US20210077942A1 - Process for handling variable flow rates and compositions in pressure swing adsorption systems - Google Patents
Process for handling variable flow rates and compositions in pressure swing adsorption systems Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20210077942A1 US20210077942A1 US17/042,627 US202017042627A US2021077942A1 US 20210077942 A1 US20210077942 A1 US 20210077942A1 US 202017042627 A US202017042627 A US 202017042627A US 2021077942 A1 US2021077942 A1 US 2021077942A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- cycle
- feed
- equalization
- pair
- processing power
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 124
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 70
- 238000001179 sorption measurement Methods 0.000 title claims description 21
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 title abstract description 14
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 claims description 48
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims description 41
- 238000010926 purge Methods 0.000 claims description 40
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 claims description 36
- VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N methane Chemical compound C VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 19
- 239000003463 adsorbent Substances 0.000 claims description 18
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims description 15
- 229930195733 hydrocarbon Natural products 0.000 claims description 7
- 150000002430 hydrocarbons Chemical class 0.000 claims description 7
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon Chemical compound [C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 4
- UFHFLCQGNIYNRP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Hydrogen Chemical compound [H][H] UFHFLCQGNIYNRP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000001257 hydrogen Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 229910052739 hydrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000004215 Carbon black (E152) Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 229910021536 Zeolite Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 3
- HNPSIPDUKPIQMN-UHFFFAOYSA-N dioxosilane;oxo(oxoalumanyloxy)alumane Chemical compound O=[Si]=O.O=[Al]O[Al]=O HNPSIPDUKPIQMN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000010457 zeolite Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000001307 helium Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 229910052734 helium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 2
- SWQJXJOGLNCZEY-UHFFFAOYSA-N helium atom Chemical compound [He] SWQJXJOGLNCZEY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 claims 1
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 36
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 21
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 18
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 10
- QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N atomic oxygen Chemical compound [O] QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 8
- 239000001301 oxygen Substances 0.000 description 8
- 229910052760 oxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 8
- 239000000356 contaminant Substances 0.000 description 7
- 239000011324 bead Substances 0.000 description 6
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000004913 activation Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000001354 calcination Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000001816 cooling Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000004584 weight gain Effects 0.000 description 3
- 235000019786 weight gain Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 238000012512 characterization method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000009472 formulation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000003306 harvesting Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000011027 product recovery Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229910001220 stainless steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000010935 stainless steel Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000001052 transient effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000010963 304 stainless steel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910000589 SAE 304 stainless steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- NINIDFKCEFEMDL-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulfur Chemical compound [S] NINIDFKCEFEMDL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- PNEYBMLMFCGWSK-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium oxide Inorganic materials [O-2].[O-2].[O-2].[Al+3].[Al+3] PNEYBMLMFCGWSK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000010923 batch production Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001276 controlling effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013213 extrapolation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005243 fluidization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011065 in-situ storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002955 isolation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011812 mixed powder Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003345 natural gas Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920001296 polysiloxane Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000000843 powder Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004886 process control Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229920002050 silicone resin Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003756 stirring Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052717 sulfur Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011593 sulfur Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002277 temperature effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013022 venting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011800 void material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000004580 weight loss Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D53/00—Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
- B01D53/02—Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols by adsorption, e.g. preparative gas chromatography
- B01D53/04—Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols by adsorption, e.g. preparative gas chromatography with stationary adsorbents
- B01D53/047—Pressure swing adsorption
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D53/00—Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
- B01D53/02—Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols by adsorption, e.g. preparative gas chromatography
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D53/00—Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
- B01D53/02—Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols by adsorption, e.g. preparative gas chromatography
- B01D53/04—Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols by adsorption, e.g. preparative gas chromatography with stationary adsorbents
- B01D53/0407—Constructional details of adsorbing systems
- B01D53/0423—Beds in columns
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
- B01J20/00—Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof
- B01J20/02—Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof comprising inorganic material
- B01J20/10—Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof comprising inorganic material comprising silica or silicate
- B01J20/16—Alumino-silicates
- B01J20/18—Synthetic zeolitic molecular sieves
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
- B01J20/00—Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof
- B01J20/02—Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof comprising inorganic material
- B01J20/10—Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof comprising inorganic material comprising silica or silicate
- B01J20/16—Alumino-silicates
- B01J20/18—Synthetic zeolitic molecular sieves
- B01J20/186—Chemical treatments in view of modifying the properties of the sieve, e.g. increasing the stability or the activity, also decreasing the activity
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C01—INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C01B—NON-METALLIC ELEMENTS; COMPOUNDS THEREOF; METALLOIDS OR COMPOUNDS THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASS C01C
- C01B21/00—Nitrogen; Compounds thereof
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C07C—ACYCLIC OR CARBOCYCLIC COMPOUNDS
- C07C7/00—Purification; Separation; Use of additives
- C07C7/12—Purification; Separation; Use of additives by adsorption, i.e. purification or separation of hydrocarbons with the aid of solids, e.g. with ion-exchangers
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10L—FUELS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NATURAL GAS; SYNTHETIC NATURAL GAS OBTAINED BY PROCESSES NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C10G, C10K; LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS; ADDING MATERIALS TO FUELS OR FIRES TO REDUCE SMOKE OR UNDESIRABLE DEPOSITS OR TO FACILITATE SOOT REMOVAL; FIRELIGHTERS
- C10L3/00—Gaseous fuels; Natural gas; Synthetic natural gas obtained by processes not covered by subclass C10G, C10K; Liquefied petroleum gas
- C10L3/06—Natural gas; Synthetic natural gas obtained by processes not covered by C10G, C10K3/02 or C10K3/04
- C10L3/10—Working-up natural gas or synthetic natural gas
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10L—FUELS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NATURAL GAS; SYNTHETIC NATURAL GAS OBTAINED BY PROCESSES NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C10G, C10K; LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS; ADDING MATERIALS TO FUELS OR FIRES TO REDUCE SMOKE OR UNDESIRABLE DEPOSITS OR TO FACILITATE SOOT REMOVAL; FIRELIGHTERS
- C10L3/00—Gaseous fuels; Natural gas; Synthetic natural gas obtained by processes not covered by subclass C10G, C10K; Liquefied petroleum gas
- C10L3/06—Natural gas; Synthetic natural gas obtained by processes not covered by C10G, C10K3/02 or C10K3/04
- C10L3/10—Working-up natural gas or synthetic natural gas
- C10L3/101—Removal of contaminants
- C10L3/102—Removal of contaminants of acid contaminants
- C10L3/104—Carbon dioxide
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10L—FUELS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NATURAL GAS; SYNTHETIC NATURAL GAS OBTAINED BY PROCESSES NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C10G, C10K; LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS; ADDING MATERIALS TO FUELS OR FIRES TO REDUCE SMOKE OR UNDESIRABLE DEPOSITS OR TO FACILITATE SOOT REMOVAL; FIRELIGHTERS
- C10L3/00—Gaseous fuels; Natural gas; Synthetic natural gas obtained by processes not covered by subclass C10G, C10K; Liquefied petroleum gas
- C10L3/06—Natural gas; Synthetic natural gas obtained by processes not covered by C10G, C10K3/02 or C10K3/04
- C10L3/10—Working-up natural gas or synthetic natural gas
- C10L3/101—Removal of contaminants
- C10L3/105—Removal of contaminants of nitrogen
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D2253/00—Adsorbents used in seperation treatment of gases and vapours
- B01D2253/10—Inorganic adsorbents
- B01D2253/106—Silica or silicates
- B01D2253/108—Zeolites
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D2253/00—Adsorbents used in seperation treatment of gases and vapours
- B01D2253/10—Inorganic adsorbents
- B01D2253/116—Molecular sieves other than zeolites
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D2253/00—Adsorbents used in seperation treatment of gases and vapours
- B01D2253/25—Coated, impregnated or composite adsorbents
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D2253/00—Adsorbents used in seperation treatment of gases and vapours
- B01D2253/30—Physical properties of adsorbents
- B01D2253/302—Dimensions
- B01D2253/308—Pore size
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D2256/00—Main component in the product gas stream after treatment
- B01D2256/10—Nitrogen
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D2256/00—Main component in the product gas stream after treatment
- B01D2256/16—Hydrogen
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D2256/00—Main component in the product gas stream after treatment
- B01D2256/24—Hydrocarbons
- B01D2256/245—Methane
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D2257/00—Components to be removed
- B01D2257/10—Single element gases other than halogens
- B01D2257/102—Nitrogen
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D2257/00—Components to be removed
- B01D2257/10—Single element gases other than halogens
- B01D2257/104—Oxygen
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D2257/00—Components to be removed
- B01D2257/50—Carbon oxides
- B01D2257/504—Carbon dioxide
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D2259/00—Type of treatment
- B01D2259/40—Further details for adsorption processes and devices
- B01D2259/40011—Methods relating to the process cycle in pressure or temperature swing adsorption
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D2259/00—Type of treatment
- B01D2259/40—Further details for adsorption processes and devices
- B01D2259/404—Further details for adsorption processes and devices using four beds
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D2259/00—Type of treatment
- B01D2259/40—Further details for adsorption processes and devices
- B01D2259/406—Further details for adsorption processes and devices using more than four beds
- B01D2259/4062—Further details for adsorption processes and devices using more than four beds using six beds
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C10—PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
- C10L—FUELS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NATURAL GAS; SYNTHETIC NATURAL GAS OBTAINED BY PROCESSES NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C10G, C10K; LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS; ADDING MATERIALS TO FUELS OR FIRES TO REDUCE SMOKE OR UNDESIRABLE DEPOSITS OR TO FACILITATE SOOT REMOVAL; FIRELIGHTERS
- C10L2290/00—Fuel preparation or upgrading, processes or apparatus therefore, comprising specific process steps or apparatus units
- C10L2290/54—Specific separation steps for separating fractions, components or impurities during preparation or upgrading of a fuel
- C10L2290/542—Adsorption of impurities during preparation or upgrading of a fuel
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02C—CAPTURE, STORAGE, SEQUESTRATION OR DISPOSAL OF GREENHOUSE GASES [GHG]
- Y02C20/00—Capture or disposal of greenhouse gases
- Y02C20/40—Capture or disposal of greenhouse gases of CO2
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a process to respond to feed flow variations by changing the process cycle and thereby increasing the productivity and capacity of the system significantly over constant process systems.
- PSA pressure swing adsorption
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,258,056 describes a turndown methodology to produce substantially less product in response to declining customer product demand. This is done by reducing the number of beds online and by taking substantially less feed flow.
- U.S. Pat. No. 7,641,716 describes a throttling methodology to maintain a constant feed. This consists of valves located before the system to keep the flow rate at the optimal rate to achieve peak performance for the system.
- U.S. Pat. No. 6,030,435 describes regulating the feed flow temperature in order to keep the temperature of the system at the optimal temperature for peak performance of the PSA process.
- PSA pressure swing adsorption
- the present invention generally relates to a process for responding to feed flow variations by changing the process cycle and thereby increasing the productivity and capacity of the system significantly over constant process systems. This increases the flexibility a PSA system for customers that do not require a constant or uniform product flow rate and/or for processes and applications that experience feed streams that vary in flow, temperature, and/or composition.
- FIG. 1 shows the process for a 4121 cycle from the view of a single bed.
- FIG. 2 shows the process for a 4131 cycle from the view of a single bed.
- FIG. 3 shows the process for a 4122 cycle from the view of a single bed.
- FIG. 4 shows the process for a 4221 cycle from the view of a single bed.
- FIG. 5 shows the pressure trace for the 4122, 4131 and 4221 cycles.
- FIGS. 6, 6A, 6B, and 6C show the cycle chart for a 12 bed 24 step process and corresponding cycles that could be used as part of this invention.
- FIG. 7 shows an example of how to switch from a 4131 cycle to a 4122 cycle and the reverse.
- FIG. 8 shows an example of how to switch from a 4122 cycle to a 4221 cycle and the reverse.
- FIGS. 1-4 and 6-7 The legend for FIGS. 1-4 and 6-7 is:
- the present invention relates to a control method to respond to feed flow variations by changing adoption a new process cycle and thereby increasing the productivity and capacity of the system significantly over constant process systems.
- PSA processes attempt to control the feed stream and adjust it to fit the optimal design or reduce the number of beds online to meet a reduced flow (which also changes the process cycle). These cycles are usually deemed turndown modes and an excellent example would be H2PSA systems.
- H2PSA systems When the systems are originally designed, the maximum flow rate and the target recovery are used to design a system to meet those objectives. This makes sense at the time because the feed stream ahead of the H2PSA is well controlled by other processes.
- a new H2PSA system would need to be built or hardware modifications are needed for the new cycles to accommodate the additional flow as the old one cannot handle the flow according to state of the art process cycles.
- the present invention takes a different approach in that the cycle/process is modified in order to fit the feed stream variability.
- a lower recovery cycle can be chosen to increase the total production of the system and utilize the increased feed stream capacity, without the requirement to deploy additional capital.
- This has substantial benefits for customers that are able to take an unregulated flow of product or are looking to increase the flow of the product.
- the system can capitalize on opportunities where flow requests exceed design conditions. These can happen during specific instances when a customer's primary supplier of hydrogen goes down and the secondary producer wishes to meet the increase in demand on their system.
- flow is lower than design conditions, adding back or even increasing equalization steps allows for higher system recovery by increasing the void recovery, and thereby reduction operating costs.
- This methodology adds considerable economic benefit over current designs by processing up to 60% or more flow than the design condition and increasing production by as much as 25% or more over state-of-the-art process cycles.
- the design basis cycle is the cycle which is used to typically run the system at the design condition (feed flow and feed composition specification).
- This poly bed system is then enabled by the process methodology to respond to variable feed temperatures, flow rates, and compositions beyond the typical conditions the system was designed for or could be designed for using the state or the art teachings.
- the trade-off is increased processing capacity for reduced recovery, which is substantially different than prior art methodologies wherein the goal is not to regulate the flow, but to adjust to the flow.
- the design cycle typically has at least 1 equalization step and in another embodiment 2 or more.
- FIG. 2 is a 4-1-3-1 cycle and is representative of the state-of-the-art design cycles for a 4 bed process. It has one bed on feed, one product make step, 3 equalization steps, two idle steps, and an overlapping feed and product pressurization step.
- the design cycle has at least one feed step, has at least one product make step, has at least a blow down step and may or may not have a purge step. All cycles should have at least one feed step, at least one product make step and at least a blow down step. Almost all cycles will have at least one equalization step pair and it would be rare if any of the proposed cycles do not have at least one equalization step pair.
- FIG. 5 The effect of the cycle changes (4-1-2-2 and 4-2-2-1 vs 4-1-3-1) on the pressure trace is shown in FIG. 5 , demonstrating the same system is capable of running all three cycles.
- the method to switch between cycles is similar to that outlined by Baksh et al. in EP2663382B1 and WO2012096812A1. Specifically, if a different cycle is desired in order to adjust to changing feed concentrations, then the changes should occur when the next step in the cycle is most similar to the next step in the cycle of the cycle being switched to. This is shown in FIG. 7 and the shaded cells show steps that should not proceed changing to the next cycles.
- the non-shaded cells show the step that could proceed changing to the next cycle and an arrow is shown indicating which step in the next cycle should be selected. It can also occur that no next steps when switching from one cycle to another are equivalent, in that case, an intermediate cycle can be run for a short period of time, where there is no product taken from the system and, the EQU 1 steps or EQU 1 /F steps are replaced with PP steps and the EQD 1 , EQD 2 and X steps between these are replaced with F steps. This is demonstrated in FIG. 8 .
- m is the number of components in the feed stream
- W q amount of component q adsorbed as defined by a multicomponent temperature dependent isotherm, preferably the LRC isotherm
- a RPP of 1 will correspond to the maximum processing power of a cycle under conditions that produce the most product at the desired purity.
- a component that is more readily adsorbable means that it can have:
- the invention relates to a method for maximizing product production under variable feed conditions in a PSA system adapted for separating a pressurized feed supply gas containing at least one more readily adsorbable component from at least one less readily adsorbable product gas component to produce a stream of product gas enriched with said less readily adsorbable component and a stream of offgas that is enriched in said more readily adsorbable component, wherein said PSA system comprises feed gas, product gas make step, a product pressurization step, a high pressure equalization step, product make step that overlaps with feeding the bed, at least one equalization up step and one equalization down step, and a blow down step to depressurize the bed, wherein when the Required Processing Power of said PSA system is greater than 1, the PSA process cycle is modified by making at least one of the following cycle changes:
- the PSA process cycle is modified by:
- the PSA process cycle is modified by making at least one of the following cycle changes:
- the PSA process cycle is modified by:
- the product gas is methane and the more readily adsorbable component is N 2 and/or CO 2 .
- the product gas is helium and the more readily adsorbable component is N 2 and/or CO 2 and/or methane and/or other hydrocarbons.
- the product gas is hydrogen and the more readily adsorbable component is N 2 and/or CO 2 and/or methane and/or other hydrocarbons.
- the product gas is N 2 and the more readily adsorbable component is O 2 .
- the adsorbent beds of the invention typically contain contains zeolitic material and other optional adsorbents depending on the separation desired.
- the adsorption bed contains adsorbent materials used in H 2 PSA, the product gas is H 2 and the more readily adsorbable component is selected from one or more of CO, CO 2 , CH 4 , N 2 , Ar, and hydrocarbon.
- the adsorbent is selected from at least one of activated carbon, Zeolite, 5A, CaX, LiX.
- PSA system comprises a 4131 design cycle
- Required Processing Power for said system is greater than 1
- the design cycle is modified to a 4122 cycle according to the following cycle chart:
- the PSA system comprises a 4122 design cycle
- the Required Processing Power for said system is greater than 1
- the design cycle is changed to a 4221 cycle according to the following cycle chart:
- the design cycle is modified to a 4122 cycle according to the following cycle chart provided that the Required Processing Power for the 4122 cycle is also less than 1:
- the PSA system comprises a 4122 design cycle
- the design cycle is modified to a 4131 cycle according to the following cycle chart provided that the Required Processing Power for the 4131 cycle is less than or equal to 1:
- the pilot system is a pressure swing adsorption system that operates by exploiting the difference in adsorption capacity of an adsorbent for the gas of interest over a specific pressure range.
- the adsorbent When the vessel containing the adsorbent is pressurized, the adsorbent will selectively adsorb the contaminant from the gas stream and thus remove it from the product stream that exits through the other end of the vessel.
- the contaminant When vessel is depressurized, the contaminant will desorb, and the adsorbent will be ready to process the feed stream again.
- This process is made into a semi-continuous batch process by having 1 vessel or more than 1 vessel available to process the gas at the majority of all times. With more than 1 vessel to process gas, additional options are available to further increase efficiency by retaining pressurized gas in dead volume spaces (piping or the heads of the vessels) and the process then has the ability to generate a continuous stream of product.
- the pilot system employs multiple PSA vessels to achieve the desired nitrogen rejection and hydrocarbon recovery target.
- the current pilot PSA design consists of 4-6 vessels with process steps consisting of 1 bed on feed and 1 bed on blowdown at a time. There are 2-3 equalization steps as well as product pressurization and purge steps.
- the pilot system was designed to process up to 17kscfd and capable of using 1 to 4 inch diameter beds. During the initial construction of the pilot test system the bed size was selected to be 1 inch due to the adsorbent performance and with considerations of adsorbent manufacturing. The height was based on maximum available height in the container. The remaining components of the design were based on similar 6 bed PSA pilot plant already in operation. Full range control valves were used for all valves. The system was constructed entirely of stainless steel grade 316. Additionally, a pretreatment system of 304 stainless steel was designed and built as H 2 S compatible in order to remove all condensed liquids and sulfur before entering the PSA portion of the system.
- the material used in the pilot testing was created as follows: 23.00 lbs. of zeolite 4A powder supplied by Jianlong (as 4A-D) on a dry weight basis (29.50 lbs. wet weight) was placed in a WAM MLH50 plow mixer. With the mixer agitating, 2.16 lbs of MR-2404 (a solventless silicone containing silicone resin from Dow Corning) was pumped in at rate of 0.07 lb/min. After the MR-2404 addition was completed, 9.2 lbs of water was added at a rate of 0.3 lb/min under constant stirring in the plow mixer. At the end of the water addition, plow mixing was continued for an additional 5 minutes.
- MR-2404 a solventless silicone containing silicone resin from Dow Corning
- the plow mixed powder product labeled hereinafter “the formulation” was transferred to a tilted rotating drum mixer having internal working volume of ⁇ 75 L and agitated therein at a speed of 24 rpm. Mixing of the formulation was continued while beads were gradually formed which had a porosity, as measured using a Micromeritics Autopore IV Hg porosimeter on the calcined product, in the 30-35% range. The beads were subjected to a screening operation to determine the yield and harvest those particles in the 8 ⁇ 16 U.S. mesh size range. The product beads were air dried overnight prior to calcination using a shallow tray method at temperatures up to 595° C.
- the shallow tray calcination method used a General Signal Company Blue-M electric oven equipped with a dry air purge. ⁇ 500 g. dry wt. of the 8 ⁇ 16 U.S. mesh adsorbent was spread out in a stainless steel mesh tray to provide a thin layer. A purge of 200 SCFH of dry air was fed to the oven during calcination. The temperature was set to 90° C., followed by a 6 hour dwell time. The temperature was then increased to 200° C. gradually over the course of a 6 hour period, and further increased to 300° C. over a 2 hour period and finally increased to 595° C. over a 3 hour period and held there for 1 hour before cooling to 450° C. after which the adsorbent was removed, immediately bottled in a sealed bottle and placed in a dry nitrogen purged drybox. The calcined beads were rescreened to harvest those particles in the 8 ⁇ 16 U.S. mesh range.
- Routine characterization of modified 4A samples was performed using a thermogravimetric method using a TA Instruments Q500 system installed in a glove box to minimize the impact of air leaks. Nitrogen and oxygen gases supplied to the instrument were high purity. The balance purge gas and gas 1 was nitrogen and a gas 2 corresponds to oxygen. For all experiments, a balance purge of 5 cc/minute was used and the gas directly over the sample was set to 95 cc/minute (nitrogen or oxygen). A sampling frequency of 0.5 sec/point was used for all adsorption steps. Alumina pans were used for all studies and the sample size after activation was in the range 100 to 120 mg.
- the TGA method involves both an in-situ activation step followed by adsorption tests using oxygen and nitrogen at 25° C.
- the sample activation was performed by heating the sample under nitrogen purge at 2° C. per minute to 150° C., maintaining isothermal for 60 minutes, heating at 5° C./minute to 350° C., holding at 350° C. for 120 minutes, then cooling to 25° C.
- the nitrogen equilibrium capacity at atmospheric pressure and 25° C. is reported as the weight gain on cooling under nitrogen relative to the minimum weight at 350° C. (the activated sample weight).
- An assessment of relative rate for different samples and preparation is captured by switching from nitrogen to oxygen. A transient weight gain is observed followed by a drop attributable to oxygen uptake followed by nitrogen leaving.
- nitrogen uptake rate corresponds to the maximum slope observed in the nitrogen uptake portion and is equivalent also to the peak in the derivative weight with respect to time for the same step. Values are reported in weight %/minute.
- a LSKP could be designed to handle a feed flow stream from a well head during flowback after hydraulic fracturing of the well.
- the state-of-the-art design condition would be based on the maximum amount of value delivered by recovering the most methane available.
- This design would call for a 4-1-3-1 cycle that could handle 5 MMscfd at a 35% N2 feed content and a 20% N2 product content.
- the extra gas would be passed to the vent.
- the product gas would contain less than 20% N2 but the product flow rate would be substantially the same.
- a switch to a 4-1-2-2 cycle would enable the system to process up to 7 MMscfd and up to 45% N2 in the feed stream while producing up to 35% more product than the equivalent feed stream with the 4-1-3-1 cycle. Additionally, switching to a 4-2-2-1 cycle would allow processing up to 10 MMscfd and up to 70% N2 in the feed stream while producing up to 45% more product that the equivalent feed stream with the 4-1-3-1 cycle and venting methodology taught in the state of the art. These values are shown in table 1 as demonstrated by modeling and pilot results.
- table 1 shows that just choosing a 4-2-2-1 cycle or a 4-1-2-2 cycle as the design basis for the system, has substantially lower recovery for the point at which the most value can be generated by the system.
- the 4-1-3-1 cycle is still the best choice for the design basis for the system, it is not the only cycle that should be employed during the operation of the system.
- Feed represents the number of beds in the feed step at one time. Eqs represents the number of equalization steps in the cycle. BD represents the number of beds on blow down in the cycle.
- Model recovery represents the simulated recovery for the cycle with a consistent feed flow. Pilot recovery represents the recovery demonstrated in the pilot test system. Model production represents the simulated production relative to the base case for the cycle with a consistent feed flow. Pilot production represents the production demonstrated in the pilot test system relative to the base case.
- Table 1 shows the demonstration of the three different cycle examples (4133, 4122, 4221).
- the feed of 105% for the 4-1-3 cycle represents the maximum possible product production of the cycle with any feed flow, but not the highest recovery.
- the process is restricted because it is unable to make higher product production at the desired purity.
- the ability to handle higher feed flow rates while maintaining a constant product purity (20% N 2 in the product) can be seen in the table with the other cycles.
- H2PSA hydrogen PSA
- H2PSA hydrogen PSA
- a 12-3-4 cycle was chosen as the design for comparison.
- the cycle time can be reduced for the cycle until the system limitations are met or exceeded (cycle time, bed fluidization etc.). Once this occurs, the full limit of the system is reached using state of the art methodology.
- table 2 was constructed showing the effect of modifications to the process cycle. These effects are a demonstration of the selection process, but other factors should be considered when switching to a different cycle, such as frequency of the cycle changes and the effect on the production, as well as cycle compatibility based on the teachings of Baksh et al.
- Table 2 shows increasing feed processing capability and increasing produced product at reduced overall recovery.
- Highest product potential is the maximum production that could be obtained by the cycle at the required product purity (99.999% H2) as additional feed gas would need to be vented. These values are given as a general approximation and should be seen as a demonstration of the overall trend, rather than exact feed flows a different cycle is used for.
- a copy of the model used is provided with PSE process builder software.
- Lowest Feed Flow Optimal (LOFF) is the lowest feed flow point at which this cycle has the highest product recovery among all the cycles tested.
- Highest Feed Flow Optimal (HOFF) is the highest feed flow point at which this cycle has the highest product recovery among all the cycles tested or is no longer able to produce more product at purity beyond this flow rate.
- H 2 Recovery is the recovery of the product from the feed relative to the recovery from the 12-3-4 cycle at its HOFF.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
- Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
- Separation Of Gases By Adsorption (AREA)
- Solid-Sorbent Or Filter-Aiding Compositions (AREA)
- Silicates, Zeolites, And Molecular Sieves (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/649,798, filed on Mar. 29, 2018, which is incorporated herein by reference.
- The present invention relates to a process to respond to feed flow variations by changing the process cycle and thereby increasing the productivity and capacity of the system significantly over constant process systems.
- Typically pressure swing adsorption (PSA) systems have an optimal design condition that is the peak performance achievable for the system. Under steady conditions, this design is acceptable most of the time. Occasionally variances occur and processes to handle the variances range from restricting the flow, to reducing the number of beds (effective physical size) of the system. Other methodologies have been suggested to address the issue of variable feed flow, composition, and temperature for PSA processes. Traditionally these methodologies are targeted toward bringing the feed stream within optimal operating parameters for the system.
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,258,056. describes a turndown methodology to produce substantially less product in response to declining customer product demand. This is done by reducing the number of beds online and by taking substantially less feed flow.
- U.S. Pat. No. 7,641,716 describes a throttling methodology to maintain a constant feed. This consists of valves located before the system to keep the flow rate at the optimal rate to achieve peak performance for the system.
- U.S. Pat. No. 6,030,435 describes regulating the feed flow temperature in order to keep the temperature of the system at the optimal temperature for peak performance of the PSA process.
- All these methodologies involve changing the feed stream rather than changing the process. The present invention offers a different approach for regulating pressure swing adsorption (PSA) systems by changing the process cycle and thereby increasing the productivity and capacity of the system significantly over constant process systems.
- The present invention generally relates to a process for responding to feed flow variations by changing the process cycle and thereby increasing the productivity and capacity of the system significantly over constant process systems. This increases the flexibility a PSA system for customers that do not require a constant or uniform product flow rate and/or for processes and applications that experience feed streams that vary in flow, temperature, and/or composition.
-
FIG. 1 shows the process for a 4121 cycle from the view of a single bed. -
FIG. 2 shows the process for a 4131 cycle from the view of a single bed. -
FIG. 3 shows the process for a 4122 cycle from the view of a single bed. -
FIG. 4 shows the process for a 4221 cycle from the view of a single bed. -
FIG. 5 shows the pressure trace for the 4122, 4131 and 4221 cycles. -
FIGS. 6, 6A, 6B, and 6C show the cycle chart for a 12bed 24 step process and corresponding cycles that could be used as part of this invention. -
FIG. 7 shows an example of how to switch from a 4131 cycle to a 4122 cycle and the reverse. -
FIG. 8 shows an example of how to switch from a 4122 cycle to a 4221 cycle and the reverse. - The legend for
FIGS. 1-4 and 6-7 is: -
- F—feed step and make product if at pressure
- EQD1—first equalization down
- EQD2—second equalization down
- EQD3—third equalization down
- X—Idle step
- BD—bed blow down/vent
- EQU3—third equalization up
- EQU2—second equalization up
- EQU1/F—first equalization up, overlap feed
- PP—product pressurization
- PP/F—product pressurization, overlap feed
- The present invention relates to a control method to respond to feed flow variations by changing adoption a new process cycle and thereby increasing the productivity and capacity of the system significantly over constant process systems.
- There are two specific cases presented as to why this is necessary and the benefits that it imparts. This first is control of low kinetic difference systems. In these systems adsorbent rate selectivity is typically low (less than 100). As a consequence, the timing for adsorption during a cycle has a very narrow window that is sufficient to adsorb the contaminant, but not substantially adsorb the product. This is an issue because the state of the art all teaches that process cycles can be altered with cycle timing in order to respond to changing feed conditions (flow, pressure, temperature, composition, etc.). If the timing of a process cycle for one of these low selectivity kinetic processes (LSKPs) is increased, the adsorption of the product increases and the recovery does not increase as is taught in the prior art. Additionally if the adsorption time is shortened, the amount of contaminant adsorbed decreases and the amount of feed stream that can be processed while maintaining product purity decreases. Since almost all feed streams have variations, controlling LSKPs becomes critical to having a viable commercial system.
- In order to control LSKPs different cycles are used to handle different flow conditions. The cycles are typically chosen to have the best performance over a feed flow regime and are used to handle the feed flow variations. The design point would be the cycle that is chosen to best suit the application based on highest recovery and lowest capital (which is synonymous with highest feed flow potential). In the state of the art, these considerations would be accounted for, the optimal cycle would be chosen, and that cycle would be used for the life of the system. Here it is demonstrated that the optimal cycle can be changed to accommodate expected or unexpected variations in the feed stream, leading to a more flexible system and ability to design a system for multiple feed stream conditions.
- Another problem that is extremely similar is for typical PSA processes. Typically, PSA processes attempt to control the feed stream and adjust it to fit the optimal design or reduce the number of beds online to meet a reduced flow (which also changes the process cycle). These cycles are usually deemed turndown modes and an excellent example would be H2PSA systems. When the systems are originally designed, the maximum flow rate and the target recovery are used to design a system to meet those objectives. This makes sense at the time because the feed stream ahead of the H2PSA is well controlled by other processes. However, if the plant wished to expand capacity, a new H2PSA system would need to be built or hardware modifications are needed for the new cycles to accommodate the additional flow as the old one cannot handle the flow according to state of the art process cycles. The present invention takes a different approach in that the cycle/process is modified in order to fit the feed stream variability. Specifically, a lower recovery cycle can be chosen to increase the total production of the system and utilize the increased feed stream capacity, without the requirement to deploy additional capital. This has substantial benefits for customers that are able to take an unregulated flow of product or are looking to increase the flow of the product. Additionally, by being able to increase processing capability by slightly lowering recovery, the system can capitalize on opportunities where flow requests exceed design conditions. These can happen during specific instances when a customer's primary supplier of hydrogen goes down and the secondary producer wishes to meet the increase in demand on their system. When flow is lower than design conditions, adding back or even increasing equalization steps allows for higher system recovery by increasing the void recovery, and thereby reduction operating costs. This methodology adds considerable economic benefit over current designs by processing up to 60% or more flow than the design condition and increasing production by as much as 25% or more over state-of-the-art process cycles.
- These two applications of the method for process control by varying process cycles can be summarized as applying to systems that are poly bed, in one
embodiment 4 or more, in another embodiment from 4 beds up to 25 beds, with at least one equalization header and preferably two or more equalization headers. The design basis cycle is the cycle which is used to typically run the system at the design condition (feed flow and feed composition specification). This poly bed system is then enabled by the process methodology to respond to variable feed temperatures, flow rates, and compositions beyond the typical conditions the system was designed for or could be designed for using the state or the art teachings. The trade-off is increased processing capacity for reduced recovery, which is substantially different than prior art methodologies wherein the goal is not to regulate the flow, but to adjust to the flow. The design cycle typically has at least 1 equalization step and in anotherembodiment 2 or more.FIG. 2 is a 4-1-3-1 cycle and is representative of the state-of-the-art design cycles for a 4 bed process. It has one bed on feed, one product make step, 3 equalization steps, two idle steps, and an overlapping feed and product pressurization step. The design cycle has at least one feed step, has at least one product make step, has at least a blow down step and may or may not have a purge step. All cycles should have at least one feed step, at least one product make step and at least a blow down step. Almost all cycles will have at least one equalization step pair and it would be rare if any of the proposed cycles do not have at least one equalization step pair. - An example of a cycle that could be switched to from a 4-1-3-1 design cycle of
FIG. 2 , is the 4-1-2-2 cycle shown inFIG. 3 which replaces an equalization set of steps with four additional blowdown steps. Another example is the 4-2-2-1 cycle ofFIG. 4 which instead replaces an equalization set of steps for four additional feed steps. This methodology applies to both equilibrium selective processes and kinetic selective processes, however, may be utilized more frequently and favorably with kinetic selective processes, particularly LSKPs. - The effect of the cycle changes (4-1-2-2 and 4-2-2-1 vs 4-1-3-1) on the pressure trace is shown in
FIG. 5 , demonstrating the same system is capable of running all three cycles. The method to switch between cycles is similar to that outlined by Baksh et al. in EP2663382B1 and WO2012096812A1. Specifically, if a different cycle is desired in order to adjust to changing feed concentrations, then the changes should occur when the next step in the cycle is most similar to the next step in the cycle of the cycle being switched to. This is shown inFIG. 7 and the shaded cells show steps that should not proceed changing to the next cycles. The non-shaded cells show the step that could proceed changing to the next cycle and an arrow is shown indicating which step in the next cycle should be selected. It can also occur that no next steps when switching from one cycle to another are equivalent, in that case, an intermediate cycle can be run for a short period of time, where there is no product taken from the system and, the EQU1 steps or EQU1/F steps are replaced with PP steps and the EQD1, EQD2 and X steps between these are replaced with F steps. This is demonstrated inFIG. 8 . - Since there are significant feed variations to accommodate when selecting changes to the existing cycles, a methodology was developed to correlate flow, pressure, temperature and composition variations in terms of a single number. The reasoning behind the generation of the single number is the adsorption isotherms being used in the process and the effect of the feed flow variations on them. Essentially the working capacity of the bed can be inferred by the use of the LRC isotherm but is equally applicable to other multicomponent isotherms that account for temperature effects as well. A logarithmic extrapolation between the inlet and outlet conditions that the bed experiences at the top of pressurization and the bottom of pressurization can be used to generate the starting points. Assuming that the end composition is always best represented by the product purity at the top pressure and bottom pressure, and that the feed is best represented by the feed inlet at the top pressure and bottom pressure, we can then solve for the working capacity of the bed at all conditions.
-
- q is the component being evaluated
- T—temperature in Kelvin of the gas and adsorbent
- P—pressure in Pascal of the gas
- Pq—partial pressure in Pascal of the gas q
- Wq—amount of component q adsorbed
- A1, A2, A3, A4, X—fitting parameters, subscripts denote which gas the parameters correspond to
- m is the number of components in the feed stream
-
- Where:
- q is the component being evaluated
- Wq—amount of component q adsorbed as defined by a multicomponent temperature dependent isotherm, preferably the LRC isotherm
- Pf—original feed pressure
- Pfn—new feed pressure
- Pv—original vent pressure
- Pvn—new vent pressure
- Tf—original feed temperature
- Tfn—new feed temperature
- Tv—original vent temperature
- Tvn—new vent temperature
- F—original feed flow rate
- Fn—new feed flow rate
- If the Required Processing Power is above 1 that means that more intensified cycles are required (meaning less equalizations and more time feeding and evacuating the beds). If this Required Processing Power is below 1, that means there's more time available for higher recovery by increasing adsorption feed time or the number of beds for instance. By definition a RPP of 1 will correspond to the maximum processing power of a cycle under conditions that produce the most product at the desired purity.
- For processes that contain a vacuum step, it is almost always most beneficial to have the vacuum equipment fully utilized as taught by U.S. Pat. No. 5,702,504 to Schaub et al. There then exists a minimum number of vacuum steps that is taught here which is that at least one bed is undergoing vacuum at substantially all times of the cycle (momentary isolation from valve switching could occur). Additionally, vacuum is best performed on one bed at a time and the teaching here is that the maximum number of steps for a vacuum containing PSA process is the same as the minimum which is one bed on vacuum at substantially all times.
- A component that is more readily adsorbable means that it can have:
-
- 1) a higher isosteric heat of adsorption than the less readily adsorbable component
- 2) a higher rate of adsorption that the less readily adsorbable component
- 3) both a higher isosteric heat of adsorption and a higher rate of adsorption than the less readily adsorbable
such that during the design cycle basis, the more readily adsorbable component is lower in concentration in the product stream than in the feed stream.
- A more rigorous method for calculating these effects and the optimal process cycle for a set of feed conditions is the modeling detailed in the modeling description.
-
-
- 1) For higher flow rates and/or increased contaminant concentrations and/or higher temperatures and/or higher product draw rates (as defined by the Required Processing Power being greater than 1) compared to the design case (Required Processing Power of 1 by definition):
- a. Substitute at least one feed step for an equalization step pair (not necessarily at the same step number) but keeping at least one equalization step pair
- b. And/or substitute at least one blow down step or purge step pair for an equalization step pair (not necessarily at the same step number) but keeping at least one equalization step pair
- c. And/or substitute at least one feed step for at least one blow down step or purge step pair (not necessarily at the same step number) but keeping at least one blow down step or purge step pair
- d. And/or substitute an “overlap feed and product pressurization” step for a product pressurization step (not necessarily at the same step number)
- e. And/or substitute a purge step for a blowdown step (not necessarily at the same step number).
- 2) For lower flow rates and/or decreased contaminant concentrations and/or lower temperatures and/or lower product draw rates (as defined by the Required Processing Power being less than 1) compared to design case (Required Processing Power of 1 by definition):
- a. Substitute an equalization step pair for a feed step (not necessarily at the same step number) but keeping at least one feed step; in another embodiment keeping at least 3 feed steps,
- b. And/or substitute an equalization step pair for a blow down step or purge step pair (not necessarily at the same step number) but keeping at least one blow down step or purge step pair; in another embodiment keeping at least 3 blow down steps or purge step pairs,
- c. And/or substitute a least one blow down step or purge step pair for at least one feed step (not necessarily at the same step number) but keeping at least one feed step, in another embodiment at least 3 feed steps,
- d. And/or substitute a product pressurization step for an “overlap feed and product pressurization” step (not necessarily at the same step number)
- e. And/or substitute a blowdown step for a purge step (not necessarily at the same step number).
An optimal method for control would be to start with change proposed as option b. and then to use the change proposed as option a. (on the basis of the original cycle, option c. on the basis of starting from option b.). In the case that RPP exceeds 1 for the original basis then switch cycles and start using option b., in the case that the RPP exceeds the RPP of 1 as calculated for option b., then start using option a. (on the basis of the original cycle, option c. on the basis of starting from option b.). When going down and starting from option a. (on the basis of the original cycle), then when the RPP is lower than or equal to 1 as calculated for option b. (on the basis of the original cycle), start using option b. (on the basis of the original cycle). When the RPP is lower than or equal to 1 for the RPP as calculated for the design cycle, start using the design cycle. It is noted here that using a deadband of up to 0.2 for the RPP when going down (essentially not choosing the next cycle until the RPP is as low as 0.8) can be used to control the switching and maintain stability during unstable flow conditions. In the case of a LSKP system, using a design basis of 4-1-3-1 would mean that option b. would be a 4-1-2-2 cycle and option a. would be a 4-2-2-1 cycle. It should be noted that the RPP of the proposed cycle needs to be 1 or lower.
- 1) For higher flow rates and/or increased contaminant concentrations and/or higher temperatures and/or higher product draw rates (as defined by the Required Processing Power being greater than 1) compared to the design case (Required Processing Power of 1 by definition):
- In one embodiment the invention relates to a method for maximizing product production under variable feed conditions in a PSA system adapted for separating a pressurized feed supply gas containing at least one more readily adsorbable component from at least one less readily adsorbable product gas component to produce a stream of product gas enriched with said less readily adsorbable component and a stream of offgas that is enriched in said more readily adsorbable component, wherein said PSA system comprises feed gas, product gas make step, a product pressurization step, a high pressure equalization step, product make step that overlaps with feeding the bed, at least one equalization up step and one equalization down step, and a blow down step to depressurize the bed, wherein when the Required Processing Power of said PSA system is greater than 1, the PSA process cycle is modified by making at least one of the following cycle changes:
-
- a. Substitute at least one feed step for an equalization step provided that the cycle retains at least one equalization step pair; or
- b. Substitute at least one blow down step or purge step pair for an equalization step pair provided that the cycle retains at least one equalization step pair; or
- c. Substitute at least one feed step for at least one blow down step or purge step pair provided that the cycle retains at least one blow down step or purge step pair; or
- d. Substitute an overlap feed and product pressurization step for a product pressurization step; or
- e. Substitute a purge step pair for at least one blowdown step.
- In another embodiment, when the Required Processing Power of said PSA system is greater than 1, the PSA process cycle is modified by:
-
- a. Substituting at least one feed step for an equalization step provided that the cycle retains at least one equalization step pair; and
- b. Substituting at least one blow down step or purge step pair for an equalization step pair provided that the cycle retains at least one equalization step pair.
- In another embodiment, when the Required Processing Power of said PSA system is less than 1, the PSA process cycle is modified by making at least one of the following cycle changes:
-
- a. Substitute an equalization step pair for a feed step provided that the cycle retains at least one feed step; or
- b. Substitute an equalization step for a blow down step or a purge step pair provided that the cycle retains at least one blow down step or purge step pair; or
- c. Substitute at least one blow down step or purge step pair for at least one feed step provided that the cycle retains at least one feed step; or
- d. Substitute a product pressurization step for an overlap feed and product pressurization step; or
- e. Substitute at least one blowdown step for a purge step pair.
- In another embodiment, when the Required Processing Power of said PSA system is less than 1, the PSA process cycle is modified by:
-
- a. Substituting an equalization step pair for a feed step provided that the cycle retains at least one feed step; and
- b. Substituting an equalization step for a blow down step or a purge step pair provided that the cycle retains at least one blow down step or purge step pair.
In situations where the Required Processing Power is less than 1, there is a deadband of up to 0.2 within no change to the process cycle is implemented. Depending on the situation, no change is made to the process cycle unless the Required Processing Power is less than about 0.95, in another embodiment less than about 0.9 and in yet another embodiment less than or equal to 0.8.
- In one embodiment the product gas is methane and the more readily adsorbable component is N2 and/or CO2.
- In another embodiment the product gas is helium and the more readily adsorbable component is N2 and/or CO2 and/or methane and/or other hydrocarbons.
- In another embodiment the product gas is hydrogen and the more readily adsorbable component is N2 and/or CO2 and/or methane and/or other hydrocarbons.
- In yet another embodiment the product gas is N2 and the more readily adsorbable component is O2.
- The adsorbent beds of the invention typically contain contains zeolitic material and other optional adsorbents depending on the separation desired.
- In one embodiment the adsorption bed contains adsorbent materials used in H2 PSA, the product gas is H2 and the more readily adsorbable component is selected from one or more of CO, CO2, CH4, N2, Ar, and hydrocarbon.
- In another embodiment the adsorbent is selected from at least one of activated carbon, Zeolite, 5A, CaX, LiX.
- In one embodiment according to the invention where PSA system comprises a 4131 design cycle, and the Required Processing Power for said system is greater than 1, the design cycle is modified to a 4122 cycle according to the following cycle chart:
- In another embodiment wherein the PSA system comprises a 4122 design cycle, when the Required Processing Power for said system is greater than 1, the design cycle is changed to a 4221 cycle according to the following cycle chart:
- In another embodiment where the PSA system comprises a 4221 design cycle, and the Required Processing Power for said system is less than or equal to 1, the design cycle is modified to a 4122 cycle according to the following cycle chart provided that the Required Processing Power for the 4122 cycle is also less than 1:
- In another embodiment where the PSA system comprises a 4122 design cycle, when the Required Processing Power for said system is less than or equal to 1, the design cycle is modified to a 4131 cycle according to the following cycle chart provided that the Required Processing Power for the 4131 cycle is less than or equal to 1:
- The pilot system is a pressure swing adsorption system that operates by exploiting the difference in adsorption capacity of an adsorbent for the gas of interest over a specific pressure range. When the vessel containing the adsorbent is pressurized, the adsorbent will selectively adsorb the contaminant from the gas stream and thus remove it from the product stream that exits through the other end of the vessel. When vessel is depressurized, the contaminant will desorb, and the adsorbent will be ready to process the feed stream again. This process is made into a semi-continuous batch process by having 1 vessel or more than 1 vessel available to process the gas at the majority of all times. With more than 1 vessel to process gas, additional options are available to further increase efficiency by retaining pressurized gas in dead volume spaces (piping or the heads of the vessels) and the process then has the ability to generate a continuous stream of product.
- The conceptual process flow diagram is presented in
FIG. 6 . - The pilot system employs multiple PSA vessels to achieve the desired nitrogen rejection and hydrocarbon recovery target. The current pilot PSA design consists of 4-6 vessels with process steps consisting of 1 bed on feed and 1 bed on blowdown at a time. There are 2-3 equalization steps as well as product pressurization and purge steps. The pilot system was designed to process up to 17kscfd and capable of using 1 to 4 inch diameter beds. During the initial construction of the pilot test system the bed size was selected to be 1 inch due to the adsorbent performance and with considerations of adsorbent manufacturing. The height was based on maximum available height in the container. The remaining components of the design were based on similar 6 bed PSA pilot plant already in operation. Full range control valves were used for all valves. The system was constructed entirely of stainless steel grade 316. Additionally, a pretreatment system of 304 stainless steel was designed and built as H2S compatible in order to remove all condensed liquids and sulfur before entering the PSA portion of the system.
- The material used in the pilot testing was created as follows: 23.00 lbs. of zeolite 4A powder supplied by Jianlong (as 4A-D) on a dry weight basis (29.50 lbs. wet weight) was placed in a WAM MLH50 plow mixer. With the mixer agitating, 2.16 lbs of MR-2404 (a solventless silicone containing silicone resin from Dow Corning) was pumped in at rate of 0.07 lb/min. After the MR-2404 addition was completed, 9.2 lbs of water was added at a rate of 0.3 lb/min under constant stirring in the plow mixer. At the end of the water addition, plow mixing was continued for an additional 5 minutes. The plow mixed powder product labeled hereinafter “the formulation” was transferred to a tilted rotating drum mixer having internal working volume of ˜75 L and agitated therein at a speed of 24 rpm. Mixing of the formulation was continued while beads were gradually formed which had a porosity, as measured using a Micromeritics Autopore IV Hg porosimeter on the calcined product, in the 30-35% range. The beads were subjected to a screening operation to determine the yield and harvest those particles in the 8×16 U.S. mesh size range. The product beads were air dried overnight prior to calcination using a shallow tray method at temperatures up to 595° C. The shallow tray calcination method used a General Signal Company Blue-M electric oven equipped with a dry air purge. ˜500 g. dry wt. of the 8×16 U.S. mesh adsorbent was spread out in a stainless steel mesh tray to provide a thin layer. A purge of 200 SCFH of dry air was fed to the oven during calcination. The temperature was set to 90° C., followed by a 6 hour dwell time. The temperature was then increased to 200° C. gradually over the course of a 6 hour period, and further increased to 300° C. over a 2 hour period and finally increased to 595° C. over a 3 hour period and held there for 1 hour before cooling to 450° C. after which the adsorbent was removed, immediately bottled in a sealed bottle and placed in a dry nitrogen purged drybox. The calcined beads were rescreened to harvest those particles in the 8×16 U.S. mesh range.
- Characterization of the modified 4A samples calcined at 595° C. was performed using a thermogravimetric method as described earlier in “ANRU TGA Testing”. The nitrogen uptake rate as performed in the test was determined to be ˜0.2 weight %/minute as measured using the TGA method disclosed herein. When the product beads in Example 1 were calcined up to 575° C., the nitrogen uptake rate as performed in the test was determined to be ˜0.7 weight %/minute as measured using the TGA method disclosed herein. Subsequently, when the product beads in Example 1 were calcined up to 555° C., the nitrogen uptake rate as performed in the test was determined to be ˜1.2 weight %/minute as measured using the TGA method disclosed herein.
- Routine characterization of modified 4A samples was performed using a thermogravimetric method using a TA Instruments Q500 system installed in a glove box to minimize the impact of air leaks. Nitrogen and oxygen gases supplied to the instrument were high purity. The balance purge gas and
gas 1 was nitrogen and agas 2 corresponds to oxygen. For all experiments, a balance purge of 5 cc/minute was used and the gas directly over the sample was set to 95 cc/minute (nitrogen or oxygen). A sampling frequency of 0.5 sec/point was used for all adsorption steps. Alumina pans were used for all studies and the sample size after activation was in the range 100 to 120 mg. - The TGA method involves both an in-situ activation step followed by adsorption tests using oxygen and nitrogen at 25° C. The sample activation was performed by heating the sample under nitrogen purge at 2° C. per minute to 150° C., maintaining isothermal for 60 minutes, heating at 5° C./minute to 350° C., holding at 350° C. for 120 minutes, then cooling to 25° C. The nitrogen equilibrium capacity at atmospheric pressure and 25° C. is reported as the weight gain on cooling under nitrogen relative to the minimum weight at 350° C. (the activated sample weight). An assessment of relative rate for different samples and preparation is captured by switching from nitrogen to oxygen. A transient weight gain is observed followed by a drop attributable to oxygen uptake followed by nitrogen leaving. A corresponding switch from oxygen back to nitrogen results in a transient weight loss followed by a weight gain attributable to oxygen loss followed by nitrogen pickup. Values reported as “nitrogen uptake rate” correspond to the maximum slope observed in the nitrogen uptake portion and is equivalent also to the peak in the derivative weight with respect to time for the same step. Values are reported in weight %/minute.
- The results from the breakthrough test and parameters obtained from the modeling were used with the methodology described by Mehrotra, et al. in Arithmetic Approach for Complex PSA Cycle Scheduling, Adsorption, 2010, pp. 113-126, vol. 16, Springer Science+Business Media which details the basis for modeling PSA processes. These simulations were performed using Process Builder, from PSE.
- A LSKP could be designed to handle a feed flow stream from a well head during flowback after hydraulic fracturing of the well. The state-of-the-art design condition would be based on the maximum amount of value delivered by recovering the most methane available. This design would call for a 4-1-3-1 cycle that could handle 5 MMscfd at a 35% N2 feed content and a 20% N2 product content. For flow rates above 5 MMscfd and 35% N2 feed content, the extra gas would be passed to the vent. For flow rates below 5 MMscfd and or 35% N2 feed content, the product gas would contain less than 20% N2 but the product flow rate would be substantially the same.
- Using the proposed methodology, for feed streams above 5 MMscfd and 35% N2 in the feed, a switch to a 4-1-2-2 cycle would enable the system to process up to 7 MMscfd and up to 45% N2 in the feed stream while producing up to 35% more product than the equivalent feed stream with the 4-1-3-1 cycle. Additionally, switching to a 4-2-2-1 cycle would allow processing up to 10 MMscfd and up to 70% N2 in the feed stream while producing up to 45% more product that the equivalent feed stream with the 4-1-3-1 cycle and venting methodology taught in the state of the art. These values are shown in table 1 as demonstrated by modeling and pilot results. Additionally, shown in table 1 is that just choosing a 4-2-2-1 cycle or a 4-1-2-2 cycle as the design basis for the system, has substantially lower recovery for the point at which the most value can be generated by the system. Thus, while the 4-1-3-1 cycle is still the best choice for the design basis for the system, it is not the only cycle that should be employed during the operation of the system.
- The methodology for switching between cycles can be extrapolated from those proposed by Baksh et al. and described previously.
-
TABLE 1 Performance of various cycles Model Pilot Feed Beds Feed Eqs BD Production* Production** 1.00 4 1 3 1 1.00 1.00 1.05 4 1 3 1 1.03 1.04 1.00 4 1 2 2 0.86 0.85 1.33 4 1 2 2 1.32 1.30 1.00 4 2 2 1 0.68 0.69 1.55 4 2 2 1 1.44 1.44 *35% N2 in CH4 feed, 10% N2 in product, variable feed flow, feed pressure 410 psig, product pressure 405 psig **32-36% N2 in pipeline sales natural gas feed, 18-21% N2 in product, variable feed flow, feed pressure 380-405 psig, product pressure 375-400 psig Beds represents the total number of adsorbents beds in the cycle. Feed represents the number of beds in the feed step at one time. Eqs represents the number of equalization steps in the cycle. BD represents the number of beds on blow down in the cycle. Model recovery represents the simulated recovery for the cycle with a consistent feed flow. Pilot recovery represents the recovery demonstrated in the pilot test system. Model production represents the simulated production relative to the base case for the cycle with a consistent feed flow. Pilot production represents the production demonstrated in the pilot test system relative to the base case. - Table 1 shows the demonstration of the three different cycle examples (4133, 4122, 4221). The feed of 105% for the 4-1-3 cycle represents the maximum possible product production of the cycle with any feed flow, but not the highest recovery. The process is restricted because it is unable to make higher product production at the desired purity. The ability to handle higher feed flow rates while maintaining a constant product purity (20% N2 in the product) can be seen in the table with the other cycles.
- As noted earlier, hydrogen PSA (H2PSA) systems can also benefit substantially from the adoption of new cycles to increase the product flow of the system, beyond the original design basis, or design basis taught in the state of the art. In this instance a 12-3-4 cycle was chosen as the design for comparison. In the event that the feed flow to the system is increased, the 12-3-4 cycle cannot handle the flow and still meet the purity target required. Initially the cycle time can be reduced for the cycle until the system limitations are met or exceeded (cycle time, bed fluidization etc.). Once this occurs, the full limit of the system is reached using state of the art methodology.
- Using the proposed methodology, table 2 was constructed showing the effect of modifications to the process cycle. These effects are a demonstration of the selection process, but other factors should be considered when switching to a different cycle, such as frequency of the cycle changes and the effect on the production, as well as cycle compatibility based on the teachings of Baksh et al.
-
TABLE 2 Relative Product Product H2 Produced Produced Recovery at at at Cycle LOFF HOFF LOFF HOFF HOFF 12-3-4 0% 100% 0% 100% 1.00 12-3-3 100% 105% 100% 104% 0.99 12-3-3 105% 107% 104% 105% 0.98 pge 12-4-4 107% 108% 105% 106% 0.98 Fpp 12-4-4 108% 109% 106% 107% 0.98 FPPe 12-5-3 109% 112% 107% 109% 0.97 12-5-3 112% 114% 109% 110% 0.96 FPPe - Table 2 shows increasing feed processing capability and increasing produced product at reduced overall recovery. Highest product potential is the maximum production that could be obtained by the cycle at the required product purity (99.999% H2) as additional feed gas would need to be vented. These values are given as a general approximation and should be seen as a demonstration of the overall trend, rather than exact feed flows a different cycle is used for. A copy of the model used is provided with PSE process builder software. Lowest Feed Flow Optimal (LOFF) is the lowest feed flow point at which this cycle has the highest product recovery among all the cycles tested. Highest Feed Flow Optimal (HOFF) is the highest feed flow point at which this cycle has the highest product recovery among all the cycles tested or is no longer able to produce more product at purity beyond this flow rate. H2 Recovery is the recovery of the product from the feed relative to the recovery from the 12-3-4 cycle at its HOFF.
- Conventional PSA system handles variable feed composition and flow by adjusting cycle time without changing the cycle and cycle steps. Within one cycle, cycle step and sequence, such as adsorption feed, equalization, purge, provide purge, blow down are fixed. Control valves are sized accordingly. Therefore, system processing range is limited for the feed and contaminant composition. With the proposed new control method, allowing and adopting new cycles to address wider feed flow and composition provides additional operational freedom compares to conventional PSA system.
- The methodology for switching between cycles can be extrapolated from those proposed by Baksh et al. as described previously.
Claims (21)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US17/042,627 US20210077942A1 (en) | 2018-03-29 | 2020-03-29 | Process for handling variable flow rates and compositions in pressure swing adsorption systems |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US201862649798P | 2018-03-29 | 2018-03-29 | |
PCT/US2019/024848 WO2019191594A1 (en) | 2018-03-29 | 2019-03-29 | Process for handling variable flow rates and compositions in pressure swing adsorption systems |
US17/042,627 US20210077942A1 (en) | 2018-03-29 | 2020-03-29 | Process for handling variable flow rates and compositions in pressure swing adsorption systems |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20210077942A1 true US20210077942A1 (en) | 2021-03-18 |
Family
ID=66429478
Family Applications (4)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US17/042,516 Active 2040-11-15 US11883775B2 (en) | 2018-03-29 | 2019-03-28 | Rate/kinetic selective multiple bed adsorption process cycle |
US17/042,627 Abandoned US20210077942A1 (en) | 2018-03-29 | 2020-03-29 | Process for handling variable flow rates and compositions in pressure swing adsorption systems |
US17/034,748 Abandoned US20210016218A1 (en) | 2018-03-29 | 2020-09-28 | Characteristics of tunable adsorbents for rate selective separation of nitrogen from methane |
US17/034,831 Active 2039-10-12 US11471820B2 (en) | 2018-03-29 | 2020-09-28 | Characteristics of tunable adsorbents for rate selective separation of nitrogen from methane |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US17/042,516 Active 2040-11-15 US11883775B2 (en) | 2018-03-29 | 2019-03-28 | Rate/kinetic selective multiple bed adsorption process cycle |
Family Applications After (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US17/034,748 Abandoned US20210016218A1 (en) | 2018-03-29 | 2020-09-28 | Characteristics of tunable adsorbents for rate selective separation of nitrogen from methane |
US17/034,831 Active 2039-10-12 US11471820B2 (en) | 2018-03-29 | 2020-09-28 | Characteristics of tunable adsorbents for rate selective separation of nitrogen from methane |
Country Status (7)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (4) | US11883775B2 (en) |
CN (2) | CN111918711A (en) |
CA (5) | CA3095132C (en) |
MX (3) | MX2020010139A (en) |
MY (2) | MY194670A (en) |
RU (2) | RU2020133778A (en) |
WO (5) | WO2019191421A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CA3095132C (en) | 2018-03-29 | 2023-02-21 | Praxair Technology, Inc. | Characteristics of tunable adsorbents for rate selective separation of nitrogen from methane |
WO2023049994A1 (en) * | 2021-09-28 | 2023-04-06 | Iogen Corporation | Method and system for upgrading biogas using psa |
Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5529607A (en) * | 1995-03-15 | 1996-06-25 | The Boc Group, Inc. | PSA process with dynamic purge control |
US6277174B1 (en) * | 2000-01-07 | 2001-08-21 | Praxair Technology, Inc. | Low pressure ratio VPSA plant tuning and balancing system |
US20060236863A1 (en) * | 2005-04-26 | 2006-10-26 | Weist Edward L Jr | Design and operation methods for pressure swing adsorption systems |
US20170021301A1 (en) * | 2015-07-24 | 2017-01-26 | Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. | Sour Pressure Swing Adsorption Process |
US20190193018A1 (en) * | 2017-12-21 | 2019-06-27 | Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. | Separation Process and Apparatus for Light Noble Gas |
Family Cites Families (63)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US121A (en) | 1837-02-10 | Improvement in the mode of constructing andweighing by means of the steelyard-balance | ||
US4816A (en) | 1846-10-17 | Bell machinery for hotels | ||
US6063A (en) | 1849-01-30 | Improvement in baking apparatus | ||
US161A (en) | 1837-04-17 | Construction of smoke-stacks of locomotive or stationary steam-engines | ||
US2843219A (en) * | 1957-01-22 | 1958-07-15 | Canadian Patents Dev | Removal of nitrogen from natural gas |
DE1794353A1 (en) * | 1967-04-15 | 1973-02-15 | Helmut Prof Dr Phys Knapp | THE WASHING OF WATER VAPOR FROM A NATURAL GAS STREAM |
SU874137A1 (en) * | 1980-02-11 | 1981-10-23 | Московский ордена Ленина и ордена Трудового Красного Знамени химико-технологический институт им.Д.И.Менделеева | Method of separating atmosphere air |
US4816121A (en) | 1983-10-03 | 1989-03-28 | Keefer Bowie | Gas phase chemical reactor |
US4801308A (en) | 1983-10-03 | 1989-01-31 | Keefer Bowie | Apparatus and process for pressure swing adsorption separation |
US4968329A (en) | 1987-10-26 | 1990-11-06 | Keefer Bowie | Pressure swing adsorption for concentration of a gas component |
CA1325182C (en) * | 1987-12-29 | 1993-12-14 | Union Carbide Corporation | Pressure swing adsorption process |
US4964889A (en) | 1989-12-04 | 1990-10-23 | Uop | Selective adsorption on magnesium-containing clinoptilolites |
US5082473A (en) | 1990-07-23 | 1992-01-21 | Keefer Bowie | Extraction and concentration of a gas component |
US5203888A (en) * | 1990-11-23 | 1993-04-20 | Uop | Pressure swing adsorption process with multiple desorption steps |
US5258056A (en) | 1991-09-27 | 1993-11-02 | The Boc Group, Inc. | PSA system with product turndown and purity control |
US5256172A (en) | 1992-04-17 | 1993-10-26 | Keefer Bowie | Thermally coupled pressure swing adsorption |
US5518526A (en) * | 1994-10-07 | 1996-05-21 | Praxair Technology, Inc. | Pressure swing adsorption process |
US5702504A (en) * | 1996-03-07 | 1997-12-30 | Praxair Technology, Inc. | Vacuum pressure swing adsorption process |
US6063161A (en) | 1996-04-24 | 2000-05-16 | Sofinoy Societte Financiere D'innovation Inc. | Flow regulated pressure swing adsorption system |
WO1998029182A1 (en) | 1996-12-31 | 1998-07-09 | Keefer Bowie | High frequency pressure swing adsorption |
US6056804A (en) | 1997-06-30 | 2000-05-02 | Questor Industries Inc. | High frequency rotary pressure swing adsorption apparatus |
FR2766384B1 (en) | 1997-07-25 | 1999-09-03 | Air Liquide | REGULATION OF A PSA PROCESS |
US6010555A (en) * | 1997-11-04 | 2000-01-04 | Praxair Technology, Inc. | Vacuum pressure swing adsorption system and method |
US6051050A (en) | 1997-12-22 | 2000-04-18 | Questor Industries Inc. | Modular pressure swing adsorption with energy recovery |
US5989316A (en) | 1997-12-22 | 1999-11-23 | Engelhard Corporation | Separation of nitrogen from mixtures thereof with methane utilizing barium exchanged ETS-4 |
CN1168524C (en) * | 1998-02-27 | 2004-09-29 | 普莱克斯技术有限公司 | Pressure swing adsorption gas separation method, using adsorbents with high intrinsic diffusivity and low pressure ratios |
US6197092B1 (en) | 1999-03-22 | 2001-03-06 | Engelhard Corporation | Selective removal of nitrogen from natural gas by pressure swing adsorption |
AU5381200A (en) | 1999-06-09 | 2001-01-02 | Questair Technologies, Inc. | Rotary pressure swing adsorption apparatus |
US6231644B1 (en) | 1999-07-23 | 2001-05-15 | The Boc Group, Inc. | Air separation using monolith adsorbent bed |
US6303841B1 (en) * | 1999-10-04 | 2001-10-16 | Uop Llc | Process for producing ethylene |
US6503299B2 (en) * | 1999-11-03 | 2003-01-07 | Praxair Technology, Inc. | Pressure swing adsorption process for the production of hydrogen |
US6691702B2 (en) | 2000-08-03 | 2004-02-17 | Sequal Technologies, Inc. | Portable oxygen concentration system and method of using the same |
US6651658B1 (en) | 2000-08-03 | 2003-11-25 | Sequal Technologies, Inc. | Portable oxygen concentration system and method of using the same |
US6444012B1 (en) | 2000-10-30 | 2002-09-03 | Engelhard Corporation | Selective removal of nitrogen from natural gas by pressure swing adsorption |
US6565628B2 (en) * | 2001-07-23 | 2003-05-20 | Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. | Pressure swing adsorption process with reduced pressure equalization time |
US20050098034A1 (en) * | 2003-11-12 | 2005-05-12 | Gittleman Craig S. | Hydrogen purification process using pressure swing adsorption for fuel cell applications |
US7179324B2 (en) * | 2004-05-19 | 2007-02-20 | Praxair Technology, Inc. | Continuous feed three-bed pressure swing adsorption system |
DE602004028184D1 (en) | 2004-10-28 | 2010-08-26 | Bialetti Ind Spa | Device for producing a hot beverage |
CA2810324C (en) | 2005-01-12 | 2014-08-26 | Lummus Technology Inc. | Methods and apparatus for improved control of psa flow variations |
US7442233B2 (en) * | 2005-07-06 | 2008-10-28 | Basf Catalysts Llc | Integrated heavy hydrocarbon removal, amine treating and dehydration |
US7763100B2 (en) | 2006-07-06 | 2010-07-27 | Praxair Technology, Inc. | Vacuum pressure swing adsorption process and enhanced oxygen recovery |
US20080028289A1 (en) | 2006-07-26 | 2008-01-31 | Adobe Systems Incorporated | Form filling lens |
US8656271B2 (en) | 2006-07-31 | 2014-02-18 | Sap Ag | Adapting a spreadsheet for use with a complex object |
US8529662B2 (en) | 2007-05-18 | 2013-09-10 | Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company | Removal of heavy hydrocarbons from gas mixtures containing heavy hydrocarbons and methane |
US7959720B2 (en) | 2007-05-18 | 2011-06-14 | Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company | Low mesopore adsorbent contactors for use in swing adsorption processes |
US8529663B2 (en) * | 2007-05-18 | 2013-09-10 | Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company | Process for removing a target gas from a mixture of gases by swing adsorption |
EA022697B1 (en) * | 2008-04-30 | 2016-02-29 | Эксонмобил Апстрим Рисерч Компани | Method and system for selective removal of oil from gas stream comprising methane |
US8551217B2 (en) | 2011-01-11 | 2013-10-08 | Praxair Technology, Inc. | Six bed pressure swing adsorption process operating in normal and turndown modes |
US8435328B2 (en) | 2011-01-11 | 2013-05-07 | Praxair Technology, Inc. | Ten bed pressure swing adsorption process operating in normal and turndown modes |
US8852322B2 (en) * | 2011-03-01 | 2014-10-07 | Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company | Gas purification process utilizing engineered small particle adsorbents |
CA2840723C (en) | 2011-08-09 | 2019-10-01 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | Natural gas liquefaction process |
US8778051B2 (en) * | 2012-03-15 | 2014-07-15 | Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. | Pressure swing adsorption process |
US8709136B2 (en) * | 2012-04-03 | 2014-04-29 | Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. | Adsorption process |
US20160097013A1 (en) * | 2013-06-19 | 2016-04-07 | Kent S. Knaebel & Associates, Inc. | PSA Separation of Nitrogen from Natural Gas |
FR3013605B1 (en) * | 2013-11-28 | 2017-05-26 | Air Liquide | PSA METHOD WITH PHASE TIME ACTIVATED STEP |
US10926241B2 (en) | 2014-06-12 | 2021-02-23 | Arizona Board Of Regents On Behalf Of Arizona State University | Carbon dioxide adsorbents |
US9381460B2 (en) | 2014-09-11 | 2016-07-05 | Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. | Pressure swing adsorption process |
PL3349878T3 (en) * | 2015-09-16 | 2024-04-08 | Uop Llc | Pressure swing adsorption process and apparatus for purifying a hydrogen-containing gas stream |
CA3005448A1 (en) * | 2015-11-16 | 2017-05-26 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | Adsorbent materials and methods of adsorbing carbon dioxide |
RU2607735C1 (en) * | 2015-12-02 | 2017-01-10 | Леонид Федорович Шестиперстов | Separation of multicomponent gas mixtures by short-cycle unheated adsorption with three-stage extraction of target gas of high purity |
CN205575628U (en) | 2015-12-18 | 2016-09-14 | 四川天采科技有限责任公司 | It presses desorption PSA to carry device of hydrogen to realize two high bands |
US10717035B2 (en) | 2017-02-13 | 2020-07-21 | Praxair Technology, Inc. | Tunable adsorbents |
CA3095132C (en) | 2018-03-29 | 2023-02-21 | Praxair Technology, Inc. | Characteristics of tunable adsorbents for rate selective separation of nitrogen from methane |
-
2019
- 2019-03-28 CA CA3095132A patent/CA3095132C/en active Active
- 2019-03-28 CN CN201980023464.5A patent/CN111918711A/en active Pending
- 2019-03-28 MY MYPI2020004930A patent/MY194670A/en unknown
- 2019-03-28 MX MX2020010139A patent/MX2020010139A/en unknown
- 2019-03-28 WO PCT/US2019/024571 patent/WO2019191421A1/en active Application Filing
- 2019-03-28 WO PCT/US2019/024581 patent/WO2019191426A1/en active Application Filing
- 2019-03-28 MY MYPI2020004929A patent/MY194862A/en unknown
- 2019-03-28 CN CN201980027170.XA patent/CN112020389B/en active Active
- 2019-03-28 CA CA3095357A patent/CA3095357C/en active Active
- 2019-03-28 MX MX2020010063A patent/MX2020010063A/en unknown
- 2019-03-28 WO PCT/US2019/024594 patent/WO2019191436A1/en active Application Filing
- 2019-03-28 US US17/042,516 patent/US11883775B2/en active Active
- 2019-03-28 RU RU2020133778A patent/RU2020133778A/en unknown
- 2019-03-28 RU RU2020133770A patent/RU2756180C1/en active
- 2019-03-28 CA CA3103291A patent/CA3103291C/en active Active
- 2019-03-29 WO PCT/US2019/024848 patent/WO2019191594A1/en active Application Filing
- 2019-03-29 CA CA3095024A patent/CA3095024A1/en active Pending
-
2020
- 2020-03-29 US US17/042,627 patent/US20210077942A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2020-09-28 US US17/034,748 patent/US20210016218A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2020-09-28 US US17/034,831 patent/US11471820B2/en active Active
-
2021
- 2021-08-30 WO PCT/US2021/048186 patent/WO2022066365A1/en active Application Filing
- 2021-08-30 CA CA3193693A patent/CA3193693A1/en active Pending
- 2021-08-30 MX MX2023003551A patent/MX2023003551A/en unknown
Patent Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5529607A (en) * | 1995-03-15 | 1996-06-25 | The Boc Group, Inc. | PSA process with dynamic purge control |
US6277174B1 (en) * | 2000-01-07 | 2001-08-21 | Praxair Technology, Inc. | Low pressure ratio VPSA plant tuning and balancing system |
US20060236863A1 (en) * | 2005-04-26 | 2006-10-26 | Weist Edward L Jr | Design and operation methods for pressure swing adsorption systems |
US20170021301A1 (en) * | 2015-07-24 | 2017-01-26 | Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. | Sour Pressure Swing Adsorption Process |
US20190193018A1 (en) * | 2017-12-21 | 2019-06-27 | Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. | Separation Process and Apparatus for Light Noble Gas |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
MX2020010063A (en) | 2020-10-15 |
CN111918711A (en) | 2020-11-10 |
CA3095132C (en) | 2023-02-21 |
US20210023497A1 (en) | 2021-01-28 |
RU2020133778A (en) | 2022-04-14 |
US20210016218A1 (en) | 2021-01-21 |
MX2023003551A (en) | 2023-04-21 |
US20210008487A1 (en) | 2021-01-14 |
CA3103291A1 (en) | 2019-10-03 |
MY194862A (en) | 2022-12-21 |
WO2019191421A1 (en) | 2019-10-03 |
CA3095357C (en) | 2023-08-08 |
CA3095357A1 (en) | 2019-10-03 |
MX2020010139A (en) | 2020-10-19 |
RU2020133778A3 (en) | 2022-04-14 |
CA3095024A1 (en) | 2019-10-03 |
CN112020389B (en) | 2023-03-14 |
MY194670A (en) | 2022-12-12 |
US11883775B2 (en) | 2024-01-30 |
WO2019191436A1 (en) | 2019-10-03 |
CA3193693A1 (en) | 2022-03-31 |
RU2756180C1 (en) | 2021-09-28 |
CA3095132A1 (en) | 2019-10-03 |
WO2019191426A1 (en) | 2019-10-03 |
CN112020389A (en) | 2020-12-01 |
WO2019191594A1 (en) | 2019-10-03 |
WO2022066365A1 (en) | 2022-03-31 |
US11471820B2 (en) | 2022-10-18 |
CA3103291C (en) | 2023-02-28 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6576043B2 (en) | Recovery of nitrogen and light hydrocarbons from polyalkene purge gas | |
US6024781A (en) | Separation of carbon dioxide and hydrocarbons | |
US5174796A (en) | Process for the purification of natural gas | |
US20210077942A1 (en) | Process for handling variable flow rates and compositions in pressure swing adsorption systems | |
US7438746B2 (en) | Off-gas feed method and target gas purification system | |
US9359203B2 (en) | Method for producing nitrogen gas, method for separating gas and device for producing nitrogen gas | |
JPH0724735B2 (en) | Over-adsorption recovery system in pressure swing adsorption | |
EP0276309A1 (en) | Process for separation of high purity gas from mixed gas | |
EP2085355A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for separating hydrogen gas | |
MX2013008114A (en) | Six bed pressure swing adsorption process operating in normal and turndown modes. | |
US6527830B1 (en) | Pressure swing adsorption process for co-producing nitrogen and oxygen | |
JP2008303089A (en) | Process of generating low purity nitrogen gas | |
CN109255132A (en) | A kind of determination method and system of the optimal adsorption time of pressure-variable adsorption | |
CN110198775B (en) | Gas separation and recovery method and equipment | |
CA2432909C (en) | Method for separating hydrogen gas | |
WO2017048742A1 (en) | Pressure swing adsorption process and apparatus for purifying a hydrogen-containing gas stream | |
JP2016150869A (en) | Method for producing hydrogen chloride | |
JPH0268111A (en) | Improved pressure swing adsorbing method | |
JP2002355522A (en) | Method of controlling pressure of offgas from offgas tank in four tower-type psa equipment for purifying hydrogen | |
JP2012106961A (en) | Method and apparatus for separating methane | |
JP2002355519A (en) | Method of stably operating four tower-type pressure- swing adsorption equipment for hydrogen purification | |
JPH04338207A (en) | Separation of gaseous impurities from gaseous mixture | |
KR20180100594A (en) | H2 PSA with a change in feed gas flow | |
JP2004351322A (en) | Production method for high purity gas by pressure change adsorption apparatus | |
JPH04338205A (en) | Gas separation |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: PRAXAIR TECHNOLOGY, INC., CONNECTICUT Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:STUCKERT, NICHOLAS R.;ST. JAMES, MICHAEL;HOOVER, CYNTHIA A.;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20200921 TO 20200923;REEL/FRAME:053905/0398 |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: APPLICATION DISPATCHED FROM PREEXAM, NOT YET DOCKETED |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |