US20110061321A1 - Fatigue reistant foundation system - Google Patents

Fatigue reistant foundation system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20110061321A1
US20110061321A1 US12/774,727 US77472710A US2011061321A1 US 20110061321 A1 US20110061321 A1 US 20110061321A1 US 77472710 A US77472710 A US 77472710A US 2011061321 A1 US2011061321 A1 US 2011061321A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
pedestal
foundation
ribs
slab
post
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US12/774,727
Inventor
Ahmed Phuly
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US11/859,588 external-priority patent/US20080072511A1/en
Priority to US12/774,727 priority Critical patent/US20110061321A1/en
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to DK10781394.1T priority patent/DK2427603T3/en
Priority to PCT/US2010/041006 priority patent/WO2010138978A2/en
Priority to US13/319,083 priority patent/US8661752B2/en
Priority to EP10781394.1A priority patent/EP2427603B1/en
Publication of US20110061321A1 publication Critical patent/US20110061321A1/en
Priority to US14/176,160 priority patent/US9096985B1/en
Priority to US14/748,241 priority patent/US9347197B2/en
Priority to US15/137,157 priority patent/US9534405B1/en
Priority to US15/530,081 priority patent/US9937635B2/en
Priority to US15/916,724 priority patent/US10648187B2/en
Priority to US16/191,781 priority patent/US10975586B2/en
Priority to US16/407,692 priority patent/US10640995B2/en
Priority to US16/516,362 priority patent/US10513833B2/en
Priority to US16/677,607 priority patent/US10947747B2/en
Priority to US16/864,685 priority patent/US11072934B2/en
Priority to US17/338,049 priority patent/US11939736B2/en
Priority to US18/447,894 priority patent/US20240018736A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E02HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
    • E02DFOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; EMBANKMENTS; UNDERGROUND OR UNDERWATER STRUCTURES
    • E02D27/00Foundations as substructures
    • E02D27/32Foundations for special purposes
    • E02D27/42Foundations for poles, masts or chimneys
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E02HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
    • E02BHYDRAULIC ENGINEERING
    • E02B17/00Artificial islands mounted on piles or like supports, e.g. platforms on raisable legs or offshore constructions; Construction methods therefor
    • E02B17/02Artificial islands mounted on piles or like supports, e.g. platforms on raisable legs or offshore constructions; Construction methods therefor placed by lowering the supporting construction to the bottom, e.g. with subsequent fixing thereto
    • E02B17/025Reinforced concrete structures
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E02HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
    • E02DFOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; EMBANKMENTS; UNDERGROUND OR UNDERWATER STRUCTURES
    • E02D27/00Foundations as substructures
    • E02D27/32Foundations for special purposes
    • E02D27/42Foundations for poles, masts or chimneys
    • E02D27/425Foundations for poles, masts or chimneys specially adapted for wind motors masts
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F03MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS; WIND, SPRING, OR WEIGHT MOTORS; PRODUCING MECHANICAL POWER OR A REACTIVE PROPULSIVE THRUST, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • F03DWIND MOTORS
    • F03D13/00Assembly, mounting or commissioning of wind motors; Arrangements specially adapted for transporting wind motor components
    • F03D13/20Arrangements for mounting or supporting wind motors; Masts or towers for wind motors
    • F03D13/22Foundations specially adapted for wind motors
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E02HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
    • E02BHYDRAULIC ENGINEERING
    • E02B17/00Artificial islands mounted on piles or like supports, e.g. platforms on raisable legs or offshore constructions; Construction methods therefor
    • E02B2017/0056Platforms with supporting legs
    • E02B2017/006Platforms with supporting legs with lattice style supporting legs
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E02HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
    • E02BHYDRAULIC ENGINEERING
    • E02B17/00Artificial islands mounted on piles or like supports, e.g. platforms on raisable legs or offshore constructions; Construction methods therefor
    • E02B2017/0056Platforms with supporting legs
    • E02B2017/0065Monopile structures
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E02HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
    • E02BHYDRAULIC ENGINEERING
    • E02B17/00Artificial islands mounted on piles or like supports, e.g. platforms on raisable legs or offshore constructions; Construction methods therefor
    • E02B2017/0056Platforms with supporting legs
    • E02B2017/0073Details of sea bottom engaging footing
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E02HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
    • E02BHYDRAULIC ENGINEERING
    • E02B17/00Artificial islands mounted on piles or like supports, e.g. platforms on raisable legs or offshore constructions; Construction methods therefor
    • E02B2017/0091Offshore structures for wind turbines
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F05INDEXING SCHEMES RELATING TO ENGINES OR PUMPS IN VARIOUS SUBCLASSES OF CLASSES F01-F04
    • F05BINDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO WIND, SPRING, WEIGHT, INERTIA OR LIKE MOTORS, TO MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS COVERED BY SUBCLASSES F03B, F03D AND F03G
    • F05B2230/00Manufacture
    • F05B2230/50Building or constructing in particular ways
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F05INDEXING SCHEMES RELATING TO ENGINES OR PUMPS IN VARIOUS SUBCLASSES OF CLASSES F01-F04
    • F05BINDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO WIND, SPRING, WEIGHT, INERTIA OR LIKE MOTORS, TO MACHINES OR ENGINES FOR LIQUIDS COVERED BY SUBCLASSES F03B, F03D AND F03G
    • F05B2240/00Components
    • F05B2240/90Mounting on supporting structures or systems
    • F05B2240/91Mounting on supporting structures or systems on a stationary structure
    • F05B2240/912Mounting on supporting structures or systems on a stationary structure on a tower
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02BCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO BUILDINGS, e.g. HOUSING, HOUSE APPLIANCES OR RELATED END-USER APPLICATIONS
    • Y02B10/00Integration of renewable energy sources in buildings
    • Y02B10/30Wind power
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02EREDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E10/00Energy generation through renewable energy sources
    • Y02E10/70Wind energy
    • Y02E10/72Wind turbines with rotation axis in wind direction
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02EREDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E10/00Energy generation through renewable energy sources
    • Y02E10/70Wind energy
    • Y02E10/728Onshore wind turbines
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P70/00Climate change mitigation technologies in the production process for final industrial or consumer products
    • Y02P70/50Manufacturing or production processes characterised by the final manufactured product

Definitions

  • This invention relates to a method for building fatigue resistant foundations for supporting columns, towers and structures under heavy cyclical loads such as wind turbines towers for onshore and offshore installations.
  • the proposed foundation system will be used specifically for the Multi-Megawatt class wind turbines.
  • Several wind turbine manufacturers have successfully developed large wind turbines with rated power ranging from 1.5 to 10 MW.
  • Several wind turbine manufacturers are planning mass production of large multi Megawatt turbines for onshore and offshore installations.
  • the installation of the E-126 model turbine by Enercon with a 7 MW rated power required a xx meter diameter circular foundation with 1,400 cubic meters of concrete and xx tons of rebar.
  • the installation of the 5M turbine by RePower with a 5 MW rated power required a 23 meter diameter circular foundation with 1,300 cubic meters of concrete and 180 tons of rebar.
  • the task of building such large foundations is daunting and requires a great deal of construction planning and logistics.
  • the proposed foundation designs and their associated construction methods provide cost-effective solutions for such challenging foundation projects.
  • the present invention improves the geometry of the foundation in order to enhance dissipation conditions for the due to the typical temperature rise after casting and also provides a cost effective fatigue resistant design.
  • Conventional gravity style foundations for large wind turbine usually comprise a large, thick, horizontal, heavily reinforced cast in situ concrete base; and a vertical cast in situ cylindrical pedestal that is installed over the base. There are several problems that are typically encountered during the construction of such foundations.
  • Fatigue resistant of such conventional footings is achieved by over sizing the structural concrete elements and the reinforcing elements such that the resulting stress amplitudes are small enough for the structural elements to bass fatigue design checks.
  • the main problem is the daunting task of managing large continuous concrete pours, which require sophisticated planning and coordination in order to pour more than four hundred cubic yards of concrete per footing, on average, in one continuous pour, without having any cold joints within the pour.
  • Another problem is logistics coordinating with multiple local batch plants the delivery plan of the large number of concrete trucks to the job site in a timely and organized manner.
  • a further problem is the complexity of installing the rebar assembly into the foundation which requires assembling two layers of steel reinforcing meshes that are two to six feet apart across the full area of the foundation, while maintaining strict geometric layout and specific spacing.
  • This rebar assembly is made of extremely long and heavy rebar which requires the use of a crane in addition to multiple workers to install all components of the assembly.
  • the rebar often exceeds forty feet in length, thus requiring special oversized shipments which are very expensive and usually require special permits. That labor intensive and time consuming task requires large number of well trained rebar placing workers.
  • thermal cracking of concrete due to overheating of the concrete mass.
  • temperature can reach high levels and the risk of thermal cracking becomes very likely.
  • Thermal cracking often compromises the structural integrity of the foundations as reported in many projects in Europe and North America.
  • Multi-cell caissons used in offshore installations always lack multi-axial post-tensioning elements and their fatigue resistant rely completely on heavily reinforced oversized concrete elements which involves expensive and labor intensive construction.
  • the wind turbine foundations can then be built to the standards of the Fatigue Resistant Foundation System which uses concrete rib stiffeners, with a cast in place slab on grade element and a central pedestal to build an integral foundation that will behave structurally as a monolithic foundation structure.
  • Other concrete components can be included such as secondary and perimeter beams, diaphragms, or intermediate stiffeners and rib stiffened or flat slab sections.
  • the foundation system relies on the use of many prefabricated components including rebar meshes and cages, pedestal cage assembly, pre cut post-tensioning strands, preassembled strand bundles, pre-cut post-tensioning duct sections and prefabricated concrete forms.
  • the present invention pertains to a fatigue resistant foundation for wind towers which comprises a plurality of components, namely a central vertical pedestal, a substantially horizontal continuous bottom support slab with stiffened perimeter, a plurality of radial reinforcing ribs extending radially outwardly from the pedestal and a three-dimensional network of vertical, horizontal, diagonal, radial and circumferential post-tensioning elements embedded in the footing that keeps all the structural elements under heavy multi-axial post compression, reduces stress amplitudes and deflections and allows the foundation to have a desirable combination of high stiffness and superior fatigue resistant while improving heat dissipation conditions during construction by having a small ratio of concrete mass to surface area thus eliminating the risk of thermal cracking due to heat of hydration.
  • any tower or column can be used on the foundation including but not limited to, antennas, chimneys, stacks, distillation columns, water towers, electric power lines, bridges, buildings, or any other structure using a column.
  • the present invention pertains to a wind turbine foundation having a plurality of components, namely a central vertical pedestal, a substantially horizontal bottom support slab, and a plurality of radial reinforcing ribs extending radially outwardly from the pedestal.
  • the ribs are prefabricated and transported to job site, but the pedestal and support slab are poured in situ at the site out of concrete.
  • the prefabricated ribs are equipped with load transfer mechanisms, for shear force and bending moment, along the conjunctions with the cast in situ support slab.
  • the prefabricated ribs are also equipped at their inner ends with load transfer mechanisms, for shear force and bending moment, along the conjunctions with the cast in situ pedestal.
  • the ribs are arranged in a circumferentially spaced manner around the outer diameter of the pedestal cage assembly before or after slab reinforcing steel is installed. Forms are then arranged for the pedestal and support slab.
  • the support slab is cast in situ by pouring concrete into the forms and then pedestal concrete is poured over the slab into the pedestal form. When the concrete cures the support slab is united to the prefabricated ribs and the ribs are also united to the pedestal.
  • the final result is continuous monolithic polygonal or circular foundation wherein loads are carried across the structure vertically and laterally through the continuous structure by the doweled and spliced reinforcing steel bars which are integrally cast into the pedestal, ribs and support slab.
  • the combination of the high stiffness of the ribs, solid pedestal and continuous slab construction across the pedestal, and through or under ribs, allows the slab to behave structurally as a continuous slab over multiple rigid supports resulting in small bending and shear stresses in the slab, reducing deflections and increasing the stiffness of the foundation, improving fatigue conditions as well as allowing for the benefits of an economical design.
  • Support slab reinforcing steel covers the entire footprint of the foundation and extends, without interruption, across the slab area and into the pedestal to improve the structural performance of the foundation under different loading conditions.
  • Perimeter beams or thickened slab edges around the perimeter add stiffness and strength to the foundation and provide the benefits of a two-way slab system. Circumferential post-tensioning of slab edge is used to increase the structural capacity of the ribs and the pedestal by creating eccentric post compression in the ribs and by reducing stress amplitudes in the slab, ribs and pedestal.
  • the foundation of the present invention substantially reduces the amount of concrete used in wind turbine foundation of spread footing style, simplifies the placement of rebar and concrete in the foundation, allows for labor and time savings and shortens foundation construction schedule when compared to conventional designs.
  • This invention provides the wind energy industry with a foundation system suitable for utility scale wind turbines including 1.5 MW through 10 MW and even larger, wherein the amount of cast in situ concrete work is limited, and the number of concrete trucks required for the foundation is small and manageable level and the amount of rebar used in the foundation is 60% less than conventional footings.
  • the present invention relies on using prefabricated components that meet size and weight limits for standard ground freight shipping through typical roads and highways, without resorting to special permitting for oversize or overweight shipments, keeping in mind that the foundation width for large turbines can easily exceed sixty feet in width.
  • the present invention uses specific combinations of precast components with cast in situ components designed to speed up construction without compromising the rigidity and structural continuity and optimization of the foundation.
  • the combination of high strength, high stiffness prefabricated ribs, solid pedestal construction and continuous slab construction across the pedestal, and through or under ribs, allows the slab to behave structurally as a continuous slab over multiple rigid supports resulting in small bending and shear stresses in the slab, reducing deflections and increasing the stiffness of the foundation, substantially reducing fatigue as well as allowing for the benefits of rapid construction and economical design.
  • the present invention improves the geometry of the foundation in order to enhance dissipation conditions for the heat of hydration due to the typical temperature rise after casting.
  • This design feature is achieved by reducing the thickness of the support slab and the ratio of concrete mass to surface area, thus reducing the risk of thermal cracking and protecting the structural integrity of the foundations.
  • the present invention optimizes the design support slab by configuring slab reinforcing to span between supporting ribs and allowing it to continue under or across the ribs.
  • Each slab panel is triangular or pie-shaped and is prestressed along all three sides such that a multi-axial prestress is generated in slab panel.
  • Slab panels with radial and perimeter post tensioning elements form a robust horizontal trussed diaphragm and as a result, the required slab thickness is optimized and the amount of cast in situ concrete is reduced.
  • the present invention reduces the maximum rebar length for field installation to roughly 7.6 meters (twenty five feet), which is significantly shorter when compared to conventional footing that may requires 15.2 to 18.3 meters (fifty to sixty foot) long reinforcing bars.
  • the present invention allows rib dowels, or post tensioning tendons, extending inwardly into the pedestal at one end, to continue without interruption between distal ends of the foundation. As a result each pair of ribs on opposite ends of the pedestal will behave structurally as one continuous beam across the width of the foundation.
  • the present invention reduces fatigue for concrete and rebar in the foundation by minimizing stress concentrations through appropriately configured connections and component geometry.
  • the solid and deep construction of the pedestal allows for great reduction of stresses across the pedestal and at the conjunctions between the pedestal and surrounding. Dowels into the pedestal are relatively deep to reduce stresses near the surface zone of the pedestal.
  • the solid pedestal offers generous bearing conditions for the tower base plate and improves geometry as needed to minimize fatigue.
  • the present invention employs prestressing and/or post tensioning techniques in order to maximize the performance of the foundation, or to extend its life span. Besides the vertical tensioning of anchor bolts, tensioning of horizontal and diagonal tendons along the length concrete ribs and across the pedestal besides circumferential 112 and radial 111 post tensioning strands imbedded in the slab are employed. Post-tensioning of the ribs is done in an eccentric manner to counter balance and reduce the stresses from the dead loads on the foundation. This can be accomplished by setting an eccentric post tensioning load pattern in the ribs with higher axial force at the bottom than at the top of the rib. The circumferential post tensioning load in the slab provides additional desirable eccentric prestressing of the ribs and the pedestal and helps increase rib load capacity and rib fatigue resistance.
  • An object of this invention is to provide the wind energy industry with a fast, reliable, yet cost-effective foundation system that is suitable for most wind energy projects, including projects using the largest utility scale turbines and tallest towers, while providing a foundation lifespan that is longer than conventional foundation systems.
  • Another object of this invention is to reduce the cost of wind energy projects by realizing savings in the areas of rebar quantity, form work, concrete trucking service, concrete pouring and finishing, logistics, man-hours and crane operations.
  • It is the object of this invention is to provide foundation system suitable for large wind turbines including utility scale turbines ranging from 1.5 MW to 10 MW and larger, wherein the amount of cast in situ concrete work is limited and the number of concrete trucks and the amount of rebar required for the foundation are reduced to a manageable level when compared to conventional gravity style foundations.
  • Another object of this invention is to improve dissipation conditions for the heat of hydration and the typical temperature rise after casting. That goal is achieved by reducing the ratio of concrete mass to surface area.
  • temperature can reach high levels and the risk of thermal cracking becomes very high unless cooling techniques or special admixtures are applied. Thermal cracking often compromises the structural integrity of the foundations.
  • a further object of this invention is to improve foundation structural properties due to fabrication of some structural components in a fully controlled environment of a precast concrete plant or a suitable facility at or near project site and to utilize benefit from advancement in concrete construction in areas such as concrete admixtures, special cements and fiber reinforcement.
  • Still another object of this invention is to utilize desirable features and benefits associated with mass production of precast concrete such as high reliability and uniform consistency and high compressive strength.
  • Another important object of this invention is to minimize chances for errors in bar placement, spacing and layout by providing pre-marked spacing for splicing slab rebar with existing dowels extending from ribs.
  • a further object of this invention is to use light weight, small diameter, short and easy to handle rebar for the cast in situ concrete.
  • a further important object of this invention is to provide the wind energy industry with a solution for all weather foundation construction.
  • Still another important object of this invention is to improve safety and accessibility around foundations under construction, and reduce hazardous conditions for construction crew.
  • a further significant object of this invention is to increase productivity and increase the number of footing that can be built in a given time frame using the same number of workers, when compared to conventional foundation designs built under similar conditions.
  • Another object of this invention is to employ prestressing and/or post tensioning techniques in order to maximize the performance of the foundation, improve its fatigue resistant and extend its life span.
  • Another object of this invention is to provide the wind energy industry with reliable and readily available designs, and prefabricated components, for every wind energy project wherein foundation designs are pre-approved by and coordinated with turbine manufactures and certification agencies.
  • a further object of this invention is to use standard designs to reduce engineering work and simplify the permitting process, as well as improve project construction schedule.
  • Still another object of this invention is to speed-up construction by using many prefabricated components including rebar meshes and cages, bolt cage assembly, pre cut post-tensioning strands, preassembled post-tensioning bundles, pre-cut post-tensioning duct sections and prefabricated concrete forms.
  • It is also the object of this invention is to provide wind energy developers with the ability to select pre-approved complete foundation designs for wind turbine foundation based on project and site variables including turbine model and tower height; site geotechnical characteristics; and desired foundation style such as gravity, anchored or piling.
  • Another object of this invention is to provide foundation contractors with the convenience and economy of using commercially available prefabricated components with complete assembly and detail drawings that can be delivered to any project site with short lead time.
  • a further object of this invention is to improve the quality and productivity of foundation construction due to experience gained from practicing standard construction techniques with repetitive production steps.
  • Still another object of his invention is to produce foundation designs suitable for shallow and deep offshore installations.
  • Another object of this invention is to use the modular foundation system for other tower structures such as chimneys, stacks, distillation columns and telecommunication towers.
  • Yet another object of the foundation is to improve tower base bearing resistant in concrete pedestals supporting wind towers such that it become possible to build the pedestal and the foundation with concrete having the same compressive strength without increasing the diameter of the pedestal.
  • Another object of the invention is to build wind tower foundation in one continuous concrete pour.
  • the final object of the invention is to independently produce prefabricated components for offshore foundations that can be assembled on a barge without having the critical path of completing to a first component before a second component can be constructed.
  • FIG. 1 is a perspective view of the foundation showing the rebar before pouring the concrete.
  • FIG. 2A is a perspective view of a pedestal and ribs in a second embodiment with a pier for off shore applications.
  • FIG. 2B is a perspective view of a pedestal and ribs.
  • FIG. 3A is an inner perspective view of a rib showing connections to the pedestal and the slab.
  • FIG. 3B is an outer perspective view of a rib showing connections to the pedestal and the slab.
  • FIG. 4 is a perspective view of a rib and forms for forming the pedestal and slab.
  • FIG. 5 is a perspective view of the bolt assembly and alignment apparatus.
  • FIG. 6 is a top view of the foundation prior to pouring the concrete showing the rebar and template for the anchor bolts and post tensioning elements.
  • FIG. 7 is a perspective view of a raised rib having means for raising the rib above the slab.
  • FIG. 8 is a perspective view of the foundation showing the alignment apparatus and a pedestal forming section.
  • FIG. 9 is a perspective view of the foundation showing the rebar and rebar cage.
  • FIG. 10 is a perspective view pedestal cage assembly with anchor bolt and reinforcing.
  • FIG. 11 is a perspective view of the foundation.
  • FIG. 12 is a perspective view of the rib for supporting a lattice style tower.
  • FIG. 13 is a perspective view of the foundation for offshore installation.
  • FIG. 14 is a perspective view of the foundation for offshore installation.
  • FIG. 15 is a perspective view of the foundation for offshore installation.
  • FIG. 16 is an elevation view of the foundation for offshore installation.
  • FIG. 17 is a perspective view of the foundation for offshore installation.
  • FIG. 18 is a perspective view of the foundation for offshore installation.
  • FIG. 19 is a perspective view of the foundation for offshore installation.
  • FIG. 20 is a perspective view of the foundation with rock anchors.
  • FIG. 21 is a perspective view of the foundation with rock anchors.
  • FIG. 22 is a perspective view of the foundation with rock anchors.
  • FIG. 23 is an elevation view of the foundation with rock anchors.
  • FIG. 24 is a perspective view of an offshore foundation with micro-piles.
  • FIG. 25 is an elevation view of an offshore foundation with micro-piles.
  • FIG. 26 is a perspective view of the foundation.
  • FIG. 27 is an elevation view of the foundation.
  • FIG. 28 is a perspective view of rock anchored foundation.
  • FIG. 29 is a perspective view of rock anchored foundation.
  • FIG. 30 a - 30 d show circumferential post tensioning view of the foundation.
  • FIG. 31 a is a plan view of the foundation.
  • FIG. 31 b is a section view of the foundation.
  • FIG. 32 a is a section view of the foundation.
  • FIG. 32 b is a section view of the rib 16 .
  • FIG. 33 a is an elevation of rib reinforcing details.
  • FIG. 33 b is a plan view of rib reinforcing details.
  • FIG. 34 a and FIG. 34 b are section views of the rib 16 .
  • FIG. 34 c and FIG. 34 d are pedestal reinforcing details.
  • FIG. 35 a and FIG. 35 b are section views of the pedestal.
  • FIGS. 36 a and 36 b are slab 20 reinforcing plans.
  • FIG. 37 a and FIG. 37 b are elevation and plan views of a rib with unbounded post tensioning elements.
  • FIG. 38 is a plan view showing circumferential post tensioning in the foundation.
  • FIG. 39 a - FIG. 41 b show details of the a foundation with prefabricated ribs.
  • FIG. 42 a - FIG. 42 d show tendon duct arrangements in a pedestal 10 .
  • the present invention pertains to a wind turbine foundation for wind turbines.
  • the foundation comprises a plurality of components, namely a central vertical pedestal, a substantially horizontal bottom support slab, and a plurality of radial reinforcing ribs extending radially outwardly from the pedestal.
  • the ribs may be prefabricated and transported to job site, but the pedestal and support slab are poured in situ at the site out of concrete. Alternatively the ribs may be cast in situ.
  • the present invention pertains to a fatigue resistant foundation 100 for wind towers which comprises a plurality of components, namely a central vertical pedestal, a substantially horizontal continuous bottom support slab with a stiffened perimeter, a plurality of radial reinforcing ribs extending radially outwardly from the pedestal and a three-dimensional network 500 of vertical, horizontal, diagonal, radial and circumferential post-tensioning elements embedded in the footing that keeps all the structural elements under heavy multi-axial post compression, reduces stress amplitudes and deflections and allows the foundation 100 to have a desirable combination of high stiffness and superior fatigue resistance while improving heat dissipation conditions during construction by having a small ratio of concrete mass to surface area thus eliminating the risk of thermal cracking due to the heat of hydration.
  • a construction site is prepared by excavation and flattening and preparation of soil for the foundation 100 .
  • the foundation 100 may be set on pilings, on piers, or have anchors (soil anchors or rock anchors 404 or micro-piles 401 or other types) in a conventional manner.
  • the present invention ensures good contact between foundation 100 and soil, or sub-base, by casting.
  • the foundation 100 is cast against prepared soil, or crushed stone sub-base, or a mud slab or a membrane sheet in case of offshore foundations assembled on a barge or in dry docks.
  • Known grouting and leveling techniques under precast elements can be employed for ensuring plumb installation and good soil contact.
  • the foundation 100 may be set on a mud slab 14 or on compacted granular fill.
  • the mud slab 14 is often a thin plain concrete layer intended to provide a clean and level base for foundation installation.
  • a plurality of three or more precast stiffener ribs 16 are placed on the mud slab 14 or compacted granular fill inside of the excavation pit 12 .
  • the precast concrete stiffener ribs 16 may have means for leveling or other leveling techniques can be employed for level and plumb installation. If desired, grouting techniques can be used to ensure complete rib base contact with the mud slab or sub-base.
  • the precast concrete stiffener ribs 16 may have bases 21 with left shear key 38 and/or shear connectors and right shear key 36 and/or shear connectors.
  • the precast concrete stiffener ribs 16 may also have a vertical shear key 34 .
  • the shear keys 34 , 36 and 38 and associated dowels 40 , 42 and 46 are to ensure continuous connections, with complete transfer of shear and bending loads, between the precast concrete rib stiffener 16 and the cast in place concrete which is to be poured into the foundation 100 .
  • the precast concrete stiffener ribs 16 have upper dowels 40 and lower dowels 42 extending on the right and left sides of the base 21 which interconnect with and spliced to upper mesh rebar 22 and lower mesh rebar 24 installed between the ribs 16 and connected to dowels 40 , 42 to form reinforcement for the slabs of foundation 100 when the concrete is poured.
  • the base 21 of rib 16 and the top of rib 16 also have dowels 46 radially entering the pedestal 10 in the center of the foundation.
  • Doweling of rebar between ribs and foundation components can be achieved rebar dowels extending from the prefabricated elements or by using rebar couplers, bar extenders or any mechanical rebar splicing system.
  • Arrays of grout or epoxy filled sleeves arranged in the slab 20 could receive corresponding arrays of vertical dowels extending from the bottom of prefabricated ribs or perimeter beams 190 or other prefabricated components.
  • Shear keys can be replaced with, or combined with, corbels or shear studs, or other shear connectors such as angled rebar or embedded steel shapes.
  • an array of steel beams are encased into the web of the rib and extend inwardly into the pedestal cavity at the inner most end of ribs, and serve as a suitable shear force transfer mechanism between the rib and the pedestal.
  • the foundation 100 comprises a steel frame fully is encased in concrete and has a central tower receiving metal cylinder fixed to an array of radially extending steel girders encased in concrete beams and rigidly connected at their outer ends to an array of perimeter beams 190 encased in the concrete foundation and a reinforced concrete slab-on-grade 20 covering the foot print of the foundation 100 and connected to the said steel frame.
  • the ribs are treated with concrete bonding agent along surfaces where cast in place concrete is received.
  • the foundation 100 is provided with drains around the perimeter and the top surface of the slab 20 is slightly sloped towards the said drains such that water is drained away from foundation 100 .
  • the ribs or other foundation elements are covered or coated with protective material for extending the life span of the footing.
  • the ribs 16 are placed on the mud slab 14 first and then the pedestal cage 50 made of an array of rebar, preferably Z or C shaped rebar and circumferential rebar is assembled around anchor bolt assembly.
  • the pedestal cage 50 is assembled first or a preassembled pedestal cage 50 dropped into place first and then the ribs 16 with dowels 46 are slid into place so that dowels 46 and shear connectors fit between the elements of pedestal cage 50 rebar assembly.
  • the precast concrete stiffener rib 16 has lifting lugs 32 to help place the stiffener rib 16 into the excavated construction area.
  • the base 21 has a flat bottom surface such that the ribs may stand on their own on the mud slab 14 or compacted granular fill or during transportation from precast plant to foundation site.
  • the precast concrete stiffener ribs 16 have prestressing elements 58 running through the ribs 16 radially from the outside of the ribs 16 and through pedestal 10 .
  • the radial prestressing elements 58 may be anchored to the opposite side of the pedestal or optionally run through the opposing precast concrete stiffener 16 on the other side of the pedestal 16 and anchored at the end of the opposite rib 16 .
  • the dowels 46 extending radially inward from ribs 16 may be connected to, or spliced with, corresponding dowels arranged in the pedestal cage.
  • additional rebar dowels 48 which will facilitate the continuity of the structural components through the pedestal 10 as well as resist bearing, shear and bending loads.
  • a bolt assembly 60 comprising a bolt template 52 an embedment ring 54 and anchor bolts 56 protected by a PVC sleeve 57 or wrapped with a material to prevent bonding between the anchor bolts 56 and concrete to be poured.
  • the anchor bolts 56 have a top portion which is used to attach the base flange 301 of a tower or column to the pedestal 10 .
  • a grout trough template 52 at the bottom of the bolt template 52 may be used to create a grout trough 90 to ensure a good connection of the tower or column to the pedestal 10 .
  • the grout trough 90 will be formed by removing the bolt template 52 from the anchor bolts 56 after the concrete has been poured.
  • Radial dowels, prestressing elements or shear connectors at the inner end of ribs 16 should be spaced to clear anchor bolts # and other reinforcement arranged in pedestal cage 50 .
  • slab forms may sit directly on the mud slab and rib forms 16 b are supported and kept elevated above slab 20 elevation by means of adjustable and reusable support legs arranged in the rib forms 16 b . Small footings or thickened mud slab areas could be used under rib form support legs.
  • Pedestal forms 102 can be supported by rib forms 16 b or by separate support legs.
  • the alignment apparatus 130 has a central post 132 with arms 134 attached perpendicularly to the center post and having legs 136 for attachment to the top of the ribs 16 to provide added stability, and bolt circle proper alignment during construction.
  • the legs 136 have an adjustable height relative to the arms 134 .
  • the arms 134 may have braces 138 attached to the central post 132 for holding the arms 134 straight.
  • the central post 132 may also have rod supports 135 for holding reinforcement rebar such as reinforcement rebar 80 which are spliced to dowels 46 .
  • the alignment apparatus 130 also has adjustable support members 140 for attachment between the arms 134 and the bolt template 52 to align the anchor bolts 56 so they are upright.
  • the alignment apparatus 130 can support the bolt assembly 60 without the central post 132 by relying on the legs 136 supported by ribs 16 , which allows the lower portion of the central post 132 to be removed if desired.
  • Alignment apparatus 130 can be used as a template to ensure proper location, elevation and orientation of ribs 16 .
  • the ribs 16 can be of any shape or size depending on the specifications of the tower and loads thereon.
  • the ribs 16 may be trapezoidal, rectangular, tee shaped or I beam shaped.
  • the ribs 16 may have intermediate stiffener plates or diaphragms for improved structural performance.
  • the ribs 16 or rib forms 16 b may receive ramps or catwalks thereon for easy access to the forms during construction.
  • Ribs 16 , or rib forms 16 b may have means for receiving and supporting perimeter forms 18 , such as bolts or threaded inserts for receiving and supporting the pedestal forms 102 .
  • the ribs 16 , or rib forms 16 b may also have attachment means 15 for holding base forms 17 .
  • the pedestal forms 102 may be equipped with platform sections for allowing access around the pedestal and the rest of the footing.
  • concrete forms may be attached such that concrete can be poured to form the pedestal and base of the foundation.
  • Pedestal forms 102 may attach to the ribs 16 , or rib forms 16 b , by bolts 18 or by any other means.
  • the base perimeter forms 17 may be attached to the ribs 16 , or rib forms 16 b , by bolts 15 or by any other means.
  • the base perimeter forms may be supported to the ground or the mud slab.
  • concrete is ready to be poured into the pedestal 10 and between the ribs 16 .
  • the pouring of the concrete can be accomplished quickly and slab areas between the ribs 16 can be finished as the pedestal 10 concrete is still being poured.
  • the concrete may be used to build the pedestal 10 and the slab 20 in one pour.
  • the base for the entire foot print of the footing can be poured in a first pour then the pedestal 10 can be formed in a second pour.
  • the prefabricated components When bonded multi-strand post tensioning system is used in the foundation 100 , the prefabricated components will be fitted with ducts and anchor hardware according to design specifications. The cast in place components will be fitted with matching ducts to facilitate the continuity of tendons across the foundation 100 . After the jacking of tendons, duct grouting is carried out as required. If the un-bonded, bundled mono-strand system is employed, no duct or grouting is required.
  • Circumferential post tensioning 59 creates a desirable symmetric bi-axial post compression in the slab 20 .
  • Circumferential post tensioning 59 is applied at an elevation well below the neutral axes of the ribs 16 thus creating eccentric post compression in the ribs 16 and the pedestal 10 and resulting in increased nominal moment and shear capacity of the ribs 16 as well as improvement in multi-axial fatigue resistant of the pedestal 10 , ribs 16 and the slab 20 .
  • Radial or diametric post tensioning elements 58 extend from rib to opposite rib across the pedestal 10 .
  • Radial post-tensioning is applied with an eccentric load pattern, with higher post compression below the neutral axis of the rib.
  • the foundation 100 is kept under heavy multi-axial eccentric post compression stress, thus increasing rib structural capacity to resist soil support reaction and providing low deflections, high stiffness and low stress amplitudes resulting in high fatigue resistant and high durability.
  • Backfill is added over the foundation 100 for increased stability and stiffness of the foundation 100 .
  • the bolt assembly can be replaced by a tower section 56 b embedded in pedestal 10 concrete and the embedded section 56 b having means 56 c for receiving a tower base by means of a bolted connection arranged at the top of the section.
  • the embedded metal cylindrical tower section 56 b encased in pedestal 10 concrete is provided with holes for rebar and post tensioning tendons 58 to extend through the metal cylinder.
  • Post tensioning 58 tendons can extend through holes arranged in the cylinder and across the pedestal 10 , through the ribs 16 to be anchored on distal ends of the foundation.
  • Pedestal 10 can be any size or shape, round, triangular, square, polygon or other shape depending on the specifications of the tower and loads thereon.
  • the ribs 16 can be in any pattern around the pedestal 10 .
  • the foundation 100 may have a square pedestal 10 and ribs 16 at the corners parallel to the faces of the pedestal.
  • the pedestal 10 may have a stepped construction with an enlarged lower cross section to reduce the length of the cantilevered ribs 16 .
  • Pre-assembled reinforcement sections (meshes) of the slab 20 components can be lowered into place in the slab 20 to speedup construction. All rebar dowel or metal shear connectors extending through a construction joints may be galvanized or Epoxy coated to prevent corrosion.
  • the use of mechanical couplers in the foundation 100 shall be limited or avoided. Specified mechanical couplers must be tested and certified for the number of load cycles in the life span of the foundation 100 .
  • the ribs are cast in place in reusable rib forms 16 b .
  • the ribs 16 are cast in place jointly with the pedestal 10 in one continuous pour over the slab.
  • the ribs 16 , the pedestal 10 and the slab 20 are all jointly cast in one pour. All rib internal components including rebar assembly with dowels and prestressing elements are placed inside the forms then cast in place concrete is poured into the rib forms 16 b as well as into pedestal 10 and slab 20 forms.
  • Rib reinforcing cages can be assembled above grade and lowered into the foundation in one or more sections.
  • rib forms 16 b with internal rib reinforcing cages are preassembled and lowered into the foundation by cranes to mesh with slab reinforcing sections already placed in the foundation.
  • the radial reinforcing panel of the slab 20 enables the meshing rib dowels between slab reinforcing without geometric interference.
  • Ribs 16 can also be made in segments and eventually united by means doweling or by using segmented post-tensioned construction techniques. Rib anchor zone with anchor trumpets and hardware can be prefabricated separately of higher strength concrete than the rest of the rib.
  • Prefabricated perimeter beams 190 with post tension ducts could serve as perimeter forms become part of the structure.
  • An array of precast, rectangular or L-shaped beams with means for connecting to the slab 20 and the ribs 16 can be used.
  • the perimeter (edge) beams can rest directly on the mud slab and connect to the slab 20 using horizontal dowels and shear key arranged at its inner side.
  • the perimeter beam is elevated and connects to the top of the slab 20 using dowels extending from its bottom.
  • the precast perimeter beams 190 may have dowels and shear keys extending from their sides ends for connecting to the ribs 16 .
  • the ribs 16 will have corresponding dowels and shear keys for receiving and supporting perimeter beams 190 .
  • the connection between ribs 16 and perimeter beams 190 is established using closure pours in small cavity at the conjunctions.
  • the foundation 100 pertains to hybrid gravity based and rock anchored foundation system.
  • Ribs 16 can be made with arrangement, mechanisms and connecters for receiving piles 400 or micro-piles 401 or anchors 404 in different configurations.
  • Vertical through holes in the ribs 16 can provide means for receiving a pile or an anchor. Bearing elements and grouting are arranged on top of each rib to establish the required structural connection.
  • An array of bearing plates 404 b with tensioning nuts 404 c on each soil/rock anchor is used to compress the foundation 100 against supporting soil.
  • Vertical through holes with corrugations for the anchor extend through the foundation.
  • Bearing plates 404 b with tensioning nuts 404 c can be placed on top of the pedestal 10 or in the foundation 100 .
  • ribs 16 may have piers extending vertically from the ribs 16 and the top of pier elevation is raised above grade to make anchor bolts accessible for tensioning and testing.
  • Typical rock or soil anchor construction and grouting methods can be utilized.
  • Another option is to house rock anchor bolts and bearing plates 404 b and tensioning nuts 404 c in accessible corrosion protection compartments above the foundation 100 .
  • the invention pertains to a foundation 100 that comprises the following elements:
  • the prefabricated components can be molded at a facility under controlled conditions for good quality concrete setting and controlled rebar spacing which is superior to what can be obtained on a job site and at a lower cost.
  • the ribs 16 acting as deep stiff horizontal cantilever support, allow the base of the foundation slabs to have a relatively small thickness using less cast in place concrete and rebar thus lowering the cost for each foundation.
  • ribs 16 can have reusable temporary supports 170 , or other means, arranged at the ribs 16 to hold the ribs 16 in place, maintain them plumb during construction and elevate them at a predetermined height over slab reinforcing.
  • This style of ribs 16 is intended to be raised above the ground or mud slab 14 so that the foundation support slab 20 can be poured in place continuously under ribs.
  • Dowels and shear connectors for this style may be arranged at the bottom of the rib for connecting with base slab 20 which extends under the raised rib.
  • the rib inner ends will be partially encased in the pedestal 10 to increase rib torsional end resistance.
  • the final result is continuous monolithic foundation wherein loads are carried across the structure vertically and laterally through the continuous structure by the doweled and spliced reinforcing steel bars which are integrally cast into the pedestal, ribs 16 and support slab 20 .
  • the combination of the high stiffness of the ribs 16 , solid pedestal 10 and continuous slab 20 construction across the pedestal 10 , and under ribs 16 allows the slab 20 to behave structurally as a continuous slab 20 over multiple rigid supports resulting in small flexural and shear stresses in the slab 20 , reducing deflections, improving fatigue conditions and increasing the stiffness of the foundation as well as allowing for the benefits of an economical design.
  • Cast in situ concrete can be shielded from extreme weather, including heat, cold, rain and snow, by simply extending blankets, covers or shields between ribs 16 during construction, and then using heaters or fans as required to regulate temperature, humidity of concrete to allow for proper setting and curing conditions.
  • Another embodiment of the present invention pertains to a leveling technique that simplifies the tower base leveling process and shortens the number of steps required for grouting under a tower base.
  • the bolt template is provided at the very top of the bolt assembly with at least three sets of additional bolts and corresponding threaded bolt inserts suitable for embedment in the concrete.
  • Such leveling bolts 53 and inserts 53 b will be located outside or inside the bolt circle of tower base, but directly under tower base flange. This allows for continuity of grout bed construction and provides an easy access to leveling bolts 53 . Small cutouts at leveling bolt locations may be used.
  • Another benefit of this leveling technique is having the ability to apply continuous grout bed that is free of cold joints, under tower base flange in one session as well as having the ability to tension all anchor bolts in one work session.
  • the foundation design can be reconfigured to support lattice towers comprising multiple columns connections to foundations in a spaced array.
  • the ribs 16 will be provided with column receiving components including embedded anchor bolts (or grouting around embedded element) and an integrated pier design into the rib.
  • the rib geometry may be widened and enlarged at the integral pier.
  • the array of said integrated piers ribs 16 are fitted with means for receiving and supporting the legs or the columns of the lattice tower 200 .
  • the integrated piers can extend above final grade elevation, while the top of pedestal 10 may stay below final grade elevation. For this foundation style, pedestal elevation may be depressed and tower receiving components may not be required in the pedestal 10 .
  • This configuration may also be used in offshore applications wherein a prefabricated gravity foundation 100 is connected to lattice tower structure 200 that is fitted with a wind tower receiving component at its top.
  • the foundation 100 will be installed over prepared seabed and filled with a suitable backfilling material 13 , and surrounded with scour protection 13 b.
  • the foundation 100 may be supported on an array of concrete piers deeply embedded and frozen into the ground. Anchors can be used to secure the ribs 16 to their supporting piers around the perimeter of the foundation. If a slab 20 is incorporated in the design, the slab 20 bottom elevation may be set above grade elevation.
  • This invention pertains to a fatigue resistant gravity based spread footing for use under heavy multi-axial cyclical loading of a wind tower 300 which comprises a plurality of components, namely a central vertical pedestal 10 , a substantially horizontal continuous bottom support slab 20 with stiffened perimeter, a plurality of radial reinforcing ribs 16 extending radially outwardly from the pedestal 10 and a three-dimensional network of vertical, horizontal, diagonal, radial (or diametric) and circumferential post-tensioning elements that keep the structural elements under heavy multi-axial post compression with specific eccentricities and orientations that are intended to reduces stress amplitudes and deflections and allows the foundation 100 to have a desirable combination of high stiffness and superior fatigue resistance while improving heat dissipation conditions during construction by having a small ratio of concrete mass to surface area thus eliminating the risk of thermal cracking due to heat of hydration.
  • a pedestal 10 may have an array of vertical post tensioning elements 56 that does not connect to a tower 300 , and an embedded tower section 56 b bolted to a tower structure 300 .
  • Radial post-tensioning 58 extending across the foundation 100 , in pairs of ribs 16 , allows for the desirable structural continuity and the direct transfer of loads from a downwind ribs 16 into the pedestal 10 and then into the opposing upwind ribs 16 .
  • Radial and circumferential post compression stresses in the slab 20 and/or perimeter beams 190 allows for a desirable reduction in stress amplitudes the structural continuity between slab 20 spans and/or perimeter beam 190 spans, across the ribs 16 , thus creating a desirable load sharing mechanism between adjacent ribs 16 by forcing more ribs 16 to be engaged in resisting tower loads.
  • the invention pertains to a durable, high-stiffness, fatigue-resistant foundation structure 100 for onshore wind tower installations which comprises:
  • Soil support reaction under the slab 20 is transferred from the slab 20 to the ribs 16 and thickened slab edge 190 a (or perimeter beams 190 ) as in two-way slab systems with more load distribution going to the ribs 16 in the primary span.
  • Perimeter or circumferential post-tensioning are applied, perpendicular to the ribs 16 , in the orientation of the primary span that effectively reduces stress amplitudes and deflections in the slab 20 by keeping the slab 20 under heavy post-compression in the directions of primary slab spans around the foundation.
  • the size, distribution, eccentricity and location of post tensioning elements 58 in the ribs 16 and the slab 20 are used, by the engineer, to dictate the natural frequencies of the foundation 100 to be in a safe range relative to operating frequencies of the wind generator according to turbine manufacturer recommendations.
  • the said vertical, radial and circumferential post-tensioning in the foundation keep all the structural components (Pedestal 10 , ribs 16 , slab 20 , thickened slab edges (or integral edge beams)) under multi-axial post compression confinement resulting in lower stress range amplitudes thus yielding higher stiffness, more effective crack control, lower deflections and improved fatigue resistance.
  • Superior fatigue resistance and long life-span are achieved by keeping most of the structural elements of the foundation 100 under multi-axial compression while resisting operating loads or even during normal and abnormal extreme loads from the supported structure (wind power generator).
  • rib post-tensioning requirement are reduced by engaging fully developed bar dowels from the rib into the pedestal connection as well as extending fully developed radial rebar dowels of the slab 20 into the pedestal 10 , thus allowing passive reinforcing to participate in the said connection especially under extreme loads.
  • Radial slab reinforcing pattern with tapered rib width was found to be very cost effective as the rib to pedestal connection benefits from a large number of top and bottom radial slab reinforcing bars participating in the said connection, as the rib width widens, thus reducing the number of bottom post-tensioning strands required for the said connection.
  • the structural configuration of the foundation 100 reduces the overall cumulative deflections in the structure under tower loads and significantly improves the rotational stiffness of the foundation 100 which is a key factor in determining the size of foundations in wind turbine installations.
  • the rotational stiffness is also improved by the interlocking between surrounding soil (after backfilling) and the multiple surfaces and vertical faces of the foundation structure.
  • the horizontal stiffness is improved by the passive earth pressure on the multiple faces of the structure. Both rotational and horizontal stiffness achieved by this design are much higher than conventional tapered inverted-T gravity spread footings especially for onshore foundations installed below grade in an excavated pit because of the increased interlocking surface area and increased passive earth pressure and increased friction on the multiple faces of the fatigue resistant foundation 100 .
  • the solid-core pedestal 10 comprises a continuous reinforcing cage and a tower receiving component, such as anchor-bolt assembly, with a cylindrical array of bond protected high strength post-tensioning bolts, for connecting to wind tower base flange 301 .
  • the tower receiving component may comprise an embedded cylindrical metal tower section 56 b with means 56 c for connecting to a tower section such as a flange with bolt holes for receiving bolts at its top and with an array of holes to allow the passing of rebar and post tension tendons.
  • the anchor bolt assembly ensures structural continuity between the tower 300 and the pedestal 10 .
  • the post-tensioning forces of the anchor bolts are selected by the engineer to insure that the tower base flange 301 remains in contact with the pedestal 10 under extreme normal and abnormal load conditions.
  • the bolt assembly includes, at its bottom end, a bearing element that may consist of an embedment ring plate that is made of segments that are welded together.
  • Radial post-tension tendons and rebar reinforcing elements extending from the ribs 16 and the slab 20 pass through the pedestal reinforcing cage, or through holes in the embedded metal tower section.
  • post-tensioning elements are flared horizontally, profiled vertically, arranged in matrix groups, spaced and draped in a manner that allows for optimum utilization of post-tensioning and ease of installation while avoiding tendon congestion and stress concentrations as tendons crisscross in the pedestal 10 .
  • the regrouping of tendons to form flat and wide matrix along each axis was found to be effective in avoiding tendon congestion especially in the pedestal 10 .
  • the said flat and wide matrix of tendons is placed as high or as low as possible to maximize their moment arms and optimize their contributed moment capacity.
  • bonded (multi-strand and grouted) or un-bonded encapsulated (mono-strand) post-tensioning elements and their associated construction techniques can be used in the foundation 100 .
  • the rib's thickness can be gradually increased at the connection to the pedestal 10 to increase rib flexural, shear and torsional capacity and enhance pedestal confinement.
  • the post-tensioning requirements can be reduced by engaging dowels at rib-to-pedestal connection and by extending fully developed radial dowels from the rib and the slab 20 deep into the pedestal, thus allowing passive reinforcing to participate in the connection.
  • ribs 16 top surface can be tapered to a substantial slope extending vertically to an elevation near the top of pedestal allowing the ribs 16 to benefit from diaphragm action at their inner zone and also provide lateral support for the full height of the pedestal 10 and to provide concrete confinement at the highly stressed zone at the top of pedestal under tower base flange 301 .
  • the foundation may have a circular or polygonal foot print.
  • the thickened slab edge 190 a 190 a may extend above or below the foundation.
  • a shallow perimeter beam profile should be selected for ease of backfilling and improved accessibility for roller compactors during the backfilling of the foundation 100 .
  • a thickened slab ring beam 190 a may be designed to be at an offset distance away from the slab edge allowing the slab segment, outside the ring, to behave as a cantilever. This configuration reduces slab span and deflections as well as the volume of concrete required in the foundation 100 .
  • the size of the slab 20 and its continuous reinforcing including that of the thickened slab is configured to create a rigid composite connection to the ribs 16 with high stiffness which is sufficient to allow adjoining ribs 16 to participate more in resisting the loads and thus reducing local deflections and increasing overall foundation stiffness in addition to reducing the unsupported length of cantilever radial ribs 16 .
  • the pairing of the ribs 16 on distal ends and the continuous perimeter beam construction yield a cost effective layout of post-tensioning that uses a small number of tendons and corresponding anchors as well as reduces friction losses by avoiding sharp turns in tendon layout.
  • the tendons of the ribs 16 are anchored in a matrix array at the outer end of the rib and extend horizontally and diagonally along the rib to split into at least two groups 58 a and 58 b one near the bottom and the other near the top of the rib as it connects to the pedestal 10 .
  • the tendons are more concentrated at the bottom than at the top in a concentric prestressing pattern that is intended to maximize the structural capacity of the foundation and meet the flexure and shear demand of the governing load cases.
  • Ribs 16 may have thickened flanges, at their connection to the pedestal 10 , that may also house post tensioning anchors for tendons 58 extending from ribs 16 on the opposite side of pedestal.
  • the ribs 16 may also have post tensioning anchors along their sides or tops if tendon curtailment methods are applied in the design.
  • the ribs 16 may also have embedded loop anchors if looping of tendons is used in the design. Loop anchors could also be used in the pedestal 10 to support precast concrete towers 300 b.
  • the tendons in ribs 16 extend horizontally and diagonally to be split into three distinctive groups as they enter the pedestal.
  • the first group 58 a with more tendons is placed at the bottom of ribs 16 or in the slab to create camber for reducing deflections and improving foundation soil contact as well as meet the high flexural demand from the governing load cases, and the second group 58 b slope up diagonally to follow the geometry of the top of the rib as they enter the pedestal 10 .
  • the third group 58 c is in the middle and it starts horizontal at rib anchor block and diagonally slopes down towards the bottom of the rib to enter the pedestal 10 for optimum use of the tendons.
  • Tendons in the pedestal 10 are fanned and flared into groups to simplify the installation and maximize their utilization by increasing their moment arms measured from the top or the bottom of the structural concrete. Additional post-tensioning groups for shear resistance can be provided by providing tendons that traverse the shear failure plane in the ribs 16 .
  • the post-tensioning in the ribs 16 consist of three distinctive groups:
  • Anchor-blocks for perimeter or circumferential post-tension tendons can be placed at perimeter beams 190 , (ring beams) or thickened slab or at the edge of the foundation or on top of perimeter beams 190 or on sides of ribs 16 .
  • a preferred layout with two anchor blocks on opposite sides of the foundation and with semi-circular (180-degree) tendon arrangement is shown on drawings.
  • Ring tendons with ring anchors 59 b (such as dog-bone anchors) can be used to avoid having blisters on the foundation 100 .
  • Styrofoam block-outs 59 c can be placed in the foundation 100 according to anchor manufacturer recommended dimensions. When the concrete reaches the sufficient strength ring tendons are jacked and ring anchors grouted.
  • the foundation is made of a network of prestressed concrete elements that can be structurally analyzed, with the strut and tie method, as to a three-dimensional structure made of an array of vertically and horizontally oriented truss-girders joined at the center, with major tension chords reinforced with prestressing tendons, based on both upwind and downwind load cases wherein tension forces in the structure are resisted largely by prestressing elements and passive reinforcing and compression forces are resisted largely by the concrete elements.
  • the structure can be analyzed as a circumferential array of vertically oriented trusses that are fixed at their inner ends to the central pedestal 10 and are laterally stabilized at their bottom by a horizontal trussed diaphragm formed by perimeter post tensioning 59 a , in the slab or perimeter beam, and radial bottom tendons 58 in the ribs 16 or the slab 20 .
  • the fatigue resistant foundation 100 comprises a circumferential array of vertically oriented eccentrically prestressed cantilevered girders that are fixed at their inner ends to a central pedestal 10 that is laterally supported and confined through most of its height by rib concrete, and the ribs 16 and pedestal 10 are laterally stabilized at their bottom by a horizontal prestressed concrete trussed diaphragm, with a continuous slab 20 , and the prestressing is provided by radial tendons in the ribs 16 (or the slab 20 ) and circumferential post tensioning elements 59 .
  • the radial and circumferential tendons provide eccentric prestressing in the ribs 16 and the pedestal 10 .
  • the pedestal is vertically prestressed and is structurally fixed to a tower base 301 of a pylon.
  • the construction of the foundation 100 may utilize pre-assembled perimeter beam reinforcing cages, built in segments with overlapping spliced bars at their ends, and each having an array of shear resisting vertical ties and flexure resisting horizontal bars as well as local reinforcing at anchor locations as shown on FIG. X.
  • the foundation has specific reinforcing groups.
  • the ribs 16 have flexure reinforcing concentrated at the bottom and the top, vertical stirrups for shear reinforcing that are tightly spaced at high shear zone along rib inner end, rib skin reinforcing on ach face and bursting and splitting reinforcing made of horizontal hairpins extending between the said rib skin reinforcing, as well as straight or U-shaped horizontal dowels for embedment into the pedestal 10 and vertical dowels, at the bottom, for composite action with the slab 20 .
  • the vertical stirrups also function as dowels for composite action of the slab 20 .
  • the said dowels are spaced such that they could mesh between slab reinforcing bars without geometric interference, if the rib reinforcing is built in preassembled cages and placed over the slab reinforcing.
  • vertical stirrups are placed side-by-side, in pairs, at the inner rib zone where the shear demand is high.
  • Anchor zones are provided with heavy reinforcing with trim bar and ties.
  • the ribs 16 may also have horizontal reinforcing dowels, perpendicular to the ribs 16 , to facilitate the structural continuity of the supported perimeter beams 190 or the thickened slab, across the width of the rib, by means of splicing the said dowels with perimeter reinforcing.
  • the pedestal 10 has a horizontal mesh at the top and skin reinforcing at all faces as well as at least one cage, around the anchor bolt assembly, comprising vertical tightly meshed anti-bursting reinforcing including two cylindrical meshes confining the anchor bolts each comprising horizontal hoops and either C or Z-Shaped bars and a radial array of horizontal hair-pins or stirrups tying both cylindrical meshes or spirals stirrups each housing a number of anchor bolts.
  • the pedestal 10 cage assembly may comprise two concentric tightly meshed cages surrounding the anchor bolts one from the inside and the other from the outside with radial array of anti bursting and splitting resistant hairpins extending between the two cages # and #.
  • an array vertically oriented pedestal vertical anti bursting and splitting resistant reinforcing group comprising circumferentially spaced vertical hairpins extending between said top horizontal mesh and a horizontal bottom reinforcing mesh in the pedestal 10 or slab 20 , is included in the pedestal cage.
  • the vertical hairpins # also function as supports to secure tendons in the pedestal 10 during construction.
  • Upper and lower slab reinforcing meshes may have any pattern such as a square grid, a circular array with radial pattern or overlapping pie-shaped segments. Additionally, an array of slab reinforcing locally arranged beneath the ribs 16 and being oriented parallel to the ribs 16 and extending into the pedestal 10 to facilitate composite action.
  • the slab 20 may also be reinforced with post-tensioning elements in any pattern including radial, circumferential, perimeter or a square grid.
  • the foundation system relies on the use of many prefabricated components including rebar meshes and cages, pedestal cage assembly, pre cut post-tensioning strands, preassembled post-tensioning bundles, pre-cut post-tensioning duct sections and prefabricated concrete forms.
  • Reusable rib forms 16 b are utilized to form foundation perimeter, the ribs 16 and the pedestal. Forms can be made to be segmented, universal, expandable and adjustable to work for different foundation sizes. As shown on FIG. X rib forms 16 b can be made with adjustable supports to elevate the forms above the wet slab concrete during construction if the foundation is built in one pour. Rib forms 16 b may sit directly on the hardened concrete slab 20 if the foundation is built in two pours. Rib forms 16 b may be made with two side-panels of stiffened non-stick plates and an array of adjustable horizontal spacers between the panels to maintain proper geometry and resist the lateral pressure of wet concrete.
  • Rib and pedestal forms 102 may be fitted with lifting lugs or means for receiving and supporting ladders, catwalks and work platforms to allow for access around the foundation.
  • the forms may have means for securing post-tension anchors and hardware at specific spacing during construction.
  • the forms may also have means for hanging an supporting rib reinforcing cages.
  • the foundation 100 may be supported on piles, or micro-piles 401 or piers 402 or rammed-aggregate piers 405 .
  • the foundation 100 may receive rock anchors 404 or soil-anchors in a conventional manner.
  • a construction site is prepared by excavation and flattening and preparation of soil for the foundation.
  • the foundation 100 may be set on a mud slab or on compacted granular fill.
  • the mud slab is a thin plain concrete layer intended to provide a clean and level base for foundation installation.
  • slab reinforcing is placed inside slab forms and the slab is poured in place with dowels extending up from the slab 20 to receive ribs 16 and pedestal in a second pour.
  • Rib and pedestal rebar and cage placement with post-tension tendons (or duct) placement are accomplished and forms are installed in place and a second pour is carried out.
  • the foundation 100 can be poured in a single pour with the use of accelerators in the concrete mix and by following a well designed concrete pour sequence.
  • a set of small footings, placed within the mud slab, can be used to support and elevate the rib forms 16 b and pedestal forms 102 during construction.
  • Slab 20 , pedestal and rib reinforcing elements are assembled in the foundation 100 .
  • Forms are placed in the foundation around the perimeter, the ribs 16 and the pedestal and the concrete is poured into the foundation in a carefully designed pour sequence.
  • One option is to start with slab 20 and the bottom part of the ribs 16 and the pedestal with accelerator in the concrete mix to seal the bottom of rib and pedestal forms 102 by the time the slab 20 concrete is finished, the ribs 16 and the pedestal are poured jointly in small lifts.
  • the invention relates to a high stiffness, fatigue resistant, wind turbine foundation 100 , supporting a wind generator with a multi-megawatt rating and subjected to extremely high cyclical upset loads that comprise the following components:
  • slab post-tensioning can be arranged at any combination of perimeter, radial or diametric, or other patterns.
  • composite action is further facilitated with radially oriented, reinforcing bars locally arranged in the slab 20 , beneath the ribs 16 , and extended deep into the pedestal 10 , in addition to an array of vertical dowels extending between the rib and the slab 20 that function as shear connectors.
  • the invention pertains to a foundation 100 for supporting a wind generator with a multi-megawatt rating and subjected to extremely high cyclical upset loads, with increased stiffness and improved fatigue resistant comprising:
  • the rib extends vertically from the bottom of the foundation to an elevation near the bottom of the tower base flange 301 to enable the ribs 16 to participate in resisting bearing loads under the tower base flange by increasing the area of the cross-section involved in bearing resistance under the tower base flange 301 and increasing the permissible bearing strength under the base flange or the grout bed by increasing the bearing area measured at the surrounding faces of the concrete.
  • the geometric configuration and the improvement in bearing resistance allow the engineer to specify concrete with only one relatively low compressive-strength for the entire foundation structure.
  • high bearing stresses under the tower base flange 301 in conventional gravity spread footings force the engineer to specify concrete with higher compressive strength for the pedestal and a lower compressive strength for the base.
  • the proximity of inner rib ends to the tower base flange 301 allows the inner zones of the ribs 16 to remain under vertical compression stresses caused by vertical post-tensioning forces between embedment ring 54 and tower base flange 301 .
  • the said vertical compression stress zones improves confinement conditions and fatigue resistance in rib inner zones.
  • Bonded and grouted multi-strand system was found to be expensive and lengthy and requires an additional step of grouting and may not be economical for some onshore installations. It is preferable to use un-bonded, encapsulated mono-strands, arranged in bundles and installed in the foundation reinforcing prior to concrete casting, which would reduce construction costs and improve construction schedule.
  • post-tensioning in the foundation 100 is made eccentric, to create cambers in the foundation 100 that could result in reduced deflections and improved foundation-soil contact.
  • the eccentric prestressing of the ribs 16 creates a convex shaped camber in the foundation 100 that helps reduce the deflections under turbine weight and operating loads.
  • cambers can be used in perimeter beams 190 and slab sections to reduce slab deflections and improve foundation-soil contact conditions by ensuring a more uniform bearing pressure under the foundation.
  • the vertical profile (elevation) of circumferential tendons in the foundation 100 may be adjusted at mid spans and under supporting ribs 16 to optimize their utilization.
  • gradual transition of geometry at the conjunction of the structural elements is employed to prevent stress concentration and fatigue related problems.
  • the use of fillets and curved transition is desirable at the conjunctions between ribs 16 , pedestal 10 and the slab 20 .
  • the inner ends of the ribs 16 are tapered to become wider as the rib connects to the pedestal, in order to satisfy the high flexural, torsional and shear demands at the inner zone of the ribs 16 , and to distribute the multi-axial compression over large surface area to help reduce splitting and bursting reinforcing at the sides of the pedestal 10 .
  • low relaxation post-tensioning strands are used to reduce post tension losses over time.
  • Concrete accelerators and plasticizers and otter admixtures may be utilized in the concrete mix design.
  • the small thickness of the structural elements may allow for on-site steam curing of concrete.
  • a hollow pedestal 10 cross-section may be used, however it can be problematic. Hollow pedestal above the frost depth where there is elevated water table is problematic. Hollow pedestal results in reduced stiffness, stress discontinuity, indirect load transfer and stress concentration with local deformation in the shell resulting in poor performance under heavy flexural and torsional loads from the cantilevered rib, as well as additional problems stemming from stresses caused by frost forming and freezing of ground water in the foundation.
  • the cross-section of the rib may change and dimensions along its length may change.
  • the section may start rectangular and gradually a top flange may be enlarged to reduce stresses in the upper zone of the rib.
  • the pedestal 10 may have an enlarged cross-section at the top followed by a transition into a smaller cross-section below.
  • the upper enlarged cross-section may help with improve bearing strength at the top of the pedestal below tower base flange 301 , or bearing washer plate, and the high strength grout bed according to American Concrete Institute design guidelines.
  • the present invention pertains to a foundation design that overcomes the thermal cracking problem stemming from heat of hydration, in large foundation pours for large multi-megawatt rated turbines, by using a structural configuration coupled with post-tensioning techniques that reduce the thickness of the structural elements, while increasing the surface area of concrete pours, thus improving heat dissipation conditions and causing a the ratio of concrete mass to surface area to be roughly 40% to 50% less than in conventional design for foundations for the same turbine under the same loading and geotechnical conditions.
  • the present invention uses a tower base leveling and grouting method without using tower anchor bolts for leveling, or having to use leveling shims which cause undesirable stress concentration at shim locations which could lead to localized fatigue failure at shim locations.
  • This task is achieved by providing the bolt template at the very top of the bolt assembly with at least three sets of additional bolts and corresponding threaded bolt inserts suitable for embedment into concrete.
  • the said leveling bolts 53 and inserts 53 b are be located outside or inside the bolt circle of tower base, but directly under tower base flange. This allows for continuity of grout bed construction and provides an easy access for leveling bolts 53 . Small cutouts at leveling bolt locations connected can be used.
  • Another benefit of this leveling technique is having the ability to apply grout a continuous grout bed that is free of construction joints, under tower base 301 in one session and to also have the ability to tension all anchor bolts in one session.
  • the present invention improves safety and accessibility around foundations during construction, and reduces hazardous conditions for construction crew. That goal is achieved by using reusable form sections that are fitted with platform sections for forming a access platforms around the foundation, and connect to at least one access ramp extending beyond the edge of the foundation.
  • the platform and the ramp are fitted with slip-resistant walking surface and elevated ramps all provided with guardrails and designed to applicable industry safety standards.
  • the relatively thin slab thickness minimizes the risk of worker injury during construction.
  • Transformer pad can be supported on precast concrete posts extending vertically from the foundation.
  • Pedestal forms 102 will have openings for running electrical and communication conduits thus preventing problems stemming from randomly placing the conduits in areas that could compromise the structural design.
  • the ribs 16 may have means for receiving and supporting prefabricated trays (or electrical duct banks) for housing power and communication cables.
  • This foundation design can also be adapted for offshore wind turbine projects.
  • the foundation 100 may be assembled on a barge or dry dock then transported or floated to its destination, then lowered into a prepared seabed location. The foundation can be weighed down in place by backfilling it with suitable material.
  • the offshore foundation 100 may be configured to receive any type of offshore piers 404 , suction piers 403 , piles 400 , micro-piles 401 , anchors 404 or any combination of the above.
  • the invention relates to an offshore concrete foundation 100 with high stiffness and improved fatigue resistant comprising:
  • the offshore foundation 100 is constructed on a barge or in a dry dock and then floated or transported to an offshore installation site and lowered to be places over a prepared sea bed, a suitable backfill material 13 placed over the foundation 100 to stabilize the foundation against overturning. Scour protection measures 13 b are provided around the foundation.
  • the foundation is built with marine cement and marine grout and is kept under heavy multi-axial horizontal and vertical pre-stress using bonded and grouted post tensioning systems rated for double corrosion protection and suitable for marine environment.
  • An offshore foundation for wind turbines comprising the following elements:
  • the pedestal 10 has means for receiving and supporting a tower 300 or pylon.
  • the upper portion of the pedestal 10 (the stem 11 ) may be made in multiple consecutive cast in situ pours, depending on its height.
  • the stem 11 may also be made by joining precast segments with circumferential and vertical post-tensioning to form the stem 11 .
  • a wind turbine is fabricated on a barge with precast concrete element as following.
  • the barge surface is prepare with a non bonding agent or a thin membrane at the foot print where the foundation to be built.
  • Lower slab reinforcing mesh sections are assembled and placed and the pedestal cage reinforcing is assembled at the center of the foundation.
  • Upper slab reinforcing mesh sections may follow after slab post tension duct is placed.
  • Precast concrete ribs 16 are placed in a radial array around the pedestal cage and precast concrete perimeter beams 190 are arranged around the perimeter of the foundation. Post tensioning ducts in the pedestal space and at perimeter beam-to-rib connections are placed to pair with corresponding duct in the precast members.
  • Forms for pedestal and for closure pours at rib-to-perimeter beam connections are installed.
  • Slab concrete is poured followed by pedestal 10 concrete and closure pours at rib-to-pedestal connections.
  • Stem 11 is fabricated possibly in multiple consecutive pours depending on pedestal height.
  • Stem 11 design may incorporate an ice cone 11 b at its top.
  • Post tensioning tendons are installed, the jacking and grouting of tendons is carried out.
  • Some pylon sections could be installed earlier prior to transportation.
  • the finished foundation 100 is transported to its offshore installation site using a suitable means of transportation such as towing the barge.
  • Radial post-tensioning tendons extend from rib ends opposite rib ends across the pedestal 10 .
  • Vertical post-tensioning is arranged in the pedestal 10 as well. The structural behavior is improved by the added compression in all ribs 16 , edge beams, slab 20 and center pedestal.
  • the lattice tower 200 preferably incorporating 3-dimentional trusses, transfers the pylon loads down to the concrete foundation 100 .
  • the lattice tower 200 may get connected to the concrete foundation prior to transportation or it can be connected to the foundation at final offshore installation site.
  • a wind turbine is fabricated on a barge with precast concrete element as following.
  • the barge surface is coated with a non-bonding agent or covered with a thin membrane at the foot print where the foundation to be built.
  • Lower slab reinforcing mesh sections are assembled and placed and the pedestal cage reinforcing is assembled at the center of the foundation.
  • Upper slab reinforcing mesh sections may follow after slab post tension duct is placed.
  • Precast concrete ribs 16 are placed in a radial array around the pedestal cage and precast concrete perimeter beams 190 are arranged around the perimeter of the foundation. Post tensioning ducts in the pedestal space and at perimeter beam-to-rib connections are placed to pair with corresponding duct in the precast members.
  • Forms for pedestal and for closure pours at rib-to-perimeter beam connections are installed.
  • Slab concrete is poured followed by pedestal concrete and closure pours at rib-to-pedestal connections.
  • a lattice tower 200 structure is prefabricated and mounted atop the concrete foundation 100 .
  • the foundation is transported to installation site using a suitable means of transportation.
  • Seabed is prepared for receiving the foundation by placing a sub-base of suitable material such as crushed stone.
  • the foundation is backfilled and scour protection measures 13 b are installed.
  • the stem 11 is prefabricated separately and provided with means for connecting to the pedestal 10 , preferably an array vertical post tensioning dowels extended between the pedestal and the stem or other segmental post tensioning joining methods.
  • the pedestal may be fitted with means for receiving the prefabricated stem based on segmental post tensioning and grouting construction methods.
  • Piles 400 , Micro-piles 401 or piers 402 or suction piers 403 or anchors 404 can be used with the offshore foundation 100 in a similar manner describe in the application.
  • vertical sleeves will be arranged in the foundation to receive an array of piles 400 or anchors extending through the foundation, and allow for additional loading capacity and improve stability of foundation.
  • Piles 400 are secured to the foundation by filling the sleeves with marine grout.
  • piles 400 , piers or suction piers or anchors may eliminate the slab 20 and/or the perimeter beams 190 from the design.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Civil Engineering (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Paleontology (AREA)
  • Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
  • Sustainable Development (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Sustainable Energy (AREA)
  • Foundations (AREA)

Abstract

A fatigue resistant gravity based spread footing under heavy multi-axial cyclical loading of a wind tower having a central vertical pedestal, a substantially horizontal continuous bottom support slab with a stiffened perimeter, a plurality of radial reinforcing ribs extending radially outwardly from the pedestal and a three-dimensional network 500 of post-tensioning elements that keep the structural elements under heavy multi-axial post compression with a specific eccentricity that is intended to reduces stress amplitudes and deflections and allows the foundation to have a desirable combination of high stiffness and superior fatigue resistance. The foundation design reduces the weight and volume of materials used, reduces cost, and improves heat dissipation conditions during construction by having a small ratio of concrete mass to surface area thus eliminating the risk of thermal cracking due to heat of hydration.

Description

    BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • 1. Field of the Invention
  • This invention relates to a method for building fatigue resistant foundations for supporting columns, towers and structures under heavy cyclical loads such as wind turbines towers for onshore and offshore installations.
  • The proposed foundation system will be used specifically for the Multi-Megawatt class wind turbines. Several wind turbine manufacturers have successfully developed large wind turbines with rated power ranging from 1.5 to 10 MW. Several wind turbine manufacturers are planning mass production of large multi Megawatt turbines for onshore and offshore installations. The installation of the E-126 model turbine by Enercon with a 7 MW rated power required a xx meter diameter circular foundation with 1,400 cubic meters of concrete and xx tons of rebar. The installation of the 5M turbine by RePower with a 5 MW rated power required a 23 meter diameter circular foundation with 1,300 cubic meters of concrete and 180 tons of rebar. The task of building such large foundations is monumental and requires a great deal of construction planning and logistics. The proposed foundation designs and their associated construction methods provide cost-effective solutions for such challenging foundation projects.
  • Several wind turbine foundations, that have been constructed in the last 10 years in the US and Europe, have structural problems stemming from thermal cracking during construction or from fatigue cracking and required repairs. The present invention improves the geometry of the foundation in order to enhance dissipation conditions for the due to the typical temperature rise after casting and also provides a cost effective fatigue resistant design.
  • 2. Description of the Related Art
  • Conventional gravity style foundations for large wind turbine usually comprise a large, thick, horizontal, heavily reinforced cast in situ concrete base; and a vertical cast in situ cylindrical pedestal that is installed over the base. There are several problems that are typically encountered during the construction of such foundations.
  • Fatigue resistant of such conventional footings is achieved by over sizing the structural concrete elements and the reinforcing elements such that the resulting stress amplitudes are small enough for the structural elements to bass fatigue design checks.
  • The main problem is the monumental task of managing large continuous concrete pours, which require sophisticated planning and coordination in order to pour more than four hundred cubic yards of concrete per footing, on average, in one continuous pour, without having any cold joints within the pour.
  • Another problem is logistics coordinating with multiple local batch plants the delivery plan of the large number of concrete trucks to the job site in a timely and organized manner.
  • A further problem is the complexity of installing the rebar assembly into the foundation which requires assembling two layers of steel reinforcing meshes that are two to six feet apart across the full area of the foundation, while maintaining strict geometric layout and specific spacing. This rebar assembly is made of extremely long and heavy rebar which requires the use of a crane in addition to multiple workers to install all components of the assembly. The rebar often exceeds forty feet in length, thus requiring special oversized shipments which are very expensive and usually require special permits. That labor intensive and time consuming task requires large number of well trained rebar placing workers.
  • Another important problem is the fact that majority of the construction process consist of field work which could be easily compromised by weather conditions and other site conditions.
  • Another problem is thermal cracking of concrete due to overheating of the concrete mass. When concrete is cast in massive sections for wind tower foundations, temperature can reach high levels and the risk of thermal cracking becomes very likely. Thermal cracking often compromises the structural integrity of the foundations as reported in many projects in Europe and North America.
  • Multi-cell caissons used in offshore installations always lack multi-axial post-tensioning elements and their fatigue resistant rely completely on heavily reinforced oversized concrete elements which involves expensive and labor intensive construction.
  • BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • It is desired to have cost-effective foundation system that can reduce construction materials and labor for large wind turbines. The wind turbine foundations can then be built to the standards of the Fatigue Resistant Foundation System which uses concrete rib stiffeners, with a cast in place slab on grade element and a central pedestal to build an integral foundation that will behave structurally as a monolithic foundation structure. Other concrete components can be included such as secondary and perimeter beams, diaphragms, or intermediate stiffeners and rib stiffened or flat slab sections. The foundation system relies on the use of many prefabricated components including rebar meshes and cages, pedestal cage assembly, pre cut post-tensioning strands, preassembled strand bundles, pre-cut post-tensioning duct sections and prefabricated concrete forms.
  • The present invention pertains to a fatigue resistant foundation for wind towers which comprises a plurality of components, namely a central vertical pedestal, a substantially horizontal continuous bottom support slab with stiffened perimeter, a plurality of radial reinforcing ribs extending radially outwardly from the pedestal and a three-dimensional network of vertical, horizontal, diagonal, radial and circumferential post-tensioning elements embedded in the footing that keeps all the structural elements under heavy multi-axial post compression, reduces stress amplitudes and deflections and allows the foundation to have a desirable combination of high stiffness and superior fatigue resistant while improving heat dissipation conditions during construction by having a small ratio of concrete mass to surface area thus eliminating the risk of thermal cracking due to heat of hydration.
  • Although the application is written for a wind turbine tower as the column being supported by the foundation, any tower or column can be used on the foundation including but not limited to, antennas, chimneys, stacks, distillation columns, water towers, electric power lines, bridges, buildings, or any other structure using a column.
  • In one embodiment, the present invention pertains to a wind turbine foundation having a plurality of components, namely a central vertical pedestal, a substantially horizontal bottom support slab, and a plurality of radial reinforcing ribs extending radially outwardly from the pedestal. The ribs are prefabricated and transported to job site, but the pedestal and support slab are poured in situ at the site out of concrete. The prefabricated ribs are equipped with load transfer mechanisms, for shear force and bending moment, along the conjunctions with the cast in situ support slab. The prefabricated ribs are also equipped at their inner ends with load transfer mechanisms, for shear force and bending moment, along the conjunctions with the cast in situ pedestal. The ribs are arranged in a circumferentially spaced manner around the outer diameter of the pedestal cage assembly before or after slab reinforcing steel is installed. Forms are then arranged for the pedestal and support slab. The support slab is cast in situ by pouring concrete into the forms and then pedestal concrete is poured over the slab into the pedestal form. When the concrete cures the support slab is united to the prefabricated ribs and the ribs are also united to the pedestal. The final result is continuous monolithic polygonal or circular foundation wherein loads are carried across the structure vertically and laterally through the continuous structure by the doweled and spliced reinforcing steel bars which are integrally cast into the pedestal, ribs and support slab. The combination of the high stiffness of the ribs, solid pedestal and continuous slab construction across the pedestal, and through or under ribs, allows the slab to behave structurally as a continuous slab over multiple rigid supports resulting in small bending and shear stresses in the slab, reducing deflections and increasing the stiffness of the foundation, improving fatigue conditions as well as allowing for the benefits of an economical design. Support slab reinforcing steel covers the entire footprint of the foundation and extends, without interruption, across the slab area and into the pedestal to improve the structural performance of the foundation under different loading conditions. Perimeter beams or thickened slab edges around the perimeter add stiffness and strength to the foundation and provide the benefits of a two-way slab system. Circumferential post-tensioning of slab edge is used to increase the structural capacity of the ribs and the pedestal by creating eccentric post compression in the ribs and by reducing stress amplitudes in the slab, ribs and pedestal.
  • The foundation of the present invention substantially reduces the amount of concrete used in wind turbine foundation of spread footing style, simplifies the placement of rebar and concrete in the foundation, allows for labor and time savings and shortens foundation construction schedule when compared to conventional designs.
  • This invention provides the wind energy industry with a foundation system suitable for utility scale wind turbines including 1.5 MW through 10 MW and even larger, wherein the amount of cast in situ concrete work is limited, and the number of concrete trucks required for the foundation is small and manageable level and the amount of rebar used in the foundation is 60% less than conventional footings.
  • In one embodiment, the present invention relies on using prefabricated components that meet size and weight limits for standard ground freight shipping through typical roads and highways, without resorting to special permitting for oversize or overweight shipments, keeping in mind that the foundation width for large turbines can easily exceed sixty feet in width.
  • In another embodiment, the present invention uses specific combinations of precast components with cast in situ components designed to speed up construction without compromising the rigidity and structural continuity and optimization of the foundation. The combination of high strength, high stiffness prefabricated ribs, solid pedestal construction and continuous slab construction across the pedestal, and through or under ribs, allows the slab to behave structurally as a continuous slab over multiple rigid supports resulting in small bending and shear stresses in the slab, reducing deflections and increasing the stiffness of the foundation, substantially reducing fatigue as well as allowing for the benefits of rapid construction and economical design.
  • The present invention improves the geometry of the foundation in order to enhance dissipation conditions for the heat of hydration due to the typical temperature rise after casting. This design feature is achieved by reducing the thickness of the support slab and the ratio of concrete mass to surface area, thus reducing the risk of thermal cracking and protecting the structural integrity of the foundations.
  • The present invention optimizes the design support slab by configuring slab reinforcing to span between supporting ribs and allowing it to continue under or across the ribs. Each slab panel is triangular or pie-shaped and is prestressed along all three sides such that a multi-axial prestress is generated in slab panel. Slab panels with radial and perimeter post tensioning elements form a robust horizontal trussed diaphragm and as a result, the required slab thickness is optimized and the amount of cast in situ concrete is reduced.
  • The present invention reduces the maximum rebar length for field installation to roughly 7.6 meters (twenty five feet), which is significantly shorter when compared to conventional footing that may requires 15.2 to 18.3 meters (fifty to sixty foot) long reinforcing bars.
  • The present invention allows rib dowels, or post tensioning tendons, extending inwardly into the pedestal at one end, to continue without interruption between distal ends of the foundation. As a result each pair of ribs on opposite ends of the pedestal will behave structurally as one continuous beam across the width of the foundation.
  • The present invention reduces fatigue for concrete and rebar in the foundation by minimizing stress concentrations through appropriately configured connections and component geometry. The solid and deep construction of the pedestal allows for great reduction of stresses across the pedestal and at the conjunctions between the pedestal and surrounding. Dowels into the pedestal are relatively deep to reduce stresses near the surface zone of the pedestal. The solid pedestal offers generous bearing conditions for the tower base plate and improves geometry as needed to minimize fatigue.
  • The present invention employs prestressing and/or post tensioning techniques in order to maximize the performance of the foundation, or to extend its life span. Besides the vertical tensioning of anchor bolts, tensioning of horizontal and diagonal tendons along the length concrete ribs and across the pedestal besides circumferential 112 and radial 111 post tensioning strands imbedded in the slab are employed. Post-tensioning of the ribs is done in an eccentric manner to counter balance and reduce the stresses from the dead loads on the foundation. This can be accomplished by setting an eccentric post tensioning load pattern in the ribs with higher axial force at the bottom than at the top of the rib. The circumferential post tensioning load in the slab provides additional desirable eccentric prestressing of the ribs and the pedestal and helps increase rib load capacity and rib fatigue resistance.
  • OBJECTS OF THE INVENTION
  • An object of this invention is to provide the wind energy industry with a fast, reliable, yet cost-effective foundation system that is suitable for most wind energy projects, including projects using the largest utility scale turbines and tallest towers, while providing a foundation lifespan that is longer than conventional foundation systems.
  • Another object of this invention is to reduce the cost of wind energy projects by realizing savings in the areas of rebar quantity, form work, concrete trucking service, concrete pouring and finishing, logistics, man-hours and crane operations.
  • It is the object of this invention is to provide foundation system suitable for large wind turbines including utility scale turbines ranging from 1.5 MW to 10 MW and larger, wherein the amount of cast in situ concrete work is limited and the number of concrete trucks and the amount of rebar required for the foundation are reduced to a manageable level when compared to conventional gravity style foundations.
  • Another object of this invention is to improve dissipation conditions for the heat of hydration and the typical temperature rise after casting. That goal is achieved by reducing the ratio of concrete mass to surface area. When concrete is cast in massive sections for wind tower foundations, temperature can reach high levels and the risk of thermal cracking becomes very high unless cooling techniques or special admixtures are applied. Thermal cracking often compromises the structural integrity of the foundations.
  • A further object of this invention is to improve foundation structural properties due to fabrication of some structural components in a fully controlled environment of a precast concrete plant or a suitable facility at or near project site and to utilize benefit from advancement in concrete construction in areas such as concrete admixtures, special cements and fiber reinforcement.
  • Still another object of this invention is to utilize desirable features and benefits associated with mass production of precast concrete such as high reliability and uniform consistency and high compressive strength.
  • Another important object of this invention is to minimize chances for errors in bar placement, spacing and layout by providing pre-marked spacing for splicing slab rebar with existing dowels extending from ribs.
  • A further object of this invention is to use light weight, small diameter, short and easy to handle rebar for the cast in situ concrete.
  • A further important object of this invention is to provide the wind energy industry with a solution for all weather foundation construction.
  • Still another important object of this invention is to improve safety and accessibility around foundations under construction, and reduce hazardous conditions for construction crew.
  • A further significant object of this invention is to increase productivity and increase the number of footing that can be built in a given time frame using the same number of workers, when compared to conventional foundation designs built under similar conditions.
  • Another object of this invention is to employ prestressing and/or post tensioning techniques in order to maximize the performance of the foundation, improve its fatigue resistant and extend its life span.
  • Another object of this invention is to provide the wind energy industry with reliable and readily available designs, and prefabricated components, for every wind energy project wherein foundation designs are pre-approved by and coordinated with turbine manufactures and certification agencies.
  • A further object of this invention is to use standard designs to reduce engineering work and simplify the permitting process, as well as improve project construction schedule.
  • Still another object of this invention is to speed-up construction by using many prefabricated components including rebar meshes and cages, bolt cage assembly, pre cut post-tensioning strands, preassembled post-tensioning bundles, pre-cut post-tensioning duct sections and prefabricated concrete forms.
  • It is also the object of this invention is to provide wind energy developers with the ability to select pre-approved complete foundation designs for wind turbine foundation based on project and site variables including turbine model and tower height; site geotechnical characteristics; and desired foundation style such as gravity, anchored or piling.
  • Another object of this invention is to provide foundation contractors with the convenience and economy of using commercially available prefabricated components with complete assembly and detail drawings that can be delivered to any project site with short lead time.
  • A further object of this invention is to improve the quality and productivity of foundation construction due to experience gained from practicing standard construction techniques with repetitive production steps.
  • Still another object of his invention is to produce foundation designs suitable for shallow and deep offshore installations.
  • Another object of this invention is to use the modular foundation system for other tower structures such as chimneys, stacks, distillation columns and telecommunication towers.
  • Yet another object of the foundation is to improve tower base bearing resistant in concrete pedestals supporting wind towers such that it become possible to build the pedestal and the foundation with concrete having the same compressive strength without increasing the diameter of the pedestal.
  • Another object of the invention is to build wind tower foundation in one continuous concrete pour.
  • The final object of the invention is to independently produce prefabricated components for offshore foundations that can be assembled on a barge without having the critical path of completing to a first component before a second component can be constructed.
  • Other objects, advantages and novel features of the present invention will become apparent from the following description of the preferred embodiments when considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is a perspective view of the foundation showing the rebar before pouring the concrete.
  • FIG. 2A is a perspective view of a pedestal and ribs in a second embodiment with a pier for off shore applications.
  • FIG. 2B is a perspective view of a pedestal and ribs.
  • FIG. 3A is an inner perspective view of a rib showing connections to the pedestal and the slab.
  • FIG. 3B is an outer perspective view of a rib showing connections to the pedestal and the slab.
  • FIG. 4 is a perspective view of a rib and forms for forming the pedestal and slab.
  • FIG. 5 is a perspective view of the bolt assembly and alignment apparatus.
  • FIG. 6 is a top view of the foundation prior to pouring the concrete showing the rebar and template for the anchor bolts and post tensioning elements.
  • FIG. 7 is a perspective view of a raised rib having means for raising the rib above the slab.
  • FIG. 8 is a perspective view of the foundation showing the alignment apparatus and a pedestal forming section.
  • FIG. 9 is a perspective view of the foundation showing the rebar and rebar cage.
  • FIG. 10 is a perspective view pedestal cage assembly with anchor bolt and reinforcing.
  • FIG. 11 is a perspective view of the foundation.
  • FIG. 12 is a perspective view of the rib for supporting a lattice style tower.
  • FIG. 13 is a perspective view of the foundation for offshore installation.
  • FIG. 14 is a perspective view of the foundation for offshore installation.
  • FIG. 15 is a perspective view of the foundation for offshore installation.
  • FIG. 16 is an elevation view of the foundation for offshore installation.
  • FIG. 17 is a perspective view of the foundation for offshore installation.
  • FIG. 18 is a perspective view of the foundation for offshore installation.
  • FIG. 19 is a perspective view of the foundation for offshore installation.
  • FIG. 20 is a perspective view of the foundation with rock anchors.
  • FIG. 21 is a perspective view of the foundation with rock anchors.
  • FIG. 22 is a perspective view of the foundation with rock anchors.
  • FIG. 23 is an elevation view of the foundation with rock anchors.
  • FIG. 24 is a perspective view of an offshore foundation with micro-piles.
  • FIG. 25 is an elevation view of an offshore foundation with micro-piles.
  • FIG. 26 is a perspective view of the foundation.
  • FIG. 27 is an elevation view of the foundation.
  • FIG. 28 is a perspective view of rock anchored foundation.
  • FIG. 29 is a perspective view of rock anchored foundation.
  • FIG. 30 a-30 d show circumferential post tensioning view of the foundation.
  • FIG. 31 a is a plan view of the foundation.
  • FIG. 31 b is a section view of the foundation.
  • FIG. 32 a is a section view of the foundation.
  • FIG. 32 b is a section view of the rib 16.
  • FIG. 33 a is an elevation of rib reinforcing details.
  • FIG. 33 b is a plan view of rib reinforcing details.
  • FIG. 34 a and FIG. 34 b are section views of the rib 16.
  • FIG. 34 c and FIG. 34 d are pedestal reinforcing details.
  • FIG. 35 a and FIG. 35 b are section views of the pedestal.
  • FIGS. 36 a and 36 b are slab 20 reinforcing plans.
  • FIG. 37 a and FIG. 37 b are elevation and plan views of a rib with unbounded post tensioning elements.
  • FIG. 38 FIG. is a plan view showing circumferential post tensioning in the foundation.
  • FIG. 39 a-FIG. 41 b show details of the a foundation with prefabricated ribs.
  • FIG. 42 a-FIG. 42 d show tendon duct arrangements in a pedestal 10.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • The present invention pertains to a wind turbine foundation for wind turbines. The foundation comprises a plurality of components, namely a central vertical pedestal, a substantially horizontal bottom support slab, and a plurality of radial reinforcing ribs extending radially outwardly from the pedestal. The ribs may be prefabricated and transported to job site, but the pedestal and support slab are poured in situ at the site out of concrete. Alternatively the ribs may be cast in situ.
  • The present invention pertains to a fatigue resistant foundation 100 for wind towers which comprises a plurality of components, namely a central vertical pedestal, a substantially horizontal continuous bottom support slab with a stiffened perimeter, a plurality of radial reinforcing ribs extending radially outwardly from the pedestal and a three-dimensional network 500 of vertical, horizontal, diagonal, radial and circumferential post-tensioning elements embedded in the footing that keeps all the structural elements under heavy multi-axial post compression, reduces stress amplitudes and deflections and allows the foundation 100 to have a desirable combination of high stiffness and superior fatigue resistance while improving heat dissipation conditions during construction by having a small ratio of concrete mass to surface area thus eliminating the risk of thermal cracking due to the heat of hydration.
  • A construction site is prepared by excavation and flattening and preparation of soil for the foundation 100. The foundation 100 may be set on pilings, on piers, or have anchors (soil anchors or rock anchors 404 or micro-piles 401 or other types) in a conventional manner. The present invention ensures good contact between foundation 100 and soil, or sub-base, by casting.
  • The foundation 100 is cast against prepared soil, or crushed stone sub-base, or a mud slab or a membrane sheet in case of offshore foundations assembled on a barge or in dry docks. Known grouting and leveling techniques under precast elements can be employed for ensuring plumb installation and good soil contact.
  • In one embodiment of the invention the foundation 100 may be set on a mud slab 14 or on compacted granular fill. The mud slab 14 is often a thin plain concrete layer intended to provide a clean and level base for foundation installation. After the foundation site has been prepared, a plurality of three or more precast stiffener ribs 16 are placed on the mud slab 14 or compacted granular fill inside of the excavation pit 12. The precast concrete stiffener ribs 16 may have means for leveling or other leveling techniques can be employed for level and plumb installation. If desired, grouting techniques can be used to ensure complete rib base contact with the mud slab or sub-base. The precast concrete stiffener ribs 16 may have bases 21 with left shear key 38 and/or shear connectors and right shear key 36 and/or shear connectors. The precast concrete stiffener ribs 16 may also have a vertical shear key 34. The shear keys 34, 36 and 38 and associated dowels 40, 42 and 46 are to ensure continuous connections, with complete transfer of shear and bending loads, between the precast concrete rib stiffener 16 and the cast in place concrete which is to be poured into the foundation 100. The precast concrete stiffener ribs 16 have upper dowels 40 and lower dowels 42 extending on the right and left sides of the base 21 which interconnect with and spliced to upper mesh rebar 22 and lower mesh rebar 24 installed between the ribs 16 and connected to dowels 40, 42 to form reinforcement for the slabs of foundation 100 when the concrete is poured. The base 21 of rib 16 and the top of rib 16 also have dowels 46 radially entering the pedestal 10 in the center of the foundation.
  • Doweling of rebar between ribs and foundation components can be achieved rebar dowels extending from the prefabricated elements or by using rebar couplers, bar extenders or any mechanical rebar splicing system.
  • Arrays of grout or epoxy filled sleeves arranged in the slab 20 could receive corresponding arrays of vertical dowels extending from the bottom of prefabricated ribs or perimeter beams 190 or other prefabricated components.
  • Shear keys can be replaced with, or combined with, corbels or shear studs, or other shear connectors such as angled rebar or embedded steel shapes.
  • In another embodiment an array of steel beams, are encased into the web of the rib and extend inwardly into the pedestal cavity at the inner most end of ribs, and serve as a suitable shear force transfer mechanism between the rib and the pedestal.
  • In another embodiment the foundation 100 comprises a steel frame fully is encased in concrete and has a central tower receiving metal cylinder fixed to an array of radially extending steel girders encased in concrete beams and rigidly connected at their outer ends to an array of perimeter beams 190 encased in the concrete foundation and a reinforced concrete slab-on-grade 20 covering the foot print of the foundation 100 and connected to the said steel frame.
  • In one embodiment the ribs are treated with concrete bonding agent along surfaces where cast in place concrete is received.
  • In another embodiment the foundation 100 is provided with drains around the perimeter and the top surface of the slab 20 is slightly sloped towards the said drains such that water is drained away from foundation 100.
  • In another embodiment the ribs or other foundation elements are covered or coated with protective material for extending the life span of the footing.
  • In one embodiment the ribs 16 are placed on the mud slab 14 first and then the pedestal cage 50 made of an array of rebar, preferably Z or C shaped rebar and circumferential rebar is assembled around anchor bolt assembly. Alternatively the pedestal cage 50 is assembled first or a preassembled pedestal cage 50 dropped into place first and then the ribs 16 with dowels 46 are slid into place so that dowels 46 and shear connectors fit between the elements of pedestal cage 50 rebar assembly.
  • As best seen in FIG. 3 b, the precast concrete stiffener rib 16 has lifting lugs 32 to help place the stiffener rib 16 into the excavated construction area. The base 21 has a flat bottom surface such that the ribs may stand on their own on the mud slab 14 or compacted granular fill or during transportation from precast plant to foundation site. The precast concrete stiffener ribs 16 have prestressing elements 58 running through the ribs 16 radially from the outside of the ribs 16 and through pedestal 10. The radial prestressing elements 58 (or post tensioning elements) may be anchored to the opposite side of the pedestal or optionally run through the opposing precast concrete stiffener 16 on the other side of the pedestal 16 and anchored at the end of the opposite rib 16. Once the ribs 16 and the pedestal cage 50 are in place, the dowels 46 extending radially inward from ribs 16 may be connected to, or spliced with, corresponding dowels arranged in the pedestal cage. Inside of a cage 50 are additional rebar dowels 48 which will facilitate the continuity of the structural components through the pedestal 10 as well as resist bearing, shear and bending loads.
  • Also inside of pedestal reinforcement cage 50 is a bolt assembly 60 comprising a bolt template 52 an embedment ring 54 and anchor bolts 56 protected by a PVC sleeve 57 or wrapped with a material to prevent bonding between the anchor bolts 56 and concrete to be poured. The anchor bolts 56 have a top portion which is used to attach the base flange 301 of a tower or column to the pedestal 10. A grout trough template 52 at the bottom of the bolt template 52 may be used to create a grout trough 90 to ensure a good connection of the tower or column to the pedestal 10. The grout trough 90 will be formed by removing the bolt template 52 from the anchor bolts 56 after the concrete has been poured. Radial dowels, prestressing elements or shear connectors at the inner end of ribs 16 should be spaced to clear anchor bolts # and other reinforcement arranged in pedestal cage 50.
  • In a preferred embodiment, for fully cast in place foundations, slab forms may sit directly on the mud slab and rib forms 16 b are supported and kept elevated above slab 20 elevation by means of adjustable and reusable support legs arranged in the rib forms 16 b. Small footings or thickened mud slab areas could be used under rib form support legs. Pedestal forms 102 can be supported by rib forms 16 b or by separate support legs.
  • When ribs 16 are prefabricated, the bolt assembly 60 is held in place and the anchor bolts 56 are properly oriented by an alignment apparatus 130 can be utilized. The alignment apparatus 130 has a central post 132 with arms 134 attached perpendicularly to the center post and having legs 136 for attachment to the top of the ribs 16 to provide added stability, and bolt circle proper alignment during construction. The legs 136 have an adjustable height relative to the arms 134.
  • The arms 134 may have braces 138 attached to the central post 132 for holding the arms 134 straight. The central post 132 may also have rod supports 135 for holding reinforcement rebar such as reinforcement rebar 80 which are spliced to dowels 46. The alignment apparatus 130 also has adjustable support members 140 for attachment between the arms 134 and the bolt template 52 to align the anchor bolts 56 so they are upright. The alignment apparatus 130 can support the bolt assembly 60 without the central post 132 by relying on the legs 136 supported by ribs 16, which allows the lower portion of the central post 132 to be removed if desired. Alignment apparatus 130 can be used as a template to ensure proper location, elevation and orientation of ribs 16.
  • The ribs 16 can be of any shape or size depending on the specifications of the tower and loads thereon. For example the ribs 16 may be trapezoidal, rectangular, tee shaped or I beam shaped. The ribs 16 may have intermediate stiffener plates or diaphragms for improved structural performance. The ribs 16 or rib forms 16 b may receive ramps or catwalks thereon for easy access to the forms during construction.
  • Ribs 16, or rib forms 16 b, may have means for receiving and supporting perimeter forms 18, such as bolts or threaded inserts for receiving and supporting the pedestal forms 102. The ribs 16, or rib forms 16 b, may also have attachment means 15 for holding base forms 17. The pedestal forms 102 may be equipped with platform sections for allowing access around the pedestal and the rest of the footing.
  • With all the rebar, ribs 16, pedestal 100, bolt assembly frame 80 and optional alignment apparatus 130 in place concrete forms may be attached such that concrete can be poured to form the pedestal and base of the foundation. Pedestal forms 102 may attach to the ribs 16, or rib forms 16 b, by bolts 18 or by any other means. Similarly the base perimeter forms 17 may be attached to the ribs 16, or rib forms 16 b, by bolts 15 or by any other means. Alternatively the base perimeter forms may be supported to the ground or the mud slab.
  • With all the parts assembled all the rebar in place and the conduit for the prestressing tendons or rods of the foundation in place, concrete is ready to be poured into the pedestal 10 and between the ribs 16. The pouring of the concrete can be accomplished quickly and slab areas between the ribs 16 can be finished as the pedestal 10 concrete is still being poured. The concrete may be used to build the pedestal 10 and the slab 20 in one pour. Alternatively the base for the entire foot print of the footing can be poured in a first pour then the pedestal 10 can be formed in a second pour.
  • When bonded multi-strand post tensioning system is used in the foundation 100, the prefabricated components will be fitted with ducts and anchor hardware according to design specifications. The cast in place components will be fitted with matching ducts to facilitate the continuity of tendons across the foundation 100. After the jacking of tendons, duct grouting is carried out as required. If the un-bonded, bundled mono-strand system is employed, no duct or grouting is required.
  • The structural load capacity of the foundation 100 is increased significantly by the combination or radial (or diametric) and circumferential post tensioning 59. Circumferential post tensioning 59 creates a desirable symmetric bi-axial post compression in the slab 20. Circumferential post tensioning 59 is applied at an elevation well below the neutral axes of the ribs 16 thus creating eccentric post compression in the ribs 16 and the pedestal 10 and resulting in increased nominal moment and shear capacity of the ribs 16 as well as improvement in multi-axial fatigue resistant of the pedestal 10, ribs 16 and the slab 20. Radial or diametric post tensioning elements 58 extend from rib to opposite rib across the pedestal 10. Radial post-tensioning is applied with an eccentric load pattern, with higher post compression below the neutral axis of the rib. When all the prestressing elements are jacked, the foundation 100 is kept under heavy multi-axial eccentric post compression stress, thus increasing rib structural capacity to resist soil support reaction and providing low deflections, high stiffness and low stress amplitudes resulting in high fatigue resistant and high durability. Backfill is added over the foundation 100 for increased stability and stiffness of the foundation 100.
  • After the concrete sets, post tensioning is carried out and the foundation 100 is backfilled with compacted granular fill to stabilize the foundation 100 against overturning.
  • Alternately the bolt assembly can be replaced by a tower section 56 b embedded in pedestal 10 concrete and the embedded section 56 b having means 56 c for receiving a tower base by means of a bolted connection arranged at the top of the section. The embedded metal cylindrical tower section 56 b encased in pedestal 10 concrete is provided with holes for rebar and post tensioning tendons 58 to extend through the metal cylinder. Post tensioning 58 tendons can extend through holes arranged in the cylinder and across the pedestal 10, through the ribs 16 to be anchored on distal ends of the foundation.
  • Pedestal 10 can be any size or shape, round, triangular, square, polygon or other shape depending on the specifications of the tower and loads thereon. The ribs 16 can be in any pattern around the pedestal 10. In one embodiment shown in FIG. 2 the foundation 100 may have a square pedestal 10 and ribs 16 at the corners parallel to the faces of the pedestal. The pedestal 10 may have a stepped construction with an enlarged lower cross section to reduce the length of the cantilevered ribs 16.
  • Pre-assembled reinforcement sections (meshes) of the slab 20 components can be lowered into place in the slab 20 to speedup construction. All rebar dowel or metal shear connectors extending through a construction joints may be galvanized or Epoxy coated to prevent corrosion. The use of mechanical couplers in the foundation 100 shall be limited or avoided. Specified mechanical couplers must be tested and certified for the number of load cycles in the life span of the foundation 100.
  • In another preferred embodiment, the ribs are cast in place in reusable rib forms 16 b. The ribs 16 are cast in place jointly with the pedestal 10 in one continuous pour over the slab. Optionally, the ribs 16, the pedestal 10 and the slab 20 are all jointly cast in one pour. All rib internal components including rebar assembly with dowels and prestressing elements are placed inside the forms then cast in place concrete is poured into the rib forms 16 b as well as into pedestal 10 and slab 20 forms.
  • Rib reinforcing cages can be assembled above grade and lowered into the foundation in one or more sections.
  • In a preferred embodiment rib forms 16 b with internal rib reinforcing cages are preassembled and lowered into the foundation by cranes to mesh with slab reinforcing sections already placed in the foundation. The radial reinforcing panel of the slab 20 enables the meshing rib dowels between slab reinforcing without geometric interference.
  • Ribs 16 can also be made in segments and eventually united by means doweling or by using segmented post-tensioned construction techniques. Rib anchor zone with anchor trumpets and hardware can be prefabricated separately of higher strength concrete than the rest of the rib.
  • Prefabricated perimeter beams 190 with post tension ducts could serve as perimeter forms become part of the structure. An array of precast, rectangular or L-shaped beams with means for connecting to the slab 20 and the ribs 16 can be used. The perimeter (edge) beams can rest directly on the mud slab and connect to the slab 20 using horizontal dowels and shear key arranged at its inner side. Optionally the perimeter beam is elevated and connects to the top of the slab 20 using dowels extending from its bottom. The precast perimeter beams 190 may have dowels and shear keys extending from their sides ends for connecting to the ribs 16. In this case the ribs 16 will have corresponding dowels and shear keys for receiving and supporting perimeter beams 190. The connection between ribs 16 and perimeter beams 190 is established using closure pours in small cavity at the conjunctions.
  • In another embodiment the foundation 100 pertains to hybrid gravity based and rock anchored foundation system. Ribs 16 can be made with arrangement, mechanisms and connecters for receiving piles 400 or micro-piles 401 or anchors 404 in different configurations. Vertical through holes in the ribs 16 can provide means for receiving a pile or an anchor. Bearing elements and grouting are arranged on top of each rib to establish the required structural connection. An array of bearing plates 404 b with tensioning nuts 404 c on each soil/rock anchor is used to compress the foundation 100 against supporting soil. Vertical through holes with corrugations for the anchor extend through the foundation. Bearing plates 404 b with tensioning nuts 404 c can be placed on top of the pedestal 10 or in the foundation 100. If desired ribs 16 may have piers extending vertically from the ribs 16 and the top of pier elevation is raised above grade to make anchor bolts accessible for tensioning and testing. Typical rock or soil anchor construction and grouting methods can be utilized. Another option is to house rock anchor bolts and bearing plates 404 b and tensioning nuts 404 c in accessible corrosion protection compartments above the foundation 100.
  • In another embodiment the invention pertains to a foundation 100 that comprises the following elements:
      • 1. A vertically extending pedestal 10 that is cast in situ, out of concrete, the pedestal 10 serving to receive and support the tower structure;
      • 2. A substantially horizontal support slab 20 that is cast in situ out of concrete, the support slab 20 covering an area of ground larger than that covered by the pedestal 10;
      • 3. A plurality of radial ribs 16 extending radially outwardly from the pedestal 10 and spaced around the pedestal 10, each rib is being joined along the base thereof to the support slab 20 being joined along an inner side thereof to the pedestal 10, each rib has means for receiving a rock or soil anchor;
      • 4. An optional plurality of perimeter beams 190, or stiffened slab edge 190 a, spanning continuously, near the perimeter of the foundation, between ribs 16 and supporting the slab 20 may be employed;
      • 5. An array of soil or rock anchors 404 extending through the foundation 100, preferably through the ribs 16, may extend down into the ground below the foundation, each anchor having a bearing element in or above the foundation 100 and compressing the foundation against support soil when the anchors are tensioned.
  • The prefabricated components can be molded at a facility under controlled conditions for good quality concrete setting and controlled rebar spacing which is superior to what can be obtained on a job site and at a lower cost. The ribs 16, acting as deep stiff horizontal cantilever support, allow the base of the foundation slabs to have a relatively small thickness using less cast in place concrete and rebar thus lowering the cost for each foundation.
  • Alternatively ribs 16 can have reusable temporary supports 170, or other means, arranged at the ribs 16 to hold the ribs 16 in place, maintain them plumb during construction and elevate them at a predetermined height over slab reinforcing. This style of ribs 16 is intended to be raised above the ground or mud slab 14 so that the foundation support slab 20 can be poured in place continuously under ribs. Dowels and shear connectors for this style may be arranged at the bottom of the rib for connecting with base slab 20 which extends under the raised rib. When the concrete cures the continuous support slab 20, extending under the ribs, is united to the prefabricated ribs 16 and the ribs 16 are also united to the pedestal 10. The rib inner ends will be partially encased in the pedestal 10 to increase rib torsional end resistance. The final result is continuous monolithic foundation wherein loads are carried across the structure vertically and laterally through the continuous structure by the doweled and spliced reinforcing steel bars which are integrally cast into the pedestal, ribs 16 and support slab 20. The combination of the high stiffness of the ribs 16, solid pedestal 10 and continuous slab 20 construction across the pedestal 10, and under ribs 16, allows the slab 20 to behave structurally as a continuous slab 20 over multiple rigid supports resulting in small flexural and shear stresses in the slab 20, reducing deflections, improving fatigue conditions and increasing the stiffness of the foundation as well as allowing for the benefits of an economical design.
  • Cast in situ concrete can be shielded from extreme weather, including heat, cold, rain and snow, by simply extending blankets, covers or shields between ribs 16 during construction, and then using heaters or fans as required to regulate temperature, humidity of concrete to allow for proper setting and curing conditions.
  • Another embodiment of the present invention pertains to a leveling technique that simplifies the tower base leveling process and shortens the number of steps required for grouting under a tower base. The bolt template is provided at the very top of the bolt assembly with at least three sets of additional bolts and corresponding threaded bolt inserts suitable for embedment in the concrete. Such leveling bolts 53 and inserts 53 b will be located outside or inside the bolt circle of tower base, but directly under tower base flange. This allows for continuity of grout bed construction and provides an easy access to leveling bolts 53. Small cutouts at leveling bolt locations may be used. Another benefit of this leveling technique is having the ability to apply continuous grout bed that is free of cold joints, under tower base flange in one session as well as having the ability to tension all anchor bolts in one work session.
  • The foundation design can be reconfigured to support lattice towers comprising multiple columns connections to foundations in a spaced array. The ribs 16 will be provided with column receiving components including embedded anchor bolts (or grouting around embedded element) and an integrated pier design into the rib. The rib geometry may be widened and enlarged at the integral pier. The array of said integrated piers ribs 16 are fitted with means for receiving and supporting the legs or the columns of the lattice tower 200. The integrated piers can extend above final grade elevation, while the top of pedestal 10 may stay below final grade elevation. For this foundation style, pedestal elevation may be depressed and tower receiving components may not be required in the pedestal 10. This configuration may also be used in offshore applications wherein a prefabricated gravity foundation 100 is connected to lattice tower structure 200 that is fitted with a wind tower receiving component at its top. The foundation 100 will be installed over prepared seabed and filled with a suitable backfilling material 13, and surrounded with scour protection 13 b.
  • In permafrost conditions, the foundation 100 may be supported on an array of concrete piers deeply embedded and frozen into the ground. Anchors can be used to secure the ribs 16 to their supporting piers around the perimeter of the foundation. If a slab 20 is incorporated in the design, the slab 20 bottom elevation may be set above grade elevation.
  • This invention pertains to a fatigue resistant gravity based spread footing for use under heavy multi-axial cyclical loading of a wind tower 300 which comprises a plurality of components, namely a central vertical pedestal 10, a substantially horizontal continuous bottom support slab 20 with stiffened perimeter, a plurality of radial reinforcing ribs 16 extending radially outwardly from the pedestal 10 and a three-dimensional network of vertical, horizontal, diagonal, radial (or diametric) and circumferential post-tensioning elements that keep the structural elements under heavy multi-axial post compression with specific eccentricities and orientations that are intended to reduces stress amplitudes and deflections and allows the foundation 100 to have a desirable combination of high stiffness and superior fatigue resistance while improving heat dissipation conditions during construction by having a small ratio of concrete mass to surface area thus eliminating the risk of thermal cracking due to heat of hydration.
  • Vertical prestressing of the pedestal 10 can be carried out independently of tower receiving elements. A pedestal 10 may have an array of vertical post tensioning elements 56 that does not connect to a tower 300, and an embedded tower section 56 b bolted to a tower structure 300.
  • Radial post-tensioning 58, extending across the foundation 100, in pairs of ribs 16, allows for the desirable structural continuity and the direct transfer of loads from a downwind ribs 16 into the pedestal 10 and then into the opposing upwind ribs 16. Radial and circumferential post compression stresses in the slab 20 and/or perimeter beams 190 allows for a desirable reduction in stress amplitudes the structural continuity between slab 20 spans and/or perimeter beam 190 spans, across the ribs 16, thus creating a desirable load sharing mechanism between adjacent ribs 16 by forcing more ribs 16 to be engaged in resisting tower loads.
  • The invention pertains to a durable, high-stiffness, fatigue-resistant foundation structure 100 for onshore wind tower installations which comprises:
      • 1. a central pedestal 10 that is made of cast-in-place concrete with concentric vertical prestressing elements and eccentric multi-axial horizontal and/or radial post-tensioning elements;
      • 2. an array of cast-in-place eccentrically post-tensioned radial ribs 16;
      • 3. a cast-in-place slab 20 with heavily post-tensioned thickened slab edge 190 a.
        All components are made of high strength reinforced concrete and are rigidly connected to each other to behave as a monolithic spread foundation structure. The structural components are rigidly connected with arrays of rebar dowels (passive reinforcing) or post-tensioning elements extending through the conjunctions. The slab 20 functions as a two-way slab system that is free of construction joints across the footprint of the foundation and spans continuously over multiple ribs 16. Perimeter post tensioning 59 a or circumferential post tensioning 59 of the slab 20 is applied at an elevation well below the neutral axes of the ribs 16 to cause eccentric loading of the ribs 16 and the pedestal 10. Radial post-tensioning elements with an eccentric load pattern, with higher post compression at the bottom of the rib, extend from rib end to opposite rib across the pedestal 10, or to the opposite end of the pedestal 10. When all the prestressing elements are jacked, the foundation 100 is kept under heavy multi-axial eccentric post compression stress, thus increasing rib structural capacity to resist soil support reaction and providing low deflections, high stiffness and low stress amplitudes resulting in high fatigue resistant and high durability. Backfill 13 is added over the foundation 100 for increased stability and stiffness of the foundation 100.
  • Soil support reaction under the slab 20 is transferred from the slab 20 to the ribs 16 and thickened slab edge 190 a (or perimeter beams 190) as in two-way slab systems with more load distribution going to the ribs 16 in the primary span. Perimeter or circumferential post-tensioning are applied, perpendicular to the ribs 16, in the orientation of the primary span that effectively reduces stress amplitudes and deflections in the slab 20 by keeping the slab 20 under heavy post-compression in the directions of primary slab spans around the foundation. The size, distribution, eccentricity and location of post tensioning elements 58 in the ribs 16 and the slab 20 are used, by the engineer, to dictate the natural frequencies of the foundation 100 to be in a safe range relative to operating frequencies of the wind generator according to turbine manufacturer recommendations.
  • The said vertical, radial and circumferential post-tensioning in the foundation keep all the structural components (Pedestal 10, ribs 16, slab 20, thickened slab edges (or integral edge beams)) under multi-axial post compression confinement resulting in lower stress range amplitudes thus yielding higher stiffness, more effective crack control, lower deflections and improved fatigue resistance. Superior fatigue resistance and long life-span are achieved by keeping most of the structural elements of the foundation 100 under multi-axial compression while resisting operating loads or even during normal and abnormal extreme loads from the supported structure (wind power generator).
  • In a preferred embodiment, rib post-tensioning requirement are reduced by engaging fully developed bar dowels from the rib into the pedestal connection as well as extending fully developed radial rebar dowels of the slab 20 into the pedestal 10, thus allowing passive reinforcing to participate in the said connection especially under extreme loads. Radial slab reinforcing pattern with tapered rib width was found to be very cost effective as the rib to pedestal connection benefits from a large number of top and bottom radial slab reinforcing bars participating in the said connection, as the rib width widens, thus reducing the number of bottom post-tensioning strands required for the said connection.
  • The structural configuration of the foundation 100 reduces the overall cumulative deflections in the structure under tower loads and significantly improves the rotational stiffness of the foundation 100 which is a key factor in determining the size of foundations in wind turbine installations. The rotational stiffness is also improved by the interlocking between surrounding soil (after backfilling) and the multiple surfaces and vertical faces of the foundation structure. The horizontal stiffness is improved by the passive earth pressure on the multiple faces of the structure. Both rotational and horizontal stiffness achieved by this design are much higher than conventional tapered inverted-T gravity spread footings especially for onshore foundations installed below grade in an excavated pit because of the increased interlocking surface area and increased passive earth pressure and increased friction on the multiple faces of the fatigue resistant foundation 100.
  • The solid-core pedestal 10 comprises a continuous reinforcing cage and a tower receiving component, such as anchor-bolt assembly, with a cylindrical array of bond protected high strength post-tensioning bolts, for connecting to wind tower base flange 301. In another embodiment and the tower receiving component may comprise an embedded cylindrical metal tower section 56 b with means 56 c for connecting to a tower section such as a flange with bolt holes for receiving bolts at its top and with an array of holes to allow the passing of rebar and post tension tendons. The anchor bolt assembly ensures structural continuity between the tower 300 and the pedestal 10. The post-tensioning forces of the anchor bolts are selected by the engineer to insure that the tower base flange 301 remains in contact with the pedestal 10 under extreme normal and abnormal load conditions. The bolt assembly includes, at its bottom end, a bearing element that may consist of an embedment ring plate that is made of segments that are welded together.
  • Radial post-tension tendons and rebar reinforcing elements extending from the ribs 16 and the slab 20 pass through the pedestal reinforcing cage, or through holes in the embedded metal tower section.
  • As shown on the drawings, post-tensioning elements are flared horizontally, profiled vertically, arranged in matrix groups, spaced and draped in a manner that allows for optimum utilization of post-tensioning and ease of installation while avoiding tendon congestion and stress concentrations as tendons crisscross in the pedestal 10. The regrouping of tendons to form flat and wide matrix along each axis was found to be effective in avoiding tendon congestion especially in the pedestal 10. The said flat and wide matrix of tendons is placed as high or as low as possible to maximize their moment arms and optimize their contributed moment capacity. For corrosion protection, bonded (multi-strand and grouted) or un-bonded encapsulated (mono-strand) post-tensioning elements and their associated construction techniques can be used in the foundation 100.
  • The rib's thickness can be gradually increased at the connection to the pedestal 10 to increase rib flexural, shear and torsional capacity and enhance pedestal confinement. The post-tensioning requirements can be reduced by engaging dowels at rib-to-pedestal connection and by extending fully developed radial dowels from the rib and the slab 20 deep into the pedestal, thus allowing passive reinforcing to participate in the connection.
  • In another embodiment, ribs 16 top surface can be tapered to a substantial slope extending vertically to an elevation near the top of pedestal allowing the ribs 16 to benefit from diaphragm action at their inner zone and also provide lateral support for the full height of the pedestal 10 and to provide concrete confinement at the highly stressed zone at the top of pedestal under tower base flange 301.
  • The foundation may have a circular or polygonal foot print. The thickened slab edge 190 a 190 a (perimeter beam) may extend above or below the foundation. A shallow perimeter beam profile should be selected for ease of backfilling and improved accessibility for roller compactors during the backfilling of the foundation 100. A thickened slab ring beam 190 a may be designed to be at an offset distance away from the slab edge allowing the slab segment, outside the ring, to behave as a cantilever. This configuration reduces slab span and deflections as well as the volume of concrete required in the foundation 100.
  • As shown on the drawings the size of the slab 20 and its continuous reinforcing including that of the thickened slab is configured to create a rigid composite connection to the ribs 16 with high stiffness which is sufficient to allow adjoining ribs 16 to participate more in resisting the loads and thus reducing local deflections and increasing overall foundation stiffness in addition to reducing the unsupported length of cantilever radial ribs 16.
  • In a preferred embodiment, as shown on the drawings, the pairing of the ribs 16 on distal ends and the continuous perimeter beam construction yield a cost effective layout of post-tensioning that uses a small number of tendons and corresponding anchors as well as reduces friction losses by avoiding sharp turns in tendon layout. The tendons of the ribs 16 are anchored in a matrix array at the outer end of the rib and extend horizontally and diagonally along the rib to split into at least two groups 58 a and 58 b one near the bottom and the other near the top of the rib as it connects to the pedestal 10. The tendons are more concentrated at the bottom than at the top in a concentric prestressing pattern that is intended to maximize the structural capacity of the foundation and meet the flexure and shear demand of the governing load cases.
  • Ribs 16 may have thickened flanges, at their connection to the pedestal 10, that may also house post tensioning anchors for tendons 58 extending from ribs 16 on the opposite side of pedestal. The ribs 16 may also have post tensioning anchors along their sides or tops if tendon curtailment methods are applied in the design. The ribs 16 may also have embedded loop anchors if looping of tendons is used in the design. Loop anchors could also be used in the pedestal 10 to support precast concrete towers 300 b.
  • As shown on the drawings the tendons in ribs 16 extend horizontally and diagonally to be split into three distinctive groups as they enter the pedestal. The first group 58 a with more tendons is placed at the bottom of ribs 16 or in the slab to create camber for reducing deflections and improving foundation soil contact as well as meet the high flexural demand from the governing load cases, and the second group 58 b slope up diagonally to follow the geometry of the top of the rib as they enter the pedestal 10. The third group 58 c is in the middle and it starts horizontal at rib anchor block and diagonally slopes down towards the bottom of the rib to enter the pedestal 10 for optimum use of the tendons. Tendons in the pedestal 10 are fanned and flared into groups to simplify the installation and maximize their utilization by increasing their moment arms measured from the top or the bottom of the structural concrete. Additional post-tensioning groups for shear resistance can be provided by providing tendons that traverse the shear failure plane in the ribs 16.
  • In another embodiment the post-tensioning in the ribs 16 consist of three distinctive groups:
      • 1. A bottom group 58 a that is horizontal at the bottom of the rib 16 and in the slab 20 and may be grouped with slab post tensioning,
      • 2. A top group 58 b that is diagonally sloped upward to follow the geometry of rib top,
      • 3. An optional middle group 58 c that starts horizontal at rib outer edge and is diagonally sloped down towards the bottom of the rib to eliminate dead load deflections and keep the ribs 16 and pedestal under post compression during normal operating conditions and also provide the high demand of post-tensioning capacity required at the bottom of the rib for downwind load cases, and traverse the shear failure plane for ribs 16 in the governing downwind load cases and provide additional shear resisting capacity in each rib,
        such that the number of strands in the bottom of the rib and the pedestal 10 is much higher than that at the top thus causing a multi-axial, heavy, eccentric horizontal post compression in the foundation after the tendons are jacked.
  • Anchor-blocks for perimeter or circumferential post-tension tendons can be placed at perimeter beams 190, (ring beams) or thickened slab or at the edge of the foundation or on top of perimeter beams 190 or on sides of ribs 16. A preferred layout with two anchor blocks on opposite sides of the foundation and with semi-circular (180-degree) tendon arrangement is shown on drawings. Ring tendons with ring anchors 59 b (such as dog-bone anchors) can be used to avoid having blisters on the foundation 100. Styrofoam block-outs 59 c can be placed in the foundation 100 according to anchor manufacturer recommended dimensions. When the concrete reaches the sufficient strength ring tendons are jacked and ring anchors grouted.
  • The foundation is made of a network of prestressed concrete elements that can be structurally analyzed, with the strut and tie method, as to a three-dimensional structure made of an array of vertically and horizontally oriented truss-girders joined at the center, with major tension chords reinforced with prestressing tendons, based on both upwind and downwind load cases wherein tension forces in the structure are resisted largely by prestressing elements and passive reinforcing and compression forces are resisted largely by the concrete elements. The structure can be analyzed as a circumferential array of vertically oriented trusses that are fixed at their inner ends to the central pedestal 10 and are laterally stabilized at their bottom by a horizontal trussed diaphragm formed by perimeter post tensioning 59 a, in the slab or perimeter beam, and radial bottom tendons 58 in the ribs 16 or the slab 20.
  • In another embodiment the fatigue resistant foundation 100 comprises a circumferential array of vertically oriented eccentrically prestressed cantilevered girders that are fixed at their inner ends to a central pedestal 10 that is laterally supported and confined through most of its height by rib concrete, and the ribs 16 and pedestal 10 are laterally stabilized at their bottom by a horizontal prestressed concrete trussed diaphragm, with a continuous slab 20, and the prestressing is provided by radial tendons in the ribs 16 (or the slab 20) and circumferential post tensioning elements 59. The radial and circumferential tendons provide eccentric prestressing in the ribs 16 and the pedestal 10. The pedestal is vertically prestressed and is structurally fixed to a tower base 301 of a pylon.
  • In a preferred embodiment the construction of the foundation 100 may utilize pre-assembled perimeter beam reinforcing cages, built in segments with overlapping spliced bars at their ends, and each having an array of shear resisting vertical ties and flexure resisting horizontal bars as well as local reinforcing at anchor locations as shown on FIG. X.
  • As shown on the drawings, the foundation has specific reinforcing groups. The ribs 16 have flexure reinforcing concentrated at the bottom and the top, vertical stirrups for shear reinforcing that are tightly spaced at high shear zone along rib inner end, rib skin reinforcing on ach face and bursting and splitting reinforcing made of horizontal hairpins extending between the said rib skin reinforcing, as well as straight or U-shaped horizontal dowels for embedment into the pedestal 10 and vertical dowels, at the bottom, for composite action with the slab 20. As shown on the drawings the vertical stirrups also function as dowels for composite action of the slab 20. The said dowels are spaced such that they could mesh between slab reinforcing bars without geometric interference, if the rib reinforcing is built in preassembled cages and placed over the slab reinforcing. In order to maximize shear capacity vertical stirrups are placed side-by-side, in pairs, at the inner rib zone where the shear demand is high.
  • Anchor zones are provided with heavy reinforcing with trim bar and ties. The ribs 16 may also have horizontal reinforcing dowels, perpendicular to the ribs 16, to facilitate the structural continuity of the supported perimeter beams 190 or the thickened slab, across the width of the rib, by means of splicing the said dowels with perimeter reinforcing.
  • The pedestal 10 has a horizontal mesh at the top and skin reinforcing at all faces as well as at least one cage, around the anchor bolt assembly, comprising vertical tightly meshed anti-bursting reinforcing including two cylindrical meshes confining the anchor bolts each comprising horizontal hoops and either C or Z-Shaped bars and a radial array of horizontal hair-pins or stirrups tying both cylindrical meshes or spirals stirrups each housing a number of anchor bolts. The pedestal 10 cage assembly may comprise two concentric tightly meshed cages surrounding the anchor bolts one from the inside and the other from the outside with radial array of anti bursting and splitting resistant hairpins extending between the two cages # and #. Additionally an array vertically oriented pedestal vertical anti bursting and splitting resistant reinforcing group, comprising circumferentially spaced vertical hairpins extending between said top horizontal mesh and a horizontal bottom reinforcing mesh in the pedestal 10 or slab 20, is included in the pedestal cage. The vertical hairpins # also function as supports to secure tendons in the pedestal 10 during construction.
  • Upper and lower slab reinforcing meshes may have any pattern such as a square grid, a circular array with radial pattern or overlapping pie-shaped segments. Additionally, an array of slab reinforcing locally arranged beneath the ribs 16 and being oriented parallel to the ribs 16 and extending into the pedestal 10 to facilitate composite action. The slab 20 may also be reinforced with post-tensioning elements in any pattern including radial, circumferential, perimeter or a square grid.
  • The foundation system relies on the use of many prefabricated components including rebar meshes and cages, pedestal cage assembly, pre cut post-tensioning strands, preassembled post-tensioning bundles, pre-cut post-tensioning duct sections and prefabricated concrete forms.
  • Reusable rib forms 16 b are utilized to form foundation perimeter, the ribs 16 and the pedestal. Forms can be made to be segmented, universal, expandable and adjustable to work for different foundation sizes. As shown on FIG. X rib forms 16 b can be made with adjustable supports to elevate the forms above the wet slab concrete during construction if the foundation is built in one pour. Rib forms 16 b may sit directly on the hardened concrete slab 20 if the foundation is built in two pours. Rib forms 16 b may be made with two side-panels of stiffened non-stick plates and an array of adjustable horizontal spacers between the panels to maintain proper geometry and resist the lateral pressure of wet concrete. Rib and pedestal forms 102 may be fitted with lifting lugs or means for receiving and supporting ladders, catwalks and work platforms to allow for access around the foundation. The forms may have means for securing post-tension anchors and hardware at specific spacing during construction. The forms may also have means for hanging an supporting rib reinforcing cages.
  • The foundation 100 may be supported on piles, or micro-piles 401 or piers 402 or rammed-aggregate piers 405. The foundation 100 may receive rock anchors 404 or soil-anchors in a conventional manner. A construction site is prepared by excavation and flattening and preparation of soil for the foundation. The foundation 100 may be set on a mud slab or on compacted granular fill. The mud slab is a thin plain concrete layer intended to provide a clean and level base for foundation installation.
  • In one embodiment, After the foundation site has been prepared, slab reinforcing is placed inside slab forms and the slab is poured in place with dowels extending up from the slab 20 to receive ribs 16 and pedestal in a second pour. Rib and pedestal rebar and cage placement with post-tension tendons (or duct) placement are accomplished and forms are installed in place and a second pour is carried out. Alternatively the foundation 100 can be poured in a single pour with the use of accelerators in the concrete mix and by following a well designed concrete pour sequence. A set of small footings, placed within the mud slab, can be used to support and elevate the rib forms 16 b and pedestal forms 102 during construction. Slab 20, pedestal and rib reinforcing elements are assembled in the foundation 100. Forms are placed in the foundation around the perimeter, the ribs 16 and the pedestal and the concrete is poured into the foundation in a carefully designed pour sequence. One option is to start with slab 20 and the bottom part of the ribs 16 and the pedestal with accelerator in the concrete mix to seal the bottom of rib and pedestal forms 102 by the time the slab 20 concrete is finished, the ribs 16 and the pedestal are poured jointly in small lifts.
  • When the concrete hardens to certain strength, post-tension elements are jacked and grouted as required. The tower base flange 301 is then attached to the pedestal 10 and grouted, and the tower anchor bolts are tensioned after the grout reaches sufficient strength.
  • In a preferred embodiment, the invention relates to a high stiffness, fatigue resistant, wind turbine foundation 100, supporting a wind generator with a multi-megawatt rating and subjected to extremely high cyclical upset loads that comprise the following components:
      • 1. a substantially massive and wide central pedestal 10 with substantially solid core concrete construction that is kept, through most of its height, under a combination of lateral structural concrete supports and confinement, high vertical post-compression stress and high eccentric multi-axial lateral horizontal post-compression stress across its width, provided by said lateral supports and post-tensioning elements that traverse the width of the pedestal 10, through non-segmented concrete construction, along multiple axes in a concentric pattern, and having a set of upright, circumferentially spaced anchor bolts, for providing the said high vertical post-compression stress, extending through said pedestal 10, and having lower ends anchored relative to an anchor ring and upper ends projecting upwardly from said top end of said pedestal, said anchor bolts being substantially bond protected along their length, said upper ends of said bolts project upwardly from the said pedestal 10 through a base flange of an annular tower structurally fixed atop the said pedestal 10, and also having an upright heavily reinforced cage of tightly meshed rebar, and concentrically arranged around both sides of the anchor bolt cage with opening to allow the passing of lateral load transfer elements,
      • 2. a support slab-on-grade 20, cast-in-situ out of concrete against the soil, in an excavation pit, of continuous construction and covering a footprint substantially larger than that of the pedestal 10 and having a thickness that is much smaller than the depth of the pedestal 10 and having thickened edge made of concrete integral with the support slab 20 and having horizontal post-tensioning elements to keep the slab 20 under heavy multi-axial post compression,
      • 3. an array of concentrically arranged ribs 16 made of deep girder construction, integral with the pedestal and support slab 20, and jointly cast-in-situ with said pedestal 10, and extending vertically, above the slab 20, to an elevation near the top of pedestal 10 such that the pedestal 10 is laterally supported and substantially confined below the said tower base flange 301, and having a width that is substantially smaller than that of the said pedestal, and being arranged such that pairs of ribs 16 outwardly extend from opposite sides of the pedestal with post-tensioning elements inwardly extending from the distal ends of the ribs 16 through the pedestal,
      • 4. reinforcing rebar and prestressed dowels extending from the ribs 16 deep into the core of the pedestal 10 from distal ends, and arrays of dowels, made of rebar, extend between the slab 20 and each of the ribs 16 and the pedestal along their conjunctions,
      • 5. a suitable backfill material 13 placed over the foundation 100, to stabilize the foundation 100 against overturning, followed by tower base installation and grouting,
        the foundation 100 is kept under heavy multi-axial post-compression such that tower loads are resisted by pairs of ribs 16, on distal ends of the pedestal 10, wherein each pair of ribs 16 form a high stiffness continuous, non-segmented, laterally supported, post-tensioned girder extending between distal ends of the foundation 100 with continuous uninterrupted composite action from the slab-on-grade 20.
  • In another embodiment, slab post-tensioning can be arranged at any combination of perimeter, radial or diametric, or other patterns.
  • In another embodiment, composite action is further facilitated with radially oriented, reinforcing bars locally arranged in the slab 20, beneath the ribs 16, and extended deep into the pedestal 10, in addition to an array of vertical dowels extending between the rib and the slab 20 that function as shear connectors.
  • In a preferred embodiment, the invention pertains to a foundation 100 for supporting a wind generator with a multi-megawatt rating and subjected to extremely high cyclical upset loads, with increased stiffness and improved fatigue resistant comprising:
      • 1. a support slab-on-grade 20 of non-segmented continuous construction with a circular integral perimeter beams 190 with circumferential post tensioning elements 59 made of two 180-degree tendon segments forming a 360-degree circle, with anchors at the opposite sides of the foundation,
      • 2. a central cylindrical pedestal 10 integral with the support slab-on-grade of solid non-segmented construction and having vertical post-tensioning elements,
      • 3. ribs 16 integral with the support slab and the central pedestal 10, on top of the slab 20, with three or four pairs of ribs 16 radially extending from opposite sides of the pedestal 10 and post tensioning elements extending axially and diagonally from anchors placed at the distal ends of the ribs 16 through the pedestal 10,
        such that the ribs 16 and the perimeter beams 190 function as a prestressed trussed diaphragm structure with infill panels, and pairs of ribs 16 on distal ends of the pedestal 10 function continuous post-tensioned girder, that is free of construction joints, with continuous composite action from the slab 20 and the foundation 100 is kept under eccentric multi-axial horizontal and concentric vertical post-compression, and circumferential post-tensioning in the slab 20 effectively reduces stress amplitudes and deflections in the slab 20 by keeping the slab 20 under heavy post-compression in the direction of primary slab spans which is roughly perpendicular to the ribs 16.
  • In a preferred embodiment, the rib extends vertically from the bottom of the foundation to an elevation near the bottom of the tower base flange 301 to enable the ribs 16 to participate in resisting bearing loads under the tower base flange by increasing the area of the cross-section involved in bearing resistance under the tower base flange 301 and increasing the permissible bearing strength under the base flange or the grout bed by increasing the bearing area measured at the surrounding faces of the concrete. The geometric configuration and the improvement in bearing resistance, in this invention, allow the engineer to specify concrete with only one relatively low compressive-strength for the entire foundation structure. In contrast, high bearing stresses under the tower base flange 301 in conventional gravity spread footings, force the engineer to specify concrete with higher compressive strength for the pedestal and a lower compressive strength for the base.
  • The proximity of inner rib ends to the tower base flange 301 allows the inner zones of the ribs 16 to remain under vertical compression stresses caused by vertical post-tensioning forces between embedment ring 54 and tower base flange 301. The said vertical compression stress zones improves confinement conditions and fatigue resistance in rib inner zones.
  • Bonded and grouted multi-strand system was found to be expensive and lengthy and requires an additional step of grouting and may not be economical for some onshore installations. It is preferable to use un-bonded, encapsulated mono-strands, arranged in bundles and installed in the foundation reinforcing prior to concrete casting, which would reduce construction costs and improve construction schedule.
  • In a preferred embodiment post-tensioning in the foundation 100 is made eccentric, to create cambers in the foundation 100 that could result in reduced deflections and improved foundation-soil contact. As an example, the eccentric prestressing of the ribs 16 creates a convex shaped camber in the foundation 100 that helps reduce the deflections under turbine weight and operating loads. Similarly cambers can be used in perimeter beams 190 and slab sections to reduce slab deflections and improve foundation-soil contact conditions by ensuring a more uniform bearing pressure under the foundation.
  • The vertical profile (elevation) of circumferential tendons in the foundation 100 may be adjusted at mid spans and under supporting ribs 16 to optimize their utilization.
  • In another embodiment gradual transition of geometry at the conjunction of the structural elements is employed to prevent stress concentration and fatigue related problems. As an example the use of fillets and curved transition is desirable at the conjunctions between ribs 16, pedestal 10 and the slab 20.
  • In a preferred embodiment, as shown on FIG. X, the inner ends of the ribs 16 are tapered to become wider as the rib connects to the pedestal, in order to satisfy the high flexural, torsional and shear demands at the inner zone of the ribs 16, and to distribute the multi-axial compression over large surface area to help reduce splitting and bursting reinforcing at the sides of the pedestal 10.
  • In another embodiment low relaxation post-tensioning strands are used to reduce post tension losses over time. Concrete accelerators and plasticizers and otter admixtures may be utilized in the concrete mix design. The small thickness of the structural elements may allow for on-site steam curing of concrete.
  • A hollow pedestal 10 cross-section may be used, however it can be problematic. Hollow pedestal above the frost depth where there is elevated water table is problematic. Hollow pedestal results in reduced stiffness, stress discontinuity, indirect load transfer and stress concentration with local deformation in the shell resulting in poor performance under heavy flexural and torsional loads from the cantilevered rib, as well as additional problems stemming from stresses caused by frost forming and freezing of ground water in the foundation.
  • In another embodiment the cross-section of the rib may change and dimensions along its length may change. For example, the section may start rectangular and gradually a top flange may be enlarged to reduce stresses in the upper zone of the rib.
  • In another embodiment the pedestal 10 may have an enlarged cross-section at the top followed by a transition into a smaller cross-section below. The upper enlarged cross-section may help with improve bearing strength at the top of the pedestal below tower base flange 301, or bearing washer plate, and the high strength grout bed according to American Concrete Institute design guidelines.
  • The present invention pertains to a foundation design that overcomes the thermal cracking problem stemming from heat of hydration, in large foundation pours for large multi-megawatt rated turbines, by using a structural configuration coupled with post-tensioning techniques that reduce the thickness of the structural elements, while increasing the surface area of concrete pours, thus improving heat dissipation conditions and causing a the ratio of concrete mass to surface area to be roughly 40% to 50% less than in conventional design for foundations for the same turbine under the same loading and geotechnical conditions.
  • The present invention uses a tower base leveling and grouting method without using tower anchor bolts for leveling, or having to use leveling shims which cause undesirable stress concentration at shim locations which could lead to localized fatigue failure at shim locations. This task is achieved by providing the bolt template at the very top of the bolt assembly with at least three sets of additional bolts and corresponding threaded bolt inserts suitable for embedment into concrete. The said leveling bolts 53 and inserts 53 b are be located outside or inside the bolt circle of tower base, but directly under tower base flange. This allows for continuity of grout bed construction and provides an easy access for leveling bolts 53. Small cutouts at leveling bolt locations connected can be used. Another benefit of this leveling technique is having the ability to apply grout a continuous grout bed that is free of construction joints, under tower base 301 in one session and to also have the ability to tension all anchor bolts in one session.
  • The present invention improves safety and accessibility around foundations during construction, and reduces hazardous conditions for construction crew. That goal is achieved by using reusable form sections that are fitted with platform sections for forming a access platforms around the foundation, and connect to at least one access ramp extending beyond the edge of the foundation. The platform and the ramp are fitted with slip-resistant walking surface and elevated ramps all provided with guardrails and designed to applicable industry safety standards. The relatively thin slab thickness minimizes the risk of worker injury during construction.
  • Transformer pad can be supported on precast concrete posts extending vertically from the foundation.
  • Pedestal forms 102 will have openings for running electrical and communication conduits thus preventing problems stemming from randomly placing the conduits in areas that could compromise the structural design.
  • The ribs 16 may have means for receiving and supporting prefabricated trays (or electrical duct banks) for housing power and communication cables.
  • This foundation design can also be adapted for offshore wind turbine projects. In this case the foundation 100 may be assembled on a barge or dry dock then transported or floated to its destination, then lowered into a prepared seabed location. The foundation can be weighed down in place by backfilling it with suitable material. The offshore foundation 100 may be configured to receive any type of offshore piers 404, suction piers 403, piles 400, micro-piles 401, anchors 404 or any combination of the above.
  • The invention relates to an offshore concrete foundation 100 with high stiffness and improved fatigue resistant comprising:
      • 1. a support slab-on-grade 20 of non-segmented continuous construction covering the entire footprint of the foundation and having (horizontal) diametric and perimeter post-tensioning elements,
      • 2. a central pedestal 10 integral with the support slab-on-grade 20 of solid non-segmented construction and having vertical post-tensioning elements and also having reinforcing elements of rebar to carry loads diametrically across the pedestal 10;
      • 3. a cylindrical or conical stem 11 extending vertically above the pedestal 10 and being fixed to the pedestal 10, and having a hollow cross section, of equal size or smaller than that of the pedestal 10, and may be constructed with segmented or non-segmented construction methods and could be made with typical cast in place over the pedestal 10 by using typical construction methods for tall cylindrical concrete structures such as continuous forming, successive pours, segmental construction with precast concrete panels or other known construction methods used conventionally for cylindrical concrete structures such as chimneys, and the stem 11 is kept under heavy concentric vertical post-compression stress by an array of circumferentially arranged vertical post-tensioning elements, and the stem 11 may have an ice cone 11 b integral with the top of stem 11, and the stem 11 having means for fixing a tower base 301 of a wind tower 300, the stem 11 and the ice cone 11 b are vertically and circumferentially prestressed with vertical and circumferential post tensioning elements,
      • 4. ribs 16 integral with the support slab 20 and the central pedestal 10, on top of the slab-on-grade, with pairs of ribs 16 radially extending from opposite sides of the pedestal 10 with post-tensioning elements extending radially and diagonally from the distal ends of the ribs 16 through the pedestal 10 and keeping the ribs 16 and the pedestal 10 under heavy eccentric post compression stress and reinforcing dowels extending from the ribs 16 into the pedestal 10 and spliced with pedestal 10 reinforcing,
      • 5. deep perimeter beams 190 extending continuously around the foundation, made of concrete integral with the support slab-on-grade 20 and the ribs 16 and having continuous perimeter or circumferential post tensioning elements,
        When the concrete sets, the said post-tensioning elements are jacked and the anchor bolts are post-tensioned the foundation is kept under heavy multi-axial post-compression.
  • The offshore foundation 100 is constructed on a barge or in a dry dock and then floated or transported to an offshore installation site and lowered to be places over a prepared sea bed, a suitable backfill material 13 placed over the foundation 100 to stabilize the foundation against overturning. Scour protection measures 13 b are provided around the foundation. The foundation is built with marine cement and marine grout and is kept under heavy multi-axial horizontal and vertical pre-stress using bonded and grouted post tensioning systems rated for double corrosion protection and suitable for marine environment.
  • An offshore foundation for wind turbines comprising the following elements:
      • 1. A vertically extending pedestal that is cast in situ, on a barge, out of concrete, the pedestal has an integral long stem 11 for receiving and supporting a tower structure;
      • 2. A substantially horizontal support slab 20 that is cast in situ, on a barge, out of concrete, the support slab 20 covering an area of ground larger than that covered by the pedestal 10;
      • 3. A plurality of radial ribs 16 extending radially outwardly from the pedestal 10 and spaced around the pedestal 10, each rib being prefabricated and being joined along the base thereof to the support slab 20 when the support slab 20 is cast in situ and being joined along an inner side thereof to the pedestal 10 when the pedestal 10 is cast in situ;
      • 4. A plurality of prefabricated perimeter beams 190 spanning continuously, near the perimeter of the foundation, between ribs 16 and supporting the slab 20;
      • 5. Backfill 13 for weighing down the foundation, resisting tower loads and providing scour protection 13 b.
        when the concrete sets, the precast components will become integral with a cast-in-place components. Radial post-tensioning tendons extend from rib ends opposite rib ends across the pedestal 10. Vertical post-tensioning is arranged in the pedestal 10 as well. The stem 11 and the ice cone 11 b may also benefit from circumferential post-tensioning.
  • The pedestal 10 has means for receiving and supporting a tower 300 or pylon. The upper portion of the pedestal 10 (the stem 11) may be made in multiple consecutive cast in situ pours, depending on its height. Alternatively, the stem 11 may also be made by joining precast segments with circumferential and vertical post-tensioning to form the stem 11.
  • In another embodiment of the invention, a wind turbine is fabricated on a barge with precast concrete element as following. The barge surface is prepare with a non bonding agent or a thin membrane at the foot print where the foundation to be built. Lower slab reinforcing mesh sections are assembled and placed and the pedestal cage reinforcing is assembled at the center of the foundation. Upper slab reinforcing mesh sections may follow after slab post tension duct is placed. Precast concrete ribs 16 are placed in a radial array around the pedestal cage and precast concrete perimeter beams 190 are arranged around the perimeter of the foundation. Post tensioning ducts in the pedestal space and at perimeter beam-to-rib connections are placed to pair with corresponding duct in the precast members. Forms for pedestal and for closure pours at rib-to-perimeter beam connections are installed. Slab concrete is poured followed by pedestal 10 concrete and closure pours at rib-to-pedestal connections. Stem 11 is fabricated possibly in multiple consecutive pours depending on pedestal height. Stem 11 design may incorporate an ice cone 11 b at its top. Post tensioning tendons are installed, the jacking and grouting of tendons is carried out. Some pylon sections could be installed earlier prior to transportation. The finished foundation 100 is transported to its offshore installation site using a suitable means of transportation such as towing the barge.
  • In another embodiment of the invention relates to an offshore foundation for wind turbines comprising the following elements:
      • 1. A vertically extending pedestal 10 that is cast in situ, on a barge or dry dock, out of concrete;
      • 2. A substantially horizontal support slab 20 that is cast in situ, on a barge or dry dock, out of concrete, the support slab 20 covering an area of ground larger than that covered by the pedestal 10;
      • 3. A plurality of radial ribs 16 extending radially outwardly from the pedestal 10 and spaced around the pedestal 10, each rib being prefabricated and being joined along the base thereof to the support slab when the support slab 20 is cast in situ and being joined along an inner side thereof to the pedestal 10 when the pedestal is cast in situ, each rib has an integral pier for receiving a leg of lattice lower;
      • 4. A plurality of perimeter beams 190 spanning continuously, near the perimeter of the foundation, between ribs 16 and supporting the slab 20, optionally each perimeter beam can be prefabricated;
      • 5. A lattice tower 200 having a plurality of legs structurally connected to the integral piers 180 in the ribs 16, the lattice tower 200 has, at its top, means for receiving and structurally supporting a pylon or a tower 300;
      • 6. Suitable offshore backfill 13 for weighing down the foundation, resisting tower loads and providing scour protection 13 b.
  • When the concrete sets, the pre-cast components will become integral with a cast-in-place components. Radial post-tensioning tendons extend from rib ends opposite rib ends across the pedestal 10. Vertical post-tensioning is arranged in the pedestal 10 as well. The structural behavior is improved by the added compression in all ribs 16, edge beams, slab 20 and center pedestal.
  • The lattice tower 200, preferably incorporating 3-dimentional trusses, transfers the pylon loads down to the concrete foundation 100. The lattice tower 200 may get connected to the concrete foundation prior to transportation or it can be connected to the foundation at final offshore installation site.
  • In another embodiment of the invention, a wind turbine is fabricated on a barge with precast concrete element as following. The barge surface is coated with a non-bonding agent or covered with a thin membrane at the foot print where the foundation to be built. Lower slab reinforcing mesh sections are assembled and placed and the pedestal cage reinforcing is assembled at the center of the foundation. Upper slab reinforcing mesh sections may follow after slab post tension duct is placed. Precast concrete ribs 16 are placed in a radial array around the pedestal cage and precast concrete perimeter beams 190 are arranged around the perimeter of the foundation. Post tensioning ducts in the pedestal space and at perimeter beam-to-rib connections are placed to pair with corresponding duct in the precast members. Forms for pedestal and for closure pours at rib-to-perimeter beam connections are installed. Slab concrete is poured followed by pedestal concrete and closure pours at rib-to-pedestal connections. A lattice tower 200 structure is prefabricated and mounted atop the concrete foundation 100. The foundation is transported to installation site using a suitable means of transportation. Seabed is prepared for receiving the foundation by placing a sub-base of suitable material such as crushed stone. The foundation is backfilled and scour protection measures 13 b are installed.
  • In another embodiment of the invention, the stem 11 is prefabricated separately and provided with means for connecting to the pedestal 10, preferably an array vertical post tensioning dowels extended between the pedestal and the stem or other segmental post tensioning joining methods. The pedestal may be fitted with means for receiving the prefabricated stem based on segmental post tensioning and grouting construction methods.
  • Piles 400, Micro-piles 401 or piers 402 or suction piers 403 or anchors 404 can be used with the offshore foundation 100 in a similar manner describe in the application. In this case vertical sleeves will be arranged in the foundation to receive an array of piles 400 or anchors extending through the foundation, and allow for additional loading capacity and improve stability of foundation. Piles 400 are secured to the foundation by filling the sleeves with marine grout.
  • Under some conditions, the use of piles 400, piers or suction piers or anchors may eliminate the slab 20 and/or the perimeter beams 190 from the design.
  • Obviously, many modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that, within the scope of the invention.

Claims (17)

1. A foundation comprising:
a concrete support slab having horizontal rebar therein,
a concrete pedestal integral with the support slab having vertical rebar therein,
a plurality of concrete ribs on top of and integral with the support slab and integral with the pedestal, the ribs being radial to pedestal, and having connection elements extending from the ribs into the pedestal and from the ribs into the slab,
post tensioning elements extending from the distal end of the ribs through the pedestal and,
a perimeter beam in the slab having a post tensioning element therein.
2. A foundation as in claim 1 wherein,
the ribs positioned in pairs on opposite sides of the pedestal and having the tension elements extending from the distal ends of the ribs through the pedestal.
3. A foundation as in claim 2 wherein,
the post tensioning elements in the ribs are eccentrically arrayed for eccentric loading.
4. A fatigue resistant foundation comprising:
a horizontally prestressed concrete slab having a structurally continuous horizontal rebar grid for reinforcing the slab and a plurality of horizontal post tensioning elements therein for prestressing the slab, and a perimeter beam proximate the perimeter of the slab,
a vertically extending central concrete pedestal having a plurality of vertical post tensioning elements, the pedestal integrally connected to the slab,
a plurality of reinforced concrete ribs on top of and integrally connected to the slab with structural continuity between the rib and the slab, the ribs integrally connected to the pedestal, with structural continuity between the rib and the pedestal,
at least one post tensioning element running through each rib and the pedestal for providing post tensioning stress in the ribs and pedestal and for connecting the ribs to the pedestal under post compression stress,
such that the pedestal, slab and the ribs are connected to each other to form a monolithic foundation with a three dimensional network of post tensioning elements in the slab, pedestal and ribs keeping the foundation under multi-axial compression while resisting operating loads, and during normal and abnormal extreme loads, thus linking the slab and the ribs to the pedestal under vertical, and horizontally eccentric post compression stress, with reduced multi-axial stress range amplitudes in the concrete and steel reinforcing.
5. A foundation as in claim 4 wherein,
the perimeter beam comprises a thickened perimeter slab portion.
6. A foundation as in claim 5 wherein,
the thickened perimeter slab portion comprises a plurality of slab perimeter reinforcing cages, each cage having a plurality of continuous horizontal bars housed in an array of vertical stirrups extending between the horizontal bars for reinforcing the perimeter slab portion and having a perimeter post tensioning element extending through the plurality of perimeter reinforcing cages to further post tension the perimeter slab portion.
7. A foundation as in claim 4 wherein,
the pedestal has a vertical inner reinforcing cage and an outer reinforcing cage with the plurality of vertical post tensioning elements therebetween, the pedestal also having a horizontal bottom reinforcing mesh, and a horizontal top reinforcing mesh, with an array of vertical reinforcing hairpin bars extending therebetween for reinforcing the core of the pedestal.
8. A foundation as in claim 4 wherein,
the pedestal has pairs of ribs on opposing sides of thereof and post tensioning elements extending from the distal ends of the ribs though the pedestal to hold the ribs to the pedestal under post compression stress.
9. A foundation as in claim 7 wherein,
the pedestal has a vertical inner reinforcing cage and an outer reinforcing cage with the plurality of vertical post tensioning elements therebetween, the pedestal also having a horizontal bottom reinforcing mesh, and a horizontal top reinforcing mesh, with an array of vertical reinforcing hairpin bars extending therebetween for reinforcing the core of the pedestal.
10. A foundation as in claim 9 wherein,
the pedestal has pairs of ribs on opposing sides of thereof and post tensioning elements extending from the distal ends of the ribs though the pedestal to hold the ribs to the pedestal under post compression stress.
11. A foundation as in claim 4 wherein,
the ribs are cantilevered and have a neutral axis, and the post tension elements in the perimeter beam and in the ribs and through the pedestal are spaced relative to the neutral axis of the cantilevered ribs to provide a three dimensional post compression load pattern in the foundation to counter influence the multi-stage and multi-axial fatigue loading of the forces of a wind tower supported thereon when the post tensioning elements are tensioned to the desired stresses.
12. A foundation as in claim 4 wherein,
the ribs have a neutral axis and the post tension elements in the perimeter beam, in the ribs and through the pedestal are spaced relative to the central axis of the ribs to provide a camber pattern in the foundation to counter the deformation due to the dead loads on the foundation from self weight, soil weight and the weight of a wind tower supported thereon when the post tensioning elements are tensioned to the desired stresses.
13. A foundation as in claim 4 wherein,
the ribs are cantilevered and have a neutral axis such that when perimeter post tensioning elements in the slab are tensioned at an elevation below the neutral axis of the cantilevered ribs it causes an eccentric loading of the cantilevered ribs and the pedestal to satisfy the governing load case of ribs under downwind loading during extreme normal and abnormal load cases when the post tensioning elements are tensioned to the desired stresses.
14. A foundation as in claim 4 wherein,
the pedestal is laterally confided by the ribs and the vertical post tensioning elements in the pedestal, and the pedestal further comprises a plurality of bond-protected anchor bolts extending vertically from an embedment ring near the bottom of the pedestal through the top of the pedestal for securing a base flange of a tower in full contact under compression for providing vertical post compression stress in the foundation when the anchor bolts are tensioned.
15. A foundation as in claim 4 wherein,
a backfilling material placed over the foundation adds stability and stiffness to the foundation.
16. A foundation as in claim 4 wherein,
the size, distribution, eccentricity and location of post tensioning elements in the ribs and the slab are selected to dictate the natural frequencies in the foundation for a desired safety range selected for the operating frequencies of the wind tower and generator supported on the pedestal.
17. A foundation as in claim 4 wherein,
the ribs are prefabricated.
US12/774,727 2006-09-21 2010-05-06 Fatigue reistant foundation system Abandoned US20110061321A1 (en)

Priority Applications (17)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/774,727 US20110061321A1 (en) 2006-09-21 2010-05-06 Fatigue reistant foundation system
DK10781394.1T DK2427603T3 (en) 2009-12-28 2010-07-05 Exhaustion-resistant foundation
PCT/US2010/041006 WO2010138978A2 (en) 2009-05-05 2010-07-05 Fatigue resistant foundation
US13/319,083 US8661752B2 (en) 2006-09-21 2010-07-05 Foundation with slab, pedestal and ribs for columns and towers
EP10781394.1A EP2427603B1 (en) 2009-05-05 2010-07-05 Fatigue resistant foundation
US14/176,160 US9096985B1 (en) 2006-09-21 2014-02-10 Foundation with slab, pedestal and ribs for columns and towers
US14/748,241 US9347197B2 (en) 2006-09-21 2015-06-24 Foundation with slab, pedestal and ribs for columns and towers
US15/137,157 US9534405B1 (en) 2006-09-21 2016-04-25 Method of constructing a wind tower foundation
US15/530,081 US9937635B2 (en) 2006-09-21 2016-12-01 Method of constructing a wind tower foundation
US15/916,724 US10648187B2 (en) 2006-09-21 2018-03-09 Foundation with pedestal and ribs for towers
US16/191,781 US10975586B2 (en) 2006-09-21 2018-11-15 Foundation with pedestal and ribs for towers
US16/407,692 US10640995B2 (en) 2006-09-21 2019-05-09 Method of constructing a wind tower foundation with pedestal and ribs
US16/516,362 US10513833B2 (en) 2006-09-21 2019-07-19 Foundation with pedestal and ribs for towers
US16/677,607 US10947747B2 (en) 2006-09-21 2019-11-07 Foundation with pedestal and ribs for towers
US16/864,685 US11072934B2 (en) 2006-09-21 2020-05-01 Foundation with pedestal and ribs for towers
US17/338,049 US11939736B2 (en) 2006-09-21 2021-06-03 Foundation with pedestal and ribs for towers
US18/447,894 US20240018736A1 (en) 2006-09-21 2023-08-10 Foundation with pedestal and ribs for towers

Applications Claiming Priority (7)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US82645206P 2006-09-21 2006-09-21
US95450207P 2007-08-07 2007-08-07
US11/859,588 US20080072511A1 (en) 2006-09-21 2007-09-21 Partially prefabricated modular foundation system
US26980009P 2009-06-29 2009-06-29
US28490109P 2009-12-28 2009-12-28
US33955010P 2010-03-05 2010-03-05
US12/774,727 US20110061321A1 (en) 2006-09-21 2010-05-06 Fatigue reistant foundation system

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/859,588 Continuation-In-Part US20080072511A1 (en) 2006-09-21 2007-09-21 Partially prefabricated modular foundation system

Related Child Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/319,083 Continuation-In-Part US8661752B2 (en) 2006-09-21 2010-07-05 Foundation with slab, pedestal and ribs for columns and towers
PCT/US2010/041006 Continuation-In-Part WO2010138978A2 (en) 2006-09-21 2010-07-05 Fatigue resistant foundation
US201113319083A Continuation-In-Part 2006-09-21 2011-11-05

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20110061321A1 true US20110061321A1 (en) 2011-03-17

Family

ID=43729103

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/774,727 Abandoned US20110061321A1 (en) 2006-09-21 2010-05-06 Fatigue reistant foundation system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US20110061321A1 (en)

Cited By (93)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100319271A1 (en) * 2009-06-18 2010-12-23 Majid Sarraf Ductile Seismic Shear Key
US20110044768A1 (en) * 2009-08-18 2011-02-24 Crux Subsurface, Inc. Batter Angled Flange Composite Cap
US20120012727A1 (en) * 2009-03-19 2012-01-19 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Tubular Telecom Tower Structure
US20120023860A1 (en) * 2011-05-25 2012-02-02 General Electric Company Adapter Configuration for a Wind Tower Lattice Structure
US20120167499A1 (en) * 2009-09-11 2012-07-05 Artepref, S.A.U. Foundation for a Wind Turbine Tower
ES2388161A1 (en) * 2012-06-06 2012-10-09 Sektor Ingeniería, Sll Ribbed foundation of superstructures and procedure of realization of the foundations (Machine-translation by Google Translate, not legally binding)
CN102733641A (en) * 2012-07-04 2012-10-17 广东明阳风电产业集团有限公司 Tower drum foundation ring of wind driven generator
US8375678B1 (en) * 2009-09-28 2013-02-19 Felix E. Ferrer Methods for construction of pre-fabricated modular reinforcement cages for concrete structures
CN103030071A (en) * 2012-12-17 2013-04-10 葫芦岛市圣德信轻型起重设备有限公司 Method of material selection and surface anticorrosive treatment of wind power hoisting machine
CN103047183A (en) * 2011-10-12 2013-04-17 霍尼韦尔国际公司 Variable thickness and variable radius structural rib support for scrolls and torus
US20130183102A1 (en) * 2010-10-01 2013-07-18 Kvaemer Engineering AS Slip formed concrete structure
CN103215967A (en) * 2013-05-15 2013-07-24 北京中水恒信环境科技发展有限公司 Prestress reverse ribbed plate and manufacturing method thereof
WO2013113873A2 (en) 2012-02-03 2013-08-08 V & M Deutschland Gmbh Foundation structure of an offshore plant, in particular an offshore wind turbine, which foundation structure is to be installed at a low noise level, and installation method therefor
WO2013144558A1 (en) * 2012-03-24 2013-10-03 Matthew Bleasdale Structures for offshore installations
ES2427431A1 (en) * 2013-04-15 2013-10-30 Iconkrete 2012, S.L. Foundation system for solar thermal and photovoltaic plants and procedure for its execution (Machine-translation by Google Translate, not legally binding)
WO2013182728A1 (en) * 2012-06-06 2013-12-12 Gestamp Hybrid Towers, S.L. Ribbed foundation for superstructures and method for producing the foundation
CN103967045A (en) * 2014-05-12 2014-08-06 中国水电顾问集团西北勘测设计研究院有限公司 Overland four-blade type whole rebar structure of draught fan spread foundation
CN103967046A (en) * 2014-05-12 2014-08-06 中国水电顾问集团西北勘测设计研究院有限公司 Overland four-blade type middle portion rebar structure of draught fan spread foundation
US8833004B2 (en) * 2010-10-08 2014-09-16 Timbertower, GmbH Foundation for a wind turbine
US20140290161A1 (en) * 2013-03-29 2014-10-02 Tindall Corporation Core component and tower assembly for a tower structure
US20140345218A1 (en) * 2011-08-30 2014-11-27 Vestas Wind Systems A/S Transition structure for a wind turbine tower
US20140345209A1 (en) * 2011-12-16 2014-11-27 Blg Logistics Solutions Gmbh & Co. Kg Support for offshore foundation structures, particularly tripods
US20150075099A1 (en) * 2013-08-08 2015-03-19 University Of Utah Research Foundation Elongate member reinforcement
US9015999B1 (en) * 2013-12-02 2015-04-28 Abel Echemendia Tower with exterior cable support and a modular base
US20160025074A1 (en) * 2013-03-13 2016-01-28 Toda Corporation Floating offshore wind power generation facility
CN105473792A (en) * 2013-08-19 2016-04-06 乌本产权有限公司 Wind turbine foundation and wind turbine
US9428877B2 (en) * 2013-05-10 2016-08-30 Are Telecom Incorporated Modular monopole tower foundation
US9499954B2 (en) * 2015-02-10 2016-11-22 Ambor Structures, Inc. Tower support structure
US20170030096A1 (en) * 2013-08-08 2017-02-02 University Of Utah Research Foundation Elongate member reinforcement with a studded collar
KR20170015347A (en) * 2014-06-06 2017-02-08 에스테이코 에스.에이.피. Foundations system for towers and method for installing the foundations system for towers
US9587363B2 (en) * 2011-11-07 2017-03-07 Oscar PEDRAZA Stationary, pre-fabricated anchor having an anchor block and an anchor rod
US9617704B2 (en) 2014-05-27 2017-04-11 One Energy Enterprises Llc Reinforcement assemblies, fixtures, and methods
US20170183840A1 (en) * 2015-12-23 2017-06-29 649119 N.B. Inc. Pre-cast concrete foundation of modular construction for telecommunication or wind turbine tower
US20170233975A1 (en) * 2014-10-07 2017-08-17 Allan P. Henderson Retrofit reinforcing structure addition and method for wind turbine concrete gravity spread foundations and the like
WO2017141095A1 (en) * 2016-02-18 2017-08-24 Holcim Technology Ltd Foundation for a wind mill
US9828739B2 (en) 2015-11-04 2017-11-28 Crux Subsurface, Inc. In-line battered composite foundations
US9869300B2 (en) * 2014-01-16 2018-01-16 Pacadar S.A.U. Foundation for wind turbine tower and pre-assembly method of wind turbine tower
WO2018055446A1 (en) * 2016-09-26 2018-03-29 Holcim Technology Ltd Foundation for a windmill
WO2018055444A1 (en) * 2016-09-26 2018-03-29 Holcim Technology Ltd Foundation for a wind turbine
US9937643B2 (en) 2011-09-16 2018-04-10 Goss Construction, Inc. Concrete forming systems and methods
CN107923136A (en) * 2015-07-15 2018-04-17 鲁特基础系统公司 Beam and stake anchoring base for pylon
ES2673105A1 (en) * 2016-12-19 2018-06-19 Gamesa Innovation & Technology, S.L. Method of construction of the foundation of a tower (Machine-translation by Google Translate, not legally binding)
US10054107B2 (en) * 2016-06-06 2018-08-21 Bowie State University Omni-directional shaftless wind turbine
US10081964B2 (en) * 2016-02-02 2018-09-25 Dywidag Sistemas Constructivos, S.A. Wind tower connection system
CN108699796A (en) * 2016-02-18 2018-10-23 霍尔辛姆科技有限公司 Pedestal for wind energy conversion system
US20180327995A1 (en) * 2017-05-15 2018-11-15 Glen Raven, Inc. Reinforcement unit and methods for creating a footing for supporting a structure
CN109395436A (en) * 2018-11-30 2019-03-01 中国冶集团有限公司 Major diameter inverted cone pond groove bottom taper degree control device and control method
CN109519334A (en) * 2018-12-14 2019-03-26 福建福船帆新能源装备制造有限公司 A kind of high stability tower barrel base ring of uniform force
US10260480B2 (en) * 2015-02-27 2019-04-16 Wobben Properties Gmbh Wind power plant foundation and wind power plant
US20190119875A1 (en) * 2017-10-25 2019-04-25 Rute Foundation Systems, Inc. Tower foundation with concrete box girder beams
US10344738B2 (en) 2013-08-28 2019-07-09 Wobben Properties Gmbh Rotor blade element for a wind turbine, rotor blade, and a production process therefor and wind turbine with rotor blade
CN110158633A (en) * 2019-05-13 2019-08-23 明阳智慧能源集团股份公司 A kind of prefabricated pier plate girder type basis of lattice concrete air pylon
CN110158627A (en) * 2019-04-30 2019-08-23 国网浙江省电力有限公司金华供电公司 A kind of basis in prefabricated transformer substation power distribution unit building and construction method
CN110285023A (en) * 2019-06-11 2019-09-27 同济大学建筑设计研究院(集团)有限公司 Assembled wind driven generator base and its manufacturing method
CN110397064A (en) * 2019-06-28 2019-11-01 天津大学 A combined ring-tube jacket foundation structure and its construction method
CN110607802A (en) * 2019-08-22 2019-12-24 上海勘测设计研究院有限公司 Connecting tool for single-column and composite-cylinder combined foundation
WO2019201714A3 (en) * 2018-04-16 2020-03-19 Universelle-Fertigteil-Fundamente GmbH Foundation for a wind turbine
US10626573B2 (en) 2013-06-21 2020-04-21 Wobben Properties Gmbh Wind turbine and wind turbine foundation
US10634122B1 (en) * 2019-02-08 2020-04-28 Are Telecom Incorporated Portable monopole tower with adjustable foundation
CN111339625A (en) * 2018-12-19 2020-06-26 北京天润新能投资有限公司 Method, device and system for constructing foundation model of wind generating set
US10738436B1 (en) * 2019-02-15 2020-08-11 Montana Systems Inc. Tubular foundation for onshore wind turbine generators
WO2020174334A1 (en) * 2019-02-28 2020-09-03 Holcim Technology Ltd Foundation for a wind turbine
US10851763B2 (en) 2018-10-04 2020-12-01 Tetra Tech, Inc. Wind turbine foundation and method of constructing a wind turbine foundation
US10851513B1 (en) * 2019-07-01 2020-12-01 Tianjin University Combined offshore wind power foundation with duct piles and a bucket
CN112112769A (en) * 2020-10-30 2020-12-22 广州容柏生建筑工程设计咨询有限公司 A prefabricated wind power tower with wing walls
JP2020204378A (en) * 2019-06-18 2020-12-24 株式会社長谷工コーポレーション Anchor plate
USD910209S1 (en) 2017-08-24 2021-02-09 Glen Raven, Inc. Support footing
CN112483327A (en) * 2020-12-04 2021-03-12 合肥通博电源科技有限公司 Wind power generation mounting base based on anticorrosion structure and mounting process thereof
CN113195835A (en) * 2018-12-03 2021-07-30 Hws混凝土塔有限公司 Foundation element for a wind turbine tower
US11225786B2 (en) * 2020-01-14 2022-01-18 Southwest Jiaotong University Dry process connected energy-consuming beam column joint based on corbel
CN114102065A (en) * 2021-12-07 2022-03-01 南通振华重型装备制造有限公司 Method for mounting suction barrel cover
CN114151286A (en) * 2021-11-05 2022-03-08 上海风领新能源有限公司 Buttress wall wind power tower cylinder
WO2022109616A1 (en) * 2020-11-20 2022-05-27 Kevin Neprud Floating foundation
US20220170229A1 (en) * 2019-03-13 2022-06-02 Cte Wind Civil Engineering Groundworks method for a foundation for an onshore wind turbine
CN114718109A (en) * 2022-03-15 2022-07-08 山东送变电工程有限公司 Rock foundation structure suitable for power transmission line construction
CN114770709A (en) * 2022-04-02 2022-07-22 华能陇东能源有限责任公司 Wind power foundation prefabricated part die
WO2022187427A1 (en) 2021-03-03 2022-09-09 Stroyer Benjamin G Wind turbine base
US20220298820A1 (en) * 2019-06-21 2022-09-22 Vestas Wind Systems A/S Improvements relating to reinforcement of wind turbine towers
US20220325493A1 (en) * 2019-07-04 2022-10-13 Vestas Wind Systems A/S Method of forming a wind turbine foundation
CN115230247A (en) * 2022-08-17 2022-10-25 沈阳工业大学 A multi-zone high-strength and tough bionic impact-resistant composite structure
CN115492152A (en) * 2022-10-10 2022-12-20 中国船舶重工集团海装风电股份有限公司 A wind turbine assembly foundation and grouting assembly construction method
CN115929559A (en) * 2023-01-17 2023-04-07 广州容柏生建筑工程设计咨询有限公司 A cable-stayed cable-stayed self-balancing wind power tower outside the tube and its construction method
CN115961601A (en) * 2022-12-13 2023-04-14 中交第一航务工程局有限公司 Integrated construction platform for cylinder-based steel frame
CN115977137A (en) * 2022-12-20 2023-04-18 重庆大学 Assembled foundation suitable for mountain wind lattice structure tower and its assembly method
CN117027041A (en) * 2023-07-19 2023-11-10 华能陕西靖边电力有限公司 Wind turbine foundation and wind turbine generator set
CN117345541A (en) * 2022-06-29 2024-01-05 金风科技股份有限公司 Anchor assembly structures, tower sections and wind turbines
US20240123519A1 (en) * 2022-10-18 2024-04-18 Robert Schaffer Drilling Jig Assembly
US20240218680A1 (en) * 2022-12-29 2024-07-04 UnWired, LLC Bracing apparatus, system, and method for installation of sub-surface utility anchors
US20240392750A1 (en) * 2021-09-29 2024-11-28 Ingecid, S.L. Method for constructing a ribbed foundation for wind turbines and ribbed foundation obtained
EP4301980A4 (en) * 2021-03-03 2025-01-29 Stroyer, Benjamin, G. WIND TURBINE BASE
CN120006762A (en) * 2025-03-12 2025-05-16 中广核新能源安徽有限公司固镇分公司 Onshore wind turbine foundation structure and construction method thereof
US12509843B1 (en) * 2024-10-18 2025-12-30 Northwest Institute Of Eco-Environment And Resources, Cas Transmission line tower base with electrothermal air-blowing anti-frost heave function for permafrost regions
WO2026012556A1 (en) * 2024-07-11 2026-01-15 Vestas Wind Systems A/S Anchor cage for a wind turbine foundation having a coupler for cables and method of making same

Citations (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR1015719A (en) * 1950-03-25 1952-10-20 Base for posts
DE7637601U1 (en) * 1976-12-01 1977-03-31 Stewing, Albert, 4270 Dorsten PREFABRICATED COOKER FOUNDATION
DE3336655A1 (en) * 1983-10-08 1985-04-25 Karl Munte Betonwerke GmbH, 3020 Salzgitter Hole footing
US4911585A (en) * 1988-05-13 1990-03-27 Henri Vidal Wall systems
DE4037438A1 (en) * 1990-11-24 1992-05-27 Bremer Gmbh Portable reinforced concrete foundation for post - is for post and has narrow shaft with baseplate, and basket
WO1999043956A1 (en) * 1998-02-27 1999-09-02 Bonus Energy A/S Method for installation of wind turbines at sea, fundation for wind turbines and use of such foundation
WO2000046452A1 (en) * 1999-02-05 2000-08-10 Northern Technologies, Inc. Support structure for elevating and supporting monopoles and associated equipment
JP2001020849A (en) * 1999-07-09 2001-01-23 Hitachi Zosen Corp Floating wind power generator
EP1074663A1 (en) * 1999-08-06 2001-02-07 Carl Bro as A foundation for supporting a building structure, in particular for the foundation of a tower structure, a wind turbine or the like
DK200000612A (en) * 2000-04-12 2001-09-10 Spaencom As Wind turbine foundation and method for mounting it
JP2002129585A (en) * 2000-10-23 2002-05-09 Hitachi Zosen Corp Basic structure of offshore wind turbines
US6672023B2 (en) * 2000-09-27 2004-01-06 Allan P. Henderson Perimeter weighted foundation for wind turbines and the like
WO2005012651A1 (en) * 2003-07-29 2005-02-10 Strongforce Pty Ltd Reinforced concrete foundations
US20070181767A1 (en) * 2003-05-13 2007-08-09 Aloys Wobben Foundation for a wind energy plant

Patent Citations (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR1015719A (en) * 1950-03-25 1952-10-20 Base for posts
DE7637601U1 (en) * 1976-12-01 1977-03-31 Stewing, Albert, 4270 Dorsten PREFABRICATED COOKER FOUNDATION
DE3336655A1 (en) * 1983-10-08 1985-04-25 Karl Munte Betonwerke GmbH, 3020 Salzgitter Hole footing
US4911585A (en) * 1988-05-13 1990-03-27 Henri Vidal Wall systems
DE4037438A1 (en) * 1990-11-24 1992-05-27 Bremer Gmbh Portable reinforced concrete foundation for post - is for post and has narrow shaft with baseplate, and basket
WO1999043956A1 (en) * 1998-02-27 1999-09-02 Bonus Energy A/S Method for installation of wind turbines at sea, fundation for wind turbines and use of such foundation
WO2000046452A1 (en) * 1999-02-05 2000-08-10 Northern Technologies, Inc. Support structure for elevating and supporting monopoles and associated equipment
JP2001020849A (en) * 1999-07-09 2001-01-23 Hitachi Zosen Corp Floating wind power generator
EP1074663A1 (en) * 1999-08-06 2001-02-07 Carl Bro as A foundation for supporting a building structure, in particular for the foundation of a tower structure, a wind turbine or the like
DK200000612A (en) * 2000-04-12 2001-09-10 Spaencom As Wind turbine foundation and method for mounting it
US6672023B2 (en) * 2000-09-27 2004-01-06 Allan P. Henderson Perimeter weighted foundation for wind turbines and the like
JP2002129585A (en) * 2000-10-23 2002-05-09 Hitachi Zosen Corp Basic structure of offshore wind turbines
US20070181767A1 (en) * 2003-05-13 2007-08-09 Aloys Wobben Foundation for a wind energy plant
WO2005012651A1 (en) * 2003-07-29 2005-02-10 Strongforce Pty Ltd Reinforced concrete foundations

Cited By (170)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20120012727A1 (en) * 2009-03-19 2012-01-19 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Tubular Telecom Tower Structure
US8196368B2 (en) * 2009-06-18 2012-06-12 Majid Sarraf Ductile seismic shear key
US20100319271A1 (en) * 2009-06-18 2010-12-23 Majid Sarraf Ductile Seismic Shear Key
US8511020B2 (en) * 2009-08-18 2013-08-20 Crux Subsurface, Inc. Composite cap
US20110044768A1 (en) * 2009-08-18 2011-02-24 Crux Subsurface, Inc. Batter Angled Flange Composite Cap
US20110042142A1 (en) * 2009-08-18 2011-02-24 Crux Subsurface, Inc. Spindrill
US20110044767A1 (en) * 2009-08-18 2011-02-24 Crux Subsurface, Inc. Composite Cap
US20110044766A1 (en) * 2009-08-18 2011-02-24 Crux Subsurface, Inc. Micropile Foundation Matrix
US9290901B2 (en) 2009-08-18 2016-03-22 Crux Subsurface, Inc. Micropile foundation matrix
US8974150B2 (en) 2009-08-18 2015-03-10 Crux Subsurface, Inc. Micropile foundation matrix
US8631618B2 (en) * 2009-08-18 2014-01-21 Crux Subsurface, Inc. Batter angled flange composite cap
US8602123B2 (en) 2009-08-18 2013-12-10 Crux Subsurface, Inc. Spindrill
US20120167499A1 (en) * 2009-09-11 2012-07-05 Artepref, S.A.U. Foundation for a Wind Turbine Tower
US8695297B2 (en) * 2009-09-11 2014-04-15 Stefano Kniesel Foundation for a wind turbine tower
US8375678B1 (en) * 2009-09-28 2013-02-19 Felix E. Ferrer Methods for construction of pre-fabricated modular reinforcement cages for concrete structures
US8381479B1 (en) * 2009-09-28 2013-02-26 Felix E. Ferrer Pre-fabricated modular reinforcement cages for concrete structures
US20130183102A1 (en) * 2010-10-01 2013-07-18 Kvaemer Engineering AS Slip formed concrete structure
US8833004B2 (en) * 2010-10-08 2014-09-16 Timbertower, GmbH Foundation for a wind turbine
US20120023860A1 (en) * 2011-05-25 2012-02-02 General Electric Company Adapter Configuration for a Wind Tower Lattice Structure
US20140345218A1 (en) * 2011-08-30 2014-11-27 Vestas Wind Systems A/S Transition structure for a wind turbine tower
US9249784B2 (en) * 2011-08-30 2016-02-02 Vestas Wind Systems A/S Transition structure for a wind turbine tower
US9937643B2 (en) 2011-09-16 2018-04-10 Goss Construction, Inc. Concrete forming systems and methods
US11559924B2 (en) 2011-09-16 2023-01-24 Goss Construction, Inc. Concrete forming systems and methods
US10836080B2 (en) 2011-09-16 2020-11-17 Goss Construction, Inc. Concrete forming systems and methods
US10112325B2 (en) 2011-09-16 2018-10-30 Goss Construction, Inc. Concrete forming systems and methods
US10449699B2 (en) 2011-09-16 2019-10-22 Goss Construction, Inc. Concrete forming systems and methods
US20130094953A1 (en) * 2011-10-12 2013-04-18 Honeywell International Inc. Variable thickness and variable radius structural rib support for scrolls and torus
CN103047183A (en) * 2011-10-12 2013-04-17 霍尼韦尔国际公司 Variable thickness and variable radius structural rib support for scrolls and torus
US9587363B2 (en) * 2011-11-07 2017-03-07 Oscar PEDRAZA Stationary, pre-fabricated anchor having an anchor block and an anchor rod
US9290903B2 (en) * 2011-12-16 2016-03-22 Blg Logistics Solutions Gmbh & Co. Kg Support for offshore foundation structures, particularly tripods
US20140345209A1 (en) * 2011-12-16 2014-11-27 Blg Logistics Solutions Gmbh & Co. Kg Support for offshore foundation structures, particularly tripods
WO2013113873A2 (en) 2012-02-03 2013-08-08 V & M Deutschland Gmbh Foundation structure of an offshore plant, in particular an offshore wind turbine, which foundation structure is to be installed at a low noise level, and installation method therefor
US9663916B2 (en) 2012-02-03 2017-05-30 Vallourec Deutschland Gmbh Foundation structure of an offshore plant, in particular an offshore wind turbine, which foundation structure is to be installed at a low noise level, and installation method therefor
WO2013144558A1 (en) * 2012-03-24 2013-10-03 Matthew Bleasdale Structures for offshore installations
US9771700B2 (en) * 2012-03-24 2017-09-26 Owlc Holdings Ltd. Structures for offshore installations
US20150056020A1 (en) * 2012-03-24 2015-02-26 Owlc Holdings Ltd. Structures for offshore installations
CN104321488A (en) * 2012-03-24 2015-01-28 Owlc控股有限公司 Structures for offshore installations
AU2013273463B2 (en) * 2012-06-06 2017-06-15 Iconkrete 2012, S.L. Ribbed foundation for superstructures and method for producing the foundation
ES2388161A1 (en) * 2012-06-06 2012-10-09 Sektor Ingeniería, Sll Ribbed foundation of superstructures and procedure of realization of the foundations (Machine-translation by Google Translate, not legally binding)
CN104603367A (en) * 2012-06-06 2015-05-06 海斯坦普混合塔公司 Ribbed foundation for superstructures and method for producing the foundation
WO2013182728A1 (en) * 2012-06-06 2013-12-12 Gestamp Hybrid Towers, S.L. Ribbed foundation for superstructures and method for producing the foundation
CN102733641A (en) * 2012-07-04 2012-10-17 广东明阳风电产业集团有限公司 Tower drum foundation ring of wind driven generator
CN103030071A (en) * 2012-12-17 2013-04-10 葫芦岛市圣德信轻型起重设备有限公司 Method of material selection and surface anticorrosive treatment of wind power hoisting machine
US20160025074A1 (en) * 2013-03-13 2016-01-28 Toda Corporation Floating offshore wind power generation facility
US9777713B2 (en) * 2013-03-13 2017-10-03 Toda Corporation Floating offshore wind power generation facility
US20140290161A1 (en) * 2013-03-29 2014-10-02 Tindall Corporation Core component and tower assembly for a tower structure
US9175493B2 (en) * 2013-03-29 2015-11-03 Tindall Corporation Core component and tower assembly for a tower structure
ES2427431A1 (en) * 2013-04-15 2013-10-30 Iconkrete 2012, S.L. Foundation system for solar thermal and photovoltaic plants and procedure for its execution (Machine-translation by Google Translate, not legally binding)
US9879441B2 (en) 2013-05-10 2018-01-30 Are Telecom Incorporated Modular monopole tower foundation
US9428877B2 (en) * 2013-05-10 2016-08-30 Are Telecom Incorporated Modular monopole tower foundation
CN103215967A (en) * 2013-05-15 2013-07-24 北京中水恒信环境科技发展有限公司 Prestress reverse ribbed plate and manufacturing method thereof
US10626573B2 (en) 2013-06-21 2020-04-21 Wobben Properties Gmbh Wind turbine and wind turbine foundation
US10227786B2 (en) * 2013-08-08 2019-03-12 University Of Utah Research Foundation Elongate member reinforcement with a studded collar
US20170030096A1 (en) * 2013-08-08 2017-02-02 University Of Utah Research Foundation Elongate member reinforcement with a studded collar
US9976315B2 (en) * 2013-08-08 2018-05-22 University Of Utah Research Foundation Elongate member reinforcement
US20150075099A1 (en) * 2013-08-08 2015-03-19 University Of Utah Research Foundation Elongate member reinforcement
JP2016528411A (en) * 2013-08-19 2016-09-15 ヴォッベン プロパティーズ ゲーエムベーハーWobben Properties Gmbh Wind power generator and its basics
US20160201653A1 (en) * 2013-08-19 2016-07-14 Wobben Properties Gmbh Wind turbine foundation and wind turbine
US9670909B2 (en) * 2013-08-19 2017-06-06 Wobben Properties Gmbh Wind turbine foundation and wind turbine
CN105473792A (en) * 2013-08-19 2016-04-06 乌本产权有限公司 Wind turbine foundation and wind turbine
CN105473792B (en) * 2013-08-19 2017-11-14 乌本产权有限公司 Wind energy plant ground and wind energy plant
US10344738B2 (en) 2013-08-28 2019-07-09 Wobben Properties Gmbh Rotor blade element for a wind turbine, rotor blade, and a production process therefor and wind turbine with rotor blade
US9015999B1 (en) * 2013-12-02 2015-04-28 Abel Echemendia Tower with exterior cable support and a modular base
US9869300B2 (en) * 2014-01-16 2018-01-16 Pacadar S.A.U. Foundation for wind turbine tower and pre-assembly method of wind turbine tower
CN103967045A (en) * 2014-05-12 2014-08-06 中国水电顾问集团西北勘测设计研究院有限公司 Overland four-blade type whole rebar structure of draught fan spread foundation
CN103967046A (en) * 2014-05-12 2014-08-06 中国水电顾问集团西北勘测设计研究院有限公司 Overland four-blade type middle portion rebar structure of draught fan spread foundation
US9617704B2 (en) 2014-05-27 2017-04-11 One Energy Enterprises Llc Reinforcement assemblies, fixtures, and methods
KR102295798B1 (en) 2014-06-06 2021-08-31 에스테이코 에스.에이. Foundations system for towers and method for installing the foundations system for towers
KR20170015347A (en) * 2014-06-06 2017-02-08 에스테이코 에스.에이.피. Foundations system for towers and method for installing the foundations system for towers
US20170152641A1 (en) * 2014-06-06 2017-06-01 Esteyco S.A.P Foundations system for towers and method for installing the foundations system for towers
US10822765B2 (en) * 2014-06-06 2020-11-03 Esteyco S.A.P. Foundations system for towers and method for installing the foundations system for towers
US10648150B2 (en) * 2014-10-07 2020-05-12 Terracon Consultants, Inc. Retrofit reinforcing structure addition and method for wind turbine concrete gravity spread foundations and the like
US20170233975A1 (en) * 2014-10-07 2017-08-17 Allan P. Henderson Retrofit reinforcing structure addition and method for wind turbine concrete gravity spread foundations and the like
US10422100B2 (en) 2015-02-10 2019-09-24 Ambor Structures, Inc. Tower support structure
US9499954B2 (en) * 2015-02-10 2016-11-22 Ambor Structures, Inc. Tower support structure
US10100484B2 (en) 2015-02-10 2018-10-16 Ambor Structures, Inc. Tower support structure
US20170051470A1 (en) * 2015-02-10 2017-02-23 Ambor Structures, Inc. Tower support structure
US9803331B2 (en) * 2015-02-10 2017-10-31 Ambor Structures, Inc. Tower support structure
US10260480B2 (en) * 2015-02-27 2019-04-16 Wobben Properties Gmbh Wind power plant foundation and wind power plant
CN107923136A (en) * 2015-07-15 2018-04-17 鲁特基础系统公司 Beam and stake anchoring base for pylon
EP3322858A4 (en) * 2015-07-15 2019-01-09 Rute Foundation Systems, Inc. Beam and pile anchor foundation for towers
US9828739B2 (en) 2015-11-04 2017-11-28 Crux Subsurface, Inc. In-line battered composite foundations
US20170183840A1 (en) * 2015-12-23 2017-06-29 649119 N.B. Inc. Pre-cast concrete foundation of modular construction for telecommunication or wind turbine tower
US10309074B2 (en) * 2015-12-23 2019-06-04 649119 N.B. Inc. Pre-cast concrete foundation of modular construction for telecommunication or wind turbine tower
US10081964B2 (en) * 2016-02-02 2018-09-25 Dywidag Sistemas Constructivos, S.A. Wind tower connection system
US20190063029A1 (en) * 2016-02-18 2019-02-28 Holcim Technology Ltd Foundation for a wind mill
RU2714745C1 (en) * 2016-02-18 2020-02-19 Холсим Технологи Лтд Foundation for wind-driven power plant
US10968592B2 (en) 2016-02-18 2021-04-06 Holcim Technology Ltd Foundation for a wind mill
RU2720210C2 (en) * 2016-02-18 2020-04-28 Холсим Технологи Лтд Foundation for wind-driven power plant
US10934679B2 (en) * 2016-02-18 2021-03-02 Holcim Technology Ltd Foundation for a wind mill
WO2017141095A1 (en) * 2016-02-18 2017-08-24 Holcim Technology Ltd Foundation for a wind mill
US20190055711A1 (en) * 2016-02-18 2019-02-21 Holcim Technology Ltd Foundation for a wind mill
CN108699797A (en) * 2016-02-18 2018-10-23 霍尔辛姆科技有限公司 Pedestal for wind energy conversion system
CN108699796A (en) * 2016-02-18 2018-10-23 霍尔辛姆科技有限公司 Pedestal for wind energy conversion system
US11795653B2 (en) 2016-02-18 2023-10-24 Holcim Technology Ltd Foundation for a wind mill
US10054107B2 (en) * 2016-06-06 2018-08-21 Bowie State University Omni-directional shaftless wind turbine
US10724204B2 (en) 2016-09-26 2020-07-28 Holcim Technology Ltd Foundation for a windmill
CN109844243A (en) * 2016-09-26 2019-06-04 霍尔辛姆科技有限公司 Ground for windmill
WO2018055446A1 (en) * 2016-09-26 2018-03-29 Holcim Technology Ltd Foundation for a windmill
CN109790695A (en) * 2016-09-26 2019-05-21 霍尔辛姆科技有限公司 Pedestal for wind energy conversion system
AU2017330583B2 (en) * 2016-09-26 2023-02-16 Holcim Technology Ltd Foundation for a windmill
WO2018055444A1 (en) * 2016-09-26 2018-03-29 Holcim Technology Ltd Foundation for a wind turbine
US10876269B2 (en) 2016-09-26 2020-12-29 Holcim Technology Ltd Foundation for a windmill
ES2673105A1 (en) * 2016-12-19 2018-06-19 Gamesa Innovation & Technology, S.L. Method of construction of the foundation of a tower (Machine-translation by Google Translate, not legally binding)
EP3336260A1 (en) * 2016-12-19 2018-06-20 Siemens Gamesa Innovation & Technology, S.L. Construction method of a tower foundation
US20180327995A1 (en) * 2017-05-15 2018-11-15 Glen Raven, Inc. Reinforcement unit and methods for creating a footing for supporting a structure
US10557247B2 (en) * 2017-05-15 2020-02-11 Glen Raven, Inc. Reinforcement unit and methods for creating a footing for supporting a structure
USD910209S1 (en) 2017-08-24 2021-02-09 Glen Raven, Inc. Support footing
US20200157760A1 (en) * 2017-10-25 2020-05-21 Rute Foundation Systems, Inc. Tower foundation with concrete box girder beams
US10676889B2 (en) * 2017-10-25 2020-06-09 Rute Foundation Systems, Inc. Tower foundation with concrete box girder beams
US10982406B2 (en) * 2017-10-25 2021-04-20 Rute Foundation Systems, Inc. Tower foundation with concrete box girder beams
US20190119875A1 (en) * 2017-10-25 2019-04-25 Rute Foundation Systems, Inc. Tower foundation with concrete box girder beams
WO2019201714A3 (en) * 2018-04-16 2020-03-19 Universelle-Fertigteil-Fundamente GmbH Foundation for a wind turbine
EP4497945A3 (en) * 2018-04-16 2025-04-23 Smart & Green Mukran Concrete GmbH Foundation for a wind turbine
US10968894B2 (en) 2018-10-04 2021-04-06 Tetra Tech, Inc. Wind turbine foundation and method of constructing a wind turbine foundation
US10851763B2 (en) 2018-10-04 2020-12-01 Tetra Tech, Inc. Wind turbine foundation and method of constructing a wind turbine foundation
CN109395436A (en) * 2018-11-30 2019-03-01 中国冶集团有限公司 Major diameter inverted cone pond groove bottom taper degree control device and control method
CN113195835A (en) * 2018-12-03 2021-07-30 Hws混凝土塔有限公司 Foundation element for a wind turbine tower
CN109519334A (en) * 2018-12-14 2019-03-26 福建福船帆新能源装备制造有限公司 A kind of high stability tower barrel base ring of uniform force
CN111339625A (en) * 2018-12-19 2020-06-26 北京天润新能投资有限公司 Method, device and system for constructing foundation model of wind generating set
US10634122B1 (en) * 2019-02-08 2020-04-28 Are Telecom Incorporated Portable monopole tower with adjustable foundation
US11053923B2 (en) 2019-02-08 2021-07-06 Are Telecom Incorporated Portable monopole tower with adjustable foundation
US20200263380A1 (en) * 2019-02-15 2020-08-20 Dongyuan Wang Tubular rivet foundation for onshore wind turbine generators
US10738436B1 (en) * 2019-02-15 2020-08-11 Montana Systems Inc. Tubular foundation for onshore wind turbine generators
CN113454291A (en) * 2019-02-28 2021-09-28 霍尔辛姆科技有限公司 Foundation for a wind power plant
WO2020174334A1 (en) * 2019-02-28 2020-09-03 Holcim Technology Ltd Foundation for a wind turbine
US12139872B2 (en) 2019-02-28 2024-11-12 Holcim Technology Ltd Foundation for a wind power plant
AU2020227281B2 (en) * 2019-02-28 2025-04-24 Holcim Technology Ltd Foundation for a wind turbine
US20220170229A1 (en) * 2019-03-13 2022-06-02 Cte Wind Civil Engineering Groundworks method for a foundation for an onshore wind turbine
CN110158627A (en) * 2019-04-30 2019-08-23 国网浙江省电力有限公司金华供电公司 A kind of basis in prefabricated transformer substation power distribution unit building and construction method
CN110158633B (en) * 2019-05-13 2024-08-13 明阳智慧能源集团股份公司 Prefabricated pier slab beam type foundation of lattice type concrete wind power tower
CN110158633A (en) * 2019-05-13 2019-08-23 明阳智慧能源集团股份公司 A kind of prefabricated pier plate girder type basis of lattice concrete air pylon
CN110285023A (en) * 2019-06-11 2019-09-27 同济大学建筑设计研究院(集团)有限公司 Assembled wind driven generator base and its manufacturing method
JP7332354B2 (en) 2019-06-18 2023-08-23 株式会社長谷工コーポレーション anchor plate
JP2020204378A (en) * 2019-06-18 2020-12-24 株式会社長谷工コーポレーション Anchor plate
US12345061B2 (en) * 2019-06-21 2025-07-01 Vestas Wind Systems A/S Relating to reinforcement of wind turbine towers
US20220298820A1 (en) * 2019-06-21 2022-09-22 Vestas Wind Systems A/S Improvements relating to reinforcement of wind turbine towers
CN110397064A (en) * 2019-06-28 2019-11-01 天津大学 A combined ring-tube jacket foundation structure and its construction method
US10851513B1 (en) * 2019-07-01 2020-12-01 Tianjin University Combined offshore wind power foundation with duct piles and a bucket
US12018448B2 (en) * 2019-07-04 2024-06-25 Vestas Wind Systems A/S Method of forming a wind turbine foundation
US20220325493A1 (en) * 2019-07-04 2022-10-13 Vestas Wind Systems A/S Method of forming a wind turbine foundation
CN110607802A (en) * 2019-08-22 2019-12-24 上海勘测设计研究院有限公司 Connecting tool for single-column and composite-cylinder combined foundation
US11225786B2 (en) * 2020-01-14 2022-01-18 Southwest Jiaotong University Dry process connected energy-consuming beam column joint based on corbel
CN112112769A (en) * 2020-10-30 2020-12-22 广州容柏生建筑工程设计咨询有限公司 A prefabricated wind power tower with wing walls
WO2022109616A1 (en) * 2020-11-20 2022-05-27 Kevin Neprud Floating foundation
US11746495B2 (en) 2020-11-20 2023-09-05 Kevin R. NEPRUD Floating foundation
JP2023550088A (en) * 2020-11-20 2023-11-30 ネプルド,ケヴィン floating foundation
CN112483327A (en) * 2020-12-04 2021-03-12 合肥通博电源科技有限公司 Wind power generation mounting base based on anticorrosion structure and mounting process thereof
CN112483327B (en) * 2020-12-04 2022-04-01 江苏盛皇新能源科技有限公司 Wind power generation mounting base based on anticorrosion structure and mounting process thereof
EP4301980A4 (en) * 2021-03-03 2025-01-29 Stroyer, Benjamin, G. WIND TURBINE BASE
WO2022187427A1 (en) 2021-03-03 2022-09-09 Stroyer Benjamin G Wind turbine base
US20240392750A1 (en) * 2021-09-29 2024-11-28 Ingecid, S.L. Method for constructing a ribbed foundation for wind turbines and ribbed foundation obtained
CN114151286A (en) * 2021-11-05 2022-03-08 上海风领新能源有限公司 Buttress wall wind power tower cylinder
CN114102065A (en) * 2021-12-07 2022-03-01 南通振华重型装备制造有限公司 Method for mounting suction barrel cover
CN114718109A (en) * 2022-03-15 2022-07-08 山东送变电工程有限公司 Rock foundation structure suitable for power transmission line construction
CN114770709A (en) * 2022-04-02 2022-07-22 华能陇东能源有限责任公司 Wind power foundation prefabricated part die
CN117345541A (en) * 2022-06-29 2024-01-05 金风科技股份有限公司 Anchor assembly structures, tower sections and wind turbines
CN115230247A (en) * 2022-08-17 2022-10-25 沈阳工业大学 A multi-zone high-strength and tough bionic impact-resistant composite structure
CN115492152A (en) * 2022-10-10 2022-12-20 中国船舶重工集团海装风电股份有限公司 A wind turbine assembly foundation and grouting assembly construction method
US20240123519A1 (en) * 2022-10-18 2024-04-18 Robert Schaffer Drilling Jig Assembly
US12352111B2 (en) * 2022-10-18 2025-07-08 Robert Schaffer Drilling jig assembly
CN115961601A (en) * 2022-12-13 2023-04-14 中交第一航务工程局有限公司 Integrated construction platform for cylinder-based steel frame
CN115977137A (en) * 2022-12-20 2023-04-18 重庆大学 Assembled foundation suitable for mountain wind lattice structure tower and its assembly method
US12163349B2 (en) * 2022-12-29 2024-12-10 UnWired, LLC Bracing apparatus, system, and method for installation of sub-surface utility anchors
US20240218680A1 (en) * 2022-12-29 2024-07-04 UnWired, LLC Bracing apparatus, system, and method for installation of sub-surface utility anchors
CN115929559A (en) * 2023-01-17 2023-04-07 广州容柏生建筑工程设计咨询有限公司 A cable-stayed cable-stayed self-balancing wind power tower outside the tube and its construction method
CN117027041A (en) * 2023-07-19 2023-11-10 华能陕西靖边电力有限公司 Wind turbine foundation and wind turbine generator set
WO2026012556A1 (en) * 2024-07-11 2026-01-15 Vestas Wind Systems A/S Anchor cage for a wind turbine foundation having a coupler for cables and method of making same
US12509843B1 (en) * 2024-10-18 2025-12-30 Northwest Institute Of Eco-Environment And Resources, Cas Transmission line tower base with electrothermal air-blowing anti-frost heave function for permafrost regions
CN120006762A (en) * 2025-03-12 2025-05-16 中广核新能源安徽有限公司固镇分公司 Onshore wind turbine foundation structure and construction method thereof

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11939736B2 (en) Foundation with pedestal and ribs for towers
US20240018736A1 (en) Foundation with pedestal and ribs for towers
US9937635B2 (en) Method of constructing a wind tower foundation
US8661752B2 (en) Foundation with slab, pedestal and ribs for columns and towers
US20110061321A1 (en) Fatigue reistant foundation system
US9938685B2 (en) Beam and pile anchor foundation for towers
AU2017330583B2 (en) Foundation for a windmill
WO2017011681A1 (en) Beam and pile anchor foundation for towers
DK2427603T3 (en) Exhaustion-resistant foundation
CN223824217U (en) A screw-type prestressed precast radial beam-slab wind turbine foundation
CN119553711B (en) Screw prestress prefabricated radial beam plate type fan foundation and construction method thereof

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION