US20160290349A1 - Control method for the accerlation of a vacuum pump, in which method the input current of the control device is limited - Google Patents
Control method for the accerlation of a vacuum pump, in which method the input current of the control device is limited Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20160290349A1 US20160290349A1 US15/035,893 US201415035893A US2016290349A1 US 20160290349 A1 US20160290349 A1 US 20160290349A1 US 201415035893 A US201415035893 A US 201415035893A US 2016290349 A1 US2016290349 A1 US 2016290349A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- acceleration
- acceleration phase
- control device
- control method
- input current
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F04—POSITIVE - DISPLACEMENT MACHINES FOR LIQUIDS; PUMPS FOR LIQUIDS OR ELASTIC FLUIDS
- F04D—NON-POSITIVE-DISPLACEMENT PUMPS
- F04D27/00—Control, e.g. regulation, of pumps, pumping installations or pumping systems specially adapted for elastic fluids
- F04D27/004—Control, e.g. regulation, of pumps, pumping installations or pumping systems specially adapted for elastic fluids by varying driving speed
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F04—POSITIVE - DISPLACEMENT MACHINES FOR LIQUIDS; PUMPS FOR LIQUIDS OR ELASTIC FLUIDS
- F04D—NON-POSITIVE-DISPLACEMENT PUMPS
- F04D19/00—Axial-flow pumps
- F04D19/02—Multi-stage pumps
- F04D19/04—Multi-stage pumps specially adapted to the production of a high vacuum, e.g. molecular pumps
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F04—POSITIVE - DISPLACEMENT MACHINES FOR LIQUIDS; PUMPS FOR LIQUIDS OR ELASTIC FLUIDS
- F04D—NON-POSITIVE-DISPLACEMENT PUMPS
- F04D25/00—Pumping installations or systems
- F04D25/02—Units comprising pumps and their driving means
- F04D25/06—Units comprising pumps and their driving means the pump being electrically driven
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F04—POSITIVE - DISPLACEMENT MACHINES FOR LIQUIDS; PUMPS FOR LIQUIDS OR ELASTIC FLUIDS
- F04D—NON-POSITIVE-DISPLACEMENT PUMPS
- F04D27/00—Control, e.g. regulation, of pumps, pumping installations or pumping systems specially adapted for elastic fluids
- F04D27/02—Surge control
- F04D27/0261—Surge control by varying driving speed
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
- H02P—CONTROL OR REGULATION OF ELECTRIC MOTORS, ELECTRIC GENERATORS OR DYNAMO-ELECTRIC CONVERTERS; CONTROLLING TRANSFORMERS, REACTORS OR CHOKE COILS
- H02P23/00—Arrangements or methods for the control of AC motors characterised by a control method other than vector control
- H02P23/0086—Arrangements or methods for the control of AC motors characterised by a control method other than vector control specially adapted for high speeds, e.g. above nominal speed
- H02P23/009—Arrangements or methods for the control of AC motors characterised by a control method other than vector control specially adapted for high speeds, e.g. above nominal speed using field weakening
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
- H02P—CONTROL OR REGULATION OF ELECTRIC MOTORS, ELECTRIC GENERATORS OR DYNAMO-ELECTRIC CONVERTERS; CONTROLLING TRANSFORMERS, REACTORS OR CHOKE COILS
- H02P6/00—Arrangements for controlling synchronous motors or other dynamo-electric motors using electronic commutation dependent on the rotor position; Electronic commutators therefor
- H02P6/20—Arrangements for starting
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F05—INDEXING SCHEMES RELATING TO ENGINES OR PUMPS IN VARIOUS SUBCLASSES OF CLASSES F01-F04
- F05D—INDEXING SCHEME FOR ASPECTS RELATING TO NON-POSITIVE-DISPLACEMENT MACHINES OR ENGINES, GAS-TURBINES OR JET-PROPULSION PLANTS
- F05D2260/00—Function
- F05D2260/85—Starting
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02B—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO BUILDINGS, e.g. HOUSING, HOUSE APPLIANCES OR RELATED END-USER APPLICATIONS
- Y02B30/00—Energy efficient heating, ventilation or air conditioning [HVAC]
- Y02B30/70—Efficient control or regulation technologies, e.g. for control of refrigerant flow, motor or heating
Definitions
- the invention relates to a control method for the acceleration of a vacuum pump, in particular a turbomolecular pump.
- Vacuum pumps such as turbomolecular pumps, have a rotatably supported rotor shaft in a pump housing.
- the rotor shaft carries at least one rotor that in the case of turbomolecular pumps comprises a plurality of rotor discs.
- the rotor cooperates with a stator which in the case of a turbomolecular pump is a stator with a plurality of stator discs, with the stator discs being arranged between the rotor discs.
- the rotor shaft is driven by an electric motor that usually is arranged directly on the rotor shaft.
- a control device is provided that is arranged either inside or outside the pump housing and that controls the vacuum pump according to different operating parameters.
- a particularly critical moment is the control of the acceleration of the vacuum pump.
- the pump is run from standstill or a very low rotational speed to the rated speed or the operating speed at which the vacuum pump has the maximum output.
- Such an acceleration of a pump is often required in particular in dynamic processes.
- a maximum current is allowed at the electric motor during acceleration. This maximum current is constant during acceleration until the rated speed of the vacuum pump is reached.
- the motor current decreases to an operating value. The same may vary depending on the quantity of gas to be conveyed and on the type of gas, but does not reach the maximum value reached during acceleration.
- the present control method for the acceleration of a vacuum pump is based on the insight that the motor current is not the essential critical parameter with respect to a demanded downsizing of the power supply unit or a shortening of the acceleration time.
- the motor has to be designed in particular with regard to mechanical conditions. As a result a maximum allowable motor current is usually reached neither during acceleration, nor during the operation of the vacuum pump. Tests have shown that the essential pertinent parameter is the input current of the control device.
- the input current of the control device is limited to a maximum value during a first acceleration phase.
- the input current rises to the maximum value.
- the control device is operated at the maximum value of the input current, wherein the rated speed of the vacuum pump is reached in particular at the end of the second acceleration phase.
- the technically allowable maximum current of the motor is not exceeded.
- the acceleration time can be reduced compared to a limitation of the motor current.
- the acceleration can be shortened.
- the input current drops to an operating value in the control device after the second acceleration phase has been run through. An overload of the control device will thus not occur in normal operation even for varying types of gas or quantities of gas.
- the input current of the control device rises in the first acceleration phase.
- this is an increase to the predefined maximum value, wherein this increase is in particular constant.
- the input current of the control device thus reaches its maximum value at the end of the first acceleration phase.
- the motor current is constant in the first acceleration phase. In particular, this is a maximum value of the motor current that is not exceeded during operation. However, this does not have to be the maximum allowable motor current. The same may possibly even higher, as long as this is allowable in view of mechanical conditions.
- the motor current decreases during the second acceleration phase. The decrease in motor current during the second acceleration phase preferably corresponds to an e-function. During the operation following the second acceleration phase, the motor current drops to an operating value. The same may vary in particular in dependence on the type and quantity of the gas conveyed, but is always lower than the maximum current applied during the first acceleration phase.
- the rotational speed of the vacuum pump preferably rises during both acceleration phases.
- the rotational speed increases faster or steeper in the first phase than in the second acceleration phase.
- the increase in rotational speed is linear in the first acceleration phase.
- the increase in rotational speed preferably follows an e-function.
- the system capacity is always lower than the motor capacity.
- the maximum allowable motor current is reduced to 2.8 A, due to a demand for a use of a power supply unit with a lower rated power, the maximum input current also decreases to 2.4 A.
- the acceleration time is extended to 1244 s.
- FIG. 1 is a graph showing acceleration according to prior art at maximum motor current
- FIG. 2 is a diagram showing acceleration according to prior art at reduced motor current
- FIG. 3 is a diagram showing an acceleration according to a preferred embodiment of the control method of the present invention.
- FIG. 1 illustrates a control method according to prior art which allows a maximum motor current I M,max .
- the motor current represented by a solid line increases to I M,max at a time t 1 .
- the motor current is then kept constant until a time t 3 .
- the rotational speed of the vacuum pump represented by a dotted line has reached the rated speed.
- the vacuum pump then runs in normal operation, where fluctuations in the quantity of gas or the type of gas conveyed may possibly occur. This results in variations of the motor current.
- FIG. 1 shows the course of the input current in a dashed line.
- the input current of the control device increases continuously from the start of acceleration t 1 and, similar to the motor current, varies during operation between the times t 3 and t 6 in dependence on the type of gas and the quantity of gas conveyed, for example.
- the input current of the control unit illustrated as a dashed line rises continuously from t 1 to t 5 , with the motor current being reduced to I M,red , and then varies during operation between t 5 and t 6 .
- the control method of the present invention as schematically illustrated in FIG. 3 has been developed.
- the acceleration was divided in two phases.
- the first phase is the period t 1 to t 2 and the second acceleration phase is t 2 to t 4 .
- the input current of the control device which is shown as a dashed line, is limited to an input current I S,max .
- the first acceleration phase i.e.
- the input current of the control means constantly rises up to the predetermined maximum value I S,max .
- the rotational speed also rises continuously, but does not yet reach the rated speed n max .
- the motor current I m is constant during this first phase.
- the input current of the control device is limited to the maximum value I S,max .
- the rise in the rated speed follows an e-function. Tests have shown that, as is also evident from the schematic graphs, the acceleration time can be reduced to the time, when the rated speed n max is reached.
- the maximum speed is reached at a time t 4 . This time is earlier than the time t 6 ( FIG. 2 ) when the maximum motor current is reduced. In normal operation between the times t 4 and t 6 the rated speed remains constant and the input current of the control device can vary.
- the second acceleration phase i.e. between the times t 2 and t 4 , declines in particular corresponding to an e-function and varies during operation between the times t 4 and t 6 , if for example the type of gas or the quantity of gas changes.
- the method of the present invention can also be used to reduce the acceleration time as compared to the acceleration time illustrated in FIG. 1 .
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Power Engineering (AREA)
- Non-Positive Displacement Air Blowers (AREA)
- Motor And Converter Starters (AREA)
- Control Of Electric Motors In General (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The invention relates to a control method for the acceleration of a vacuum pump, in particular a turbomolecular pump.
- Vacuum pumps, such as turbomolecular pumps, have a rotatably supported rotor shaft in a pump housing. The rotor shaft carries at least one rotor that in the case of turbomolecular pumps comprises a plurality of rotor discs. The rotor cooperates with a stator which in the case of a turbomolecular pump is a stator with a plurality of stator discs, with the stator discs being arranged between the rotor discs. The rotor shaft is driven by an electric motor that usually is arranged directly on the rotor shaft. Further, a control device is provided that is arranged either inside or outside the pump housing and that controls the vacuum pump according to different operating parameters.
- A particularly critical moment is the control of the acceleration of the vacuum pump. Here, the pump is run from standstill or a very low rotational speed to the rated speed or the operating speed at which the vacuum pump has the maximum output. Such an acceleration of a pump is often required in particular in dynamic processes. In known pumps, in particular turbomolecular pumps, a maximum current is allowed at the electric motor during acceleration. This maximum current is constant during acceleration until the rated speed of the vacuum pump is reached. When the vacuum pump is operated at the rated speed, the motor current decreases to an operating value. The same may vary depending on the quantity of gas to be conveyed and on the type of gas, but does not reach the maximum value reached during acceleration.
- At times there is a demand to provide smaller, less powerful power supply unit for the vacuum pump. These are power supply units which, different from conventional power supply units, are not designed for the nominal power of the pump, but have a lower nominal power. In an attempt to meet this demand for smaller power supply units it is known to reduce the maximum current of the electric motor allowable during acceleration. It may well be possible to thereby use smaller power supply units, but the acceleration time until the rated speed of the vacuum pump is reached becomes longer.
- It is an object of the present invention to possibly reduce the increase in acceleration time also when power supply units are used that have a lower nominal power than the pump or the pump electronics, or to reduce the acceleration time when high-capacity power supply units are used.
- The object is achieved according to the invention with the features of
claim 1. - The present control method for the acceleration of a vacuum pump, in particular a turbomolecular pump, is based on the insight that the motor current is not the essential critical parameter with respect to a demanded downsizing of the power supply unit or a shortening of the acceleration time. The motor has to be designed in particular with regard to mechanical conditions. As a result a maximum allowable motor current is usually reached neither during acceleration, nor during the operation of the vacuum pump. Tests have shown that the essential pertinent parameter is the input current of the control device.
- According to the control method of the present invention the input current of the control device is limited to a maximum value during a first acceleration phase. Thus, in the first acceleration phase, the input current rises to the maximum value. Thereafter, in a second acceleration phase, the control device is operated at the maximum value of the input current, wherein the rated speed of the vacuum pump is reached in particular at the end of the second acceleration phase. In such a control method, the technically allowable maximum current of the motor is not exceeded. As such, when a smaller power supply unit is used, the acceleration time can be reduced compared to a limitation of the motor current. Similarly, when a high-capacity power supply unit is used, the acceleration can be shortened.
- It is preferred that the input current drops to an operating value in the control device after the second acceleration phase has been run through. An overload of the control device will thus not occur in normal operation even for varying types of gas or quantities of gas.
- Further, it is preferred that the input current of the control device rises in the first acceleration phase. In particular, this is an increase to the predefined maximum value, wherein this increase is in particular constant. Preferably the input current of the control device thus reaches its maximum value at the end of the first acceleration phase.
- It is further preferred that the motor current is constant in the first acceleration phase. In particular, this is a maximum value of the motor current that is not exceeded during operation. However, this does not have to be the maximum allowable motor current. The same may possibly even higher, as long as this is allowable in view of mechanical conditions. Preferably the motor current decreases during the second acceleration phase. The decrease in motor current during the second acceleration phase preferably corresponds to an e-function. During the operation following the second acceleration phase, the motor current drops to an operating value. The same may vary in particular in dependence on the type and quantity of the gas conveyed, but is always lower than the maximum current applied during the first acceleration phase.
- The rotational speed of the vacuum pump preferably rises during both acceleration phases. Preferably the rotational speed increases faster or steeper in the first phase than in the second acceleration phase. Preferably the increase in rotational speed is linear in the first acceleration phase. In the second acceleration phase the increase in rotational speed preferably follows an e-function.
- Preferably there is a marginal condition during the control method of the present invention that the system capacity is always lower than the motor capacity.
- Tests have shown that in a vacuum pump without reduction of the motor current, i.e. in a method according to common prior art, the input current of the control device rises to maximally 7.3 A, while the motor current reaches a maximum value of 7.8 A. The acceleration time to the maximum rotational speed of the vacuum pump is 350 s in this case.
- If, as is further known from prior art, the maximum allowable motor current is reduced to 2.8 A, due to a demand for a use of a power supply unit with a lower rated power, the maximum input current also decreases to 2.4 A. However, the acceleration time is extended to 1244 s.
- An exemplary test has shown that, if the control method of the present invention is used, the acceleration time can be reduced drastically to 628 s. Here, the maximum input current of the control device is 2.5 A and the maximum motor current is 2.8 A.
- The following is a detailed explanation of the invention with reference to different graphs in comparison with prior art.
- In the Figures:
-
FIG. 1 is a graph showing acceleration according to prior art at maximum motor current, -
FIG. 2 is a diagram showing acceleration according to prior art at reduced motor current, -
FIG. 3 is a diagram showing an acceleration according to a preferred embodiment of the control method of the present invention. -
FIG. 1 illustrates a control method according to prior art which allows a maximum motor current IM,max. At the beginning of the acceleration the motor current represented by a solid line increases to IM,max at a time t1. The motor current is then kept constant until a time t3. At this time, the rotational speed of the vacuum pump represented by a dotted line has reached the rated speed. Up to a time t6 the vacuum pump then runs in normal operation, where fluctuations in the quantity of gas or the type of gas conveyed may possibly occur. This results in variations of the motor current. Further,FIG. 1 shows the course of the input current in a dashed line. The input current of the control device increases continuously from the start of acceleration t1 and, similar to the motor current, varies during operation between the times t3 and t6 in dependence on the type of gas and the quantity of gas conveyed, for example. - For a downsizing of the power supply unit, it is known to reduce the motor current. This is schematically illustrated in
FIG. 2 , with the motor current reduced to IM,red. At a time t1 the motor current thus rises to IM,red and is kept on that value until the vacuum pump has reached its rated speed. Due to the reduction of the motor current, the rated speed nmax is reached only at the time t5. Between the times t5 and t6, the operation in which the motor current may vary is again shown schematically. Corresponding to the operation at maximum motor current, the input current of the control unit illustrated as a dashed line rises continuously from t1 to t5, with the motor current being reduced to IM,red, and then varies during operation between t5 and t6. - In particular, it is also evident from the graphs in
FIG. 1 andFIG. 2 that the input current of the control device does not exceed the current of the motor. Since it has further been found that, possibly due to mechanical requirements to be met by the motor, a maximum allowable current in the motor is higher than the current IM,max, the control method of the present invention as schematically illustrated inFIG. 3 has been developed. Here, the acceleration was divided in two phases. The first phase is the period t1 to t2 and the second acceleration phase is t2 to t4. According to the invention, in a first acceleration phase, the input current of the control device, which is shown as a dashed line, is limited to an input current IS,max. In the first acceleration phase, i.e. up to the time t2, the input current of the control means constantly rises up to the predetermined maximum value IS,max. During this first acceleration phase the rotational speed also rises continuously, but does not yet reach the rated speed nmax. The motor current Im is constant during this first phase. - In the second phase the input current of the control device is limited to the maximum value IS,max. This causes a further, although slower rise in the rotational speed of the vacuum pump until the rated speed nmax is reached. The rise in the rated speed follows an e-function. Tests have shown that, as is also evident from the schematic graphs, the acceleration time can be reduced to the time, when the rated speed nmax is reached. The maximum speed is reached at a time t4. This time is earlier than the time t6 (
FIG. 2 ) when the maximum motor current is reduced. In normal operation between the times t4 and t6 the rated speed remains constant and the input current of the control device can vary. - In the second acceleration phase, i.e. between the times t2 and t4, declines in particular corresponding to an e-function and varies during operation between the times t4 and t6, if for example the type of gas or the quantity of gas changes.
- The method of the present invention has been described above with reference to the demand for the use of a smaller power supply unit. As has been explained, in particular with reference to
FIG. 3 , the use of a smaller power supply unit makes it possible to reduce the acceleration time with respect to the acceleration time achieved when the motor current s reduced. - Correspondingly, when conventional power supply units are used, the method of the present invention can also be used to reduce the acceleration time as compared to the acceleration time illustrated in
FIG. 1 .
Claims (10)
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE102013223276.4A DE102013223276A1 (en) | 2013-11-14 | 2013-11-14 | Control method for a run-up of a vacuum pump |
DE102013223276.4 | 2013-11-14 | ||
PCT/EP2014/074517 WO2015071372A1 (en) | 2013-11-14 | 2014-11-13 | Control method for the acceleration of a vacuum pump, in which method the input current of the control device is limited |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20160290349A1 true US20160290349A1 (en) | 2016-10-06 |
Family
ID=51982534
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US15/035,893 Abandoned US20160290349A1 (en) | 2013-11-14 | 2014-11-13 | Control method for the accerlation of a vacuum pump, in which method the input current of the control device is limited |
Country Status (7)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20160290349A1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP3069028A1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2016538463A (en) |
KR (1) | KR20160083877A (en) |
CN (1) | CN105765230B (en) |
DE (1) | DE102013223276A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2015071372A1 (en) |
Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6739840B2 (en) * | 2002-05-22 | 2004-05-25 | Applied Materials Inc | Speed control of variable speed pump |
US20090039820A1 (en) * | 2007-08-08 | 2009-02-12 | Milano Shaun D | Motor controller having a multifunction port |
US7729148B2 (en) * | 2006-11-27 | 2010-06-01 | Abb Oy | Method for thermal protection of frequency converter and a frequency converter |
US20120068636A1 (en) * | 2010-09-16 | 2012-03-22 | Fanuc Corporation | Motor driving apparatus |
US20130106334A1 (en) * | 2011-10-31 | 2013-05-02 | Yilcan Guzelgunler | Variable speed motor power de-rating (limiting) system and method for operating a motor with the same |
US20140097784A1 (en) * | 2012-10-10 | 2014-04-10 | Control Techniques Limited | Rotor Control |
Family Cites Families (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE3942003A1 (en) * | 1989-12-20 | 1991-06-27 | Thomson Brandt Gmbh | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR CONTROLLING AN ELECTRONICALLY COMMUTED MOTOR |
DE4113068A1 (en) * | 1991-04-22 | 1992-11-05 | Leybold Ag | Ascertaining or regulating RPM of async. motor - altering frequency of variable voltage or current source until characteristic signal indicates switching between motor and generator modes |
JPH0622577A (en) * | 1992-06-29 | 1994-01-28 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp | Controller for motor |
FI113815B (en) * | 2001-09-03 | 2004-06-15 | Abb Oy | A method for changing engine group speed |
DE10223869A1 (en) * | 2002-05-29 | 2003-12-11 | Leybold Vakuum Gmbh | Two-shaft vacuum pump |
JP2004197644A (en) * | 2002-12-18 | 2004-07-15 | Toyota Industries Corp | Controller for vacuum pump |
JP4527961B2 (en) * | 2003-10-27 | 2010-08-18 | 株式会社大阪真空機器製作所 | Molecular pump rotation control device |
GB0508872D0 (en) * | 2005-04-29 | 2005-06-08 | Boc Group Plc | Method of operating a pumping system |
FR2921772A1 (en) * | 2007-10-01 | 2009-04-03 | Renault Sas | METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THE ELECTRIC POWER SUPPLY OF A VARIABLE RELUCTANCE ELECTRIC MACHINE |
JP5606315B2 (en) * | 2008-08-05 | 2014-10-15 | エドワーズ株式会社 | Magnetic bearing device and vacuum pump equipped with the magnetic bearing device |
KR101272393B1 (en) * | 2012-02-10 | 2013-06-07 | 엘에스산전 주식회사 | Apparatus for controlling inverter |
-
2013
- 2013-11-14 DE DE102013223276.4A patent/DE102013223276A1/en active Pending
-
2014
- 2014-11-13 CN CN201480061310.2A patent/CN105765230B/en active Active
- 2014-11-13 EP EP14802836.8A patent/EP3069028A1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2014-11-13 US US15/035,893 patent/US20160290349A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2014-11-13 JP JP2016530997A patent/JP2016538463A/en active Pending
- 2014-11-13 WO PCT/EP2014/074517 patent/WO2015071372A1/en active Application Filing
- 2014-11-13 KR KR1020167012515A patent/KR20160083877A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
Patent Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6739840B2 (en) * | 2002-05-22 | 2004-05-25 | Applied Materials Inc | Speed control of variable speed pump |
US7729148B2 (en) * | 2006-11-27 | 2010-06-01 | Abb Oy | Method for thermal protection of frequency converter and a frequency converter |
US20090039820A1 (en) * | 2007-08-08 | 2009-02-12 | Milano Shaun D | Motor controller having a multifunction port |
US20120068636A1 (en) * | 2010-09-16 | 2012-03-22 | Fanuc Corporation | Motor driving apparatus |
US20130106334A1 (en) * | 2011-10-31 | 2013-05-02 | Yilcan Guzelgunler | Variable speed motor power de-rating (limiting) system and method for operating a motor with the same |
US20140097784A1 (en) * | 2012-10-10 | 2014-04-10 | Control Techniques Limited | Rotor Control |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN105765230B (en) | 2018-06-12 |
WO2015071372A1 (en) | 2015-05-21 |
CN105765230A (en) | 2016-07-13 |
DE102013223276A1 (en) | 2015-05-21 |
JP2016538463A (en) | 2016-12-08 |
EP3069028A1 (en) | 2016-09-21 |
KR20160083877A (en) | 2016-07-12 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
JP6277796B2 (en) | Electric pump | |
US10778068B2 (en) | Rotating electrical machine cooling structure, and control method thereof | |
CN109477473B (en) | Method and device for oscillation compensation in a reciprocating compressor | |
US9287808B2 (en) | Motor controller and construction machine provided therewith | |
CN104980067A (en) | DC brushless motor system for drainage motor, and DC brushless motor control method and control apparatus for drainage motor | |
CN111556923B (en) | Internal combustion engine, and open-loop control and closed-loop control mechanism and method for internal combustion engine | |
US10465677B2 (en) | Control method for compressor system | |
EP2624436B1 (en) | Method for controlling inverter and system | |
US20160290349A1 (en) | Control method for the accerlation of a vacuum pump, in which method the input current of the control device is limited | |
EP3681032B1 (en) | Vacuum pump and motor control device | |
US20160160782A1 (en) | Method of diagnosing electronic water pump of engine | |
US10931218B2 (en) | Vacuum pump drive with star-delta switchover | |
US11473584B2 (en) | Method of starting a fan using an open loop starting stage with a decreasing drive signal value | |
EP2599212A2 (en) | Method for starting a single-phase induction motor | |
JP2018139491A (en) | Dc motor driving device and ceiling embedded ventilation device comprising the same | |
JP6357648B2 (en) | DC motor drive device and ceiling-embedded ventilator equipped with the same | |
US9641116B2 (en) | Method and device for operating an asynchronous machine, and an asynchronous machine | |
US11933309B2 (en) | Method of starting a fan using an open loop starting stage with a decreasing drive signal value | |
TWI707534B (en) | Dry vacuum pump device, method of controlling same, and program of controlling same | |
JP6357649B2 (en) | DC motor drive device and ceiling-embedded ventilator equipped with the same | |
US10794318B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for operating an EC-fuel pump | |
US10566921B2 (en) | Induction machine having a customized field-forming current component | |
JP5386611B2 (en) | Compressor and control method of compressor | |
JP2017089524A (en) | Electric compressor | |
JP6398273B2 (en) | Generator shutdown method and generator system |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: OERLIKON LEYBOLD VACUUM GMBH, GERMANY Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:LIESSMANN, MARKUS;REEL/FRAME:039213/0732 Effective date: 20160525 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: LEYBOLD GMBH, GERMANY Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:OERLIKON LEYBOLD VACUUM GMBH;REEL/FRAME:040653/0016 Effective date: 20160901 |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |