US20160017086A1

US20160017086A1 - Flexible, open-cell thermoset foams and blowing agents and methods for making same

Info

Publication number: US20160017086A1
Application number: US14/701,511
Authority: US
Inventors: Ronald S. Grossman; Pranav Mehta
Original assignee: Honeywell International Inc
Current assignee: Honeywell International Inc
Priority date: 2014-04-30
Filing date: 2015-04-30
Publication date: 2016-01-21
Also published as: CN106459338A8; MX2016014167A; RU2016142531A; WO2015168486A1; BR112016025360A2; CA2947458A1; CN106459338A; KR20170003944A; EP3137525A4; WO2015168486A9; JP2017514947A; EP3137525A1

Abstract

Disclosed are methods and compositions for forming a flexible, open cell viscoelastic foams which utilize a thermosetting composition comprising one or more components capable of forming a thermoset matrix and a blowing agent comprising at least one chemical blowing agent, such as water, and at least one physical blowing agent selected from the group consisting of trans-1-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoropropene (HFCO-1233zd(E)), 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluoropropane (HFC-245fa); 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane (365mfc), blends consisting essentially of at least about 80% of HFC-365mfc and 1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropane (227ea), and combinations of any two or more of these.

Description

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to improved open-cell flexible thermoset foams and to compositions and methods for forming such foams.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

One of the most common thermoset flexible foams are polyurethane foams. Such foams are typically prepared by reacting a polyisocyanate with an active hydrogen-containing compound, such as a polyol, in the presence of a blowing agent and other optional ingredients.
Catalysts are employed to promote two major reactions to produce the foam. One reaction is primarily a chain extending isocyanate-hydroxyl reaction or gelation reaction by which a hydroxyl-containing molecule is reacted with an isocyanate-containing molecule to form a urethane linkage. The progress of this reaction increases the viscosity of the mixture, and generally contributes to crosslink formation with polyfunctional polyols (i.e. polyols having a nominal functionality above 2). The second major reaction comprises an isocyanate-water reaction which forms carbon dioxide as a reaction product. The CO2 thus generated serves to “blow” or assist in the “blowing” of the foam. The in-situ generation of carbon dioxide by this reaction plays an essential part in the preparation of many flexible polyurethane foams, including open-cell flexible foams. Heretofore such foams have frequently been referred to as “water-blown” flexible polyurethane foams.
While the use of water as the primary source of blowing agent in such foams is typical and frequently adequate, problems and/or deficiencies can be associated with such water-blown flexible foams. For example, in order to reduce the density of such foams, which in many applications is a highly desirable result, it is generally known that it might be possible to achieve a decrease in foam density by increasing the amount of the blowing agent. For water-blown foams, increasing the amount of water in the foamable mixture is a common approach to decrease foam density since additional water in the foaming composition will generally result in more CO2 and hence increase the amount of blowing agent. However, the isocyanate-water reaction that produces the carbon dioxide blowing agent (i.e. the water reaction) is exothermic. As a result, the use of additional water to generate additional CO2 blowing agent has the consequence of increasing the heat that is generated in the foaming reaction. In many cases, this additional heat can cause serious problems for the foaming process and/or the foam product produced. These potential disadvantages can be understood with reference to the types of intended applications for the flexible foam and the types of processes used to form the foam. As a result, limitations have been observed on the ability to increase water levels generally to about 3.8%; above this level problems have been known to arise, including the fact that the foam tends to become boardy and has a sandpaper feel leading to poor compression set
Flexible, open-cell polyurethane foams have applications in a variety of products and, depending on the end use, can be tailor made to fit the particular application and desired physical properties. The polyurethane industry has come to recognize two, generally distinct, categories of flexible foam products: high resilience foams and conventional, lower resilience foams. High resilience (HR) foam is widely used for furniture cushions, mattresses, automotive cushions and padding, and numerous other applications requiring foams have properties similar to those describe above. Conventional foam also is used in these applications and finds additional applications in the areas of carpet underlays and packaging materials.
One particular type of HR foam is flexible, viscoelastic polyurethane foam (also known as “dead” foam, “slow recovery” foam, or “high damping” foam). This type of foam is characterized by slow, gradual recovery from compression. While most of the physical properties of viscoelastic foams resemble those of conventional foams, the resilience of viscoelastic foams is much lower, generally less than about 15%. Suitable applications for viscoelastic foam take advantage of its shape conforming, energy attenuating, and sound damping characteristics. For example, the foam can be used in mattresses to reduce pressure points, in athletic padding or helmets as a shock absorber, and in automotive interiors for soundproofing.
Various synthetic approaches have been used to make viscoelastic foam. Formulators have modified the amount and type of polyol(s), polyisocyanate, surfactants, foaming catalysts, fillers (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 4,367,259, which is incorporated herein by reference), or other components, to arrive at foams having low resilience, good softness, and the right processing characteristics. Too often, however, the window for processing these formulations is undesirably narrow. Other viscoelastic foam formulations and processing techniques are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,391,935, U.S. Pat. No. 6,586,485. U.S. Pat. No. 6,734,220 and US 20050210595, each of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Commercially, water-blown flexible polyurethane foams are produced by both molded and free-rise (slab foam) processes. Conventional foam is most frequently made using the free-rise process. HR foam often is made using closed molds. Slab foams are generally produced more or less continuously by the free-rise process in large buns which, after curing, are sliced or otherwise formed into useful shapes. For example, carpet underlayment is sliced from large buns of polyurethane foam. Molding is typically utilized to produce, in what is essentially a batchwise process, an article in essentially its final dimensions. Automotive seating and some furniture cushions are examples of employment of the molding process. Slab foam buns produced using the free-rise process tend to be much larger than molded foams. While molded foam objects are normally less than about ten cubic feet in volume, slab foam buns are rarely less than 50 cubic feet in volume.
Each process has its advantages and disadvantages, and the impact of increasing water content to effect a decrease in density may be different in each. However, it is generally considered unacceptable if a decrease in density is associated with a substantial increase in rigidity. This is because while lower densities are generally desirable, if the means used to achieve this result produce an increase in the rigidity of the final foam, the foam will be considered not acceptable or at least of a lower quality/lower value. This is because rigidity is contrary to the intended purpose of such foams for the primary use as seat cushions, mattresses, sofa cushions, carpet underlayment and the like.
In general, the use of water to improve (ie., lower) the density of open cell, flexible foam is not a viable option beyond a certain point because it tends to cause other problems with the foam, such as an unacceptable increase in rigidity. Furthermore, by using additional water to blow a foam with decreased density can cause foam over-heating and significantly increases the hazard of fire, especially in slab foams because of the large volume of foam being produced. The hazard of fire is diminished when producing molded foam due to the small volume of the articles produced which facilitates their rapid cooling. In both cases, however, use of increased water can result in other problems, such as foam splitting, i.e. sizeable openings or voids in either or both the surface and interior of the foam.
It has been suggested that other, inert blowing agents may be used in addition to water in the formation of flexible foams. See for example U.S. Pat. No. 7,268,170. The '170 patent discloses that such other blowing agents can include halogenated hydrocarbons, liquid carbon dioxide, low boiling solvents such as, for example, pentane, and other known blowing agents. However, there is no indication that a careful selection from among this large group of possible blowing agents can be used in conjunction with water to achieve a reduction in foam density while maintaining one or more of the other important foam properties, such as IFD 25%, IFD 65%, tensile strength and elongation, compression set, and preferably all of these, at acceptable levels. Applicants have found that a careful selection of certain halogenated hydrocarbons for use in combination with water as a blowing agent is capable of achieving this and/or other advantageous, highly desirable and unexpected results, as explained hereinafter.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to novel open-cell flexible thermoset foams, to composition and methods for forming such foams and to articles formed from such foams. The invention involves the use of foamable compositions which comprise water blowing agent and certain organic, inert co-blowing agents, including certain HFC, HFO and/or HFCO compounds, to form foamable compositions that have several unexpected advantages in terms of processing of the foam and the resultant foam properties. As used in the context of blowing agent, the term “inert” means that the blowing agent acts principally, and preferably essentially entirely, as a physical blowing agent (as opposed to a chemical blowing agent).
In certain highly preferred embodiments, the present invention provides a method of forming a flexible, open cell foam comprising: (a) providing a foamable, thermosetting composition capable of forming an open-cell, flexible foam, said composition comprising (i) one or more components capable of forming a thermoset matrix, preferably a polyurethane matrix; and (ii) a blowing agent for forming open cells in said matrix, said blowing agent comprising, preferably comprising at least 75% by weight of, more preferably comprising at least about 85%, in certain embodiments consisting essentially of, and in certain embodiments consisting of, a combination of water and a co-blowing agent selected from the group consisting of trans-1-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoropropene (HFCO-1233zd(E)), 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluoropropane (HFC-245fa); 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane (365mfc), and blends consisting essentially of at least about 80% of HFC-365mfc and 1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropane (227ea) and combinations of any two or more of these; and (b) forming from said foamable composition a flexible foam comprising a matrix comprising thermoset polymer and a plurality of open cells in said matrix.
In certain preferred embodiments, the relative amounts of said water to said co-blowing agent(s) is effective to such that said methods: (1) produce a foam having a substantial density reduction in free-rise density compared to the same method but in which the co-blowing agent is not present; and/or (2) said providing step, especially and preferably in methods of forming molded flexible foam, utilizes a substantially reduced amount of foamable composition compared to the same method but in which the co-blowing agent is not present. In highly preferred embodiments, the substantial density reduction and/or foamable composition reduction is achieved while providing one or more of the following properties, and preferably at least any two of the following properties, and more preferably any three of the following properties, in a substantially acceptable value:

- (a) IFD 25%
- (b) IFD 65%
- (c) comfort factor
- (d) compression set
- (e) resilience.

As used herein the term “substantial density reduction” means a reduction in density of at least 5% relative to the density of the same foam produced without the co-blowing agent.
As used herein the term “substantially reduced amount of foamable composition” means at least about 5% less foamable composition relative to the amount of foamable composition needed to form the article in the absence of said co-blowing agent.
It is contemplated that the present invention can be used to advantage in many types and varieties of flexible, open-cell foam. It is generally preferred, however, that the foams according to the present invention have a density of less than about 8 pounds per cubic foot (hereinafter “PCF”), more preferably less than about 7 PCF, and in certain preferred embodiments of less than about 6 PCF. For embodiments involving viscoelastic foam, the density of the foam is preferably be less than about 7 pounds per cubic foot, more preferably less than about 6 PCF, and in certain preferred embodiments is in the range of from about 3 PCF to about 7 PCF, more preferably in certain embodiments in the range of from about 4 PCF to about 6 PFC.
In certain embodiments, including particularly HR foam, the density of the foam is not greater than about 4.5 PCF (including particularly for MDI-based foam, and even more particularly molded MDI-based foam), more preferably not greater than about 3 PCF and in certain embodiments even more preferably not greater than 2.5 PCF (including particularly for MDI-based foam, and even more particularly molded MDI-based foam). The difficulty of achieving such density reductions according to prior art methods is believed to result, at least in part, from the large size of the hard segment polymer domains in MDI, relative to those in TDI, and also because of the lower NCO of MDI on a per pound basis.
In certain preferred embodiments, the present methods achieve a free-rise density reduction that is reduced at least about 5 relative percent, more preferably in certain embodiments at least about 8 relative percent, more preferably in certain embodiments at least about 10 relative percent, and even more preferably in certain embodiments at least about 12 relative percent. In certain highly preferred embodiments, including in each of the preferred embodiments described in the preceding sentence, the free-rise density reduction is achieved in an amount of up to about 15 relative percent. As used herein, the term “free-rise density reduction” means the density of foam made according the present methods and/or compositions as measured in free-rise of the type described in Example 1 hereof, in comparison to the density of the free-rise foam produced using the same method but without said co-blowing agent.
In preferred embodiments, and especially those embodiments relating to viscoelastic foam, the preferred density reductions are achieved while also achieving viscoelastic foam having low resilience, i.e., less than 15% as measured in the standard ball rebound test (ASTM D 3574-95, Test H), more preferably in certain embodiments the foams have resilience less than 10%; and even more preferably in certain embodiments the foams have a resilience of less than 5%. In addition, the preferred viscoelastic foams have a high degree of softness, as indicated by 25% IFD (indentation force deflection at 25% compression, ASTM D 3574, Test B1—values that are preferably less than about 22 lbs. (about 100 Newtons (N)). Preferred foams also have low compression sets. For example, preferred foams exhibit a 90% compression set value, (Ct (ASTM D 3574, Test D—70 C and ambient humidity), of less than about 15%, more preferably less than about 10% and even more preferably less than about 5%.
In certain preferred embodiments, and especially those embodiments relating to viscoelastic foam, each of the preferred reductions in density is achieved without decreasing the 90% compression set value, Ct (ASTM D 3574, Test D), by more than about 20 relative percent, more preferably not more than about 10 relative percent. In certain preferred embodiments, each of the preferred reductions in density is achieved without increasing the resilience as measured in the standard ball rebound test (ASTM D 3574-95, Test H) by more than about 20 relative percent, more preferably not more than about 10 relative percent.
In certain preferred embodiments, each of the preferred reductions in density is achieved without decreasing elongation as measured by ASTM D3574 Test E by more than about 25 relative percent, more preferably 20 relative percent, and even more preferably not more than about 10 relative percent. In certain preferred embodiments, each of the preferred reductions in density is achieved without degrading comfort factor by more than about 20 relative percent, more preferably not more than about 10 relative percent.
In certain preferred embodiments each of the preferred reductions in density is achieved without changing Indent Force Deflection (IFD) at 25% as measured by ASTM D3574 Test B1 by more than 25 relative percent, more preferably 20 relative percent, and even more preferably by more than 10 relative percent. In certain preferred embodiments each of the preferred reductions in density is achieved without changing Indent Force Deflection (IFD) at 65% as measured by ASTM D3574 Test B1 by more than 25 relative percent, more preferably 20 relative percent, and even more preferably by more than 10 relative percent.
In certain preferred embodiments especially for viscoelastic foam each of the preferred reductions in density is achieved while achieving in the foam a comfort factor (“CF” also sometimes referred to as “comfort value (CV)) of from about 1.25 to 2.8 for High Resilience HR foam. In certain embodiments, the CV is from about 2 to about 4, more preferably from about 2 to about 3, and even more preferably from about 2.2 to about 2.8. As used herein, the terms comfort factor and CF mean the ratio of IFD at 65% to the IFD at 25%. The CF is an important property indicator in certain applications, such as for example in automobile seat cushion manufacture, in that it is considered to represent the preferred balance of a foam that is soft but at the same time supportive.
In certain preferred embodiments each of the preferred reductions in density is achieved while achieving a foam with a 50% compression set at 70 C and ambient relative humidity (unless otherwise indicated herein, this is sometimes referred to simply as Compression Set), also known as “constant deflection compression set) as measured by ASTM D3574 Test D, of not greater than 15%, more preferably of not greater than 12%. Wet compression set 50 C at 95% RH is preferred to be less than 12% and more preferred to be less than 10%.
In certain highly preferred embodiments, each of the preferred reductions in density is achieved while simultaneously achieving the preferred values as mentioned herein of at least two, more preferably at least three, and in certain preferred embodiments preferably all of the following foam properties: IFD at 25%; IFD at 65%; elongation; compression set; and comfort factor.
In certain highly preferred embodiments, particularly those involving slab foam and even more preferably TDI-based or TDI/MDI based slab foam, each of the preferred reductions in density is achieved while simultaneously achieving a reduction of the exotherm associated with the process of producing the foam, preferably in certain embodiments by at least about 10, and preferably from about 10 to about 20 relative percent.
The present invention also provides in certain embodiments foamable compositions comprising (a) one or more components capable of forming a thermoset matrix, preferably a polyurethane matrix; and (b) a blowing agent for forming open cells in said matrix, said blowing agent comprising, and in certain embodiments consisting essentially of, water and a co-blowing agent selected from the group consisting of trans-1-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoropropene (HFCO-1233zd(E)), 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluoropropane (HFC-245fa); 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane (365mfc), blends consisting essentially of at least about 80% of HFC-365mfc and 1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropane (227ea), and combinations of any two or more of these.
The present invention also provides in certain embodiments a blowing agent composition for use in forming a flexible, open-cell thermoset foam, preferably a polyurethane foam, said blowing agent composition comprising, and in certain embodiments consisting essentially of, water and a co-blowing agent selected from the group consisting of trans-1-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoropropene (HFCO-1233zd(E)), 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluoropropane (HFC-245fa); 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane (365mfc), blends consisting essentially of at least about 80% of HFC-365mfc and 1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropane (227ea), and combinations of any two or more of these.
One advantage that can be achieved in accordance with the present invention is the ability to form a low density, open-cell polyurethane foam having desirable physical properties, and in certain embodiments one or more properties (including the properties identified above) that are approximately as good as or better than foams made according to prior methods and compositions, and at the same time achieving a substantial advantage in raw material usage (e.g., polyurethane), preferably at least about 5%, more preferably at least about 10%, and in certain embodiments about 12%, compared to prior methods and compositions.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

In general the present invention is adaptable for use in connection with either the slabstock method and to foamable compositions for use with the slabstock method, or the molding method of forming flexible polyurethane foams, and even more preferably in certain embodiments cold cure molding of flexible, open cell foam and to foamable compositions for use with the molding method. Preferably, the foams of the present invention are polyurethane foams. As used herein, the terms “polyurethane foam” generally refers to cellular products as obtained by reacting polyisocyanates with one or more isocyanate-reactive hydrogen containing compounds, in the presence of a blowing agent, and in particular includes cellular products obtained with water as reactive or chemical blowing agent (involving a reaction of water with isocyanate groups yielding urea linkages and carbon dioxide). The term “polyurethane foamable compositions” refers to compositions capable of being formed into a polyurethane foam.
As used herein, the term “flexible polyurethane foam” refers to cellular products which have a substantial proportion of open cells, and even more preferably consists essentially of open cells, and which exhibit substantial shape recovery after deformation.
The preferred polyurethane foams comprise the reaction product of an aromatic polyisocyanate component and an isocyanate-reactive component, preferably comprising one or more hydroxyl functional materials, including preferably polyoxyalkylene polyether polyols. In general, the reaction mixture preferably includes one or more catalysts, one or more surfactants and a blowing agent component
FOAMABLE COMPOSITIONS For both slabstock and molded methods, the preferred foamable compositions and foams are polyurethane-based and will generally include the following components:
A) one or more polyisocyanates;
B) one or more isocyanate-reactive hydrogen containing compounds;
C) blowing agent;
D) catalyst;
E) surfactant;
F) foam modifier:
G) other additives.
In general, it is contemplated that those skilled in the art will be able to select and adjust the type and amount of each of these components in view of the teachings contained herein to achieve advantageous foam, formable compositions and methods of the present invention, and all such selections and adjustments are within broad scope of the present invention. According to preferred aspects of the invention, the materials and amounts described below have certain advantages.
A. Isocyanates
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the type and amount of isocyanate can vary widely depending on many factors, including whether the foamable composition is to be used in slabstock methods or molding methods, and the particular requirements of the methods involved and the expected end-use for the foam being formed.
Although many types of isocyanates are adaptable for use, in general, it is contemplated that the preferred compositions will comprise one or more aromatic polyisocyanate components, including preferably components based on MDI (diphenylmethane diisocyanate) c, TDI (toluene diisocyanate), mixtures of polymeric MDI and TDI, and modified versions of these, and combinations of these.
The terms “polymethylene polyphenylene polyisocyanates” and “MDI” are used herein to refer to polyisocyanates selected from diphenylmethane diisocyanate isomers, polyphenyl polymethylene polyisocyanates and derivatives thereof bearing at least two isocyanate groups and containing carbodiimide groups, uretonimine groups, isocyanurate groups, urethane groups, allophanate groups, urea groups or biuret groups. They are obtainable, for example, by condensing aniline with formaldehyde, followed by phosgenation, which process yields what is called crude MDI, by fractionation of said crude MDI, which process yields pure MDI and polymeric MDI, and by autocondensation of crude, pure or polymeric MDI, or reaction of excess of crude, pure or polymeric MDI with polyols or polyamines, which processes yield modified MDI, containing carbodiimide, uretonimine, isocyanurate, urethane, allophanate, urea or biuret groups. Examples of MDI that are adaptable for use in accordance with the present invention are provided in U.S. Pat. No. 5,399,594, which is incorporated herein by reference.
It is contemplated that in certain embodiments the isocyanate can include, 2,4′-diphenylmethane diisocyanate (2,4′-MDI), 4,4′-diphenylmethane diisocyanate (4,4′-MDI), H12MDI (hydrogenated MDI).
The term “TDI” is used herein to toluene dissocyanates general, and is intended to include but is not limited to 2,4-toluene diisocyanate (2,4-TDI), 2,6-tolylene diisocyanate (2,6-TDI), H6TDI (hydrogenated TDI), and combinations of these.
It is also contemplate that the isocyanate in general, and the MDI and the TDI components in particular, can include materials known as urethane prepolymers obtained by the pre-reaction/reacting such isocyanate compounds with one or more of the polyol compounds, including those described below.
Other isocyantes can be used instead of or in addition to one or more of the MDI components or TDI components, including 1,4-phenylene diisocyanate, xylylene diisocyanate (XDI), tetramethylxylylene diisocyanate (TMXDI), tolidine diisocyanate (TODI), and 1,5-naphthalene diisocyanate (NDI); aliphatic polyisocyanates such as hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI), trimethylhexamethylene diisocyanate (TMHDI), lysine diisocyanate, and norbornane diisocyanate methyl (NBDI); alicyclic polyisocyanates such as transcyclohexane-1,4-diisocyanate, isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI), H6XDI (hydrogenated XDI).
Once again, the type and the amount of the various isocyante components to be included can be determined by those skilled in the art in view of the teaching contained herein.
It is also contemplated that the amount of the isocyanate relative to the other components of the foamable composition according to the present invention can vary widely within the scope hereof, and all such relative amounts are within the broad scope of the invention. In general, however, it preferred that the amount of isocyanate is selected relative to the amount of the one or more isocyanate-reactive hydrogen containing compounds so as to obtain an Index of from about 75 to about 115, more preferably from about 80 to about 110 and even more preferably from about 85 to 105. The term “Index” is used by those skilled in the art as a shortcut term to indicate the ratio of NCO (isocyanate) groups to OH, water and other isocyanate-reactive groups in the foam. For instance an Index of 85 indicates a ratio of 0.85, while an Index of 105 indicates a ratio of 1.05.
In preferred embodiments, the isocyanate has an NCO percentage that can vary widely within the scope hereof. In certain preferred embodiments, the NCO of the isocyanate in the foamable composition is from about 20 to about 32%, more preferably from about 25 to about 32, and the NCO in the foam is from 12 to about 29%.
B. Isocyanate-Reactive Hydrogen Containing Compounds
As used herein, the term “isocyanate-reactive hydrogen containing compounds” or “isocyanate-reactive compounds” includes polyols as well as polyamines and combinations of these. The term “polyurethane foam” is thus intended also to include products which comprise urethane linkages together with urea linkages and even products which essentially comprise urea linkages with few or no urethane linkages. The isocyanate-reactive hydrogen containing compounds preferably comprising one or more hydroxyl functional materials, including preferably polyoxyalkylene polyether polyols
Once again, it is contemplated that the type and amount of isocyanate-reactive hydrogen containing compounds, including the polyol, can be readily selected for use with the present invention in view of the teachings contained herein. In certain preferred embodiments, polyol is used and is preferably selected from polyether polyol, a polyester polyol, or a polyol chain extender.
In highly preferred embodiments the isocyanate-reactive hydrogen containing compounds comprise, more preferably comprise in major proportion, polyether polyol(s). Representative examples of polyether polyols are polyether diols such as polypropylene glycol, polyethylene glycol and polytetramethylene glycol: polyether triols such as glycerol triols; polyether tetrols and pentols such as aliphatic amine tetrols and aromatic amine tetrols; polyether octols such as sucrose octol; and others such as sorbitol, trimethylol propane, and pentaerythritol. Of course, any combination of any two or more of these may be used and combined or not with other isocyanate-reactive hydrogen containing compounds.
In preferred embodiments the isocyanate-reactive component comprises a polyol, and even more preferably a blend of polyols. In certain preferred embodiments, the polyol comprises polyether polyol (such as may be formed by reacting polypropylene oxide and glycerol), and even more preferably in certain embodiments a polyether polyol having a molecular weight (MW) of from about 2,000 to about 10.000 preferably 3000 to 8000 and most preferably 4500 to 7500. With respect to functionality, it is preferred that the polyol component has a functionality of from about 1 to about 6, more preferably from about 2 to about 5, and even more preferably from about 2 to about 4.
C. Blowing Agent
Applicants have found that unexpected by highly desirable advantage can be achieved by the use of blowing agent, especially in combination with the other preferred aspects of the invention, comprising: (a) at least one chemical blowing agent, preferably water; and (b) at least one physical blowing agent, which preferably comprises, and in certain embodiments consisting essentially of at least one co-blowing agent selected from the group consisting of trans-1-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoropropene (HFCO-1233zd(E)); 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluoropropane (HFC-245fa); 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane (365mfc), blends consisting essentially of at least about 80% of HFC-365mfc and 1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropane (227ea), and combinations of any two or more of these.
In general it is preferred that the blowing agent component is present in the reaction mixture in an amount of from about 0.5% to about 10% by weight based on the total weight of the reaction mixture (including the aromatic polyisocyanate component and the isocyanate-reactive component), and more preferably from about 1% to about 8% by weight, and even more preferably from about 1.3 to about 4% by weight.
In certain embodiments the blowing agent preferably comprises from about 55 mol % to about 98 mol % of chemical or reactive blowing agent, preferably consisting essentially of water, and from about 2 mol % to about 45 mol % by of a physical blowing agent. In preferred embodiments the physical blowing agent is selected from the group consisting of trans-1-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoropropene (1-HFCO-12337d(E)), 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluoropropane (HFC-245fa); 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane (365mfc), blends consisting essentially of at least about 80% of HFC-365mfc and 1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropane (227ea), and combinations of any two or more of these. In certain preferred embodiments, the chemical or reactive blowing agent, preferably water, is present in amounts of from about 55 to about 98 mol %, more preferably from about 70 to about 96 mol %, and even more preferably in certain embodiments in amounts for from about 80 mol % to about 95 mol % based on the total blowing agent components, and the physical blowing agent, preferably selected from the group as identified herein, is present in an amount of from about 2 mol % to about 50 mol %, more preferably from 2 to about 30 mol % and even more preferably in amounts of from about 3 mol % to about 20 mol % of based on the total blowing agent components. In certain embodiments the chemical or reactive blowing agent, preferably water, is present in amounts of from about 85 mol % to about 95 mol % based on the total blowing agent components, and the physical blowing agent, preferably selected from the group as identified herein, is present in an amount of from about 5 mol % to about 15 mol % of the total blowing agent components.
D. Foam Modifying Agent
Applicants have found that certain of the physical properties of the foams formed according to the present invention can be unexpectedly be maintained and/or enhanced by incorporation into the foamable composition one or more foam modifying agents. More specifically, applicants have found that in certain embodiments a level of density reduction is desired, and can be achieved according to the present invention by use of the blowing agent as described herein, but one or more foam properties are altered in a manner that is undesirable and/or unacceptable for certain applications. The properties that can be negatively impacted in such situations include (a) IFD at 25%; (b) IFD at 65%; (c) comfort factor; (d) compression set; and (e) resilience. Applicants have found that including certain select compounds or combinations of compounds (referred to herein for convenience but not by way of limitation) a “foam modifying agent” of the present invention in the present compositions can interact in an unexpected manner with the other components of the composition during the foaming process to result in an improvement in one or more, and preferably at least two of these properties.
Applicants have found that certain diol, triols and combinations of these are capable of acting as effective reinforcing agents according to the preferred aspects of the present invention. For foaming modifying agents comprising diols, the molecular weight of the diol is preferably from about 60 to about 250, more preferably about 85 to about 180. In particularly preferred embodiments diol is 1.4 butane diol. For foaming modifying agents comprising triols, the molecular weight of the triol is preferably from about 70 to about 5000, more preferably about 80 to about 265. In particularly preferred embodiments the triol has at least a secondary and more preferably a tertiary amine. In highly preferred embodiments, the triol is selected from glycerol, triisopropanolamine, and polyether triol having a molecular weight of from about 250 to 275, and preferably of about 265. In preferred embodiments, the amount of the foam modifying agent is present in the composition in an amount of from greater than about 0 to about 1%.
E) Catalysts
In preferred embodiments the catalysts comprise, and in certain embodiments consist in major proportion of, tertiary amines containing hydroxyl, primary or secondary amines. Preferably the amine catalyst such as TEDA and Dabco BL-11 are used, in addition low-emissive or even “non-emissive” catalyst as would typically be used in open-cell flexible foam, and even more preferably molded foam used for auto or other transportation seat foam. Examples of catalyst that may be useful according to the present invention are: Dabco NE300, NE600, NE310, Polycat 140, NE1070 and NE1190, Jeffcat ZF-10, triethylene diamine, and 2-(2 dimethylaminoethyloxy)-N,N-dimethylethanamine (Dabco BI-11). The catalyst may also comprise in certain embodiments other catalytic materials that are known for use in minor amounts in flexible foam applications, including organo-metallic catalysts used for rigid foam would be included such as those based on tin, zinc, and bismuth.

Foaming Methods

A) Molding Methods
It is contemplated that all known methods of forming open-cell, flexible polyurethane foam are adaptable for use in accordance with the present methods, and all such methods are within the broad scope of the present invention. In general, the molding aspects of the present invention include the step of providing a foamable composition, preferably by mixing the polyol components and the isocyante components to form a reactive mixture, introducing the foamable composition into the mold, which is preferably a heated mold, and closing the mold. In preferred embodiments, the foamable composition sufficiently reactive to substantially fill the mold in a time period that is greater than about 2 seconds, and even more preferably in a time period greater than about 3 seconds and even more preferably in a time period that is greater than about 4 seconds. In certain embodiments, the time required to till the mold is greater than one or more of preferred minimum mold-file time but less than about 15 seconds, more preferably less than about 10 seconds, and even more preferably less than about 8 seconds.
In preferred embodiments the mold is a heated mold heated to a temperature of at least about 120 C, and even more preferably from about 120 F to about 140 F.
In preferred embodiments, the amount of foamable composition introduced to the mold creates an overpack of from about 0% to about 20%. As used herein, the term 0% overpack means introducing into the mold the theoretical amount of foamable composition that would be needed to fill the foam volume based on the free-rise density of the foamable composition. Other overpack values are based upon 0% overpack as this calculated.
Applicants have found that in certain preferred embodiments unexpected advantage can be achieved by conducting the molding step by using an overpack that is at least about 5%, more preferably at least about 10%, and even more preferably at least about 15%. More particularly, applicants have found that selection of relatively high overpack, including preferably an overpack value above about 10%, more preferably above about 12% and even more preferably above about 13%, can cause a substantial reduction in the compression set of the foam (whether the foam is MDI based, TDI based or a mixture of MDI and TDI) compared to a lower overpack value. Applicants have found that is unexpected advantage is desirable because in certain embodiments the use of the preferred co-blowing agent to achieve the desired free-rise density reduction can cause an unwanted, and in certain cases, an unacceptable increase in compression set. This result is especially unexpected and advantageous in connection with Wet Compression Set (at 50 C and 50% deflection), which in preferred embodiments of the present invention is less than 15%, more preferably less than 13%, and in highly preferred embodiments less than 10%.
B) Slab Foam Methods
According to preferred embodiments, the present invention provides method of forming open-cell, flexible slab foam. It is contemplated that all known methods of forming open-cell, flexible polyurethane slab foam are adaptable for use in accordance with the present methods, and all such methods are within the broad scope of the present invention. In general, the slab foam method aspects of the present invention include the step of providing a foamable composition according to the present invention onto a conveyor or other appropriate substrate and allowing the foam to rise under the desired conditions for the desired period of time.
Applicants have found that one unexpected advantage of the present invention is that use of a blowing agent to form a slab foam not only provides an advantageous density reduction, in preferred embodiments it also decreases the exotherm associated with the foaming process. Reduction of this exotherm, preferably by at least about 2%, more preferably at least about 3% and most preferably at least about 4% has many advantages in connection with slab foam processing. For example, such a reduction in exotherm may permit the use of different amounts or types of catalyst in foamable composition, which can have substantial advantages. It can also serve to avoid the problems with high exotherms as described herein before. Other advantages of methods involving such a reduction in exotherm will be understood by those skilled in the art.
It is generally preferred that slab foam formulations according to the present invention are TDI-based foams, although MDI-based foam and MDI/TDI combination foams can also realize advantage in connection with the preferred slab foam aspects of the present invention. For those embodiments in which combination of MDI and TDI are used, all ratios of these components are contemplated. However, it is preferred that when TDI:MDI combinations are used that the weight ratio in the formulation is from about 99.9:0.1 to about 50:50, more preferably 99.8:0.1 to about 50:40 and even more preferably 99.8:0.1 to about 80:20.
According to one aspect of the present invention, it is believed that a most advantageous use of the present invention can be achieved in connection with methods of forming open cell flexible foam products using the slab foam methods, and in particular with such methods for producing viscoelasitc flexible foams having a density of less than or equal to about 7 PCF, preferably less than or equal to 6 PCF, more preferably less than about 5 PCF, and even more preferably in certain embodiments less than about 4 PCF. Furthermore, it is preferred in certain embodiments that the viscoelastic foams produced according to the present invention have a Compression Set of not greater than 15%, more preferably of not greater than 12%, even more preferably of not greater than 10%, and most preferably in certain embodiments not greater than about 8%. It is also preferred in certain embodiments that the viscoelastic foam of the present invention has a comfort factor of from about 2 to about 4, more preferably from about 2 to about 3, and even more preferably from about 2.2 to about 2.8.

Articles

It is contemplated that any of the articles currently formed from flexible open-cell foam can be formed form the foams of the present invention. It is believed however that the molded foam formulations and the molding methods of the present invention are well suited to form automotive foams, including seat cushion foams, seat back foams, arm rest, dashboard, head rest, and head rest foams, as well as furniture foams, including particular office furniture.
It is believed however that the slab foam formulations and the slab forming methods of the present invention are well suited to form mattress foams, furniture foams, including sofas and large chairs and in airline seat foam.

EXAMPLES

In Examples 1-7 and C1-C8 which follow, bench scale foams are prepared. The foamable compositions are all prepared using as the isocyanate component the MDI LUPRINATE M10 ((5 gal=31.8% NCO) and the indicated ingredients of the polyol master batch as listed in Table A below, unless specifically indicated herein.

TABLE A

COMPONENT	MATERIAL	PROPERTIES

POLYOL A	BASF Pluracol 1026	Density at 21 C. - 1.03 g/cc
		Viscosity at 21 C. - 1329 cp
		MW functionality approx = 3Hydroxyl
		No. 26.5 - 28.5 KOH/g
POLYOL B	BASF Pluracol 528 FF	Density at 25 C. - 1.02 g/cc
		Viscosity at 25 C. - 5768 cp
		MW approx 3600
		45% graft polymer content, 3
		functionality
		Hydroxyl No. 17 - 21 KOH/g
POLYOL C	BASF Pluracol 816	Density at 25 C. - 1.02 g/cc
		Viscosity at 25 C. - 900 cp
		MW - 4800 g/mol 3 functionality
		Total Acid No. <=0.010
		Hydroxyl No. 34 - 36 KOH/g
SURFACTANT A	Dabco DC5043
SURFACTANT B	Dabco DC2525
SURFACTANT C	Niax L3640
ISOCYANATE A	Lupranate M10 (MDI)	Low Functionality Polymeric -
		% NCO - 31.7
		Nominal Functionality - 2.2
		Viscosity (77 F.) - 60 cps
BLOWING
AGENTS
	WATER (Deionized)
	HFCO-1233ZD(E)
	HFC-245FA
	HFC-365MFC
	HFC-365MFC/HFC 227EA
	(93/7 wt ratio)
FOAM
MODIFIERS
	Dipropylene Glycol
CATALYST A	DMEA
CATALYST B	Dabco 2040
CATALYST C	JeffCat ZF10
CATALYST D	Dabco NE300
CATALYST E	Dabco NE600
FOAM ADDITIVE A	Glycerol
FOAM ADDITIVE B	1,4 Butane Diol

A polyol master batch is created by introducing the Polyols A-C and Surfactants A and B into a container. These materials are then mixed until uniform. Then the foam modifier (diproplylene glycol), the water, and the catalyst are added. Mixing is resumed for several minutes to produce the polyol master batch as indicated in Control Table 1 below. To produce the foam, 220.7 grams of the isocyanate and 400 grams of the polyol master batch (as modified according to each of the examples) are mixed together for about 6 seconds at 6000 RPM to simulate the results of a machine molding process. Then the combined ingredients which form a foamable, reactive composition are poured into a 12×12×5 inch box and allowed to foam. The reaction profile is monitored until the surface is tack-free. The foam is allowed to cure at ambient conditions for about 20 minutes and then is crushed to open many, and preferably substantially all, of any remaining closed cells. After crushing, the foam is allowed to cure at ambient conditions for about 24 hours. Indications of foam shrinkage are noted after this period and then the foam is cut 12×12×4″ for physical property measurements.

Control Number 1

An open cell, flexible polyurethane foam was formed to be used as a control for Examples 1-4 and C1-C4 using the following 100 index foam formulation:

Control Table 1 - Polyol Master Batch

		WT % IN THE	PARTS PER	MOL % IN
	WEIGHT,	MASTER BATCH	HUNDRED	BLOWING
COMPONENT	grams	FORMULATION	POLYOL	AGENT

POLYOL A	700	81.02	85.59	NA
POLYOL B	45	5.21	5.52	NA
POLYOL C	70	8.1	8.59	NA
SURFACTANT A	2	0.23	0.25
SURFACTANT B	6	0.69	0.74	NA
FOAM MODIFIER	6.75	0.78	0.83
BLOWING AGENTS
WATER	27.5	3.18	3.37	100
CATALYST A	1.78	0.21	0.22	NA
CATALYST B	1.04	.012	0.13	NA
CATALYST B	3.89	0.45	0.48	NA
PHYSICAL PROPERTY	0	0	0	NA
MODIFIER
TOTAL	863.95	100.00	106.01	100

After being processed as indicated above to form a first foam, the procedure is repeated identically to form a second foam and a third foam. The foams so produced are tested and found to have the average following physical properties.
Density (PCF)—2.23
IFD 25%—125
IFD 65%—330
CV—2.64
Tensile Strength, psi—15.37
Elongation—88.8
Constant Deflection Compression (at 45-50° C.)—13.97

Example 1

Open cell, flexible polyurethane foams were formed using the same procedures and materials indicated above in connection with the control, except that four samples were made and for each sample the blowing agent was modified to include a co-blowing agent HFCO-1233zd(E) in an amount such that the total blowing agent had the following concentrations, with the total weight of the water in the formulation remaining unchanged:


BLOWING AGENT	Wt %	Mol %

WATER	50.72	88.14
HFCO-1233ZD(E)	49.28	11.86

The foams so produced are tested and found to have the following average physical properties and comparisons to the control:


CONTROL	EXAMPLE 1	% CHANGE

DENSITY, PCF	2.23	1.95	−12.4
CONSTANT	13.969	12.21	−12.6
DEFLECTION
COMPRESSION (at
45-50° C.)
IFD 25%	125	101	−19.2
IFD 65%	330	250	−24.24
Tensile Strength, psi	15.37	13.75	−10.54
Elongation	88.8	101.9	14.75

Example 2

Open cell, flexible polyurethane foams were formed using the same procedures and materials indicated above in connection with the control, except that five samples were made and for each sample the blowing agent was modified to include as a co-blowing agent HFC-245fa in an amount such that the HFC-245fa was present in the same molar amount as the co-blowing agent in Example 1, as indicated below:


BLOWING AGENT	Wt %	Mol %

WATER	49.96	88.14
HFC-245fa	50.04	11.86


The foams so
produced are tested
and found to have the
following average
physical properties
and comparisons to
the control:	CONTROL	EXAMPLE 2	% CHANGE

DENSITY, PCF	2.23	1.99	−10.7
CONSTANT	13.969	14.55	4.13
DEFLECTION
COMPRESSION (at
45-50° C.)

Example 3

Open cell, flexible polyurethane foams were formed using the same procedures and materials indicated above in connection with the control, except that three samples were made and for each sample the blowing agent is modified to include as a co-blowing agent HFC-365mfc/HFC227ea (in a relative weight ratio of 93/7) and in an amount such that the co-blowing agent is present in the same molar amount as the co-blowing agent in Example 1, as indicated below:


BLOWING AGENT	Wt %	Mol %

WATER	47.21	88.14
HFC-365mfc/227ea	52.79	11.86


CONTROL	EXAMPLE 3	% CHANGE

DENSITY, PCF	2.23	1.95	−12.6

Comparative Example C1

Open cell, flexible polyurethane foams were formed using the same procedures and materials indicated above in connection with Examples 1-3, except that two samples were made and for each sample the blowing agent included instead of a co-blowing agent an increased amount of water such that the same total moles of water were present in the composition as the total moles blowing agent present in Examples 1-3. Thus, the comparative formulation included 48.92 grams of water compared to 27.5 grams in the control.
The foams so produced are tested and found to have the following average physical properties and comparisons to the control:


CONTROL	EXAMPLE C1	% CHANGE

DENSITY, PCF	2.23	1.99	−10.9
CONSTANT	13.969	22.058	57.91
DEFLECTION
COMPRESSION (at
45-50° C.)

Comparative Example C2

Open cell, flexible polyurethane foams were formed using the same procedures and materials indicated above in connection with Examples 1-3, except that two samples were made and for each sample the blowing agent included as the co-blowing agent acetone and in an amount such that the co-blowing agent was present in the same molar amount as the co-blowing agent in Example 1, as indicated below:
BLOWING AGENT Wt % Mol %

WATER 69.73 88.14

Acetone 30.27 11.86

The foams so produced are tested and found to have the following average physical properties and comparisons to the control:


CONTROL	EXAMPLE C2	% CHANGE

DENSITY, PCF	2.23	2.1	−5.8

Comparative Example C3

Open cell, flexible polyurethane foams were formed using the same procedures and materials indicated above in connection with Examples 1-3, except that two samples were made and for each sample the blowing agent included as the co-blowing agent dimethoxymethane and in an amount such that the co-blowing agent was present in the same molar amount as the co-blowing agents in Examples 1-3, as indicated below:
BLOWING AGENT Wt % Mol %

WATER 70.89 88.14

Dimethoxymethane 9.54 11.86

The foams so produced are tested and found to have the following average physical properties and comparisons to the control:


CONTROL	EXAMPLE C4	% CHANGE

DENSITY, PCF	2.23	2.18	−2.2

Comparative Example C4

Open cell, flexible polyurethane foams were formed using the same procedures and materials indicated above in connection with Examples 1-3, except that two samples were made and for each sample the blowing agent included as the co-blowing agent methyl formate and in an amount such that the co-blowing agent was present in the same molar amount as the co-blowing agents in Examples 1-3, as indicated below:
BLOWING AGENT Wt % Mol %

WATER 69.01 88.14

Methy formate 30.99 11.86

The foams so produced are tested and found to have the following average physical properties and comparisons to the control:


CONTROL	EXAMPLE C4	% CHANGE

DENSITY, PCF	2.23	2.15	−3.8

Example 4

Open cell, flexible polyurethane foams were formed using the same procedures and materials indicated above in connection with Example 1 (the blowing agent consisting of water and HFCO-1233zd(E)), except that a compound found to have the ability to enhance certain foam physical properties when used in accordance with the present invention, including but not limited to compression set, namely, 1,4 butane diol, was added in an amount of about (0.95 pphp).
The foams so produced are tested and found to have the following average physical properties and comparisons to the control:


CONTROL	EXAMPLE 4	% CHANGE

DENSITY, PCF	2.23	1.84	−11.8
IFD 25%	125	121	−3.2
IFD 65%	330	330	0
Tensile Strength, psi	15.37	14.29	−7
Elongation	88.8	90.72	2.1

Control Number 2

An open cell, flexible polyurethane foam was formed to be used as a control for Examples 5-8 and C5-C8 using the following 100 Index foam formulation based on the ingredient(s) as indicated in Table A above:

Control Table 2 - Polyol Master Batch

POLYOL A	0	0	0	NA
POLYOL B	0	0	0	NA
POLYOL C	750	93.85	100	NA
SURFACTANT A	2	0.25	0.27
SURFACTANT B	6	0.75	0.8	NA
FOAM MODIFIER	14	1.75	1.87
BLOWING AGENTS
WATER	21	2.63	2.8	100
CATALYST A	1.64	0.21	0.22	NA
CATALYST B	0.96	.012	0.13	NA
CATALYST B	3.58	0.45	0.48	NA
PHYSICAL	0		0	NA
PROPERTY
MODIFIER
TOTAL	799.18	100.00	106.56	100

After being processed as indicated above to form a first foam, the procedure is repeated identically to form a second foam and a third foam. The foams so produced are tested and found to have the average following physical properties.
Density (PCF)—2.54
IFD 25%—157
IFD 65%—360
CV—2.31
Constant Deflection Compression (taken at 70° C.)—9.92

Example 5

Open cell, flexible polyurethane foams were formed using the same procedures and materials indicated above in connection with the control, except that two samples were made and for each sample the blowing agent included as a co-blowing agent HFCO-1233zd(E) in an amount such that the blowing agent had the following concentrations:


BLOWING AGENT	Wt %	Mol %

WATER	47.83	86.88
HFCO-1233ZD(E)	52.17	13.12


CONTROL	EXAMPLE 5	% CHANGE

DENSITY, PPCF	2.54	2.16	−12.6
CONSTANT	9.92	10.31	3.9
DEFLECTION
COMPRESSION
(taken at 70° C.)
IFD 25%	157	117	−25.48
IFD 65%	360	262	−27.22
CV	2.31	2.25	−2.6

Example 6

Open cell, flexible polyurethane foams were formed using the same procedures and materials indicated above in connection with the control except that for each sample the blowing agent included as a co-blowing agent HFC-245fa in an amount such that the HFC-245fa was present in the same molar amount as the co-blowing agent in Example 5, as indicated below:


BLOWING AGENT	Wt %	Mol %

WATER	47.07	86.88
HFC-245fa	52.93	13.12


CONTROL	EXAMPLE 6	% CHANGE

DENSITY, PCF	2.54	2.29	−10.63
CONSTANT	9.92	9.38	−6.5
DEFLECTION
COMPRESSION
(taken at 70° C.)
IFD 25%	157	115	−26.75
IFD 65%	360	262	−27.22
CV	2.31	2.25	−2.6

Example 7

Open cell, flexible polyurethane foams were formed using the same procedures and materials indicated above in connection with the control, except that for each sample the blowing agent included as a co-blowing agent HFC-365mfc/HFC227ea in a weight ratio of 93/7 and in an amount such that the co-blowing agent was present in the same molar amount as the co-blowing agent in Example 5, as indicated below:


BLOWING AGENT	Wt %	Mol %

WATER	44.35	86.88
HFC-365mfc/227ea	55.65	13.12


CONTROL	EXAMPLE 7	% CHANGE

DENSITY, PCF	2.54	2.18	−13.19
CONSTANT	9.92	9.98	.5
DEFLECTION
COMPRESSION
(taken at 70° C.)
IFD 25%	157	113	−28.03
IFD 65%	360	247	−31.39
CV	2.31	2.21	−4.3

Comparative Example C5

Open cell, flexible polyurethane foams were formed using the same procedures and materials indicated above in connection with Examples 5-7, except that the blowing agent included as the co-blowing agent trans-1,3,3,3-tetrafluoroethylene (“trans-HFO-1234ze”) (added to the polyol master batch by incorporating it into the master batch as a solution with the polyol) and in an amount such that the co-blowing agent was present as indicated below:
BLOWING AGENT Wt % Mol %

WATER 55.08 88.6

transHFO-1234ze 44.92 11.4

The foams so produced are tested and found to have the following average physical properties and comparisons to the control:


CONTROL	EXAMPLE C3	% CHANGE

DENSITY, PCF	2.54	2.46	−3.34

Comparative Example C6

Open cell, flexible polyurethane foams were formed using the same procedures and materials indicated above in connection with Examples 5-7, except that for each sample the blowing agent included as the co-blowing agent acetone and in an amount such that the co-blowing agent was present in the same molar amount as the co-blowing agent in Example 5, as indicated below:


BLOWING AGENT	Wt %	Mol %

WATER	67.23	86.88
Acetone

The foams so
produced are tested
and found to have the
following average
physical properties
and comparisons to
the control:	CONTROL	EXAMPLE C6	% CHANGE

DENSITY, PCF	2.54	2.47	−2.56
CONSTANT	9.92	9.97	0.5
DEFLECTION
COMPRESSION
(taken at 70° C.)
IFD 25%	157	144	−8.3
IFD 65%	360	315	−12.5
CV	2.31	2.19	−5.2

Comparative Example C7

Open cell, flexible polyurethane foams were formed using the same procedures and materials indicated above in connection with Examples 5-7, except that two samples were made and for each sample the blowing agent included as the co-blowing agent dimethoxymethane and in an amount such that the co-blowing agent was present in the same molar amount as the co-blowing agents in Examples 5-7, as indicated below:
BLOWING AGENT Wt % Mol %

WATER 61.02 86.88

Dimethoxymethane 38.98 13.12

The foams so produced are tested and found to have the following average physical properties and comparisons to the control:


CONTROL	EXAMPLE C7	% CHANGE

DENSITY, PPCF	2.54	2.49	−1.97
CONSTANT	9.92	9.8	−1
DEFLECTION
COMPRESSION
(taken at 70° C.)
IFD 25%	157	145	−7.64
IFD 65%	360	340	−5.55
CV	2.31	2.35	1.7

Comparative Example C8

Open cell, flexible polyurethane foams were formed using the same procedures and materials indicated above in connection with Examples 5-7, except that two samples were made and for each sample the blowing agent included as the co-blowing agent methyl formate and in an amount such that the co-blowing agent was present in the same molar amount as the co-blowing agents in Examples 5-7, as indicated below:
BLOWING AGENT Wt % Mol %

WATER 66.34 88.14

Methyl formate 33.66 11.86

The foams so produced are tested and found to have the following average physical properties and comparisons to the control:


CONTROL	EXAMPLE C8	% CHANGE

DENSITY, PCF	2.54	2.51	−1.18
CONSTANT	9.92	15.97	60.98
DEFLECTION
COMPRESSION
(taken at 70° C.)
IFD 25%	157	145	−7.64
IFD 65%	360	344	−4.44
CV	2.31	2.37	2.6

Example 8 and Comparative Example 9

A commercial scale production unit is used to produce molded automobile seat cushion foams. The foamable compositions are prepared using as the isocyanate component the MDI from BASF sold under the trade designation D4002 and the polyol master batch, including catalysts, surfactants, modifiers and a blowing agent consisting essentially of water, which is used is sold by BASF under the trade designation Elastoflex EW 5322. The equipment used is an OSM machine rated at 300 grams per second. The foam is formed in a first run from a foamable composition in an polyol:isocyanate weight ratio of 100:75 using the commercially supplied materials (referred to as “Base Line” below). The molding operation is repeated except that about 2 parts by weight of HFC-245fa per hunder parts by weight of polyol master blend is added as a co-blowing agent. Each foam thus formed was tested and found have the following properties:


	FOAMS

Name of			Example C9	Example 8
the test	Test Method	Unit	BASE LINE	2% 245fa

Density	ASTM D 3574, Test A	Kgf/m³	36.5	33.6
Hysteresis	ASTM D 3574,	%	36.7	36.02
Loss	Appendix X6
	Procedure A
Tensile	ASTM D 3574, Test E	kPa	1.21	1.01
Strength
Elongation	ASTM D 3574, Test E	%	91.1	86.8
at Break
Tear	ASTM D 624, Die C	kN/m	0.54	0.5
Strength
Resilience		%	57	56
Hardness		Kgf	24.2	24.2

Control Number 3

An open cell, flexible polyurethane foam is formed to be used as a control for Examples 9-12 and C10-C14 using the same formulation as Control 1 except at a 90 index.
After being processed as indicated above to form a first foam, the procedure is repeated identically to form a second foam and a third foam. The foams so produced are tested and found to have the average following physical properties.
Density (PCF)—2.48
IFD 25%—129
IFD 65%—314
CV—2.43
Tensile Strength, psi—15.5
Elongation—84.5
Constant Deflection Compression (at 70° C.)—13.5

Example 9A

Open cell, flexible polyurethane foams were formed using the same procedures and materials indicated above in connection with Example 1 but using the foam formulation of Control Number 3 with the blowing agent modified as per Example 1.
The foams so produced are tested and found to have the following average physical properties and comparisons to the control:


CONTROL	EXAMPLE 9A	% CHANGE

DENSITY, PCF	2.48	2.17	−12
IFD 25%	129	109	−16
IFD 65%	314	258	−18
Comfort	2.43	2.37	−2
Tensile Strength, psi	15.5	14.7	−5
Elongation	84.5	91.3	8
Compression Set (at	13.5	11.9	−12
70° C., ambient relative
humidity)

Example 9B

Open cell, flexible polyurethane foams were formed using the same procedures and materials indicated above in connection with Example 9A, except that index of the formulation was increased from 90 to 98 by increasing the amount of isocyanate in the formulation.
The foams so produced are tested and found to have the following average physical properties and comparisons to the control:


CONTROL	EXAMPLE 9	% CHANGE

DENSITY PCF	2.48	2.05	−13.87
IFD 25%	129	118	−8.53
IFD 65%	314	292	−7.01
Comfort	2.43	2.47	+1.68
Tensile Strength, psi	15.5	17.2	+11.33
Elongation	84.5	90.3	6.86
	13.5

Example 10

Open cell, flexible polyurethane foams were formed using the same procedures and materials indicated above in connection with Example 1 but using the foam formulation of Control Number 3, except that a compound found to have the ability to enhance certain foam physical properties when used in accordance with the present invention, including but not limited to compression set and comfort factor, namely, glycerol was added in an amount of about 5% equivalent.
The foams so produced are tested and found to have the following average physical properties and comparisons to the control:


CONTROL	EXAMPLE 9	% CHANGE

DENSITY, PCF	2.48	2.15	−13
IFD 25%	129	114	−12
IFD 65%	314	283	−10
Comfort	2.43	2.48	2
Tensile Strength, psi	15.5	19.1	24
Elongation	84.5	90.9	8
Compression - 70° C.	13.5	15.8	17

Example 11

Open cell, flexible polyurethane foams were formed using the same procedures and materials indicated above in connection with Example 1 but using the foam formulation of Example 10, except that glycerol was added in an amount of about 7.5% equivalent.
The foams so produced are tested and found to have the following average physical properties and comparisons to the control:


CONTROL	EXAMPLE 9	% CHANGE

DENSITY, PCF	2.48	2.06	−17
IFD 25%	129	112	−13
IFD 65%	314	276	−12
Comfort	2.43	2.46	1
Tensile Strength, psi	15.5	13.8	−11
Elongation	84.5	74.	−12
Compression (at	13.5	16.8	24
70° C.)

Example 12

Open cell, flexible polyurethane foams were formed using the same procedures and materials indicated above in connection with Example 1 but using the foam formulation of Control Number 3, except that a compound found to have the ability to enhance certain foam physical properties when used in accordance with the present invention, including but not limited to compression set, namely, a polyether triol was added in an amount of about 15 equivalent weight. The polyether triol had a molecular weight (avg.) of about 265, an equivalent weight of about 87, a hydroxyl number (avg.) of about 648, and a maximum acid number of about 0.05 (mg KOH/g), a maximum water content of about 0.03, a pH (avg.) of about 6.3, a color (max—APHA) of about 50, a viscosity (cps at 25 C) of about 930, and a specific gravity (at 25 C) of about 1.091, and is sold under the trade designation Poly-G 76-635 by Monument Chemicals, Inc.
The foams so produced are tested and found to have the following average physical properties:


CONTROL	EXAMPLE 12	% CHANGE

DENSITY, PCF	2.48	2.21	−11
IFD 25%	129	138	7
IFD 65%	314	329	5
Comfort	2.43	2.38	−2
Tensile Strength, psi	15.5	16.6	7
Elongation	84.5	81	−4
Compression (at	13.5	21.2	57
70° C.)

Example 13A-13F

Each of the viscoelastic foams according to Examples 1-6 of U.S. Pat. No. 6,391,935 is formed, except that in each case 2 parts per hundred parts of polyol (pphp) of HFCO-1233zd is added as a co-bowing agent. In each case the density of the foam is reduced by at least about 20% while substantially maintaining within acceptable parameters or improving the physical properties of the viscoelastic foam.

Example 14A-14F

Each of the viscoelastic foams according to Examples 1-6 of U.S. Pat. No. 6,391,935 is formed, except that in each case 2 parts per hundred parts of polyol of 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluoropropane (HFC-245fa) is added as a co-bowing agent. In each case the density of the foam is reduced by at least about 20% while substantially maintaining within acceptable parameters or improving the physical properties of the viscoelastic foam.

Example 15A-15F

Each of the viscoelastic foams according to Examples 1-6 of U.S. Pat. No. 6,391,935 is formed, except that in each case 2 pphp of an 87%/13% mixture 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane (365mfc)/1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropane is added as a co-bowing agent. In each case the density of the foam is reduced by at least about 20% while substantially maintaining within acceptable parameters or improving the physical properties of the viscoelastic foam.

Example 16A-16F

Each of the viscoelastic foams according to Examples 1-6 of U.S. Pat. No. 6,391,935 is formed, except that in each case 2 pphp of 93:7 HFC-365mfc:HFC-227ea is added as a co-bowing agent. In each case the density of the foam is reduced by at least about 20% while substantially maintaining within acceptable parameters or improving the physical properties of the viscoelastic foam.

Example 17A-17F

Each of the viscoelastic foams according to Examples 1-6 of U.S. Pat. No. 6,586,485 is formed, except that in each case 3 parts per hundred parts of polyol (pphp) of HFCO-1233zd is added as a co-bowing agent. In each case the density of the foam is reduced by at least about 20% while substantially maintaining within acceptable parameters or improving the physical properties of the viscoelastic foam.

Example 18A-18F

Each of the viscoelastic foam according to Examples 1-6 of US U.S. Pat. No. 6,586,485 is formed, except that in each case 3 parts per hundred parts of polyol of 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluoropropane (HFC-245fa) is added as a co-bowing agent. In each case the density of the foam is reduced by at least about 20% while substantially maintaining within acceptable parameters or improving the physical properties of the viscoelastic foam.

Example 19A-19F

Each of the viscoelastic foams according to Examples 1-6 of US U.S. Pat. No. 6,586,485 is formed, except that in each case 3 pphp of an 87%/13% mixture 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane (365mfc)/1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropane is added as a co-bowing agent. In each case the density of the foam is reduced by at least about 20% while substantially maintaining within acceptable parameters or improving the physical properties of the viscoelastic foam.

Example 20A-20F

Each of the viscoelastic foams according to Examples 1-6 of US U.S. Pat. No. 6,586,485 is formed, except that in each case 4 pphp of 93/7 HFC-365mfc:HFC-227ea is added as a co-bowing agent. In each case the density of the foam is reduced by at least about 20%; while substantially maintaining within acceptable parameters or improving the physical properties of the viscoelastic foam.
Control Number 4
In each of the following comparative examples 10-12 and Examples 21-26 which follow, bench scale foams are prepared. The foamable compositions are all prepared using as the isocyanate component the MDI, PAPI 94 and indicated ingredients of the polyol master batch as listed in Table B below, unless specifically indicated herein.

TABLE B

COMPONENT	MATERIAL	PROPERTIES

POLYOL A	Voranol 3140	1000 MW EO/PO triol
		Hydroxyl No. - 168
		Viscosity (25 C.) - 235 cSt
POLYOL B	Voranol 3150	1000 MW triol
		Hydroxyl No. - 167
		Viscosity (25 C.) - 244 cps
POLYOL C	Voranol 3136	3100 MW heteropolymer triol
		(glycerine-initiated)
		Hydroxyl No. - 54
		Viscosity (25 C.) - 460 cSt
STABILIZER A	Niax L-618 Silicone
STABILIZER B	Niax L-627 Silicone
ISOCYANATE A	PAPI 94	Polyethylene polyphenyliscoyanate
		containing MDI (from 55 to 65%
		4,4′-methylenediphenyl
		diisocyanate)
		Wt % NCO - 31.3-32.6
		Isocyanate EW - 131.5
		Flash Point (F.) - >400
		Densisty (g/cc) - 1.23
		Viscosity (25 C.) - 40-60 cSt
BLOWING AGENTS	WATER (Deionized)
	HFCO-1233ZD(E)
	HFC-245FA
	HFC-365MFC
	HFC-365MFC/HFC
	227EA (93/7 wt ratio)
	HFO-1336mzzm
FOAM MODIFIERS
	Dipropylene Glycol
CATALYST A	Niax A-1/Dabco BL-11
CATALYST B	Niax A-1/Dabco 33-LV
CATALYST C	Cotin 430
FOAM ADDITIVE A	Glycerol
FOAM ADDITIVE B	1,4 Butane Diol

A polyol master batch is created by introducing the Polyols A-C and Surfactants A and B into a container. These materials are then mixed until uniform. Then the foam modifier (diproplylene glycol), the water, and the catalyst are added. Mixing is resumed for several minutes to produce the polyol master batch as indicated in Control Table 1 below. To produce the 75 Index foam (Comparative Example C10 and Examples 21 and 22), 165 grams of the isocyanate and 400 grams of the polyol master batch are mixed together. To produce the 80 Index foam (Comparative Example C11 and Examples 23 and 24), 167 grams of the isocyanate and 380 grams of the polyol master batch are mixed together. To produce the 85 Index foam (Comparative Example C12 and Examples 25 and 26), 177.5 grams of the isocyanate and 380 grams of the polyol master batch are mixed together. In each case, the combination of the master batch and the isocyanate are mixed together for about 6 seconds at 6000 RPM to simulate the results of a machine molding process. Then the combined ingredients which form a foamable, reactive composition are poured into a 8×8×5 inch box and allowed to foam. The reaction profile is monitored until the surface is tack-free. The foam is allowed to cure at ambient conditions for about 20 minutes and then is crushed to open many, and preferably substantially all, of any remaining closed cells. After crushing, the foam is allowed to cure at ambient conditions for about 24 hours. Indications of foam shrinkage are noted after this period and then the foam is cut for physical property measurements.

Control 4

Comparative Examples 10, 11 and 12 and Examples 21-26

An open cell, viscoelasticflexible polyurethane foam was formed to be used as a control for Examples 21-26 and Comparative Examples 10-12 using the following foam formulation adjusted to obtain the indicated index:

Control Table 4 - Polyol Master Batch

		WT % IN THE	PARTS PER
	WEIGHT,	MASTER BATCH	HUNDRED
COMPONENT	grams	FORMULATION	POLYOL

POLYOL A	1200	58.5	60
POLYOL B	400	19.5	20
POLYOL C	400	19.5	20
SURFACTANT A	16	0.76	0.8
BLOWING AGENTS
WATER	30	1.45	1.5
CATALYST A	4	0.19	0.2
CATALYST B	1	0.05	0.05
CATALYST C	1	0.05	0.05
PHYSICAL	0	0	0
PROPERTY
MODIFIER
TOTAL	2052	100	102.6

After being processed as indicated above to form a first foam, the procedure is repeated identically to form a second foam and a third foam. The foams so produced are tested and found to have the average physical properties provided in the table below in connection with Comparative Examples 10-12 and Examples 21-26.
A viscoelastic foam is formed from a formulation having indexes of 75 (Comparative Example 10), 80 (Comparative Example 11) and 85 (Comparative Example 12) using as the blowing agent in each case about 1.5 pphp of water as indicated above. Each such example is repeated, expect added as a co-blowing agent in each case 2 and 3 pphp of transHFCO-1233zd is added.


	IFD ASTM 3574 B1			Memory

Load at	Load at	Support			(Test M),
25%	65%	Factor		% Density	Seconds to
B (N)	D (N)	(D/B)	Density	Reduction	Recovery

Ex. C 10	71	139	1.95	5.14	NA	1.1
Ex. 21	45	67	1.51	3.7	−28.2	1.6
(2 pphP)
Ex. 22	49	87	1.76	3.63	−29.5	1.5
(3 pphP)
Ex. C 11	70	153	2.18	4.41	NA	4.1
Ex. 23	80	180	2.24	3.42	−22.4	19
(2 pphP)
Ex. 24	58	96	1.66	3.37	−23.6	2.3
(3 pphP)
Ex. C 12	106	201	1.89	4.32	NA	1.4
Ex. 25	72	125	1.72	3.54	−18.1	12
(2 pphP)
Ex. 26	70	127	1.81	3.29	−23.8	7.7
(3 pphP)

Control 5

Comparative Examples 13 and 14 and Examples 27-31

In Examples 27-31 and C13 and C14 which follow, bench scale, molded foams are prepared. The foamable compositions (95 Index) are all prepared using as the isocyanate component the MDI LUPRINATE M10 ((31.8% NCO)) and ingredients of the polyol master batch as listed in Table A above, unless specifically indicated herein.
A polyol master batch is created by introducing the Polyols A-C and Surfactant C into a container. These materials are then mixed until uniform. Then the foam modifier (diproplylene glycol), the water, and the Catalysts C-E are added. Mixing is resumed for several minutes to produce the polyol master batch as indicated in Control Table 5 below. In order to determine the amount of foamable material to use in order to produce 0% overpack, the free-rise density as determined in accordance with Control No. 1 above is used to determine the theoretical weight of material needed to fill the mold based on the free rise density and this amount is increased by 10% as a starting point. Tests are then conducted to make fine adjustments to the amount of material needed to completely fill the mold, that is, establish the 0% overpack condition for the formulation. To produce the control foam at 95 Index and 100% mold fill (no overpacking), 246.1 grams of the isocyanate and 480 grams of the polyol master batch are mixed together for about 8 seconds at about 2500-3000 RPM and then all but 92 grams of the mixture are poured manually into the mold over a time of about 8 seconds. The mold is a 14×14×4″ mold preheated to 130 F. As soon as the contents are poured into the mold, the lid is closed on the mold. The foams are de-molded 4 minutes after mixing and immediately crushed by hand to create open cells. The foam blocks were allowed to complete their reaction outside the mold at 75 F for 2 days prior to testing. They were tested first for overall density. Then the foams were processed as follows for testing according to ASTM D3574 methods—all blocks had the first inch from the bottom removed and then a one-inch slice was taken for core density measurements. Then the core density sample was cut into 2″×2″×1″ samples for compression set testing. Then a ½ inch slice was taken for tensile/elongation testing and Die A “dogbone” samples for tensile/elongation testing were pressed from this slice of foam.

Control Number 5

An open cell, flexible polyurethane foam was formed by molding as indicated above to be used as a control for Examples 27-31 and C13 and C14 using the following 95 Index foam formulation:

Control Table 5 - Polyol Master Batch

POLYOL A	1125	34.21	36.21
POLYOL B	31.25	0.95	1.01
POLYOL C	1950	59.32	62.78
SURFACTANT C	33	1.00	1.06
FOAM MODIFIER	31.25	0.95	1.01
BLOWING AGENTS
WATER	100	3.04	3.22
CATALYST C	10	0.3	0.32
CATALYST B	4	.12	0.13
CATALYST B	3.33	0.10	0.11
PHYSICAL PROPERTY	0	0	0
MODIFIER
TOTAL	3288.34	100.00	105.84

After being processed as indicated above to form a first foam, the procedure is repeated identically to form a second foam. The control foams so produced are tested and found to have the average following physical properties.
Density (PCF)

- Overall—3.08
- Core—2.87

IFD 25%—225
IFD 65%—608
CF—2.7
Tensile Strength, psi—19.8
Elongation—68.8
50% Compression Set (at 70° C. and ambient relative humidity)—7.65
The following examples 27 through 30B illustrate the use of one of the claimed co-blowing agents, 1233zd(E) at an amount of 2%, based on the total foam weight. These examples all use a 12% reduced amount of total material in the mold, as compared to the Control foam #5.
Example 27 illustrates the use of 1233zd(E) by itself. It can be seen that hardness and tensile strength decrease, which may be considered undesirable in molded foam application.
Examples 27A through 30B illustrate the use of 2% by weight 1233zd (E) plus the addition of low molecular weight di-functional and tri-functional OH-containing molecules. The amount of MDI also is adjusted in these examples to keep the NCO:OH Index at 95. The purpose of these added materials is to make the reduced density foams' physical properties closer to the original Control Foam #5.

Example 27

Open cell, flexible, molded polyurethane foams were formed using the same procedures and materials indicated above in connection with the Control 5, except that the amount of polyol master batch was reduced to 422.4 grams and the isocyanate was reduced to 216.6 grams (a 12% reduction in usage) and except that the blowing agent was modified to include a co-blowing agent HFCO-1233zd(E) in an amount equal to 2% of the total formulation (12.78 grams) such that the total blowing agent had the following weights and concentrations.


BLOWING AGENT	Wt, gm.	Wt %	moles	Mol %

WATER	12.84	50.1	0.7133	87.9
HFCO-1233ZD(E)	12.78	49.9	0.0983	12.1


CONTROL	EXAMPLE 27	% CHANGE

OVERALL	3.08	2.73	−11.36
DENSITY, PCF
CORE DENSITY,	2.87	2.52	−12.20
PCF
50%	7.65	6.95	−9.15
COMPRESSION
SET (at 70° C. and
ambient relative
humidity)
IFD 25%	225.5	101	−55.21
IFD 65%	608	250	−58.88
Tensile Strength, psi	19.8	13.75	−30.56
Elongation	68.8	101.9	+48.11

Example 27A

Open cell, flexible, molded polyurethane foams were formed using the same procedures and materials indicated above in connection with the Example 27, except that 5% equivalent of 45 equivalent weight 1,4-butane diol (3.8 grams; 0.6 pphp) were add to the polyol master batch and the amount of polyol master batch was reduced to 417.5 grams and the isocyanate was reduced to 223.2 grams (a 12% reduction in material usage).
The foams so produced are tested and found to have the following average physical properties and comparisons to the control:


CONTROL	EXAMPLE 27A	% CHANGE

OVERALL	3.08	2.79	−9.42
DENSITY, PCF
CORE DENSITY,	2.87	2.45	−14.63
PCF
50%	7.65	9.1	+18.95
COMPRESSION
SET (at 70° C. and
ambient relative
humidity)
IFD 25%	225.5	177	−21.51
IFD 65%	608	515	−15.30
Tensile Strength, psi	19.8	17.5	−11.62
Elongation	68.8	63.2	−8.4

Example 27B

Open cell, flexible, molded polyurethane foams were formed using the same procedures and materials indicated above in connection with the Example 27A, except that 12.5% equivalent weight of 45 equivalent weight 1,4-butane diol (9.2 grams; 1.5 pphp) were add to the polyol master batch and the amount of polyol master batch was reduced to 409.2 grams and the isocyanate was reduced to 230.3 grams (a 12% reduction in material usage).
The foams so produced are tested and found to have the following average physical properties and comparisons to the control:


CONTROL	EXAMPLE 27B	% CHANGE

OVERALL	3.08	2.84	−7.8
DENSITY, PCF
CORE DENSITY,	2.87	2.5	−12.9
PCF
50%	7.65	15.3	+100.00
COMPRESSION
SET (at 70° C. and
ambient relative
humidity)
IFD 25%	225.5	196	−13.08
IFD 65%	608	610	+0.33
Tensile Strength, psi	19.8	20.4	+3.03
Elongation	68.8	97.6	+41.86

Example 28A

Open cell, flexible, molded polyurethane foams were formed using the same procedures and materials indicated above in connection with the Example 27, except that 5% weight of the 87 equivalent weight triol PolyG 76-636 (7.3 grams; 1.1 pphp) were add to the polyol master batch and the amount of polyol master batch was reduced to 418.3 grams and the isocyanate was reduced to 220.9 grams 12% in order to keep the total weight of the total material constant at 639.5+−0.5 grams.
The foams so produced are tested and found to have the following average physical properties and comparisons to the control:


CONTROL	EXAMPLE 28A	% CHANGE

OVERALL	3.08	2.78	−9.7
DENSITY, PCF
CORE DENSITY,	2.87	2.68	−6.6
PCF
50%	7.65	7.9	+3.27
COMPRESSION
SET (at 70° C. and
ambient relative
humidity)
IFD 25%	225.5	180	−20.18
IFD 65%	608	534	−12.17
Tensile Strength, psi	19.8	20.1	+1.52
Elongation	68.8	54

Example 28B

Open cell, flexible, molded polyurethane foams were formed using the same procedures and materials indicated above in connection with the Example 28A, except that 12.5% equivalent weight of 265 MW triol PolyG 76-636 (17.43 grams) were add to the polyol master batch and the amount of polyol master batch was reduced to 93 grams and the isocyanate was reduced to 27.16 grams, in order to keep the total weight of the wet foam at 639.5+−0.5 grams. The foam popped in the mold.

Example 28C

Open cell, flexible, molded polyurethane foams were formed using the same procedures and materials indicated above in connection with the Example 28A, except that 7.5% equivalent weight of 265 MW triol PolyG 76-636 (10.8 grams; 1.7 pphp) were add to the polyol master batch and the amount of polyol master batch was reduced to 405.5 grams and the isocyanate was reduced to 230.33 grams, in order to keep the total weight of the wet foam at 639.5+−0.5 grams, an additional and 0.065% of Niax L3640 surfactant is added to the master batch. Effective foams were formed, tested and found to have the following average physical properties and comparisons to the control:


CONTROL	EXAMPLE 28C	% CHANGE

OVERALL DENSITY,	3.08	2.9	−5.8
PCF
CORE DENSITY, PCF	2.87	2.6	−10.5
50% COMPRESSION	7.65	11.2	+46.41
SET (at 70° C.
and ambient
relative humidity)
IFD 25%	225.5	232	+2.88
IFD 65%	608	640	+5.26
Tensile Strength, psi	19.8	24.2	+22.22
Elongation	68.8	78.2	+13.66

Example 29A

Open cell, flexible, molded polyurethane foams were formed using the same procedures and materials indicated above in connection with the Example 26, except that (see comment) weight of 30 equivalent weight glycerol (2.54 grams; 0.6 pphp) were add to the polyol master batch and the amount of polyol master batch was reduced to 414 grams and the isocyanate was reduced to 222.5 grams.
The foams so produced are tested and found to have the following average physical properties and comparisons to the control:


CONTROL	EXAMPLE 29A	% CHANGE

OVERALL DENSITY,	3.08	2.75	−10.71
PCF
CORE DENSITY, PCF	2.87	2.45	−14.63
50% COMPRESSION	7.65	12	+56.86
SET (at 70° C.
and ambient
relative humidity)
IFD 25%	225.5	238	+5.54
IFD 65%	608	706	+16.12
Tensile Strength, psi	19.8	22.3	+12.63
Elongation	68.8	53.6	−22.09

Example 29B

Open cell, flexible, molded polyurethane foams were formed using the same procedures and materials indicated above in connection with the Example 29A, except that 7.5% equivalent weight of glycerol (3.8 grams; 0.6 pphp) were add to the polyol master batch and the amount of polyol master batch was reduced to 414 grains and the isocyanate was reduced to 225.6 grams (a ______% reduction in usage).
The foams so produced are tested and found to have the following average physical properties and comparisons to the control:


CONTROL	EXAMPLE 29B	% CHANGE

OVERALL DENSITY,	3.08	2.75	−10.7
PCF
CORE DENSITY, PCF	2.87	2.45	−14.6
50% COMPRESSION	7.65	12.8	+67.32
SET (at 70° C.
and ambient
relative humidity)
IFD 25%	225.5	257	+13.97
IFD 65%	608	712	+17.11
Tensile Strength, psi	19.8	21.4	+8.08
Elongation	68.8	56.	−18.60

Example 30A

Open cell, flexible, molded polyurethane foams were formed using the same procedures and materials indicated above in connection with the Example 26, except that 5% equivalent of a 64 equivalent weight triisopropanolamine (5.37 grams; 0.8 pphp) were added to the polyol master batch and the amount of polyol master batch was reduced to 417.87 grams and the isocyanate was reduced to 221.7 grams.
The foams so produced are tested and found to have the following average physical properties and comparisons to the control:


CONTROL	EXAMPLE 30A	% CHANGE

OVER ALL DENSITY,	3.08	2.78	−9.7
PCF
CORE DENSITY, PCF	2.87	2.42	−15.7
50% COMPRESSION	7.65	15.3	+100.00
SET (at 70° C.
and ambient
relative humidity)
IFD 25%	225.5	212	−5.99
IFD 65%	608	580	−4.61
Tensile Strength, psi	19.8	24.2	+22.22
Elongation	68.8	64.1	−6.83

Example 30B

Open cell, flexible, molded polyurethane foams were formed using the same procedures and materials indicated above in connection with the Example 30B, except that 7.5% equivalent of a 64 equivalent weight triisopropanolamine (7.95 grams; 1.2 pphp) were add to the polyol master batch and the amount of polyol master batch was reduced to 417.9 grams and the isocyanate was reduced to 221.7 grams.
The foams so produced are tested and found to have the following average physical properties and comparisons to the control:


CONTROL	EXAMPLE 30B	% CHANGE

OVER ALL DENSITY,	3.08	2.76	−10.4
PCF
CORE DENSITY, PCF	2.87	2.65	−7.7
50% COMPRESSION	7.65	15.4	+101.31
SET (at 70° C.
and ambient
relative humidity)
IFD 25%	225.5	203	−9.98
IFD 65%	608	553	−9.05
Tensile Strength, psi	19.8	15.8	−20.20
Elongation	68.8	42.4	−38.37

Comparative Example 13

Open cell, flexible, molded polyurethane foams were formed using the same procedures and materials indicated above in connection with the Control 5, except that the amounts of polyol master batch and isocyanate were increased (while maintaining the same relative proportions) by an amount of about 5% (specifically, 4.7%). This is considered to be a low overpack foam condition. After being processed as indicated above to form a first foam, the procedure is repeated identically to form a second foam. The control foams so produced are tested and found to have the average following physical properties.
Density (PCF)
Overall—3.05
Core—2.95
IFD 25%—292
IFD 65%—735
CF—2.52
Tensile Strength, 27.7 psi
Elongation—64.0%
50% Compression Set (at 70° C. and ambient relative humidity)—12.1

Example 31

Open cell, flexible, molded polyurethane foams were formed using the same procedures and materials indicated above in connection with the Comparative Example 13 to produce a low overpack foam (actual overpack was 5.6%), except that the blowing agent was modified to include a co-blowing agent HFCO-1233zd(E) in an amount equal to 2% by weight of the total formulation such that the total blowing agent had the following weights and concentrations:


BLOWING AGENT	Wt %	Mol %

WATER	12.84	50.1
HFCO - 1233ZD(E)	12.78	49.9


Comparative
Example 13	EXAMPLE 31	% CHANGE

Actual Over pack %	4.7	5.6	n/a
OVERALL DENSITY,	3.05	2.65	−13.1
PCF
CORE DENSITY, PCF	2.95	2.47	−16.3
50% COMPRESSION	12.1	11.3
SET (at 70° C.
and ambient
relative humidity)
IFD 25%	292	234	−
IFD 65%	690	717	+
Tensile Strength, psi	27.7	22.9	−17.3
Elongation	64	53.4	−16.6

Due to the overpack in Example 31 plus the added 12337d(e), applicants have unexpectedly reduced density by about 13% while keeping key physical properties constant—within a narrow range.

Comparative Example 14

Open cell, flexible, molded polyurethane foams were formed using the same procedures and materials indicated above in connection with the Control 5, except that the amounts of polyol master batch and isocyanate were increased (while maintaining the same relative proportions) by an amount of about 10% (specifically, 8.9%). This is considered to be a high overpack foam condition. After being processed as indicated above to form a first foam, the procedure is repeated identically to form a second foam. The control foams so produced are tested and found to have the average following physical properties.
Density (PCF)
Overall—3.11
Core—3.07
IFD 25%—289
IFD 65%—690
CF—2.39
Tensile Strength, 32 psi
Elongation—64.5
50% Compression Set (at 70° C. and ambient relative humidity)—10.5

Example 32

Open cell, flexible, molded polyurethane foams were formed using the same procedures and materials indicated above in connection with the Comparative Example 14 to produce a high overpack foam (actual overpack was 13.1%), except that the blowing agent was modified to include a co-blowing agent HFCO-1233zd(E) in an amount equal to 2% by weight of the total formulation such that the total blowing agent had the following weights and concentrations:


BLOWING AGENT	Wt %	Mol %

WATER	12.84	50.1
HFCO - 1233ZD(E)	12.78	49.9


Comparative
Example 14	EXAMPLE 32	% CHANGE

Actual Over pack %	8.9	13.1	n/a
OVER ALL DENSITY,	3.11	2.97	−4.5
PCF
CORE DENSITY, PCF	3.07	2.55	−16.9
50% COMPRESSION	10.5	12.1	+15.24
SET (at 70° C.
and ambient
relative humidity)
IFD 25%	289	281	−2.77
IFD 65%	690	717	+3.91
Tensile Strength, psi	32	27.2	−15.0
Elongation	64.5	61.8	−4.2

Due to the high amount of overpack of Comparative Example 13 and the added overpack in Example 31, the added 1233zd(e) unexpectedly reduced density by 4.5% while keeping key physical properties constant—within a narrow range.
In Examples 33-______ which follow, pilot scale, TDI-based slabstock foams are prepared. The foamable compositions (105Index) are all prepared using as the isocyanate component the TDI 80/20 (80% 2,4 isomer and 20% 2,6 isomer) and ingredients of the polyol master batch as listed in Table C below, unless specifically indicated herein.

TABLE C

COMPONENT	MATERIAL

POLYOL A	Manali EO-PO polyol having
	molecular weight 3000 and OH
	value of 56.
SURFACTANT A	Niax L 618 silcon
Water
Physical BLOWING AGENTS -	HFCO-1233ZD(E)
245fa Methylene Chloride,,
1233zd(E), amounts used,
are molar equivalents to
245fa
	HFC-245FA
	Methylene Chloride
	HFC-365MFC/HFC 227EA
	(93/7 wt ratio)
CATALYST A	Niax D19 stannous octoate
	catalyst
CATALYST B	Niax B11 plus amine catalyst
FOAM ADDITIVE A
FOAM ADDITIVE E

A polyol master batch is created according to methods similar to those described above in connection with the respect to Controls 1-5.
Control Number 6
An open cell, flexible polyurethane foam was formed to be used as a control for Examples 32—using the following 105 index foam formulation:

CONTROL TABLE 6

Polyol Master Batch

	PARTS PER
	HUNDRED POLYOL

	COMPONENT
	POLYOL A	100
	TDI	34
	SURFACTANT A	1
	BLOWING AGENTS
	WATER	2.45
	CATALYST A	0.2
	CATALYST B	0.04
	TOTAL

After being processed as indicated above to form a first foam, the procedure is repeated identically to form a second foam and a third foam. The foams so produced are tested and found to have the average density in PCF of 2.56 and an average exotherm (as measured by peak exotherm temperature rise in degree C of 122.2 and an average IFD as follows
IFD 10%—17.64
IFD 25%—43.12
IFD 50%—92.12
IFD 65%—132
CF—2.64

Example 33A and 33B

Open cell, flexible slabstock polyurethane foams were formed using the same procedures and materials indicated above in connection with Control 6, except that two samples were made and for each sample the blowing agent was modified to include a co-blowing agent HFC-245fa in an amounts of 2 phhp (Example 33A) and 4 pphp (Example 33B) such that the total blowing agent had the following concentrations, with the total weight of the water in the formulation remaining unchanged.


	Wt %	Mol %

BLOWING AGENT - 2 pphp
WATER	55.06	91.12
HFC - 245fa	44.94	8.88
BLOWING AGENT - 4 pphp
WATER	37.98	83.69
HFC - 245fa	62.01	16.31


		% CHANGE		% CHANGE
CONTROL	EXAMPLE	EXAMPLE	EXAMPLE	EXAMPLE
6	33A	33A	33B	33B

DENSITY,	2.56	2.33	−8.63	1.98	−22.63
PCF
IFD 10%	17.64	14.7	−16.67	5.88	−66.67
IFD 25%	43.12	38.22	−11.36	21.56	−50.00
IFD 50%	92.12	86.24	−6.38	49	−46.81
IFD 65%	132.63	121.52	−8.37	73.5	−44.58
Exotherm	122.2	118.3	−3.19	116.1	−4.09

Example 34A and 34B

Open cell, flexible slabstock polyurethane foams were formed using the same procedures and materials indicated above in connection with Control 6, except that two samples were made and for each sample and the blowing agent was modified to include a co-blowing agent HFCO-1233zd(E) in the amounts of 1.94 pphp and 3.88 pphp such that the total blowing agent had the following concentrations, with the total weight of the water in the formulation remaining:


	Wt %	Mol %

BLOWING AGENT - 1.94 pphp
WATER	55.81	91.12
HCFC -1233zd	44.19	8.88
BLOWING AGENT - 3.88 pphp
WATER	38.70	83.69
HCFC - 1233zd	61.3	16.31


		% CHANGE		% CHANGE
CONTROL	EXAMPLE	EXAMPLE	EXAMPLE	EXAMPLE
6	34A	34A	34B	34B

DENSITY,	2.56	2.46	−3.93	2.22	−13.04
PCF
IFD 10%	17.64	15.19	−13.89	8.82	−50
IFD 25%	43.12	38.22	−11.36	29.4	−31.82
IFD 50%	92.12	84.28	−8.51	65.66	−28.72
IFD 65%	132.63	120.05	−9.48	92.12	−30.54
Exotherm	122.2	119.3	−2.33	119.4	−2.25

Example 34A and 34B

Open cell, flexible slabstock polyurethane foams were formed using the same procedures and materials indicated above in connection with Control 6, except that two samples were made and for each sample the blowing agent was modified to include a co-blowing agent methylene chloride in the molar equivalent of 4 pphp of 245fa such that the total blowing agent had the following concentrations, with the total weight of the water in the formulation remaining unchanged.


	Wt %	Mol %

BLOWING AGENT - 2 pphp
WATER	65.86	91.12
MeCl2	34.14	8.88
BLOWING AGENT - 4 pphp
WATER	49.2	83.69
MeCl2	50.8	16.31


		% CHANGE		% CHANGE
CONTROL	EXAMPLE	EXAMPLE	EXAMPLE	EXAMPLE
6	34A	34A	34B	34B

DENSITY,	2.56	2.49	−8.63	2.3	−10.06
PCF
IFD 10%	17.64	10.29	−41.67	7.84	−55.56
IFD 25%	43.12	37.24	−13.64	29.40	−31.82
IFD 50%	92.12	85.26	−7.45	67.62	−26.60
IFD 65%	132.63	122.50	−7.64	98.00	−26.11
Exotherm	122.2	120.8	−1.11	120.8	−1.11

Example 35A and 35B

Open cell, flexible slabstock polyurethane foams are formed using the same procedures and materials indicated above in connection with Control 6, except that two samples are made and for each sample the blowing agent is modified to include a co-blowing agent HFC-365mfc/HFC227ea (in a relative weight ratio of 93/7) and in an amount such that the co-blowing agent is present in the same molar amount as the co-blowing agents in Example 33A and 33B, respectively. The result produces an advantageous result in density with other properties being considered acceptable for most seat cushion applications.

Example 36A and 36B

Open cell, flexible slabstock polyurethane foams are formed using the same procedures and materials indicated above in connection with Control 6, except that two samples are made and for each sample the blowing agent is modified to include a co-blowing agent HFC-365mfc/HFC227ea (in a relative weight ratio of 80/20) and in an amount such that the co-blowing agent is present in the same molar amount as the co-blowing agents in Example 33A and 338, respectively. The result produces an advantageous result in density with other properties being considered acceptable for most seat cushion applications.

Examples 37-41

In Examples 37-41 bench scale foams are prepared. The foamable compositions are all prepared using as the isocyanate component the TDI LUPRINATE TD80 and the indicated ingredients of the polyol master batch as listed in Table D below, unless specifically indicated herein.

TABLE D

TDI

	MATERIAL	PROPERTIES

COMPONENT
POLYOL A	Poly-G 85-29 (EO Caped	functionality
	Polyether Triol)	approx = 3.
		27.2-33.88 mg KOH/g
POLYOL B	Voranol-Voractiv 6340	functionality
	(EO Caped Polyether	approx = 3.
	Triol)	33.88 mg KOH/g
POLYOL C	Speciflex NC 701	functionality
	(Grafted Polyether	approx = .
	Polyol)	24.35 mg KOH/g
POLYOL D	Lumulse POE 26	Hydroxyl Vale =
(CELL OPENER)	Ethoxylated glycerin;	134.83 mg KOH/g
ISOCYANATE A	Lupranate TD80 (TDI)	% NCO- 48
ISOCYANATE B	Rubinate M Standard	% NCO- 31
	Polymeric MDI
SURFACTANT A	Tegostab B4690
	(Polyether/Silicone
	Oil Mix)
BLOWING AGENTS
	WATER (Deionized)
	HFCO-1233ZD(E)
	HFC-245FA
	HFC-365MFC
	HFC-365MFC/
	HFC 227EA
	(93/7 wt ratio)
FOAM MODIFIERS
	Dipropylene Glycol
CATALYST A	Dabco 33LV
	(Triethylenediamine in
	Dipropylene Glycol)
CATALYST B	Niax A-1 (Bis(2-
	dimethylaminoethyl)
	Ether in Dipropylene
	Glycol)
CHAIN EXTENDER	Diethanolamine	Diethanolamine
	LFG 85%	with 15% water
		(Eq. wt. = 35.04)
FOAM ADDITIVE A	Glycerol
FOAM ADDITIVE B	1,4 Butane Diol

A polyol master batch is created by introducing the Polyols A-C and Surfactant A into a container. These materials are then mixed until uniform. The remaining ingredients (except for the isocyanate) are added. Mixing is resumed for several minutes to produce the polyol master batch as indicated in Control Table 1—TDI below. To produce the foam, the isocyanate and the polyol master batch (as modified according to each of the examples) are mixed together for about 7 seconds at 3100 RPM to simulate the results of a machine molding process. Then the combined ingredients which form a foamable, reactive composition are poured into a 13.4×18.25×4.6 inch box and allowed to foam. The reaction profile is monitored until the surface is tack-free. The foam is allowed to cure at ambient conditions for about 30 minutes and then is transferred to a preheated oven at 75 C to complete the cure. The foams were then aged for at least one week before testing

Control Number 7—TDI Molded Foam

An open cell, flexible polyurethane foam was formed to be used as a control for Examples 37-41 the following 90 index foam formulation:

CONTROL TABLE 7

TDI - Polyol + TDI

	WEIGHT, parts

	COMPONENT
	POLYOL A	33.5
	POLYOL B	33.5
	POLYOL C	30
	POLYOL C	3
	SURFACTANT A	1
	SURFACTANT B	0
	FOAM MODIFIER	0
	BLOWING AGENTS
	WATER	3.5
	CATALYST A	1
	CATALYST B	1
	ISOCYANATE A	34.89

After being processed as indicated above to form a first foam, the procedure is repeated identically to form a second foam and a third foam. The foams so produced are tested and found to have the average following physical properties (because of sample size using CFD pursuant to ASTM standards instead of IFD).
Density (PCF)—2.28
CFD 25%—0.26
CFD 65%—0.66
CFD—1.54
Tensile Strength, psi—16.05
Elongation—113.93

Example 37

Open cell, flexible polyurethane foams were formed using the same procedures and materials indicated above in connection with the control, except that the blowing agent was modified to include a co-blowing agent HFCO-1233zd(E) in an amount of about 2% by weight of the formulation with the amount of water being unchanged.
The foams so produced are tested and found to have the following average physical properties and comparisons to the control:


CONTROL	EXAMPLE 37	% CHANGE

DENSITY, PCF	2.28	2.09	−8
CFD 25%	0.26	0.23	−12
CFD 65%	0.66	0.62	−6%
Tensile Strength, psi	16.05	14.57	−9%
Elongation	113.93	124.69	9%

Example 38

Open cell, flexible polyurethane foams were formed using the same procedures and materials indicated above in connection with the control, except that the blowing agent was modified to include a co-blowing agent HFCO-1233zd(E) in an amount of about 4% by weight of the formulation with the amount of water being unchanged.
The foams so produced are tested and found to have the following average physical properties and comparisons to the control:


CONTROL	EXAMPLE 37	% CHANGE

DENSITY, PCF	2.28	1.9	−17
CFD 25%	0.26	0.18	−31
CFD 65%	0.66	0.28	−30%
Tensile Strength, psi	16.05	13.74	−14%
Elongation	113.93	131.49	+15%

Example 39

The procedure of Example 37 is repeated except that the blowing agent is modified to include as a co-blowing agent HFC-365mfc/HFC227ea (in a relative weight ratio of 93/7) and in an amount such that the co-blowing agent is present in the same molar amount as the co-blowing agent in Example 37. Foams with reduced density are produced.

Example 40

The procedure of Example 38 is repeated except that the blowing agent is modified to include as a co-blowing agent HFC-365mfc/HFC227ea (in a relative weight ratio of 93/7) and in an amount such that the co-blowing agent is present in the same molar amount as the co-blowing agent in Example 37. Foams with reduced density are produced.

Example 41

Molded foams are formed using the formulation as described above in connection with Control 7 and formed into molds using steps as described in connection with Comparative Examples 13-14 and Examples 32-33. The results indicate that wet compression set (at 50 C, 50% deflection and 95% relative humidity) is unacceptable, for example, greater than 10, for molding operations of about 0 overpack, and that with both low overpack operations (overpack about 5% to less than 10%) and high overpack (greater than 10% and up to 15% and up to about 20%) substantially reduced the Wet Compression Set, preferably by more than about 10%, and even more preferably more than about 15%, and to a value of less than about 10).

Example 42

Molded foams are formed using the formulation as described above in connection with Control 7 and formed into molds using steps as described in connection with Comparative Example 13 with overpack at about 0% and except that the polymer polyol Speciflex NC 701 is increased by an amount of up to about 33 relative percent (with a corresponding proportional reduction in the weight of the other polyol components to maintain the same weight of polyol in the formulation). The results indicate that wet compression set (at 50 C, 50% deflection and 95% relative humidity) is improved.
Although the invention has been described in detail in the foregoing for the purposes including explanation and illustration, it is to be understood that all of the recited detail is not necessarily limiting of the invention and that variations can be made therein by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention except as it may be limited by the claims presented herein below and as amended hereinafter.

Claims

1. A method of forming a flexible, open cell polyurethane molded foam having a target IFD at 65% comprising:

(a) providing a foamable, thermosetting composition capable of forming an open-cell, flexible polyurethane foam, said composition comprising: (i) one or more polyol components; (ii) one or more isocyanate components, and (iii) blowing agent comprising water and at least one physical blowing agent, said physical blowing agent being present in an amount effective to reduce the free-rise density of the foam by at least about 5% relative to the same foam made without the physical blowing agent;

(b) molding said foamable composition to form a molded foam; and

(c) prior to and/or simultaneous with said molding step, ensuring that the IFD at 65% of said molded foam is not more than 15% less than the target IFD at 65% by carrying out one or more of the following steps:

(1) including in said foamable composition an polymer modifying agent in an amount effective to increase the IFD at 65% of said molded foam;

(2) conducting said molding step by overpacking said mold in amount effective to increase the IFD at 65% of said molded foam;

(3) increasing the index of said foamable composition by an amount effective to increase the IFD at 65% of said molded foam; and

(4) including in said foamable composition an amount of polymeric polyol so as to increase the IFD at 65% of said molded foam.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein said step (c) comprises including in said foamable composition a polymer modifying agent in an amount effective to increase the IFD at 65% of said molded foam.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein said step (c) comprises conducting said molding step by overpacking said mold in amount effective to increase the IFD at 65% of said molded foam.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein said step (c) comprises increasing the index of said foamable composition by an amount effective to increase the IFD at 65% of said molded foam.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein said step (c) comprises including in said foamable composition an amount of polymeric polyol so as to increase the IFD at 65% of said molded foam.

6. A method of forming a flexible, open cell polyurethane foam comprising:

(a) providing a foamable, thermosetting composition capable of forming an open-cell, flexible polyurethane foam, said composition comprising: (i) one or more polyol components; (ii) one or more isocyanate components, and (iii) blowing agent comprising water and at least one physical blowing agent selected from the group consisting of trans-1-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoropropene (HFCO-1233zd(E)), 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluoropropane (HFC-245fa); 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane (365mfc), blends consisting essentially of at least about 80% of HFC-365mfc and 1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropane (227ea), and combinations of any two or more of these; and

(b) forming from said foamable composition a flexible, open cell polyurethane foam comprising a matrix comprising said thermoset polymer and a plurality of open cells in said matrix, said foam having a free-rise density that is at least about 5% less than the density of the free-rise density of the foam formed from said same composition but in the absence of said physical blowing agent and having an IFD at 65% of not more than 20% less than the IFD at 65% of said same foam but without said physical blowing agent.

7. The method of claim 6 wherein said forming step comprises molding said foamable composition.

8. The method of claim 6 wherein said forming step comprises slab forming said foamable composition.

9. A automotive seat cushion containing a foam formed according to the method of claim 7.

10. A foamable composition for forming a flexible, open cell polyurethane foam comprising:

(a) one or more polyol components;

(b) one or more isocyanate components;

(c) blowing agent comprising water and at least one physical blowing agent selected from the group consisting of trans-1-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoropropene (HFCO-1233zd(E)), 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluoropropane (HFC-245fa); 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane (365mfc), blends consisting essentially of at least about 80% of HFC-365mfc and 1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropane (227ea), and combinations of any two or more of these; and

(d) a foam modifying agent selected from diols, triols and glycerols.

11. A method of forming a flexible, open cell viscoelastic foam comprising:

(a) providing a foamable, thermosetting composition capable of forming an open-cell, viscoelastic flexible foam, said composition comprising (i) one or more components capable of forming a thermoset viscoelastic matrix; and (ii) a blowing agent for forming open cells in said viscoelastic matrix, said blowing agent comprising at least one chemical blowing agent and at least one physical blowing agent selected from the group consisting of trans-1-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoropropene (HFCO-1233zd(E)), 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluoropropane (HFC-245fa); 1,1,1,3,3-pentafluorobutane (365mfc), blends consisting essentially of at least about 80% of HFC-365mfc and 1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropane (227ea), and combinations of any two or more of these; and

(b) forming from said foamable composition a flexible viscoelastic foam comprising a matrix comprising said thermoset polymer and a plurality of open cells in said matrix, said foam having a density of not greater than about 6 pounds per cubic foot.

12. The method of claim 11 wherein said foamable composition comprises MDI

13. The method of claim 11 wherein said foamable composition comprises TDI.

14. The method of claim 11 wherein said blowing agent comprises from about 70 to about 99 mole percent water and from about 1 to about 30 mole percent of said physical co-blowing agent.

15. The method of claim 11 wherein said foam has a density of not greater than about 4 pounds per cubic foot, said density of said foam being at least about 8 relative percent less than the density of said foam produced using the same method but without said co-blowing agent.

16. The method of claim 11 wherein said foamable composition further comprises at least one additive selected from the group consisting of 1,4 butane diol, glycerol, polyether triol, and combinations of these.