CA2188220A1 - Non-food crop plant bioreactor - Google Patents
Non-food crop plant bioreactorInfo
- Publication number
- CA2188220A1 CA2188220A1 CA 2188220 CA2188220A CA2188220A1 CA 2188220 A1 CA2188220 A1 CA 2188220A1 CA 2188220 CA2188220 CA 2188220 CA 2188220 A CA2188220 A CA 2188220A CA 2188220 A1 CA2188220 A1 CA 2188220A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- plant
- interest
- csf
- food crop
- protein
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 244000038559 crop plants Species 0.000 title claims abstract description 35
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 claims abstract description 95
- 102000004169 proteins and genes Human genes 0.000 claims abstract description 62
- 235000013305 food Nutrition 0.000 claims abstract description 39
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 35
- 230000009261 transgenic effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 35
- 230000014509 gene expression Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 20
- 239000013598 vector Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 14
- NOESYZHRGYRDHS-UHFFFAOYSA-N insulin Chemical compound N1C(=O)C(NC(=O)C(CCC(N)=O)NC(=O)C(CCC(O)=O)NC(=O)C(C(C)C)NC(=O)C(NC(=O)CN)C(C)CC)CSSCC(C(NC(CO)C(=O)NC(CC(C)C)C(=O)NC(CC=2C=CC(O)=CC=2)C(=O)NC(CCC(N)=O)C(=O)NC(CC(C)C)C(=O)NC(CCC(O)=O)C(=O)NC(CC(N)=O)C(=O)NC(CC=2C=CC(O)=CC=2)C(=O)NC(CSSCC(NC(=O)C(C(C)C)NC(=O)C(CC(C)C)NC(=O)C(CC=2C=CC(O)=CC=2)NC(=O)C(CC(C)C)NC(=O)C(C)NC(=O)C(CCC(O)=O)NC(=O)C(C(C)C)NC(=O)C(CC(C)C)NC(=O)C(CC=2NC=NC=2)NC(=O)C(CO)NC(=O)CNC2=O)C(=O)NCC(=O)NC(CCC(O)=O)C(=O)NC(CCCNC(N)=N)C(=O)NCC(=O)NC(CC=3C=CC=CC=3)C(=O)NC(CC=3C=CC=CC=3)C(=O)NC(CC=3C=CC(O)=CC=3)C(=O)NC(C(C)O)C(=O)N3C(CCC3)C(=O)NC(CCCCN)C(=O)NC(C)C(O)=O)C(=O)NC(CC(N)=O)C(O)=O)=O)NC(=O)C(C(C)CC)NC(=O)C(CO)NC(=O)C(C(C)O)NC(=O)C1CSSCC2NC(=O)C(CC(C)C)NC(=O)C(NC(=O)C(CCC(N)=O)NC(=O)C(CC(N)=O)NC(=O)C(NC(=O)C(N)CC=1C=CC=CC=1)C(C)C)CC1=CN=CN1 NOESYZHRGYRDHS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 10
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 10
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 10
- 239000000427 antigen Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 9
- 108091007433 antigens Proteins 0.000 claims abstract description 9
- 102000036639 antigens Human genes 0.000 claims abstract description 9
- -1 hPG-CSF Proteins 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 102100022641 Coagulation factor IX Human genes 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 108010076282 Factor IX Proteins 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 108010054218 Factor VIII Proteins 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 102000001690 Factor VIII Human genes 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 108010017080 Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Proteins 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 102000004269 Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Human genes 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 108010017213 Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Proteins 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 102000004877 Insulin Human genes 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 108090001061 Insulin Proteins 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 108010046938 Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Proteins 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 102000007651 Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Human genes 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 229960004222 factor ix Drugs 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 229960000301 factor viii Drugs 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 229940125396 insulin Drugs 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 102000015696 Interleukins Human genes 0.000 claims abstract description 4
- 108010063738 Interleukins Proteins 0.000 claims abstract description 4
- 239000003630 growth substance Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 4
- 229940047122 interleukins Drugs 0.000 claims abstract description 4
- 231100000252 nontoxic Toxicity 0.000 claims abstract description 4
- 230000003000 nontoxic effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 4
- 108010051696 Growth Hormone Proteins 0.000 claims abstract description 3
- 102000018997 Growth Hormone Human genes 0.000 claims abstract description 3
- 239000000122 growth hormone Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 3
- 230000001131 transforming effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 3
- 102000014150 Interferons Human genes 0.000 claims abstract 3
- 108010050904 Interferons Proteins 0.000 claims abstract 3
- 229940047124 interferons Drugs 0.000 claims abstract 3
- 102000003951 Erythropoietin Human genes 0.000 claims abstract 2
- 108090000394 Erythropoietin Proteins 0.000 claims abstract 2
- 229940105423 erythropoietin Drugs 0.000 claims abstract 2
- OXCMYAYHXIHQOA-UHFFFAOYSA-N potassium;[2-butyl-5-chloro-3-[[4-[2-(1,2,4-triaza-3-azanidacyclopenta-1,4-dien-5-yl)phenyl]phenyl]methyl]imidazol-4-yl]methanol Chemical compound [K+].CCCCC1=NC(Cl)=C(CO)N1CC1=CC=C(C=2C(=CC=CC=2)C2=N[N-]N=N2)C=C1 OXCMYAYHXIHQOA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract 2
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 claims description 99
- 244000061176 Nicotiana tabacum Species 0.000 claims description 45
- 235000002637 Nicotiana tabacum Nutrition 0.000 claims description 43
- 102000004388 Interleukin-4 Human genes 0.000 claims description 22
- 108090000978 Interleukin-4 Proteins 0.000 claims description 22
- 229940028885 interleukin-4 Drugs 0.000 claims description 22
- 210000001519 tissue Anatomy 0.000 claims description 18
- 229960002715 nicotine Drugs 0.000 claims description 16
- 108010076504 Protein Sorting Signals Proteins 0.000 claims description 15
- SNICXCGAKADSCV-JTQLQIEISA-N (-)-Nicotine Chemical compound CN1CCC[C@H]1C1=CC=CN=C1 SNICXCGAKADSCV-JTQLQIEISA-N 0.000 claims description 13
- SNICXCGAKADSCV-UHFFFAOYSA-N nicotine Natural products CN1CCCC1C1=CC=CN=C1 SNICXCGAKADSCV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 13
- 229930013930 alkaloid Natural products 0.000 claims description 10
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000011282 treatment Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 210000002472 endoplasmic reticulum Anatomy 0.000 claims description 6
- 150000003797 alkaloid derivatives Chemical class 0.000 claims description 5
- 206010012601 diabetes mellitus Diseases 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000014759 maintenance of location Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 208000036142 Viral infection Diseases 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000023555 blood coagulation Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 210000002540 macrophage Anatomy 0.000 claims description 2
- 210000001616 monocyte Anatomy 0.000 claims description 2
- 210000000130 stem cell Anatomy 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000009385 viral infection Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 102100039620 Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor Human genes 0.000 claims 2
- 102000000589 Interleukin-1 Human genes 0.000 claims 1
- 108010002352 Interleukin-1 Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 102000000588 Interleukin-2 Human genes 0.000 claims 1
- 108010002350 Interleukin-2 Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 102000000646 Interleukin-3 Human genes 0.000 claims 1
- 108010002386 Interleukin-3 Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- 241000208125 Nicotiana Species 0.000 claims 1
- 229940121364 interleukin derivative Drugs 0.000 claims 1
- 229940076264 interleukin-3 Drugs 0.000 claims 1
- 230000000638 stimulation Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 abstract description 13
- 102000004457 Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Human genes 0.000 abstract description 3
- 241000208134 Nicotiana rustica Species 0.000 abstract description 2
- 108010053481 Antifreeze Proteins Proteins 0.000 description 67
- 235000018102 proteins Nutrition 0.000 description 51
- 239000000284 extract Substances 0.000 description 27
- 108700019146 Transgenes Proteins 0.000 description 25
- 241000723873 Tobacco mosaic virus Species 0.000 description 18
- 241000699670 Mus sp. Species 0.000 description 16
- 108091032973 (ribonucleotides)n+m Proteins 0.000 description 14
- 101710107540 Type-2 ice-structuring protein Proteins 0.000 description 14
- 102100023635 Alpha-fetoprotein Human genes 0.000 description 12
- 101710123134 Ice-binding protein Proteins 0.000 description 12
- 210000001723 extracellular space Anatomy 0.000 description 12
- 210000000172 cytosol Anatomy 0.000 description 10
- 238000001262 western blot Methods 0.000 description 10
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 9
- 108091034117 Oligonucleotide Proteins 0.000 description 8
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 8
- 230000003248 secreting effect Effects 0.000 description 8
- 244000061456 Solanum tuberosum Species 0.000 description 6
- 235000002595 Solanum tuberosum Nutrition 0.000 description 6
- JLCPHMBAVCMARE-UHFFFAOYSA-N [3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[5-(2-amino-6-oxo-1H-purin-9-yl)-3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[3-[[5-(2-amino-6-oxo-1H-purin-9-yl)-3-[[5-(2-amino-6-oxo-1H-purin-9-yl)-3-hydroxyoxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxyoxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(5-methyl-2,4-dioxopyrimidin-1-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(6-aminopurin-9-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(6-aminopurin-9-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(6-aminopurin-9-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(6-aminopurin-9-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxyoxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(5-methyl-2,4-dioxopyrimidin-1-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(4-amino-2-oxopyrimidin-1-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(5-methyl-2,4-dioxopyrimidin-1-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(5-methyl-2,4-dioxopyrimidin-1-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(6-aminopurin-9-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(6-aminopurin-9-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(4-amino-2-oxopyrimidin-1-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(4-amino-2-oxopyrimidin-1-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(4-amino-2-oxopyrimidin-1-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(6-aminopurin-9-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methoxy-hydroxyphosphoryl]oxy-5-(4-amino-2-oxopyrimidin-1-yl)oxolan-2-yl]methyl [5-(6-aminopurin-9-yl)-2-(hydroxymethyl)oxolan-3-yl] hydrogen phosphate Polymers Cc1cn(C2CC(OP(O)(=O)OCC3OC(CC3OP(O)(=O)OCC3OC(CC3O)n3cnc4c3nc(N)[nH]c4=O)n3cnc4c3nc(N)[nH]c4=O)C(COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3COP(O)(=O)OC3CC(OC3CO)n3cnc4c(N)ncnc34)n3ccc(N)nc3=O)n3cnc4c(N)ncnc34)n3ccc(N)nc3=O)n3ccc(N)nc3=O)n3ccc(N)nc3=O)n3cnc4c(N)ncnc34)n3cnc4c(N)ncnc34)n3cc(C)c(=O)[nH]c3=O)n3cc(C)c(=O)[nH]c3=O)n3ccc(N)nc3=O)n3cc(C)c(=O)[nH]c3=O)n3cnc4c3nc(N)[nH]c4=O)n3cnc4c(N)ncnc34)n3cnc4c(N)ncnc34)n3cnc4c(N)ncnc34)n3cnc4c(N)ncnc34)O2)c(=O)[nH]c1=O JLCPHMBAVCMARE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 101150055123 afp gene Proteins 0.000 description 6
- 239000002299 complementary DNA Substances 0.000 description 6
- 230000001086 cytosolic effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 241000251468 Actinopterygii Species 0.000 description 5
- 108091026890 Coding region Proteins 0.000 description 5
- 210000004027 cell Anatomy 0.000 description 5
- 239000000499 gel Substances 0.000 description 5
- 230000008595 infiltration Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000001764 infiltration Methods 0.000 description 5
- 108020004999 messenger RNA Proteins 0.000 description 5
- 239000002773 nucleotide Substances 0.000 description 5
- 125000003729 nucleotide group Chemical group 0.000 description 5
- 210000000056 organ Anatomy 0.000 description 5
- 241000276572 Hemitripterus americanus Species 0.000 description 4
- 150000001413 amino acids Chemical class 0.000 description 4
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000014616 translation Effects 0.000 description 4
- 101100043696 Drosophila melanogaster Stim gene Proteins 0.000 description 3
- PEDCQBHIVMGVHV-UHFFFAOYSA-N Glycerine Chemical compound OCC(O)CO PEDCQBHIVMGVHV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- FFEARJCKVFRZRR-BYPYZUCNSA-N L-methionine Chemical compound CSCC[C@H](N)C(O)=O FFEARJCKVFRZRR-BYPYZUCNSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 241000699666 Mus <mouse, genus> Species 0.000 description 3
- 238000000636 Northern blotting Methods 0.000 description 3
- 108091081024 Start codon Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 210000001744 T-lymphocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 238000009825 accumulation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000009395 breeding Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000001488 breeding effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000003776 cleavage reaction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000000605 extraction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000012634 fragment Substances 0.000 description 3
- 150000002500 ions Chemical class 0.000 description 3
- 229930182817 methionine Natural products 0.000 description 3
- 230000037361 pathway Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000001556 precipitation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000007017 scission Effects 0.000 description 3
- 108700005378 sea raven antifreeze Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 210000002966 serum Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 3
- 231100000331 toxic Toxicity 0.000 description 3
- 230000002588 toxic effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000009466 transformation Effects 0.000 description 3
- JBFQOLHAGBKPTP-NZATWWQASA-N (2s)-2-[[(2s)-4-carboxy-2-[[3-carboxy-2-[[(2s)-2,6-diaminohexanoyl]amino]propanoyl]amino]butanoyl]amino]-4-methylpentanoic acid Chemical group CC(C)C[C@@H](C(O)=O)NC(=O)[C@H](CCC(O)=O)NC(=O)C(CC(O)=O)NC(=O)[C@@H](N)CCCCN JBFQOLHAGBKPTP-NZATWWQASA-N 0.000 description 2
- CIWBSHSKHKDKBQ-JLAZNSOCSA-N Ascorbic acid Chemical compound OC[C@H](O)[C@H]1OC(=O)C(O)=C1O CIWBSHSKHKDKBQ-JLAZNSOCSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 108020004635 Complementary DNA Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 108020004414 DNA Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 238000002965 ELISA Methods 0.000 description 2
- 241001529936 Murinae Species 0.000 description 2
- YFONKFDEZLYQDH-OPQQBVKSSA-N N-[(1R,2S)-2,6-dimethyindan-1-yl]-6-[(1R)-1-fluoroethyl]-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine Chemical compound C[C@@H](F)C1=NC(N)=NC(N[C@H]2C3=CC(C)=CC=C3C[C@@H]2C)=N1 YFONKFDEZLYQDH-OPQQBVKSSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 241000282320 Panthera leo Species 0.000 description 2
- IQFYYKKMVGJFEH-XLPZGREQSA-N Thymidine Chemical compound O=C1NC(=O)C(C)=CN1[C@@H]1O[C@H](CO)[C@@H](O)C1 IQFYYKKMVGJFEH-XLPZGREQSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 206010067584 Type 1 diabetes mellitus Diseases 0.000 description 2
- XSQUKJJJFZCRTK-UHFFFAOYSA-N Urea Chemical compound NC(N)=O XSQUKJJJFZCRTK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000002253 acid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000004075 alteration Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001580 bacterial effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 2
- IQFYYKKMVGJFEH-UHFFFAOYSA-N beta-L-thymidine Natural products O=C1NC(=O)C(C)=CN1C1OC(CO)C(O)C1 IQFYYKKMVGJFEH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000004899 c-terminal region Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 239000013078 crystal Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000000502 dialysis Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000796 flavoring agent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 235000019634 flavors Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 238000003306 harvesting Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000004615 ingredient Substances 0.000 description 2
- 108010089256 lysyl-aspartyl-glutamyl-leucine Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 235000019629 palatability Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 239000013612 plasmid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229920002401 polyacrylamide Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 230000008488 polyadenylation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000013641 positive control Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000028327 secretion Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000001488 sodium phosphate Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910000162 sodium phosphate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 238000010186 staining Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000003786 synthesis reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 2
- RYFMWSXOAZQYPI-UHFFFAOYSA-K trisodium phosphate Chemical compound [Na+].[Na+].[Na+].[O-]P([O-])([O-])=O RYFMWSXOAZQYPI-UHFFFAOYSA-K 0.000 description 2
- 230000003612 virological effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- QKNYBSVHEMOAJP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2-amino-2-(hydroxymethyl)propane-1,3-diol;hydron;chloride Chemical compound Cl.OCC(N)(CO)CO QKNYBSVHEMOAJP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 101150098072 20 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101150055869 25 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241000219194 Arabidopsis Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000370685 Arge Species 0.000 description 1
- 208000035143 Bacterial infection Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000009010 Bradford assay Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000014698 Brassica juncea var multisecta Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000006008 Brassica napus var napus Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 240000000385 Brassica napus var. napus Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000006618 Brassica rapa subsp oleifera Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000004977 Brassica sinapistrum Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 102100023321 Ceruloplasmin Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 241000736839 Chara Species 0.000 description 1
- 108700010070 Codon Usage Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101150105088 Dele1 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000004190 Enzymes Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108090000790 Enzymes Proteins 0.000 description 1
- WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-GASJEMHNSA-N Glucose Natural products OC[C@H]1OC(O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]1O WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-GASJEMHNSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 206010020649 Hyperkeratosis Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 102000005755 Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010070716 Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 240000008415 Lactuca sativa Species 0.000 description 1
- FYYHWMGAXLPEAU-UHFFFAOYSA-N Magnesium Chemical compound [Mg] FYYHWMGAXLPEAU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 240000003183 Manihot esculenta Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000016735 Manihot esculenta subsp esculenta Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 241001465754 Metazoa Species 0.000 description 1
- 108010086093 Mung Bean Nuclease Proteins 0.000 description 1
- NHNBFGGVMKEFGY-UHFFFAOYSA-N Nitrate Chemical compound [O-][N+]([O-])=O NHNBFGGVMKEFGY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 101900322896 Norwalk virus Capsid protein VP1 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108091028043 Nucleic acid sequence Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 240000007594 Oryza sativa Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000007164 Oryza sativa Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 101710096342 Pathogenesis-related protein Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108700001094 Plant Genes Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108091022910 Putrescine N-methyltransferase Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 239000011542 SDS running buffer Substances 0.000 description 1
- BQCADISMDOOEFD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silver Chemical compound [Ag] BQCADISMDOOEFD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229930006000 Sucrose Natural products 0.000 description 1
- CZMRCDWAGMRECN-UGDNZRGBSA-N Sucrose Chemical compound O[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@@]1(CO)O[C@@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O1 CZMRCDWAGMRECN-UGDNZRGBSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 210000004241 Th2 cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 241000607479 Yersinia pestis Species 0.000 description 1
- 150000007513 acids Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 1
- GFFGJBXGBJISGV-UHFFFAOYSA-N adenyl group Chemical class N1=CN=C2N=CNC2=C1N GFFGJBXGBJISGV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 208000026935 allergic disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000003321 amplification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003092 anti-cytokine Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000692 anti-sense effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000010323 ascorbic acid Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229960005070 ascorbic acid Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000011668 ascorbic acid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000003719 b-lymphocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 208000022362 bacterial infectious disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000004071 biological effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006696 biosynthetic metabolic pathway Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000004369 blood Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000008280 blood Substances 0.000 description 1
- UDSAIICHUKSCKT-UHFFFAOYSA-N bromophenol blue Chemical compound C1=C(Br)C(O)=C(Br)C=C1C1(C=2C=C(Br)C(O)=C(Br)C=2)C2=CC=CC=C2S(=O)(=O)O1 UDSAIICHUKSCKT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000004202 carbamide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000004663 cell proliferation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002038 chemiluminescence detection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002759 chromosomal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010367 cloning Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000000470 constituent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000013068 control sample Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000287 crude extract Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000015872 dietary supplement Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000010790 dilution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012895 dilution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 201000010099 disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000037265 diseases, disorders, signs and symptoms Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000003828 downregulation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003814 drug Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000013399 edible fruits Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000001962 electrophoresis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003623 enhancer Substances 0.000 description 1
- ZMMJGEGLRURXTF-UHFFFAOYSA-N ethidium bromide Chemical compound [Br-].C12=CC(N)=CC=C2C2=CC=C(N)C=C2[N+](CC)=C1C1=CC=CC=C1 ZMMJGEGLRURXTF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004108 freeze drying Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001502 gel electrophoresis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000008103 glucose Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000227 grinding Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003102 growth factor Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910001385 heavy metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 210000003630 histaminocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000003345 hyperglycaemic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009169 immunotherapy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001727 in vivo Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010348 incorporation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 208000015181 infectious disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000010354 integration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002955 isolation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229930027917 kanamycin Natural products 0.000 description 1
- SBUJHOSQTJFQJX-NOAMYHISSA-N kanamycin Chemical compound O[C@@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CN)O[C@@H]1O[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O[C@@H]2[C@@H]([C@@H](N)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O2)O)[C@H](N)C[C@@H]1N SBUJHOSQTJFQJX-NOAMYHISSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229960000318 kanamycin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 229930182823 kanamycin A Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 238000005567 liquid scintillation counting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012160 loading buffer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011068 loading method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000004698 lymphocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000011777 magnesium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052749 magnesium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000003550 marker Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000035772 mutation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000013642 negative control Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000003199 nucleic acid amplification method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000004923 pancreatic tissue Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 244000052769 pathogen Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000008506 pathogenesis Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001717 pathogenic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000008188 pellet Substances 0.000 description 1
- NRNCYVBFPDDJNE-UHFFFAOYSA-N pemoline Chemical compound O1C(N)=NC(=O)C1C1=CC=CC=C1 NRNCYVBFPDDJNE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000000419 plant extract Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000002729 polyribosome Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- CHKVPAROMQMJNQ-UHFFFAOYSA-M potassium bisulfate Chemical compound [K+].OS([O-])(=O)=O CHKVPAROMQMJNQ-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- 229910000343 potassium bisulfate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- RWPGFSMJFRPDDP-UHFFFAOYSA-L potassium metabisulfite Chemical compound [K+].[K+].[O-]S(=O)S([O-])(=O)=O RWPGFSMJFRPDDP-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 235000010263 potassium metabisulphite Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000004297 potassium metabisulphite Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000010333 potassium nitrate Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000004323 potassium nitrate Substances 0.000 description 1
- FGIUAXJPYTZDNR-UHFFFAOYSA-N potassium nitrate Inorganic materials [K+].[O-][N+]([O-])=O FGIUAXJPYTZDNR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- OTYBMLCTZGSZBG-UHFFFAOYSA-L potassium sulfate Chemical compound [K+].[K+].[O-]S([O-])(=O)=O OTYBMLCTZGSZBG-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 229910052939 potassium sulfate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000001120 potassium sulphate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000011151 potassium sulphates Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000002244 precipitate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 108090000765 processed proteins & peptides Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 238000002731 protein assay Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000004252 protein component Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000011546 protein dye Substances 0.000 description 1
- 108091008146 restriction endonucleases Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 235000009566 rice Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229920002477 rna polymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 235000012045 salad Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000003118 sandwich ELISA Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052709 silver Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000004332 silver Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000002741 site-directed mutagenesis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007790 solid phase Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002904 solvent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012916 structural analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000005720 sucrose Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008685 targeting Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001225 therapeutic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013518 transcription Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000035897 transcription Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013519 translation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000017260 vegetative to reproductive phase transition of meristem Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003442 weekly effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- DGVVWUTYPXICAM-UHFFFAOYSA-N β‐Mercaptoethanol Chemical compound OCCS DGVVWUTYPXICAM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
- C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
- C12N15/63—Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
- C12N15/79—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
- C12N15/82—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
- C12N15/8241—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology
- C12N15/8242—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with non-agronomic quality (output) traits, e.g. for industrial processing; Value added, non-agronomic traits
- C12N15/8257—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with non-agronomic quality (output) traits, e.g. for industrial processing; Value added, non-agronomic traits for the production of primary gene products, e.g. pharmaceutical products, interferon
Landscapes
- Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Zoology (AREA)
- Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
- Biotechnology (AREA)
- Biophysics (AREA)
- Plant Pathology (AREA)
- Cell Biology (AREA)
- Microbiology (AREA)
- Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
- Pharmacology & Pharmacy (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Breeding Of Plants And Reproduction By Means Of Culturing (AREA)
Abstract
A novel method for the production of transgenic proteins of interest suitable for oral administration is disclosed. The method involves the preparation of a protein of interest suitable for oral administration within a non-food crop plant comprising, transforming the non-food crop plant with a suitable vector containing a gene of interest and appropriate regulatory regions to ensure expression of the gene of interest within the non-food crop plant, such that the non-food crop plant is characterized as being non-toxic, non-addictive, palatable, and requiring minimal or no processing prior to oral administration. An example of a non-food crop plant is low nicotine tobacco. Proteins of interest may include pharmaceutically active proteins such as growth regulators, insulin, interferons, interleukins, growth hormone, erythropoietin, G-CSF, GM-CSF, hPG-CSF, M-CSF, Factor VIII, Factor IX, tPA, antibodies, antigens and combinations and/or derivatives thereof.
Description
21 88~20 NON-FOOD CROP PLANT BIOREACTOR
The present invention relates to the use of a non-food crop plant as a bioreactor. More specifically this invention relates to the expression of transgenes S of interest for oral a~lmini~tration using non-food crop plants. An example of a suitable non-food crop plant that can be used as a bioreactor is nicotine-free tobacco.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Full citations for references appear at the end of the examples section.
Numerous plants have proven themselves to be amenable to transformation with heterologous genes and for some time tobacco has been the model system for plant transformation. Despite the fact that crop-protection focused biotechnologies 15 have not found application in non-food crop plant production, a major role does remain for such plants as bioreactors. An example of a non-food crop plant is tobacco, which is capable of producing high levels of soluble protein (fraction 1 protein, FlP; Woodleif et al 1981) and pilot systems have been developed to purify this fraction for use as a high protein dietary supplement (MollL~nali et al 1993).
Expression of m~mm~ n genes in several plants including tobacco and Arabidopsis has been recognized as efficient, low cost, non-sterile bioreactors for the production of proleills valuable to both medicine and industry (Ma and Hein 1995).
Recently evidence was presented that demonstrated that the four chains of the 25 secretory immlmoglobulin were properly expressed and assembled in plants and that the antibody was fully functional (Ma et al 1995). Furthermore, bacterial (Haq et al 1995), and viral (Mason et al 1996) antigens produced in transgenic tobacco and potato effectively illlllllll~i~P~l mice when the transgenic potato was a(lmini~tered orally. However, prior to the atlmini~tration of plant tissue obtained from transgenic 30 tobacco, the proLeills had to be partially purified. Clearly steps involving processing are undesirable if ease of oral ~-lmini~tration is to be m~ximi~e~l as well as minimi~ing any associated costs for production.
The present invention relates to the use of a non-food crop plant as a bioreactor. More specifically this invention relates to the expression of transgenes S of interest for oral a~lmini~tration using non-food crop plants. An example of a suitable non-food crop plant that can be used as a bioreactor is nicotine-free tobacco.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Full citations for references appear at the end of the examples section.
Numerous plants have proven themselves to be amenable to transformation with heterologous genes and for some time tobacco has been the model system for plant transformation. Despite the fact that crop-protection focused biotechnologies 15 have not found application in non-food crop plant production, a major role does remain for such plants as bioreactors. An example of a non-food crop plant is tobacco, which is capable of producing high levels of soluble protein (fraction 1 protein, FlP; Woodleif et al 1981) and pilot systems have been developed to purify this fraction for use as a high protein dietary supplement (MollL~nali et al 1993).
Expression of m~mm~ n genes in several plants including tobacco and Arabidopsis has been recognized as efficient, low cost, non-sterile bioreactors for the production of proleills valuable to both medicine and industry (Ma and Hein 1995).
Recently evidence was presented that demonstrated that the four chains of the 25 secretory immlmoglobulin were properly expressed and assembled in plants and that the antibody was fully functional (Ma et al 1995). Furthermore, bacterial (Haq et al 1995), and viral (Mason et al 1996) antigens produced in transgenic tobacco and potato effectively illlllllll~i~P~l mice when the transgenic potato was a(lmini~tered orally. However, prior to the atlmini~tration of plant tissue obtained from transgenic 30 tobacco, the proLeills had to be partially purified. Clearly steps involving processing are undesirable if ease of oral ~-lmini~tration is to be m~ximi~e~l as well as minimi~ing any associated costs for production.
2 1 88~20 From both a regulatory and public safety stand point non-food crop plants are ideal species for the transgenic production of biologically active prolcills. Non-food crop plants minimi7e the risk of accidental leakage of transgenic plant materialexpressing genes for biologically active proteins into the human food chain. Other 5 plant bioreactor systems based on canola (Rooijen et al. 1995), potato (Manson et al 1996), rice and cassava (Ma and Hein 1995) do not offer this advantage.
Furthermore, non-food crop plants can be selected so that production in areas where there are no naturally occurring wild species further minimi7es the risk of geneleakage to the local flora, an example of this would be to grow tobacco in regions 10 where tobacco does not ovcl~illler, such as Canada. With any non-food crop plant, transgenic ploLcills can be produced using any tissue or organ of the plant. However if protein production is based on leaves, not seeds or tubers, and when coupled with the fact that the leaves are harvested before flowering there is virtually no risk of uncontrolled bioreactor plants occurring in future crop seasons.
Thus there is a need to provide a non-food crop plant capable of being used to prepa~c transgenic proteins of interest suitable for oral ~t1mini~tration.
SUMl\~ARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to the production of a protein of interest using a non-food crop plant.
According to the present invention there is provided a method for the 25 plcpa~alion of a protein of interest suitable for oral ~imini.ctration within a non-food crop plant comprising, transforming the non-food crop plant with a suitable vector cont~ining a gene of interest and appropliate regulatory regions to ensure expression of the gene of interest within the non-food crop plant, such that the non-food crop plant is characteri_ed as being non-toxic, non-addictive, palatable, and requiring little 30 or no processing prior to oral ~(lmini~tration.
21 ~220 This invention further relates to the above method wherein the non-food plant is characteri_ed in having a low aLkaloid level. This invention also includes methods l1tili7ing a plant characteri_ed in having a low nicotine level.
This invention also relates to the above method wherein the protein of interest includes ph~rm~celltic2lly active proteins, such as growth regulators, insulin, inlelrerol1 and related compounds, interleukins, growth hormone, ely~opoietin, G-CSF, GM-CSF, hPG-CSF, M-CSF, Factor VIII, Factor IX, tPA, antibodies, antigens and any combinations and derivatives thereof.
Furthermore, this invention includes the above method wherein a suitable vector contains a gene of interest along with applopliate regulatory regions to ensure expression of the gene of interest within desired plant tissues.
This invention also provides for compositions comprising a tissue from a non-food crop cont~ining a transgenic protein of interest.
Another aspect of an embodiment of this invention is a method for the treatment of a medical aliment by ~tlmini~tering a suitable amount of the above composition comprising a tissue from a non-food crop plant cont~ining as a ph~rm~re~ltically active component a transgenic protein of interest.
Although the present invention is exemplified by the preparation of transgenic ploteills of interest using tobacco, in practice any non-food crop plant may be used.
21 ~220 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
These and other features of the invention will become more appalclll from the following description in which lcferellce is made to the appended drawings wherein:
FIGURE 1 shows the oligonucleotide cassettes for integration of TMV 5'-untr~n.cl~te~l region and PR-lb transit peptide sequences into transgene constructs. Figure l(A) the TMV leader sequence. Figure l(B) the PR-lb signal peptide sequence. Figure l(C) the amino acid translation of encoded signal peptide. Identity, sequence, and position of each oligonucloeitde within the cacsettes are indicated. TMV sequence is marked in bold, PR-lb signal peptide sequence in plain letters and additional sequence in italics.
Nucleotides co~ g all or part of the initiation codon are present within boxes. Oligonucleotides #1091, #1092 and #1093 represent the TMV oligo set. Oligonucelotids #1091, #1092, and #4361 through #4365 represent the TMV-PR oligo set.
FIGURE 2 displays the map of the T-DNA region of pCDX-TL-MAFPII
FIGURE 3 displays the map of the T-DNA region of pMON-TL-MAFPII
FIGURE 4 is a Western blot showing Type II AFP accllmlll~tion in field plants.
Western blot analysis of total soluble protein (2.5 ~g) extracts from Rl generation Type II AFP transgenic plants in which the AFP was targeted to accllml-l~te in the extracellular space. Samples are decign~te~l by number to indicate the plot from which it was collected and by letter to indicate the transformed parent plant from which the Rl plants were descended. Records at the Delhi station inflie~te that A plants were descended from parent II4c2-#10, B plants from II4c2-#l, C from pII3a-#7, and D plants were wild-type controls (4D). Total soluble protein extract from a field-grown wild type plant was included in the analysis as a negative control and mixed with mature Type II AFP (25 ng) purified from sea raven sera to generate the positive control (AFP).
21 ~220 DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
Even though non-food crop plants are ideal species for use as bioreactors from both a regulatory and public safety point of view, there a several obstacles that must 5 be overcome prior to their use as bioreactors. A major problem with the use of non-food crop plants, for example tobacco, as bioreactors is that these plants may contain undesirable secondary plant products. Secondary plant products are constituents that are generally toxic or reduce the palatability of the plant tissue or that are addictive in nature. This is a significant concern since one of the benefits of plcpaling proleills 10 of interest within a plant is that large q~l~ntiti~s of protein may be required for a~1mini~tration (Ma and Hein, 1995), therefore any toxic, addictive, or otherwise non-desirable products should be avoided within the plant tissue. For example, tobacco plants contain high levels of secondary plant products such as nicotine and related alkaloids, making the plant tissue unsuitable for the direct oral ~(lmini~tration.
15 Earlier studies have described the ~t1mini.~tration of tobacco-derived proteins to mice, however, the ploteills were in a partially purified form. For example the study by Mason et al (1996) involved the direct oral ~(lmini.~tration of viral antigens expressed in potato tuber and tobacco. The potato tuber samples were directly fed to mice, yet the antigen, when obtained from tobacco, had to be partially purified using sucrose 20 gradients prior to ~mini~tration to mice.
A non-food crop plant host to be used as a bioreactor for the production of ploteins suitable for direct oral a~lmini~tration of transgenic-expressed proteins of interest should comprise the following properties: that it 25 a) is non-toxic b) requires little or no processing prior to oral ~mini~tration c) is characterized in having low levels of non-desirable secondary plant products such as alkaloids and/or nicotine so that the medicinal matrix is palatable and not addictive.
Use of the terms "low nicotine" and "low alkaloid" with Icl~erellce to plants, such as tobacco, means a plant cont~ining less than about 0. 35 % total alkaloids. Such plants may be obtained through conventional breeding programs (e.g. Chaplin, 1977), through selective down regulation of undesired genes (e.g. U.S. 5,260,205, issued November 9, 1993 and U.S. 5,369,023, issued November 29, 1994; inventors Nakatani and Malik), or by any other means e.g. metagenesis followed by selection 5 of desired traits. However, as is known to one of skill in the art, the llltim~te nicotine or alkaloid level may still depend upon the envilolllllent under which the plant is grown.
By "suitable vector" it is meant a vector comprising a gene of interest that is 10 capable of being expressed within plant tissue. Such a vector may also include ubiquitous or tissue specific promoters and other 5' and 3' regulatory elements as would be known to one of skill in the art. Other elements that may be included with this vector include sequences for ~arge~ing the protein of interest to the cytosol or secretory pathway such as the C-terminal KDEL sequence, an endoplasmic reticulum15 retention motif (Schouten et al 1966). Furthermore, such a vector may includemarker genes for the detection of expression within the transgenic plant.
By "protein of interest" it is meant any protein that is to be expressed in a transformed plant. Such proteins may include, but are not limited to, 20 ph~rm~r,eutic~lly active proteil~, for example growth factors, growth regulators, antibodies, antigens, their derivatives and the like.
By "oral ~(lmini~tration~ it is meant the a~h~ lion of a tissue or organ of a non-food crop plant, for example the leaf, root, fruit etc with minim~l or no prior 25 processing. Such tissues or organs may be provided in the form of a salad or the like along with other ph~rm~çeutir~l ingredients, or ingredients to increase palatability, if desired. It is also contemplated that minim~l proces~ing of the tissue or organ may take place prior to a~mini~tration of the extract. For example, ~)loteills secreted within the extracelluar space of leaf tissues could be readily obtained using vacuum 30 or centrifugal extraction, or tissues could be extracted under pres~ule by passage through rollers or grinding or the like to squeeze or liberate the protein free from within the extracelluar space. Minimal processing could also involve preparation of 21 88~20 crude extracts of soluble proteins, since these plel)al~lions would have negligible cont~min~tion from secondary plant products.
By "medical aliment" it is meant a defined medical condition that can be 5 treated a specific ph~rm~eutical suitable for the treatment of the condition.
Examples of such medical ailments and their corresponding suitable ph~rm~e~ltical include, but are not limited to: diabetes and the ~lmini~tration of IL-4 or insulin or a combination thereof; conditions related to blood clotting and the a~lmini.ctration of Factor VIII, Factor IX or tPA or combinations thereof; m~flir~l conditions requiring 10 the stimul~tion of progenitor cells to monocytes/macrophages and the ~lmini~tration of G-CSF, GM-CSF, hPG-CSF, M-CSF or combinations thereof; viral infections and the ~tlmini~tration of inlelrerolls e.g. hllelrel~ , hllelrelo~ , inlelreloll-~.
Several methods have been proposed for the removal of nicotine from tobacco, 15 however, these processes typically involve the treatment of post harvest-tissue. For example the use of solvents (EP 10,665, published May 14, 1980; inventors Kur7h~l~
and Hubert), or potassium metabisulphite, potassium sulphate and nitrate (U.S.
4,183,364, issued January 8, 1980; inventor Gllmu~h~n) have been proposed as methods for removing nicotine from tobacco leaves. All of these treatments are 20 designed to m~int~in the flavour and aroma of the tobacco, and these methods involve extensive post-harvest processing and are therefore not suitable for the preparation of products as described in this invention.
Recently, specific alteration of nicotine levels within tobacco, by either over 25 expression (i.e. increasing) or antisense expression (decreasing) of putrescine N-methyltransferase, a rate limiting enzyme involved in the nicotine biosynthetic pathway, has been suggested (U.S. 5,260,205, issued November 9, 1993 and U.S.
5,369,023, issued November 29, 1994; hlvellLol~ Nakatani and Malik). However, these methods are directed to the alteration of nicotine levels without modifying the 30 levels of other alkaloids that affect the flavours and aroma of tobacco. No nicotine free plants were actually produced, nor was the use of these transgenically modified tobacco plants, as a bioreactor for the synthesis of pfoleills of interest, suggested.
21 ~220 However, such a transgenic tobacco plant, if produced, may be useful as a bioreactor for the synthesis of proteins of interest as contemplated by this invention.
The breeding of low alkaloid-cont~ining tobacco plants has been reported 5 (Chaplin 1977), however, use of such a plant as a bioreactor has not been suggested.
Due to reduced levels of undesirable secondary plant products within suitable non-food crop plants, it is contemplated that transgenic pl~teins produced within such plants could also be rapidly processed for subsequent ~1mini~tration~ Such rapid10 processing could involve such methods as those employed for the plcpaldtion of FlP
as disclosed in Woodleif et al (1981). These include the aqueous extraction of soluble protein from green tobacco leaves by precipitation with KHSO4, following removalof chloroplastic debris.
In order to establish the efficacy of transgene expression in nicotine-free tobacco, and ensure soluble protein production a Type II antifreeze protein (AFP) was used to prepare transgenic tobacco plants.
As a further example to establish the efficacy of the use of a non-food crop 20 plant as a bioreactor, the preparation of low-nicotine tobacco plants expressing interleukin-4 (IL-4) is disclosed. IL-4 is a growth and dirrelcll~iation factor for T-cells. In particular, IL-4 promotes the development of the subset of T helper (Th2) cells from native T cells upon antigen stim~ tion. IL-4 producing Th2 cells generally protect against the onset of many organ-specific autoimmlln~ diseases,25 including type 1 diabetes. Thus the availability of an abundant source of IL-4 may prove invaluable for the immunotherapy of diabetes. Transgenic low-nicotine tobacco plants can be used in direct feeding studies to determine the efficacy of the recombinantly produced protein.
Gene constructs were transformed into N.tabacum cv. Xanthi and 81V9-4 tobacco strains (available from Agricuture and Agri-Food Canada, Pest ManagementResearch Center, Delhi Farm, Genetics Section) . 81V9-4 is a flue-cured tobacco line 2 1 ~3822(~
cont~ining only trace amounts of alkaloids and is an ideal component for tobacco-based molecular f~rming applications. Gene constructs were built for production of pro and mature forms of a Type II antifreeze protein (AFP), or IL-4, to be accllm~ tecl in the cell cytosol and extracelluar space.
IgG expression in plants lends support to the idea that passage through the endoplasmic reticulum may enhance protein accllmlll~tion. In plants bred to simlllt~n~-ously express mouse IgG light and heavy chain p~ eills targeted to the extracelluar space, the amount of each protein increased up to 60-fold over that seen 10 when expressed individually into the same colllpalllllent (Hiatt et al 1989).Expression of both protein components into the cytosol, however, did not affect their level of accumulation. IgG processing and assembly in lymphocytes occurs throughthe action of heavy-chain binding proteins present in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER).
The observed increase in yield when both proteills were targeted to the extracelluar 15 space has been attributed to an enh~n~e~ stability contingent on IgG assembly.
Consistent with this hypothesis, active antibody complexes were observed when the plOlt~inS were targeted to the extracelluar space but not when targeted to the cytosol.
To further maximize expression levels and transgene protein production the 20 gene encoding the protein of interest, the codon usage within the non-crop plant of interest should be dele~ d. Also, it has been shown that endoplasmic reti~llhlm retention signals can dramatically increase transgene protein levels, for example the KDEL motif (Schouten et al 1996). Replacing any secretory signal sequence with aplant secretory signal will also ensure talg~lillg to the endoplasmic reticulum 25 (Denecke et al 1990).
~,Y~np'~-~
Gene Construction To m~imi7e potential AFP production at the translational level, the native 5'-untr~n~l~te~ region of the fish cDNA was replaced with the 5'-untr~n~l~te-1 leader 21 ~38220 region of the tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) (Richards et al 1977 & 1978, Sleat et al 1988). The fish signal peptide sequence was also replaced with that of the tobacco pathogenesis-related protein lb (PR-lb) (Cornelissen et al 1986, Sijmons et al 1990, Denecke et al 1990). Oligonucleotide c~settes were designed: three oligonucleotides, #1091, #1092 and #1309, which would hybridize to generate the complete TMV
leader sequence (TMV CasseKe: Figure lA); and five oligonucleotides #4361-#4365 which in concert with oligonucleotides #1091 and #1092 would hybridize to generate a linked TMV leader and PR-lb signal peptide DNA sequence (TMV-PR CasseKe:
Figure lB). The 5' end of these c~settes corresponded to a BamH I sticky end restriction site. The 3' end of the TMV casseKe was blunt and incorporated an additional adenine nucleotide intended to form the first nucleotide of the start codon while the 3' end of the TMV-PR casseKe was compatible with Nde I-cut DNA but would not be able to re-gen~ the restriction site following ligation.
To facilitate addition of the TMV and TMV-PR cassettes, sea raven Type II
AFP cDNA was site-specifically mllt~t~ according to the method described by Kunkel (1985) to incorporate an Nde I restriction site at either bp 157 or 207. These mutations also introduced applol)liate in-frame methionine start codons at the junctions between sequences encoding pre and pro, or pro and mature portions of the AFP. To build the gene construct for ~cllm~ tion of AFP into the cytosol, plasmids cont~ining the mllt~te~ Type II AFP cDNAs were initially cut with NdeI and made blunt-ended with mung bean nuclease. The cDNA fragments were released by cleavage with Sal I, were isolated and directionally ligated into a BamH IISal I-cut pTZ18 vector together with annealed TMV oligonucleotides #1091, #1092 and #1309.The TMV-proAFP and TMV-mAFP constructs were then cut with BamH I and Hinc II, and the isolated AFP gene fragments ligated separately into pMON 893. For gene constructs targeting AFP to the extracelluar space, the mllt~tç~l Type II AFP cDNAs were initially subcloned from their pTZ 19 vectors into Hind III/Sal I-cut pBluescript vectors to position a BamH I restriction site 5' to the AFP coding sequence. ThepBluescript-AFP clones were cut with BamH I and Nde I restriction enzymes to remove the sea raven signal peptide sequence or signal peptide and pro-region DNA.
The plasmid portions of these digests were isolated and ligated with armealed 2~ 88220 oligonucleotides #1091, #1092, and #4361 through #4365. The gene constructs werethen cut with Xba I and R~7n I, and separately cloned into pCDX-l.
Cloning of the Type II AFP gene constructs into pMON 893 or pCDX-l 5 oriented the gene cassette into the vector between the double CaMV 35S promoter (Kay et al 1987) and the NOS polyadenylation sequence. AFP encoded by the transgene constructs was identical to the pro and mature AFP forms present in fish with the exception of one additional methionine at the N-terminal end of the proteins.
The T-DNA portion of the final constructs are depicted in Figures 2 and 3. Cleavage 10 of the signal peptide components from the expressed AFPs was predicted (von Heijne 1986) to occur immediately prior to the added methionine in both the pro and mature AFP gene constructs so the AFP accllmul~ting in the cytosol and extracelluar space should be identical.
Gene constructs were transformed into N.tabacum cv. Xanthi and 81V9-4 tobacco strains according to the method described by Horsch et al (1988). AKempts to gelleldte plants carrying transgenes for cytosolic accllmlll~tion of the AFP were made inl~llllillellLly over a period of several years. Discs infected withA.tumefaciens carrying these gene constructs showed little tendency to form callus and seemed more 20 subject to bacterial infection than comparably treated discs transformed with other transgene constructs. Eventually six transgenic plants were regenerated: one proAFP
transgenic in each tobacco strain, three mature AFP transgenics in Xanthi and one mature AFP transgenic in 81V9-4. By contrast, within six months, eight transgenic plants were regenerated carrying gene constructs for AFP ~ccllmlll~tion into the25 extracellular space: two proAFP transgenics in each strain and four mature AFP
transgenics in 81V-9. Tldl~rolllled and regelleldt~d plants were initially selected for kanamycin resistance. Transgenic status was subsequently determined by direct PCR
screening for the AFP transgene using primers #3339 S'-TATTTTTTACAACAATTACCAACAAC-3' and #4708 30 5'-CAGCAGTCATCTGCATACAGCAC-3' which hybridize to the TMV leader and at the 3' end of the sea raven AFP coding sequence, respectively. Type II AFP gene constructs were amplified in 30 cycles of dendluldlion for 1 min at 95~C, ~nn~ling ' 21~38220 for 1 min at 55~C, and elongation for 2 min at 72~C. This generated amplification products of 440 and 388 bp from the gene constructs for cytosolic accllm~ tion of the pro and mature AFPs, and 532 and 480 bp fragments from gene constructs designed for accllmlll~tion of the same AFPs into the extracellular space.
Analysis of Transgene Expression Plants were removed from the growth chamber and m~int~in~d at room telllpel~Lul~ under a grow light for a minimllm 48 h prior to RNA or protein 10 extraction. RNA was prepared by selective precipitation according to the method of Palmiter (1974). Total RNA (40 ,ug) was analysed by Northern blots according to the method of Lehrach et al (1977) and probed with [a-32P]-labelled sea raven AFP
cDNA sequence.
Total soluble protein extracts were prepared from three to four leaves taken from the upper half of a healthy plant according to the method described by Gengenheimer (1990). Extracts were dialysed at 4~C against 0.1%, 0.01% and 0.001% ascorbic acid in SpectraPorl #3 dialysis tubing (MWCO 3.5 kDa) and centrifuged for 15 min at 12,000xg to remove precipitate formed during dialysis prior 20 to lyophilization. Samples were resuspended in Millipore~-filtered water and their protein concentrations determined by Bradford assay (16) relative to a BSA standard.
To extract protein present in the appoplast by vacuum infiltration (Sijmones et al 1990), leaves were cut longillldin~lly into 4 cm x 0.8 cm strips, and rolled 25 lengthwise in 5 cm x 1.8 cm strips of Parafilrn~ so that the bottom of the leaf was exposed to view. The leaf strip was exposed to vacuum derived from a water aspirator twice for 2 min or until the exposed leaf surface was dark green. Eachtreated leaf strip yielded 10 + 2.5 ul of extract. Larger volume samples were too dilute for use and were discarded. Samples which contained green pellets were also 30 discarded to reduce the possibility of cytosolic protein co~ ion. All rem~ining extracts from a given plant were pooled and the amount of protein present determined 21 ~8220 by Bradford (1976) protein assay relative to a BSA standard. Extract concentrations were generally between 0.1-0.2 llg/,ul.
Western Analysis Lyophilized protein was resuspended directly in loading buffer (60 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8/10% glycerol/5% ,B-mercaptoethanol/2% (w/v) SDS/ 1.3 x 10-3% (w/v) bromophenol blue), and were electrophoresed through a 17% polyacrylamide/0.1 M
sodium phosphate, pH 6.8/4 M Urea/0.1% SDS gel using 0.1 M sodium phosphate, pH 6.8/0.1% SDS running buffer. Electrophoresis was conducted at 50 V for 3-4 h or until the 6 kDa pre-stained marker was at the bottom of the gel. Western blots were prepared according to the method described by Burnette et al (1981) and probed with polyclonal antibody to the mature sea raven AFP. A chemiluminescence detection kit (Amersham) for probing of Western blots was used to detect bound first 15 antibody. All reactions were carried out according to the m~nllfa~tllrer's directions.
FY~nrl~ 1: AFP Gene Expression Protein Acc -m~ tion Western blot analysis of total soluble protein extracted from plants carrying genes for cytosolic AFP expression did not find evidence of either pro or mature AFP
acc lm~ tion even when up to 80 ,ug of protein extract were analysed. In contrast, a protein which co-migrated with mature AFP from sea raven and cross-reacted with 25 antibody to Type II AFP was ~letecte~l in as little as 2.5 ~g total soluble protein extMct of plants in which the AFP was targeted to the extracellular space (Figure 4).
This protein was unique to the transgenic plants and was absent in extracts of a wild-type plant and a plant, pII3a-#9, which had been transformed and regenerated butdet~llnilled to be non-transgenic by PCR. Insufficient resolution was obtained with 30 these extracts to dirrerelltiate size differences between the AFPs produced by the plants carrying transgenes for production of pro or mature AFPs. This was probably due to the viscosity of the total soluble protein extracts which often caused distortion of samples during the running of gels. For this reason, positive control Type II AFP
was mixed with total soluble protein extract from a lab-grown wild-type plant togenerate a suitable size standard. Wild-type protein extract was not mixed with the molecular weight markers, so the size of plant-produced AFP could not accurately5 estimated from these extracts. AFP accllmlll~tion varied between plants and appeared slightly higher in plants II4c~-#1 and 10 which carried genes for mature AFP
production. Based on Western blot comparison with a known amount of Type II AFP,the amount of AFP produced by the plants has been estim~ted to be approximately 0.5-1% of the total soluble protein.
mRNA Transcription from Transgenes for Cytosolic AFP Accumulation RNA extracts of plants transgenic with gene constructs for cytosolic AFP
accumul~tion were analysed by Northern blot to determine if the AFP transgene was transcribed. Two plants, Xanthi TmSR #1 and 81V9-4 TmSR #l, carrying transgenes for AFP accumulation into the cell cytosol were found to produce a 0.96 kb RNA
transcript which hybridized with the AFP cDNA used as a probe: on longer exposure of the blots, the same RNA transcript was also seen in extract from Xanthi TmSR #2 and slightly larger one of approximately 1.02 kb was detected in extract from 81V9-4 20 TpSR #3. TldllsC~ip~S from pro and mature AFP transgene constructs were expected to differ by 51 nucleotides. Both plant-produced AFP gene transcripts were both considerably larger than a PCR-gel1eLated control sample estim~ted to be 0. 36 kb and representing the size of the mature AFP transgene between the TMV leader and the3' end of the coding sequence. This was consistent with the size dirrclcllce expected 25 based on the additional coding sequence and 3'-untr~n~l~t~d region (155 nt totdl) present in the transgene construct, and with the use of the NOS polyadenylation sequence to obtain polyadenylated transcripts. Both transcripts were smaller than an equivalent gene ~ldnsclil)l of 1.06 kb produced in a plant carrying the transgene for targeted mature AFP ~ccllm~ tion into the extracellular space. This size dirrel~llce 30 was consistent with the addition of the 90 nt signal peptide coding sequence to the transgene construct for secretion of the AFP. Based on EtBr staining, more RNA
was loaded onto the gel from the plant producing AFP for accllmlll~tion into the extracellular space compared to the amount of RNA from the plants Lalg~ g the AFP
to the cytosol. No comparison could be made regarding the relative amounts of AFP
mRNA transcribed from these constructs. However, similar loadings were achieved between the plants L~lgelillg the AFP to the cytosol. The dirrelel1ce in amount of 5 transcript observed, therefore, suggests that this transgene construct was being expressed at variable levels in the dirrer~lll plants.
AFP Present in the Apoplast Vacuum infiltration extracts were prepared from AFP-producing plants to determine if the ~ressed AFP was present in the extracellular space. These extracts were not subject to the viscosity and sample distortion associated with total soluble protein extracts, so were also considered more suitable to estim~te the sizes of the plant AFPs. Western blot analysis confirmed the presence of AFP. AFP was detected 15 in plants pII3a-#7 and II4c2-#l which carried mature and proAFP transgenes respectively, as a diffuse band of approximately 14.7 kDa which migrated at a similar rate to mature AFP isolated from fish sera. A small mobility dirrelcllce was observed between the AFPs produced by the two plants, however, proAFP isolated from fish sera was distinctly larger than either plant-produced AFP.
Having established the presence of AFP in vacuum infiltration extracts of those plants carrying transgenes for extracellular AFP ~ccllm~ tion, the extracts were concentrated ten-fold and tested for thermal hy~Lelesis activity and effects on ice crystal morphology using the nanolitre osmometer. Extracts from plants expressing 25 gene constructs for either the pro or mature AFP both showed evidence of AFP
activity. Ice crystals grown in these plant extracts were seen as the characteristic eye-shaped bi~yl~llids produced in the presence of native Type II AFP. Thermal hy~Lelesis activity was measured and based on comparison with a standard activity curve the amount of active AFP present in the extracellular space was estim~te-l as 30 2% of the total protein present in the colllpalLlnent.
RNA analysis of the transgenic plants has shown that they are able to transcribe the integrated transgene constructs, and that the size of the plant AFP
mRNA from both construct types is consistent with that expected for a full-length, polyadenylated ll~nsc~ . mRNA produced from the transgene for AFP a~cllmlll~tion5 into the extracellular space was obviously tr~n~l~t~ble.
The presence of plant-produced AFPs in vacuum infiltration extracts in~ t~s that the plant recognized the PR-lb signal peptide component and correctly targeted the attached AFPs to the extracellular space. The predicted size of the AFPs forexport to the extracellular space is 18.7 or 17 kDa with the signal peptide component attached and 15.8 or 14.1 kDa without the signal peptide for the pro and mature AFPs, respectively. Western blot analysis of the plant vacuum infiltration extracts showed that the AFPs produced from the proAFP and mature AFP transgene constructs and present in the extracellular space both co-migrated with mature Type 15 II AFP and were approximately 14.7 kDa. This suggests that not only is the plant capable of cleaving the signal peptide from the expressed AFP but that it can remove most or all of the pro-region of the AFP.
F,~q...l le 2: Interleukin-4 expression Full length murine IL-4 cDNA is 585 base pairs long (Lee et al 1988) and codes for a 140 amino acid prepfoleill with a 40 amino acid secretory signal (Otsuka et al 1987). This gene sequence encoding the 40 amino acid secretory signal was replaced with a plant secretory signal obtained from the tobacco PRl-b secretory25 signal (Denecke et al 1990) to ensure ~lg~lhlg to the endoplasmic reticulum. The reslll~nt vector was introduced into low-nicotine tobacco plants using the methods described above.
In order to determine the biological activity of plant recombinant IL-4, in 30 vitro, the stim~ tion of growth of murine IL-4 dependent CT.4S cell line (Rapoport et al 1993) is dete~ illed. Applopliate dilutions of purified plant recombinant IL-4 is added to cultures cont~ining 5x103 CT.4S cells in flat bottom 96-well plates in a final volume of 100 ml for 48 hr. CT.4S cell proliferation is assessed by addition of 1 mCi/well of [3H]thymidine 18 hr before termination of culture, and [3H] thymidine incorporation is de~e~ ed by liquid scintillation counting.
The immllnoreactivity of plant recombinant IL-4 is determined by solid phase sandwich ELISA (Abrams et al 1992). Briefly, the BVD4-lDll anti-IL-4 mAB is used as a capture antibody and is paired with the biotinylated BVD6-24G2 antiIL-4 mAB as the detecting antibody. Mouse rIL-4 (Ph~rmingen) is used a standard.
In vivo activity of plant produced IL-4 is delellllilled in NOD mice. NOD and control strain (in~lliti~- and diabetes-free) female mice (20 mice/group) are fed either transgenic low nicotine tobacco leaves expressing recombhlall~ly produced IL-4. At various times during the 4 week treatment, circ~ ting serum levels of plant 15 recombinant IL-4-fed and un-fed NOD and control mice are analyzed by ELISA asdescribed above. Both NOD and control mice are monitored for any potential toxiceffects arising from the plant recombinant IL-4 feeding, and their serum concentrations of IgE and IgG quantified by ELISA. Increase in serum IgE levels indicate that recipient mice are more susceptible to allergic responses.
Feeding of plant recombinant IL-4 to protect against the onset of in~llliti~
and/or Type 1 diabetes in NOD mice is also determin~d. Neonatal female NOD mice (2-3 weeks of age) fed or not fed with plant recombinant IL-4 are m~int~in~d in a specific pathogen free animal facility. Mice are monitored weekly for their blood 25 glucose levels (BGL), and mice that are hyperglycemic (i.e. BGL > 11.1 mmol/L) for two consecutive weeks are diagnosed as Type 1 diabetic. The onset of in~llliti~
is monitored by immllnohistoch~ l analysis of pancreatic tissue by sacrificing mice at various times (2 weeks to 2 months) after plant recombinant IL-4-feeding is initi~tç~l .
All scientific publications and patent documents are incorporated herein by lererellce.
2~ 8~220 The present invention has been described with regard to prefelled embodiments.
However, it will be obvious to persons skilled in the art that a number of variations and modifications can be made without departing from the scope of the invention as described in the following claims.
s 21 ~8220 References Abrams, J.S., M.G. Roncarolo, H. Yasel, U. Anderson, G. Gleich, J. Silver (1992)Strategies of anti-cytokine monoclonal antibody development. Tmmllnol. Rev.
127, 5-24.
Bradford M.M. (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the qll~ntit~tion of microgram qu~ntiti~s of protein utili7ing the principle of protein dye binding.
Anal. Biochem. 72, 248-254.
Burnette W.H. (1981) Western blotting: electrophoretic transfer of proteills from SDS-polyacrylamide gels to unmodified nitrocellulose and radio-graphic detections with antibody and radioiodinated protein A. Anal. Biochem. 112, 195-203.
Chaplin J.F. (1977) Breeding for varying levels of nicotine in tobacco. In: Proc Amer Chem Soc, 173rd meeting, New Orleans.
Cornelissen B.J.C, R.A.M Hooft van Huijsduijnen, L.D.Van Loon & J.F.Bol (1986) Molecular chara ;t~ alion of messenger mRNAs for "pathogenesis-related"
protehls la, lb and lc, influcecl by TMV infection of tobacco. EMBO J. 5, 37-40.
Denecke J., J.Botterman & R.Deblaere (1990) Protein secretion in plant cells can occur via a default pathway. Plant Cell 2, 51-59.
Fourney R.M., J.Miyakoshi, R.S.Day III & M.C.Paterson (1988) Northern blotting:
efficient RNA staining and transfer. Focus 10:1, 5-7.
~0 Gengenheimer P (1990) Pl~al~ion of Extracts from Plants. Methods of Enzymology 182, 184-185.
Haq T.A., H.S. Mason, J.D. Clements, C.J. Artzen (1995) Oral i~ ni~ion with a recombinant bacterial antigen produced in plants. Science 268, 714-716.
Hiatt A., R.Cafferkey & K.Bowdish (1989) Production of antibodies in transgenic 5plants. Nature 342, 76-78.
Horsch R.B., J.Fry, N.Hofmann, J.Neidermeyer, S.G.Rogers & R.T.Fraley. (1988) Leaf disc transformation. Plant Molecular Biology Manual A5, 1-9. Ed.
S.B.Gelvin, R.A.Schilperoort, D.P.S.Verma. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
10Dordrecht/Boston/London.
Kay R., A. Chan, M . Daly & J.McPherson (1987) Duplication of CaMV 35S promoter sequences creates a strong enhancer for plant genes. Science 236, 1299-1302.
15Kunkel T.A. (1985) Rapid and efficient site-specific mutagenesis without phenotypic selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82, 488-492.
Lehrach H., D.Diamond, J.M.Wozney & H. Boedtker. (1977) RNA molecular weight determinations by gel electrophoresis underdenaLu~ g conditions; a 20critical reex~min~tion. Biochemistry 16, 4743.
Ma J.K.C., M. Hein (1995) Tmmum~therapeutic potential of antibodies produced in plants. TibTech 13, 522-527.
25Mason H.S., J.M. Ball, J-J. Shi, X. Jiang, M.K. Estes, C.J. Arntzen (1996) Expression of Norwalk virus capsid protein in transgenic tobacco and potato and its oral immlln(lgenicity in mice. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 93, 5335-5340.
MollL~l~i L., P. Fantozzi, S. Pedone (1993) Tobacco fraction 1 (FlP utili7~tion of 30oral feeding and enteral feeding of patients. 1 Heavy Metal evaluation. Food SAci. Tech. 26, 259-263.
Otsuka T., D. Vallaret, T. Yokota, Y. Takebe, F. Lee, N. Arai, K. Arai (1987) Structural analysis of the mouse chromosomal gene encoding interleukin-4 which expresses B cell, T cell and mast cell stim~ ting activities. Nucl. Acid Res. 15, 333-334 s Palmiter R.D. (1974) Magnesium precipitation of ribonucleopll~teill complexes:
Expedient techniques for the isolation of undegraded polysomes and messenger ribonucleic acid. Biochemistry 13, 3606-3615.
~0 Rapoport M.J., D. Zipris, A.H. Lazarus, A. Jaramillo, D.V. Serreze, E.H. Leiter, P. Cyopick, J.S. Danska, T.L. Delovitch (1993) IL-4 reverses thymic T cell proliferative unresponsiveness and prevents diabetes in NOD mice. J. Exp.
Med. 178, 87-99.
Richards K., H.Guilley, G.Jonard & G.Keith (1977) Leader sequence of 71 nucleotides devoid of G in tobacco mosaic virus RNA. Nature 267, 548-550.
Richards K., H.Guilley, G.Jonard & L.Hirth (1978) Nucleotide sequence at the 5' extremity of tobacco mosaic virus RNA. Eur. J. Biochem. 84, 513-519.
Schouten A et al. (1966) The C-terminal KDEL sequence increases the expression level of a single-chain antibody designed to be targeted to both the cytosol andthe secretory pathway in transgenic tobacco. Plant Molec. Biol. 30, 781-793.
Sleat D.E., R.Jull, P.C.Turner & T.M.A.Wilson (1988) On the mechanism of translational enhancement by the 5'-leader sequence of tobacco mosaic virus RNA. Eur. J. Biochem. 175, 75-86.
Sijmons P.C., B.M.M.Dekker, B.Schrammeijer, T.C.Verwoerd, P.J.M.van den Elzen & A.Hoekema (1990) Production of correctly processed human serum albumin in transgenic plants. Bio/Technology 8, 217-221.
2~ 81322U
von Heijne G. (1986) A new method for predicting signal cleavage sites. Nucl.
Acids Res. 14, 4683-4690.
Woodleif W.G., J.F. Chaplin, C.R. Campbell, D.W. DeJong (1981) Effect of variety and harvest treatments on protein yield of close grown tobacco Tobacco Sci. 25, 83-86.
Furthermore, non-food crop plants can be selected so that production in areas where there are no naturally occurring wild species further minimi7es the risk of geneleakage to the local flora, an example of this would be to grow tobacco in regions 10 where tobacco does not ovcl~illler, such as Canada. With any non-food crop plant, transgenic ploLcills can be produced using any tissue or organ of the plant. However if protein production is based on leaves, not seeds or tubers, and when coupled with the fact that the leaves are harvested before flowering there is virtually no risk of uncontrolled bioreactor plants occurring in future crop seasons.
Thus there is a need to provide a non-food crop plant capable of being used to prepa~c transgenic proteins of interest suitable for oral ~t1mini~tration.
SUMl\~ARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to the production of a protein of interest using a non-food crop plant.
According to the present invention there is provided a method for the 25 plcpa~alion of a protein of interest suitable for oral ~imini.ctration within a non-food crop plant comprising, transforming the non-food crop plant with a suitable vector cont~ining a gene of interest and appropliate regulatory regions to ensure expression of the gene of interest within the non-food crop plant, such that the non-food crop plant is characteri_ed as being non-toxic, non-addictive, palatable, and requiring little 30 or no processing prior to oral ~(lmini~tration.
21 ~220 This invention further relates to the above method wherein the non-food plant is characteri_ed in having a low aLkaloid level. This invention also includes methods l1tili7ing a plant characteri_ed in having a low nicotine level.
This invention also relates to the above method wherein the protein of interest includes ph~rm~celltic2lly active proteins, such as growth regulators, insulin, inlelrerol1 and related compounds, interleukins, growth hormone, ely~opoietin, G-CSF, GM-CSF, hPG-CSF, M-CSF, Factor VIII, Factor IX, tPA, antibodies, antigens and any combinations and derivatives thereof.
Furthermore, this invention includes the above method wherein a suitable vector contains a gene of interest along with applopliate regulatory regions to ensure expression of the gene of interest within desired plant tissues.
This invention also provides for compositions comprising a tissue from a non-food crop cont~ining a transgenic protein of interest.
Another aspect of an embodiment of this invention is a method for the treatment of a medical aliment by ~tlmini~tering a suitable amount of the above composition comprising a tissue from a non-food crop plant cont~ining as a ph~rm~re~ltically active component a transgenic protein of interest.
Although the present invention is exemplified by the preparation of transgenic ploteills of interest using tobacco, in practice any non-food crop plant may be used.
21 ~220 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
These and other features of the invention will become more appalclll from the following description in which lcferellce is made to the appended drawings wherein:
FIGURE 1 shows the oligonucleotide cassettes for integration of TMV 5'-untr~n.cl~te~l region and PR-lb transit peptide sequences into transgene constructs. Figure l(A) the TMV leader sequence. Figure l(B) the PR-lb signal peptide sequence. Figure l(C) the amino acid translation of encoded signal peptide. Identity, sequence, and position of each oligonucloeitde within the cacsettes are indicated. TMV sequence is marked in bold, PR-lb signal peptide sequence in plain letters and additional sequence in italics.
Nucleotides co~ g all or part of the initiation codon are present within boxes. Oligonucleotides #1091, #1092 and #1093 represent the TMV oligo set. Oligonucelotids #1091, #1092, and #4361 through #4365 represent the TMV-PR oligo set.
FIGURE 2 displays the map of the T-DNA region of pCDX-TL-MAFPII
FIGURE 3 displays the map of the T-DNA region of pMON-TL-MAFPII
FIGURE 4 is a Western blot showing Type II AFP accllmlll~tion in field plants.
Western blot analysis of total soluble protein (2.5 ~g) extracts from Rl generation Type II AFP transgenic plants in which the AFP was targeted to accllml-l~te in the extracellular space. Samples are decign~te~l by number to indicate the plot from which it was collected and by letter to indicate the transformed parent plant from which the Rl plants were descended. Records at the Delhi station inflie~te that A plants were descended from parent II4c2-#10, B plants from II4c2-#l, C from pII3a-#7, and D plants were wild-type controls (4D). Total soluble protein extract from a field-grown wild type plant was included in the analysis as a negative control and mixed with mature Type II AFP (25 ng) purified from sea raven sera to generate the positive control (AFP).
21 ~220 DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
Even though non-food crop plants are ideal species for use as bioreactors from both a regulatory and public safety point of view, there a several obstacles that must 5 be overcome prior to their use as bioreactors. A major problem with the use of non-food crop plants, for example tobacco, as bioreactors is that these plants may contain undesirable secondary plant products. Secondary plant products are constituents that are generally toxic or reduce the palatability of the plant tissue or that are addictive in nature. This is a significant concern since one of the benefits of plcpaling proleills 10 of interest within a plant is that large q~l~ntiti~s of protein may be required for a~1mini~tration (Ma and Hein, 1995), therefore any toxic, addictive, or otherwise non-desirable products should be avoided within the plant tissue. For example, tobacco plants contain high levels of secondary plant products such as nicotine and related alkaloids, making the plant tissue unsuitable for the direct oral ~(lmini~tration.
15 Earlier studies have described the ~t1mini.~tration of tobacco-derived proteins to mice, however, the ploteills were in a partially purified form. For example the study by Mason et al (1996) involved the direct oral ~(lmini.~tration of viral antigens expressed in potato tuber and tobacco. The potato tuber samples were directly fed to mice, yet the antigen, when obtained from tobacco, had to be partially purified using sucrose 20 gradients prior to ~mini~tration to mice.
A non-food crop plant host to be used as a bioreactor for the production of ploteins suitable for direct oral a~lmini~tration of transgenic-expressed proteins of interest should comprise the following properties: that it 25 a) is non-toxic b) requires little or no processing prior to oral ~mini~tration c) is characterized in having low levels of non-desirable secondary plant products such as alkaloids and/or nicotine so that the medicinal matrix is palatable and not addictive.
Use of the terms "low nicotine" and "low alkaloid" with Icl~erellce to plants, such as tobacco, means a plant cont~ining less than about 0. 35 % total alkaloids. Such plants may be obtained through conventional breeding programs (e.g. Chaplin, 1977), through selective down regulation of undesired genes (e.g. U.S. 5,260,205, issued November 9, 1993 and U.S. 5,369,023, issued November 29, 1994; inventors Nakatani and Malik), or by any other means e.g. metagenesis followed by selection 5 of desired traits. However, as is known to one of skill in the art, the llltim~te nicotine or alkaloid level may still depend upon the envilolllllent under which the plant is grown.
By "suitable vector" it is meant a vector comprising a gene of interest that is 10 capable of being expressed within plant tissue. Such a vector may also include ubiquitous or tissue specific promoters and other 5' and 3' regulatory elements as would be known to one of skill in the art. Other elements that may be included with this vector include sequences for ~arge~ing the protein of interest to the cytosol or secretory pathway such as the C-terminal KDEL sequence, an endoplasmic reticulum15 retention motif (Schouten et al 1966). Furthermore, such a vector may includemarker genes for the detection of expression within the transgenic plant.
By "protein of interest" it is meant any protein that is to be expressed in a transformed plant. Such proteins may include, but are not limited to, 20 ph~rm~r,eutic~lly active proteil~, for example growth factors, growth regulators, antibodies, antigens, their derivatives and the like.
By "oral ~(lmini~tration~ it is meant the a~h~ lion of a tissue or organ of a non-food crop plant, for example the leaf, root, fruit etc with minim~l or no prior 25 processing. Such tissues or organs may be provided in the form of a salad or the like along with other ph~rm~çeutir~l ingredients, or ingredients to increase palatability, if desired. It is also contemplated that minim~l proces~ing of the tissue or organ may take place prior to a~mini~tration of the extract. For example, ~)loteills secreted within the extracelluar space of leaf tissues could be readily obtained using vacuum 30 or centrifugal extraction, or tissues could be extracted under pres~ule by passage through rollers or grinding or the like to squeeze or liberate the protein free from within the extracelluar space. Minimal processing could also involve preparation of 21 88~20 crude extracts of soluble proteins, since these plel)al~lions would have negligible cont~min~tion from secondary plant products.
By "medical aliment" it is meant a defined medical condition that can be 5 treated a specific ph~rm~eutical suitable for the treatment of the condition.
Examples of such medical ailments and their corresponding suitable ph~rm~e~ltical include, but are not limited to: diabetes and the ~lmini~tration of IL-4 or insulin or a combination thereof; conditions related to blood clotting and the a~lmini.ctration of Factor VIII, Factor IX or tPA or combinations thereof; m~flir~l conditions requiring 10 the stimul~tion of progenitor cells to monocytes/macrophages and the ~lmini~tration of G-CSF, GM-CSF, hPG-CSF, M-CSF or combinations thereof; viral infections and the ~tlmini~tration of inlelrerolls e.g. hllelrel~ , hllelrelo~ , inlelreloll-~.
Several methods have been proposed for the removal of nicotine from tobacco, 15 however, these processes typically involve the treatment of post harvest-tissue. For example the use of solvents (EP 10,665, published May 14, 1980; inventors Kur7h~l~
and Hubert), or potassium metabisulphite, potassium sulphate and nitrate (U.S.
4,183,364, issued January 8, 1980; inventor Gllmu~h~n) have been proposed as methods for removing nicotine from tobacco leaves. All of these treatments are 20 designed to m~int~in the flavour and aroma of the tobacco, and these methods involve extensive post-harvest processing and are therefore not suitable for the preparation of products as described in this invention.
Recently, specific alteration of nicotine levels within tobacco, by either over 25 expression (i.e. increasing) or antisense expression (decreasing) of putrescine N-methyltransferase, a rate limiting enzyme involved in the nicotine biosynthetic pathway, has been suggested (U.S. 5,260,205, issued November 9, 1993 and U.S.
5,369,023, issued November 29, 1994; hlvellLol~ Nakatani and Malik). However, these methods are directed to the alteration of nicotine levels without modifying the 30 levels of other alkaloids that affect the flavours and aroma of tobacco. No nicotine free plants were actually produced, nor was the use of these transgenically modified tobacco plants, as a bioreactor for the synthesis of pfoleills of interest, suggested.
21 ~220 However, such a transgenic tobacco plant, if produced, may be useful as a bioreactor for the synthesis of proteins of interest as contemplated by this invention.
The breeding of low alkaloid-cont~ining tobacco plants has been reported 5 (Chaplin 1977), however, use of such a plant as a bioreactor has not been suggested.
Due to reduced levels of undesirable secondary plant products within suitable non-food crop plants, it is contemplated that transgenic pl~teins produced within such plants could also be rapidly processed for subsequent ~1mini~tration~ Such rapid10 processing could involve such methods as those employed for the plcpaldtion of FlP
as disclosed in Woodleif et al (1981). These include the aqueous extraction of soluble protein from green tobacco leaves by precipitation with KHSO4, following removalof chloroplastic debris.
In order to establish the efficacy of transgene expression in nicotine-free tobacco, and ensure soluble protein production a Type II antifreeze protein (AFP) was used to prepare transgenic tobacco plants.
As a further example to establish the efficacy of the use of a non-food crop 20 plant as a bioreactor, the preparation of low-nicotine tobacco plants expressing interleukin-4 (IL-4) is disclosed. IL-4 is a growth and dirrelcll~iation factor for T-cells. In particular, IL-4 promotes the development of the subset of T helper (Th2) cells from native T cells upon antigen stim~ tion. IL-4 producing Th2 cells generally protect against the onset of many organ-specific autoimmlln~ diseases,25 including type 1 diabetes. Thus the availability of an abundant source of IL-4 may prove invaluable for the immunotherapy of diabetes. Transgenic low-nicotine tobacco plants can be used in direct feeding studies to determine the efficacy of the recombinantly produced protein.
Gene constructs were transformed into N.tabacum cv. Xanthi and 81V9-4 tobacco strains (available from Agricuture and Agri-Food Canada, Pest ManagementResearch Center, Delhi Farm, Genetics Section) . 81V9-4 is a flue-cured tobacco line 2 1 ~3822(~
cont~ining only trace amounts of alkaloids and is an ideal component for tobacco-based molecular f~rming applications. Gene constructs were built for production of pro and mature forms of a Type II antifreeze protein (AFP), or IL-4, to be accllm~ tecl in the cell cytosol and extracelluar space.
IgG expression in plants lends support to the idea that passage through the endoplasmic reticulum may enhance protein accllmlll~tion. In plants bred to simlllt~n~-ously express mouse IgG light and heavy chain p~ eills targeted to the extracelluar space, the amount of each protein increased up to 60-fold over that seen 10 when expressed individually into the same colllpalllllent (Hiatt et al 1989).Expression of both protein components into the cytosol, however, did not affect their level of accumulation. IgG processing and assembly in lymphocytes occurs throughthe action of heavy-chain binding proteins present in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER).
The observed increase in yield when both proteills were targeted to the extracelluar 15 space has been attributed to an enh~n~e~ stability contingent on IgG assembly.
Consistent with this hypothesis, active antibody complexes were observed when the plOlt~inS were targeted to the extracelluar space but not when targeted to the cytosol.
To further maximize expression levels and transgene protein production the 20 gene encoding the protein of interest, the codon usage within the non-crop plant of interest should be dele~ d. Also, it has been shown that endoplasmic reti~llhlm retention signals can dramatically increase transgene protein levels, for example the KDEL motif (Schouten et al 1996). Replacing any secretory signal sequence with aplant secretory signal will also ensure talg~lillg to the endoplasmic reticulum 25 (Denecke et al 1990).
~,Y~np'~-~
Gene Construction To m~imi7e potential AFP production at the translational level, the native 5'-untr~n~l~te~ region of the fish cDNA was replaced with the 5'-untr~n~l~te-1 leader 21 ~38220 region of the tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) (Richards et al 1977 & 1978, Sleat et al 1988). The fish signal peptide sequence was also replaced with that of the tobacco pathogenesis-related protein lb (PR-lb) (Cornelissen et al 1986, Sijmons et al 1990, Denecke et al 1990). Oligonucleotide c~settes were designed: three oligonucleotides, #1091, #1092 and #1309, which would hybridize to generate the complete TMV
leader sequence (TMV CasseKe: Figure lA); and five oligonucleotides #4361-#4365 which in concert with oligonucleotides #1091 and #1092 would hybridize to generate a linked TMV leader and PR-lb signal peptide DNA sequence (TMV-PR CasseKe:
Figure lB). The 5' end of these c~settes corresponded to a BamH I sticky end restriction site. The 3' end of the TMV casseKe was blunt and incorporated an additional adenine nucleotide intended to form the first nucleotide of the start codon while the 3' end of the TMV-PR casseKe was compatible with Nde I-cut DNA but would not be able to re-gen~ the restriction site following ligation.
To facilitate addition of the TMV and TMV-PR cassettes, sea raven Type II
AFP cDNA was site-specifically mllt~t~ according to the method described by Kunkel (1985) to incorporate an Nde I restriction site at either bp 157 or 207. These mutations also introduced applol)liate in-frame methionine start codons at the junctions between sequences encoding pre and pro, or pro and mature portions of the AFP. To build the gene construct for ~cllm~ tion of AFP into the cytosol, plasmids cont~ining the mllt~te~ Type II AFP cDNAs were initially cut with NdeI and made blunt-ended with mung bean nuclease. The cDNA fragments were released by cleavage with Sal I, were isolated and directionally ligated into a BamH IISal I-cut pTZ18 vector together with annealed TMV oligonucleotides #1091, #1092 and #1309.The TMV-proAFP and TMV-mAFP constructs were then cut with BamH I and Hinc II, and the isolated AFP gene fragments ligated separately into pMON 893. For gene constructs targeting AFP to the extracelluar space, the mllt~tç~l Type II AFP cDNAs were initially subcloned from their pTZ 19 vectors into Hind III/Sal I-cut pBluescript vectors to position a BamH I restriction site 5' to the AFP coding sequence. ThepBluescript-AFP clones were cut with BamH I and Nde I restriction enzymes to remove the sea raven signal peptide sequence or signal peptide and pro-region DNA.
The plasmid portions of these digests were isolated and ligated with armealed 2~ 88220 oligonucleotides #1091, #1092, and #4361 through #4365. The gene constructs werethen cut with Xba I and R~7n I, and separately cloned into pCDX-l.
Cloning of the Type II AFP gene constructs into pMON 893 or pCDX-l 5 oriented the gene cassette into the vector between the double CaMV 35S promoter (Kay et al 1987) and the NOS polyadenylation sequence. AFP encoded by the transgene constructs was identical to the pro and mature AFP forms present in fish with the exception of one additional methionine at the N-terminal end of the proteins.
The T-DNA portion of the final constructs are depicted in Figures 2 and 3. Cleavage 10 of the signal peptide components from the expressed AFPs was predicted (von Heijne 1986) to occur immediately prior to the added methionine in both the pro and mature AFP gene constructs so the AFP accllmul~ting in the cytosol and extracelluar space should be identical.
Gene constructs were transformed into N.tabacum cv. Xanthi and 81V9-4 tobacco strains according to the method described by Horsch et al (1988). AKempts to gelleldte plants carrying transgenes for cytosolic accllmlll~tion of the AFP were made inl~llllillellLly over a period of several years. Discs infected withA.tumefaciens carrying these gene constructs showed little tendency to form callus and seemed more 20 subject to bacterial infection than comparably treated discs transformed with other transgene constructs. Eventually six transgenic plants were regenerated: one proAFP
transgenic in each tobacco strain, three mature AFP transgenics in Xanthi and one mature AFP transgenic in 81V9-4. By contrast, within six months, eight transgenic plants were regenerated carrying gene constructs for AFP ~ccllmlll~tion into the25 extracellular space: two proAFP transgenics in each strain and four mature AFP
transgenics in 81V-9. Tldl~rolllled and regelleldt~d plants were initially selected for kanamycin resistance. Transgenic status was subsequently determined by direct PCR
screening for the AFP transgene using primers #3339 S'-TATTTTTTACAACAATTACCAACAAC-3' and #4708 30 5'-CAGCAGTCATCTGCATACAGCAC-3' which hybridize to the TMV leader and at the 3' end of the sea raven AFP coding sequence, respectively. Type II AFP gene constructs were amplified in 30 cycles of dendluldlion for 1 min at 95~C, ~nn~ling ' 21~38220 for 1 min at 55~C, and elongation for 2 min at 72~C. This generated amplification products of 440 and 388 bp from the gene constructs for cytosolic accllm~ tion of the pro and mature AFPs, and 532 and 480 bp fragments from gene constructs designed for accllmlll~tion of the same AFPs into the extracellular space.
Analysis of Transgene Expression Plants were removed from the growth chamber and m~int~in~d at room telllpel~Lul~ under a grow light for a minimllm 48 h prior to RNA or protein 10 extraction. RNA was prepared by selective precipitation according to the method of Palmiter (1974). Total RNA (40 ,ug) was analysed by Northern blots according to the method of Lehrach et al (1977) and probed with [a-32P]-labelled sea raven AFP
cDNA sequence.
Total soluble protein extracts were prepared from three to four leaves taken from the upper half of a healthy plant according to the method described by Gengenheimer (1990). Extracts were dialysed at 4~C against 0.1%, 0.01% and 0.001% ascorbic acid in SpectraPorl #3 dialysis tubing (MWCO 3.5 kDa) and centrifuged for 15 min at 12,000xg to remove precipitate formed during dialysis prior 20 to lyophilization. Samples were resuspended in Millipore~-filtered water and their protein concentrations determined by Bradford assay (16) relative to a BSA standard.
To extract protein present in the appoplast by vacuum infiltration (Sijmones et al 1990), leaves were cut longillldin~lly into 4 cm x 0.8 cm strips, and rolled 25 lengthwise in 5 cm x 1.8 cm strips of Parafilrn~ so that the bottom of the leaf was exposed to view. The leaf strip was exposed to vacuum derived from a water aspirator twice for 2 min or until the exposed leaf surface was dark green. Eachtreated leaf strip yielded 10 + 2.5 ul of extract. Larger volume samples were too dilute for use and were discarded. Samples which contained green pellets were also 30 discarded to reduce the possibility of cytosolic protein co~ ion. All rem~ining extracts from a given plant were pooled and the amount of protein present determined 21 ~8220 by Bradford (1976) protein assay relative to a BSA standard. Extract concentrations were generally between 0.1-0.2 llg/,ul.
Western Analysis Lyophilized protein was resuspended directly in loading buffer (60 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8/10% glycerol/5% ,B-mercaptoethanol/2% (w/v) SDS/ 1.3 x 10-3% (w/v) bromophenol blue), and were electrophoresed through a 17% polyacrylamide/0.1 M
sodium phosphate, pH 6.8/4 M Urea/0.1% SDS gel using 0.1 M sodium phosphate, pH 6.8/0.1% SDS running buffer. Electrophoresis was conducted at 50 V for 3-4 h or until the 6 kDa pre-stained marker was at the bottom of the gel. Western blots were prepared according to the method described by Burnette et al (1981) and probed with polyclonal antibody to the mature sea raven AFP. A chemiluminescence detection kit (Amersham) for probing of Western blots was used to detect bound first 15 antibody. All reactions were carried out according to the m~nllfa~tllrer's directions.
FY~nrl~ 1: AFP Gene Expression Protein Acc -m~ tion Western blot analysis of total soluble protein extracted from plants carrying genes for cytosolic AFP expression did not find evidence of either pro or mature AFP
acc lm~ tion even when up to 80 ,ug of protein extract were analysed. In contrast, a protein which co-migrated with mature AFP from sea raven and cross-reacted with 25 antibody to Type II AFP was ~letecte~l in as little as 2.5 ~g total soluble protein extMct of plants in which the AFP was targeted to the extracellular space (Figure 4).
This protein was unique to the transgenic plants and was absent in extracts of a wild-type plant and a plant, pII3a-#9, which had been transformed and regenerated butdet~llnilled to be non-transgenic by PCR. Insufficient resolution was obtained with 30 these extracts to dirrerelltiate size differences between the AFPs produced by the plants carrying transgenes for production of pro or mature AFPs. This was probably due to the viscosity of the total soluble protein extracts which often caused distortion of samples during the running of gels. For this reason, positive control Type II AFP
was mixed with total soluble protein extract from a lab-grown wild-type plant togenerate a suitable size standard. Wild-type protein extract was not mixed with the molecular weight markers, so the size of plant-produced AFP could not accurately5 estimated from these extracts. AFP accllmlll~tion varied between plants and appeared slightly higher in plants II4c~-#1 and 10 which carried genes for mature AFP
production. Based on Western blot comparison with a known amount of Type II AFP,the amount of AFP produced by the plants has been estim~ted to be approximately 0.5-1% of the total soluble protein.
mRNA Transcription from Transgenes for Cytosolic AFP Accumulation RNA extracts of plants transgenic with gene constructs for cytosolic AFP
accumul~tion were analysed by Northern blot to determine if the AFP transgene was transcribed. Two plants, Xanthi TmSR #1 and 81V9-4 TmSR #l, carrying transgenes for AFP accumulation into the cell cytosol were found to produce a 0.96 kb RNA
transcript which hybridized with the AFP cDNA used as a probe: on longer exposure of the blots, the same RNA transcript was also seen in extract from Xanthi TmSR #2 and slightly larger one of approximately 1.02 kb was detected in extract from 81V9-4 20 TpSR #3. TldllsC~ip~S from pro and mature AFP transgene constructs were expected to differ by 51 nucleotides. Both plant-produced AFP gene transcripts were both considerably larger than a PCR-gel1eLated control sample estim~ted to be 0. 36 kb and representing the size of the mature AFP transgene between the TMV leader and the3' end of the coding sequence. This was consistent with the size dirrclcllce expected 25 based on the additional coding sequence and 3'-untr~n~l~t~d region (155 nt totdl) present in the transgene construct, and with the use of the NOS polyadenylation sequence to obtain polyadenylated transcripts. Both transcripts were smaller than an equivalent gene ~ldnsclil)l of 1.06 kb produced in a plant carrying the transgene for targeted mature AFP ~ccllm~ tion into the extracellular space. This size dirrel~llce 30 was consistent with the addition of the 90 nt signal peptide coding sequence to the transgene construct for secretion of the AFP. Based on EtBr staining, more RNA
was loaded onto the gel from the plant producing AFP for accllmlll~tion into the extracellular space compared to the amount of RNA from the plants Lalg~ g the AFP
to the cytosol. No comparison could be made regarding the relative amounts of AFP
mRNA transcribed from these constructs. However, similar loadings were achieved between the plants L~lgelillg the AFP to the cytosol. The dirrelel1ce in amount of 5 transcript observed, therefore, suggests that this transgene construct was being expressed at variable levels in the dirrer~lll plants.
AFP Present in the Apoplast Vacuum infiltration extracts were prepared from AFP-producing plants to determine if the ~ressed AFP was present in the extracellular space. These extracts were not subject to the viscosity and sample distortion associated with total soluble protein extracts, so were also considered more suitable to estim~te the sizes of the plant AFPs. Western blot analysis confirmed the presence of AFP. AFP was detected 15 in plants pII3a-#7 and II4c2-#l which carried mature and proAFP transgenes respectively, as a diffuse band of approximately 14.7 kDa which migrated at a similar rate to mature AFP isolated from fish sera. A small mobility dirrelcllce was observed between the AFPs produced by the two plants, however, proAFP isolated from fish sera was distinctly larger than either plant-produced AFP.
Having established the presence of AFP in vacuum infiltration extracts of those plants carrying transgenes for extracellular AFP ~ccllm~ tion, the extracts were concentrated ten-fold and tested for thermal hy~Lelesis activity and effects on ice crystal morphology using the nanolitre osmometer. Extracts from plants expressing 25 gene constructs for either the pro or mature AFP both showed evidence of AFP
activity. Ice crystals grown in these plant extracts were seen as the characteristic eye-shaped bi~yl~llids produced in the presence of native Type II AFP. Thermal hy~Lelesis activity was measured and based on comparison with a standard activity curve the amount of active AFP present in the extracellular space was estim~te-l as 30 2% of the total protein present in the colllpalLlnent.
RNA analysis of the transgenic plants has shown that they are able to transcribe the integrated transgene constructs, and that the size of the plant AFP
mRNA from both construct types is consistent with that expected for a full-length, polyadenylated ll~nsc~ . mRNA produced from the transgene for AFP a~cllmlll~tion5 into the extracellular space was obviously tr~n~l~t~ble.
The presence of plant-produced AFPs in vacuum infiltration extracts in~ t~s that the plant recognized the PR-lb signal peptide component and correctly targeted the attached AFPs to the extracellular space. The predicted size of the AFPs forexport to the extracellular space is 18.7 or 17 kDa with the signal peptide component attached and 15.8 or 14.1 kDa without the signal peptide for the pro and mature AFPs, respectively. Western blot analysis of the plant vacuum infiltration extracts showed that the AFPs produced from the proAFP and mature AFP transgene constructs and present in the extracellular space both co-migrated with mature Type 15 II AFP and were approximately 14.7 kDa. This suggests that not only is the plant capable of cleaving the signal peptide from the expressed AFP but that it can remove most or all of the pro-region of the AFP.
F,~q...l le 2: Interleukin-4 expression Full length murine IL-4 cDNA is 585 base pairs long (Lee et al 1988) and codes for a 140 amino acid prepfoleill with a 40 amino acid secretory signal (Otsuka et al 1987). This gene sequence encoding the 40 amino acid secretory signal was replaced with a plant secretory signal obtained from the tobacco PRl-b secretory25 signal (Denecke et al 1990) to ensure ~lg~lhlg to the endoplasmic reticulum. The reslll~nt vector was introduced into low-nicotine tobacco plants using the methods described above.
In order to determine the biological activity of plant recombinant IL-4, in 30 vitro, the stim~ tion of growth of murine IL-4 dependent CT.4S cell line (Rapoport et al 1993) is dete~ illed. Applopliate dilutions of purified plant recombinant IL-4 is added to cultures cont~ining 5x103 CT.4S cells in flat bottom 96-well plates in a final volume of 100 ml for 48 hr. CT.4S cell proliferation is assessed by addition of 1 mCi/well of [3H]thymidine 18 hr before termination of culture, and [3H] thymidine incorporation is de~e~ ed by liquid scintillation counting.
The immllnoreactivity of plant recombinant IL-4 is determined by solid phase sandwich ELISA (Abrams et al 1992). Briefly, the BVD4-lDll anti-IL-4 mAB is used as a capture antibody and is paired with the biotinylated BVD6-24G2 antiIL-4 mAB as the detecting antibody. Mouse rIL-4 (Ph~rmingen) is used a standard.
In vivo activity of plant produced IL-4 is delellllilled in NOD mice. NOD and control strain (in~lliti~- and diabetes-free) female mice (20 mice/group) are fed either transgenic low nicotine tobacco leaves expressing recombhlall~ly produced IL-4. At various times during the 4 week treatment, circ~ ting serum levels of plant 15 recombinant IL-4-fed and un-fed NOD and control mice are analyzed by ELISA asdescribed above. Both NOD and control mice are monitored for any potential toxiceffects arising from the plant recombinant IL-4 feeding, and their serum concentrations of IgE and IgG quantified by ELISA. Increase in serum IgE levels indicate that recipient mice are more susceptible to allergic responses.
Feeding of plant recombinant IL-4 to protect against the onset of in~llliti~
and/or Type 1 diabetes in NOD mice is also determin~d. Neonatal female NOD mice (2-3 weeks of age) fed or not fed with plant recombinant IL-4 are m~int~in~d in a specific pathogen free animal facility. Mice are monitored weekly for their blood 25 glucose levels (BGL), and mice that are hyperglycemic (i.e. BGL > 11.1 mmol/L) for two consecutive weeks are diagnosed as Type 1 diabetic. The onset of in~llliti~
is monitored by immllnohistoch~ l analysis of pancreatic tissue by sacrificing mice at various times (2 weeks to 2 months) after plant recombinant IL-4-feeding is initi~tç~l .
All scientific publications and patent documents are incorporated herein by lererellce.
2~ 8~220 The present invention has been described with regard to prefelled embodiments.
However, it will be obvious to persons skilled in the art that a number of variations and modifications can be made without departing from the scope of the invention as described in the following claims.
s 21 ~8220 References Abrams, J.S., M.G. Roncarolo, H. Yasel, U. Anderson, G. Gleich, J. Silver (1992)Strategies of anti-cytokine monoclonal antibody development. Tmmllnol. Rev.
127, 5-24.
Bradford M.M. (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the qll~ntit~tion of microgram qu~ntiti~s of protein utili7ing the principle of protein dye binding.
Anal. Biochem. 72, 248-254.
Burnette W.H. (1981) Western blotting: electrophoretic transfer of proteills from SDS-polyacrylamide gels to unmodified nitrocellulose and radio-graphic detections with antibody and radioiodinated protein A. Anal. Biochem. 112, 195-203.
Chaplin J.F. (1977) Breeding for varying levels of nicotine in tobacco. In: Proc Amer Chem Soc, 173rd meeting, New Orleans.
Cornelissen B.J.C, R.A.M Hooft van Huijsduijnen, L.D.Van Loon & J.F.Bol (1986) Molecular chara ;t~ alion of messenger mRNAs for "pathogenesis-related"
protehls la, lb and lc, influcecl by TMV infection of tobacco. EMBO J. 5, 37-40.
Denecke J., J.Botterman & R.Deblaere (1990) Protein secretion in plant cells can occur via a default pathway. Plant Cell 2, 51-59.
Fourney R.M., J.Miyakoshi, R.S.Day III & M.C.Paterson (1988) Northern blotting:
efficient RNA staining and transfer. Focus 10:1, 5-7.
~0 Gengenheimer P (1990) Pl~al~ion of Extracts from Plants. Methods of Enzymology 182, 184-185.
Haq T.A., H.S. Mason, J.D. Clements, C.J. Artzen (1995) Oral i~ ni~ion with a recombinant bacterial antigen produced in plants. Science 268, 714-716.
Hiatt A., R.Cafferkey & K.Bowdish (1989) Production of antibodies in transgenic 5plants. Nature 342, 76-78.
Horsch R.B., J.Fry, N.Hofmann, J.Neidermeyer, S.G.Rogers & R.T.Fraley. (1988) Leaf disc transformation. Plant Molecular Biology Manual A5, 1-9. Ed.
S.B.Gelvin, R.A.Schilperoort, D.P.S.Verma. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
10Dordrecht/Boston/London.
Kay R., A. Chan, M . Daly & J.McPherson (1987) Duplication of CaMV 35S promoter sequences creates a strong enhancer for plant genes. Science 236, 1299-1302.
15Kunkel T.A. (1985) Rapid and efficient site-specific mutagenesis without phenotypic selection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82, 488-492.
Lehrach H., D.Diamond, J.M.Wozney & H. Boedtker. (1977) RNA molecular weight determinations by gel electrophoresis underdenaLu~ g conditions; a 20critical reex~min~tion. Biochemistry 16, 4743.
Ma J.K.C., M. Hein (1995) Tmmum~therapeutic potential of antibodies produced in plants. TibTech 13, 522-527.
25Mason H.S., J.M. Ball, J-J. Shi, X. Jiang, M.K. Estes, C.J. Arntzen (1996) Expression of Norwalk virus capsid protein in transgenic tobacco and potato and its oral immlln(lgenicity in mice. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 93, 5335-5340.
MollL~l~i L., P. Fantozzi, S. Pedone (1993) Tobacco fraction 1 (FlP utili7~tion of 30oral feeding and enteral feeding of patients. 1 Heavy Metal evaluation. Food SAci. Tech. 26, 259-263.
Otsuka T., D. Vallaret, T. Yokota, Y. Takebe, F. Lee, N. Arai, K. Arai (1987) Structural analysis of the mouse chromosomal gene encoding interleukin-4 which expresses B cell, T cell and mast cell stim~ ting activities. Nucl. Acid Res. 15, 333-334 s Palmiter R.D. (1974) Magnesium precipitation of ribonucleopll~teill complexes:
Expedient techniques for the isolation of undegraded polysomes and messenger ribonucleic acid. Biochemistry 13, 3606-3615.
~0 Rapoport M.J., D. Zipris, A.H. Lazarus, A. Jaramillo, D.V. Serreze, E.H. Leiter, P. Cyopick, J.S. Danska, T.L. Delovitch (1993) IL-4 reverses thymic T cell proliferative unresponsiveness and prevents diabetes in NOD mice. J. Exp.
Med. 178, 87-99.
Richards K., H.Guilley, G.Jonard & G.Keith (1977) Leader sequence of 71 nucleotides devoid of G in tobacco mosaic virus RNA. Nature 267, 548-550.
Richards K., H.Guilley, G.Jonard & L.Hirth (1978) Nucleotide sequence at the 5' extremity of tobacco mosaic virus RNA. Eur. J. Biochem. 84, 513-519.
Schouten A et al. (1966) The C-terminal KDEL sequence increases the expression level of a single-chain antibody designed to be targeted to both the cytosol andthe secretory pathway in transgenic tobacco. Plant Molec. Biol. 30, 781-793.
Sleat D.E., R.Jull, P.C.Turner & T.M.A.Wilson (1988) On the mechanism of translational enhancement by the 5'-leader sequence of tobacco mosaic virus RNA. Eur. J. Biochem. 175, 75-86.
Sijmons P.C., B.M.M.Dekker, B.Schrammeijer, T.C.Verwoerd, P.J.M.van den Elzen & A.Hoekema (1990) Production of correctly processed human serum albumin in transgenic plants. Bio/Technology 8, 217-221.
2~ 81322U
von Heijne G. (1986) A new method for predicting signal cleavage sites. Nucl.
Acids Res. 14, 4683-4690.
Woodleif W.G., J.F. Chaplin, C.R. Campbell, D.W. DeJong (1981) Effect of variety and harvest treatments on protein yield of close grown tobacco Tobacco Sci. 25, 83-86.
Claims (14)
1. A method for the preparation of a protein of interest suitable for oral administration within a non-food crop plant comprising, transforming the non-food crop plant with a suitable vector containing a gene of interest and appropriate regulatory regions to ensure expression of the gene of interest within the non-food crop plant, such that the non-food crop plant is characterized as being non-toxic, non-addictive, palatable, and requiring minimal or no processing prior to oral administration.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the non-food plant is characterized in having a low alkaloid level.
3. The method of claim 2 wherein the non-food crop plant is a tobacco plant characterized as having a low nicotine level.
4. The method of claim 3 wherein the protein of interest is a pharmaceutically active protein.
5. The method of claim 4 wherein the pharmaceutically active protein is selected from the group consisting of growth regulators, insulin, interferons, interleukins, growth hormone, erythropoietin, G-CSF, GM-CSF, hPG-CSF, M-CSF, Factor VIII, Factor IX, tPA, antibodies, antigens and any combinations and derivatives thereof
6. The method of claim 4 wherein the appropriate regulatory regions to ensure expression of the gene of interest include ubiquitous or tissue specific promoters.
7. The method of claim 6 wherein the appropriate regulatory regions include an endoplasmic reticulum retention motif.
8. The method of claim 7 wherein the appropriate regulatory regions include a plant signal sequence.
9. A composition comprising a low alkaloid non-food crop tissue containing a pharmaceutically active transgenic protein of interest.
10. The composition of claim 9 wherein the pharmaceutically active transgenic protein of interest is selected from the group consisting of insulin, Factor VIII, Factor IX, tPA, G-CSF, GM-CSF, hPG-CSF, M-CSF, interferons including interferon-.alpha., interferon-.beta., interferon-.gamma., or interleukins including interleukin-1, interleukin-2, interleukin-3, interleukin-4, or derivatives or combinations thereof.
11. The composition of claim 9 wherein the non-food crop is tobacco.
12. The composition of claim 9 wherein the tissue is leaf.
13. A method for the treatment of a medical ailment comprising orally administering an effective amount of the composition of claim 10 to a patient.
14. The method of claim 13 wherein the medical ailment is selected from the group consisting of diabetes, conditions related to blood clotting, medical conditions requiring the stimulation of progenitor cells to monocytes/macrophages, or viral infections.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CA 2188220 CA2188220A1 (en) | 1996-10-18 | 1996-10-18 | Non-food crop plant bioreactor |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CA 2188220 CA2188220A1 (en) | 1996-10-18 | 1996-10-18 | Non-food crop plant bioreactor |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA2188220A1 true CA2188220A1 (en) | 1998-04-18 |
Family
ID=4159106
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA 2188220 Abandoned CA2188220A1 (en) | 1996-10-18 | 1996-10-18 | Non-food crop plant bioreactor |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CA (1) | CA2188220A1 (en) |
Cited By (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO1999067401A2 (en) * | 1998-06-22 | 1999-12-29 | Her Majesty The Queen In Right Of Canada As Represented By The Minister Of Agriculture And Agri-Food Canada | Non-food crop plant bioreactor |
WO2000003012A2 (en) * | 1998-07-10 | 2000-01-20 | Calgene Llc | Expression of eukaryotic peptides in plant plastids |
US6512162B2 (en) | 1998-07-10 | 2003-01-28 | Calgene Llc | Expression of eukaryotic peptides in plant plastids |
US7361331B2 (en) | 1996-10-18 | 2008-04-22 | Her Majesty The Queen In Right Of Canada, As Represented By The Minister Of Agriculture And Agri-Food | Plant bioreactors |
US20140294895A1 (en) * | 2001-12-26 | 2014-10-02 | University Of Central Florida Research Foundation, Inc. | Expression of Protective Antigens in Transgenic Chloroplasts and the Production of Improved Vaccines |
-
1996
- 1996-10-18 CA CA 2188220 patent/CA2188220A1/en not_active Abandoned
Cited By (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7361331B2 (en) | 1996-10-18 | 2008-04-22 | Her Majesty The Queen In Right Of Canada, As Represented By The Minister Of Agriculture And Agri-Food | Plant bioreactors |
WO1999067401A2 (en) * | 1998-06-22 | 1999-12-29 | Her Majesty The Queen In Right Of Canada As Represented By The Minister Of Agriculture And Agri-Food Canada | Non-food crop plant bioreactor |
WO1999067401A3 (en) * | 1998-06-22 | 2000-03-23 | Ca Minister Agriculture & Food | Non-food crop plant bioreactor |
WO2000003012A2 (en) * | 1998-07-10 | 2000-01-20 | Calgene Llc | Expression of eukaryotic peptides in plant plastids |
WO2000003012A3 (en) * | 1998-07-10 | 2000-06-08 | Calgene Llc | Expression of eukaryotic peptides in plant plastids |
US6512162B2 (en) | 1998-07-10 | 2003-01-28 | Calgene Llc | Expression of eukaryotic peptides in plant plastids |
US6812379B2 (en) | 1998-07-10 | 2004-11-02 | Calgene Llc | Expression of eukaryotic peptides in plant plastids |
US7259293B2 (en) | 1998-07-10 | 2007-08-21 | Calgene Llc | Expression of eukaryotic peptides in plant plastids |
US20140294895A1 (en) * | 2001-12-26 | 2014-10-02 | University Of Central Florida Research Foundation, Inc. | Expression of Protective Antigens in Transgenic Chloroplasts and the Production of Improved Vaccines |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20060107353A1 (en) | Plant bioreactors | |
KR100238904B1 (en) | Recombinant plant viral nucleic acid | |
Menassa et al. | A self-contained system for the field production of plant recombinant interleukin-10 | |
DE60221051T2 (en) | PREPARATION OF PEPTIDES AND PROTEINS BY TREATMENT IN PROTEIN BODIES DERIVED FROM ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM | |
EP1090133B1 (en) | Production of il-10 in non-food crop plant bioreactor | |
US5855881A (en) | Mammalian alcohol dehydrogenase and aldehyde dehydrogenase production in plants | |
KR20080038131A (en) | Mucosal or enteral administration of biologically active macromolecules | |
CA2261913A1 (en) | Plant phytases and biotechnological applications | |
EP1364966A2 (en) | Production of recombinant human epidermal growth factor in plants | |
JP2004527227A (en) | Methods for the production of multimeric proteins, and related compositions | |
US20080115243A1 (en) | Transgenic Plants Expressing Intein Modified Proteins and Associated Processes for Bio-Pharmaceutical Production | |
CA2188220A1 (en) | Non-food crop plant bioreactor | |
US20220195449A1 (en) | Methods to increase antigenicity of membrane-bound polypeptides produced in plants | |
FR2774379A1 (en) | PROCESS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF ALPHA 1-ANTITRYPSIN AND ITS VARIANTS BY PLANT CELLS, AND PRODUCTS CONTAINING THE ALPHA-ANTITRYPSIN OBTAINED THEREBY | |
DE69332148T2 (en) | USE OF A DNA SEQUENCE, ENCODING FOR A PROTEIN WITH THE ABILITY TO DEGRADE OXALIC ACID, FOR GENESELECTION | |
US7554006B2 (en) | Commercial production of insulin and insulin-like protein in plants | |
US20020038470A1 (en) | Non-food crop plant bioreactor | |
CA2320430C (en) | Recombinant mistletoe lectins | |
DAVIES et al. | Patent 2188220 Summary | |
US20050050602A1 (en) | Production of GM-CSF in plants | |
EP1290201B1 (en) | Recombinant subunit proteins from porcine parvovirus produced in plants | |
CA2427574A1 (en) | Plant bioreactor | |
WO2001016339A1 (en) | Use of arabinogalactan protein fusion constructs in a method of expressing proteins and peptides in plants | |
CA2695809A1 (en) | Plant bioreactor for the production of interleukin-24 cytokine | |
CA2451001A1 (en) | Production of gm-csf in plants |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
EEER | Examination request | ||
FZDE | Dead |