US20160244574A1 - Electrochemically engineered surface of hydrogels, particularly peg hydrogels, for enhanced cellular penetration - Google Patents

Electrochemically engineered surface of hydrogels, particularly peg hydrogels, for enhanced cellular penetration Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20160244574A1
US20160244574A1 US15/025,558 US201415025558A US2016244574A1 US 20160244574 A1 US20160244574 A1 US 20160244574A1 US 201415025558 A US201415025558 A US 201415025558A US 2016244574 A1 US2016244574 A1 US 2016244574A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
polymer
polymer structure
linking density
hydrogel
cells
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US15/025,558
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Vincent Milleret
Benjamin R. SIMONA
Janos Voros
Martin EHRBAR
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Eidgenoessische Technische Hochschule Zurich ETHZ
Universitaet Zuerich
Original Assignee
Eidgenoessische Technische Hochschule Zurich ETHZ
Universitaet Zuerich
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from EP13186561.0A external-priority patent/EP2853620A1/fr
Application filed by Eidgenoessische Technische Hochschule Zurich ETHZ, Universitaet Zuerich filed Critical Eidgenoessische Technische Hochschule Zurich ETHZ
Assigned to ETH ZURICH reassignment ETH ZURICH ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: SIMONA, Benjamin R., VOROS, JANOS
Assigned to UNIVERSITAT ZURICH reassignment UNIVERSITAT ZURICH ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: EHRBAR, MARTIN, MILLERET, Vincent
Publication of US20160244574A1 publication Critical patent/US20160244574A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C08—ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
    • C08J—WORKING-UP; GENERAL PROCESSES OF COMPOUNDING; AFTER-TREATMENT NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C08B, C08C, C08F, C08G or C08H
    • C08J3/00—Processes of treating or compounding macromolecular substances
    • C08J3/02—Making solutions, dispersions, lattices or gels by other methods than by solution, emulsion or suspension polymerisation techniques
    • C08J3/03—Making solutions, dispersions, lattices or gels by other methods than by solution, emulsion or suspension polymerisation techniques in aqueous media
    • C08J3/075—Macromolecular gels
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C08—ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
    • C08G—MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS OBTAINED OTHERWISE THAN BY REACTIONS ONLY INVOLVING UNSATURATED CARBON-TO-CARBON BONDS
    • C08G65/00—Macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions forming an ether link in the main chain of the macromolecule
    • C08G65/02—Macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions forming an ether link in the main chain of the macromolecule from cyclic ethers by opening of the heterocyclic ring
    • C08G65/04—Macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions forming an ether link in the main chain of the macromolecule from cyclic ethers by opening of the heterocyclic ring from cyclic ethers only
    • C08G65/06—Cyclic ethers having no atoms other than carbon and hydrogen outside the ring
    • C08G65/08—Saturated oxiranes
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C08—ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
    • C08G—MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS OBTAINED OTHERWISE THAN BY REACTIONS ONLY INVOLVING UNSATURATED CARBON-TO-CARBON BONDS
    • C08G65/00—Macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions forming an ether link in the main chain of the macromolecule
    • C08G65/02—Macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions forming an ether link in the main chain of the macromolecule from cyclic ethers by opening of the heterocyclic ring
    • C08G65/26—Macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions forming an ether link in the main chain of the macromolecule from cyclic ethers by opening of the heterocyclic ring from cyclic ethers and other compounds
    • C08G65/2696—Macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions forming an ether link in the main chain of the macromolecule from cyclic ethers by opening of the heterocyclic ring from cyclic ethers and other compounds characterised by the process or apparatus used
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C08—ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
    • C08G—MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS OBTAINED OTHERWISE THAN BY REACTIONS ONLY INVOLVING UNSATURATED CARBON-TO-CARBON BONDS
    • C08G65/00—Macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions forming an ether link in the main chain of the macromolecule
    • C08G65/02—Macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions forming an ether link in the main chain of the macromolecule from cyclic ethers by opening of the heterocyclic ring
    • C08G65/32—Polymers modified by chemical after-treatment
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N11/00—Carrier-bound or immobilised enzymes; Carrier-bound or immobilised microbial cells; Preparation thereof
    • C12N11/02—Enzymes or microbial cells immobilised on or in an organic carrier
    • C12N11/04—Enzymes or microbial cells immobilised on or in an organic carrier entrapped within the carrier, e.g. gel or hollow fibres
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12P—FERMENTATION OR ENZYME-USING PROCESSES TO SYNTHESISE A DESIRED CHEMICAL COMPOUND OR COMPOSITION OR TO SEPARATE OPTICAL ISOMERS FROM A RACEMIC MIXTURE
    • C12P7/00—Preparation of oxygen-containing organic compounds
    • C12P7/02—Preparation of oxygen-containing organic compounds containing a hydroxy group
    • C12P7/04—Preparation of oxygen-containing organic compounds containing a hydroxy group acyclic
    • C12P7/18—Preparation of oxygen-containing organic compounds containing a hydroxy group acyclic polyhydric
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25B—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF COMPOUNDS OR NON-METALS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25B11/00—Electrodes; Manufacture thereof not otherwise provided for
    • C25B11/02—Electrodes; Manufacture thereof not otherwise provided for characterised by shape or form
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25B—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF COMPOUNDS OR NON-METALS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25B11/00—Electrodes; Manufacture thereof not otherwise provided for
    • C25B11/04—Electrodes; Manufacture thereof not otherwise provided for characterised by the material
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25B—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF COMPOUNDS OR NON-METALS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25B3/00—Electrolytic production of organic compounds
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25B—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF COMPOUNDS OR NON-METALS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25B3/00—Electrolytic production of organic compounds
    • C25B3/20—Processes
    • C25B3/29—Coupling reactions
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25B—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF COMPOUNDS OR NON-METALS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25B3/00—Electrolytic production of organic compounds
    • C25B3/20—Processes
    • C25B3/29—Coupling reactions
    • C25B3/295—Coupling reactions hydrodimerisation
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25B—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF COMPOUNDS OR NON-METALS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25B9/00—Cells or assemblies of cells; Constructional parts of cells; Assemblies of constructional parts, e.g. electrode-diaphragm assemblies; Process-related cell features
    • C25B9/30—Cells comprising movable electrodes, e.g. rotary electrodes; Assemblies of constructional parts thereof
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C08—ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
    • C08G—MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS OBTAINED OTHERWISE THAN BY REACTIONS ONLY INVOLVING UNSATURATED CARBON-TO-CARBON BONDS
    • C08G2210/00—Compositions for preparing hydrogels

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a polymer structure, a method for generating such a structure, a device, particularly for receiving such a structure, and other aspects.
  • Natural and synthetic hydrogels have been tremendously developed over the past decades for emulating the natural extracellular matrix (ECM) [1].
  • ECM extracellular matrix
  • the ability to independently control the physical and chemical properties of hydrogels, makes these cell culture platforms capable of supporting the growth and differentiation of a wide range of cell types and tissues [2].
  • By spatially controlling the incorporation of bio-active molecules it is possible to address the complex and heterogeneous architecture of human tissues and thus create better tissue mimics [3], [4], [4c]. Because of long reagent incubation times and extensive washing steps, the production of such patterned gels can last up to several days [3-4]. During this time, undesired interactions can take place between the soluble bio-active molecules (used to create the pattern) and the cells cultured in the hydrogel, possibly affecting them in an uncontrolled manner.
  • a strategy to overcome uncontrolled and unwanted cell alterations during these procedures is to seed cells after scaffold fabrication and patterning.
  • cells seeded on the surface of a hydrogel do not—or very poorly—invade the matrix [3, 5].
  • This phenomenon occurs also for hydrogels optimized to be permissive to embedded cells, indicating that the surface boundary represents a barrier to cell invasion of the bulk.
  • Current strategies to enhance cell penetration mainly consist in altering the bulk properties of hydrogels by incorporating macropores via various techniques [5-6].
  • the problem underlying the present invention therefore is to provide an improved polymer structure, particularly a hydrogel, that particularly enhances cell penetration without affecting the bulk properties.
  • a polymer structure comprises at least a polymer, wherein said structure comprises a volume and a surface delimiting said volume, e.g. at least on one side of the volume, and wherein said polymer comprises a plurality of polymer chains connected by linkings characterized by a linking density, wherein said linking density (i.e. a density of said linkings being the number of linkings per volume) increases, particularly monotonously, more particularly strictly monotonously, and particularly continuously from the surface into/towards the volume (or bulk) of the polymer structure, so that a linking density gradient is formed/present (the direction of the gradient can be normal to said surface).
  • said linking density i.e. a density of said linkings being the number of linkings per volume
  • the linking density is particularly not formed as a step, but increases gradually from a minimal value to a maximal value over a distance from the surface, which distance is at least 1 ⁇ m long, particularly at least 100 ⁇ m long, particularly at least 150 ⁇ m long, particularly at least 200 ⁇ m long, particularly at least 250 ⁇ m long.
  • the functional form/course of the increasing linking density can be one of: exponential, sigmoidal or linear. Other forms are also possible. Due to the fact that the linking density is zero at the surface and increases towards the bulk (volume), the polymer structure comprises a soft surface and a stiffness that increases towards the bulk.
  • a linking or linking reaction particularly refers to the chemical linking, particularly via the formation of a covalent bond between two chemical compounds, particularly a first and a second compound (e.g. polymer chain) comprising a first moiety (belonging to the first compound) and a second moiety (belonging to the second compound) between which the linking and particularly the covalent bond is established.
  • a first and a second compound e.g. polymer chain
  • Particularly said surface is an outer surface (e.g. outwardly facing surface) that is a free surface (i.e. not in contact with a wall of a container in which the polymer structure can be arranged, see below)
  • such a (e.g. electrochemically) engineered gradient at a polymer (particularly hydrogel) surface allows the cell to spontaneously penetrate into the polymer/hydrogel, whereas cell seeded onto a conventionally polymerized gel form a two-dimensional cell sheet.
  • a polymer particularly hydrogel
  • the linking density is 0% at the surface (i.e. no linkings at the surface) and reaches a maximal linking density (corresponding to the linking density of the bulk and hence referred to as bulk density) in the volume (which is also denoted as bulk), wherein particularly the linking density reaches said maximum at a distance from the surface ranging between 1 ⁇ m and 1000 ⁇ m.
  • said distance preferably lies between 50 ⁇ m and 150 ⁇ m.
  • the polymer is a naturally occurring polymer, particularly one of the following polymers: fibrin, alginate, chitosan; or a synthetic polymer (i.e. a non-naturally occurring polymer, also including modified naturally occurring polymers), particularly one of the following polymers: polyethylene glycol (PEG), polyactic acid, SU-8.
  • the polymer may be any polymer consisting of—or including—a combination of monomers, e.g.
  • dopamine amine-containing groups such as lysine, cathecols, phosphate containing groups, thiol containing groups, alcohol containing groups, active esters and any polymer or dendrimer containing any of said groups (e.g. Hybrane, Boltorn).
  • amine-containing groups such as lysine, cathecols, phosphate containing groups, thiol containing groups, alcohol containing groups, active esters and any polymer or dendrimer containing any of said groups (e.g. Hybrane, Boltorn).
  • the polymer structure is a composite polymer structure (blend) comprising a plurality of different polymers, wherein each polymer comprises a linking density gradient, wherein the linking density gradients span over different directions and/or different distances/lengths.
  • the volume comprises one of the following: a spherical shape, a cylindrical shape, a cubic shape, a parallelepiped shape.
  • said polymer chains comprise or are formed as polyethylenglycol (PEG), particularly PEG with a molar weight in the range from 4000 Da to 100000 Da, particularly 40000 Da, and wherein particularly said PEG is an unbranched or a branched PEG, wherein particularly the branched PEG comprises particularly 2, 3, 4, or 8 arms.
  • PEG polyethylenglycol
  • said structure comprises cells (e.g. a basic structural, functional and/or biological unit of an organism), particularly embedded in said polymer structure. Particularly these cells are embedded into the polymer structure during the formation of said polymer structure.
  • cells e.g. a basic structural, functional and/or biological unit of an organism
  • said polymer structure is a hydrogel.
  • an implant is disclosed according to claim 9 , the implant comprising a polymer structure according to the invention.
  • the implant is designed for use in an animal, wherein the implant is designed to enhance the cell penetration from the body of the animal into the polymer structure of the implant.
  • a membrane is disclosed according to claim 10 , the membrane being permeable for cells particularly implemented in a cell impermeable material, wherein the membrane comprises a polymer structure according to the invention. Cells deposited on the surface of the impermeable material and of the permeable material will migrate through the material through the permeable region only. The presence of the gradient on one side of the membrane enables directional penetration of the cells through a material (see also FIGS. 19 to 26 ).
  • the membrane may separate two compartments, and may comprise at least one permeable region having a surface and a bulk/volume (e.g. as described above).
  • the surface may comprises a linking density gradient (e.g. as described above) so that cells can migrate through said surface from one compartment to the other compartment.
  • the membrane may comprise several of these permeable regions.
  • the membrane can also comprise at least two permeable regions each having a surface with a gradient according to the invention, wherein one surface faces one of the compartments and the other surface faces the other compartment.
  • a method is disclosed according to claim 11 , namely a method for embedding cells into a matrix (e.g. polymer structure), the method comprising the steps of
  • a method for generating a polymer structure is disclosed according to claim 12 .
  • the method for generating a polymer structure comprising a volume, a surface and a linking density gradient comprises the steps of:
  • said linking reaction is controlled by applying one of: an electric current, a radiation, or by adding a compound being capable of linking said moieties, particularly a cross-linker that links said moieties.
  • said polymer chains are provided by polymerization of monomers (particularly, in the context of the present invention, polymerization refers to a process of reacting monomer molecules together in a chemical reaction to form polymer chains or three-dimensional networks), wherein each of said monomers comprises one of said moieties.
  • said polymer is provided in a solution, and said linking reaction is controlled by the pH of said solution, wherein particularly for controlling said pH an electrolysis-inducing current is applied to said solution using a first electrode covering said surface of the polymer structure at least partially or completely.
  • a current density in the range from 10 nA/mm 2 to 1 ⁇ A/mm 2 is used. This means in particular, that the flowing current is adjusted to obtain a desired current density which is scaled with the surface of the working electrode (e.g. first electrode or second electrode).
  • a preferred current density lies within the range from 0.05 ⁇ A/mm 2 to 0.15 ⁇ A/mm 2 , particularly 0.075 ⁇ A/mm 2 to 0.0125 ⁇ A/mm 2 , and particularly amounts to essentially 0.1 ⁇ A/mm 2 .
  • the first electrode can assume anodic polarization or cathodic polarization, turning it into an anode or a cathode.
  • a second electrode would assume the opposite polarity of the first electrode.
  • said linking reaction is performed or catalyzed by an enzyme, particularly a transglutaminase, more particularly a factor XIIIa (described by the UniProt Nr: P00488) or a precursor thereof.
  • an enzyme particularly a transglutaminase, more particularly a factor XIIIa (described by the UniProt Nr: P00488) or a precursor thereof.
  • UniProt numbers refer to entries in the UniProt Knowledgebase.
  • the reacting moieties of two polymer chains are an acyl (first moiety), particularly an amide, and an amine (second moiety).
  • said first or said second moiety is a peptide comprising said acyl/amide or said amine.
  • the enzyme is present in said polymer structure, particularly by adding the enzyme to the structure and/or solution.
  • the enzymatic activity of said enzyme is controlled, particularly inhibited, by altering said pH of the solution locally, wherein particularly said enzyme converts said moieties of said polymer chains by means of forming a covalent bond between said moieties.
  • an electrolysis-inducing current is applied to said solution using a first electrode covering said surface of the polymer structure at least in parts or completely (see above).
  • said polymer chains comprise or are formed as polyethylenglycol (PEG), particularly PEG with a molar weight in the range from 4000 Da to 100000 Da, particularly 40000 Da.
  • PEG polyethylenglycol
  • said PEG is an unbranched or branched PEG, wherein particularly the branched PEG comprises particularly 2, 3, 4 or eight arms.
  • a polymer structure according to claim 18 is disclosed, namely a polymer structure formed by at least a first polymer, wherein said structure comprises a volume and a surface (e.g. delimiting said volume, e.g. at least on one side, cf. also above), wherein said polymer comprises a plurality of polymer chains connected by linkings characterized by a linking density, wherein said linking density (i.e. a density of said linkings, see above) increases, particularly monotonously, particularly strictly monotonously, and particularly continuously from the surface into the volume (bulk) of the polymer structure so that a linking density gradient is formed/present, wherein the polymer structure is generated using the method according to the invention for generating a polymer structure.
  • said linking density i.e. a density of said linkings, see above
  • a device comprising:
  • the device comprises a first and a second electrode for controlling said pH in said solution by applying an electrolysis-inducing current to said solution.
  • the first and/or second electrode is coated with PLL-g-PEG.
  • the container is made out of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). Further, particularly, the container comprises a circumferential wall extending from a bottom of the container so that the wall and the bottom delimit a chamber for receiving the polymer structure or the solution comprising the precursors of the polymer structure or hydrogel.
  • PDMS polydimethylsiloxane
  • the container comprises an open side so that the polymer structure or the solution comprising the precursors of the polymer structure or hydrogel in the chamber comprises an (e.g. upwardly facing) surface.
  • the first electrode is designed to contact said surface.
  • the volume of the polymer structure/solution (apart from the surface) is delimited by the container (i.e. by the wall and the bottom of the container).
  • the first electrode is designed to cover the first surface at least in portions, particularly completely.
  • the second electrode protrudes into the chamber through a recess in the wall of the container.
  • the second electrode extends along the bottom of the container and faces the first electrode.
  • the first electrode may comprise a two-dimensional, flat surface for contacting the polymer structure or the solution comprising the precursors of the polymer structure or hydrogel
  • the second electrode can have a longitudinal shape (e.g. elongated conductor/wire).
  • a local change of pH of the solution can be achieved by the application of an electric current to the solution via said electrodes so that electrolysis of the solution is induced.
  • electrolysis of the solution is induced.
  • Such a voltage-induced electrolysis results in a local pH decrease at the anodic electrode-solution interface and in a local pH increase at the cathodic-buffer interface.
  • the extent of the region around each electrode where a linking, cross-linking/polymerization of the precursors can be inhibited, confined or promoted, depends on the applied current density, pH and buffer capacity of the precursor solution in proximity of an electrode.
  • the container may comprise a wall having two circumferential portions, wherein a first portion surrounds the chamber for receiving the polymer structure/solution, and wherein a second portion of the wall surrounds a further chamber for receiving a fluid, particularly saline solutions, buffer solutions, Chemo-attractant solution, growth-factor solution, cell suspension or mixture thereof and other solution having cell-responsive functions).
  • a fluid particularly saline solutions, buffer solutions, Chemo-attractant solution, growth-factor solution, cell suspension or mixture thereof and other solution having cell-responsive functions.
  • the second electrode (or first electrode) can be (slidably) arranged in a first and a second recess in said wall, which recesses face each other, so that the second electrode extends across the chamber, and closes said recesses, and particularly protrudes out of the container, wherein the second recess is in flow connection with the further chamber, so that—when the second electrode is removed from said second recess—a fluid stored in the further chamber can flow through said second recess into the first chamber, namely into a channel of the polymer structure/hydrogel being formed with help of the second electrode.
  • the second portion of the wall comprises a third recess being aligned with the second recess (and particularly the first recess), so that the second recess can be closed by inserting a closure means (e.g. rod) into the second recess via the third recess.
  • a closure means e.g. rod
  • the two chambers are each also delimited by a bottom from which said portions of the wall extend, wherein the bottom of the first chamber may comprise a counter electrode (first electrode or second electrode) or may be formed as a counter electrode.
  • the container may comprise a plurality of chambers for receiving the polymer structure/solution, so that high-throughput experiments can be performed using the device.
  • the polymer structure comprises a linking density gradient at a surface of the polymer structure that is not in contact with the container.
  • the polymer structure comprises a channel in the polymer structure (e.g. generated as described above), particularly crossing the structure, and a linking density gradient at an interface (i.e. an inner surface of the structure) between the polymer structure and the lumen of said channel.
  • Said gradient may be present at the whole interface between the lumen and the bulk or only at a segment or region of said interface.
  • the gradient may be normal to the interface (surface) so that particularly the linking density is minimal or zero at the interface and increases towards the bulk (e.g. as described above).
  • the interface is soft while the stiffness of the structure increases towards the bulk surrounding the lumen of the channel.
  • the polymer that comprises a surface comprising at least one recess (e.g. like pits, wells, invaginations and other complex shapes) and a linking density gradient at said surface at the location of the at least one recess.
  • at least one recess e.g. like pits, wells, invaginations and other complex shapes
  • cells are deposited in the at least one recess for promoting their invasion of the polymeric structure.
  • An aspect of the invention according to item 1 relates to a density gradient in a polymer extending from the surface where the density is 0% (interfacial density gradients) into the bulk reaching maximum crosslinking density of 100% in a distance range between 1 and 1000 ⁇ m.
  • Item 2 The density gradient according to item 1, wherein the gradient is formed electrochemically, using photochemistry or using diffusion of a cross-linker.
  • Item 3 The (interfacial) density gradient according to item 1 or 2 which is used to enhance cell penetration into the bulk of the polymer, particularly of cells seeded on the surface of the polymer.
  • Item 4 The density gradient of one of the items 1 to 3, wherein the polymer is natural (e.g. fibrin, alginate, chitosan, etc.) or synthetic (Polyethylene glycol, Polylactic acid, SU-8 and others).
  • the polymer is natural (e.g. fibrin, alginate, chitosan, etc.) or synthetic (Polyethylene glycol, Polylactic acid, SU-8 and others).
  • Item 5 A composite polymeric structure (blend) featuring density gradients of different components spanning over different directions and different lengths, particularly according to one of the items 1 to 4.
  • Item 6 A device featuring a container for a polymer structure (made of any shape and made of plastics or metals) and a polymer structure, contained in such container featuring an interfacial density gradient, particularly according to one of the items 1 to 4, on the side of the polymer not in contact with the container.
  • Item 7 A device featuring a container for a polymer structure (made of any shape and made of any plastic or metal) and a polymer structure contained in such container featuring a channel crossing said polymer structure and featuring a density gradient at the interface between the polymer structure and parts of or the whole lumen of the channel.
  • Item 8 A device featuring a container for a polymer structure (made of any shape and made of any plastic or metal) and a polymer structure contained in such container featuring a surface presenting pits, wells, invaginations and other complex shapes and featuring a density gradient at parts of or the whole surface of such complex shapes.
  • Item 9 A device described in claim 8 , where cells (e.g. endothelial cells, mesenchymal stem cells and/or other cells), spheroids composed of one or more of this cell types, microtissues and others forms of cell aggregates are deposited in such pits, wells or invaginations to promote their invasion of the polymeric structure.
  • cells e.g. endothelial cells, mesenchymal stem cells and/or other cells
  • spheroids composed of one or more of this cell types, microtissues and others forms of cell aggregates are deposited in such pits, wells or invaginations to promote their invasion of the polymeric structure.
  • Item 10 A polymer structure of spherical, semi-spherical, cylindrical, ellipsoidal, pyramidal, cubical, cuboidal and prismatoidal shape featuring one or more density gradients on one or more of the sides of said structure or on parts of the surface of said structure.
  • Item 11 A polymer structure described in item 10 to be implanted in the body of animals to enhance cell penetration from the body of said animal into the polymer structure.
  • Item 12 A polymer structure described in item 10 to be used as permeable membrane for cells implemented in a cell impermeable material.
  • Item 13 Any of the polymer structures described above in which cells are embedded during the formation of said polymer structure.
  • FIG. 1 schematically shows a representation of the experimental setup: approximately 50 ⁇ L PDMS chambers of a device according to the invention, accommodating the counter electrode (second electrode) in which the hydrogel precursors were poured; and on which a flat working electrode (first electrode) was placed during polymerization;
  • FIG. 2 shows a schematic representation of the hydrogel boundaries production: controls are left to be polymerized conventionally (Air-hydrogel), or covered with an anode to which no current, a low (0.1 ⁇ A/mm 2 ) or high current density (1 ⁇ A/mm 2 ) was imposed during polymerization;
  • FIG. 3 shows fluorescence intensity profiles of FITC-tagged hydrogel boundaries prepared in air or covered with an electrode without current or with current densities varying from 0.1 to 1 ⁇ A/mm 2 ;
  • FIG. 4 shows corresponding representative confocal fluorescence images of FITC-tagged hydrogels boundaries
  • FIG. 5 shows mechanical characterization of the hydrogel boundary. Force-displacement measurements acquired by colloidal force spectroscopy of Air-, No current-, 0.1 ⁇ A/mm 2 - and 1 ⁇ A/mm 2 -hydrogel surfaces;
  • FIG. 6 shows cell infiltration in the engineered hydrogel surface 1 day (a, d, g and j) and 3 days (b, e, h and k) after cell seeding on top of the engineered surfaces.
  • Hydrogel surfaces were produced in absence of electrodes (a and b), or covered with an anode, without imposing any current (d and e) or applying 0.1 ⁇ A/mm 2 (g and h) and 1 ⁇ A/mm 2 (j and k);
  • FIG. 8 shows engineering of a hydrogel-hydrogel interface.
  • a gel containing cells was poured on top of hydrogels with engineered surfaces: air (left) and 1 ⁇ A/mm 2 (right);
  • FIG. 9 shows cell infiltration from the top gel in the bottom hydrogel that was quantified at day 3, by analyzing the fraction of cells at different depth in the bottom hydrogel;
  • FIG. 10 shows 3D reconstructions of stacks (100 ⁇ 5 ⁇ m stacks) acquired by LSCM of the constructs containing a bottom hydrogel with an engineered surface ( 102 ) (green), a second gel ( 101 ) (red) containing cells ( 100 ) (white); in c) the surface of the bottom hydrogel was not engineered, while in d) 1 ⁇ A/mm 2 was applied during polymerization;
  • FIG. 11 shows disruption of the hydrogel when removal of the metal electrode when no current was applied.
  • Schematic representation and photograph of the experimental phenomenon electrode is placed on top of the chamber during polymerization and evaluation of gel disruption upon electrode removal: when no current was applied disrupted hydrogel stayed on the electrode (a), while no hydrogel was left when anodic currents were applied to the electrode (b).
  • electrodes were coated with PLL-g-PEG, gel adhesion to the surface could be prevented (c), which was not the case when using Teflon surfaces (d).
  • FIG. 12 shows microbeads on 1 ⁇ A/mm 2 hydrogel surface. 3 ⁇ m and 20 ⁇ m diameter fluorescent beads (Fluoresbrite Plain YG, Polyscience Inc.) were poured on the hydrogel surface and left to sediment for 1 hour, and their distribution was monitored by acquiring 150 ⁇ m thick Z-stacks of the hydrogel surface using a SP5 confocal laser scanning microscope (Leica, Germany);
  • FIG. 13 shows a mechanical characterization of the hydrogel cross-section, particularly a schematic representation of the experimental setup: Hydrogels prepared as described previously were cut perpendicularly to the surface and flipped (cut showing upwards). 50 ⁇ m beads (200) were poured on the sections and used to probe the mechanical properties of the hydrogel at different positions;
  • FIGS. 14-15 show representative force-displacement curves acquired on the bulk hydrogel (at least 500 ⁇ m from the surface) confirm that Air-hydrogel and 0.1 ⁇ A/mm 2 -hydrogel have similar bulk mechanical properties (b). By comparing bulk and surface force-displacement curves, it was confirmed that the No current-hydrogel has homogenous mechanical properties (c), while the Air-hydrogel has a stiffer surface compared to the bulk (d), and the 0.1 ⁇ A/mm 2 -hydrogel a softer surface compared to the bulk (e);
  • FIG. 16 shows cell migration within the hydrogel.
  • MSCs were embedded in TG-PEG hydrogels (final concentration: 0.5 ⁇ 106 ml-1).
  • For migration assays three random positions were selected using an inverted microscope (Leica DMI6000 B) equipped with a motorized focus and stage and images were acquired every 20 min for 24 hours. Cell migration was followed for 24 hours using the manual tracking plugin in ImageJ. 30 tracked cells had an average migration of 226 ⁇ 44 ⁇ m in 24 h.
  • FIG. 17 shows cells seeded on softer hydrogels.
  • Human derived bone marrow MSCs were seeded on PEG gels prepared conventionally (in absence of electrode during polymerization) with lower PEG densities (respectively 0.8%, 1.1%, 1.4% and 1.7%).
  • a), c), e) and g) are 3D reconstruction of 250 ⁇ m thick stacks (consisting of 50 images acquired every 5 ⁇ m, unless for the 1.7% condition for which 125 images every 2 ⁇ m) acquired by LSCM, 3 days after seeding: cells formed a 2D sheet on the gel regardless of the stiffness.
  • Cell morphology top view, right column) show that cells respond to the gel stiffness by spreading more on stiffer gels, as shown in previous studies [20];
  • FIG. 18 shows a device according to the invention comprising several chambers for receiving the polymer structure/hydrogel according to the invention.
  • FIG. 19-26 shows embodiments (possible geometries) of polymer structures according to the invention having e.g. recesses, channels (e.g. microchannels etc. as well as embodiments of polymer structures having the shape of e.g. a sphere etc.; and
  • FIG. 27 shows another embodiment of the device according to the invention allowing for generating a channel in the polymer structure/hydrogel according to the invention.
  • the present invention describes how to electrochemically modulate a PEG hydrogel surface 3 to form density gradients increasing towards the bulk (volume) 2 .
  • a PEG hydrogel surface 3 to form density gradients increasing towards the bulk (volume) 2 .
  • the possibility to locally inhibit the enzymatic crosslinking reaction of PEG hydrogels in the vicinity of electrodes by exploiting the acidic gradient at the anode-liquid interface generated upon electrolysis of water has been shown[7].
  • hydrogels 1 By placing an anodized electrode 21 at the surface 3 of the PEG precursor solution during polymerization, one can produce hydrogels 1 with surface density gradients.
  • a confocal laser scanning microscopy was used to qualitatively describe the density gradients.
  • the mechanical properties of the hydrogel surfaces have been characterized by colloidal probe force spectroscopy.
  • MSCs human derived bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells
  • devices 50 comprising a special polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) mould (container) 40 accommodating a platinum counter electrode (second electrode) 22 and in which the PEG precursor solution was casted were designed (cf. FIG. 1 ).
  • the container 40 comprises a circumferential wall 41 surrounding a chamber 43 which is delimited by a bottom 42 .
  • the PEG monomers used here contained peptidic substrates previously described, which make possible the crosslinking of PEG via transglutamination (hence referred to as TG-PEG) [8].
  • the chamber 43 of the container 40 was covered with a flat gold electrode (first electrode) 21 during polymerization (cf. FIG. 1 ), which was anodized with different current densities to locally inhibit the enzymatic polymerization of TG-PEG (samples referred to as 0.1 ⁇ A/mm 2 -hydrogel and 1 ⁇ A/mm 2 -hydrogel).
  • the gel 1 was prepared in absence of the electrode 21 , as conventionally done (from here referred to as Air-hydrogel).
  • the gel precursors were covered with a gold surface without imposing any electric current during polymerization (from here referred to as No current-hydrogel, see FIG. 2 ). Because of the strong adhesion of the PEG hydrogel to gold and Teflon, the removal of any of these surfaces after polymerization resulted in the disruption of the gel (see FIG. 11 a and d ).
  • the gold surface e.g. surface of the first electrode 21
  • the adhesion was inhibited because the PEG chains extending from the gold surface did not contain the peptidic crosslinking substrate and therefore acted as an inert film. Coating the anode surface was not needed because the inhibited polymerization in its proximity is sufficient to eliminate the adhesion problem, as previously shown ( FIG. 11 b and [7]).
  • FITC-tagged Lys substrates (Lys-FITC) were admixed to TG-PEG hydrogel precursors. Since the fluorescent dye is covalently incorporated into the TG-PEG matrix by the same crosslinking reactions, the fluorescence signal is indicative of the crosslinking density [9]. Sections cut perpendicularly to the hydrogel surface 3 were inspected by confocal fluorescence microscopy. The surface boundaries produced in presence of anodic currents showed a gradient of intensity.
  • the distance from the surface at which the fluorescence intensity reached a plateau increased from 250 ⁇ m (0.1 ⁇ A/mm 2 -hydrogel) to 500 ⁇ m (1 ⁇ A/mm 2 -hydrogel) (see FIGS. 3 and 4 ).
  • the No current-hydrogel was characterized by a homogeneous signal intensity throughout the gel thickness, while the Air-hydrogel had a peak of fluorescence in the first 50 ⁇ m close to the surface.
  • the interfacial increase of crosslinking density was presumably due to water evaporation during polymerization and consequent local increase of monomer concentration.
  • FIG. 5 shows force-distance curves acquired by probing the upper surface of the hydrogels by pressing the bead into the gel.
  • the Air-hydrogel presented the stiffest surface: the maximal measurable force (0.8 ⁇ N) was reached at a penetration of approximately 3.5 ⁇ m only.
  • the No current-hydrogel presented a softer surface compared to the Air-hydrogel, reaching 0.8 ⁇ N with a penetration between 15 and 17 ⁇ m. This observation is in accordance with the fluorescence microscopy inspection, revealing the presence of a shell of higher crosslinking density in the Air-hydrogel.
  • the surfaces of the hydrogels prepared electrochemically were considerably softer.
  • the force-distance curves of the 0.1 ⁇ A/mm2-hydrogel reached between 0.05 and 0.13 ⁇ N at the maximal piezo displacement (50 ⁇ m) and for the 1 ⁇ A/mm 2 -hydrogel forces always below 0.05 ⁇ N at 50 ⁇ m were measured.
  • the softness of the gel surface appeared to increase with increasing currents.
  • the ability of cells 100 seeded onto them to penetrate into the hydrogel bulk 2 were assessed.
  • human derived bone marrow MSCs were seeded on top of the engineered gel surfaces and the cell distribution within the first 150 ⁇ m of the hydrogel was assessed after 1 and 3 days in culture using confocal laser scanning microscopy (see FIGS. 6 and 7 ).
  • the gel formulation chosen for this study was previously shown to support migration of embedded cells [11] and this was confirmed for the culture conditions used here (see FIG. 16 ).
  • Cells seeded on both Air- and No current-hydrogels grew in 2D forming a monolayer and thus were almost exclusively located in the first 50 ⁇ m after 1 and 3 days (see FIG.
  • FIG. 6 a, b, d, e and FIG. 7 c, f When placed on the electrochemically engineered hydrogel surfaces, cells could penetrate into the gel. Furthermore, the penetration depth increased with increasing current density. In particular, cells could penetrate more than 150 ⁇ m into the gels prepared with the highest current density after 1 day already ( FIG. 6 j and FIG. 7 l ). The cell distribution after 3 days was quite homogenous within the first 150 ⁇ m from the gel surface (see FIG. 6 k and FIG. 7 l ).
  • Hydrogel permeability to cells or tissue is an important challenge in the development of functional scaffolds for tissue engineering and other strategies have been explored. For instance, Wylie et al. observed that on similar RGD-functionalized synthetic hydrogels neural precursor cell infiltration was very limited, not exceeding 20 ⁇ m after 14 days. The authors enhanced cell penetration up to 85 ⁇ m after 2 weeks by creating a gradient of SHH (Sonic HedgeHog) spanning from the surface into the bulk of the hydrogel using photopatterning. This approach is very elegant, however it requires longer manufacturing times [3]. The use of different cells, culture conditions and matrices do not allow for a direct comparison of the results.
  • SHH Sonic HedgeHog
  • Post-processing cell seeding is not the only occurrence during hydrogel boundaries can present a barrier. Constructs produced by additive manufacturing feature interfaces between individually added elements. While it was shown repeatedly that cell and matrix components could be precisely deposited forming heterogeneously organized and viable constructs resembling native tissues [17], the interface between the assembled elements was so far mostly overlooked and the question how cells sense and respond to this interface remains elusive. Bordeleau et al. are among the few addressing this issue; the authors sequentially polymerized cell containing collagen gels varying in density on top of each other, and showed that cells do not migrate from a soft gel to a stiffer one, and could only migrate from a stiff gel to a softer one in very rare occurrences [18]. This observation indicates that also for additive manufacturing, the gel boundary represents a barrier to cells invasion, potentially leading to the compartmentalization of individually added elements. The approach described in this work could also be beneficial for such applications.
  • Electrochemically generated surface gradients hold great promise for enabling topical cell seeding on processed hydrogels and cell migration through the interface of adjacent hydrogels additively manufactured.
  • PDMS frames (container of the device according to the invention).
  • Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) frames were made as follows: the silicon elastomer and the curing agent (Sylgard 184, Dow Corning Corporation, USA) were mixed (10:1 in mass) at 2000 rpm for 3 min in a ARE-250 mixer (Thinky Corporation, Japan). The mixture was subsequently poured into poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) molds, where a 500 ⁇ m in diameter stainless steel wire was positioned to create the holes for the future counter electrode. The mixture was subsequently degassed for 30 min in a vacuum chamber and baked for 4 h at 60° C. Stainless steel wire and PDMS forms were removed from the PMMA molds rinsed with isopropanol (IPA) and MilliQ water.
  • IPA isopropanol
  • TG-PEG Hydrogels Metalloprotease (MMP)-sensitive TG-PEG hydrogels were prepared as described previously [19].
  • MMP Metalloprotease
  • eight-arm PEG precursors containing the pending factor XIIIa substrate peptides glutamine acceptor (n-PEG-Gln) or lysine donor with an additional MMP-sensitive linker (n-PEG-MMPsensitive-Lys) were mixed stoichiometrically (final dry mass content 1.7%) in Tris-Buffer (TBS, 50 mM, pH 7.6) containing 50 mM calcium chloride.
  • Lys-FITC, Gln-Alexa 561, Gln-RGD or combinations were added to the precursor solution prior to initiation of cross-linking by 10 U/mL thrombin-activated FXIIIa and vigorous mixing.
  • Electrochemical control of TG-PEG polymerization The precursors mixture was immediately poured in the PDMS frame accommodating a platinum wire (0.5 mm in diameter, Alfa Aesar, Ward Hill, USA) used as auxiliary electrode. Cobalt-chromium disks (15 mm in diameter and 0.8 mm in thickness) evaporated 10 nm chromium and 200 nm gold were used as working electrode to be placed on top of the PDMS chamber.
  • the polymerization of the TG-PEG was allowed to progress during 8 minutes in presence of a DC current applied in galvanostatic mode. The current density was 100 nA/mm 2 or 1 ⁇ A/mm 2 .
  • Human bone marrow MSCs were cultured in minimal essential medium alpha (MEMalpha, Gibco Life Technologies, cat. no. 22571-020) supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum (FCS, Gibco Life Technologies, cat. no. 10500), 1% (v/v) penicillin/streptomycin solution (Gibco Life Technologies, cat. no. 15140-122), 5 ng/mL FGF-2 (Peprotech, cat. no. 100-18B) and 50 nM PDGF (Peprotech, cat. no. 100-14B).
  • MEMalpha minimal essential medium alpha
  • FCS Gibco Life Technologies, cat. no. 10500
  • FCS fetal calf serum
  • penicillin/streptomycin solution Gibco Life Technologies, cat. no. 15140-122
  • 5 ng/mL FGF-2 Peprotech, cat. no. 100-18B
  • 50 nM PDGF Peprotech, cat. no. 100-14B
  • MSCs were seeded onto hydrogel surfaces and kept in culture for 1 or 3 days. At each time point, cells were fixed with samples were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, rinsed three times and kept in PBS until staining.
  • Infiltration quantification Stacks (125 ⁇ 2 ⁇ m) acquired by LSCM were reconstructed in 3D, and a side projection was performed.
  • the FITC channel was used to determine the gel surface and the alexa-633 channel was used to determine the position of cells in the gel cross-section.
  • a threshold was applied to the alexa-633 channel images, which were subsequently cleaned (noise removal) and segmented into regions of 25 ⁇ m thick starting from the gel surface.
  • the amount of positive pixels was quantified in each region as a representation of the cell number.
  • the ratio of cells in each section was calculated as a percentage of the overall amount of cells in the sample.
  • the values represent mean values ⁇ standard deviation of at least 3 scaffolds per time point, in which at least 3 regions were analyzed.
  • the devices according to the invention used for receiving the polymer structure/hydrogel to be produced can take various forms and shapes.
  • a container 40 of such a device may comprise a plurality of chambers 43 of e.g. identical shape for a massive parallelization of experiments.
  • the chambers 43 may be separated by wells 44 .
  • the free (upper) surface 3 of the polymer structure 1 generated in the individual chambers 43 as described above may exhibit the linking density gradient so that a soft surface 3 is generated while the stiffness of the structure 1 (and the linking density gradient) increases towards the bulk/volume 2 of the structure 1 .
  • FIG. 19 shows an arrangement of a polymer structure in the form of a (polymer-) hydrogel membrane 10 featuring permeable and/or impermeable compartments A, B (wherein the membrane 10 separates said compartments A, B) for directional migration of cells 100 ( 103 ) from one surface 3 ( 3 a ) to another surface 3 a ( 3 ).
  • Thickness h can be in the range of 100 ⁇ m to several centimetres.
  • the length L and width can be in the range between 100 ⁇ m and several centimetres.
  • the length and width of the impermeable region s and of the permeable region d can be the same or different and can be in the range of 1 ⁇ m to several centimetres.
  • FIG. 20 shows a recess 30 in the form of a channel (e.g. microchannel) 30 created through a hydrogel 1 with a portion of the inner surface 3 of the polymer structure 1 in contact with the lumen 31 featuring a (linking density) gradient (i.e. said surface 3 forms an interface between lumen 31 and polymer structure 1 ).
  • Cells 100 perfused through said channel 30 will invade the hydrogel bulk 2 from this region only.
  • the diameter of the microchannel 30 can be in the range of 10 ⁇ m to several centimetres. The most interesting range is 10 ⁇ m to 1000 ⁇ m.
  • the length L of the channel 30 can be in the range of 100 ⁇ m to several centimetres.
  • FIG. 21 shows recesses 30 in form of wells (e.g. rectangular wells), particularly microwells, crypts or invaginations in a hydrogel 1 used to dispense cells 100 or cell aggregates 100 .
  • Cells 100 can invade the bulk 2 of the hydrogel 1 only from the crypts or wells 30 featuring the density gradient at the surface 3 (forming e.g. the bottom of the respective well 30 ), wherein the linking density is minimal or zero at the surface 3 and increase towards its maximum the bulk/volume 2 .
  • the well 30 can be of any shape (cubical, cuboidal, pyramidal, cylindrical, semi-spherical, ellipsoidal and prismatoidal), represented here is cuboidal (i.e. rectangular cross section).
  • the depth d, width w and length of the well 30 can be in the range of 10 ⁇ m to several millimetres.
  • the separation between the wells 30 s can be in the range of 10 ⁇ m to several millimetres.
  • the thickness H, length L and width of the hydrogel (polymer structure) 1 can be in the range of 100 ⁇ m to several centimetres.
  • FIG. 22 shows a polymer structure (e.g. hydrogel) 1 comprising recesses 30 in the form of wells (e.g. microwells), crypts or invaginations in the hydrogel 1 used to dispense cells 100 or cell aggregates 100 .
  • Cells 100 can invade the bulk 2 of the hydrogel 1 only from the crypts or wells 30 featuring the density gradient at the surface 3 delimiting the respective recess (well) 30 .
  • the well 30 can be of any shape (cubical, cuboidal, pyramidal, cylindrical, semi-spherical, ellipsoidal and prismatoidal), represented here is pyramidal.
  • the depth d, width w and length of the well 30 can be in the range of 10 ⁇ m to several millimetres.
  • the separation s between the wells 30 can be in the range of 10 ⁇ m to several millimetres.
  • the thickness H, length L and width of the hydrogel 1 can be in the range of 100 ⁇ m to several centimetres.
  • the angle ⁇ of the pyramidal well can vary between 10° and 180°.
  • FIG. 23 shows recesses (e.g. microwells) 30 , crypts or invaginations in a hydrogel 1 used to dispense cells 100 or cell aggregates 100 .
  • Cells 100 can invade the bulk 2 of the hydrogel 1 only from the crypts or wells 30 featuring the (linking density) gradient at the surface 3 delimiting the well 30 .
  • the well 30 can be of any shape (cubical, cuboidal, pyramidal, cylindrical, semi-spherical, ellipsoidal and prismatoidal), represented here is semi-spherical or ellipsoidal shape.
  • the depth d and radius r of the well 30 can be in the range of 10 ⁇ m to several millimetres.
  • the separation s between the wells 30 can be in the range of 10 ⁇ m to several millimetres.
  • the thickness H, length L and width of the hydrogel (polymer structure) 1 can be in the range of 100 ⁇ m to several centimetres.
  • FIG. 24 shows a polymer structure 1 in the form of a hydrogel coating (thickness d may vary from 10 ⁇ m to several millimetres) of a body (e.g. an implant or a device of any shape and size) featuring a density gradient at the surface 3 to promote 3D cell infiltration of cells 100 in the coating and/or avoid cell spreading in 2D on the surface 3 .
  • 2D cell spreading on the surface 3 of a body 5 is among the first steps of the foreign body response and thus this coating could prevent foreign body response.
  • FIG. 25 shows another polymer structure 10 in the form of a hydrogel membrane (thickness d may vary from 10 ⁇ m to several millimetres) separating two liquid compartments L 1 , L 2 and allowing directional cell invasion of cells 100 in the membrane 10 from one or both compartments L 1 , L 2 .
  • FIG. 26 shows polymer structures 1 (hydrogel bodies) of any shape (spherical, semi-spherical, cylindrical, ellipsoidal, pyramidal, cubical, cuboidal and prismatoidal), here represented spherical, cubical, pyramidal and cylindrical, featuring a density gradient increasing towards the center of the respective body 1 and having this gradient being present on one or more faces (surfaces) of the respective body 1 .
  • These bodies 1 can e.g. be implanted as implants in animals and promote cell infiltration inside the implant's bulk.
  • the working electrode e.g. first or second electrode
  • the counter electrode e.g. second or first electrode
  • the polymer structure i.e. in the chamber
  • the container 40 may comprise a wall 41 having two circumferential portions 41 a , 41 b , wherein a first portion 41 a surrounds the chamber 43 for receiving the polymer structure/solution, and wherein a second portion 41 b of the wall 41 surrounds a further chamber 45 for receiving a fluid F, particularly saline solutions, buffer solutions, chemo-attractant solution, growth-factor solution, cell suspension or mixture thereof and other solution inducing responses in cell functions).
  • a fluid F particularly saline solutions, buffer solutions, chemo-attractant solution, growth-factor solution, cell suspension or mixture thereof and other solution inducing responses in cell functions.
  • the first electrode 21 (or second electrode) is slidably arranged in a first and a second recess 401 , 402 in said wall 41 , which recesses 401 , 402 face each other, so that the first electrode 21 extends across the chamber 43 , and closes said recesses 401 , 402 .
  • the first electrode 21 protrudes out of the container 40 (e.g. for moving it manually).
  • the second recess 402 is in flow connection with the further chamber 45 , so that—when the first electrode 21 is removed from said second recess 402 —a fluid F (e.g.
  • a Chemo-attractant solution, growth-factor solution, cell suspension or mixture thereof and other solution inducing responses in cell functions) stored in the further chamber 45 can flow through said second recess 402 into the (first) chamber 43 , namely into a channel 30 of the polymer structure 1 /hydrogel being formed with help of the electrodes 21 , 22 .
  • the second portion of the wall 41 b comprises a third recess 403 that is aligned with the second recess 402 (and e.g. also with the first recess 401 ), so that the second recess 402 can be closed by inserting a closure means (e.g. rod or pin) 60 into the second recess 402 via the third recess 403 .
  • the two chambers 43 , 45 are each delimited on the lower side by a bottom 42 from which said portions 41 a , 41 b of the wall 41 extend, wherein the bottom 42 of the first chamber 43 may comprise a counter electrode (second electrode or first electrode) 22 or may be formed as a counter electrode 22 .
  • a polymer structure 1 can be generated that comprises a channel 30 in the polymer structure 1 , particularly crossing the structure 1 , and a linking density gradient at an interface 3 between the polymer structure 1 and the lumen 31 of said channel 30 .
  • a channel 30 can be filled with a fluid F, e.g. as described above.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Electrochemistry (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Polymers & Plastics (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Dispersion Chemistry (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Apparatus Associated With Microorganisms And Enzymes (AREA)
  • Immobilizing And Processing Of Enzymes And Microorganisms (AREA)
  • Materials For Medical Uses (AREA)
  • Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)
  • Processes Of Treating Macromolecular Substances (AREA)
  • Measuring Or Testing Involving Enzymes Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)
  • Peptides Or Proteins (AREA)
US15/025,558 2013-09-29 2014-09-29 Electrochemically engineered surface of hydrogels, particularly peg hydrogels, for enhanced cellular penetration Abandoned US20160244574A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP13186561.0 2013-09-29
EP13186561.0A EP2853620A1 (fr) 2013-09-29 2013-09-29 Procédé, dispositif et système permettant de commander électrochimiquement la formation d'un hydrogel
EP13186965 2013-10-01
EP13186965.3 2013-10-01
PCT/EP2014/070827 WO2015044431A1 (fr) 2013-09-29 2014-09-29 Surface d'hydrogels électrochimiquement modifiée, en particulier d'hydrogels peg, pour pénétration cellulaire améliorée

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/EP2014/070827 A-371-Of-International WO2015044431A1 (fr) 2013-09-29 2014-09-29 Surface d'hydrogels électrochimiquement modifiée, en particulier d'hydrogels peg, pour pénétration cellulaire améliorée

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US16/931,452 Continuation US20210032412A1 (en) 2013-09-29 2020-07-17 Electrochemically engineered surface of hydrogels, particularly peg hydrogels, for enhanced cellular penetration

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20160244574A1 true US20160244574A1 (en) 2016-08-25

Family

ID=51830271

Family Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/025,558 Abandoned US20160244574A1 (en) 2013-09-29 2014-09-29 Electrochemically engineered surface of hydrogels, particularly peg hydrogels, for enhanced cellular penetration
US15/025,559 Active 2035-07-04 US10385170B2 (en) 2013-09-29 2014-09-29 Method, device and system for spatially controlling the formation of a hydrogel electrochemically
US16/931,452 Pending US20210032412A1 (en) 2013-09-29 2020-07-17 Electrochemically engineered surface of hydrogels, particularly peg hydrogels, for enhanced cellular penetration

Family Applications After (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/025,559 Active 2035-07-04 US10385170B2 (en) 2013-09-29 2014-09-29 Method, device and system for spatially controlling the formation of a hydrogel electrochemically
US16/931,452 Pending US20210032412A1 (en) 2013-09-29 2020-07-17 Electrochemically engineered surface of hydrogels, particularly peg hydrogels, for enhanced cellular penetration

Country Status (9)

Country Link
US (3) US20160244574A1 (fr)
EP (2) EP3049122B1 (fr)
JP (2) JP6518673B2 (fr)
CN (1) CN105764540B (fr)
DK (2) DK3049122T3 (fr)
ES (2) ES2880311T3 (fr)
PL (1) PL3049122T3 (fr)
PT (1) PT3049122T (fr)
WO (2) WO2015044426A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP6991572B2 (ja) * 2018-01-18 2022-01-12 国立大学法人 東京大学 人工三次元組織のバリア機能測定システム、人工三次元組織のバリア機能測定方法及び人工三次元組織を用いた薬剤評価方法
KR102200543B1 (ko) * 2019-03-22 2021-01-08 숙명여자대학교산학협력단 전기영동법을 이용한 하이드로겔 성형방법 및 이를 이용한 성형품
CN115110105B (zh) * 2022-07-28 2023-11-21 广东海洋大学 一种虾壳简易制备壳寡糖的方法

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1999067019A1 (fr) * 1998-06-24 1999-12-29 Therasense, Inc. Syntheses electrochimiques combinatoires
ES2441414T3 (es) * 2002-09-26 2014-02-04 Ajinomoto Co., Inc. Preparación enzimática y procedimiento para producir alimentos que utiliza la misma
US8852620B2 (en) * 2007-07-20 2014-10-07 Medtronic Vascular, Inc. Medical devices comprising polymeric drug delivery systems with drug solubility gradients
US8501172B2 (en) * 2008-09-26 2013-08-06 Trustees Of Tufts College pH-induced silk gels and uses thereof
JP5885505B2 (ja) * 2008-09-26 2016-03-15 タフツ ユニバーシティー／トラスティーズ オブ タフツ カレッジ 活性なシルク粘液接着剤、シルク電気的ゲル化方法、およびデバイス
CA2832795C (fr) * 2010-04-12 2018-01-09 Tufts University Composants electroniques en soie et la methode de fabrication desdits composants
WO2011160098A2 (fr) * 2010-06-17 2011-12-22 Tufts University Particules optiques de soie et utilisations de celles-ci

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN105764540A (zh) 2016-07-13
US20210032412A1 (en) 2021-02-04
JP6669657B2 (ja) 2020-03-18
JP2017500055A (ja) 2017-01-05
US20160230197A1 (en) 2016-08-11
DK3049554T3 (da) 2021-07-12
EP3049122A1 (fr) 2016-08-03
EP3049554A1 (fr) 2016-08-03
ES2659567T3 (es) 2018-03-16
CN105764540B (zh) 2021-07-02
DK3049122T3 (en) 2018-02-26
PL3049122T3 (pl) 2018-07-31
WO2015044431A1 (fr) 2015-04-02
EP3049122B1 (fr) 2017-11-15
ES2880311T3 (es) 2021-11-24
PT3049122T (pt) 2018-02-22
EP3049554B1 (fr) 2021-04-21
US10385170B2 (en) 2019-08-20
WO2015044426A1 (fr) 2015-04-02
JP2016534746A (ja) 2016-11-10
JP6518673B2 (ja) 2019-05-22

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20210032412A1 (en) Electrochemically engineered surface of hydrogels, particularly peg hydrogels, for enhanced cellular penetration
Akther et al. Hydrogels as artificial matrices for cell seeding in microfluidic devices
Schmidt et al. Control of cell adhesion by mechanical reinforcement of soft polyelectrolyte films with nanoparticles
Caliari et al. A practical guide to hydrogels for cell culture
Dubiel et al. Bridging the gap between physicochemistry and interpretation prevalent in cell− surface interactions
Higgins et al. Organic conducting polymer–protein interactions
US20040147016A1 (en) Programmable scaffold and methods for making and using the same
Simona et al. Density gradients at hydrogel interfaces for enhanced cell penetration
JP2006500953A (ja) プログラム可能なスキャホールド材ならびにそれを作製および使用する方法
Abalymov et al. Cells-grab-on particles: A novel approach to control cell focal adhesion on hybrid thermally annealed hydrogels
Solbu et al. Assessing cell migration in hydrogels: An overview of relevant materials and methods
Ting et al. Conducting polymer hydrogels with electrically-tuneable mechanical properties as dynamic cell culture substrates
Sancho et al. Cell adhesion assessment reveals a higher force per contact area on fibrous structures compared to flat substrates
Yasmeen et al. Electrochemically synthesized polyacrylamide gel and core–shell nanoparticles for 3D cell culture formation
Khan et al. Bioactive Materials Based on Biopolymers Grafted on Conducting Polymers: Recent Trends in Biomedical Field and Sensing
Gao et al. Large-Scale Fabrication of Freestanding Polymer Ultrathin Porous Membranes for Transparent Transwell Coculture Systems
Puckert Direct Probing of Neural Stem Cell Interactions on Hydrogel Electrodes using Atomic Force Microscopy
Ting Design and Fabrication of Stiffness Modulated Conducting Polymer Hydrogels
Lin et al. Nanostructured effect on antifouling conducting polymers through interfacial adhesive interaction and protein adsorption
Kulkarni et al. Wettability switch of anodic titanium dioxide nanotubes with various diameters
Suter Cellular interactions with protein nanofibers
Cai Biological response of myoblasts to three-dimensional electrically conductive fibrous scaffolds
EP2853620A1 (fr) Procédé, dispositif et système permettant de commander électrochimiquement la formation d'un hydrogel
Hasan et al. 4 Engineering Cell Surface Interface in Tissue Engineering and Cell-Based Biosensors
Simona Interfacial electrochemistry of blood coagulation factors: Fundamentals and applications

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: ETH ZURICH, SWITZERLAND

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SIMONA, BENJAMIN R.;VOROS, JANOS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20160412 TO 20160413;REEL/FRAME:038274/0255

Owner name: UNIVERSITAT ZURICH, SWITZERLAND

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MILLERET, VINCENT;EHRBAR, MARTIN;REEL/FRAME:038274/0266

Effective date: 20160411

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION