US20120234681A1 - Functionally graded coatings and claddings for corrosion and high temperature protection - Google Patents

Functionally graded coatings and claddings for corrosion and high temperature protection Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20120234681A1
US20120234681A1 US13/323,431 US201113323431A US2012234681A1 US 20120234681 A1 US20120234681 A1 US 20120234681A1 US 201113323431 A US201113323431 A US 201113323431A US 2012234681 A1 US2012234681 A1 US 2012234681A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
functionally
ceramic
coating
metal
polymer
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US13/323,431
Inventor
Christina A. LOMASNEY
John D. Whitaker
Brian Flinn
Rajendra Kumar Bordia
Jesse A. Unger
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Modumetal Inc
Original Assignee
Modumetal LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Modumetal LLC filed Critical Modumetal LLC
Priority to US13/323,431 priority Critical patent/US20120234681A1/en
Publication of US20120234681A1 publication Critical patent/US20120234681A1/en
Priority to US14/712,626 priority patent/US20150322588A1/en
Assigned to MODUMETAL, LLC reassignment MODUMETAL, LLC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: UNGER, JESSE
Assigned to MODUMETAL, LLC reassignment MODUMETAL, LLC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: WHITAKER, JOHN D.
Assigned to MODUMETAL, LLC reassignment MODUMETAL, LLC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: LOMASNEY, CHRISTINA A.
Assigned to MODUMETAL, INC. reassignment MODUMETAL, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: MODUMETAL, LLC
Assigned to MODUMETAL, INC. reassignment MODUMETAL, INC. CHANGE OF ADDRESS Assignors: MODUMETAL, INC.
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25DPROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PRODUCTION OF COATINGS; ELECTROFORMING; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25D5/00Electroplating characterised by the process; Pretreatment or after-treatment of workpieces
    • C25D5/18Electroplating using modulated, pulsed or reversing current
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25DPROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PRODUCTION OF COATINGS; ELECTROFORMING; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25D13/00Electrophoretic coating characterised by the process
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25DPROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PRODUCTION OF COATINGS; ELECTROFORMING; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25D15/00Electrolytic or electrophoretic production of coatings containing embedded materials, e.g. particles, whiskers, wires
    • C25D15/02Combined electrolytic and electrophoretic processes with charged materials
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25DPROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PRODUCTION OF COATINGS; ELECTROFORMING; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25D21/00Processes for servicing or operating cells for electrolytic coating
    • C25D21/12Process control or regulation
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25DPROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PRODUCTION OF COATINGS; ELECTROFORMING; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25D21/00Processes for servicing or operating cells for electrolytic coating
    • C25D21/12Process control or regulation
    • C25D21/14Controlled addition of electrolyte components
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25DPROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PRODUCTION OF COATINGS; ELECTROFORMING; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25D5/00Electroplating characterised by the process; Pretreatment or after-treatment of workpieces
    • C25D5/48After-treatment of electroplated surfaces
    • C25D5/50After-treatment of electroplated surfaces by heat-treatment
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T428/00Stock material or miscellaneous articles
    • Y10T428/31504Composite [nonstructural laminate]
    • Y10T428/31511Of epoxy ether
    • Y10T428/31529Next to metal
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T428/00Stock material or miscellaneous articles
    • Y10T428/31504Composite [nonstructural laminate]
    • Y10T428/31551Of polyamidoester [polyurethane, polyisocyanate, polycarbamate, etc.]
    • Y10T428/31605Next to free metal
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T428/00Stock material or miscellaneous articles
    • Y10T428/31504Composite [nonstructural laminate]
    • Y10T428/31652Of asbestos
    • Y10T428/31663As siloxane, silicone or silane
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T428/00Stock material or miscellaneous articles
    • Y10T428/31504Composite [nonstructural laminate]
    • Y10T428/31678Of metal
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T428/00Stock material or miscellaneous articles
    • Y10T428/31504Composite [nonstructural laminate]
    • Y10T428/31678Of metal
    • Y10T428/31692Next to addition polymer from unsaturated monomers

Definitions

  • a process for depositing functionally graded materials and structures is described for manufacturing materials that possess the high temperature and corrosion resistant performance of ceramics and glasses, while at the same time eliminating the common mismatches encountered when these are applied to structural metal or composite substrates.
  • An example of the structure of a functionally graded coating is shown in FIG. 1 .
  • An example of the functionally graded coating structure applied to a pipe is shown in FIG. 2 .
  • Electrolytic deposition describes the deposition of metal coatings onto metal or other conductive substrates and can be used to deposit metal and ceramic materials via electrolytic and electrophoretic methods. Electrodeposition which is a low-cost method for forming a dense coating on any conductive substrate and which can be used to deposit organic primer (i.e. “E-coat” technology) and ceramic coatings.
  • the embodiments described herein include methods and materials utilized in manufacturing functionally graded coatings or claddings for at least one of corrosion, tribological and high temperature protection of an underlying substrate.
  • the technology described herein also is directed to articles which include a wear resistant, corrosion resistant and/or high temperature resistant coating including a functionally-graded matrix.
  • One embodiment provides a method which will allow for the controlled growth of a functionally-graded matrix of metal and polymer or metal and ceramic on the surface of a substrate, which can corrode, or otherwise degrade, such as a metal.
  • Another embodiment provides a method which includes the electrophoretic deposition of controlled ratios of ceramic pre-polymer and atomic-scale expansion agents to form a ceramic (following pyrolysis). This form of electrophoretic deposition may then be coupled with electrolytic deposition to form a hybrid structure that is functionally graded and changes in concentration from metal (electrolytically deposited) to ceramic, polymer or glass (electrophoretically deposited).
  • Embodiments of the methods described here provide a high-density, corrosion and/or heat resistant material (e.g., ceramic, glass, polymer) that is deposited onto the surface of a substrate to form a functionally-graded polymer:metal, ceramic:metal, or glass:metal coating.
  • a coating of controlled density, composition, hardness, thermal conductivity, wear resistance and/or corrosion resistance, that has been grown directly onto a surface.
  • the functionally-graded coating made according to the methods disclosed herein may be resistant to spallation due to mismatch in any of: coefficient of thermal expansion, hardness, ductility, toughness, elasticity or other property (together “Interface Property”), between the substrate and the ceramic, polymer, pre-ceramic polymer (with or without fillers) or glass (together “Inert Phase”) as the coating incorporates a material at the substrate interface, which more closely matches the Interface Property of the substrate.
  • coatings made according to methods described herein are resistant to wear, corrosion and/or heat due to the hard, abrasion-resistant, non-reactive and/or heat-stable nature of the Inert Phase.
  • Polymer-derived ceramic composites have been demonstrated for applications, including-oxidation resistance and thermal barriers, due to their high density and low open-pore volume (e.g., the ceramic has less than 1, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, or 50 percent voids based on volume). See, J D Torrey and R K Bordia, Journal of European Ceramic Society 28 (2008) 253-257. These polymer-derived ceramics can be electrophoretically deposited. Electrophoretic deposition is a two-step process.
  • a first step particles suspended in a liquid are forced to move towards one of the electrodes by applying an electric field to the suspension (electrophoresis).
  • the particles collect at one of the electrodes and form a coherent deposit on it. Since the local composition of the deposit is directly related to the concentration and composition of the suspension at the moment of deposition, the electrophoretic process allows continuous processing of functionally graded materials.
  • Polymer-derived ceramics is the method used in commercial production of Nicalon® and Tyranno fibers.
  • the technology of this disclosure includes the use of electrochemical deposition processes to produce composition-controlled functionally-graded coating through chemical and electrochemical control of the initial suspension.
  • This deposition process is referred to as Layered Electrophoretic and Faradaic Depostion (LEAF).
  • LEAF Layered Electrophoretic and Faradaic Depostion
  • Control of current evolution and direction of the electric field also offers the possibility to orient anisotropic powders allowing intimate control of both the density AND the morphology of the Inert Phase (e.g., the content and organization of added ceramic, polymer or glass materials incorporated into an electrodeposited functionally-graded coating).
  • the resulting density of ceramic can be varied through the coatings to produce a varying morphology of ceramic/metal composition.
  • FIG. 1 is an illustration of a functionally graded material.
  • FIG. 2 is an illustration of a pipe based on functionally graded material shown in FIG. 1 .
  • FIG. 3 is graph illustrating mass loss of a substrate per area over time for several materials exposed to concentrated sulfuric acid at 200 degrees C.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates Active Filler Controlled Pyrolysis.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates LEAF electrophoretic deposition process on a fiber mat.
  • FIG. 6 illustrates the concentration of Si and nickel in deposits found by changing the current density.
  • Si is the left most member of each bar graph pair and nickel the right most member of each bar graph pair measured at a specific current density
  • FIG. 7 illustrates the concentration of Ni in the emulsion increases from left to right.
  • Si is the left most member of each bar graph pair and nickel the right most member of each bar graph pair prepared with the noted solution concentration of nickel.
  • Polymer-derived ceramics have shown promise as a novel way to process low-dimensional ceramics, including matrices, fibers and coatings. Polymer-derived ceramic composites have been demonstrated for applications including oxidation barriers, due to their high density and low open-pore volume. See, Torrey and R K Bordia, Journal of European Ceramic Society 28 (2008) 253-257.
  • the Active Filler Controlled Pyrolysis (AFCoP), polymer-derived ceramics offer many benefits over tradition ceramic processing methods including:
  • volume shrinkage up to 50%, upon sintering.
  • AFCoP process is employed, as shown in FIG. 4 .
  • the active-filler additive can be occluded into the liquid polymer prior to casting and sintering. During sintering, this additive acts as an expansion agent, resulting in a fully dense part with near zero volume loss (e.g., there are no voids present).
  • Active fillers include Si, Al, Ti and other metals, which on pyrolysis form SiC, Al2O 3 or TiSi 2 , for example.
  • One of the limitations of this process, as it is practiced currently, is the limited reactivity of the fillers. In many cases, due to kinetic limitations, even for the finest available powders, the filler conversion is incomplete. As will be shown in the processes described herein, the reactive “filler” and the polymer will mixed at molecular scale leading to highly efficient conversion of the filler to the product phase.
  • Polymer-derived ceramics and in particular, AFCoP ceramics have shown promise as a novel way to process a variety of ceramics forms, including matrices, fibers and coatings.
  • Polymer-derived ceramic composites have been demonstrated for applications, including-oxidation resistance and thermal barriers, due to their high density and low open-pore volume. See, J D Torrey and R K Bordia, Journal of European Ceramic Society 28 (2008) 253-257.
  • the AFCoP concept and the LEAF deposition process are combined to enable a manufacturing capability which can produce tailorable, low-cost, ultra-high-performance SiC f /SiC composites and parts.
  • the Layered Electrophoretic And Faradaic (LEAF) production process employed herein enables the low-cost production of tailored ceramic matrices.
  • a first portion of the LEAF process consists in depositing either direct SiC powders, pre-ceramic polymer emulsions (including active fillers) or a combination of these onto the SiC fiber.
  • Electrophoretic deposition is a two-step process. In a first step, particles suspended in a liquid are forced to move towards one of the electrodes by applying an electric field to the suspension (electrophoresis). In a second step (deposition), the particles collect at one of the electrodes and form a coherent deposit on it. Since the local composition of the deposit is directly related to the concentration and composition of the suspension at the moment of deposition, the electrophoretic process allows continuous continuous processing of functionally graded materials.
  • compositions described herein are prepared by the LEAF electrophoretic deposition process outlined above on fiber mat as illustrated in FIG. 5 .
  • the LEAF process offers the ability to reliably produce composition-controlled “green” (not yet sintered) ceramic through chemical and electrochemical control of the initial suspension.
  • the starting fiber which serves as a mandrel, LEAF provides a means to manufacture free standing parts of complex geometry, and hybrid, strength-tailored materials.
  • LEAF affords the means to engineer step-graded and continuously graded compositions.
  • Control of current evolution and direction of the electric field also offers the possibility to orient anisotropic powders allowing intimate control of both the density AND the morphology of the ceramic deposit.
  • Layer thickness can be controlled by, among other things, the application of current in the electrodeposition process.
  • current density may be varied within the range between 0.5 and 2000 mA/cm 2 .
  • Other ranges for current densities are also possible, for example, a current density may be varied within the range between: about 1 and 20 mA/cm 2 ; about 5 and 50 mA/cm 2 ; about 30 and 70 mA/cm 2 ; 0.5 and 500 mA/cm 2 ; 100 and 2000 mA/cm 2 ; greater than about 500 mA/cm 2 ; and about 15 and 40 mA/cm 2 base on the surface area of the substrate or mandrel to be coated.
  • the frequency of the wave forms may be from about 0.01 Hz to about 50 Hz. In other embodiments the frequency can be from: about 0.5 to about 10 Hz; 0.02 to about 1 Hz or from about 2 to 20 Hz; or from about 1 to about 5 Hz.
  • the electrical potential employed to prepare the coatings is in the range of 5V and 5000 V. In other embodiments the electrical potential is within a range selected from 5 and 200 V; about 50 and 500 V; about 100 and 1000 V; 250 and 2500 V; 500 and 3000 V; 1,000 and 4,000 V; and 2000 and 5000 V.
  • Density gradation allows for the design and development of a highly optimized SiC-fiber:SiC-matrix interface. Density gradation provides a means for balancing the optimization of the interface strength, while still maintaining a high density, and in some embodiments gas impermeable and hermetically sealed matrix. Gas impermeability is especially important in corrosion protection where a high level of gas diffusion through the coating may result in substrate attack.
  • the LEAF process enables control and gradation of density such that a high density region near the substrate may protect the substrate from attack while a low density region near the surface may reduce the thermal conductivity of the coating.
  • a sample composition can be controlled by controlling the voltage. Specifically, by slowly transitioning from a low voltage electrolytic deposition regime to a high voltage electrophoretic deposition regime it may be possible to create a functionally-graded material that gradually changes from metal to ceramic or polymer.
  • the coating composition can be functionally-graded by modifying the metal concentration in the electrolyte solution during electrochemical deposition.
  • This approach affords an additional means to control the composition of the functionally-graded coating, and allows for deposition to occur at relatively lower current densities and voltages, which produced a better quality in the deposited composites.
  • the standard cathodic emulsion system where the emulsion particles comprise polymer, pre-ceramic polymer, ceramic or a combination thereof, can be adjusted by adding increasing amounts of nickel to the solution. This embodiment is described in Example #3.
  • this disclosure provides a corrosion resistant coating, which changes in composition throughout its depth, from a high metal concentration at the interface with the substrate to which it is applied to an Inert Phase at the surface.
  • the present disclosure provides a heat resistant coating, which changes in composition throughout its depth, from a high metal concentration at the interface with the substrate to which it is applied to an Inert Phase at the surface.
  • Inert Phase means any polymer, ceramic, pre-ceramic polymer (with or without fillers) or glass, which can be electrophoretically deposited.
  • This Inert Phase may include Al 2 O 3 , SiO 2 , TiN, BN, Fe 2 O 3 , MgO, and TiO 2 , SiC, TiO, TiN, silane polymers, polyhydriromethylsilazane and others.
  • M is selected from Li, Sr, La, W, Ta, Hf, Cr, Ca, Na, Al, Ti, Zr, Cs, Ru, and Pb.
  • metal means any metal, metal alloy or other composite containing a metal. These metals may comprise one or more of Ni, Zn, Fe, Cu, Au, Ag, Pd, Sn, Mn, Co, Pb, Al, Ti, Mg and Cr. In embodiments where metals are deposited, the percentage of each metal may independently be selected. Individual metals may be present at about 0.001, 0.005, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, 98, 99, 99.9, 99.99, 99.999 or 100 percent of the electrodeposited species/composition.
  • the coating can have a coating thickness that varies according to properties of the material that is to be protected by the coating, or according to the environment that the coating is subjected to.
  • the coating can range from 0.2 and 250 millimeters, and in other embodiments the range can vary from 0.2 to 25 millimeters, 25 to 250 millimeters, or be greater than about 25 millimeter and less than about 250 millimeters.
  • the coating thickness can range from 0.5 to 5 millimeters, 1 to 10 millimeters, 5 to 15 millimeters, 10 to 20 millimeters, and 15 to 25 millimeters.
  • the overall thickness of the functionally-graded coating can vary greatly as, for example, between 2 micron and 6.5 millimeters or more. In some embodiments the overall thickness of the functionally-graded coating can also be between 2 nanometers and 10,000 nanometers, 4 nanometers and 400 nanometers, 50 nanometers and 500 nanometers, 100 nanometers and 1,000 nanometers, 1 micron to 10 microns, 5 microns to 50 microns, 20 microns to 200 microns, 200 microns to 2 millimeters (mm), 400 microns to 4 mm, 200 microns to 5 mm, 1 mm to 6.5 mm, 5 mm to 12.5 mm, 10 mm to 20 mm, 15 mm to 30 mm.
  • the functionally graded coatings described herein are suitable for coating a variety of substrates that are susceptible to wear and corrosion.
  • the substrates are particularly suited for coating substrates made of materials that can corrode and wear such as iron, steel, aluminum, nickel, cobalt, iron, manganese, copper, titanium, alloys thereof, reinforced composites and the like.
  • the functionally graded coatings described herein may be employed to protect against numerous types of corrosion, including, but not limited to corrosion caused by oxidation, reduction, stress (stress corrosion), dissolution, dezincification, acid, base, sulfidation and the like.
  • the functionally graded coatings described herein may be employed to protect against thermal degradation.
  • the coatings will have a lower thermal conductivity than the substrates (e.g., metal surfaces) to which they are applied.
  • the coatings described herein may be employed to protect against numerous types of corrosion, including, but not limited to corrosion caused by oxidation, reduction, stress (stress corrosion), dissolution, dezincification, acid, base, sulfidation and the like.
  • the coatings are resistant to the action of strong mineral acid, such as sulfuric, nitric, and hydrochloric acids.
  • Preparation of a functionally graded coating comprising a Inert Phase and a metal formed utilizing a combination of electrolytic (faradaic) and electrophoretic deposition includes the following steps:
  • the resistance of a TiSi 2 filled and an unfilled coating to degradation by 200 degree C. concentrated sulfuric acid is shown in FIG. 3 .
  • a standard of Alloy 20 and 316 stainless steel are provide for reference.
  • the filled coating showed the least loss of weight.
  • a low-content of a metal binder e.g., nickel in this Example
  • a metal binder e.g., nickel in this Example
  • the concentration of nickel in deposits can be controlled by changing the current density employed.
  • a standard nickel plating bath was added to the polymer emulsion in 1% increments by volume up to 10%.
  • the nickel emulsion system can be optimized through concentration alteration and current and voltage modulation to create a structural material suitable for corrosion resistant, wear resistant, heat resistant and other applications.
  • Nickel, a siloxane-based pre-ceramic polymer particles and ceramic SiC particles are added to an organic electrolyte Note that in this case, the polymer is not deposited as an emulsion, but rather directly as a lacquer.
  • a cathode and an anode were connected to a power supply.
  • the substrate was connected to the cathode and inert anodes were connected to the anode.
  • a potential was applied across the anodes and cathode, which potential ramped from a low voltage (around 5-100V) to a high voltage (about 100-1000V). The high voltage was held for a period of time.
  • gray masses are the SiC fibers
  • the darker gray areas are a mixed matrix of SiOC and SiC.
  • SiOC is present due to the heat treatment in an environment in which oxygen was present.
  • the white areas are where the nickel was able to infiltrate into the cracks and reinforce the structure of the material.
  • Fiber break analysis was performed on a selection of samples that contained the functionally graded metal:SiC structure to determine the toughness and fracture characteristics of various SiC bundles.
  • the toughness of the fiber matrix can be determined through the visual inspection of fiber pull-out during fracture. This is observed in SEM images of the fracture surface of a dipped coated ceramic bundle cross-linked at 500° F. for 2 hours.

Abstract

The present disclosure describes functionally graded coatings and claddings for corrosion and high temperature protection.

Description

  • This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/186,057, filed Jun. 11, 2009, tilted Functionally Graded Coatings and Claddings for Corrosion and High Temperature Protection, incorporates herein by reference in its entirety.
  • A process for depositing functionally graded materials and structures is described for manufacturing materials that possess the high temperature and corrosion resistant performance of ceramics and glasses, while at the same time eliminating the common mismatches encountered when these are applied to structural metal or composite substrates. An example of the structure of a functionally graded coating is shown in FIG. 1. An example of the functionally graded coating structure applied to a pipe is shown in FIG. 2.
  • Electrolytic deposition describes the deposition of metal coatings onto metal or other conductive substrates and can be used to deposit metal and ceramic materials via electrolytic and electrophoretic methods. Electrodeposition which is a low-cost method for forming a dense coating on any conductive substrate and which can be used to deposit organic primer (i.e. “E-coat” technology) and ceramic coatings.
  • The embodiments described herein include methods and materials utilized in manufacturing functionally graded coatings or claddings for at least one of corrosion, tribological and high temperature protection of an underlying substrate. The technology described herein also is directed to articles which include a wear resistant, corrosion resistant and/or high temperature resistant coating including a functionally-graded matrix.
  • One embodiment provides a method which will allow for the controlled growth of a functionally-graded matrix of metal and polymer or metal and ceramic on the surface of a substrate, which can corrode, or otherwise degrade, such as a metal.
  • Another embodiment provides a method which includes the electrophoretic deposition of controlled ratios of ceramic pre-polymer and atomic-scale expansion agents to form a ceramic (following pyrolysis). This form of electrophoretic deposition may then be coupled with electrolytic deposition to form a hybrid structure that is functionally graded and changes in concentration from metal (electrolytically deposited) to ceramic, polymer or glass (electrophoretically deposited).
  • Embodiments of the methods described here provide a high-density, corrosion and/or heat resistant material (e.g., ceramic, glass, polymer) that is deposited onto the surface of a substrate to form a functionally-graded polymer:metal, ceramic:metal, or glass:metal coating. The result is a coating, of controlled density, composition, hardness, thermal conductivity, wear resistance and/or corrosion resistance, that has been grown directly onto a surface.
  • The functionally-graded coating made according to the methods disclosed hereinmay be resistant to spallation due to mismatch in any of: coefficient of thermal expansion, hardness, ductility, toughness, elasticity or other property (together “Interface Property”), between the substrate and the ceramic, polymer, pre-ceramic polymer (with or without fillers) or glass (together “Inert Phase”) as the coating incorporates a material at the substrate interface, which more closely matches the Interface Property of the substrate.
  • In general, coatings made according to methods described herein are resistant to wear, corrosion and/or heat due to the hard, abrasion-resistant, non-reactive and/or heat-stable nature of the Inert Phase.
  • Polymer-derived ceramics that incorporate active fillers (e.g., TiN, Ti disilicide, and others) to improve density, have shown promise as a way to process a variety of Inert Phases, which are more dense than polymer-derived ceramics which do not incorporate these fillers. Polymer-derived ceramic composites have been demonstrated for applications, including-oxidation resistance and thermal barriers, due to their high density and low open-pore volume (e.g., the ceramic has less than 1, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, or 50 percent voids based on volume). See, J D Torrey and R K Bordia, Journal of European Ceramic Society 28 (2008) 253-257. These polymer-derived ceramics can be electrophoretically deposited. Electrophoretic deposition is a two-step process. In a first step, particles suspended in a liquid are forced to move towards one of the electrodes by applying an electric field to the suspension (electrophoresis). In a second step (deposition), the particles collect at one of the electrodes and form a coherent deposit on it. Since the local composition of the deposit is directly related to the concentration and composition of the suspension at the moment of deposition, the electrophoretic process allows continuous processing of functionally graded materials. Polymer-derived ceramics is the method used in commercial production of Nicalon® and Tyranno fibers.
  • In embodiments, the technology of this disclosure includes the use of electrochemical deposition processes to produce composition-controlled functionally-graded coating through chemical and electrochemical control of the initial suspension. This deposition process is referred to as Layered Electrophoretic and Faradaic Depostion (LEAF). By controlling the composition and current evolution during the deposition process, LEAF affords the means to engineer step-graded and continuously graded compositions; see Figs. and reference graphs that show dependence of Ni and Si as a function of solution chemistry and current density. Control of current evolution and direction of the electric field also offers the possibility to orient anisotropic powders allowing intimate control of both the density AND the morphology of the Inert Phase (e.g., the content and organization of added ceramic, polymer or glass materials incorporated into an electrodeposited functionally-graded coating). For example, in one embodiment by controlling current evolution and the direction of the electric field in a solution including pre-ceramic polymer, the resulting density of ceramic can be varied through the coatings to produce a varying morphology of ceramic/metal composition.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1. is an illustration of a functionally graded material.
  • FIG. 2. is an illustration of a pipe based on functionally graded material shown in FIG. 1.
  • FIG. 3. is graph illustrating mass loss of a substrate per area over time for several materials exposed to concentrated sulfuric acid at 200 degrees C.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates Active Filler Controlled Pyrolysis.
  • FIG. 5. illustrates LEAF electrophoretic deposition process on a fiber mat.
  • FIG. 6 illustrates the concentration of Si and nickel in deposits found by changing the current density. Si is the left most member of each bar graph pair and nickel the right most member of each bar graph pair measured at a specific current density
  • FIG. 7 illustrates the concentration of Ni in the emulsion increases from left to right. Si is the left most member of each bar graph pair and nickel the right most member of each bar graph pair prepared with the noted solution concentration of nickel.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • Polymer-derived ceramics have shown promise as a novel way to process low-dimensional ceramics, including matrices, fibers and coatings. Polymer-derived ceramic composites have been demonstrated for applications including oxidation barriers, due to their high density and low open-pore volume. See, Torrey and R K Bordia, Journal of European Ceramic Society 28 (2008) 253-257.
  • The Active Filler Controlled Pyrolysis (AFCoP), polymer-derived ceramics offer many benefits over tradition ceramic processing methods including:
      • Liquid form with low crosslinking temperature
      • High purity reactants
      • Tailorable composition, microstructure, nanostructures and properties
      • Ability to produce crystalline and beta-SiC phases
  • Pure polymer-derived ceramics suffer from certain performance limitations.
  • One such limitation is the occurrence of volume shrinkage—up to 50%, upon sintering. To prevent this, and in order to increase the density of PDC matrices, the AFCoP process is employed, as shown in FIG. 4.
  • To produce fully-dense ceramic matrices, the active-filler additive can be occluded into the liquid polymer prior to casting and sintering. During sintering, this additive acts as an expansion agent, resulting in a fully dense part with near zero volume loss (e.g., there are no voids present). Active fillers include Si, Al, Ti and other metals, which on pyrolysis form SiC, Al2O3 or TiSi2, for example. One of the limitations of this process, as it is practiced currently, is the limited reactivity of the fillers. In many cases, due to kinetic limitations, even for the finest available powders, the filler conversion is incomplete. As will be shown in the processes described herein, the reactive “filler” and the polymer will mixed at molecular scale leading to highly efficient conversion of the filler to the product phase.
  • Polymer-derived ceramics and in particular, AFCoP ceramics, have shown promise as a novel way to process a variety of ceramics forms, including matrices, fibers and coatings. Polymer-derived ceramic composites have been demonstrated for applications, including-oxidation resistance and thermal barriers, due to their high density and low open-pore volume. See, J D Torrey and R K Bordia, Journal of European Ceramic Society 28 (2008) 253-257. In the some embodiments of this disclosure the AFCoP concept and the LEAF deposition process are combined to enable a manufacturing capability which can produce tailorable, low-cost, ultra-high-performance SiCf/SiC composites and parts.
  • The Layered Electrophoretic And Faradaic (LEAF) production process employed herein enables the low-cost production of tailored ceramic matrices. A schematic of one embodiment of that process described in Scheme A.
  • Figure US20120234681A1-20120920-C00001
  • Starting from SiC powders and fiber, a first portion of the LEAF process consists in depositing either direct SiC powders, pre-ceramic polymer emulsions (including active fillers) or a combination of these onto the SiC fiber. Electrophoretic deposition is a two-step process. In a first step, particles suspended in a liquid are forced to move towards one of the electrodes by applying an electric field to the suspension (electrophoresis). In a second step (deposition), the particles collect at one of the electrodes and form a coherent deposit on it. Since the local composition of the deposit is directly related to the concentration and composition of the suspension at the moment of deposition, the electrophoretic process allows continuous continuous processing of functionally graded materials.
  • A variety of substrates may be employed to prepare the compositions described herein. In one embodiment, the compositions are prepared by the LEAF electrophoretic deposition process outlined above on fiber mat as illustrated in FIG. 5.
  • The LEAF process offers the ability to reliably produce composition-controlled “green” (not yet sintered) ceramic through chemical and electrochemical control of the initial suspension. By shaping the starting fiber, which serves as a mandrel, LEAF provides a means to manufacture free standing parts of complex geometry, and hybrid, strength-tailored materials.
  • By controlling the composition and current evolution during deposition process, LEAF affords the means to engineer step-graded and continuously graded compositions. Control of current evolution and direction of the electric field also offers the possibility to orient anisotropic powders allowing intimate control of both the density AND the morphology of the ceramic deposit.
  • Layer thickness can be controlled by, among other things, the application of current in the electrodeposition process. In some embodiments current density may be varied within the range between 0.5 and 2000 mA/cm2. Other ranges for current densities are also possible, for example, a current density may be varied within the range between: about 1 and 20 mA/cm2; about 5 and 50 mA/cm2; about 30 and 70 mA/cm2; 0.5 and 500 mA/cm2; 100 and 2000 mA/cm2; greater than about 500 mA/cm2; and about 15 and 40 mA/cm2 base on the surface area of the substrate or mandrel to be coated. In some embodiments the frequency of the wave forms may be from about 0.01 Hz to about 50 Hz. In other embodiments the frequency can be from: about 0.5 to about 10 Hz; 0.02 to about 1 Hz or from about 2 to 20 Hz; or from about 1 to about 5 Hz.
  • In some embodiments the electrical potential employed to prepare the coatings is in the range of 5V and 5000 V. In other embodiments the electrical potential is within a range selected from 5 and 200 V; about 50 and 500 V; about 100 and 1000 V; 250 and 2500 V; 500 and 3000 V; 1,000 and 4,000 V; and 2000 and 5000 V.
  • In addition to direct electrophoretic deposition of SiC pre-polymers onto SiC fibers, studies have also demonstrated the co-deposition of densification additives. This is similar to the AFCoP process described above. These active-filler additives allow low-temperature densification without any detrimental effects on the fibers, as many densification additives can be sintered well below the re-crystallization temperature of the SiCf. See, A. R. Boccaccini et al., Journal of European Ceramic Society 17 (1997) 1545-1550. By combining these additives into the LEAF process, it is possible to produce high density and density graded ceramic matrices.
  • Density gradation allows for the design and development of a highly optimized SiC-fiber:SiC-matrix interface. Density gradation provides a means for balancing the optimization of the interface strength, while still maintaining a high density, and in some embodiments gas impermeable and hermetically sealed matrix. Gas impermeability is especially important in corrosion protection where a high level of gas diffusion through the coating may result in substrate attack. The LEAF process enables control and gradation of density such that a high density region near the substrate may protect the substrate from attack while a low density region near the surface may reduce the thermal conductivity of the coating.
  • It is believed to be possible to join non oxide ceramics using preceramic polymers with active fillers based on the work of Borida. See, J D Torrey and R K Bordia, Journal of European Ceramic Society 28 (2008) 253-257. In regard t the embodiments described herein, refinement of the microstructure of ceramics joined by the LEAF processes leads to higher bond strengths In one embodiment of the technology, a sample composition can be controlled by controlling the voltage. Specifically, by slowly transitioning from a low voltage electrolytic deposition regime to a high voltage electrophoretic deposition regime it may be possible to create a functionally-graded material that gradually changes from metal to ceramic or polymer. The same could be achieved by controlling the current to selectively deposit ionic (metal) species and/or charged particle (Inert Phase) species. To create a metal:ceramic functionally graded SiC composite material would significantly increase the corrosion-resistance, wear-resistance, toughness, durability and temperature stability of a ceramic-coated structure.
  • In another embodiment, the coating composition can be functionally-graded by modifying the metal concentration in the electrolyte solution during electrochemical deposition. This approach affords an additional means to control the composition of the functionally-graded coating, and allows for deposition to occur at relatively lower current densities and voltages, which produced a better quality in the deposited composites. The standard cathodic emulsion system, where the emulsion particles comprise polymer, pre-ceramic polymer, ceramic or a combination thereof, can be adjusted by adding increasing amounts of nickel to the solution. This embodiment is described in Example #3.
  • In other embodiments, this disclosure provides a corrosion resistant coating, which changes in composition throughout its depth, from a high metal concentration at the interface with the substrate to which it is applied to an Inert Phase at the surface.
  • In another embodiment, the present disclosure provides a heat resistant coating, which changes in composition throughout its depth, from a high metal concentration at the interface with the substrate to which it is applied to an Inert Phase at the surface.
  • As used herein “Inert Phase” means any polymer, ceramic, pre-ceramic polymer (with or without fillers) or glass, which can be electrophoretically deposited. This Inert Phase may include Al2O3, SiO2, TiN, BN, Fe2O3, MgO, and TiO2, SiC, TiO, TiN, silane polymers, polyhydriromethylsilazane and others.
  • In some embodiments, ceramic particles may include of one or more metal oxides that can be selected from ZrxOx, YtOx, AlxOx, SiOx, FeOxOx, TiOx, MgO where x=1-4, and include mixed metal oxides with the structure MxY, where M is a metal and Y is ZrxOx, YtOx, AlxOx, SiOx, FexOx, TiOx, MgO. In another embodiment, M is selected from Li, Sr, La, W, Ta, Hf, Cr, Ca, Na, Al, Ti, Zr, Cs, Ru, and Pb.
  • As used herein, “metal” means any metal, metal alloy or other composite containing a metal. These metals may comprise one or more of Ni, Zn, Fe, Cu, Au, Ag, Pd, Sn, Mn, Co, Pb, Al, Ti, Mg and Cr. In embodiments where metals are deposited, the percentage of each metal may independently be selected. Individual metals may be present at about 0.001, 0.005, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, 98, 99, 99.9, 99.99, 99.999 or 100 percent of the electrodeposited species/composition.
  • In other embodiments, the coating can have a coating thickness that varies according to properties of the material that is to be protected by the coating, or according to the environment that the coating is subjected to. In some embodiments, the coating can range from 0.2 and 250 millimeters, and in other embodiments the range can vary from 0.2 to 25 millimeters, 25 to 250 millimeters, or be greater than about 25 millimeter and less than about 250 millimeters. In still other embodiments, the coating thickness can range from 0.5 to 5 millimeters, 1 to 10 millimeters, 5 to 15 millimeters, 10 to 20 millimeters, and 15 to 25 millimeters. In still other embodiments, the overall thickness of the functionally-graded coating can vary greatly as, for example, between 2 micron and 6.5 millimeters or more. In some embodiments the overall thickness of the functionally-graded coating can also be between 2 nanometers and 10,000 nanometers, 4 nanometers and 400 nanometers, 50 nanometers and 500 nanometers, 100 nanometers and 1,000 nanometers, 1 micron to 10 microns, 5 microns to 50 microns, 20 microns to 200 microns, 200 microns to 2 millimeters (mm), 400 microns to 4 mm, 200 microns to 5 mm, 1 mm to 6.5 mm, 5 mm to 12.5 mm, 10 mm to 20 mm, 15 mm to 30 mm.
  • The functionally graded coatings described herein are suitable for coating a variety of substrates that are susceptible to wear and corrosion. In one embodiment the substrates are particularly suited for coating substrates made of materials that can corrode and wear such as iron, steel, aluminum, nickel, cobalt, iron, manganese, copper, titanium, alloys thereof, reinforced composites and the like.
  • The functionally graded coatings described herein may be employed to protect against numerous types of corrosion, including, but not limited to corrosion caused by oxidation, reduction, stress (stress corrosion), dissolution, dezincification, acid, base, sulfidation and the like.
  • The functionally graded coatings described herein may be employed to protect against thermal degradation. In one embodiment, the coatings will have a lower thermal conductivity than the substrates (e.g., metal surfaces) to which they are applied.
  • The coatings described herein may be employed to protect against numerous types of corrosion, including, but not limited to corrosion caused by oxidation, reduction, stress (stress corrosion), dissolution, dezincification, acid, base, sulfidation and the like. In one embodiment, the coatings are resistant to the action of strong mineral acid, such as sulfuric, nitric, and hydrochloric acids.
  • EXAMPLES Example 1
  • Preparation of a functionally graded coating comprising a Inert Phase and a metal formed utilizing a combination of electrolytic (faradaic) and electrophoretic deposition includes the following steps:
  • 1. Acquire the desired substrate material and cut it to its appropriate size
  • 2. Sand the substrate on a circular sander using three steps to achieve a 600 Grit finish
      • a. 120 Grit
      • b. 420 Grit
      • c. 600 Grit
  • 3. Attrition Mill TiSi2 powder for 10 or more hours.
      • a. Add isopropanol to the TiSi2 powder to aid in grinding
      • b. The longer the time period the smaller the particle size
      • c. Rinse with isopropanol
      • d. Dry at 100 C for 8 hours
  • 4. Mix the Pre-ceramic Polymer with the solvent
      • a. Pre-ceramic Polymer, Polyhydridomethysilazane (PHMS): 5.25 g
      • b. Add to Solvent, n-Octane: 6.25 mL
      • c. Add an electrodepositable metal species (e.g. Ni) to the slurry
      • d. The total Volume ratio of slurry: n-Octane is 3:5
  • 5. Mix TiSi2 powder at 30% volume with PHMS from step 4 to create slurry
  • 6. Ball mill slurry for 4 hours with 200, 5/32″ diameter glass beads
  • 7. Dissolve the Ru3(CO)12 catalyst in n-Octane
      • a. Ru3(CO)12: 2.63 mg
      • b. n-Octane: 6.25 mL
      • c. Combine the mixture with the slurry
  • 8. Ball mill for the entire slurry from step 7 for 30 minutes
  • 9. Dip-coat the slurry onto the prepared substrate
      • a. Dip substrate into slurry
      • b. Apply a current to affect electrolytic deposition of the metal content of the coating
      • c. Increase the current to affect electrophoretic deposition of the ceramic content of the coating
      • d. Attach the substrate to the Instron head
      • e. Optionally dip into the substrate into the slurry and remove it at a rate of 50 cm/min
  • 10. Cross-link the samples in humid air
      • a. Hang the dipped substrates in a jar filled 1/5 with water
      • b. Temperature: 150 C
      • c. Time: 2 hours
  • 11. Pyrolyze the dipped samples with flowing air
      • a. Hang the samples from a ceramic stand and place them in the oven
      • b. Ramp rate: 2 C/min
      • c. Hold temperature: 800 C
      • d. Hold Time: 2 hours
      • e. Ramp down: 2 C/min
  • 12. Remove the completed sample from the oven.
  • The resistance of a TiSi2 filled and an unfilled coating to degradation by 200 degree C. concentrated sulfuric acid is shown in FIG. 3. A standard of Alloy 20 and 316 stainless steel are provide for reference. The filled coating showed the least loss of weight.
  • Example 2 Toughness Improvements Employing Leaf Processes to Incorporate a Low-Content of Metal Binder Into Composites
  • In order to improve toughness, the LEAF processes a low-content of a metal binder (e.g., nickel in this Example) may be incorporated into composites. As shown in FIG. 6, the concentration of nickel in deposits can be controlled by changing the current density employed.
  • Example 3 A Functionally Graded Coating
  • In order to create a functionally-graded coating, a standard nickel plating bath was added to the polymer emulsion in 1% increments by volume up to 10%.
  • Samples were subsequently exposed to a DC current for a fixed period. The bath was stirred and agitated at the conclusion of each test in order to ensure proper solution mixing and suspension.
  • The observations attained from the optical image of the samples were confirmed by the EDX compositional analysis. The Ni composition of the coating was increasing as the Ni concentration in solution increased. These results once again demonstrate the feasibility of creating a functionally graded ceramic:metal composite material by controlling the concentration of metal and Inert Phases in the electrolyte during the deposition process.
  • In addition, the data demonstrated that the silicon content in the deposit remain constant over time. This result is to be expected as a result of the voltage driven nature of electrophoretic deposition, and a constant current density and similar voltages were used for the samples. The nickel emulsion system can be optimized through concentration alteration and current and voltage modulation to create a structural material suitable for corrosion resistant, wear resistant, heat resistant and other applications.
  • Example 4
  • Nickel, a siloxane-based pre-ceramic polymer particles and ceramic SiC particles are added to an organic electrolyte Note that in this case, the polymer is not deposited as an emulsion, but rather directly as a lacquer. A cathode and an anode were connected to a power supply. The substrate was connected to the cathode and inert anodes were connected to the anode. A potential was applied across the anodes and cathode, which potential ramped from a low voltage (around 5-100V) to a high voltage (about 100-1000V). The high voltage was held for a period of time. In an SEM of the resulting structure, where gray masses are the SiC fibers the darker gray areas are a mixed matrix of SiOC and SiC. SiOC is present due to the heat treatment in an environment in which oxygen was present. The white areas are where the nickel was able to infiltrate into the cracks and reinforce the structure of the material.
  • The addition of the SiC filler particles into the pre-ceramic polymer led to the densification and, strengthening of the specimen by reducing shrinkage on formation. The sub-micron size of the filler particles facilitated the flow and migration of the matrix around the SiC fibers. The upper-right corner of the image contains a zoomed in view of the interface around a fiber. Any gaps present were filled and strengthened by the nickel metal deposition.
  • Fiber break analysis was performed on a selection of samples that contained the functionally graded metal:SiC structure to determine the toughness and fracture characteristics of various SiC bundles. The toughness of the fiber matrix can be determined through the visual inspection of fiber pull-out during fracture. This is observed in SEM images of the fracture surface of a dipped coated ceramic bundle cross-linked at 500° F. for 2 hours.
  • The above descriptions of embodiments of methods and compositions are illustrative of the present technology. Because of variations which will be apparent to those skilled in the art, however, the technology is not intended to be limited to the particular embodiments described above.

Claims (22)

1. A method for producing a functionally-graded coating, comprising:
(a) exposing a mandrel or a substrate to be coated to an electrolyte containing one or more metal ions, and containing one or more ceramic particles, polymer particles, pre-ceramic polymer particles, active fillers, or a combination thereof;
(b) applying an electric current and changing in time one or more of: an amplitude of the electrical current, an amplitude of an electrical potential, an electrolyte temperature, a relative concentration of metal ions or particles in the electrolyte, or an electrolyte agitation, to change a ratio of an electrodeposited species; and
(c) promoting growth of the functionally-graded coating until a desired thickness of the coating is achieved, the electrodeposited species being varied throughout the desired thickness of the coating.
2. (canceled)
3. The method of claim 1, further comprising heat treating the coating to cause partial or complete sintering of a pre-ceramic polymer applied to said mandrel or substrate by said applying of said electric current.
4. The method of claim 3, where the heat treating has a heat treatment temperature between 200 degrees C. to 1300 degrees C.
5-6. (canceled)
7. The method of claim 1, wherein said one or more metal ions are selected from the group consisting of: Ni, Zn, Fe, Cu, Au, Ag, Pd, Sn, Mn, Co, Pb, Al, Ti, Mg, and Cr.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein the ceramic particles are chosen from metal oxides, carbides, nitrides, or combinations thereof.
9-12. (canceled)
13. The method of claim 1,
wherein the polymer particles comprise one or more of: epoxy, polyurethane, polyaniline, polyethylene, poly ether ether ketone, polypropylene, and siloxane;
wherein the pre-ceramic polymer particles comprise one or more of siloxides, silences, silanes, organosilanes, siloxanes, polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes, polydimethylsiloxanes, and polydiphenylsiloxanes; and/or
wherein the active fillers comprise one or more of: titanium disilicide, yittrium disilicide, nickel disilicide, niobium disilicide, tantalum disilicide, vanadium disilicide, chromium disilicide, and molybdenum disilicide.
14.-24. (canceled)
25. A coating prepared by the method of claim 1.
26. An electrodeposited corrosion-resistant functionally-graded coating, comprising:
an interior first region of metal; and
an exterior second region of polymer, pre-ceramic polymer, or ceramic,
wherein a non-discrete region is disposed between the first region and the second region, the non-discrete region being a combination of the first region and the second region.
27. The functionally-graded coating of claim 26, wherein said non-discrete region has a monotonically increasing metal concentration gradient.
28. The functionally-graded coating of claim 26, wherein said non-discrete region has a monotonically decreasing metal concentration gradient.
29. The functionally-graded coating claim 26, wherein said functionally-graded coating is corrosion-resistant or substantially corrosion resistant, is heat resistant or substantially heat resistant, and/or wear resistant or substantially wear resistant.
30-31. (canceled)
32. The functionally-graded coating of claim 26, wherein said metal comprises one or more metal ions selected from the group consisting of: Ni, Zn, Fe, Cu, Au, Ag, Pd, Sn, Mn, Co, Pb, Al, Ti, Mg, and Cr.
33. The functionally-graded coating of claim 26, wherein said ceramic comprises one or more metal oxides, carbides, nitrides, or combinations thereof.
34-37. (canceled)
38. The functionally-graded coating of claim 26,
wherein the polymer comprises one or more on epoxy, polyurethane, polyaniline, polyethylene, poly ether ether ketone, polypropylene, and siloxane;
wherein the pre-ceramic polymer comprises one or more of: siloxides, silences, silanes, organosilanes, siloxanes, polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes, polydimethylsiloxanes, and polydiphenylsiloxanes.
39. (canceled)
40. The functionally-graded coating of claim 26, further comprising a first substrate disposed proximate to a second substrate comprising iron, copper, zinc, aluminum, titanium, nickel, chromium, graphite, carbon, cobalt, lead, epoxy, or composites or alloys thereof.
US13/323,431 2009-06-11 2011-12-12 Functionally graded coatings and claddings for corrosion and high temperature protection Abandoned US20120234681A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/323,431 US20120234681A1 (en) 2009-06-11 2011-12-12 Functionally graded coatings and claddings for corrosion and high temperature protection
US14/712,626 US20150322588A1 (en) 2009-06-11 2015-05-14 Functionally Graded Coatings and Claddings for Corrosion and High Temperature Protection

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US18605709P 2009-06-11 2009-06-11
PCT/US2010/001677 WO2010144145A2 (en) 2009-06-11 2010-06-11 Functionally graded coatings and claddings for corrosion and high temperature protection
US13/323,431 US20120234681A1 (en) 2009-06-11 2011-12-12 Functionally graded coatings and claddings for corrosion and high temperature protection

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2010/001677 Continuation WO2010144145A2 (en) 2009-06-11 2010-06-11 Functionally graded coatings and claddings for corrosion and high temperature protection

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/712,626 Continuation US20150322588A1 (en) 2009-06-11 2015-05-14 Functionally Graded Coatings and Claddings for Corrosion and High Temperature Protection

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20120234681A1 true US20120234681A1 (en) 2012-09-20

Family

ID=43063528

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/323,431 Abandoned US20120234681A1 (en) 2009-06-11 2011-12-12 Functionally graded coatings and claddings for corrosion and high temperature protection
US14/712,626 Abandoned US20150322588A1 (en) 2009-06-11 2015-05-14 Functionally Graded Coatings and Claddings for Corrosion and High Temperature Protection

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/712,626 Abandoned US20150322588A1 (en) 2009-06-11 2015-05-14 Functionally Graded Coatings and Claddings for Corrosion and High Temperature Protection

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (2) US20120234681A1 (en)
EP (1) EP2440692B1 (en)
CA (2) CA2764968C (en)
ES (1) ES2636742T3 (en)
WO (1) WO2010144145A2 (en)

Cited By (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20120276403A1 (en) * 2010-02-04 2012-11-01 Kazushi Nakagawa Heat sink material
US9434653B1 (en) * 2012-03-02 2016-09-06 Dynamic Material Systems, LLC Method for producing bulk ceramic components from agglomerations of partially cured gelatinous polymer ceramic precursor resin droplets
US9744694B2 (en) 2015-04-02 2017-08-29 The Boeing Company Low-cost tooling and method for manufacturing the same
US9764987B2 (en) 2012-03-02 2017-09-19 Dynamic Material Systems, LLC Composite ceramics and ceramic particles and method for producing ceramic particles and bulk ceramic particles
US9944021B2 (en) 2012-03-02 2018-04-17 Dynamic Material Systems, LLC Additive manufacturing 3D printing of advanced ceramics
CN108385143A (en) * 2018-04-11 2018-08-10 珠海市跳跃自动化科技有限公司 A kind of diamond wire production line and production method
US10060042B2 (en) 2016-04-04 2018-08-28 The Boeing Company Tooling having a durable metallic surface over an additively formed polymer base and method of forming such tooling
US10399907B2 (en) 2012-03-02 2019-09-03 Dynamic Material Systems, LLC Ceramic composite structures and processing technologies
CN111825479A (en) * 2020-07-24 2020-10-27 江西宁新新材料股份有限公司 Method for preparing graphite high-temperature-resistant composite coating through electrochemistry-impregnation cooperation
CN114657615A (en) * 2022-03-25 2022-06-24 重庆理工大学 Wear-resistant nickel coating with gradient nanostructure and preparation method thereof
CN114759419A (en) * 2022-03-17 2022-07-15 江苏海洋大学 Preparation method of copper-aluminum gradient alloy transition joint for submarine cable welding

Families Citing this family (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1919703B1 (en) 2005-08-12 2013-04-24 Modumetal, LLC Compositionally modulated composite materials and methods for making the same
WO2010005983A2 (en) 2008-07-07 2010-01-14 Modumetal Llc Property modulated materials and methods of making the same
EP2440691B1 (en) 2009-06-08 2019-10-23 Modumetal, Inc. Electrodeposited, nanolaminate coatings and claddings for corrosion protection
CN105189828B (en) 2013-03-15 2018-05-15 莫杜美拓有限公司 Nickel chromium triangle nanometer laminate coat with high rigidity
EP2971266A4 (en) 2013-03-15 2017-03-01 Modumetal, Inc. A method and apparatus for continuously applying nanolaminate metal coatings
BR112015022235A2 (en) 2013-03-15 2017-07-18 Modumetal Inc nanolaminated coatings
WO2014145771A1 (en) 2013-03-15 2014-09-18 Modumetal, Inc. Electrodeposited compositions and nanolaminated alloys for articles prepared by additive manufacturing processes
GB201308473D0 (en) 2013-05-10 2013-06-19 Authentix Inc Plating of articles
CN105765007A (en) 2013-11-19 2016-07-13 巴斯夫涂料有限公司 Aqueous coating composition for the dip-paint coating of electrically conductive substrates containing magnesium oxide
HUE036975T2 (en) 2013-11-19 2018-08-28 Henkel Ag & Co Kgaa Aqueous coating composition for dipcoating electrically conductive substrates containing aluminium oxide
CA2961508A1 (en) 2014-09-18 2016-03-24 Modumetal, Inc. A method and apparatus for continuously applying nanolaminate metal coatings
EA201790644A1 (en) 2014-09-18 2017-08-31 Модьюметал, Инк. METHODS OF PRODUCTION OF PRODUCTS ELECTRICAL PLANTING AND PROCESSES OF LAYERED SYNTHESIS
CN104975326B (en) * 2015-07-06 2017-10-24 常州大学 A kind of preparation method of surface electro-deposition nano rare earth modified cobalt base composite cladding
CN105332010B (en) * 2015-11-18 2017-05-10 常州大学 Preparation method of pulse electrodeposition Co/Y2O3 nanometer composite plating layer
AR109584A1 (en) 2016-09-08 2018-12-26 Modumetal Inc PROCESSES TO PROVIDE LAMINATED COATINGS ON WORK PARTS, AND THE ARTICLES OBTAINED WITH THE SAME
CN110637107B (en) 2017-03-24 2022-08-19 莫杜美拓有限公司 Lift plunger with electroplated layer and system and method for producing the same
CN110770372B (en) 2017-04-21 2022-10-11 莫杜美拓有限公司 Tubular article having an electrodeposited coating and system and method for producing same
CN112272717B (en) 2018-04-27 2024-01-05 莫杜美拓有限公司 Apparatus, system, and method for producing multiple articles with nanolaminate coatings using rotation
CN110129864B (en) * 2019-05-30 2020-04-28 中国石油大学(华东) Reduced graphene oxide-nickel-based gradient coating and preparation method thereof
CN114656275B (en) * 2022-03-11 2023-08-04 西北工业大学 SiC preparation by vacuum impregnation combined with reaction melt infiltration f Method for preparing/Si-Y-B-C composite material

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5865976A (en) * 1994-10-07 1999-02-02 Toyoda Gosei Co., Inc. Plating method
US6607844B1 (en) * 1999-03-15 2003-08-19 Kobe Steel, Ltd. Zn-Mg electroplated metal sheet and fabrication process therefor
US20050112399A1 (en) * 2003-11-21 2005-05-26 Gray Dennis M. Erosion resistant coatings and methods thereof

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5660704A (en) * 1994-02-21 1997-08-26 Yamaha Hatsudoki Kabushiki Kaisha Plating method and plating system for non-homogenous composite plating coating
JPH08311696A (en) * 1995-05-18 1996-11-26 Brother Ind Ltd Formation of composite plated film having gradient composition
DE10301135B4 (en) * 2003-01-14 2006-08-31 AHC-Oberflächentechnik GmbH & Co. OHG Object with a wear protection layer
US9005420B2 (en) * 2007-12-20 2015-04-14 Integran Technologies Inc. Variable property electrodepositing of metallic structures

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5865976A (en) * 1994-10-07 1999-02-02 Toyoda Gosei Co., Inc. Plating method
US6607844B1 (en) * 1999-03-15 2003-08-19 Kobe Steel, Ltd. Zn-Mg electroplated metal sheet and fabrication process therefor
US20050112399A1 (en) * 2003-11-21 2005-05-26 Gray Dennis M. Erosion resistant coatings and methods thereof

Cited By (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20120276403A1 (en) * 2010-02-04 2012-11-01 Kazushi Nakagawa Heat sink material
US9434653B1 (en) * 2012-03-02 2016-09-06 Dynamic Material Systems, LLC Method for producing bulk ceramic components from agglomerations of partially cured gelatinous polymer ceramic precursor resin droplets
US9764987B2 (en) 2012-03-02 2017-09-19 Dynamic Material Systems, LLC Composite ceramics and ceramic particles and method for producing ceramic particles and bulk ceramic particles
US9944021B2 (en) 2012-03-02 2018-04-17 Dynamic Material Systems, LLC Additive manufacturing 3D printing of advanced ceramics
US10392311B2 (en) 2012-03-02 2019-08-27 Dynamic Material Systems, LLC Composite ceramics and ceramic particles and method for producing ceramic particles and bulk ceramic particles
US10399907B2 (en) 2012-03-02 2019-09-03 Dynamic Material Systems, LLC Ceramic composite structures and processing technologies
US9744694B2 (en) 2015-04-02 2017-08-29 The Boeing Company Low-cost tooling and method for manufacturing the same
US10060042B2 (en) 2016-04-04 2018-08-28 The Boeing Company Tooling having a durable metallic surface over an additively formed polymer base and method of forming such tooling
CN108385143A (en) * 2018-04-11 2018-08-10 珠海市跳跃自动化科技有限公司 A kind of diamond wire production line and production method
CN111825479A (en) * 2020-07-24 2020-10-27 江西宁新新材料股份有限公司 Method for preparing graphite high-temperature-resistant composite coating through electrochemistry-impregnation cooperation
CN114759419A (en) * 2022-03-17 2022-07-15 江苏海洋大学 Preparation method of copper-aluminum gradient alloy transition joint for submarine cable welding
CN114657615A (en) * 2022-03-25 2022-06-24 重庆理工大学 Wear-resistant nickel coating with gradient nanostructure and preparation method thereof

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2440692A2 (en) 2012-04-18
CA2991617A1 (en) 2010-12-16
CA2764968A1 (en) 2010-12-16
US20150322588A1 (en) 2015-11-12
ES2636742T3 (en) 2017-10-09
CA2764968C (en) 2018-03-06
WO2010144145A9 (en) 2013-03-07
WO2010144145A2 (en) 2010-12-16
WO2010144145A3 (en) 2013-01-17
EP2440692B1 (en) 2017-05-10
CA2991617C (en) 2019-05-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2440692B1 (en) Functionally graded coatings and claddings for corrosion and high temperature protection
Li et al. Preparation of Ni-W/SiC nanocomposite coatings by electrochemical deposition
Qu et al. Fabrication of Ni–CeO2 nanocomposite by electrodeposition
Susan et al. Electrodeposited NiAl particle composite coatings
Surender et al. Electrochemical behavior of electrodeposited Ni–WC composite coatings
CN109763125B (en) High-entropy alloy coating resistant to high-temperature abrasion and preparation process and application thereof
Sun et al. Effect of graphite concentration on the friction and wear of Ni–Al2O3/graphite composite coatings by a combination of electrophoresis and electrodeposition
Xue et al. Fabrication of NiCo coating by electrochemical deposition with high super-hydrophobic properties for corrosion protection
Zanella et al. Influence of the particle size on the mechanical and electrochemical behaviour of micro-and nano-nickel matrix composite coatings
Gyawali et al. Preparation of Ni–W–Si3N4 composite coatings and evaluation of their scratch resistance properties
EP2096194B1 (en) Protective coating for metallic seals
CN102011121B (en) Large-area TiB-TiC reinforced titanium-based composite coating and preparation method thereof
Safavi et al. Incorporation of Y2O3 nanoparticles and glycerol as an appropriate approach for corrosion resistance improvement of Ni-Fe alloy coatings
US6410086B1 (en) Method for forming high performance surface coatings and compositions of same
Hashemi et al. Effect of SiC nanoparticles on microstructure and wear behavior of Cu-Ni-W nanocrystalline coating
CZ2002572A3 (en) Protective polyfunctional mixed coating based on light alloys and process for producing thereof
Chaudhari et al. Structure and properties of electro Co-Deposited Ni-Fe/ZrO2 nanocomposites from ethylene glycol bath
Fayomi et al. Anti-corrosion properties and structural characteristics of fabricated ternary coatings
Abdel Hamid et al. Performance of Ni–Cu–ZrO2 nanocomposite coatings fabricated by electrodeposition technique
JPH03173798A (en) Formation of high temperature gas corrosion layer deposited electrically
Shi On the use of nanotechnology to manage steel corrosion
ThippaReddy et al. Electrodeposited nickel composite coating containing in-situ nickel impregnated alumina particles
JP3973039B2 (en) Composite plated product and method for producing the same
Liang et al. Electrodeposition and characterization of Ni/Ti3Si (Al) C2 composite coatings
Li et al. Effect of Bath ZrO2 Concentration on the Properties of Ni-Co/ZrO2 Coatings Obtained by Electrodeposition

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION

AS Assignment

Owner name: MODUMETAL, LLC, WASHINGTON

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:LOMASNEY, CHRISTINA A.;REEL/FRAME:045392/0268

Effective date: 20180119

Owner name: MODUMETAL, LLC, WASHINGTON

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:WHITAKER, JOHN D.;REEL/FRAME:045392/0324

Effective date: 20180112

Owner name: MODUMETAL, LLC, WASHINGTON

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:UNGER, JESSE;REEL/FRAME:045392/0441

Effective date: 20180117

AS Assignment

Owner name: MODUMETAL, INC., WASHINGTON

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MODUMETAL, LLC;REEL/FRAME:045399/0979

Effective date: 20180329

AS Assignment

Owner name: MODUMETAL, INC., WASHINGTON

Free format text: CHANGE OF ADDRESS;ASSIGNOR:MODUMETAL, INC.;REEL/FRAME:059472/0786

Effective date: 20211112