.0797 0.000
    Treatment F 1.045 1.045 0.648 1.615 0.592 1.0000
    Treatment Prob(F) 0.4316 0.4316 0.7303 0.1727 0.7745
  • TABLE 5-6
    Mustard
    Crop Code POAPR SINSS SINSS SINSS SINSS SINSS
    BBCH Scale BRAP BRAP BRAP BRAP BRAP BRAP BRAP
    Crop Name Mustard Mustard Mustard Mustard Mustard Mustard Mustard
    Crop Variety
    Description
    Rating Data Type Injury Bleaching Injury Bleaching Injury Injury Injury
    Days After First/Last 3 3 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 10 10 14 14
    Applic.
    Trt-Eval Interval 3DA-A 6DA-A 6DA-A 7DA-A 7DA-A 10 DA-A 14 DA-A
    Trt Treatment
    No. Name 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
    1 Untreated Check 1.0 c 2.8 b 1.0 c 1.5 c 1.3 d 1.8 c 1.5 c
    2 Amicarbazone 2.8 b 2.0 bc 2.8 c 2.0 bc 4.3 c 6.0 b 5.8 b
    3 Amicarbazone 6.8 a 1.3 c 6.5 ab 2.0 bc 7.0 b 8.8 a 8.8 a
    4 Tenacity 3.3 b 5.3 a 2.8 c 5.0 a 4.3 c 7.3 ab 8.3 a
    5 Tenacity 2.3 bc 5.8 a 2.5 c 5.0 a 4.3 c 6.8 ab 7.8 a
    6 Tenacity 5.5 a 2.0 be 5.5 b 2.0 be 6.0 bc 8.5 a 9.0 a
    Amicarbazone
    7 Tenacity 6.5 a 1.3 c 6.8 ab 2.0 be 7.0 b 8.8 a 9.0 a
    Amicarbazone
    8 Tenacity 5.8 a 2.3 be 5.5 b 2.3 b 6.0 bc 8.5 a 9.0 a
    Amicarbazone
    9 Tenacity 7.5 a 1.3 c 8.0 a 2.0 be 8.8 a 9.0 a 9.0 a
    Amicarbazone
    LSD (P = .10) 1.35 0.89 1.30 0.41 1.21 1.35 1.36
    Standard Deviation 1.11 0.73 1.07 0.34 1.00 1.11 1.13
    CV 24.3 27.83 23.45 12.89 18.5 15.34 14.91
    Bartlett's X2 8.347 8.64 0.714 0.767 6.826 16.312 20.518
    P(Bartlctt's X2) 0.303 0.28 0.994 0.682 0.556 0.022* 0.001*
    Replicate F 0.261 0.189 0.152 2.800 0.544 1.101 1.460
    Replicate Prob(F) 0.8526 0.9030 0.9272 0.0616 0.6570 0.3680 0.2505
    Treatment F 17.127 21.567 19.750 63.240 19.037 17.292 19.796
    Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001
    Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P = .10, Student-Newman-Keuls)
    Mean comparisons performed on y when AOV Treatment P(F) is significant at mean comparison OSL.
  • TABLE 5-7
    Poa
    Crop Code
    BBCH Scale
    Crop Name Poa Poa Poa Poa Poa Poa Poa
    Crop Variety
    Description
    Rating Data Type Bleaching Bleaching Injury Bleaching Injury Bleaching Injury
    Days After 6 6 7 7 10 10 14 14 14 14 16 16 16 16
    First/Last Applic.
    Trt-Eval Interval 6 DA-A 7 DA-A 10 DA-A 14 DA-A 14 DA-A 16 DA-A 16 DA-A
    Trt Treatment
    No. Name 31 32 33 34 35 36 37
    1 Untreated 1.0 a 1.0 a 1.3 de  1.0 b 2.0 d  1.5 ab 3.0 d 
    Check
    2 Amicarbazone 1.0 a 1.0 a 1.0 e   1.0 b 1.8 d  1.0 b  2.5 d 
    3 Amicarbazone 1.0 a 1.0 a 3.5 bc  1.8 b 4.8 b  2.0 ab 5.0 bc
    4 Tenacity 1.0 a 1.0 a 1.3 de  1.3 b 1.8 d  2.3 ab 2.3 d 
    5 Tenacity 1.3 a 1.3 a 2.3 cde 1.8 b 2.8 cd 2.8 ab 2.8 d 
    6 Tenacity 1.3 a 1.5 a 2.5 cde 2.8 b 4.0 bc 2.8 ab 4.0 cd
    Amicarbazone
    7 Tenacity 1.0 a 1.0 a 4.3 b   2.3 b 5.5 b  2.5 ab 6.3 b 
    Amicarbazone
    8 Tenacity 1.0 a 1.0 a 2.8 cd  1.8 b 4.3 bc 2.0 ab 4.8 bc
    Amicarbazone
    9 Tenacity 1.3 a 1.0 a 6.0 a   4.5 a 7.0 a  3.8 a  7.8 a 
    Amicarbazone
    LSD (P = .10) 0.34 0.30 1.02 1.64 1.29 1.33 1.26
    Standard Deviation 0.28 0.25 0.84 1.36 1.07 1.10 1.05
    CV 26.27 22.65 30.6 67.83 28.46 48.35 24.59
    Bartlett's X2 0.0 0.061 11.9 10.892 13.605 13.55 11.159
    P(Bartlett's X2) . 0.805 0.104 0.092 0.034* 0.06 0.132
    Replicate F 1.257 1.692 2.235 0.242 1.000 0.519 0.771
    Replicate Prob(F) 0.3113 0.1953 0.1101 0.8665 0.4098 0.6732 0.5215
    Treatment F 0.771 2.077 15.000 2.615 11.854 2.084 12.814
    Treatment Prob(F) 0.6311 0.0795 0.0001 0.0326 0.0001 0.0786 0.0001
    Poa
    Crop Code
    BBCH Scale
    Crop Name Poa Poa Poa Poa Poa
    Crop Variety
    Description
    Rating Data Type Bleaching Injury Injury Injury Injury
    Days After First/ 20 20 20 20 24 24 31 31 41 41
    Last Applic.
    Trt-Eval Interval 20 DA-A 20 DA-A 24 DA-A 31 DA-A 31 DA-A
    Trt Treatment
    No. Name 38 39 40 41 42
    1 Untreated 1.0 a 2.3 d 1.8 d  2.3 c  2.8 c 
    Check
    2 Amicarbazone 1.0 a 2.5 d 2.5 cd 3.3 c  3.8 c 
    3 Amicarbazone 2.0 a 5.5 c 5.3 b  7.0 ab 7.5 ab
    4 Tenacity 1.5 a 2.0 d 2.0 d  2.8 c  2.8 c 
    5 Tenacity 1.8 a 2.8 d 2.8 cd 2.8 c  2.8 c 
    6 Tenacity 2.0 a 4.8 c 4.0 bc 6.3 b  6.5 ab
    Amicarbazone
    7 Tenacity 2.3 a 6.8 b 7.0 a  8.3 a  8.3 a 
    Amicarbazone
    8 Tenacity 1.5 a 5.0 c 4.8 b  6.0 b  6.3 b 
    Amicarbazone
    9 Tenacity 2.3 a 8.3 a 8.0 a  8.5 a  8.3 a 
    Amicarbazone
    LSD (P = .10) 0.76 1.07 1.31 1.46 1.25
    Standard Deviation 0.63 0.88 1.08 1.20 1.03
    CV 37.13 20.03 25.58 23.07 19.07
    Bartlett's X2 6.349 5.253 6.542 6.997 9.142
    P(Bartlett's X2) 0.385 0.629 0.478 0.537 0.33
    Replicate F 2.316 0.414 0.571 0.153 0.512
    Replicate Prob(F) 0.1012 0.7443 0.6393 0.9267 0.6779
    Treatment F 2.333 24.763 16.952 17.115 21.729
    Treatment Prob(F) 0.0518 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001
    Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P = .10, Student-Newman-Keuls)
    Mean comparisons performed only when AOV Treatment P(F) is significant at mean comparison OSL.
  • TABLE 5-8
    Green Foxtail
    Crop Code
    BBCH Scale
    Crop Name Green Green Green Green Green Green Green
    Foxta> Foxta> Foxta> Foxta> Foxta> Foxta> Foxta>
    Crop Variety
    Description
    Rating Data Type Bleaching Injury Bleaching Injury Injury Injury Bleaching
    Days After 16 16 16 16 20 20 20 20 24 24 31 31 31 31
    First/Last Applic.
    Trt-Eval Interval 16 DA-A 16 DA-A 20 DA-A 20 DA-A 24 DA-A 31 DA-A 31 DA-A
    Trt Treatment
    No. Name 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56
    1 Untreated 1.3 d 1.5 d  1.5 c  1.8 d  1.8 d  4.0 cd  3.5 a
    Check
    2 Amicarbazone 1.0 d 1.8 d  1.3 c  1.8 d  2.0 d  2.8 d   3.0 a
    3 Amicarbazone 1.0 d 2.8 cd 1.3 c  3.5 cd 3.8 c  5.3 bc  3.3 a
    4 Tenacity 4.0 b 3.8 c  3.0 ab 3.8 cd 4.0 c  5.0 bc  3.3 a
    5 Tenacity 5.3 a 6.0 b  3.8 a  5.5 bc 5.8 b  6.3 abc 2.5 a
    6 Tenacity 2.8 c 5.5 b  2.0 bc 5.5 bc 6.3 b  6.5 abc 2.3 a
    Amicarbazone
    7 Tenacity 1.3 d 7.5 a  1.5 c  7.5 ab 7.5 ab 8.0 a   3.0 a
    Amicarbazone
    8 Tenacity 3.0 c 7.8 a  2.3 bc 7.5 ab 7.3 ab 7.5 ab  1.8 a
    Amicarbazone
    9 Tenacity 1.5 d 8.5 a  1.3 c  8.3 a  8.8 a  8.3 a   1.3 a
    Amicarbazone
    LSD (P = .10) 0.74 1.25 0.84 1.56 1.42 1.71 2.03 .
    Standard Deviation 0.61 1.03 0.70 1.29 1.18 1.41 1.68 .
    CV 26.08 20.59 35.35 25.75 22.55 23.79 63.73 .
    Bartlett's X2 2.66 10.181 4.884 15.792 17.483 11.091 17.093 .
    P(Bartlett's X2) 0.85 0.253 0.674 0.045* 0.025* 0.135 0.029* .
    Replicate F 1.000 1.747 1.429 1.251 1.977 1.833 1.869
    Replicate Prob(F) 0.4098 0.1843 0.2590 0.3132 0.1444 0.1680 0.1618
    Treatment F 24.975 26.764 6.486 14.631 17.735 6.931 0.820
    Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.0001 0.0002 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.5929
    Green Foxtail
    Crop Code
    BBCH Scale
    Crop Name Green Green Foxta> Green Foxta> Green Foxta> Green
    Foxta> Foxta>
    Crop Variety
    Description
    Rating Data Type Injury Injury Bleaching Bleaching Injury
    Days After First/Last 6 6 7 7 10 10 14 14 14 14
    Applic.
    Trt-Eval Interval 6 DA-A 7 DA-A 10 DA-A 14 DA-A 14 DA-A
    Trt Treatment
    No. Name 44 45 46 47 48
    1 Untreated Check 1.3 f  1.0 c 1.0 c 1.3 d 1.0 g 
    2 Amicarbazone 1.5 f  1.5 c 1.0 c 1.0 d 1.3 g 
    3 Amicarbazone 3.8 de 3.5 b 1.0 c 1.0 d 2.5 f 
    4 Tenacity 3.3 e  3.8 b 5.0 a 5.0 b 4.3 e 
    5 Tenacity 4.0 de 4.5 b 5.8 a 6.0 a 5.8 d 
    6 Tenacity 5.3 cd 6.0 a 2.8 b 2.8 c 6.5 cd
    Amicarbazone
    7 Tenacity 7.5 ab 8.0 a 1.0 c 1.0 d 7.8 ab
    Amicarbazone
    8 Tenacity 6.5 bc 7.0 a 2.8 b 2.5 c 7.0 bc
    Amicarbazone
    9 Tenacity 8.3 a  8.0 a 1.3 c 1.5 d 8.5 a 
    Amicarbazone
    LSD (P = .10) 1.34 1.46 0.97 0.83 0.95
    Standard Deviation 1.11 1.20 0.80 0.69 0.78
    CV 24.21 25.05 33.46 28.04 15.87
    Bartlett's X2 14.914 7.631 2.954 1.944 9.714
    P(Bartlett's X2) 0.061 0.266 0.566 0.857 0.205
    Replicate F 1.406 1.604 1.913 0.158 4.992
    Replicate Prob(F) 0.2653 0.2146 0.1544 0.9237 0.0079
    Treatment F 20.098 18.968 21.435 29.631 51.541
    Treatment Prob(F) 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001
    Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P = .10, Student-Newman-Keuls)
    Mean comparisons performed only when AOV Treatment P(F) is significant at mean comparison OSL.
  • TABLE 5-9
    Crabgrass
    Crop Code
    BBCH Scale
    Crop Name Crabgrass Crabgrass Crabgrass Crabgrass Crabgrass Crabgrass Crabgrass Crabgrass Crabgrass Crabgrass
    Crop Variety
    Description
    Rating Data Type Bleaching Injury Bleaching Injury Bleaching Bleaching Injury Bleachins Injury Bleaching
    Days After First/ 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 10 10 14 14 14 14 16 16 16 16 20 20
    Last Applic.
    Trt-Eval Interval 6 DA-A 6 DA-A 7 DA-A 7 DA-A 10 DA-A 14 DA-A 14 DA-A 16 DA-A 16 DA-A 20 DA-A
    Trt Treatment
    No. Name 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66
    1 Untreated 1.0 f 1.0 d 1.0 c 1.0 e  1.0 c 1.0 c 1.0 d 1.0 c 1.0 d  1.0 d 
    Check
    2 Amicarbazone 1.3 f 1.5 d 1.0 c 1.0 e  1.0 c 1.0 c 1.0 d 1.3 c 1.3 d  1.3 d 
    3 Amicarbazone 1.0 f 1.0 d 1.0 c 1.0 e  1.0 c 1.0 c 1.0 d 1.0 c 1.5 d  1.0 d 
    4 Tenacity 6.0 a 5.3 c 6.5 a 5.3 d  7.3 a 7.0 a 5.8 c 7.3 a 7.5 bc 7.3 a 
    5 Tenacity 5.3 b 5.8 c 6.0 a 6.0 cd 6.8 a 6.5 a 6.3 c 6.5 a 7.5 bc 5.5 b 
    6 Tenacity 3.0 d 5.0 c 4.3 b 6.8 bc 5.0 b 4.3 b 7.0 b 3.5 b 7.3 c  3.8 bc
    Amicarbazone
    7 Tenacity 2.3 e 6.8 b 2.5 c 7.3 b  1.8 c 2.0 c 8.5 a 2.3 c 8.5 a  2.8 cd
    Amicarbazone
    8 Tenacity 3.8 c 5.5 c 4.5 b 6.0 cd 4.3 b 3.5 b 7.3 b 3.8 b 8.3 ab 4.3 bc
    Amicarbazone
    9 Tenacity 1.5 f 8.3 a 1.3 c 8.3 a  1.0 c 1.0 c 9.0 a 1.3 c 9.0 a  1.5 d 
    Amicarbazone
    LSD (P = .10)  0.69  0.87  1.04  0.78  1.11  1.09   0.55  1.09   0.70  1.62
    Standard Deviation  0.57  0.72  0.86  0.65  0.92  0.90   0.45  0.90   0.58  1.34
    CV 20.49 16.13 27.53 13.67 28.57 29.81   8.74 29.19  10.01 42.53
    Bartlett's X2  2.475  4.552  7.441  3.943  6.356  1.5   1.172  8.404   2.53 14.194
    P(Bartlerts X2)  0.78  0.602  0.19  0.558  0.174  0.827   0.883  0.21   0.865  0.028*
    Replicate F  0.229  0.432  1.312  0.800  1.049  2.125   0.494  1.771   0.308  3.922
    Replicate Prob(F)  0.8756  0.7317  0.2934  0.5061  0.3889  0.1235   0.6896  0.1795   0.8196  0.0207
    Treatment F 43.286 54.459 27.435 81.667 32.344 28.875 211.382 28.234 141.420 11.119
    Treatment Prob(F)  0.0001  0.0001  0.0001  0.0001  0.0001  0.0001   0.0001  0.0001   0.0001  0.0001
    Crabgrass
    Crop Code
    BBCH Scale
    Crop Name Crabgrass Crabgrass Crabgrass Crabgrass Crabgrass Crabgrass Crabgrass
    Crop Variety
    Description
    Rating Data Type Injury Injury % Crab Cvr % Crab Cvr Bleaching % Crab Cvr Bleachings
    Days After First/ 20 20 24 24 24 24 31 31 31 31 41 41 41 41
    Last Applic.
    Trt-Eval Interval 20 DA-A 24 DA-A 24 DA-A 31 DA-A 31 DA-A 41 DA-A 41 DA-A
    Trt Treatment
    No. Name 67 68 69 70 71 72 73
    1 Untreated 1.0 c  1.0 c  8.8 a  8.8 a 1.0 b 9.0 a 1.0 a
    Check
    2 Amicarbazone 1.3 c  1.5 c  7.8 a  8.3 a 1.0 b 9.0 a 1.0 a
    3 Amicarbazone 1.5 c  1.5 c  6.3 b  6.3 b 1.0 b 6.8 b 1.0 a
    4 Tenacity 7.8 b  7.0 b  2.8 c  3.3 c 2.3 a 2.0 c 1.0 a
    5 Tenacity 7.5 b  7.0 b  1.8 cd 2.0 d 2.5 a 1.5 c 1.0 a
    6 Tenacity 8.0 ab 7.8 ab 1.3 d  1.0 d 1.3 b 1.3 c 1.0 a
    Amicarbazone
    7 Tenacity 8.5 ab 8.3 ab 1.0 d  1.0 d 1.3 b 1.3 c 1.0 a
    Amicarbazone
    8 Tenacity 8.5 ab 8.0 ab 1.5 cd 1.0 d 1.3 b 1.3 c 1.0 a
    Amicarbazone
    9 Tenacity 9.0 a  9.0 a  1.0 d 1.0 d 1.0 b 1.8 c 1.0 a
    Amicarbazone
    LSD (P = .10)   0.72  0.95 1.04 1.13 0.61  0.92  0.00
    Standard Deviation   0.59  0.79 0.86 0.94 0.50  0.76  0.00
    CV  10.04 13.87 24.17 25.97 36.33 20.37  0.0
    Bartlett's X2   2.548  0.246 10.589 10.672 3.123 13.048  0.0
    P(Bartlett'sX2)   0.863  0.999 0.102 0.031* 0.537  0.042* .
    Replicate F   1.060  0.360 1.705 3.747 2.473  5.000  0.000
    Replicate Prob(F)   0.3846  0.7827 0.1926 0.0244 0.0861  0.0078  1.0000
    Treatment F 140.921 70.888 53.050 48.253 5.182 81.429  0.000
    Treatment Prob(F)   0.0001  0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0008  0.0001  1.0000
    Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P = .10, Student-Newman-Keuls)
    Mean comparisons performed only when AOV Treatment P(F) is significant at mean comparison OSL.
  • TABLE 5-10
    St. Augustine-Sapphire
    Crop Code
    BBCH Scale
    Crop Name St. St. St. St. St. St. St. St. St.
    Augusti> Augusti> Augusti> Augusti> Augusti> Augusti> Aueusti> Augusti> Augusti>
    Crop Variety Sapphire Sapphire Sapphire Sapphire Sapphire Sapphire Sapphire Sapphire Sapphire
    Description
    Rating Data Type Bleaching Bleaching Bleaching Bleaching Bleaching Bleaching Bleaching Bleaching TurfQuality
    Days After First/ 6 6 7 7 10 10 14 14 16 16 20 20 31 31 41 41 41 41
    Last Applic.
    Trt-Eval Interval 6 DA-A 7 DA-A 10 DA-A 14 DA-A 16 DA-A 20 DA-A 31 DA-A 31 DA-A 31 DA-A
    Trt No. Treatment Name 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83
    1 Untreated Check 1.0 a 1.0 b  1.0 d   1.0 c   1.0 d  1.0 c   1.0 a 1.0 a 7.0 a
    2 Amicarbazone 1.0 a 1.0 b  1.0 d   1.0 c   1.0 d  1.5 c   1.0 a 1.0 a 7.0 a
    3 Amicarbazone 1.5 a 1.0 b  1.0 d   1.0 c   1.0 d  1.0 c   1.0 a 1.0 a 7.5 a
    4 Tenacity 2.0 a 2.0 a  1.5 cd  1.0 c   1.0 d  1.0 c   1.5 a 1.0 a 7.0 a
    5 Tenacity 2.0 a 2.0 a  3.5 a   2.5 ab  3.0 b  3.0 ab  2.5 a 1.0 a 7.0 a
    6 Tenacity 2.0 a 2.0 a  2.5 abc 2.0 abc 2.0 c  2.5 abc 2.5 a 1.0 a 7.0 a
    Amicarbazone
    7 Tenacity 1.5 a 1.5 ab 2.0 bcd 1.5 bc  2.0 c  2.0 bc  1.0 a 1.0 a 7.5 a
    Amicarbazone
    8 Tenacity 1.5 a 2.0 a  2.0 bcd 1.5 bc  1.5 cd 2.5 abc 2.0 a 1.0 a 7.0 a
    Amicarbazone
    9 Tenacity 1.0 a 2.0 a  3.0 ab  3.0 a   4.0 a  3.5 a   3.0 a 1.0 a 7.5 a
    Amicarbazone
    LSD (P = .10) 0.79 0.44 0.79 0.79 0.44 0.88 1.14 0.00 0.79
    Standard Deviation 0.42 0.24 0.42 0.42 0.24 0.47 0.61 0.00 0.42
    CV 28.33 14.63 21.85 26.37 12.86 23.57 35.56 0.0 5.93
    Bartlett's X2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.748 0.0 0.0
    P(Bartler‘s X2) . . . . . . 0.862 . .
    Replicate F 0.308 1.000 0.308 0.308 1.000 1.000 1.333 0.000 0.308
    Replicate Prob(F) 0.5943 0.3466 0.5943 0.5943 0.3466 0.3466 0.2815 1.0000 0.5943
    Treatment F 2.077 8.500 9.308 6.077 40.500 7.875 3.370 0.000 0.692
    Treatment Prob(F) 0.1607 0.0033 0.0024 0.0098 0.0001 0.0043 0.0526 1.0000 0.6924
    Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P = .10, Student-Newman-Keuls)
    Mean comparisons performed only when AOV Treatment P(F) is significant at mean comparison OSL.
  • TABLE 5-11
    St. Augustine-Floratum
    CropCode
    BBCH Scale
    Crop Name St. St. St. St. St. St. St. St. St.
    Augusti> Augusti> Augusti> Augusti> Augusti> Augusti> Augusti> Augusti> Augusti>
    Crop Variety Floratam Floratam Floratam Floratam Floratam Floratam Floratam Floratam Floratam
    Description
    Rating Data Type Bleaching Bleaching Bleaching Bleaching Bleaching Bleaching Bleaching Bleaching TurfQuality
    Days After First/Last 6 6 7 7 10 10 14 14 16 16 20 20 31 31 41 41 41 41
    Applic.
    Trt-Eval Interval 6 DA-A 7 DA-A 10 DA-A 14 DA-A 16 DA-A 20 DA-A 31 DA-A 31 DA-A 31 DA-A
    Trt No. Treatment Name 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93
    1 Untreated Check 1.0 a 1.0 c  1.0 c  1.0 c  1.0 e  1.0 b 1.0 c   1.0 a 6.0 c 
    2 Amicarbazone 1.0 a 1.0 c  1.0 c  1.0 c  1.0 e  1.0 b 1.0 c   1.0 a 6.8 bc
    3 Amicarbazone 1.0 a 1.0 c  1.0 c  1.0 c  1.3 e  1.3 b 1.0 c   1.0 a 7.3 ab
    4 Tenacity 1.3 a 2.0 bc 3.0 ab 2.8 ab 2.8 cd 3.3 a 2.5 abc 1.0 a 6.5 bc
    5 Tenacity 2.0 a 2.8 ab 4.0 ab 3.8 a  4.8 a  4.5 a 4.0 a   1.0 a 6.5 bc
    6 Tenacity 2.0 a 2.3 ab 3.5 ab 2.8 ab 4.0 ab 4.3 a 3.8 a   1.0 a 7.0 ab
    Amicarbazone
    7 Tenacity 1.3 a 1.8 bc 2.5 b  2.0 bc 2.3 d  2.8 a 1.8 bc  1.0 a 7.8 a 
    Amicarbazone
    8 Tenacity 2.0 a 3.3 a  4.5 a  3.5 a  3.5 bc 3.3 a 2.8 ab  1.0 a 6.5 bc
    Amicarbazone
    9 Tenacity 2.0 a 2.5 ab 3.8 ab 3.3 a  4.5 ab 4.5 a 4.0 a   1.0 a 7.0 ab
    Amicarbazone
    LSD (P = .10) 0.65 0.77 1.00 0.73 0.85 1.13 1.05 0.00 0.55
    Standard Deviation 0.54 0.63 0.82 0.60 0.70 0.93 0.87 0.00 0.45
    CV 35.86 32.64 30.62 25.75 25.34 32.52 35.89 0.0 6.67
    Bartlett's X2 1.482 4.118 1.836 0.131 4.28 6.623 4.477 0.0 0.173
    P(Bartlett's X2) 0.83 0.533 0.871 1.00 0.639 0.357 0.483 . 0.999
    Replicate F 0.640 1.931 1.673 6.769 6.131 3.455 4.074 0.000 0.494
    Replicate Prob(F) 0.5967 0.1515 0.1992 0.0018 0.0030 0.0323 0.0180 1.0000 0.6896
    Treatment F 3.240 6.793 11.367 13.846 17.972 9.898 8.889 0.000 5.090
    Treatment Prob(F) 0.0121 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 1.0000 0.0009
    Means followed by same letter do not significantly differ (P = .10, Student-Newman-Keuls)
    Mean comparisons performed only when AOV Treatment P(F) is significant at mean comparison OSL.
    • Example 6 A. Pre Emergence Application Against Weed in Maize
  • In this part of the Example the efficacy of DINAMIC® (amicarbazone 700WDG, 700 grams active/kg, available from Arysta LifeScience North America, Cary, N.C.) mixtures with Galago (mesotrione 480SC, 480 grams active/L, available from Arysta LifeScience North America, Cary, N.C.) as a pre emergence application against weeds in maize (variety PHI 2369W) was determined.
  • Three trials were conducted at a site with a history of weeds. The trials were executed under moderate weather conditions. Efficacy and visual phytotoxicity assessments were performed in triplicate. Normal practices were carried out to control insects and fungi. Crops were provided in 55 cm row width, at a sowing rate of 65,000 plants/ha, and at a sowing depth of five to eight cm. Soil class was clay with a clay content of about 40%. The site in this Example had been previously used for maize. Trial design was randomized blocks with a plot size of 20 m2 replicated four times. Municipal water was used for all applications (pH=7.2).
  • Application of the treatments shown in Table 6-1 was conducted at pre emergence stage 1 day after planting seed. Application of the treatments was conducted over a 24 hour period. Over this time period, dry bulb temperature was about 30° C., wet bulb temperature was about 26° C., relative humidity was about 70%, cloud cover was about 100%, wind speed was about 1 m/s, and the wind was out of the east. Treatments were administered with a multi-spray gas sprayer with a 4× flat fan 03F80 nozzle. Spacing was 50 cm, with a height of 50 cm, pressure 2.8 Bar, at a ground speed of 1 m/s, and a calibration mean output of 330 L/ha. The soil temperature over the application period averaged to about 28° C. and the soil remained moist and fine.
  • TABLE 6-1
    Treatments
    Dosage Dosage rate
    No Treatments rate (gai/ha) (g/ha or mL/ha)
    Untreated control — —
    1 DINAMIC ® 700WDG 52.5 75
    2 DINAMIC ® 700WDG 70 100
    3 DINAMIC ® 700WDG 87.5 125
    4 DINAMIC ® 700WDG 105 150
    5 DINAMIC ® 700WDG 210 300
    6 Galago 480SC 48 100
    7 Galago 480SC 96 200
    8 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 52.5 75
    Galago 480SC 48 100
    9 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 52.5 75
    Galago 480SC 72 150
    10 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 70 100
    Galago 480SC 48 100
    11 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 70 100
    Galago 480SC 72 150
    12 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 87.5 125
    Galago 480SC 48 100
    13 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 87.5 125
    Galago 480SC 72 150
    14 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 175 250
    Galago 480SC 144 300
  • Assessments of the treated crops at 2, 4, and 6 weeks are summarized in Tables 6-2 to 6-4 below. No visual signs of phytotoxicity were noticed over the 6 weeks.
  • TABLE 6-2
    2 Week Assessment
    Crop condition Actively growing
    Crop stage 4 Leaves
    BBCH scale
    14
    Soil moisture Moist
    Rain since last visit 28 mm
  • TABLE 6-3
    4 Week Assessment
    Crop condition Actively growing
    Crop stage 6 Leaves
    BBCH scale 16
    Soil moisture Wet
    Rain since last visit 6 mm
  • TABLE 6-4
    6 Week Assessment
    Crop condition Actively growing
    Crop stage 8 leaves
    BBCH scale: 18
    Soil moisture Moist
    Rain since last visit 23 mm
  • Control and weed cover at 2, 4, and 6 weeks for the indicated species are summarized below in Tables 6-5 through 6-7. 80% is considered acceptable control.
  • TABLE 6-5
    % Control and weed cover (2 weeks after application)
    Treatments
    (product/ha) Rep ROTTE IPOPU AMAHY
    Untreated control I 30 40 30
    % soil cover ii 40 30 30
    iii 40 40 20
    iv 30 40 30
    Mean 35 38 28
    1 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 20 80 90
    ii 30 80 80
    iii 20 70 80
    iv 20 80 80
    Mean 23 78 83
    2 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 20 80 90
    ii 30 70 80
    iii 30 80 80
    iv 30 70 80
    Mean 28 75 83
    3 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 30 90 95
    ii 30 70 90
    iii 30 80 90
    iv 30 80 90
    Mean 30 80 91
    4 DINAMIC ® at 150 g I 50 90 80
    ii 30 80 90
    iii 40 80 90
    iv 30 80 90
    Mean 38 83 88
    5 DINAMIC ® at 300 g I 50 90 100
    ii 50 95 100
    iii 60 100 90
    iv 50 90 95
    Mean 53 94 96
    6 Galago at 100 ml I 60 90 80
    ii 60 90 90
    iii 70 90 80
    iv 60 90 90
    Mean 63 90 85
    7 Galago at 200 ml I 80 90 90
    ii 70 95 90
    iii 70 100 95
    iv 80 95 95
    Mean 75 95 93
    8 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 60 90 90
    Galago at 100 ml ii 60 80 90
    iii 60 90 80
    iv 60 90 80
    Mean 60 88 85
    9 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 70 90 100
    Galago at 150 ml ii 80 90 95
    iii 80 95 90
    iv 80 95 95
    Mean 78 93 95
    10 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 50 90 90
    Galago at 100 ml ii 60 90 90
    iii 70 90 90
    iv 70 95 90
    Mean 63 91 90
    11 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 70 90 100
    Galago at 150 ml ii 70 90 95
    iii 80 90 100
    iv 70 90 95
    Mean 73 90 98
    12 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 70 90 95
    Galago at 100 ml ii 70 80 95
    iii 60 90 100
    iv 70 90 90
    Mean 68 88 95
    13 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 90 100 100
    Galago at 150 ml ii 80 100 100
    iii 80 90 100
    iv 80 95 100
    Mean 83 96 100
    14 DINAMIC ® at 250 g I 90 100 100
    Galago at 300 ml ii 90 100 100
    iii 95 95 100
    iv 95 95 100
    Mean 93 98 100
    ROTTE = Rottboelia exaltata;
    IPOPU = Ipomoea purpurea;
    AMAHY = Amaranthus hybridus
  • TABLE 6-6
    % Control and weed cover (4 weeks after application)
    Treatments
    (product/ha) Rep ROTTE IPOPU AMAHY
    Untreated control I 30 40 30
    % soil cover ii 30 30 40
    iii 30 40 30
    iv 20 40 40
    Mean 28 38 35
    1 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 20 70 80
    ii 20 70 80
    iii 20 70 70
    iv 20 70 80
    Mean 20 70 78
    2 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 20 80 80
    ii 30 70 80
    iii 20 70 80
    iv 20 70 80
    Mean 23 73 80
    3 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 30 80 90
    ii 30 70 90
    iii 20 70 90
    iv 30 80 90
    Mean 28 75 90
    4 DINAMIC ® at 150 g 1 40 80 80
    ii 30 80 90
    iii 40 80 80
    iv 20 80 90
    Mean 33 80 85
    5 DINAMIC ® at 300 g I 40 90 100
    ii 50 90 100
    iii 50 100 90
    iv 50 90 90
    Mean 48 93 95
    6 Galago at 100 ml I 50 90 80
    ii 60 80 80
    iii 60 80 80
    iv 60 90 80
    Mean 58 85 80
    7 Galago at 200 ml I 80 90 90
    ii 60 90 90
    iii 70 100 90
    iv 70 95 90
    Mean 70 94 90
    8 DINAMIC ® at 75 g 1 60 90 90
    Galago at 100 ml ii 60 80 90
    iii 50 80 80
    iv 60 80 80
    Mean 58 83 85
    9 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 70 90 100
    Galago at 150 ml ii 70 90 90
    iii 70 90 90
    iv 80 95 95
    Mean 73 91 94
    10 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 50 90 90
    Galago at 100 ml ii 50 80 80
    iii 70 80 90
    iv 60 90 90
    Mean 58 85 88
    11 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 70 90 100
    Galago at 150 ml ii 70 80 95
    iii 70 90 98
    iv 70 90 95
    Mean 70 88 97
    12 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 70 90 95
    Galago at 100 ml ii 70 80 90
    iii 60 90 100
    iv 60 90 90
    Mean 65 88 94
    13 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 90 100 100
    Galago at 150 ml ii 80 100 100
    iii 70 90 100
    iv 80 98 100
    Mean 80 97 100
    14 DINAMIC ® at 250 g I 90 100 100
    Galago at 300 ml ii 90 100 100
    iii 90 95 100
    iv 90 95 100
    Mean 90 98 100
    ROTTE = Rottboelia exaltala;
    IPOPU = Ipomoea purpurea;
    AMAHY = Amaranthus hybridus
  • TABLE 6-7
    % Control and weed cover (6 weeks after application)
    Treatments
    (product/ha) Rep ROTTE IPOPU AMAHY
    Untreated control I 20 40 40
    % soil cover ii 30 30 40
    iii 20 50 30
    iv 20 40 40
    Mean 23 40 38
    1 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 20 70 80
    ii 20 70 80
    iii 10 70 80
    iv 20 70 80
    Mean 18 70 80
    2 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 20 70 80
    ii 20 70 80
    iii 20 70 80
    iv 10 70 80
    Mean 18 70 80
    3 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 20 80 90
    ii 30 70 90
    iii 20 70 90
    iv 30 70 90
    Mean 25 73 90
    4 DINAMIC ® at 150 g I 30 70 90
    ii 30 80 90
    iii 30 80 90
    iv 20 70 90
    Mean 28 75 90
    5 DINAMIC ® at 300 g I 30 80 100
    ii 40 90 100
    iii 50 98 90
    iv 40 90 90
    Mean 40 90 95
    6 Galago at 100 ml I 50 80 90
    ii 50 80 80
    iii 50 80 70
    iv 50 80 80
    Mean 50 80 80
    7 Galago at 200 ml I 70 90 90
    ii 60 90 90
    iii 60 98 90
    iv 60 90 90
    Mean 63 92 90
    8 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 50 80 80
    Galago at 100 ml ii 60 80 80
    iii 50 80 80
    iv 60 80 80
    Mean 55 80 80
    9 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 70 90 100
    Galago at 150 ml ii 70 90 90
    iii 70 90 90
    iv 70 90 90
    Mean 70 90 93
    10 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 60 80 80
    Galago at 100 ml ii 50 80 80
    iii 70 80 90
    iv 70 90 90
    Mean 63 83 85
    11 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 70 90 100
    Galago at 150 ml ii 70 80 95
    iii 60 80 95
    iv 70 90 95
    Mean 68 85 96
    12 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 60 80 90
    Galago at 100 ml ii 70 80 90
    iii 60 80 100
    iv 60 90 90
    Mean 63 83 93
    13 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 80 100 100
    Galago at 150 ml ii 80 100 100
    iii 70 90 100
    iv 80 95 100
    Mean 78 96 100
    14 DINAMIC ® at 250 g I 80 100 100
    Galago at 300 ml ii 90 100 100
    iii 90 90 100
    iv 90 95 100
    Mean 88 96 100
    ROTTE = Rottboelia exaltata, IPOPU = Ipomoea purpurea; AMAHY = Amaranthus hybridus
  • DINAMIC® 700WDG at 100 g/ha alone showed marginal control of Amaranthus hybridus, but the rest of the spectrum was insufficiently controlled by rates up to 300 g/ha. DINAMIC® 700WDG at 300 mL/ha controlled Ipomoea purpurea, but Rottboellia exaltata was still too tough to be controlled. Galago 480SC at 100 mL/ha showed marginal control of Ipomoea purpurea and Amaranthus hybridus, but could also not control Rottboellia exaltata. The combination (DINAMIC® at 75 g/ha+Galago at 100 mL/ha) resulted in marginal control of Amaranthus hybridus and Ipomoea purpurea. DINAMIC® at 250 g/ha+Galago at 300 mL/ha was the only treatment which could control Rottboellia exaltata with satisfactory results. There were no visual signs of phytotoxicity were noticed throughout the growing season. DINAMIC® at 300 g/ha can be used to control Amaranthus hybridus and Ipomoea purpurea. Galago at 200 mL/ha can be used to control Amaranthus hybridus and Ipomoea purpurea. DINAMIC® at 75 g/ha+Galago at 100 mL/ha can be used to control Amaranthus hybridus and Ipomoea purpurea. DINAMIC® at 250 g/ha+Galago at 300 mL/ha can be used to control Amaranthus hybridus, Ipomoea purpurea and Rottboellia exaltata.
    • B. Pre Emergence Application Against Weed in Maize
  • In this part of the Example the efficacy of DINAMIC® (amicarbazone 700WDG, 700 grams active/kg, available from Arysta LifeScience North America, Cary, N.C.) mixtures with Galago (mesotrione 480SC, 480 grams active/L, available from Arysta LifeScience North America, Cary, N.C.) as a pre emergence application against weeds in maize (variety PHI 32Y85) was determined.
  • Trials were conducted at a site with a history of weeds. The trials were executed under moderate weather conditions. Efficacy and visual phytotoxicity assessments were performed in triplicate. Normal practices were carried out to control insects and fungi. Crops were provided in 76 cm row width, at a sowing rate of 65,000 plants/ha, and at a sowing depth of five to eight cm. Soil class was clay with a clay content of about 35%. The site in this Example had been previously used for soya beans. Trial design was randomized blocks with a plot size of 20 m2 replicated four times. Municipal water was used for all applications (pH=7.2).
  • Application of the treatments shown in Table 6-8 was conducted at pre emergence stage 1 day after planting seed. Application of the treatments was conducted over a 24 hour period. Over this time period, dry bulb temperature was about 26° C., wet bulb temperature was about 23° C., relative humidity was about 70%, cloud cover was about 50%, wind speed was about 0 m/s. Treatments were administered with a multi-spray gas sprayer with a 4× flat fan 03F80 nozzle. Spacing was 50 cm, with a height of 50 cm, pressure 2.8 Bar, at a ground speed of 1 m/s, and a calibration mean output of 330 L/ha. The soil temperature over the application period averaged to about 24° C. and the soil remained moist and fine.
  • TABLE 6-8
    Treatments
    Dosage rate Dosage rate
    No Treatments (gai/ha) (g/ha or mL/ha)
    Untreated control — —
    1 DINAMIC ® 700WDG 52.5 75
    2 DINAMIC ® 700WDG 70 100
    3 DINAMIC ® 700WDG 87.5 125
    4 DINAMIC ® 700WDG 105 150
    5 DINAMIC ® 700WDG 210 300
    6 Galago 480SC 48 100
    7 Galago 480SC 96 200
    8 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 52.5 75
    Galago 480SC 48 100
    9 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 52.5 75
    Galago 480SC 72 150
    10 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 70 100
    Galago 480SC 48 100
    11 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 70 100
    Galago 480SC 72 150
    12 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 87.5 125
    Galago 480SC 48 100
    13 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 87.5 125
    Galago 480SC 72 150
    14 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 175 250
    Galago 480SC 144 300
  • Assessments of the treated crops at 2, 4, and 6 weeks are summarized in Tables 6-9 to 6-11 below. No visual signs of phytotoxicity were noticed over the 6 weeks.
  • TABLE 6-9
    2 Week Assessment
    Crop condition Actively growing
    Crop stage 3-4 Leaves
    BBCH scale
    13
    Soil moisture Moist
    Rain since last visit 0 mm
  • TABLE 6-10
    4 Week Assessment
    Crop condition Actively growing
    Crop stage 6 Leaves
    BBCH scale 16
    Soil moisture Wet
    Rain since last visit 18 mm
  • TABLE 6-11
    6 Week Assessment
    Crop condition Actively growing
    Crop stage 8 leaves
    BBCH scale: 18
    Soil moisture Moist
    Rain since last visit 12 mm
  • Control and weed cover at 2, 4, and 6 weeks for the indicated species are summarized below in Tables 6-12 through 6-14. 80% is considered acceptable control.
  • TABLE 6-12
    % Control and weed cover (2 weeks after application)
    Treatments
    (product/ha) Rep DIGSA POROL AMAHY COMBE
    Untreated control I 30 20 30 20
    % soil cover ii 40 10 20 30
    iii 40 20 30 10
    iv 30 20 30 20
    Mean 35 18 28 20
    1 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 60 50 70 50
    ii 70 40 90 60
    iii 60 40 80 60
    iv 70 50 70 60
    Mean 65 45 78 58
    2 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 70 50 70 50
    ii 70 40 70 50
    iii 70 50 80 60
    iv 70 50 80 60
    Mean 70 48 75 55
    3 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 70 50 80 60
    ii 70 50 90 70
    iii 80 40 80 70
    iv 70 40 80 70
    Mean 73 45 83 68
    4 DINAMIC ® at 150 g I 80 60 100 70
    ii 90 70 100 80
    iii 80 80 95 80
    iv 80 60 100 80
    Mean 83 68 99 78
    5 DINAMIC ® at 300 g I 90 90 100 80
    ii 80 80 95 95
    iii 80 80 100 90
    iv 90 90 100 90
    Mean 84 77 99 89
    6 Galago at 100 ml I 70 70 80 70
    ii 70 70 70 80
    iii 60 60 80 70
    iv 70 70 90 80
    Mean 68 68 80 75
    7 Galago at 200 ml I 70 80 80 80
    ii 90 90 90 90
    iii 80 90 90 90
    iv 80 80 90 80
    Mean 80 85 88 85
    8 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 70 60 70 70
    Galago at 100 ml ii 80 70 90 90
    iii 80 70 90 80
    iv 70 60 80 80
    Mean 75 65 83 80
    9 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 80 70 70 70
    Galago at 150 ml ii 80 70 90 70
    iii 70 80 90 80
    iv 70 70 90 80
    Mean 75 73 85 75
    10 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 70 70 80 80
    Galago at 100 ml ii 80 80 90 90
    iii 80 70 95 80
    iv 80 70 90 80
    Mean 78 73 89 83
    11 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 80 80 95 95
    Galago at 150 ml ii 90 80 90 95
    iii 80 80 95 90
    iv 90 70 95 95
    Mean 85 78 94 94
    12 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 80 70 90 90
    Galago at 100 ml ii 80 80 90 80
    iii 80 70 98 90
    iv 80 70 95 95
    Mean 80 73 93 89
    13 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 90 90 95 90
    Galago at 150 ml ii 80 90 100 70
    iii 90 90 95 80
    iv 80 80 100 90
    Mean 85 88 98 83
    14 DINAMIC ® at 250 g I 90 100 100 100
    Galago at 300 ml ii 100 100 100 100
    iii 95 100 100 100
    iv 95 100 100 100
    Mean 95 100 100 100
    DIGSA = Digitaria sanguinalis;
    POROL = Portulaca oleracea;
    AMAHY = Amaranthus hybridus;
    COMBE = Commelina benghalensis
  • TABLE 6-13
    % Control and weed cover (4 weeks after application)
    Treatments
    (product/ha) Rep DIGSA POROL AMAHY COMBE
    Untreated control I 30 20 30 20
    % soil cover ii 40 10 20 30
    iii 40 20 30 10
    iv 30 20 30 20
    Mean 35 18 28 20
    1 DINAMIC ® at I 50 40 70 50
    75 g ii 60 40 80 50
    iii 60 40 80 50
    iv 70 50 80 50
    Mean 60 43 78 50
    2 DINAMIC ® at I 70 40 70 50
    100 g ii 60 40 70 50
    iii 60 50 80 60
    iv 70 40 80 60
    Mean 65 43 75 55
    3 DINAMIC ® at I 70 40 80 60
    125 g ii 70 50 80 70
    iii 70 40 80 60
    iv 70 40 80 70
    Mean 70 43 80 65
    4 DINAMIC ® at I 80 60 100 70
    150 g ii 80 60 98 70
    iii 70 80 90 70
    iv 80 50 100 80
    Mean 78 63 97 73
    5 DINAMIC ® at I 80 90 100 80
    300 g ii 80 70 95 90
    iii 80 80 100 80
    iv 90 80 100 90
    Mean 80 72 98 79
    6 Galago at 100 ml I 70 70 80 70
    ii 60 70 70 70
    iii 60 60 70 70
    iv 60 70 80 80
    Mean 63 68 75 73
    7 Galago at 200 ml I 70 80 80 80
    ii 80 80 90 80
    iii 80 80 80 80
    iv 80 80 90 80
    Mean 78 80 85 80
    8 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 70 60 70 70
    Galago at 100 ml ii 70 60 90 80
    iii 70 70 80 80
    iv 70 60 70 70
    Mean 70 63 78 75
    9 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 70 70 70 70
    Galago at 150 ml ii 70 60 90 70
    iii 60 70 80 70
    iv 70 70 90 70
    Mean 68 68 83 70
    10 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 70 70 80 80
    Galago at 100 ml ii 80 70 80 80
    iii 70 70 90 70
    iv 80 70 90 80
    Mean 75 70 85 78
    11 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 80 80 90 90
    Galago at 150 ml ii 80 70 90 90
    iii 70 80 90 90
    iv 90 70 90 90
    Mean 80 75 90 90
    12 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 70 70 90 80
    Galago at 100 ml ii 80 70 90 80
    iii 80 70 95 90
    iv 70 70 90 90
    Mean 75 70 91 85
    13 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 80 80 90 80
    Galago at 150 ml ii 80 90 100 70
    iii 80 90 95 80
    iv 70 80 100 80
    Mean 78 85 96 78
    14 DINAMIC ® at 250 g I 90 100 100 100
    Galago at 300 ml ii 98 100 100 100
    iii 90 100 100 100
    iv 95 100 100 100
    Mean 93 100 100 100
    DIGSA = Digitaria sanguinalis;
    POROL = Portulaca oleracea;
    AMAHY = Amaranthus hybridus;
    COMBE = Commelina benghalensis
  • TABLE 6-14
    % Control and weed cover (6 weeks after application)
    Treatments
    (product/ha) Rep DIGSA POROL AMAHY COMBE
    Untreated control I 20 30 30 20
    % soil cover ii 30 20 20 30
    iii 30 30 30 10
    iv 20 20 40 20
    Mean 25 25 30 20
    1 DINAMIC ® at I 50 40 70 50
    75 g ii 60 40 80 50
    iii 50 30 70 50
    iv 60 40 80 50
    Mean 55 38 75 50
    2 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 60 40 70 50
    ii 60 40 70 50
    iii 60 40 80 50
    iv 60 40 80 60
    Mean 60 40 75 53
    3 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 70 40 80 60
    ii 70 50 80 60
    iii 60 40 80 60
    iv 70 40 80 70
    Mean 68 43 80 63
    4 DINAMIC ® at 150 g I 70 60 95 70
    ii 70 50 95 60
    iii 70 70 90 70
    iv 80 50 100 70
    Mean 73 58 95 68
    5 DINAMIC ® at I 80 80 100 80
    300 g ii 70 70 95 90
    iii 80 70 95 80
    iv 90 80 100 80
    Mean 77 66 96 75
    6 Galago at 100 ml I 70 70 70 70
    ii 60 70 70 70
    iii 60 60 70 70
    iv 50 60 80 70
    Mean 60 65 73 70
    7 Galago at 200 ml I 60 70 80 80
    ii 70 70 90 80
    iii 80 80 80 80
    iv 80 80 90 80
    Mean 73 75 85 80
    8 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 70 60 70 70
    Galago at 100 ml ii 70 50 80 70
    iii 60 60 70 70
    iv 60 60 70 70
    Mean 65 58 73 70
    9 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 60 70 80 70
    Galago at 150 ml ii 70 60 90 70
    iii 60 60 80 80
    iv 70 70 90 70
    Mean 65 65 85 73
    10 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 70 70 80 80
    Galago at 100 ml ii 70 60 80 70
    iii 70 70 80 70
    iv 80 70 80 80
    Mean 73 68 80 75
    11 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 80 80 90 80
    Galago at 150 ml ii 80 70 90 80
    iii 70 70 90 80
    iv 80 70 90 90
    Mean 78 73 90 83
    DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 70 70 90 80
    Galago at 100 ml ii 80 70 95 80
    iii 80 60 95 80
    iv 70 70 90 80
    Mean 75 68 93 80
    13 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 80 80 90 90
    Galago at 150 ml ii 80 90 98 80
    iii 80 90 90 80
    iv 70 90 100 90
    Mean 78 88 95 85
    14 DINAMIC ® at 250 g I 90 100 100 100
    Galago at 300 ml ii 95 100 100 100
    iii 90 100 100 100
    iv 90 100 100 100
    Mean 91 100 100 100
    DIGSA = Digitaria sanguinalis;
    POROL = Portulaca oleracea;
    AMAHY = Amaranthus hybridus;
    COMBE = Commelina benghalensis
  • DINAMIC® 700WDG at 125 g/ha alone showed marginal control of Amaranthus hybridus, but the rest of the spectrum was insufficiently controlled by rates as high as 300 g/ha. Galago 480SC at 200 mL/ha controlled Amaranthus hybridus and showed marginal control of Commilina benghalensis. The combination (DINAMIC® at 75 g/ha+Galago at 150 mL/ha) resulted in satisfactory control of Amaranthus hybridus only. However, when the DINAMIC® rate of this combination was increased to 100 g/ha Commilina benghalensis was also controlled satisfactorily. Should the DINAMIC® rate of the combination be increased further to 125 g/ha, Portulaca oleracea was added to the controlled spectrum. Digitaria sanguinalis could be controlled by the high rate (DINAMIC® at 250 g/ha+Galago at 300 mL/ha). No visual signs of phytotoxicity were noticed throughout the growing season. DINAMIC® can be applied in combination with Galago to give the following control: DINAMIC® at 100 g/ha+Galago at 150 mL/ha to control Amaranthus hybridus and Commilina benghalensis. DINAMIC® at 125 g/ha+Galago at 150 mL/ha to control Amaranthus hybridus, Commilina benghalensis and Portulaca oleracea. The higher dosage rate (DINAMIC® at 250 g/ha+Galago at 300 mL/ha can be used to control the entire spectrum.
    • C. Pre Emergence Application Against Weed in Maize
  • In this part of the Example the efficacy of DINAMIC® (amicarbazone 700WDG, 700 grams active/kg, available from Arysta LifeScience North America, Cary, N.C.) mixtures with Galago (mesotrione 480SC, 480 grams active/L, available from Arysta LifeScience North America, Cary, N.C.) as a pre emergence application against weeds in maize (variety PAN60-445B) was determined.
  • Trials were conducted at a site with a history of weeds. The trials were executed under moderate weather conditions. Efficacy and visual phytotoxicity assessments were performed in triplicate. Normal practices were carried out to control insects and fungi. Crops were provided in 76 cm row width, at a sowing rate of 65,000 plants/ha, and at a sowing depth of five to eight cm. Soil class was clay with a clay content of about 28%. The site in this Example had been previously used for soya beans. Trial design was randomized blocks with a plot size of 20 m2 replicated four times. Municipal water was used for all applications (pH=7.2).
  • Application of the treatments shown in Table 6-15 was conducted at pre emergence stage 3 days after planting seed. Application of the treatments was conducted over a24 hour period. Over this time period, dry bulb temperature was about 20° C., wet bulb temperature was about 16° C., relative humidity was about 65%, cloud cover was about 10%, wind speed was about 0 m/s. Treatments were administered with a multi-spray gas sprayer with a 4× flat fan 03F80 nozzle. Spacing was 50 cm, with a height of 50 cm, pressure 2.8 Bar, at a ground speed of 1 m/s, and a calibration mean output of 330 L/ha. The soil temperature over the application period averaged to about 20° C. and the soil remained moist and fine.
  • TABLE 6-15
    Treatments
    Dosage rate Dosage rate
    No Treatments (gai/ha) (g/ha or mL/ha)
    Untreated control — —
    1 DINAMIC ® 700WDG 52.5 75
    2 DINAMIC ® 700WDG 70 100
    3 DINAMIC ® 700WDG 87.5 125
    4 DINAMIC ® 700WDG 105 150
    5 DINAMIC ® 700WDG 210 300
    6 Galago 480SC 48 100
    7 Galago 480SC 96 200
    8 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 52.5 75
    Galago 480SC 48 100
    9 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 52.5 75
    Galago 480SC 72 150
    10 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 70 100
    Galago 480SC 48 100
    11 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 70 100
    Galago 480SC 72 150
    12 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 87.5 125
    Galago 480SC 48 100
    13 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 87.5 125
    Galago 480SC 72 150
    14 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 175 250
    Galago 480SC 144 300
  • Assessments of the treated crops at 2, 4, and 6 weeks are summarized in Tables 6-16 to 6-18 below. No visual signs of phytotoxicity were noticed over the 6 weeks.
  • TABLE 6-16
    2 Week Assessment
    Crop condition Actively .growing
    Crop stage 3 Leaves
    BBCH scale
    13
    Soil moisture Moist
    Rain since last visit 16 mm
  • TABLE 6-17
    4 Week Assessment
    Crop condition Actively growing
    Crop stage 5 Leaves
    BBCH scale 15
    Soil moisture Wet
    Rain since last visit 30 mm
  • TABLE 6-18
    6 Week Assessment
    Crop condition Actively growing
    Crop stage 8 leaves
    BBCH scale: 18
    Soil moisture Moist
    Rain since last visit 22 mm
  • Control and weed cover at 2, 4, and 6 weeks for the indicated species are summarized below in Tables 6-19 through 6-21. 80% is considered acceptable control.
  • TABLE 6-19
    % Control and weed cover (2 weeks after application)
    Treatments
    (product/ha) Rep AMASP ELEIN IPOPU COMBE
    Untreated control I 30 20 30 20
    % soil cover ii 40 10 20 30
    iii 40 20 30 10
    iv 30 20 30 20
    Mean 35 18 28 20
    1 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 70 70 60 70
    ii 70 70 60 60
    iii 70 70 60 60
    iv 70 60 50 70
    Mean 70 68 58 65
    2 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 70 70 70 70
    ii 70 70 60 70
    iii 70 70 60 70
    iv 70 70 60 70
    Mean 70 70 63 70
    3 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 80 70 70 70
    ii 70 80 60 70
    iii 80 80 70 70
    iv 70 70 60 70
    Mean 75 75 65 70
    4 DINAMIC ® at 150 g I 80 80 70 80
    ii 80 70 70 70
    iii 80 70 60 80
    iv 80 70 70 70
    Mean 80 73 68 75
    5 DINAMIC ® at 300 g I 90 80 90 80
    ii 80 80 80 80
    iii 80 90 90 80
    iv 90 90 90 80
    Mean 85 85 88 80
    6 Galago at 100 ml I 90 80 80 80
    ii 80 80 80 80
    iii 80 70 80 70
    iv 90 70 80 80
    Mean 85 75 80 78
    7 Galago at 200 ml I 100 90 95 90
    ii 100 90 95 90
    iii 100 95 98 90
    iv 100 95 98 90
    Mean 100 93 97 90
    8 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 80 80 70 80
    Galago at 100 ml ii 80 80 70 70
    iii 80 80 70 70
    iv 80 70 60 80
    Mean 80 78 68 75
    9 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 80 80 80 80
    Galago at 150 ml ii 80 80 70 80
    iii 80 80 70 80
    iv 80 80 70 80
    Mean 80 80 73 80
    10 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 90 80 80 80
    Galago at 100 ml ii 80 90 70 80
    iii 90 90 80 80
    iv 80 80 70 80
    Mean 85 85 75 80
    11 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 95 90 80 90
    Galago at 150 ml ii 95 80 80 80
    iii 95 80 70 90
    iv 90 80 80 90
    Mean 94 83 78 88
    12 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 100 95 100 95
    Galago at 100 ml ii 95 95 98 90
    iii 95 100 100 90
    iv 100 100 100 90
    Mean 98 98 100 91
    13 DINAMIC® at 125 g I 100 90 95 90
    Galago at 150 ml ii 95 90 90 90
    iii 95 80 90 80
    iv 100 80 95 90
    Mean 98 85 93 88
    14 DINAMIC ® at 250 g I 100 100 100 100
    Galago at 300 ml ii 100 100 100 95
    iii 100 100 98 95
    iv 100 100 95 90
    Mean 100 100 98 95
    AMASP = Amaranthus spinosus;
    COMBE = Commelina benghalensis;
    IPOPU= Ipomoea purpurea;
    ELEIN = Eleusine indica
  • TABLE 6-20
    % Control and weed cover (4 weeks after application)
    Treatments
    (product/ha) Rep AMASP ELEIN IPOPU COMBE
    Untreated control I 30 20 30 20
    % soil cover ii 40 10 20 30
    iii 40 20 30 10
    iv 30 20 30 20
    Mean 35 18 28 20
    1 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 60 60 50 60
    ii 70 60 60 60
    iii 60 70 60 50
    iv 70 60 50 70
    Mean 65 63 55 60
    2 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 60 60 60 70
    ii 60 70 50 60
    iii 60 60 60 70
    iv 70 60 60 60
    Mean 63 63 58 65
    3 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 70 70 70 60
    ii 70 80 60 70
    iii 70 70 60 70
    iv 60 70 60 60
    Mean 68 73 63 65
    4 DINAMIC ® at 150 g I 80 70 60 70
    ii 80 70 70 70
    iii 80 60 60 80
    iv 80 70 60 70
    Mean 80 68 63 73
    5 DINAMIC ® at 300 g I 90 80 90 80
    ii 80 80 80 80
    iii 80 90 90 70
    iv 90 90 90 80
    Mean 85 85 88 78
    6 Galago at 100 ml I 80 70 70 70
    ii 70 60 70 70
    iii 70 60 70 60
    iv 70 60 70 70
    Mean 73 63 70 68
    7 Galago at 200 ml I 90 80 80 80
    ii 90 80 80 80
    iii 90 90 90 80
    iv 90 80 90 80
    Mean 90 83 85 80
    8 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 70 70 60 70
    Galago at 100 ml ii 70 70 60 70
    iii 70 70 70 70
    iv 80 70 60 80
    Mean 73 70 63 73
    9 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 70 70 70 80
    Galago at 150 ml ii 70 80 70 70
    iii 80 80 60 70
    iv 70 70 70 80
    Mean 73 75 68 75
    10 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 80 70 70 70
    Galago at 100 ml ii 80 80 70 80
    iii 80 80 70 80
    iv 80 80 70 80
    Mean 80 78 70 78
    11 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 90 80 70 80
    Galago at 150 ml ii 90 80 80 70
    iii 95 70 70 80
    iv 90 80 70 90
    Mean 91 78 73 80
    12 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 100 90 100 90
    Galago at 100 ml ii 90 95 95 90
    iii 95 100 100 90
    iv 100 100 100 90
    Mean 96 96 99 90
    13 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 100 80 90 90
    Galago at 150 ml ii 95 90 90 80
    iii 90 80 90 80
    iv 100 80 90 90
    Mean 96 83 90 85
    14 DINAMIC ® at 250 g I 100 100 100 100
    Galago at 300 ml ii 100 100 100 95
    iii 100 100 95 90
    iv 100 100 95 90
    Mean 100 100 98 94
    AMASP = Amaranthus spinosus;
    COMBE = Commelina benghalensis;
    IPOPU = Ipomoea purpurea;
    ELEIN = Eleusine indica
  • TABLE 6-21
    % Control and weed cover (6 weeks after application)
    Treatments
    (product/ha) Rep AMASP ELEIN IPOPU COMBE
    Untreated I 30 10 30 30
    control ii 40 10 20 30
    % soil cover iii 40 20 30 10
    iv 30 10 30 30
    Mean 35 13 28 25
    1 DINAMIC ® at I 50 60 50 50
    75 g ii 60 60 60 60
    iii 60 60 50 50
    iv 60 50 50 60
    Mean 58 58 53 55
    2 DINAMIC ® at I 60 60 60 70
    100 g ii 60 60 50 60
    iii 60 60 60 60
    iv 60 60 60 60
    Mean 60 60 58 63
    3 DINAMIC ® at I 60 60 70 60
    125 g ii 70 70 60 70
    iii 60 70 50 60
    iv 60 70 60 60
    Mean 63 68 60 63
    4 DINAMIC ® at I 80 60 60 70
    150 g ii 70 70 60 70
    iii 70 60 60 80
    iv 80 60 50 70
    Mean 75 63 58 73
    5 DINAMIC ® at I 80 70 80 70
    300 g ii 80 80 80 80
    iii 80 80 90 70
    iv 90 90 80 80
    Mean 83 80 83 75
    6 Galago at I 70 60 70 70
    100 ml ii 60 60 60 60
    iii 70 60 70 60
    iv 70 60 70 70
    Mean 68 60 68 65
    7 Galago at I 80 80 80 80
    200 ml ii 90 80 80 80
    iii 80 90 80 90
    iv 90 80 90 80
    Mean 85 83 83 83
    8 DINAMIC ® at I 70 60 60 70
    75 g ii 60 70 50 70
    Galago at iii 60 70 60 60
    100 ml iv 70 60 60 70
    Mean 65 65 58 68
    9 DINAMIC ® at I 60 70 70 70
    75 g ii 70 70 60 70
    Galago at iii 70 70 50 70
    150 ml iv 60 60 70 80
    Mean 65 68 63 73
    10 DINAMIC ® at I 70 70 60 70
    100 g ii 70 70 70 70
    Galago at iii 80 80 70 80
    100 ml iv 70 70 60 80
    Mean 73 73 65 75
    11 DINAMIC ® at I 80 70 70 80
    100 g ii 90 80 70 70
    Galago at iii 90 70 60 80
    150ml iv 90 80 70 80
    Mean 88 75 68 78
    12 DINAMIC ® at I 98 90 100 90
    125 g ii 90 90 95 80
    Galago at iii 90 100 98 90
    100 ml iv 100 98 98 90
    Mean 95 95 98 88
    13 DINAMIC ® at I 98 80 90 90
    125 g ii 95 90 95 80
    Galago at iii 90 80 95 80
    150 ml iv 98 90 90 90
    Mean 95 85 93 85
    DINAMIC ® at I 100 100 100 100
    14 250 g ii 100 100 100 98
    Galago at iii 100 100 95 90
    300 ml iv 100 100 90 80
    Mean 100 100 96 92
    AMASP = Amaranthus spinosus;
    COMBE = Commelina benghalensis;
    IPOPU= Ipomoea purpurea;
    ELEIN = Eleusine indica
  • DINAMIC® 700WDG at 300 g/ha showed satisfactory control of Amaranthus spinosus, Eleusine indica and Ipomoea purpurea but could not control Commilina benghalensis. Galago 480SC at 200 mL/ha showed sufficient of the entire weed spectrum. The combinations at the higher dosage rates resulted in excellent control. DINAMIC® at 125 g/ha+Galago at 100 mL/ha showed good control over the entire weed spectrum. No visual signs of phytotoxicity were noticed throughout the growing season. DINAMIC® at 300 g/ha alone or Galago 480SC at 200 mL/ha can be used to control Amaranthus spinosus, Eleusine indica and Ipomoea purpurea. DINAMIC® at 125 g/ha+Galago at 100 mL/ha can be used to control Amaranthus spinosus, Eleusine indica, Ipomoea purpurea and Commilina benghalensis.
    • D. Pre Emergence Application Against Weed in Maize
  • In this part of the Example the efficacy of DINAMIC® (amicarbazone 700WDG, 700 grams active/kg, available from Arysta LifeScience North America, Cary, N.C.) mixtures with Galago (mesotrione 480SC, 480 grams active/L, available from Arysta LifeScience North America, Cary, N.C.) or TOLLA 840 S (available from Volanco Agroscience, Mt. Edgecombe, South Africa) as a pre emergence application against weeds in maize (variety PHI 2369W) was determined.
  • Trials were conducted at a site with a history of weeds. The trials were executed under moderate weather conditions. Efficacy and visual phytotoxicity assessments were performed in triplicate. Normal practices were carried out to control insects and fungi. Crops were provided in 55 cm row width, at a sowing rate of 65,000 plants/ha, and at a sowing depth of five to eight cm. Soil class was clay with a clay content of about 40%. The site in this Example had been previously used for maize. Trial design was randomized blocks with a plot size of 20 m2 replicated four times. Municipal water was used for all applications (pH=7.2).
  • Application of the treatments shown in Table 6-22 was conducted at pre emergence stage 1 day after planting seed. Application of the treatments was conducted over a 24 hour period. Over this time period, dry bulb temperature was about 26° C., wet bulb temperature was about 16° C., relative humidity was about 65%-70%, cloud cover was about 100%, and wind speed was about 1 nm/s out of the east. Treatments were administered with a multi-spray gas sprayer with a 4× flat fan 031F80 nozzle. Spacing was 50 cm, with a height of 50 cm, pressure 2.8 Bar, at a ground speed of 1 m/s, and a calibration mean output of 330 L/ha. The soil temperature over the application period averaged to about 28° C. and the soil remained moist and fine.
  • TABLE 6-22
    Treatments
    Dosage rate Dosage rate
    No Treatments (gai/ha) (g/ha or mL/ha)
    Untreated control — —
    1 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 52.5 75
    Galago 480SC 48 100
    2 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 52.5 75
    Galago 480SC 72 150
    3 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 70 100
    Galago 480SC 48 100
    4 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 70 100
    Galago 480SC 72 150
    5 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 87.5 125
    Galago 480SC 48 100
    6 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 87.5 125
    Galago 480SC 72 150
    7 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 52.5 75
    Galago 480SC + 48 100
    TOLLA 840S 840 1000
    8 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 52.5 75
    Galago 480SC + 72 150
    TOLLA 840S 840 1000
    9 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 70 100
    Galago 480SC + 48 100
    TOLLA 840S 840 1000
    10 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 70 100
    Galago 480SC + 72 150
    TOLLA 840S 840 1000
    11 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 87.5 125
    Galago 480SC + 48 100
    TOLLA 840S 840 1000
    12 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 87.5 125
    Galago 480SC + 72 150
    TOLLA 840S 840 1000
    13 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 175 250
    Galago 480SC + 144 300
    TOLLA 840S 840 2000
    14 CALLISTO ® 480SC + 124.8 260
    DUALS GOLD ® 915EC 649.7 710
  • Assessments of the treated crops at 2, 4, and 6 weeks are summarized in Tables 6-23 to 6-25 below. No visual signs of phytotoxicity were noticed over the 6 weeks.
  • TABLE 6-23
    2 Week Assessment
    Crop condition Actively growing
    Crop stage 4 Leaves
    BBCH scale
    14
    Soil moisture Moist
    Rain since last visit 28 mm
  • TABLE 6-24
    4 Week Assessment
    Crop condition Actively growing
    Crop stage 6 Leaves
    BBCH scale 16
    Soil moisture Wet
    Rain since last visit 6 mm
  • TABLE 6-25
    6 Week Assessment
    Crop condition Actively growing
    Crop stage 8 leaves
    BBCH scale: 18
    Soil moisture Moist
    Rain since last visit 23 mm
  • Control and weed cover at 2, 4, and 6 weeks for the indicated species are summarized below in Tables 6-26 through 6-28. 80% is considered acceptable control.
  • TABLE 6-26
    % Control and weed cover (2 weeks after application)
    Treatments
    (product/ha) Rep ROTEX IPOPU AMAHY
    Untreated control I 30 40 30
    % soil cover ii 40 30 30
    iii 40 40 20
    iv 30 40 30
    Mean 35 38 28
    1 DINAMIC ® at I 60 80 80
    75 g
    Galago at 100 ml ii 60 70 80
    iii 60 80 70
    iv 60 80 70
    Mean 60 78 75
    2 DINAMIC ® at I
    75 g 70 80 90
    Galago at 150 ml ii 80 80 80
    iii 80 90 80
    iv 80 80 90
    Mean 78 83 85
    3 DINAMIC ® at I 50 80 80
    100 g
    Galago at 100 ml ii 60 90 80
    iii 70 80 80
    iv 70 80 80
    Mean 63 83 80
    4 DINAMIC ® at I 70 80 90
    100 g
    Galago at 150 ml ii 70 90 80
    iii 80 90 90
    iv 70 80 90
    Mean 73 85 88
    5 DINAMIC ® at I 70 90 95
    125 g
    Galago at 100 ml ii 70 80 95
    iii 60 90 100
    iv 70 90 90
    Mean 68 88 95
    6 DINAMIC ® at I 90 100 100
    125 g
    Galago at 150 ml ii 80 100 100
    iii 80 90 100
    iv 80 95 100
    Mean 83 96 100
    7 DINAMIC ® at I 80 90 95
    75 g
    Galago at 100 ml ii 80 90 95
    TOLLA at 1000 ml iii 80 80 95
    iv 70 90 98
    Mean 78 88 96
    8 DINAMIC ® at I 80 90 100
    75 g ii 80 90 100
    Galago at 150 ml
    TOLLA at 1000 ml iii 80 90 100
    iv 80 95 100
    Mean 80 91 100
    9 DINAMIC ® at I 100
    100 g 90 95
    Galago at 100 ml ii 80 95 100
    TOLLA at 1000 ml iii 80 95 100
    iv 90 90 100
    Mean 85 94 100
    10 DINAMIC ® at I 90 95 100
    100 g ii 90 95 100
    Galago at 150 ml
    TOLLA at 1000 ml iii 90 98 100
    iv 80 95 100
    Mean 88 96 100
    11 DINAMIC ® at I 80 98 100
    125 g ii 90 95 100
    Galago at 100 ml
    TOLLA at 1000 ml iii 80 95 100
    iv 90 98 100
    Mean 85 97 100
    12 DINAMIC ® at I 90 100 100
    125 g ii 90 95 100
    Galago at 150 ml
    TOLLA at 1000 ml iii 80 100 100
    iv 90 98 100
    Mean 88 98 100
    13 DINAMIC ® at I 95 100 100
    250 g ii 100 100 100
    Galago at 300 ml
    TOLLA at 2000 ml iii 100 100 100
    iv 98 100 100
    Mean 98 100 100
    14 Calisto at 260 ml I 80 95 100
    DUAL S GOLD ® ii 80 95 100
    at 710 ml iii 80 100 100
    iv 70 95 100
    Mean 78 96 100
    ROTTE = Rottboelia exaltata, IPOPU = Ipomoea purpurea; AMAHY = Amaranthus hybridus
  • TABLE 6-27
    % Control and weed cover (4 weeks after application)
    Treatments
    (product/ha) Rep ROTEX IPOPU AMAHY
    Untreated control I 30 40 30
    % soil cover ii 40 30 30
    iii 40 40 20
    iv 30 40 30
    Mean 35 38 28
    1 DINAMIC ® at I 50 70 70
    75 g
    Galago at 100 ml ii 50 60 70
    iii 50 70 60
    iv 50 70 60
    Mean 50 68 65
    2 DINAMIC ® at I 70 70 80
    75 g
    Galago at 150 ml ii 70 70 70
    iii 80 80 70
    iv 70 70 80
    Mean 73 73 75
    3 DINAMIC ® at I 50 70 70
    100 g
    Galago at 100 ml ii 60 80 70
    iii 60 70 70
    iv 60 70 70
    Mean 58 73 70
    4 DINAMIC ® at I 60 70 80
    100 g
    Galago at 150 ml ii 70 80 70
    iii 70 80 80
    iv 70 70 80
    Mean 68 75 78
    5 DINAMIC ® at I 70 80 90
    125 g
    Galago at 100 ml ii 60 80 90
    iii 60 90 100
    iv 70 90 90
    Mean 65 85 93
    6 DINAMIC ® at I 90 100 100
    125 g
    Galago at 150 ml ii 70 98 100
    iii 70 90 100
    iv 80 95 100
    Mean 78 96 100
    7 DINAMIC ® at I 80 90 95
    75 g
    Galago at 100 ml ii 70 80 90
    TOLLA at 1000 ml iii 80 80 95
    iv 60 80 98
    Mean 73 83 95
    8 DINAMIC ® at I 70 90 100
    75 g ii 80 90 100
    Galago at 150 ml
    TOLLA at 1000 ml iii 80 90 100
    iv 70 90 100
    Mean 75 90 100
    9 DINAMIC ® at I 100
    100 g 80 90
    Galago at 100 ml ii 80 90 100
    TOLLA at 1000 ml iii 80 90 100
    iv 80 90 100
    Mean 80 90 100
    10 DINAMIC ® at I 90 90 100
    100 g ii 80 90 100
    Galago at 150 ml
    TOLLA at 1000 ml iii 90 95 100
    iv 80 95 100
    Mean 85 93 100
    11 DINAMIC ® at I 80 95 100
    125 g ii 80 90 100
    Galago at 100 ml
    TOLLA at 1000 ml iii 70 90 100
    iv 90 95 100
    Mean 80 93 100
    12 DINAMIC ® at I 90 98 100
    125 g ii 80 95 100
    Galago at 150 ml
    TOLLA at 1000 ml iii 80 98 100
    iv 90 98 100
    Mean 85 97 100
    13 DINAMIC ® at I 95 100 100
    250 g ii 98 100 100
    Galago at 300 ml
    TOLLA at 2000 ml iii 100 100 100
    iv 95 100 100
    Mean 97 100 100
    14 Calisto at 260 ml I 80 95 100
    DUAL S GOLD ® ii 70 90 100
    at 710 ml iii 80 98 100
    iv 70 95 100
    Mean 75 95 100
    ROTTE = Rottboelia exaltata, IPOPU = Ipomoea purpurea; AMAHY = Amaranthus hybridus
  • TABLE 6-28
    % Control and weed cover (6 weeks after application)
    Treatments
    (product/ha) Rep ROTEX IPOPU AMAHY
    Untreated control I 30 40 30
    % soil cover ii 40 30 30
    iii 40 40 20
    iv 30 40 30
    Mean 35 38 28
    1 D1NAMIC ® at I 50 70 60
    75 g
    Galago at 100 ml ii 50 60 70
    iii 50 60 60
    iv 50 70 60
    Mean 50 65 63
    2 DINAMIC ® at I 70 70 80
    75 g
    Galago at 150 ml ii 70 70 70
    iii 70 80 70
    iv 70 70 80
    Mean 70 73 75
    3 DINAMIC ® at I 50 70 80
    100 g
    Galago at 100 ml ii 50 70 70
    iii 50 70 70
    iv 60 70 80
    Mean 53 70 75
    4 DINAMIC ® at I 60 70 80
    100 g
    Galago at 150 ml ii 60 80 70
    iii 60 70 80
    iv 70 70 70
    Mean 63 73 75
    5 DINAMIC ® at I 60 70 90
    125 g
    Galago at 100 ml ii 60 80 90
    iii 60 90 100
    iv 60 80 90
    Mean 60 80 93
    6 DINAMIC ® at I 80 100 100
    125 g
    Galago at 150 ml ii 70 95 100
    iii 70 90 100
    iv 80 95 100
    Mean 75 95 100
    7 DINAMIC ® at I 80 80 90
    75 g
    Galago at 100 ml ii 70 80 90
    TOLL A at 1000 ml iii 70 80 95
    iv 60 80 98
    Mean 70 80 93
    DINAMIC ® at I 70 90 100
    8 75 g ii 70 90 100
    Galago at 150 ml
    TOLL A at 1000 ml iii 80 90 100
    iv 70 80 100
    Mean 73 88 100
    DINAMIC ® at I 100
    9 100 g 70 90
    Galago at 100 ml ii 80 80 100
    TOLL A at 1000 ml iii 80 80 100
    iv 70 90 100
    Mean 75 85 100
    DINAMIC ® at I 80 90 100
    10 100 g ii 80 90 100
    Galago at 150 ml
    TOLL A at 1000 ml iii 90 95 100
    iv 80 90 100
    Mean 83 91 100
    DINAMIC ® at I 70 95 100
    11 125 g ii 80 90 100
    Galago at 100 ml
    TOLL A at 1000 ml iii 70 90 100
    iv 80 90 100
    Mean 75 91 100
    DINAMIC ® at I 90 95 100
    12 125 g ii 80 95 100
    Galago at 150 ml
    TOLLA at 1000 ml iii 80 95 100
    iv 80 98 100
    Mean 83 96 100
    DINAMIC ® at I 95 100 100
    13 250 g ii 95 100 100
    Galago at 300 ml
    TOLLA at 2000 ml iii 100 100 100
    iv 95 100 100
    Mean 96 100 100
    14 Calisto at 260 ml I 80 90 100
    DUAL S GOLD ® ii 70 90 100
    at 710 ml iii 80 95 100
    iv 70 95 100
    Mean 75 93 100
    ROTTE = Rottboelia exaltata; IPOPU = Ipomoea purpurea; AMAHY = Amaranthus hybridus
  • DINAMIC® 700WDG at 125 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 100 mL/ha showed satisfactory control of Amaranthus hybridus and marginal control of Ipomoea purpurea but Rottboellia exaltata was insufficiently controlled even by the higher rate of Galago 480SC (150 mL/ha). The higher rate of this combination (DINAMIC® 700WDG at 125 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 150 mL/ha) performed on par with the standard CALLISTO® at 260 mL/ha+DUAL S GOLD® at 710 mL/ha. The addition of TOLLA showed a significant improvement to efficacy of the DINAMIC®+Galago mixture. DINAMIC®700WDG at 75 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 100 mL/ha+TOLLA 840S at 1000 mL/ha resulted in satisfactory control of Amaranthus hybridus and marginal control of Ipomoea purpurea. DINAMIC®700WDG at 100 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 150 mL/ha+TOLLA 840S at 1000 mL/ha compared with the standard CALLISTO® at 260 mL/ha+DUAL S GOLD® at 710 mL/ha. DINAMIC®700WDG at 125 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 150 mL/ha+TOLLA 840S at 1000 mL/ha resulted in satisfactory control of Rottboellia exaltata which could not be achieved by the standard CALLISTO® at 260 mL/ha+DUAL S GOLD® at 710 mL/ha. DINAMIC® 700WDG at 125 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 150 mL/ha can be used to control Amaranthus hybridus and Ipomoea purpurea. DINAMIC® 700WDG at 75 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 150 mL/ha+TOLLA 840S at 1000 mL/ha can be used to control Amaranthus hybridus and Ipomoea purpurea. To control Rottboellia exaltata DINAMIC® 700WDG at 125 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 150 mL/ha+TOLLA 840S at 1000 mL/ha can be used.
    • E. Pre Emergence Application Against Weed in Maize
  • In this part of the Example the efficacy of DINAMIC® (amicarbazone 700WDG, 700 grams active/kg, available from Arysta LifeScience North America, Cary, N.C.) mixtures with Galago (mesotrione 480SC, 480 grams active/L, available from Arysta LifeScience North America, Cary, N.C.) or TOLLA 840 S (available from Volanco Agroscience, Mt. Edgecombe, South Africa) as a pre emergence application against weeds in maize (variety PHI 32Y85) was determined. A comparison with CALLISTO® 480SC plus DUAL S GOLD® 915EC (both available from Syngenta, Greensboro, N.C.) was performed.
  • Trials were conducted at a site with a history of weeds. The trials were executed under moderate weather conditions. Efficacy and visual phytotoxicity assessments were performed in triplicate. Normal practices were carried out to control insects and fungi. Crops were provided in 76 cm row width, at a sowing rate of 65,000 plants/ha, and at a sowing depth of five to eight cm. Soil class was clay with a clay content of about 35%. The site in this Example had been previously used for soya beans. Trial design was randomized blocks with a plot size of 20 m2 replicated four times. Municipal water was used for all applications (pH=7.2).
  • Application of the treatments shown in Table 6-29 was conducted at pre emergence stage 1 day after planting seed. Application of the treatments was conducted over a 24 hour period. Over this time period, dry bulb temperature was about 26° C., wet bulb temperature was about 23° C., relative humidity was about 70%, cloud cover was about 50%, and wind speed was about 0 m/s. Treatments were administered with a multi-spray gas sprayer with a 4× flat fan 03F80 nozzle. Spacing was 50 cm, with a height of 50 cm, pressure 2.8 Bar, at a ground speed of 1 m/s, and a calibration mean output of 330 L/ha. The soil temperature over the application period averaged to about 24° C. and the soil remained moist and fine.
  • TABLE 6-29
    Treatments
    Dosage rate Dosage rate
    No Treatments (gai/ha) (g/ha or mL/ha)
    Untreated control — —
    1 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 52.5 75
    Galago 480SC 48 100
    2 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 52.5 75
    Galago 480SC 72 150
    3 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 70 100
    Galago 480SC 48 100
    4 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 70 100
    Galago 480SC 72 150
    5 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 87.5 125
    Galago 480SC 48 100
    6 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 87.5 125
    Galago 480SC 72 150
    7 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 52.5 75
    Galago 480SC + 48 100
    TOLLA 840S 840 1000
    8 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 52.5 75
    Galago 480SC + 72 150
    TOLLA 840S 840 1000
    9 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 70 100
    Galago 480SC + 48 100
    TOLLA 840S 840 1000
    10 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 70 100
    Galago 480SC + 72 150
    TOLLA 840S 840 1000
    11 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 87.5 125
    Galago 480SC + 48 100
    TOLLA 840S 840 1000
    12 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 87.5 125
    Galago 480SC + 72 150
    TOLLA 840S 840 1000
    13 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 175 250
    Galago 480SC + 144 300
    TOLLA 840S 840 2000
    14 CALLISTO ® 480SC + 124.8 260
    DUALS GOLD ® 915EC 649.7 710
  • Assessments of the treated crops at 2, 4, and 6 weeks are summarized in Tables 6-23 to 6-25 below. No visual signs of phytotoxicity were noticed over the 6 weeks.
  • TABLE 6-30
    2 Week Assessment
    Crop condition Actively growing
    Crop stage 3-4 Leaves
    BBCH scale
    13
    Soil moisture Moist
    Rain since last visit 0 mm
  • TABLE 6-31
    4 Week Assessment
    Crop condition Actively growing
    Crop stage 6 Leaves
    BBCH scale 16
    Soil moisture Wet
    Rain since last visit 18 mm
  • TABLE 6-32
    6 Week Assessment
    Crop condition Actively growing
    Crop stage 8 leaves
    BBCH scale: 18
    Soil moisture Moist
    Rain since last visit 12 mm
  • Control and weed cover at 2, 4, and 6 weeks for the indicated species are summarized below in Tables 6-33 through 6-35. 80% is considered acceptable control.
  • TABLE 6-33
    % Control and weed cover (2 weeks after application)
    Treatments
    (product/ha) Rep DIGSA POROL AMAHY COMBE
    Untreated control I 30 20 30 20
    % soil cover ii 40 10 20 30
    iii 40 20 30 10
    iv 30 20 30 20
    Mean 35 18 28 20
    1 DINAMIC ® at I
    75 g 70 60 70 70
    Galago at 100 ml ii 80 70 90 90
    iii 80 70 90 80
    iv 70 60 80 80
    Mean 75 65 83 80
    2 DINAMIC ® at I
    75 g 80 70 70 70
    Galago at 150 ml ii 80 70 90 70
    iii 70 80 90 80
    iv 70 70 90 80
    Mean 75 73 85 75
    3 DINAMIC ® at I
    100 g 70 70 80 80
    Galago at 100 ml ii 80 80 90 90
    iii 80 70 95 80
    iv 80 70 90 80
    Mean 78 73 89 83
    4 DINAMIC ® at I 80 80 95 95
    100 g
    Galago at 150 ml ii 90 80 90 95
    iii 80 80 95 90
    iv 90 70 95 95
    Mean 85 78 94 94
    5 DINAMIC ® at I 80 70 90 90
    125 g
    Galago at 100 ml ii 80 80 90 80
    iii 80 70 98 90
    iv 80 70 95 95
    Mean 80 73 93 89
    6 DINAMIC ® at I 90 90 95 90
    125 g
    Galago at 150 ml ii 80 90 100 70
    iii 90 90 95 80
    iv 80 80 100 90
    Mean 85 88 98 83
    7 DINAMIC ® at I 95 70 95 80
    75 g
    Galago at 100 ml ii 90 70 90 90
    TOLLA at 1000 ml iii 90 70 90 95
    iv 90 70 95 90
    Mean 91 70 93 89
    8 DINAMIC ® at I 100 70 80 98
    75 g
    Galago at 150 ml ii 95 80 95 90
    TOLLA at 1000 ml iii 95 70 90 95
    iv 100 80 90 90
    Mean 98 75 89 93
    9 DINAMIC ® at I
    100 g 95 90 90 95
    Galago at 100 ml ii 95 80 90 95
    TOLLA at 1000 ml iii 100 90 100 90
    iv 100 90 90 100
    Mean 98 88 93 95
    10 DINAMIC ® at I
    100 g 100 100 90 80
    Galago at 150 ml ii 98 100 100 95
    TOLLA at 1000 ml iii 100 100 100 90
    iv 95 100 95 95
    Mean 98 100 96 90
    11 DINAMIC ® at I 100 100 90 95
    125 g
    Galago at 100 ml ii 100 100 100 98
    TOLLA at 1000 ml iii 95 100 95 90
    iv 98 100 100 100
    Mean 98 100 96 96
    12 DINAMIC ® at I 100 100 90 80
    125 g
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 100 90
    TOLLA at 1000 ml iii 100 100 100 90
    iv 100 100 100 90
    Mean 100 100 98 88
    13 DINAMIC ® at I 100 100 100 90
    250 g
    Galago at 300 ml ii 100 100 100 100
    TOLLA at 2000 ml iii 100 100 90 100
    iv 100 100 100 100
    Mean 100 100 98 98
    14 Calisto at 260 ml I 100 90 90 90
    DUAL S GOLD® ii 100 90 95 95
    at 710 ml
    iii 100 80 100 90
    iv 100 90 100 95
    Mean 100 88 96 93
    DIGSA = Digitaria sanguinalis; POROL = Portulaca oleracea; AMAHY = Amaranthus hybridus; COMBE = Commelina benghalensis
  • TABLE 6-34
    % Control and weed cover (4 weeks after application)
    Treatments
    (product/ha) Rep DIGSA POROL AMAHY COMBE
    Untreated control I 30 20 30 20
    % soil cover ii 40 10 20 30
    iii 40 20 30 10
    iv 30 20 30 20
    Mean 35 18 28 20
    1 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 70 70 60 70
    Galago at 100 ml ii 70 70 60 70
    iii 70 70 70 70
    iv 80 70 60 80
    Mean 73 70 63 73
    2 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 70 70 70 80
    Galago at 150 ml ii 70 80 70 70
    iii 80 80 60 70
    iv 70 70 70 80
    Mean 73 75 68 75
    3 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 80 70 70 70
    Galago at 100 ml ii 80 80 70 80
    iii 80 80 70 80
    iv 80 80 70 80
    Mean 80 78 70 78
    4 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 90 80 70 80
    Galago at 150 ml ii 90 80 80 70
    iii 95 70 70 80
    iv 90 80 70 90
    Mean 91 78 73 80
    5 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 100 90 100 90
    Galago at 100 ml ii 90 95 95 90
    iii 95 100 100 90
    iv 100 100 100 90
    Mean 96 96 99 90
    6 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 100 80 90 90
    Galago at 150 ml ii 95 90 90 80
    iii 90 80 90 80
    iv 100 80 90 90
    Mean 96 83 90 85
    7 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 100 100 80 95
    Galago at 100 ml ii 100 100 70 95
    TOLLA at 1000 ml iii 100 100 80 98
    iv 100 100 80 95
    Mean 100 100 78 96
    8 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 100 100 80 100
    Galago at 150 ml ii 98 100 80 98
    TOLLA at 1000 ml iii 100 100 80 100
    iv 100 100 80 98
    Mean 100 100 80 99
    9 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 100 100 95 98
    Galago at 100 ml ii 100 100 80 98
    TOLLA at 1000 ml iii 100 100 90 95
    iv 100 100 80 100
    Mean 100 100 86 98
    10 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 100 100 80 95
    Galago at 150 ml ii 98 100 90 98
    TOLLA at 1000 ml iii 100 100 80 98
    iv 100 100 80 100
    Mean 100 100 83 98
    11 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 100 100 98 100
    Galago at 100 ml ii 100 100 100 100
    TOLLA at 1000 ml iii 100 100 95 100
    iv 100 100 100 100
    Mean 100 100 98 100
    12 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 100 100 98 100
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 100 100
    TOLLA at 1000 ml iii 100 100 100 100
    iv 100 100 100 100
    Mean 100 100 100 100
    13 DINAMIC ® at 250 g I 100 100 100 100
    Galago at 300 ml ii 100 100 100 100
    TOLLA at 2000 ml iii 100 100 100 100
    iv 100 100 100 100
    Mean 100 100 100 100
    14 Calisto at 260 ml I 100 100 100 100
    DUAL S GOLD® at ii 100 100 100 100
    710 ml iii 100 100 95 100
    iv 100 100 90 100
    Mean 100 100 96 100
    DIGSA = Digitaria sanguinalis; POROL = Portulaca oleracea; AMAHY = Amaranthus hybridus; COMBE = Commelina benghalensis
  • TABLE 6-35
    % Control and weed cover (6 weeks after application)
    Treatments
    (product/ha) Rep DIGSA POROL AMAHY COMBE
    Untreated control I 30 20 30 20
    % soil cover ii 40 10 20 30
    iii 40 20 30 10
    iv 30 20 30 20
    Mean 35 18 28 20
    1 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 70 60 60 70
    Galago at 100 ml ii 60 70 50 70
    iii 60 70 60 60
    iv 70 60 60 70
    Mean 65 65 58 68
    2 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 60 70 70 70
    Galago at 150 ml ii 70 70 60 70
    iii 70 70 50 70
    iv 60 60 70 80
    Mean 65 68 63 73
    3 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 70 70 60 70
    Galago at 100 ml ii 70 70 70 70
    iii 80 80 70 80
    iv 70 70 60 80
    Mean 73 73 65 75
    4 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 80 70 70 80
    Galago at 150 ml ii 90 80 70 70
    iii 90 70 60 80
    iv 90 80 70 80
    Mean 88 75 68 78
    5 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 98 90 100 90
    Galago at 100 ml ii 90 90 95 80
    iii 90 100 98 90
    iv 100 98 98 90
    Mean 95 95 98 88
    6 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 98 80 90 90
    Galago at 150 ml ii 95 90 95 80
    iii 90 80 95 80
    iv 98 90 90 90
    Mean 95 85 93 85
    7 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 100 100 70 95
    Galago at 100 ml ii 100 100 60 90
    TOLLA at 1000 ml iii 100 100 70 95
    iv 100 100 70 95
    Mean 100 100 68 94
    8 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 100 100 70 100
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 80 100
    TOLLA at 1000 ml iii 100 100 70 100
    iv 100 100 70 98
    Mean 100 100 73 100
    9 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 100 100 90 100
    Galago at 100 ml ii 100 100 80 100
    TOLLA at 1000 ml iii 100 100 80 98
    iv 100 100 80 100
    Mean 100 100 83 100
    10 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 100 100 80 98
    Galago at 150 ml ii 98 100 90 100
    TOLLA at 1000 ml iii 100 100 90 100
    iv 100 100 80 100
    Mean 100 100 85 100
    11 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 100 100 100 100
    Galago at 100 ml ii 100 100 100 100
    TOLLA at 1000 ml iii 100 100 98 100
    iv 100 100 100 100
    Mean 100 100 100 100
    12 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 100 100 100 100
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 100 100
    TOLLA at 1000 ml iii 100 100 100 100
    iv 100 100 100 100
    Mean 100 100 100 100
    13 DINAMIC ® at 250 g I 100 100 100 100
    Galago at 300 ml ii 100 100 100 100
    TOLLA at 2000 ml iii 100 100 100 100
    iv 100 100 100 100
    Mean 100 100 100 100
    14 Calisto at 260 ml I 100 100 100 100
    DUAL S GOLD ® at ii 100 100 100 100
    710 ml iii 100 100 95 100
    iv 100 100 95 100
    Mean 100 100 98 100
    DIGSA = Digitaria sanguinalis; POROL = Portulaca oleracea; AMAHY = Amaranthus hybridus; COMBE = Commelina benghalensis
  • DINAMIC®700WDG at 125 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 100 mL/ha showed satisfactory control of Digitaria sanguinalis, Portulaca oleracea, Amaranthus hybridus and Commilina benghalensis. This combination compared favorably with the standard CALLISTO® at 260 mL/ha+DUAL S GOLD® at 710 mL/ha. The addition of TOLLA improved the efficacy of the DINAMIC®+Galago mixture. DINAMIC®700WDG at 100 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 100 mL/ha+TOLLA 840S at 1000 mL/ha resulted in 100% control of Digitaria sanguinalis, Portulaca oleracea and Commilina benghalensis, and satisfactory control of Amaranthus hybridus. This combination compared favorably with the standard CALLISTO® at 260 mL/ha+DUAL S GOLD® at 710 mL/ha. No visual signs of phytotoxicity were noticed throughout the growing season. DINAMIC®700WDG at 125 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 100 mL/ha can be used to control Digitaria sanguinalis, Portulaca oleracea, Amaranthus hybridus and Commilina benghalensis. DINAMIC® 700WDG at 100 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 100 mL/ha+TOLLA 840S at 1000 mL/ha can be used to control Digitaria sanguinalis, Portulaca oleracea, Amaranthus hybridus and Commilina benghalensis.
    • F. Pre Emergence Application Against Weed in Maize
  • In this part of the Example the efficacy of DINAMIC® (amicarbazone 700WDG, 700 grams active/kg, available from Arysta LifeScience North America, Cary, N.C.) mixtures with Galago (mesotrione 480SC, 480 grams active/L, available from Arysta LifeScience North America, Cary, N.C.) or TOLLA 840 S (available from Volanco Agroscience, Mt. Edgecombe, South Africa) as a pre emergence application against weeds in maize (variety PAN60-445B) was determined. A comparison with CALLISTO® 480SC plus DUAL S GOLD® 915EC (both available from Syngenta, Greensboro, N.C.) was performed.
  • Trials were conducted at a site with a history of weeds. The trials were executed under moderate weather conditions. Efficacy and visual phytotoxicity assessments were performed in triplicate. Normal practices were carried out to control insects and fungi. Crops were provided in 76 cm row width, at a sowing rate of 65,000 plants/ha, and at a sowing depth of five to eight cm. Soil class was clay with a clay content of about 28%. The site in this Example had been previously used for soya beans. Trial design was randomized blocks with a plot size of 20 m2 replicated four times. Municipal water was used for all applications (pH=7.2).
  • Application of the treatments shown in Table 6-29 was conducted at pre emergence stage 3 days after planting seed. Application of the treatments was conducted over a 24 hour period. Over this time period, dry bulb temperature was about 22° C., wet bulb temperature was about 18° C., relative humidity was about 65%, cloud cover was about 30%, and wind speed was about 0 m/s. Treatments were administered with a multi-spray gas sprayer with a 4× flat fan 03F80 nozzle. Spacing was 50 cm, with a height of 50 cm, pressure 2.8 Bar, at a ground speed of 1 m/s, and a calibration mean output of 330 L/ha. The soil temperature over the application period averaged to about 22° C. and the soil remained moist and fine.
  • TABLE 6-36
    Treatments
    Dosage rate Dosage rate
    No Treatments (gai/ha) (g/ha or mL/ha)
    Untreated control — —
    1 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 52.5 75
    Galago 480SC 48 100
    2 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 52.5 75
    Galago 480SC 72 150
    3 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 70 100
    Galago 480SC 48 100
    4 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 70 100
    Galago 480SC 72 150
    5 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 87.5 125
    Galago 480SC 48 100
    6 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 87.5 125
    Galago 480SC 72 150
    7 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 52.5 75
    Galago 480SC + 48 100
    TOLLA 840S 840 1000
    8 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 52.5 75
    Galago 480SC + 72 150
    TOLLA 840S 840 1000
    9 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 70 100
    Galago 480SC + 48 100
    TOLLA 840S 840 1000
    10 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 70 100
    Galago 480SC + 72 150
    TOLLA 840S 840 1000
    11 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 87.5 125
    Galago 480SC + 48 100
    TOLLA 840S 840 1000
    12 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 87.5 125
    Galago 480SC + 72 150
    TOLLA 840S 840 1000
    13 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 175 250
    Galago 480SC + 144 300
    TOLLA 840S 840 2000
    14 CALLISTO ® 480SC + 124.8 260
    DUAL S GOLD ® 915EC 649.7 710
  • Assessments of the treated crops at 2, 4, and 6 weeks are summarized in Tables 6-37 to 6-39 below. No visual signs of phytotoxicity were noticed over the 6 weeks.
  • TABLE 6-37
    2 Week Assessment
    Crop condition Actively growing
    Crop stage 3 Leaves
    BBCH scale
    13
    Soil moisture Moist
    Rain since last visit 16 mm
  • TABLE 6-38
    4 Week Assessment
    Crop condition Actively growing
    Crop stage 5 Leaves
    BBCH scale
    15
    Soil moisture Wet
    Rain since last visit 30 mm
  • TABLE 6-39
    6 Week Assessment
    Crop condition Actively growing
    Crop stage 8 leaves
    BBCH scale: 18
    Soil moisture Moist
    Rain since last visit 22 mm
  • Control and weed cover at 2,4, and 6 weeks for the indicated species are summarized below in Tables 6-40 through 6-42. 80% is considered acceptable control.
  • TABLE 6-40
    % Control and weed cover (2 weeks after application)
    Treatments
    (product/ha) Rep AMASP ELEIN IPOPU COMBE
    Untreated control I 30 20 30 20
    % soil cover ii 40 10 20 30
    iii 40 20 30 10
    iv 30 20 30 20
    Mean 35 18 28 20
    DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 80 80 70 80
    Galago at 100 ml ii 80 80 70 70
    iii 80 80 70 70
    iv 80 70 60 80
    Mean 80 78 68 75
    DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 80 80 80 80
    Galago at 150 ml ii 80 80 70 80
    iii 80 80 70 80
    iv 80 80 70 80
    Mean 80 80 73 80
    DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 90 80 80 80
    Galago at 100 ml ii 80 90 70 80
    iii 90 90 80 80
    iv 80 80 70 80
    Mean 85 85 75 80
    DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 95 90 80 90
    Galago at 150 ml ii 95 80 80 80
    iii 95 80 70 90
    iv 90 80 80 90
    Mean 94 83 78 88
    DINAMIC ® at 125 g 1 100 95 100 95
    Galago at 100 ml ii 95 95 98 90
    iii 95 100 100 90
    iv 100 100 100 90
    Mean 98 98 100 91
    DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 100 90 95 90
    Galago at 150 ml ii 95 90 90 90
    iii 95 80 90 80
    iv 100 80 95 90
    Mean 98 85 93 88
    DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 100 100 90 95
    Galago at 100 ml ii 100 100 80 95
    TOLL A at 1000 ml iii 100 98 80 100
    iv 100 100 90 95
    Mean 100 100 85 96
    DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 100 100 90 100
    Galago at 150 ml ii 98 100 90 98
    TOLLA at 1000 ml iii 100 100 90 98
    iv 100 100 90 98
    Mean 100 100 90 99
    DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 100 100 100 95
    Galago at 100 ml ii 100 100 90 98
    TOLLA at 1000 ml iii 100 100 90 98
    iv 100 100 95 100
    Mean 100 100 94 98
    DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 98 100 90 95
    Galago at 150 ml ii 98 100 90 95
    TOLLA at 1000 ml iii 100 100 90 100
    iv 100 100 90 100
    Mean 99 100 90 98
    DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 100 100 95 100
    Galago at 100 ml ii 100 100 98 100
    TOLLA at 1000 ml iii 100 100 95 100
    iv 100 100 98 100
    Mean 100 100 97 100
    DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 100 100 95 100
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 98 100
    TOLLA at 1000 ml iii 100 100 98 100
    iv 100 100 98 100
    Mean 100 100 97 100
    DINAMIC ® at 250 g I 100 100 100 100
    Galago at 300 ml ii 100 100 100 100
    TOLLA at 2000 ml iii 100 100 100 100
    iv 100 100 100 100
    Mean 100 100 100 100
    Calisto at 260 ml
    710 ml ii 100 100 100 100
    Mean iii 100 100 90 100
    iv 100 100 90 100
    DUAL S GOLD ® at 100 100 95 100
    AMASP = Amaranthus spinosus; COMBE = Commelina benghalensis; IPOPU= Ipomoea purpurea; ELEIN = Eleusine indica
  • TABLE 6-41
    % Control and weed cover (4 weeks after application)
    Treatments
    (product/ha) Rep AMASP ELEIN IPOPU COMBE
    Untreated control I 30 20 30 20
    % soil cover ii 40 10 20 30
    iii 40 20 30 10
    iv 30 20 30 20
    Mean 35 18 28 20
    1 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 70 70 60 70
    Galago at 100 ml ii 70 70 60 70
    iii 70 70 70 70
    iv 80 70 60 80
    Mean 73 70 63 73
    2 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 70 70 70 80
    Galago at 150 ml ii 70 80 70 70
    iii 80 80 60 70
    iv 70 70 70 80
    Mean 73 75 68 75
    3 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 80 70 70 70
    Galago at 100 ml ii 80 80 70 80
    iii 80 80 70 80
    iv 80 80 70 80
    Mean 80 78 70 78
    4 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 90 80 70 80
    Galago at 150 ml ii 90 80 80 70
    iii 95 70 70 80
    iv 90 80 70 90
    Mean 91 78 73 80
    5 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 100 90 100 90
    Galago at 100 ml ii 90 95 95 90
    iii 95 100 100 90
    iv 100 100 100 90
    Mean 96 96 99 90
    6 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 100 80 90 90
    Galago at 150 ml ii 95 90 90 80
    iii 90 80 90 80
    iv 100 80 90 90
    Mean 96 83 90 85
    7 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 100 100 80
    Galago at 100 ml ii 100 100 70 95
    TOLLA at 1000 ml iii 100 100 80 98
    IV 100 100 80 95
    Mean 100 100 78 96
    8 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 100 100 80 100
    Galago at 150 ml ii 98 100 80 98
    TOLLA at 1000 ml iii 100 100 80 100
    iv 100 100 80 98
    Mean 100 100 80 99
    9 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 100 100 95 98
    Galago at 100 ml ii 100 100 80 98
    TOLLA at 1000 ml iii 100 100 90 95
    iv 100 100 80 100
    Mean 100 100 86 98
    10 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 100 100 80 95
    Galago at 150 ml ii 98 100 90 98
    TOLLA at 1000 ml iii 100 100 80 98
    iv 100 100 80 100
    Mean 100 100 83 98
    11 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 100 100 98 100
    Galago at 100 ml ii 100 100 100 100
    TOLLA at 1000 ml iii 100 100 95 100
    iv 100 100 100 100
    Mean 100 100 98 100
    12 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 100 100 98 100
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 100 100
    TOLLA at 1000 ml iii 100 100 100 100
    iv 100 100 100 100
    Mean 100 100 100 100
    13 DINAMIC ® at 250 g I 100 100 100 100
    Galago at 300 ml ii 100 100 100 100
    TOLLA at 2000 ml iii 100 100 100 100
    iv 100 100 100 100
    Mean 100 100 100 100
    14 Calisto at 260 ml I 100 100 100 100
    DUAL S GOLD ® at ii 100 100 100 100
    710 ml iii 100 100 95 100
    iv 100 100 90 100
    Mean 100 100 96 100
    AMASP = Amaranthus spinosus; COMBE = Commelina benghalensis; IPOELEIN = Eleusine indica
  • TABLE 6-42
    % Control and weed cover (6 weeks after application)
    iii 40 20 30 10
    iv 30 20 30 20
    Mean 35 18 28 20
    1 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 70 60 60 70
    Galago at 100 ml ii 60 70 50 70
    iii 60 70 60 60
    iv 70 60 60 70
    Mean 65 65 58 68
    2 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 60 70 70 70
    Galago at 150 ml ii 70 70 60 70
    iii 70 70 50 70
    iv 60 60 70 80
    Mean 65 68 63 73
    3 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 70 70 60 70
    Galago at 100 ml ii 70 70 70 70
    iii 80 80 70 80
    iv 70 70 60 80
    Mean 73 73 65 75
    4 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 80 70 70 80
    Galago at 150 ml ii 90 80 70 70
    iii 90 70 60 80
    iv 90 80 70 80
    Mean 88 75 68 78
    5 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 98 90 100 90
    Galago at 100 ml ii 90 90 95 80
    iii 90 100 98 90
    iv 100 98 98 90
    Mean 95 95 98 88
    6 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 98 80 90 90
    Galago at 150 ml ii 95 90 95 80
    iii 90 80 95 80
    iv 98 90 90 90
    Mean 95 85 93 85
    7 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 100 100 70 95
    Galago at 100 ml ii 100 100 60 90
    TOLL A at 1000 ml iii 100 100 70 95
    iv 100 100 70 95
    Mean 100 100 68 94
    8 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 100 100 70 100
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 80 100
    TOLL A at 1000 ml iii 100 100 70 100
    iv 100 100 70 98
    Mean 100 100 73 100
    9 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 100 100 90 100
    Galago at 100 ml ii 100 100 80 100
    TOLL A at 1000 ml iii 100 100 80 98
    iv 100 100 80 100
    Mean 100 100 83 100
    10 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 100 100 80 98
    Galago at 150 ml ii 98 100 90 100
    TOLLA at 1000 ml iii 100 100 90 100
    iv 100 100 80 100
    Mean 100 100 85 100
    11 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 100 100 100 100
    Galago at 100 ml ii 100 100 100 100
    TOLLA at 1000 ml iii 100 100 98 100
    iv 100 100 100 100
    Mean 100 100 100 100
    12 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 100 100 100 100
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 100 100
    TOLLA at 1000 ml iii 100 100 100 100
    iv 100 100 100 100
    Mean 100 100 100 100
    13 DINAMIC ® at 250 g I 100 100 100 100
    Galago at 300 ml ii 100 100 100 100
    TOLLA at 2000 ml iii 100 100 100 100
    iv 100 100 100 100
    Mean 100 100 100 100
    14 Calisto at 260 ml 1 100 100 100 100
    DUAL S GOLD ® at ii 100 100 100 100
    710 ml iii 100 100 95 100
    iv 100 100 95 100
    Mean 100 100 98 100
    AMASP = Amaranthus spinosus; COMBE = Commelina benghalensis; IPOPU = Ipomoea purpurea; ELEIN = Eleusine indica
  • DINAMIC® 700WDG at 125 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 100 mL/ha showed satisfactory control of Amaranthus spinosus, Eleusine indica, Ipomoea purpurea and Commilina benghalensis. The addition of TOLLA to the above mixture appears to be a good practice. DINAMIC® 700WDG at 75 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 100 mL/ha+TOLLA 840S at 1000 mL/ha performed excellently on Amaranthus spinosus, Eleusine indica and Commilina benghalensis. However to control Ipomoea purpurea the dosage rate of DINAMIC® has to be increased from 75 g/ha to 100 g/ha—this combination compared with the standard CALLISTO® at 260 mL/ha+DUAL S GOLD® at 710 mL/ha. No visual signs of phytotoxicity were noticed throughout the growing season. DINAMIC®700WDG at 125 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 100 mL/ha can be used to control Amaranthus spinosus, Eleusine indica, Ipomoea purpurea and Commilina benghalensis. DINAMIC® 700WDG at 75 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 100 mL/ha+TOLLA 840S at 1000 mL/ha can be used to control Amaranthus spinosus, Eleusine indica, Ipomoea purpurea and Commilina benghalensis.
    • G. Post Emergence Application Against Weed in Maize
  • In this part of the Example the efficacy of DINAMIC® (amicarbazone 700WDG, 700 grams active/kg, available from Arysta LifeScience North America, Cary, N.C.) mixtures with Galago (mesotrione 480SC, 480 grams active/L, available from Arysta LifeScience North America, Cary, N.C.) with or without Wet-All (available from Arysta LifeScience North America, Cary, N.C.) as a post emergence application against weeds in maize (variety PHI 2369W) was determined.
  • Trials were conducted at a site with a history of weeds. The trials were executed under moderate weather conditions. Efficacy and visual phytotoxicity assessments were performed in triplicate. Normal practices were carried out to control insects and fungi. Crops were provided in 55 cm row width, at a sowing rate of 65,000 plants/ha, and at a sowing depth of five to eight cm. Soil class was clay with a clay content of about 40%. The site in this Example had been previously used for maize. Trial design was randomized blocks with a plot size of 20 m2 replicated four times. Municipal water was used for all applications (pH=7.2).
  • Application of the treatments shown in Table 6-43 was conducted at post emergence stage 15 days after planting. Application of the treatments was conducted over a 24 hour period. Over this time period, dry bulb temperature was about 30° C., wet bulb temperature was about 24° C., relative humidity was about 55%, cloud cover was about 0%, and wind speed was about 0 m/s. Treatments were administered with a multi-spray gas sprayer with a 4× flat fan 03F80 nozzle. Spacing was 50 cm, with a height of 50 cm, pressure 2.8 Bar, at a ground speed of 1 m/s, and a calibration mean output of 330 L/ha. The soil temperature over the application period averaged to about 29° C. and the soil remained moist and fine. Crops stage at the outset was about 4 leaves with a BBCH scale of 14. Crop and weeds were actively growing. Weed stage was about 3-5 leaves.
  • TABLE 6-43
    Treatments
    Dosage rate Dosage rate
    No Treatments (gai/ha) (g/ha or mL/ha)
    Untreated control — —
    1 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 52.5 75
    Galago 480SC 48 100
    2 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 52.5 75
    Galago 480SC 72 150
    3 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 70 100
    Galago 480SC 48 100
    4 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 70 100
    Galago 480SC 72 150
    5 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 87.5 125
    Galago 480SC 48 100
    6 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 87.5 125
    Galago 480SC 72 150
    7 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 175 250
    Galago 480SC + 144 300
    Wet-All
    8 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 52.5 75
    Galago 480SC + 48 100
    Wet-All — 0.1%
    9 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 52.5 75
    Galago 480SC + 72 150
    Wet-All — 0.1%
    10 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 70 100
    Galago 480SC + 48 100
    Wet-All — 0.1%
    11 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 70 100
    Galago 480SC + 72 150
    Wet-All — 0.1%
    12 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 87.5 125
    Galago 480SC + 48 100
    Wet-All — 0.1%
    13 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 87.5 125
    Galago 480SC + 72 150
    Wet-All — 0.1%
    14 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 175 250
    Galago 480SC + 144 300
    Wet-All — 0.1%
  • Assessments of the treated crops at 2, 4, and 6 weeks are summarized in Tables 6-44 to 6-46 below. No visual signs of phytotoxicity were noticed over the first 2 weeks. Signs of phytoxicity were noticed in treatment 14 at 4 week assessment. Signs of phytotoxicity were noticed in treatment 13 at 6 weeks.
  • TABLE 6-44
    2 Week Assessment
    Crop condition Actively growing
    Crop stage 5-6 Leaves
    BBCH scale 15-16
    Soil moisture Wet
    Rain since last visit 18 mm
  • TABLE 6-45
    4 Week Assessment
    Crop condition Actively growing
    Crop stage 8 Leaves
    BBCH scale 18
    Soil moisture Wet
    Rain since last visit 38 mm
  • TABLE 6-46
    6 Week Assessment
    Crop condition Actively growing
    Crop stage 10 leaves
    BBCH scale: 20
    Soil moisture Moist
    Rain since last visit 0 mm
  • Control and weed cover at 2, 4, and 6 weeks for the indicated species are summarized below in Tables 6-47 through 6-49. 80% is considered acceptable control.
  • TABLE 6-47
    % Control and weed cover (2 weeks after application)
    Treatments
    (product/ha) Rep ROTEX IPOPU AMAHY
    Untreated control I 50 20 30
    % soil cover ii 40 10 50
    iii 40 20 40
    iv 30 20 50
    Mean 40 18 43
    1 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 50 60 60
    Galago at 100 ml ii 60 60 70
    iii 60 70 80
    iv 60 60 70
    Mean 58 63 70
    2 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 70 70 70
    Galago at 150 ml ii 80 70 80
    iii 80 70 80
    iv 70 70 70
    Mean 75 70 75
    3 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 50 50 70
    Galago at 100 ml ii 60 60 70
    iii 70 60 70
    iv 60 70 70
    Mean 60 60 70
    4 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 70 70 90
    Galago at 150 ml ii 70 80 90
    iii 70 80 80
    iv 70 80 90
    Mean 70 78 88
    5 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 60 70 90
    Galago at 100 ml ii 60 80 90
    iii 70 80 95
    iv 80 70 90
    Mean 68 75 91
    6 D1NAMIC ® at 125 g I 80 90 95
    Galago at 150 ml ii 60 90 95
    iii 70 90 95
    iv 80 90 95
    Mean 73 90 95
    7 DINAMIC ® at 250 g I 80 95 100
    Galago at 300 ml ii 90 95 100
    iii 90 98 100
    iv 90 98 100
    Mean 88 97 100
    8 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 60 80 80
    Galago at 100 ml ii 60 70 70
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 70 70 80
    iv 60 70 80
    Mean 63 73 78
    9 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 70 80 80
    Galago at 150 ml ii 80 70 80
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 80 80 80
    iv 70 70 80
    Mean 75 75 80
    10 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 60 70 80
    Galago at 100 ml ii 70 70 80
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 60 70 80
    iv 70 70 80
    Mean 65 70 80
    11 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 80 80 90
    Galago at 150 ml ii 80 80 90
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 80 90 95
    iv 80 80 90
    Mean 80 83 91
    12 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 70 80 95
    Galago at 100 ml ii 70 80 95
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 80 80 98
    iv 70 80 95
    Mean 73 80 96
    13 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 70 90 100
    Galago at 150 ml ii 80 90 100
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 80 90 100
    iv 80 80 100
    Mean 78 88 100
    14 DINAMIC ® at 250 g I 90 100 100
    Galago at 300 ml ii 90 95 100
    Wet-All at 0.2% iii 95 95 100
    iv 90 95 100
    Mean 91 96 100
    ROTTE = Rottboelia exaltata; IPOPU = Ipomoea purpurea; AMAHY = Amaranthus hybridus
  • TABLE 6-48
    % Control and weed cover (4 weeks after application)
    Treatments
    (product/ha) Rep ROTEX IPOPU AMAHY
    Untreated control I 40 20 40
    % soil cover ii 40 20 40
    iii 40 30 30
    iv 30 20 50
    Mean 38 23 40
    DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 50 70 60
    Galago at 100 ml ii 60 60 70
    iii 50 70 80
    iv 60 60 70
    Mean 55 65 70
    DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 80 70 70
    Galago at 150 ml ii 80 70 80
    iii 80 70 80
    iv 70 70 70
    Mean 78 70 75
    DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 60 60 70
    Galago at 100 ml ii 70 70 70
    iii 70 60 70
    iv 60 70 70
    Mean 65 65 70
    DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 80 80 90
    Galago at 150 ml ii 70 90 90
    iii 70 80 80
    iv 80 80 90
    Mean 75 83 88
    DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 60 80 90
    Galago at 100 ml ii 70 80 90
    iii 70 80 95
    iv 80 80 90
    Mean 70 80 91
    DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 80 90 95
    Galago at 150 ml ii 70 95 95
    iii 80 95 95
    iv 80 90 95
    Mean 78 93 95
    DINAMIC ® at 250 g I 90 98 100
    Galago at 300 ml ii 90 100 100
    iii 95 100 100
    iv 90 100 100
    Mean 91 100 100
    DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 60 80 80
    Galago at 100 ml ii 60 70 70
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 70 80 80
    iv 60 70 80
    Mean 63 75 78
    DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 80 80 80
    Galago at 150 ml ii 80 80 80
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 80 80 80
    iv 80 80 80
    Mean 80 80 80
    DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 70 70 80
    Galago at 100 ml ii 70 80 80
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 70 80 80
    iv 70 70 80
    Mean 70 75 80
    DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 80 90 90
    Galago at 150 ml ii 80 90 90
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 80 90 95
    iv 80 90 90
    Mean 80 90 91
    DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 70 80 95
    Galago at 100 ml ii 80 90 95
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 80 90 98
    iv 70 90 95
    Mean 75 88 96
    DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 80 100 100
    Galago at 150 ml ii 90 100 100
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 90 100 100
    iv 80 95 100
    Mean 85 99 100
    DINAMIC ® at 250 g I 95 100 100
    Galago at 300 ml ii 95 100 100
    Wet-All at 0.2% iii 98 100 100
    iv 95 100 100
    Mean 96 100 100
    ROTTE = Rottboelia exaltata; IPOPU = Ipomoea purpurea; AMAHY = Amaranthus hybridus
  • TABLE 6-49
    % Control and weed cover (6 weeks after application)
    Treatments
    (product/ha) Rep ROTEX IPOPU AMAHY
    Untreated control I 40 20 40
    % soil cover ii 40 20 40
    iii 40 30 30
    iv 30 20 50
    Mean 38 23 40
    DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 50 70 60
    Galago at 100 ml ii 50 70 70
    iii 50 70 70
    iv 60 70 70
    Mean 53 70 68
    DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 80 70 70
    Galago at 150 ml ii 70 70 80
    iii 80 80 80
    iv 70 80 70
    Mean 75 75 75
    DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 70 70 70
    Galago at 100 ml ii 70 70 95
    iii 70 70 70
    iv 60 80 70
    Mean 68 73 76
    DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 80 90 90
    Galago at 150 ml ii 80 90 90
    iii 70 90 95
    iv 80 80 90
    Mean 78 88 91
    DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 70 80 90
    Galago at 100 ml ii 70 80 90
    iii 70 80 90
    iv 70 80 90
    Mean 70 80 90
    DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 80 90 95
    Galago at 150 ml ii 80 98 98
    iii 80 95 95
    iv 80 95 100
    Mean 80 95 97
    DINAMIC ® at 250 g I 90 100 100
    Galago at 300 ml ii 95 100 100
    iii 95 100 100
    iv 90 100 100
    Mean 93 100 100
    DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 60 80 80
    Galago at 100 ml ii 60 70 70
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 60 80 80
    iv 60 70 80
    Mean 60 75 78
    DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 70 80 80
    Galago at 150ml ii 80 90 90
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 80 80 80
    iv 70 80 90
    Mean 75 83 85
    DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 70 70 90
    Galago at 100 ml ii 75 80 80
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 75 80 90
    iv 70 70 90
    Mean 73 75 88
    DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 80 90 95
    Galago at 150 ml ii 90 95 95
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 80 90 100
    iv 80 90 100
    Mean 83 91 98
    DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 70 90 95
    Galago at 100 ml ii 80 90 95
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 80 90 100
    iv 70 90 98
    Mean 75 90 97
    DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 80 100 100
    Galago at 150 ml ii 90 100 100
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 90 100 100
    iv 80 100 100
    Mean 85 100 100
    DINAMIC ® at 250 g I 95 100 100
    Galago at 300 ml ii 95 100 100
    Wet-All at 0.2% iii 100 100 100
    iv 95 100 100
    Mean 96 100 100
    ROTTE = Rottboelia exaltata; IPOPU = Ipomoea purpurea; AMAHY = Amaranthus hybridus
  • DINAMIC®+Galago without a wetter: DINAMIC® 700WDG at 100 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 150 mL/ha showed satisfactory control of Amaranthus hybridus and Ipomoea purpurea. Rottboellia exaltata was insufficiently controlled by this mixture. It was however marginally controlled by DINAMIC® 700WDG at 125 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 150 mL/ha. DINAMIC®+Galago with a wetter: It is clear that a wetter improved efficacy. DINAMIC®700WDG at 75 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 150 mL/ha+Wet-All at 0.1% resulted in satisfactory control of Amaranthus hybridus and Ipomoea purpurea in comparison to the equivalent treatment without a wetter (treatment 2). Rottboellia exaltata could still not be controlled by this mixture and needed higher rates (DINAMIC®700WDG at 100 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 150 mL/ha+Wet-All at 0.1%) to be controlled satisfactory. Signs of phytotoxicity were noticed in the plots were DINAMIC®700WDG at 250 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 300 mL/ha+Wet-All at 0.1% was sprayed. DINAMIC® 700WDG at 75 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 100 mL/ha+Wet-All at 0.1% can be used to control Amaranthus hybridus and Ipomoea purpurea. To control Rottboellia exaltata DINAMIC®700WDG at 100 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 150 mL/ha+Wet-All at 0.1% can be used.
    • H. Post Emergence Application Against Weed in Maize
  • In this part of the Example the efficacy of DINAMIC® (amicarbazone 700WDG, 700 grams active/kg, available from Arysta LifeScience North America, Cary, N.C.) mixtures with Galago (mesotrione 480SC, 480 grams active/L, available from Arysta LifeScience North America, Cary, N.C.) with or without Wet-All (available from Arysta LifeScience North America, Cary, N.C.) as a post emergence application against weeds in maize (variety PHI 32Y85) was determined.
  • Trials were conducted at a site with a history of weeds. The trials were executed under moderate weather conditions. Efficacy and visual phytotoxicity assessments were performed in triplicate. Normal practices were carried out to control insects and fungi. Crops were provided in 76 cm row width, at a sowing rate of 65,000 plants/ha, and at a sowing depth of five to eight cm. Soil class was clay with a clay content of about 35%. The site in this Example had been previously used for soya beans. Trial design was randomized blocks with a plot size of 20 m2 replicated four times. Municipal water was used for all applications (pH=7.2).
  • Application of the treatments shown in Table 6-50 was conducted at post emergence stage 14 days after planting. Application of the treatments was conducted over a 24 hour period. Over this time period, dry bulb temperature was about 24-26° C., wet bulb temperature was about 20° C., relative humidity was about 60%, cloud cover was about 70%, and wind speed was about 0 m/s. Treatments were administered with a multi-spray gas sprayer with a 4× flat fan 03F80 nozzle. Spacing was 50 cm, with a height of 50 cm, pressure 2.8 Bar, at a ground speed of 1 m/s, and a calibration mean output of 330 L/ha. The soil temperature over the application period averaged to about 23° C. and the soil remained moist and fine. Crops stage at the outset was about 4 leaves with a BBCH scale of 14. Crop and weeds were actively growing. Weed stage was about 2-5 leaves.
  • TABLE 6-50
    Treatments
    Dosage rate Dosage rate
    No Treatments (gai/ha) (g/ha or mL/ha)
    Untreated control — —
    1 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 52.5 75
    Galago 480SC 48 100
    2 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 52.5 75
    Galago 480SC 72 150
    3 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 70 100
    Galago 480SC 48 100
    4 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 70 100
    Galago 480SC 72 150
    5 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 87.5 125
    Galago 480SC 48 100
    6 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 87.5 125
    Galago 480SC 72 150
    7 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 175 250
    Galago 480SC + 144 300
    8 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 52.5 75
    Galago 480SC + 48 100
    Wet-All — 0.1%
    9 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 52.5 75
    Galago 480SC + 72 150
    Wet-All — 0.1%
    10 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 70 100
    Galago 480SC + 48 100
    Wet-All — 0.1%
    11 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 70 100
    Galago 480SC + 72 150
    Wet-All — 0.1%
    12 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 87.5 125
    Galago 480SC + 48 100
    Wet-All — 0.1%
    13 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 87.5 125
    Galago 480SC + 72 150
    Wet-All — 0.1%
    14 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 175 250
    Galago 480SC + 144 300
    Wet-All — 0.1%
  • Assessments of the treated crops at 2, 4, and 6 weeks are summarized in Tables 6-51 to 6-53 below. No visual signs of phytotoxicity were noticed over the 6 weeks.
  • TABLE 6-51
    2 Week Assessment
    Crop condition Actively growing
    Crop stage 6 Leaves
    BBCH scale 16
    Soil moisture Moist
    Rain since last visit 8 mm
  • TABLE 6-52
    4 Week Assessment
    Crop condition Actively growing
    Crop stage 7 Leaves
    BBCH scale 17
    Soil moisture Wet
    Rain since last visit 44 mm
  • TABLE 6-53
    6 Week Assessment
    Crop condition Actively growing
    Crop stage 9 leaves
    BBCH scale: 19
    Soil moisture Moist
    Rain since last visit 0 mm
  • Control and weed cover at 2, 4, and 6 weeks for the indicated species are summarized below in Tables 6-54 through 6-56. 80% is considered acceptable control.
  • TABLE 6-54
    % Control and weed cover (2 weeks after application)
    Treatments
    (product/ha) Rep DIGSA POROL AMAHY COMBE
    Untreated control I 30 20 30 20
    % soil cover ii 40 10 20 30
    iii 40 20 30 10
    iv 30 20 30 20
    Mean 35 18 28 20
    1 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 80 80 70 60
    Galago at 100 ml ii 80 80 70 60
    iii 80 80 70 50
    iv 80 70 60 70
    Mean 80 78 68 60
    2 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 90 80 80 70
    Galago at 150 ml ii 90 80 70 80
    iii 90 80 70 80
    iv 90 80 70 80
    Mean 90 80 73 78
    3 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 80 70 80 70
    Galago at 100 ml ii 80 80 70 80
    iii 90 70 80 70
    iv 80 80 70 70
    Mean 83 75 75 73
    4 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 95 90 80 90
    Galago at 150 ml ii 95 80 80 80
    iii 95 80 70 90
    iv 90 80 80 80
    Mean 94 83 78 85
    5 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 80 80 80 80
    Galago at 100 ml ii 70 80 80 80
    iii 80 80 80 70
    iv 80 80 80 70
    Mean 78 80 80 75
    6 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 100 90 95 90
    Galago at 150 ml ii 95 90 90 90
    iii 95 80 90 80
    iv 100 80 95 90
    Mean 98 85 93 88
    7 DINAMIC ® at 250 g I 100 100 95 95
    Galago at 300 ml ii 100 100 95 95
    iii 100 98 98 100
    iv 100 100 98 95
    Mean 100 100 97 96
    8 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 100 100 80 70
    Galago at 100 ml ii 98 100 90 80
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 80 70
    iv 100 100 80 70
    Mean 100 100 83 73
    9 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 100 100 80 80
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 80 80
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 90 80
    iv 100 100 90 80
    Mean 100 100 85 80
    10 DINAMIC ® at 100 g 1 98 100 90 70
    Galago at 100 ml ii 98 100 80 70
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 90 80
    iv 100 100 90 80
    Mean 99 100 88 75
    11 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 100 100 90 90
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 90 90
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 95 90
    iv 100 100 80 90
    Mean 100 100 89 90
    12 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 100 100 90 80
    Galago at 100 ml ii 100 100 95 70
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 95 80
    iv 100 100 90 90
    Mean 100 100 93 80
    13 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 100 100 100 100
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 100 95
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 100 95
    iv 100 100 100 95
    Mean 100 100 100 96
    14 DINAMIC ® at 250 g I 100 100 100 100
    Galago at 300 ml ii 100 100 100 100
    Wet-All at 0.2% iii 100 100 100 100
    iv 100 100 100 100
    Mean 100 100 100 100
    DIGSA = Digitaria sanguinalis; POROL = Portulaca oleracea; AMAHY = Amaranthus hybridus; COMBE = Commelina benghalensis
  • TABLE 6-55
    % Control and weed cover (4 weeks after application)
    Treatments
    (product/ha) Rep DIGSA POROL AMAHY COMBE
    Untreated control I 40 10 30 20
    % soil cover ii 40 10 20 30
    iii 50 10 30 10
    iv 30 20 30 20
    Mean 40 13 28 20
    1 DINAMIC @ at 75 g I 70 70 60 50
    Galago at 100 ml ii 70 70 60 50
    iii 70 70 60 50
    iv 70 70 50 60
    Mean 70 70 58 53
    2 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 80 80 80 60
    Galago at 150 ml ii 70 80 60 60
    iii 70 70 70 70
    iv 70 80 70 70
    Mean 73 78 70 65
    3 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 80 70 60 60
    Galago at 100 ml ii 80 80 60 70
    iii 80 80 60 70
    iv 70 70 60 70
    Mean 78 75 60 68
    4 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 90 90 80 90
    Galago at 150 ml ii 95 70 70 70
    iii 95 80 70 70
    iv 90 80 80 80
    Mean 93 80 75 78
    5 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 80 70 70 70
    Galago at 100 ml ii 70 70 70 70
    iii 70 70 70 60
    iv 70 70 70 70
    Mean 73 70 70 68
    6 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 98 90 90 80
    Galago at 150 ml ii 90 80 90 80
    iii 90 80 90 90
    iv 100 80 90 80
    Mean 95 83 90 83
    7 DINAMIC ® at 250 g I 100 100 95 95
    Galago at 300 ml ii 100 100 90 95
    iii 100 98 95 100
    iv 100 100 95 90
    Mean 100 100 94 95
    8 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 100 100 80 60
    Galago at 100 ml ii 98 100 90 70
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 90 60
    iv 100 100 80 60
    Mean 100 100 85 63
    9 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 100 100 80 70
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 80 70
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 90 80
    iv 100 100 90 80
    Mean 100 100 85 75
    10 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 98 100 90 60
    Galago at 100 ml ii 95 100 90 60
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 90 70
    iv 100 100 90 80
    Mean 98 100 90 68
    11 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 100 100 90 80
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 90 80
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 95 80
    iv 100 100 90 80
    Mean 100 100 91 80
    12 DINAMIC ® at 125 g 1 100 100 95 70
    Galago at 100 ml ii 100 100 95 90
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 95 70
    iv 100 100 90 80
    Mean 100 100 94 78
    13 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 100 100 100 100
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 100 90
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 100 90
    iv 100 100 100 90
    Mean 100 100 100 93
    14 DINAMIC ® at 250 g I 100 100 100 100
    Galago at 300 ml ii 100 100 100 100
    Wet-All at 0.2% iii 100 100 100 100
    iv 100 100 100 100
    Mean 100 100 100 100
    DIGSA = Digitaria sanguinalis; POROL = Portulaca oleracea; AMAHY = Amaranthus hybridus; COMBE = Commelina benghalensis
  • TABLE 6-56
    % Control and weed cover (6 weeks after application)
    Treatments
    (product/ha) Rep DIGSA POROL AMAHY COMBE
    Untreated control I 40 10 30 20
    % soil cover ii 40 10 20 30
    iii 50 10 30 10
    iv 30 10 40 20
    Mean 40 10 30 20
    DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 60 60 50 50
    Galagoat 100 ml ii 70 60 60 50
    iii 60 60 60 50
    iv 70 60 50 50
    Mean 65 60 55 50
    DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 80 80 70 60
    Galago at 150 ml ii 70 80 60 60
    iii 70 70 70 60
    iv 60 80 70 60
    Mean 70 78 68 60
    DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 70 70 60 60
    Galago at 100 ml ii 70 70 60 60
    iii 70 80 50 60
    iv 60 60 60 60
    Mean 68 70 58 60
    DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 90 90 80 80
    Galago at 150 ml ii 90 70 70 70
    iii 90 70 70 60
    iv 80 80 70 70
    Mean 88 78 73 70
    DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 70 70 60 60
    Galago at 100 ml ii 70 70 60 60
    iii 70 70 70 60
    iv 70 70 70 60
    Mean 70 70 65 60
    DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 90 90 80 70
    Galago at 150 ml ii 90 90 80 70
    in 90 80 80 80
    iv 100 80 80 80
    Mean 93 85 80 75
    DINAMIC ® at 250 g I 100 100 95 90
    Galago at 300 ml ii 100 100 95 95
    iii 100 95 95 100
    iv 100 100 95 90
    Mean 100 99 95 94
    DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 100 100 80 60
    Galago at 100 ml ii 100 100 90 60
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 80 50
    iv 100 100 80 60
    Mean 100 100 83 58
    DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 100 100 80 60
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 80 60
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 90 70
    iv 100 100 90 80
    Mean 100 100 85 68
    DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 95 100 90 50
    Galago at 100 ml ii 95 100 90 60
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 90 60
    iv 100 100 90 80
    Mean 98 100 90 63
    DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 100 100 95 80
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 95 80
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 95 80
    iv 100 100 95 80
    Mean 100 100 95 80
    DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 100 100 95 70
    Galago at 100 ml ii 100 100 95 80
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 95 80
    iv 100 100 95 80
    Mean 100 100 95 78
    DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 100 100 100 95
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 100 90
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 100 80
    iv 100 100 100 90
    Mean 100 100 100 89
    DINAMIC ® at 250 g I 100 100 100 100
    Galago at 300 ml ii 100 100 100 100
    Wet-All at 0.2% iii 100 100 100 100
    iv 100 100 100 100
    Mean 100 100 100 100
    DIGSA = Digitaria sanguinalis; POROL = Portulaca oleracea; AMAHY = Amaranthus hybridus; COMBE = Commelina benghalensis
  • The higher Galago rate (150 mL/ha) improves control when used as a mixing partner for DINAMIC®. DINAMIC®+Galago without a wetter: DINAMIC® 700WDG at 125 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 150 mL/ha showed satisfactory control of Digitaria sanguinalis and Portulaca oleracea and marginal control of Amaranthus hybridus. It could however not control Commilina benghalensis except with higher rates. DINAMIC®+Galago with a wetter: A wetter should be used with these mixtures (see treatment 1 vs. treatment 8). DINAMIC® 700WDG at 75 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 100 mL/ha+Wet-All at 0.1% resulted in 100% control of Amaranthus spinosus and Portulaca oleracea in comparison to 65% and 60% respectively without a wetter (treatment 1). Commilina benghalensis could not be controlled by this mixture and needed higher rates (DINAMIC®700WDG at 100 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 150 mL/ha+Wet-All at 0.1%) to be controlled satisfactory. No visual signs of phytotoxicity were noticed throughout the growing season. DINAMIC® 700WDG at 75 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 100 mL/ha+Wet-All at 0.1% can be used to control Digitaria sanguinalis, Portulaca oleracea and Amaranthus hybridus. To control Commilina benghalensis DINAMIC® 700WDG at 100 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 150 mL/ha+Wet-All at 0.1% can be used.
    • I. Post Emergence Application Against Weed in Maize
  • In this part of the Example the efficacy of DINAMIC® (amicarbazone 700WDG, 700 grams active/kg, available from Arysta LifeScience North America, Cary, N.C.) mixtures with Galago (mesotrione 480SC, 480 grams active/L, available from Arysta LifeScience North America, Cary, N.C.) with or without Wet-All (available from Arysta LifeScience North America, Cary, N.C.) as a post emergence application against weeds in maize (variety PAN60-445B) was determined.
  • Trials were conducted at a site with a history of broad leaf weeds and grasses. The trials were executed under moderate weather conditions. Efficacy and visual phytotoxicity assessments were performed in triplicate. Normal practices were carried out to control insects and fungi. Crops were provided in 76 cm row width, at a sowing rate of 65,000 plants/ha, and at a sowing depth of five to eight cm. Soil class was clay with a clay content of about 28%. The site in this Example had been previously used for soya beans. Trial design was randomized blocks with a plot size of 20 m2 replicated four times. Municipal water was used for all applications (pH=7.2).
  • Application of the treatments shown in Table 6-57 was conducted at post emergence stage 18 days after planting. Application of the treatments was conducted over a 24 hour period. Over this time period, dry bulb temperature was about 31° C., wet bulb temperature was about 28° C., relative humidity was about 80%, cloud cover was about 100%, and wind speed was about 0 m/s. Treatments were administered with a multi-spray gas sprayer with a 4× flat fan 03F80 nozzle. Spacing was 50 cm, with a height of 50 cm, pressure 2.8 Bar, at a ground speed of 1 m/s, and a calibration mean output of 330 L/ha. The soil temperature over the application period averaged to about 29° C. and the soil remained moist and fine. Crops stage at the outset was about 4 leaves with a BBCH scale of 14. Crop and weeds were actively growing. Weed stage was about 2-6 leaves.
  • TABLE 6-57
    Treatments
    Dosage rate Dosage rate
    No Treatments (gai/ha) (g/ha or mL/ha)
    Untreated control — —
    1 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 52.5 75
    Galago 480SC 48 100
    2 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 52.5 75
    Galago 480SC 72 150
    3 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 70 100
    Galago 480SC 48 100
    4 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 70 100
    Galago 480SC 72 150
    5 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 87.5 125
    Galago 480SC 48 100
    6 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 87.5 125
    Galago 480SC 72 150
    7 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 175 250
    Galago 480SC + 144 300
    8 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 52.5 75
    Galago 480SC + 48 100
    Wet-All — 0.1%
    9 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 52.5 75
    Galago 480SC + 72 150
    Wet-All — 0.1%
    10 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 70 100
    Galago 480SC + 48 100
    Wet-All — 0.1%
    11 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 70 100
    Galago 480SC + 72 150
    Wet-All — 0.1%
    12 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 87.5 125
    Galago 480SC + 48 100
    Wet-All — 0.1%
    13 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 87.5 125
    Galago 480SC + 72 150
    Wet-All — 0.1%
    14 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 175 250
    Galago 480SC + 144 300
    Wet-All — 0.1%
  • Assessments of the treated crops at 2, 4, and 6 weeks are summarized in Tables 6-58 to 6-60 below. No visual signs of phytotoxicity were noticed over 4 weeks. Signs of phytotoxicity were noticed in treatment 13 at 6 weeks.
  • TABLE 6-58
    2 Week Assessment
    Crop condition Actively growing
    Crop stage 6 Leaves
    BBCH scale 16
    Soil moisture Moist
    Rain since last visit 16 mm
  • TABLE 6-59
    4 Week Assessment
    Crop condition Actively growing
    Crop stage 8 Leaves
    BBCH scale 18
    Soil moisture Wet
    Rain since last visit 30 mm
  • TABLE 6-60
    6 Week Assessment
    Crop condition Actively growing
    Crop stage 10 leaves
    BBCH scale: 18
    Soil moisture Moist
    Rain since last visit 0 mm
  • Control and weed cover at 2, 4, and 6 weeks for the indicated species are summarized below in Tables 6-61 through 6-63. 80% is considered acceptable control.
  • TABLE 6-61
    % Control and weed cover (2 weeks after application)
    Treatments
    (product/ha) DAA AMASP ELEIN IPOPU COMBE
    Untreated control 2 35 18 28 20
    % soil cover 4 35 13 30 23
    6 33 13 30 25
    1 DINAMIC ® at 75 g 2 80 78 68 75
    Galago at 100 ml 4 73 70 60 75
    6 65 63 50 70
    2 DINAMIC ® at 75 g 2 80 80 73 80
    Galago at 150 ml 4 73 75 68 80
    6 68 73 63 80
    3 DINAMIC ® at 100 g 2 85 85 75 80
    Galago at 100 ml 4 78 78 68 80
    6 73 75 63 75
    4 DINAMIC ® at 100 g 2 94 83 78 88
    Galago at 150 ml 4 90 80 70 88
    6 85 75 63 83
    5 DINAMIC ® at 125 g 2 98 85 80 91
    Galago at 100 ml 4 96 80 70 91
    6 95 78 65 85
    6 DINAMIC ® at 125 g 2 98 90 93 88
    Galago at 150 ml 4 96 90 90 88
    6 94 83 83 90
    7 DINAMIC ® at 250 g 2 100 100 100 96
    Galago at 300 ml 4 100 100 100 96
    6 100 100 100 95
    8 DINAMIC ® at 75 g 2 100 100 90 99
    Galago at 100 ml 4 100 100 83 99
    Wet-All at 0.1% 6 100 100 80 90
    9 DINAMIC ® at 75 g 2 100 100 100 98
    Galago at 150 ml 4 100 100 90 98
    Wet-All at 0.1% 6 100 100 84 93
    10 DINAMIC ® at 100 g 2 99 100 90 98
    Galago at 100 ml 4 100 100 83 98
    Wet-All at 0.1% 6 100 100 78 93
    11 DINAMIC ® at 100 g 2 100 100 97 100
    Galago at 150 ml 4 100 100 95 100
    Wet-All at 0.1% 6 100 100 90 100
    12 DINAMIC ® at 125 g 2 100 100 97 100
    Galago at 100 ml 4 100 100 93 100
    Wet-All at 0.1% 6 100 100 88 100
    13 DINAMIC ® at 125 g 2 100 100 100 100
    Galago at 150 ml 4 100 100 100 100
    Wet-All at 0.1% 6 100 100 100 100
    14 DINAMIC ® at 250 g 2 100 100 95 100
    Galago at 300 ml 4 100 100 99 100
    Wet-All at 0.2% 6 100 100 99 100
    AMASP = Amaranthus spinosus; COMBE = Commelina benghalensis; IPOPU = Ipomoea purpurea; ELEIN = Eleusine indica
  • TABLE 6-62
    % Control and weed cover (4 weeks after application)
    Treatments
    (product/ha) Rep AMASP ELEIN IPOPU COMBE
    Untreated control I 30 10 40 20
    % soil cover ii 40 10 20 30
    iii 40 20 30 10
    iv 30 10 30 30
    Mean 35 13 30 23
    1 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 70 70 60 80
    Galago at 100 ml ii 70 70 60 70
    iii 80 70 60 70
    iv 70 70 60 80
    Mean 73 70 60 75
    2 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 70 80 70 80
    Galago at 150 ml ii 80 70 70 80
    iii 70 70 60 80
    iv 70 80 70 80
    Mean 73 75 68 80
    3 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 80 70 70 80
    Galago at 100 ml ii 70 80 70 80
    iii 80 80 70 80
    iv 80 80 60 80
    Mean 78 78 68 80
    4 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 90 80 70 90
    Galago at 150 ml ii 90 80 70 80
    iii 90 80 70 90
    iv 90 80 70 90
    Mean 90 80 70 88
    5 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 100 80 70 95
    Galago at 100 ml ii 90 80 70 90
    iii 95 80 70 90
    iv 100 80 70 90
    Mean 96 80 70 91
    6 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 100 90 90 90
    Galago at 150 ml ii 95 90 90 90
    iii 90 90 90 80
    iv 100 90 90 90
    Mean 96 90 90 88
    7 DINAMIC ® at 250 g I 100 100 100 95
    Galago at 300 ml ii 100 100 100 95
    iii 100 100 100 100
    iv 100 100 100 95
    Mean 100 100 100 96
    8 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 100 100 80 100
    Galago at 100 ml ii 100 100 80 98
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 90 98
    iv 100 100 80 98
    Mean 100 100 83 99
    9 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 100 100 98 95
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 90 98
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 80 98
    iv 100 100 90 100
    Mean 100 100 90 98
    10 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 100 100 80 95
    Galago at 100 ml ii 98 100 90 95
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 80 100
    iv 100 100 80 100
    Mean 100 100 83 98
    11 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 100 100 95 100
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 95 100
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 95 100
    iv 100 100 95 100
    Mean 100 100 95 100
    12 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 100 100 90 100
    Galago at 100 ml ii 100 100 95 100
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 95 100
    iv 100 100 90 100
    Mean 100 100 93 100
    13 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 100 100 100 100
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 100 100
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 100 100
    iv 100 100 100 100
    Mean 100 100 100 100
    14 DINAMIC ® at 250 g I 100 100 100 100
    Galago at 300 ml ii 100 100 100 100
    Wet-All at 0.2% iii 100 100 95 100
    iv 100 100 100 100
    Mean 100 100 99 100
    AMASP = Amaranthus spinosus; COMBE = Commelina benghalensis; IPOPU = Ipomoea purpurea; ELEIN = Eleusine indica
  • TABLE 6-63
    % Control and weed cover (6 weeks after application)
    Treatments
    (product/ha) Rep AMASP ELEIN IPOPU COMBE
    Untreated control I 30 10 40 20
    % soil cover ii 40 10 20 30
    iii 30 20 30 20
    iv 30 10 30 30
    Mean 33 13 30 25
    1 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 60 60 50 70
    Galago at 100 ml ii 70 60 50 70
    iii 70 70 50 70
    iv 60 60 50 70
    Mean 65 63 50 70
    2 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 70 70 60 80
    Galago at 150 ml ii 70 70 70 80
    iii 60 70 60 80
    iv 70 80 60 80
    Mean 68 73 63 80
    3 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 80 70 70 80
    Galago at 100 ml ii 70 80 60 70
    iii 70 70 60 70
    iv 70 80 60 80
    Mean 73 75 63 75
    4 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 90 70 60 80
    Galago at 150 ml ii 90 80 60 80
    iii 80 80 60 90
    iv 80 70 70 80
    Mean 85 75 63 83
    5 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 100 80 60 90
    Galago at 100 ml ii 90 80 60 90
    iii 90 70 70 80
    iv 100 80 70 80
    Mean 95 78 65 85
    6 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 100 80 80 90
    Galago at 150 ml ii 90 90 80 90
    iii 90 80 80 90
    iv 95 80 90 90
    Mean 94 83 83 90
    7 DINAMIC ® at 250 g I 100 100 100 95
    Galago at 300 ml ii 100 100 100 90
    iii 100 100 100 98
    iv 100 100 100 95
    Mean 100 100 100 95
    8 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 100 100 80 90
    Galago at 100 ml ii 100 100 80 90
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 80 90
    iv 100 100 80 90
    Mean 100 100 80 90
    9 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 100 100 95 90
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 80 95
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 80 90
    iv 100 100 80 95
    Mean 100 100 84 93
    10 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 100 100 80 90
    Galago at 100 ml ii 100 100 80 90
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 70 98
    iv 100 100 80 95
    Mean 100 100 78 93
    11 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 100 100 90 100
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 90 100
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 90 100
    iv 100 100 90 100
    Mean 100 100 90 100
    12 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 100 100 80 100
    Galago at 100 ml ii 100 100 90 100
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 90 100
    iv 100 100 90 100
    Mean 100 100 88 100
    13 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 100 100 100 100
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 100 100
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 100 100
    iv 100 100 100 100
    Mean 100 100 100 100
    14 DINAMIC ® at 250 g I 100 100 100 100
    Galago at 300 ml ii 100 100 100 100
    Wet-All at 0.2% iii 100 100 95 100
    iv 100 100 100 100
    Mean 100 100 99 100
    AMASP = Amaranthus spinosus; COMBE = Commelina benghalensis; IPOPU = Ipomoea purpurea; ELEIN = Eleusine indica
  • The higher Galago rate (150 mL/ha) improves control when used as a mixing partner for DINAMIC®. A wetter is beneficially used with this mixture. DINAMIC®+Galago without a wetter: DINAMIC® 700WDG at 125 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 100 mL/ha showed satisfactory control of Amaranthus spinosus and Commilina benghalensis, and as soon as the Galago rate increases to 150 mL/ha Eleusine indica and Ipomoea purpurea are also controlled. DINAMIC®+Galago with a wetter: DINAMIC® 700WDG at 75 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 100 mL/ha+Wet-All at 0.1% resulted in excellent control of Amaranthus spinosus, Commilina benghalensis and Eleusine indica, but Ipomoea purpurea was marginally controlled. Signs of phytotoxicity were noticed in the plots were DINAMIC® 700WDG at 250 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 300 mL/ha+Wet-All at 0.1% was sprayed. DINAMIC® 700WDG at 125 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 150 mL/ha can be used to control Amaranthus spinosus, Eleusine indica, Ipomoea purpurea and Commilina benghalensis. DINAMIC® 700WDG at 75 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 100 mL/ha+Wet-All at 0.1% can be used to control Amaranthus spinosus, Eleusine indica, Ipomoea purpurea and Commilina benghalensis.
    • J. Post Emergence Application Against Weed in Maize
  • In this part of the Example the efficacy of DINAMIC® (amicarbazone 700WDG, 700 grams active/kg, available from Arysta LifeScience North America, Cary, N.C.) mixtures with Galago (mesotrione 480SC, 480 grams active/L, available from Arysta LifeScience North America, Cary, N.C.) or TOLLA 960 (available from Arysta LifeScience North America, Cary, N.C.) with or without Wet-All (available from Arysta LifeScience North America, Cary, N.C.) as a post emergence application against weeds in maize (variety PHI 2369W) was determined. A comparison with CALLISTO® 480SC plus GARDOGOLD® 500SC plus COMPLEMENT® Super (each available from Syngenta, Greensboro, N.C.) was performed.
  • Trials were conducted at a site with a history of weeds. The trials were executed under moderate weather conditions. Efficacy and visual phytotoxicity assessments were performed in triplicate. Normal practices were carried out to control insects and fungi. Crops were provided in 55 cm row width, at a sowing rate of 65,000 plants/ha, and at a sowing depth of five to eight cm. Soil class was clay with a clay content of about 40%. The site in this Example had been previously used for maize. Trial design was randomized blocks with a plot size of 20 m2 replicated four times. Municipal water was used for all applications (pH=7.2).
  • Application of the treatments shown in Table 6-64 was conducted at post emergence stage 15 days after planting. Application of the treatments was conducted over a 24 hour period. Over this time period, dry bulb temperature was about 32° C., wet bulb temperature was about 25° C., relative humidity was about 50%, cloud cover was about 0%, and wind speed was about 0 m/s. Treatments were administered with a multi-spray gas sprayer with a 4× flat fan 03F80 nozzle. Spacing was 50 cm, with a height of 50 cm, pressure 2.8 Bar, at a ground speed of 1 m/s, and a calibration mean output of 330 L/ha. The soil temperature over the application period averaged to about 29° C. and the soil remained moist and fine. Crops stage at the outset was about 4 leaves with a BBCH scale of 14. Crop and weeds were actively growing. Weed stage was about 3-5 leaves.
  • TABLE 6-64
    Treatments
    Dosage rate Dosage rate
    No Treatments (gai/ha) (g/ha or mL/ha)
    Untreated control — —
    1 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 52.5 75
    Galago 480SC + 48 100
    Wet-All — 0.1%
    2 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 52.5 75
    Galago 480SC + 72 150
    Wet-All — 0.1%
    3 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 70 100
    Galago 480SC + 48 100
    Wet-All — 0.1%
    4 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 70 100
    Galago 480SC + 72 150
    Wet-All — 0.1%
    5 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 87.5 125
    Galago 480SC + 48 100
    Wet-All — 0.1%
    6 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 87.5 125
    Galago 480SC + 72 150
    Wet-All — 0.1%
    7 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 52.5 75
    Galago 480SC + 48 100
    TOLLA 960 960 1000
    Wet-All — 0.1%
    8 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 52.5 75
    Galago 480SC + 72 150
    TOLLA 960 960 1000
    Wet-All — 0.1%
    9 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 70 100
    Galago 480SC + 48 100
    TOLLA 960 960 1000
    Wet-All — 0.1%
    10 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 70 100
    Galago 480SC + 72 150
    TOLLA 960 960 1000
    Wet-All — 0.1%
    11 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 87.5 125
    Galago 480SC + 48 100
    TOLLA 960 960 1000
    Wet-All — 0.1%
    12 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 87.5 125
    Galago 480SC + 72 150
    TOLLA 960 960 1000
    Wet-All — 0.1%
    13 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 175 250
    Galago 480SC + 144 300
    TOLLA 960 960 1000
    Wet-All — 0.1%
    14 CALLISTO ® 480SC + 52.5 260
    GardoGold 500SC + 48 1562
    Compliment Super 960 0.1%
  • Assessments of the treated crops at 2, 4, and 6 weeks are summarized in Tables 6-65 to 6-67 below. No visual signs of phytotoxicity were noticed over 2 weeks. Signs of phytotoxicity were noticed in treatment 13 at 4 and 6 weeks.
  • TABLE 6-65
    2 Week Assessment
    Crop condition Actively growing
    Crop stage 5-6 Leaves
    BBCH scale 15-16
    Soil moisture Wet
    Rain since last visit 18 mm
  • TABLE 6-66
    4 Week Assessment
    Crop condition Actively growing
    Crop stage 8 Leaves
    BBCH scale 18
    Soil moisture Wet
    Rain since last visit 38 mm
  • TABLE 6-67
    6 Week Assessment
    Crop condition Actively growing
    Crop stage 10 leaves
    BBCH scale: 20
    Soil moisture Moist
    Rain since last visit 0 mm
  • Control and weed cover at 2, 4, and 6 weeks for the indicated species are summarized below in Tables 6-68 through 6-70. 80% is considered acceptable control.
  • TABLE 6-68
    % Control and weed cover (2 weeks after application)
    Treatments
    (product/ha) Rep ROTEX AMAHY COMBE
    Untreated control I 30 40 30
    % soil cover ii 40 30 30
    iii 40 50 10
    iv 30 40 30
    Mean 35 40 25
     1 DINAMIC ® at I 30 80 90
    75 g
    Galago at 100 ml ii 40 70 90
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 30 80 90
    iv 20 80 90
    Mean 30 78 90
     2 DINAMIC ® at I 50 80 100
    75 g
    Galago at 150 ml ii 40 80 100
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 40 90 95
    iv 50 80 100
    Mean 45 83 99
     3 DINAMIC ® at I 40 80 95
    100 g
    Galago at 100 ml ii 40 90 95
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 40 80 100
    iv 50 90 90
    Mean 43 85 95
     4 DINAMIC ® at I 60 90 100
    100 g
    Galago at 150 ml ii 40 90 100
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 50 90 100
    iv 60 90 100
    Mean 53 90 100
     5 DINAMIC ® at I 50 90 95
    125 g
    Galago at 100 ml ii 40 80 95
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 50 90 100
    iv 50 95 95
    Mean 48 89 96
     6 DINAMIC ® at I 70 100 100
    125 g
    Galago at 150 ml ii 50 100 100
    Wet-All at 0.1 % iii 60 95 100
    iv 60 100 100
    Mean 60 99 100
     7 DINAMIC ® at I 70 80 90
    75 g
    Galago at 100 ml ii 80 80 95
    TOLLA 960 at iii 80 80 95
    1000 ml
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 80 80 90
    Mean 78 80 93
     8 DINAMIC ® at I 70 100 100
    75 g
    Galago at 150 ml ii 80 90 100
    TOLLA 960 at iii 80 80 100
    1000 ml
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 90 90 100
    Mean 80 90 100
     9 DINAMIC ® at I 80 100 98
    100 g
    Galago at 100 ml ii 90 100 98
    TOLLA 960 at iii 80 90 100
    1000 ml
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 80 90 95
    Mean 83 95 98
    10 DINAMIC ® at I 90 90 100
    100 g
    Galago at 150 ml ii 80 90 100
    TOLLA 960 at iii 80 90 100
    1000 ml
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 90 90 100
    Mean 85 90 100
    11 DINAMIC ® at I 95 95 100
    125 g
    Galago at 100 ml ii 80 100 100
    TOLLA 960 at iii 90 90 98
    1000 ml
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 90 90 95
    Mean 89 94 98
    12 DINAMIC ® at I 90 100 100
    125 g
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 100
    TOLLA 960 at iii 95 100 100
    1000 ml
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 95 100 100
    Mean 95 100 100
    13 DINAMIC ® at I 100 100 100
    250 g
    Galago at 300 ml ii 95 100 100
    TOLLA 960 at iii 100 100 100
    1000 ml
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 95 100 100
    Mean 98 100 100
    14 CALLISTO ® I 100 95 100
    480SC at 260 ml
    GardoGOLD at ii 95 100 100
    1562 ml
    Compliment at iii 95 95 100
    0.1%
    iv 95 100 100
    Mean 96 98 100
    ROTTE = Rottboelia exaltata; IPOPU = Ipomoea purpurea; AMAHY = Amaranthus hyhridus
  • TABLE 6-69
    % Control and weed cover (4 weeks after application)
    Treatments
    (product/ha) Rep ROTEX AMAHY COMBE
    Untreated control I 30 40 30
    % soil cover ii 40 30 30
    iii 40 50 10
    iv 30 40 30
    Mean 35 40 25
     1 DINAMIC ® at I 40 80 90
    75 g
    Galago at 100 ml ii 40 80 90
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 30 90 95
    iv 30 80 90
    Mean 35 83 91
     2 DINAMIC ® at I 50 90 100
    75 g
    Galago at 150 ml ii 40 80 100
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 50 95 95
    iv 50 90 100
    Mean 48 89 99
     3 DINAMIC ® at I 40 90 95
    100 g
    Galago at 100 ml ii 50 90 98
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 40 90 100
    iv 50 90 95
    Mean 45 90 97
     4 DINAMIC ® at I 60 100 100
    100 g
    Galago at 150 ml ii 50 100 100
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 50 95 100
    iv 60 95 100
    Mean 55 98 100
     5 DINAMIC ® at I 50 95 95
    125 g
    Galago at 100 ml ii 50 90 100
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 60 95 100
    iv 50 95 98
    Mean 53 94 98
     6 DINAMIC ® at I 70 100 100
    125 g
    Galago at 150 ml ii 60 100 100
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 70 98 100
    iv 60 100 100
    Mean 65 100 100
     7 DINAMIC ® at I 70 90 90
    75 g
    Galago at 100 ml ii 80 90 98
    TOLLA 960 at iii 80 80 95
    1000 ml
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 80 90 95
    Mean 78 88 95
     8 DINAMIC ® at I 80 100 100
    75 g
    Galago at 150 ml ii 80 90 100
    TOLLA 960 at iii 80 90 100
    1000 ml
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 90 95 100
    Mean 83 94 100
     9 DINAMIC ® at I 80 100 100
    100 g
    Galago at 100 ml ii 90 100 98
    TOLLA 960 at iii 90 95 100
    1000 ml
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 90 95 98
    Mean 88 98 99
    10 DINAMIC ® at I 90 95 100
    100 g
    Galago at 150 ml ii 80 95 100
    TOLLA 960 at iii 90 90 100
    1000 ml
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 90 95 100
    Mean 88 94 100
    11 DINAMIC ® at I 95 98 100
    125 g
    Galago at 100 ml ii 90 100 100
    TOLLA 960 at iii 95 95 100
    1000 ml
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 90 95 98
    Mean 93 97 100
    12 DINAMIC ® at I 90 100 100
    125 g
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 100
    TOLLA 960 at iii 98 100 100
    1000 ml
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 98 100 100
    Mean 97 100 100
    13 DINAMIC ® at I 100 100 100
    250 g
    Galago at 300 ml ii 95 100 100
    TOLLA 960 at iii 100 100 100
    1000 ml
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 100 100 100
    Mean 99 100 100
    14 CALLISTO ® I 100 100 100
    480SC at 260 ml
    GardoGOLD at ii 95 100 100
    1562 ml
    Compliment at iii 98 95 100
    0.1%
    iv 100 100 100
    Mean 98 99 100
    ROTTE = Rottboelia exaltata; IPOPU = Ipomoea purpurea; AMAHY = Amaranthus hyhridus
  • TABLE 6-70
    % Control and weed cover (6 weeks after application)
    Treatments
    (product/ha) Rep ROTEX AMAHY COMBE
    Untreated control I 30 40 30
    % soil cover ii 30 30 40
    iii 40 50 10
    iv 20 40 40
    Mean 30 40 30
     1 DINAMIC ® at I 40 80 90
    75 g
    Galago at 100 ml ii 40 80 95
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 30 90 95
    iv 40 90 95
    Mean 38 85 94
     2 DINAMIC ® at I 50 90 100
    75 g
    Galago at 150 ml ii 50 90 100
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 50 98 98
    iv 50 90 100
    Mean 50 92 100
     3 DINAMIC ® at I 50 90 95
    100 g
    Galago at 100 ml ii 50 95 100
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 50 95 100
    iv 50 90 98
    Mean 50 93 98
     4 DINAMIC ® at I 60 100 100
    100 g
    Galago at 150 ml ii 50 100 100
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 60 100 100
    iv 70 98 100
    Mean 60 100 100
     5 DINAMIC ® at I 50 98 95
    125 g
    Galago at 100 ml ii 60 95 100
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 60 95 100
    iv 50 95 100
    Mean 55 96 99
     6 DINAMIC ® at I 70 100 100
    125 g
    Galago at 150 ml ii 70 100 100
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 70 100 100
    iv 70 100 100
    Mean 70 100 100
     7 DINAMIC ® at I 80 90 95
    75 g
    Galago at 100 ml ii 80 90 100
    TOLLA 960 at iii 80 90 95
    1000 ml
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 90 95 98
    Mean 83 91 97
     8 DINAMIC ® at I 90 100 100
    75 g
    Galago at 150 ml ii 80 95 100
    TOLLA 960 at iii 80 95 100
    1000 ml
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 90 95 100
    Mean 85 96 100
     9 DINAMIC ® at I 80 100 100
    100 g
    Galago at 100 ml ii 95 100 100
    TOLLA 960 at iii 95 100 100
    1000 ml
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 90 95 100
    Mean 90 99 100
    10 DINAMIC ® at I 90 98 100
    100 g
    Galago at 150 ml ii 90 95 100
    TOLLA 960 at iii 90 95 100
    1000 ml
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 95 95 100
    Mean 91 96 100
    11 DINAMIC ® at I 95 100 100
    125 g
    Galago at 100 ml ii 95 100 100
    TOLLA 960 at iii 95 95 100
    1000 ml
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 95 100 100
    Mean 95 99 100
    12 DINAMIC ® at I 98 100 100
    125 g
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 100
    TOLLA 960 at iii 98 100 100
    1000 ml
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 100 100 100
    Mean 99 100 100
    13 DINAMIC ® at I 100 100 100
    250 g
    Galago at 300 ml ii 98 100 100
    TOLLA 960 at iii 100 100 100
    1000 ml
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 100 100 100
    Mean 100 100 100
    14 CALLISTO ® I 100 100 100
    480SC at 260 ml
    GardoGOLD at ii 98 100 100
    1562 ml
    Compliment at iii 100 98 100
    0.1%
    iv 100 100 100
    Mean 100 100 100
    ROTTE = Rottboelia exaltata; IPOPU = Ipomoea purpurea; AMAHY = Amaranthus hyhridus
  • DINAMIC®+Galago+Wet-All: Rottboellia exaltata could not be controlled by any dosage rates of this mixture. DINAMIC® 700WDG at 75 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 100 mL/ha+Wet-All at 0.1% resulted in satisfactory control of Amaranthus hybridus and Ipomoea purpurea. With the exception of Rottboellia exaltata DINAMIC® 700WDG at 125 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 150 mL/ha+Wet-All at 0.1% compared with the standard CALLISTO® 480 SC at 260 mL/ha+Gardo Gold at 1562 mL/ha+Compliment at 0.1%. Rottboellia exaltata was 100% controlled by the standard treatment. DINAMIC®+Galago+TOLLA+Wet-All: DINAMIC® 700WDG at 75 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 100 mL/ha+TOLLA 960EC at 1000 mL/ha+Wet-All at 0.1% showed acceptable control of the entire weed spectrum after 6 weeks. DINAMIC®700WDG at 125 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 150 mL/ha+TOLLA 960EC at 000 mL/ha+Wet-All at 0.1% showed similar results to the standard CALLISTO® 480 SC at 260 mL/ha+Gardo Gold at 1562 mL/ha+Compliment at 0.1%. Signs of phytotoxicity were noticed in the plots were DINAMIC® 700WDG at 250 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 300 mL/ha+TOLLA 960EC at 1000 mL/ha+Wet-All at 0.1% was sprayed. DINAMIC® 700WDG at 75 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 150 mL/ha+TOLLA 960EC at 1000 mL/ha+Wet-All at 0.1% can safely be used to control of Amaranthus hybridus, Ipomoea purpurea and Rottboellia exaltata.
    • K. Post Emergence Application Against Weed in Maize
  • In this part of the Example the efficacy of DINAMIC® (amicarbazone 700WDG, 700 grams active/kg, available from Arysta LifeScience North America, Cary, N.C.) mixtures with Galago (mesotrione 480SC, 480 grams active/L, available from Arysta LifeScience North America, Cary, N.C.) or TOLLA 840S (available from Arysta LifeScience North America, Cary, N.C.) with or without Wet-All (available from Arysta LifeScience North America, Cary, N.C.) as a post emergence application against weeds in maize (variety PHI 32Y85) was determined. A comparison with CALLISTO® 480SC plus GARDOGOLD® 500SC plus COMPLEMENT® Super (each available from Syngenta, Greensboro, N.C.) was performed.
  • Trials were conducted at a site with a history of weeds. The trials were executed under moderate weather conditions. Efficacy and visual phytotoxicity assessments were performed in triplicate. Normal practices were carried out to control insects and fungi. Crops were provided in 76 cm row width, at a sowing rate of 65,000 plants/ha, and at a sowing depth of five to eight cm. Soil class was clay with a clay content of about 35%. The site in this Example had been previously used for soya beans. Trial design was randomized blocks with a plot size of 20 m2 replicated four times. Municipal water was used for all applications (pH=7.2).
  • Application of the treatments shown in Table 6-71 was conducted at post emergence stage 14 days after planting. Application of the treatments was conducted over a 24 hour period. Over this time period, dry bulb temperature was about 26° C., wet bulb temperature was about 21° C., relative humidity was about 65%, cloud cover was about 50%, and wind speed was about 0 m/s. Treatments were administered with a multi-spray gas sprayer with a 4× flat fan 03F80 nozzle. Spacing was 50 cm, with a height of 50 cm, pressure 2.8 Bar, at a ground speed of 1 m/s, and a calibration mean output of 330 L/ha. The soil temperature over the application period averaged to about 23° C. and the soil remained moist and fine. Crops stage at the outset was about 4 leaves with a BBCH scale of 14. Crop and weeds were actively growing. Weed stage was about 2-5 leaves.
  • TABLE 6-71
    Treatments
    Dosage rate Dosage rate
    No Treatments (gai/ha) (g/ha or mL/ha)
    Untreated control — —
     1 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 52.5 75
    Galago 480SC+ 48 100
    Wet-All — 0.1%
     2 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 52.5 75
    Galago 480SC + 72 150
    Wet-All — 0.1%
     3 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 70 100
    Galago 480SC + 48 100
    Wet-All — 0.1%
     4 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 70 100
    Galago 480SC + 72 150
    Wet-All — 0.1%
     5 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 87.5 125
    Galago 480SC + 48 100
    Wet-All — 0.1%
     6 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 87.5 125
    Galago 480SC + 72 150
    Wet-All — 0.1%
     7 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 52.5 75
    Galago 480SC + 48 100
    TOLLA 960 960 1000
    Wet-All — 0.1%
     8 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 52.5 75
    Galago 480SC + 72 150
    TOLLA 960 960 1000
    Wet-All — 0.1%
     9 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 70 100
    Galago 480SC + 48 100
    TOLLA 960 960 1000
    Wet-All — 0.1%
    10 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 70 100
    Galago 480SC + 72 150
    TOLLA 960 960 1000
    Wet-All — 0.1%
    11 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 87.5 125
    Galago 480SC + 48 100
    TOLLA 960 960 1000
    Wet-All — 0.1%
    12 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 87.5 125
    Galago 480SC + 72 150
    TOLLA 960 960 1000
    Wet-All — 0.1%
    13 DINAMIC ® 700WDG + 175 250
    Galago 480SC + 144 300
    TOLLA 960 960 1000
    Wet-All — 0.1%
    14 CALLISTO ® 480SC + 52.5 260
    GardoGold 500SC + 48 1562
    Compliment 960 0.1%
  • Assessments of the treated crops at 2, 4, and 6 weeks are summarized in Tables 6-72 to 6-74 below. No visual signs of phytotoxicity were noticed over 6 weeks.
  • TABLE 6-72
    2 Week Assessment
    Crop condition Actively growing
    Crop stage 6 Leaves
    BBCH scale 16
    Soil moisture Moist
    Rain since last visit 8 mm
  • TABLE 6-73
    4 Week Assessment
    Crop condition Actively growing
    Crop stage 7 Leaves
    BBCH scale 17
    Soil moisture Wet
    Rain since last visit 44 mm
  • TABLE 6-74
    6 Week Assessment
    Crop condition Actively growing
    Crop stage 9 leaves
    BBCH scale: 19
    Soil moisture Moist
    Rain since last visit 0 mm
  • Control and weed cover at 2, 4, and 6 weeks for the indicated species are summarized below in Tables 6-75 through 6-77. 80% is considered acceptable control.
  • TABLE 6-75
    % Control and weed cover (2 weeks after application)
    Treatments
    (product/ha) Rep DIGSA POROL AMAHY COMBE
    Untreated control I 30 20 20 30
    % soil cover ii 40 10 30 20
    iii 40 20 10 30
    iv 30 20 20 30
    Mean 35 18 20 28
    1 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 80 80 70 70
    Galago at 100 ml ii 70 80 70 80
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 80 70 60 70
    iv 80 70 70 70
    Mean 78 75 68 73
    2 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 80 80 70 60
    Galago at 150 ml ii 90 80 80 70
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 90 70 70 70
    iv 90 70 70 70
    Mean 88 75 73 68
    3 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 70 90 90 80
    Galago at 100 ml ii 80 90 80 80
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 80 80 90 80
    iv 70 90 90 70
    Mean 75 88 88 78
    4 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 90 90 90 80
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 90 80
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 95 90 90 80
    iv 90 90 90 80
    Mean 94 93 90 80
    5 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 90 100 98 95
    Galago at 100 ml ii 95 100 100 95
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 90 100 95 95
    iv 90 100 95 95
    Mean 91 100 97 95
    6 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 95 100 95 100
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 100 100
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 98 100 98 100
    iv 95 100 100 100
    Mean 97 100 98 100
    7 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 90 100 85 90
    Galago at 100 ml ii 90 100 90 90
    TOLLA 960 at iii 95 100 90 95
    1000 ml
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 95 100 80 90
    Mean 93 100 86 91
    8 DINAMIC ® at 75 g 1 95 100 90 100
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 100 100
    TOLLA 960 at iii 100 100 95 95
    1000 ml
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 100 100 95 100
    Mean 99 100 95 99
    9 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 95 100 100 100
    Galago at 100 ml ii 100 100 100 95
    TOLLA 960 at iii 98 100 100 100
    1000 ml
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 95 100 100 100
    Mean 97 100 100 99
    10 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 90 100 95 95
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 100 100
    TOLLA 960 at iii 100 100 100 100
    1000 ml
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 100 100 98 100
    Mean 98 100 98 99
    11 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 90 100 100 100
    Galago at 100 ml ii 90 100 98 100
    TOLLA 960 at iii 95 100 98 95
    1000 ml
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 95 100 100 98
    Mean 93 100 99 98
    12 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 100 100 90 100
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 100 100
    TOLLA 960 at iii 100 100 95 98
    1000 ml
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 100 100 95 100
    Mean 100 100 95 100
    13 DINAMIC ® at 250 g I 100 100 100 100
    Galago at 300 ml ii 100 100 100 100
    TOLLA 960 at iii 100 100 100 100
    1000 ml
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 100 100 100 100
    Mean 100 100 100 100
    14 CALLISTO ® 480SC I 95 90 98 100
    at 260 ml
    GardoGOLD at ii 90 95 100 100
    1562 ml
    Compliment at 0.1% iii 95 100 98 100
    iv 95 95 98 100
    Mean 94 95 99 100
    DIGSA = Digitaria sanguinalis; POROL = Portulaca oleracea; AMAHY = Amaranthus hybridus; COMBE = Commelina benghalensis
  • TABLE 6-76
    % Control and weed cover (4 weeks after application)
    Treatments (product/ha) Rep DIGSA POROL AMAHY COMBE
    Untreated control I 30 20 20 30
    % soil cover ii 40 10 30 20
    iii 40 20 10 30
    iv 30 20 20 30
    Mean 35 18 20 28
    DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 80 80 70 80
    Galago at 100 ml ii 80 80 70 80
    Wet-All at 0.1% ili 80 70 70 70
    iv 90 80 80 70
    Mean 83 78 73 75
    DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 90 80 70 70
    Galago at 150 ml ii 90 80 80 80
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 90 70 80 80
    iv 98 80 80 70
    Mean 92 78 78 75
    DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 80 90 90 80
    Galago at 100 ml ii 90 90 90 80
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 80 90 90 70
    iv 80 90 90 80
    Mean 83 90 90 78
    DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 95 95 90 80
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 90 80
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 98 90 95 90
    iv 90 95 90 90
    Mean 96 95 91 85
    DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 95 100 98 95
    Galago at 100 ml ii 98 100 100 95
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 90 100 95 95
    iv 95 100 95 95
    Mean 95 100 97 95
    DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 98 100 95 100
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 100 100
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 98 100
    iv 98 100 100 100
    Mean 99 100 98 100
    DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 90 100 85 90
    Galago at 100 ml ii 95 100 90 90
    TOLLA 960 at 1000 ml iii 100 100 90 95
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 98 100 80 90
    Mean 96 100 86 91
    DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 100 100 90 100
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 100 100
    TOLLA 960 at 1000 ml iii 100 100 95 95
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 100 100 95 100
    Mean 100 100 95 99
    DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 98 100 100 100
    Galago at 100 ml ii 100 100 100 95
    TOLLA 960 at 1000 ml iii 100 100 100 100
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 95 100 100 100
    Mean 98 100 100 99
    DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 95 100 95 95
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 100 100
    TOLLA 960 at 1000 ml iii 100 100 100 100
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 100 100 98 100
    Mean 99 100 98 99
    DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 95 100 100 100
    Galago at 100 ml ii 90 100 98 100
    TOLLA 960 at 1000 ml iii 98 100 98 95
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 95 100 100 98
    Mean 95 100 99 98
    DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 100 100 90 100
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 100 100
    TOLLA 960 at 1000 ml iii 100 100 95 98
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 100 100 95 100
    Mean 100 100 95 100
    DINAMIC ® at 250 g I 100 100 100 100
    Galago at 300 ml ii 100 100 100 100
    TOLLA 960 at 1000 ml iii 100 100 100 100
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 100 100 100 100
    Mean 100 100 100 100
    CALLISTO ® 480SC I 95 90 98 100
    at 260 ml
    GardoGOLD at 1562 ml ii 95 95 100 100
    Compliment at 0.1% iii 98 100 98 100
    iv 95 95 98 100
    Mean 96 95 99 100
    DIGSA = Digitaria sanguinalis; POROL = Portulaca oleracea; AMAHY = Amaranthus hybridus; COMBE = Commelina benghalensis
  • TABLE 6-77
    % Control and weed cover (6 weeks after application)
    Treatments (product/ha) Rep DIGSA POROL AMAHY COMBE
    Untreated control I 20 20 30 30
    % soil cover ii 20 20 40 20
    iii 30 20 20 30
    iv 20 30 20 30
    Mean 23 23 28 28
     1 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 80 80 70 80
    Galago at 100 ml ii 90 70 80 70
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 90 70 70 70
    iv 90 80 80 70
    Mean 88 75 75 73
     2 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 95 70 70 70
    Galago at 150 ml ii 90 80 80 80
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 95 70 80 70
    iv 100 70 70 70
    Mean 95 73 75 73
     3 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 80 80 90 80
    Galago at 100 ml ii 90 80 90 80
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 80 80 90 70
    iv 90 80 90 70
    Mean 85 80 90 75
     4 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 100 90 95 80
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 95 90 70
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 90 95 80
    iv 95 90 90 90
    Mean 99 91 93 80
     5 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 98 100 100 90
    Galago at 100 ml ii 100 100 100 95
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 95 100 95 95
    iv 95 100 95 90
    Mean 97 100 98 93
     6 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 100 100 95 100
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 100 100
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 100 100
    iv 100 100 100 100
    Mean 100 100 99 100
     7 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 95 100 90 90
    Galago at 100 ml ii 95 100 90 95
    TOLLA 960 at 1000 ml iii 100 100 95 98
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 100 100 90 90
    Mean 98 100 91 93
     8 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 100 100 90 100
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 100 100
    TOLLA 960 at 1000 ml iii 100 100 98 95
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 100 100 95 100
    Mean 100 100 96 99
     9 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 100 100 100 100
    Galago at 100 ml ii 100 100 100 98
    TOLLA 960 at 1000 ml iii 100 100 100 100
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 98 100 100 100
    Mean 100 100 100 100
    10 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 95 100 95 95
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 100 100
    TOLLA 960 at 1000 ml iii 100 100 100 100
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 100 100 100 100
    Mean 99 100 99 99
    11 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 95 100 100 100
    Galago at 100 ml ii 95 100 100 100
    TOLLA 960 at 1000 ml iii 100 100 98 95
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 95 100 100 100
    Mean 96 100 100 99
    12 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 100 100 95 100
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 100 100
    TOLL A 960 at 1000 ml iii 100 100 100 100
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 100 100 98 100
    Mean 100 100 98 100
    13 DINAMIC ® at 250g I 100 100 100 100
    Galago at 300 ml ii 100 100 100 100
    TOLLA 960 at 1000 ml iii 100 100 100 100
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 100 100 100 100
    Mean 100 100 100 100
    14 CALLISTO ® 480SC at 260 ml I 95 95 100 100
    GardoGOLD at 1562 ml ii 95 95 100 100
    Compliment at 0.1% iii 98 100 98 100
    iv 95 95 100 100
    Mean 96 96 100 100
    DIGSA = Digitaria sanguinalis; POROL = Portulaca oleracea; AMAHY = Amaranthus hybridus; COMBE = Commelina benghalensis
  • DINAMIC®+Galago+Wet-All: DINAMIC® 700WDG at 100 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 100 mL/ha+Wet-All at 0.1% resulted in satisfactory control of Digitaria sanguinalis, Portulaca oleracea and Amaranthus hybridus. Commilina benghalensis was insufficiently controlled but as soon as the Galago rate was increased to 100 mL/ha satisfactory control was achieved. DINAMIC®+Galago+TOLLA+Wet-All: The addition of TOLLA showed a drastic improvement on control. DINAMIC® 700WDG at 75 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 100 mL/ha+TOLLA 960EC at 1000 mL/ha+Wet-All at 0.1% showed excellent control of the entire weed spectrum after 6 weeks. This mixture performed on par with the standard CALLISTO® 480 SC at 260 mL/ha+Gardo Gold at 1562 mL/ha+Compliment at 0.1%._No visual signs of phytotoxicity were noticed throughout the growing season. DINAMIC® 700WDG at 75 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 100 mL/ha+TOLLA 960EC at 1000 mL/ha+Wet-All at 0.1% can be used for to control Digitaria sanguinalis, Portulaca oleracea, Amaranthus hybridus and Commilina benghalensis.
    • L. Post Emergence Application Against Weed in Maize
  • In this part of the Example the efficacy of DINAMIC® (amicarbazone 700WDG, 700 grams active/kg, available from Arysta LifeScience North America, Cary, N.C.) mixtures with Galago (mesotrione 480SC, 480 grams active/L, available from Arysta LifeScience North America, Cary, N.C.) or TOLLA 840S (available from Arysta LifeScience North America, Cary, N.C.) with or without Wet-All (available from Arysta LifeScience North America, Cary, N.C.) as a post emergence application against weeds in maize (variety PAN60-445B) was determined. A comparison with CALLISTO® 480SC plus GARDOGOLD® 500SC plus COMPLEMENT® Super (each available from Syngenta, Greensboro, N.C.) was performed.
  • Trials were conducted at a site with a history of broad leaf weeds and grasses. The trials were executed under moderate weather conditions. Efficacy and visual phytotoxicity assessments were performed in triplicate. Normal practices were carried out to control insects and fungi. Crops were provided in 76 cm row width, at a sowing rate of 65,000 plants/ha, and at a sowing depth of five to eight cm. Soil class was clay with a clay content of about 28%. The site in this Example had been previously used for soya beans. Trial design was randomized blocks with a plot size of 20 m2 replicated four times. Municipal water was used for all applications (pH=7.2).
  • Application of the treatments shown in Table 6-78 was conducted at post emergence stage 18 days after planting. Application of the treatments was conducted over a 24 hour period. Over this time period, dry bulb temperature was about 31° C., wet bulb temperature was about 28° C., relative humidity was about 80%, cloud cover was about 100%, and wind speed was about 0 m/s. Treatments were administered with a multi-spray gas sprayer with a 4× flat fan 03F80 nozzle. Spacing was 50 cm, with a height of 50 cm, pressure 2.8 Bar, at a ground speed of 1 m/s, and a calibration mean output of 330 L/ha. The soil temperature over the application period averaged to about 29° C. and the soil remained moist and fine. Crops stage at the outset was about 4 leaves with a BBCH scale of 14. Crop and weeds were actively growing. Weed stage was about 2-6 leaves.
  • TABLE 6-78
    Treatments
    Dosage rate Dosage rate
    No Treatments (gai/ha) (g/ha or mL/ha)
    Untreated control — —
     1 DINAMIC® 700WDG + 52.5 75
    Galago 480SC + 48 100
    Wet-All — 0.1%
     2 DINAMIC® 700WDG + 52.5 75
    Galago 480SC + 72 150
    Wet-All — 0.1%
     3 DINAMIC® 700WDG + 70 100
    Galago 480SC + 48 100
    Wet-All — 0.1%
     4 DINAMIC® 700WDG + 70 100
    Galago 480SC + 72 150
    Wet-All — 0.1%
     5 DINAMIC® 700WDG + 87.5 125
    Galago 480SC + 48 100
    Wet-All — 0.1%
     6 DINAMIC® 700WDG + 87.5 125
    Galago 480SC + 72 150
    Wet-All — 0.1%
     7 DINAMIC® 700WDG + 52.5 75
    Galago 480SC + 48 100
    TOLLA 960 960 1000
    Wet-All — 0.1%
     8 DINAMIC® 700WDG + 52.5 75
    Galago 480SC + 72 150
    TOLLA 960 960 1000
    Wet-All — 0.1%
     9 DINAMIC® 700WDG + 70 100
    Galago 480SC + 48 100
    TOLLA 960 960 1000
    Wet-All — 0.1%
    10 DINAMIC® 700WDG + 70 100
    Galago 480SC + 72 150
    TOLLA 960 960 1000
    Wet-All — 0.1%
    11 DINAMIC® 700WDG + 87.5 125
    Galago 480SC + 48 100
    TOLLA 960 960 1000
    Wet-All — 0.1%
    12 DINAMIC® 700WDG + 87.5 125
    Galago 480SC + 72 150
    TOLLA 960 960 1000
    Wet-All — 0.1%
    13 DINAMIC® 700WDG + 175 250
    Galago 480SC + 144 300
    TOLLA 960 960 1000
    Wet-All — 0.1%
    14 CALLISTO® 480SC + 52.5 260
    GardoGold 500SC + 48 1562
    Compliment 960 0.1%
  • Assessments of the treated crops at 2, 4, and 6 weeks are summarized in Tables 6-79 to 6-81 below. No visual signs of phytotoxicity were noticed over 4 weeks. Signs of phytotoxicity were noticed in treatment 13 at 6 weeks.
  • TABLE 6-79
    2 Week Assessment
    Crop condition Actively growing
    Crop stage 6 Leaves
    BBCH scale 16
    Soil moisture Moist
    Rain since last visit 16 mm
  • TABLE 6-80
    4 Week Assessment
    Crop condition Actively growing
    Crop stage 8 Leaves
    BBCH scale 18
    Soil moisture Wet
    Rain since last visit 30 mm
  • TABLE 6-81
    6 Week Assessment
    Crop condition Actively growing
    Crop stage 10 leaves
    BBCH scale: 18
    Soil moisture Moist
    Rain since last visit 0 mm
  • Control and weed cover at 2, 4, and 6 weeks for the indicated species are summarized below in Tables 6-82 through 6-84. 80% is considered acceptable control.
  • TABLE 6-82
    % Control and weed cover (2 weeks after application)
    Treatments
    (product/ha) Rep AMASP ELEIN IPOPI COMBI
    Untreated control I 30 30 20 20
    % soil cover ii 20 40 10 30
    iii 30 40 20 10
    iv 30 30 20 20
    Mean 28 35 18 20
     1 DINAMIC ® at I 100 100 90 100
    75 g
    Galago at 100 ml ii 98 100 90 98
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 90 98
    iv 100 100 90 98
    Mean 100 100 90 99
     2 DINAMIC ® at I 100 100 100 95
    75 g
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 100 98
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 100 98
    iv 100 100 100 100
    Mean 100 100 100 98
     3 DINAMIC ® at I 98 100 90 95
    100 g
    Galago at 100 ml ii 98 100 90 95
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 90 100
    iv 100 100 90 100
    Mean 99 100 90 98
     4 DINAMIC ® at I 100 100 95 100
    100 g
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 98 100
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 95 100
    iv 100 100 98 100
    Mean 100 100 97 100
     5 DINAMIC ® at I 100 100 95 100
    125 g
    Galago at 100 ml ii 100 100 98 100
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 98 100
    iv 100 100 98 100
    Mean 100 100 97 100
     6 DINAMIC ® at I 100 100 100 100
    125 g
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 100 100
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 100 100
    iv 100 100 100 100
    Mean 100 100 100 100
     7 DINAMIC ® at I 90 95 100 90
    75 g
    Galago at 100 ml ii 90 90 100 95
    TOLLA 960 at iii 95 90 100 95
    1000 ml
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 90 95 100 95
    Mean 91 93 100 100
     8 DINAMIC ® at I 95 90 100 95
    75 g
    Galago at 150 ml ii 95 90 100 95
    TOLLA 960 at iii 95 90 100 98
    1000 ml
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 98 90 100 95
    Mean 96 90 100 96
     9 DINAMIC ® at I 90 95 100 98
    100 g
    Galago at 100 ml ii 90 90 100 100
    TOLLA 960 at iii 90 90 100 95
    1000 ml
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 90 90 100 100
    Mean 90 91 100 98
    10 DINAMIC ® at I 98 98 100 100
    100 g
    Galago at 150 ml ii 98 95 100 100
    TOLLA 960 at iii 98 98 100 100
    1000 ml
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 90 95 100 100
    Mean 96 97 100 100
    11 DINAMIC ® at I 95 100 100 95
    125 g
    Galago at 100 ml ii 95 98 100 95
    TOLLA 960 at iii 90 95 100 95
    1000 ml
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 95 95 100 98
    Mean 94 97 100 96
    12 DINAMIC ® at I 98 98 100 98
    125 g
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 95 100 100
    TOLLA 960 at iii 100 98 100 100
    1000 ml
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 95 95 100 100
    Mean 98 97 100 100
    13 DINAMIC ® at I 100 98 100 100
    250 g
    Galago at 300 ml ii 100 100 100 100
    TOLLA 960 at iii 100 100 100 100
    1000 ml
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 100 98 100 100
    Mean 100 99 100 100
    14 CALLISTO ® I 90 98 100 90
    480SC at 260 ml ii 90 95 100 95
    GardoGOLD at iii 95 90 100 90
    1562 ml
    Compliment at iv 95 90 100 90
    0.1%
    Mean 93 93 100 91
    AMASP = Amaranthus spinosus; COMBE = Commelina benghalensis; IPOPU = Ipomoea purpurea; ELEIN = Eleusine indica
  • TABLE 6-83
    % Control and weed cover (4 weeks after application)
    Treatments
    (product/ha) Rep AMASP ELEIN IPOPI COMBI
    Untreated control I 30 30 20 20
    % soil cover ii 20 30 20 30
    iii 30 30 20 20
    iv 30 20 30 20
    Mean 28 28 23 23
     1 DINAMIC ® at I 100 100 80 100
    75 g
    Galago at 100 ml ii 100 100 80 98
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 90 98
    iv 100 100 80 98
    Mean 100 100 83 99
     2 DINAMIC ® at I 100 100 98 95
    75 g
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 90 98
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 80 98
    iv 100 100 90 100
    Mean 100 100 90 98
     3 DINAMIC ® at I 100 100 80 95
    100 g
    Galago at 100 ml ii 98 100 90 95
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 80 100
    iv 100 100 80 100
    Mean 100 100 83 98
     4 DINAMIC ® at I 100 100 95 100
    100 g
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 95 100
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 95 100
    iv 100 100 95 100
    Mean 100 100 95 100
     5 DINAMIC ® at I 100 100 90 100
    125 g
    Galago at 100 ml ii 100 100 95 100
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 95 100
    iv 100 100 90 100
    Mean 100 100 93 100
     6 DINAMIC ® at I 100 100 100 100
    125 g
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 100 100
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 100 100
    iv 100 100 100 100
    Mean 100 100 100 100
     7 DINAMIC ® at I 100 98 100 90
    75 g
    Galago at 100 ml ii 100 95 100 95
    TOLLA 960 at iii 100 98 100 95
    1000 ml
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 100 100 100 95
    Mean 100 98 100 100
     8 DINAMIC ® at I 100 100 100 95
    75 g
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 100 95
    TOLLA 960 at iii 100 100 100 98
    1000 ml
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 100 100 100 95
    Mean 100 100 100 96
     9 DINAMIC ® at I 100 100 100 98
    100 g
    Galago at 100 ml ii 100 98 100 100
    TOLLA 960 at iii 100 95 100 95
    1000 ml
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 100 100 100 100
    Mean 100 98 100 98
    10 DINAMIC ® at I 100 100 100 100
    100 g
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 100 100
    TOLLA 960 at iii 100 100 100 100
    1000 ml
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 100 100 100 100
    Mean 100 100 100 100
    11 DINAMIC ® at I 100 100 100 95
    125 g
    Galago at 100 ml ii 100 100 100 95
    TOLLA 960 at iii 100 95 100 95
    1000 ml
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 100 98 100 98
    Mean 100 98 100 96
    12 DINAMIC ® at I 100 100 100 98
    125 g
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 100 100
    TOLLA 960 at iii 100 100 100 100
    1000 ml
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 100 100 100 100
    Mean 100 100 100 100
    13 DINAMIC ® at I 100 100 100 100
    250 g
    Galago at 300 ml ii 100 100 100 100
    TOLLA 960 at iii 100 100 100 100
    1000 ml
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 100 100 100 100
    Mean 100 100 100 100
    14 CALLISTO ® I 100 100 100 90
    480SC at 260 ml ii 100 100 100 95
    GardoGOLD at iii 100 100 100 90
    1562 ml
    Compliment at iv 100 100 100 90
    0.1%
    Mean 100 100 100 91
    AMASP = Amaranthus spinosu; COMBE = Commelina benghalensis; IPOPU = Ipomoea purpurea; ELEIN = Eleusine indica
  • TABLE 6-84
    % Control and weed cover (6 weeks after application)
    Treatments (product/ha) Rep AMASP ELEIN IPOPI COMBI
    Untreated control I 30 20 20 30
    % soil cover ii 30 20 20 30
    iii 40 20 20 20
    iv 30 20 30 20
    Mean 33 20 23 25
     1 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 100 100 80 90
    Galago at 100 ml ii 100 100 80 90
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 80 90
    iv 100 100 80 90
    Mean 100 100 80 90
     2 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 100 100 95 90
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 80 95
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 80 90
    iv 100 100 80 95
    Mean 100 100 84 93
     3 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 100 100 80 90
    Galago at 100 ml ii 100 100 80 90
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 70 98
    iv 100 100 80 95
    Mean 100 100 78 93
     4 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 100 100 90 100
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 90 100
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 90 100
    iv 100 100 90 100
    Mean 100 100 90 100
     5 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 100 100 80 100
    Galago at 100 ml ii 100 100 90 100
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 90 100
    iv 100 100 90 100
    Mean 100 100 88 100
     6 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 100 100 100 100
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 100 100
    Wet-All at 0.1% iii 100 100 100 100
    iv 100 100 100 100
    Mean 100 100 100 100
     7 DINAMIC ® at 75 g I 100 100 100 95
    Galago at 100 ml ii 100 98 100 95
    TOLLA 960 at 1000 ml iii 100 100 100 98
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 100 100 100 98
    Mean 100 100 100 100
     8 DINAMIC ® at 75 g 1 100 100 100 95
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 100 98
    TOLLA 960 at 1000 ml iii 100 100 100 100
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 100 100 100 95
    Mean 100 100 100 97
     9 DINAMIC ® at 100 g I 100 100 100 100
    Galago at 100 ml ii 100 100 100 100
    TOLLA 960 at 1000 ml iii 100 95 100 95
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 100 100 100 100
    Mean 100 99 100 99
    10 DINAMIC ® at 100 g 1 100 100 100 100
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 100 100
    TOLLA 960 at 1000 ml iii 100 100 100 100
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 100 100 100 100
    Mean 100 100 100 100
    11 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 100 100 100 98
    Galago at 100 ml ii 100 100 100 98
    TOLLA 960 at 1000 ml iii 100 95 100 95
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 100 100 100 100
    Mean 100 99 100 98
    12 DINAMIC ® at 125 g I 100 100 100 100
    Galago at 150 ml ii 100 100 100 100
    TOLLA 960 at 1000 ml iii 100 100 100 100
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 100 100 100 100
    Mean 100 100 100 100
    13 DINAMIC ® at 250 g I 100 100 100 100
    Galago at 300 ml ii 100 100 100 100
    TOLLA 960 at 1000 ml iii 100 100 100 100
    Wet-All at 0.1% iv 100 100 100 100
    Mean 100 100 100 100
    14 CALLISTO ® 480SC at 260 ml I 100 100 100 95
    GardoGOLD at 1562 ml ii 100 100 100 95
    Compliment at 0.1% iii 100 100 100 90
    iv 100 100 100 95
    Mean 100 100 100 94
    AMASP = Amaranthus spinosu; COMBE = Commelina benghalensis; IPOPU = Ipomoea purpurea; ELEIN = Eleusine indica
  • The results indicate that TOLLA was unnecessarily added to the DINAMIC®+Galago+Wet-All mixture as the mixture gave sufficient control without TOLLA. DINAMIC®+Galago+Wet-All: DINAMIC® 700WDG at 75 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 100 mL/ha+Wet-All at 0.1% resulted in excellent control of Amaranthus spinosus and satisfactory control of Commilina benghalensis and Ipomoea purpurea. With the exception of Ipomoea purpurea this mixture compared with the standard CALLISTO® 480 SC at 260 mL/ha+Gardo Gold at 1562 mL/ha+Compliment at 0.1%. DINAMIC®+Galago+TOLLA+Wet-All: DINAMIC® 700WDG at 75 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 100 mL/ha+TOLLA 960EC at 1000 mL/ha+Wet-All at 0.1% showed 100% control of the entire weed spectrum after 6 weeks. This mixture outperformed the standard CALLISTO® 480 SC at 260 mL/ha+Gardo Gold at 1562 mL/ha+Compliment at 0.1%. Signs of phytotoxicity were noticed in the plots were DINAMIC® 700WDG at 250 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 300 mL/ha+TOLLA 960EC at 1000 mL/ha+Wet-All at 0.1% was sprayed. DINAMIC® 700WDG at 75 g/ha+Galago 480SC at 100 mL/ha+TOLLA 960EC at 1000 mL/ha+Wet-All at 0.1% can be used to control of Amaranthus spinosus, Eleusine indica, Ipomoea purpurea and Commilina benghalensis.
    • M. Pre Emergence Application Against Weed in Maize
  • This Example compares the herbicidal selectivity and efficacy of DINAMIC® 700WDG applied in combination with Galago and TOLLA 840S as a pre-emergence application with regards to both crop and weeds in dry land maize. Treatments and conditions are tabulated below.
  • TABLE 6-85
    Treatments
    Rate/ha
    TREATMENT Product (l) a.i. (g)
     1 DINAMIC ® + Galago  75 g + 100 ml 52.5 + 48
     2 DINAMIC ® + Galago  75 g + 150 ml 52.5 + 72
     3 DINAMIC ® + Galago 100 g + 100 ml 70 + 48
     4 DINAMIC ® + Galago 100 g + 150 ml 70 + 72
     5 DINAMIC ® + Galago 125 g + 100 ml 87.5 + 48
     6 DINAMIC ® + Galago 125 g + 150 ml 87.5 + 72
     7 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 75 g + 100 ml + 52.5 + 48 + 840
    TOLLA 840 S 1.0 l
     8 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 75 g + 150 ml + 52.5 + 72 + 840
    TOLLA 840 S 1.0 l
     9 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 100 g + 100 ml + 70 + 48 + 840
    TOLLA 840 S 1.0 l
    10 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 100 g + 150 ml + 70 +72 + 840
    TOLLA 840 S 1.0 l
    11 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 125 g + 100 ml + 87.5 + 48+ 840
    TOLLA 840 S 1.0 l
    12 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 125 g + 150 ml + 87.5 + 72 + 840
    TOLLA 840 S 1.0 l
    13 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 250 g + 300 ml + 175 + 144+ 1680
    TOLLA 840 S 2.0 l
    14 CALLISTO ® + Dual Gold 260 ml + 710 ml 125 + 650
    15 Untreated control — —
  • TABLE 6-86
    Test products
    Manu-
    facturer/ Reg.
    Product Active Ingredient Form Supplier No.
    1 DINAMIC ® Amicarbazone WDG Arysta
    700WDG 700 g/kg Lifescience
    2 Galago Mesotrione 480 g/l SC Arysta L. 8089
    Lifescience
    3 TOLIA Metolachlor 840 EC Arysta L. 7374
    840 S g/l + Safener Lifescience
    4 CALLISTO ® Mesotrione 480 g/l SC Syngenta L. 6795
    5 DUALS S-Melolachlor 915 EC Syngenta L. 5749
    GOLD ® g/l + Safener
  • TABLE 6-87
    TRIAL DESIGN:
    Design Completely randomized design
    Replicates Five
    Plot size 5m × 2.5 m = Nett/plot
  • TABLE 6-88
    SPRAYER
    Sprayer CO2 Precision Sprayer
    Boom 2.5 m aluminium
    Nozzle
    5 × 11002 flat fan nozzles (Teejet 11002 DG)
    Pressure 2.7 Bar
    Application 200 l/ha
    • Spray Water Quality
  • pH: 6.62
    EC: 0.85 mS/m
    • Spray Volume
  • 200l/ha at 2.7 Bar
  • TABLE 6-89
    WEATHER INFORMATION AT APPLICATION
    Temperature (max) 21.9° C.
    RH: 48%
    Wind: 0-10 km/h, N
    Cloud
    6/8
  • TABLE 6-90
    SOIL PROPERTIES AT APPLICATION:
    Clay Fraction 16.0%
    Silt Fraction  3.5%
    Sand Fraction 80.5%
    pH (KCl) 5.1
    Moisture Surface dry, subsurface moist at 6 cm
    Seedbed condition Medium to cloddy
    • Irrigation
  • None (rain-fed)
    • Crop Crop: Maize Variety: Phb 31 G 54 BR
  • Growth stage: Pre-emergence (BBCH growth stage 00)
    Sowing depth: 5 cm
    Sowing density: 45000 plants/ha
  • TABLE 6-91
    WEED INFORMATION
    SPECIES COMMON NAME ABBREVIATION
    Bidens pilosa Blackjack BIDPI
    Amaranthus hybridus Pigweed AMAHY
    Tagetes minuta Khaki weed TAGMI
    Digitaria sanquinalis Crab-finger grass DIGSA
  • TABLE 6-92
    ASSESSMENT DETAILS:
    Method Comparative Efficacy
    Herbicide Efficacy:
    Number of weeds in treated versus untreated plots
    Selectivity:
    1. Visual phytotoxicity: BBA 1-9 scale (refer to appendix for details)
    2. Yield: 20 cobs harvested at random from each plot. Average grain weight
    per plot determined using a precision 2 decimal scale. Statistical evaluation:
    ANOVA at the 95% probability using Tukeys LSD formulae
    Assessment
    14 DAA Efficacy/Selectivity
    Times-Days 28 DAA Efficacy/Selectivity
    After 42 DAA Efficacy/Selectivity
    Application
    56 DAA Efficacy
    (DAA) Harvest Selectivity
  • TABLE 6-93
    Comparative yield of DINAMIC ® 700WDG programs
    YIELD (Kg/plot)
    Replicate
    TREATMENT I II III IV Mean
     1 DINAMIC ® + Galago 2.77 2.45 3.07 3.25 2.89 b 
    75 g + 100 ml
     2 DINAMIC ® + Galago 2.14 2.11 3.03 2.65 2.34 ab
    75 g + 150 ml0
     3 DINAMIC ® + Galago 2.45 3.12 2.33 2.50 2.70 ab
    100 g + 100 ml
     4 DINAMIC ® + Galago 2.35 2.33 2.50 2.32 2.72 ab
    100 g + 150 ml
     5 DINAMIC ® + Galago 3.00 3.13 2.97 2.42 2.44 b 
    125 g + 100 ml
     6 DINAMIC ® + Galago 2.67 2.17 2.06 2.06 2.75 a 
    125 g + 150 ml
     7 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 2.64 2.56 2.76 3.00 2.16 ab
    TOLLA 840S
    75 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l
     8 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 2.73 2.90 2.98 3.06 2.30 b 
    TOLLA 840S
    75 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l
     9 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 2.70 2.86 2.94 3.02 2.39 b 
    TOLLA 840S
    100 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l
    10 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 2.73 2.90 2.98 3.06 2.47 b 
    TOLLA 840S
    100 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l
    11 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 2.71 2.87 2.96 3.04 2.92 b 
    TOLLA 840S
    125 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l
    12 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 2.70 2.87 2.95 3.03 2.88 b 
    TOLLA 840S
    125 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l
    13 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 2.72 2.88 2.96 3.05 2.67 b 
    TOLLA 840S
    250 g + 300 ml + 2.0 l
    14 CALLISTO ® + Dual Gold 2.68 2.85 2.93 3.01 2.99 b 
    260 ml + 710 ml
    15 Untreated control 2.68 2.84 2.92 3.00 2.89 b 
    Note:
    Treatment means sharing the same letter do not differ significantly by LSD test at the 5% (α = 0.05) level of probability
  • TABLE 6-94
    Comparative visual phytotoxicity of DINAMIC ® 700WDG pre-emergence programs
    BBA VISUAL PHYTOTOXICITY
    SCALE
    (1-no damage; 9-dead)
    Replicate
    TREATMENT Timing I II III IV Mean
     1 DINAMIC ® + Galago 14 1 1 1 1 1.0
    75 g + 100 ml 28 1 1 1 1 1.0
    42 1 1 1 1 1.0
     2 DINAMIC ® + Galago 14 1 1 1 1 1.0
    75 g + 150 ml 28 1 1 1 1 1.0
    42 1 1 1 1 1.0
     3 DINAMIC ® + Galago 14 1 1 1 1 1.0
    100 g + 100 ml 28 1 1 1 1 1.0
    42 1 1 1 1 1.0
     4 DINAMIC ® + Galago 14 1 1 1 1 1.0
    100 g + 150 ml 28 1 1 1 1 1.0
    42 1 1 1 1 1.0
     5 DINAMIC ® + Galago 14 1 1 1 1 1.0
    125 g + 100 ml 28 1 1 1 1 1.0
    42 1 1 1 1 1.0
     6 DINAMIC ® + Galago 14 1 1 1 1 1.0
    125 g + 150 ml 28 1 1 1 1 1.0
    42 1 1 1 1 1.0
     7 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 840S 14 1 1 1 1 1.0
    75 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l 28 1 1 1 1 1.0
    42 1 1 1 1 1.0
     8 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 840S 14 1 1 1 1 1.0
    75 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l 28 1 1 1 1 1.0
    42 1 1 1 1 1.0
     9 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 840S 14 1 1 1 1 1.0
    100 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l 28 1 1 1 1 1.0
    42 1 1 1 1 1.0
    10 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 840S 14 1 1 1 1 1.0
    100 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l 28 1 1 1 1 1.0
    42 1 1 1 1 1.0
    11 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 840S 14 1 1 1 1 1.0
    125 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l 28 1 1 1 1 1.0
    42 1 1 1 1 1.0
    12 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 840S 14 1 1 1 1 1.0
    125 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l 28 1 1 1 1 1.0
    42 1 1 1 1 1.0
    13 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 840S 14 1 1 1 1 1.0
    250 g + 300 ml + 2.0 l 28 1 1 1 1 1.0
    42 1 1 1 1 1.0
    14 CALLISTO ® + Dual Gold 14 1 1 1 1 1.0
    260 ml + 710 ml 28 1 1 1 1 1.0
    42 1 1 1 1 1.0
    15 Untreated control 14 1 1 1 1 1.0
    28 1 1 1 1 1.0
    42 1 1 1 1 1.0
  • TABLE 6-95
    Comparative herbicidal activity of DINAMIC ® 700WDG pre-emergence programs
    AVERAGE % WEED CONTROL BY
    SPECIES
    % C = Visual % weed control
    % P = Visual % weed pressure
    BIDPI AMAHY TAGMI DIGSA
    % % % % % % % %
    TREATMENT Timing C P C P C P C P
     1 DINAMIC ® + Galago 14 95 5 85 3 100 3 45 3
    75 g + 100 ml 28 90 10 75 10 100 5 40 5
    42 80 12 65 15 80 10 20 10
    56 60 15 55 20 70 12 10 15
     2 DINAMIC ® + Galago 14 98 5 96 3 100 1 50 1
    75 g + 150 ml 28 96 10 90 5 100 3 50 3
    42 80 15 85 10 94 5 30 10
    56 70 20 80 20 90 10 20 15
     3 DINAMIC ® + Galago 14 96 3 95 3 100 1 45 5
    100 g + 100 ml 28 92 5 93 5 100 3 40 10
    42 75 10 85 10 90 5 20 15
    56 65 12 70 20 80 10 10 25
     4 DINAMIC ® + Galago 14 96 3 98 3 100 1 55 3
    100 g + 150 ml 28 92 5 96 5 100 5 50 5
    42 85 10 92 15 95 10 40 10
    56 70 10 90 25 90 12 35 15
     5 DINAMIC ® + Galago 14 99 3 98 3 100 1 50 5
    125 g + 100 ml 28 96 5 96 5 100 3 45 10
    42 90 10 92 10 100 5 30 15
    56 85 15 90 20 98 12 20 25
     6 DINAMIC ® + Galago 14 96 5 99 5 100 3 55 1
    125 g + 150 ml 28 92 10 95 10 100 5 55 3
    42 90 12 92 15 94 10 45 10
    56 90 15 90 25 90 12 40 15
     7 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 840S 14 99 5 100 5 100 3 99 5
    75 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l 28 96 10 98 10 100 5 99 10
    42 90 12 92 15 94 10 99 15
    56 85 15 88 25 92 15 98 25
     8 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 840S 14 99 5 100 5 100 3 100 3
    75 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l 28 95 10 98 15 100 5 100 5
    42 90 15 96 25 94 10 98 10
    56 90 20 94 30 92 15 98 15
     9 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 840S 14 100 3 98 3 100 1 100 5
    100 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l 28 99 5 95 5 100 3 100 10
    42 90 10 92 15 99 5 100 15
    56 85 12 90 20 98 10 98 25
    10 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 840S 14 100 3 100 1 100 1 100 1
    100 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l 28 99 5 99 5 100 5 99 3
    42 96 10 95 10 99 10 98 10
    56 90 10 90 20 98 12 98 15
    11 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 840S 14 100 5 100 3 100 3 100 1
    125 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l 28 99 10 98 5 100 5 100 3
    42 92 12 90 10 95 10 99 5
    56 85 15 88 20 90 15 98 15
    12 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 840S 14 100 3 100 1 100 1 100 1
    125 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l 28 99 8 99 5 99 3 100 3
    42 92 12 95 7 99 5 98 5
    56 90 15 93 15 95 10 98 15
    13 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 840S 14 100 3 100 3 100 1 100 3
    250 g + 300 ml + 2.0 l 28 100 5 100 5 100 3 100 5
    42 99 12 99 10 100 5 100 15
    56 98 15 97 15 100 10 99 25
    14 CALLISTO ® + DUAL S GOLD ® 14 99 5 100 3 100 3 100 5
    260 ml + 710 ml 28 96 8 97 5 100 5 100 10
    42 92 12 97 10 98 10 100 20
    56 92 15 94 20 96 15 99 25
    15 Untreated control 14 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3
    28 0 5 0 5 0 5 0 5
    42 0 10 0 10 0 10 0 15
    56 0 15 0 20 0 15 0 25
  • The trial was conducted on a commercial maize crop produced under dry land conditions. The DINAMIC® 700WDG formulation was evaluated for herbicidal activity and crop selectivity when applied as a pre-emergence spray program in tank-mix combination with Galago and TOLLA 840S. Treatments were applied pre-emergence of crop and weeds as broadcast applications over the maize rows. Treatments were applied one day after planting. First rains (10 mm) were recorded at 6 days following application. Weather conditions were dry with infrequent showers of rain occurring for the duration of the trial. At 30 days following application heavy rains (140 mm) were recorded. Thereafter dry conditions prevailed for the remainder of the trial.
  • No visual symptoms of phytotoxicity in the form of stunting, chlorosis, necrosis or growth-abnormalities were observed on any of the treatments receiving the tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Ga/ago and DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 840S, whether applied at single or double rates, respectively. The tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 840S displayed a similar level of herbicidal selectivity as the standard tank-mix combination of CALLISTO®+DUAL S GOLD®.
  • The weed spectrum at the trial site consisted of broadleaved weeds and a single grass weed (DIGSA). The broadleaved weed spectrum was composed of Blackjack (BIDPI), Pigweed (AMAHY) and Khaki weed (TAGMI). Efficacy evaluations were conducted at 14, 28, 42 and 56 days following application, respectively.
  • DINAMIC®700WDG+Galago
  • Tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago displayed a typical dosage related efficacy response between the rates of 75-125 g/ha applied. Higher rates DINAMIC® 700WDG gave improved activity against broadleaved weeds, while an increase in the rate of Galago improved herbicidal activity against broadleaved weeds and grasses. At the final assessment conducted at 56 DAA, the tank-mix combination of DINAMIC®+Galago applied at 125 g/ha+150 ml/ha exhibited commercially acceptable levels of herbicidal activity against the entire broadleaved weed spectrum consisting of BIDPI, AMAHY and TAGMI. DINAMIC® applied at the rate of 100 g/ha in combination with Galago at 150 m/ha displayed commercial levels of herbicidal activity against the broadleaved weeds AMAHY and TAGMI at the final assessment.
  • DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 840S
  • The addition of TOLLA 840S to the tank-mix combination of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago greatly enhanced the herbicidal activity against the grass weed DIGSA, with all tank-mix combinations exhibiting commercial control of DIGSA at the final assessment conducted at 56 DAA. DINAMIC® 700WDG treatments applied between the rates of 75-125 g/ha in combination with Galago at 150 ml/ha and TOLLA 840S at 1.0l/ha exhibited commercially acceptable levels of herbicidal activity against the entire weed spectrum consisting of the grass weed DIGSA and the broadleaved weeds, BIDPI, AMAHY and TAGMI, respectively. In tank-mix combinations where Galago was applied at the lower rate of 100 ml/fa and the rate of DINAMIC® 700WDG exceeded 75 g/ha, commercially acceptable levels of activity were observed for the broadleaved weeds AMAHY and TAGMI, respectively. The tank-mix combination of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 840S applied at 125 g/ha+150 ml/ha+1.0 l/ha achieved comparable levels of herbicidal activity as the standard tank-mix combination of CALLISTO®+Dual Gold applied at 260 ml/ha+710 ml/ha.
  • Compatibility
  • No visual symptoms of incompatibility in the form of phase separation or agglomeration were observed in any of the tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago and DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 840S, whether applied at single or double rates.
  • No visual symptoms of phytotoxicity in the form of stunting, chlorosis, necrosis or growth-abnormalities were observed on any of the treatments receiving the tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago and DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 840S, whether applied at single or double rates, respectively.
  • Tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago displayed a typical dosage related efficacy response between the rates of 75-125 g/ha applied.
  • DINAMIC®+Galago applied at 125 g/ha+150 ml/ha exhibited commercially acceptable levels of herbicidal activity against the entire broadleaved weed spectrum consisting of BIDPI, AMAHY and TAGMI, but not the grass weed DIGSA.
  • The addition of TOLLA 840S to the tank-mix combination of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago greatly enhanced the herbicidal activity against the grass weed DIGSA. DINAMIC® 700WDG treatments applied between the rates of 75-125 g/ha in combination with Galago at 150 ml/ha and TOLLA 840S at 1.0 l/ha exhibited commercially acceptable levels of herbicidal activity against the entire weed spectrum consisting of the grass weed DIGSA and the broadleaved weeds, BIDPI, AMAHY and TAGMI, respectively.
  • No visual symptoms of incompatibility in the form of phase separation or agglomeration were observed in any of the tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago and DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 840S, whether applied at single or double rates.
  • TABLE 6-96
    Anova Table Grain yield (kg/plot)
    Degrees of Sums of Mean F
    Unit freedom Squares Squares Value
    Reps
    3 0.3544
    Treatments 14 2.767 0.1976 3.901
    Error 42 2.128 0.5066
    Total 59 5.249
    Overall mean 2.755
    S. E for Difference 0.1592
    Least Significant Difference (LSD) at 95% 0.3212
  • TABLE 6-97
    BBA Visual Phytotoxicity rating scale
    EQUIVALENT
    Scale % Description
    1 0% NO DAMAGE
    2 0.1-2.5% NEGLIGIBLE DAMAGE
    3 2.5-5.0% MODERATE DAMAGE
    No effects on yield and/or quality
    4 5.0-10%  Damage up to limits of commercial acceptability if no yield loss
    5 10-15% DISTINCT DAMAGE
    Commercially acceptable only under certain conditions if no yield loss
    6 15-25% SEVERE DAMAGE
    Not commercially acceptable yield loss and quality
    7 25-35% VERY SEVERE DAMAGE
    8 35-68% EXTREME DAMAGE
    9 68-100% START OF WITHERING AND DEATH
    • N. Pre Emergence Application Against Weed in Maize
  • This Example compares the herbicidal selectivity and efficacy of DINAMIC® 700WDG applied in combination with Galago and TOLLA 840S as a pre-emergence application with regards to both crop and weeds in irrigated maize. Treatments are conditions are tabulated below.
  • TABLE 6-98
    Treatments
    Rate/ha
    TREATMENT Product (t) a.i. (g)
    1 DINAMIC ® + Galago  75 g + 100 ml 52.5 + 48
    2 DINAMIC ® + Galago  75 g + 150 ml 52.5 + 72
    3 DINAMIC ® + Galago 100 g + 100 ml   70 + 48
    4 DINAMIC ® + Galago 100 g + 150 ml   70 + 72
    5 DINAMIC ® + Galago 125 g + 100 ml 87.5 + 48
    6 DINAMIC ® + Galago 125 g + 150 ml 87.5 + 72
    7 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 840S  75 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l 52.5 + 48 + 840
    8 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 840S  75 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l 52.5 + 72 + 840
    9 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 840S 100 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l   70 + 48 + 840
    10 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 840S 100 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l   70 + 72 + 840
    11 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 840S 125 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l 87.5 + 48 + 840
    12 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 840S 125 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l 87.5 + 72 + 840
    13 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 840S 250 g + 300 ml + 2.0 l  175 + 144 + 1680
    14 CALLISTO ® + Dual Gold 260 ml + 710 ml  125 + 650
    15 Untreated control — —
  • TABLE 6-99
    Test products used
    Manufacturer/
    Product Active Ingredient Form Supplier Reg. No.
    1 DINAMIC ® Amicarbazone 700 g/kg WDG Arysta Lifescience
    700WDG
    2 Galago Mesotrionc 480 g/l SC Arysta Lifescience L. 8089
    3 TOLLA 840 S Metolachlor 840 g/l + Safener EC Arysta Lifescience L. 7374
    4 CALLISTO ® Mesotrione 480 g/l SC Syngenta L. 6795
    5 DUAL S S-Metolachlor 915 g/l + Safener EC Syngenta L. 5749
    GOLD ®
  • TABLE 6-100
    TRIAL DESIGN
    Design Completely randomized design
    Replicates Four
    Plot size 5 m × 2.5 m = Nett/plot
  • TABLE 6-101
    SPRAYER
    Sprayer CO2 Precision Sprayer
    Boom 2.5 m aluminium
    Nozzle
    5 × 11002 flat fan nozzles (Teejet 11002 DG)
    Pressure 3.0 Bar
    Application 200 l/ha
    • Spray Water Quality:
  • pH: 6.5
    EC: 0.6 mS/m
  • TABLE 6-102
    WEATHER INFORMATION AT APPLICATION:
    Temperature (max) 30.4° C.
    RH: 35%
    Wind: 0-5 km/h, Variable
    Cloud
    8/8
  • TABLE 6-103
    SOIL PROPERTIES AT APPLICATION
    Clay Fraction 10.3%
    Silt Fraction  5.8%
    Sand Fraction 94.8%
    pH (H2O) 7.3
    Moisture Surface dry, subsurface moist at 5 cm
    Seedbed condition Fine (no clods)
    • Irrigation: Sprinkler Crop: Crop: Maize Variety: Phb 32 D 68 BR
  • Growth stage: Pre-emergence (BBCH growth stage 00)
    Sowing depth: 5 cm
    Sowing density: 90000 plants/ha
  • TABLE 6-104
    WEED INFORMATION:
    SPECIES COMMON NAME ABBREVIATION
    Datura ferox Large thornapple DATFE
    Portulaca oleracea Purslane POROL
    Schkuhria pinnata Dwarf marigold SCHPI
    Bidens pilosa Blackjack BIDPI
  • TABLE 6-105
    ASSESSMENT DETAILS
    Method Comparative Efficacy
    Herbicide Efficacy:
    Number of weeds in treated versus untreated plots
    Selectivity:
    3. Visual phytotoxicity: BBA 1-9 scale (refer to
    appendix for details)
    4. Yield: 20 cobs harvested at random from each plot.
    Average grain weight per plot determined using a
    precision 2 decimal scale. Statistical evaluation:
    ANOVA at the 95% probability using Tukeys LSD
    formulae
    Assessment
    14 DAA—Efficacy/Selectivity
    Times-Days 28 DAA—Efficacy/Selectivity
    After 42 DAA—Efficacy/Selectivity
    Application
    56 DAA—Efficacy
    (DAA) Harvest—Selectivity
  • TABLE 6-106
    Comparative yield of DINAMIC ® 700WDG programs
    YIELD (Kg/plot)
    Replicate
    TREATMENT I 11 III IV Mean
     1 DINAMIC ® + Galago 2.34 1.83 1.79 1.86 1.95 a 
    75 g + 100 ml
     2 DINAMIC ® + Galago 2.10 2.36 1.96 2.45 2.21 ab
    75 g + 150 ml0
     3 DINAMIC ® + Galago 2.32 1.97 2.41 2.18 2.22 ab
    100 g + 100 ml
     4 DINAMIC ® + Galago 2.08 1.96 2.29 2.26 2.15 ab
    100 g + 150 ml
     5 DINAMIC ® + Galago 2.12 2.45 1.86 2.30 2.18 ab
    125 g + 100 ml
     6 DINAMIC ® + Galago 1.97 1.81 2.02 1.90 1.92 a 
    125 g + 150 ml
     7 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 2.72 2.31 2.00 2.33 2.34 ab
    TOLLA 840S
    75 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l
     8 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 2.49 1.75 2.07 2.21 2.13 ab
    TOLLA 840S
    75 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l
     9 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 2.11 1.74 1.87 2.07 1.95 a 
    TOLLA 840S
    100 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l
    10 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 2.81 1.98 2.00 2.37 2.29 ab
    TOLLA 840S
    100 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l
    11 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 1.84 2.53 2.20 2.19 2.19 ab
    TOLLA 840S
    125 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l
    12 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 2.99 2.29 2.94 2.37 2.65 b 
    TOLLA 840S
    125 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l
    13 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 2.96 2.47 2.38 2.43 2.56 b 
    TOLLA 840S
    250 g + 300 ml + 2.0 l
    14 CALLISTO ® + Dual Gold 2.55 1.93 2.25 2.09 2.20 ab
    260 ml + 710 ml
    15 Untreated control 2.30 2.00 2.25 2.06 2.15 ab
    Note:
    Treatment means sharing the same letter do not differ significantly by LSD test at the 5% (α = 0.05) level of probability
  • TABLE 6-107
    Comparative visual phytotoxicity of DINAMIC ® 700WDG pre-emergence programs
    BBA VISUAL
    PHYTOTOXICITY SCALE
    (1-no damage; 9-dead)
    Replicate
    TREATMENT Timing I II III IV Mean
     1 DINAMIC ® + Galago 14 1 1 1 1 1.0
    75 g + 100 ml 28 1 1 1 1 1.0
    42 1 1 1 1 1.0
     2 DINAMIC ® + Galago 14 1 1 1 1 1.0
    75 g + 150 ml 28 1 1 1 1 1.0
    42 1 1 1 1 1.0
     3 DINAMIC ® + Galago 14 2 2 2 2 2.0
    100 g + 100 ml 28 1 1 1 1 1.0
    42 1 1 1 1 1.0
     4 DINAMIC ® + Galago 14 1 1 3 3 2.0
    100 g + 150 ml 28 1 1 1 1 1.0
    42 1 1 1 1 1.0
     5 DINAMIC ® + Galago 14 3 2 3 1 2.5
    125 g + 100 ml 28 3 2 3 2 2.5
    42 2 1 2 1 1.5
     6 DINAMIC ® + Galago 14 3 1 1 3 2.0
    125 g + 150 ml 28 3 3 3 3 1.0
    42 2 2 2 2 1.0
     7 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 840S 14 1 1 1 1 1.0
    75 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l 28 1 1 1 1 1.0
    42 1 1 1 1 1.0
     8 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 840S 14 1 1 1 1 1.0
    75 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l 28 1 1 1 1 1.0
    42 1 1 1 1 1.0
     9 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 840S 14 3 3 2 2 2.5
    100 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l 28 3 3 3 3 3.0
    42 2 1 1 2 1.5
    10 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 840S 14 4 3 3 3 3.25
    100 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l 28 4 3 2 3 3.0
    42 3 1 1 2 1.75
    11 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 840S 14 3 3 1 3 2.66
    125 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l 28 1 1 1 1 1.0
    42 1 1 1 1 1.0
    12 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 840S 14 4 3 3 3 3.25
    125 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l 28 3 3 2 1 2.25
    42 2 2 1 1 1.5
    13 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 840S 14 5 5 5 5 5.0
    250 g + 300 ml + 2.0 l 28 6 6 4 4 5.0
    42 4 4 4 4 4.0
    14 CALLISTO ® + Dual Gold 14 1 1 1 1 1.0
    260 ml + 710 ml 28 1 1 1 1 1.0
    42 1 1 1 1 1.0
    15 Untreated control 14 1 1 1 1 1.0
    28 1 1 1 1 1.0
    42 1 1 1 1 1.0
  • TABLE 6-108
    Comparative herbicidal activity of DINAMIC ® 700WDG pre-emergence programs
    AVERAGE % WEED CONTROL BY SPECIES
    % C = Visual % weed control
    % P = Visual % weed pressure
    DATE POROL SCHPI BIDPI
    % % % % % % % %
    TREATMENT Timing C P C P C P C P
     1 DINAMIC ® + Galago 14 95 10 99 5 100 3 100 3
    75 g + 100 ml 28 95 15 96 10 99 7 98 5
    42 85 25 90 15 96 10 90 7
    56 80 35 80 20 96 15 80 15
     2 DINAMIC ® + Galago 14 100 5 100 10 100 5 100 3
    75 g + 150 ml 28 98 10 100 15 100 5 100 5
    42 98 15 99 20 99 10 96 7
    56 98 30 97 25 99 15 94 10
     3 DINAMIC ® + Galago 14 100 10 100 1 100 1 100 3
    100 g + 100 ml 28 100 15 100 3 100 1 100 5
    42 97 25 100 5 100 3 95 7
    56 95 35 99 15 99 5 85 10
     4 DINAMIC ® + Galago 14 100 10 100 5 100 3 100 1
    100 g + 150 ml 28 100 20 100 10 100 5 100 3
    42 98 25 100 15 100 10 99 5
    56 96 30 99 20 99 15 98 7
     5 DINAMIC ® + Galago 14 100 5 100 10 100 5 100 3
    125 g + 100 ml 28 99 10 100 15 100 5 100 5
    42 97 15 99 20 99 10 95 7
    56 95 30 97 25 99 15 90 10
     6 DINAMIC ® + Galago 14 100 5 100 5 100 1 100 1
    125 g + 150 ml 28 100 15 100 10 100 1 100 1
    42 100 25 100 15 99 3 99 3
    56 99 30 97 20 99 5 99 5
     7 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 14 100 10 100 3 100 1 100 3
    TOLLA 840S 28 99 15 100 5 100 1 100 5
    75 g + 10 0ml + 1.0 l 42 99 20 99 10 99 3 95 7
    56 97 25 99 15 97 7 90 10
     8 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 14 100 3 100 1 100 10 100 3
    TOLLA 840S 28 100 5 100 3 100 10 100 5
    75 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l 42 98 10 99 10 100 15 98 10
    56 96 20 99 15 99 20 96 15
     9 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 14 100 5 100 3 100 1 100 3
    TOLLA 840S 28 100 10 100 10 100 3 100 3
    100 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l 42 95 20 97 15 99 3 98 5
    56 93 30 95 25 99 5 96 5
    10 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 14 100 5 100 1 100 1 100 1
    TOLLA 840S ″ 28 100 15 100 5 100 1 100 3
    100 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l 42 98 25 99 10 99 3 100 3
    56 96 35 99 30 99 5 99 7
    11 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 14 100 5 100 5 100 1 100 1
    TOLLA 840S 28 100 12 100 10 100 1 100 3
    125 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l 42 99 15 10 15 99 3 96 5
    56 98 25 99 20 99 5 94 10
    12 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 14 100 10 100 5 100 1 100 1
    TOLLA 840S 28 100 20 100 10 100 3 100 3
    125 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l 42 99 25 99 15 100 5 99 5
    56 97 30 97 25 99 10 99 10
    13 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 14 100 1 100 3 100 1 100 1
    TOLLA 840S 28 100 5 100 5 100 5 100 3
    250 g + 300 ml + 2.0 l 42 99 15 100 10 100 5 100 5
    56 99 30 100 15 100 7 100 15
    14 CALLISTO ® + DUAL S 14 100 5 100 1 100 1 100 3
    GOLD ® 28 99 15 100 5 100 3 100 5
    260 ml + 710 ml 42 99 25 100 10 100 7 98 10
    56 98 35 100 15 100 15 96 15
    15 Untreated control 14 0 10 0 1 0 1 0 3
    28 0 20 0 3 0 3 0 5
    42 0 30 0 5 0 5 0 10
    56 0 40 0 10 0 10 0 15
  • The trial was conducted on a commercial maize crop produced under irrigated conditions. The DINAMIC® 700WDG formulation was evaluated for herbicidal activity and crop selectivity when applied as a pre-emergence spray program in tank-mix combination with Galago and TOLLA 840S. Treatments were applied pre-emergence of crop and weeds as broadcast applications over the maize rows. Weather conditions were dry with infrequent showers of rain occurring for the duration of the trial.
  • Visual symptoms of phytotoxicity in the form of stunting and yellowing were observed in treatments receiving the DINAMIC® 700WDG formulation applied at the rates of 100 g/ha and 125 g/ha in combination with Galago and Galago+TOLLA 840S at 14 DAA. Visual symptoms of phytotoxicity were dosage related and ranged from negligible to moderate (class 2 to class 3) according to the BBA visual phytotoxicity rating scale (refer to appendix for details on scale). Slight chlorosis (yellowing) was only observed at 14 DAA. Visual symptoms of stunting were observed at the assessments conducted at 14, 28 and 42 DAA with a decrease in severity of stunting observed at the final visual phytotoxicity assessment conducted at 42 DAA.
  • The tank-mix combination of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 840S applied at the double rate of 250 g/ha+300 m/ha+2.0/ha exhibited visual symptoms of phytotoxicity in the form of stunting and slight yellowing (chlorosis) at the assessment conducted at 14 DAA. At the assessment conducted at 28 DAA, visual symptoms of stunting corresponding to a BBA scale of 5 (Commercially acceptable only under circumstances where yield losses do not occur) were observed. While at 42 DAA, severity of stunting improved from class 5 to class 4 according to the BBA visual phytotoxicity assessment scale.
  • Yield
  • None of the various DINAMIC® 700WDG tank-mix combinations exhibited significantly different yields in terms of grain yield per plot compared to the untreated control treatment or the standard tank-mix combination of CALLISTO®+DUAL S GOLD®, respectively.
  • The weed spectrum at the trial site consisted of broadleaved weeds only. The broadleaved weed spectrum was composed of Large thornapple (DATFE), Purslane (POROL), Dwarf marigold (SCHPI) and Blackjack (BIDPI). Efficacy evaluations were conducted at 14, 28, 42 and 56 days following application, respectively.
  • DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago
  • The tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago were efficacious and displayed excellent levels of herbicidal activity against the broadleaved weed spectrum at the trial site. Commercially acceptable levels of herbicidal activity were achieved across the entire weed spectrum where DINAMIC® 700WDG was applied at rates exceeding 75 g/ha in combination with Galago applied at either 100 mL/ha or 150 ml/ha, respectively. Commercial control of the entire broadleaved weed spectrum was observed in all treatments where Galago was applied at the rate of 150 ml/ha, regardless of the rate of DINAMIC® 700WDG applied.
  • DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 840S
  • The addition of TOLLA 840S to the tank-mix combination of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago greatly enhanced the herbicidal activity against the small-seeded broadleaved weeds (POROL, SCHPI and BIDPI). All of the tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 840S exhibited commercially acceptable levels of herbicidal activity against the broadleaved weeds DATFE, POROL, SCHPI and BIDPI at the final assessment conducted at 56 DAA. The tank-mix combination of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 840S applied at 100-125 g/ha+150 ml/ha+1.0l/ha achieved comparable levels of herbicidal activity as the standard tank-mix combination of CALLISTO®+Dual Gold applied at 260 mL/ha+710 ml/ha.
  • Compatibility
  • No visual symptoms of incompatibility in the form of phase separation or agglomeration were observed in any of the tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago and DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 840S, whether applied at single or double rates.
  • Visual symptoms of phytotoxicity in the form of stunting were observed on treatments receiving the tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago and DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 840S in all cases where DINAMIC® 700WDG was applied at rates exceeding 75 g/ha. Visual symptoms of stunting were dosage related and ranged from negligible to distinct damage (class 2 to class 5) according to the BBA visual phytotoxicity rating scale.
  • DINAMIC®+Galago combinations displayed commercially acceptable levels of herbicidal activity against the broadleaved weed spectrum consisting of DATFE, POROL, SCHPI and BIDPI in all tank-mix treatments where DINAMIC® 700WDG was applied at rates exceeding 75 g/ha, or in tank-mix treatments where Galago was applied at the rate of 150 mL/ha.
  • Tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 840S were efficacious and exhibited commercial control of DATFE, POROL, SCHPI and BIDPI across all rates applied. The tank-mix combination of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 840S applied at 100-125 g/ha+150 ml/ha+1.0 l/ha achieved comparable levels of herbicidal activity as the standard tank-mix combination of CALLISTO®+Dual Gold applied at 260 ml/ha+710 ml/ha.
  • No visual symptoms of incompatibility in the form of phase separation or agglomeration were observed in any of the tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago and DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 840S, whether applied at single or double rates.
  • None of the various DINAMIC® 700WDG tank-mix combinations exhibited significantly different yields in terms of grain yield per plot compared to the untreated control treatment or the standard tank-mix combination of CALLISTO®+DUAL S GOLD®, respectively.
  • TABLE 6-109
    Anova Table Grain yield (kg/plot)
    Degrees of Sums of Mean F
    Unit freedom Squares Squares Value
    Reps
    3 .6917
    Treatments 14 2.269 .1621 2.969
    Error 42 2.293 .5459
    Total 59 5.253
    Overall mean 2.207
    S. E for Difference .1652
    Least Significant Difference (LSD) at 95% .3334
  • TABLE 6-110
    BBA Visual Phytotoxicity rating scale
    EQUIVALENT
    Scale % Description
    1 0% NO DAMAGE
    2 0.1-2.5% NEGLIGIBLE DAMAGE
    3 2.5-5.0% MODERATE DAMAGE
    No effects on yield and/or quality
    4 5.0-10%  Damage up to limits of commercial
    acceptability—if no yield loss
    5 10-15% DISTINCT DAMAGE
    Commercially acceptable only under
    certain conditions—if no yield loss
    6 15-25% SEVERE DAMAGE
    Not commercially acceptable—yield loss
    and quality
    7 25-35% VERY SEVERE DAMAGE
    8 35-68% EXTREME DAMAGE
    9  68-100% START OF WITHERING AND DEATH
    • O. Pre Emergence Application Against Weed in Maize
  • This Example compares the herbicidal selectivity and efficacy of DINAMIC® 700WDG applied in combination with Galago and TOLLA 840S as a pre-emergence application with regards to both crop and weeds in irrigated maize. Treatments and conditions are tabulated below.
  • TABLE 6-111
    TREATMENTS
    Rate/ha
    TREATMENT Product (l) a.i. (g)
     1  DINAMIC ® + Galago  75 g + 100 ml 52.5 + 48  
     2  DINAMIC ® + Galago  75 g + 150 ml 52.5 + 72  
     3  DINAMIC ® + Galago  100 g + 100 ml   70 + 48
     4  DINAMIC ® + Galago  100 g + 150 ml   70 + 72
     5  DINAMIC ® + Galago  125 g + 100 ml 87.5 + 48  
     6  DINAMIC ® + Galago  125 g + 150 ml 87.5 + 72  
     7  DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 840S  75 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l 52.5 + 48 + 840
     8  DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 840S  75 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l 52.5 + 72 + 840
     9  DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 840S  100 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l   70 + 48 + 840
    10  DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 840S  100 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l   70 + 72 + 840
    11  DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 840S  125 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l 87.5 + 48 + 840
    12  DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 840S  125 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l 87.5 + 72 + 840
    13  DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 840S  250 g + 300 ml + 2.0 l  175 + 144 + 1680
    14 CALLISTO ® + Dual Gold 260 ml + 710 ml  125 + 650
    15 Untreated control — —
  • TABLE 6-112
    Test products used
    Manufacturer/
    Product Active Ingredient Form Supplier Reg. No.
    1 DINAMIC ® Amicarbazone 700 g/kg WDG Arysta Lifescience
    700WDG
    2 Galago Mesotrione 480 g/l SC Arysta Lifescience L. 8089
    3 TOLLA 840 S Metolachlor 840 g/l + Safener EC Arysta Lifescience L. 7374
    4 CALLISTO ® Mesotrione 480 g/l SC Syngenta L. 6795
    5 DUALS S-Metolachlor 915 g/l + Safener EC Syngenta L. 5749
    GOLD ®
  • TABLE 6-113
    TRIAL DESIGN
    Design Completely randomized design
    Replicates Four
    Plot size 5 m × 2 m = Nett/plot
  • TABLE 6-114
    SPRAYER
    Sprayer CO2 Precision Sprayer
    Boom  2.0 m aluminium
    Nozzle
    4 × 11002 flat fan nozzles (Teejet 11002 DG)
    Pressure 2.55 Bar
    Application 2000/ha
    • Spray Water Quality:
  • pH: 6.6
    EC: 0.5 mS/m
  • TABLE 6-115
    WEATHER INFORMATION AT APPLICATION
    Temperature (max) 31.6° C.
    RH: 34%
    Wind: 0-5 km/h, NW
    Cloud
    8/8
  • TABLE 6-116
    SOIL PROPERTIES AT APPLICATION:
    Clay Fraction  9%
    Silt Fraction
     5%
    Sand Fraction 86%
    pH (H2O) 6.01
    Moisture Field capacity
    Seedbed condition Fine (no clods)
    • Irrigation: Sprinkler Crop: Crop: Maize Variety: Pan 3P-736BR
  • Growth stage: Pre-emergence (BBCH growth stage 00)
    Sowing depth: 5 cm
    Sowing density: 80 000 plants/ha
  • TABLE 6-117
    WEED INFORMATION:
    SPECIES COMMON NAME ABBREVIATION
    Bidens pilosa Blackjack BIDPI
    Portulaca oleracea Purslane POROL
    Convolvulus arvensis Field bindweed CONAR
    Anoda cristata Anoda weed ANOCR
  • TABLE 6-118
    ASSESSMENT DETAILS
    Method Comparative Efficacy
    Herbicide Efficacy:
    Number of weeds in treated versus untreated plots
    Selectivity:
    5. Visual phytotoxicity: BBA 1-9 scale (refer to
    appendix for details)
    6. Yield: 40 cobs harvested at random from each plot.
    Average grain weight per plot determined using a
    precision 2 decimal scale. Statistical evaluation:
    ANOVA at the 95% probability using Tukeys LSD
    formulae
    Assessment
    14 DAA—Efficacy/Selectivity
    Times-Days 28 DAA—Efficacy/Selectivity
    After 42 DAA—Efficacy/Selectivity
    Application
    56 DAA—Efficacy
    (DAA) Harvest—Selectivity
  • TABLE 6-119
    Comparative yield of DINAMIC ® 700WDG programs
    YIELD (Kg/plot)
    Replicate
    TREATMENT I 11 III IV Mean
     1 DINAMIC ® + Galago 4.06 3.52 4.59 4.22 4.10 a
    75 g + 100 ml
     2 DINAMIC ® + Galago 3.59 3.21 3.90 4.19 3.72 a
    75 g + 150 ml 0
     3 DINAMIC ® + Galago 4.30 3.43 3.97 3.91 3.90 a
    100 g + 100 ml
     4 DINAMIC ® + Galago 3.47 3.00 3.70 3.56 3.43 a
    100 g + 150 ml
     5 DINAMIC ® + Galago 3.68 3.04 4.01 3.69 3.61 a
    125 g + 100 ml
     6 DINAMIC ® + Galago 3.69 3.34 3.59 3.78 3.60 a
    125 g + 150 ml
     7 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 3.64 3.16 3.48 4.37 3.66 a
    TOLLA 840S
    75 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l
     8 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 3.01 3.45 3.56 4.82 3.71 a
    TOLLA 840S
    75 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l
     9 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 3.52 3.22 4.00 3.90 3.66 a
    TOLLA 840S
    100 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l
    10 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 3.91 4.20 3.50 3.91 3.88 a
    TOLLA 840S
    100 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l
    11 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 3.71 4.84 3.58 3.48 3.90 a
    TOLLA 840S
    125 g + 100 ml+ 1.0 l
    12 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 3.36 3.54 4.75 3.95 3.90 a
    TOLLA 840S
    125 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l
    13 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 3.49 3.85 4.42 3.48 3.81 a
    TOLLA 840S
    250 g + 300 ml + 2.0 l
    14 CALLISTO ® + Dual Gold 3.73 4.40 4.09 4.06 4.07 a
    260 ml + 710 ml
    15 Untreated control 4.00 4.32 4.37 4.02 4.18 a
    Note:
    Treatment means sharing the same letter do not differ significantly by LSD test at the 5% (α = 0.05) level of probability
  • TABLE 6-120
    Comparative visual phytotoxicity of DINAMIC ® 700WDG
    pre-emergence programs
    BBA VISUAL
    PHYTOTOXICITY
    SCALE
    (1 - no damage; 9 - dead)
    Replicate
    TREATMENT Timing I II III IV Mean
    1 DINAMIC  ® + Galago 14 1 1 1 1 1.0
    75 g + 100 ml 28 1 1 1 1 1.0
    42 1 1 1 1 1.0
    2 DINAMIC ® + Galago 14 1 1 1 1 1.0
    75 g + 150 ml 28 1 1 1 1 1.0
    42 1 1 1 1 1.0
    3 DINAMIC ® + Galago 14 1 1 1 1 1.0
    100 g + 100 ml 28 1 1 1 1 1.0
    42 1 1 1 1 1.0
    4 DINAMIC ® + Galago 14 1 1 1 1 1.0
    100 g + 150 ml 28 1 1 1 1 1.0
    42 1 1 1 1 1.0
    5 DINAMIC ® + Galago 14 1 1 1 1 1.0
    125 g + 100 ml 28 1 1 1 1 1.0
    42 1 1 1 1 1.0
    6 DINAMIC ® + Galago 14 1 1 1 1 1.0
    125 g + 150 ml 28 1 1 1 1 1.0
    42 1 1 1 1 1.0
    7 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 14 1 1 1 1 1.0
    TOLLA 840S 28 1 1 1 1 1.0
    75 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l 42 1 1 1 1 1.0
    8 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 14 1 1 1 1 1.0
    TOLLA 840S 28 1 1 1 1 1.0
    75 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l 42 1 1 1 1 1.0
    9 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 14 1 1 1 1 1.0
    TOLLA 840S 28 1 1 1 1 1.0
    100 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l 42 1 1 1 1 1.0
    10 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 14 1 1 1 1 1.0
    TOLLA 840S 28 1 1 1 1 1.0
    100 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l 42 1 1 1 1 1.0
    11 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 14 3 3 1 1 2.0
    TOLLA 840S 28 1 1 1 1 1.0
    125 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l 42 1 1 1 1 1.0
    12 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 14 3 1 1 3 2.0
    TOLLA 840S 28 1 1 1 1 1.0
    125 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l 42 1 1 1 1 1.0
    13 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 14 3 2 1 3 2.25
    TOLLA 840S 28 2 2 1 2 1.75
    250 g + 300 ml + 2.0 l 42 4 4 1 2 2.75
    14 CALLISTO ® + Dual Gold 14 1 1 1 1 1.0
    260 ml + 710 ml 28 1 1 1 1 1.0
    42 1 1 1 1 1.0
    15 Untreated control 14 1 1 1 1 1.0
    28 1 1 1 1 1.0
    42 1 1 1 1 1.0
  • TABLE 6-121
    Comparative herbicidal activity of DINAMIC ® 700WDG
    pre-emergence programs
    AVERAGE % WEED CONTROL BY
    SPECIES
    % C = Visual % weed control
    % P = Visual % weed pressure
    BIDPI POROL ANOCR CONAR
    % % % % % % % %
    TREATMENT Timing C P C P C P C P
    1 DINAMIC ® + Galago 14 100 5 100 3 100 1 100 1
    75 g + 100 ml 28 100 10 100 10 100 3 100 1
    42 96 15 100 15 80 5 100 3
    56 85 20 90 25 70 10 80 10
    2 DINAMIC ® + Galago 14 100 5 100 5 100 1 100 1
    75 g + 150 ml 28 100 10 100 10 100 3 100 3
    42 100 15 100 15 100 5 100 7
    56 94 20 98 20 90 10 90 10
    3 DINAMIC ® + Galago 14 100 5 100 1 100 1 100 2
    100 g + 100 ml 28 100 10 100 3 98 5 100 5
    42 100 20 100 5 100 10 100 10
    56 90 25 98 15 90 10 85 10
    4 DINAMIC ® + Galago 14 100 3 100 3 100 1 100 1
    100 g + 150 ml 28 100 5 100 5 100 1 100 1
    42 100 10 100 10 100 3 100 3
    56 98 15 99 20 98 5 96 5
    5 DINAMIC ® + Galago 14 100 1 100 1 100 1 100 1
    125 g + 100 ml 28 100 5 100 5 100 1 100 1
    42 100 10 100 10 100 3 100 3
    56 96 15 98 15 96 7 94 5
    6 DINAMIC ® + Galago 14 100 5 100 1 100 1 100 2
    125 g + 150 ml 28 100 10 100 3 100 3 100 5
    42 100 15 100 5 100 5 100 10
    56 99 20 99 15 98 10 98 10
    7 DINAMIC ® + 14 100 5 100 3 100 1 100 2
    Galago + TOLLA 840S 28 100 10 100 5 90 3 100 5
    75 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l 42 94 20 100 10 90 5 100 7
    56 90 25 98 20 80 10 90 10
    8 DINAMIC ® + 14 100 3 100 3 100 1 100 2
    Galago + TOLLA 840S 28 100 5 100 5 100 3 100 5
    75 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l 42 100 10 100 10 100 5 100 10
    56 99 20 99 20 90 10 94 10
    9 DINAMIC ® + 14 100 5 100 3 100 2 100 1
    Galago + TOLLA 840S 28 100 10 100 5 96 5 100 1
    100 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l 42 96 20 100 10 96 10 100 3
    56 96 25 96 20 90 10 90 5
    10 DINAMIC ® + 14 100 3 100 1 100 1 100 1
    Galago + TOLLA 840S 28 100 5 100 3 100 1 100 3
    100 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l 42 100 10 100 5 100 3 100 5
    56 99 20 98 15 94 7 94 10
    11 DINAMIC ® + 14 100 5 100 1 100 1 100 1
    Galago + TOLLA 840S 28 100 10 100 3 100 1 98 3
    125 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l 42 99 15 100 5 100 3 90 3
    56 98 20 100 15 96 10 90 10
    12 DINAMIC ® + 14 100 5 100 3 100 2 100 2
    Galago + TOLLA 840S 28 100 10 100 5 100 5 100 5
    125 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l 42 100 15 100 10 100 10 100 10
    56 100 20 100 20 98 15 96 12
    13 DINAMIC ® + 14 100 5 100 3 100 0 100 1
    Galago + TOLLA 840S 28 100 10 100 5 100 0 100 3
    250 g + 300 ml + 2.0 l 42 100 20 100 10 100 1 100 5
    56 100 25 100 20 100 5 100 10
    14 CALLISTO ® + 14 100 1 100 1 100 1 100 2
    DUAL S GOLD ® 28 100 5 100 3 100 3 100 5
    260 ml + 710 ml 42 100 10 100 5 100 5 100 10
    56 100 15 100 15 100 10 100 10
    15 Untreated control 14 0 5 0 1 0 1 0 1
    28 0 10 0 3 0 3 0 3
    42 0 15 0 5 0 5 0 5
    56 0 20 0 15 0 10 0 10
  • The trial was conducted on a commercial maize crop produced under irrigated conditions. The DINAMIC® 700WDG formulation was evaluated for herbicidal activity and crop selectivity when applied as a pre-emergence spray program in tank-mix combination with Ga/ago and TOLLA 840S. Treatmients were applied pre-emergence of crop and weeds as broadcast applications over the maize rows.
  • No visual symptoms of phytotoxicity in the form of stunting, chlorosis or growth abnormalities were observed on any of the treatments receiving the tank-mix combination of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Ga/ago across all rates applied.
  • The tank-mix combination of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 840S exhibited symptoms of phytotoxicity in the form of stunting in treatments receiving the DINAMIC® 700WDG formulation applied at the rate of 125 g/ha and the double rate of 250 g/ha, respectively. At 125 g/ha, stunting was only observed at the first assessment conducted at 14 DAA. At the double rate of 250 g/ha, stunting was observed at each of the assessments conducted. No visual symptoms of phytotoxicity were observed in tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 840S where the DINAMIC® 700WDG formulation was applied at rates of 75 g/ha and 100 g/ha, respectively.
  • In terms of yield, tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago and DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 840S did not significantly increase or decrease yield compared to the untreated control treatments and the standard tank-mix combination of
  • Callisto®+Dual S Gold®.
  • The weed spectrum at the trial site consisted mainly of broadleaved weeds namely; Blackjack (BIDPI), Purslane (POROL), Anoda weed (ANOCR) and Field bindweed (CONAR). Efficacy evaluations were conducted at 14, 28, 42 and 56 days following application, respectively. Blackjack (BIDPI) and Purslane (POROL) were well represented in each plot with 15-25% soil cover of each weed observed in the untreated control strips at the final assessment, respectively. The weeds ANOCR and CONAR represented a smaller portion of the weed population with 5-15% and 5-10% soil cover of each weed observed in the untreated control strips at the final assessment conducted at 56 DAA, respectively.
  • DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago
  • The tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago exhibited commercially acceptable levels of herbicidal activity against the broadleaved weed POROL across all rates applied. Commercially acceptable levels of herbicidal activity were achieved for BIDPI and ANOCR where DINAMIC® 700WDG was applied at rates exceeding 75 g/ha in combination with Galago applied at either 100 m/ha or 150 ml/ha, respectively. Generally, weed control was greatest with increasing rates of Galago applied and commercial control of the entire broadleaved weed spectrum was observed in all treatments where Galago was applied at the rate of 150 mL/ha, regardless of the rate of DINAMIC® 700WDG applied.
  • DINAMIC®700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 840S
  • The addition of TOLLA 840S to the tank-mix combination of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago greatly enhanced the herbicidal activity against the small-seeded broadleaved weeds (POROL and BIDPI). All of the tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 840S exhibited commercially acceptable levels of herbicidal activity against the broadleaved weeds BIDPI, POROL and CONAR at the final assessment conducted at 56 DAA. The broadleaved weed CONAR was commercially controlled by all tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 840S where Galago was applied at the rate of 150 ml/ha or where the rate of DINAMIC® 700WDG exceeded 75 g/ha. The tank-mix combination of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 840S applied at 125 g/ha+150 ml/ha+1.0 l/ha achieved comparable levels of herbicidal activity as the standard tank-mix combination of CALLISTO®+Dual Gold applied at 260 ml/ha+710 ml/ha.
  • Compatibility
  • No visual symptoms of incompatibility in the form of phase separation or agglomeration were observed in any of the tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago and DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 840S, whether applied at single or double rates.
  • No visual symptoms of phytotoxicity in the form of stunting, chlorosis or growth abnormalities were observed on any of the treatments receiving the tank-mix combination of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago across all rates applied. DINAMIC®+Galago tank-mix combinations displayed commercially acceptable levels of herbicidal activity against the broadleaved weed POROL across all rates applied, while commercially acceptable levels of herbicidal activity were observed for BIDPI and ANOCR where DINAMIC® 700WDG was applied at rates exceeding 75 g/ha in combination with Galago applied at either 100 ml/ha or 150 ml/ha.
  • The tank-mix combination of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 840S exhibited symptoms of phytotoxicity in the form of stunting in treatments receiving the DINAMIC® 700WDG formulation applied at the rate of 125 g/ha and the double rate of 250 g/ha, respectively. No visual symptoms of phytotoxicity were observed in tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 840S where the DINAMIC® 700WDG formulation was applied at rates of 75 g/ha and 100 g/ha, respectively.
  • Tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 840S were efficacious and exhibited commercial control of BIDPI, POROL and CONAR across all rates applied. CONAR was commercially controlled by all tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 840S where Galago was applied at the rate of 150 ml/ha or where the rate of DINAMIC® 700WDG exceeded 75 g/ha. The tank-mix combination of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 840S applied at 125 g/ha+150 m/ha+1.0 l/ha achieved comparable levels of herbicidal activity as the standard tank-mix combination of CALLISTO®+Dual Gold applied at 260 ml/ha+710 ml/ha.
  • No visual symptoms of incompatibility in the form of phase separation or agglomeration were observed in any of the tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago and DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 840S, whether applied at single or double rates.
  • Tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago and DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 840S did not significantly increase or decrease yield compared to the untreated control treatments and the standard tank-mix combination of CALLISTO®+DUAL S GOLD®.
  • TABLE 6-122
    Anova Table Grain yield (kg/plot)
    Degrees of Sums of Mean F
    Unit freedom Squares Squares Value
    Reps
    3 1.416
    Treatments 14 2.424 0.1731 0.9727
    Error 42 7.476 0.1780
    Total 59 11.32
    Overall mean 3.809
    S. E for Difference 0.2983
    Least Significant Difference (LSD) at 95% 0.6020
  • TABLE 6-123
    BBA Visual Phytotoxicity rating scale
    EQUIVALENT
    Scale % Description
    1 0% NO DAMAGE
    2 0.1-2.5% NEGLIGIBLE DAMAGE
    3 2.5-5.0% MODERATE DAMAGE
    No effects on yield and/or quality
    4 5.0-10% Damage up to limits of commercial
    acceptability—if no yield loss
    5  10-15% DISTINCT DAMAGE
    Commercially acceptable only under
    certain conditions—if no yield loss
    6 15-25% SEVERE DAMAGE
    Not commercially acceptable—yield loss
    and quality
    7 25-35% VERY SEVERE DAMAGE
    8 35-68% EXTREME DAMAGE
    9  68-100% START OF WITHERING AND DEATH
  • This Example compares the herbicidal selectivity and efficacy of DINAMIC®700WDG applied in combination with Galago and TOLLA 960 as a post-emergence application with regards to both crop and weeds in irrigated maize. Treatments and conditions are tabulated below.
  • TABLE 6-124
    TREATMENTS
    Rate / ha
    TREATMENT Product (t) a.i. (g)
     1  DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All  75 g + 100 ml + 100 ml/100 l 52.5 + 48 + 180
     2  DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All  75 g + 150 ml + 100 ml/100 l 52.5 + 72
     3  DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All  100 g + 100 ml + 100 ml/100 l   70 + 48
     4  DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All  100 g + 150 ml + 100 ml/100 l   70 + 72
     5  DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All  125 g + 100 ml + 100 ml/100 l 87.5 + 48
     6  DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All  125 g + 150 ml + 100 ml/100 l 87.5 + 72
     7  DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 960 +  75 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l + 52.5 + 48 + 960 +
    Wet-All 100 ml/100 l 180
     8  DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 960 +  75 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l + 52.5 + 72 + 960 +
    Wet-All 100 ml/100 l 180
     9  DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 960 +  100 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l +   70 + 48 + 960 +
    Wet-All 100 ml/100 l 180
    10  DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 960 +  100 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l +   70 + 72 + 960 +
    Wet-All 100 ml/100 l 180
    11  DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 960 +  125 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l + 87.5 + 48+ 960 +
    Wet-All 100 ml/100 l 180
    12  DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 960 +  125 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l + 87.5 + 72 + 960 +
    Wet-All 100 ml/100 l 180
    13  DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 960 +  250 g + 300 ml + 2.0 l +  175 + 144 + 1920 +
    Wet-All 200 ml/100 l 360
    14 CALLISTO ® + Gardo Gold + 260 ml + 1562 ml + 100 ml  125 + 488/293 +
    Complement super 100
    15 Untreated control — —
  • TABLE 6-125
    Test products used
    Manufacturer/ Registration
    Product Active Ingredient Formulation Supplier No.
    1 DINAMIC ® Amicarbazone 700 g/kg WDG Arysta Lifescience
    700WDG
    2 Galago Mesotrione 480 g/l SC Arysta Lifescience L. 8089
    3 TOLLA 960 Metolachlor 960 g/l EC Arysta Lifescience L. 6794
    4 Wel-AU Adjuvant SL Arysta Lifescience L. 8361
    5 CALLISTO ® Mesotrione 480 g/l SC Syngenta L. 6795
    6 Gardo Gold S-Metolachlor 312.5 g/l SC Syngenta L. 7763
    Terbulhylazine 187.5 g/l
    7 COMPLEMENT ® Adjuvant SL Syngenta L. 8169
    Super
  • TABLE 6-126
    TRIAL DESIGN
    Design Completely randomized design
    Replicates Four
    Plot size 5 m × 2.5 m = Nett/plot
  • TABLE 6-127
    SPRAYER
    Sprayer CO2 Precision Sprayer
    Boom 2m aluminium
    Nozzle
    5 × 11002 flat fan nozzles (Teejet 11002 DG)
    Pressure 2.7 Bar
    Application 200 l/ha
    • Spray Water Quality:
  • pH: 6.5
    EC: 0.7 mS/m
    • Spray Volume:
  • 200 l/ha at 2.7 Bar
  • TABLE 6-128
    WEATHER INFORMATION AT APPLICATION
    Temperature (max) 25.9° C.
    RH: 57%
    Wind: 0-5 km/h, W
    Cloud
    7/8
  • TABLE 6-129
    SOIL PROPERTIES AT APPLICATION
    Clay Fraction 10.3%
    Silt Fraction  5.8%
    Sand Fraction 94.8%
    pH (KCl) 7.3
    Moisture Field capacity (one day after irrigation)
    • Irrigation:
  • None (rain-fed)
    • Crop: Crop: Maize Variety: Phb 32 P 68 R
  • Growth stage: 4-5 leaf (BBCH growth stage 14/15)
    Sowing depth: 5 cm
    Sowing density: 90 000 plants/ha
  • TABLE 6-130
    WEED INFORMATION
    COMMON GROWTH % SOIL
    SPECIES NAME CODE STAGE COVER
    Datura ferox Large thornapple DATFE 2-4 leaf 20%
    Portulaca Purslane POROL 8-12 leaf + 2  5%
    oleracea sideshoots
    Schkuhria pinnata Dwarf marigold SCHPI 2-6 leaf 10%
    Bidens pilosa Blackjack BIDPI 4-12 leaf + 2  5%
    sideshoots
  • TABLE 6-131
    ASSESSMENT DETAILS
    Method Comparative Efficacy
    Herbicide Efficacy: Number of weeds in treated versus untreated plots
    Selectivity: Visual phytotoxicity and yield
    7. Visual phytotoxicity: BBA 1-9 scale (refer to
    appendix for details)
    8. Yield: 20 cobs harvested at random from each plot.
    Average grain weight per plot determined using a
    precision 2 decimal scale. Statistical evaluation:
    ANOVA at the 95% probability using Tukeys LSD formulae
    Assessment
    14 DAA—Efficacy/Selectivity
    Times-Days 28 DAA—Efficacy/Selectivity
    After 56 DAA—Efficacy/Selectivity
    Application Harvest—Selectivity
    (DAA)
  • TABLE 6-132
    Comparative yield of DINAMIC ® 700WDG programs
    YIELD (Kg/plot)
    Replicate
    TREATMENT I II III IV Mean
    1 DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All 2.04 2.13 2.30 1.60 2.02 a
    75 g + 100 ml + 100 ml/100 l
    2 DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All 2.31 2.31 2.31 1.72 2.16 a
    75 g + 150 ml + 100 ml/100 l
    3 DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All 2.62 1.95 2.27 1.79 2.16 a
    100 g + 100 ml + 100 ml/100 l
    4 DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All 2.49 1.97 2.39 1.93 2.20 a
    100 g + 150 ml + 100 ml/100 l
    5 DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All 2.09 2.27 2.37 2.07 2.20 a
    125 g + 100 ml + 100 ml/100 l
    6 DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All 2.35 2.17 1.84 2.22 2.14 a
    125 g + 150 ml + 100 ml/100 l
    7 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 2.61 1.88 2.23 2.12 2.21 a
    960 + Wet-All
    75 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l + 100 ml/
    100 l
    8 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 2.33 2.03 2.05 1.91 2.08 a
    960 + Wet-All
    75 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l + 100 ml/
    100 l
    9 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 2.20 1.92 2.66 1.96 2.18 a
    960 + Wet-All
    100 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l + 100 ml/
    100 l
    10 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 2.21 2.24 2.31 2.58 2.34 a
    960 + Wet-All
    100 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l + 100 ml/
    100 l
    11 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 1.84 2.03 2.63 2.80 2.33 a
    960 + Wet-All
    125 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l + 100 ml/
    100 l
    12 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 1.50 2.29 2.19 2.74 2.18 a
    960 + Wet-All
    125 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l + 100 ml/
    100 l
    13 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 1.57 1.92 1.90 2.07 1.87 a
    960 + Wet-All
    250 g + 300 ml + 2.0 l + 200 ml/
    100 l
    14 CALLISTO ® + Gardo Gold + 1.80 2.64 2.85 2.52 2.46 a
    COMPLIMENT ® Super
    260 ml + 1562 ml + 100 ml/100 l
    15 Untreated control 2.12 2.67 2.68 2.45 2.48 a
  • TABLE 6-133
    Comparative visual phytotoxicity of DINAMIC ® 700WDG
    post-emergence programs
    BBA VISUAL
    PHYTOTOXICITY
    SCALE
    (1 - no damage;
    9 - dead)
    Replicate
    TREATMENT Timing I II III IV Mean
    1 DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All 14 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    75 g + 100 ml + 100 ml/100 ml 28 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    42 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    2 DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All 14 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    75 g + 150 ml + 100 ml/100 ml 28 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    42 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    3 DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All 14 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    100 g + 100 ml + 100 ml/100 ml 28 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    42 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    4 DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All 14 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    100 g + 150 ml + 100 ml/100 ml 28 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    42 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    5 DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All 14 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    125 g + 100 ml + 100 ml/100 ml 28 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    42 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    6 DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All 14 DAA 3 1 1 3 2.0
    125 g + 150 ml + 100 ml/100 ml 28 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    42 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    7 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 14 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    960 + Wet-All 28 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    75 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l + 100 ml/ 42 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    100 ml
    8 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 14 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    960 + Wet-All 28 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    75 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l + 100 ml/ 42 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    100 ml
    9 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 14 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    960 + Wet-All 28 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    100 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l + 100 ml/ 42 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    100 ml
    10 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 14 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.5
    960 + Wet-All 28 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    100 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l + 100 ml/ 42 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    100 ml
    11 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 14 DAA 3 3 1 1 2.0
    960 + Wet-All 28 DAA 2 3 1 1 1.75
    125 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l + 100 ml/ 42 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    100 ml
    12 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 14 DAA 3 3 1 1 2.0
    960 + Wet-All 28 DAA 2 2 1 1 1.5
    125 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l + 100 ml/ 42 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    100 ml
    13 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 14 DAA 5 6 6 5 5.5
    960 + Wet-All 28 DAA 3 4 4 3 3.5
    250 g + 300 ml + 2.0 l + 200 ml/ 42 DAA 2 3 3 2 2.5
    100 ml
    14 CALLISTO ® + Gardo Gold + 14 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    COMPLEMENT ® Super 28 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    260 ml + 1562 ml + 100 ml 42 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    15 Untreated control 14 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    28 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    42 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    Note:
    Treatment means sharing the same letter do not differ significantly by LSD test at the 5% (α = 0.05) level of probability
  • TABLE 6-134
    Comparative visual phytotoxicity of DINAMIC ® 700WDG
    post-emergence programs
    AVERAGE % WEED CONTROL
    BY SPECIES
    TREATMENT Timing DATFE SCHPI POROL CYPES
    1 DINAMIC ® + 14 DAA 99 100 60 30
    Galago + Wet-All 28 DAA 100 100 40 40
    75 g + 100 ml + 56 DAA 100 100 30 30
    100 ml/100 ml
    2 DINAMIC ® + 14 DAA 100 100 70 50
    Galago + Wet-All 28 DAA 100 100 50 70
    75 g + 150 ml + 56 DAA 100 100 30 50
    100 ml/100 ml
    3 DINAMIC ® + 14 DAA 99 100 65 35
    Galago + Wet-All 28 DAA 100 100 50 40
    100 g + 100 ml + 56 DAA 100 100 35 35
    100 ml/100 ml
    4 DINAMIC ® + 14 DAA 100 100 70 55
    Galago + Wet-All 28 DAA 100 100 60 70
    100 g + 150 ml + 56 DAA 100 100 40 50
    100 ml/100 ml
    5 DINAMIC ® + 14 DAA 100 100 70 40
    Galago + Wet-All 28 DAA 100 100 60 50
    125 g + 100 ml + 56 DAA 100 100 50 40
    100 ml/100 ml
    6 DINAMIC ® + 14 DAA 100 100 75 40
    Galago + Wet-All 28 DAA 100 100 70 70
    125 g + 150 ml + 56 DAA 100 100 55 60
    100 ml/100 ml
    7 DINAMIC ® + 14 DAA 100 100 70 40
    Galago + TOLLA 28 DAA 100 100 55 50
    960 + Wet-All 56 DAA 100 100 45 40
    75 g + 100 ml +
    1.0 l + 100 ml/100 ml
    8 DINAMIC ® + 14 DAA 100 100 75 60
    Galago + TOLLA 28 DAA 100 100 65 80
    960 + Wet-All 56 DAA 100 100 50 70
    75 g + 150 ml +
    1.0 l + 100 ml/100 ml
    9 DINAMIC ® + 14 DAA 100 100 75 50
    Galago + TOLLA 28 DAA 100 100 75 60
    960 + Wet-All 56 DAA 100 100 60 45
    100 g + 100 ml +
    1.0 l + 100 ml/100 ml
    10 DINAMIC ® + 14 DAA 100 100 80 65
    Galago + TOLLA 28 DAA 100 100 75 80
    960 + Wet-All 56 DAA 100 100 65 70
    100 g + 150 ml +
    1.0 l + 100 ml/100 ml
    11 DINAMIC ® + 14 DAA 100 100 80 50
    Galago + TOLLA 28 DAA 100 100 80 70
    960 + Wet-All 56 DAA 100 100 70 55
    125 g + 100 ml +
    1.0 l + 100 ml/100 ml
    12 DINAMIC ® + 14 DAA 100 100 85 60
    Galago + TOLLA 28 DAA 100 100 85 85
    960 + Wet-All 56 DAA 100 100 80 70
    125 g + 150 ml +
    1.0 l + 100 ml/100 ml
    13 DINAMIC ® + 14 DAA 100 100 100 70
    Galago + TOLLA 28 DAA 100 100 100 95
    960 + Wet-All 56 DAA 100 100 100 90
    250 g + 300 ml +
    2.0 l + 200 ml/100 ml
    14 CALLISTO ® + 14 DAA 100 100 85 65
    Gardo Gold + 28 DAA 100 100 90 90
    COMPLEMENT ® 56 DAA 100 100 90 90
    Super
    260 ml + 1562 ml +
    100 ml
    15 Untreated Control 14 DAA 0 0 0 0
    28 DAA 0 0 0 0
    56 DAA 0 0 0 0
  • The trial was conducted on a commercial maize crop produced under sprinkler irrigation. The DINAMIC® 700WDG formulation was evaluated for herbicidal activity and crop selectivity when applied as a post-emergence spray program in tank-mix combination with Galago and TOLLA 960. The adjuvant Wet-All was applied to all treatments receiving DINAMIC® 700WDG as standard practice. Treatments were applied post-emergence of crop and weeds as broadcast applications over the maize rows when the maize crop was in the 4-5 leaf stage.
  • No visual symptoms of phytotoxicity in the form of stunting, chlorosis, necrosis or growth-abnormalities were observed on treatments receiving the tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+Wet-All where DINAMIC® 700WDG was applied at rates of 75 g/ha and 100 g/ha, respectively. Tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+Wet-All applied at rates of 125 g/ha+150 ml+100 ml/100 l exhibited slight visual symptoms of stunting on isolated plots at the first assessment only. No visual symptoms of stunting were observed on any of the subsequent evaluations conducted at 28 DAA and 42 DAA, respectively.
  • Visual symptoms of phytotoxicity in the form of stunting were observed at the assessments conducted at 14 and 28 DAA in treatments receiving the tank-mix combination of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 960+Wet-All where DINAMIC® 700WDG was applied at the rate of 125 g/ha and the double rate of 250 g/ha. Symptoms of phytotoxicity were not severe and ranged from negligible to moderate (BBA visual phytotoxicity rating of 2 to 3) in tank-mix treatments receiving DINAMIC® 700WDG at the rate of 125 g/ha. No visual symptoms of phytotoxicity of any nature were observed at the final assessment conducted at 56 DAA.
  • Tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 960+Wet-All applied at the double rate of 250 g/ha+300 ml/ha+1.0l/ha+200 ml/100 l exhibited distinct symptoms of stunting (BBA class 5-6) at the first assessment conducted at 14 DAA. Severity of stunting improved at the subsequent evaluations conducted at 28 DAA (BBA class 3-4) and 56 DAA (BBA class 2-3).
  • Yield:
  • None of the various DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 960+Wet-All tank-mix combinations exhibited a significant reduction in yield compared to the untreated control and the standard CALLISTO®+Gardo Gold+COMPLEMENT® Super treatments.
  • The weed spectrum at the trial site was composed of yellow nutsedge (CYPES) and broadleaved weeds namely Large thornapple (DATFE), Dwarf marigold (SCHPI) and Purslane (POROL). The broadleaved weed POROL was in an advanced growth stage at application and considered to be beyond acceptable post-emergence application size. Efficacy evaluations were conducted at 14, 28 and 56 days following application, respectively.
  • DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago
  • Tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+Wet-all exhibited commercially acceptable levels of herbicidal activity against the broadleaved weeds DATFE and SCHPI across all rates applied. None of the treatments exhibited commercially acceptable levels of herbicidal activity against CYPES and POROL.
  • DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 960
  • Tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 960+Wet-All were efficacious and exhibited commercially acceptable levels of herbicidal activity against the broadleaved weeds DATFE and SCHPI across all rates applied. The broadleaved weed POROL was suppressed (efficacy between 80-89%) in treatments receiving DINAMIC® 700WDG applied at the rate of 125 g/ha in combination with Galago at 150 ml/ha. The double rate of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 960+Wet-All and the standard tank-mix combination of CALLISTO®+Gardo Gold+COMPLEMENT® Super were the only treatments to display commercially acceptable levels of herbicidal activity against yellow nutsedge (CYPES) as a result of the higher rate of mesotrione in these treatments. The standard tank-mix combination of CALLISTO®+Gardo Gold+COMPLEMENT® Super applied at 260 ml/ha+1562 ml/ha+100 ml/100 l displayed superior levels of herbicidal activity with commercial control achieved for all weed species at the final assessment conducted at 56 DAA.
  • Compatibility
  • No visual symptoms of incompatibility in the form of phase separation or agglomeration were observed in any of the tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+Wet-All and DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 960+Wet-All, whether applied at single or double rates.
  • No visual symptoms of phytotoxicity in the form of stunting, chlorosis, necrosis or growth-abnormalities were observed on treatments receiving the tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+Wet-All where DINAMIC® 700WDG was applied at the rates of 75 g/ha and 100 g/ha. Negligible levels of stunting were observed in treatments receiving the tank-mix combination of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+Wet-All at the rate of 125 g/ha+150 m/ha+100 ml/100 l at the first assessment only, after which no further symptoms of phytotoxicity were observed.
  • Visual symptoms of phytotoxicity in the form of stunting were observed at the assessments conducted at 14 and 28 DAA in treatments receiving the tank-mix combination of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 960+Wet-All where DINAMIC® 700WDG was applied at the rate of 125 g/ha. Stunting was not severe and ranged from negligible to moderate according to BBA visual phytotoxicity scale. Tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 960+Wet-All applied at the rate of 250 g/ha+300 ml/ha+1.0l/ha+200 ml/100 l exhibited distinct symptoms of stunting (BBA class 5-6) at the first assessment conducted at 14 DAA. Severity of stunting improved at the subsequent evaluations conducted at 28 DAA (BBA class 3-4) and 56 DAA (BBA class 2-3).
  • None of the various DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 960+Wet-All tank-mix combinations exhibited a significant reduction in yield compared to the untreated control and the standard CALLISTO®+Gardo Gold+COMPLEMENT® Super treatments.
  • Tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 960+Wet-All were efficacious and exhibited commercially acceptable levels of herbicidal activity against the broadleaved weeds DATFE and SCHPI across all rates applied. Yellow nutsedge (CYPES) was only controlled by the double rate of DINAMIC®+Galago+TOLLA 960+Wet-All and the standard tank-mix combination of CALLISTO®+Gardo Gold+COMPLEMENT® Super as a result of the higher rate of mesotrione in these treatments.
  • No visual symptoms of incompatibility in the form of phase separation or agglomeration were observed in any of the tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+Wet-All and DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 960+Wet-All, whether applied at single or double rates.
  • TABLE 6-135
    Anova Table Grain yield (kg/plot)
    Degrees of Sums of Mean F
    Unit freedom Squares Squares Value
    Reps
    3 0.3582
    Treatments 14 1.372 0.9798 0.9748
    Error 42 4.221 0.1005
    Total 59 5.951
    Overall mean 2.199
    S.E for Difference 0.2242
    Least Significant Difference (LSD) at 95% 0.4524
  • TABLE 6-136
    BBA Visual Phytotoxicity rating scale
    EQUIVALENT
    Scale % Description
    1 0% NO DAMAGE
    2 0.1-2.5% NEGLIGIBLE DAMAGE
    3 2.5-5.0% MODERATE DAMAGE
    No effects on yield and/or quality
    4 5.0-10% Damage up to limits of commercial
    acceptability—if no yield loss
    5  10-15% DISTINCT DAMAGE
    Commercially acceptable only under
    certain conditions—if no yield loss
    6  15-25% SEVERE DAMAGE
    Not commercially acceptable—yield
    loss and quality
    7  25-35% VERY SEVERE DAMAGE
    8  35-68% EXTREME DAMAGE
    9  68-100% START OF WITHERING AND DEATH
    • Q. Post-Emergence Application Against Weed in Maize
  • This Example compares the herbicidal selectivity and efficacy of DINAMIC® 700WDG applied in combination with Galago and TOLLA 960 as a post-emergence application with regards to both crop and weeds in dry land maize. Treatments and conditions are tabulated below.
  • TABLE 6-137
    TREATMENTS
    Rate/ha
    TREATMENT Product (l) a.i. (g)
    1 DINAMIC ® + 75 g + 100 ml + 52.5 + 48 +
    Galago + Wet-All 100 ml/100 l 180
    2 DINAMIC ® + 75 g + 150 ml + 52.5 + 72
    Galago + Wet-All 100 ml/100 l
    3 DINAMIC ® + 100 g + 100 ml + 70 + 48
    Galago + Wet-All 100 ml/100 l
    4 DINAMIC ® + 100 g + 150 ml + 70 + 72
    Galago + Wet-All 100 ml/100 l
    5 DINAMIC ® + 125 g + 100 ml + 87.5 + 48
    Galago + Wet-All 100 ml/100 l
    6 DINAMIC ® + 125 g + 150 ml + 87.5 + 72
    Galago + Wet-All 100 ml/100 l
    7 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 75 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l 52.5 + 48 +
    TOLLA 960 + Wet-All +100 ml/100 l 960 + 180
    8 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 75 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l 52.5 + 72 +
    TOLLA 960 + Wet-All +100 ml/100 l 960 + 180
    9 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 100 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l + 70 + 48 +
    TOLLA 960 + Wet-All 100 ml/100 l 960 + 180
    10 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 100 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l + 70 + 72 +
    TOLLA 960 + Wet-All 100 ml/100 l 960 + 180
    11 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 125 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l + 87.5 + 48 +
    TOLLA 960 + Wet-All 100 ml/100 l 960 + 180
    12 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 125 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l + 87.5 + 72 +
    TOLLA 960 + Wet-All 100 ml/100 l 960 + 180
    13 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 250 g + 300 ml + 2.0 l + 175 + 144 +
    TOLLA 960 + Wet-All 200 ml/100 l 1920 + 360
    14 CALLISTO ® + Gardo 260 ml + 1562 ml + 125 + 488/
    Gold + Complement super 100 ml/100 l 293 + 100
    15 Untreated control — —
  • TABLE 6-138
    Test products used:
    Manu-
    Active Formu- facturer/ Registration
    Product Ingredient lation Supplier No.
    1 DINAMIC ® Amicarbazone WDG Arysta
    700WDG 700 g/kg Lifescience
    2 Galago Mesotrione SC Arysta L. 8089
    480 g/l Lifescience
    3 TOLLA 960 Metolachlor EC Arysta L. 6794
    960 g/l Lifescience
    4 Wet-All Adjuvant SL Arysta L. 8361
    Lifescience
    5 CALLISTO ® Mesotrione SC Syngenta L. 6795
    480 g/l
    6 Gardo Gold S-Melolachlor SC Syngenta L. 7763
    312.5 g/l
    Terbuthvlazine
    187.5 g/l
    7 COMPLE- Adjuvant SL Syngenta L.8169
    MENT ®
    Super
  • TABLE 6-139
    TRIAL DESIGN
    Design Completely randomized design
    Replicates Four
    Plot size 5 m × 2.5 m = Nett/plot
  • TABLE 6-140
    SPRAYER
    Sprayer CO2 Precision Sprayer
    Boom 2 m aluminium
    Nozzle
    5 × 11002 flat fan nozzles (Teejet 11002 DG)
    Pressure 2.7 Bar
    Application 200 l/ha
    • Spray Water Quality:
  • pH: 6.5
    EC: 0.7 mS/m
    • Spray Volume:
  • 200l/ha at 2.7 Bar
  • TABLE 6-141
    WEATHER INFORMATION AT APPLICATION
    Time: 10:00
    Temperature (max) 28.3° C.
    RH: 44%
    Wind: 0-5 km/h, NE
    Cloud
    3/8
  • TABLE 6-142
    SOIL PROPERTIES AT APPLICATION
    Clay Fraction 16.0%
    Silt Fraction  3.5%
    Sand Fraction 80.5%
    pH (KCl)  5.1
    Moisture Surface dry, subsurface moist at 6 cm
    • Irrigation:
  • None (rain-fed)
    • Crop: Crop: Maize Variety: Phb 31 G 54 BR
  • Growth stage: 6-7 leaf (BBCH growth stage 16/17)
    Sowing depth: 5 cm
    Sowing density: 45000 plants/ha
  • TABLE 6-143
    WEED INFORMATION
    COMMON GROWTH % SOIL
    SPECIES NAME CODE STAGE COVER
    Bidens pilosa Blackjack BIDPI 2-4 leaf 10%
    Amaranthus hybridus Pigweed AMAHY 2-4 leaf 10%
    Tagetes minuta Khaki weed TAGMI 2-6 leaf  5%
    Portulaca oleracea Purslane POROL 4-12 leaf +  5%
    2 sideshoots
    Commelina Wandering COMBE 4-8 leaf  5%
    benghalensis Jew
  • TABLE 6-144
    ASSESSMENT DETAILS
    Method Comparative Efficacy
    Herbicide Efficacy: Number of weeds in treated versus untreated plots
    Selectivity: Visual phytotoxicity and yield
    9. Visual phytotoxicity: BBA 1-9 scale
    (refer to appendix for details)
    10. Yield: 20 cobs harvested at random from each plot.
    Average grain weight per plot determined using a precision
    2 decimal scale. Statistical evaluation:
    ANOVA at the 95% probability using Tukeys LSD formulae
    Assessment
    14 DAA—Efficacy/Selectivity
    Times- 28 DAA—Efficacy/Selectivity
    Days After 42 DAA—Efficacy/Selectivity
    Application Harvest—Selectivity
    (DAA)
  • TABLE 6-145
    Comparative yield of DINAMIC ® 700WDG programs
    YIELD (Kg/plot)
    Replicate
    TREATMENT I II III IV Mean
    1 DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All 2.63 2.65 2.63 1.71 2.41 a
    75 g + 100 ml + 100 ml/100 l
    2 DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All 2.95 2.87 2.24 2.55 2.65 a
    75 g + 150 ml + 100 ml/100 l
    3 DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All 2.29 2.67 2.67 2.01 2.41 a
    100 g + 100 ml + 100 ml/100 l
    4 DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All 2.47 2.85 1.79 2.22 2.33 a
    100 g + 150 ml + 100 ml/100 l
    5 DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All 2.64 2.58 2.71 2.48 2.60 a
    125 g + 100 ml + 100 ml/100 l
    6 DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All 2.43 2.77 2.69 2.15 2.51 a
    125 g + 150 ml + 100 ml/100 l
    7 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 2.47 2.72 2.62 2.44 2.57 a
    960 + Wet-All
    75 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l + 100 ml/
    100 l
    8 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 2.52 2.66 2.09 2.88 2.54 a
    960 + Wet-All
    75 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l + 100 ml/
    100 l
    9 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 2.84 2.49 2.47 2.97 2.69 a
    960 + Wet-All
    100 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l + 100 ml/
    100 l
    10 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 2.72 2.82 2.28 2.69 2.63 a
    960 + Wet-All
    100 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l + 100 ml/
    100 l
    11 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 2.52 2.42 2.41 2.78 2.53 a
    960 + Wet-All
    125 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l + 100 ml/
    100 l
    12 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 2.51 2.53 1.95 2.53 2.38 a
    960 + Wet-All
    125 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l + 100 ml/
    100 l
    13 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 2.10 2.41 2.61 2.51 2.41 a
    960 + Wet-All
    250 g + 300 ml + 2.0 l + 200 ml/
    100 l
    14 CALLISTO ® + Gardo Gold + 2.30 2.30 1.68 3.17 2.36 a
    COMPLIMENT ® Super
    260 ml + 1562 ml + 100 ml/100 l
    15 Untreated control 2.32 2.42 2.92 3.14 2.70 a
    Note:
    Treatment means sharing the same letter do not differ significantly by LSD test at the 5% (α = 0.05) level of probability
  • TABLE 6-146
    Comparative visual phytotoxicity of DINAMIC ® 700WDG
    post-emergence programs
    BBA VISUAL
    PHYTOTOXICITY
    SCALE
    (1 - no damage;
    9 - dead)
    Replicate
    TREATMENT Timing I II III IV Mean
    1 DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All 14 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    75 g + 100 ml + 100 ml/100 ml 28 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    42 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    2 DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All 14 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    75 g + 150 ml + 100 ml/100 ml 28 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    42 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    3 DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All 14 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    100 g + 100 ml + 100 ml/100 ml 28 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    42 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    4 DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All 14 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    100 g + 150 ml + 100 ml/100 ml 28 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    42 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    5 DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All 14 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    125 g + 100 ml + 100 ml/100 ml 28 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    42 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    6 DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All 14 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    125 g + 150 ml + 100 ml/100 ml 28 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    42 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    7 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 14 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    960 + Wet-All 28 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    75 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l + 100 ml/ 42 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    100 ml
    8 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 14 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    960 + Wet-All 28 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    75 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l + 100 ml/ 42 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    100 ml
    9. DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 14 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    960 + Wet-All 28 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    100 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l + 100 ml/ 42 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    100 ml
    10. DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 14 DAA 2 1 1 2 1.5
    960 + Wet-All 28 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    100 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l + 100 ml/ 42 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    100 ml
    11. DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 14 DAA 3 1 2 1 1.75
    960 + Wet-All 28 DAA 2 1 2 1 1.5
    125 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l + 100 ml/ 42 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    100 ml
    12. DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 14 DAA 3 3 2 2 2.5
    960 + Wet-All 28 DAA 3 2 2 2 2.25
    125 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l + 100 ml/ 42 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    100 ml
    13. DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 14 DAA 4 3 3 3 3.25
    960 + Wet-All 28 DAA 3 3 3 3 3.0
    250 g + 300 ml + 2.0 l + 200 ml/ 42 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    100 ml
    14. CALLISTO ® + Gardo Gold + 14 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    COMPLEMENT ® Super 28 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    260 ml + 1562 ml + 100 ml 42 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    15. Untreated control 14 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    28 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    42 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
  • TABLE 6-147
    Comparative visual phytotoxicity of DYNAMIC ® 700WDG
    post-emergence programs
    AVERAGE % WEED CONTROL
    BY SPECIES
    TREATMENT DAA AMAHY BIDPI TAGMI POROL COMBE
    1 DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All 14 70 90 94 40 40
    75 g + 100 ml + 100 ml/100 ml 28 80 90 100 50 40
    56 65 80 100 30 30
    2 DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All 14 90 96 98 60 60
    75 g + 150 ml + 100 ml/100 ml 28 85 100 100 60 60
    56 80 100 100 35 40
    3 DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All 14 85 98 98 50 50
    100 g + 100 ml + 100 ml/100 ml 28 85 94 100 60 55
    56 75 90 100 30 30
    4 DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All 14 92 98 98 60 65
    100 g + 150 ml + 100 ml/100 ml 28 96 100 100 65 60
    56 85 100 100 40 45
    5 DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All 14 90 98 99 65 65
    125 g + 100 ml + 100 ml/100 ml 28 92 100 100 60 60
    56 85 100 100 40 45
    6 DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All 14 98 99 99 70 70
    125 g + 150 ml + 100 ml/100 ml 28 98 100 100 65 70
    56 90 100 100 45 45
    7 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 960 + 14 90 98 99 60 70
    Wet-All 28 85 100 100 65 60
    75 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l + 100 ml/100 ml 56 80 100 100 35 30
    8 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 960 + 14 98 99 99 70 80
    Wet-All 28 96 100 100 80 70
    75 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l + 100 ml/100 ml 56 90 100 100 40 40
    9 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 960 + 14 99 99 99 75 85
    Wet-All 28 92 100 100 70 70
    100 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l + 100 ml/100 ml 56 90 100 100 45 50
    10 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 960 + 14 99 99 99 85 90
    Wet-All 28 100 100 100 80 80
    100 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l + 100 ml/100 ml 56 100 100 100 55 60
    11 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 960 + 14 99 99 99 85 90
    Wet-All 28 100 100 100 80 85
    125 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l + 100 ml/100 ml 56 100 100 100 60 60
    12 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 960 + 14 99 99 99 90 90
    Wet-All 28 100 100 100 90 90
    125 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l + 100 ml/100 ml 56 100 100 100 80 80
    13 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 960 + 14 100 100 100 98 99
    Wet-All 28 100 100 100 94 96
    250 g + 300 ml + 2.0 l + 200 ml/100 ml 56 100 100 100 92 100
    14 CALLISTO ® + Gardo Gold + 14 100 100 100 94 94
    COMPLIMENT ® Super 28 100 100 100 94 92
    260 ml + 1562 ml + 100 ml/100 ml 56 100 100 100 90 95
    15 Untreated Control 14 0 0 0 0 0
    28 0 0 0 0 0
    56 0 0 0 0 0
  • The trial was conducted on a commercial maize crop produced under dry land conditions. The DINAMIC® 700WDG formulation was evaluated for herbicidal activity and crop selectivity when applied as a post-emergence spray program in tank-mix combination with Galago and TOLLA 960. The adjuvant Wet-All was applied to all treatments receiving DINAMIC® 700WDG as standard practice. Treatments were applied post-emergence of crop and weeds as broadcast applications over the maize rows when the maize crop was in the 6-7 leaf stage.
  • No visual symptoms of phytotoxicity in the form of stunting, chlorosis, necrosis or growth-abnormalities were observed on any of the treatments receiving the tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+Wet-All across all rates applied.
  • Visual symptoms of phytotoxicity in the form of stunting were observed at the assessments conducted at 14 and 28 DAA in treatments receiving the tank-mix combination of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 960+Wet-All where DINAMIC® 700WDG was applied at the rate of 125 g/ha and the double rate of 250 g/ha. Symptoms of phytotoxicity were not severe and ranged from negligible to moderate (BBA visual phytotoxicity rating of 2 to 3) depending on the dosage rate of DINAMIC® 700WDG applied. No visual symptoms of phytotoxicity of any nature were observed at the final assessment conducted at 56 DAA.
  • The weed spectrum at the trial site was dominated by broadleaved weeds namely Blackjack (BIDPI), Pigweed (AMAHY), Khaki weed (TAGMI) and Wandering jew (COMBE). The broadleaved weed POROL was in an advanced growth stage at application and considered to be beyond acceptable post-emergence application size. Efficacy evaluations were conducted at 14, 28 and 56 days following application, respectively.
  • DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago
  • Tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+Wet-all exhibited commercially acceptable levels of herbicidal activity against the broadleaved weeds BIDPI and TAGMI in treatments receiving DINAMIC® 700WDG applied at the higher rates of 100 g/ha and 125 g/ha. The broadleaved weed AMAHY was only commercially controlled at the higher tank-mix rate of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago applied at 125 g/ha+150 ml/ha. None of the treatments displayed commercially acceptable levels of herbicidal activity against the broadleaved weeds COMBE and POROL.
  • DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 960
  • Tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 960+Wet-All were efficacious and exhibited commercially acceptable levels of herbicidal activity against the broadleaved weeds BIDPI and TAGMI across all rates applied. The broadleaved weed AMAHY was commercially controlled by all tank-mix combinations where DINAMIC® 700WDG was applied at rates exceeding 75 g/ha or where Galago was applied at 150 ml/ha. The broadleaved weeds POROL and COMBE were only commercially controlled by the double rate of DINAMIC®+Galago+TOLLA+Wet-All applied at 250 g/ha+300 ml/ha+2.0 l/ha+200 ml/100l and the standard tank-mix combination of CALLISTO®+Gardo Gold+COMPLEMENT® Super applied at 260 ml/ha+1562 ml/ha+100 ml/100l due to the higher rate of the active ingredient Mesotrione in these treatments.
  • Compatibility
  • No visual symptoms of incompatibility in the form of phase separation or agglomeration were observed in any of the tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+Wet-All and DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 960+Wet-All, whether applied at single or double rates.
  • No visual symptoms of phytotoxicity in the form of stunting, chlorosis, necrosis or growth-abnormalities were observed on any of the treatments receiving the tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+Wet-All across all rates applied.
  • Visual symptoms of phytotoxicity in the form of stunting were observed at the assessments conducted at 14 and 28 DAA in treatments receiving the tank-mix combination of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 960+Wet-All where DINAMIC® 700WDG was applied at the rate of 125 g/ha and the double rate of 250 g/ha. Stunting was not severe and ranged from negligible to moderate according to BBA visual phytotoxicity scale.
  • Tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 960+Wet-All were efficacious and exhibited commercially acceptable levels of herbicidal activity against the broadleaved weeds BIDPI and TAGMI across all rates applied. AMAHY was commercially controlled by all tank-mix combinations where DINAMIC® 700WDG was applied at rates exceeding 75 g/ha or where Galago was applied at 150 ml/ha. The broadleaved weeds POROL and COMBE were only commercially controlled by the double rate of DINAMIC®+Galago+TOLLA+Wet-All and the standard tank-mix combination of CALLISTO®+Gardo Gold+COMPLEMENTS Super.
  • No visual symptoms of incompatibility in the form of phase separation or agglomeration were observed in any of the tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+Wet-All and DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 960+Wet-All, whether applied at single or double rates.
  • TABLE 6-148
    Anova Table Grain yield (kg/plot)
    Degrees of Sums of Mean F
    Unit freedom Squares Squares Value
    Reps
     3  .4117
    Treatments 14  .8700 .6214  .5757
    Error 42 4.533  .1079
    Total 59 5.815 
    Overall mean 2.514 
    S. E for Difference 0.2323
    Least Significant Difference (LSD) at 95% 0.4688
  • TABLE 6-149
    BBA Visual Phytotoxicity rating scale
    Scale EQUIVALENT % Description
    1 0% NO DAMAGE
    2 0.1-2.5% NEGLIGIBLE DAMAGE
    3 2.5-5.0% MODERATE DAMAGE
    No effects on yield and/or quality
    4 5.0-10%  Damage up to limits of commercial
    acceptability-if no yield loss
    5 10-15% DISTINCT DAMAGE
    Commercially acceptable only under
    certain conditions-if no yield loss
    6 15-25% SEVERE DAMAGE
    Not commercially acceptable-yield
    loss and quality
    7 25-35% VERY SEVERE DAMAGE
    8 35-68% EXTREME DAMAGE
    9  68-100% START OF WITHERING AND DEATH
    • R. Post-Emergence Application Against Weed in Maize
  • This Example compares the herbicidal selectivity and efficacy of DINAMIC® 700WDG applied in combination with Galago and TOLLA 960 as a post-emergence application with regards to both crop and weeds in irrigated maize. Treatments and conditions are tabulated below.
  • TABLE 6-150
    TREATMENTS
    Rate/ha
    TREATMENT Product (l) a.i. (g)
     1 DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All  75 g + 100 ml + 100 ml/100 l 52.5 + 48 + 180
     2 DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All  75 g + 150 ml + 100 ml/100 l 52.5 + 72  
     3 DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All 100 g + 100 ml + 100 ml/100 l   70 + 48
     4 DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All 100 g + 150 ml + 100 ml/100 l   70 + 72
     5 DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All 125 g + 100 ml + 100 ml/100 l 87.5 + 48  
     6 DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All 125 g + 150 ml + 100 ml/100 l 87.5 + 72   
     7 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 960 + Wet-All  75 g + 100 ml + 100 ml/100 l 52.5 + 48 + 960 + 180
     8 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 960 + Wet-All  75 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l+ 100 ml/100 l 52.5 + 72 + 960 + 180
     9 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 960 + Wet-All 100 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l + 100 ml/100 l   70 + 48 + 960 + 180
    10 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 960 + Wet-All 100 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l + 100 ml/100 l   70 + 72 + 960 + 180
    11 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 960 + Wet-All 125 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l + 100 ml/100 l 87.5 + 48 + 960 + 180
    12 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 960 + Wet-All 125 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l + 100 ml/100 l 87.5 + 72 + 960 + 180
    13 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 960 + Wet-All 250 g + 300 ml + 2.0 l + 200 ml/100 l  175 + 144 + 1920 + 360
    14 CALLISTO ® + Gardo Gold + Complement super 260 ml + 1562 ml + 100 ml/100 l  125 + 488/293 + 100
    15 Untreated control — —
  • TABLE 6-151
    Test products used
    Manu- Regi-
    Active Form- facturer/ stration
    Product Ingredient ulation Supplier No.
    1 DINAMIC ® Amicarbazone WDG Arysta
    700WDG 700 g/kg Lifescience
    2 Galago Mesotrione SC Arysta L. 8089
    480 g/l Lifescience
    3 TOLLA 960 Metolachlor EC Arysta L. 6794
    960 g/l Lifescience
    4 Wet-All Adjuvant SL Arysta L. 8361
    Lifescience
    5 CALLISTO ® Mesotrione SC Syngenta L. 6795
    480 g/l
    6 Gardo Gold S-Metolachlor SC Syngenta L. 7763
    312.5 g/l
    Terbuthylazine
    187.5 g/l
    7 COMPLEMENT ® Adjuvant SL Syngenta L. 8169
    Super
  • TABLE 6-152
    TRIAL DESIGN
    Design Completely randomized design
    Replicates Four
    Plot size 5 m × 2.5 m = Nett/plot
  • TABLE 6-153
    SPRAYER
    Sprayer CO2 Precision Sprayer
    Boom 2 m aluminium
    Nozzle
    5 × 11002 flat fan nozzles (Teejet 11002 DG)
    Pressure 2.7 Bar
    Application 200 l/ha
    • Spray Water Quality:
  • pH: 6.5
    EC: 0.7 mS/m
    • Spray Volume:
  • 200l/ha at 2.7 Bar
  • TABLE 6-154
    WEATHER INFORMATION AT APPLICATION
    Temperature (max) 21.7° C.
    RH: 65%
    Wind: 0-5 km/h, NE
    Cloud 8/8
  • TABLE 6-155
    SOIL PROPERTIES AT APPLICATION
    Clay Fraction
     9%
    Silt Fraction  5%
    Sand Fraction 86%
    pH (KCl) 6.01
    Moisture Field
    capacity
    • Irrigation
  • None (rain-fed)
    • Crop Crop: Maize Variety: Pan 3P-736BR
  • Growth stage: 4-5 leaf (BBCH growth stage 14/15)
    Sowing depth: 5 cm
    Sowing density: 80 000 plants/ha
  • TABLE 6-156
    WEED INFORMATION
    COMMON GROWTH % SOIL
    SPECIES NAME CODE STAGE COVER
    Bidens pilosa Blackjack BIDPI 2-4 leaf 25%
    Portulaca oleracea Purslane POROL 4-6 leaf  5%
    Convolvulus arvensis Field bindweed CONAR 2-4 leaf  5%
    Anoda cristata Anoda weed ANOCR 2-4 leaf  5%
  • TABLE 6-157
    ASSESSMENT DETAILS
    YIELD (Kg/plot)
    Replicate
    TREATMENT I II III IV Mean
    1 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 3.89 4.00 3.68 3.43 3.75 ab
    Wet-All
    75 g + 100 ml + 100 ml/
    100 l
    2 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 3.61 3.56 3.72 3.34 3.56 ab
    Wet-All
    75 g + 150 ml + 100 ml/
    100 l
    3 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 3.81 4.06 3.43 2.78 3.52 ab
    Wet-All
    100 g + 100 ml + 100 ml/
    100 l
    4 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 3.99 4.01 3.98 3.27 3.81 ab
    Wet-All
    100 g + 150 ml + 100 ml/
    100 l
    5 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 3.57 3.78 3.60 3.66 3.65 ab
    Wet-All
    125 g + 100 ml + 100 ml/
    100 l
    6 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 3.43 3.92 3.92 4.04 3.83 ab
    Wet-All
    125 g + 150 ml + 100 ml/
    100 l
    7 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 3.54 4.06 3.70 3.50 3.70 ab
    TOLLA 960 + Wet-All
    75 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l +
    100 ml/100 l
    8 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 3.90 4.06 3.33 2.93 3.55 ab
    TOLLA 960 + Wet-All
    75 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l +
    100 ml/100 l
    9 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 3.52 4.27 3.80 3.32 3.73 ab
    TOLLA 960 + Wet-All
    100 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l +
    100 ml/100 l
    10 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 4.01 3.92 3.53 4.04 3.87 ab
    TOLLA 960 + Wet-All
    100 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l +
    100 ml/100 l
    11 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 3.28 3.46 3.37 4.07 3.55 ab
    TOLLA 960 + Wet-All
    125 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l +
    100 ml/100 l
    12 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 2.94 4.14 3.39 4.01 3.62 ab
    TOLLA 960 + Wet-All
    125 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l +
    100 ml/100 l
    13 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 2.62 3.36 3.52 3.74 3.31 a
    TOLLA 960 + Wet-All
    250 g + 300 ml + 2.0 l +
    200 ml/100 l
    14 CALLISTO ® + Gardo 3.75 4.50 4.73 4.50 4.37 b
    Gold + COMPLIMENT ®
    Super
    260 ml + 1562 ml +
    100 ml/100 l
    15 Untreated control 3.99 3.28 3.60 3.15 3.50 ab
  • TABLE 6-158
    Comparative yield of DINAMIC ® 700WDG programs
    Method Comparative Efficacy
    Herbicide Efficacy: Number of weeds in treated versus untreated plots
    Selectivity: Visual phytotoxicity and yield
    11. Visual phytotoxicity: BBA 1-9 scale
    (refer to appendix for details)
    12. Yield: 40 cobs harvested at random from each plot.
    Average grain weight per plot determined using a precision
    2 decimal scale. Statistical evaluation:
    ANOVA at the 95% probability using Tukeys LSD formulae
    Assessment
    14 DAA—Efficacy/Selectivity
    Times-Days 28 DAA—Efficacy/Selectivity
    After 42 DAA—Efficacy/Selectivity
    Application Harvest—Selectivity
    (DAA)
    Note:
    Treatment means sharing the same letter do not differ significantly by LSD test at the 5% (α = 0.05) level of probability
  • TABLE 6-159
    Comparative visual phytotoxicity of DINAMIC ® 700WDG
    post-emergence programs
    BBA VISUAL
    PHYTOTOXICITY
    SCALE
    (1 - no damage;
    9 - dead)
    Replicate
    TREATMENT Rate/ha Timing I II III IV Mean
    1 DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All 14 DAA 3 2 2 3 2.5
    75 g + 100 ml + 100 ml/100 ml 28 DAA 1 1 1 3 1.5
    42 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    2 DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All 14 DAA 3 2 4 3 3.0
    75 g + 150 ml + 100 ml/100 ml 28 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    42 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    3 DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All 14 DAA 3 3 2 4 3.0
    100 g + 100 ml + 100 ml/100 ml 28 DAA 2 1 2 2 1.75
    42 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    4 DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All 14 DAA 3 3 4 3 3.25
    100 g + 150 ml + 100 ml/100 ml 28 DAA 3 1 1 1 1.5
    42 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    5 DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All 14 DAA 4 4 3 3 3.5
    125 g + 100 ml + 100 ml/100 ml 28 DAA 1 3 2 3 2.25
    42 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    6 DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All 14 DAA 4 4 4 2 3.5
    125 g + 150 ml + 100 ml/100 ml 28 DAA 3 3 2 3 2.75
    42 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    7 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 14 DAA 2 2 3 2 2.25
    TOLLA 960 + Wet-All 28 DAA 1 1 1 2 1.25
    75 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l + 100 ml/ 42 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    100 ml
    8 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 14 DAA 2 2 3 3 2.5
    TOLLA 960 + Wet-All 28 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    75 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l + 100 ml/ 42 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    100 ml
    9 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 14 DAA 4 3 4 4 3.75
    TOLLA 960 + Wet-All 28 DAA 1 3 3 2 2.25
    100 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l + 100 ml/ 42 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    100 ml
    10 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 14 DAA 4 3 3 4 3.5
    TOLLA 960 + Wet-All 28 DAA 1 2 1 3 1.75
    100 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l + 100 ml/ 42 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    100 ml
    11 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 14 DAA 4 3 4 4 3.75
    TOLLA 960 + Wet-All 28 DAA 3 3 3 3 3.0
    125 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l + 100 ml/ 42 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    100 ml
    12 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 14 DAA 4 4 4 3 3.75
    TOLLA 960 + Wet-All 28 DAA 3 3 3 3 3.0
    125 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l + 100 ml/ 42 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    100 ml
    13 DINAMIC ® + Galago + 14 DAA 6 6 6 6 6.0
    TOLLA 960 + Wet-All 28 DAA 5 5 4 5 4.75
    250 g + 300 ml + 2.0 l + 200 ml/ 42 DAA 4 4 4 4 4.0
    100 ml
    14 CALLISTO ® + Gardo Gold + 14 DAA 3 1 1 1 1.5
    COMPLEMENT ® Super 28 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    260 ml + 1562 ml + 100 ml 42 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    15 Untreated control 14 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    28 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
    42 DAA 1 1 1 1 1.0
  • TABLE 6-160
    Comparative visual phytotoxicity of DINAMIC ® 700WDG
    post-emergence programs
    AVERAGE % WEED CONTROL
    BY SPECIES
    TREATMENT Rate/ha TIMING BIDPI ANOCR CONAR POROL
    1 DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All 14 DAA 94 100 100 70
    75 g + 100 ml + 100 ml/100 ml 28 DAA 96 100 100 60
    56 DAA 90 100 100 60
    2 DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All 14 DAA 98 98 100 80
    75 g + 150 ml + 100 ml/100 ml 28 DAA 100 100 100 70
    56 DAA 100 100 100 80
    3 DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All 14 DAA 99 98 100 80
    100 g + 100 ml + 100 ml/100 ml 28 DAA 99 98 100 70
    56 DAA 96 100 100 70
    4 DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All 14 DAA 98 100 100 75
    100 g + 150 ml + 100 ml/100 ml 28 DAA 99 100 100 70
    56 DAA 100 100 100 85
    5 DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All 14 DAA 100 100 100 80
    125 g + 100 ml + 100 ml/100 ml 28 DAA 100 100 100 75
    56 DAA 100 100 100 80
    6 DINAMIC ® + Galago + Wet-All 14 DAA 100 100 100 80
    125 g + 150 ml + 100 ml/100 ml 28 DAA 100 100 100 80
    56 DAA 100 100 100 94
    7 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 960 + 14 DAA 100 99 100 85
    Wet-All 28 DAA 100 100 100 80
    75 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l + 100 ml/100 ml 56 DAA 100 100 100 85
    8 DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 960 + 14 DAA 100 100 100 85
    Wet-All 28 DAA 100 100 100 80
    75 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l + 100 ml/100 ml 56 DAA 100 100 100 85
    9. DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 960 + 14 DAA 100 100 100 85
    Wet-All 28 DAA 100 100 100 80
    100 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l + 100 ml/100 ml 56 DAA 100 100 100 90
    10. DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 960 + 14 DAA 100 100 100 90
    Wet-All 28 DAA 100 100 100 99
    100 g + 150 ml + 1.0 l + 100 ml/100 ml 56 DAA 100 100 100 90
    11. DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 960 + 14 DAA 100 100 100 96
    Wet-All 28 DAA 100 100 100 94
    125 g + 100 ml + 1.0 l + 100 ml/100 ml 56 DAA 100 100 100 92
    12. DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 960 + 14 DAA 100 100 100 94
    Wet-All 28 DAA 100 100 100 100
    125 g + 150 ml + 1.0 + 100 ml/100 ml 56 DAA 100 100 100 96
    13. DINAMIC ® + Galago + TOLLA 960 + 14 DAA 100 100 100 90
    Wet-All 28 DAA 100 100 100 100
    250 g + 300 ml + 2.0 l + 200 ml/100 ml 56 DAA 100 100 100 100
    14. CALLISTO ® + Gardo Gold + 14 DAA 100 100 100 95
    COMPLEMENT ® Super 28 DAA 100 100 100 90
    260 ml + 1562 ml + 100 ml 56 DAA 100 100 100 100
    15. Untreated Control 14 DAA 0 0 0 0
    28 DAA 0 0 0 0
    56 DAA 0 0 0 0
  • The trial was conducted on a commercial maize crop produced under centre pivot irrigation. The DINAMIC® 700WDG formulation was evaluated for herbicidal efficacy and crop selectivity when applied as a post-emergence spray program in tank-mix combination with Galago and TOLLA 960. The adjuvant Wet-All was applied to all treatments containing DINAMIC® 700WDG as standard practice. Treatments were applied post-emergence of crop and weeds as broadcast applications over the maize rows when the maize crop was in the 4-5 leaf stage. Weather conditions on the day of application were overcast and cool.
  • At the first assessment conducted at 14 DAA, all DINAMIC® 700WDG treatments displayed visual symptoms of phytotoxicity in the form of leaf scorching. Scorching appeared to be dosage related, with the severity of scorching increasing along with an increase in the rate of DINAMIC® 700WDG applied. Visual symptoms of stunting were also observed on treatments receiving DINAMIC® 700WDG at rates exceeding 75 g/ha. At the second assessment conducted at 28 DAA, visual symptoms of phytotoxicity in the form of stunting were observed in tank-mix combinations receiving the DINAMIC® 700WDG formulation exceeding the rate of 75 g/ha applied. Stunting was distinct (BBA phytotoxicity class 5) in tank-mix treatments receiving the double rate of DINAMIC® 700WDG applied at 250 g/ha. Stunting was negligible to moderate (BBA class 2-3) across all other DINAMIC® 700WDG tank-mix combinations applied between the rates 100-125 g/ha.
  • At the final assessment conducted at 42 DAA, no visual symptoms of phytotoxicity of any nature were observed on any of the treatments applied.
  • Yield
  • Tank-mix combinations of the test product DINAMIC® 700WDG applied between the rates of 75-125 g/ha did not exhibit significantly different yields compared to the standard tank-mix combination of CALLISTO®+Gardo Gold+COMPLEMENT® Super and the untreated control treatment.
  • The tank-mix combination of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 960+Wet-All applied at the double rate of 250 g/ha+300 ml/ha+1.0l/ha+200 ml/100l displayed significantly lower yields compared to the standard tank-mix combination of CALLISTO®+Gardo Gold+COMPLEMENT® Super. However, no significant yield reduction occurred when compared to the untreated control treatment.
  • The weed spectrum at the trial site was dominated by broadleaved weeds namely Blackjack (BIDPI), Field bindweed (CONAR), Anoda weed (ANOCR) and Purslane (POROL). The weed spectrum varied from 2-6 leaf stage at application. Efficacy evaluations were conducted at 14, 28 and 56 days following application, respectively.
  • DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago
  • Tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+Wet-all exhibited commercially acceptable levels of herbicidal activity against the broadleaved weeds BIDPI, CONAR and ANOCR across all rates applied. The broadleaved weed POROL was only commercially controlled at the higher tank-mix rate of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+Wet-All applied at 125 g/ha+150 m/ha+100 m/100l.
  • DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 960
  • Tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 960+Wet-All were efficacious and exhibited total control (100% efficacy) of the broadleaved weeds BIDPI, CONAR and ANOCR across all rates applied. The broadleaved weed POROL was commercially controlled by all tank-mix combinations where DINAMIC® 700WDG was applied at rates exceeding 75 g/ha. Herbicidal activity was greatest where DINAMIC® 700WDG was applied in tank-mix combinations with Galago at the higher rate of 150 ml/ha. The tank-mix combination of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 960+Wet-All applied at the rate of 125 g/ha+150 m/ha+1.0l/ha+100 ml/100l displayed a similar level of herbicidal activity as the standard tank-mix combination of CALLISTO®+Gardo Gold+COMPLEMENT® Super applied at the registered rate of 260 ml/ha+1562 ml/ha+100 ml/ha.
  • Compatibility
  • No visual symptoms of incompatibility in the form of phase separation or agglomeration were observed in any of the tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+Wet-All and DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 960+Wet-All, whether applied at single or double rates.
  • All DINAMIC® 700WDG tank-mix combinations displayed visual symptoms of phytotoxicity in the form of leaf scorching at 14 days following application. Scorching appeared to be dosage related, with the severity of scorching increasing along with an increase in the rate of DINAMIC® 700WDG applied.
  • Visual symptoms of phytotoxicity in the form of stunting were observed at the assessments conducted at 14 and 28 DAA in treatments receiving the tank-mix combination of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 960+Wet-All where DINAMIC® 700WDG was applied at the rates exceeding 75 g/ha. Stunting observed in plots treated with the DINAMIC® 700WDG formulation applied between the rates of 100-125 g/ha was not severe and ranged from negligible to moderate according to the BBA visual phytotoxicity scale. Symptoms of stunting were distinct in treatments receiving the double rate of DINAMIC® 700WDG applied. No visual symptoms of phytotoxicity of any nature were observed at the assessment conducted at 42 DAA.
  • Tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 960+Wet-All were efficacious and exhibited commercially acceptable levels of herbicidal activity against the broadleaved weeds BIDPI, CONAR and ANOCR across all rates applied. POROL was commercially controlled by all tank-mix combinations where DINAMIC® 700WDG was applied at rates exceeding 75 g/ha.
  • Likewise, tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+Wet-all exhibited commercially acceptable levels of herbicidal activity against the broadleaved weeds BIDPI, CONAR and ANOCR across all rates applied. The broadleaved weed POROL was only commercially controlled at the higher tank-mix rate of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+Wet-All applied at 125 g/ha+150 ml/ha+100 ml/100l.
  • No visual symptoms of incompatibility in the form of phase separation or agglomeration were observed in any of the tank-mix combinations of DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+Wet-All and DINAMIC® 700WDG+Galago+TOLLA 960+Wet-All, whether applied at single or double rates.
  • TABLE 6-161
    Anova Table Grain yield (kg/plot)
    Degrees of Sums of Mean F
    Unit freedom Squares Squares Value
    Reps
     3 0.9264
    Treatments 14 3.225  0.2304 1.730 
    Error 42 5.593  0.1332
    Total 59 9.745 
    Overall mean 3.688 
    S. E for Difference 0.2580
    Least Significant Difference (LSD) at 95% 0.5208
  • TABLE 6-162
    BBA Visual Phytotoxicity rating scale
    Scale EQUIVALENT % Description
    1 0% NO DAMAGE
    2 0.1-2.5% NEGLIGIBLE DAMAGE
    3 2.5-5.0% MODERATE DAMAGE
    No effects on yield and/or quality
    4 5.0-10%  Damage up to limits of commercial
    acceptability-if no yield loss
    5 10-15% DISTINCT DAMAGE
    Commercially acceptable only under
    certain conditions-if no yield loss
    6 15-25% SEVERE DAMAGE
    Not commercially acceptable-yield loss
    and quality
    7 25-35% VERY SEVERE DAMAGE
    8 35-68% EXTREME DAMAGE
    9  68-100% START OF WITHERING AND DEATH
    • Example 7 Evaluation of Synergistic Action Between Amicarbazone and TENACITY® (Mesotrione 40%)
  • This Example shows the synergism in the use of the combination of amicarbazone and mesotrione. In evaluating synergism, the data from Example 5 above were converted to % of control. This was done based on the data provided on a 1-9 scale detailed in Example 5. Expected values were computed from the % of control data by the formula for expected control=A*B/100, where A is the % of control value for herbicide A alone and B is the % of control value for herbicide B alone.
  • In this Example, the source of mesotrione was TENACITY®, available from Syngenta (Greensboro, N.C.). Rates appear as pounds of active ingredient (ai), rates as ounces per acre. Results are tabulated in Tables 7-1 through 7-17 below.
  • TABLE 7-1
    Kentucky Bluegrass Bleaching from Tenacity + Amicarbazone applications plus the
    expected responses calculated from the responses to each herbicide applied singly.
    Rate Rate
    Treatment (lbs ai/A) (oz/A) 1 Exp 2 Exp 3 Exp 3/27 Exp
    Control — 100 100 100 100
    Amicarbazone 0.022 0.5 100 100 100 100
    Amicarbazone 0.13 3 100 100 100 94
    Tenacity 0.125 4 100 100 100 100
    Tenacity 0.25 8 100 100 91 91
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.125 + 0.022 4 + 0.5 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.125 + 0.13  4 + 3   100 100 100 100 100 100 97 94
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone  0.25 + 0.022 8 + 0.5 100 100 100 100 100 91 97 91
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.25 + 0.13 8 + 3   100 100 100 100 100 91 97 85
  • TABLE 7-2
    Kentucky bluegrass injury from Tenacity + Amicarbazone
    applications plus
    Rate Rate
    Treatment (lbs ai/A) (oz/A) 1 Exp 2 Exp
    Control — 100 100
    Amicarbazone 0.022 0.5 100 100
    Amicarbazone 0.13 3 91 83
    Tenacity 0.125 4 100 100
    Tenacity 0.25 8 94 90
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.125 + 0.022 4 + 0.5 97 100 94 101
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.125 + 0.13  4 + 3   63 91 59 84
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone  0.25 + 0.022 8 + 0.5 84 94 79 91
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.25 + 0.13 8 + 3   13 85 6 75
  • TABLE 7-3
    Kentucky Bluegrass percent cover from Tenacity + Amicarbazone
    applications plus the expected responses calculated from the
    responses to each herbicide applied singly.
    Rate Rate
    Treatment (lbs ai/A) (oz/A) 1 Exp 2 Exp 3 Exp
    Control — 100 100 100
    Amicarbazone 0.022 0.5 85 85 100
    Amicarbazone 0.13 3 55 53 83
    Tenacity 0.125 4 67 66 91
    Tenacity 0.25 3 77 81 89
    Tenacity + 0.125 + 0.022 4 + 0.5 74 57 76 56 97 91
    Amicarbazone
    Tenacity + 0.125 + 0.13  4 + 3   31 37 41 35 55 75
    Amicarbazone
    Tenacity +  0.25 + 0.022 8 + 0.5 61 65 61 69 87 90
    Amicarbazone
    Tenacity + 0.25 + 0.13 8 + 3   3 42 7 43 0 74
    Amicarbazone
  • TABLE 7-4
    Kentucky Bluegrass Bleaching from Tenacity + Amicarbazone applications plus the
    expected responses calculated from the responses to each herbicide applied singly.
    Rate Rate
    Treatment (lbs ai/A) (oz/A) 1 Exp 2 Exp 3 Exp 4 Exp 5 Exp 6 Exp
    Control — 100 100 100 100 100 100
    Amicarbazone 0.022 0.5 100 100 100 100 97 100
    Amicarbazone 0.13 3 97 97 97 100 100 100
    Tenacity 0.125 4 94 94 100 100 94 100
    Tenacity 0.25 3 97 97 97 97 100 100
    Tenacity + 0.125 + 0.022 4 + 0.5 97 94 97 94 94 100 100 100 94 91 100 100
    Amicarbazone
    Tenacity + 0.125 + 0.13  4 + 3   97 91 97 91 97 97 94 100 97 94 100 100
    Amicarbazone
    Tenacity +  0.25 + 0.022 8 + 0.5 91 97 91 97 94 97 94 97 94 97 100 100
    Amicarbazone
    Tenacity + 0.25 + 0.13 8 + 3   97 94 97 94 94 94 91 97 94 100 100 100
    Amicarbazone
  • TABLE 7-5
    Mustard bleaching from Tenacity + Amicarbazone applications plus the expected
    responses calculated from the responses to each herbicide applied singly.
    Treatment Rate (lbs ai/A) Rate (oz/A) 1 Exp 2 Exp
    Control — 100 100
    Amicarbazone 0.022 0.5 119 94
    Amicarbazone 0.13 3 132 94
    Tenacity 0.125 4 64 54
    Tenacity 0.25 8 54 53
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.125 + 0.022 4 + 0.5 119 76 94 50
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.125 + 0.13  4 + 3   132 85 94 50
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone  0.25 + 0.022 8 + 0.5 115 65 90 50
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.25 + 0.13 8 + 3   132 72 94 50
  • TABLE 7-6
    Mustard injury from Tenacity + Amicarbazone applications plus the expected responses calculated from the responses to each
    herbicide applied singly.
    Rate
    Treatment Rate (lbs ai/A) (oz/A) 1 Exp 2 Exp 3 Exp 4 Exp 5 Exp
    Control — 100 100 100 100 100
    Amicarbazone 0.022 0.5 78 78 61 39 42
    Amicarbazone 0.13 3 28 31 26 3 3
    Tenacity 0.125 4 72 78 62 25 10
    Tenacity 0.25 8 84 81 62 33 17
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.125 + 0.022 4 + 0.5 44 56 44 61 39 38 6 10 0 4
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.125 + 0.13  4 + 3   31 20 28 24 26 16 4 1 0 0
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone  0.25 + 0.022 8 + 0.5 41 66 44 63 39 37 7 13 0 7
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.25 + 0.13 8 + 3   19 24 13 25 0 16 0 1 0 1
  • TABLE 7-7
    Annual bluegrass bleaching from Tenacity + Amicarbazone applications plus the expected responses calculated from the
    responses to each herbicide applied singly.
    Rate
    Treatment Rate (lbs ai/A) (oz/A) 1 Exp 2 Exp 3 Exp 4 Exp 4/2 Exp
    Control — 100 100 100 100 100
    Amicarbazone 0.022 0.5 100 100 100 107 100
    Amicarbazone 0.13 3 100 100 91 94 88
    Tenacity 0.125 4 100 100 97 91 94
    Tenacity 0.25 3 97 97 91 83 91
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.125 + 0.022 4 + 0.5 97 100 94 100 78 97 82 97 88 94
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.125 + 0.13  4 + 3   100 100 100 100 84 88 87 85 84 82
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone  0.25 + 0.022 8 + 0.5 100 97 100 97 91 91 93 89 94 91
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.25 + 0.13 8 + 3   97 97 100 97 56 82 71 78 84 79
  • TABLE 7-8
    Annual bluegrass injury from Tenacity + Amicarbazone applications plus the expected responses calculated from the responses
    to each herbicide applied singly.
    Rate
    Treatment Rate (lbs ai/A) (oz/A) 1 Exp 2 Exp 3 Exp 4 Exp 5 Exp
    Control — 100 100 100 100 100
    Amicarbazone 0.022 0.5 104 104 108 96 90
    Amicarbazone 0.13 3 71 61 67 53 52
    Tenacity 0.125 4 100 104 113 104 97
    Tenacity 0.25 3 88 89 104 93 86
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.125 + 0.022 4 + 0.5 84 104 71 107 83 122 64 100 70 87
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.125 + 0.13  4 + 3   61 72 50 63 46 75 33 55 28 50
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone  0.25 + 0.022 8 + 0.5 81 91 68 92 71 113 60 90 59 78
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.25 + 0.13 8 + 3   38 62 29 54 21 69 11 50 14 45
  • TABLE 7-8
    (cont’d). Annual bluegrass injury from Tenacity + Amicarbazone applications plus the expected
    responses calculated from the responses to each herbicide applied singly.
    Treatment Rate (lbs ai/A) Rate (oz/A) 6 Exp 7 Exp
    Control — 100 100
    Amicarbazone 0.022 0.5 85 85
    Amicarbazone 0.13 3 31 24
    Tenacity 0.125 4 93 101
    Tenacity 0.25 3 93 102
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.125 + 0.022 4 + 0.5 41 79 40 85
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.125 + 0.13  4 + 3   11 29 11 25
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone  0.25 + 0.022 8 + 0.5 43 80 45 86
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.25 + 0.13 8 + 3   3 29 13 25
  • TABLE 7-9
    Green Foxtail bleaching from Tenacity + Amicarbazone applications plus the expected responses calculated from the responses
    to each herbicide applied singly.
    Rate
    Treatment Rate (lbs ai/A) (oz/A) 1 Exp 2 Exp 3 Exp 4 Exp 5 Exp
    Control — 100 100 100 100 100
    Amicarbazone 0.022 0.5 100 104 104 104 160
    Amicarbazone 0.13 3 100 104 104 104 106
    Tenacity 0.125 4 50 52 65 80 142
    Tenacity 0.25 3 41 38 49 71 159
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.125 + 0.022 4 + 0.5 78 50 81 54 81 68 94 83 164 227
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.125 + 0.13  4 + 3   100 50 104 54 100 68 100 83 109 151
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone  0.25 + 0.022 8 + 0.5 78 41 84 40 77 51 90 73 164 256
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.25 + 0.13 8 + 3   97 41 97 40 97 51 104 73 179 169
  • TABLE 7-10
    Green Foxtail injury from Tenacity + Amicarbazone applications plus the expected responses calculated from the responses to
    each herbicide applied singly.
    Rate
    Treatment Rate (lbs ai/A) (oz/A) 1 Exp 2 Exp 3 Exp 4 Exp 5 Exp
    Control — 100 100 100 100 100
    Amicarbazone 0.022 0.5 97 94 97 97 102
    Amicarbazone 0.13 3 67 69 81 84 77
    Tenacity 0.125 4 74 66. 59 70 71
    Tenacity 0.25 3 66 56 41 40 48
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.125 + 0.022 4 + 0.5 49 72 38 62 31 58 46 68 49 72
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.125 + 0.13  4 + 3   19 50 13 45 16 48 20 59 21 55
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone  0.25 + 0.022 8 + 0.5 32 64 25 53 25 39 17 39 21 49
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.25 + 0.13 8 + 3   10 44 13 39 6 33 7 99 11 37
  • TABLE 7-10
    (cont’d). Green Foxtail injury from Tenacity + Amicarbazone applications plus the expected responses calculated from the
    responses to each herbicide applied singly.
    Treatment Rate (lbs ai/A) Rate (oz/A) 6 Exp 7 Exp
    Control — 100 100
    Amicarbazone 0.022 0.5 97 268
    Amicarbazone 0.13 3 73 144
    Tenacity 0.125 4 68 109
    Tenacity 0.25 8 45 64
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.125 + 0.022 4 + 0.5 38 66 81 291
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.125 + 0.13  4 + 3   21 50 37 156
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone  0.25 + 0.022 8 + 0.5 24 44 46 170
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.25 + 0.13 8 + 3   4 33 34 91
  • TABLE 7-11
    Crabgrass bleaching from Tenacity + Amicarbazone applications plus the expected responses calculated from the responses to
    each herbicide applied singly.
    Rate
    Treatment Rate (lbs ai/A) (oz/A) 1 Exp 2 Exp 3 Exp 4 Exp 5 Exp
    Control — 100 100 100 100 100
    Amicarbazone 0.022 0.5 97 100 100 100 97
    Amicarbazone 0.13 0 100 100 100 100 100
    Tenacity 0.125 4 38 31 22 25 22
    Tenacity 0.25 3 47 38 28 31 31
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.125 + 0.022 4 + 0.5 75 36 59 31 50 22 59 25 69 21
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.125 + 0.13  4 + 3   84 38 81 31 91 22 88 25 84 22
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone  0.25 + 0.022 8 + 0.5 66 45 56 38 59 28 69 31 66 30
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.25 + 0.13 8 + 3   94 47 97 38 100 28 100 31 97 31
  • TABLE 7-11
    (cont’d). Crabgrass bleaching from Tenacity + Amicarbazone applications plus the expected responses calculated from the
    responses to each herbicide applied singly.
    Treatment Rate (lbs ai/A) Rate (oz/A) 6 Exp 7 Exp 3 Exp
    Control — 100 100 100
    Amicarbazone 0.022 0.5 97 100 100
    Amicarbazone 0.13 3 100 100 100
    Tenacity 0.125 4 22 84 100
    Tenacity 0.25 8 44 81 100
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.125 + 0.022 4 + 0.5 66 21 97 84 100 100
    Tenacity+Amicarbazone 0.125 + 0.13  4 + 3   78 22 97 84 100 100
    Tenacity+Amicarbazone  0.25 + 0.022 8 + 0.5 59 42 97 81 100 100
    Tenacity+Amicarbazone 0.25 + 0.13   8 + 3 94 44 100 81 100 100
  • TABLE 7-12
    Crabgrass injury from Tenacity + Amicarbazone applications plus the expected responses calculated from the responses to each
    herbicide applied singly.
    Rate (lbs Rate
    Treatment ai/A) (oz/A) 1 Exp 2 Exp 3 Exp 4 Exp 5 Exp 5 Exp
    Control — 100 100 100 100 100 100
    Amicarbazone 0.022 0.5 94 100 100 97 97 94
    Amicarbazone 0.13 9 100 100 100 94 94 94
    Tenacity 0.125 4 47 47 41 19 16 25
    Tenacity 0.25 3 41 38 34 19 19 25
    Tenacity + 0.125 + 0.022 4 + 0.5 50 44 28 47 25 41 22 18 13 15 16 23
    Amicarbazone
    Tenacity + 0.125 + 0.13  4 + 3   28 47 22 47 6 41 6 18 6 15 9 23
    Amicarbazone
    Tenacity +  0.25 + 0.022 8 + 0.5 44 38 38 38 22 34 9 18 6 18 13 23
    Amicarbazone
    Tenacity + 0.25 + 0.13 8 + 3   9 41 9 38 0 34 0 18 0 18 0 23
    Amicarbazone
  • TABLE 7-13
    Crabgrass cover from Tenacity + Amicarbazone applications plus the expected responses calculated from the responses to each
    herbicide applied singly.
    Treatment Rate (lbs ai/A) Rate (oz/A) 1 Exp 2 Exp 3 Exp
    Control — 100 100 100
    Amicarbazone 0.022 0.5 88 94 100
    Amicarbazone 0.13 3 67 67 72
    Tenacity 0.125 4 22 28 13
    Tenacity 0.25 8 10 13 6
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.125 + 0.022 4 + 0.5 4 19 0 26 0 13
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.125 + 0.13  4 + 3   0 15 0 19 3 9
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone  0.25 + 0.022 8 + 0.5 7 9 0 12 3 6
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.25 + 0.13 8 + 3   0 7 0 9 9 4
  • TABLE 7-14
    Floratam St. Augustine bleaching from Tenacity + Amicarbazone applications plus the expected responses calculated from the
    responses to each herbicide applied singly.
    Rate
    Treatment Rate (lbs ai/A) (oz/A) 1 Exp 2 Exp n Exp 4 Exp 5 Exp
    Control — 100 100 100 100 100
    Amicarbazone 0.022 0.5 100 100 100 100 100
    Amicarbazone 0.13 3 100 100 100 100 97
    Tenacity 0.125 4 97 88 75 78 78
    Tenacity 0.25 3 88 78 63 66 53
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.125 + 0.022 4 + 0.5 88 97 84 88 69 75 78 78 63 78
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.125 + 0.13  4 + 3   97 97 91 88 81 75 88 78 84 76
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone  0.25 + 0.022 8 + 0.5 88 88 72 78 56 63 69 66 69 53
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.25 + 0.13 8 + 3   88 88 81 78 66 63 72 66 56 51
  • TABLE 7-14
    (cont’d). Floratam St. Augustine bleaching from Tenacity+Amicarbazone applications plus the expected responses calculated
    from the responses to each herbicide applied singly.
    Treatment Rate (lbs ai/A) Rate (oz/A) 6 Exp 7 Exp 3 Exp
    Control — 100 100 100
    Amicarbazone 0.022 0.5 100 100 100
    Amicarbazone 0.13 0 97 100 100
    Tenacity 0.125 4 72 81 100
    Tenacity 0.25 8 56 63 100
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.125 + 0.022 4 + 0.5 59 72 66 81 100 100
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.125 + 0.13  4 + 3   78 70 91 81 100 100
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone  0.25 + 0.022 8 + 0.5 72 56 78 63 100 100
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.25 + 0.13 8 + 3   56 54 63 63 100 100
  • TABLE 7-15
    Floratam St. Augustine turf quality as affected by Tenacity +
    Amicarbazone applications plus the expected responses calculated
    from the responses to each herbicide applied singly.
    Treatment Rate (lbs ai/A) Rate (oz/A) l Exp
    Control — 100
    Amicarbazone 0.022 0.5  75
    Amicarbazone 0.13  3    58
    Tenacity 0.125 4    83
    Tenacity 0.25  8    83
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.125 + 0.022 4 + 0.5  67 63
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.125 + 0.13  4 + 3    42 49
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone  0.25 + 0.022 8 + 0.5  83 63
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.25 + 0.13 8 + 3    67 49
  • TABLE 7-16
    Sapphire St. Augustine bleaching from Tenacity+Amicarbazone applications plus the expected responses calculated from the
    responses to each herbicide applied singly.
    Rate
    Treatment Rate (lbs ai/A) (oz/A) 1 Exp 2 Exp 3 Exp 4 Exp 5 Exp 6 Exp 7 Exp 8 Exp
    Control — 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
    Amicarbazone 0.022 0.5 100 100 100 100 100 94 100 100
    Amicarbazone 0.13 3 94 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
    Tenacity 0.125 4 88 88 94 100 100 100 94 100
    Tenacity 0.25 8 88 88 69 81 75 75 81 100
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.125 + 0.022 4 + 0.5 88 88 88 88 81 94 88 100 88 100 81 94 81 94 100 100
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.125 + 0.13  4 + 3   94 82 94 88 88 94 94 100 88 100 88 100 100 94 100 100
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone  0.25 + 0.022 8 + 0.5 94 88 88 88 88 69 94 81 94 75 81 70 88 81 100 100
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.25 + 0.13 8 + 3   100 82 88 88 75 69 75 81 63 75 69 75 75 81 100 100
  • TABLE 7-17
    Sapphire St. Augustine turf quality as affected by Tenacity +
    Amicarbazone applications plus the expected responses calculated
    from the responses to each herbicide applied singly.
    Treatment Rate (lbs ai/A) Rate (oz/A) l Exp
    Control — 100
    Amicarbazone 0.022 0.5 100
    Amicarbazone 0.13  3    75
    Tenacity 0.125 4   100
    Tenacity 0.25  8   100
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.125 + 0.022 4 + 0.5 100 100
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.125 + 0.13  4 + 3    75  75
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone  0.25 + 0.022 8 + 0.5 100 100
    Tenacity + Amicarbazone 0.25 + 0.13 8 + 3    75  75
  • The Kentucky bluegrass data shows that the high rate of Tenacity+Amicarbazone is injurious and synergistic to Kentucky bluegrass. The high rate of amicarbazone appears to be the driver of this response. Bleaching in mustard was reduced by the combination treatment, indicating that amicarbazone prevents some of the bleaching responses typical from mesotrione. Injury data shows some synergism initially. Annual bluegrass clearly shows synergism, particularly from the low rate of amicarbazone. The high rate of amicarbazone was sufficient to get reasonable control of annual bluegrass by itself.
  • Green foxtail results indicate synergism, both in terms of increased injury from the combination treatments and in terms of reduction in bleaching from the combination.

Claims (25)

1. A composition comprising a synergistic amount of a combination of amicarbazone and propisochlor, wherein the composition is an effective herbicide.
2. The composition according to claim 1, further comprising an adjuvant.
3. The composition according to claim 2, wherein the adjuvant is an ethoxylated propoxylated fatty amine or a polyether-polymethylsiloxane-copolymer.
4. The composition according to claim 1, further comprising a herbicidally acceptable diluent or carrier.
5. The composition according to claim 1, wherein the composition is in solid or liquid form.
6. The composition according to claim 1, wherein the composition comprises an emulsifiable concentrate, wettable powder, granule, dust, oil spray or aerosol.
7. The composition according to claim 1, wherein the composition provides synergistic control of one or more weeds.
8. The composition according to claim 7, wherein the one or more weeds is a broadleaf weed.
9. The composition according to claim 7, wherein the one or more weeds is selected from the group consisting of mustard, Poa annua, green foxtail, crabgrass, blackjack, pigweed, khaki weed, crab-finger grass, large thornapple, purslane, dwarf marigold, field bindweed, anoda weed, Rottboelia exaltata, Ipomeoea purpurea, Eleusine indica, Amaranthus spinosus, Commelina benghalensis, Digitaria ciliaris, Digitaria sanguinalis, Cyperus esculentus, Cyperus rotundus, Euphorbia heterophylla, and combinations thereof.
10-22. (canceled)
23. The method according to claim 27, wherein the weed is of the genera Amaranthus, Digitaria, Cyperus or Euphorbia.
24. The composition according to claim 1, wherein propisochlor is present in the composition in an amount ranging from 0.001 to 1000 parts by weight per part by weight of amicarbazone.
25. The composition according to claim 1, wherein propisochlor is present in the composition in an amount ranging from 0.05 to 100 parts by weight per part by weight of amicarbazone.
26. The composition according to claim 1, wherein propisochlor is present in the composition in an amount ranging from 0.1 to 10 parts by weight per part by weight of amicarbazone.
27. A method for selective control of weeds, comprising contacting a weed with a composition of claim 1.
28. The method according to claim 27, wherein the weed is present within a crop.
29. The method according to claim 28, wherein the crop is selected from the group consisting of cereals, rice, maize, sorghum, sugar cane, cotton, canola, grass, turf grass, barley, potato, sweet potato, sunflower, rye, oats, wheat, corn, soybean, sugar beet, tobacco, safflower, tomato, alfalfa, pineapple and cassava.
30. The method according to claim 27, wherein the weed is a broadleaf weed.
31. The method according to claim 27, wherein the weed is of the genera Amaranthus, Digiuaria, Cyperus or Euphorbia.
32. The method according to claim 27, wherein the weed is selected from the group consisting of mustard, Poa annua, green foxtail, crabgrass, blackjack, pigweed, khaki weed, crabfinger grass, large thornapple, purslane, dwarf marigold, field bindweed, Anoda weed, Rottboelia exaltata, Ipomeoea purpurea, Eleusine indica, Amaranthus spinosus, Commelina benghalensis, Digitaria ciliaris, Digitaria sanguinalis, Cyperus esculentus, Cyperus rotundus, Euphorbia heterophylla, and combinations thereof.
33. The method according to claim 27, wherein the composition is applied as a pre-emergence treatment.
34. The method according to claim 27, wherein the composition is applied as a post-emergence treatment.
35. The method according to claim 27, wherein the composition is applied at an application rate of 0.01 kg/ha to 5.00 kg/ha of amicarbazone and from 0.5 kg/ha to 10.00 kg/ha of the propisochlor to the crop.
36. The method according to claim 27, wherein the composition is applied at an application rate of 0.03 kg/ha to 3.00 kg/ha of amicarbazone to the crop.
37. The method according to claim 27, wherein the composition is applied at an application rate of about 0.05 kg/ha to 5.00 kg/ha of propisochlor to the crop.
US17/868,013 2009-06-09 2022-07-19 Carbamoyl triazolinone based herbicide combinations and methods of use Pending US20220378047A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US17/868,013 US20220378047A1 (en) 2009-06-09 2022-07-19 Carbamoyl triazolinone based herbicide combinations and methods of use

Applications Claiming Priority (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US18536309P 2009-06-09 2009-06-09
US12/796,511 US20100311589A1 (en) 2009-06-09 2010-06-08 Carbamoyl triazolinone based herbicide combinations and method of use
US201261747963P 2012-12-31 2012-12-31
US13/737,849 US10299479B2 (en) 2009-06-09 2013-01-09 Carbamoyl triazolinone based herbicide combinations and methods of use
US16/375,236 US11432549B2 (en) 2009-06-09 2019-04-04 Carbamoyl triazolinone based herbicide combinations and method of use
US17/868,013 US20220378047A1 (en) 2009-06-09 2022-07-19 Carbamoyl triazolinone based herbicide combinations and methods of use

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US16/375,236 Continuation US11432549B2 (en) 2009-06-09 2019-04-04 Carbamoyl triazolinone based herbicide combinations and method of use

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20220378047A1 true US20220378047A1 (en) 2022-12-01

Family

ID=50100439

Family Applications (4)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/737,849 Active US10299479B2 (en) 2009-06-09 2013-01-09 Carbamoyl triazolinone based herbicide combinations and methods of use
US16/375,236 Active US11432549B2 (en) 2009-06-09 2019-04-04 Carbamoyl triazolinone based herbicide combinations and method of use
US16/709,374 Active US11917994B2 (en) 2009-06-09 2019-12-10 Carbamoyl triazolinone based herbicide combinations and method of use
US17/868,013 Pending US20220378047A1 (en) 2009-06-09 2022-07-19 Carbamoyl triazolinone based herbicide combinations and methods of use

Family Applications Before (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/737,849 Active US10299479B2 (en) 2009-06-09 2013-01-09 Carbamoyl triazolinone based herbicide combinations and methods of use
US16/375,236 Active US11432549B2 (en) 2009-06-09 2019-04-04 Carbamoyl triazolinone based herbicide combinations and method of use
US16/709,374 Active US11917994B2 (en) 2009-06-09 2019-12-10 Carbamoyl triazolinone based herbicide combinations and method of use

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (4) US10299479B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10299479B2 (en) * 2009-06-09 2019-05-28 Arysta Lifescience Corporation Carbamoyl triazolinone based herbicide combinations and methods of use
CN103814929A (en) * 2014-03-05 2014-05-28 安徽蓝田农业开发有限公司 Herbicide composition containing amicarbazone and mesotrione
EP4039092A1 (en) * 2021-02-08 2022-08-10 UPL Corporation Limited Herbicidal combination

Family Cites Families (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4405357A (en) 1980-06-02 1983-09-20 Fmc Corporation Herbicidal 3-isoxazolidinones and hydroxamic acids
DE4437049A1 (en) 1994-10-17 1996-04-18 Bayer Ag Selective herbicides based on carbamoyltriazolinones and heteroaryloxyacetamides
US5506195A (en) * 1994-11-01 1996-04-09 Zeneca Limited Selective 1,3-cyclohexanedione corn herbicide
US5583090A (en) * 1995-06-26 1996-12-10 Monsanto Company Herbicidal microencapsulated clomazone compositions with reduced vapor transfer
DE19635074A1 (en) 1996-08-30 1998-03-05 Bayer Ag Synergistic selective herbicide for sugar cane cultivation
DE19635060A1 (en) 1996-08-30 1998-03-05 Bayer Ag Synergistic selective herbicide e.g. for use in maize, wheat, rice
US6040271A (en) 1998-02-20 2000-03-21 Bayer Aktiengesellschaft Selective herbicides for the cultivation of sugar cane
FR2778820B1 (en) 1998-05-20 2000-07-28 Rhone Poulenc Agrochimie HERBICIDE MIXTURES BASED ON ACLONIFEN AND CLOMAZONE
DE19955662B4 (en) 1999-11-19 2011-03-31 Arysta LifeScience North America, Herbicides based on carbamoyltriazolinone
DE10031825A1 (en) 2000-06-30 2002-01-10 Bayer Ag Selective herbicides based on arylsulfonylaminocarbonyltriazolinones
AR036047A1 (en) * 2001-06-13 2004-08-04 Syngenta Participations Ag SELECTIVE HERBICIDE COMPOSITION AND METHOD TO SELECTLY CONTROL WEEDS AND PASTES IN USEFUL PLANTS CROPS
JP2005502717A (en) 2001-09-20 2005-01-27 シンジェンタ パーティシペーションズ アクチェンゲゼルシャフト Herbicidal composition
WO2003024225A2 (en) 2001-09-20 2003-03-27 Syngenta Participations Ag Herbicidal composition
WO2003028450A2 (en) 2001-09-27 2003-04-10 Syngenta Participations Ag Herbicidal composition
CN1486609A (en) 2003-07-11 2004-04-07 大连松辽化工公司 Herbicide composition containing 2,4-D ester, amide herbicide and clomazone
CN1596649A (en) 2004-08-25 2005-03-23 马韵升 Herbicide composition containing methyl sulcotrione
US20070032382A1 (en) * 2005-08-04 2007-02-08 Helena Holding Company Method for enhancing the crop safety and efficacy of an agricultural chemical onto an agricultural substrate
US20100016159A1 (en) * 2006-07-19 2010-01-21 Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. Herbicidal composition and method of use thereof
US10299479B2 (en) 2009-06-09 2019-05-28 Arysta Lifescience Corporation Carbamoyl triazolinone based herbicide combinations and methods of use
WO2010143071A2 (en) * 2009-06-09 2010-12-16 Arysta Lifescience Corporation Carbamoyl triazolinone based herbicide combinations and methods of use

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US11917994B2 (en) 2024-03-05
US10299479B2 (en) 2019-05-28
US20140051579A1 (en) 2014-02-20
US11432549B2 (en) 2022-09-06
US20190223439A1 (en) 2019-07-25
US20200107547A1 (en) 2020-04-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20220378047A1 (en) Carbamoyl triazolinone based herbicide combinations and methods of use
JP5980412B2 (en) Herbicidal composition containing uracil compound as active ingredient
JP7015816B2 (en) Synergistic weed control from penoxyslam and benzobicyclon or application of chromazone and benzobicyclon
JP5374361B2 (en) Herbicidal composition as a dispersion containing diflufenican and flurtamone
US20100311589A1 (en) Carbamoyl triazolinone based herbicide combinations and method of use
KR20170103912A (en) Herbicidal combination comprising saflufenacil and glufosinate
US8426339B2 (en) Method of minimizing herbicidal injury
PL215317B1 (en) Application of herbicide composition, method for controlling weeds and herbicide formulation
RU2663917C2 (en) Herbicidal combination containing pelargonic acid and specified acetolactate synthase inhibitors
KR20020059758A (en) N-aryl-uracile-based herbicides
KR20040034722A (en) Herbicides containing substituted thien-3-yl-sulfonylamino(thio)carbonyl-triazolin(thi)one
PL217250B1 (en) Use of the herbicide composition for fighting harmful plants in cereal crop, method for fighting harmful plants in the tolerant cereal crops and herbicide formulation
PL217227B1 (en) Herbicide composition containing specific sulfonylureas, a method of controlling harmful plants, and the use of herbicide compositions
MX2012014650A (en) Herbicidal composition.
JP2005501876A (en) Selective herbicides containing tetrazolinone derivatives
JP5708917B2 (en) Herbicidal composition
CN111109270A (en) Herbicidal compositions based on carbamoyltriazolinone and methods of use
TWI763751B (en) Herbicide combination comprising a dimethoxytriazinyl-substituted difluoromethanesulfonylanilide
US7612017B2 (en) Selective herbicides based on substituted aminotriazinones and substituted benzoylcyclohexanediones

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION