US20140294895A1 - Expression of Protective Antigens in Transgenic Chloroplasts and the Production of Improved Vaccines - Google Patents
Expression of Protective Antigens in Transgenic Chloroplasts and the Production of Improved Vaccines Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20140294895A1 US20140294895A1 US14/231,420 US201414231420A US2014294895A1 US 20140294895 A1 US20140294895 A1 US 20140294895A1 US 201414231420 A US201414231420 A US 201414231420A US 2014294895 A1 US2014294895 A1 US 2014294895A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- chloroplast
- vaccine
- plants
- transgenic
- gene
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 210000003763 chloroplast Anatomy 0.000 title claims abstract description 172
- 229960005486 vaccine Drugs 0.000 title claims abstract description 53
- 108091007433 antigens Proteins 0.000 title claims abstract description 38
- 239000000427 antigen Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 34
- 102000036639 antigens Human genes 0.000 title claims abstract description 34
- 230000001681 protective effect Effects 0.000 title abstract description 9
- 230000009261 transgenic effect Effects 0.000 title description 96
- 230000014509 gene expression Effects 0.000 title description 62
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 title description 20
- 230000001976 improved effect Effects 0.000 title description 7
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 claims abstract description 102
- 241000193738 Bacillus anthracis Species 0.000 claims abstract description 39
- 210000002706 plastid Anatomy 0.000 claims abstract description 31
- 241000124008 Mammalia Species 0.000 claims abstract description 16
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 15
- 230000036039 immunity Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 9
- 101710194807 Protective antigen Proteins 0.000 claims description 110
- 235000002017 Zea mays subsp mays Nutrition 0.000 claims description 54
- 235000005824 Zea mays ssp. parviglumis Nutrition 0.000 claims description 41
- 235000005822 corn Nutrition 0.000 claims description 41
- 240000003768 Solanum lycopersicum Species 0.000 claims description 31
- 241000607479 Yersinia pestis Species 0.000 claims description 31
- 244000000626 Daucus carota Species 0.000 claims description 29
- 235000002767 Daucus carota Nutrition 0.000 claims description 29
- 235000007688 Lycopersicon esculentum Nutrition 0.000 claims description 26
- 241000209082 Lolium Species 0.000 claims description 22
- 102000009016 Cholera Toxin Human genes 0.000 claims description 19
- 108010049048 Cholera Toxin Proteins 0.000 claims description 19
- 244000200882 Setaria barbata Species 0.000 claims description 17
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims description 10
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 9
- 230000028993 immune response Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 239000012528 membrane Substances 0.000 claims description 7
- 231100000518 lethal Toxicity 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000001665 lethal effect Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 235000018927 edible plant Nutrition 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000013604 expression vector Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 210000004379 membrane Anatomy 0.000 claims description 5
- 206010030113 Oedema Diseases 0.000 claims description 4
- 241000193830 Bacillus <bacterium> Species 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000002480 immunoprotective effect Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000001939 inductive effect Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 210000004347 intestinal mucosa Anatomy 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000031998 transcytosis Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 241000208134 Nicotiana rustica Species 0.000 claims 1
- 108091028043 Nucleic acid sequence Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 abstract description 123
- 239000013598 vector Substances 0.000 abstract description 89
- 230000009466 transformation Effects 0.000 abstract description 43
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 28
- 229940126576 edible vaccine Drugs 0.000 abstract description 16
- 239000003550 marker Substances 0.000 abstract description 16
- 102000004190 Enzymes Human genes 0.000 abstract description 6
- 108090000790 Enzymes Proteins 0.000 abstract description 6
- 241000209510 Liliopsida Species 0.000 abstract description 6
- 229940065181 bacillus anthracis Drugs 0.000 abstract description 6
- 241001233957 eudicotyledons Species 0.000 abstract description 5
- 230000001524 infective effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 2
- 238000007911 parenteral administration Methods 0.000 abstract description 2
- 244000052769 pathogen Species 0.000 abstract description 2
- 235000018102 proteins Nutrition 0.000 description 50
- 102000004169 proteins and genes Human genes 0.000 description 50
- 240000008042 Zea mays Species 0.000 description 40
- 210000004027 cell Anatomy 0.000 description 39
- 101150075980 psbA gene Proteins 0.000 description 37
- SXKNCCSPZDCRFD-UHFFFAOYSA-N betaine aldehyde Chemical compound C[N+](C)(C)CC=O SXKNCCSPZDCRFD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 31
- 108700019146 Transgenes Proteins 0.000 description 30
- 230000010354 integration Effects 0.000 description 28
- 210000001519 tissue Anatomy 0.000 description 27
- 239000002609 medium Substances 0.000 description 25
- 238000001262 western blot Methods 0.000 description 24
- 108010049668 Betaine-Aldehyde Dehydrogenase Proteins 0.000 description 22
- 102100024085 Alpha-aminoadipic semialdehyde dehydrogenase Human genes 0.000 description 20
- 229960000268 spectinomycin Drugs 0.000 description 19
- UNFWWIHTNXNPBV-WXKVUWSESA-N spectinomycin Chemical compound O([C@@H]1[C@@H](NC)[C@@H](O)[C@H]([C@@H]([C@H]1O1)O)NC)[C@]2(O)[C@H]1O[C@H](C)CC2=O UNFWWIHTNXNPBV-WXKVUWSESA-N 0.000 description 19
- 108010043121 Green Fluorescent Proteins Proteins 0.000 description 18
- 102000004144 Green Fluorescent Proteins Human genes 0.000 description 18
- 244000061176 Nicotiana tabacum Species 0.000 description 18
- 235000002637 Nicotiana tabacum Nutrition 0.000 description 18
- 101150067314 aadA gene Proteins 0.000 description 18
- 239000005090 green fluorescent protein Substances 0.000 description 18
- UCSJYZPVAKXKNQ-HZYVHMACSA-N streptomycin Chemical compound CN[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](CO)O[C@H]1O[C@@H]1[C@](C=O)(O)[C@H](C)O[C@H]1O[C@@H]1[C@@H](NC(N)=N)[C@H](O)[C@@H](NC(N)=N)[C@H](O)[C@H]1O UCSJYZPVAKXKNQ-HZYVHMACSA-N 0.000 description 18
- 108020003589 5' Untranslated Regions Proteins 0.000 description 17
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 17
- 206010035148 Plague Diseases 0.000 description 16
- 108020001507 fusion proteins Proteins 0.000 description 16
- FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium chloride Chemical compound [Na+].[Cl-] FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 15
- 102000037865 fusion proteins Human genes 0.000 description 15
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 15
- 108020005345 3' Untranslated Regions Proteins 0.000 description 14
- 230000008929 regeneration Effects 0.000 description 14
- 238000011069 regeneration method Methods 0.000 description 14
- 108020004465 16S ribosomal RNA Proteins 0.000 description 13
- 108020004414 DNA Proteins 0.000 description 13
- 241000588724 Escherichia coli Species 0.000 description 13
- 206010020649 Hyperkeratosis Diseases 0.000 description 13
- 229930006000 Sucrose Natural products 0.000 description 13
- CZMRCDWAGMRECN-UGDNZRGBSA-N Sucrose Chemical compound O[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@@]1(CO)O[C@@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O1 CZMRCDWAGMRECN-UGDNZRGBSA-N 0.000 description 13
- 235000016383 Zea mays subsp huehuetenangensis Nutrition 0.000 description 13
- 238000010790 dilution Methods 0.000 description 13
- 239000012895 dilution Substances 0.000 description 13
- 235000009973 maize Nutrition 0.000 description 13
- 125000006850 spacer group Chemical group 0.000 description 13
- 239000005720 sucrose Substances 0.000 description 13
- LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethanol Chemical compound CCO LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 12
- 241000699670 Mus sp. Species 0.000 description 12
- 230000000408 embryogenic effect Effects 0.000 description 12
- 239000012634 fragment Substances 0.000 description 12
- 230000003053 immunization Effects 0.000 description 12
- 210000002540 macrophage Anatomy 0.000 description 12
- 238000002105 Southern blotting Methods 0.000 description 11
- 108020004566 Transfer RNA Proteins 0.000 description 11
- 239000000872 buffer Substances 0.000 description 11
- 238000002649 immunization Methods 0.000 description 11
- 239000006228 supernatant Substances 0.000 description 11
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 11
- 239000003053 toxin Substances 0.000 description 11
- 231100000765 toxin Toxicity 0.000 description 11
- 108700012359 toxins Proteins 0.000 description 11
- 230000014616 translation Effects 0.000 description 11
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 description 10
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 10
- 238000013519 translation Methods 0.000 description 10
- 241001465754 Metazoa Species 0.000 description 9
- 230000001580 bacterial effect Effects 0.000 description 9
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 9
- 238000010353 genetic engineering Methods 0.000 description 9
- 210000002966 serum Anatomy 0.000 description 9
- 229960005322 streptomycin Drugs 0.000 description 9
- 238000002965 ELISA Methods 0.000 description 8
- 239000002671 adjuvant Substances 0.000 description 8
- 230000003115 biocidal effect Effects 0.000 description 8
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 8
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 8
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 8
- 230000029087 digestion Effects 0.000 description 8
- 210000002257 embryonic structure Anatomy 0.000 description 8
- 239000000284 extract Substances 0.000 description 8
- YBYRMVIVWMBXKQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride Chemical compound FS(=O)(=O)CC1=CC=CC=C1 YBYRMVIVWMBXKQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 8
- 239000000419 plant extract Substances 0.000 description 8
- 230000004224 protection Effects 0.000 description 8
- 150000003839 salts Chemical class 0.000 description 8
- 239000011780 sodium chloride Substances 0.000 description 8
- 101150069979 BADH gene Proteins 0.000 description 7
- 241000282414 Homo sapiens Species 0.000 description 7
- 229920001213 Polysorbate 20 Polymers 0.000 description 7
- 101150027061 RPS16 gene Proteins 0.000 description 7
- 238000009825 accumulation Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000003556 assay Methods 0.000 description 7
- 239000000499 gel Substances 0.000 description 7
- 230000006698 induction Effects 0.000 description 7
- 239000006870 ms-medium Substances 0.000 description 7
- 239000013612 plasmid Substances 0.000 description 7
- 239000000256 polyoxyethylene sorbitan monolaurate Substances 0.000 description 7
- 235000010486 polyoxyethylene sorbitan monolaurate Nutrition 0.000 description 7
- 238000013518 transcription Methods 0.000 description 7
- 230000035897 transcription Effects 0.000 description 7
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 7
- UMCMPZBLKLEWAF-BCTGSCMUSA-N 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]propane-1-sulfonate Chemical compound C([C@H]1C[C@H]2O)[C@H](O)CC[C@]1(C)[C@@H]1[C@@H]2[C@@H]2CC[C@H]([C@@H](CCC(=O)NCCC[N+](C)(C)CCCS([O-])(=O)=O)C)[C@@]2(C)[C@@H](O)C1 UMCMPZBLKLEWAF-BCTGSCMUSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 241000894006 Bacteria Species 0.000 description 6
- 101100200593 Emericella nidulans (strain FGSC A4 / ATCC 38163 / CBS 112.46 / NRRL 194 / M139) rps19 gene Proteins 0.000 description 6
- 239000006142 Luria-Bertani Agar Substances 0.000 description 6
- 238000010222 PCR analysis Methods 0.000 description 6
- 101100418504 Schizosaccharomyces pombe (strain 972 / ATCC 24843) rps1601 gene Proteins 0.000 description 6
- HEMHJVSKTPXQMS-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium hydroxide Chemical compound [OH-].[Na+] HEMHJVSKTPXQMS-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 6
- DBMJMQXJHONAFJ-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium laurylsulphate Chemical compound [Na+].CCCCCCCCCCCCOS([O-])(=O)=O DBMJMQXJHONAFJ-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 6
- 230000033228 biological regulation Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000012790 confirmation Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000000670 limiting effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000000746 purification Methods 0.000 description 6
- 101150116648 rpsP gene Proteins 0.000 description 6
- 230000000392 somatic effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 239000011782 vitamin Substances 0.000 description 6
- 229940088594 vitamin Drugs 0.000 description 6
- 235000013343 vitamin Nutrition 0.000 description 6
- 229930003231 vitamin Natural products 0.000 description 6
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 102000002260 Alkaline Phosphatase Human genes 0.000 description 5
- 108020004774 Alkaline Phosphatase Proteins 0.000 description 5
- 241000283707 Capra Species 0.000 description 5
- 241000282412 Homo Species 0.000 description 5
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 5
- 239000003242 anti bacterial agent Substances 0.000 description 5
- 230000002238 attenuated effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 210000004369 blood Anatomy 0.000 description 5
- 239000008280 blood Substances 0.000 description 5
- 201000010099 disease Diseases 0.000 description 5
- 208000037265 diseases, disorders, signs and symptoms Diseases 0.000 description 5
- 229940088598 enzyme Drugs 0.000 description 5
- 230000002550 fecal effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000035784 germination Effects 0.000 description 5
- KWIUHFFTVRNATP-UHFFFAOYSA-N glycine betaine Chemical compound C[N+](C)(C)CC([O-])=O KWIUHFFTVRNATP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 5
- 230000012010 growth Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000006801 homologous recombination Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000002744 homologous recombination Methods 0.000 description 5
- 101100288100 Acinetobacter baumannii aphA-6 gene Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 108020004705 Codon Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 229920002148 Gellan gum Polymers 0.000 description 4
- 241000283973 Oryctolagus cuniculus Species 0.000 description 4
- 108020005120 Plant DNA Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000003776 cleavage reaction Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000011536 extraction buffer Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000012737 fresh medium Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 4
- 210000003000 inclusion body Anatomy 0.000 description 4
- 229930027917 kanamycin Natural products 0.000 description 4
- 229960000318 kanamycin Drugs 0.000 description 4
- SBUJHOSQTJFQJX-NOAMYHISSA-N kanamycin Chemical compound O[C@@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CN)O[C@@H]1O[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O[C@@H]2[C@@H]([C@@H](N)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O2)O)[C@H](N)C[C@@H]1N SBUJHOSQTJFQJX-NOAMYHISSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 229930182823 kanamycin A Natural products 0.000 description 4
- 108090000765 processed proteins & peptides Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 230000017854 proteolysis Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000011002 quantification Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000007017 scission Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000005631 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid Substances 0.000 description 3
- JKMHFZQWWAIEOD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2-[4-(2-hydroxyethyl)piperazin-1-yl]ethanesulfonic acid Chemical compound OCC[NH+]1CCN(CCS([O-])(=O)=O)CC1 JKMHFZQWWAIEOD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- QKNYBSVHEMOAJP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2-amino-2-(hydroxymethyl)propane-1,3-diol;hydron;chloride Chemical compound Cl.OCC(N)(CO)CO QKNYBSVHEMOAJP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 102100031323 Anthrax toxin receptor 1 Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 241000193388 Bacillus thuringiensis Species 0.000 description 3
- 108700031407 Chloroplast Genes Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 102000004163 DNA-directed RNA polymerases Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 108090000626 DNA-directed RNA polymerases Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 108010054576 Deoxyribonuclease EcoRI Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 239000006144 Dulbecco’s modified Eagle's medium Substances 0.000 description 3
- KCXVZYZYPLLWCC-UHFFFAOYSA-N EDTA Chemical compound OC(=O)CN(CC(O)=O)CCN(CC(O)=O)CC(O)=O KCXVZYZYPLLWCC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- KFZMGEQAYNKOFK-UHFFFAOYSA-N Isopropanol Chemical compound CC(C)O KFZMGEQAYNKOFK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 244000100545 Lolium multiflorum Species 0.000 description 3
- 241000699666 Mus <mouse, genus> Species 0.000 description 3
- 102000035195 Peptidases Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 108091005804 Peptidases Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 240000007377 Petunia x hybrida Species 0.000 description 3
- 102000007056 Recombinant Fusion Proteins Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 108010008281 Recombinant Fusion Proteins Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 241000607142 Salmonella Species 0.000 description 3
- 108090000631 Trypsin Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 102000004142 Trypsin Human genes 0.000 description 3
- KRWTWSSMURUMDE-UHFFFAOYSA-N [1-(2-methoxynaphthalen-1-yl)naphthalen-2-yl]-diphenylphosphane Chemical compound COC1=CC=C2C=CC=CC2=C1C(C1=CC=CC=C1C=C1)=C1P(C=1C=CC=CC=1)C1=CC=CC=C1 KRWTWSSMURUMDE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 150000001413 amino acids Chemical class 0.000 description 3
- 108010039069 anthrax toxin receptors Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 101150056056 aphA-6 gene Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 229960003237 betaine Drugs 0.000 description 3
- 229960000074 biopharmaceutical Drugs 0.000 description 3
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000009089 cytolysis Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000003599 detergent Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000002095 exotoxin Substances 0.000 description 3
- 231100000776 exotoxin Toxicity 0.000 description 3
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000005286 illumination Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000002163 immunogen Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000000338 in vitro Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000008188 pellet Substances 0.000 description 3
- 102000004196 processed proteins & peptides Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 108700022487 rRNA Genes Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 238000012021 retail method of payment Methods 0.000 description 3
- 210000003705 ribosome Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 238000002415 sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis Methods 0.000 description 3
- SUKJFIGYRHOWBL-UHFFFAOYSA-N sodium hypochlorite Chemical compound [Na+].Cl[O-] SUKJFIGYRHOWBL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000002269 spontaneous effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000012134 supernatant fraction Substances 0.000 description 3
- 231100000331 toxic Toxicity 0.000 description 3
- 230000002588 toxic effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000012588 trypsin Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000011144 upstream manufacturing Methods 0.000 description 3
- PRPINYUDVPFIRX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 1-naphthaleneacetic acid Chemical compound C1=CC=C2C(CC(=O)O)=CC=CC2=C1 PRPINYUDVPFIRX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 101150028074 2 gene Proteins 0.000 description 2
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- IVOMOUWHDPKRLL-KQYNXXCUSA-N Cyclic adenosine monophosphate Chemical compound C([C@H]1O2)OP(O)(=O)O[C@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@@H]2N1C(N=CN=C2N)=C2N=C1 IVOMOUWHDPKRLL-KQYNXXCUSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 241001057636 Dracaena deremensis Species 0.000 description 2
- WSFSSNUMVMOOMR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Formaldehyde Chemical compound O=C WSFSSNUMVMOOMR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000012981 Hank's balanced salt solution Substances 0.000 description 2
- 108091006905 Human Serum Albumin Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102000008100 Human Serum Albumin Human genes 0.000 description 2
- FAIXYKHYOGVFKA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Kinetin Natural products N=1C=NC=2N=CNC=2C=1N(C)C1=CC=CO1 FAIXYKHYOGVFKA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 101100288095 Klebsiella pneumoniae neo gene Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 108010006519 Molecular Chaperones Proteins 0.000 description 2
- NWBJYWHLCVSVIJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N N-benzyladenine Chemical compound N=1C=NC=2NC=NC=2C=1NCC1=CC=CC=C1 NWBJYWHLCVSVIJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- PXHVJJICTQNCMI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Nickel Chemical compound [Ni] PXHVJJICTQNCMI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000000020 Nitrocellulose Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000004365 Protease Substances 0.000 description 2
- PXIPVTKHYLBLMZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sodium azide Chemical compound [Na+].[N-]=[N+]=[N-] PXIPVTKHYLBLMZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- UIIMBOGNXHQVGW-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium bicarbonate Chemical compound [Na+].OC([O-])=O UIIMBOGNXHQVGW-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 2
- 239000005708 Sodium hypochlorite Substances 0.000 description 2
- IVOMOUWHDPKRLL-UHFFFAOYSA-N UNPD107823 Natural products O1C2COP(O)(=O)OC2C(O)C1N1C(N=CN=C2N)=C2N=C1 IVOMOUWHDPKRLL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 108091023045 Untranslated Region Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 238000001042 affinity chromatography Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000011543 agarose gel Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229940126575 aminoglycoside Drugs 0.000 description 2
- BFNBIHQBYMNNAN-UHFFFAOYSA-N ammonium sulfate Chemical compound N.N.OS(O)(=O)=O BFNBIHQBYMNNAN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229910052921 ammonium sulfate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000001166 ammonium sulphate Substances 0.000 description 2
- 235000011130 ammonium sulphate Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 208000020282 anthrax disease Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 229940088710 antibiotic agent Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 230000000890 antigenic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000007844 bleaching agent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 201000006824 bubonic plague Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 230000003197 catalytic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001413 cellular effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229940028617 conventional vaccine Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 239000000287 crude extract Substances 0.000 description 2
- 101150005152 ctb gene Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 229940095074 cyclic amp Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 231100000433 cytotoxic Toxicity 0.000 description 2
- 230000001472 cytotoxic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000002784 cytotoxicity assay Methods 0.000 description 2
- 231100000263 cytotoxicity test Toxicity 0.000 description 2
- 230000034994 death Effects 0.000 description 2
- 231100000676 disease causative agent Toxicity 0.000 description 2
- 239000012153 distilled water Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000024346 drought recovery Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000005069 ears Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 238000009585 enzyme analysis Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000000605 extraction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004927 fusion Effects 0.000 description 2
- QPJBWNIQKHGLAU-IQZHVAEDSA-N ganglioside GM1 Chemical compound O[C@@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@H](OC[C@H](NC(=O)CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC)[C@H](O)\C=C\CCCCCCCCCCCCC)O[C@H](CO)[C@H]1O[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O[C@]2(O[C@H]([C@H](NC(C)=O)[C@@H](O)C2)[C@H](O)[C@H](O)CO)C(O)=O)[C@@H](O[C@H]2[C@@H]([C@@H](O[C@H]3[C@@H]([C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O3)O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O2)NC(C)=O)[C@@H](CO)O1 QPJBWNIQKHGLAU-IQZHVAEDSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000002068 genetic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- PCHJSUWPFVWCPO-UHFFFAOYSA-N gold Chemical compound [Au] PCHJSUWPFVWCPO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229910052737 gold Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000010931 gold Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000005556 hormone Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229940088597 hormone Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 230000009851 immunogenic response Effects 0.000 description 2
- 208000015181 infectious disease Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 230000000977 initiatory effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 description 2
- NOESYZHRGYRDHS-UHFFFAOYSA-N insulin Chemical compound N1C(=O)C(NC(=O)C(CCC(N)=O)NC(=O)C(CCC(O)=O)NC(=O)C(C(C)C)NC(=O)C(NC(=O)CN)C(C)CC)CSSCC(C(NC(CO)C(=O)NC(CC(C)C)C(=O)NC(CC=2C=CC(O)=CC=2)C(=O)NC(CCC(N)=O)C(=O)NC(CC(C)C)C(=O)NC(CCC(O)=O)C(=O)NC(CC(N)=O)C(=O)NC(CC=2C=CC(O)=CC=2)C(=O)NC(CSSCC(NC(=O)C(C(C)C)NC(=O)C(CC(C)C)NC(=O)C(CC=2C=CC(O)=CC=2)NC(=O)C(CC(C)C)NC(=O)C(C)NC(=O)C(CCC(O)=O)NC(=O)C(C(C)C)NC(=O)C(CC(C)C)NC(=O)C(CC=2NC=NC=2)NC(=O)C(CO)NC(=O)CNC2=O)C(=O)NCC(=O)NC(CCC(O)=O)C(=O)NC(CCCNC(N)=N)C(=O)NCC(=O)NC(CC=3C=CC=CC=3)C(=O)NC(CC=3C=CC=CC=3)C(=O)NC(CC=3C=CC(O)=CC=3)C(=O)NC(C(C)O)C(=O)N3C(CCC3)C(=O)NC(CCCCN)C(=O)NC(C)C(O)=O)C(=O)NC(CC(N)=O)C(O)=O)=O)NC(=O)C(C(C)CC)NC(=O)C(CO)NC(=O)C(C(C)O)NC(=O)C1CSSCC2NC(=O)C(CC(C)C)NC(=O)C(NC(=O)C(CCC(N)=O)NC(=O)C(CC(N)=O)NC(=O)C(NC(=O)C(N)CC=1C=CC=CC=1)C(C)C)CC1=CN=CN1 NOESYZHRGYRDHS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- QANMHLXAZMSUEX-UHFFFAOYSA-N kinetin Chemical compound N=1C=NC=2N=CNC=2C=1NCC1=CC=CO1 QANMHLXAZMSUEX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229960001669 kinetin Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000011068 loading method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 210000004072 lung Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 210000001165 lymph node Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 102000006240 membrane receptors Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 230000035772 mutation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000013642 negative control Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000006386 neutralization reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229920001220 nitrocellulos Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 231100000252 nontoxic Toxicity 0.000 description 2
- 230000003000 nontoxic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229940126578 oral vaccine Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 239000000137 peptide hydrolase inhibitor Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229960004545 plague vaccines Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 201000009430 pneumonic plague Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 229920002401 polyacrylamide Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 239000013641 positive control Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 210000001938 protoplast Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 238000005057 refrigeration Methods 0.000 description 2
- 108091008146 restriction endonucleases Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 description 2
- ATHGHQPFGPMSJY-UHFFFAOYSA-N spermidine Chemical compound NCCCCNCCCN ATHGHQPFGPMSJY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000001954 sterilising effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004659 sterilization and disinfection Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000007920 subcutaneous administration Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229940031626 subunit vaccine Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 239000013595 supernatant sample Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000009885 systemic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 231100000419 toxicity Toxicity 0.000 description 2
- 230000001988 toxicity Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003612 virological effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005406 washing Methods 0.000 description 2
- DGVVWUTYPXICAM-UHFFFAOYSA-N β‐Mercaptoethanol Chemical compound OCCS DGVVWUTYPXICAM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- HDTRYLNUVZCQOY-UHFFFAOYSA-N α-D-glucopyranosyl-α-D-glucopyranoside Natural products OC1C(O)C(O)C(CO)OC1OC1C(O)C(O)C(O)C(CO)O1 HDTRYLNUVZCQOY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- SNICXCGAKADSCV-JTQLQIEISA-N (-)-Nicotine Chemical compound CN1CCC[C@H]1C1=CC=CN=C1 SNICXCGAKADSCV-JTQLQIEISA-N 0.000 description 1
- FPIPGXGPPPQFEQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 13-cis retinol Natural products OCC=C(C)C=CC=C(C)C=CC1=C(C)CCCC1(C)C FPIPGXGPPPQFEQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- OVSKIKFHRZPJSS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2,4-D Chemical compound OC(=O)COC1=CC=C(Cl)C=C1Cl OVSKIKFHRZPJSS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- HXKWSTRRCHTUEC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyaceticacid Chemical compound OC(=O)C(Cl)OC1=CC=C(Cl)C=C1 HXKWSTRRCHTUEC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- AZKSAVLVSZKNRD-UHFFFAOYSA-M 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide Chemical compound [Br-].S1C(C)=C(C)N=C1[N+]1=NC(C=2C=CC=CC=2)=NN1C1=CC=CC=C1 AZKSAVLVSZKNRD-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- 101150011812 AADAC gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 229920001817 Agar Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920000936 Agarose Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 108020004217 Aminoglycoside phosphotransferase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241001167018 Aroa Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000011725 BALB/c mouse Methods 0.000 description 1
- 241000304886 Bacilli Species 0.000 description 1
- 101500000960 Bacillus anthracis Protective antigen PA-63 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108700003860 Bacterial Genes Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108010077805 Bacterial Proteins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 231100000699 Bacterial toxin Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 239000002028 Biomass Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229940124899 Biothrax Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 241000283690 Bos taurus Species 0.000 description 1
- 108091003079 Bovine Serum Albumin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- UXVMQQNJUSDDNG-UHFFFAOYSA-L Calcium chloride Chemical compound [Cl-].[Cl-].[Ca+2] UXVMQQNJUSDDNG-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 244000025254 Cannabis sativa Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000700198 Cavia Species 0.000 description 1
- 108010001857 Cell Surface Receptors Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108020004998 Chloroplast DNA Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108091026890 Coding region Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 240000008067 Cucumis sativus Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000010799 Cucumis sativus var sativus Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 102000004127 Cytokines Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108090000695 Cytokines Proteins 0.000 description 1
- MYMOFIZGZYHOMD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Dioxygen Chemical compound O=O MYMOFIZGZYHOMD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000012286 ELISA Assay Methods 0.000 description 1
- 101100491986 Emericella nidulans (strain FGSC A4 / ATCC 38163 / CBS 112.46 / NRRL 194 / M139) aromA gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241000701867 Enterobacteria phage T7 Species 0.000 description 1
- 102100029727 Enteropeptidase Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010013369 Enteropeptidase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101710146739 Enterotoxin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 206010015548 Euthanasia Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 108060002716 Exonuclease Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101150047844 F1 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108090001126 Furin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000004961 Furin Human genes 0.000 description 1
- WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-GASJEMHNSA-N Glucose Natural products OC[C@H]1OC(O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]1O WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-GASJEMHNSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000004471 Glycine Substances 0.000 description 1
- 241000238631 Hexapoda Species 0.000 description 1
- 101000856199 Homo sapiens Chymotrypsin-like protease CTRL-1 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108010001336 Horseradish Peroxidase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000004877 Insulin Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108090001061 Insulin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- PIWKPBJCKXDKJR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Isoflurane Chemical compound FC(F)OC(Cl)C(F)(F)F PIWKPBJCKXDKJR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 102100027612 Kallikrein-11 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 206010024769 Local reaction Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 102000043136 MAP kinase family Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108091054455 MAP kinase family Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 240000005561 Musa balbisiana Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000018290 Musa x paradisiaca Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- IOYVFKKKAQTTIV-UCQVOLLVSA-N NCC(O)=O.NCC(O)=O.OC(=O)[C@@H]1CCCN1.OC(=O)[C@@H]1CCCN1 Chemical compound NCC(O)=O.NCC(O)=O.OC(=O)[C@@H]1CCCN1.OC(=O)[C@@H]1CCCN1 IOYVFKKKAQTTIV-UCQVOLLVSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910019093 NaOCl Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000000636 Northern blotting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 241001494479 Pecora Species 0.000 description 1
- 108010064851 Plant Proteins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241000209504 Poaceae Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000288906 Primates Species 0.000 description 1
- 229940124158 Protease/peptidase inhibitor Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 108700008625 Reporter Genes Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241000702670 Rotavirus Species 0.000 description 1
- 244000061456 Solanum tuberosum Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000002595 Solanum tuberosum Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 244000300264 Spinacia oleracea Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000009337 Spinacia oleracea Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 108010090804 Streptavidin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 206010042434 Sudden death Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000005867 T cell response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 108010006785 Taq Polymerase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 206010057040 Temperature intolerance Diseases 0.000 description 1
- HDTRYLNUVZCQOY-WSWWMNSNSA-N Trehalose Natural products O[C@@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@@H]1O[C@@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O1 HDTRYLNUVZCQOY-WSWWMNSNSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000007983 Tris buffer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920004890 Triton X-100 Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000013504 Triton X-100 Substances 0.000 description 1
- 101710152431 Trypsin-like protease Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108060008682 Tumor Necrosis Factor Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108010069584 Type III Secretion Systems Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 235000009499 Vanilla fragrans Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 244000263375 Vanilla tahitensis Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000012036 Vanilla tahitensis Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 241001464837 Viridiplantae Species 0.000 description 1
- FPIPGXGPPPQFEQ-BOOMUCAASA-N Vitamin A Natural products OC/C=C(/C)\C=C\C=C(\C)/C=C/C1=C(C)CCCC1(C)C FPIPGXGPPPQFEQ-BOOMUCAASA-N 0.000 description 1
- 101710204001 Zinc metalloprotease Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 238000005299 abrasion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010521 absorption reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000654 additive Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000996 additive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000443 aerosol Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000008272 agar Substances 0.000 description 1
- FPIPGXGPPPQFEQ-OVSJKPMPSA-N all-trans-retinol Chemical compound OC\C=C(/C)\C=C\C=C(/C)\C=C\C1=C(C)CCCC1(C)C FPIPGXGPPPQFEQ-OVSJKPMPSA-N 0.000 description 1
- HDTRYLNUVZCQOY-LIZSDCNHSA-N alpha,alpha-trehalose Chemical compound O[C@@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@@H]1O[C@@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O1 HDTRYLNUVZCQOY-LIZSDCNHSA-N 0.000 description 1
- XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium Chemical compound [Al] XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910052782 aluminium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229960004821 amikacin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- LKCWBDHBTVXHDL-RMDFUYIESA-N amikacin Chemical compound O([C@@H]1[C@@H](N)C[C@H]([C@@H]([C@H]1O)O[C@@H]1[C@@H]([C@@H](N)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O1)O)NC(=O)[C@@H](O)CCN)[C@H]1O[C@H](CN)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H]1O LKCWBDHBTVXHDL-RMDFUYIESA-N 0.000 description 1
- 125000000539 amino acid group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 102000006646 aminoglycoside phosphotransferase Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 238000010171 animal model Methods 0.000 description 1
- 244000037640 animal pathogen Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000005349 anion exchange Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229960000754 anthrax vaccine adsorbed Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000005875 antibody response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 101150037081 aroA gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 230000003190 augmentative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940097012 bacillus thuringiensis Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 244000052616 bacterial pathogen Species 0.000 description 1
- 239000000688 bacterial toxin Substances 0.000 description 1
- WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-VFUOTHLCSA-N beta-D-glucose Chemical compound OC[C@H]1O[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]1O WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-VFUOTHLCSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000003124 biologic agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000004071 biological effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000903 blocking effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940098773 bovine serum albumin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000009395 breeding Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001488 breeding effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000004899 c-terminal region Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000001110 calcium chloride Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910001628 calcium chloride Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000002775 capsule Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012754 cardiac puncture Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004113 cell culture Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000030833 cell death Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003833 cell viability Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005119 centrifugation Methods 0.000 description 1
- UMCMPZBLKLEWAF-UHFFFAOYSA-N chaps detergent Chemical compound OC1CC2CC(O)CCC2(C)C2C1C1CCC(C(CCC(=O)NCCC[N+](C)(C)CCCS([O-])(=O)=O)C)C1(C)C(O)C2 UMCMPZBLKLEWAF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000013522 chelant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004587 chromatography analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010367 cloning Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011109 contamination Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000013078 crystal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000012228 culture supernatant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 201000004836 cutaneous anthrax Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000005520 cutting process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007123 defense Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000645 desinfectant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000368 destabilizing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001784 detoxification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910001882 dioxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229940042399 direct acting antivirals protease inhibitors Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000001035 drying Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000013399 edible fruits Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000000635 electron micrograph Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001493 electron microscopy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003623 enhancer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 102000013165 exonuclease Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 210000003608 fece Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000796 flavoring agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000019634 flavors Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000037406 food intake Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005714 functional activity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002825 functional assay Methods 0.000 description 1
- 244000053095 fungal pathogen Species 0.000 description 1
- 108010055409 ganglioside receptor Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 206010017931 gastrointestinal anthrax Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 210000001035 gastrointestinal tract Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000030279 gene silencing Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012226 gene silencing method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 244000037671 genetically modified crops Species 0.000 description 1
- 239000008103 glucose Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000001963 growth medium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000036541 health Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008543 heat sensitivity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 208000002672 hepatitis B Diseases 0.000 description 1
- SPSXSWRZQFPVTJ-ZQQKUFEYSA-N hepatitis b vaccine Chemical compound C([C@H](NC(=O)[C@H]([C@@H](C)O)NC(=O)[C@H]([C@@H](C)O)NC(=O)[C@H](CO)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(N)=O)NC(=O)[C@H](CC=1C2=CC=CC=C2NC=1)NC(=O)[C@H](CCC(N)=O)NC(=O)[C@@H](N)CCSC)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC1N=CN=C1)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCC(N)=O)C(=O)N[C@@H]([C@@H](C)O)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(C)C)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCC(N)=O)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(O)=O)C(=O)N1[C@@H](CCC1)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCNC(N)=N)C(=O)N[C@@H](C(C)C)C(=O)OC(=O)CNC(=O)CNC(=O)[C@H](C)NC(=O)[C@H]1N(CCC1)C(=O)[C@H](CC=1C=CC=CC=1)NC(=O)[C@H](CC=1C=CC(O)=CC=1)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(C)C)NC(=O)CNC(=O)[C@@H](N)CCCNC(N)=N)C1=CC=CC=C1 SPSXSWRZQFPVTJ-ZQQKUFEYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229940124736 hepatitis-B vaccine Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000002363 herbicidal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004009 herbicide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 244000038280 herbivores Species 0.000 description 1
- 244000052637 human pathogen Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000008348 humoral response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009396 hybridization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001900 immune effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000984 immunochemical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005847 immunogenicity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003126 immunogold labeling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001727 in vivo Methods 0.000 description 1
- 208000009449 inhalation anthrax Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000002401 inhibitory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011081 inoculation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002054 inoculum Substances 0.000 description 1
- CDAISMWEOUEBRE-GPIVLXJGSA-N inositol Chemical compound O[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H]1O CDAISMWEOUEBRE-GPIVLXJGSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000003780 insertion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000037431 insertion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940125396 insulin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000968 intestinal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229960002725 isoflurane Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 231100000636 lethal dose Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 231100000225 lethality Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 239000003446 ligand Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229940124590 live attenuated vaccine Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 229940023012 live-attenuated vaccine Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000012160 loading buffer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000005923 long-lasting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007774 longterm Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000464 low-speed centrifugation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000002751 lymph Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000001161 mammalian embryo Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 235000013622 meat product Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 108020004084 membrane receptors Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 230000000442 meristematic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 108020004999 messenger RNA Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 244000005700 microbiome Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000013336 milk Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000008267 milk Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000004080 milk Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000004570 mortar (masonry) Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010172 mouse model Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000004877 mucosa Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000016379 mucosal immune response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000001989 nasopharynx Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 229910052759 nickel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229960002715 nicotine Drugs 0.000 description 1
- SNICXCGAKADSCV-UHFFFAOYSA-N nicotine Natural products CN1CCCC1C1=CC=CN=C1 SNICXCGAKADSCV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000002777 nucleoside Substances 0.000 description 1
- 125000003835 nucleoside group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 235000015097 nutrients Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009401 outcrossing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000036961 partial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000037361 pathway Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009520 phase I clinical trial Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009521 phase II clinical trial Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000021118 plant-derived protein Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229920003023 plastic Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000004033 plastic Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008488 polyadenylation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229920001184 polypeptide Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 235000012015 potatoes Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000000843 powder Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002244 precipitate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001556 precipitation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002265 prevention Effects 0.000 description 1
- 125000002924 primary amino group Chemical group [H]N([H])* 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002035 prolonged effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000159 protein binding assay Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002797 proteolythic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940024999 proteolytic enzymes for treatment of wounds and ulcers Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000002829 reductive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000014493 regulation of gene expression Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003362 replicative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013341 scale-up Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000028327 secretion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007226 seed germination Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000006152 selective media Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000009758 senescence Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012163 sequencing technique Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013207 serial dilution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000035939 shock Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011734 sodium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000017557 sodium bicarbonate Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229910000030 sodium bicarbonate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000001509 sodium citrate Substances 0.000 description 1
- NLJMYIDDQXHKNR-UHFFFAOYSA-K sodium citrate Chemical compound O.O.[Na+].[Na+].[Na+].[O-]C(=O)CC(O)(CC([O-])=O)C([O-])=O NLJMYIDDQXHKNR-UHFFFAOYSA-K 0.000 description 1
- 239000002689 soil Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000030118 somatic embryogenesis Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940063673 spermidine Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000010473 stable expression Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010186 staining Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000008223 sterile water Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000002784 stomach Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000725 suspension Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004114 suspension culture Methods 0.000 description 1
- 208000024891 symptom Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 239000008399 tap water Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000020679 tap water Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000008685 targeting Effects 0.000 description 1
- 231100000033 toxigenic Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000001551 toxigenic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000003437 trachea Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000010474 transient expression Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005945 translocation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002054 transplantation Methods 0.000 description 1
- LENZDBCJOHFCAS-UHFFFAOYSA-N tris Chemical compound OCC(N)(CO)CO LENZDBCJOHFCAS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 102000003390 tumor necrosis factor Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 238000002255 vaccination Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000013311 vegetables Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000003981 vehicle Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000035899 viability Effects 0.000 description 1
- 244000052613 viral pathogen Species 0.000 description 1
- 239000000304 virulence factor Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000007923 virulence factor Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000019155 vitamin A Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000011719 vitamin A Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229940045997 vitamin a Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000007279 water homeostasis Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003442 weekly effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K39/00—Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies
- A61K39/02—Bacterial antigens
- A61K39/07—Bacillus
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K39/00—Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K39/00—Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies
- A61K39/02—Bacterial antigens
- A61K39/025—Enterobacteriales, e.g. Enterobacter
- A61K39/0291—Yersinia
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C07K—PEPTIDES
- C07K14/00—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof
- C07K14/195—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from bacteria
- C07K14/24—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from bacteria from Enterobacteriaceae (F), e.g. Citrobacter, Serratia, Proteus, Providencia, Morganella, Yersinia
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C07K—PEPTIDES
- C07K14/00—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof
- C07K14/195—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from bacteria
- C07K14/28—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from bacteria from Vibrionaceae (F)
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C07K—PEPTIDES
- C07K14/00—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof
- C07K14/195—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from bacteria
- C07K14/32—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from bacteria from Bacillus (G)
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
- C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
- C12N15/63—Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
- C12N15/79—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
- C12N15/82—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
- C12N15/8201—Methods for introducing genetic material into plant cells, e.g. DNA, RNA, stable or transient incorporation, tissue culture methods adapted for transformation
- C12N15/8214—Plastid transformation
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
- C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
- C12N15/63—Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
- C12N15/79—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
- C12N15/82—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
- C12N15/8241—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology
- C12N15/8242—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with non-agronomic quality (output) traits, e.g. for industrial processing; Value added, non-agronomic traits
- C12N15/8257—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with non-agronomic quality (output) traits, e.g. for industrial processing; Value added, non-agronomic traits for the production of primary gene products, e.g. pharmaceutical products, interferon
- C12N15/8258—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with non-agronomic quality (output) traits, e.g. for industrial processing; Value added, non-agronomic traits for the production of primary gene products, e.g. pharmaceutical products, interferon for the production of oral vaccines (antigens) or immunoglobulins
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K39/00—Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies
- A61K2039/51—Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies comprising whole cells, viruses or DNA/RNA
- A61K2039/517—Plant cells
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K39/00—Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies
- A61K2039/54—Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies characterised by the route of administration
- A61K2039/541—Mucosal route
- A61K2039/542—Mucosal route oral/gastrointestinal
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K39/00—Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies
- A61K2039/555—Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies characterised by a specific combination antigen/adjuvant
- A61K2039/55511—Organic adjuvants
- A61K2039/55516—Proteins; Peptides
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K39/00—Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies
- A61K2039/60—Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies characteristics by the carrier linked to the antigen
- A61K2039/6031—Proteins
- A61K2039/6037—Bacterial toxins, e.g. diphteria toxoid [DT], tetanus toxoid [TT]
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C07K—PEPTIDES
- C07K2319/00—Fusion polypeptide
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02A—TECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02A50/00—TECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE in human health protection, e.g. against extreme weather
- Y02A50/30—Against vector-borne diseases, e.g. mosquito-borne, fly-borne, tick-borne or waterborne diseases whose impact is exacerbated by climate change
Definitions
- Yersinia pestis is the causative agent of bubonic and pneumonic plague.
- Bacillus anthracis is the causative agent for the anthrax disease.
- the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (hereinafter “CDC”) lists Y. pestis and B. anthracis as two of the six Category A biological agents that pose a risk to national security.
- the etiologic agent of plague is the Gram-negative bacterium Yersinia pestis .
- the natural route of transmission of Y. pestis from one animal host to another is either directly or via a flea vector. Plague is endemic in some regions of the world and outbreaks occasionally occur as a consequence of natural disasters.
- Y. pestis is also a concern as one of the microorganisms with potential for use against civilian or military populations as a biological warfare/biological terrorism agent. In such a situation, the pneumonic form of plague would be the most likely outcome. This form of plague is particularly devastating because of the rapidity of onset, the high mortality, and the rapid spread of the disease. Immunization against aerosolized plague presents a particular challenge for vaccine developers. There is currently no vaccine for plague.
- the two most recently described approaches to development of improved plague vaccines are 1) attenuated mutants of Y. pestis and 2) subunit vaccines.
- the potential efficacy of attenuated mutants of Y. pestis as vaccines is supported by experience with the live attenuated vaccine strain EV76.
- This vaccine has been in use since 1908 and is given as a single dose Immunization of mice with EV76 induces an immune response and protects mice against subcutaneous and inhalation (aerosolized) infection.
- this vaccine strain is not avirulent and has an unacceptable safety profile.
- multiple variants of the classical EV76 strain exist that differ significantly in passage history and genetic characteristics. Recent studies have focused on creating defined genetically attenuated mutants of Y.
- F1 and V are capsular proteins located on the surface of the bacterium and the V antigen is a component of the Y. pestis Type III secretion system. These proteins have been produced recombinantly and induce protective immune responses when administered individually. A combination or fusion of F1 and V may have an additive protective effect when used to immunize humans against plague. It is thought that F1-V fusion protein should provide protection against both subcutaneous and aerosol challenge, and will have the potential to provide protective immunity against pneumonic as well as bubonic plague due to either wild type F1 + Y. pestis or to naturally occurring F1-variants. To date no one has been able to express the F1-V fusion protein in transgenic chloroplast. Such an accomplishment would provide a large supply of high-quality antigen for vaccines.
- Bacillus anthracis is the organism that causes the anthrax disease. It is a Gram-positive, nonmotile, aerobic or facultatively anaerobic, spore-forming bacterium. The spores are about 1 .mu.m in size, extremely hardy, resistant to gamma rays, UV light, drying, heat, and many disinfectants. Spores germinate upon entering an environment rich in glucose, amino acids, and nucleosides, such as in animal and human tissues and blood. The vegetative cells enter the spore state when the nutrients are exhausted or when the organisms are exposed to molecular oxygen in the air.
- Anthrax is typically a disease of animals, especially herbivores such as cows, sheep, and goats. It affects humans through contact with the spores in one of three ways. Cutaneous anthrax occurs when the spores enter the body through a cut or an abrasion on the skin. Gastrointestinal anthrax occurs when the spores enters the body through consumption of contaminated meat products. Inhalation anthrax occurs when the spores enter the body through inhalation of the spores.
- the CDC lists anthrax as a category A disease agent and estimates the cost of an anthrax attack would be $26.2 billion per 100,000 persons exposed.
- the only vaccine licensed for human use in the U.S., Biothrax (formerly Anthrax vaccine adsorbed, or AVA), is an aluminum hydroxide-adsorbed, formalin-treated culture supernatant of a toxigenic, nonencapsulated, non-proteolytic strain of Bacillus anthracis .
- the vaccine contains trace amounts of edema factor (EF) and lethal factor (LF) that may contribute to the local reactions seen in 5-7% of vaccine recipients, or reported to be toxic causing side-effects.
- EF edema factor
- LF lethal factor
- LF a zinc metalloprotease which inactivates mitogen-activated protein kinase.
- cAMP cyclic AMP
- the lethal toxin is formed from binding of PA and LF. This toxin stimulates macrophages to release interleukin-1b, tumor necrosis factor a, and other cytokines which contribute to shock and sudden death.
- Anthrax has become a serious threat due to its potential use in bioterrorism and recent outbreaks among wild-life in the United States.
- Concerns regarding vaccine purity, the current requirement for six injections followed by yearly boosters, and a limited supply of the key protective antigen (PA), underscore the urgent need for an improved vaccine.
- PA key protective antigen
- the present invention pertains to vaccines for conferring immunity in mammals to infective pathogens, as well as vectors and methods for plastid transformation of plants to produce protective antigens and vaccines for oral delivery.
- the invention further provides transformed plastids having the ability to survive selection in both the light and the dark, at different developmental stages by using genes coding for two different enzymes capable of detoxifying the same selectable marker, driven by regulatory signals that are functional in proplastids as well as in mature chloroplasts.
- the invention utilizes antibiotic-free selectable markers to provide edible vaccines for conferring immunity to a mammal against Bacillus anthracis , as well as Yersina pestis .
- the vaccines are operative by parenteral administration as well.
- the invention also extends to the transformed plants, plant parts, and seeds and progeny thereof.
- the invention is applicable to monocot and dicot plants.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic view of anthrax chloroplast constructs according to the present invention, and a view of a southern blot.
- FIG. 1A shows the pLD-JW1 vector used for chloroplast transformation.
- FIG. 1B shows the pLD-JW2 construct.
- FIG. 1C shows PCR with the primers 3P and 3M.
- FIG. 1D shows a PCR analysis of randomly selected clones.
- FIG. 2 is a schematic view of anthrax chloroplast constructs according to the present invention, and views of southern blots.
- FIG. 2A shows expected products from digestion of wild type untransformed plant.
- FIG. 2B shows expected products from digestion of a plant transformed with pLD-JW1.
- FIG. 2C shows expected products from digestion of a plant transformed with pLD-JW2.
- FIG. 2D shows a flanking sequence probe showing heteroplasmy in pLD-JW1 line and homoplasmy in pLD-JW2 lines.
- FIG. 2E shows a pag sequence probe showing presence of pag in transgenic lines.
- FIG. 3 shows Western blots demonstrating PA expression of transgenic lines containing different constructs.
- FIG. 3A shows a western blot of pLD-JW1 T.sub.1 transgenic lines for PA quantification. Lane 1: wild type; Lane 2: Ladder; Lane 3: 20 ng PA; Lane 4: 10 ng PA; Lane 5: 5 ng PA; Lane 6: 1:10 dilution pLD-JW1 line; Lane 7: 1:20 dilution pLD-JW1 line.
- FIG. 3B shows a western blot of pLD-JW2 T.sub.1 transgenic lines for PA quantification.
- FIG. 3C shows a western blot comparing extraction buffers, containing CHAPS and SDS, and both, and measuring stability of extracts at 4.degree. C., where “Sup” means supernatant fraction, “Hom” means homogenate (soluble and insoluble fractions).
- the construct used was pLD-JW2.
- FIG. 4 shows western blots of T.sub.1 pLD-JW1 plant in continuous light in FIGS. 4A and 4B
- FIG. 4C shows histogram of .mu.g PA/g fresh tissue in young, mature, and old leaves after 3 and 5 days of continuous illumination.
- FIG. 5 shows graphs of the results of macrophage cytotoxic assays for extracts from transgenic plants.
- FIG. 5A shows supernatant and homogenate samples from T.sub.0 pLD-JW1 tested.
- FIG. 5B shows Supernatant samples from T.sub.1 pLD-JW1 tested.
- FIG. 6 is a schematic view of tomato vector construct pLD Tom-BADH.
- FIG. 7 is a schematic of the pTOM-BADH2-G10-pag tomato vector construct
- FIG. 8 shows PCR analysis of the products of tomato vectors using BADH primers, wherein + is pTOM-G10-PA vector control, ⁇ is WT Tomato plant, and #3 is transgenic tomato plant.
- FIG. 9 shows tomato seedlings 12 days after seed germination.
- FIG. 10 shows tomato cotyledons ready for bombardment.
- FIG. 11 shows cut and bombarded cotyledons.
- FIG. 12 shows the serum anti-PA as determined by ELISA and the in vitro toxin neutralization by serum antibodies following intranasal immunization.
- FIG. 13A is a schematic view of a pLDS-F1V vector construct, while FIG. 13B shows restriction enzyme analysis of the pLDS-F1V vector.
- FIG. 14A shows PCR reactions to determine pLDS-F1V vector integration into the chloroplast genome of Petit Havana, while 14 B shows a second PCR reaction, which is also used to determine pLDS-F1V transgene integration.
- FIG. 15A shows a Western Blot of pLDS-F1V from XL1-Blue strain of E coli
- 15 B shows Western Blots of F1V expression in transgenic chloroplasts.
- FIG. 16 is a schematic of constructs to be inserted in edible plants, where “gene X” represents each of LF27-PA63, CTB-LF27, LF27-PA63+CTB-LF27, LF27+PA.
- FIG. 17A is a schematic view of a pDD34-ZM-gfp-BADH vector construct, while 17 B shows the subsequent expression of the construct containing GFP in E. coli.
- FIG. 18A is a schmetactic of pDD33-ZM-aadA-BADH vector construction, and 18 B shows the subsequent expression of the construct in E. coli grown on spectinomycin.
- FIG. 19(A-C) show GFP expression in embryogenic maize cultures where a is non-transgenic control and b and c are transformed maize embryonic calli.
- FIG. 20A shows maize control and transgenic plants on regeneration medium containing spectomycin
- FIG. 20B shows PCR confirmation of chloroplast transgenic plants using appropriate primers.
- FIG. 21A is a schematic view of a pDD37-DC-gfp-BADH carrot chloroplast transformation vector, while 21 B illustrates GFP expression in E. coli.
- FIG. 22A is a schematic of a vector construct pDD36-DC aadA-BADH carrot chloroplast transformation vector, while 22 B illustrates the expression of the vector using E. coli cells grown on spectinomycin.
- FIG. 23(A-D) shows Expression of GFP in different stages of transgenic cultures of carrot.
- FIG. 24 is a schematic view of a Double Barreled Plastid Vector harboring aphA-6 and aphA-2 genes conferring resistance to aminoglycosides according to the present invention.
- chloroplast genetic engineering allows the introduction of isolated intact chloroplasts into protoplasts and regeneration of transgenic plants.
- Early investigations involving chloroplast transformation focused on the development of in organello systems using intact chloroplasts capable of efficient and prolonged transcription, translation, and expression of foreign genes in isolated chloroplasts.
- the discovery of the gene gun as a transformation device made it possible to transform plant chloroplasts without the use of isolated plastids and protoplasts.
- Chloroplast genetic engineering has been accomplished in several phases. Studies have been made on the transient expression of foreign genes in plastids of monocots and dicots.
- Unique to the chloroplast genetic engineering is the development of a foreign gene expression system using autonomously replicating chloroplast expression vectors.
- Chloroplast genomes of plants have also been genetically engineered to confer herbicide resistance where the introduced foreign genes were maternally inherited. This was a significant step in the development of commercially viable genetically modified plants because it alleviates any concerns over the problem of out-crossing traits with weeds or other crops.
- Transgenic chloroplast technology has been used to hyper-express bacterial proteins—up to 46% of total soluble protein from Bacillus genes, the highest ever reported in transgenic plants.
- large heterologous proteins are not always processed correctly.
- proteins are subject to attack by proteolytic enzymes after formation.
- the cholera toxin B subunit is about 11 kilodaltons in size.
- the anthrax protective antigen is about 83 kd in size, presenting a significant challenge to production in a chloroplast.
- a similar challenge is presented by the F1-V antigen, which is a fusion protein.
- Such fusion proteins have not heretofore been successfully expressed in chloroplasts.
- Chloroplasts are prokaryotic in nature and express native bacterial genes (like B subunit of cholera toxin) at very high levels (410-fold higher than nuclear expression). Production in chloroplasts is in sharp contrast to nuclear expression, that often requires extensive codon modifications because of high AT content, unfavorable codons, presence of mRNA destabilizing sequences, and cryptic polyadenylation or splice sites. Chloroplast transformation typically utilizes two flanking sequences that, through homologous recombination, insert transgenes into spacer regions between functional genes of the chloroplast genome, thus targeting transgenes to a known location. This eliminates the “position effect” and gene silencing frequently observed in nuclear transgenic plants.
- Chloroplast genetic engineering is an environmentally friendly approach, minimizing concerns of out-cross of introduced traits via pollen to weeds or other related crops.
- the chloroplast genome may be engineered without the use of antibiotic resistant genes as well for the development of edible vaccines.
- edible vaccine refers to a substance which may be given orally which will elicit a protective immunogenic response in a mammal.
- the Applicant has transformed the chloroplast of edible monocot and dicot species, as is illustrated in the accompanying Figures. Specifically, the figures illustrate the stable transformation of carrot and corn chloroplast genomes, which has not previously been accomplished.
- the transformation of carrot, tomato, and corn allow the production of edible vaccines. These transformed plants also allow the purification and use of the antigens produced by these plants as high purity parenteral vaccines. However, the production of edible vaccines is preferred for their ease of use and low cost.
- FIGS. 17A and 18A illustrate the construction of maize chloroplast transformation vector, where flanking regions were amplified using PCR.
- the PCR products were cloned and the expression cassette was inserted in the transcriptionally active spacer region between trnI/trnA genes.
- the expression cassette of FIG. 17A has the Prrn promoter driving the expression of GFP and BADH, which are regulated by (5′) gene10/rps16 3′ and psbA 5′/3′ UTRs respectively.
- the expression cassette of 18 A has the Prrn promoter driving the expression of aadA and BADH. The latter gene is regulated by (5′) gene10/rps16 3′ UTRs.
- FIG. 19 shows GFP expression in embryogenic maize cultures studied under the confocal microscope.
- FIG. 19A is a non-transgenic control, while FIG. 19B-C are transformed maize embryogenic calli.
- the selection in FIG. 19 was initiated two days after bombardment by transferring the bombarded calli to callus induction medium containing BA or streptomycin. After eight weeks, a number of the healthy growing calli from different bombardment experiments were examined for GFP expression under the fluorescent stereomicroscope and the confocal microscope. Somatic embryos were regenerated on maize regeneration medium containing BA or streptomycin.
- FIG. 20A shows maize plants on regeneration medium containing streptomycin or betaine aldehyde.
- FIG. 20A illustrates maize chloroplast transgenic plants which were capable of growth on the selection agent indicating that construction of transgenic maize, while untransfomed maize plants did not grow on the selection medium.
- FIG. 20B shows PCR confirmation of chloroplast transgenic plants using appropriate primers.
- Lanes 1-3 plants transformed with pDD34-ZM-gfp-BADH and Lanes 4-5, plants transformed with pDD33-ZM-aadA-BADH. Lanes ⁇ and + represent the negative and positive controls respectively.
- Genomic DNA was isolated from the leaf tissues and PCR was performed on transformed and non-transformed tissues using appropriate primers.
- FIGS. 21A and 22A show the schematic construction of carrot chloroplast transformation vectors.
- the construction of the carrot chloroplast transformation vector illustrated in FIGS. 21A and 22A have flanking regions that were amplified using PCR. The PCR products were then cloned and the expression cassette was inserted in the transcriptionally active spacer region between trnI/trnA genes.
- the expression cassette of FIG. 21A has the Prrn promoter driving the expression of GFP and BADH, which are regulated by (5′) gene10/rps16 3′ and psbA 5′/3′ UTRs respectively.
- the expression cassette of FIG. 22A has the Prrn promoter driving the expression of aadA and BADH. The latter gene is regulated by (5′) gene10/rps16 3′ UTRs.
- FIG. 23 shows expression of GFP in different stages of transgenic carrot cultures studied under confocal microscope
- A Untransformed control
- B Embryogenic callus
- C Embryogenic callus differentiated into globular somatic embryos
- D Somatic embryo with differentiated cotyledons.
- FIG. 16 offers a schematic of a construct as an example of construct which could elicit an immune response to anthrax where, in this non-limiting example, gene X is chosen from; 1) LF27-PA63; 2) CTB-LF27; 3) LF27-PA63+CTB-LF27; 4) LF27+PA.
- gene X is chosen from; 1) LF27-PA63; 2) CTB-LF27; 3) LF27-PA63+CTB-LF27; 4) LF27+PA.
- Edible vaccines are heat stable unlike conventional vaccines which tend to be heat sensitive.
- An edible vaccine has a longer shelf life and does not require expensive refrigeration equipment.
- the heat sensitivity of the conventional vaccine makes it expensive, capricious and destination limited with a series of refrigeration steps during the transportation process from manufacture to final destination.
- Another major cause for the high cost of biopharmaceutical production is purification; for example, during insulin production, chromatography accounts for 30% of the production cost and 70% of the set up cost. Therefore, oral delivery of properly folded and fully functional biopharmaceuticals could potentially reduce production costs by 90%.
- the banana could deliver a vaccine (Hepatitis B) at two cents per dose compared to approximately $125 per dose for conventional Hepatitis B vaccine injection.
- Bioencapsulation of pharmaceutical proteins within plant cells offers protection against digestion in the stomach while allowing successful delivery.
- plant cells proved sufficient for vaccinogen protection against digestion, and the resulting vaccinogen induced systemic and mucosal immune responses without the aid of adjuvants.
- Oral administration of PA has also been reported to offer protection against B. anthracis using an attenuated Salmonella strain expressing PA.
- the limitation is the low levels of antigen expression which is overcome by the present invention.
- the examples set forth herein are non-limiting examples, and the vectors can be used on a number of plants.
- the following description is capable of being utilized as illustration and guide work for transformation of plants to express any bacterial antigen gene. It can also be used to express viral antigen genes.
- FIG. 1 shows tobacco constructs and PCR confirmation of chloroplast transgene integration.
- FIG. 1A shows the pLD-JW1 vector used for chloroplast transformation.
- the trnI and trnA genes were used as flanking sequences for homologous recombination.
- the constitutive 16s rRNA promoter (“16s” in FIG. 1C ) was used to regulate transcription.
- the aadA gene conferring spectinomycin resistance was used for selection of transgenic shoots.
- the pag gene coding for anthrax protective antigen was regulated by the psbA promoter and 5′ (5UTR) and 3′ UTR (T) elements. As shown in FIG.
- the pLD-JW1 vector (8.3 kb, see FIG. 1A ) was constructed to transform tobacco chloroplasts. This construct is based on the vector pLD the Applicant has used successfully in previous publications. Specifically, the construct is connected to the Applicants universal vectors, which are described in detail in PCT patent publication WO 99/10513, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
- the trnI and trnA genes were used as flanking sequences for homologous recombination to insert a pag-containing cassette into the spacer region between these two tRNA genes in the inverted repeat region of the chloroplast genome, as reported previously. It should be noted that it is possible to insert the pag containing cassette into any of a number of spacer regions between genes.
- the constitutive 16s rRNA promoter which can be recognized by both the chloroplast encoded RNA polymerase and the nuclear encoded RNA polymerase, was used to drive transcription. Any of a number of promoters functional in plastids and well understood and known in the art can be used to help drive transcription.
- the aadA gene conferring spectinomycin resistance was used for selection of transgenic shoots. It is noted however, that the use other antibiotic-resistant genes or an antibiotic free selectable marker such as BADH, could also be used in the construction of the vector.
- the pag gene coding for anthrax protective antigen was regulated by the psbA 5′ and 3′ elements.
- chloroplast vector can be constructed without the use of any promoter, because all polycistronic spacer regions contain a native promoter which can be used to drive transcription.
- a second construct was made by adding orf1,2 from B. thuringiensis to the pLD-JW1 vector, forming the pLD-JW2 vector (see FIG. 1B ).
- the orf1,2 gene codes for a putative chaperone. Including the orf1,2 gene was done to test whether the putative chaperone could fold a heterologous Bacillus protein (i.e., PA) into cuboidal crystals or form inclusion bodies, protect PA from proteolytic degradation, and thereby facilitate purification.
- PA Bacillus protein
- Chloroplast transgenic lines were generated by particle bombardment as described previously. After bombarding Nicotiana tabacum cv. Petit Havana tobacco leaves with the chloroplast vectors, the leaves were grown on selective medium containing 500 .mu.g/ml spectinomycin. Three different genetic events can produce spectinomycin-resistant tobacco shoots: (1) transgene integration into chloroplasts, (2) into the nuclear genome or (3) spontaneous mutants. PCR with two specific primers, 3P and 3M, allowed identification of shoots having the desired chloroplast transgene integration. The 3P primer annealed to the native chloroplast genome and the 3M primer annealed to the aadA gene (see FIG. 1C ).
- T.sub.0 refers to first generation transgenic lines
- T.sub.1 refers to second generation lines obtained by germination of seeds from T.sub.0.
- FIG. 2 shows southern blots to investigate the site of transgene integration and determine homoplasmy or heteroplasmy.
- the figure shows a schematic diagram of the expected products from digestion of wild type untransformed plant as follows: FIG. 2A shows plants transformed with pLD-JW1; FIG. 2B shows plants transformed with pLD-JW2.
- FIG. 2D shows a flanking sequence probe revealing heteroplasmy in pLD-JW1 line and homoplasmy in pLD-JW2 lines.
- FIG. 2E shows pag sequence probe showing presence of pag in transgenic lines.
- the T.sub.1 transgenic lines showed a greater amount of PA in the pLD-JW1 lines as compared to the pLD-JW2 lines. Additional western blots were done comparing two different detergents in the extraction buffers, CHAPS and SDS, and both were found to extract PA equally well (see FIG. 3C ). The supernatant and the homogenate were also found to be comparable suggesting that most of the PA is in the soluble fraction. After storage for two days at 4.degree. C. and ⁇ 20.degree. C., the PA in plant crude extracts is quite stable (see FIG. 3C ). Powdered leaf was stored at ⁇ 80.degree. C.
- pLD-JW1 T.sub.1 transgenic plants were placed in continuous light and young, mature, and old leaves were collected after 3 or 5 days of continuous illumination. Western blots were performed using different dilutions of crude plant extracts (see FIG. 4A-B ).
- the 3 day mature and young leaves contained 80 .mu.g PA or 108 .mu.g PA/g of fresh tissue.
- the 5 day old, mature and young leaves contained 32 .mu.g PA, 108 .mu.g PA or 156 .mu.g PA/g of fresh tissue, respectively.
- FIG. 4 shows total protein from plant extracts loaded in each lane is shown in parenthesis.
- FIG. 4A shows pLD-JW1 transgenic line in 3 days of continuous light, 1:20 dilutions. Lane 1: old leaf (187 ng); Lane 2: mature leaf (369 ng); Lane 3: young leaf (594 ng); Lanes 4-5: blank; Lane 6: 10 ng PA; Lane 7: 20 ng PA; Lane 9: ladder; Lane 10: wild type (15,000 ng).
- FIG. 4B shows pLD-JW1 transgenic line in 5 days of continuous light, 1:20 dilutions.
- FIG. 4C is a histogram of .mu.g PA/g fresh tissue in young, mature, and old leaves after 3 (blue) and 5 (red) days of continuous illumination.
- PA accumulation was visualized in crude plant extracts by Coomassie staining.
- a capture ELISA was used to quantify PA, it appeared that PA constituted a large percentage of total soluble protein in some extracts. While these values may reflect detection of partially cleaved PA, they do not result from non-specific interaction of the antibodies with any other proteins, because no signal was detected in untransformed plants.
- the data set forth herein is from quantitative scanning of polyacrylamide gels and not from the capture ELISA.
- PCR was performed using the Perkin Elmer Gene Amp PCR System 2400 (available from Perkin Elmer, Chicago, Ill.). PCR reactions contained template DNA, 1.times.Taq buffer, 0.5 mM dNTPs, 0.2 mM 3P primer, 0.2 mM 3M primer, 0.05 units/.mu.l Taq Polymerase, and 0.5 mM MgCl.sub.2. Samples were run for 30 cycles as follows: 95.degree. C. for 1 min, 65.degree. C. for 1 min, and 72.degree. C. for 2 min with a 5 min ramp up at 95.degree. C. and a 72.degree. C. hold for 10 min after cycles complete. PCR products were separated on 1% agarose gels.
- Total plant DNA was digested with BglII and run on a 0.8% agarose gel at 50 V for 2 hours. The gel was soaked in 0.25 N HCl for 15 minutes and then rinsed 2.times. with water. The gel was soaked in transfer buffer (0.4 N NaOH, 1 M NaCl) for 20 minutes and then transferred overnight to a nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was rinsed twice in 2.times.SSC (0.3 M NaCl, 0.03 M Sodium citrate), dried on filter paper, and then crosslinked in the GS GeneLinker (Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif.). The flanking sequence probe was made by digesting pUC-CT vector DNA with BamHI and BglII to generate a 0.81 kb probe. Lee, S.
- the pag probe was made by digesting pag with NcoI to generate a 0.52 kb probe.
- the probes were labeled with .sup.32P using the ProbeQuant G-50 Micro Columns (Amersham, Arlington Heights, Ill.).
- the probes were hybridized with the membranes using Stratagene QUICK-HYB hybridization solution and protocol (Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif.).
- the supernatant containing the extracted protein was transferred to a fresh tube and an aliquot was taken out, combined with sample loading buffer, boiled, and then run on 8% SDS-PAGE gels for one hour at 80 V, then 2 hours at 150 V. Gels were transferred overnight at 10 V to nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was blocked with PTM (1.times.PBS, 0.05% Tween 20, and 3% dry milk). PA was detected with anti-PA monoclonal antibody 14B7. Secondary antibody used was goat anti-mouse IgG conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (American Qualex Antibodies, A106PN).
- the stability assay utilized SDS buffer (0.1% SDS, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM EDTA, 200 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 0.05% Tween 20, 14 mM .beta.-mercaptoethanol, 400 mM sucrose, 2 mM PMSF) and CHAPS buffer (4% CHAPS, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM EDTA, 200 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 14 mM .beta.-mercaptoethanol, 400 mM sucrose, 2 mM PMSF). Two hundred .mu.l of each buffer was added to 100 mg powdered leaf tissue.
- the extraction was centrifuged at 10,000.times.g for 5 minutes and supernatant was removed. For homogenate, the entire extract was used. The samples were stored at 4.degree. C. and ⁇ 20.degree. C. for two days. The rest of the western protocol was the same as described above. Dilutions of 1:10 and 1:20 of the protein extracts were made and run on the gel along with 20, 10, and 5 ng of PA protein standards to generate a standard curve for protein quantification. After the film was developed, the PA was quantified using the Gel-Doc.
- the Applicant constructed the pLD Tom-BADH vector ( FIG. 6 ) illustrating the ability to transform the chloroplast genome of edible dicots.
- the Tom-BADH vector was constructed to with two selectable marker genes (BA and spectinomycin) to test ability of transformed plants to grow on BA as compared to spectinomycin.
- the pLD-Tom-BADH vector contains the chimeric aadA gene and the BADH gene driven by the constitutive 16 S rRNA promoter and regulated by the 3′UTR region of psbA gene from petunia plastid genome.
- aadA and BADH possess the chloroplast preferred ribosomal binding site, GGAGG.
- Another suitable vector used for tomato chloroplast transformation is the pLD-Tom-UTR-BADH vector, which has the constitutive 16 S rRNA promoter driving the expression of the dicistron, in which the BADH is under the regulation of the promoter and the 5′UTR of the psbA gene and the 3′ UTR of psbA gene, for enhanced expression.
- FIG. 7 shows the schematic construct of the pTom-BADH2-G10-pag ⁇ 8.8 kb vector, which was constructed containing the selectable marker gene BADH. This construct is also be made using the aad gene to confer spectinomycin resistance in place of the BADH gene.
- the cotyledons were put on selection media containing Betaine Aldeyhyde (BA) and calli formed. The calli were transferred to new selection media to obtain shoots.
- BA Betaine Aldeyhyde
- FIG. 11 shows the first selection after bombardment with the pTom-BADH2-G10-pag ⁇ 8.8 kb vector, wherein the cotyledons were incubated in the dark for 48 hours and then the bombarded cotyledons were cut.
- the RMOP medium shown in FIG. 11 is a shoot inducing media. The bombarded cotyledons were grown on 2.5 mM Betaine Aldehyde (BA) for selection.
- BA Betaine Aldehyde
- FIG. 8 shows the PCR test that was performed to determine integration of the pTom-BADH2-G10-pag ⁇ 8.8 kb vector, where the tomato shoots were tested with PCR to confirm integration of the transgene.
- the + is pTOM-G10-PA vector control
- ⁇ is WT Tomato plant
- #3 is the transgenic tomato plant. This confirmation utilized appropriate primers.
- TrnI and trnA are homologous recombination regions in tomato; 5′UTR from psbA is used for translation enhancement and also contains it's own promoter; BADH gene confers Betaine Aldehyde (BA) resistance; G10 is a translation enhancer from the T7 bacteriophage; pag codes for the protective antigen, and T is the psbA terminator.
- the pDD11 vector is cleaved with NdeI & NotI to remove the gene and leave opened pBlue-G10 region of the vector.
- the pBlue-T7-pag vector is then cleaved with NdeI & NotI to remove the pag gene .about.2.2 kb.
- the pag gene is ligated into the opened pBlue-G10 vector, and the resulting pBlue-G10-pag is cleaved with SmaI & NotI to remove the G10-pag .about.5.2 kb segment from the pBlue-G10-pag vector.
- pTom-BADH2 vector is cleaved with SmaI and NotI, and then the G10-pag fragment is ligated into the vector creating a pTOM-BADH2-G10-pag ⁇ 8.8 kb ( FIG. 7 ).
- the cotyledons After bombarding the tomato cotyledons (seed leaves or embryonic leaves) with the tomato construct vector, pTOM-BADH2-G10-pag ⁇ 8.8 kb, the cotyledons are put on selection media containing Betaine Aldeyhyde (BA) and calli formed ( FIG. 11 ). The calli are transferred to new selection media to obtain shoots. Shoots are tested with PCR to confirm integration of the transgene, which utilizes appropriate primers ( FIG. 8 ).
- BA Betaine Aldeyhyde
- LT(R192G) a novel adjuvant
- This adjuvant was shown to be effective at augmenting protection against a variety of bacterial, viral, and fungal pathogens when delivered with appropriate antigens intranasally, orally, rectally, or transcutaneously.
- This adjuvant was developed by the Clements laboratory at Tulane University Health Sciences Center with funding from NIH and the Department of Defense and has been evaluated in a number of Phase I and Phase II clinical trials.
- FIG. 12 shows the serum anti-PA as determined by ELISA and the in vitro toxin neutralization by serum antibodies following intranasal immunization. Equivalent results were seen following transcutaneous immunization.
- suitable candidate regulatory sequences are the T7 gene 10 leader sequence and cry2Aa2 UTR.
- the T7 gene 10 leader sequence is used to express foreign proteins in transgenic chromoplasts.
- the cry2Aa2 UTR accumulates foreign protein in chromoplasts as efficiently as the psbA UTR.
- the selectable marker for the future generation vectors can optionally be the BADH gene under the regulation of psbA promoter and 5′UTR as psbA is one of the most efficiently translated chloroplast genes in green tissues. Since green tissue is used for introducing the transgene into the chloroplasts in tomato, it is ideal to use the light regulated psbA UTR for the selectable marker.
- FIG. 9 shows tomato seeds (Moneymaker and Ady varieties) that are surface sterilized with ethanol for 30 s, followed by a 20 min treatment with 1.5% NaOCl and 0.1% Tween 20. Seeds are washed thoroughly with sterile water (at least 3-4 times) and transferred to germination media ( FIG. 14 ). Germination media consists of MS salts with 30% sucrose and 0.8% agar. About 20 seeds are inoculated per bottle and placed under a photoperiod of 16 h light and 8 h dark for 8-10 days to obtain cotyledons for particle bombardment. The cotyledons are then excised either as an explant for bombardment or the resulting seedlings are used for transplantation to obtain leaves.
- the cotyledons and leaf material are bombarded using the particle gun. After bombardment the explants are then incubated in the dark for 48 h. The cotyledons and leaves are then cut into small pieces and placed onto RMOP media supplemented with 2.5, 5.0 and 7.5 mM of betaine aldehyde for regeneration.
- the concentration of 2.5 nm BA is optimal, but not required, as regeneration of putative transformants could be observed after two weeks. Specifically, there is no response on media having higher concentrations of 5.0 and 7.5 mM BA. With leaves, the concentration of 1 and 1.5 mM is optimal for pLD-Tom-BADH and pLD-Tom-UTR-BADH respectively.
- Selection is optimally performed in the presence of BA, but has also been performed in the presence of antibiotics.
- PCR analysis is performed as described above, as is well understood in the art.
- Southern and northern blot analyses are performed as described above, and well understood in the art, to determine the amount and level of transformation in the chloroplast genome.
- Carrot Daucus carota L.
- Carrot taproots are rich in vitamin A and fiber and are ideal to genetically manipulate in the chromoplast for the production of edible vaccines.
- flanking sequences trnI and trnA
- duration for regeneration of carrot plantlets is shortened to four months from eight months when replacing the antibiotic selection with BA.
- the same chloroplast constructs as described above for tomatoes are used for carrot except that homologous recombination regions i.e. trnI and trnA are derived from carrot chloroplast DNA.
- the advantage of using carrot is that from small clusters of cells or a small piece of carrot one can get thousands of transgenic plants in a limited space. Moreover, single cells are directly in contact with the culture media surface. Therefore, even a small quantity of selecting agent (betaine aldehyde) is more effective in comparison to other larger tissues. Carrot is easy to store for long periods of time.
- Seeds of carrot ( Daucus carota L. cv Nantaise ) are sown in pots and placed under a growth chamber with appropriate growth conditions for as little as four weeks to as long as a year.
- the hypocotyls are then cut into segments of 1 cm long and placed either on semi-solid callus induction medium or in 50 ml MS medium containing 3% sucrose, 0.1 mg/l 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) having pH 5.7.
- liberated cells are collected on a 100 .mu.M mesh, centrifuged (150.times.g for lo min) and resuspended in fresh medium.
- Rapidly growing cell cultures can be subcultured weekly.
- callus formation from hypocotyls segments is established on semi-solid MS medium (Carolina Biological supply company) containing 1 mg/l kinetin and 3 mg/l 2,4-D.
- Homogenously growing calli is subcultured every 4 weeks on fresh medium.
- the resulting friable calli is then resuspended in 50 ml MS medium containing 3% sucrose and 0.1 mg/kinetin.
- suspension-cultured cells are filtered through a 100 .mu.M mesh and subjected to bombardment with chloroplast vectors.
- Fine cell suspension culture of carrot, evenly spread over MS semi-solid medium is used for bombardment. After bombardment the explants are incubated in the dark for 48 h and later in appropriate light condition (16/8 h day/night cycle at 24.degree. C.). Somatic embryogenesis is induced in a suspension of single cells and small clusters harvested on sieve and low-speed centrifugation. The harvested cells are washed once with hormone free liquid MS medium and resuspended in 40 ml hormone free MS medium containing different concentrations of betaine aldehyde (1.5, 2.5 and 3.5 mM).
- Transgenic somatic embryos visible 2 weeks after induction, are selected manually and transferred onto plates with semi-solid MS medium containing 1.5% sucrose and variable concentrations of betaine aldehyde (1.5, 2.5 and 3.5 mM). The plates are sealed with parafilm. After two weeks, somatic embryos development into plantlets which are transferred to soil in pots. Initially, the pots are covered with plastic bags to maintain high humidity and irrigated with progressively reduced concentrations of MS salts for the first week, followed by tap water in the second week. Transgenic plants with stable expression of recombinant protein are then utilized for suitable assays.
- Yersinia pestis vaccine in a low nicotine strain of tobacco is accomplished by expressing in chloroplasts the F1-V antigen fusion protein produced from F1 gene (513 bp/15.5 kDa) and the entire V antigen (980 bp/35 kDa).
- the protein of 478 amino acids having a calculated mass of 53,193 and a pI of 5.1 has shown this fusion protein to be immunoprotective.
- F1-V was modified to add an EcoR1 site. This fragment is cloned into the universal chloroplast vector, which has been described above, with the psbA 5′UTR upstream of the F1-V fusion. The use of the psbA 5′UTR, is not required, but it has been shown to increase expression of foreign proteins by chloroplast.
- His-tag with an enterokinase cut site was added to the above construct.
- the His-tag allows for purification on a nickel column with subsequent cleavage of the fusion protein from the His-tag.
- the plasmid pPW731 (a pET-24 vector) carrying the gene for the F1V fusion protein was delivered in BLR strain of E. coli . Because of the exonuclease activity in BLR, XL1-Blue strain of E. coli was transformed with pPW731. Using NdeI and NotI, F1V was cut out of pPW731 and ligated into PCR2.1 with 5′ psbA. In order to ligate 5′psbA-F1V into the universal chloroplast vector, pLD-CtV, PCR2.1-5′ psbA-F1V was cut with Sac I, and blunt ended, then cut with Not I.
- FIG. 13A shows the construct of the pLDS-F1V vector, wherein the vector contains the F1/V antigen gene contained in the spacer region between the trnI and trnA genes. It should be understood that the F1/V antigen gene could be inserted into any of a number of spacer regions between chloroplast genes, which are described and illustrated in Sugita, M. Sugiura, M. Regulation of gene expression in chloroplast of higher plants, Plant Molecular Biology 32:315-326, 1996).
- FIG. 13B shows PCR restriction enzyme analysis of pLDS-F1V with Xho I, Eco RI, and Nde I, which showed that the psbA-F1V sequence to be in proper orientation in pLD.
- Xho I yielding: 340 bp, 2679 bp, and 4634 bp: Eco RI yielding 682 bp, and 6953 bp: and Xho I/Nde I yielding 340 bp, 925 bp, 1102 bp, 1620 bp, 3610 bp, and incomplete digestion at 2601 bp, and 4550 bp).
- FIGS. 14A and 14B show PCR confirmation of transgene integration into the chloroplast genome.
- chloroplast transgenic After bombarding tobacco leaves with pLDS-F1V, there are three possibilities that might produce shoots: chloroplast transgenic, nuclear transgenic, and mutants resistant to spectinomycin.
- chloroplast transgenic plants we utilize two PCR reactions. The first ( FIG. 14A ), which checks for chloroplast intergration, uses 3P and 3M primers which land on the native chloroplast geneome and the aadA gene, respectively. Nuclear transformants are screened out because 3P will not anneal. Mutants are screened out because 3M will not anneal. Positive chloroplast transformants produce a 1.65 Kb PCR product.
- FIG. 15A shows the western blot of pLDS-F1V from XL1-Blue strain of E. coli
- 15 B shows the western blot of plants 1 and 2.
- FIG. 15A showing the Western blot of F1V expression in E. coli
- the expression in E. coli was detected by rabbit anti-F1 as the primary antibody and alkaline phosphatase labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG as the Western blot of F1V expression in E. coli was detected by rabbit anti-F1 as the primary antibody and alkaline phosphatase labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG as the secondary antibody.
- the western blot in FIG. 15A shows: Lane 1: pLDS-F1V; Lane 2: F1 antigen; Lane 3: V antigen; Lane 4: F1V fusion protein.
- FIG. 15B illustrates the Western blot of F1V expression in plants as was detected by rabbit anti-F1 and anti-V as primary antibodies and alkaline phosphatase labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG as the secondary antibody. Controls and samples were boiled. Specifically the western blot in FIG. 15B shows: Lane 1: purified F1V fusion protein; Lane 2: Untransformed Petit Havana; Lane 3: Transformed plant line #1; Lane 4: Transformed plant line #2. From this western blot it is clear that transgenic line 2 has surpassed line 1 in growth and is very healthy confirming that the foreign protein is not toxic to plants.
- the F1-V antigen which is a bacterial antigen, was cloned into the tomato pLD vector between gene 10 and rps 16 terminator. This was discussed further above.
- the selectable marker, BADH with psbA 5′ UTR and psbA 3′ follows the rps16 region.
- the second vector made contains F1-V attached to the carboxy terminus of CTB.
- CTB serves as a mucosal carrier for this plague protein.
- CTB Cholera Toxin B Subunit
- CTB has previously been expressed in nuclear transgenic plants at levels of 0.01 (leaves) to 0.3% (tubers) of the total soluble protein.
- the chloroplast genome was engineered to express the CTB gene.
- PCR and Southern Blot analyses confirmed stable integration of the CTB gene into the chloroplast genome.
- Western blot analysis showed that transgenic chloroplast expressed CTB was antigenically identical to commercially available purified CTB antigen.
- GM1-ganglioside binding assays confirm that chloroplast synthesized CTB binds to the intestinal membrane receptor of cholera toxin Transgenic tobacco plants were morphologically indistinguishable from untransformed plants and the introduced gene was found to be stably inherited in the subsequent generation as confirmed by PCR and Southern blot analyses. Thus chloroplasts form disulfide bridges to assemble foreign proteins. Spontaneously forming CTB pentamers exhibit intact transcytosis to the external basolateral membrane of intestinal epithelium, and have been widely used as oral vaccine vehicles.
- Chloroplast transformation has been accomplished only in a few Solanaceous crops so far. There are several challenges in extending this technology to other crops. So far, only green chloroplasts have been transformed in which the leaf has been used as the explant. However, for many crops, including monocots, cultured non-green cells or other non-green plant parts are used as explants. These non-green tissues contain proplastids instead of chloroplasts, in which gene expression and gene regulation systems are quite different. During transformation, transformed proplastids should develop into mature chloroplasts and transformed cells should survive the selection process during all stages of development. Therefore, the major challenge is to provide chloroplasts the ability to survive selection in the light and the dark, at different developmental stages.
- Double Barrel Plastid Vectors accomplish this by using genes coding for two different enzymes capable of detoxifying the same selectable marker (or spectrum of selectable markers), driven by regulatory signals that are functional in proplastids as well as in mature chloroplasts.
- the plastid vector described here is one among several such examples (non-limiting example).
- the chloroplast flanking sequence contains appropriate coding sequences and a spacer region into which the transgene cassette is inserted. Any spacer sequence within the plastid genome could be targeted for transgene integration, including transcribed and transcriptionally silent spacer regions.
- aphA-6 and aphA-2 (nptII) genes code for enzymes that belong to the aminoglycoside phosphotransferase family but they originate from different prokaryotic organisms. Because of prokaryotic nature of the chloroplast genome, these genes are ideal for use in transgenic chloroplasts without any codon optimization.
- kanamycin Genes of prokaryotic origin have been expressed at very high levels in transgenic chloroplasts (up to 47% of total soluble protein, DeCosa et al., 2001). Both enzymes have similar catalytic activity but the aphA-6 gene product has an extended ability to detoxify kanamycin and provides a wider spectrum of aminoglycoside detoxification, including amikacin.
- the advantage of choosing kanamycin as a selectable marker is that it has no natural resistance, unlike spectinomycin resistance observed in most monocots or spontaneous point mutation of the 16 S rRNA gene observed during the selection process.
- kanamycin is not in human clinical use as an antibiotic and several crops containing kanamycin resistant nuclear transgenes have been already approved by FDA for human consumption (e.g. flavor savor tomatoes) and currently in the market place.
- all transgenes are regulated by the plastid Prrn promoter; this 16S rRNA promoter drives the entire rRNA operon in the native chloroplast genome and contains binding sites for both the nuclear encoded and plastid encoded RNA polymerases. Therefore, this promoter is capable of functioning in both proplastids and chloroplasts (green and non-green, in the light and dark).
- the aphA-6 gene is further regulated by the gene 10 5′ UTR capable of efficient translation in the dark, in proplastids present in non-green tissues (see GFP expression in proplastids of non-green cells of corn and carrot in FIGS.
- the 16S rRNA promoter and gene 10 UTR has been used to stabilize aphA-6 gene transcripts.
- the aphA-2 (nptII) gene is regulated by the psbA promoter, 5′ and 3′ UTRs, which are light regulated and highly efficient in the light, in chloroplasts (see A. Fernandez-San Millan, A. Mingeo-Castel, M. Miller and H. Daniell, 2003, A chloroplast transgenic approach to hyper-express and purify Human Serum Albumin, a protein highly susceptible to proteolytic degradation. Plant Biotechnology Journal, in press; also see WO 01/72959).
- a combination of both aphA-6 and aphA-2 genes driven by regulatory signals in the light and in the dark in both proplastids and chloroplasts, provides continuous protection for transformed plastids/chloroplasts around the clock from the selectable agent.
- the gene(s) of interest with appropriate regulatory signals (gene X) are inserted downstream or upstream of the double barrel selectable system. Because multiple genes are inserted within spacer regions (DeCosa et al 2001, Daniell & Dhingra, 2002), the number of transgenes inserted does not pose problems in transcription, transcript processing or translation of operons (WO 01/64024).
- aphA-6 and aphA-2 genes, coupled with different transgenes are inserted at different spacer regions within the same chloroplast genome using appropriate flanking sequences and introduced via co-transformation of both vectors.
- corn specific sequences, flanking the targeted integration site in the corn chloroplast genome were amplified with specific PCR primers and subcloned to flank the betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase (BADH) selectable marker, and green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporter gene expression cassette.
- BADH betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase
- GFP green fluorescent protein
- Callus cultures were initiated from aseptically excised immature zygotic embryos (1-2 mm in length), produced on self-pollinated ears of HiII (F1) maize plants. Ears were surface sterilized in a solution containing 2.6% Sodium hypochlorite (prepared with commercial bleach) containing 0.1% Tween 20 (polyoxyethylene sorbitan monolaurate) for 20 minutes under continuous shaking, then rinsed 4 times in sterile distilled water.
- Sodium hypochlorite prepared with commercial bleach
- Tween 20 polyoxyethylene sorbitan monolaurate
- the Embryos were then placed on the callus induction medium CI-1, which contained N6 salts and vitamins (463.0 mg/l (NH.sub.4).sub.2SO.sub.4, 2830.0 mg/lKNO.sub.3, 400 mg/l KH.sub.2PO.sub.4, 166.0 mg/l CaCl.sub.2, 185 mg/l MgSO.sub.4.7H.sub.2O, 37.3 mg/l Na.sub.2-EDTA, 27.85 mg/l FeSO.sub.4.7H.sub.2O, 1.6 mg/l H.sub.3BO.sub.3, 4.4 mg/l MnSO.sub.4.H.sub.2O, 0.8, KI, 1.5 mg/l ZnSO.sub.4.7H.sub.2O), 2% sucrose and 1.0 mg/l 2,4-D (2,4 dichloro-phenoxy acetic acid), with the rounded scutellar side exposed and the flat plumule-radicle axis side in contact with the
- Micro projectiles were coated with DNA (pDA34-ZM-gfp-BADH and pDA33-ZM-aadA-BADH) and bombardment was carried out with the biolistic device PDS1000/He (Bio-Rad).
- embryogenic calli Prior to bombardment, embryogenic calli were selected, transferred over sterile filter paper (Watman No. 1), and placed on the surface of a fresh medium in standard Petrti plates (100.times.15 mm). Gold particles (0.6 .mu.m) were then coated with plasmid DNA as follows: 50 .mu.l of washed gold particles were mixed with 10 .mu.l DNA (1 .mu.g/.mu.l), 50 .mu.l of 2.5M CaCl.sub.2, 20 .mu.l of 0.1M spermidine and vortexed. Particles were cneterfuged for a few seconds at 3000 rpm and then the ethanol was poured off.
- Ethanol washing was repeated five times, then the pellet was resuspended in 30 .mu.l of 100% ethanol and placed on ice until it was used for bombardment (the coated particles were used within 2 hours). Bombardment was carried out with the biolistic device PDS 1000/He (Bio Rad) by loading the target sample at level 2 in the sample chamber under a partial vacuum (28 inches Hg).
- the callus cultures were bombarded with the maize chloroplast transformation vectors using 1100 psi rupture discs. Following bombardment, the explants were transferred to a fresh medium; plates were sealed with micropore tape and incubated in darkness at 25-28.degree. C.
- Regeneration was initiated 6 to 8 weeks after bombardment by transferring the calli to a medium R1 containing Ms salts and vitamins supplemented with 1.0 mg/l NAA (.alpha.-naphthalene acetic acid), 2% sucrose, 2 g/l myoinositol and 0.3% phytagel at pH 5.8. Regenerated plants were transferred to R2 containing 1/2 MS salts and vitamins, 3% sucrose and 0.3% phytagel at pH 5.8. Regenerated plants were maintained in light (16/8 hr photoperiod).
- NAA alpha.-naphthalene acetic acid
- Corn seeds were surface sterilized in a solution containing 2.6% Sodium hypochlorite (prepared from commercial bleach) containing 0.1% Tween 20 for 20 minutes under continuos shaking, then rinsed four times in sterile distilled water. Seeds were grown on MS medium at pH 5.8 in darkness. Nodal sections were excised aseptically from three day old seedlings. The nodal sections appear as clear demarcations on the germinated seedlings and represent the seventh node. When excised, the nodal cross sections are 1.3 to 1.5 mm in length.
- Nodal section explants are placed acropital end up on shoot multiplication medium SM1 composed of Ms salts and vitamins, 1.0 mg/l 6BA (6-Benzyl amino purine), 3% sucrose and 5 g/l phytagel at pH 5.8 under continuous light at 25.degree. C.
- Initiation of the shoot-tip clumps from the original shoot tips occurred 2 to 4 weeks after culture.
- Two days after bombardment transformed nodal sections were transferred to shoot multiplication medium containing 5-20 mM BA or 50-100 mg/l streptomycin selective agents. Subsequent subcultures at two week intervals were carried out by selecting, dividing and subculturing green clumps on selective shoot multiplication medium containing 5-20 mM BA or 25-100 mg/l streptomycin.
- the Multiple shoot clumps were regenerated by transferring them to regeneration medium M1 containing MS salts and Vitamins, 5 mg/l IBA and 3% sucrose at pH 5.8.
- the developed shoots were regenerated by transferring the shoot tip clumps to M2 medium containing 1/2 MS salts and vitamins, 3% sucrose and 3 g/l phytagel at pH 5.8. It should be further noted that all the regeneration media are supplemented with 5-20 mM BA or 25-100 mg/l streptomycin as the selective agents.
- Corn chloroplast transformation vector facilitates the integration of transgene into the inverted repeat (IR) region of the corn chloroplast genome.
- the vector pLD-Corn-BADH contains the chimeric aadA gene and the BADH gene driven by the constitutive 16 S rRNA promoter and regulated by the 3′ UTR region of psbA gene from petunia plastid genome.
- aadA and BADH possess the chloroplast preferred ribosomal binding site, GGAGG.
- Another vector used for corn chloroplast transformation pLD-corn-UTR-BADH has the constitutive 16 S rRNA promoter driving the expression of the dicistron, but BADH is under the regulation of the promoter and the 5′ UTR of the psbA gene and the 3′ UTR of psbA gene, for enhanced expression. Since the expression of the foreign protein is desired in chromoplasts of corn seeds, the gene of interest needs to be under the control of a regulatory sequence that is free from cellular control.
- suitable candidate regulatory sequences are the T7 gene 10-leader sequence and cry2Aa2 UTR. The T7 gene 10-leader sequence is used to express foreign proteins in transgenic chromoplasts.
- the cry2Aa2 UTR has been shown by the inventor to accumulate as much foreign protein in chromoplasts as efficient as the psbA UTR in green tissues. Therefore the selectable marker for additional vectors use the BADH gene under the regulation of psbA promoter and 5′UTR, as psbA is one of the most efficiently translated chloroplast genes in green tissues.
- psbA is one of the most efficiently translated chloroplast genes in green tissues.
- green tissue or non-green embryogenic calli are used for introducing the transgene into the corn chloroplast genome, it is preferred to use the light regulated psbA promoter/UTR or 16 S rRNA promoter/gene 10 UTR, respectively.
- Annual ryegrass chloroplast transformation vector facilitates the integration of transgene into the inverted repeat (IR) region of the annual ryegrass chloroplast genome.
- the vector pLD-Ryegrass-BADH contains the chimeric aadA gene and the BADH gene driven by the constitutive 16 S rRNA promoter and regulated by the 3′ UTR region of psbA gene from petunia plastid genome.
- aadA and BADH possess the chloroplast preferred ribosomal binding site, GGAGG.
- Another vector used for ryegrass chloroplast transformation pLD-ryegrass-UTR-BADH has the constitutive 16 S rRNA promoter driving the expression of the dicistron, but BADH is under the regulation of the promoter and the 5′ UTR of the psbA gene and the 3′ UTR of psbA gene, for enhanced expression.
- BADH is under the regulation of the promoter and the 5′ UTR of the psbA gene and the 3′ UTR of psbA gene, for enhanced expression.
- green tissue or non-green embryogenic calli are used for introducing the transgene into the corn chloroplast genome, it is preferred to use the light regulated psbA promoter/UTR or 16 S rRNA promoter/gene 10 UTR, respectively.
- LF amino terminal domain amino acid residues 1-254 (27 kDa) contains all the information necessary for binding PA and mediating translocation, and this domain alone is nontoxic because the catalytic domain of LF, residues 255-776, is responsible for lethality. Titers of antibody to both PA and LF from mice immunized with the combination were 4 to 5 times greater than titers from mice immunized with either alone.
- LF27-PA63 PA63 is the cleaved active form of PA
- CTB-LF27 fusion proteins LF27 and PA independently within the same edible plant as a standard.
- the LF27-PA63 and CTB-LF27 constructs are expressed alone and together as an operon in corn and ryegrass. It has been demonstrated that Rotavirus enterotoxin proteins fused with CTB is processed via the MHC II pathway generating a strong T-cell response. Thus CTB-fusion proteins produced in plants are ideal for oral delivery.
- CTB-LF27 and PA-LF27 we maximize immunity to lethal toxin challenge.
- Gm1 ganglioside and anthrax toxin receptor can be bound by ligands and work synergistically for maximum immune response.
- a flexible hinge was introduced between fusion proteins to reduce steric hindrance. Specifically a glycine-proline-glycine-proline hinge between CTB-LF27 and proline-glycine-proline-glycine hinge between LF27-PA63 was used. The application of less frequently used codons in plants within the hinge peptide promotes translational arrest during the protein elongation process, facilitating subunit folding prior to translation. The efficiency of folding of some proteins is increased by controlled rates of translation in vivo.
- IEs immature embryos
- IEs embryogenic callus derived from IEs
- Microprojectiles are coated with plasmid DNA (chloroplast vectors) and bombardments are carried out with the biolistic device PDS 1000/He (Bio-Rad) as is well-known in the art relating to the use of the “gene-gun.”
- PDS 1000/He Bio-Rad
- Expression levels from chloroplast regulatory sequences and the size of the proplastids are limiting factors for the successful chloroplast transformation using non-green, embryogenic callus tissues as a target for the gene transfer. Therefore, it is most desirable, when using the present invention with plant species not tested here, to compare green shoot meristematic cultures with non-green embryogenic callus as target tissue for chloroplast transformation. Protocols for the establishment of these tissue types are reported for corn and the grasses and are established in the Alpeters laboratory at University of Florida at Gainesville for ryegrass.
- BADH and aadA selectable markers are compared with the corresponding selective agents. Selection is to be maintained during the regeneration process of plants. Regenerated plants are then analyzed by PCR and Southern blot for integration in the corn or ryegrass plastome.
- PCR is done using DNA isolated from control and transgenic plants in order to distinguish a) true chloroplast transformants from mutants and b) chloroplast transformants from nuclear transformants.
- the 3′ primer will anneal to the selectable marker gene while the 5′ primer will anneal to the native chloroplast genome.
- No PCR product is expected with nuclear transgenic plants or mutants using this set of primers. This screening is essential to eliminate mutants and nuclear transformants.
- Total DNA from wildtype and transgenic plants is isolated and used as a template for PCR reactions. Southern blots allow one skilled in the art to determine the copy number of the introduced foreign gene per cell as well as to test homoplasmy.
- chloroplast genome there are several thousand copies of the chloroplast genome present in each plant cell. When foreign genes are inserted into the chloroplast genome, not all chloroplasts will integrate foreign DNA resulting in heteroplasmy. To ensure that only the transformed genome exists in transgenic plants (homoplasmy), the selection process is continued. In order to confirm homoplasmy at the end of the selection cycle, total DNA from transgenic plants is probed with the chloroplast border (flanking) sequences (the trnI-trnA fragment). Wild type fragment size is observed along with the larger fragments of transformed plastomes. Presence of a large fragment (due to insertion of foreign genes within the flanking sequences) and absence of the native small fragment confirms homoplasmy. The copy number of the integrated gene is determined by establishing homoplasmy for the transgenic chloroplast genome.
- vectors for the production of an orally administrable form of PA are introduced in ryegrass and corn plants.
- Site specific vector integration into the ryegrass or corn plastome is then confirmed by PCR and Southern blot analysis as specified.
- Western blot verification of PA verifies that recombinant anthrax protective antigen proteins are antigenically similar to native PA using monoclonal antibodies against PA (Advanced ImmunoChemical G1-Ba1).
- PA is quantified by a ELISA using purified PA antigen as standard and commercially available antibody.
- Electron microscopy is next carried out in mature leaves of chloroplast or mature seeds amyloplasts of transgenic plants to detect inclusion bodies according a protocol and similar to several published electron micrographs of transgenic chloroplasts, with immunogold label of foreign proteins.
- the PA protein is then purified using a two step protocol, such as that described in Ahuja, N., Kumar, P., & Bhatnagar, R. (2001), Rapid Purification of Recombinant Anthrax-Protective Antigen under Nondenaturing Conditions, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 286, 6-11.
- the protein is purified on AKTA-FPLC using anion exchange Resource Q column (Pharmacia).
- the protein is then eluted from the column with a 20 ml decreasing gradient of ammonium sulphate. Fractions of 1 ml each are collected, analyzed on SDS-PAGE, and those containing PA are pooled. With an affinity tag, the PA protein can optionally be purified using metal-chelate affinity chromatography under denaturing conditions. Ten ml of each fraction is then analyzed on 12% SDS-PAGE. Fractions containing the protein are collected, pooled, and dialyzed against 10 mM Hepes buffer containing 50 mM NaCl and stored frozen at ⁇ 70.degree. C. in suitable aliquots.
- Recombinant PA proteins are then assayed for their functional activity in the J774A1 (American Type Culture Collection) macrophage lysis assay. Varying concentrations of PA protein along with LF (1 mg/ml) are added to the cells. The native PA along with LF is kept as the positive control. After 3 h, cell viability is determined using the MTT (3-(4,5-dimethyl thiazol-2-yl),-5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) dye and the resulting precipitate is dissolved in a buffer containing 0.5% (w/v) sodium dodecyl sulfate, 25 mM HCl in 90% isopropyl alcohol. Absorption at 540 nm is measured and percent viability determined.
- MTT 3-(4,5-dimethyl thiazol-2-yl),-5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide
- PA can be tested for susceptibility to cleavage by trypsin.
- the PA protein 1.0 mg/ml
- trypsin (1 ng/mg of protein) for 30 min at room temperature in 25 mM Hepes, 1 mM CaCl 2 , 0.5 mM EDTA, pH 7.5.
- the digestion reaction is stopped by adding PMSF to a concentration of 1 mM.
- Trypsin nicked PA (1.0 mg/ml) is incubated with LF (1.0 mg/ml) and in 25 mM Tris, pH 9.0, containing 2 mg/ml CHAPS (3- ⁇ (3-cholamidopropyl) dimethyl ammonio ⁇ -propanesulfonic acid) for 15 min at room temperature. Samples are applied to nondenaturing 4.5% polyacrylamide gel.
- the binding of PA protein to cell surface receptor is analyzed in 24 well plates using constant amount of radio-iodinated native PA (0.1 mg/ml).
- J774A.1 (ATCC) cells are washed twice with cold HBSS for 5 minutes each time and then placed on ice. The medium is replaced with cold binding medium (DMEM, Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium, without sodium bicarbonate containing 1% bovine serum albumin and 25 mM, Hepes, pH 7.4).
- DMEM Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium, without sodium bicarbonate containing 1% bovine serum albumin and 25 mM, Hepes, pH 7.4
- the cells are incubated with 0.1 mg/ml of iodinated PA and varying concentrations of the recombinant PA protein at 4.degree. C. for 3 h and then washed with cold HBSS. The cells are then dissolved in 0.1 N NaOH and radioactivity measured in Gamma counter.
- Leaves from transgenic lines producing epitope tagged products are frozen and powdered at 4.degree. C. using a microdismembranator and proteins are extracted in PBS with 1% Triton X-100. Fusion proteins are purified by affinity chromatography on a nickel-agarose bed, using standard 6-His methods, as described above.
- Corn and ryegrass expressing PA as potential edible vaccines against anthrax are characterized using the protocol described above. These are then evaluated for the ability of PA-expressing corn seeds or corn or ryegrass leaves or bay to function as edible vaccines for the induction of serum and mucosal (bronchial lavage, nasal, vaginal, and fecal) antibodies by ELISA. Antibodies induced by feeding the transgenic corn or ryegrass to mammals neutralize the biologic activity of anthrax lethal toxin. This activity can be confirmed in an in vitro macrophage cytotoxicity assay. Antibody responses in mice and humans following ingestion of transgenic potatoes and corn expressing recombinant bacterial proteins have been successfully demonstrated.
- mice and other mammals by feeding transgenic plants or plant parts is accomplished as follows.
- female BALB/c mice are fed transgenic corn or ryegrass, control corn or ryegrass, or soluble rPA in conjunction with the mucosal adjuvant LT(R192G).
- the amount of rPA fed to control animals is based upon the amount of PA in the transgenic corn or ryegrass fed to the animals. That amount correlates with the amount of transgenic corn or ryegrass a mouse will consume in a one hour period. Mice tend to eat grass if a small amount of vanilla extract is placed on each leaf.
- Two additional groups can be included in which the mucosal adjuvant LT(R192G) is administered in conjunction with the transgenic or control corn or ryegrass.
- Edible vaccines administered to mice often require the presence of a mucosal adjuvant due to the small amount of material that can be consumed by a mouse. However, this is not necessary when using the plants of the present invention to vaccinate humans, or other large mammals due to the volume which can be consumed by the animal. Twenty-five micrograms of the adjuvant should be applied directly to the corn or ryegrass before consumption when testing mice.
- Intranasal immunization is accomplished in mice as follows. Mice are first lightly anesthetized with Isoflurane for approximately 45 seconds. The immunizing inoculum (5-10 ml per animal/per dose) is delivered intranasally to the external nares of one nostril with a pipette tip.
- Oral immunization consisted of 500 ml of the antigen preparation in saline delivered intragastrically with a blunt-tip feeding needle (Popper & Sons, Inc.).
- BAL Bronchoalveolar lavages
- a flexible 24 gauge canula is inserted into the posterior opening of the nasopharynx and a total of 150 ml ml PBS+ protease inhibitor is injected into the opening.
- the outflow is collected as the nasal wash.
- Vaginal washes are obtained by washing the vaginal mucosa three times with 50 .mu.l of PBS containing 0.01% NaN.sub.3.
- feces are collected and frozen overnight at ⁇ 70.degree.
- Biotinylated anti-mouse IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b or IgG3 followed by alkaline phosphatase conjugated streptavidin are used to quantify antibody isotypes.
- Optical density at 405 nm is determined using an ELISA reader.
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Microbiology (AREA)
- Biotechnology (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Biophysics (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Pharmacology & Pharmacy (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
- Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Zoology (AREA)
- Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Mycology (AREA)
- Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
- Epidemiology (AREA)
- Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Plant Pathology (AREA)
- Cell Biology (AREA)
- Breeding Of Plants And Reproduction By Means Of Culturing (AREA)
- Medicines Containing Antibodies Or Antigens For Use As Internal Diagnostic Agents (AREA)
- Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)
Abstract
Vaccines for conferring immunity in mammals to infective pathogens are provided, as well as vectors and methods for plastid transformation of plants to produce protective antigens and vaccines for oral delivery. The invention further provides transformed plastids having the ability to survive selection in both the light and the dark, at different developmental stages by using genes coding for two different enzymes capable of detoxifying the same selectable marker, driven by regulatory signals that are functional in proplastids as well as in mature chloroplasts. The invention utilizes antibiotic-free selectable markers to provide edible vaccines for conferring immunity to a mammal against Bacillus anthracis, as well as Yersina pestis. The vaccines are operative by parenteral administration as well. The invention also extends to the transformed plants, plant parts, and seeds and progeny thereof. The invention is applicable to monocot and dicot plants.
Description
- The present application is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 12/014,352 filed Jan. 15, 2008, which is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 10/500,351 filed Jan. 3, 2005, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,354,760, which is a national stage filing of PCT/US02/41503 filed Dec. 26, 2002, which claims priority to U.S. Ser. Nos. 60/400,816 filed Aug. 2, 2002, 60/393,651 filed Jul. 3, 2002, and 60/344,704 filed Dec. 26, 2001 which are incorporated herein in their entirety by reference.
- Yersinia pestis is the causative agent of bubonic and pneumonic plague. Bacillus anthracis is the causative agent for the anthrax disease. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (hereinafter “CDC”) lists Y. pestis and B. anthracis as two of the six Category A biological agents that pose a risk to national security.
- Yersinia pestis
- The etiologic agent of plague is the Gram-negative bacterium Yersinia pestis. The natural route of transmission of Y. pestis from one animal host to another is either directly or via a flea vector. Plague is endemic in some regions of the world and outbreaks occasionally occur as a consequence of natural disasters. Y. pestis is also a concern as one of the microorganisms with potential for use against civilian or military populations as a biological warfare/biological terrorism agent. In such a situation, the pneumonic form of plague would be the most likely outcome. This form of plague is particularly devastating because of the rapidity of onset, the high mortality, and the rapid spread of the disease. Immunization against aerosolized plague presents a particular challenge for vaccine developers. There is currently no vaccine for plague.
- Both live attenuated and killed plague vaccines have been used in man, although questions remain about their safety and relative efficacy, especially against the pneumonic form of infection. Since plague remains endemic in some regions of the world, and because of the possibility of the illegitimate use of Y. pestis as a biological warfare agent, development of improved vaccines against plague is a high priority. The ideal vaccine should be deliverable in a minimum of doses and quickly produce high titer and long-lasting antibodies. Moreover, such a vaccine should protect against aerosolized transmission of Y. pestis.
- The two most recently described approaches to development of improved plague vaccines are 1) attenuated mutants of Y. pestis and 2) subunit vaccines. The potential efficacy of attenuated mutants of Y. pestis as vaccines is supported by experience with the live attenuated vaccine strain EV76. This vaccine has been in use since 1908 and is given as a single dose Immunization of mice with EV76 induces an immune response and protects mice against subcutaneous and inhalation (aerosolized) infection. However, this vaccine strain is not avirulent and has an unacceptable safety profile. Moreover, multiple variants of the classical EV76 strain exist that differ significantly in passage history and genetic characteristics. Recent studies have focused on creating defined genetically attenuated mutants of Y. pestis, similar to those created in other Gram-negative bacteria (i.e., Salmonella spp.). For unknown reasons, genetic mutations, which markedly attenuate Salmonella spp. do not attenuate Y. pestis. For instance, an aroA mutant of Y. pestis was fully virulent in the murine model of disease but avirulent in guinea pigs.
- A number of potential subunit vaccines have been evaluated for immunogenicity and protective efficacy against Y. pestis. The two most promising are F1 and V. F1 is a capsular protein located on the surface of the bacterium and the V antigen is a component of the Y. pestis Type III secretion system. These proteins have been produced recombinantly and induce protective immune responses when administered individually. A combination or fusion of F1 and V may have an additive protective effect when used to immunize humans against plague. It is thought that F1-V fusion protein should provide protection against both subcutaneous and aerosol challenge, and will have the potential to provide protective immunity against pneumonic as well as bubonic plague due to either wild type F1+ Y. pestis or to naturally occurring F1-variants. To date no one has been able to express the F1-V fusion protein in transgenic chloroplast. Such an accomplishment would provide a large supply of high-quality antigen for vaccines.
- Bacillus anthracis
- Bacillus anthracis is the organism that causes the anthrax disease. It is a Gram-positive, nonmotile, aerobic or facultatively anaerobic, spore-forming bacterium. The spores are about 1 .mu.m in size, extremely hardy, resistant to gamma rays, UV light, drying, heat, and many disinfectants. Spores germinate upon entering an environment rich in glucose, amino acids, and nucleosides, such as in animal and human tissues and blood. The vegetative cells enter the spore state when the nutrients are exhausted or when the organisms are exposed to molecular oxygen in the air.
- Anthrax is typically a disease of animals, especially herbivores such as cows, sheep, and goats. It affects humans through contact with the spores in one of three ways. Cutaneous anthrax occurs when the spores enter the body through a cut or an abrasion on the skin. Gastrointestinal anthrax occurs when the spores enters the body through consumption of contaminated meat products. Inhalation anthrax occurs when the spores enter the body through inhalation of the spores.
- When spores enter the body, macrophages engulf them, migrate to regional lymph nodes and the spores germinate into vegetative bacteria. Macrophages release the vegetative bacteria and they spread through the blood and lymph until there are up to 10.sup.8 bacilli per milliliter of blood. The exotoxins are produced from bacteria and they lead to symptoms and possible death. Spores can survive in the lungs or lymph nodes up to 60 days before germination occurs. In animal experiments, it has been seen that once toxin secretion has reached a critical threshold, death will occur, even if the blood is rendered sterile through the use of antibiotics. From primate studies, the estimated lethal dose of inhaled anthrax spores sufficient to kill 50% of humans exposed to it (the LD50) is 2,500-55,000 spores.
- The CDC lists anthrax as a category A disease agent and estimates the cost of an anthrax attack would be $26.2 billion per 100,000 persons exposed. The only vaccine licensed for human use in the U.S., Biothrax (formerly Anthrax vaccine adsorbed, or AVA), is an aluminum hydroxide-adsorbed, formalin-treated culture supernatant of a toxigenic, nonencapsulated, non-proteolytic strain of Bacillus anthracis. In addition to the immunogenic protective antigen (PA), the vaccine contains trace amounts of edema factor (EF) and lethal factor (LF) that may contribute to the local reactions seen in 5-7% of vaccine recipients, or reported to be toxic causing side-effects. There is a clear need and urgency for an improved vaccine for anthrax and for improved production methods that allow it to be mass-produced at reasonable cost.
- There are two main virulence factors associated with B. anthracis, the polyglutamyl capsule which is believed to prevent the vegetative bacterial cells from being phagocytized and the exotoxins. Two different exotoxins are produced by three factors. PA binds to the host cell, LF is a zinc metalloprotease which inactivates mitogen-activated protein kinase. The edema toxin is formed when PA binds to EF. This toxin increases cyclic AMP (cAMP) levels in the cell which upsets the water homeostasis resulting in accumulation of fluid called edema. The lethal toxin is formed from binding of PA and LF. This toxin stimulates macrophages to release interleukin-1b, tumor necrosis factor a, and other cytokines which contribute to shock and sudden death.
- Anthrax has become a serious threat due to its potential use in bioterrorism and recent outbreaks among wild-life in the United States. Concerns regarding vaccine purity, the current requirement for six injections followed by yearly boosters, and a limited supply of the key protective antigen (PA), underscore the urgent need for an improved vaccine.
- The present invention pertains to vaccines for conferring immunity in mammals to infective pathogens, as well as vectors and methods for plastid transformation of plants to produce protective antigens and vaccines for oral delivery. The invention further provides transformed plastids having the ability to survive selection in both the light and the dark, at different developmental stages by using genes coding for two different enzymes capable of detoxifying the same selectable marker, driven by regulatory signals that are functional in proplastids as well as in mature chloroplasts. The invention utilizes antibiotic-free selectable markers to provide edible vaccines for conferring immunity to a mammal against Bacillus anthracis, as well as Yersina pestis. The vaccines are operative by parenteral administration as well. The invention also extends to the transformed plants, plant parts, and seeds and progeny thereof. The invention is applicable to monocot and dicot plants.
-
FIG. 1 is a schematic view of anthrax chloroplast constructs according to the present invention, and a view of a southern blot.FIG. 1A shows the pLD-JW1 vector used for chloroplast transformation.FIG. 1B shows the pLD-JW2 construct.FIG. 1C shows PCR with the primers 3P and 3M.FIG. 1D shows a PCR analysis of randomly selected clones. -
FIG. 2 is a schematic view of anthrax chloroplast constructs according to the present invention, and views of southern blots.FIG. 2A shows expected products from digestion of wild type untransformed plant.FIG. 2B shows expected products from digestion of a plant transformed with pLD-JW1.FIG. 2C shows expected products from digestion of a plant transformed with pLD-JW2.FIG. 2D shows a flanking sequence probe showing heteroplasmy in pLD-JW1 line and homoplasmy in pLD-JW2 lines.FIG. 2E shows a pag sequence probe showing presence of pag in transgenic lines. -
FIG. 3 shows Western blots demonstrating PA expression of transgenic lines containing different constructs.FIG. 3A shows a western blot of pLD-JW1 T.sub.1 transgenic lines for PA quantification. Lane 1: wild type; Lane 2: Ladder; Lane 3: 20 ng PA; Lane 4: 10 ng PA; Lane 5: 5 ng PA; Lane 6: 1:10 dilution pLD-JW1 line; Lane 7: 1:20 dilution pLD-JW1 line.FIG. 3B shows a western blot of pLD-JW2 T.sub.1 transgenic lines for PA quantification. Lane 1: wild type; Lane 2: Ladder; Lane 3: 20 ng PA; Lane 4: 10 ng PA; Lane 5: 5 ng PA; Lane 6: blank; Lane 7: 1:10 dilution pLD-JW2 line # 1; Lane 8: 1:20 dilution pLD-JW2 line # 1; Lane 9: 1:10 dilution pLD-JW2 line # 2; Lane 10:1:20 dilution pLD-JW2 line # 2.FIG. 3C shows a western blot comparing extraction buffers, containing CHAPS and SDS, and both, and measuring stability of extracts at 4.degree. C., where “Sup” means supernatant fraction, “Hom” means homogenate (soluble and insoluble fractions). The construct used was pLD-JW2. -
FIG. 4 shows western blots of T.sub.1 pLD-JW1 plant in continuous light inFIGS. 4A and 4B , and inFIG. 4C shows histogram of .mu.g PA/g fresh tissue in young, mature, and old leaves after 3 and 5 days of continuous illumination. -
FIG. 5 shows graphs of the results of macrophage cytotoxic assays for extracts from transgenic plants.FIG. 5A shows supernatant and homogenate samples from T.sub.0 pLD-JW1 tested.FIG. 5B shows Supernatant samples from T.sub.1 pLD-JW1 tested. -
FIG. 6 is a schematic view of tomato vector construct pLD Tom-BADH. -
FIG. 7 is a schematic of the pTOM-BADH2-G10-pag tomato vector constructFIG. 8 shows PCR analysis of the products of tomato vectors using BADH primers, wherein + is pTOM-G10-PA vector control, − is WT Tomato plant, and #3 is transgenic tomato plant. -
FIG. 9 showstomato seedlings 12 days after seed germination. -
FIG. 10 shows tomato cotyledons ready for bombardment. -
FIG. 11 shows cut and bombarded cotyledons. -
FIG. 12 shows the serum anti-PA as determined by ELISA and the in vitro toxin neutralization by serum antibodies following intranasal immunization. -
FIG. 13A is a schematic view of a pLDS-F1V vector construct, whileFIG. 13B shows restriction enzyme analysis of the pLDS-F1V vector. -
FIG. 14A shows PCR reactions to determine pLDS-F1V vector integration into the chloroplast genome of Petit Havana, while 14B shows a second PCR reaction, which is also used to determine pLDS-F1V transgene integration. -
FIG. 15A shows a Western Blot of pLDS-F1V from XL1-Blue strain of E coli, while 15B shows Western Blots of F1V expression in transgenic chloroplasts. -
FIG. 16 is a schematic of constructs to be inserted in edible plants, where “gene X” represents each of LF27-PA63, CTB-LF27, LF27-PA63+CTB-LF27, LF27+PA. -
FIG. 17A is a schematic view of a pDD34-ZM-gfp-BADH vector construct, while 17B shows the subsequent expression of the construct containing GFP in E. coli. -
FIG. 18A is a schmetactic of pDD33-ZM-aadA-BADH vector construction, and 18B shows the subsequent expression of the construct in E. coli grown on spectinomycin. -
FIG. 19(A-C) show GFP expression in embryogenic maize cultures where a is non-transgenic control and b and c are transformed maize embryonic calli. -
FIG. 20A shows maize control and transgenic plants on regeneration medium containing spectomycin, whileFIG. 20B shows PCR confirmation of chloroplast transgenic plants using appropriate primers. -
FIG. 21A is a schematic view of a pDD37-DC-gfp-BADH carrot chloroplast transformation vector, while 21B illustrates GFP expression in E. coli. -
FIG. 22A is a schematic of a vector construct pDD36-DC aadA-BADH carrot chloroplast transformation vector, while 22B illustrates the expression of the vector using E. coli cells grown on spectinomycin. -
FIG. 23(A-D) shows Expression of GFP in different stages of transgenic cultures of carrot. -
FIG. 24 is a schematic view of a Double Barreled Plastid Vector harboring aphA-6 and aphA-2 genes conferring resistance to aminoglycosides according to the present invention. - The concept of chloroplast genetic engineering, allows the introduction of isolated intact chloroplasts into protoplasts and regeneration of transgenic plants. Early investigations involving chloroplast transformation focused on the development of in organello systems using intact chloroplasts capable of efficient and prolonged transcription, translation, and expression of foreign genes in isolated chloroplasts. However, the discovery of the gene gun as a transformation device made it possible to transform plant chloroplasts without the use of isolated plastids and protoplasts. Chloroplast genetic engineering has been accomplished in several phases. Studies have been made on the transient expression of foreign genes in plastids of monocots and dicots. Unique to the chloroplast genetic engineering is the development of a foreign gene expression system using autonomously replicating chloroplast expression vectors. Stable integration of a selectable marker gene into the tobacco chloroplast genome was also accomplished using the gene gun. Recently, useful genes conferring valuable traits via chloroplast genetic engineering have been demonstrated. Plants resistant to Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) sensitive and resistant insects were obtained by integrating the cryIAc and cry2A genes into the tobacco chloroplast genome.
- Chloroplast genomes of plants have also been genetically engineered to confer herbicide resistance where the introduced foreign genes were maternally inherited. This was a significant step in the development of commercially viable genetically modified plants because it alleviates any concerns over the problem of out-crossing traits with weeds or other crops.
- For large-scale foreign protein production, plants are an ideal choice due to the relative ease of genetic manipulation, rapid scale up (million seeds per plant), large biomass, and the potential to find alternative uses for various crops. A remarkable feature of chloroplast genetic engineering is the observation of exceptionally large accumulation of foreign proteins in transgenic plants (as much as 46% of CRY protein in total soluble protein) even in bleached old leaves. Using chloroplast transformation technology, large quantities of protective antigen can be produced in transgenic plants, due to the presence of thousands of copies of transgenes per cell as opposed to only a few copies in nuclear transgenic plants. By “protective antigen” is meant that the antigen elicits an immunogenic response in mammals when administered by an appropriate route in an appropriate amount. Transgenic chloroplast technology has been used to hyper-express bacterial proteins—up to 46% of total soluble protein from Bacillus genes, the highest ever reported in transgenic plants. However, large heterologous proteins are not always processed correctly. Furthermore, such proteins are subject to attack by proteolytic enzymes after formation. The cholera toxin B subunit is about 11 kilodaltons in size. The anthrax protective antigen is about 83 kd in size, presenting a significant challenge to production in a chloroplast. A similar challenge is presented by the F1-V antigen, which is a fusion protein. Such fusion proteins have not heretofore been successfully expressed in chloroplasts. Chloroplasts are prokaryotic in nature and express native bacterial genes (like B subunit of cholera toxin) at very high levels (410-fold higher than nuclear expression). Production in chloroplasts is in sharp contrast to nuclear expression, that often requires extensive codon modifications because of high AT content, unfavorable codons, presence of mRNA destabilizing sequences, and cryptic polyadenylation or splice sites. Chloroplast transformation typically utilizes two flanking sequences that, through homologous recombination, insert transgenes into spacer regions between functional genes of the chloroplast genome, thus targeting transgenes to a known location. This eliminates the “position effect” and gene silencing frequently observed in nuclear transgenic plants. Chloroplast genetic engineering is an environmentally friendly approach, minimizing concerns of out-cross of introduced traits via pollen to weeds or other related crops. The chloroplast genome may be engineered without the use of antibiotic resistant genes as well for the development of edible vaccines. The term “edible vaccine” as used herein refers to a substance which may be given orally which will elicit a protective immunogenic response in a mammal.
- The difficulty of engineering the chloroplast genome without antibiotic resistant genes has recently been overcome by modifying chloroplasts without these genes. Engineering genetically modified crops without these genes eliminates their potential transfer to the environment and to microbes in the gut. Antibiotic-free selection can be accomplished by using the betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase (BADH) gene from spinach as a selectable marker. Specifically, the Applicant's published application, WO01/64023, which is hereby incorporated by reference, demonstrates using an antibiotic free selectable marker. The selection process involves conversion of toxic betaine aldehyde (BA) to non-toxic glycine betaine, which also serves as an osmoprotectant and helps confer drought tolerance.
- The Applicant has transformed the chloroplast of edible monocot and dicot species, as is illustrated in the accompanying Figures. Specifically, the figures illustrate the stable transformation of carrot and corn chloroplast genomes, which has not previously been accomplished. The transformation of carrot, tomato, and corn allow the production of edible vaccines. These transformed plants also allow the purification and use of the antigens produced by these plants as high purity parenteral vaccines. However, the production of edible vaccines is preferred for their ease of use and low cost.
-
FIGS. 17A and 18A illustrate the construction of maize chloroplast transformation vector, where flanking regions were amplified using PCR. The PCR products were cloned and the expression cassette was inserted in the transcriptionally active spacer region between trnI/trnA genes. The expression cassette ofFIG. 17A has the Prrn promoter driving the expression of GFP and BADH, which are regulated by (5′) gene10/rps16 3′ andpsbA 5′/3′ UTRs respectively. The expression cassette of 18A has the Prrn promoter driving the expression of aadA and BADH. The latter gene is regulated by (5′) gene10/rps16 3′ UTRs. - Functions of the genes in the carrot chloroplast transformation vectors were tested in E. coli. For observing GFP expression, cells were plated on LB agar (Amp) plates and incubated at 37.degree. C. overnight. Cells harboring pDD34-ZM-GFP-BADH were seen to fluoresce when exposed to UV light, as is seen in
FIG. 17B . To test the aadA gene expression, cells harboring pDD33-ZM-aadA-BADH plasmid were plated on LB agar plates containing spectinomycin (100 mg/ml) and incubated at 37.degree. C. overnight. Transformed cells grow on spectinomycin, as can be seen inFIG. 18B . -
FIG. 19 shows GFP expression in embryogenic maize cultures studied under the confocal microscope.FIG. 19A is a non-transgenic control, whileFIG. 19B-C are transformed maize embryogenic calli. - The selection in
FIG. 19 was initiated two days after bombardment by transferring the bombarded calli to callus induction medium containing BA or streptomycin. After eight weeks, a number of the healthy growing calli from different bombardment experiments were examined for GFP expression under the fluorescent stereomicroscope and the confocal microscope. Somatic embryos were regenerated on maize regeneration medium containing BA or streptomycin. -
FIG. 20A shows maize plants on regeneration medium containing streptomycin or betaine aldehyde.FIG. 20A illustrates maize chloroplast transgenic plants which were capable of growth on the selection agent indicating that construction of transgenic maize, while untransfomed maize plants did not grow on the selection medium. -
FIG. 20B shows PCR confirmation of chloroplast transgenic plants using appropriate primers. Lanes 1-3, plants transformed with pDD34-ZM-gfp-BADH and Lanes 4-5, plants transformed with pDD33-ZM-aadA-BADH. Lanes − and + represent the negative and positive controls respectively. Genomic DNA was isolated from the leaf tissues and PCR was performed on transformed and non-transformed tissues using appropriate primers. -
FIGS. 21A and 22A show the schematic construction of carrot chloroplast transformation vectors. The construction of the carrot chloroplast transformation vector illustrated inFIGS. 21A and 22A have flanking regions that were amplified using PCR. The PCR products were then cloned and the expression cassette was inserted in the transcriptionally active spacer region between trnI/trnA genes. The expression cassette ofFIG. 21A has the Prrn promoter driving the expression of GFP and BADH, which are regulated by (5′) gene10/rps16 3′ andpsbA 5′/3′ UTRs respectively. The expression cassette ofFIG. 22A has the Prrn promoter driving the expression of aadA and BADH. The latter gene is regulated by (5′) gene10/rps16 3′ UTRs. - Functions of the genes in the carrot chloroplast transformation vectors were tested in E. coli. For observing GFP expression, cells were plated on LB agar (Amp) plates and incubated at 370 C overnight. Cells harboring pDD37-DC-GFP-BADH were seen to fluoresce when exposed to UV light (A). To test the aadA gene expression, cells harboring pDD36-DC-aadA-BADH plasmid were plated on LB agar plates containing spectinomycin (100 mg/ml) and incubated at 370 C overnight. Transformed cells grow on spectinomycin (B).
- Functions of the genes in the carrot chloroplast transformation vectors were tested in E. coli. For observing GFP expression, cells were plated on LB agar (Amp) plates and incubated at 37.degree. C. overnight. Cells harboring pDD34-ZM-GFP-BADH were seen to fluoresce when exposed to UV light as is seen in
FIG. 21B . To test the aadA gene expression, cells harboring pDD33-ZM-aadA-BADH plasmid were plated on LB agar plates containing spectinomycin (100 .mu.g/ml) and incubated at 37.degree. C. overnight. Transformed cells grow on spectinomycin, as is seen inFIG. 22B . -
FIG. 23 (A-D) shows expression of GFP in different stages of transgenic carrot cultures studied under confocal microscope (A) Untransformed control, (B) Embryogenic callus, (C) Embryogenic callus differentiated into globular somatic embryos and (D) Somatic embryo with differentiated cotyledons. - The aforementioned transformation of maize and carrot chloroplast provides a novel approach for improved vaccines with the creation of an edible vaccine, which provides a heat stable environment, allows easy administration at lower cost, and stimulates the mucosal and systemic immune responses. There still remain a number of hurdles which need to be overcome, such as the fact that protective antigens tend to be very large and unstable proteins (83 kDa); such large proteins have never been expressed before in transgenic chloroplasts, and to date the Applicant is unaware of the expression and assembly of heptamers in transgenic chloroplasts.
- Based upon the vector construct described above and set-forth in further detail in this application, it is possible to have a general construct in edible plants where it can be determined through experimentation which construct can elicit the strongest immune response to bacterial toxin challenges such as, but not limiting, plague or anthrax. As an example,
FIG. 16 offers a schematic of a construct as an example of construct which could elicit an immune response to anthrax where, in this non-limiting example, gene X is chosen from; 1) LF27-PA63; 2) CTB-LF27; 3) LF27-PA63+CTB-LF27; 4) LF27+PA. These antigens derived from these genes have been shown to elicit the immune response to anthrax. It is noted however that a number of known genes, which code for a bacterial antigen could be utilized in the construct. - Edible vaccines are heat stable unlike conventional vaccines which tend to be heat sensitive. An edible vaccine has a longer shelf life and does not require expensive refrigeration equipment. The heat sensitivity of the conventional vaccine makes it expensive, capricious and destination limited with a series of refrigeration steps during the transportation process from manufacture to final destination. Another major cause for the high cost of biopharmaceutical production is purification; for example, during insulin production, chromatography accounts for 30% of the production cost and 70% of the set up cost. Therefore, oral delivery of properly folded and fully functional biopharmaceuticals could potentially reduce production costs by 90%. In one study it was estimated that the banana could deliver a vaccine (Hepatitis B) at two cents per dose compared to approximately $125 per dose for conventional Hepatitis B vaccine injection. Bioencapsulation of pharmaceutical proteins within plant cells offers protection against digestion in the stomach while allowing successful delivery. In three human clinical trials performed with plant derived vaccines, plant cells proved sufficient for vaccinogen protection against digestion, and the resulting vaccinogen induced systemic and mucosal immune responses without the aid of adjuvants. Oral administration of PA has also been reported to offer protection against B. anthracis using an attenuated Salmonella strain expressing PA. However, in all these studies the limitation is the low levels of antigen expression which is overcome by the present invention.
- It should be understood that the examples set forth herein are non-limiting examples, and the vectors can be used on a number of plants. The following description is capable of being utilized as illustration and guide work for transformation of plants to express any bacterial antigen gene. It can also be used to express viral antigen genes.
-
FIG. 1 shows tobacco constructs and PCR confirmation of chloroplast transgene integration.FIG. 1A shows the pLD-JW1 vector used for chloroplast transformation. The trnI and trnA genes were used as flanking sequences for homologous recombination. The constitutive 16s rRNA promoter (“16s” inFIG. 1C ) was used to regulate transcription. The aadA gene conferring spectinomycin resistance was used for selection of transgenic shoots. The pag gene coding for anthrax protective antigen was regulated by the psbA promoter and 5′ (5UTR) and 3′ UTR (T) elements. As shown inFIG. 1B , The pLD-JW2 construct was made by adding orf1,2 from B. thuringiensis to the pLD-JW1 vector.FIG. 1C shows a scheme for PCR using the primers 3P and 3M to investigate chloroplast transgene integration. The 3P primer anneals to the native chloroplast genome and the 3M primer anneals to the aadA gene, generating a 1.65 kb PCR product in chloroplast transgenic lines.FIG. 1D shows the results of an analysis of randomly selected clones. Lane 1: Ladder; Lane 2: Negative control wild type tobacco plant DNA; Lane 3: Positive transgenic plant DNA (pLD-5′UTR/HIS/THR/IFN.alpha.2b); Lane 4-8: 5 different transgenic lines tested. - The pLD-JW1 vector (8.3 kb, see
FIG. 1A ) was constructed to transform tobacco chloroplasts. This construct is based on the vector pLD the Applicant has used successfully in previous publications. Specifically, the construct is connected to the Applicants universal vectors, which are described in detail in PCT patent publication WO 99/10513, which is hereby incorporated by reference. The trnI and trnA genes were used as flanking sequences for homologous recombination to insert a pag-containing cassette into the spacer region between these two tRNA genes in the inverted repeat region of the chloroplast genome, as reported previously. It should be noted that it is possible to insert the pag containing cassette into any of a number of spacer regions between genes. The constitutive 16s rRNA promoter, which can be recognized by both the chloroplast encoded RNA polymerase and the nuclear encoded RNA polymerase, was used to drive transcription. Any of a number of promoters functional in plastids and well understood and known in the art can be used to help drive transcription. - The aadA gene conferring spectinomycin resistance was used for selection of transgenic shoots. It is noted however, that the use other antibiotic-resistant genes or an antibiotic free selectable marker such as BADH, could also be used in the construction of the vector. The pag gene coding for anthrax protective antigen was regulated by the
psbA 5′ and 3′ elements. The 5′UTR from psbA, including its promoter, was used for transcription and translation enhancement and the 3′UTR region conferred transcript stability. - One skilled in the art would recognize that an alternative chloroplast vector can be constructed without the use of any promoter, because all polycistronic spacer regions contain a native promoter which can be used to drive transcription.
- A second construct was made by adding orf1,2 from B. thuringiensis to the pLD-JW1 vector, forming the pLD-JW2 vector (see
FIG. 1B ). The orf1,2 gene codes for a putative chaperone. Including the orf1,2 gene was done to test whether the putative chaperone could fold a heterologous Bacillus protein (i.e., PA) into cuboidal crystals or form inclusion bodies, protect PA from proteolytic degradation, and thereby facilitate purification. - Transgene Integration into the Chloroplast Genome by PCR Analysis:
- Chloroplast transgenic lines were generated by particle bombardment as described previously. After bombarding Nicotiana tabacum cv. Petit Havana tobacco leaves with the chloroplast vectors, the leaves were grown on selective medium containing 500 .mu.g/ml spectinomycin. Three different genetic events can produce spectinomycin-resistant tobacco shoots: (1) transgene integration into chloroplasts, (2) into the nuclear genome or (3) spontaneous mutants. PCR with two specific primers, 3P and 3M, allowed identification of shoots having the desired chloroplast transgene integration. The 3P primer annealed to the native chloroplast genome and the 3M primer annealed to the aadA gene (see
FIG. 1C ). Nuclear transformants were eliminated because 3P will not anneal and mutants were ruled out because 3M will not anneal. At least 50 shoots were obtained in the initial transformation, a high frequency which suggests that there was no inhibitory effects of PA. Among clones tested, in both constructs, all were chloroplast transformants. No spontaneous mutants or nuclear transformants were observed (seeFIG. 1D ). - Southern blots were done to further verify that the transgenes had been integrated into the chloroplast genome and to determine homoplasmy (containing only transformed chloroplast genomes) or heteroplasmy (containing both transformed and untransformed chloroplast genomes). Total plant DNA was digested with the enzyme BglII which generated a 4.4-kb fragment in wild type, 5.2-kb and 3-kb fragments in pLD-JW1 transgenic lines, and 6.8-kb and 3-kb fragments in pLD-JW2 transgenic lines when hybridized with a 0.81-kb probe made from chloroplast flanking sequences (see
FIG. 2A-D ). The blots were also hybridized with a 0.52-kb probe made from pag coding sequence (seeFIG. 2E ). All of the pLD-JW2 plants appeared to be homoplasmic. In the pLD-JW1 plants,transgenic line 2 appeared to be heteroplasmic, which is not uncommon to find in T.sub.0 plants. T.sub.0 refers to first generation transgenic lines and T.sub.1 refers to second generation lines obtained by germination of seeds from T.sub.0. -
FIG. 2 shows southern blots to investigate the site of transgene integration and determine homoplasmy or heteroplasmy. The figure shows a schematic diagram of the expected products from digestion of wild type untransformed plant as follows:FIG. 2A shows plants transformed with pLD-JW1;FIG. 2B shows plants transformed with pLD-JW2.FIG. 2D shows a flanking sequence probe revealing heteroplasmy in pLD-JW1 line and homoplasmy in pLD-JW2 lines.FIG. 2E shows pag sequence probe showing presence of pag in transgenic lines. - Western blots were performed on transgenic lines containing the two different constructs. Full length 83-kDa polypeptide was detected/on blots, confirming PA expression in transgenic lines and absence of unique proteases that cleave PA in plant cells (see
FIGS. 3A-C ). Presence of active furin or trypsin-like proteases would have resulted in a 63-kDa protein due to cleavage at the sequence RKKR (amino acids 164-167). The sequence FFD at residues 312-314 is another site that is highly sensitive to chymotrypsin-like enzymes, and cleavage would have resulted in 47- and 37-kDa fragments. No other cleaved PA products were observed (see full length blots shown), demonstrating stability of chloroplast derived PA. Prior to the Applicant's discovery, it was widely believed that proteases would cleave long antigenic bacterial peptides, but this invention illustrates that the antigenic bacterial peptides are free from protolytic degradation. - The T.sub.1 transgenic lines showed a greater amount of PA in the pLD-JW1 lines as compared to the pLD-JW2 lines. Additional western blots were done comparing two different detergents in the extraction buffers, CHAPS and SDS, and both were found to extract PA equally well (see
FIG. 3C ). The supernatant and the homogenate were also found to be comparable suggesting that most of the PA is in the soluble fraction. After storage for two days at 4.degree. C. and −20.degree. C., the PA in plant crude extracts is quite stable (seeFIG. 3C ). Powdered leaf was stored at −80.degree. C. for several months before performing western blots or functional assays; this did not result in any noticeable decrease in PA quantity or functionality. This facilitates long term storage of harvested leaves before extraction of PA for vaccine production. Native PA has been shown to be highly unstable due to proteolysis-sensitive sites, which have been modified to confer better stability. - In order to quantify the amount of PA in transgenic chloroplasts, western blots were used to observe varying dilutions of the crude extract. PA was quantified using gel documentation software (Bio-Rad). Based on western blot analysis, pLD-JW1 T.sub.1 transgenic lines showed 44 .mu.g PA/g of fresh tissue (22 .mu.g/ml). An average tobacco leaf weighed 6.5 g; therefore 286 .mu.g PA could be expressed per leaf. The pLD-JW2 transgenic lines showed lower levels of PA accumulation, probably due to interference of both UTRs, resulting in decrease in translation. We have observed recently that the combination of ORF-psbA5′UTR decreases expression of human serum albumin in transgenic chloroplasts.
- The psbA regulatory sequences, including the promoters and UTRs, have been shown to enhance translation and accumulation of foreign proteins under continuous light. Therefore, pLD-JW1 T.sub.1 transgenic plants were placed in continuous light and young, mature, and old leaves were collected after 3 or 5 days of continuous illumination. Western blots were performed using different dilutions of crude plant extracts (see
FIG. 4A-B ). The 3 day mature and young leaves contained 80 .mu.g PA or 108 .mu.g PA/g of fresh tissue. The 5 day old, mature and young leaves contained 32 .mu.g PA, 108 .mu.g PA or 156 .mu.g PA/g of fresh tissue, respectively. Thus, young leaves showed the highest accumulation of PA and old leaves showed the lowest, probably due to proteolytic degradation induced during senescence. These assays quantified only full length PA. In spite of loading 500-1000 fold more protein of untransformed plant extracts, no cross-reacting protein was observed with the monoclonal antibody used. -
FIG. 4 shows total protein from plant extracts loaded in each lane is shown in parenthesis.FIG. 4A shows pLD-JW1 transgenic line in 3 days of continuous light, 1:20 dilutions. Lane 1: old leaf (187 ng); Lane 2: mature leaf (369 ng); Lane 3: young leaf (594 ng); Lanes 4-5: blank; Lane 6: 10 ng PA; Lane 7: 20 ng PA; Lane 9: ladder; Lane 10: wild type (15,000 ng).FIG. 4B shows pLD-JW1 transgenic line in 5 days of continuous light, 1:20 dilutions. Lane 1: old leaf (214 ng); Lane 2: mature leaf (588 ng); Lane 3: young leaf (745 ng); Lane 6: 10 ng PA; Lane 7: 20 ng PA; Lane 8: blank; Lane 9: ladder; Lane 10: wild type (15,000 ng).FIG. 4C is a histogram of .mu.g PA/g fresh tissue in young, mature, and old leaves after 3 (blue) and 5 (red) days of continuous illumination. - PA accumulation was visualized in crude plant extracts by Coomassie staining. When a capture ELISA was used to quantify PA, it appeared that PA constituted a large percentage of total soluble protein in some extracts. While these values may reflect detection of partially cleaved PA, they do not result from non-specific interaction of the antibodies with any other proteins, because no signal was detected in untransformed plants. However, the data set forth herein is from quantitative scanning of polyacrylamide gels and not from the capture ELISA.
- Supernatant and homogenate samples from both To constructs, pLD-JW1 and pLD-JW2, were tested. Two different buffers were used to extract proteins—one contained CHAPS detergent and one did not have any detergent. The PA produced in chloroplast transgenic lines was able to bind to the anthrax toxin receptor, be cleaved to the 63-kDa fragment, heptamerize, bind LF, be internalized and lyse the macrophage cells. Therefore the transgenic plants were shown to produce fully functional PA (see
FIG. 5A ). Active PA was found in both the supernatant and homogenate fractions; but was quantitated only in the former. The assay using CHAPS gave a result of the pLD-JW1 supernatant with the best yield. In the absence of any detergent, the supernatants lysed the macrophage cells better than the homogenates. Crude plant extracts contained up to 5 .mu.g per ml functional PA confirming expression of high levels of functional PA. Supernatant samples from T1 pLD-JW1 transgenic lines were tested and they resulted in approximately 12-25 .mu.g functional PA per ml (seeFIG. 5B ) and the toxicity was entirely dependent on the presence of LF. - The threat of biological warfare and terrorism is real. The most effective way to prevent or deter effective use of anthrax as a weapon would be to produce an efficacious and inexpensive vaccine. Plants are an inexpensive and easy way to produce recombinant proteins, without human or animal pathogen contamination. Because one acre of tobacco yields up to 40 tons of fresh leaves (40,000 kg in three cuttings), the production could be up to 6.24 kg PA per acre based on expression levels reported in this manuscript. There is less than 50% loss during purification from plant extracts (loss of foreign protein is generally between 30 and 90%), and at 5 .mu.g PA per dose (which is roughly equivalent to prior art vaccine which is in a range of 1.75 to 7 .mu.g PA), one can produce 600 million doses of vaccine per acre of tobacco. Thus a few acres of transgenic tobacco can meet the world's need for the anthrax vaccine.
- Sterile Nicotiana tabacum cv. Petit Havana tobacco leaves were bombarded using the Bio-Rad PDS-1000/He biolistic device as previously described. The bombarded leaves were placed on RMOP medium containing 500 .mu.g/ml spectinomycin for two rounds of selection on plates and subsequently moved to jars of MSO medium containing 500 .mu.g/ml spectinomycin.
- DNA was extracted from tobacco leaves using Qiagen DNeasy Plant Mini Kit available from Qiagen, Valencia, Calif. PCR was performed using the Perkin Elmer Gene Amp PCR System 2400 (available from Perkin Elmer, Chicago, Ill.). PCR reactions contained template DNA, 1.times.Taq buffer, 0.5 mM dNTPs, 0.2 mM 3P primer, 0.2 mM 3M primer, 0.05 units/.mu.l Taq Polymerase, and 0.5 mM MgCl.sub.2. Samples were run for 30 cycles as follows: 95.degree. C. for 1 min, 65.degree. C. for 1 min, and 72.degree. C. for 2 min with a 5 min ramp up at 95.degree. C. and a 72.degree. C. hold for 10 min after cycles complete. PCR products were separated on 1% agarose gels.
- Total plant DNA was digested with BglII and run on a 0.8% agarose gel at 50 V for 2 hours. The gel was soaked in 0.25 N HCl for 15 minutes and then rinsed 2.times. with water. The gel was soaked in transfer buffer (0.4 N NaOH, 1 M NaCl) for 20 minutes and then transferred overnight to a nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was rinsed twice in 2.times.SSC (0.3 M NaCl, 0.03 M Sodium citrate), dried on filter paper, and then crosslinked in the GS GeneLinker (Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif.). The flanking sequence probe was made by digesting pUC-CT vector DNA with BamHI and BglII to generate a 0.81 kb probe. Lee, S. B., Byun, M. O., Daniell, H. Accumulation of trehalose within transgenic chloroplasts confers drought tolerance. Molecular Breeding (in press) (2002). The pag probe was made by digesting pag with NcoI to generate a 0.52 kb probe. The probes were labeled with .sup.32P using the ProbeQuant G-50 Micro Columns (Amersham, Arlington Heights, Ill.). The probes were hybridized with the membranes using Stratagene QUICK-HYB hybridization solution and protocol (Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif.).
- Approximately 100 mg of leaf tissue was ground in liquid nitrogen with a mortar and pestle and stored at −80.degree. C. for several months. When it was time to extract the proteins, the powder was removed from −80.degree. C. and 200 .mu.l of plant extraction buffer was added and mixed with mechanical pestle (0.1% SDS, 100 mM NaCl, 200 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 0.05
% Tween 20, 400 mM sucrose, 2 mM PMSF). The plant extract was then centrifuged for 5 minutes at 10,000.times.g to pellet the plant material. The supernatant containing the extracted protein was transferred to a fresh tube and an aliquot was taken out, combined with sample loading buffer, boiled, and then run on 8% SDS-PAGE gels for one hour at 80 V, then 2 hours at 150 V. Gels were transferred overnight at 10 V to nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was blocked with PTM (1.times.PBS, 0.05% Tween - The stability assay utilized SDS buffer (0.1% SDS, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM EDTA, 200 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 0.05
% Tween - Approximately 100 mg of powdered leaf tissue was extracted with 200 .mu.l of extraction buffer. For the supernatant fraction, the buffer and tissue were centrifuged for 5 minutes at 10,000.times.g and the supernatant was placed in a new tube. For the homogenate, it was all of the tissue and the buffer. RAW 264.7 macrophage cells were plated in 96-well plates in 120 .mu.l DMEM medium and grown to 50% confluence. The medium was aspirated and replaced with 100 .mu.l medium containing 250 ng/ml LF. The control plate received medium with no LF to test toxicity of plant material and buffers. In separate 96-well plates, the plant samples were diluted serially 2-fold and 40 .mu.l of the dilutions were transferred onto the RAW cells so the top row had plant extract at 1:14 dilution. MTT (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) was added after 5-10 hours to assess cell death. Gu, M. L., Leppla, S. H., Klinman, D. M. Protection against anthrax toxin by vaccination with a DNA plasmid encoding anthrax protective antigen (Vaccine. 17, 340-344 (1999)).
- Prior to the creation of the pTom-BADH2-G10-pag ˜8.8 kb vector construct (
FIG. 7 ), the Applicant constructed the pLD Tom-BADH vector (FIG. 6 ) illustrating the ability to transform the chloroplast genome of edible dicots. The Tom-BADH vector was constructed to with two selectable marker genes (BA and spectinomycin) to test ability of transformed plants to grow on BA as compared to spectinomycin. The pLD-Tom-BADH vector contains the chimeric aadA gene and the BADH gene driven by the constitutive 16 S rRNA promoter and regulated by the 3′UTR region of psbA gene from petunia plastid genome. In this construct both, aadA and BADH possess the chloroplast preferred ribosomal binding site, GGAGG. Another suitable vector used for tomato chloroplast transformation is the pLD-Tom-UTR-BADH vector, which has the constitutive 16 S rRNA promoter driving the expression of the dicistron, in which the BADH is under the regulation of the promoter and the 5′UTR of the psbA gene and the 3′ UTR of psbA gene, for enhanced expression. - After successful construction and integration into the tomato chloroplast genome using the pLD Tom-BADH vector of
FIG. 6 , the Applicant then constructed the pTom-BADH2-G10-pag ˜8.8 kb vector, which is illustrated inFIG. 7 .FIG. 7 shows the schematic construct of the pTom-BADH2-G10-pag ˜8.8 kb vector, which was constructed containing the selectable marker gene BADH. This construct is also be made using the aad gene to confer spectinomycin resistance in place of the BADH gene. After bombarding the tomato cotyledons (seed leaves or embryonic leaves) with the tomato construct ofFIG. 7 , the cotyledons were put on selection media containing Betaine Aldeyhyde (BA) and calli formed. The calli were transferred to new selection media to obtain shoots. -
FIG. 11 shows the first selection after bombardment with the pTom-BADH2-G10-pag ˜8.8 kb vector, wherein the cotyledons were incubated in the dark for 48 hours and then the bombarded cotyledons were cut. The RMOP medium shown inFIG. 11 is a shoot inducing media. The bombarded cotyledons were grown on 2.5 mM Betaine Aldehyde (BA) for selection. -
FIG. 8 shows the PCR test that was performed to determine integration of the pTom-BADH2-G10-pag ˜8.8 kb vector, where the tomato shoots were tested with PCR to confirm integration of the transgene. InFIG. 8 , the + is pTOM-G10-PA vector control, − is WT Tomato plant, and #3 is the transgenic tomato plant. This confirmation utilized appropriate primers. - To apply the plastid transformation technology to edible plants to produce an edible vaccine, a first generation tomato vector is constructed containing pag. TrnI and trnA are homologous recombination regions in tomato; 5′UTR from psbA is used for translation enhancement and also contains it's own promoter; BADH gene confers Betaine Aldehyde (BA) resistance; G10 is a translation enhancer from the T7 bacteriophage; pag codes for the protective antigen, and T is the psbA terminator.
- The pDD11 vector is cleaved with NdeI & NotI to remove the gene and leave opened pBlue-G10 region of the vector. The pBlue-T7-pag vector is then cleaved with NdeI & NotI to remove the pag gene .about.2.2 kb. The pag gene is ligated into the opened pBlue-G10 vector, and the resulting pBlue-G10-pag is cleaved with SmaI & NotI to remove the G10-pag .about.5.2 kb segment from the pBlue-G10-pag vector. Finally the pTom-BADH2 vector is cleaved with SmaI and NotI, and then the G10-pag fragment is ligated into the vector creating a pTOM-BADH2-G10-pag ˜8.8 kb (
FIG. 7 ). - After bombarding the tomato cotyledons (seed leaves or embryonic leaves) with the tomato construct vector, pTOM-BADH2-G10-pag ˜8.8 kb, the cotyledons are put on selection media containing Betaine Aldeyhyde (BA) and calli formed (
FIG. 11 ). The calli are transferred to new selection media to obtain shoots. Shoots are tested with PCR to confirm integration of the transgene, which utilizes appropriate primers (FIG. 8 ). - Anthrax vaccine studies focused on mucosal and transcutaneous immunization with rPA as a vaccine antigen when delivered in conjunction with a novel adjuvant, designated LT(R192G). This adjuvant was shown to be effective at augmenting protection against a variety of bacterial, viral, and fungal pathogens when delivered with appropriate antigens intranasally, orally, rectally, or transcutaneously. This adjuvant was developed by the Clements laboratory at Tulane University Health Sciences Center with funding from NIH and the Department of Defense and has been evaluated in a number of Phase I and Phase II clinical trials. In rPA studies, a number of immunologic outcomes were measured, but the studies focused primarily on those associated with protection against inhaled pathogens—serum and bronchial lavage (BAL) fluid antibodies. It was demonstrated that mucosal and transcutaneous immunization of mice with rPA induces high levels of antigen-specific antibodies in serum and in bronchoalveolar lavage fluids. Moreover, circulating anti-rPA antibodies are able to neutralize the cytotoxic effect of anthrax Lethal Toxin when tested in macrophage cytotoxicity assays.
FIG. 12 shows the serum anti-PA as determined by ELISA and the in vitro toxin neutralization by serum antibodies following intranasal immunization. Equivalent results were seen following transcutaneous immunization. - Since the expression of the foreign protein is desired in chromoplasts of tomato fruit, the gene of interest needs to be under the control of a regulatory sequence that is free from cellular control. In this context, examples of suitable candidate regulatory sequences are the
T7 gene 10 leader sequence and cry2Aa2 UTR. TheT7 gene 10 leader sequence is used to express foreign proteins in transgenic chromoplasts. The cry2Aa2 UTR accumulates foreign protein in chromoplasts as efficiently as the psbA UTR. The selectable marker for the future generation vectors can optionally be the BADH gene under the regulation of psbA promoter and 5′UTR as psbA is one of the most efficiently translated chloroplast genes in green tissues. Since green tissue is used for introducing the transgene into the chloroplasts in tomato, it is ideal to use the light regulated psbA UTR for the selectable marker. -
FIG. 9 shows tomato seeds (Moneymaker and Ady varieties) that are surface sterilized with ethanol for 30 s, followed by a 20 min treatment with 1.5% NaOCl and 0.1% Tween 20. Seeds are washed thoroughly with sterile water (at least 3-4 times) and transferred to germination media (FIG. 14 ). Germination media consists of MS salts with 30% sucrose and 0.8% agar. About 20 seeds are inoculated per bottle and placed under a photoperiod of 16 h light and 8 h dark for 8-10 days to obtain cotyledons for particle bombardment. The cotyledons are then excised either as an explant for bombardment or the resulting seedlings are used for transplantation to obtain leaves. - The cotyledons and leaf material are bombarded using the particle gun. After bombardment the explants are then incubated in the dark for 48 h. The cotyledons and leaves are then cut into small pieces and placed onto RMOP media supplemented with 2.5, 5.0 and 7.5 mM of betaine aldehyde for regeneration. In the case of cotyledons, the concentration of 2.5 nm BA is optimal, but not required, as regeneration of putative transformants could be observed after two weeks. Specifically, there is no response on media having higher concentrations of 5.0 and 7.5 mM BA. With leaves, the concentration of 1 and 1.5 mM is optimal for pLD-Tom-BADH and pLD-Tom-UTR-BADH respectively.
- Selection is optimally performed in the presence of BA, but has also been performed in the presence of antibiotics. After selection, PCR analysis is performed as described above, as is well understood in the art. Finally Southern and northern blot analyses are performed as described above, and well understood in the art, to determine the amount and level of transformation in the chloroplast genome.
- Carrot (Daucus carota L.) is a biennial plant grown for its edible taproot. It is one of the most important vegetables used worldwide for human consumption. Carrot taproots are rich in vitamin A and fiber and are ideal to genetically manipulate in the chromoplast for the production of edible vaccines. For transformation of carrot, flanking sequences (trnI and trnA) are amplified with the help of PCR. Duration for regeneration of carrot plantlets is shortened to four months from eight months when replacing the antibiotic selection with BA. The same chloroplast constructs as described above for tomatoes are used for carrot except that homologous recombination regions i.e. trnI and trnA are derived from carrot chloroplast DNA. The advantage of using carrot is that from small clusters of cells or a small piece of carrot one can get thousands of transgenic plants in a limited space. Moreover, single cells are directly in contact with the culture media surface. Therefore, even a small quantity of selecting agent (betaine aldehyde) is more effective in comparison to other larger tissues. Carrot is easy to store for long periods of time.
- Seeds of carrot (Daucus carota L. cv Nantaise) are sown in pots and placed under a growth chamber with appropriate growth conditions for as little as four weeks to as long as a year. The hypocotyls are then cut into segments of 1 cm long and placed either on semi-solid callus induction medium or in 50 ml MS medium containing 3% sucrose, 0.1 mg/
l 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) having pH 5.7. After 3 weeks of continuous shaking at 24.degree. C. and 120 rpm, liberated cells are collected on a 100 .mu.M mesh, centrifuged (150.times.g for lo min) and resuspended in fresh medium. Rapidly growing cell cultures can be subcultured weekly. Next, callus formation from hypocotyls segments is established on semi-solid MS medium (Carolina Biological supply company) containing 1 mg/l kinetin and 3 mg/l 2,4-D. Homogenously growing calli is subcultured every 4 weeks on fresh medium. The resulting friable calli is then resuspended in 50 ml MS medium containing 3% sucrose and 0.1 mg/kinetin. Finally, suspension-cultured cells are filtered through a 100 .mu.M mesh and subjected to bombardment with chloroplast vectors. - Fine cell suspension culture of carrot, evenly spread over MS semi-solid medium is used for bombardment. After bombardment the explants are incubated in the dark for 48 h and later in appropriate light condition (16/8 h day/night cycle at 24.degree. C.). Somatic embryogenesis is induced in a suspension of single cells and small clusters harvested on sieve and low-speed centrifugation. The harvested cells are washed once with hormone free liquid MS medium and resuspended in 40 ml hormone free MS medium containing different concentrations of betaine aldehyde (1.5, 2.5 and 3.5 mM). Transgenic somatic embryos, visible 2 weeks after induction, are selected manually and transferred onto plates with semi-solid MS medium containing 1.5% sucrose and variable concentrations of betaine aldehyde (1.5, 2.5 and 3.5 mM). The plates are sealed with parafilm. After two weeks, somatic embryos development into plantlets which are transferred to soil in pots. Initially, the pots are covered with plastic bags to maintain high humidity and irrigated with progressively reduced concentrations of MS salts for the first week, followed by tap water in the second week. Transgenic plants with stable expression of recombinant protein are then utilized for suitable assays.
- The production of Yersinia pestis vaccine in a low nicotine strain of tobacco (LAMD) is accomplished by expressing in chloroplasts the F1-V antigen fusion protein produced from F1 gene (513 bp/15.5 kDa) and the entire V antigen (980 bp/35 kDa). The entire immunogenic sequence will be (441+980+6 for a hinge=1437 bp). With the protein of 478 amino acids having a calculated mass of 53,193 and a pI of 5.1 has shown this fusion protein to be immunoprotective.
- F1-V was modified to add an EcoR1 site. This fragment is cloned into the universal chloroplast vector, which has been described above, with the
psbA 5′UTR upstream of the F1-V fusion. The use of thepsbA 5′UTR, is not required, but it has been shown to increase expression of foreign proteins by chloroplast. - Large-scale expression of the fusion protein results in the formation of inclusion bodies as observed with several other foreign proteins expressed in transgenic chloroplasts. These inclusion bodies are easily separated by centrifugation. Another option is use of ammonium sulphate for the precipitation of the protein.
- Optionally, a His-tag with an enterokinase cut site was added to the above construct. The His-tag allows for purification on a nickel column with subsequent cleavage of the fusion protein from the His-tag.
- The plasmid pPW731 (a pET-24 vector) carrying the gene for the F1V fusion protein was delivered in BLR strain of E. coli. Because of the exonuclease activity in BLR, XL1-Blue strain of E. coli was transformed with pPW731. Using NdeI and NotI, F1V was cut out of pPW731 and ligated into PCR2.1 with 5′ psbA. In order to ligate 5′psbA-F1V into the universal chloroplast vector, pLD-CtV, PCR2.1-5′ psbA-F1V was cut with Sac I, and blunt ended, then cut with Not I. This was ligated into pLD-CtV which had been cut with EcoRV (blunt end) and Not I. This produced the chloroplast vector pLDS-F1V containing the 5′UTR psbA upstream of F1V, which was then used for bombardment. The use of the
psbA 5′UTR has proven to increase expression of foreign proteins by chloroplasts. -
FIG. 13A shows the construct of the pLDS-F1V vector, wherein the vector contains the F1/V antigen gene contained in the spacer region between the trnI and trnA genes. It should be understood that the F1/V antigen gene could be inserted into any of a number of spacer regions between chloroplast genes, which are described and illustrated in Sugita, M. Sugiura, M. Regulation of gene expression in chloroplast of higher plants, Plant Molecular Biology 32:315-326, 1996). -
FIG. 13B shows PCR restriction enzyme analysis of pLDS-F1V with Xho I, Eco RI, and Nde I, which showed that the psbA-F1V sequence to be in proper orientation in pLD. (Xho I yielding: 340 bp, 2679 bp, and 4634 bp: Eco RI yielding 682 bp, and 6953 bp: and Xho I/Nde I yielding 340 bp, 925 bp, 1102 bp, 1620 bp, 3610 bp, and incomplete digestion at 2601 bp, and 4550 bp). Lane 1:1 KB Ladder, Lane 2: pLDS 37 C, Lane 3: pLDS 4 C, Lane 4: Eco RI, Lane 5: Xho I, Lane 6: Xho I/Nde I (overnight), Lane 7: Xho I/Nde I. The sequencing of pLDS-(5′ psbA)-F1V using the 5′UTR primer, which lands on the 5′ psbA, showed no changes during vector construction. -
FIGS. 14A and 14B show PCR confirmation of transgene integration into the chloroplast genome. - After bombarding tobacco leaves with pLDS-F1V, there are three possibilities that might produce shoots: chloroplast transgenic, nuclear transgenic, and mutants resistant to spectinomycin. In order to select chloroplast transgenic plants we utilize two PCR reactions. The first (
FIG. 14A ), which checks for chloroplast intergration, uses 3P and 3M primers which land on the native chloroplast geneome and the aadA gene, respectively. Nuclear transformants are screened out because 3P will not anneal. Mutants are screened out because 3M will not anneal. Positive chloroplast transformants produce a 1.65 Kb PCR product. - The second PCR reaction (
FIG. 14B ) uses 5P which lands on the aadA gene and 2M which lands on trnA. This produces a PCR product of 1.65 kb+Insert (psbA=203 bp+F1V=1437 bp)=3.29 Kb. Plants 2-5, 8, and 10 clearly contain the transgene. -
FIG. 15A shows the western blot of pLDS-F1V from XL1-Blue strain of E. coli, and 15B shows the western blot ofplants - Turning to
FIG. 15A showing the Western blot of F1V expression in E. coli, the expression in E. coli was detected by rabbit anti-F1 as the primary antibody and alkaline phosphatase labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG as the Western blot of F1V expression in E. coli was detected by rabbit anti-F1 as the primary antibody and alkaline phosphatase labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG as the secondary antibody. Specifically the western blot inFIG. 15A shows: Lane 1: pLDS-F1V; Lane 2: F1 antigen; Lane 3: V antigen; Lane 4: F1V fusion protein. -
FIG. 15B illustrates the Western blot of F1V expression in plants as was detected by rabbit anti-F1 and anti-V as primary antibodies and alkaline phosphatase labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG as the secondary antibody. Controls and samples were boiled. Specifically the western blot inFIG. 15B shows: Lane 1: purified F1V fusion protein; Lane 2: Untransformed Petit Havana; Lane 3: Transformedplant line # 1; Lane 4: Transformedplant line # 2. From this western blot it is clear thattransgenic line 2 has surpassedline 1 in growth and is very healthy confirming that the foreign protein is not toxic to plants. - Cloning F1-V Antigen into Tomato:
- The F1-V antigen, which is a bacterial antigen, was cloned into the tomato pLD vector between
gene 10 andrps 16 terminator. This was discussed further above. In this case, the selectable marker, BADH, withpsbA 5′ UTR andpsbA 3′ follows the rps16 region. The second vector made contains F1-V attached to the carboxy terminus of CTB. CTB serves as a mucosal carrier for this plague protein. - The increased production of an efficient transmucosal carrier molecule and delivery system in chloroplasts of plants allows the production of plant based oral vaccines and fusion proteins with CTB. CTB has previously been expressed in nuclear transgenic plants at levels of 0.01 (leaves) to 0.3% (tubers) of the total soluble protein. To increase expression levels, the chloroplast genome was engineered to express the CTB gene. We observed expression of oligomeric CTB at levels of 4-5% of total soluble plant protein. PCR and Southern Blot analyses confirmed stable integration of the CTB gene into the chloroplast genome. Western blot analysis showed that transgenic chloroplast expressed CTB was antigenically identical to commercially available purified CTB antigen. Also, GM1-ganglioside binding assays confirm that chloroplast synthesized CTB binds to the intestinal membrane receptor of cholera toxin Transgenic tobacco plants were morphologically indistinguishable from untransformed plants and the introduced gene was found to be stably inherited in the subsequent generation as confirmed by PCR and Southern blot analyses. Thus chloroplasts form disulfide bridges to assemble foreign proteins. Spontaneously forming CTB pentamers exhibit intact transcytosis to the external basolateral membrane of intestinal epithelium, and have been widely used as oral vaccine vehicles.
- Chloroplast transformation has been accomplished only in a few Solanaceous crops so far. There are several challenges in extending this technology to other crops. So far, only green chloroplasts have been transformed in which the leaf has been used as the explant. However, for many crops, including monocots, cultured non-green cells or other non-green plant parts are used as explants. These non-green tissues contain proplastids instead of chloroplasts, in which gene expression and gene regulation systems are quite different. During transformation, transformed proplastids should develop into mature chloroplasts and transformed cells should survive the selection process during all stages of development. Therefore, the major challenge is to provide chloroplasts the ability to survive selection in the light and the dark, at different developmental stages. This is absolutely critical because only one or two chloroplasts are transformed in a plant cell and these plastids should have the ability to survive the selection pressure, multiply and establish themselves while all other untransformed plastids are eliminated in the selection process. The Double Barrel Plastid Vectors accomplish this by using genes coding for two different enzymes capable of detoxifying the same selectable marker (or spectrum of selectable markers), driven by regulatory signals that are functional in proplastids as well as in mature chloroplasts.
- The plastid vector described here is one among several such examples (non-limiting example). The chloroplast flanking sequence contains appropriate coding sequences and a spacer region into which the transgene cassette is inserted. Any spacer sequence within the plastid genome could be targeted for transgene integration, including transcribed and transcriptionally silent spacer regions. Both aphA-6 and aphA-2 (nptII) genes code for enzymes that belong to the aminoglycoside phosphotransferase family but they originate from different prokaryotic organisms. Because of prokaryotic nature of the chloroplast genome, these genes are ideal for use in transgenic chloroplasts without any codon optimization. Genes of prokaryotic origin have been expressed at very high levels in transgenic chloroplasts (up to 47% of total soluble protein, DeCosa et al., 2001). Both enzymes have similar catalytic activity but the aphA-6 gene product has an extended ability to detoxify kanamycin and provides a wider spectrum of aminoglycoside detoxification, including amikacin. The advantage of choosing kanamycin as a selectable marker is that it has no natural resistance, unlike spectinomycin resistance observed in most monocots or spontaneous point mutation of the 16 S rRNA gene observed during the selection process. In addition, kanamycin is not in human clinical use as an antibiotic and several crops containing kanamycin resistant nuclear transgenes have been already approved by FDA for human consumption (e.g. flavor savor tomatoes) and currently in the market place.
- As shown in
FIG. 24 , in this non-limiting example, all transgenes are regulated by the plastid Prrn promoter; this 16S rRNA promoter drives the entire rRNA operon in the native chloroplast genome and contains binding sites for both the nuclear encoded and plastid encoded RNA polymerases. Therefore, this promoter is capable of functioning in both proplastids and chloroplasts (green and non-green, in the light and dark). The aphA-6 gene is further regulated by thegene 10 5′ UTR capable of efficient translation in the dark, in proplastids present in non-green tissues (see GFP expression in proplastids of non-green cells of corn and carrot inFIGS. 19 and 23 regulated by the 16S rRNA promoter andgene 10 UTR). Therps16 3′ UTR has been used to stabilize aphA-6 gene transcripts. The aphA-2 (nptII) gene, on the other hand is regulated by the psbA promoter, 5′ and 3′ UTRs, which are light regulated and highly efficient in the light, in chloroplasts (see A. Fernandez-San Millan, A. Mingeo-Castel, M. Miller and H. Daniell, 2003, A chloroplast transgenic approach to hyper-express and purify Human Serum Albumin, a protein highly susceptible to proteolytic degradation. Plant Biotechnology Journal, in press; also see WO 01/72959). Therefore, a combination of both aphA-6 and aphA-2 genes, driven by regulatory signals in the light and in the dark in both proplastids and chloroplasts, provides continuous protection for transformed plastids/chloroplasts around the clock from the selectable agent. The gene(s) of interest with appropriate regulatory signals (gene X) are inserted downstream or upstream of the double barrel selectable system. Because multiple genes are inserted within spacer regions (DeCosa et al 2001, Daniell & Dhingra, 2002), the number of transgenes inserted does not pose problems in transcription, transcript processing or translation of operons (WO 01/64024). In a variation of this example, aphA-6 and aphA-2 genes, coupled with different transgenes are inserted at different spacer regions within the same chloroplast genome using appropriate flanking sequences and introduced via co-transformation of both vectors. - For genetic engineering of the corn chloroplast genome, corn specific sequences, flanking the targeted integration site in the corn chloroplast genome (trnI and trnA) were amplified with specific PCR primers and subcloned to flank the betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase (BADH) selectable marker, and green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporter gene expression cassette.
- Callus cultures were initiated from aseptically excised immature zygotic embryos (1-2 mm in length), produced on self-pollinated ears of HiII (F1) maize plants. Ears were surface sterilized in a solution containing 2.6% Sodium hypochlorite (prepared with commercial bleach) containing 0.1% Tween 20 (polyoxyethylene sorbitan monolaurate) for 20 minutes under continuous shaking, then rinsed 4 times in sterile distilled water. The Embryos were then placed on the callus induction medium CI-1, which contained N6 salts and vitamins (463.0 mg/l (NH.sub.4).sub.2SO.sub.4, 2830.0 mg/lKNO.sub.3, 400 mg/l KH.sub.2PO.sub.4, 166.0 mg/l CaCl.sub.2, 185 mg/l MgSO.sub.4.7H.sub.2O, 37.3 mg/l Na.sub.2-EDTA, 27.85 mg/l FeSO.sub.4.7H.sub.2O, 1.6 mg/l H.sub.3BO.sub.3, 4.4 mg/l MnSO.sub.4.H.sub.2O, 0.8, KI, 1.5 mg/l ZnSO.sub.4.7H.sub.2O), 2% sucrose and 1.0 mg/
l 2,4-D (2,4 dichloro-phenoxy acetic acid), with the rounded scutellar side exposed and the flat plumule-radicle axis side in contact with the medium. Callus cultures were maintained in darkness at 25-28.degree. C. and subcultured every two weeks. - Micro projectiles were coated with DNA (pDA34-ZM-gfp-BADH and pDA33-ZM-aadA-BADH) and bombardment was carried out with the biolistic device PDS1000/He (Bio-Rad).
- Prior to bombardment, embryogenic calli were selected, transferred over sterile filter paper (Watman No. 1), and placed on the surface of a fresh medium in standard Petrti plates (100.times.15 mm). Gold particles (0.6 .mu.m) were then coated with plasmid DNA as follows: 50 .mu.l of washed gold particles were mixed with 10 .mu.l DNA (1 .mu.g/.mu.l), 50 .mu.l of 2.5M CaCl.sub.2, 20 .mu.l of 0.1M spermidine and vortexed. Particles were cneterfuged for a few seconds at 3000 rpm and then the ethanol was poured off. Ethanol washing was repeated five times, then the pellet was resuspended in 30 .mu.l of 100% ethanol and placed on ice until it was used for bombardment (the coated particles were used within 2 hours). Bombardment was carried out with the
biolistic device PDS 1000/He (Bio Rad) by loading the target sample atlevel 2 in the sample chamber under a partial vacuum (28 inches Hg). - The callus cultures were bombarded with the maize chloroplast transformation vectors using 1100 psi rupture discs. Following bombardment, the explants were transferred to a fresh medium; plates were sealed with micropore tape and incubated in darkness at 25-28.degree. C.
- Selection was initiated two days after bombardment. The bombarded calli were transferred to callus induction medium containing 5-20 mM BA (betaine aldehyde) or 25-100 mg/l streptomycin. Selection was also carried out using 50-150 mM NaCl in combination with the BA to maintain osmostic pressure.
- Regeneration was initiated 6 to 8 weeks after bombardment by transferring the calli to a medium R1 containing Ms salts and vitamins supplemented with 1.0 mg/l NAA (.alpha.-naphthalene acetic acid), 2% sucrose, 2 g/l myoinositol and 0.3% phytagel at pH 5.8. Regenerated plants were transferred to R2 containing 1/2 MS salts and vitamins, 3% sucrose and 0.3% phytagel at pH 5.8. Regenerated plants were maintained in light (16/8 hr photoperiod).
- Corn seeds were surface sterilized in a solution containing 2.6% Sodium hypochlorite (prepared from commercial bleach) containing 0.1
% Tween 20 for 20 minutes under continuos shaking, then rinsed four times in sterile distilled water. Seeds were grown on MS medium at pH 5.8 in darkness. Nodal sections were excised aseptically from three day old seedlings. The nodal sections appear as clear demarcations on the germinated seedlings and represent the seventh node. When excised, the nodal cross sections are 1.3 to 1.5 mm in length. - Prior to bombardment, 20-30 nodal sections were placed in the center of each petri plate with acropitila end up. Bombardment was carried out with the maize chloroplast vectors, using 1100, 1300 and 1550 psi rupture discs.
- Nodal section explants are placed acropital end up on shoot multiplication medium SM1 composed of Ms salts and vitamins, 1.0 mg/l 6BA (6-Benzyl amino purine), 3% sucrose and 5 g/l phytagel at pH 5.8 under continuous light at 25.degree. C. Initiation of the shoot-tip clumps from the original shoot tips occurred 2 to 4 weeks after culture. Two days after bombardment, transformed nodal sections were transferred to shoot multiplication medium containing 5-20 mM BA or 50-100 mg/l streptomycin selective agents. Subsequent subcultures at two week intervals were carried out by selecting, dividing and subculturing green clumps on selective shoot multiplication medium containing 5-20 mM BA or 25-100 mg/l streptomycin.
- The Multiple shoot clumps were regenerated by transferring them to regeneration medium M1 containing MS salts and Vitamins, 5 mg/l IBA and 3% sucrose at pH 5.8. The developed shoots were regenerated by transferring the shoot tip clumps to M2 medium containing 1/2 MS salts and vitamins, 3% sucrose and 3 g/l phytagel at pH 5.8. It should be further noted that all the regeneration media are supplemented with 5-20 mM BA or 25-100 mg/l streptomycin as the selective agents.
- To engineer the corn chloroplast genome free of antibiotic resistance genes, maize calli were bombarded with a chloroplast expression vector containing the green fluorescent protein (GFP) and the betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase (BADH) genes as selectable or screenable markers. To compare the betaine aldehyde (BA) selection with streptomycin, another chloroplast expression vector was constructed containing the aada and the BADH genes. The number of putative transgenic events was higher on BA selection than on streptomycin. Transgenic corn tissues screened on BA were examined using a laser-scanning confocal microscope. The GFP fluorescence was observed throughout the somatic embryos of corn. Chloroplast transformation of corn provides a suitable avenue for the production of edible vaccines and oral delivery of biopharmaceuticals.
- Corn chloroplast transformation vector facilitates the integration of transgene into the inverted repeat (IR) region of the corn chloroplast genome. The vector pLD-Corn-BADH contains the chimeric aadA gene and the BADH gene driven by the constitutive 16 S rRNA promoter and regulated by the 3′ UTR region of psbA gene from petunia plastid genome. In this construct both, aadA and BADH possess the chloroplast preferred ribosomal binding site, GGAGG. Another vector used for corn chloroplast transformation pLD-corn-UTR-BADH has the constitutive 16 S rRNA promoter driving the expression of the dicistron, but BADH is under the regulation of the promoter and the 5′ UTR of the psbA gene and the 3′ UTR of psbA gene, for enhanced expression. Since the expression of the foreign protein is desired in chromoplasts of corn seeds, the gene of interest needs to be under the control of a regulatory sequence that is free from cellular control. In this context, examples of suitable candidate regulatory sequences are the T7 gene 10-leader sequence and cry2Aa2 UTR. The T7 gene 10-leader sequence is used to express foreign proteins in transgenic chromoplasts. The cry2Aa2 UTR has been shown by the inventor to accumulate as much foreign protein in chromoplasts as efficient as the psbA UTR in green tissues. Therefore the selectable marker for additional vectors use the BADH gene under the regulation of psbA promoter and 5′UTR, as psbA is one of the most efficiently translated chloroplast genes in green tissues. When green tissue or non-green embryogenic calli are used for introducing the transgene into the corn chloroplast genome, it is preferred to use the light regulated psbA promoter/UTR or 16 S rRNA promoter/
gene 10 UTR, respectively. - Annual ryegrass chloroplast transformation vector facilitates the integration of transgene into the inverted repeat (IR) region of the annual ryegrass chloroplast genome. The vector pLD-Ryegrass-BADH contains the chimeric aadA gene and the BADH gene driven by the constitutive 16 S rRNA promoter and regulated by the 3′ UTR region of psbA gene from petunia plastid genome. In this construct both, aadA and BADH possess the chloroplast preferred ribosomal binding site, GGAGG. Another vector used for ryegrass chloroplast transformation pLD-ryegrass-UTR-BADH has the constitutive 16 S rRNA promoter driving the expression of the dicistron, but BADH is under the regulation of the promoter and the 5′ UTR of the psbA gene and the 3′ UTR of psbA gene, for enhanced expression. When green tissue or non-green embryogenic calli are used for introducing the transgene into the corn chloroplast genome, it is preferred to use the light regulated psbA promoter/UTR or 16 S rRNA promoter/
gene 10 UTR, respectively. - Studies have confirmed the role of PA as the major protective antigen in the humoral response but also indicate a significant contribution of LF and EF to immunoprotection. The LF amino terminal domain, amino acid residues 1-254 (27 kDa) contains all the information necessary for binding PA and mediating translocation, and this domain alone is nontoxic because the catalytic domain of LF, residues 255-776, is responsible for lethality. Titers of antibody to both PA and LF from mice immunized with the combination were 4 to 5 times greater than titers from mice immunized with either alone. Therefore we express the constructs LF27-PA63 (PA63 is the cleaved active form of PA), CTB-LF27 fusion proteins, and LF27 and PA independently within the same edible plant as a standard. The LF27-PA63 and CTB-LF27 constructs are expressed alone and together as an operon in corn and ryegrass. It has been demonstrated that Rotavirus enterotoxin proteins fused with CTB is processed via the MHC II pathway generating a strong T-cell response. Thus CTB-fusion proteins produced in plants are ideal for oral delivery. By expressing the CTB-LF27 and PA-LF27 we maximize immunity to lethal toxin challenge. This is because both Gm1 ganglioside and anthrax toxin receptor (ATR) can be bound by ligands and work synergistically for maximum immune response. A flexible hinge was introduced between fusion proteins to reduce steric hindrance. Specifically a glycine-proline-glycine-proline hinge between CTB-LF27 and proline-glycine-proline-glycine hinge between LF27-PA63 was used. The application of less frequently used codons in plants within the hinge peptide promotes translational arrest during the protein elongation process, facilitating subunit folding prior to translation. The efficiency of folding of some proteins is increased by controlled rates of translation in vivo.
- Using either immature embryos (IEs) or embryogenic callus derived from IEs as a target for biolistic gene transfer is a well-established procedure for stable integration into the nuclear genome of corn or ryegrass. For biolistic transfer of integrative chloroplast expression vectors, the gene transfer protocol is adjusted and smaller particle sizes (0.6 .mu.m diameter) are used. Microprojectiles are coated with plasmid DNA (chloroplast vectors) and bombardments are carried out with the
biolistic device PDS 1000/He (Bio-Rad) as is well-known in the art relating to the use of the “gene-gun.” Expression levels from chloroplast regulatory sequences and the size of the proplastids are limiting factors for the successful chloroplast transformation using non-green, embryogenic callus tissues as a target for the gene transfer. Therefore, it is most desirable, when using the present invention with plant species not tested here, to compare green shoot meristematic cultures with non-green embryogenic callus as target tissue for chloroplast transformation. Protocols for the establishment of these tissue types are reported for corn and the grasses and are established in the Alpeters laboratory at University of Florida at Gainesville for ryegrass. - The timing of gene transfer after culture initiation and the duration and level of selection affect transgenic events while reducing the number of chimeric plants and achieving homoplasmy and are best evaluated empirically. BADH and aadA selectable markers are compared with the corresponding selective agents. Selection is to be maintained during the regeneration process of plants. Regenerated plants are then analyzed by PCR and Southern blot for integration in the corn or ryegrass plastome.
- PCR is done using DNA isolated from control and transgenic plants in order to distinguish a) true chloroplast transformants from mutants and b) chloroplast transformants from nuclear transformants. In order to test chloroplast integration of the transgenes, the 3′ primer will anneal to the selectable marker gene while the 5′ primer will anneal to the native chloroplast genome. No PCR product is expected with nuclear transgenic plants or mutants using this set of primers. This screening is essential to eliminate mutants and nuclear transformants. Total DNA from wildtype and transgenic plants is isolated and used as a template for PCR reactions. Southern blots allow one skilled in the art to determine the copy number of the introduced foreign gene per cell as well as to test homoplasmy. There are several thousand copies of the chloroplast genome present in each plant cell. When foreign genes are inserted into the chloroplast genome, not all chloroplasts will integrate foreign DNA resulting in heteroplasmy. To ensure that only the transformed genome exists in transgenic plants (homoplasmy), the selection process is continued. In order to confirm homoplasmy at the end of the selection cycle, total DNA from transgenic plants is probed with the chloroplast border (flanking) sequences (the trnI-trnA fragment). Wild type fragment size is observed along with the larger fragments of transformed plastomes. Presence of a large fragment (due to insertion of foreign genes within the flanking sequences) and absence of the native small fragment confirms homoplasmy. The copy number of the integrated gene is determined by establishing homoplasmy for the transgenic chloroplast genome.
- Using the aforementioned transformation protocols, vectors for the production of an orally administrable form of PA are introduced in ryegrass and corn plants. Site specific vector integration into the ryegrass or corn plastome is then confirmed by PCR and Southern blot analysis as specified. Western blot verification of PA verifies that recombinant anthrax protective antigen proteins are antigenically similar to native PA using monoclonal antibodies against PA (Advanced ImmunoChemical G1-Ba1). PA is quantified by a ELISA using purified PA antigen as standard and commercially available antibody. Electron microscopy is next carried out in mature leaves of chloroplast or mature seeds amyloplasts of transgenic plants to detect inclusion bodies according a protocol and similar to several published electron micrographs of transgenic chloroplasts, with immunogold label of foreign proteins. The PA protein is then purified using a two step protocol, such as that described in Ahuja, N., Kumar, P., & Bhatnagar, R. (2001), Rapid Purification of Recombinant Anthrax-Protective Antigen under Nondenaturing Conditions, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 286, 6-11. The protein is purified on AKTA-FPLC using anion exchange Resource Q column (Pharmacia). The protein is then eluted from the column with a 20 ml decreasing gradient of ammonium sulphate. Fractions of 1 ml each are collected, analyzed on SDS-PAGE, and those containing PA are pooled. With an affinity tag, the PA protein can optionally be purified using metal-chelate affinity chromatography under denaturing conditions. Ten ml of each fraction is then analyzed on 12% SDS-PAGE. Fractions containing the protein are collected, pooled, and dialyzed against 10 mM Hepes buffer containing 50 mM NaCl and stored frozen at −70.degree. C. in suitable aliquots.
- Recombinant PA proteins are then assayed for their functional activity in the J774A1 (American Type Culture Collection) macrophage lysis assay. Varying concentrations of PA protein along with LF (1 mg/ml) are added to the cells. The native PA along with LF is kept as the positive control. After 3 h, cell viability is determined using the MTT (3-(4,5-dimethyl thiazol-2-yl),-5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) dye and the resulting precipitate is dissolved in a buffer containing 0.5% (w/v) sodium dodecyl sulfate, 25 mM HCl in 90% isopropyl alcohol. Absorption at 540 nm is measured and percent viability determined.
- PA can be tested for susceptibility to cleavage by trypsin. To do so, the PA protein (1.0 mg/ml) is incubated with trypsin (1 ng/mg of protein) for 30 min at room temperature in 25 mM Hepes, 1 mM CaCl2, 0.5 mM EDTA, pH 7.5. The digestion reaction is stopped by adding PMSF to a concentration of 1 mM. Trypsin nicked PA (1.0 mg/ml) is incubated with LF (1.0 mg/ml) and in 25 mM Tris, pH 9.0, containing 2 mg/ml CHAPS (3-{(3-cholamidopropyl) dimethyl ammonio}-propanesulfonic acid) for 15 min at room temperature. Samples are applied to nondenaturing 4.5% polyacrylamide gel.
- The binding of PA protein to cell surface receptor is analyzed in 24 well plates using constant amount of radio-iodinated native PA (0.1 mg/ml). J774A.1 (ATCC) cells are washed twice with cold HBSS for 5 minutes each time and then placed on ice. The medium is replaced with cold binding medium (DMEM, Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium, without sodium bicarbonate containing 1% bovine serum albumin and 25 mM, Hepes, pH 7.4). The cells are incubated with 0.1 mg/ml of iodinated PA and varying concentrations of the recombinant PA protein at 4.degree. C. for 3 h and then washed with cold HBSS. The cells are then dissolved in 0.1 N NaOH and radioactivity measured in Gamma counter.
- Leaves from transgenic lines producing epitope tagged products are frozen and powdered at 4.degree. C. using a microdismembranator and proteins are extracted in PBS with 1% Triton X-100. Fusion proteins are purified by affinity chromatography on a nickel-agarose bed, using standard 6-His methods, as described above.
- Corn and ryegrass expressing PA as potential edible vaccines against anthrax are characterized using the protocol described above. These are then evaluated for the ability of PA-expressing corn seeds or corn or ryegrass leaves or bay to function as edible vaccines for the induction of serum and mucosal (bronchial lavage, nasal, vaginal, and fecal) antibodies by ELISA. Antibodies induced by feeding the transgenic corn or ryegrass to mammals neutralize the biologic activity of anthrax lethal toxin. This activity can be confirmed in an in vitro macrophage cytotoxicity assay. Antibody responses in mice and humans following ingestion of transgenic potatoes and corn expressing recombinant bacterial proteins have been successfully demonstrated.
- Oral immunization of mice and other mammals by feeding transgenic plants or plant parts is accomplished as follows. In the case of corn and ryegrass, female BALB/c mice are fed transgenic corn or ryegrass, control corn or ryegrass, or soluble rPA in conjunction with the mucosal adjuvant LT(R192G). The amount of rPA fed to control animals is based upon the amount of PA in the transgenic corn or ryegrass fed to the animals. That amount correlates with the amount of transgenic corn or ryegrass a mouse will consume in a one hour period. Mice tend to eat grass if a small amount of vanilla extract is placed on each leaf. Two additional groups can be included in which the mucosal adjuvant LT(R192G) is administered in conjunction with the transgenic or control corn or ryegrass. Edible vaccines administered to mice often require the presence of a mucosal adjuvant due to the small amount of material that can be consumed by a mouse. However, this is not necessary when using the plants of the present invention to vaccinate humans, or other large mammals due to the volume which can be consumed by the animal. Twenty-five micrograms of the adjuvant should be applied directly to the corn or ryegrass before consumption when testing mice.
- Intranasal immunization is accomplished in mice as follows. Mice are first lightly anesthetized with Isoflurane for approximately 45 seconds. The immunizing inoculum (5-10 ml per animal/per dose) is delivered intranasally to the external nares of one nostril with a pipette tip.
- Oral immunization: Oral inoculations consisted of 500 ml of the antigen preparation in saline delivered intragastrically with a blunt-tip feeding needle (Popper & Sons, Inc.).
- Sample collection: Animals are sacrificed following euthanasia by CO.sub.2 inhalation. Blood is collected by cardiac puncture and the serum is separated in Microtainer tubes. Bronchoalveolar lavages (BAL) are obtained by inserting a 20 G cannula in the exposed trachea and injecting 1 ml of PBS supplemented with protease inhibitors. The buffer is allowed to bathe the lung for approximately 20 seconds and then it is suctioned out; this procedure is repeated three times in each mouse. The resulting BAL fluid is immediately centrifuged (400 g, 2 min, 4.degree. C.) and the supernatant is saved. To obtain nasal lavages a flexible 24 gauge canula is inserted into the posterior opening of the nasopharynx and a total of 150 ml ml PBS+ protease inhibitor is injected into the opening. The outflow is collected as the nasal wash. Vaginal washes are obtained by washing the vaginal mucosa three times with 50 .mu.l of PBS containing 0.01% NaN.sub.3. For determination of fecal IgA, feces are collected and frozen overnight at −70.degree. C., lyophilized, resuspended in 800 .mu.l PBS containing 0.05% sodium azide per 15 fecal pellets, centrifuged at 1,400.times.g for 5 minutes, and the supernatant stored at −20.degree. C. until assayed.
- Evaluation of humoral and mucosal antibodies: Each serum, BAL, nasal wash, vaginal wash, and fecal extract sample is individually analyzed by ELISA. For all ELISA assays, 96-well plates are coated with 500 ng per well of rPA and incubated overnight at 4.degree. C. All subsequent steps are carried out at room temperature. After blocking with 1% BSA, twofold serial dilutions of serum, BAL, nasal wash, vaginal wash, or fecal extract from the experimental animals are added. Alkaline phosphatase conjugated rabbit anti-mouse IgG or anti-mouse IgA are used for determination of total IgG or IgA. Biotinylated anti-mouse IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b or IgG3 followed by alkaline phosphatase conjugated streptavidin are used to quantify antibody isotypes. Optical density at 405 nm is determined using an ELISA reader.
- The following references, along with all other references mentioned herein, and patent applications to which this application may claim priority, are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
- 1. Ahuja, N., Kumar, P., & Bhatnagar, R. (2001). Rapid Purification of Recombinant Anthrax-Protective Antigen under Nondenaturing Conditions. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 286, 6-11.
- 2. Altpeter, F., & and Xu J. 2000. Rapid production of transgenic turfgrass (Festuca rubra L.) plants. J. Plant Physiol. 157, 441-448.
- 3. Altpeter, F., Vasil, V., Srivastava, V., & Vasil, I. K. (1996b): Integration and expression of the high molecular weight glutenin subunit 1Ax1 into wheat.
Nature Biotechnology 14, 1155-1159. - 4. Altpeter, F., Vasil, V., Srivastava, V., Stoeger, E., & Vasil I. K. (1996a) Accelerated production of transgenic wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) plants. Plant Cell Rep. 16, 12-17.
- 5. Altpeter, F., Xu, J., & Ahmed, S. 2000. Generation of large numbers of independently transformed fertile perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) plants of forage—and turf type cultivars. Mol. Breeding. 6, 519-528.
- 6. Anderson G W, Leary S C, Williamson E D, Titball R W, Welkos S L, Worsham P L, and Friedlander A M. (1996) Recombinant V antigen protects mice against Pneumonic and Bubonic Plague caused by F1-capsule-positive and negative strains of Yersinia pestis. Infection and Immunity. 64 (11) 4580-5.
- 7. Andrews G P, Strachan S T, Benner G E, Sample A K, Anderson J R, Adamovicz J J, Welkos S L, Pullen J K, and Friedlander A M. (1999) Protective efficacy of recombinant Yersinia outer proteins against bubonic plague caused by encapsulated and non-encapsulated Yersinia pestis. Infection and Immunity. 67: 1533-1537.
- 8. Arakawa T, Cong D K X, Merritt J L, and Langridge W H R. (1997) Expression of cholera toxin B subunit oligomers in transgenic plants. Transgen. Res. 6: 403-413.
- 9. Arakawa, T., Chong D. X. X., Langridge, W. H. R. (1998). Efficacy of a food plant based oral cholera toxin B subunit vaccine. Nature Biotechnology, 16, 292-297.
- 10. Arntzen, C. www.bio.org/food%26ag/vaccine.htmlArtzen estimates the banana could deliver the vaccine at 2 cents a dose verses $125.00 for an injection.
- 11. Baillie, L. (2001). The development of new vaccines against Bacillus anthracis. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 91, 609-613.
- 12. BBC News (2002) http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/health/newsid.-sub.--1830000/1830034.stm
- 13. Beck L R, Cowsar D R, Lewis D H, Cosgrove J R, Lowry S L, and Epperly T A. (1979) A new long-acting microencapsule system for administration of progesterone. Fertility Sterility. 31: 545-551.
- 14. Belyakov I M, Ahlers J D, Clements J D, Strober W, Berzofsky J A. 2000. Interplay of cytokines and adjuvants in the regulation of mucosal and systemic HIV-specific CTL. Journal of Immunology 165(11):6454-62.
- 15. Berneman, A., Belec, L., Fischetti, V. A., Bouvet, J. P. (1998) the specific patterns of human immunoglobulins G antibodies in serum differ from those in autologous secretions. Infection and immunology, 66, 4163-4168.
- 16. Bhatnagar, R., Singh, Y., Leppla, S. H., & Friedlander, A. M. (1989). Calcium is required for the expression of anthrax lethal toxin activity in the macrophage-like cell line J774A.1. Infect. Immun., 57, 2107-2114.
- 17. Bocci V (1999). The oropharyngeal delivery of interferons: where are we and where do we need to go? J Interferon Cytokine Res. 19 (8): 859-61.
- 18. Bockman D E, Cooper M D. 1973. Pinocytosis by epithelium associated with lymphoid follicles in the bursa of Fabricius, appendix and Peyer's patches. An electron microscopic study. American Journal of Anatomy 136:455-477.
- 19. Bouvet, J. P., Decroix, N., Pamonsinlapatham, P. (2002). Stimulation of local antibody production: parenteral or mucosal. Trends in Immunology, 23 (4), 209-212.
- 20. Bouvet, J. P., Fischetti, V. A. (1999). Diversity of antibody-mediated immunity at the mucosal immune barrier. Infection and Immunology, 67, 2687-2691.
- 21. Bradley, K. A., Mogridge, J., Mourez, M., Collier, R. J., Young, J. A. (2001) Identification of the cellular receptor for anthrax toxin. Nature. 414 (6860). 225-229.
- 22. Brossier, F., Weber-Levey, M., Mock, M., Sirard, J-C. (2000). Role of toxin functional domains in anthrax pathogenesis. Infect. Immun., 68, 1781-1786.
- 23. Crdenas-Freytag L, Cheng E, Mayeux P, Domer J E, Clements J D. 1999. Effectiveness of a vaccine composed of heat-killed Candida albicans and a novel mucosal adjuvant, LT(R192G), against systemic candidiasis. Infection and Immunity 67(2):826-33.
- 24. Carlson, P. S. (1973). The use of protoplasts for genetic research. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 70, 598-602.
- 25. Castanon S, Marin M S, Martin-Alonso J M, Boga J A, Casais R, Humara J M, Ordas R J, Parra F. Immunization with potato plants expressing VP60 proteins protects against rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus. J. Virology. 73:4452-55.
- 26. Center for Disease Control, February 8.sup.th, 2002 http://www.bt.cdc.gov/agent/agentlist.asp
- 27. Chauhan, V., Singh, A., Waheed, M., Singh, S., & Bhatnagar, R. (2001). Constitutive expression of Protective Antigen of Bacillus anthracis in Escherichia coli. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 283, 308-315.
- 28. Cheng E, Cardenas-Freytag L, Clements J D. 1999. The role of cAMP in mucosal adjuvanticity of Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin (LT). Vaccine 18(1-2):38-49 chimeric.
- 29. Cho, M.-J., Ha, C. D., & Lemaux P. G. (2000) Production of transgenic tall fescue and red fescue plants by particle bombardment of mature seed-derived highly regenerative tissues. Plant cell Rep. 19, 1084-1089.
- 30. Choi A H, Basu M, McNeal M M, Clements J D, Ward R L. 1999. Antibody-independent protection against rotavirus infection of mice stimulated by intranasal immunization with chimeric VP4 or VP6 protein. Journal of Virology 73(9):7574-81.
- 31. Choi A H, Basu M, McNeal M M, Flint J, VanCott J L, Clements J D, Ward R L. 2000. Functional mapping of protective domains and epitopes in the rotavirus VP6 protein. Journal of Virology 74(24):11574-80.
- 32. Chong C, Friberg M, Clements J D. 1998. LT(R192G), a non-toxic mutant of the heat-labile enterotoxin of Escherichia coli, elicits enhanced humoral and cellular immune responses associated with protection against lethal oral challenge with Salmonella spp. Vaccine 16(7):732-40.
- 33. Coulson, N. M., Fulop, M., Titball, R. W. (1994). Bacillus anthracis protective antigen, expressed in Salmonella typhimurium SL 3261, affords protection against anthrax spore challenge. Vaccine, 12 (15), 1395-1401.
- 34. Cramer, C., Boothe, J., Oishi, K. Transgenic Plants for Therapeutic Protein: Linking Upstream and Downstream Strategies. Current Topics Microbiol. Immunol., 240, 95-118 (1998).
- 35. Cummins J M, Beilharz M W, Krakowka S (1999). Oral use of interferon. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 19 (8): 853-7.
- 36. Daniell H (1993). Foreign gene expression in chloroplasts of higher plants mediated by tungsten particle bombardment. Methods Enzymol. 217: 536-556.
- 37. Daniell H (1997). Transformation and foreign gene expression in plants mediated by microprojectile bombardment. Meth. Mol. Biol. 62:453-488.
- 38. Daniell H (1999). Universal chloroplast integration and expression vectors, transformed plants and products thereof, World Intellectual Property Organization. WO 99/10513.
- 39. Daniell H, and Dhingra A. (2002) Multiple gene engineering, Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 13: 136-141.
- 40. Daniell H, Datta R, Varma S Gray S Lee S B (1998). Containment of herbicide resistance through genetic engineering of the chloroplast genome. Nature Biotechnology. 16: 345-348.
- 41. Daniell H, Khan M S, and Allison L. (2002) Milestones in chloroplast genetic engineering: an environmentally friendly era in biotechnology. Trends in Plant Science. 7:84-91.
- 42. Daniell H, Lee S B, Panchal T, and Wiebe P O. (2001) Expression of native cholera toxin B subunit gene and assembly as functional oligomers in transgenic tobacco chloroplasts. J. Mol. Biol. 311: 1001-1009.
- 43. Daniell H, Muthukumar B, and Lee S B. (2001) Marker free transgenic plants: engineering the chloroplast genome without the use of antibiotic selection. Curr. Genet. 39: 109-116.
- 44. Daniell H, Streatfield S J, and Wycoff K. (2001) Medical molecular farming: production of antibodies, biopharmaceuticals and edible vaccines in plants. Trends in Plant Sci. 6 (5) 219-226.
- 45. Daniell H. (2002). Molecular strategies for gene containment. Nature Biotechnology. 20: 581-586.
- 46. Daniell H., Krishnan, M., McFadden, B. A. (1991). Expression of B-glucuronidase gene in different cellular compartments following biolistic delivery of foreign DNA into wheat leaves and calli. Plant Cell Reports, 9 615-619.
- 47. Daniell H., Krishnan, M., Umabai, U., Gnanam, A. (1986). An efficient and prolonged in vitro translational system from cucumber etioplasts. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comun. 135, 48-255.
- 48. Daniell H., McFadden, B. A. (1987). Uptake and expression of bacterial and cyanobacterial genes by isolated cucumber etioplasts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84, 6349-6353.
- 49. Daniell H., Ramanujan, P., Krishnan, M., Gnanam, A., Rebeiz, C. A. (1983). In vitro synthesis of photosynthetic membranes: I. Development of photosystem I activity and cyclic phosphorylation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comun. 111, 740-749.
- 50. Daniell H., Vivekananda, J., Neilsen, B., Ye, G. N., Tewari, K. K., Sanford, J. C. (1990). Transient foreign gene expression in chloroplasts of cultured tobacco cells following biolistic delivery of chloroplast vectors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA., 87, 88-92.
- 51. Daniell, H. (1997). Transformation and foreign gene expression in plants mediated by microprojectile bombardment. Meth Mol. Biol., 62, 453-488.
- 52. Daniell, H. (1999). Universal chloroplast integration and expression vectors, transformed plants and products thereof, World Intellectual Property Organization. WO 99/10513.
- 53. Daniell, H. (2002). Molecular strategies for gene containment in transgenic crops. Nature Biotechnology, 20, 581-586.
- 54. Daniell, H., Datta, R., Varma, S., Gray, S., & Lee, S. B. (1998). Containment of herbicide resistance through genetic engineering of the chloroplast genome. Nature Biotechnology, 16, 345-348.
- 55. Daniell, H., Khan, M. S., & Allison, L. (2002). Milestones in chloroplast genetic engineering: an environmentally friendly era in biotechnology. Trends in Plant Science, 7, 84-91.
- 56. Daniell, H., Lee, S. B., Panchal, T., Wiebe, P. O. (2001b). Expression of the native cholera toxin B subunit gene and assembly of functional oligomers in transgenic tobacco chloroplasts. Journal of Molecular Biology, 311, 1001-1009.
- 57. Daniell, H., McFadden, B. A. (1988). Genetic Engineering of plant chloroplasts. U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,932,479; 5,693,507.
- 58. Daniell, H., Muthukumar, B., Lee, S. B. (2001c). Marker free transgenic plants: engineering the chloroplast genome without the use of antibiotic selection. Curr Genet, 39(2), 109-16.
- 59. Daniell, H., Rebeiz, C. A. (1982). Chloroplast culture IX: Chlorphyll(ide) A biosynthesis in vitro at rates higher than in vivo. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comun, 106, 466-471.
- 60. Daniell, H., Streafield, S. J., & Wycoff, K. (2001a). Medical molecular farming: production of antibodies, biopharmaceuticals and edible vaccines in plants. Trends Plant Sci., 6(5), 219-26.
- 61. Daniell, H.,& Dhingra, A. (2002). Multiple gene engineering. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 13, 136-141.
- 62. De Cosa, B., Moar, W., Lee, S. B., Miller, M.,& Daniell, H. (2001). Hyper-expression of Bt Cry2Aa2 operon in chloroplasts leads to formation of insecticidal crystals. Nature Biotechnology, 19, 71-74.
- 63. DeGray, G., Rajasekaran, K., Smith, F., Sanford, J., Daniell, H. (2001). Expression of an antimicrobial peptide via the chloroplast genome to control phytopathogenic bacteria and fungi. Plant Physiology, 127, 1-11.
- 64. Dire J D, Long D A, Williams L D, and McGovern T W (2002) CBRNE—Biological warefare agents. EMedicine Journal. http://www.emedicine.com/emerg/topic853.htm. 3: 1-44.
- 65. Dixon, T., Meselson, M., Guillemin, J., & Hanna, P. (1999). Anthrax. The New England Journal of Medicine, 341 (11), 815-826.
- 66. Drum, C. L., Yan, S-Z, Bard, J., Shen, Y-Q, Lu, D., Soelaiman, A., Grabarek, Z., Bohm, A., Tang, W-J. (2002). Structural basis for the activation of anthrax adenylyl cyclase exotoxin by calmodulin. Nature. 415, 396-402.
- 67. Edwards, K., Johnstone, C., & Thompson, C. (1991). A simple and rapid method for preparation of plant genomic DNA for PCR analysis. Nucleic Acid Res., 19, 1349.
- 68. Eyles J E, Spiers I D, Williamson E D, and Alpar H O. (1998) Analysis of local systemic immunological responses after intra-tracheal, intra-nasal and intra-muscular administration of microsphere co-encapsulated Yersinia pestis sub-unit vaccines. Vaccine. 16 (20) 2000-9.
- 69. Eyles J E, Williamson E D, Spiers I D, Stagg A J, Jones S M, and Alpar H O (2000) Generation of protective immune responses to plague by mucosal administration of microsphere co-encapsulated recombinant subunits. J. Controlled Release. 63, 191-200.
- 70. Fang, Y.-D., Akula, C., & Altpeter, F. (2002) Agrobacterium-mediated barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) transformation using green fluorescent protein as a visual marker and sequence analysis of the T-DNA::barley genomic DNA junctions. J Plant Physiol 159, 1131-1138.
- 71. Fernandez-San Millan, A., Mingo-Castel, A., Miller, M., Daniell, H. A chloroplast transgenic approach to express and purify pharmaceutical proteins that are highly susceptible to proteolytic degradation. Plant Biotechnology Journal. (in press) (2002).
- 72. Freytag L C, Clements J D. 1999. Bacterial toxins as mucosal adjuvants. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology 236:215-36.
- 73. Ge, B., et al. (1998). Differential effects of helper proteins encoded by the cry2A and cry11A operons on the formation of Cry2A inclusions in Bacillus thuringiensis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 165, 35-41.
- 74. Gerber S, Lane C, Brown D M, Lord E, DiLorenzo M, Clements J D, Rybicki E, Williamson A L, Rose R C. 2001. Human papillomavirus virus-like particles are efficient oral immunogens when coadministered with Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin mutant R192G or CpG DNA. Journal of Virology 75(10):4752-60.
- 75. Gordon-Kamm, W. J., Baszczynski, W. B., Bruce, W. B., & Tomes, D. T. (1999) Transgenic cereals—Zea mays (maize). In: Vasil IK (ed) Molecular improvement of cereal crops. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 189-253.
- 76. Gu, M. L., Leppla, S. H., Klinman, D. M. Protection against anthrax toxin by vaccination with a DNA plasmid encoding anthrax protective antigen. Vaccine. 17, 340-344 (1999).
- 77. Guda C, Lee S B, Daniell H (2000). Stable expression of biodegradable protein based polymer in tobacco chloroplasts. Plant Cell Rep. 19: 257-262.
- 78. Guillobel H C, Carinhanha J I, Cardenas L, Clements J D, de Almeida D F, Ferreira L C. 2000. Adjuvant activity of a nontoxic mutant of Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin on systemic and mucosal immune responses elicited against a heterologous antigen carried by a live Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium vaccine strain. Infection and Immunity 68(7):4349-53.
- 79. Hanna, P. C., Acosta, D., & Collier, R. J. (1993). On the role of macrophages in anthrax. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 90, 10198-201.
- 80. Haq T A, Mason H S, Clements J D, and Artzen C J. (1995) Oral immunization with a recombinant bacterial antigen produced in transgenic plants. Science, 268: 714-716.
- 81. Heath D G, Anderson J W Jr., Maurot J M, Welkos S L, Andrews J P, Adamovicz J, and Friedlander A M. (1998) Protection against experimental bubonic and pneumonic plague by a recombinant capsular F1-V antigen fusion protein vaccine. Vaccine. 16 (11/12) 1131-1137.
- 82. Hill J., Leary S. C., Griffin K. F., Williamson E. D., and Titbal R. W. (1997) Regions of Yersinia pestis V antigen that contribute to protection against plague identified by passive and active immunization. Infection and Immunity. 65 (11) 4476-4482.
- 83. Holmgren J. Lycke N, Czerkinsky C. (1993) Cholera toxin and cholera B subunit as oral-mucosal adjuvant and antigen vector systems. Vaccine. 11(12) 1179-84.
- 84. Inglesby, T. et al. Anthrax as a biological weapon. JAMA 281 (18), 1735-1745 (1999).
- 85. Inglesby, T., Henderson, D., Bartlett, J., Ascher, M., Eitzen, E., Friendlander, A., Hauer, J., MdDade, J., Osterholm, M., O'Toole, T., Parker, G., Perl, T., Russel, P., Tonat, K. (1999). Anthrax as a biological weapon. JAMA 281 (18), 1735-1745.
- 86. Ivins, B., Fellows, P., Pitt, L., Estep, J., Farchaus, J., Friedlander, A., & Gibbs, P. (1995). Experimental anthrax vaccines: efficacy of adjuvants combined with protective antigen against an aerosol Bacillus anthracis spore challenge in guinea pigs. Vaccine, 13 (18), 1779-1783.
- 87. Ivins, B., Pitt, M., Fellows, P., Farchaus, J., Benner, G., Waag, D., Little, S., Anderson Jr., G., Gibbs, P., & Friedlander, A. (1998). Comparative efficacy of experimental anthrax vaccine candidates against inhalation anthrax in rhesus macaques. Vaccine, 16 (11/12), 1141-1148.
- 88. Jefferson T, Dermichelli V, and Pratt M. (2000) Vaccines for preventing plague. Cochrane Database Systems Review. 2, CD000976.
- 89. Joellenbeck, L. M., Zwanziger, L. L., Durch, J. S., Strom, B. L. Editors National Academy Press, Washington D.C.
Chapter 7 “Anthrax Vaccine Manufacture” in The Anthrax Vaccine. Is it safe? Does it work? pp 180-197 (2002). - 90. Jones S M, Day F, Stagg A J, and Williamson. (2000) Protection conferred by a fully recombinant subunit vaccine against Yersinia pestis in male and female mice of four inbred strains. Vaccine. 19:358-66.
- 91. Kapusta J, Modelska A, Figlerowicz M, Pniewski T, Letellier M, Lisowa O, Yusibov V, Koprowski H, Plucienniczak A, Legocki A B. (1999) A plant-derived edible vaccine against hepatitis B virus. FASEB J. 13(13):1796-9.
- 92. Kaufmann, A. F., Meltzer, M. I., Schmid, G. P. (1997). The economic impact of a bioterrorist attack: are prevention and postattack intervention programs justifiable? Emerging Infectious Disease, 3, 83-94.
- 93. Klimpel, K. R., Molloy, S. S., Thomas, G., Leppla, S. H. (1992). Anthrax toxin protective antigen is activated by a cell surface protease with the sequence specificity and catalytic properties of furin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 89, 10277-10281.
- 94. Koo, M., Bendahmane, M., Lettieri, G. A., Paoletti, A. D., Lane, T. E., Fitchen, J. H., Buchmeier, M. J., Beachy, R. N. (1999). Protective immunity against murine hepatitis virus (MHV) induced by intranasal or subcutaneous administration of hybrids of tobacco mosaic virus that carries an MHV epitope. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 96, 7774-7779.
- 95. Kota M, Daniell H., Varma S, Garczynski F et al (1999). Overexpression of the Bacillus thuringiensis Cry2A protein in chloroplasts confers resistance to plants against susceptible and Bt-resistant insects. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 96: 1840-1845.
- 96. Kotloff K L, Sztein M B, Wasserman S S, Losonsky G A, DiLorenzo S C, Walker R I. 2001. Safety and Immunogenicity of oral inactivated whole-cell Helicobacter pylori vaccine with adjuvant among volunteers with or without subclinical infection. Infection and Immunity 69(6):3581-90.
- 97. Kuby N. (2000). Immunology. (4.sup.th Ed.) New York. W.H. Freeman and Company.
- 98. Kusnadi A, Nikolov Z, Howard J (1997). Production of Recombinant proteins in Transgenic plants: Practical considerations. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 56 (5): 473-484.
- 99. Larrick, J. W., & Thomas, B. W. (2001) Plants proteins in transgenic plants and animals. Curent Opinion in Biotechnology, 12, 411-418.
- 100. Leary S E C, Griffin K F, Garmory H S, Williamson E D, and Titball R W. (1997) Expression of an F1-V fusion protein in attenuated Salmonella typhimurium and protection of mice against plague. Microbial Pathogenesis. 23: 167-179.
- 101. Lee, S. B., Byun, M. O., Daniell, H. Accumulation of trehalose within transgenic chloroplasts confers drought tolerance. Molecular Breeding (in press) (2002).
- 102. Lee, S. B., Kwon, H., Kwon, S., Park, S., Jeong, M., Han, S., Daniell, H., Byun, H. (2001). Drought tolerance conferred by the yeast trehalose-6 phosphate synthase gene engineered via the chloroplast genome. Transgenic Research. In press.
- 103. Lencer, W. I., Moe, S., Rufo, P. A. & Madara, J. L. (1995). Transcytosis of cholera toxin subunits across model human intestinal epithelia. Proc. Natl. Acad Sci USA., 92, 10094-10098.
- 104. Leppla, S. H., Robbins, J. B., Schneerson, R., Shiloach, J. Development of an improved vaccine for anthrax. J. Clin. Invest. 110 (2), 141-144 (2002).
- 105. Mason H S, Ball J M, Shi J J, Jiang X, Estes M K, and Arntzen C J. (1996) Expression of Norwalk virus capsid protein in transgenic tobacco and potato and its oral immunogenicity in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 93(11):5335-40.
- 106. Mason, H. S., Haq, T. A., Clements, J. D., & Arntzen, C. J. (1998). Edible vaccine protects mice against Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin (LT): potatoes expressing a synthetic LT-B gene. Vaccine. 16, 1336-1343.
- 107. Mathiowitz, E., Jacob, J. S., Jong, Y. S., Carino, G. P., Chickering, D. E., Chaturvedi, P., Santos, C. A., Vijayarahauau, K., Montgomery, S., Bassett, M., & Morrell, C. (1997). Biologically erodable microspheres as potential oral drug delivery systems. Nature, 386, 410-414.
- 108. May, G. D., Mason, H. S., & Lyons, P. C. (1996). Application of transgenic plants as production systems for pharmaceuticals in ACS symposium series 647. Fuller et al. eds.,
chapter 13, 196-204. - 109. McBride, K. E., Svab, Z., Schaaf, D. J., Hogen, P. S., Stalker, D. M., & Maliga, P. (1995). Amplification of a chimeric Bacillus gene in chloroplasts leads to extraordinary level of an insecticidal protein in tobacco. Biotechnology, 13, 362-365.
- 110. McCluskie M J, Weeratna R D, Clements J D, Davis H L. 2001. Mucosal immunization of mice using CpG DNA and/or mutants of the heat-labile enterotoxin of Escherichia coli as adjuvants. Vaccine 19(27):3759-68.
- 111. McNeal M M, Rae M N, Bean J A, Ward R L. 1999. Antibody-dependent and -independent protection following intranasal immunization of mice with rotavirus particles. Journal of Virology 73(9):7565-73.
- 112. MMWR 2000: 49. Use of anthrax vaccine in the United States. Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).
- 113. Molloy, S. S., Bresnahan, P. A., Leppla, S. H. Klimpel, K. R., Thomas, G. (1992). Human furin is a calcium-dependent serine endoprotease that recognizes the sequence Arg-X-X-Arg and efficiently cleaves anthrax toxin protective antigen. J. Biol. Chem., 267 (23), 16396-16402.
- 114. Moriya, O., Matsui, M., Osorio, M., Miyazawa, H., et al (2002). Induction of hepatitis C virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes in mice by immunization with dendritic cells treated with an anthrax toxin fusion protein. Vaccine, 20, 789-796.
- 115. Morris C B, Cheng E, Thanawastien A, Cardenas-Freytag L, Clements J D. 2000. Effectiveness of intranasal immunization with HIV-gp160 and an HIV-1 Env CTL epitope peptide (E7) in combination with the mucosal adjuvant LT(R192G). Vaccine 18(18):1944-1951.
- 116. New England Biolabs Catalog (2000-2001). 154.
- 117. Nicolson, G., Nass, M., & Nicolson, N. (2000). Anthrax vaccine: controversy over safety and efficacy. Antimicrobics and Infectious Diseases Newsletter, 18 (1), 1-6.
- 118. O'Neal C M, Clements J D, Estes M K, Conner M E. 1998.
Rotavirus 2/6 viruslike particles administered intranasally with cholera toxin, Escherichia coli heat-labile toxin (LT), and LT-R192G induce protection from rotavirus challenge. Journal of Virology 72(4):3390-3. - 119. Oplinger M L, Bagar S, Trofa A F, Clements J D, Gibbs P, Pazzaglia G, Bourgeois A L, Scott. D A. Safety and immunogenicity in volunteers of a new candidate oral mucosal adjuvant, LT(R192G). 1997.
- 120. Owen R L, Pierce N F, Apple R T, W. C. Cray J. 1986. M cell transport of Vibrio cholerae from the intestinal lumen into Peyer's patches: a mechanism for antigen sampling and for microbial transepithelial migration. Journal of Infectious Diseases 153:1108-1118.
- 121. Oyston P C, Russell P, Williamson E D, Titball R W. 1996. An aroA mutant of Yersinia pestis is attenuated in guinea-pigs, but virulent in mice. Microbiology 142 (Pt 7):1847-53.
- 122. Pannifer, A. D., Wong, T. Y., Schwazenbacher, R., Renatus, M., Petosa, C., Bienkowska, J., Lacy. D. B., Collier, R. J., Park, S., Leppla, S. H., Hanna, P., Liddington, R. C. (2001). Crystal structure of anthrax lethal toxin. Nature, 414, 229-233.
- 123. Petosa, C., Collier, R., Klimpel, K., Leppla, S., & Liddington, R. (1997). Crystal structure of the anthrax toxin protective antigen. Nature, 385, 833-838.
- 124. Petridis D, Sapidou E and Calandranis J (1995). Computer-Aided process analysis and economic evaluation of for biosynthetic human insulin production. A case study. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 48: 529-541.
- 125. Pezard, C., Weber, M., Sirard, J. C., Berche, P., Mock, M. (1995). Protective Immunity Induced by Bacillus anthracis Toxin-Deficient Strains. Infection and Immunity., 63, 1369-1372.
- 126. Plague History. 10 Feb. 2002. http://www.ento.vtedu/IHS/plagueHistory.html#justinian.
- 127. Price, B. M., Liner, A. L., Park, S., Leppla, S. H., Mateczun, A., Galloway, D. R. (2001). Protection against anthrax lethal toxin challenge by genetic immunization with a plasmid encoding the lethal factor protein. Infect. Immun., 69, 4509-4515.
- 128. Purvis, I. J., Bettany, A. J., Santiago, T. C., Coggins, J. R., et al (1987). The efficiency of folding of some proteins is increased by controlled rates of translation in vivo. J. Mol. Biol., 193, 413-417.
- 129. Ramirez, D. M., Leppla, S. H., Schneerson, R., Shiloach, J. Production, recovery and immunogenicity of the protective antigen from a recombinant strain of Bacillus anthracis. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 28 (4), 232-238 (2002).
- 130. Ruf, S., Hermann, M., Berger, I. J., Carer, H., & Bock, R. (2001). Stable genetic transformation of tomato plastids: high level foreign protein expression in fruits. Nature Biotechnology, 19, 870-875.
- 131. Russell P, Eley S M, Hibbs S E, Manchee R J, Stagg A J, and Titball R W. (1995) A comparison of plague vaccine, USP and EV76 vaccine induced protection against Yersinia pestis in a murine model. Vaccine. 13: 1551-6.
- 132. Ryan E T, Crean T I, John M, Butterton J R, Clements J D, Calderwood S B. 1999. In vivo expression and immunoadjuvancy of a mutant of heat-labile enterotoxin of Escherichia coli in vaccine and vector strains of Vibrio cholerae. Infection and Immunity 67(4):1694-701.
- 133. Sabnani L, and Rao D N. (1999) Identification of immunodominant epitope of F1 antigen of Yersinia pestis. FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology. 27: 155-162.
- 134. Sanford, J. C., Smith, F. D., Russell, J. A. (1993). Optimizing the Biolistic Process for Different Biological Applications. Methods in Enzymolog, 217, 483-509.
- 135. Sanford, J. C., Smith, F. D., Russell, J. A. (1993). Optimizing the Biolistic Process for Different Biological Applications. Methods in Enzymology, 217, 483-509.
- 136. Scharton-Kersten T, Yu J, Vassell R, O'Hagan D, Alving C R, Glenn G M. 2000. Transcutaneous immunization with bacterial ADP-ribosylating exotoxins, subunits, and unrelated adjuvants. Infection and Immunity 68(9):5306-13.
- 137. Sestak K, Meister R K, Hayes J R, Kim L, Lewis P A, Myers G, Saif L J. 1999. Active immunity and T-cell populations in pigs intraperitoneally inoculated with baculovirus-expressed transmissible gastroenteritis virus structural proteins. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 70(3-4):203-21.
- 138. Sidorov, V. A., Kasten, D., Pang, S. Z., Hajdukiewicz, P. T. J., Staub, J. M., Nehra, N. S. (1999). Stable chloroplast transformation in potato: use of green fluorescent protein as a plastid marker. Plant Journal, 19, 209-216.
- 139. Singh, Y., Ivins, B. E., Leppla, S. H. (1998). Study of immunization against anthrax with the purified recombinant protective antigen of Bacillus anthracis. Infect. Immun., 66, 3447-3448.
- 140. Staub, J. M., Garcia, B., Graves, J., Hajdukiewicz, et al (2000). High yield production of human therapeutic protein in tobacco chloroplasts. Nat. Biotechnol., 18, 333-338.
- 141. Straley S C, and Bowmer W S. (1996) Virulence genes regulated at the transcriptional level by Ca+2 in Yersinia pestis include structural genes for outer membrane proteins. Infect. Immun. 51: 445-454.
- 142. Streatfield S J, Jilka J M, Hood E E, Turner D D, Bailey M R, Mayor J M, Woodard S L, Beifuss K K, Horn M E, Delaney D E, Tizard I R, and Howard J A. (2001). Plant-based vaccines: unique advantages. Vaccine. 19: 2742-2748.
- 143. Sugita, M. Sugiura, M. Regulation of gene expression in chloroplast of higher plants, Plant Molecular Biology 32:315-326, (1996).
- 144. Svab, Z., Maliga, P. (1993). High frequency plastid transformation in tobacco by selection for a chimeric aadA gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 90, 913-917.
- 145. Tacket C O, Sztein M B, Lsonosky G A, Wasserman S S, Nataro J P, Edelman R, Pickard D., Dougan G, Chatfield S N, and Lavine M M. (1997) Safety of live oral Salmonella typhi vaccine strain with deletions in htrA and aroCaroD and immune response in humans. Infect Immun. 65: 452-456.
- 146. Tacket, C. O., Mason, H. S., Losonsky, G., Clements, J. D., Levine, M. M. & Arntzen, C. J. (1998). Immunogenicity in humans of a recombinant bacterial antigen delivered in a transgenic potato.
Nat Med 4, 607-9. - 147. Titbal R. W., and Williamson E. D. (2001). Vaccination against bubonic and pneumonic plague. Vaccine. 19: 4175-4184.
- 148. Tribble D R, Baqar S, Oplinger M L, Bourgeois A L, Clements J D, Pazzaglia G, Pace J, Walker R I, Gibbs P, Scott. D A. Safety and enhanced immunogenicity in volunteers of an oral, inactivated whole cell Campylobacter vaccine co-administered with a modified E. coli heat-labile enterotoxin adjuvant-1-LT(R192G); 1997.
- 149. Tsafrir, S. M., Gomez-Lim, M. A., Palmer, K. E. (1998). Perspective: edible vaccines—a concept coming age. Trends in Microbiology, 6 (11) 449-453.
- 150. Tuboly T, Yu W, Bailey A, Degrandis S, Du S, Erickson L, Nagy E. (2000) Immunogenicity of porcupine transmissible gastroenteritis virus spike protein expressed in plants. Vaccine. 18: 2023-2028.
- 151. Tumpey T M, Renshaw M, Clements J D, Katz J M. 2001. Mucosal delivery of inactivated influenza vaccine induces B-Cell-dependent heterosubtypic cross-protection against lethal influenza A H5N1 virus infection. Journal of Virology 75(11):5141-50.
- 152. Varshney, A., & Altpeter, F. (2001) Stable transformation—and tissue culture response in current European winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) germplasm. Mol. Breeding. 8, 295-309.
- 153. Vasil, I. K., Bean, S., Zhao, J, McClusskey, P., Lookhart, M., Zhao, H.-P., Altpeter, F., & Vasil, V. (2001) Evaluation of baking properties and gluten protein composition of field grown transgenic wheat lines expressing high molecular weight glutenin gene 1Ax1. J. Plant Physiol. 158, 521-528.
- 154. Vrekleij, A. J., & Leunissen, J. M., eds. (1989). Immuno-gold labeling in cell biology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.
- 155. Walmsley A M and Arntezen C J. (2000) Plants for delivery of edible vaccines. Review. Curr. Opin. Biotechnology. 11(12) 1179-84.
- 156. Walmsley, A., & Arntzen, C. (2000). Plants for Delivery of Edible Vaccines. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 11, 126-129.
- 157. Wesche, J., Elliot, J., Falnes, P., Olsnes, S., & Collier, R. (1998). Characterization of membrane translocation by anthrax protective antigen. Biochemistry, 37, 15737-15746.
- 158. Williamson E, Westrich G M, Viney J L. 1999a. Modulating dendritic cells to optimize mucosal immunization protocols. Journal of Immunology 163(7):3668-75.
- 159. Williamson E D, Eley S M, Griffin K F, Green M, Russell P, Leary S E, Oyston P C, Easterbrook T, Reddin K M, Robinson A and others. 1995. A new improved sub-unit vaccine for plague: the basis of protection. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 12(3-4):223-30.
- 160. Williamson E D, Eley S M, Stagg A J, Green M, Russell P, and Titball R W. (1997) A sub-unit vaccine elicits IgG in serum, spleen cell cultures and bronchial washings and protects immunized animals against plague. Vaccine. 15 (10) 1079-1084.
- 161. Williamson E D, Eley S M, Stagg A J, Green M, Russell P, Titball R W. 2000. A single dose sub-unit vaccine protects against pneumonic plague. Vaccine 19(4-5):566-71.
- 162. Williamson E D, Sharp G J E, Eley S M, Vesey P M, Peppert T C, Titball R W, and Alpar H O. (1996) Local and systemic immune response to microencapsulated subunit vaccine for plague. Vaccine. 14 (17-18) 1613-1619.
- 163. Williamson E D, Vesey P M, Gillhespy K J, Eley S M, Green M, and Titball R W. (1999) An IgG titre to the F1 and Vantigens correlates with protection against plague in the mouse model. Clin Exp Immunol. 116: 107-114.
- 164. Williamson E D. (2001) Plague vaccine research and development. J. Applied Microbiology. 91: 606-608.
- 165. Xu, J., Schubert, J., & Altpeter, F. (2001) Dissection of RNA mediated virus resistance in fertile transgenic perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Plant J 26, 265-274.
- 166. Ye, G. N., Daniell, H., & Sanford, J. C. (1990). Optimization of delivery of foreign DNA into higher-plant chloroplasts. Plant Mol. Biol., 15 (6), 809-819.
- 167. Yu, J., & Langridge, H. R. (2001). A plant-based multicomponent vaccine protects mice from enteric diseases. Nat. Biotech., 19, 548-552.
- 168. Yuan L, Geyer A, Hodgins D C, Fan Z, Qian Y, Chang K O, Crawford S E, Parreno V, Ward L A, Estes M K and others. 2000. Intranasal administration of 2/6-rotavirus-like particles with mutant Escherichia coli heat-labile toxin (LT-R192G) induces antibody-secreting cell responses but not protective immunity in gnotobiotic pigs. Journal of Virology 74(19):8843-53.
- 169. Zhang, S., Williams-Carrier, R., & Lemaux, P. G. (2002). Transformation of recalcitrant maize elite inbreds using in vitro shoot meristematic cultures induced from germinated seedlings. Plant Cell Rep. (in press).
Claims (12)
1-25. (canceled)
26. An orally-administrable vaccine composition comprising a chloroplast expressed protective antigen for conferring immunity to said antigen in a mammal, said vaccine comprising edible plant material.
27. The vaccine composition of claim 26 , wherein said antigen confers an immunoprotective response in said mammal.
28. The vaccine composition of claim 26 , wherein said plant material comprises a chloroplast expression vector encoding said antigen, said antigen being fused to a sequence encoding cholera toxin B (CTB), said CTB forming CTB pentamers which exhibit intact transcytosis to the external basolateral membrane of intestinal epithelium.
29. The vaccine composition of claim 26 , wherein said vaccine composition is heat-stable.
30. The vaccine composition of claim 26 , wherein said plant is selected from the group consisting of tomato, carrot, low nicotine tobacco, corn, and ryegrass.
31. A method for inducing an immune response against an antigen, comprising feeding to said mammal an effective amount of the vaccine composition of claim 1.
32. An orally-administrable vaccine composition as claimed in claim 1, for conferring immunity to Yershina pestis to a mammal, said vaccine comprising plant material comprising V and F1 antigens of Y. pestis.
33. The vaccine composition of claim 32 , wherein said plant material comprises a plant plastid genome having a genetic sequence encoding for V and F1 antigens of Y. pestis.
34. A process for vaccinating a mammal against Yershina pestis comprising feeding to said mammal an effective amount of the vaccine composition of claim 32 .
35. An orally-administrable vaccine composition as claimed in claim 1 for conferring immunity to Bacillus anthracia to a mammal, said vaccine comprising plant material comprising anthrax protective antigen.
36. The composition of claim 35 , wherein said vaccine is free of both anthrax edema factor and anthrax lethal factor.
Applications Claiming Priority (7)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US34470401P | 2001-12-26 | 2001-12-26 | |
US39342802P | 2002-07-03 | 2002-07-03 | |
US39365102P | 2002-07-03 | 2002-07-03 | |
US40081602P | 2002-08-02 | 2002-08-02 | |
PCT/US2002/041503 WO2003057834A2 (en) | 2001-12-26 | 2002-12-26 | Expression of protective antigens in transgenic chloroplasts and the production of improved vaccines |
US10/500,351 US7354760B2 (en) | 2001-12-26 | 2002-12-26 | Expression of protective antigens in transgenic chloroplasts |
US12/014,352 US20120135038A1 (en) | 2001-12-26 | 2008-01-15 | Expression of protective antigens in transgenic chloroplasts and the production of improved vaccines |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US13/684,813 Continuation US20130189308A1 (en) | 2001-12-26 | 2012-11-26 | Expression of protective antigens in transgenic chloroplasts and the production of improved vaccines |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20140294895A1 true US20140294895A1 (en) | 2014-10-02 |
Family
ID=34577832
Family Applications (4)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/500,351 Expired - Lifetime US7354760B2 (en) | 2001-12-26 | 2002-12-26 | Expression of protective antigens in transgenic chloroplasts |
US12/014,352 Abandoned US20120135038A1 (en) | 2001-12-26 | 2008-01-15 | Expression of protective antigens in transgenic chloroplasts and the production of improved vaccines |
US13/684,813 Abandoned US20130189308A1 (en) | 2001-12-26 | 2012-11-26 | Expression of protective antigens in transgenic chloroplasts and the production of improved vaccines |
US14/231,420 Abandoned US20140294895A1 (en) | 2001-12-26 | 2014-03-31 | Expression of Protective Antigens in Transgenic Chloroplasts and the Production of Improved Vaccines |
Family Applications Before (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/500,351 Expired - Lifetime US7354760B2 (en) | 2001-12-26 | 2002-12-26 | Expression of protective antigens in transgenic chloroplasts |
US12/014,352 Abandoned US20120135038A1 (en) | 2001-12-26 | 2008-01-15 | Expression of protective antigens in transgenic chloroplasts and the production of improved vaccines |
US13/684,813 Abandoned US20130189308A1 (en) | 2001-12-26 | 2012-11-26 | Expression of protective antigens in transgenic chloroplasts and the production of improved vaccines |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (4) | US7354760B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (15)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20100251425A9 (en) | 1998-05-15 | 2010-09-30 | University Of Central Florida | Expression of human interferon in transgenic chloroplasts |
US7354760B2 (en) * | 2001-12-26 | 2008-04-08 | University Of Central Florida Research Foundation, Inc. | Expression of protective antigens in transgenic chloroplasts |
US20040199937A1 (en) * | 2003-04-01 | 2004-10-07 | Monsanto Technology Llc | Plastid Transformation of Tobacco Suspension Cells |
US8409590B2 (en) * | 2004-02-11 | 2013-04-02 | Ligocyte Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | Anthrax antigens and methods of use |
AU2006309281B2 (en) | 2005-05-27 | 2011-11-03 | University Of Central Florida | Chloroplasts engineered to express pharmaceutical proteins |
US10752909B2 (en) * | 2007-03-30 | 2020-08-25 | The Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania | Chloroplasts engineered to express pharmaceutical proteins in edible plants |
WO2008121953A2 (en) * | 2007-03-30 | 2008-10-09 | University Of Central Florida Research Foundation, Inc. | Interferon produced in plastids |
WO2009077611A2 (en) * | 2007-12-19 | 2009-06-25 | Basf Plant Science Gmbh | Plants with increased yield and/or increased tolerance to environmental stress (iy-bm) |
CN101980668A (en) | 2008-02-07 | 2011-02-23 | 赛拉基因公司 | Rescue of photoreceptors by intravitreal administration of expression vectors encoding therapeutic proteins |
US10689633B2 (en) | 2008-02-29 | 2020-06-23 | The Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania | Expression of β-mannanase in chloroplasts and its utilization in lignocellulosic woody biomass hydrolysis |
US20110110981A1 (en) * | 2008-05-27 | 2011-05-12 | Henry Daniell | Orally Administerable Vaccine for Yersinia Pestis |
CA2780362C (en) | 2009-11-09 | 2019-12-24 | University Of Central Florida Research Foundation, Inc. | Administration of plant expressed oral tolerance agents |
US10865419B2 (en) | 2011-10-24 | 2020-12-15 | The Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania | Orally administered plastid expressed cholera toxin B subunit-exendin 4 as treatment for type 2 diabetes |
AR127146A1 (en) * | 2021-09-27 | 2023-12-20 | Monsanto Technology Llc | COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR THE TRANSFORMATION OF EXPLANTS OF EMBRYOS REMOVED FROM MONOCOTYLEDON SEEDS |
CN118580997A (en) * | 2024-05-30 | 2024-09-03 | 中国农业科学院北京畜牧兽医研究所 | Preparation method and application of bacillus anthracis LT toxin |
Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5484719A (en) * | 1991-08-26 | 1996-01-16 | Edible Vaccines, Inc. | Vaccines produced and administered through edible plants |
CA2188220A1 (en) * | 1996-10-18 | 1998-04-18 | Kimberley Kenward | Non-food crop plant bioreactor |
WO1999010513A1 (en) * | 1997-08-07 | 1999-03-04 | Auburn University | Universal chloroplast integration and expression vectors, transformed plants and products thereof |
US6387665B1 (en) * | 1994-11-23 | 2002-05-14 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army | Method of making a vaccine for anthrax |
US7354760B2 (en) * | 2001-12-26 | 2008-04-08 | University Of Central Florida Research Foundation, Inc. | Expression of protective antigens in transgenic chloroplasts |
Family Cites Families (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5877402A (en) * | 1990-05-01 | 1999-03-02 | Rutgers, The State University Of New Jersey | DNA constructs and methods for stably transforming plastids of multicellular plants and expressing recombinant proteins therein |
US5612487A (en) | 1991-08-26 | 1997-03-18 | Edible Vaccines, Inc. | Anti-viral vaccines expressed in plants |
US5576198A (en) * | 1993-12-14 | 1996-11-19 | Calgene, Inc. | Controlled expression of transgenic constructs in plant plastids |
DE69935225T2 (en) | 1998-07-10 | 2007-11-15 | Calgene Llc, Davis | EXPRESSION OF HERBICIDAL TOLERANCES IN PLANT PLASTIDS |
AU2001276813A1 (en) | 2000-03-01 | 2001-10-08 | Auburn University | Pharmaceutical proteins, human therapeutics, human serum albumin, insulin, native cholera toxic b submitted on transgenics plastids |
-
2002
- 2002-12-26 US US10/500,351 patent/US7354760B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2008
- 2008-01-15 US US12/014,352 patent/US20120135038A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2012
- 2012-11-26 US US13/684,813 patent/US20130189308A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2014
- 2014-03-31 US US14/231,420 patent/US20140294895A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5484719A (en) * | 1991-08-26 | 1996-01-16 | Edible Vaccines, Inc. | Vaccines produced and administered through edible plants |
US6387665B1 (en) * | 1994-11-23 | 2002-05-14 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army | Method of making a vaccine for anthrax |
CA2188220A1 (en) * | 1996-10-18 | 1998-04-18 | Kimberley Kenward | Non-food crop plant bioreactor |
WO1999010513A1 (en) * | 1997-08-07 | 1999-03-04 | Auburn University | Universal chloroplast integration and expression vectors, transformed plants and products thereof |
US7354760B2 (en) * | 2001-12-26 | 2008-04-08 | University Of Central Florida Research Foundation, Inc. | Expression of protective antigens in transgenic chloroplasts |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
Title |
---|
Arakawa et al (1998, Nature Biotechnol. 16:934-938) * |
Daniell et al (August 2001, J. Mol. Biol. 311:1001-1009) * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US7354760B2 (en) | 2008-04-08 |
US20120135038A1 (en) | 2012-05-31 |
US20130189308A1 (en) | 2013-07-25 |
US20050108792A1 (en) | 2005-05-19 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP1456390B1 (en) | Expression of protective antigens in transgenic chloroplasts and the production of improved vaccines | |
US20140294895A1 (en) | Expression of Protective Antigens in Transgenic Chloroplasts and the Production of Improved Vaccines | |
Chikwamba et al. | A functional antigen in a practical crop: LT-B producing maize protects mice against Escherichia coli heat labile enterotoxin (LT) and cholera toxin (CT) | |
Gorantala et al. | Generation of protective immune response against anthrax by oral immunization with protective antigen plant-based vaccine | |
Molina et al. | High‐yield expression of a viral peptide animal vaccine in transgenic tobacco chloroplasts | |
Rigano et al. | Expression systems and developments in plant‐made vaccines | |
AU722327B2 (en) | Method of stimulating an immune response by administration of host organisms that express intimin alone or as a fusion protein with one or more other antigens | |
Cardi et al. | Chloroplasts as expression platforms for plant-produced vaccines | |
Tiwari et al. | Plants as bioreactors for the production of vaccine antigens | |
Kang et al. | Expression of the B subunit of E. coli heat-labile enterotoxin in the chloroplasts of plants and its characterization | |
US7186560B2 (en) | High level expression of immunogenic proteins in the plastids of higher plants | |
Gorantala et al. | A plant based protective antigen [PA (dIV)] vaccine expressed in chloroplasts demonstrates protective immunity in mice against anthrax | |
Karaman et al. | Expression of the cholera toxin B subunit (CT-B) in maize seeds and a combined mucosal treatment against cholera and traveler’s diarrhea | |
Joensuu et al. | Transgenic plants for animal health: plant-made vaccine antigens for animal infectious disease control | |
Chen et al. | Subunit vaccines produced using plant biotechnology | |
Soria-Guerra et al. | Expression of a multi-epitope DPT fusion protein in transplastomic tobacco plants retains both antigenicity and immunogenicity of all three components of the functional oligomer | |
WO1999018225A1 (en) | Expression of cholera toxin b subunit in transgenic plants and efficacy thereof in oral vaccines | |
Qureshi et al. | Edible plant vaccines: a step towards revolution in the field of immunology. | |
US20150196627A1 (en) | Plastid-expressed mycobacterium tuberculosis vaccine antigens esat-6 and mtb72f fused to cholera toxin b subunit | |
YUSIBOV et al. | Plants as vectors for biomedical products | |
Mor et al. | Plants as a production and delivery vehicle for orally delivered subunit vaccines | |
Joensuu | Production of F4 fimbrial adhesin in plants: a model for oral porcine vaccine against enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli | |
Nicholson et al. | Production of vaccines in GM plants | |
Bum-Soo et al. | Recent Studies on the Edible Plant Vaccine for Prophylactic Medicine against Microorganism-Mediated Diseases | |
Chebolu | Expression Of Gal/galnac Lectin Of Entamoeba Histolytica In Transgenic Chloroplasts To Develop A Vaccine For Amebiasis |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |