US20170250641A1 - Flux estimation for fault tolerant control of pmsm machines for eps - Google Patents

Flux estimation for fault tolerant control of pmsm machines for eps Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20170250641A1
US20170250641A1 US15/054,554 US201615054554A US2017250641A1 US 20170250641 A1 US20170250641 A1 US 20170250641A1 US 201615054554 A US201615054554 A US 201615054554A US 2017250641 A1 US2017250641 A1 US 2017250641A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
flux
velocity
low pass
estimation
generating
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US15/054,554
Other versions
US9985564B2 (en
Inventor
Prerit Pramod
Rakesh Mitra
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Steering Solutions IP Holding Corp
Original Assignee
Steering Solutions IP Holding Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Steering Solutions IP Holding Corp filed Critical Steering Solutions IP Holding Corp
Priority to US15/054,554 priority Critical patent/US9985564B2/en
Assigned to STEERING SOLUTIONS IP HOLDING CORPORATION reassignment STEERING SOLUTIONS IP HOLDING CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: MITRA, RAKESH, PRAMOD, PRERIT
Priority to DE102017103727.6A priority patent/DE102017103727B4/en
Priority to CN201710103076.0A priority patent/CN107248829B/en
Publication of US20170250641A1 publication Critical patent/US20170250641A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US9985564B2 publication Critical patent/US9985564B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H02GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02PCONTROL OR REGULATION OF ELECTRIC MOTORS, ELECTRIC GENERATORS OR DYNAMO-ELECTRIC CONVERTERS; CONTROLLING TRANSFORMERS, REACTORS OR CHOKE COILS
    • H02P21/00Arrangements or methods for the control of electric machines by vector control, e.g. by control of field orientation
    • H02P21/14Estimation or adaptation of machine parameters, e.g. flux, current or voltage
    • H02P21/141Flux estimation
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01PMEASURING LINEAR OR ANGULAR SPEED, ACCELERATION, DECELERATION, OR SHOCK; INDICATING PRESENCE, ABSENCE, OR DIRECTION, OF MOVEMENT
    • G01P3/00Measuring linear or angular speed; Measuring differences of linear or angular speeds
    • G01P3/42Devices characterised by the use of electric or magnetic means
    • G01P3/44Devices characterised by the use of electric or magnetic means for measuring angular speed
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01RMEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R33/00Arrangements or instruments for measuring magnetic variables
    • G01R33/02Measuring direction or magnitude of magnetic fields or magnetic flux
    • G01R33/038Measuring direction or magnitude of magnetic fields or magnetic flux using permanent magnets, e.g. balances, torsion devices
    • G01R33/0385Measuring direction or magnitude of magnetic fields or magnetic flux using permanent magnets, e.g. balances, torsion devices in relation with magnetic force measurements
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01RMEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R33/00Arrangements or instruments for measuring magnetic variables
    • G01R33/02Measuring direction or magnitude of magnetic fields or magnetic flux
    • G01R33/04Measuring direction or magnitude of magnetic fields or magnetic flux using the flux-gate principle
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H02GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02PCONTROL OR REGULATION OF ELECTRIC MOTORS, ELECTRIC GENERATORS OR DYNAMO-ELECTRIC CONVERTERS; CONTROLLING TRANSFORMERS, REACTORS OR CHOKE COILS
    • H02P21/00Arrangements or methods for the control of electric machines by vector control, e.g. by control of field orientation
    • H02P21/14Estimation or adaptation of machine parameters, e.g. flux, current or voltage
    • H02P21/18Estimation of position or speed
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H02GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02PCONTROL OR REGULATION OF ELECTRIC MOTORS, ELECTRIC GENERATORS OR DYNAMO-ELECTRIC CONVERTERS; CONTROLLING TRANSFORMERS, REACTORS OR CHOKE COILS
    • H02P6/00Arrangements for controlling synchronous motors or other dynamo-electric motors using electronic commutation dependent on the rotor position; Electronic commutators therefor
    • H02P6/14Electronic commutators
    • H02P6/16Circuit arrangements for detecting position
    • H02P6/18Circuit arrangements for detecting position without separate position detecting elements
    • H02P6/182Circuit arrangements for detecting position without separate position detecting elements using back-emf in windings

Definitions

  • Electric Power Steering (EPS) systems utilize an electric motor, typically a Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machine (PMSM), to provide steering assist to the driver.
  • PMSMs are controlled using a well-known technique called Field Oriented Control (FOC), which allows sinusoidal three phase motor voltage and current signals to be transformed into equivalent signals in a synchronously rotating reference frame, commonly referred to as the DQ reference frame, where the motor voltages and currents become DC quantities.
  • FOC Field Oriented Control
  • the reference frame transformation requires information of the absolute position of the rotor of the machine, which is usually obtained by using a physical position sensor.
  • Sensorless Control (SC) refers to the class of control schemes in which the motor is controlled without a physical position sensor.
  • SC methods can be classified into two broad categories, namely the Direct Torque Control (DTC) and Field Oriented Control (FOC) methods. While DTC does not require any direct knowledge of the position, FOC relies on direct knowledge of position. In contrast with their sensor based counterpart, SC-FOC schemes employ observers or estimators to obtain the position of the machine, however, the overall control architecture remains identical to a sensor based FOC scheme.
  • EPS systems typically employ a sensor based FOC system for motor control, but SC provides an alternative to provide Fault Tolerant Control (FTC) in order to avoid Loss of Assist (LoA) when the position sensor fails.
  • FTC Direct Torque Control
  • FOC Field Oriented Control
  • a system for estimating flux linkage in an electric motor includes a flux estimation module that generates estimated flux linkages based on a back electromagnetic force and estimated velocity of the electric motor, the flux linkages having an alpha flux linkage component and a beta flux linkage component; and a velocity estimation module that generates an estimated motor velocity based on the back electromagnetic force and the estimated flux linkages.
  • a method for estimating flux linkage in an electric motor comprises generating estimated flux linkages based on a back electromagnetic force and estimated velocity of the electric motor, the flux linkages having an alpha flux linkage component and a beta flux linkage component, and generating an estimated motor velocity based on the back electromagnetic force and the estimated flux linkages.
  • FIG. 1 is an exemplary schematic illustration of a motor control system in accordance with some embodiments
  • FIG. 2 is an exemplary block diagram of a SC-FOC system in accordance with some embodiments
  • FIG. 3 is an exemplary block diagram of selected components of the control module in accordance with some embodiments.
  • FIG. 4 is flow diagram illustrating a flux estimation module in accordance with some embodiments.
  • FIG. 5 is flow diagram illustrating a flux estimation module in accordance with another embodiment
  • FIG. 6 is a flow diagram illustrating quadrature signal signature compensator module in accordance with some embodiments.
  • FIG. 7 is a flow diagram illustrating a velocity estimation module in accordance with some embodiments.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a motor control system 10 in accordance with one aspect of the invention.
  • the motor control system 10 includes a motor 20 , an inverter 22 , a voltage supply 24 , and a control module 30 (also referred to as a controller).
  • the voltage supply 24 supplies a supply voltage V B to the motor 20 .
  • the voltage supply 24 is a 12-volt battery. However, it is to be understood that other types of voltage supplies may be used as well.
  • the inverter 22 is connected to the motor 20 by a plurality of connections 32 (e.g., three connectors) that are labeled as ‘A’, ‘B’ and ‘C’.
  • the motor 20 is a poly-phase PMSM.
  • the motor 20 is a three-phase PMSM.
  • the control module 30 is connected to the motor 20 through the inverter 22 .
  • the control module 30 receives a motor torque command T CMD from a system 34 such as, for example, a steering control system.
  • the control module 30 includes control logic for sending motor voltage commands to the motor 20 through the inverter 22 .
  • the motor 20 is a plant that may be represented by a mathematical model in the DQ reference frame.
  • the following equations may represent the mathematical model
  • V d I d R+ ⁇ dot over ( ⁇ ) ⁇ d + ⁇ e ⁇ q
  • V q I q R+ ⁇ dot over ( ⁇ ) ⁇ q ⁇ e ⁇ d
  • ⁇ d and ⁇ q are stator flux linkages
  • I d and I q are currents
  • V d and V q are voltages
  • T e is the electromagnetic torque.
  • the machine parameters are the inductances L d and L q (which vary with the motor currents), resistance R (which varies with temperature) and magnet flux ⁇ m (which varies with both motor currents and temperature).
  • the two machine inductances are equal and are referred to as the synchronous inductance L s .
  • T e ⁇ ⁇ I ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ I ⁇
  • ⁇ ⁇ and ⁇ ⁇ are stator flux linkages
  • I ⁇ and I ⁇ are currents
  • V ⁇ and V ⁇ are voltages.
  • the two reference frames are related by the Park transformation shown below,
  • [ ⁇ ⁇ ] [ cos ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ sin ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ sin ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ - cos ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ] ⁇ [ d q ]
  • FIG. 2 is an exemplary block diagram of a SC-FOC system.
  • the control module described in further detail below can be implemented in a SC-FOC system.
  • the position is estimated using the flux and velocity estimates.
  • the measured phase currents are transformed into the DQ reference frame using the park transform and a current regulator is used to track the current commands.
  • the voltages computed by current regulator are used along with the estimated position to determine the duty cycles to be applied to the inverter.
  • FIG. 3 is an exemplary block diagram of a portion of the control module 30 in accordance with some embodiments of the invention.
  • the control module 30 includes several sub-modules including but not limited to a flux estimation module 40 and a velocity estimation module 42 .
  • the control module 30 also includes a torque and flux command calculation module 44 and a torque estimation module 46 .
  • the flux estimation module 40 and the velocity estimation module 42 provide accurate and robust flux and speed estimation. These modules can be implemented digitally as described herein, and these modules may be tuned for optimization of transient and steady-state responses. Further, a closed-loop position observer may also include at least the flux estimation module 40 . The closed-loop position observer may also generate a separate velocity estimate. The various modules and observers may be applied in both DTC and FOC based SC schemes. The proposed can be applied in non-salient pole machines ranging from very low to very high speeds.
  • EPS systems utilize a motor 20 operatively connected to an inverter 22 .
  • the motor 20 may be a PMSM to provide steering assist to the driver.
  • a control technique is FOC, which allows the sinusoidal three phase motor voltage and current signals to be transformed into equivalent signals in a synchronously rotating reference frame, commonly referred to as the DQ reference frame, where the motor voltages and currents become DC quantities.
  • the reference frame transformation requires information of the absolute position of the machine, which is usually obtained by using a physical position sensor.
  • SC refers to the class of control schemes in which the motor is controlled without a physical position sensor.
  • SC methods can be classified into two broad categories, namely the DTC and FOC methods. While the former does not require any direct knowledge of the position, the latter relies on direct knowledge of position.
  • SC-FOC schemes employ observers or estimators to obtain the position of the machine, however, the overall control architecture remains identical to a sensor based FOC scheme.
  • EPS systems typically employ a sensor based FOC system for motor control.
  • SC provides an attractive alternative to provide FTC in order to avoid LoA when the position sensor fails.
  • the flux linkages may be estimated from the back electromotive force (BEMF), which is calculated from the terminal or commanded voltages and measured currents of the machine using the following equations,
  • V ⁇ and I ⁇ both of which have an alpha and a beta component.
  • E ⁇ includes the respective V ⁇ (commanded voltage) and I ⁇ (measured currents), each with alpha and beta components. It should be noted that if a measurement of the actual voltages applied to the motor is available, it is preferable to use those instead of commanded voltages.
  • the integration may be written as,
  • the flux estimation module 40 estimates flux linkages based on the BEMF signals of a power steering motor and an estimated velocity of the power steering motor.
  • the flux estimation module 40 estimates flux linkages based on the motor currents, voltages, and an estimated velocity of the power steering motor.
  • the flux estimation module 40 may include a flux estimation high pass filter module (alpha) 48 A and a flux estimation high pass filter module (beta) 48 B.
  • the flux estimation module 40 may further include a flux estimation low pass filter module (alpha) 50 A and a flux estimation low pass filter module (alpha) 50 B.
  • the flux estimation high pass filter module (alpha) 48 A and the flux estimation low pass filter module (alpha) 50 A may filter the alpha component of the BEMF, where the flux estimation high pass filter module (beta) 48 B and the flux estimation low pass filter module (beta) 50 B may filter the beta component of the BEMF.
  • FIG. 4 shows the low pass filter module 50 processing the output of the high pass filter module 48 , this configuration can be reversed.
  • the flux estimation high pass filter modules 48 A, 48 B can process the respective outputs of the flux estimation low pass filter modules 50 A, 50 B.
  • the flux estimation high pass filter modules 48 A, 48 B and the flux estimation low pass filter modules 50 A, 50 B may be programmable and therefore operate as functions of the estimated motor velocity.
  • the flux estimation high pass filter modules 48 A, 48 B and the flux estimation low pass filter modules 50 A, 50 B may be individually programmable as a function of the estimated motor velocity.
  • the respective transfer functions G H (s) and G L (s) of the flux estimation high pass filter modules 48 A, 48 B and the flux estimation low pass filter modules 50 A, 50 B respectively may be written as follows,
  • G H ⁇ ( s ) s s + k H ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ e ⁇
  • G L ⁇ ( s ) 1 s 2 + 2 ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ k L ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ e ⁇ ⁇ s + k L 2 ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ e ⁇ 2
  • ⁇ tilde over ( ⁇ ) ⁇ e is the estimated motor electrical velocity or synchronous frequency.
  • the flux estimation module 40 applies for a non-standstill condition, and thus the velocity input must be limited to an appropriate lower limit.
  • the flux linkage estimation module 40 of FIG. 4 also includes a quadrature signal signature compensator module 52 that receives the respective outputs of the flux estimation low pass filter modules 50 A, 50 B in one embodiment. If the filter modules are tuned such that the gain and phase of the composite structure is not substantially identical as that of an integrator, the quadrature signal signature compensator 52 module modulates the filtered output, to ensure the output of the flux estimation module 40 mimics characteristics of a pure integrator in steady-state.
  • the configuration described in FIG. 4 can be a decoupled cascaded structure, where both signal paths are decoupled, and also as a complimentary structure, where both signals are used to correct each other.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates another embodiment of a flux estimation module.
  • the flux estimation module 40 A includes a first set of cascaded first order programmable low pass filter modules 56 A, 56 B, and a second set of cascaded first order programmable low pass filter modules 58 A, 58 B, along with a flux estimation high pass filter module (alpha) 48 A and a flux estimation high pass filter module (beta) 48 B.
  • alpha flux estimation high pass filter module
  • beta flux estimation high pass filter module
  • the transfer functions of the flux estimation high pass filter module (alpha) 48 A and the flux estimation high pass filter module (beta) 48 B, which includes G H (s), and the two sets of cascaded first order programmable low pass filter modules, which include G La (s), G Lb (s), respectively, are as follows,
  • G H ⁇ ( s ) s s + k H ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ e ⁇
  • G La ⁇ ( s ) 1 s + k La ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ e ⁇
  • Lb ⁇ ( s ) 1 s + k Lb ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ e ⁇
  • the flux estimation high pass filter module (alpha) 48 A and the flux estimation high pass filter module (beta) 48 B are configured to remove DC offset in the input and are programmable.
  • the sets of first order programmable low pass filter modules are required to provide a ⁇ /2 phase lag of an integrator, and also to compensate the phase lead provided by the flux estimation high pass filter modules 48 A, 48 B. Accordingly, a cascaded first order programmable low pass filter module design (e.g. a sequential arrangement of low pass filters) is used in this embodiment.
  • the flux estimation module 40 A of FIG. 4 also includes a quadrature signal signature compensator module 60 A. If the filter modules are tuned such that the gain and phase of the composite structure is not substantially identical as that of an integrator, the quadrature signal signature compensator 60 A module modulates the filtered output, to ensure the output of the flux estimation module 40 A mimics characteristics of a pure integrator in steady-state.
  • the configuration described in FIG. 5 can also be a decoupled cascaded structure, where both signal paths are decoupled, and also as a complimentary structure, where both signals are used to correct each other.
  • FIG. 6 illustrates the quadrature signal signature compensator module 60 in more detail.
  • the quadrature signal signature compensator module 60 may perform the compensation according to the following equation,
  • ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ′
  • ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ′
  • the quadrature signal signature compensator module 60 of FIG. 6 is also applicable to the quadrature signal signature compensator module 60 A shown in FIG. 5 .
  • the gain compensation performed by gain compensators 62 , 64 of the quadrature signal signature compensator module 60 A may be performed by employing the following relationship,
  • phase compensation from to ⁇ ⁇ ′′ to ⁇ tilde over ( ⁇ ) ⁇ ⁇ may be obtained, using the following relationship.
  • the flux estimation modules 40 , 40 A of FIG. 4 and FIG. 5 respectively use motor velocity as a factor for performance.
  • the velocity estimation module 42 is illustrated in more detail in FIG. 7 .
  • the velocity estimation module 42 estimates a motor velocity based on the motor currents, the motor voltages and the flux linkage estimates.
  • the structure of the velocity estimation module 42 is a derivative-based design and may employ the following equation,
  • a filtering scheme including a programmable high pass filter and a gain and phase compensator that utilizes the estimated velocity in a recursive manner is incorporated to remove the DC offset in the measured signals. Specifically, the BEMF inputs are filtered and then used to calculate the velocity.
  • filter transfer functions B H (s), B L (s) may be chosen as follows,
  • the gain compensator B g (s) is chosen so that the original signal amplitude remains intact is, as shown below,
  • motor speed is fundamentally a low bandwidth signal
  • a properly tuned anti-aliasing filter should be used for the down-sampling process from the flux estimator to the velocity estimator.
  • a digital implementation of the estimation module may facilitate high performance applications because difference in the magnitude and phase between the designed continuous-time filters and their discrete-time equivalents may cause significant errors in the estimated quantities.
  • the frequency of interest for various programmable filters proposed above is the synchronous frequency ⁇ e
  • the bilinear transform with prewarping with estimated synchronous frequency ⁇ tilde over ( ⁇ ) ⁇ e as the critical frequency may be used for the discretization process.
  • this discretization method ensures that the frequency distortion in the digital implementation is minimal.
  • the equation for the s to z domain transformation for the proposed discretization is shown as follows,
  • the direct bilinear transformation may be utilized for the digital implementation.
  • a closed-loop position estimator may be used with the flux linkage and velocity estimators described above for estimating the rotor position.
  • the closed loop observer uses feedback of the estimated position and corrects the synchronous reference frame by regulating the error between the measured currents and estimated currents in the estimated reference frame (using estimated position) to zero.
  • the estimator also produces a velocity estimate.
  • the flux estimates are used along with the estimated position to compute the reference currents.
  • I ⁇ ⁇ 1 ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ + ⁇ m ⁇ cos ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ L s
  • I ⁇ ⁇ 1 ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ + ⁇ m ⁇ sin ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ L s
  • the current errors are used along with the estimated position to perform a reference frame transformation.
  • a regulator (following example shows a simple PI regulator, but it should be understood that other regulators may be used) is employed to produce the velocity signal as an estimate.
  • the velocity is then integrated to produce the position estimate as follows.
  • the updated position is used to compute the current errors which are thereafter used to calculate the flux errors as follows.
  • the flux errors are then used to correct the flux estimates for use in the next loop. It should be noted that the flux corrections are only for position estimation, and is decoupled from the flux linkage and velocity observers proposed earlier. It is clear that this estimator is a Model Reference Adaptive Scheme (MRAS) type observer.
  • MRAS Model Reference Adaptive Scheme
  • module refers to an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), an electronic circuit, a processor (shared, dedicated, or group) and memory that executes one or more software or firmware programs, a combinational logic circuit, and/or other suitable components that provide the described functionality.
  • ASIC application specific integrated circuit
  • processor shared, dedicated, or group
  • memory executes one or more software or firmware programs, a combinational logic circuit, and/or other suitable components that provide the described functionality.
  • a module or a sub-module can be embodied in memory as a non-transitory machine-readable storage medium readable by a processing circuit and storing instructions for execution by the processing circuit for performing a method.
  • the modules and sub-modules shown in the Figures may be combined and/or further partitioned.

Abstract

A system for estimating flux linkage in an electric motor includes a flux estimation module that generates estimated flux linkages based on a back electromagnetic force and estimated velocity of the electric motor, the flux linkages having an alpha flux linkage component and a beta flux linkage component, and a velocity estimation module that generates an estimated motor velocity based on the back electromagnetic force and the estimated flux linkages.

Description

    BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • Electric Power Steering (EPS) systems utilize an electric motor, typically a Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machine (PMSM), to provide steering assist to the driver. PMSMs are controlled using a well-known technique called Field Oriented Control (FOC), which allows sinusoidal three phase motor voltage and current signals to be transformed into equivalent signals in a synchronously rotating reference frame, commonly referred to as the DQ reference frame, where the motor voltages and currents become DC quantities. The reference frame transformation requires information of the absolute position of the rotor of the machine, which is usually obtained by using a physical position sensor. Sensorless Control (SC) refers to the class of control schemes in which the motor is controlled without a physical position sensor. SC methods can be classified into two broad categories, namely the Direct Torque Control (DTC) and Field Oriented Control (FOC) methods. While DTC does not require any direct knowledge of the position, FOC relies on direct knowledge of position. In contrast with their sensor based counterpart, SC-FOC schemes employ observers or estimators to obtain the position of the machine, however, the overall control architecture remains identical to a sensor based FOC scheme. EPS systems typically employ a sensor based FOC system for motor control, but SC provides an alternative to provide Fault Tolerant Control (FTC) in order to avoid Loss of Assist (LoA) when the position sensor fails.
  • Most SC algorithms require estimation of the stator flux linkages for the control implementation. For DTC systems, the flux estimation is used for torque estimation, which is then used along with the flux estimates to generate gate signals for the Voltage Source Inverter (VSI) directly. FOC systems require flux estimates in order to estimate the machine velocity and position. For high performance applications such as EPS, it is critical to accurately estimate the stator flux, because errors in these quantities result in direct performance degradation of the overall drive system.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • In some embodiments, a system for estimating flux linkage in an electric motor includes a flux estimation module that generates estimated flux linkages based on a back electromagnetic force and estimated velocity of the electric motor, the flux linkages having an alpha flux linkage component and a beta flux linkage component; and a velocity estimation module that generates an estimated motor velocity based on the back electromagnetic force and the estimated flux linkages.
  • In some embodiments, a method for estimating flux linkage in an electric motor comprises generating estimated flux linkages based on a back electromagnetic force and estimated velocity of the electric motor, the flux linkages having an alpha flux linkage component and a beta flux linkage component, and generating an estimated motor velocity based on the back electromagnetic force and the estimated flux linkages.
  • These and other advantages and features will become more apparent from the following description taken in conjunction with the drawings.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The subject matter which is regarded as the invention is particularly pointed out and distinctly claimed in the claims at the conclusion of the specification. The foregoing and other features, and advantages of the invention are apparent from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
  • FIG. 1 is an exemplary schematic illustration of a motor control system in accordance with some embodiments;
  • FIG. 2 is an exemplary block diagram of a SC-FOC system in accordance with some embodiments;
  • FIG. 3 is an exemplary block diagram of selected components of the control module in accordance with some embodiments;
  • FIG. 4 is flow diagram illustrating a flux estimation module in accordance with some embodiments;
  • FIG. 5 is flow diagram illustrating a flux estimation module in accordance with another embodiment;
  • FIG. 6 is a flow diagram illustrating quadrature signal signature compensator module in accordance with some embodiments; and
  • FIG. 7 is a flow diagram illustrating a velocity estimation module in accordance with some embodiments.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • Referring now to the Figures, where the invention will be described with reference to specific embodiments, without limiting same, FIG. 1 illustrates a motor control system 10 in accordance with one aspect of the invention. In the exemplary embodiments as shown, the motor control system 10 includes a motor 20, an inverter 22, a voltage supply 24, and a control module 30 (also referred to as a controller). The voltage supply 24 supplies a supply voltage VB to the motor 20. In some embodiments, the voltage supply 24 is a 12-volt battery. However, it is to be understood that other types of voltage supplies may be used as well. The inverter 22 is connected to the motor 20 by a plurality of connections 32 (e.g., three connectors) that are labeled as ‘A’, ‘B’ and ‘C’. In some embodiments, the motor 20 is a poly-phase PMSM. In this example, the motor 20 is a three-phase PMSM. The control module 30 is connected to the motor 20 through the inverter 22. The control module 30 receives a motor torque command TCMD from a system 34 such as, for example, a steering control system. The control module 30 includes control logic for sending motor voltage commands to the motor 20 through the inverter 22.
  • The motor 20 is a plant that may be represented by a mathematical model in the DQ reference frame. The following equations may represent the mathematical model,

  • ψd =L d I d−λm

  • ψq =L q I q

  • T eq I d−ψd I q

  • V d =I d R+{dot over (λ)} deλq

  • V q =I q R+{dot over (λ)} q−ωeλd
  • In the above equations, λd and λq are stator flux linkages, Id and Iq are currents, Vd and Vq are voltages and Te is the electromagnetic torque. The machine parameters are the inductances Ld and Lq (which vary with the motor currents), resistance R (which varies with temperature) and magnet flux λm (which varies with both motor currents and temperature).
  • For a non-salient pole machine, such as a Surface Permanent Magnet (SPM) machine, the two machine inductances are equal and are referred to as the synchronous inductance Ls. The synchronous inductance Ls is equal to Ld and Lq, i.e., Ld=Lq=Ls.
  • The plant model in the stationary or αβ reference frame for an SPM machine is as shown below,

  • ψα =L s I α−λm cos θ

  • ψβ =L s I β−λm sin θ

  • T eβ I α−ψα I β

  • V αα +RI α =E α +RI α

  • V ββ +RI β =E β +RI β
  • As referred to above, λα and λβ are stator flux linkages, Iα and Iβ are currents and Vα and Vβ are voltages.
  • The two reference frames are related by the Park transformation shown below,
  • [ α β ] = [ cos θ sin θ sin θ - cos θ ] [ d q ]
  • FIG. 2 is an exemplary block diagram of a SC-FOC system. The control module described in further detail below can be implemented in a SC-FOC system. As shown in the figure, the position is estimated using the flux and velocity estimates. The measured phase currents are transformed into the DQ reference frame using the park transform and a current regulator is used to track the current commands. The voltages computed by current regulator are used along with the estimated position to determine the duty cycles to be applied to the inverter.
  • FIG. 3 is an exemplary block diagram of a portion of the control module 30 in accordance with some embodiments of the invention. As shown, the control module 30 includes several sub-modules including but not limited to a flux estimation module 40 and a velocity estimation module 42. As shown the control module 30 also includes a torque and flux command calculation module 44 and a torque estimation module 46.
  • The flux estimation module 40 and the velocity estimation module 42 provide accurate and robust flux and speed estimation. These modules can be implemented digitally as described herein, and these modules may be tuned for optimization of transient and steady-state responses. Further, a closed-loop position observer may also include at least the flux estimation module 40. The closed-loop position observer may also generate a separate velocity estimate. The various modules and observers may be applied in both DTC and FOC based SC schemes. The proposed can be applied in non-salient pole machines ranging from very low to very high speeds.
  • EPS systems utilize a motor 20 operatively connected to an inverter 22. The motor 20 may be a PMSM to provide steering assist to the driver. A control technique is FOC, which allows the sinusoidal three phase motor voltage and current signals to be transformed into equivalent signals in a synchronously rotating reference frame, commonly referred to as the DQ reference frame, where the motor voltages and currents become DC quantities. The reference frame transformation requires information of the absolute position of the machine, which is usually obtained by using a physical position sensor.
  • SC refers to the class of control schemes in which the motor is controlled without a physical position sensor. SC methods can be classified into two broad categories, namely the DTC and FOC methods. While the former does not require any direct knowledge of the position, the latter relies on direct knowledge of position. In contrast with its sensor based counterpart, SC-FOC schemes employ observers or estimators to obtain the position of the machine, however, the overall control architecture remains identical to a sensor based FOC scheme. EPS systems typically employ a sensor based FOC system for motor control. However, SC provides an attractive alternative to provide FTC in order to avoid LoA when the position sensor fails.
  • Most SC algorithms, whether they belong to the FOC or DTC class, require estimation of the stator flux linkages for the control implementation. For DTC systems, the flux estimation is used for torque estimation, which is then used along with the flux estimates to generate gate signals for the VSI directly. A general SC-DTC architecture employed for PMSMs is shown in FIG. 3.
  • Based on the above equations that relate to the motor 20, the flux linkages may be estimated from the back electromotive force (BEMF), which is calculated from the terminal or commanded voltages and measured currents of the machine using the following equations,

  • ψαβ=∫t 0 t E αβ dt=∫ t 0 t(V αβ −RI αβ)dt
  • The commanded voltages and measured currents are represented by Vαβ and Iαβ, both of which have an alpha and a beta component. Thus, Eαβ includes the respective Vαβ (commanded voltage) and Iαβ (measured currents), each with alpha and beta components. It should be noted that if a measurement of the actual voltages applied to the motor is available, it is preferable to use those instead of commanded voltages.
  • In the s-domain, the integration may be written as,
  • ψ αβ = E αβ s = V αβ - RI αβ s
  • The flux estimation module 40 estimates flux linkages based on the BEMF signals of a power steering motor and an estimated velocity of the power steering motor. The flux estimation module 40 estimates flux linkages based on the motor currents, voltages, and an estimated velocity of the power steering motor.
  • As shown in FIG. 4, the flux estimation module 40 may include a flux estimation high pass filter module (alpha) 48A and a flux estimation high pass filter module (beta) 48B. The flux estimation module 40 may further include a flux estimation low pass filter module (alpha) 50A and a flux estimation low pass filter module (alpha) 50B. The flux estimation high pass filter module (alpha) 48A and the flux estimation low pass filter module (alpha) 50A may filter the alpha component of the BEMF, where the flux estimation high pass filter module (beta) 48B and the flux estimation low pass filter module (beta) 50B may filter the beta component of the BEMF. Although FIG. 4 shows the low pass filter module 50 processing the output of the high pass filter module 48, this configuration can be reversed. Thus, the flux estimation high pass filter modules 48A, 48B can process the respective outputs of the flux estimation low pass filter modules 50A, 50B. The flux estimation high pass filter modules 48A, 48B and the flux estimation low pass filter modules 50A, 50B may be programmable and therefore operate as functions of the estimated motor velocity. Specifically, the flux estimation high pass filter modules 48A, 48B and the flux estimation low pass filter modules 50A, 50B may be individually programmable as a function of the estimated motor velocity. The respective transfer functions GH(s) and GL(s) of the flux estimation high pass filter modules 48A, 48B and the flux estimation low pass filter modules 50A, 50B respectively may be written as follows,
  • G H ( s ) = s s + k H ω ~ e G L ( s ) = 1 s 2 + 2 ζ k L ω ~ e s + k L 2 ω ~ e 2
  • where {tilde over (ω)}e is the estimated motor electrical velocity or synchronous frequency. The flux estimation module 40 applies for a non-standstill condition, and thus the velocity input must be limited to an appropriate lower limit.
  • The flux linkage estimation module 40 of FIG. 4 also includes a quadrature signal signature compensator module 52 that receives the respective outputs of the flux estimation low pass filter modules 50A, 50B in one embodiment. If the filter modules are tuned such that the gain and phase of the composite structure is not substantially identical as that of an integrator, the quadrature signal signature compensator 52 module modulates the filtered output, to ensure the output of the flux estimation module 40 mimics characteristics of a pure integrator in steady-state. Thus, the configuration described in FIG. 4 can be a decoupled cascaded structure, where both signal paths are decoupled, and also as a complimentary structure, where both signals are used to correct each other.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates another embodiment of a flux estimation module. Here, the flux estimation module 40A includes a first set of cascaded first order programmable low pass filter modules 56A, 56B, and a second set of cascaded first order programmable low pass filter modules 58A, 58B, along with a flux estimation high pass filter module (alpha) 48A and a flux estimation high pass filter module (beta) 48B. Importantly, the configuration of the first set 56A, 56B and second set 58A, 58B of cascaded first order programmable low pass filter modules and the flux estimation high pass filter modules 48A, 48B can be reversed. In this case, the transfer functions of the flux estimation high pass filter module (alpha) 48A and the flux estimation high pass filter module (beta) 48B, which includes GH(s), and the two sets of cascaded first order programmable low pass filter modules, which include GLa(s), GLb(s), respectively, are as follows,
  • G H ( s ) = s s + k H ω ~ e G La ( s ) = 1 s + k La ω ~ e G Lb ( s ) = 1 s + k Lb ω ~ e
  • The flux estimation high pass filter module (alpha) 48A and the flux estimation high pass filter module (beta) 48B are configured to remove DC offset in the input and are programmable. The sets of first order programmable low pass filter modules are required to provide a π/2 phase lag of an integrator, and also to compensate the phase lead provided by the flux estimation high pass filter modules 48A, 48B. Accordingly, a cascaded first order programmable low pass filter module design (e.g. a sequential arrangement of low pass filters) is used in this embodiment.
  • The flux estimation module 40A of FIG. 4 also includes a quadrature signal signature compensator module 60A. If the filter modules are tuned such that the gain and phase of the composite structure is not substantially identical as that of an integrator, the quadrature signal signature compensator 60A module modulates the filtered output, to ensure the output of the flux estimation module 40A mimics characteristics of a pure integrator in steady-state. Thus, the configuration described in FIG. 5 can also be a decoupled cascaded structure, where both signal paths are decoupled, and also as a complimentary structure, where both signals are used to correct each other.
  • FIG. 6 illustrates the quadrature signal signature compensator module 60 in more detail. The quadrature signal signature compensator module 60 may perform the compensation according to the following equation,
  • λ ~ αβ = E αβ j γ ω e
  • where γ is the sign of motor velocity. As an example, for the case of a programmable high pass filter module and the doubly cascaded first order programmable low pass filter module as shown in FIG. 5, the aforementioned relationship produces the following correction equations,

  • λαα′|{tilde over (ω)}e|(k H +k La +k Lb −k H k La k Lb)−γ|{tilde over (ω)}eβ′(1−k H k La −k H k Lb −k La k Lb)

  • λββ′|{tilde over (ω)}e|(k H +k La +k Lb −k H k La k Lb)+γ|{tilde over (ω)}eβ′(1−k H k La −k H k Lb −k La k Lb)
  • The quadrature signal signature compensator module 60 of FIG. 6 is also applicable to the quadrature signal signature compensator module 60A shown in FIG. 5. As such, the gain compensation performed by gain compensators 62, 64 of the quadrature signal signature compensator module 60A may be performed by employing the following relationship,
  • λ αβ = E αβ ω ~ e
  • For the case of a programmable high pass filter module 54 and two first order programmable low pass filter modules 56, 58, as shown in FIG. 5, the relationship for the quadrature signal signature compensator module 60A produces the following gain correction equations,

  • αβ″|=|{tilde over (ω)}e|(√{square root over (1+k H 2)}√{square root over (1+k La 2)}√{square root over (1+k Lb 2)})|λαβ′|
  • Thereafter, the phase compensation from to λαβ″ to {tilde over (λ)}αβ may be obtained, using the following relationship.
  • λ ~ αβ = E αβ j γ
  • The flux estimation modules 40, 40A of FIG. 4 and FIG. 5 respectively use motor velocity as a factor for performance.
  • The velocity estimation module 42 is illustrated in more detail in FIG. 7. The velocity estimation module 42 estimates a motor velocity based on the motor currents, the motor voltages and the flux linkage estimates. The structure of the velocity estimation module 42 is a derivative-based design and may employ the following equation,
  • ω ~ e = λ α λ . β - λ β λ . α λ α 2 + λ β 2 = λ α E β - λ β E α λ α 2 + λ β 2
  • From the above equation that the offset errors in measurements will cause errors in the velocity estimate. A filtering scheme including a programmable high pass filter and a gain and phase compensator that utilizes the estimated velocity in a recursive manner is incorporated to remove the DC offset in the measured signals. Specifically, the BEMF inputs are filtered and then used to calculate the velocity.
  • Note that it is possible to use different filter designs for pre-filtering the BEMF signals, as long as the correct input-output relationship is maintained. For a general filter structure, the gain and phase relationships between the inputs and outputs that must be ensured are mentioned below.

  • E αβ( e)=Ê αβ( e)
  • As an example, the filter transfer functions BH(s), BL(s) may be chosen as follows,
  • B H ( s ) = s s + k Hv ω ~ e B L ( s ) = k Lv ω ~ e s + k Lv ω ~ e
  • Since the filter combination is required to remove the DC input and simultaneously retain the original phase of the input, the relationship between the cutoff frequency scalars is obtained as follows,
  • ∠B H ( e ) - ∠B L ( e ) = 0 tan - 1 ( k Hv ) - tan - 1 ( 1 k Lv ) = 0 k Lv = 1 k Hv
  • Further, the gain compensator Bg(s) is chosen so that the original signal amplitude remains intact is, as shown below,

  • B g=1+k Hv 2
  • Since motor speed is fundamentally a low bandwidth signal, it is preferable to filter the estimate with a fixed cutoff low pass filter to filter out high frequency estimation noise. It is also possible to perform the velocity estimation in a low sampling rate control loop to improve software throughput. For the down-sampling process from the flux estimator to the velocity estimator, a properly tuned anti-aliasing filter should be used.
  • A digital implementation of the estimation module may facilitate high performance applications because difference in the magnitude and phase between the designed continuous-time filters and their discrete-time equivalents may cause significant errors in the estimated quantities. Since the frequency of interest for various programmable filters proposed above is the synchronous frequency ωe, the bilinear transform with prewarping with estimated synchronous frequency {tilde over (ω)}e as the critical frequency may be used for the discretization process. In other words, since the response of the programmable filters are required to be exactly correct at the synchronous frequency only, this discretization method ensures that the frequency distortion in the digital implementation is minimal. This is a different (and unique) implementation of the digital system, as the discretization process is partially “online” since the critical frequency is estimated online. The equation for the s to z domain transformation for the proposed discretization is shown as follows,
  • s = ω ~ e tan ( ω ~ e T s 2 ) 1 - z - 1 1 + z - 1
  • For all the other fixed cutoff frequency filters, the direct bilinear transformation may be utilized for the digital implementation. A closed-loop position estimator may be used with the flux linkage and velocity estimators described above for estimating the rotor position.
  • The closed loop observer uses feedback of the estimated position and corrects the synchronous reference frame by regulating the error between the measured currents and estimated currents in the estimated reference frame (using estimated position) to zero. As mentioned earlier, in the process of computing the estimated position, the estimator also produces a velocity estimate.
  • The flux estimates are used along with the estimated position to compute the reference currents.
  • I ~ α1 = λ ~ α + λ m cos θ ~ L s I ~ β1 = λ ~ β + λ m sin θ ~ L s
  • Next, the current errors are computed using the reference and measured currents.

  • ΔI αβ =I αβ1 −Ĩ a
  • The current errors are used along with the estimated position to perform a reference frame transformation.

  • ΔI d =ΔI α cos {tilde over (θ)}+ΔI β sin {tilde over (θ)}

  • ΔI q =ΔI α sin {tilde over (θ)}−ΔI β cos {tilde over (θ)}
  • One of the currents errors, i.e., either d or q, is chosen, and a regulator (following example shows a simple PI regulator, but it should be understood that other regulators may be used) is employed to produce the velocity signal as an estimate.
  • ω ~ e = ( K p + K I s ) Δ I dq
  • The velocity is then integrated to produce the position estimate as follows.
  • θ ~ = ω ~ e s
  • The updated position is used to compute the current errors which are thereafter used to calculate the flux errors as follows.
  • I ~ α2 = λ ~ α + λ m cos θ ~ L s I ~ β2 = λ ~ β + λ m sin θ ~ L s Δ I αβ2 = I αβ2 - I ~ α Δλ αβ = L s Δ I αβ2
  • The flux errors are then used to correct the flux estimates for use in the next loop. It should be noted that the flux corrections are only for position estimation, and is decoupled from the flux linkage and velocity observers proposed earlier. It is clear that this estimator is a Model Reference Adaptive Scheme (MRAS) type observer.
  • As used herein, the term “module” or “sub-module” refers to an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), an electronic circuit, a processor (shared, dedicated, or group) and memory that executes one or more software or firmware programs, a combinational logic circuit, and/or other suitable components that provide the described functionality. When implemented in software, a module or a sub-module can be embodied in memory as a non-transitory machine-readable storage medium readable by a processing circuit and storing instructions for execution by the processing circuit for performing a method. Moreover, the modules and sub-modules shown in the Figures may be combined and/or further partitioned.
  • While the invention has been described in detail in connection with only a limited number of embodiments, it should be readily understood that the invention is not limited to such disclosed embodiments. Rather, the invention can be modified to incorporate any number of variations, alterations, substitutions or equivalent arrangements not heretofore described, but which are commensurate with the spirit and scope of the invention. Additionally, while various embodiments of the invention have been described, it is to be understood that aspects of the invention may include only some of the described embodiments. Accordingly, the invention is not to be seen as limited by the foregoing description.

Claims (20)

Having thus described the invention, it is claimed:
1. A system for estimating flux linkage in an electric motor, the system comprising:
a flux estimation module that generates estimated flux linkages based on a back electromagnetic force and estimated velocity of the electric motor, the flux linkages having an alpha flux linkage component and a beta flux linkage component; and
a velocity estimation module that generates an estimated motor velocity based on the back electromagnetic force and the estimated flux linkages.
2. The system of claim 1, wherein the flux estimation module includes:
a flux estimation high pass filter module that filters the back electromagnetic force signal, thereby generating a high pass output;
a flux estimation low pass filter module that filters the high pass output thereby generating a low pass output, the flux estimation low pass filter module is a second order filter, the flux estimation low pass filter module may include a plurality of first order filters; and
a quadrature signal signature compensator module that generates the flux linkage based on the low pass output and the estimated motor velocity.
3. The system of claim 2, the flux estimation low pass filter module and the flux estimation high pass filter module are digitally implemented using a bilinear with prewarping that uses the estimated motor velocity as a critical frequency.
4. The system of claim 2, wherein the quadrature signal signature compensator module compensates based on a sign of the estimated motor velocity.
5. The system of claim 2, wherein the flux estimation high pass filter module and the flux estimation low pass filter module operate as functions of the estimated motor velocity.
6. The system of claim 1, wherein the velocity estimation module includes:
a velocity estimation high pass filter module that filters the back electromagnetic force signal, thereby generating a high pass output;
a velocity estimation low pass filter module that filters the high pass output thereby generating a low pass output, the velocity estimation low pass filter module is a first order filter.
7. The system of claim 6, the velocity estimation low pass filter module and the velocity estimation high pass filter module are digitally implemented using a bilinear with prewarping that uses the estimated motor velocity as a critical frequency.
8. The system of claim 1, wherein the flux estimation module includes:
a flux estimation low pass filter module that filters the back electromagnetic force signal with a second order filter, thereby generating a low pass output;
a flux estimation high pass filter module that filters the low pass output, thereby generating a high pass output; and
a quadrature signal signature compensator module that generates the flux linkage based on the high pass output.
9. The system of claim 8, the flux estimation low pass filter module and the flux estimation high pass filter module are digitally implemented using a bilinear with prewarping that uses the estimated motor velocity as a critical frequency.
10. The system of claim 1, wherein the velocity estimation module includes:
a velocity estimation low pass filter module that filters the back electromagnetic force signal thereby generating a low pass output, the velocity estimation low pass filter module is a first order filter; and
a velocity estimation high pass filter module that filters the low pass output, thereby generating a high pass output.
11. The system of claim 10, the velocity estimation low pass filter module and the velocity estimation high pass filter module are digitally implemented using a bilinear with prewarping that uses the estimated motor velocity as a critical frequency
12. A method for estimating flux linkage in an electric motor, the method comprising:
generating estimated flux linkages based on a back electromagnetic force and estimated velocity of the electric motor, the flux linkages having an alpha flux linkage component and a beta flux linkage component; and
generating an estimated motor velocity based on the back electromagnetic force and the estimated flux linkages.
13. The method of claim 12, wherein generation of the estimated flux linkages includes:
filtering the back electromagnetic force signal, thereby generating a high pass output;
filtering the high pass output thereby generating a low pass output, the filtering is performed with a second order filter that includes a plurality of first order filters; and
generating the flux linkage based on the low pass output and the estimated motor velocity.
14. The method of claim 13, wherein the generating the flux linkage based on the low pass output includes compensating based on a sign of the estimated motor velocity.
15. The method of claim 13, wherein the filtering is based on functions of the estimated motor velocity.
16. The method of claim 13, wherein the generating the estimated motor velocity includes:
filtering the back electromagnetic force signal, thereby generating a high pass output;
filtering the high pass output with a second order filter, thereby generating a low pass output.
17. The method of claim 16, the filtering is digitally implemented using a bilinear method with prewarping that uses the estimated motor velocity as a critical frequency.
18. The method of claim 13, wherein the generating the estimated flux linkages includes:
filtering the back electromagnetic force signal with a second order filter, thereby generating a low pass output;
filtering the low pass output, thereby generating a high pass output; and
a quadrature signal signature compensator module that generates the flux linkage based on the high pass output.
19. The method of claim 18, the filtering is digitally implemented using a bilinear with prewarping that uses the estimated motor velocity as a critical frequency.
20. The method of claim 13, wherein the generating the estimated motor velocity includes:
filtering the back electromagnetic force signal with a first order filter, thereby generating a low pass output; and
filtering the low pass output with a low pass filter, thereby generating a high pass output.
US15/054,554 2016-02-26 2016-02-26 Flux estimation for fault tolerant control of PMSM machines for EPS Active 2036-05-29 US9985564B2 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US15/054,554 US9985564B2 (en) 2016-02-26 2016-02-26 Flux estimation for fault tolerant control of PMSM machines for EPS
DE102017103727.6A DE102017103727B4 (en) 2016-02-26 2017-02-23 Flux estimation for a fault tolerant control of PMSM machines for electric power steering
CN201710103076.0A CN107248829B (en) 2016-02-26 2017-02-24 Flux estimation for fault tolerant control of PMSM motors for EPS

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US15/054,554 US9985564B2 (en) 2016-02-26 2016-02-26 Flux estimation for fault tolerant control of PMSM machines for EPS

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20170250641A1 true US20170250641A1 (en) 2017-08-31
US9985564B2 US9985564B2 (en) 2018-05-29

Family

ID=59679029

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/054,554 Active 2036-05-29 US9985564B2 (en) 2016-02-26 2016-02-26 Flux estimation for fault tolerant control of PMSM machines for EPS

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US9985564B2 (en)
CN (1) CN107248829B (en)
DE (1) DE102017103727B4 (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN108712122A (en) * 2018-05-29 2018-10-26 广东威灵电机制造有限公司 The discrimination method and device for identifying of the permanent magnet flux linkage of permanent magnet synchronous motor
CN108736781A (en) * 2018-05-29 2018-11-02 广东威灵电机制造有限公司 The discrimination method and device for identifying of the permanent magnet flux linkage of non-salient pole permanent magnet synchronous motor
US11196371B2 (en) * 2020-01-10 2021-12-07 DRiV Automotive Inc. Sensorless position detection for electric motor
JP7095760B1 (en) * 2021-01-14 2022-07-05 株式会社安川電機 Control device, magnetic flux estimation device and magnetic flux estimation method

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109067284B (en) * 2018-08-15 2021-01-15 江门市蒙德电气股份有限公司 Motor control method and device based on filtering error
EP3627691B1 (en) 2018-09-18 2022-05-04 Goodrich Actuation Systems Limited Use of motor flux linkage maps for monitoring the health of an actuator
CN109768741B (en) * 2019-03-26 2021-01-05 北京航空航天大学 Drive controller for permanent magnet fault-tolerant motor of airborne electric power actuator and control method
FR3097090B1 (en) 2019-06-04 2021-05-21 Renault Sas Method for estimating the electromagnetic torque of a synchronous electric machine
FR3106894B1 (en) 2020-02-04 2021-12-24 Renault Sas Method for estimating the electromagnetic torque of a synchronous electric machine

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6841969B1 (en) * 2003-09-24 2005-01-11 General Motors Corporation Flux observer in a sensorless controller for permanent magnet motors
US20090218965A1 (en) * 2005-12-23 2009-09-03 Connel Brett Williams Electric Motor Control
US20150268283A1 (en) * 2014-03-24 2015-09-24 Maxon Motor Ag Method for determining the position of a rotor of a polyphase motor
US9682336B2 (en) * 2014-05-28 2017-06-20 Ingersoll-Rand Company Impact moisture separator

Family Cites Families (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP4475368B2 (en) 2000-03-10 2010-06-09 富士電機システムズ株式会社 Speed sensorless vector controller
KR100371369B1 (en) 2000-08-18 2003-02-06 엘지산전 주식회사 Vector control system of induction motor
CN2749178Y (en) * 2004-11-26 2005-12-28 南京航空航天大学 A brushless DC motor speed regulator based on direct torque control (DTC) of fundamental wave method
KR100645807B1 (en) 2004-12-06 2007-02-28 엘지전자 주식회사 Apparatus and method for startup synchronous reluctance motor
US8340848B2 (en) * 2007-11-29 2012-12-25 GM Global Technology Operations LLC Method and system for sensorless control of an electric motor
US8736222B2 (en) 2010-10-15 2014-05-27 Lsis Co., Ltd. Flux controller for induction motor
EP2552015B1 (en) 2011-07-28 2018-05-16 Vestas Wind Systems A/S A method of position sensorless control of an electrical machine
US9106177B2 (en) * 2012-01-05 2015-08-11 GM Global Technology Operations LLC Method and system for sensorless control of an electric motor
EP2706659A1 (en) * 2012-09-06 2014-03-12 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft System for correcting an estimated position of a rotor of an electrical machine
CN103944482B (en) * 2014-05-12 2016-08-24 阳光电源股份有限公司 Stator magnetic linkage, electromagnetic torque observation procedure and respectively apply two kinds of methods device

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6841969B1 (en) * 2003-09-24 2005-01-11 General Motors Corporation Flux observer in a sensorless controller for permanent magnet motors
US20090218965A1 (en) * 2005-12-23 2009-09-03 Connel Brett Williams Electric Motor Control
US20150268283A1 (en) * 2014-03-24 2015-09-24 Maxon Motor Ag Method for determining the position of a rotor of a polyphase motor
US9682336B2 (en) * 2014-05-28 2017-06-20 Ingersoll-Rand Company Impact moisture separator

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN108712122A (en) * 2018-05-29 2018-10-26 广东威灵电机制造有限公司 The discrimination method and device for identifying of the permanent magnet flux linkage of permanent magnet synchronous motor
CN108736781A (en) * 2018-05-29 2018-11-02 广东威灵电机制造有限公司 The discrimination method and device for identifying of the permanent magnet flux linkage of non-salient pole permanent magnet synchronous motor
US11196371B2 (en) * 2020-01-10 2021-12-07 DRiV Automotive Inc. Sensorless position detection for electric motor
JP7095760B1 (en) * 2021-01-14 2022-07-05 株式会社安川電機 Control device, magnetic flux estimation device and magnetic flux estimation method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE102017103727A1 (en) 2017-12-14
CN107248829B (en) 2020-10-20
DE102017103727B4 (en) 2022-04-21
US9985564B2 (en) 2018-05-29
CN107248829A (en) 2017-10-13

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9985564B2 (en) Flux estimation for fault tolerant control of PMSM machines for EPS
US9806656B1 (en) Fault tolerant phase current measurement for motor control systems
EP2961058B1 (en) Decoupling current control utilizing direct plant modification in electric power steering system
Kim et al. An improved rotor position estimation with vector-tracking observer in PMSM drives with low-resolution hall-effect sensors
US9966890B2 (en) Detection of offset errors in phase current measurement for motor control system
US8283881B2 (en) Methods, systems and apparatus for synchronous current regulation of a five-phase machine
CN111162707B (en) Permanent magnet synchronous motor finite set model-free fault-tolerant predictive control method and system
US9873450B2 (en) Detection of offset errors in phase current measurement for motor control system
EP2706659A1 (en) System for correcting an estimated position of a rotor of an electrical machine
US8896249B2 (en) Method of position sensorless control of an electrical machine
US20160156297A1 (en) Motor drive system, motor control apparatus and motor control method
CN110073590A (en) Control system for motor circuit
Yuan et al. A simple three-degree-of-freedom digital current controller with dead beat response for AC machines
Pang et al. Sensorless control of electrically excited synchronous machines considering magnetic saturation and flux linkage dynamics for automotive applications
CN116345975A (en) Double three-phase permanent magnet synchronous motor system and angle compensation method and device thereof
US10404197B2 (en) Feedforward control of permanent magnet DC motors
US11139765B1 (en) Dynamic decoupling control with active noise cancellation
CN111049457B (en) Current mode control in an electric power steering system using motor reverse decoupling
US20220038038A1 (en) Method for determining the magnetic flux of an electric machine
US11936316B2 (en) Position estimation for permanent magnet synchronous machines via rotor flux space vector identification
Pak et al. Sensorless vector control of permanent magnetic synchronous motor with parameter error compensation
Kuruppu et al. Position sensor offset quantification in PMSM drives via current estimation
Zeng et al. Nonlinear flux observer based on extended flux model for sensorless control of IPMSM in electric vehicles
US11378597B2 (en) Closed-loop compensation of current measurement offset errors in alternating current motor drives
JP7269152B2 (en) rotary motor controller

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: STEERING SOLUTIONS IP HOLDING CORPORATION, MICHIGA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:PRAMOD, PRERIT;MITRA, RAKESH;REEL/FRAME:037839/0578

Effective date: 20160224

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1551); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 4