US20150374415A1 - Systems and methods for stabilizing the motion or adjusting the position of the spine - Google Patents
Systems and methods for stabilizing the motion or adjusting the position of the spine Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20150374415A1 US20150374415A1 US14/676,553 US201514676553A US2015374415A1 US 20150374415 A1 US20150374415 A1 US 20150374415A1 US 201514676553 A US201514676553 A US 201514676553A US 2015374415 A1 US2015374415 A1 US 2015374415A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- distraction
- lateral
- members
- spinal motion
- motion segment
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/56—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor
- A61B17/58—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor for osteosynthesis, e.g. bone plates, screws, setting implements or the like
- A61B17/68—Internal fixation devices, including fasteners and spinal fixators, even if a part thereof projects from the skin
- A61B17/70—Spinal positioners or stabilisers ; Bone stabilisers comprising fluid filler in an implant
- A61B17/7062—Devices acting on, attached to, or simulating the effect of, vertebral processes, vertebral facets or ribs ; Tools for such devices
- A61B17/7065—Devices with changeable shape, e.g. collapsible or having retractable arms to aid implantation; Tools therefor
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/02—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets for holding wounds open; Tractors
- A61B17/025—Joint distractors
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/34—Trocars; Puncturing needles
- A61B17/3468—Trocars; Puncturing needles for implanting or removing devices, e.g. prostheses, implants, seeds, wires
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/56—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor
- A61B17/58—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor for osteosynthesis, e.g. bone plates, screws, setting implements or the like
- A61B17/68—Internal fixation devices, including fasteners and spinal fixators, even if a part thereof projects from the skin
- A61B17/70—Spinal positioners or stabilisers ; Bone stabilisers comprising fluid filler in an implant
- A61B17/7062—Devices acting on, attached to, or simulating the effect of, vertebral processes, vertebral facets or ribs ; Tools for such devices
- A61B17/7064—Devices acting on, attached to, or simulating the effect of, vertebral facets; Tools therefor
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/56—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor
- A61B17/58—Surgical instruments or methods for treatment of bones or joints; Devices specially adapted therefor for osteosynthesis, e.g. bone plates, screws, setting implements or the like
- A61B17/68—Internal fixation devices, including fasteners and spinal fixators, even if a part thereof projects from the skin
- A61B17/70—Spinal positioners or stabilisers ; Bone stabilisers comprising fluid filler in an implant
- A61B17/7062—Devices acting on, attached to, or simulating the effect of, vertebral processes, vertebral facets or ribs ; Tools for such devices
- A61B17/7067—Devices bearing against one or more spinous processes and also attached to another part of the spine; Tools therefor
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B2017/00535—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets pneumatically or hydraulically operated
- A61B2017/00557—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets pneumatically or hydraulically operated inflatable
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
- A61B17/02—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets for holding wounds open; Tractors
- A61B17/025—Joint distractors
- A61B2017/0256—Joint distractors for the spine
Definitions
- the present invention is directed towards the treatment of spinal disorders and pain. More particularly, the present invention is directed to systems and methods of treating the spine to eliminate pain, adjust the position of one or more spinal motion segments and/or enable spinal motion which effectively mimics that of a normally functioning spine.
- FIG. 1 illustrates a portion of the human spine having a superior vertebra 2 and an inferior vertebra 4 , with an intervertebral disc 6 located in between the two vertebral bodies.
- the superior vertebra 2 has superior facet joints 8 a and 8 b , inferior facet joints 10 a and 10 b , and spinous process 18 .
- Pedicles 3 a and 3 b interconnect the respective superior facet joints a, 8 b to the vertebral body 2 .
- Extending laterally from superior facet joints 8 a , 8 b are transverse processes 7 a and 7 b , respectively.
- Extending between each inferior facet joints 10 a and 10 b and the spinous process 18 are laminal zones 5 a and 5 b , respectively.
- inferior vertebra 4 has superior facet joints 12 a and 12 b , superior pedicles 9 a and 9 b , transverse processes 11 a and 11 b , inferior facet joints 14 a and 14 b , laminal zones 15 a and 15 b , and spinous process 22 .
- the superior vertebra with its inferior facets, the inferior vertebra with its superior facet joints, the intervertebral disc, and seven spinal ligaments (not shown) extending between the superior and inferior vertebrae together comprise a spinal motion segment or functional spine unit.
- the facet joints, laminas and spinal processes comprise the “posterior element” (or a portion thereof) of a spinal motion segment.
- Each spinal motion segment enables motion along three orthogonal axes, both in rotation and in translation.
- the various spinal motions are illustrated in FIGS. 2A-2C .
- FIG. 2A illustrates flexion and extension motions and axial loading
- FIG. 2B illustrates lateral bending motion
- FIG. 2C illustrated axial rotational motion.
- a normally functioning spinal motion segment provides physiological limits and stiffness in each rotational and translational direction to create a stable and strong column structure to support physiological loads.
- the specific location or source of spinal pain is most often an affected intervertebral disc or facet joint. Often, a disorder in one location or spinal component can lead to eventual deterioration or disorder, and ultimately, pain in the other.
- Spine fusion is a procedure in which two or more adjacent vertebral bodies are fused together. It is one of the most common approaches to alleviating various types of spinal pain, particularly pain associated with one or more affected intervertebral discs. While spine fusion generally helps to eliminate certain types of pain, it has been shown to decrease function by limiting the range of motion for patients in flexion, extension, rotation and lateral bending. Furthermore, the fusion creates increased stresses on adjacent non-fused motion segments and accelerated degeneration of the motion segments. Additionally, pseudarthrosis (resulting from an incomplete or ineffective fusion) may not provide the expected pain-relief for the patient. Also, the device(s) used for fusion, whether artificial or biological, may migrate out of the fusion site creating significant new problems for the patient.
- facet joints can also be a significant source of spinal disorders and debilitating pain.
- a patient may suffer from arthritic facet joints, severe facet joint tropism, otherwise deformed facet joints, facet joint injuries, etc.
- spinal stenosis, degenerative spondylolithesis, and/or isthmic spondylotlisthesis pinching the nerves that extend between the affected vertebrae.
- Facetectomy retractal of the facet joints
- Laminectomy retractal of the lamina, including the spinal arch and the spinous process
- problems with the facet joints can also complicate treatments associated with other portions of the spine.
- contraindications for disc replacement include arthritic facet joints, absent facet joints, severe facet joint tropism, or otherwise deformed facet joints due to the inability of the artificial disc (when used with compromised or missing facet joints) to properly restore the natural biomechanics of the spinal motion segment.
- facet joint replacement While various attempts have been made at facet joint replacement, they have been inadequate. This is due to the fact that prosthetic facet joints preserve existing bony structures and therefore do not address pathologies that affect facet joints themselves. Certain facet joint prostheses, such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,132,464, are intended to be supported on the lamina or the posterior arch. As the lamina is a very complex and highly variable anatomical structure, it is very difficult to design a prosthesis that provides reproducible positioning against the lamina to correctly locate the prosthetic facet joints. In addition, when facet joint replacement involves complete removal and replacement of the natural facet joint, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No.
- the prosthesis is unlikely to endure the loads and cycling experienced by the vertebra.
- the facet joint replacement may be subject to long-term displacement.
- facet joint disorders are accompanied by disease or trauma to other structures of a vertebra (such as the lamina, spinous process, and/or transverse processes) facet joint replacement is insufficient to treat the problem(s).
- Dynamic posterior stabilization Most recently, surgical-based technologies, referred to as “dynamic posterior stabilization,” have been developed to address spinal pain resulting from more than one disorder, when more than one structure of the spine have been compromised. An objective of such technologies is to provide the support of fusion-based implants while maximizing the natural biomechanics of the spine. Dynamic posterior stabilization systems typically fall into one of two general categories: posterior pedicle screw-based systems and interspinous spacers.
- pedicle screw-based systems are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,015,247, 5,484,437, 5,489,308, 5,609,636, 5,658,337, 5,741,253, 6,080,155, 6,096,038, 6,264,656 and 6,270,498. These types of systems involve the use of screws that are positioned in the vertebral body through the pedicle. Certain types of these pedicle screw-based systems may be used to augment compromised facet joints, while others require removal of the spinous process and/or the facet joints for implantation.
- the Zimmer Spine Dynesys® employs a cord which is extended between the pedicle screws and a fairly rigid spacer which is passed over the cord and positioned between the screws.
- interspinous spacers are preferred over pedicle based systems as they require a less invasive implantation approach and less dissection of the surrounding tissue and ligaments.
- Examples of interspinous spacers are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. Re. 36,211, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,645,599, 6,149,642, 6,500,178, 6,695,842, 6,716,245 and 6,761,720.
- the spacers which are made of either a hard or compliant material, are placed in between adjacent spinous processes.
- the harder material spacers are fixed in place by means of the opposing force caused by distracting the affected spinal segment and/or by use of keels or screws that anchor into the spinous process. While slightly less invasive than the procedures required for implanting a pedicle screw-based dynamic stabilization system, implantation of hard or solid interspinous spacers still requires dissection of muscle tissue and of the supraspinous and interspinous ligaments. Additionally, these tend to facilitate spinal motion that is less analogous to the natural spinal motion than do the more compliant and flexible interspinous spacers. Another advantage of the compliant/flexible interspinous spacers is the ability to deliver them somewhat less invasively than those that are not compliant or flexible; however, their compliancy makes them more susceptible to displacement or migration over time.
- the present invention provides systems and methods for stabilizing or adjusting the position of at least one spinal motion segment.
- the systems are particularly useful in treating degenerative facet or disk disease, central and/or lateral canal stenosis, foraminal narrowing or any other condition which involves compression of the neural element.
- the systems are also useful in treating scoliosis.
- the subject systems are implantable posterior to the spine in a minimally invasive manner and create or maintain distraction of at least a portion of the posterior element (i.e., the facet joints, laminas and/or the spinous processes) of the spinal motion segment being treated.
- the subject systems include one or more implantable members which are positionable laterally of the axial line or plane defined by the interspinous processes.
- the lateral members are expandable in at least one dimension or direction, most commonly in a direction along the axis of the spine.
- the expandable members may be inflatable balloons, expandable scaffoldings or struts or the like or combination thereof.
- the expandable lateral members provide a distraction function between adjacent vertebrae or at least a portion of their posterior elements.
- the expandable lateral members are used to maintain a distraction between the two vertebrae where the initial distraction is created by another means.
- This distraction involves relative movement between adjacent vertebrae where such movement may be axial (i.e., along the longitudinal axis of the spine) or angular or rotational (i.e., the angle defined by the intersection of the axes of two adjacent spinal processes is changed) or both.
- Systems for addressing stabilization of a spinal segment employ two lateral members in tandem where they are positioned on opposing sides of a single spinal motion segment. These types of systems are referred to herein interchangeably as “bi-lateral” or “para-lateral” systems. Certain of these systems further employ one or more intermediately positioned transverse members extending between the two, laterally-opposed members.
- the transverse member(s) may varying in number and function and may couple with the lateral members in any suitable manner and at any point along a dimension, e.g., the length, of the lateral members.
- two transverse members may be placed at opposing end portions of the lateral members and may also be configured to engage the spinous processes in some manner.
- the transverse members may be configured to engage an outer surface of a spinous process, and as such, act as a saddle or cradle.
- the transverse member is configured to engage a surface formed within the spinous process, i.e., is positioned within and extended through a width of a spinous process where a through bore or hole is made from one side of the process to the other.
- the transverse member extends substantially centrally between the two lateral members and the size, e.g., height, of the single transverse member dictates whether or not the transverse member engages one or both of the spinous processes between which it is interposed.
- the transverse member may have a planar or webbing configuration with its end portions configured to engage the spinous processes and act as a saddle or cradle.
- the transverse member may be fairly narrow in width wherein it does not engage the spinous processes between which it extends and is configured as a lumen or the like which interconnects the two lateral members in fluid communication with each other.
- the material used to fabricate the transverse members, their size and extent of flexibility and the position in which they are placed relative to the lateral members and the other transverse members are primarily dictated by the intended function of the transverse members.
- the lateral members and transverse members may be positioned substantially perpendicular to one another or their interconnection may define an acute or obtuse angle between the two. Where there are two or more transverse members, they may be positioned parallel to each other or they themselves may intersect at an angle.
- only a single expandable member is used or is necessary to treat a single spinal segment where the member is positioned on either the left or right side of the spinal motion segment being treated.
- These types of systems are referred to herein as “unilateral” systems. Such systems are particularly useful in treating spinal motion segments where one side is more symptomatic than the other, for example, where bony spur deposits create a hypertrophic facet joint or due to foraminal narrowing. The systems are also useful for treating scoliosis.
- a plurality of such unilateral members may be placed along and on either or both sides of the spine as necessary.
- a plurality of lateral members aligned in a serial fashion along the same or both sides of the spine may be employed.
- two unilateral systems may be employed in tandem with respect to the same spinal segment where they are positioned on opposite sides of the spine. Such an arrangement may be used to stabilize spinal motion similar to the bi-lateral approach described above with the difference being that the two “unilateral” members are not interconnected or integral with each other in any way.
- a lateral member of a unilateral system may depend on its particular placement relative to the components of the posterior element of the spinal motion segment being treated.
- the lateral member may be positioned relatively anteriorly, e.g., between the laminal portions, and configured to engage with the same.
- the lateral member provides a distracting function which may then require use of an anchoring means within the implant site to secure the lateral member to a portion of the vertebrae so as to minimize the risk of migration of the lateral member.
- anchoring means may include one or more transverse members which interconnect with one or both of the spinal processes.
- one or more transverse members may be configured and aligned to interconnect with one or more portions of the lamina or one or more facet joints of the spinal segment being treated. Still, yet one transverse member may anchor to a spinous process and the other may anchor to a lamina or facet joint.
- the lateral member may be positioned relatively posteriorly within the muscle and fascial tissue and itself be an anchoring means for another component which functions as a distracting means.
- Distraction between the adjacent vertebrae of the spinal segment being treated by a bi-lateral system or by two unilateral systems implanted at the same spinal motion segment is primarily in the axial direction of the spine. It should be understood that the axial distraction may be accomplished by the lateral members themselves but such is not always or necessarily the case. Instead, while the lateral members may contribute to maintaining a distracting force between the adjacent vertebrae, the initial distraction may be created by a separate distraction means which itself may also have an expandable component. The transverse member(s) of the implantable system is (are) then employed, in some cases, to maintain the distraction, while the lateral members essentially anchor the transverse member(s). While distraction between adjacent vertebrae of a spinal segment being treated by a unilateral system of the present invention is primarily rotational or angular, the same distracting-anchoring relationship may exist between the lateral member and the one or more transverse members in a unilateral approach.
- the expandable lateral members of the present invention have an unexpanded configuration and an expanded configuration, wherein the expandable member in an expanded configuration has a size, volume and/or shape configured for positioning minimally invasively in a position lateral to a spinous process.
- the expandable member may include an enclosed cavity which is fillable with a material to effect expansion or may have a strut or scaffolding-like structure that has a low profile configuration for delivery purposes through a small working channel and which is expandable to a greater profile upon deployment at or in close proximity to the implant site.
- the former type of expandable members include inflatable balloons made of either non-compliant or compliant material, may include a mesh material which may be coated or lined with a non-porous material or may generally provide an enclosed, compressible cavity which is fillable with a material such as a gas, fluid or other material which is deliverable in a flowable form which subsequently forms a solid upon curing, setting or drying.
- the expandable member may further include a port for coupling to a source of inflation and/or an expansion medium for inflating and/or expanding the expandable member. In certain embodiments, the port may be used to deflate or evacuate the expandable member.
- expandable members may have a preformed configuration which is compressible and which is self-expanding upon deployment.
- the expandable members may be selectively adjustable and locked into place upon achieving a certain degree of expansion.
- the systems may include one or more markers on a surface of a lateral and/or transverse member to facilitate fluoroscopic imaging during minimally invasive implantation, particularly percutaneous implantation.
- the invention further includes methods directed to stabilizing or adjusting the position of at least one spinal motion segment.
- the methods involve the implantation of one or more systems of the present invention, in which a lateral member is positioned laterally of a spinal motion segment in an unexpanded condition and then subsequently expanded to a size and/or shape for maintaining a selected distraction of adjacent vertebrae of a spinal motion segment.
- the invention also contemplates the temporary implantation of the subject systems which may be subsequently removed from the patient once the intended treatment is complete. Many of the methods involve the percutaneous implantation of the subject systems.
- FIG. 1 illustrates a perspective view of a portion of the human spine having two vertebral segments.
- FIGS. 2A , 28 and 2 C illustrate left side, dorsal and top views, respectively, of the spinal segments of FIG. 1A under going various motions.
- FIG. 3A illustrates a bi-lateral posterior element distraction system of the present invention operatively engaged within a delivery and implantation system of the present invention.
- FIG. 3B is a side view of the posterior element distraction system and a distracting mechanism of the implantation system of FIG. 3A positioned within a spinal motion segment.
- FIG. 3C is a dorsal view of the posterior element distraction system of FIG. 3A implanted within the spinal motion segment.
- FIG. 4A illustrates another bi-lateral posterior element distraction system of the present invention operatively engaged within a delivery and implantation system of the present invention.
- FIG. 4B is a side view of the posterior element distraction system and a distracting mechanism of the implantation system of FIG. 4A positioned within a spinal motion segment.
- FIG. 4C is a dorsal view of the posterior element distraction system of FIG. 4A implanted within the spinal motion segment.
- FIG. 5A illustrates another bi-lateral posterior element distraction system of the present invention operatively engaged within a delivery and implantation system of the present invention.
- FIG. 5B is a side view of the posterior element distraction system and a distracting mechanism of the implantation system of FIG. 5A positioned within a spinal motion segment.
- FIG. 5C is a dorsal view of the posterior element distraction system of FIG. 5A implanted within the spinal motion segment.
- FIG. 6A illustrates another bi-lateral posterior element distraction system of the present invention operatively engaged within a delivery and implantation system of the present invention.
- FIG. 6B is a side view of the posterior element distraction system and a distracting mechanism of the implantation system of FIG. 6A positioned within a spinal motion segment.
- FIG. 6C is a dorsal view of the posterior element distraction system of FIG. 6A implanted within the spinal motion segment.
- FIG. 7A illustrates another bi-lateral posterior element distraction system of the present invention operatively engaged within a delivery and implantation system of the present invention.
- FIG. 7B is a side view of the posterior element distraction system and a distracting mechanism of the implantation system of FIG. 7A positioned within a spinal motion segment.
- FIG. 7C is a dorsal view of the posterior element distraction system of FIG. 7A implanted within the spinal motion segment.
- FIG. 8A illustrates another bi-lateral posterior element distraction system of the present invention operatively engaged within a delivery and implantation system of the present invention.
- FIG. 8B is a side view of the posterior element distraction system and a distracting mechanism of the implantation system of FIG. 8A positioned within a spinal motion segment.
- FIG. 8C is a dorsal view of the posterior element distraction system of FIG. 8A implanted within the spinal motion segment.
- FIG. 9A illustrates another bi-lateral posterior element distraction system of the present invention operatively engaged within a delivery and implantation system of the present invention.
- FIG. 9B is a side view of the posterior element distraction system and a distracting mechanism of the implantation system of FIG. 9A positioned within a spinal motion segment.
- FIG. 9C is a dorsal view of the posterior element distraction system of FIG. 9A implanted within the spinal motion segment.
- FIG. 10A illustrates another bi-lateral posterior element distraction system of the present invention operatively engaged within a delivery and implantation system of the present invention.
- FIG. 10B is a dorsal view of the posterior element distraction system of FIG. 10A implanted within a spinal motion segment.
- FIG. 10C is a side view of FIG. 10A .
- FIGS. 11A-11H illustrate the steps of implanting the bi-lateral posterior element distraction system of FIGS. 10A-10C .
- FIGS. 12A-12E illustrate the steps of implanting another bi-lateral posterior element distraction system of the present invention.
- FIGS. 13A and 13B illustrate dorsal views of another bi-lateral posterior element distraction system of the present invention implanted within a spinal motion segment in unexpanded and expanded configurations, respectively.
- FIG. 13C is a side view of the posterior element distraction system of FIG. 13B .
- FIGS. 14A and 14B illustrate dorsal views of another bi-lateral posterior element distraction system of the present invention implanted within a spinal motion segment in unexpanded and expanded configurations, respectively.
- FIG. 14C is a side view of the posterior element distraction system of FIG. 14B .
- FIGS. 15A and 15B illustrate dorsal views of another bi-lateral posterior element distraction system of the present invention implanted within a spinal motion segment in unexpanded and expanded configurations, respectively.
- FIG. 15C is a side view of the posterior element distraction system of FIG. 15B .
- FIGS. 16A and 16B illustrate dorsal views of another bi-lateral posterior element distraction system of the present invention implanted within a spinal motion segment in unexpanded and expanded configurations, respectively.
- FIG. 16C is a side view of the posterior element distraction system of FIG. 16B .
- FIGS. 17A and 17B illustrate dorsal views of another hi-lateral posterior element distraction system of the present invention implanted within a spinal motion segment in unexpanded and expanded configurations, respectively.
- FIGS. 18A and 18B illustrate dorsal views of another bi-lateral posterior element distraction system of the present invention implanted within a spinal motion segment in unexpanded and expanded configurations, respectively.
- FIGS. 19A and 19B illustrate dorsal views of another bi-lateral posterior element distraction system of the present invention implanted within a spinal motion segment in unexpanded and expanded configurations, respectively.
- FIG. 20A illustrates two unilateral posterior element distraction systems of the present invention implanted in tandem within a spinal motion segment.
- FIGS. 20B and 20C illustrate dorsal views of the tandem implant of FIG. 20A in unexpanded and expanded configurations, respectively.
- FIGS. 21A and 21B illustrate dorsal views of another unilateral posterior element distraction system of the present invention implanted within a spinal motion segment in unexpanded and expanded configurations, respectively.
- FIG. 22A illustrate the unilateral posterior element distraction system of FIGS. 21A and 21B within a delivery system of the present invention.
- FIGS. 22B and 22C illustrate a dorsal views of the systems implanted in tandem within a spinal motion segment in various states of expansion.
- FIG. 23A illustrates another bi-lateral posterior element distraction system of the present invention in combination with a temporary distraction mechanism.
- FIGS. 23B and 23C illustrate delivery of the distraction system and use of the temporary distraction mechanism to distract a spinal motion segment.
- FIG. 23D illustrates the bi-lateral posterior element distraction system of FIG. 23A implanted within a spinal motion segment and subsequent to removing the distraction mechanism.
- FIG. 24A illustrates a scoliotic spine having a plurality of unilateral posterior element distraction systems of the present invention implanted therein.
- FIG. 24B illustrates the same spine after successful treatment utilizing the unilateral posterior element distraction systems.
- FIGS. 25A-25E illustrate the steps of a method of the present invention for percutaneously implanting certain systems of the present invention.
- the present invention generally includes an implantable system or device as well as instruments for the percutaneous implantation of the system or device.
- a key feature of the subject systems is that it includes an expandable member which is implanted laterally of a spinal motion segment.
- the lateral member is expandable from a low profile configuration to a higher profile or operative configuration. This design allows the lateral member, when in the low profile condition, to be delivered by percutaneous means without requiring the removal of any portion of the spinal motion segment into which the device is implanted.
- System 24 includes parallely spaced apart expandable lateral members 26 and transverse members 28 extending between the end portions of lateral members 26 .
- lateral members 26 are illustrated as balloons (shown in an expanded condition) encased in an optional mesh material.
- the balloons may be made of a non-porous, biocompatible material, such as latex or acrylate.
- the balloons are inflatable with an inflation or expansion medium, such as air, saline, another biologically compatible fluid, or a flowable solid material, such as polyurethane, or a gel, which thickens or hardens substantially upon injection into balloon the balloon.
- the balloons may be made of a porous material, such as a hydrophilic polymer, to allow absorption of fluid from the implant site to within the balloon.
- a porous material such as a hydrophilic polymer
- the extent of expansion of the balloons is dependent upon the particular composition of the hydrophilic polymer used.
- the balloons are made of a non-compliant or semi-compliant material so as to maintain a substantially fixed shape or configuration and ensure proper, long-term retention within the implant site.
- the balloons may be made of a compliant material.
- the compressibility and flexibility of balloons 26 can be selected to address the indications being treated.
- balloons 26 may further include radiopaque markers (not shown) on their surfaces which are visible under fluoroscopic imaging to facilitate positioning of system 24 .
- the optional mesh material may be made of a material similar to that of the balloons, polyethylene, a metal, e.g., a nitinol or titanium, or another compliant (stretchable) or non-compliant material to provide a protective layer about the balloons to provide further stability to the balloons.
- the mesh material itself may be radiopaeque.
- Transverse members 28 may be made of a metal or polymer material that is conformable to a solid structure, e.g., a spinous process 18 , 22 (see FIG. 3C ), against which it is placed in tension and has a sufficient length and width to contact at least a portion of the spinous process.
- the distance between the two transverse members 28 and the length of each may vary depending on the extent of distraction desired between the vertebrae of the spinal motion segment into which the system is implanted.
- FIG. 3A illustrates posterior element distraction system 24 operatively engaged to a minimally invasive delivery and implantation system 35 of the present invention.
- System 35 includes a main body 36 which defines a working channel within proximity of the implant site and further includes a lumen for the delivery of system 24 when in an unexpanded configuration to within proximity of the implant site.
- each of balloons 26 is fluidly coupled to an inflation line 34 which also functions as a pusher for advancing the balloons collectively through the main body lumen and for advancing it once in the implant region.
- System 35 further includes a distraction mechanism 30 , also in the form of an expandable balloon.
- Distraction balloon is also fluidly coupled to an inflation line 32 which, like lines 34 , also functions as a pusher for advancing balloon 30 through the main body lumen.
- Distraction mechanism 30 may share a single lumen with system 24 or may be deliverable through its own designated lumen. Air and saline are suitable mediums for inflating the distraction balloon.
- delivery body 36 is inserted to within proximity to the implant site of the spinal motion segment being treated.
- distraction mechanism 30 is translated in an unexpanded or deflated state through main body 36 .
- inflation lumen 32 acts as a guide wire to direct distraction balloon to within the interspinous space of the spinal segment being treated.
- distraction balloon 30 is placed substantially anteriorly within the space. Upon proper positioning within the interspinous space, distraction balloon 30 is slowly inflated to progressively distract the spinous processes 18 , 22 , as illustrated in FIG. 3B .
- system 24 Upon sufficient distraction of the vertebrae 2 , 4 , system 24 is similarly advanced to within the interspinous space adjacent and posteriorly to the distraction balloon 30 ; however, the relative position of the implanted balloons and the temporary distraction balloons may be reversed, depending on the particular application at hand.
- balloons 26 Upon proper alignment within the space, balloons 26 are inflated or expanded and transverse members 28 are caused to engage respective spinous processes 18 and 22 . Balloons 26 are inflated to the extent necessary to maintain the desired distraction of vertebrae 2 , 4 .
- Distraction balloon 30 is then deflated and retracted from the interspinous space, and inflation lumens 34 are decoupled from balloons 26 and retracted to within main body 36 .
- FIG. 3C illustrates system 24 operatively implanted within a spinal motion segment having superior vertebra 2 and inferior vertebra 4 where lateral members 26 are positioned on opposite sides of the interspinous space and transverse members 28 extend across the interspinous space and are in contact with opposing spinous processes 18 , 22 , respectively.
- transverse members 28 maintain the posterior element distraction achieved by distraction mechanism 30 and lateral members 26 function to anchor the transverse members 28 .
- System 40 also includes expandable lateral members 42 in the form of balloons.
- expandable lateral members 42 in the form of balloons.
- a single fitted mesh 44 is provided over and encases both balloons in opposing manner with the peripheral edges 46 of mesh 44 functioning as transverse members.
- System 40 is implantable and deployable in the same manner as described above with respect to system 24 of FIGS. 3A-3C .
- FIGS. SA- 5 C Another embodiment of an implantable posterior element distraction system of the present invention is illustrated in FIGS. SA- 5 C.
- System 50 provides expandable lateral members 52 similar to those just described and enclosed in a mesh 54 .
- mesh 54 is in the form of a sock which is open at a proximal end and extends over inflation lumens 34 .
- the open proximal end of mesh 54 is synched down to tightly encase balloons 52 .
- the synched end 58 is tied or secured and the proximally extending remainder is cut and removed.
- implantation system 35 is equipped with synching and cutting mechanisms (not shown) which may be deliverable to the target site through designated lumens within main body 36 .
- synching and cutting mechanisms (not shown) which may be deliverable to the target site through designated lumens within main body 36 .
- the now taught peripheral edges 56 of mesh 54 function as transverse members.
- FIGS. 6A-6C illustrate another posterior element distraction system 60 in which lateral members 62 are in the form of doughnut-shaped balloons. Balloons 62 are maintained in an opposed substantially parallel relationship with each other by way of straps 66 wherein each strap 66 is wrapped around opposing sides of balloons 62 . The two ends of each strap 66 and balloon inflation lines 34 then collectively extend proximally together to within the same delivery lumen of main body 36 of implantation system 35 .
- System 60 is implanted as described with respect to FIGS. 3A-3C , and upon proper implantation of balloons 62 , the strap ends 68 are synched and cut as described above. As illustrated in FIG. 6C , the outer portion of straps 66 function as transverse members, maintaining the distraction achieved by distraction mechanism 30 .
- the posterior element distraction system 70 of FIGS. 7A-7C involves features of the systems of FIGS. 5A-5C and FIGS. 6A-6C in that the lateral members 72 of system 70 are doughnut-shaped balloons enclosed in a mesh sock 74 . Similar to the system of FIGS. 5A-5C , upon proper implantation within the implant site, the proximal end 78 of mesh 74 is synched and cut to maintain balloons 72 in a tensioned, substantially parallel relationship with peripheral edges 76 of mesh 74 functioning as transverse members.
- FIGS. 8A-8C illustrate another embodiment of a posterior element distraction system 80 having inflatable lateral members 82 fluidly interconnected at a central location by transverse member 84 .
- Transverse member 84 is in the form of a lumen thereby eliminating the need for separate inflation lumens 34 for balloons 82 . Only a single inflation lumen 34 , here coupled to the more proximal of the two balloons 82 , as lumen 84 transports the inflation medium from the proximally positioned balloon to the distally positioned balloon.
- System 80 further includes transverse member 86 which are configured to engage and maintain the distraction between the spinous processes 18 , 22 .
- System 80 is implanted as described with respect to FIGS. 3A-3C .
- FIGS. 9A-9C illustrate another embodiment of a posterior element distraction system 90 having inflatable lateral members 92 fluidly interconnected at a central location by transverse member 94 .
- transverse member 94 is in the form of a lumen for transporting the inflation medium from the proximally positioned balloon to the distally positioned balloon.
- a single fitted mesh 94 is provided over and encases both balloons 92 in an opposing manner with the peripheral edges 96 of mesh 94 functioning as transverse members.
- System 90 is implantable and deployable in the same manner as described above with respect to FIGS. 3A-3C .
- FIGS. 10A-10C illustrate another posterior element distraction system 100 of the present invention.
- System 100 includes lateral members 106 a , 106 b and transverse members 108 a , 108 b provided serially on a guide wire 102 where each component is fixedly coupled to guide wire or suture thread 102 .
- Guide wire 102 has a leading distal end 104 configured to facilitate threading or feeding of system 100 through the bone and tissue at the implant site.
- distal end 104 may have a dumbbell configuration with bulbous end portions 105 a , 105 b particularly suited for being held by a feeding or threading tool 117 which is described below with respect to FIGS. 11B and 11C .
- Lateral members 106 a , 106 b are inflatable balloons which may have any material composition and configuration as described above.
- Transverse members 108 a , 108 b are in the form of cylindrical plugs and may be made of a metal, polymer or the like and may be coated with hydroxyapetate to facilitate bone in growth. The coating may also include a lubricant to facilitate delivery through the spinous process as will be explained in greater detail below.
- FIGS. 11A-11H illustrate the various steps involved in implanting distraction system 100 at a target site within a spinal motion segment.
- system 100 is implanted by threading guide wire 102 through hole or bores which are formed in both spinous processes 18 , 22 of the spinal motion segment.
- a small incision is made proximate the target spinal motion segment in order to access spinous processes 18 , 20 .
- a puncturing or hole-forming tool 115 is used to form bores 110 a , 110 b within spinous process 18 , 22 , respectively.
- Tool 115 has opposing jaws 112 a , 112 b where jaw 112 a has punch member and jaw 112 b has an anvil configuration for receiving the punch member.
- Distal end 104 is then operatively loaded into guide wire feeding tool 117 as shown in FIG. 11C and the jaws of feeding tool 117 are straddled on the opposite sides of spinous process 18 .
- distal bulb 105 a of feeding end 104 is held in the left jaw 116 a of feeding tool 117 and distal bulb 105 b is fed through bore 110 a in superior spinous process 18 and is received in right jaw 116 which is positioned on the opposing side of spinous process 18 , as shown in FIG. 11D .
- guide wire 102 is folded back over leading end 104 and, as such, is threaded through bore 10 a as well.
- Guide wire 102 is pulled through bore 110 a ( FIG. 11E ) and then tool 117 is repositioned closer to inferior spinous process 22 where distal bulb 105 a of leading end 104 is inserted in to bore 110 b ( FIG. 11F ) and received on the opposing side by jaw 116 a of tool 117 ( FIG. 11G ).
- Guide wire 102 is then pulled through both bores 110 a , 110 b ( FIG. 1H ) until system 100 is positioned as illustrated in FIGS. 10B and 10C .
- distal balloon 106 a in on the left side of the interspinous space proximal balloon 106 b is on the right side of the interspinous space
- distal bore plug 108 a is positioned within bore 110 a of spinous process 22
- bore plug 108 b is positioned within bore 110 b of spinous process 18 .
- the distal portion of guide wire 102 situated between distal balloon 106 b and leading end 104 and the proximal portion of guide wire 102 proximal to balloon 108 b are cut.
- the cut ends are then securely fixed together such as by tension crimpers.
- balloons 106 are inflated or expanded by a separate inflation means (not shown).
- guide wire 102 may be equipped with a central inflation lumen, in which case, inflation of the balloons must occur before cutting the guide wire.
- FIGS. 12A-12E illustrate another bi-lateral posterior element distraction system 130 and the steps for implanting it within a target spinal motion segment.
- the components of system 120 are serially interconnected to a guide wire 128 which is deliverable through implantation system 36 .
- System 120 includes lateral balloon members 122 and transverse members 124 which are interconnected with each other via a preformed, compressible annular strut 124 which itself is interconnected to guide wire 128 .
- balloon abutment members 129 On opposing sides of system 120 , in particular on the outer sides of balloons 122 are balloon abutment members 129 such that each balloon 122 is sandwiched between a side of strut 124 and an abutment member.
- System 120 is deliverable from one side of the target spinal motion segment, and is inserted through the interspinous space while strut 124 is in a restrained or compressed state until transverse members 126 are centered between the spinous processes 18 , 22 , as shown in FIG. 12B . Then, strut 124 is allowed to expand to is preformed, expanded state, as shown in FIG. 12C . Subsequently, balloons 122 are inflated so as to expand both vertically and widthwise and are caused to contact and become snuggly fit between their respective abutment member 129 and strut 124 , as illustrated in FIG. 12D . Balloons 122 preferably have a cogged, petalled or starred configuration to better anchor within the surrounding tissue and, thus, mitigate migration of the device.
- FIGS. 13A-13C illustrate another posterior element distraction system 130 of the present invention having a two-piece configuration.
- System 130 includes superior component 132 a and inferior component 132 b which are similarly constructed, each having a transverse member 134 and lateral balloon members 136 at opposing ends. The difference between the two is in the profile or shape of the respective balloon members in an expanded configuration.
- balloons 136 a of superior component 132 a and balloons 138 b are shaped to interlock with each other in a mating configuration so as to provide an anchor for transverse members 134 .
- a punching tool 115 as described above may be used to create bores 138 a and 138 b , respectively, in spinous processes 18 , 22 .
- the superior and inferior components are independently delivered and implanted so that the transverse members 134 are positioned within the bores. Subsequently, all of the balloons 136 are inflated with superiorly and inferiorly opposing balloons 136 a , 136 b interconnecting in a mating configuration.
- FIGS. 14A-14C , 15 A- 15 C and 16 A- 16 C each illustrate similar posterior element distraction systems having left and right lateral members, shown here in the form of expandable balloons.
- Each lateral member has a transverse member having a hook-like configuration for hooking around or about either a portion of the posterior element or a pedicle screw positioned within a portion of the posterior element.
- system 140 of FIGS. 14A-14C has hook-like transverse members 146 , where each lateral balloon member 142 has a superior transverse hook 146 a configured for hooking under the superior spinous process 18 and an inferior transverse hook 146 b configured for hooking over the inferior spinous process 22 .
- the hooks may be placed prior to inflation and, upon inflation of the lateral members 142 , the respective hooks become securely anchored to the spinous processes.
- the pair of superior hooks 146 a may be aligned to overlap or contact each other or to be displaced from each other as illustrated in FIG. 14C .
- the inferior hooks 146 a may be similarly aligned.
- each lateral balloon member 152 has a superior transverse hook 156 a configured for hooking under a respective laminal arch 5 a , 5 b and an inferior transverse book 156 configured for hooking over the inferior spinous process 22 as described above.
- the hooks may be placed prior to inflation of the lateral members 152 and, upon inflation of lateral members 152 , the respective superior hooks 156 a become securely anchored to respective portions of the laminal arch 5 a , 5 b of the superior vertebra 2 , and the respective inferior hooks 156 b engage with and securely anchor to the inferior spinous process 22 .
- System 160 of FIGS. 16A-16C has superior hook-like transverse members 166 a where each lateral balloon member 162 is configured to hook about the pedicle screws 168 .
- pedicle screws 168 are positioned in the inferior facet joints 10 a , 10 b , respectively, and their supporting pedicles of superior vertebra 2 .
- System 160 further includes inferiorly positioned 166 b configured for hooking over the inferior spinous process 22 as described above.
- the respective superior hooks 166 a Prior to inflation of lateral members 162 , the respective superior hooks 166 a may be engage with or positioned about or secured by pedicle screws 168 .
- the respective inferior hooks 166 b securely anchor to the inferior spinous process 22 .
- FIGS. 17A and 17B illustrate a unilateral posterior element distraction system 170 of the present invention.
- System 170 includes a single lateral member 172 which is in the form of an expandable strut having a hinged jaw configuration whereby the strut is foldable at a central joint 177 , as shown in FIG. 17A .
- Hooked transverse members 174 are positioned at superior and inferior ends of strut 172 and are configured for engaging the underside of superior spinous process 18 and the top side of inferior spinous process 22 .
- Transverse members 174 are preferably made from a superelastic material wherein they have a preformed hook configuration but are sufficiently flexible to be compressed to a straightened configuration.
- a working channel or delivery lumen 178 in conjunction with a pusher/guide wire 178 extendable and slidable through hinge joint 177 may be used to deliver system 170 minimally invasively to the implant site whereby strut 172 is delivered in a folded condition and transverse members 174 are delivered in a straightened condition.
- lumen 178 Upon placement of the distal end of working channel 176 within the interspinous space, lumen 178 is retracted thereby releasing strut 172 whereby strut 172 straightens and transverse members 174 engage with the spinous processes 18 , 22 .
- wire 178 is retracted until its distal end, which terminates in a stop 179 , is cause to abut hinge joint 177 , as shown in FIG. 17B .
- FIGS. 18A-18B illustrate another bi-lateral posterior element distraction system 180 having left and right lateral members 182 , shown here in the form of compressible-expandable struts.
- Extending between the ends of struts 182 are transverse superior and inferior transverse members 184 which are preferably made from a superelastic material wherein they have a preformed curved configuration ( FIG. 188 ) but are sufficiently flexible to be compressed to a straightened configuration ( FIG. 18A ).
- Each strut member 182 is hinged centrally at a hub 186 wherein the strut ends are foldable at hub 186 .
- Extending between hubs 186 is a central transverse member 188 .
- a guide wire 185 is threadably engaged with and extends proximally of hub 186 a.
- the lateral and transverse members of system 180 are all in a compressed, low-profile state to be easily translated through a working channel to the interspinous space, as illustrated in FIG. 18A .
- the working channel (not shown) is withdrawn proximally.
- Guide wire 185 is then used to push against proximal hub 186 a thereby expanding struts 182 and allowing transverse members 184 to achieve there expanded and curved configuration for engagement with the spinous processes 18 , 22 , as shown in FIG. 18B .
- guide wire 185 is unscrewed from proximal hub 186 a thereby leaving system 180 at the implant site.
- Lateral struts 182 are sufficiently rigid to maintain the expanded condition and withstand the natural forces exerted on it by spine.
- System 190 of FIGS. 19A and 19B is similar to the system of FIGS. 18A and 18B as just described in that expandable-compressible strut 192 , preformed transverse members 194 and hubs 196 are substantially identical in structure and function.
- the lateral members further include expandable balloon members 198 positioned between hubs 198 and the exterior ends of struts 192 , respectively.
- central transverse member 197 provides a lumen by which balloon members 198 are in fluid communication with each other as well as with guide wire 195 which transports an inflation medium to the balloons.
- the delivery of system 190 to the implantation site is also similar to that described above with respect to the system of FIGS.
- balloons 198 function, at least in part, as anchors for and provide further stability to system 190 .
- the posterior element distraction systems of FIGS. 20-23 all provide lateral members, either in a unilateral or a bilateral arrangement, which have strut configurations, particularly wire forms which are configured to be spring-loaded wherein they are self-expandable from a compressed or retained condition.
- the lateral struts have configurations which provide a substantially central “living hinge” about which the strut ends may be folded.
- the struts may be compressed along their length to a lower profile configuration to make them easily deliverable through a narrow working channel. The spring force provided by the struts is sufficient to create the desired distraction between the vertebrae 2 , 4 .
- FIGS. 20A-20C illustrate a system 200 which is a unilateral system having a single lateral strut member 202 .
- Transverse members 204 also of a wire form which may be substantially flexible so as to be straightenable during delivery through a working channel extend from the ends of strut member 202 .
- system 200 may be used alone, two systems 200 may be employed in tandem on opposite sides of an interspinous space, as illustrated in FIGS. 20B and 20C , depending on the clinical application at hand.
- the two systems may be delivered independently through separate incisions formed on both sides of the spine.
- the two systems may be delivered serially through the same incision and through the same working channel wherein the position of the systems within the working channel and upon delivery are opposite each other.
- the most distal of the two systems, and thus the first to be delivered, would be delivered hinge first while the more proximally positioned system would be delivered second with its transverse members leading through the working channel.
- the two may be delivered in the same or any suitable position and their positions subsequently manipulated once at the implant site.
- FIGS. 21A and 21B illustrate another unilateral system 210 similar to that of FIGS. 20A-20C , having a lateral strut member 212 and two transverse members 214 .
- System 210 has an additional balloon member 216 attached along the length of strut member 212 which, upon expansion within the implant site provides additional stability and anchoring for system 210 .
- Balloon member 216 is inflatable in the ways described above.
- FIGS. 22A-22C illustrates another manner of delivering system 210 , namely, delivering the system with balloon member 216 either partially or completely pre-inflated, i.e., prior to placement at the implant site.
- a cannula or working channel 215 is provided with a pusher mechanism 217 having a distal working end having a cylindrical cavity therein for holding system 210 with balloon 216 in an inflated state.
- Strut member 212 and transverse members 214 are still delivered in a compressed or low profile state.
- pre-inflated balloon 216 facilitates the spring-loading of system 210 such that upon release of balloon 216 from the distal end of delivery means 217 , system 210 may immediately expand. If additional distraction of the spinal motion segment is required, balloon 216 may be additionally inflated as needed.
- both sides of the above-described unilateral system 210 may be integrally attached prior to implantation, thereby providing a bilateral system.
- the balloon members 216 are inflated subsequent to placement at the implant site, a lumen extending between the two may be provided so as to allow inflation of both balloons from one side.
- each of the balloons may have its own inflation port whereby they are inflated or expanded independently of each other. The inflation procedure may then be done bi-laterally or from the same inflation lumen.
- FIGS. 23A-23D illustrates a posterior distraction system 230 similar to that of FIGS. 20A-20C but having a bilateral configuration rather than a unilateral configuration.
- System 230 includes lateral members 232 and transverse members 234 which and is deliverable as described above.
- the permanently implantable distraction system 230 is implanted with the use of a temporary distraction mechanism 226 .
- Distraction mechanism 226 is in the form of an inflatable balloon which may be made of a compliant or non-compliant material.
- System 230 may be delivered in tandem with distraction mechanism 226 with the assistance of a pusher mechanism 237 . As such, both are delivered through a single working channel 235 in a compressed or low profile state where system 230 is positioned over balloon 226 .
- balloon 226 and system 230 may be delivered independently of each other through separate working channels or lumens whereby, when both are positioned within the interspinous space, they are staggered from each other anteriorly to posteriorly. As illustrated in FIG. 23B , both may be placed in the interspinous space simultaneously or distraction mechanism 226 may be initially placed while retaining system 230 within working channel 235 . In either case, distraction member 236 is inflated via an inflation lumen 239 of pusher mechanism 237 . As balloon 236 is inflated, vertebrae 2 and 4 are distracted relative to each other and system 230 is allowed to expand within the interspinous space. After the desire distraction is achieved, balloon 236 is deflated and removed from the implant site, as illustrated in FIG. 23D .
- FIGS. 24A and 24B illustrate use of a plurality of another unilateral posterior distraction devices 240 implanted within spine 245 .
- Device 240 is in the form of an expandable balloon configured for positioning laterally of a spinal motion segment, and particularly laterally, on either side, of an interspinous space 247 .
- Device 240 is particularly suitable for treating scoliosis where one or more devices are placed axially on one or both sides of spine 245 .
- curvature 242 of the spine as illustrated in FIG. 24A , is treated by implanting one or more, e.g., two, on the concave side (here, the right side) of the spine adjacent the affected spinal motion segments.
- the devices are selectively expanded to rotationally distract the vertebrae of the affected segments such that the axial position of the spine is corrected, as illustrated in FIG. 24B .
- the devices may be configured to anchor themselves such as by having a shape that minimizes migration or may be further secured by other means such as a biological adhesive, pins, screws, etc.
- FIGS. 25A-25E illustrate certain preliminary steps of a minimally invasive procedure for implanting the devices and systems of the present invention.
- a percutaneous penetration or puncture is first made to one side of the spinal motion segment being treated.
- An instrument 250 commonly referred to as a “K-wire” may used to form the penetration.
- the instrument 250 may be directed under fluoroscopy or x-ray proximate a target implant site, such as between the vertebrae 2 , 4 of the spinal motion segment being treated.
- a dilator 252 is then translated over k-wire 250 to within the target area to enlarge the channel through the tissue created by the k-wire. Then, as illustrated in FIG.
- a cannula or working channel 254 is translated over dilator 252 to within the target area to further expand the channel within the tissue and to provide a channel through which dissection, visualization and/or implantation instruments can be delivered.
- k-wire 250 and dilator 252 may be removed from the implant site.
- a dissection tool 256 such as a scalpel 258 , is then delivered through the lumen of working channel 254 , and working channel 253 and is manipulated to allow dissection or incising of an area within or adjacent the implant site, e.g., the intraspinous ligament 25 , as illustrated in FIG. 25D .
- a delivery or pusher instrument or lumen 260 within which a system 262 of the present invention is retained in an undeployed or partially undeployed state is translated through working channel 254 to the target implant site.
- the system or device 262 is then deployed and expanded or allowed to expand to an extent sufficient to distract vertebrae 2 and 4 or a portion of their posterior elements a desired amount.
- the size or volume of the implanted system may be selectively adjusted or varied. For example, after an initial assessment upon implant, it may be necessary to adjust, either reduce or increase, the size or volume of the spacer to optimize the intended treatment. Further, it may be intended to only temporarily implant the spacer for the purpose of treating a temporary condition, e.g., an injured or bulging or herniated disk, or scoliotic curvature. Once the repair is achieved or the treatment completed, the spacer may be removed, either with or without substantially reducing the size or volume of the spacer.
- the implant as well as the inflation/expansion material, if one is used may be made of biodegradable materials wherein the implant degrades after a time in which the injury is healed or the treatment completed.
- the balloon may come equipped with an inflation or injection port for coupling to a source of inflation or expansion material or medium.
- the port may consist of a one-way valve which is self-sealing upon release from an inflation mechanism or lumen.
- the port may be further configured to releasably engage from an inflation tube, where such engagement may be threaded or involve a releasable locking mechanism.
- the expandable members of the present invention may have a degree of stiffness in an unexpanded or deflated state such that they may maintain an elongated configuration so as to be directly insertable and pushable through a working channel.
- the expandable member is made of a is strut or mesh material.
- a pusher or small diameter rod may be inserted through an inflation port of a balloon type expandable member to keep the expandable member in an elongated state so as to prevent it from bunching within the working channel and to provide some rigidity to more effectively position the expandable body in the target implant site.
- the balloon members are initially inflated with air and then filled with a solid or fluid medium
- the latter is preferably not delivered or injected into the interior of the expandable body until the position of the expandable body within the interspinous space has been verified and optimized.
- the balloon member may simply be deflated of air to the extent necessary and repositioned in a less inflated or deflated state. If necessary, for example where it is found that the maximum distraction provided by the implant is insufficient for the particular application at hand, the implant may be completely deflated or compressed or both and removed and replaced with a more suitably sized implant.
- any of the implants of the present invention may be implanted with the assistance of any of the temporary distraction mechanism of the present invention.
- any of the above-described steps or procedures including but not limited to cannulation of the target area, dissection of the spinous ligament, insertion of the subject implants within the target implant site, inflation and/or expansion of a temporary distraction means, inflation and/or expansion of the implant or a portion thereof and the adjustment or readjustment of the implant may be facilitated by way of a scope delivered through a lumen of the working channel.
- a second cannula or working channel delivered through another percutaneous penetration on the same or opposite side of the spine may be employed for use of an endoscope and any other instruments needed to facilitate the procedure.
- kits which include at least one interspinous device of the present invention.
- a plurality of such devices may be provided where the devices have the same or varying sizes and shapes and are made of the same or varying materials.
- the kits may further include instruments and tools for implanting the subject devices, including but not limited to, a cannula, a trocar, a scope, a device delivery/inflation/expansion lumen, a cutting instrument, a screw driver, etc., as well as a selection of screws or other devices for anchoring the spacer tabs to the spinous processes.
- the kits may also include a supply of an inflation and/or expansion medium. Instructions for implanting the subject systems and devices and for using the above-described instrumentation may also be provided with the kits.
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Orthopedic Medicine & Surgery (AREA)
- Surgery (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
- Neurology (AREA)
- Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Prostheses (AREA)
- Surgical Instruments (AREA)
- Orthopedics, Nursing, And Contraception (AREA)
Abstract
The present invention provides systems and methods for stabilizing or adjusting the position of at least one spinal motion segment.
Description
- The present invention is directed towards the treatment of spinal disorders and pain. More particularly, the present invention is directed to systems and methods of treating the spine to eliminate pain, adjust the position of one or more spinal motion segments and/or enable spinal motion which effectively mimics that of a normally functioning spine.
-
FIG. 1 illustrates a portion of the human spine having asuperior vertebra 2 and aninferior vertebra 4, with an intervertebral disc 6 located in between the two vertebral bodies. Thesuperior vertebra 2 hassuperior facet joints inferior facet joints spinous process 18.Pedicles vertebral body 2. Extending laterally fromsuperior facet joints transverse processes inferior facet joints spinous process 18 arelaminal zones inferior vertebra 4 hassuperior facet joints superior pedicles transverse processes inferior facet joints 14 a and 14 b,laminal zones 15 a and 15 b, andspinous process 22. - The superior vertebra with its inferior facets, the inferior vertebra with its superior facet joints, the intervertebral disc, and seven spinal ligaments (not shown) extending between the superior and inferior vertebrae together comprise a spinal motion segment or functional spine unit. Collectively, the facet joints, laminas and spinal processes comprise the “posterior element” (or a portion thereof) of a spinal motion segment. Each spinal motion segment enables motion along three orthogonal axes, both in rotation and in translation. The various spinal motions are illustrated in
FIGS. 2A-2C . In particular,FIG. 2A illustrates flexion and extension motions and axial loading,FIG. 2B illustrates lateral bending motion andFIG. 2C illustrated axial rotational motion. A normally functioning spinal motion segment provides physiological limits and stiffness in each rotational and translational direction to create a stable and strong column structure to support physiological loads. - Traumatic, inflammatory, metabolic, synovial, neoplastic and degenerative disorders of the spine can produce debilitating pain that can affect a spinal motion segment's ability to properly function. The specific location or source of spinal pain is most often an affected intervertebral disc or facet joint. Often, a disorder in one location or spinal component can lead to eventual deterioration or disorder, and ultimately, pain in the other.
- Spine fusion (arthrodesis) is a procedure in which two or more adjacent vertebral bodies are fused together. It is one of the most common approaches to alleviating various types of spinal pain, particularly pain associated with one or more affected intervertebral discs. While spine fusion generally helps to eliminate certain types of pain, it has been shown to decrease function by limiting the range of motion for patients in flexion, extension, rotation and lateral bending. Furthermore, the fusion creates increased stresses on adjacent non-fused motion segments and accelerated degeneration of the motion segments. Additionally, pseudarthrosis (resulting from an incomplete or ineffective fusion) may not provide the expected pain-relief for the patient. Also, the device(s) used for fusion, whether artificial or biological, may migrate out of the fusion site creating significant new problems for the patient.
- Various technologies and approaches have been developed to treat spinal pain without fusion in order to maintain or recreate the natural biomechanics of the spine. To this end, significant efforts are being made in the use of implantable artificial intervertebral discs. Artificial discs are intended to restore articulation between vertebral bodies so as to recreate the full range of motion normally allowed by the elastic properties of the natural disc. Unfortunately, the currently available artificial discs do not adequately address all of the motion mechanics of the spinal column.
- It has been found that the facet joints can also be a significant source of spinal disorders and debilitating pain. For example, a patient may suffer from arthritic facet joints, severe facet joint tropism, otherwise deformed facet joints, facet joint injuries, etc. These disorders lead to spinal stenosis, degenerative spondylolithesis, and/or isthmic spondylotlisthesis, pinching the nerves that extend between the affected vertebrae.
- Current interventions for the treatment of facet joint disorders have not been found to provide completely successful results. Facetectomy (removal of the facet joints) may provide some pain relief; but as the facet joints help to support axial, torsional, and shear loads that act on the spinal column in addition to providing a sliding articulation and mechanism for load transmission, their removal inhibits natural spinal function. Laminectomy (removal of the lamina, including the spinal arch and the spinous process) may also provide pain relief associated with facet joint disorders; however, the spine is made less stable and subject to hypermobility. Problems with the facet joints can also complicate treatments associated with other portions of the spine. In fact, contraindications for disc replacement include arthritic facet joints, absent facet joints, severe facet joint tropism, or otherwise deformed facet joints due to the inability of the artificial disc (when used with compromised or missing facet joints) to properly restore the natural biomechanics of the spinal motion segment.
- While various attempts have been made at facet joint replacement, they have been inadequate. This is due to the fact that prosthetic facet joints preserve existing bony structures and therefore do not address pathologies that affect facet joints themselves. Certain facet joint prostheses, such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,132,464, are intended to be supported on the lamina or the posterior arch. As the lamina is a very complex and highly variable anatomical structure, it is very difficult to design a prosthesis that provides reproducible positioning against the lamina to correctly locate the prosthetic facet joints. In addition, when facet joint replacement involves complete removal and replacement of the natural facet joint, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,579,319, the prosthesis is unlikely to endure the loads and cycling experienced by the vertebra. Thus, the facet joint replacement may be subject to long-term displacement. Furthermore, when facet joint disorders are accompanied by disease or trauma to other structures of a vertebra (such as the lamina, spinous process, and/or transverse processes) facet joint replacement is insufficient to treat the problem(s).
- Most recently, surgical-based technologies, referred to as “dynamic posterior stabilization,” have been developed to address spinal pain resulting from more than one disorder, when more than one structure of the spine have been compromised. An objective of such technologies is to provide the support of fusion-based implants while maximizing the natural biomechanics of the spine. Dynamic posterior stabilization systems typically fall into one of two general categories: posterior pedicle screw-based systems and interspinous spacers.
- Examples of pedicle screw-based systems are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,015,247, 5,484,437, 5,489,308, 5,609,636, 5,658,337, 5,741,253, 6,080,155, 6,096,038, 6,264,656 and 6,270,498. These types of systems involve the use of screws that are positioned in the vertebral body through the pedicle. Certain types of these pedicle screw-based systems may be used to augment compromised facet joints, while others require removal of the spinous process and/or the facet joints for implantation. One such system, the Zimmer Spine Dynesys® employs a cord which is extended between the pedicle screws and a fairly rigid spacer which is passed over the cord and positioned between the screws. While this system is able to provide load sharing and restoration of disc height, because it is so rigid, it does not effective in preserving the natural motion of the spinal segment into which it is implanted. Other pedicle screw-based systems employ articulating joints between the pedicle screws. Because these types of systems require the use of pedicle screws, implantation of the systems are often more invasive to implant than interspinous spacers.
- Where the level of disability or pain to the affected spinal motion segments is not that severe or where the condition, such as an injury, is not chronic, the use of interspinous spacers are preferred over pedicle based systems as they require a less invasive implantation approach and less dissection of the surrounding tissue and ligaments. Examples of interspinous spacers are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. Re. 36,211, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,645,599, 6,149,642, 6,500,178, 6,695,842, 6,716,245 and 6,761,720. The spacers, which are made of either a hard or compliant material, are placed in between adjacent spinous processes. The harder material spacers are fixed in place by means of the opposing force caused by distracting the affected spinal segment and/or by use of keels or screws that anchor into the spinous process. While slightly less invasive than the procedures required for implanting a pedicle screw-based dynamic stabilization system, implantation of hard or solid interspinous spacers still requires dissection of muscle tissue and of the supraspinous and interspinous ligaments. Additionally, these tend to facilitate spinal motion that is less analogous to the natural spinal motion than do the more compliant and flexible interspinous spacers. Another advantage of the compliant/flexible interspinous spacers is the ability to deliver them somewhat less invasively than those that are not compliant or flexible; however, their compliancy makes them more susceptible to displacement or migration over time. To obviate this risk, many of these spacers employ straps or the like that are wrapped around the spinous processes of the vertebrae above and below the level where the spacer is implanted. Of course, this requires some additional tissue and ligament dissection superior and inferior to the implant site, i.e., at least within the adjacent interspinous spaces.
- With the limitations of current spine stabilization technologies, there is clearly a need for an improved means and method for dynamic posterior stabilization of the spine and/or for treating scoliosis, which means and method address the drawbacks of prior devices. In particular, it would be highly beneficial to have a dynamic stabilization system that involves a minimally invasive implantation procedure, where the extent of distraction between the affected vertebrae is adjustable upon implantation and at a later time if necessary. It would be additionally advantageous if the system or device was also removable in a minimally invasive manner as well as obviated any risk of migration from the original implant site.
- The present invention provides systems and methods for stabilizing or adjusting the position of at least one spinal motion segment. The systems are particularly useful in treating degenerative facet or disk disease, central and/or lateral canal stenosis, foraminal narrowing or any other condition which involves compression of the neural element. The systems are also useful in treating scoliosis.
- The subject systems are implantable posterior to the spine in a minimally invasive manner and create or maintain distraction of at least a portion of the posterior element (i.e., the facet joints, laminas and/or the spinous processes) of the spinal motion segment being treated. The subject systems include one or more implantable members which are positionable laterally of the axial line or plane defined by the interspinous processes. In many embodiments, the lateral members are expandable in at least one dimension or direction, most commonly in a direction along the axis of the spine. The expandable members may be inflatable balloons, expandable scaffoldings or struts or the like or combination thereof. In certain embodiments, the expandable lateral members provide a distraction function between adjacent vertebrae or at least a portion of their posterior elements. In other embodiments, the expandable lateral members are used to maintain a distraction between the two vertebrae where the initial distraction is created by another means. This distraction involves relative movement between adjacent vertebrae where such movement may be axial (i.e., along the longitudinal axis of the spine) or angular or rotational (i.e., the angle defined by the intersection of the axes of two adjacent spinal processes is changed) or both.
- Systems for addressing stabilization of a spinal segment, in certain embodiments, employ two lateral members in tandem where they are positioned on opposing sides of a single spinal motion segment. These types of systems are referred to herein interchangeably as “bi-lateral” or “para-lateral” systems. Certain of these systems further employ one or more intermediately positioned transverse members extending between the two, laterally-opposed members. The transverse member(s) may varying in number and function and may couple with the lateral members in any suitable manner and at any point along a dimension, e.g., the length, of the lateral members.
- In certain embodiments, two transverse members may be placed at opposing end portions of the lateral members and may also be configured to engage the spinous processes in some manner. In one variation, the transverse members may be configured to engage an outer surface of a spinous process, and as such, act as a saddle or cradle. In another variation, the transverse member is configured to engage a surface formed within the spinous process, i.e., is positioned within and extended through a width of a spinous process where a through bore or hole is made from one side of the process to the other.
- In other embodiments, only a single transverse member is employed. In one variation of this embodiment, the transverse member extends substantially centrally between the two lateral members and the size, e.g., height, of the single transverse member dictates whether or not the transverse member engages one or both of the spinous processes between which it is interposed. For example, the transverse member may have a planar or webbing configuration with its end portions configured to engage the spinous processes and act as a saddle or cradle. On the other hand, the transverse member may be fairly narrow in width wherein it does not engage the spinous processes between which it extends and is configured as a lumen or the like which interconnects the two lateral members in fluid communication with each other. Thus, the material used to fabricate the transverse members, their size and extent of flexibility and the position in which they are placed relative to the lateral members and the other transverse members are primarily dictated by the intended function of the transverse members.
- The lateral members and transverse members may be positioned substantially perpendicular to one another or their interconnection may define an acute or obtuse angle between the two. Where there are two or more transverse members, they may be positioned parallel to each other or they themselves may intersect at an angle.
- In certain other embodiments of the present invention, only a single expandable member is used or is necessary to treat a single spinal segment where the member is positioned on either the left or right side of the spinal motion segment being treated. These types of systems are referred to herein as “unilateral” systems. Such systems are particularly useful in treating spinal motion segments where one side is more symptomatic than the other, for example, where bony spur deposits create a hypertrophic facet joint or due to foraminal narrowing. The systems are also useful for treating scoliosis.
- A plurality of such unilateral members may be placed along and on either or both sides of the spine as necessary. For example, where the spinal condition affects several adjacent spinal segments, a plurality of lateral members aligned in a serial fashion along the same or both sides of the spine may be employed. For spinal motion stabilization applications, two unilateral systems may be employed in tandem with respect to the same spinal segment where they are positioned on opposite sides of the spine. Such an arrangement may be used to stabilize spinal motion similar to the bi-lateral approach described above with the difference being that the two “unilateral” members are not interconnected or integral with each other in any way.
- The function of a lateral member of a unilateral system may depend on its particular placement relative to the components of the posterior element of the spinal motion segment being treated. For example, the lateral member may be positioned relatively anteriorly, e.g., between the laminal portions, and configured to engage with the same. As such, the lateral member provides a distracting function which may then require use of an anchoring means within the implant site to secure the lateral member to a portion of the vertebrae so as to minimize the risk of migration of the lateral member. Such anchoring means may include one or more transverse members which interconnect with one or both of the spinal processes. Alternatively, one or more transverse members may be configured and aligned to interconnect with one or more portions of the lamina or one or more facet joints of the spinal segment being treated. Still, yet one transverse member may anchor to a spinous process and the other may anchor to a lamina or facet joint. On the other hand, the lateral member may be positioned relatively posteriorly within the muscle and fascial tissue and itself be an anchoring means for another component which functions as a distracting means.
- Distraction between the adjacent vertebrae of the spinal segment being treated by a bi-lateral system or by two unilateral systems implanted at the same spinal motion segment is primarily in the axial direction of the spine. It should be understood that the axial distraction may be accomplished by the lateral members themselves but such is not always or necessarily the case. Instead, while the lateral members may contribute to maintaining a distracting force between the adjacent vertebrae, the initial distraction may be created by a separate distraction means which itself may also have an expandable component. The transverse member(s) of the implantable system is (are) then employed, in some cases, to maintain the distraction, while the lateral members essentially anchor the transverse member(s). While distraction between adjacent vertebrae of a spinal segment being treated by a unilateral system of the present invention is primarily rotational or angular, the same distracting-anchoring relationship may exist between the lateral member and the one or more transverse members in a unilateral approach.
- The expandable lateral members of the present invention have an unexpanded configuration and an expanded configuration, wherein the expandable member in an expanded configuration has a size, volume and/or shape configured for positioning minimally invasively in a position lateral to a spinous process. The expandable member may include an enclosed cavity which is fillable with a material to effect expansion or may have a strut or scaffolding-like structure that has a low profile configuration for delivery purposes through a small working channel and which is expandable to a greater profile upon deployment at or in close proximity to the implant site.
- The former type of expandable members include inflatable balloons made of either non-compliant or compliant material, may include a mesh material which may be coated or lined with a non-porous material or may generally provide an enclosed, compressible cavity which is fillable with a material such as a gas, fluid or other material which is deliverable in a flowable form which subsequently forms a solid upon curing, setting or drying. The expandable member may further include a port for coupling to a source of inflation and/or an expansion medium for inflating and/or expanding the expandable member. In certain embodiments, the port may be used to deflate or evacuate the expandable member.
- The latter type of expandable members may have a preformed configuration which is compressible and which is self-expanding upon deployment. Alternatively, the expandable members may be selectively adjustable and locked into place upon achieving a certain degree of expansion.
- Optionally, the systems may include one or more markers on a surface of a lateral and/or transverse member to facilitate fluoroscopic imaging during minimally invasive implantation, particularly percutaneous implantation.
- The invention further includes methods directed to stabilizing or adjusting the position of at least one spinal motion segment. The methods involve the implantation of one or more systems of the present invention, in which a lateral member is positioned laterally of a spinal motion segment in an unexpanded condition and then subsequently expanded to a size and/or shape for maintaining a selected distraction of adjacent vertebrae of a spinal motion segment. The invention also contemplates the temporary implantation of the subject systems which may be subsequently removed from the patient once the intended treatment is complete. Many of the methods involve the percutaneous implantation of the subject systems.
- These and other objects, advantages, and features of the invention will become apparent to those persons skilled in the art upon reading the details of the invention as more fully described below.
- The invention is best understood from the following detailed description when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. It is emphasized that, according to common practice, the various features of the drawings are not to-scale. On the contrary, the dimensions of the various features are arbitrarily expanded or reduced for clarity. Included in the drawings are the following figures:
-
FIG. 1 illustrates a perspective view of a portion of the human spine having two vertebral segments. -
FIGS. 2A , 28 and 2C illustrate left side, dorsal and top views, respectively, of the spinal segments ofFIG. 1A under going various motions. -
FIG. 3A illustrates a bi-lateral posterior element distraction system of the present invention operatively engaged within a delivery and implantation system of the present invention.FIG. 3B is a side view of the posterior element distraction system and a distracting mechanism of the implantation system ofFIG. 3A positioned within a spinal motion segment.FIG. 3C is a dorsal view of the posterior element distraction system ofFIG. 3A implanted within the spinal motion segment. -
FIG. 4A illustrates another bi-lateral posterior element distraction system of the present invention operatively engaged within a delivery and implantation system of the present invention.FIG. 4B is a side view of the posterior element distraction system and a distracting mechanism of the implantation system ofFIG. 4A positioned within a spinal motion segment.FIG. 4C is a dorsal view of the posterior element distraction system ofFIG. 4A implanted within the spinal motion segment. -
FIG. 5A illustrates another bi-lateral posterior element distraction system of the present invention operatively engaged within a delivery and implantation system of the present invention.FIG. 5B is a side view of the posterior element distraction system and a distracting mechanism of the implantation system ofFIG. 5A positioned within a spinal motion segment.FIG. 5C is a dorsal view of the posterior element distraction system ofFIG. 5A implanted within the spinal motion segment. -
FIG. 6A illustrates another bi-lateral posterior element distraction system of the present invention operatively engaged within a delivery and implantation system of the present invention.FIG. 6B is a side view of the posterior element distraction system and a distracting mechanism of the implantation system ofFIG. 6A positioned within a spinal motion segment.FIG. 6C is a dorsal view of the posterior element distraction system ofFIG. 6A implanted within the spinal motion segment. -
FIG. 7A illustrates another bi-lateral posterior element distraction system of the present invention operatively engaged within a delivery and implantation system of the present invention.FIG. 7B is a side view of the posterior element distraction system and a distracting mechanism of the implantation system ofFIG. 7A positioned within a spinal motion segment.FIG. 7C is a dorsal view of the posterior element distraction system ofFIG. 7A implanted within the spinal motion segment. -
FIG. 8A illustrates another bi-lateral posterior element distraction system of the present invention operatively engaged within a delivery and implantation system of the present invention.FIG. 8B is a side view of the posterior element distraction system and a distracting mechanism of the implantation system ofFIG. 8A positioned within a spinal motion segment.FIG. 8C is a dorsal view of the posterior element distraction system ofFIG. 8A implanted within the spinal motion segment. -
FIG. 9A illustrates another bi-lateral posterior element distraction system of the present invention operatively engaged within a delivery and implantation system of the present invention.FIG. 9B is a side view of the posterior element distraction system and a distracting mechanism of the implantation system ofFIG. 9A positioned within a spinal motion segment.FIG. 9C is a dorsal view of the posterior element distraction system ofFIG. 9A implanted within the spinal motion segment. -
FIG. 10A illustrates another bi-lateral posterior element distraction system of the present invention operatively engaged within a delivery and implantation system of the present invention.FIG. 10B is a dorsal view of the posterior element distraction system ofFIG. 10A implanted within a spinal motion segment.FIG. 10C is a side view ofFIG. 10A . -
FIGS. 11A-11H illustrate the steps of implanting the bi-lateral posterior element distraction system ofFIGS. 10A-10C . -
FIGS. 12A-12E illustrate the steps of implanting another bi-lateral posterior element distraction system of the present invention. -
FIGS. 13A and 13B illustrate dorsal views of another bi-lateral posterior element distraction system of the present invention implanted within a spinal motion segment in unexpanded and expanded configurations, respectively.FIG. 13C is a side view of the posterior element distraction system ofFIG. 13B . -
FIGS. 14A and 14B illustrate dorsal views of another bi-lateral posterior element distraction system of the present invention implanted within a spinal motion segment in unexpanded and expanded configurations, respectively.FIG. 14C is a side view of the posterior element distraction system ofFIG. 14B . -
FIGS. 15A and 15B illustrate dorsal views of another bi-lateral posterior element distraction system of the present invention implanted within a spinal motion segment in unexpanded and expanded configurations, respectively.FIG. 15C is a side view of the posterior element distraction system ofFIG. 15B . -
FIGS. 16A and 16B illustrate dorsal views of another bi-lateral posterior element distraction system of the present invention implanted within a spinal motion segment in unexpanded and expanded configurations, respectively.FIG. 16C is a side view of the posterior element distraction system ofFIG. 16B . -
FIGS. 17A and 17B illustrate dorsal views of another hi-lateral posterior element distraction system of the present invention implanted within a spinal motion segment in unexpanded and expanded configurations, respectively. -
FIGS. 18A and 18B illustrate dorsal views of another bi-lateral posterior element distraction system of the present invention implanted within a spinal motion segment in unexpanded and expanded configurations, respectively. -
FIGS. 19A and 19B illustrate dorsal views of another bi-lateral posterior element distraction system of the present invention implanted within a spinal motion segment in unexpanded and expanded configurations, respectively. -
FIG. 20A illustrates two unilateral posterior element distraction systems of the present invention implanted in tandem within a spinal motion segment.FIGS. 20B and 20C illustrate dorsal views of the tandem implant ofFIG. 20A in unexpanded and expanded configurations, respectively. -
FIGS. 21A and 21B illustrate dorsal views of another unilateral posterior element distraction system of the present invention implanted within a spinal motion segment in unexpanded and expanded configurations, respectively. -
FIG. 22A illustrate the unilateral posterior element distraction system ofFIGS. 21A and 21B within a delivery system of the present invention.FIGS. 22B and 22C illustrate a dorsal views of the systems implanted in tandem within a spinal motion segment in various states of expansion. -
FIG. 23A illustrates another bi-lateral posterior element distraction system of the present invention in combination with a temporary distraction mechanism.FIGS. 23B and 23C illustrate delivery of the distraction system and use of the temporary distraction mechanism to distract a spinal motion segment.FIG. 23D illustrates the bi-lateral posterior element distraction system ofFIG. 23A implanted within a spinal motion segment and subsequent to removing the distraction mechanism. -
FIG. 24A illustrates a scoliotic spine having a plurality of unilateral posterior element distraction systems of the present invention implanted therein.FIG. 24B illustrates the same spine after successful treatment utilizing the unilateral posterior element distraction systems. -
FIGS. 25A-25E illustrate the steps of a method of the present invention for percutaneously implanting certain systems of the present invention. - Before the subject devices, systems and methods are described, it is to be understood that this invention is not limited to particular embodiments described, as such may, of course, vary. It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only, and is not intended to be limiting, since the scope of the present invention will be limited only by the appended claims.
- Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs.
- It must be noted that as used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a”, “an”, and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to “a spinal segment” may include a plurality of such spinal segments and reference to “the screw” includes reference to one or more screw and equivalents thereof known to those skilled in the art, and so forth.
- Where a range of values is provided, it is understood that each intervening value, to the tenth of the unit of the lower limit unless the context clearly dictates otherwise, between the upper and lower limits of that range is also specifically disclosed. Each smaller range between any stated value or intervening value in a stated range and any other stated or intervening value in that stated range is encompassed within the invention. The upper and lower limits of these smaller ranges may independently be included or excluded in the range, and each range where either, neither or both limits are included in the smaller ranges is also encompassed within the invention, subject to any specifically excluded limit in the stated range. Where the stated range includes one or both of the limits, ranges excluding either or both of those included limits are also included in the invention.
- All publications mentioned herein are incorporated herein by reference to disclose and describe the methods and/or materials in connection with which the publications are cited. The publications discussed herein are provided solely for their disclosure prior to the filing date of the present application. Nothing herein is to be construed as an admission that the present invention is not entitled to antedate such publication by virtue of prior invention. Further, the dates of publication provided may be different from the actual publication dates which may need to be independently confirmed.
- The present invention will now be described in greater detail by way of the following description of exemplary embodiments and variations of the devices and methods of the present invention. The invention generally includes an implantable system or device as well as instruments for the percutaneous implantation of the system or device. A key feature of the subject systems is that it includes an expandable member which is implanted laterally of a spinal motion segment. In many embodiments the lateral member is expandable from a low profile configuration to a higher profile or operative configuration. This design allows the lateral member, when in the low profile condition, to be delivered by percutaneous means without requiring the removal of any portion of the spinal motion segment into which the device is implanted.
- Referring now to the drawings and to
FIG. 3A in particular, an exemplary bilateral posteriorelement distraction system 24 of the present invention.System 24 includes parallely spaced apart expandablelateral members 26 andtransverse members 28 extending between the end portions oflateral members 26. Here,lateral members 26 are illustrated as balloons (shown in an expanded condition) encased in an optional mesh material. The balloons may be made of a non-porous, biocompatible material, such as latex or acrylate. The balloons are inflatable with an inflation or expansion medium, such as air, saline, another biologically compatible fluid, or a flowable solid material, such as polyurethane, or a gel, which thickens or hardens substantially upon injection into balloon the balloon. Alternatively, the balloons may be made of a porous material, such as a hydrophilic polymer, to allow absorption of fluid from the implant site to within the balloon. The extent of expansion of the balloons is dependent upon the particular composition of the hydrophilic polymer used. - In certain embodiments, the balloons are made of a non-compliant or semi-compliant material so as to maintain a substantially fixed shape or configuration and ensure proper, long-term retention within the implant site. In other embodiments, the balloons may be made of a compliant material. In any embodiment, the compressibility and flexibility of
balloons 26 can be selected to address the indications being treated. Optionally still, balloons 26 may further include radiopaque markers (not shown) on their surfaces which are visible under fluoroscopic imaging to facilitate positioning ofsystem 24. The optional mesh material may be made of a material similar to that of the balloons, polyethylene, a metal, e.g., a nitinol or titanium, or another compliant (stretchable) or non-compliant material to provide a protective layer about the balloons to provide further stability to the balloons. For purposes of fluoroscopic imaging, the mesh material itself may be radiopaeque. -
Transverse members 28 may be made of a metal or polymer material that is conformable to a solid structure, e.g., aspinous process 18, 22 (seeFIG. 3C ), against which it is placed in tension and has a sufficient length and width to contact at least a portion of the spinous process. The distance between the twotransverse members 28 and the length of each may vary depending on the extent of distraction desired between the vertebrae of the spinal motion segment into which the system is implanted. -
FIG. 3A illustrates posteriorelement distraction system 24 operatively engaged to a minimally invasive delivery andimplantation system 35 of the present invention.System 35 includes amain body 36 which defines a working channel within proximity of the implant site and further includes a lumen for the delivery ofsystem 24 when in an unexpanded configuration to within proximity of the implant site. In this embodiment, each of balloons 26 is fluidly coupled to aninflation line 34 which also functions as a pusher for advancing the balloons collectively through the main body lumen and for advancing it once in the implant region.System 35 further includes adistraction mechanism 30, also in the form of an expandable balloon. Distraction balloon is also fluidly coupled to aninflation line 32 which, likelines 34, also functions as a pusher for advancingballoon 30 through the main body lumen.Distraction mechanism 30 may share a single lumen withsystem 24 or may be deliverable through its own designated lumen. Air and saline are suitable mediums for inflating the distraction balloon. - In use, and subsequent to the preparatory steps taken as will be described below with respect to
FIGS. 26A-26E ,delivery body 36 is inserted to within proximity to the implant site of the spinal motion segment being treated. Upon insertion,distraction mechanism 30 is translated in an unexpanded or deflated state throughmain body 36. In addition to advancingdistraction balloon 30,inflation lumen 32 acts as a guide wire to direct distraction balloon to within the interspinous space of the spinal segment being treated. In particular,distraction balloon 30 is placed substantially anteriorly within the space. Upon proper positioning within the interspinous space,distraction balloon 30 is slowly inflated to progressively distract the spinous processes 18, 22, as illustrated inFIG. 3B . Upon sufficient distraction of thevertebrae system 24 is similarly advanced to within the interspinous space adjacent and posteriorly to thedistraction balloon 30; however, the relative position of the implanted balloons and the temporary distraction balloons may be reversed, depending on the particular application at hand. Upon proper alignment within the space, balloons 26 are inflated or expanded andtransverse members 28 are caused to engage respectivespinous processes Balloons 26 are inflated to the extent necessary to maintain the desired distraction ofvertebrae Distraction balloon 30 is then deflated and retracted from the interspinous space, andinflation lumens 34 are decoupled fromballoons 26 and retracted to withinmain body 36. -
FIG. 3C illustratessystem 24 operatively implanted within a spinal motion segment havingsuperior vertebra 2 andinferior vertebra 4 wherelateral members 26 are positioned on opposite sides of the interspinous space andtransverse members 28 extend across the interspinous space and are in contact with opposingspinous processes transverse members 28 maintain the posterior element distraction achieved bydistraction mechanism 30 andlateral members 26 function to anchor thetransverse members 28. - Another embodiment of an implantable posterior element distraction system of the present invention is illustrated in
FIGS. 4A-4C .System 40 also includes expandablelateral members 42 in the form of balloons. A single fittedmesh 44 is provided over and encases both balloons in opposing manner with theperipheral edges 46 ofmesh 44 functioning as transverse members.System 40 is implantable and deployable in the same manner as described above with respect tosystem 24 ofFIGS. 3A-3C . - Another embodiment of an implantable posterior element distraction system of the present invention is illustrated in FIGS. SA-5C.
System 50 provides expandablelateral members 52 similar to those just described and enclosed in amesh 54. Here, however, instead of a fitted mesh,mesh 54 is in the form of a sock which is open at a proximal end and extends overinflation lumens 34. Subsequent to delivery, deployment and inflation oflateral members 52 within the implant site between the interspinous processes, 18, 22 (as described above with respect toFIGS. 3A-3C ), the open proximal end ofmesh 54 is synched down to tightly encase balloons 52. Upon proper tensioning between the balloons, thesynched end 58 is tied or secured and the proximally extending remainder is cut and removed. To accomplish such,implantation system 35 is equipped with synching and cutting mechanisms (not shown) which may be deliverable to the target site through designated lumens withinmain body 36. As with the posterior element distraction system ofFIG. 4A-4C , the now taughtperipheral edges 56 ofmesh 54 function as transverse members. -
FIGS. 6A-6C illustrate another posteriorelement distraction system 60 in whichlateral members 62 are in the form of doughnut-shaped balloons.Balloons 62 are maintained in an opposed substantially parallel relationship with each other by way ofstraps 66 wherein eachstrap 66 is wrapped around opposing sides ofballoons 62. The two ends of eachstrap 66 andballoon inflation lines 34 then collectively extend proximally together to within the same delivery lumen ofmain body 36 ofimplantation system 35.System 60 is implanted as described with respect toFIGS. 3A-3C , and upon proper implantation ofballoons 62, the strap ends 68 are synched and cut as described above. As illustrated inFIG. 6C , the outer portion ofstraps 66 function as transverse members, maintaining the distraction achieved bydistraction mechanism 30. - The posterior
element distraction system 70 ofFIGS. 7A-7C involves features of the systems ofFIGS. 5A-5C andFIGS. 6A-6C in that thelateral members 72 ofsystem 70 are doughnut-shaped balloons enclosed in amesh sock 74. Similar to the system ofFIGS. 5A-5C , upon proper implantation within the implant site, theproximal end 78 ofmesh 74 is synched and cut to maintainballoons 72 in a tensioned, substantially parallel relationship withperipheral edges 76 ofmesh 74 functioning as transverse members. -
FIGS. 8A-8C illustrate another embodiment of a posteriorelement distraction system 80 having inflatablelateral members 82 fluidly interconnected at a central location by transversemember 84.Transverse member 84 is in the form of a lumen thereby eliminating the need forseparate inflation lumens 34 forballoons 82. Only asingle inflation lumen 34, here coupled to the more proximal of the twoballoons 82, aslumen 84 transports the inflation medium from the proximally positioned balloon to the distally positioned balloon.System 80 further includestransverse member 86 which are configured to engage and maintain the distraction between thespinous processes System 80 is implanted as described with respect toFIGS. 3A-3C . -
FIGS. 9A-9C illustrate another embodiment of a posteriorelement distraction system 90 having inflatablelateral members 92 fluidly interconnected at a central location by transversemember 94. Similar to that of the system ofFIGS. 8A-8C ,transverse member 94 is in the form of a lumen for transporting the inflation medium from the proximally positioned balloon to the distally positioned balloon. A single fittedmesh 94 is provided over and encases bothballoons 92 in an opposing manner with theperipheral edges 96 ofmesh 94 functioning as transverse members.System 90 is implantable and deployable in the same manner as described above with respect toFIGS. 3A-3C . -
FIGS. 10A-10C illustrate another posteriorelement distraction system 100 of the present invention.System 100 includeslateral members transverse members guide wire 102 where each component is fixedly coupled to guide wire orsuture thread 102.Guide wire 102 has a leadingdistal end 104 configured to facilitate threading or feeding ofsystem 100 through the bone and tissue at the implant site. For example,distal end 104 may have a dumbbell configuration withbulbous end portions threading tool 117 which is described below with respect toFIGS. 11B and 11C .Lateral members Transverse members -
FIGS. 11A-11H illustrate the various steps involved in implantingdistraction system 100 at a target site within a spinal motion segment. Generally,system 100 is implanted by threadingguide wire 102 through hole or bores which are formed in bothspinous processes spinous processes 18, 20. As illustrated inFIGS. 11A and 11B , a puncturing or hole-formingtool 115 is used to formbores spinous process Tool 115 has opposingjaws jaw 112 a has punch member andjaw 112 b has an anvil configuration for receiving the punch member.Distal end 104 is then operatively loaded into guidewire feeding tool 117 as shown inFIG. 11C and the jaws of feedingtool 117 are straddled on the opposite sides ofspinous process 18. Specifically,distal bulb 105 a of feedingend 104 is held in theleft jaw 116 a offeeding tool 117 anddistal bulb 105 b is fed throughbore 110 a in superiorspinous process 18 and is received in right jaw 116 which is positioned on the opposing side ofspinous process 18, as shown inFIG. 11D . During this step,guide wire 102 is folded back overleading end 104 and, as such, is threaded throughbore 10 a as well.Guide wire 102 is pulled throughbore 110 a (FIG. 11E ) and thentool 117 is repositioned closer to inferiorspinous process 22 wheredistal bulb 105 a ofleading end 104 is inserted in to bore 110 b (FIG. 11F ) and received on the opposing side byjaw 116 a of tool 117 (FIG. 11G ).Guide wire 102 is then pulled through bothbores FIG. 1H ) untilsystem 100 is positioned as illustrated inFIGS. 10B and 10C . Namely,distal balloon 106 a in on the left side of the interspinous space,proximal balloon 106 b is on the right side of the interspinous space, distal bore plug 108 a is positioned withinbore 110 a ofspinous process 22 and boreplug 108 b is positioned withinbore 110 b ofspinous process 18. The distal portion ofguide wire 102 situated betweendistal balloon 106 b andleading end 104 and the proximal portion ofguide wire 102 proximal to balloon 108 b are cut. The cut ends are then securely fixed together such as by tension crimpers. Either before or after the guide wire is cut, balloons 106 are inflated or expanded by a separate inflation means (not shown). Alternatively,guide wire 102 may be equipped with a central inflation lumen, in which case, inflation of the balloons must occur before cutting the guide wire. -
FIGS. 12A-12E illustrate another bi-lateral posteriorelement distraction system 130 and the steps for implanting it within a target spinal motion segment. Like the system ofFIGS. 11A-11C , the components ofsystem 120 are serially interconnected to aguide wire 128 which is deliverable throughimplantation system 36.System 120 includeslateral balloon members 122 andtransverse members 124 which are interconnected with each other via a preformed, compressibleannular strut 124 which itself is interconnected to guidewire 128. On opposing sides ofsystem 120, in particular on the outer sides ofballoons 122 areballoon abutment members 129 such that eachballoon 122 is sandwiched between a side ofstrut 124 and an abutment member.System 120 is deliverable from one side of the target spinal motion segment, and is inserted through the interspinous space whilestrut 124 is in a restrained or compressed state untiltransverse members 126 are centered between thespinous processes FIG. 12B . Then, strut 124 is allowed to expand to is preformed, expanded state, as shown inFIG. 12C . Subsequently, balloons 122 are inflated so as to expand both vertically and widthwise and are caused to contact and become snuggly fit between theirrespective abutment member 129 and strut 124, as illustrated inFIG. 12D .Balloons 122 preferably have a cogged, petalled or starred configuration to better anchor within the surrounding tissue and, thus, mitigate migration of the device. -
FIGS. 13A-13C illustrate another posteriorelement distraction system 130 of the present invention having a two-piece configuration.System 130 includessuperior component 132 a andinferior component 132 b which are similarly constructed, each having atransverse member 134 andlateral balloon members 136 at opposing ends. The difference between the two is in the profile or shape of the respective balloon members in an expanded configuration. In particular, balloons 136 a ofsuperior component 132 a and balloons 138 b are shaped to interlock with each other in a mating configuration so as to provide an anchor fortransverse members 134. Apunching tool 115 as described above may be used to createbores spinous processes transverse members 134 are positioned within the bores. Subsequently, all of theballoons 136 are inflated with superiorly and inferiorly opposingballoons -
FIGS. 14A-14C , 15A-15C and 16A-16C each illustrate similar posterior element distraction systems having left and right lateral members, shown here in the form of expandable balloons. Each lateral member has a transverse member having a hook-like configuration for hooking around or about either a portion of the posterior element or a pedicle screw positioned within a portion of the posterior element. - For example,
system 140 ofFIGS. 14A-14C has hook-liketransverse members 146, where eachlateral balloon member 142 has a superiortransverse hook 146 a configured for hooking under the superiorspinous process 18 and an inferiortransverse hook 146 b configured for hooking over the inferiorspinous process 22. The hooks may be placed prior to inflation and, upon inflation of thelateral members 142, the respective hooks become securely anchored to the spinous processes. The pair ofsuperior hooks 146 a may be aligned to overlap or contact each other or to be displaced from each other as illustrated inFIG. 14C . Theinferior hooks 146 a may be similarly aligned. - System 150 of
FIGS. 15A-15C has hook-liketransverse members 156, where eachlateral balloon member 152 has a superiortransverse hook 156 a configured for hooking under a respective laminal arch 5 a, 5 b and an inferiortransverse book 156 configured for hooking over the inferiorspinous process 22 as described above. The hooks may be placed prior to inflation of thelateral members 152 and, upon inflation oflateral members 152, the respectivesuperior hooks 156 a become securely anchored to respective portions of the laminal arch 5 a, 5 b of thesuperior vertebra 2, and the respectiveinferior hooks 156 b engage with and securely anchor to the inferiorspinous process 22. -
System 160 ofFIGS. 16A-16C has superior hook-liketransverse members 166 a where eachlateral balloon member 162 is configured to hook about the pedicle screws 168. Here, pedicle screws 168 are positioned in the inferior facet joints 10 a, 10 b, respectively, and their supporting pedicles ofsuperior vertebra 2.System 160 further includes inferiorly positioned 166 b configured for hooking over the inferiorspinous process 22 as described above. Prior to inflation oflateral members 162, the respectivesuperior hooks 166 a may be engage with or positioned about or secured by pedicle screws 168. Upon inflation oflateral members 162, the respectiveinferior hooks 166 b securely anchor to the inferiorspinous process 22. -
FIGS. 17A and 17B illustrate a unilateral posteriorelement distraction system 170 of the present invention.System 170 includes a singlelateral member 172 which is in the form of an expandable strut having a hinged jaw configuration whereby the strut is foldable at a central joint 177, as shown inFIG. 17A . Hookedtransverse members 174 are positioned at superior and inferior ends ofstrut 172 and are configured for engaging the underside of superiorspinous process 18 and the top side of inferiorspinous process 22.Transverse members 174 are preferably made from a superelastic material wherein they have a preformed hook configuration but are sufficiently flexible to be compressed to a straightened configuration. A working channel ordelivery lumen 178 in conjunction with a pusher/guide wire 178 extendable and slidable through hinge joint 177 may used to deliversystem 170 minimally invasively to the implant site wherebystrut 172 is delivered in a folded condition andtransverse members 174 are delivered in a straightened condition. Upon placement of the distal end of workingchannel 176 within the interspinous space,lumen 178 is retracted thereby releasingstrut 172 wherebystrut 172 straightens andtransverse members 174 engage with the spinous processes 18, 22. To lockhinge joint 177 and maintain distraction of the vertebrae,wire 178 is retracted until its distal end, which terminates in astop 179, is cause to abut hinge joint 177, as shown inFIG. 17B . -
FIGS. 18A-18B illustrate another bi-lateral posteriorelement distraction system 180 having left and rightlateral members 182, shown here in the form of compressible-expandable struts. Extending between the ends ofstruts 182 are transverse superior and inferiortransverse members 184 which are preferably made from a superelastic material wherein they have a preformed curved configuration (FIG. 188 ) but are sufficiently flexible to be compressed to a straightened configuration (FIG. 18A ). Eachstrut member 182 is hinged centrally at a hub 186 wherein the strut ends are foldable at hub 186. Extending between hubs 186 is a centraltransverse member 188. Aguide wire 185 is threadably engaged with and extends proximally ofhub 186 a. - During delivery, the lateral and transverse members of
system 180 are all in a compressed, low-profile state to be easily translated through a working channel to the interspinous space, as illustrated inFIG. 18A . Upon positioning within the space, the working channel (not shown) is withdrawn proximally.Guide wire 185 is then used to push againstproximal hub 186 a thereby expandingstruts 182 and allowingtransverse members 184 to achieve there expanded and curved configuration for engagement with the spinous processes 18, 22, as shown inFIG. 18B . Once the desired amount of distraction is achieved betweenvertebrae guide wire 185 is unscrewed fromproximal hub 186 a thereby leavingsystem 180 at the implant site. Lateral struts 182 are sufficiently rigid to maintain the expanded condition and withstand the natural forces exerted on it by spine. -
System 190 ofFIGS. 19A and 19B is similar to the system ofFIGS. 18A and 18B as just described in that expandable-compressible strut 192, preformedtransverse members 194 and hubs 196 are substantially identical in structure and function.System 190, however, in that the lateral members further includeexpandable balloon members 198 positioned betweenhubs 198 and the exterior ends ofstruts 192, respectively. Additionally, centraltransverse member 197 provides a lumen by whichballoon members 198 are in fluid communication with each other as well as withguide wire 195 which transports an inflation medium to the balloons. The delivery ofsystem 190 to the implantation site is also similar to that described above with respect to the system ofFIGS. 18A and 18B , with the additional step of inflatingballoons 198, which may be done either prior to or after expandingstrut members 192 within the interspinous space. Once the desired amount of vertebral distraction and balloon inflation is achieved,proximal hub 196 a is locked in place andguide wire 195 is cut and removed. As such, balloons 198 function, at least in part, as anchors for and provide further stability tosystem 190. - The posterior element distraction systems of
FIGS. 20-23 all provide lateral members, either in a unilateral or a bilateral arrangement, which have strut configurations, particularly wire forms which are configured to be spring-loaded wherein they are self-expandable from a compressed or retained condition. Moreover, the lateral struts have configurations which provide a substantially central “living hinge” about which the strut ends may be folded. Alternatively, the struts may be compressed along their length to a lower profile configuration to make them easily deliverable through a narrow working channel. The spring force provided by the struts is sufficient to create the desired distraction between thevertebrae -
FIGS. 20A-20C illustrate asystem 200 which is a unilateral system having a singlelateral strut member 202.Transverse members 204, also of a wire form which may be substantially flexible so as to be straightenable during delivery through a working channel extend from the ends ofstrut member 202. Whilesystem 200 may be used alone, twosystems 200 may be employed in tandem on opposite sides of an interspinous space, as illustrated inFIGS. 20B and 20C , depending on the clinical application at hand. The two systems may be delivered independently through separate incisions formed on both sides of the spine. Alternatively, the two systems may be delivered serially through the same incision and through the same working channel wherein the position of the systems within the working channel and upon delivery are opposite each other. In other words, the most distal of the two systems, and thus the first to be delivered, would be delivered hinge first while the more proximally positioned system would be delivered second with its transverse members leading through the working channel. Alternatively, the two may be delivered in the same or any suitable position and their positions subsequently manipulated once at the implant site. -
FIGS. 21A and 21B illustrate anotherunilateral system 210 similar to that ofFIGS. 20A-20C , having alateral strut member 212 and twotransverse members 214.System 210, however, has anadditional balloon member 216 attached along the length ofstrut member 212 which, upon expansion within the implant site provides additional stability and anchoring forsystem 210.Balloon member 216 is inflatable in the ways described above. - As with the unilateral system of
FIGS. 20A and 20B , two ofsystem 210 may be used in tandem on opposite sides of the spinal motion segment being treated. This arrangement is illustrated inFIGS. 22A-22C .FIG. 22A , however, illustrates another manner of deliveringsystem 210, namely, delivering the system withballoon member 216 either partially or completely pre-inflated, i.e., prior to placement at the implant site. A cannula or workingchannel 215 is provided with apusher mechanism 217 having a distal working end having a cylindrical cavity therein for holdingsystem 210 withballoon 216 in an inflated state.Strut member 212 andtransverse members 214, however, are still delivered in a compressed or low profile state. As such,pre-inflated balloon 216 facilitates the spring-loading ofsystem 210 such that upon release ofballoon 216 from the distal end of delivery means 217,system 210 may immediately expand. If additional distraction of the spinal motion segment is required,balloon 216 may be additionally inflated as needed. - Where a bilateral approach is used, both sides of the above-described
unilateral system 210 may be integrally attached prior to implantation, thereby providing a bilateral system. Where theballoon members 216 are inflated subsequent to placement at the implant site, a lumen extending between the two may be provided so as to allow inflation of both balloons from one side. Alternatively, each of the balloons may have its own inflation port whereby they are inflated or expanded independently of each other. The inflation procedure may then be done bi-laterally or from the same inflation lumen. -
FIGS. 23A-23D illustrates aposterior distraction system 230 similar to that ofFIGS. 20A-20C but having a bilateral configuration rather than a unilateral configuration.System 230 includeslateral members 232 andtransverse members 234 which and is deliverable as described above. Here, however, the permanentlyimplantable distraction system 230 is implanted with the use of atemporary distraction mechanism 226.Distraction mechanism 226 is in the form of an inflatable balloon which may be made of a compliant or non-compliant material.System 230 may be delivered in tandem withdistraction mechanism 226 with the assistance of apusher mechanism 237. As such, both are delivered through asingle working channel 235 in a compressed or low profile state wheresystem 230 is positioned overballoon 226. Alternatively,balloon 226 andsystem 230 may be delivered independently of each other through separate working channels or lumens whereby, when both are positioned within the interspinous space, they are staggered from each other anteriorly to posteriorly. As illustrated inFIG. 23B , both may be placed in the interspinous space simultaneously ordistraction mechanism 226 may be initially placed while retainingsystem 230 within workingchannel 235. In either case,distraction member 236 is inflated via aninflation lumen 239 ofpusher mechanism 237. Asballoon 236 is inflated,vertebrae system 230 is allowed to expand within the interspinous space. After the desire distraction is achieved,balloon 236 is deflated and removed from the implant site, as illustrated inFIG. 23D . -
FIGS. 24A and 24B illustrate use of a plurality of another unilateralposterior distraction devices 240 implanted withinspine 245.Device 240 is in the form of an expandable balloon configured for positioning laterally of a spinal motion segment, and particularly laterally, on either side, of aninterspinous space 247.Device 240 is particularly suitable for treating scoliosis where one or more devices are placed axially on one or both sides ofspine 245. For example,curvature 242 of the spine, as illustrated inFIG. 24A , is treated by implanting one or more, e.g., two, on the concave side (here, the right side) of the spine adjacent the affected spinal motion segments. The devices are selectively expanded to rotationally distract the vertebrae of the affected segments such that the axial position of the spine is corrected, as illustrated inFIG. 24B . The devices may be configured to anchor themselves such as by having a shape that minimizes migration or may be further secured by other means such as a biological adhesive, pins, screws, etc. -
FIGS. 25A-25E illustrate certain preliminary steps of a minimally invasive procedure for implanting the devices and systems of the present invention. As illustrated inFIG. 25A , a percutaneous penetration or puncture is first made to one side of the spinal motion segment being treated. Aninstrument 250 commonly referred to as a “K-wire” may used to form the penetration. Theinstrument 250 may be directed under fluoroscopy or x-ray proximate a target implant site, such as between thevertebrae FIG. 25B , adilator 252 is then translated over k-wire 250 to within the target area to enlarge the channel through the tissue created by the k-wire. Then, as illustrated inFIG. 25C , a cannula or workingchannel 254 is translated overdilator 252 to within the target area to further expand the channel within the tissue and to provide a channel through which dissection, visualization and/or implantation instruments can be delivered. At this juncture in the procedure, k-wire 250 anddilator 252 may be removed from the implant site. Adissection tool 256, such as ascalpel 258, is then delivered through the lumen of workingchannel 254, and working channel 253 and is manipulated to allow dissection or incising of an area within or adjacent the implant site, e.g., theintraspinous ligament 25, as illustrated inFIG. 25D . Finally, as illustrated inFIG. 25E , a delivery or pusher instrument orlumen 260 within which asystem 262 of the present invention is retained in an undeployed or partially undeployed state is translated through workingchannel 254 to the target implant site. The system ordevice 262 is then deployed and expanded or allowed to expand to an extent sufficient to distractvertebrae - In certain embodiments of present invention, either during the implant procedure or in a subsequent procedure, the size or volume of the implanted system may be selectively adjusted or varied. For example, after an initial assessment upon implant, it may be necessary to adjust, either reduce or increase, the size or volume of the spacer to optimize the intended treatment. Further, it may be intended to only temporarily implant the spacer for the purpose of treating a temporary condition, e.g., an injured or bulging or herniated disk, or scoliotic curvature. Once the repair is achieved or the treatment completed, the spacer may be removed, either with or without substantially reducing the size or volume of the spacer. In other embodiments, the implant as well as the inflation/expansion material, if one is used, may be made of biodegradable materials wherein the implant degrades after a time in which the injury is healed or the treatment completed.
- For those implants of the present invention having a balloon configuration, the balloon may come equipped with an inflation or injection port for coupling to a source of inflation or expansion material or medium. The port may consist of a one-way valve which is self-sealing upon release from an inflation mechanism or lumen. The port may be further configured to releasably engage from an inflation tube, where such engagement may be threaded or involve a releasable locking mechanism.
- Depending upon the material used to fabricate the expandable members of the present invention, they may have a degree of stiffness in an unexpanded or deflated state such that they may maintain an elongated configuration so as to be directly insertable and pushable through a working channel. This may the case where the expandable member is made of a is strut or mesh material. Alternatively, a pusher or small diameter rod may be inserted through an inflation port of a balloon type expandable member to keep the expandable member in an elongated state so as to prevent it from bunching within the working channel and to provide some rigidity to more effectively position the expandable body in the target implant site.
- With embodiments in which the balloon members are initially inflated with air and then filled with a solid or fluid medium, the latter is preferably not delivered or injected into the interior of the expandable body until the position of the expandable body within the interspinous space has been verified and optimized. This is beneficial in situations where, upon inflation, it is found that the expandable body is misaligned within the interspinous space and requires repositioning. The balloon member may simply be deflated of air to the extent necessary and repositioned in a less inflated or deflated state. If necessary, for example where it is found that the maximum distraction provided by the implant is insufficient for the particular application at hand, the implant may be completely deflated or compressed or both and removed and replaced with a more suitably sized implant.
- It should be noted that any of the implants of the present invention may be implanted with the assistance of any of the temporary distraction mechanism of the present invention.
- It should also be noted that any of the above-described steps or procedures, including but not limited to cannulation of the target area, dissection of the spinous ligament, insertion of the subject implants within the target implant site, inflation and/or expansion of a temporary distraction means, inflation and/or expansion of the implant or a portion thereof and the adjustment or readjustment of the implant may be facilitated by way of a scope delivered through a lumen of the working channel. Alternatively, a second cannula or working channel delivered through another percutaneous penetration on the same or opposite side of the spine may be employed for use of an endoscope and any other instruments needed to facilitate the procedure.
- The subject devices and systems may be provided in the form of a kit which includes at least one interspinous device of the present invention. A plurality of such devices may be provided where the devices have the same or varying sizes and shapes and are made of the same or varying materials. The kits may further include instruments and tools for implanting the subject devices, including but not limited to, a cannula, a trocar, a scope, a device delivery/inflation/expansion lumen, a cutting instrument, a screw driver, etc., as well as a selection of screws or other devices for anchoring the spacer tabs to the spinous processes. The kits may also include a supply of an inflation and/or expansion medium. Instructions for implanting the subject systems and devices and for using the above-described instrumentation may also be provided with the kits.
- The preceding merely illustrates the principles of the invention. It will be appreciated that those skilled in the art will be able to devise various arrangements which, although not explicitly described or shown herein, embody the principles of the invention and are included within its spirit and scope. Furthermore, all examples and conditional language recited herein are principally intended to aid the reader in understanding the principles of the invention and the concepts contributed by the inventors to furthering the art, and are to be construed as being without limitation to such specifically recited examples and conditions. Moreover, all statements herein reciting principles, aspects, and embodiments of the invention as well as specific examples thereof, are intended to encompass both structural and functional equivalents thereof. Additionally, it is intended that such equivalents include both currently known equivalents and equivalents developed in the future, i.e., any elements developed that perform the same function, regardless of structure. The scope of the present invention, therefore, is not intended to be limited to the exemplary embodiments shown and described herein. Rather, the scope and spirit of present invention is embodied by the appended claims.
Claims (20)
1. A posterior element distraction system for implantation at a spinal motion segment comprising a superior vertebra, an inferior vertebra, each vertebra comprising a posterior element comprising a spinous process, laminal portions and a set of facet joints, and further comprising an interspinous space between the spinous processes, the system comprising:
at least one lateral member for positioning on a side of the spinal motion segment and outside the interspinous space, wherein the at least one lateral member has an unexpanded configuration and an expanded configuration; and
first and second transverse members extending transversely from the at least one lateral member, wherein when the system is operatively implanted at a spinal motion segment and the at least one lateral member is in an expanded configuration, the transverse members are caused to contact a portion of either the superior or inferior posterior elements thereby providing distraction between the superior and inferior posterior elements.
2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the system comprises two lateral members for positioning on opposite sides of spinal motion segment.
3. The system of claim 2 , wherein each transverse member is a strap extending between the two lateral members.
4. The system of claim 2 , further comprising a meshing about the two lateral members.
5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the system comprises only one lateral member.
6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one lateral member comprises a balloon configuration.
7. The system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one lateral member comprises a strut configuration.
8. The system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one lateral member comprises a balloon and a strut.
9. The system of claim 1 , wherein the transverse members have a pre-formed configuration.
10. The system of claim 1 , wherein the transverse members have a flexible configuration.
11. A system for implanting the system of claim 1 , the implantation system comprising:
a temporary distraction device having an expanded configuration and an unexpanded configuration and further configured for insertion within the interspinous space, wherein upon expansion of the device, the superior and inferior vertebrae are distracted from each other.
12. The system of claim 11 , further comprising:
a working channel for delivering the temporary distraction device and the posterior distraction system, wherein the temporary distraction device is deliverable in an unexpanded configuration.
13. The system of claim 12 , wherein the temporary distraction device and the posterior distraction system are deliverable simultaneously to the spinal motion segment.
14. The system of claim 11 , wherein the temporary distraction device comprises a balloon.
15. A method for distracting at least a portion of a spinal motion segment comprising a superior vertebra, an inferior vertebra, each vertebra comprising a posterior element comprising a spinous process, laminal portions and a set of facet joints, and further comprising an interspinous space between the spinous processes, the method comprising:
inserting an expandable member laterally of the spinal motion segment; and
expanding the expandable member thereby distracting the superior vertebra and the inferior vertebra relative to each other.
16. The method of claim 15 , further comprising:
inserting two transverse members within the interspinous space.
17. The method of claim 15 , wherein the distraction between the vertebrae is along the longitudinal axis of the spine.
18. The method of claim 15 , wherein the distraction between the vertebrae is rotational.
19. A method for distracting at least a portion of a spinal motion segment comprising a superior vertebra, an inferior vertebra, each vertebra comprising a posterior element comprising a spinous process, laminal portions and a set of facet joints, and further comprising an interspinous space between the spinous processes, the method comprising:
distracting the superior vertebra and the inferior vertebra relative to each other until a desired amount of distraction is achieved;
inserting an implantable expandable member within the interspinous space; and
expanding the implantable expandable member to contact the spinous processes thereby maintaining the distraction achieved.
20. The method of claim 19 , wherein the distracting comprises using another expandable member positionable within the interspinous space; and wherein the other expandable member is removed subsequent to the expanding of the implantable expandable.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US14/676,553 US10292738B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2015-04-01 | Systems and methods for stabilizing the motion or adjusting the position of the spine |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/970,843 US8167944B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2004-10-20 | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US11/006,521 US9023084B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2004-12-06 | Systems and methods for stabilizing the motion or adjusting the position of the spine |
US14/676,553 US10292738B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2015-04-01 | Systems and methods for stabilizing the motion or adjusting the position of the spine |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/006,521 Continuation US9023084B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2004-12-06 | Systems and methods for stabilizing the motion or adjusting the position of the spine |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20150374415A1 true US20150374415A1 (en) | 2015-12-31 |
US10292738B2 US10292738B2 (en) | 2019-05-21 |
Family
ID=36575371
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/006,521 Active 2029-06-17 US9023084B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2004-12-06 | Systems and methods for stabilizing the motion or adjusting the position of the spine |
US14/676,553 Expired - Lifetime US10292738B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2015-04-01 | Systems and methods for stabilizing the motion or adjusting the position of the spine |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/006,521 Active 2029-06-17 US9023084B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2004-12-06 | Systems and methods for stabilizing the motion or adjusting the position of the spine |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US9023084B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1819287B1 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2410088T3 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2006063047A2 (en) |
Cited By (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9393055B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2016-07-19 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Spacer insertion instrument |
US9532812B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2017-01-03 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US9572603B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2017-02-21 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US9675303B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2017-06-13 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Visualization systems, instruments and methods of using the same in spinal decompression procedures |
US9861398B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2018-01-09 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US9956011B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2018-05-01 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US10039576B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2018-08-07 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US10058358B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2018-08-28 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US10080587B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2018-09-25 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Methods for treating a patient's spine |
US10258389B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2019-04-16 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US10278744B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2019-05-07 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US10524772B2 (en) | 2014-05-07 | 2020-01-07 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Spinal nerve decompression systems, dilation systems, and methods of using the same |
US10588663B2 (en) | 2006-10-18 | 2020-03-17 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Dilator |
US10709481B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2020-07-14 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US11229461B2 (en) | 2006-10-18 | 2022-01-25 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US12102542B2 (en) | 2022-02-15 | 2024-10-01 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Interspinous spacer and methods and systems utilizing the interspinous spacer |
Families Citing this family (209)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6068630A (en) * | 1997-01-02 | 2000-05-30 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Spine distraction implant |
US6695842B2 (en) * | 1997-10-27 | 2004-02-24 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Interspinous process distraction system and method with positionable wing and method |
US7306628B2 (en) | 2002-10-29 | 2007-12-11 | St. Francis Medical Technologies | Interspinous process apparatus and method with a selectably expandable spacer |
US7959652B2 (en) | 2005-04-18 | 2011-06-14 | Kyphon Sarl | Interspinous process implant having deployable wings and method of implantation |
US20080086212A1 (en) | 1997-01-02 | 2008-04-10 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Spine distraction implant |
US7201751B2 (en) * | 1997-01-02 | 2007-04-10 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Supplemental spine fixation device |
US20080215058A1 (en) * | 1997-01-02 | 2008-09-04 | Zucherman James F | Spine distraction implant and method |
US20080071378A1 (en) * | 1997-01-02 | 2008-03-20 | Zucherman James F | Spine distraction implant and method |
US8128661B2 (en) * | 1997-01-02 | 2012-03-06 | Kyphon Sarl | Interspinous process distraction system and method with positionable wing and method |
US20080027552A1 (en) * | 1997-01-02 | 2008-01-31 | Zucherman James F | Spine distraction implant and method |
FR2828398B1 (en) * | 2001-08-08 | 2003-09-19 | Jean Taylor | VERTEBRA STABILIZATION ASSEMBLY |
FR2844179B1 (en) | 2002-09-10 | 2004-12-03 | Jean Taylor | POSTERIOR VERTEBRAL SUPPORT KIT |
US7549999B2 (en) | 2003-05-22 | 2009-06-23 | Kyphon Sarl | Interspinous process distraction implant and method of implantation |
US7833246B2 (en) * | 2002-10-29 | 2010-11-16 | Kyphon SÀRL | Interspinous process and sacrum implant and method |
US20060064165A1 (en) * | 2004-09-23 | 2006-03-23 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Interspinous process implant including a binder and method of implantation |
US20050075634A1 (en) * | 2002-10-29 | 2005-04-07 | Zucherman James F. | Interspinous process implant with radiolucent spacer and lead-in tissue expander |
US8070778B2 (en) | 2003-05-22 | 2011-12-06 | Kyphon Sarl | Interspinous process implant with slide-in distraction piece and method of implantation |
US8147548B2 (en) | 2005-03-21 | 2012-04-03 | Kyphon Sarl | Interspinous process implant having a thread-shaped wing and method of implantation |
US8221463B2 (en) * | 2002-10-29 | 2012-07-17 | Kyphon Sarl | Interspinous process implants and methods of use |
US8048117B2 (en) | 2003-05-22 | 2011-11-01 | Kyphon Sarl | Interspinous process implant and method of implantation |
US7909853B2 (en) | 2004-09-23 | 2011-03-22 | Kyphon Sarl | Interspinous process implant including a binder and method of implantation |
US7749252B2 (en) * | 2005-03-21 | 2010-07-06 | Kyphon Sarl | Interspinous process implant having deployable wing and method of implantation |
US7335203B2 (en) | 2003-02-12 | 2008-02-26 | Kyphon Inc. | System and method for immobilizing adjacent spinous processes |
US7585316B2 (en) * | 2004-05-21 | 2009-09-08 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US8012209B2 (en) | 2004-09-23 | 2011-09-06 | Kyphon Sarl | Interspinous process implant including a binder, binder aligner and method of implantation |
US8192435B2 (en) | 2004-10-15 | 2012-06-05 | Baxano, Inc. | Devices and methods for tissue modification |
US8221397B2 (en) | 2004-10-15 | 2012-07-17 | Baxano, Inc. | Devices and methods for tissue modification |
US20110190772A1 (en) | 2004-10-15 | 2011-08-04 | Vahid Saadat | Powered tissue modification devices and methods |
US8430881B2 (en) | 2004-10-15 | 2013-04-30 | Baxano, Inc. | Mechanical tissue modification devices and methods |
US9247952B2 (en) | 2004-10-15 | 2016-02-02 | Amendia, Inc. | Devices and methods for tissue access |
US20100004654A1 (en) * | 2008-07-01 | 2010-01-07 | Schmitz Gregory P | Access and tissue modification systems and methods |
US20070213734A1 (en) * | 2006-03-13 | 2007-09-13 | Bleich Jeffery L | Tissue modification barrier devices and methods |
US8257356B2 (en) | 2004-10-15 | 2012-09-04 | Baxano, Inc. | Guidewire exchange systems to treat spinal stenosis |
US7857813B2 (en) | 2006-08-29 | 2010-12-28 | Baxano, Inc. | Tissue access guidewire system and method |
US7938830B2 (en) | 2004-10-15 | 2011-05-10 | Baxano, Inc. | Powered tissue modification devices and methods |
US8048080B2 (en) | 2004-10-15 | 2011-11-01 | Baxano, Inc. | Flexible tissue rasp |
US20100331883A1 (en) | 2004-10-15 | 2010-12-30 | Schmitz Gregory P | Access and tissue modification systems and methods |
US7887538B2 (en) | 2005-10-15 | 2011-02-15 | Baxano, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for tissue modification |
US7578819B2 (en) | 2005-05-16 | 2009-08-25 | Baxano, Inc. | Spinal access and neural localization |
US8617163B2 (en) | 2004-10-15 | 2013-12-31 | Baxano Surgical, Inc. | Methods, systems and devices for carpal tunnel release |
US9101386B2 (en) | 2004-10-15 | 2015-08-11 | Amendia, Inc. | Devices and methods for treating tissue |
US8062300B2 (en) | 2006-05-04 | 2011-11-22 | Baxano, Inc. | Tissue removal with at least partially flexible devices |
US8123782B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2012-02-28 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US9023084B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2015-05-05 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for stabilizing the motion or adjusting the position of the spine |
US8123807B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2012-02-28 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US8945183B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2015-02-03 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous process spacer instrument system with deployment indicator |
US8277488B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2012-10-02 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US8425559B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2013-04-23 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US8012207B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2011-09-06 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US8613747B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2013-12-24 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Spacer insertion instrument |
US9055981B2 (en) | 2004-10-25 | 2015-06-16 | Lanx, Inc. | Spinal implants and methods |
US8241330B2 (en) | 2007-01-11 | 2012-08-14 | Lanx, Inc. | Spinous process implants and associated methods |
US8096995B2 (en) | 2005-02-17 | 2012-01-17 | Kyphon Sarl | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US20070276493A1 (en) * | 2005-02-17 | 2007-11-29 | Malandain Hugues F | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US8029567B2 (en) | 2005-02-17 | 2011-10-04 | Kyphon Sarl | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US8057513B2 (en) | 2005-02-17 | 2011-11-15 | Kyphon Sarl | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US8007521B2 (en) * | 2005-02-17 | 2011-08-30 | Kyphon Sarl | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US8157841B2 (en) | 2005-02-17 | 2012-04-17 | Kyphon Sarl | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US8097018B2 (en) | 2005-02-17 | 2012-01-17 | Kyphon Sarl | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US8096994B2 (en) | 2005-02-17 | 2012-01-17 | Kyphon Sarl | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US20070055237A1 (en) * | 2005-02-17 | 2007-03-08 | Edidin Avram A | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US20060184248A1 (en) * | 2005-02-17 | 2006-08-17 | Edidin Avram A | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US7927354B2 (en) | 2005-02-17 | 2011-04-19 | Kyphon Sarl | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US20080288078A1 (en) * | 2005-02-17 | 2008-11-20 | Kohm Andrew C | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US20070276372A1 (en) * | 2005-02-17 | 2007-11-29 | Malandain Hugues F | Percutaneous Spinal Implants and Methods |
US7998208B2 (en) * | 2005-02-17 | 2011-08-16 | Kyphon Sarl | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US8100943B2 (en) | 2005-02-17 | 2012-01-24 | Kyphon Sarl | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US7998174B2 (en) | 2005-02-17 | 2011-08-16 | Kyphon Sarl | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US7988709B2 (en) | 2005-02-17 | 2011-08-02 | Kyphon Sarl | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US8034080B2 (en) * | 2005-02-17 | 2011-10-11 | Kyphon Sarl | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US7993342B2 (en) | 2005-02-17 | 2011-08-09 | Kyphon Sarl | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US8038698B2 (en) * | 2005-02-17 | 2011-10-18 | Kphon Sarl | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US20070276373A1 (en) * | 2005-02-17 | 2007-11-29 | Malandain Hugues F | Percutaneous Spinal Implants and Methods |
US8092459B2 (en) * | 2005-02-17 | 2012-01-10 | Kyphon Sarl | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US8043335B2 (en) * | 2005-02-17 | 2011-10-25 | Kyphon Sarl | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US20080039944A1 (en) * | 2005-02-17 | 2008-02-14 | Malandain Hugues F | Percutaneous Spinal Implants and Methods |
JP2006253316A (en) * | 2005-03-09 | 2006-09-21 | Sony Corp | Solid-state image sensing device |
US8066742B2 (en) * | 2005-03-31 | 2011-11-29 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Intervertebral prosthetic device for spinal stabilization and method of implanting same |
US20060241757A1 (en) * | 2005-03-31 | 2006-10-26 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Intervertebral prosthetic device for spinal stabilization and method of manufacturing same |
US7862590B2 (en) | 2005-04-08 | 2011-01-04 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Interspinous process spacer |
US7780709B2 (en) * | 2005-04-12 | 2010-08-24 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Implants and methods for inter-transverse process dynamic stabilization of a spinal motion segment |
US8034079B2 (en) * | 2005-04-12 | 2011-10-11 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Implants and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of a spinal motion segment |
US7789898B2 (en) * | 2005-04-15 | 2010-09-07 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Transverse process/laminar spacer |
US7727233B2 (en) | 2005-04-29 | 2010-06-01 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Spinous process stabilization devices and methods |
FR2887434B1 (en) | 2005-06-28 | 2008-03-28 | Jean Taylor | SURGICAL TREATMENT EQUIPMENT OF TWO VERTEBRATES |
US8092456B2 (en) | 2005-10-15 | 2012-01-10 | Baxano, Inc. | Multiple pathways for spinal nerve root decompression from a single access point |
US8062298B2 (en) | 2005-10-15 | 2011-11-22 | Baxano, Inc. | Flexible tissue removal devices and methods |
US8366712B2 (en) | 2005-10-15 | 2013-02-05 | Baxano, Inc. | Multiple pathways for spinal nerve root decompression from a single access point |
US8357181B2 (en) * | 2005-10-27 | 2013-01-22 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Intervertebral prosthetic device for spinal stabilization and method of implanting same |
US7862591B2 (en) * | 2005-11-10 | 2011-01-04 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Intervertebral prosthetic device for spinal stabilization and method of implanting same |
US20070173823A1 (en) * | 2006-01-18 | 2007-07-26 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Intervertebral prosthetic device for spinal stabilization and method of implanting same |
US8083795B2 (en) | 2006-01-18 | 2011-12-27 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Intervertebral prosthetic device for spinal stabilization and method of manufacturing same |
US20070191838A1 (en) * | 2006-01-27 | 2007-08-16 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Interspinous devices and methods of use |
US7837711B2 (en) * | 2006-01-27 | 2010-11-23 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Artificial spinous process for the sacrum and methods of use |
US7682376B2 (en) | 2006-01-27 | 2010-03-23 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Interspinous devices and methods of use |
US7691130B2 (en) * | 2006-01-27 | 2010-04-06 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Spinal implants including a sensor and methods of use |
US20070185490A1 (en) * | 2006-01-31 | 2007-08-09 | Dante Implicito | Percutaneous interspinous distraction device and method |
US20070233068A1 (en) * | 2006-02-22 | 2007-10-04 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Intervertebral prosthetic assembly for spinal stabilization and method of implanting same |
US8262698B2 (en) | 2006-03-16 | 2012-09-11 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Expandable device for insertion between anatomical structures and a procedure utilizing same |
US7985246B2 (en) * | 2006-03-31 | 2011-07-26 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Methods and instruments for delivering interspinous process spacers |
FR2899788B1 (en) * | 2006-04-13 | 2008-07-04 | Jean Taylor | TREATMENT EQUIPMENT FOR VERTEBRATES, COMPRISING AN INTEREPINOUS IMPLANT |
US8118844B2 (en) * | 2006-04-24 | 2012-02-21 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Expandable device for insertion between anatomical structures and a procedure utilizing same |
US7846185B2 (en) * | 2006-04-28 | 2010-12-07 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Expandable interspinous process implant and method of installing same |
US8105357B2 (en) | 2006-04-28 | 2012-01-31 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Interspinous process brace |
US8252031B2 (en) | 2006-04-28 | 2012-08-28 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Molding device for an expandable interspinous process implant |
US8048118B2 (en) | 2006-04-28 | 2011-11-01 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Adjustable interspinous process brace |
US8348978B2 (en) * | 2006-04-28 | 2013-01-08 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Interosteotic implant |
US20070270823A1 (en) | 2006-04-28 | 2007-11-22 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Multi-chamber expandable interspinous process brace |
US8062337B2 (en) * | 2006-05-04 | 2011-11-22 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Expandable device for insertion between anatomical structures and a procedure utilizing same |
US20070276497A1 (en) * | 2006-05-23 | 2007-11-29 | Sdgi Holdings. Inc. | Surgical spacer |
US8147517B2 (en) * | 2006-05-23 | 2012-04-03 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Systems and methods for adjusting properties of a spinal implant |
US20070276496A1 (en) * | 2006-05-23 | 2007-11-29 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Surgical spacer with shape control |
US20070276369A1 (en) * | 2006-05-26 | 2007-11-29 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | In vivo-customizable implant |
US20080058808A1 (en) | 2006-06-14 | 2008-03-06 | Spartek Medical, Inc. | Implant system and method to treat degenerative disorders of the spine |
US8048119B2 (en) | 2006-07-20 | 2011-11-01 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Apparatus for insertion between anatomical structures and a procedure utilizing same |
US20080086115A1 (en) * | 2006-09-07 | 2008-04-10 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Intercostal spacer device and method for use in correcting a spinal deformity |
FR2907329B1 (en) * | 2006-10-20 | 2009-02-27 | Jean Taylor | INTEREPINEAL VERTEBRAL PROSTHESIS |
US20080177298A1 (en) * | 2006-10-24 | 2008-07-24 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Tensioner Tool and Method for Implanting an Interspinous Process Implant Including a Binder |
US8097019B2 (en) * | 2006-10-24 | 2012-01-17 | Kyphon Sarl | Systems and methods for in situ assembly of an interspinous process distraction implant |
FR2908035B1 (en) | 2006-11-08 | 2009-05-01 | Jean Taylor | INTEREPINE IMPLANT |
US20080114357A1 (en) * | 2006-11-15 | 2008-05-15 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Inter-transverse process spacer device and method for use in correcting a spinal deformity |
US7879104B2 (en) | 2006-11-15 | 2011-02-01 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Spinal implant system |
US7993375B2 (en) * | 2006-12-05 | 2011-08-09 | Spine Wave, Inc. | Dynamic stabilization devices and methods |
US7955392B2 (en) | 2006-12-14 | 2011-06-07 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Interspinous process devices and methods |
US20080177179A1 (en) * | 2006-12-19 | 2008-07-24 | Cytyc Corporation | Target Tissue Locator for Image Guided Radiotherapy |
US8974496B2 (en) | 2007-08-30 | 2015-03-10 | Jeffrey Chun Wang | Interspinous implant, tools and methods of implanting |
US9265532B2 (en) | 2007-01-11 | 2016-02-23 | Lanx, Inc. | Interspinous implants and methods |
US20080177326A1 (en) * | 2007-01-19 | 2008-07-24 | Matthew Thompson | Orthosis to correct spinal deformities |
US8435268B2 (en) * | 2007-01-19 | 2013-05-07 | Reduction Technologies, Inc. | Systems, devices and methods for the correction of spinal deformities |
US20080195153A1 (en) * | 2007-02-08 | 2008-08-14 | Matthew Thompson | Dynamic spinal deformity correction |
US20080281361A1 (en) * | 2007-05-10 | 2008-11-13 | Shannon Marlece Vittur | Posterior stabilization and spinous process systems and methods |
US8840646B2 (en) | 2007-05-10 | 2014-09-23 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Spinous process implants and methods |
US20080294199A1 (en) * | 2007-05-25 | 2008-11-27 | Andrew Kohm | Spinous process implants and methods of using the same |
US7963978B2 (en) | 2007-06-05 | 2011-06-21 | Spartek Medical, Inc. | Method for implanting a deflection rod system and customizing the deflection rod system for a particular patient need for dynamic stabilization and motion preservation spinal implantation system |
US8092501B2 (en) | 2007-06-05 | 2012-01-10 | Spartek Medical, Inc. | Dynamic spinal rod and method for dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US8048115B2 (en) | 2007-06-05 | 2011-11-01 | Spartek Medical, Inc. | Surgical tool and method for implantation of a dynamic bone anchor |
US8066747B2 (en) | 2007-06-05 | 2011-11-29 | Spartek Medical, Inc. | Implantation method for a dynamic stabilization and motion preservation spinal implantation system and method |
US8083772B2 (en) | 2007-06-05 | 2011-12-27 | Spartek Medical, Inc. | Dynamic spinal rod assembly and method for dynamic stabilization of the spine |
WO2008151096A1 (en) | 2007-06-05 | 2008-12-11 | Spartek Medical, Inc. | A deflection rod system for a dynamic stabilization and motion preservation spinal implantation system and method |
US8048123B2 (en) | 2007-06-05 | 2011-11-01 | Spartek Medical, Inc. | Spine implant with a deflection rod system and connecting linkages and method |
US8021396B2 (en) | 2007-06-05 | 2011-09-20 | Spartek Medical, Inc. | Configurable dynamic spinal rod and method for dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US8114134B2 (en) | 2007-06-05 | 2012-02-14 | Spartek Medical, Inc. | Spinal prosthesis having a three bar linkage for motion preservation and dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US20090005873A1 (en) | 2007-06-29 | 2009-01-01 | Michael Andrew Slivka | Spinous Process Spacer Hammock |
US8348976B2 (en) * | 2007-08-27 | 2013-01-08 | Kyphon Sarl | Spinous-process implants and methods of using the same |
EP2194861A1 (en) | 2007-09-06 | 2010-06-16 | Baxano, Inc. | Method, system and apparatus for neural localization |
WO2009039464A1 (en) * | 2007-09-20 | 2009-03-26 | Life Spine, Inc. | Expandable spinal spacer |
US8696714B2 (en) * | 2007-11-02 | 2014-04-15 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Intervertebral stabilization devices |
US20090118833A1 (en) * | 2007-11-05 | 2009-05-07 | Zimmer Spine, Inc. | In-situ curable interspinous process spacer |
US8192436B2 (en) | 2007-12-07 | 2012-06-05 | Baxano, Inc. | Tissue modification devices |
AU2009205429A1 (en) | 2008-01-14 | 2009-07-23 | Conventus Orthopaedics Inc. | Apparatus and methods for fracture repair |
US20090198338A1 (en) | 2008-02-04 | 2009-08-06 | Phan Christopher U | Medical implants and methods |
US20090198241A1 (en) * | 2008-02-04 | 2009-08-06 | Phan Christopher U | Spine distraction tools and methods of use |
US8252029B2 (en) * | 2008-02-21 | 2012-08-28 | Zimmer Gmbh | Expandable interspinous process spacer with lateral support and method for implantation |
US8333792B2 (en) | 2008-02-26 | 2012-12-18 | Spartek Medical, Inc. | Load-sharing bone anchor having a deflectable post and method for dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US8097024B2 (en) | 2008-02-26 | 2012-01-17 | Spartek Medical, Inc. | Load-sharing bone anchor having a deflectable post and method for stabilization of the spine |
US8211155B2 (en) | 2008-02-26 | 2012-07-03 | Spartek Medical, Inc. | Load-sharing bone anchor having a durable compliant member and method for dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US8007518B2 (en) | 2008-02-26 | 2011-08-30 | Spartek Medical, Inc. | Load-sharing component having a deflectable post and method for dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US8048125B2 (en) | 2008-02-26 | 2011-11-01 | Spartek Medical, Inc. | Versatile offset polyaxial connector and method for dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US8083775B2 (en) | 2008-02-26 | 2011-12-27 | Spartek Medical, Inc. | Load-sharing bone anchor having a natural center of rotation and method for dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US8267979B2 (en) | 2008-02-26 | 2012-09-18 | Spartek Medical, Inc. | Load-sharing bone anchor having a deflectable post and axial spring and method for dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US8337536B2 (en) | 2008-02-26 | 2012-12-25 | Spartek Medical, Inc. | Load-sharing bone anchor having a deflectable post with a compliant ring and method for stabilization of the spine |
US8057517B2 (en) | 2008-02-26 | 2011-11-15 | Spartek Medical, Inc. | Load-sharing component having a deflectable post and centering spring and method for dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US8114136B2 (en) | 2008-03-18 | 2012-02-14 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Implants and methods for inter-spinous process dynamic stabilization of a spinal motion segment |
US8202299B2 (en) | 2008-03-19 | 2012-06-19 | Collabcom II, LLC | Interspinous implant, tools and methods of implanting |
EP2328493B1 (en) * | 2008-06-02 | 2013-09-04 | Synthes GmbH | Inflatable interspinous spacer |
US8398641B2 (en) | 2008-07-01 | 2013-03-19 | Baxano, Inc. | Tissue modification devices and methods |
US8409206B2 (en) | 2008-07-01 | 2013-04-02 | Baxano, Inc. | Tissue modification devices and methods |
US9314253B2 (en) | 2008-07-01 | 2016-04-19 | Amendia, Inc. | Tissue modification devices and methods |
MX348805B (en) | 2008-07-14 | 2017-06-28 | Baxano Inc | Tissue modification devices. |
US20100030549A1 (en) * | 2008-07-31 | 2010-02-04 | Lee Michael M | Mobile device having human language translation capability with positional feedback |
US8114131B2 (en) | 2008-11-05 | 2012-02-14 | Kyphon Sarl | Extension limiting devices and methods of use for the spine |
US8114135B2 (en) * | 2009-01-16 | 2012-02-14 | Kyphon Sarl | Adjustable surgical cables and methods for treating spinal stenosis |
MX2011009165A (en) | 2009-03-13 | 2011-09-26 | Baxano Inc | Flexible neural localization devices and methods. |
JP2012522588A (en) | 2009-03-31 | 2012-09-27 | ランクス インコーポレイテッド | Spinous process implants and related methods |
US8372117B2 (en) | 2009-06-05 | 2013-02-12 | Kyphon Sarl | Multi-level interspinous implants and methods of use |
AU2010258937A1 (en) * | 2009-06-08 | 2012-01-19 | Reduction Technologies Inc. | Systems, methods and devices for correcting spinal deformities |
US8157842B2 (en) | 2009-06-12 | 2012-04-17 | Kyphon Sarl | Interspinous implant and methods of use |
US8394102B2 (en) | 2009-06-25 | 2013-03-12 | Baxano, Inc. | Surgical tools for treatment of spinal stenosis |
US10349980B2 (en) | 2009-08-27 | 2019-07-16 | The Foundry, Llc | Method and apparatus for altering biomechanics of the shoulder |
US9278004B2 (en) | 2009-08-27 | 2016-03-08 | Cotera, Inc. | Method and apparatus for altering biomechanics of the articular joints |
US9668868B2 (en) | 2009-08-27 | 2017-06-06 | Cotera, Inc. | Apparatus and methods for treatment of patellofemoral conditions |
EP2781197B8 (en) | 2009-08-27 | 2018-06-27 | The Foundry, LLC | Apparatus for force redistribution in articular joints |
US9861408B2 (en) | 2009-08-27 | 2018-01-09 | The Foundry, Llc | Method and apparatus for treating canine cruciate ligament disease |
US8771317B2 (en) | 2009-10-28 | 2014-07-08 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Interspinous process implant and method of implantation |
US8257397B2 (en) | 2009-12-02 | 2012-09-04 | Spartek Medical, Inc. | Low profile spinal prosthesis incorporating a bone anchor having a deflectable post and a compound spinal rod |
US8740948B2 (en) | 2009-12-15 | 2014-06-03 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Spinal spacer for cervical and other vertebra, and associated systems and methods |
WO2011079222A2 (en) | 2009-12-23 | 2011-06-30 | Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. | Less traumatic method of delivery of mesh-based devices into human body |
US8114132B2 (en) | 2010-01-13 | 2012-02-14 | Kyphon Sarl | Dynamic interspinous process device |
US8317831B2 (en) * | 2010-01-13 | 2012-11-27 | Kyphon Sarl | Interspinous process spacer diagnostic balloon catheter and methods of use |
JP5161250B2 (en) * | 2010-02-15 | 2013-03-13 | Hoya株式会社 | Spacer fixing thread and spacer with spacer fixing thread |
US8147526B2 (en) | 2010-02-26 | 2012-04-03 | Kyphon Sarl | Interspinous process spacer diagnostic parallel balloon catheter and methods of use |
US20110295370A1 (en) * | 2010-06-01 | 2011-12-01 | Sean Suh | Spinal Implants and Methods of Use Thereof |
US8518085B2 (en) | 2010-06-10 | 2013-08-27 | Spartek Medical, Inc. | Adaptive spinal rod and methods for stabilization of the spine |
US8814908B2 (en) | 2010-07-26 | 2014-08-26 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Injectable flexible interspinous process device system |
CN103501714A (en) * | 2011-02-11 | 2014-01-08 | 泰尔茂株式会社 | Interspinous process spacing device |
US8496689B2 (en) | 2011-02-23 | 2013-07-30 | Farzad Massoudi | Spinal implant device with fusion cage and fixation plates and method of implanting |
US8562650B2 (en) | 2011-03-01 | 2013-10-22 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Percutaneous spinous process fusion plate assembly and method |
US8425560B2 (en) | 2011-03-09 | 2013-04-23 | Farzad Massoudi | Spinal implant device with fixation plates and lag screws and method of implanting |
US8591548B2 (en) | 2011-03-31 | 2013-11-26 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Spinous process fusion plate assembly |
US8591549B2 (en) | 2011-04-08 | 2013-11-26 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Variable durometer lumbar-sacral implant |
US11812923B2 (en) | 2011-10-07 | 2023-11-14 | Alan Villavicencio | Spinal fixation device |
EP2779925B1 (en) | 2011-11-17 | 2019-01-16 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Interspinous spacers |
EP2790773B1 (en) | 2012-01-25 | 2020-10-14 | Nevro Corporation | Lead anchor |
US8430916B1 (en) | 2012-02-07 | 2013-04-30 | Spartek Medical, Inc. | Spinal rod connectors, methods of use, and spinal prosthesis incorporating spinal rod connectors |
US9468466B1 (en) * | 2012-08-24 | 2016-10-18 | Cotera, Inc. | Method and apparatus for altering biomechanics of the spine |
US9265935B2 (en) | 2013-06-28 | 2016-02-23 | Nevro Corporation | Neurological stimulation lead anchors and associated systems and methods |
DE112017003415T5 (en) | 2016-07-07 | 2019-03-28 | Mark, S. Stern | Spinous process LAMINAKLEMMVORRICHTUNG |
WO2019010252A2 (en) | 2017-07-04 | 2019-01-10 | Conventus Orthopaedics, Inc. | Apparatus and methods for treatment of a bone |
US20230181226A1 (en) * | 2021-12-10 | 2023-06-15 | Spinal Elements, Inc. | Bone tie and portal |
Citations (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6048342A (en) * | 1997-01-02 | 2000-04-11 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Spine distraction implant |
US20010012938A1 (en) * | 1997-01-02 | 2001-08-09 | Zucherman James F. | Spine distraction implant |
US20020022856A1 (en) * | 2000-08-14 | 2002-02-21 | Wesley Johnson | Transverse cavity device and method |
US20020029039A1 (en) * | 1997-01-02 | 2002-03-07 | Zucherman James F. | Supplemental spine fixation device and methods |
US6616673B1 (en) * | 2001-04-19 | 2003-09-09 | Biomet, Inc. | Segmented joint distractor |
US6733534B2 (en) * | 2002-01-29 | 2004-05-11 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | System and method for spine spacing |
US20040106999A1 (en) * | 2001-07-30 | 2004-06-03 | Mathews Hallett H. | Methods and devices for interbody spinal stabilization |
US20040106997A1 (en) * | 2002-11-01 | 2004-06-03 | Lieberson Robert E. | Apparatus and method for creating a surgical channel |
US20050090822A1 (en) * | 2003-10-24 | 2005-04-28 | Dipoto Gene | Methods and apparatus for stabilizing the spine through an access device |
US20070276493A1 (en) * | 2005-02-17 | 2007-11-29 | Malandain Hugues F | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US20080051896A1 (en) * | 2006-08-25 | 2008-02-28 | Loubert Suddaby | Expandable Spinous Process Distractor |
US20080071380A1 (en) * | 2006-09-19 | 2008-03-20 | Thomas Sweeney | Systems and Methods for Percutaneous Placement of Interspinous Process Spacers |
Family Cites Families (423)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CA268461A (en) | 1927-02-15 | H. Everett Claud | Storage battery | |
US2248054A (en) | 1939-06-07 | 1941-07-08 | Becker Joseph | Screw driver |
US2677369A (en) | 1952-03-26 | 1954-05-04 | Fred L Knowles | Apparatus for treatment of the spinal column |
US3242120A (en) * | 1960-03-22 | 1966-03-22 | Du Pont | Self-supporting gel shaped structures |
US3486505A (en) | 1967-05-22 | 1969-12-30 | Gordon M Morrison | Orthopedic surgical instrument |
US3648691A (en) * | 1970-02-24 | 1972-03-14 | Univ Colorado State Res Found | Method of applying vertebral appliance |
US3986383A (en) | 1974-01-02 | 1976-10-19 | Petteys Howard A | Expander tool |
SU988281A1 (en) | 1981-06-26 | 1983-01-15 | За витель | Vertical column fixing device |
US4545374A (en) | 1982-09-03 | 1985-10-08 | Jacobson Robert E | Method and instruments for performing a percutaneous lumbar diskectomy |
US4632101A (en) | 1985-01-31 | 1986-12-30 | Yosef Freedland | Orthopedic fastener |
US4685447A (en) * | 1985-03-25 | 1987-08-11 | Pmt Corporation | Tissue expander system |
US5863948A (en) * | 1985-06-14 | 1999-01-26 | Massachusetts Eye And Ear Infirmary | Increasing aqueous humor outflow |
GB8620937D0 (en) | 1986-08-29 | 1986-10-08 | Shepperd J A N | Spinal implant |
US5019081A (en) | 1986-12-10 | 1991-05-28 | Watanabe Robert S | Laminectomy surgical process |
US4799484A (en) | 1987-04-10 | 1989-01-24 | Ethicon, Inc. | Tapered I-beam surgical needles |
FR2623085B1 (en) | 1987-11-16 | 1992-08-14 | Breard Francis | SURGICAL IMPLANT TO LIMIT THE RELATIVE MOVEMENT OF VERTEBRES |
US5487739A (en) * | 1987-11-17 | 1996-01-30 | Brown University Research Foundation | Implantable therapy systems and methods |
FR2625097B1 (en) | 1987-12-23 | 1990-05-18 | Cote Sarl | INTER-SPINOUS PROSTHESIS COMPOSED OF SEMI-ELASTIC MATERIAL COMPRISING A TRANSFILING EYE AT ITS END AND INTER-SPINOUS PADS |
US5195526A (en) * | 1988-03-11 | 1993-03-23 | Michelson Gary K | Spinal marker needle |
US4986831A (en) | 1988-04-25 | 1991-01-22 | Angeion Corporation | Medical implant |
US4895564A (en) * | 1988-06-08 | 1990-01-23 | Farrell Edward M | Percutaneous femoral bypass system |
US5484437A (en) | 1988-06-13 | 1996-01-16 | Michelson; Gary K. | Apparatus and method of inserting spinal implants |
US5015247A (en) | 1988-06-13 | 1991-05-14 | Michelson Gary K | Threaded spinal implant |
EP0703757B1 (en) | 1988-06-13 | 2003-08-27 | Karlin Technology, Inc. | Apparatus for inserting spinal implants |
US7452359B1 (en) | 1988-06-13 | 2008-11-18 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Apparatus for inserting spinal implants |
CA1333209C (en) | 1988-06-28 | 1994-11-29 | Gary Karlin Michelson | Artificial spinal fusion implants |
FR2642645B1 (en) * | 1989-02-03 | 1992-08-14 | Breard Francis | FLEXIBLE INTERVERTEBRAL STABILIZER AND METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CONTROLLING ITS VOLTAGE BEFORE PLACEMENT ON THE RACHIS |
US5458638A (en) * | 1989-07-06 | 1995-10-17 | Spine-Tech, Inc. | Non-threaded spinal implant |
FR2649312A1 (en) * | 1989-07-10 | 1991-01-11 | Lacaffiniere Jean Yves | LATEST LOCKING DEVICE FOR CENTRO-MEDALLION PINS USED FOR OSTEOSYNTHESIS OF FRACTURES OF FEMUR, TIBIA AND HUMERUS |
JP3158405B2 (en) | 1989-07-21 | 2001-04-23 | ブラザー工業株式会社 | Communication management information processing device for facsimile machine |
US5059193A (en) | 1989-11-20 | 1991-10-22 | Spine-Tech, Inc. | Expandable spinal implant and surgical method |
US5331975A (en) * | 1990-03-02 | 1994-07-26 | Bonutti Peter M | Fluid operated retractors |
US5040542A (en) | 1990-03-05 | 1991-08-20 | Norman Gray | Bone biopsy needle |
JPH03289951A (en) | 1990-04-05 | 1991-12-19 | Matsutani Seisakusho Co Ltd | Edged sewing needle |
JPH0433794A (en) * | 1990-05-30 | 1992-02-05 | Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd | Brazing method in inert atmosphere |
FR2666981B1 (en) * | 1990-09-21 | 1993-06-25 | Commarmond Jacques | SYNTHETIC LIGAMENT VERTEBRAL. |
CA2051716C (en) | 1990-10-01 | 2002-05-14 | James H. Lefiles | Copper hydroxide dry flowable bactericide/fungicide and method of making and using same |
US6471976B1 (en) | 1990-10-01 | 2002-10-29 | Evelyn J. Taylor | Copper complex bactericide/fungicide and method of making same |
FR2671972B1 (en) * | 1991-01-25 | 1995-03-03 | Esteve Labor Dr | USE OF 1-H-AZOLE- (OMEGA- (4- (2-PYRIMIDINYL) -1-PIPERAZINYL) -ALKYL) DERIVATIVES FOR THE PREPARATION OF MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR THE TREATMENT OF COGNITIVE FUNCTION DISORDERS. |
US5390683A (en) * | 1991-02-22 | 1995-02-21 | Pisharodi; Madhavan | Spinal implantation methods utilizing a middle expandable implant |
FR2681525A1 (en) | 1991-09-19 | 1993-03-26 | Medical Op | Device for flexible or semi-rigid stabilisation of the spine, in particular of the human spine, by a posterior route |
FR2681776A1 (en) | 1991-09-30 | 1993-04-02 | Fixano Sa | VERTEBRAL OSTEOSYNTHESIS DEVICE. |
US5762629A (en) | 1991-10-30 | 1998-06-09 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Oval cannula assembly and method of use |
US6277112B1 (en) | 1996-07-16 | 2001-08-21 | Arthrocare Corporation | Methods for electrosurgical spine surgery |
US5857996A (en) | 1992-07-06 | 1999-01-12 | Catheter Imaging Systems | Method of epidermal surgery |
FR2693364B1 (en) * | 1992-07-07 | 1995-06-30 | Erpios Snc | INTERVERTEBRAL PROSTHESIS FOR STABILIZING ROTATORY AND FLEXIBLE-EXTENSION CONSTRAINTS. |
GB9217578D0 (en) * | 1992-08-19 | 1992-09-30 | Surgicarft Ltd | Surgical implants,etc |
FR2697743B1 (en) * | 1992-11-09 | 1995-01-27 | Fabrication Mat Orthopedique S | Spinal osteosynthesis device applicable in particular to degenerative vertebrae. |
FR2698261B1 (en) | 1992-11-24 | 1995-03-17 | Lacaffiniere Jean Yves De | Device for guiding a double screw of the neck of the femur for locked trochantero-diaphyseal nail. |
US5456722A (en) | 1993-01-06 | 1995-10-10 | Smith & Nephew Richards Inc. | Load bearing polymeric cable |
US5496318A (en) * | 1993-01-08 | 1996-03-05 | Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc. | Interspinous segmental spine fixation device |
US5415661A (en) | 1993-03-24 | 1995-05-16 | University Of Miami | Implantable spinal assist device |
FR2704745B1 (en) | 1993-05-07 | 1995-11-24 | Erpios | Device for connecting the ends of a ligament for osteosynthesis, in particular for vertebral osteosynthesis. |
DE69534156T2 (en) | 1994-01-26 | 2005-09-29 | Kyphon Inc., Sunnyvale | Improved inflatable device for use in surgical protocols relating to bone fixation |
AU2212695A (en) | 1994-03-23 | 1995-10-09 | Schnorrenberg Chirurgiemechanik Gmbh | Positioning and support device for the spinal column |
FR2719763B1 (en) | 1994-05-11 | 1996-09-27 | Jean Taylor | Vertebral implant. |
US5571189A (en) | 1994-05-20 | 1996-11-05 | Kuslich; Stephen D. | Expandable fabric implant for stabilizing the spinal motion segment |
DE69516279T2 (en) | 1994-05-23 | 2000-08-10 | Sulzer Spine-Tech Inc., Angleton | IMPLANT FOR INTERVERTEBRAL FUSION |
FR2721501B1 (en) | 1994-06-24 | 1996-08-23 | Fairant Paulette | Prostheses of the vertebral articular facets. |
FR2722980B1 (en) | 1994-07-26 | 1996-09-27 | Samani Jacques | INTERTEPINOUS VERTEBRAL IMPLANT |
US5472452A (en) | 1994-08-30 | 1995-12-05 | Linvatec Corporation | Rectilinear anchor for soft tissue fixation |
ES2216021T3 (en) | 1994-10-17 | 2004-10-16 | Raymedica, Inc. | NUCLEO OF THE SPINAL PROTEST DISC. |
US5654599A (en) | 1994-12-29 | 1997-08-05 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration | Dynamically timed electric motor |
US6602248B1 (en) | 1995-06-07 | 2003-08-05 | Arthro Care Corp. | Methods for repairing damaged intervertebral discs |
DE19529605C2 (en) * | 1995-08-11 | 1997-10-09 | Bernhard Zientek | Intervertebral implant |
NZ272994A (en) | 1995-09-12 | 2001-06-29 | C G Surgical Ltd | Spinal prosthesis device which stabilises lamina after laminoplasty |
US5746720A (en) | 1995-10-18 | 1998-05-05 | Stouder, Jr.; Albert E. | Method and apparatus for insertion of a cannula and trocar |
US5700264A (en) | 1996-07-01 | 1997-12-23 | Zucherman; James F. | Apparatus and method for preparing a site for an interbody fusion implant |
FR2753368B1 (en) | 1996-09-13 | 1999-01-08 | Chauvin Jean Luc | EXPANSIONAL OSTEOSYNTHESIS CAGE |
US5893850A (en) * | 1996-11-12 | 1999-04-13 | Cachia; Victor V. | Bone fixation device |
JP2002505592A (en) | 1996-11-15 | 2002-02-19 | アドバンスト バイオ サーフェイシズ,インコーポレイティド | Biomaterial systems used to repair tissue in situ |
US6068630A (en) | 1997-01-02 | 2000-05-30 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Spine distraction implant |
US20020143331A1 (en) | 1998-10-20 | 2002-10-03 | Zucherman James F. | Inter-spinous process implant and method with deformable spacer |
US6902566B2 (en) | 1997-01-02 | 2005-06-07 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Spinal implants, insertion instruments, and methods of use |
US20080086212A1 (en) | 1997-01-02 | 2008-04-10 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Spine distraction implant |
US20080071378A1 (en) | 1997-01-02 | 2008-03-20 | Zucherman James F | Spine distraction implant and method |
US6796983B1 (en) | 1997-01-02 | 2004-09-28 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Spine distraction implant and method |
US7306628B2 (en) * | 2002-10-29 | 2007-12-11 | St. Francis Medical Technologies | Interspinous process apparatus and method with a selectably expandable spacer |
US6156038A (en) | 1997-01-02 | 2000-12-05 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Spine distraction implant and method |
US5860977A (en) * | 1997-01-02 | 1999-01-19 | Saint Francis Medical Technologies, Llc | Spine distraction implant and method |
US6451019B1 (en) | 1998-10-20 | 2002-09-17 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Supplemental spine fixation device and method |
US20080027552A1 (en) * | 1997-01-02 | 2008-01-31 | Zucherman James F | Spine distraction implant and method |
US20050245937A1 (en) * | 2004-04-28 | 2005-11-03 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | System and method for insertion of an interspinous process implant that is rotatable in order to retain the implant relative to the spinous processes |
US6712819B2 (en) | 1998-10-20 | 2004-03-30 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Mating insertion instruments for spinal implants and methods of use |
US7959652B2 (en) | 2005-04-18 | 2011-06-14 | Kyphon Sarl | Interspinous process implant having deployable wings and method of implantation |
US6695842B2 (en) | 1997-10-27 | 2004-02-24 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Interspinous process distraction system and method with positionable wing and method |
US6514256B2 (en) * | 1997-01-02 | 2003-02-04 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Spine distraction implant and method |
US20080215058A1 (en) | 1997-01-02 | 2008-09-04 | Zucherman James F | Spine distraction implant and method |
US5836948A (en) | 1997-01-02 | 1998-11-17 | Saint Francis Medical Technologies, Llc | Spine distraction implant and method |
US6039761A (en) * | 1997-02-12 | 2000-03-21 | Li Medical Technologies, Inc. | Intervertebral spacer and tool and method for emplacement thereof |
IL128261A0 (en) | 1999-01-27 | 1999-11-30 | Disc O Tech Medical Tech Ltd | Expandable element |
IES970411A2 (en) | 1997-06-03 | 1997-12-03 | Tecos Holdings Inc | Pluridirectional and modulable vertebral osteosynthesis device of small overall size |
US5972015A (en) | 1997-08-15 | 1999-10-26 | Kyphon Inc. | Expandable, asymetric structures for deployment in interior body regions |
DE19726141A1 (en) | 1997-06-19 | 1999-01-28 | Daum Gmbh | Device for inserting medical instrument into neuronal part of head |
US5928207A (en) | 1997-06-30 | 1999-07-27 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Microneedle with isotropically etched tip, and method of fabricating such a device |
GB9714580D0 (en) | 1997-07-10 | 1997-09-17 | Wardlaw Douglas | Prosthetic intervertebral disc nucleus |
WO1999016891A1 (en) | 1997-10-01 | 1999-04-08 | Oregon Health Sciences University | Methods of replicating virus in monocyte-derived macrophage cultures |
US5948017A (en) | 1997-10-12 | 1999-09-07 | Taheri; Syde A. | Modular graft assembly |
FR2770767B1 (en) | 1997-11-10 | 2000-03-10 | Dimso Sa | IMPLANT FOR VERTEBRA |
US6159215A (en) | 1997-12-19 | 2000-12-12 | Depuy Acromed, Inc. | Insertion instruments and method for delivering a vertebral body spacer |
AU2451099A (en) | 1998-01-05 | 1999-07-26 | Tegementa, L.L.C. | Distraction device for vertebral disc procedures |
US6149642A (en) | 1998-01-16 | 2000-11-21 | Medical Creative Technologies Inc. | Surgical instrument and method for use in hand-assisted laparoscopy |
FR2774581B1 (en) | 1998-02-10 | 2000-08-11 | Dimso Sa | INTEREPINOUS STABILIZER TO BE ATTACHED TO SPINOUS APOPHYSIS OF TWO VERTEBRES |
US5904636A (en) | 1998-02-17 | 1999-05-18 | Chen; Paul | Exerciser for surfing |
FR2775183B1 (en) | 1998-02-20 | 2000-08-04 | Jean Taylor | INTER-SPINOUS PROSTHESIS |
US6093185A (en) | 1998-03-05 | 2000-07-25 | Scimed Life Systems, Inc. | Expandable PMR device and method |
US6045552A (en) | 1998-03-18 | 2000-04-04 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Spine fixation plate system |
CA2342633C (en) | 1998-09-04 | 2007-11-13 | Spinal Dynamics Corporation | Peanut spectacle multi discoid thoraco-lumbar disc prosthesis |
IL126333A0 (en) | 1998-09-24 | 1999-05-09 | Super Dimension Ltd | System and method of recording and displaying in context of an image a location of at least one point-of-interest in body during an intra-body medical procedure |
US6652527B2 (en) | 1998-10-20 | 2003-11-25 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Supplemental spine fixation device and method |
US6652534B2 (en) | 1998-10-20 | 2003-11-25 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Apparatus and method for determining implant size |
US7189234B2 (en) | 1998-10-20 | 2007-03-13 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Interspinous process implant sizer and distractor with a split head and size indicator and method |
US7029473B2 (en) | 1998-10-20 | 2006-04-18 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Deflectable spacer for use as an interspinous process implant and method |
US6174311B1 (en) | 1998-10-28 | 2001-01-16 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Interbody fusion grafts and instrumentation |
FR2787018B1 (en) | 1998-12-11 | 2001-03-02 | Dimso Sa | INTERVERTEBRAL DISC PROSTHESIS WITH LIQUID ENCLOSURE |
US6413228B1 (en) | 1998-12-28 | 2002-07-02 | Pro Duct Health, Inc. | Devices, methods and systems for collecting material from a breast duct |
WO2000045709A1 (en) | 1999-02-04 | 2000-08-10 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Methods and instrumentation for vertebral interbody fusion |
US6746485B1 (en) | 1999-02-18 | 2004-06-08 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Hair used as a biologic disk, replacement, and/or structure and method |
US6582451B1 (en) | 1999-03-16 | 2003-06-24 | The University Of Sydney | Device for use in surgery |
US6328730B1 (en) | 1999-03-26 | 2001-12-11 | William W. Harkrider, Jr. | Endoluminal multi-luminal surgical sheath and method |
US6048345A (en) | 1999-04-08 | 2000-04-11 | Joseph J. Berke | Motorized reciprocating surgical file apparatus and method |
US6783529B2 (en) | 1999-04-09 | 2004-08-31 | Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. | Non-metal inserts for bone support assembly |
AU4238700A (en) | 1999-04-16 | 2000-11-02 | Nuvasive, Inc. | Segmented linked intervertebral implant systems |
US6805697B1 (en) | 1999-05-07 | 2004-10-19 | University Of Virginia Patent Foundation | Method and system for fusing a spinal region |
WO2002009626A1 (en) | 1999-07-26 | 2002-02-07 | Advanced Prosthetic Technologies, Inc. | Improved spinal surgical prosthesis |
US7717961B2 (en) | 1999-08-18 | 2010-05-18 | Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc. | Apparatus delivery in an intervertebral disc |
USD433193S (en) | 1999-08-18 | 2000-10-31 | The Procter & Gamble Company | Sprayer |
US6783546B2 (en) | 1999-09-13 | 2004-08-31 | Keraplast Technologies, Ltd. | Implantable prosthetic or tissue expanding device |
FR2799640B1 (en) | 1999-10-15 | 2002-01-25 | Spine Next Sa | IMPLANT INTERVETEBRAL |
FR2799639B1 (en) * | 1999-10-18 | 2002-07-19 | Dimso Sa | TOOTHED FACED INTERVERTEBRAL DISC PROSTHESIS |
US20030153976A1 (en) | 1999-10-20 | 2003-08-14 | Cauthen Joseph C. | Spinal disc annulus reconstruction method and spinal disc annulus stent |
US6974478B2 (en) | 1999-10-22 | 2005-12-13 | Archus Orthopedics, Inc. | Prostheses, systems and methods for replacement of natural facet joints with artificial facet joint surfaces |
ATE467400T1 (en) | 1999-10-22 | 2010-05-15 | Fsi Acquisition Sub Llc | FACET ARTHROPLASTY DEVICES |
US7717958B2 (en) | 2000-02-16 | 2010-05-18 | Trans1, Inc. | Prosthetic nucleus apparatus |
US6336930B1 (en) * | 2000-03-07 | 2002-01-08 | Zimmer, Inc. | Polymer filled bone plate |
FR2806616B1 (en) | 2000-03-21 | 2003-04-11 | Cousin Biotech | INTERPINEUSE SHIM AND FASTENING DEVICE ON THE SACRUM |
US6402750B1 (en) | 2000-04-04 | 2002-06-11 | Spinlabs, Llc | Devices and methods for the treatment of spinal disorders |
US6312431B1 (en) | 2000-04-24 | 2001-11-06 | Wilson T. Asfora | Vertebrae linking system |
FR2808181B1 (en) * | 2000-04-28 | 2002-06-14 | Fixano | EXTERNAL FIXER FOR IMMOBILIZATION OF BONE FRAGMENTS, ESPECIALLY AT THE WRIST |
US6645207B2 (en) | 2000-05-08 | 2003-11-11 | Robert A. Dixon | Method and apparatus for dynamized spinal stabilization |
US20070191991A1 (en) | 2000-06-05 | 2007-08-16 | Aqua Conserve, Inc. | Irrigation Controller Communication System |
US6875212B2 (en) | 2000-06-23 | 2005-04-05 | Vertelink Corporation | Curable media for implantable medical device |
FR2811540B1 (en) | 2000-07-12 | 2003-04-25 | Spine Next Sa | IMPORTING INTERVERTEBRAL IMPLANT |
FR2811543B1 (en) | 2000-07-12 | 2003-07-04 | Spine Next Sa | INTERSOMATIC IMPLANT |
US6679886B2 (en) * | 2000-09-01 | 2004-01-20 | Synthes (Usa) | Tools and methods for creating cavities in bone |
US6579281B2 (en) | 2000-10-11 | 2003-06-17 | Popcab, Llc | Instrument stabilizer for through-a-port surgery |
FR2816197B1 (en) | 2000-11-07 | 2003-01-10 | Jean Taylor | INTER-SPINABLE PROSTHESIS, TOOL AND PROCESS FOR PREPARING THE SAME |
FR2816196B1 (en) | 2000-11-07 | 2003-01-03 | Medicrea | VERTEBRAL ARTHRODESIS MATERIAL |
FR2816195B1 (en) | 2000-11-07 | 2003-01-03 | Medicrea | VERTEBRAL ARTHRODESIS MATERIAL |
US6579319B2 (en) | 2000-11-29 | 2003-06-17 | Medicinelodge, Inc. | Facet joint replacement |
FR2818530B1 (en) | 2000-12-22 | 2003-10-31 | Spine Next Sa | INTERVERTEBRAL IMPLANT WITH DEFORMABLE SHIM |
US6663637B2 (en) | 2001-01-02 | 2003-12-16 | Robert A Dixon | Vertebral distraction stabilizer |
US6645211B2 (en) | 2001-02-07 | 2003-11-11 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Orthopedic support system and method of installation |
US6364883B1 (en) | 2001-02-23 | 2002-04-02 | Albert N. Santilli | Spinous process clamp for spinal fusion and method of operation |
US7229441B2 (en) | 2001-02-28 | 2007-06-12 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Flexible systems for spinal stabilization and fixation |
US6769983B2 (en) | 2001-03-01 | 2004-08-03 | Igt | Bonus game |
FR2822051B1 (en) | 2001-03-13 | 2004-02-27 | Spine Next Sa | INTERVERTEBRAL IMPLANT WITH SELF-LOCKING ATTACHMENT |
US6565570B2 (en) | 2001-03-14 | 2003-05-20 | Electro-Biology, Inc. | Bone plate and retractor assembly |
US6478822B1 (en) | 2001-03-20 | 2002-11-12 | Spineco, Inc. | Spherical spinal implant |
US7128760B2 (en) | 2001-03-27 | 2006-10-31 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Radially expanding interbody spinal fusion implants, instrumentation, and methods of insertion |
US6582433B2 (en) | 2001-04-09 | 2003-06-24 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Spine fixation device and method |
US20030149438A1 (en) | 2001-04-30 | 2003-08-07 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Insertion instrument |
TW524094U (en) | 2001-05-02 | 2003-03-11 | Jung-Chiuan Ye | Retaining and recovering apparatus for spines |
US6702847B2 (en) | 2001-06-29 | 2004-03-09 | Scimed Life Systems, Inc. | Endoluminal device with indicator member for remote detection of endoleaks and/or changes in device morphology |
US6926728B2 (en) | 2001-07-18 | 2005-08-09 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Curved dilator and method |
EP1427341A1 (en) * | 2001-07-20 | 2004-06-16 | Spinal Concepts Inc. | Spinal stabilization system and method |
EP1638484A4 (en) | 2001-07-25 | 2011-08-24 | Kyphon Sarl | Deformable tools and implants |
US6375682B1 (en) | 2001-08-06 | 2002-04-23 | Lewis W. Fleischmann | Collapsible, rotatable and expandable spinal hydraulic prosthetic device |
FR2828398B1 (en) | 2001-08-08 | 2003-09-19 | Jean Taylor | VERTEBRA STABILIZATION ASSEMBLY |
JP4947879B2 (en) | 2001-08-20 | 2012-06-06 | ジンテーズ ゲゼルシャフト ミト ベシュレンクテル ハフツング | Interspinous prosthesis |
AU2002323457A1 (en) | 2001-08-27 | 2003-05-19 | James C. Thomas Jr. | Implant for partial disc and cancellous bone replacement |
US8025684B2 (en) | 2001-11-09 | 2011-09-27 | Zimmer Spine, Inc. | Instruments and methods for inserting a spinal implant |
FR2832917B1 (en) * | 2001-11-30 | 2004-09-24 | Spine Next Sa | ELASTICALLY DEFORMABLE INTERVERTEBRAL IMPLANT |
US6726690B2 (en) | 2002-01-17 | 2004-04-27 | Concept Matrix, Llc | Diskectomy instrument and method |
FR2835173B1 (en) | 2002-01-28 | 2004-11-05 | Biomet Merck France | INTERTEPINEOUS VERTEBRAL IMPLANT |
JP4064122B2 (en) | 2002-02-13 | 2008-03-19 | 任天堂株式会社 | Collection card that can be linked with electronic game machine and game system using the collection card |
GB2385791B (en) | 2002-02-28 | 2005-03-30 | Alexander Craig Wille Campbell | Surgical device |
US20030176921A1 (en) | 2002-03-13 | 2003-09-18 | Lawson Kevin Jon | Two-part prosthetic nucleus replacement for surgical reconstruction of intervertebral discs |
FR2837094B1 (en) | 2002-03-15 | 2004-11-26 | Fixano | INTERVERTEBRAL IMPLANT |
AU2003218189A1 (en) | 2002-03-18 | 2003-10-08 | American Osteomedix, Inc. | Minimally invasive bone manipulation device and method of use |
US7223289B2 (en) | 2002-04-16 | 2007-05-29 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Annulus repair systems and techniques |
US7572276B2 (en) | 2002-05-06 | 2009-08-11 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Minimally invasive instruments and methods for inserting implants |
AU2003234508A1 (en) | 2002-05-06 | 2003-11-17 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Instrumentation and methods for preparation of an intervertebral space |
US7048736B2 (en) | 2002-05-17 | 2006-05-23 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Device for fixation of spinous processes |
US6840944B2 (en) | 2002-05-21 | 2005-01-11 | Loubert Suddaby | Vertebral body end plate cutter |
US8388684B2 (en) | 2002-05-23 | 2013-03-05 | Pioneer Signal Technology, Inc. | Artificial disc device |
US20030220643A1 (en) | 2002-05-24 | 2003-11-27 | Ferree Bret A. | Devices to prevent spinal extension |
US20030233098A1 (en) | 2002-06-18 | 2003-12-18 | Stryker Spine | Variable depth drill guide |
US7087055B2 (en) | 2002-06-25 | 2006-08-08 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Minimally invasive expanding spacer and method |
US7070598B2 (en) | 2002-06-25 | 2006-07-04 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Minimally invasive expanding spacer and method |
AU2003251910B2 (en) | 2002-07-17 | 2008-03-06 | Covidien Lp | Surgical cobra head suture needle |
US20040087947A1 (en) | 2002-08-28 | 2004-05-06 | Roy Lim | Minimally invasive expanding spacer and method |
AU2003283978C1 (en) | 2002-09-27 | 2010-01-21 | Surgitech, Llc | Shielded reciprocating surgical file |
US8100823B2 (en) | 2002-09-27 | 2012-01-24 | Surgitech, Llc | Surgical file system with a visualization instrument |
FR2845587B1 (en) | 2002-10-14 | 2005-01-21 | Scient X | DYNAMIC DEVICE FOR INTERVERTEBRAL CONNECTION WITH MULTIDIRECTIONALLY CONTROLLED DEBATMENT |
US20060271194A1 (en) | 2005-03-22 | 2006-11-30 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Interspinous process implant having deployable wing as an adjunct to spinal fusion and method of implantation |
US20060064165A1 (en) * | 2004-09-23 | 2006-03-23 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Interspinous process implant including a binder and method of implantation |
US7083649B2 (en) | 2002-10-29 | 2006-08-01 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Artificial vertebral disk replacement implant with translating pivot point |
US8070778B2 (en) | 2003-05-22 | 2011-12-06 | Kyphon Sarl | Interspinous process implant with slide-in distraction piece and method of implantation |
US20060264939A1 (en) | 2003-05-22 | 2006-11-23 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Interspinous process implant with slide-in distraction piece and method of implantation |
US7749252B2 (en) * | 2005-03-21 | 2010-07-06 | Kyphon Sarl | Interspinous process implant having deployable wing and method of implantation |
US8048117B2 (en) | 2003-05-22 | 2011-11-01 | Kyphon Sarl | Interspinous process implant and method of implantation |
US20080221692A1 (en) | 2002-10-29 | 2008-09-11 | Zucherman James F | Interspinous process implants and methods of use |
US8221463B2 (en) * | 2002-10-29 | 2012-07-17 | Kyphon Sarl | Interspinous process implants and methods of use |
US20050075634A1 (en) | 2002-10-29 | 2005-04-07 | Zucherman James F. | Interspinous process implant with radiolucent spacer and lead-in tissue expander |
US7549999B2 (en) * | 2003-05-22 | 2009-06-23 | Kyphon Sarl | Interspinous process distraction implant and method of implantation |
US8147548B2 (en) | 2005-03-21 | 2012-04-03 | Kyphon Sarl | Interspinous process implant having a thread-shaped wing and method of implantation |
US7497859B2 (en) | 2002-10-29 | 2009-03-03 | Kyphon Sarl | Tools for implanting an artificial vertebral disk |
US7909853B2 (en) * | 2004-09-23 | 2011-03-22 | Kyphon Sarl | Interspinous process implant including a binder and method of implantation |
US7273496B2 (en) | 2002-10-29 | 2007-09-25 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Artificial vertebral disk replacement implant with crossbar spacer and method |
US6869398B2 (en) * | 2003-01-06 | 2005-03-22 | Theodore G. Obenchain | Four-blade surgical speculum |
US7828849B2 (en) | 2003-02-03 | 2010-11-09 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Expanding interbody implant and articulating inserter and method |
US7335203B2 (en) * | 2003-02-12 | 2008-02-26 | Kyphon Inc. | System and method for immobilizing adjacent spinous processes |
FR2851154B1 (en) | 2003-02-19 | 2006-07-07 | Sdgi Holding Inc | INTER-SPINOUS DEVICE FOR BRAKING THE MOVEMENTS OF TWO SUCCESSIVE VERTEBRATES, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME THEREOF |
US20040176764A1 (en) | 2003-03-03 | 2004-09-09 | Centerpulse Spine-Tech, Inc. | Apparatus and method for spinal distraction using a flip-up portal |
ITFI20030084A1 (en) | 2003-03-28 | 2004-09-29 | Cousin Biotech S A S | INTERLAMINARY VERTEBRAL PROSTHESIS |
US7491204B2 (en) | 2003-04-28 | 2009-02-17 | Spine Solutions, Inc. | Instruments and method for preparing an intervertebral space for receiving an artificial disc implant |
DK1638485T3 (en) | 2003-06-20 | 2011-05-02 | Intrinsic Therapeutics Inc | Device for delivery of an implant through an annular defect in an intervertebral disc |
DE602004023039D1 (en) * | 2003-07-23 | 2009-10-22 | Ebi Llc | Expandable intervertebral implant |
KR100582768B1 (en) | 2003-07-24 | 2006-05-23 | 최병관 | Insert complement for vertebra |
DE112004001370B8 (en) | 2003-07-25 | 2010-06-10 | Impliant Ltd. | Elastomeric nucleus replacement |
US7794476B2 (en) * | 2003-08-08 | 2010-09-14 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Implants formed of shape memory polymeric material for spinal fixation |
WO2005018466A2 (en) * | 2003-08-26 | 2005-03-03 | Endius, Inc. | Access systems and methods for minimally invasive surgery |
US7252673B2 (en) * | 2003-09-10 | 2007-08-07 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Devices and methods for inserting spinal implants |
FR2860428B1 (en) | 2003-10-02 | 2006-05-12 | Fixano | INTERVERTEBRAL IMPLANT |
US6966930B2 (en) * | 2003-10-20 | 2005-11-22 | Impliant Ltd. | Facet prosthesis |
US7588588B2 (en) | 2003-10-21 | 2009-09-15 | Innovative Spinal Technologies | System and method for stabilizing of internal structures |
US7320707B2 (en) * | 2003-11-05 | 2008-01-22 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Method of laterally inserting an artificial vertebral disk replacement implant with crossbar spacer |
US7011685B2 (en) | 2003-11-07 | 2006-03-14 | Impliant Ltd. | Spinal prostheses |
US7699852B2 (en) | 2003-11-19 | 2010-04-20 | Zimmer Spine, Inc. | Fenestrated bone tap and method |
US7670377B2 (en) | 2003-11-21 | 2010-03-02 | Kyphon Sarl | Laterally insertable artifical vertebral disk replacement implant with curved spacer |
US7862586B2 (en) | 2003-11-25 | 2011-01-04 | Life Spine, Inc. | Spinal stabilization systems |
US7481839B2 (en) | 2003-12-02 | 2009-01-27 | Kyphon Sarl | Bioresorbable interspinous process implant for use with intervertebral disk remediation or replacement implants and procedures |
US20050154462A1 (en) | 2003-12-02 | 2005-07-14 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Laterally insertable artificial vertebral disk replacement implant with translating pivot point |
US20050125066A1 (en) | 2003-12-08 | 2005-06-09 | Innovative Spinal Technologies | Nucleus replacement securing device and method |
US7217291B2 (en) | 2003-12-08 | 2007-05-15 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | System and method for replacing degenerated spinal disks |
US20050131406A1 (en) | 2003-12-15 | 2005-06-16 | Archus Orthopedics, Inc. | Polyaxial adjustment of facet joint prostheses |
US20050216087A1 (en) | 2004-01-05 | 2005-09-29 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Disk repair structures for positioning disk repair material |
US20050165398A1 (en) * | 2004-01-26 | 2005-07-28 | Reiley Mark A. | Percutaneous spine distraction implant systems and methods |
US7846183B2 (en) | 2004-02-06 | 2010-12-07 | Spinal Elements, Inc. | Vertebral facet joint prosthesis and method of fixation |
US7763028B2 (en) | 2004-02-13 | 2010-07-27 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Spacer with height and angle adjustments for spacing vertebral members |
US7248988B2 (en) | 2004-03-01 | 2007-07-24 | Transmeta Corporation | System and method for reducing temperature variation during burn in |
US8070750B2 (en) | 2004-03-05 | 2011-12-06 | Depuy Mitek, Inc. | Tunnel notcher and guidewire delivery device |
DE602004012109T2 (en) | 2004-03-08 | 2009-02-19 | Impliant Ltd. | SPINE GRAFT |
US7763073B2 (en) | 2004-03-09 | 2010-07-27 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | Posterior process dynamic spacer |
FR2870107B1 (en) | 2004-05-11 | 2007-07-27 | Spine Next Sa | SELF-LOCKING DEVICE FOR FIXING AN INTERVERTEBRAL IMPLANT |
US7585316B2 (en) | 2004-05-21 | 2009-09-08 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US20060036258A1 (en) * | 2004-06-08 | 2006-02-16 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Sizing distractor and method for implanting an interspinous implant between adjacent spinous processes |
US7297162B2 (en) | 2004-06-09 | 2007-11-20 | Zimmer Spine, Inc. | Expandable helical cage |
FR2871366A1 (en) | 2004-06-09 | 2005-12-16 | Ceravic Soc Par Actions Simpli | PROSTHETIC EXPANSIBLE BONE IMPLANT |
US7776091B2 (en) | 2004-06-30 | 2010-08-17 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | Adjustable posterior spinal column positioner |
EP1778104A1 (en) | 2004-07-29 | 2007-05-02 | X-Sten, Corp. | Spinal ligament modification devices |
US8012209B2 (en) | 2004-09-23 | 2011-09-06 | Kyphon Sarl | Interspinous process implant including a binder, binder aligner and method of implantation |
US20060074431A1 (en) | 2004-09-28 | 2006-04-06 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | Disc distraction instrument and measuring device |
US7481840B2 (en) * | 2004-09-29 | 2009-01-27 | Kyphon Sarl | Multi-piece artificial spinal disk replacement device with selectably positioning articulating element |
US7575600B2 (en) | 2004-09-29 | 2009-08-18 | Kyphon Sarl | Artificial vertebral disk replacement implant with translating articulation contact surface and method |
AU2005292345B9 (en) | 2004-09-30 | 2011-12-15 | Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V. | Novel benzimidazole derivatives useful as selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMS) |
US20060084976A1 (en) | 2004-09-30 | 2006-04-20 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | Posterior stabilization systems and methods |
US7738969B2 (en) | 2004-10-15 | 2010-06-15 | Baxano, Inc. | Devices and methods for selective surgical removal of tissue |
US20060085073A1 (en) * | 2004-10-18 | 2006-04-20 | Kamshad Raiszadeh | Medical device systems for the spine |
US9023084B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2015-05-05 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for stabilizing the motion or adjusting the position of the spine |
US8425559B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2013-04-23 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US8123807B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2012-02-28 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US8167944B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2012-05-01 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US9119680B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2015-09-01 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US9161783B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2015-10-20 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US7763074B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2010-07-27 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US8273108B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2012-09-25 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US8317864B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2012-11-27 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US8409282B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2013-04-02 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US8012207B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2011-09-06 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US8945183B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2015-02-03 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous process spacer instrument system with deployment indicator |
US8152837B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2012-04-10 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US8613747B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2013-12-24 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Spacer insertion instrument |
US8128662B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2012-03-06 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Minimally invasive tooling for delivery of interspinous spacer |
US8226690B2 (en) | 2005-07-22 | 2012-07-24 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for stabilization of bone structures |
US8123782B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2012-02-28 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US8277488B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2012-10-02 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US9055981B2 (en) | 2004-10-25 | 2015-06-16 | Lanx, Inc. | Spinal implants and methods |
JP4549164B2 (en) | 2004-11-17 | 2010-09-22 | 住友ゴム工業株式会社 | Pneumatic tire and manufacturing method thereof |
JP4874259B2 (en) | 2004-11-23 | 2012-02-15 | ヌームアールエックス・インコーポレーテッド | Steerable device for accessing the target site |
CA2701050A1 (en) | 2004-12-06 | 2009-07-09 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Spacer insertion instrument |
US7187064B2 (en) * | 2004-12-09 | 2007-03-06 | Domintech Co., Ltd. | Electrical-interference-isolated transistor structure |
US8172877B2 (en) | 2004-12-13 | 2012-05-08 | Kyphon Sarl | Inter-cervical facet implant with surface enhancements |
MX2007006808A (en) | 2004-12-13 | 2007-10-08 | St Francis Medical Tech Inc | Inter-facet implant. |
US8128660B2 (en) | 2004-12-13 | 2012-03-06 | Kyphon Sarl | Inter-cervical facet joint implant with locking screw system |
US8100944B2 (en) | 2004-12-13 | 2012-01-24 | Kyphon Sarl | Inter-cervical facet implant and method for preserving the tissues surrounding the facet joint |
US8118838B2 (en) | 2004-12-13 | 2012-02-21 | Kyphon Sarl | Inter-cervical facet implant with multiple direction articulation joint and method for implanting |
US20070016218A1 (en) * | 2005-05-10 | 2007-01-18 | Winslow Charles J | Inter-cervical facet implant with implantation tool |
US8066749B2 (en) | 2004-12-13 | 2011-11-29 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Implant for stabilizing a bone graft during spinal fusion |
US20060149289A1 (en) | 2004-12-13 | 2006-07-06 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Inter-cervical facet implant and method |
EP1824403A1 (en) | 2004-12-16 | 2007-08-29 | Horst Döllinger | Implant for the treatment of lumbar spinal canal stenosis |
US8097018B2 (en) | 2005-02-17 | 2012-01-17 | Kyphon Sarl | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US8007521B2 (en) | 2005-02-17 | 2011-08-30 | Kyphon Sarl | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US20070276372A1 (en) | 2005-02-17 | 2007-11-29 | Malandain Hugues F | Percutaneous Spinal Implants and Methods |
US8057513B2 (en) | 2005-02-17 | 2011-11-15 | Kyphon Sarl | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US8096994B2 (en) | 2005-02-17 | 2012-01-17 | Kyphon Sarl | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US8034080B2 (en) | 2005-02-17 | 2011-10-11 | Kyphon Sarl | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US7988709B2 (en) | 2005-02-17 | 2011-08-02 | Kyphon Sarl | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US20060195102A1 (en) | 2005-02-17 | 2006-08-31 | Malandain Hugues F | Apparatus and method for treatment of spinal conditions |
AU2006214169A1 (en) | 2005-02-17 | 2006-08-24 | Kyphon Sarl | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US20070276373A1 (en) | 2005-02-17 | 2007-11-29 | Malandain Hugues F | Percutaneous Spinal Implants and Methods |
US20070055237A1 (en) * | 2005-02-17 | 2007-03-08 | Edidin Avram A | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
EP3045110B1 (en) | 2005-03-28 | 2019-07-31 | Vessix Vascular, Inc. | Intraluminal electrical tissue characterization and tuned rf energy for selective treatment of atheroma and other target tissues |
US20060241757A1 (en) | 2005-03-31 | 2006-10-26 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Intervertebral prosthetic device for spinal stabilization and method of manufacturing same |
US8066742B2 (en) | 2005-03-31 | 2011-11-29 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Intervertebral prosthetic device for spinal stabilization and method of implanting same |
WO2006105437A2 (en) | 2005-03-31 | 2006-10-05 | Life Spine, Inc. | Expandable spinal interbody and intravertebral body devices |
US20060276801A1 (en) | 2005-04-04 | 2006-12-07 | Yerby Scott A | Inter-cervical facet implant distraction tool |
FR2884136B1 (en) | 2005-04-08 | 2008-02-22 | Spinevision Sa | INTERVERTEBRAL SURGICAL IMPLANT FORMING BALL |
US7862590B2 (en) | 2005-04-08 | 2011-01-04 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Interspinous process spacer |
US8034079B2 (en) | 2005-04-12 | 2011-10-11 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Implants and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of a spinal motion segment |
US7780709B2 (en) | 2005-04-12 | 2010-08-24 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Implants and methods for inter-transverse process dynamic stabilization of a spinal motion segment |
US20060235386A1 (en) | 2005-04-14 | 2006-10-19 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Magnetic manipulation of a cable in blind approach |
US7789898B2 (en) | 2005-04-15 | 2010-09-07 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Transverse process/laminar spacer |
CN2794456Y (en) | 2005-04-22 | 2006-07-12 | 强生(上海)医疗器材有限公司 | Hand aid device for cavity mirror |
US7727233B2 (en) | 2005-04-29 | 2010-06-01 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Spinous process stabilization devices and methods |
US20060247623A1 (en) | 2005-04-29 | 2006-11-02 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Local delivery of an active agent from an orthopedic implant |
US20060247773A1 (en) | 2005-04-29 | 2006-11-02 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Instrumented implant for diagnostics |
US20060271055A1 (en) | 2005-05-12 | 2006-11-30 | Jeffery Thramann | Spinal stabilization |
JP4624851B2 (en) | 2005-05-17 | 2011-02-02 | 株式会社東海理化電機製作所 | Wiper control device and correction method in wiper control device |
US7967844B2 (en) | 2005-06-10 | 2011-06-28 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | Multi-level posterior dynamic stabilization systems and methods |
US7837688B2 (en) | 2005-06-13 | 2010-11-23 | Globus Medical | Spinous process spacer |
FR2887434B1 (en) | 2005-06-28 | 2008-03-28 | Jean Taylor | SURGICAL TREATMENT EQUIPMENT OF TWO VERTEBRATES |
FR2888744B1 (en) | 2005-07-21 | 2007-08-24 | Charles Khalife | ROTARY INTERINEABLE DEVICE |
EP2335600B1 (en) | 2005-07-29 | 2017-04-19 | Vertos Medical, Inc. | Percutaneous tissue excision devices |
FR2889438B1 (en) * | 2005-08-04 | 2008-06-06 | Scient X Sa | DOUBLE-SHAPED INTERVERTEBRAL IMPLANT |
US8870890B2 (en) | 2005-08-05 | 2014-10-28 | DePuy Synthes Products, LLC | Pronged holder for treating spinal stenosis |
US7753938B2 (en) | 2005-08-05 | 2010-07-13 | Synthes Usa, Llc | Apparatus for treating spinal stenosis |
US7722674B1 (en) | 2005-08-12 | 2010-05-25 | Innvotec Surgical Inc. | Linearly expanding spine cage for enhanced spinal fusion |
DE102005044364A1 (en) | 2005-09-09 | 2007-03-15 | Karl Storz Gmbh & Co. Kg | Spacer for a medical instrument |
PL377136A1 (en) | 2005-09-19 | 2007-04-02 | Lfc Spółka Z Ograniczoną Odpowiedzialnością | Intervertebral space implant |
AR057832A1 (en) | 2005-09-27 | 2007-12-19 | Paradigm Spine Llc | INTERESPINOUS VERTEBRAL STABILIZATION DEVICES |
US7879074B2 (en) * | 2005-09-27 | 2011-02-01 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | Posterior dynamic stabilization systems and methods |
US8357181B2 (en) | 2005-10-27 | 2013-01-22 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Intervertebral prosthetic device for spinal stabilization and method of implanting same |
US20070100366A1 (en) | 2005-10-28 | 2007-05-03 | Sara Dziedzic | Minimally invasive tissue expander systems and methods |
US20070123904A1 (en) | 2005-10-31 | 2007-05-31 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | Distraction instrument and method for distracting an intervertebral site |
US7699873B2 (en) | 2005-11-23 | 2010-04-20 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Spinous process anchoring systems and methods |
WO2007067547A2 (en) | 2005-12-06 | 2007-06-14 | Globus Medical, Inc. | Facet joint prosthesis |
US7862592B2 (en) * | 2005-12-06 | 2011-01-04 | Nuvasive, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for treating spinal stenosis |
US8430911B2 (en) | 2005-12-14 | 2013-04-30 | Spinefrontier Inc | Spinous process fixation implant |
US8002802B2 (en) | 2005-12-19 | 2011-08-23 | Samy Abdou | Devices and methods for inter-vertebral orthopedic device placement |
US7585313B2 (en) | 2005-12-22 | 2009-09-08 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | Rotatable interspinous spacer |
WO2007078692A2 (en) | 2005-12-23 | 2007-07-12 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for fixation of bone with an expandable device |
US7922745B2 (en) | 2006-01-09 | 2011-04-12 | Zimmer Spine, Inc. | Posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US20070173821A1 (en) | 2006-01-13 | 2007-07-26 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Materials, devices, and methods for treating multiple spinal regions including the posterior and spinous process regions |
US20070173822A1 (en) | 2006-01-13 | 2007-07-26 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Use of a posterior dynamic stabilization system with an intradiscal device |
US20070173823A1 (en) | 2006-01-18 | 2007-07-26 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Intervertebral prosthetic device for spinal stabilization and method of implanting same |
US20070233084A1 (en) | 2006-01-25 | 2007-10-04 | Spinemedica Corporation | Implantable spinous process prosthetic devices, including cuffs, and methods of fabricating same |
US20070233088A1 (en) | 2006-01-27 | 2007-10-04 | Edmond Elizabeth W | Pedicle and non-pedicle based interspinous and lateral spacers |
US7682376B2 (en) | 2006-01-27 | 2010-03-23 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Interspinous devices and methods of use |
US7837711B2 (en) | 2006-01-27 | 2010-11-23 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Artificial spinous process for the sacrum and methods of use |
US20070185490A1 (en) | 2006-01-31 | 2007-08-09 | Dante Implicito | Percutaneous interspinous distraction device and method |
ATE548000T1 (en) | 2006-02-01 | 2012-03-15 | Synthes Gmbh | INTERSPINAL INTERVENTION SPACER |
US20070233096A1 (en) | 2006-02-13 | 2007-10-04 | Javier Garcia-Bengochea | Dynamic inter-spinous device |
WO2007098423A2 (en) | 2006-02-17 | 2007-08-30 | Paradigm Spine, L.L.C. | Method and system for performing interspinous space preparation for receiving an implant |
US20070233089A1 (en) | 2006-02-17 | 2007-10-04 | Endius, Inc. | Systems and methods for reducing adjacent level disc disease |
US20070198045A1 (en) | 2006-02-21 | 2007-08-23 | John Morton | System to Facilitate the Use of a Surgical Instrument |
US20070233068A1 (en) | 2006-02-22 | 2007-10-04 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Intervertebral prosthetic assembly for spinal stabilization and method of implanting same |
US20070208366A1 (en) | 2006-03-03 | 2007-09-06 | Richard Pellegrino | Minimally invasive tissue expander systems and methods |
US8262698B2 (en) | 2006-03-16 | 2012-09-11 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Expandable device for insertion between anatomical structures and a procedure utilizing same |
US7871426B2 (en) | 2006-03-21 | 2011-01-18 | Spinefrontier, LLS | Spinous process fixation device |
GB0605960D0 (en) | 2006-03-24 | 2006-05-03 | Galley Geoffrey H | Expandable spinal prosthesis |
US8361116B2 (en) | 2006-03-24 | 2013-01-29 | U.S. Spine, Inc. | Non-pedicle based interspinous spacer |
GB2436293A (en) | 2006-03-24 | 2007-09-26 | Galley Geoffrey H | Spinous processes insertion device |
GB2436292B (en) | 2006-03-24 | 2011-03-16 | Galley Geoffrey H | Expandable spacing means for insertion between spinous processes of adjacent vertebrae |
US7985246B2 (en) | 2006-03-31 | 2011-07-26 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Methods and instruments for delivering interspinous process spacers |
US20070233077A1 (en) | 2006-03-31 | 2007-10-04 | Khalili Farid B | Dynamic intervertebral spacer assembly |
US8251900B2 (en) | 2009-03-06 | 2012-08-28 | Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. | Surgical access devices and methods providing seal movement in predefined paths |
US7766967B2 (en) | 2006-04-06 | 2010-08-03 | Warsaw Orthopedic Inc. | Intervertebral disc nucleus replacement implants and methods |
US7806911B2 (en) | 2006-04-14 | 2010-10-05 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Fixation plate and method of use |
US8118844B2 (en) | 2006-04-24 | 2012-02-21 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Expandable device for insertion between anatomical structures and a procedure utilizing same |
US8105357B2 (en) | 2006-04-28 | 2012-01-31 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Interspinous process brace |
US7846185B2 (en) | 2006-04-28 | 2010-12-07 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Expandable interspinous process implant and method of installing same |
US20070270822A1 (en) | 2006-04-28 | 2007-11-22 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Bone fixation grommet |
US8348978B2 (en) | 2006-04-28 | 2013-01-08 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Interosteotic implant |
US8252031B2 (en) | 2006-04-28 | 2012-08-28 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Molding device for an expandable interspinous process implant |
US8048118B2 (en) | 2006-04-28 | 2011-11-01 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Adjustable interspinous process brace |
US20070270823A1 (en) | 2006-04-28 | 2007-11-22 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Multi-chamber expandable interspinous process brace |
US20070270824A1 (en) | 2006-04-28 | 2007-11-22 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Interspinous process brace |
US8062337B2 (en) | 2006-05-04 | 2011-11-22 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Expandable device for insertion between anatomical structures and a procedure utilizing same |
US7942830B2 (en) | 2006-05-09 | 2011-05-17 | Vertos Medical, Inc. | Ipsilateral approach to minimally invasive ligament decompression procedure |
WO2007134113A2 (en) | 2006-05-09 | 2007-11-22 | Raymedica, Llc | Systems and methods for stabilizing a functional spinal unit |
US8147517B2 (en) | 2006-05-23 | 2012-04-03 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Systems and methods for adjusting properties of a spinal implant |
US20070272259A1 (en) | 2006-05-23 | 2007-11-29 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Surgical procedure for inserting a device between anatomical structures |
US20070276497A1 (en) | 2006-05-23 | 2007-11-29 | Sdgi Holdings. Inc. | Surgical spacer |
US20070276496A1 (en) | 2006-05-23 | 2007-11-29 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | Surgical spacer with shape control |
US20070276369A1 (en) | 2006-05-26 | 2007-11-29 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | In vivo-customizable implant |
US20080058808A1 (en) | 2006-06-14 | 2008-03-06 | Spartek Medical, Inc. | Implant system and method to treat degenerative disorders of the spine |
US7862569B2 (en) * | 2006-06-22 | 2011-01-04 | Kyphon Sarl | System and method for strengthening a spinous process |
US7857815B2 (en) | 2006-06-22 | 2010-12-28 | Kyphon Sarl | System and method for strengthening a spinous process |
EP2043764A4 (en) | 2006-07-17 | 2010-12-01 | Commw Scient Ind Res Org | Co2 capture using solar thermal energy |
US8845726B2 (en) | 2006-10-18 | 2014-09-30 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Dilator |
US20080108990A1 (en) | 2006-11-02 | 2008-05-08 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Interspinous process implant having a fixed wing and a deployable wing and method of implantation |
US20080114455A1 (en) | 2006-11-15 | 2008-05-15 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Rotating Interspinous Process Devices and Methods of Use |
AR064013A1 (en) | 2006-11-30 | 2009-03-04 | Paradigm Spine Llc | VERTEBRAL, INTERLAMINAR, INTERESPINOUS STABILIZATION SYSTEM |
US7955392B2 (en) | 2006-12-14 | 2011-06-07 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Interspinous process devices and methods |
ATE529054T1 (en) | 2006-12-15 | 2011-11-15 | Adelman Res Ltd | APPARATUS FOR LAMINA OSTEOTOMY AND LAMINOPLASTY |
US20080177312A1 (en) | 2006-12-28 | 2008-07-24 | Mi4Spine, Llc | Interspinous Process Spacer Device |
US20080167655A1 (en) | 2007-01-05 | 2008-07-10 | Jeffrey Chun Wang | Interspinous implant, tools and methods of implanting |
WO2008098054A2 (en) | 2007-02-06 | 2008-08-14 | Pioneer Surgical Technology, Inc. | Intervertebral implant devices and methods for insertion thereof |
US8034081B2 (en) | 2007-02-06 | 2011-10-11 | CollabComl, LLC | Interspinous dynamic stabilization implant and method of implanting |
US8142461B2 (en) | 2007-03-22 | 2012-03-27 | Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. | Surgical instruments |
WO2008130564A1 (en) | 2007-04-16 | 2008-10-30 | Vertiflex Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
CN101854887B (en) | 2007-05-01 | 2013-09-25 | 斯百诺辛普利斯提有限责任公司 | Interspinous implants and methods for implanting same |
CA2698718C (en) | 2007-09-07 | 2015-10-06 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US20090118833A1 (en) | 2007-11-05 | 2009-05-07 | Zimmer Spine, Inc. | In-situ curable interspinous process spacer |
EP2244670B1 (en) | 2008-01-15 | 2017-09-13 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
WO2009094463A2 (en) | 2008-01-23 | 2009-07-30 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Dilator |
AU2009223607A1 (en) | 2008-03-12 | 2009-09-17 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous process spacer instrument system with deployment indicator |
US8313512B2 (en) | 2008-03-26 | 2012-11-20 | Depuy Spine, Inc. | S-shaped interspinous process spacer having tight access offset hooks |
EP2189124A1 (en) | 2008-11-19 | 2010-05-26 | Christian Röbling | Thorn removal set implant |
US8945184B2 (en) | 2009-03-13 | 2015-02-03 | Spinal Simplicity Llc. | Interspinous process implant and fusion cage spacer |
US20100261972A1 (en) | 2009-04-08 | 2010-10-14 | Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. | Surgical Access Device with One Time Seal |
US9622792B2 (en) | 2009-04-29 | 2017-04-18 | Nuvasive Specialized Orthopedics, Inc. | Interspinous process device and method |
USD618796S1 (en) | 2009-07-28 | 2010-06-29 | Vertos Medical, Inc. | Lockable articulating base plate |
US8740948B2 (en) | 2009-12-15 | 2014-06-03 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Spinal spacer for cervical and other vertebra, and associated systems and methods |
WO2011123703A1 (en) | 2010-03-31 | 2011-10-06 | Smart Medical Devices, Inc. | Depth controllable and measurable medical driver devices |
US8518087B2 (en) | 2011-03-10 | 2013-08-27 | Interventional Spine, Inc. | Method and apparatus for minimally invasive insertion of intervertebral implants |
US8834508B2 (en) | 2011-05-27 | 2014-09-16 | Spinefrontier Inc | Methods, tools and devices for percutaneous access in minimally invasive spinal surgeries |
US20130289399A1 (en) | 2012-04-27 | 2013-10-31 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Decompression systems and methods of using the same |
US9675303B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2017-06-13 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Visualization systems, instruments and methods of using the same in spinal decompression procedures |
AU2015256024B2 (en) | 2014-05-07 | 2020-03-05 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Spinal nerve decompression systems, dilation systems, and methods of using the same |
JP2016157863A (en) | 2015-02-25 | 2016-09-01 | 株式会社ミツトヨ | Laser light source device and adjustment method therefor |
-
2004
- 2004-12-06 US US11/006,521 patent/US9023084B2/en active Active
-
2005
- 2005-12-05 EP EP05849654A patent/EP1819287B1/en not_active Not-in-force
- 2005-12-05 WO PCT/US2005/044256 patent/WO2006063047A2/en active Application Filing
- 2005-12-05 ES ES05849654T patent/ES2410088T3/en active Active
-
2015
- 2015-04-01 US US14/676,553 patent/US10292738B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7201751B2 (en) * | 1997-01-02 | 2007-04-10 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Supplemental spine fixation device |
US20010012938A1 (en) * | 1997-01-02 | 2001-08-09 | Zucherman James F. | Spine distraction implant |
US20020029039A1 (en) * | 1997-01-02 | 2002-03-07 | Zucherman James F. | Supplemental spine fixation device and methods |
US6048342A (en) * | 1997-01-02 | 2000-04-11 | St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc. | Spine distraction implant |
US20020022856A1 (en) * | 2000-08-14 | 2002-02-21 | Wesley Johnson | Transverse cavity device and method |
US6616673B1 (en) * | 2001-04-19 | 2003-09-09 | Biomet, Inc. | Segmented joint distractor |
US20040106999A1 (en) * | 2001-07-30 | 2004-06-03 | Mathews Hallett H. | Methods and devices for interbody spinal stabilization |
US6733534B2 (en) * | 2002-01-29 | 2004-05-11 | Sdgi Holdings, Inc. | System and method for spine spacing |
US20040106997A1 (en) * | 2002-11-01 | 2004-06-03 | Lieberson Robert E. | Apparatus and method for creating a surgical channel |
US20050090822A1 (en) * | 2003-10-24 | 2005-04-28 | Dipoto Gene | Methods and apparatus for stabilizing the spine through an access device |
US20070276493A1 (en) * | 2005-02-17 | 2007-11-29 | Malandain Hugues F | Percutaneous spinal implants and methods |
US20080051896A1 (en) * | 2006-08-25 | 2008-02-28 | Loubert Suddaby | Expandable Spinous Process Distractor |
US20080071380A1 (en) * | 2006-09-19 | 2008-03-20 | Thomas Sweeney | Systems and Methods for Percutaneous Placement of Interspinous Process Spacers |
Cited By (28)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US10610267B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2020-04-07 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Spacer insertion instrument |
US10166047B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2019-01-01 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US9572603B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2017-02-21 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US11076893B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2021-08-03 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Methods for treating a patient's spine |
US9861398B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2018-01-09 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US9956011B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2018-05-01 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US10039576B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2018-08-07 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US10058358B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2018-08-28 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US10080587B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2018-09-25 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Methods for treating a patient's spine |
US10835295B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2020-11-17 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US10258389B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2019-04-16 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US10278744B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2019-05-07 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US9532812B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2017-01-03 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US9393055B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2016-07-19 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Spacer insertion instrument |
US10835297B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2020-11-17 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US10709481B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2020-07-14 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
US10653456B2 (en) | 2005-02-04 | 2020-05-19 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US11013539B2 (en) | 2006-10-18 | 2021-05-25 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Methods for treating a patient's spine |
US11229461B2 (en) | 2006-10-18 | 2022-01-25 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US11986221B2 (en) | 2006-10-18 | 2024-05-21 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Interspinous spacer |
US12035946B2 (en) | 2006-10-18 | 2024-07-16 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Interspinous spacer |
US10588663B2 (en) | 2006-10-18 | 2020-03-17 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Dilator |
US12035947B2 (en) | 2006-10-18 | 2024-07-16 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Devices and methods for treating a patient's spine |
US9675303B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2017-06-13 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Visualization systems, instruments and methods of using the same in spinal decompression procedures |
US12035884B2 (en) | 2014-05-07 | 2024-07-16 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Spinal nerve decompression systems, dilation systems, and methods of using the same |
US11357489B2 (en) | 2014-05-07 | 2022-06-14 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Spinal nerve decompression systems, dilation systems, and methods of using the same |
US10524772B2 (en) | 2014-05-07 | 2020-01-07 | Vertiflex, Inc. | Spinal nerve decompression systems, dilation systems, and methods of using the same |
US12102542B2 (en) | 2022-02-15 | 2024-10-01 | Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation | Interspinous spacer and methods and systems utilizing the interspinous spacer |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US9023084B2 (en) | 2015-05-05 |
EP1819287A4 (en) | 2009-07-01 |
WO2006063047A3 (en) | 2006-09-28 |
EP1819287B1 (en) | 2013-03-13 |
US20060122620A1 (en) | 2006-06-08 |
WO2006063047A2 (en) | 2006-06-15 |
ES2410088T3 (en) | 2013-06-28 |
EP1819287A2 (en) | 2007-08-22 |
US10292738B2 (en) | 2019-05-21 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US10292738B2 (en) | Systems and methods for stabilizing the motion or adjusting the position of the spine | |
US10709481B2 (en) | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine | |
US10258389B2 (en) | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine | |
US8123807B2 (en) | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine | |
US10039576B2 (en) | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine | |
US10278744B2 (en) | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine | |
US8012207B2 (en) | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine | |
US9283005B2 (en) | Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE MAILED -- APPLICATION RECEIVED IN OFFICE OF PUBLICATIONS |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: PUBLICATIONS -- ISSUE FEE PAYMENT VERIFIED |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1551); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 4 |