US20090117243A1 - Process for wholegrain-conditioning of brewer's cereal grains used in beer production - Google Patents

Process for wholegrain-conditioning of brewer's cereal grains used in beer production Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20090117243A1
US20090117243A1 US12/300,083 US30008306A US2009117243A1 US 20090117243 A1 US20090117243 A1 US 20090117243A1 US 30008306 A US30008306 A US 30008306A US 2009117243 A1 US2009117243 A1 US 2009117243A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
brewer
wetting
process according
wholegrain
grains
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US12/300,083
Other versions
US8141799B2 (en
Inventor
Klaus Gehrig
Hans-Jorg Menger
Urs Keller
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Buehler AG
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Publication of US20090117243A1 publication Critical patent/US20090117243A1/en
Assigned to BUEHLER AG reassignment BUEHLER AG ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: GEHRIG, KLAUS, MENGER, HANS-JOERG, KELLER, URS
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US8141799B2 publication Critical patent/US8141799B2/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12CBEER; PREPARATION OF BEER BY FERMENTATION; PREPARATION OF MALT FOR MAKING BEER; PREPARATION OF HOPS FOR MAKING BEER
    • C12C7/00Preparation of wort
    • C12C7/01Pretreatment of malt, e.g. malt grinding
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12CBEER; PREPARATION OF BEER BY FERMENTATION; PREPARATION OF MALT FOR MAKING BEER; PREPARATION OF HOPS FOR MAKING BEER
    • C12C7/00Preparation of wort
    • C12C7/04Preparation or treatment of the mash
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12CBEER; PREPARATION OF BEER BY FERMENTATION; PREPARATION OF MALT FOR MAKING BEER; PREPARATION OF HOPS FOR MAKING BEER
    • C12C1/00Preparation of malt
    • C12C1/02Pretreatment of grains, e.g. washing, steeping
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12CBEER; PREPARATION OF BEER BY FERMENTATION; PREPARATION OF MALT FOR MAKING BEER; PREPARATION OF HOPS FOR MAKING BEER
    • C12C1/00Preparation of malt
    • C12C1/16After-treatment of malt, e.g. malt cleaning, detachment of the germ

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a process for wholegrain conditioning, especially of brewer's grains, such as malted barley, and the processing of these wholegrain-conditioned cereal grains in the brewing technology.
  • Brewer's grains are mechanically broken up, e.g. by crushing in roller, hammer or corundum-disk mills or in rotor-stator systems, prior to further processing in the brewing process.
  • roller mills are used, a wetting of the brewer's grains in conditioning screw conveyors to a max. of 2% moisture content, for improving the milling result, is likewise known to prior art; while in the case of so-called ‘soft conditioning’ mills (Weichkondition réelle), a water component of up to 16% is introduced to the malt in a so-called softening shaft.
  • soft conditioning Weichkonditionierung
  • This holding time is not sufficient to allow the malt to fully absorb the water, and at least part of the introduced water is left still clinging to the husk in its free state. Because of this short holding time, and also the naturally occurring dissimilar grain sizes of the cereal grain, a homogenous water uptake in the charge is not ensured.
  • the resulting solution (mash) is separated into the liquid phase (wort) and the solid substances (draff).
  • a lauter tun or a mash filter is used for the separation of solid/liquid.
  • the solid, water-insoluble parts of the cereal grain, the husks form a filter layer, through which the liquid (wort) is drawn downwards and filtered. If due to insufficient elasticity the husks and germ are broken up into too small a size in the coarse grinding, then firstly, an increased dissolution can lead to unwanted constituents such as polyphenols, lipids etc. getting into the wort, and furthermore it results in a pronounced negative effect on the structure of the filter layer, leading to a slowing down of the lautering of the wort.
  • a coarse grinding mill for malt with a continuous monitoring of the grinding (DE-A-10218424), a wet coarse grinding (DE-A-10255504 among others), an enclosed, airless coarse grinding (DE-A-19740036), or an extrusion of malt grist (DE-A-3212390).
  • the invention is based on the intended aim of developing a process for wholegrain conditioning of brewer's grain used in beer production which improves the standard of the wetting of the brewer's grain, as preparation for the coarse grinding process, and therefore by a homogenous wetting of each individual grain of up to 20% water content, without free surface water, there is a very good tender crumbliness of the endosperm and at the same time the elasticity of husks and germ is increased to such an extent that the husks and germ emerge from the coarse grinding process almost without any mechanical damage, and thus the subsequent stages in the brewing process, the mashing, the lautering, the boiling of the wort and the fermentation, can be configured with optimal raw material and process parameters.
  • the copious bulk of the coarse meal produced by the inventive process allows a c. 10 to 15% higher volume throughput in the solid/liquid separation stage of the process as compared to coarse meal produced by the described methods of prior art, and this means shorter cycle times.
  • a further technological advantage results from the great number of germs retained whole and therefore fully separable, if required, as this means the harmful constituents in the germ, such as lipids and others, are less likely to get extracted in the mash.
  • the high portion of whole germs allows a fractioning of the coarse meal into husks, germ and endosperm by the known mechanical processes, where all or some portion of the husks can be fed back into the process at a later stage. If the unfractioned coarse meal is mashed in, then at the time of the mashing in one can already observe how the germs, kept unbroken, swim on the mash as a surface layer and can be separated from there.
  • a further process advantage due to the optimised homogenous wetting of the endosperm is an accelerated reaction kinetics in the enzymatic metabolism during the mashing process.
  • the wetting of the brewer's grain according to the invention is carried out in at least one stage, by using moist air, or in two stages by a pre-wetting with small quantities of water of 1-3%, then letting it stand for a while (resting phase), followed by a second wetting and where needed a second resting phase, until the desired final humidity is achieved.
  • a pre-wetting with small quantities of water of 1-3% then letting it stand for a while (resting phase), followed by a second wetting and where needed a second resting phase, until the desired final humidity is achieved.
  • the brewer's grains which are optimally prepared in this way for the mechanical crushing process are then led to a mechanical crushing. This can be done using the mills known from prior art in the brewing technology, and here the wholegrain-conditioned brewer's grains can be either dry-milled or wet-milled.
  • the brewer's grains wetted by the inventive process can, however, also be crushed and mashed in-line, using dry crushing mills with high throughput rates which are specially adapted to the requirements of this malt.
  • An additional advantage of the inventive process in the milling of the wholegrain-conditioned malt lies in the field of explosion protection, for the degree of wetting of the malt markedly reduces the risk of a dust explosion and therefore it is possible to use rollermills as found in bread grain mills.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Food Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Distillation Of Fermentation Liquor, Processing Of Alcohols, Vinegar And Beer (AREA)
  • Medicines Containing Material From Animals Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)
  • Disintegrating Or Milling (AREA)
  • Alcoholic Beverages (AREA)
  • Cereal-Derived Products (AREA)

Abstract

The invention relates to a process for whole-grain conditioning, in particular of native and malted brewing cereals. To improve the mashing process and to increase the number of brews and product quality, the brewing cereals are conditioned and subsequently fed to a hulling and/or mechanical comminution process.

Description

  • The invention relates to a process for wholegrain conditioning, especially of brewer's grains, such as malted barley, and the processing of these wholegrain-conditioned cereal grains in the brewing technology.
  • Brewer's grains are mechanically broken up, e.g. by crushing in roller, hammer or corundum-disk mills or in rotor-stator systems, prior to further processing in the brewing process. Where roller mills are used, a wetting of the brewer's grains in conditioning screw conveyors to a max. of 2% moisture content, for improving the milling result, is likewise known to prior art; while in the case of so-called ‘soft conditioning’ mills (Weichkonditionierung), a water component of up to 16% is introduced to the malt in a so-called softening shaft. In both systems the holding time of the malt in the wetting zone is somewhere around 60 sec. This holding time is not sufficient to allow the malt to fully absorb the water, and at least part of the introduced water is left still clinging to the husk in its free state. Because of this short holding time, and also the naturally occurring dissimilar grain sizes of the cereal grain, a homogenous water uptake in the charge is not ensured.
  • As the proportion of introduced water increases, there is an increased danger of the rollers of the mills sticking and/or of problems arising in connection with hygiene.
  • In the subsequent mashing process, there takes place the enzymatic conversion of water-insoluble, large molecular weight constituents such as starches and proteins to smaller molecular weight, water-soluble substances, e.g. sugar and amino acids. In order to convert and extract these from the cereal grains, the mechanical preparation of the brewer's grains has have been done sufficiently.
  • In the subsequent lautering process, the resulting solution (mash) is separated into the liquid phase (wort) and the solid substances (draff).
  • In the brewing technology generally a lauter tun or a mash filter is used for the separation of solid/liquid.
  • In the lauter tun, the solid, water-insoluble parts of the cereal grain, the husks, form a filter layer, through which the liquid (wort) is drawn downwards and filtered. If due to insufficient elasticity the husks and germ are broken up into too small a size in the coarse grinding, then firstly, an increased dissolution can lead to unwanted constituents such as polyphenols, lipids etc. getting into the wort, and furthermore it results in a pronounced negative effect on the structure of the filter layer, leading to a slowing down of the lautering of the wort.
  • In the mash filter, the effect that unbroken whole husks have on the speed of lautering is of little importance due to the low height of the filter layer.
  • In DE-A-4440481 the suggestion was therefore made to first wet the malt, then subject it to a pressure treatment in the milling gap, and also to separate the husks and endosperm by sieving. For this the malt mill used is fitted with at least one sieve. The separated husks are then subjected to an impact treatment so that any extract still adhering to them can be removed.
  • By impacting, not only can a gain in extract be obtained, it also increases the volume of the husk fraction. This increased fraction produces an optimised filter bed in the lauter tun which in turn ensures an improved lautering; or conversely it is possible to use a smaller portion of the husks as filter material, by which means the possible entry of polyphenols is reduced.
  • Also known are a coarse grinding mill for malt with a continuous monitoring of the grinding (DE-A-10218424), a wet coarse grinding (DE-A-10255504 among others), an enclosed, airless coarse grinding (DE-A-19740036), or an extrusion of malt grist (DE-A-3212390).
  • The invention is based on the intended aim of developing a process for wholegrain conditioning of brewer's grain used in beer production which improves the standard of the wetting of the brewer's grain, as preparation for the coarse grinding process, and therefore by a homogenous wetting of each individual grain of up to 20% water content, without free surface water, there is a very good tender crumbliness of the endosperm and at the same time the elasticity of husks and germ is increased to such an extent that the husks and germ emerge from the coarse grinding process almost without any mechanical damage, and thus the subsequent stages in the brewing process, the mashing, the lautering, the boiling of the wort and the fermentation, can be configured with optimal raw material and process parameters.
  • The copious bulk of the coarse meal produced by the inventive process allows a c. 10 to 15% higher volume throughput in the solid/liquid separation stage of the process as compared to coarse meal produced by the described methods of prior art, and this means shorter cycle times. A further technological advantage results from the great number of germs retained whole and therefore fully separable, if required, as this means the harmful constituents in the germ, such as lipids and others, are less likely to get extracted in the mash.
  • If one desires to completely eliminate the extraction of these unwanted constituents, the high portion of whole germs allows a fractioning of the coarse meal into husks, germ and endosperm by the known mechanical processes, where all or some portion of the husks can be fed back into the process at a later stage. If the unfractioned coarse meal is mashed in, then at the time of the mashing in one can already observe how the germs, kept unbroken, swim on the mash as a surface layer and can be separated from there.
  • A further process advantage due to the optimised homogenous wetting of the endosperm is an accelerated reaction kinetics in the enzymatic metabolism during the mashing process.
  • The wetting of the brewer's grain according to the invention is carried out in at least one stage, by using moist air, or in two stages by a pre-wetting with small quantities of water of 1-3%, then letting it stand for a while (resting phase), followed by a second wetting and where needed a second resting phase, until the desired final humidity is achieved. By the pre-wetting and the resting phase, it is ensured that the entire quantity of water is taken up by the husks and their permeability is decisively increased for the second wetting. By this means, in the second wetting the quantities of water necessary for the required tender crumbliness of the endosperm and also for the required elasticity of husk and germ can be very rapidly taken up by the grain, so that no free surface water, which would have a negative effect on the process, is left remaining.
  • It is also possible to wetten the cereal grains by means of an air-moistening, i.e. by a variable relative humidity of the air, where the relative (initial) humidity of the air should be at least 95%.
  • The brewer's grains which are optimally prepared in this way for the mechanical crushing process are then led to a mechanical crushing. This can be done using the mills known from prior art in the brewing technology, and here the wholegrain-conditioned brewer's grains can be either dry-milled or wet-milled.
  • The brewer's grains wetted by the inventive process can, however, also be crushed and mashed in-line, using dry crushing mills with high throughput rates which are specially adapted to the requirements of this malt.
  • An additional advantage of the inventive process in the milling of the wholegrain-conditioned malt, lies in the field of explosion protection, for the degree of wetting of the malt markedly reduces the risk of a dust explosion and therefore it is possible to use rollermills as found in bread grain mills.
  • As a result it should be possible to achieve an increase in the number of brews to about 20.

Claims (7)

1. Process for wholegrain-conditioning of brewer's grains used in beer production, such as virgin or malted brewer's grains, especially of malted barley, by homogenous wetting of the cereal grains for up to 20% effective moisture content and a related resting phase, as well as a subsequent dry and/or wet milling of the wholegrain-conditioned brewer's grains.
2. Process according to claim 1, characterized in that the brewer's grain is shelled prior to wetting.
3. Process according to claim 1, characterized in that the moistening/wetting and the resting phase are carried out in at least one stage.
4. Process according to claim 3, characterized in that the wetting and the resting phase are carried out in two stages.
5. Process according to claim 1, characterized in that the homogenous conditioned brewer's grain is crushed twice without an intermediate sifting.
6. Process according to claim 1, characterized in that the time of the resting phase amounts to max. 30 minutes per stage.
7. Process according to claim 1, characterized in that the brewer's grain is moistened slowly by means of moist air, with it being possible to vary the relative humidity of the air.
US12/300,083 2006-05-09 2006-10-09 Process for wholegrain-conditioning of brewer's cereal grains used in beer production Expired - Fee Related US8141799B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102006021777A DE102006021777A1 (en) 2006-04-21 2006-05-09 Procedure for complete conditioning of brewing grains from barley malt, comprises peeling the brewing grains, homogeneous moistening cereal grains, sticking out and dry- and/or wet milling the brewing grain
DE102006021777.2 2006-06-09
DE102006021777 2006-06-09
PCT/CH2006/000552 WO2007140630A1 (en) 2006-05-09 2006-10-09 Process for whole-grain conditioning of brewing cereals used in brewing beer

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20090117243A1 true US20090117243A1 (en) 2009-05-07
US8141799B2 US8141799B2 (en) 2012-03-27

Family

ID=37680660

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/300,083 Expired - Fee Related US8141799B2 (en) 2006-05-09 2006-10-09 Process for wholegrain-conditioning of brewer's cereal grains used in beer production

Country Status (11)

Country Link
US (1) US8141799B2 (en)
EP (1) EP2029720B1 (en)
JP (1) JP4868551B2 (en)
KR (1) KR101309606B1 (en)
AT (1) ATE449158T1 (en)
BR (1) BRPI0621759A2 (en)
CA (1) CA2654766C (en)
DE (2) DE102006021777A1 (en)
DK (1) DK2029720T3 (en)
MX (1) MX2008014152A (en)
WO (1) WO2007140630A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP4903511B2 (en) * 2006-07-12 2012-03-28 アサヒビール株式会社 Method for producing malt from which young buds have been removed
US9844783B2 (en) * 2012-07-26 2017-12-19 John Bihn Grain crushing apparatuses and processes

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4165388A (en) * 1977-12-09 1979-08-21 Grain Processing Corporation Torrefied barley for brewer's mashes
US4255456A (en) * 1978-11-22 1981-03-10 Peavey Company Roasted ground wheat coating
US4504514A (en) * 1981-10-22 1985-03-12 Asahi-Matsu Foods Inc. Soybean-based fibrous or granular food material having improved texture
US6613371B2 (en) * 1997-07-23 2003-09-02 Cargill, Incorporated Method for malting seeds

Family Cites Families (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE440481C (en) * 1924-08-12 1927-02-08 Jakob Spanjaard Device for shutting down electrically driven textile machines, in particular spinning machines
DE7106561U (en) * 1971-02-20 1971-07-15 Bolick F DEVICE FOR CONDITIONING MALT BEFORE SCRAPPING
BE786777A (en) * 1971-07-26 1973-01-26 Grandes Malteries Modernes MUST MANUFACTURING PROCESS FOR THE FOOD INDUSTRIES, ESPECIALLY FOR THE BREWERY
DE2844827C2 (en) * 1978-10-14 1984-09-20 Bernhard Dipl.-Braum. 8710 Kitzingen Lenz Device for soaking brewing materials
DE3515816A1 (en) * 1985-05-02 1986-11-06 Steinecker Maschinenfabrik GmbH, 8050 Freising METHOD AND DEVICE FOR SOFTING AND WET-SCRAPING Brewing Materials
JPH0626508B2 (en) * 1985-12-04 1994-04-13 日清製粉株式会社 Method of manufacturing cereal flakes
JPS6368068A (en) * 1986-09-08 1988-03-26 Nisshin Eng Kk Milling device for malt
JPS63178852A (en) * 1987-01-17 1988-07-22 株式会社 サタケ Wheat milling apparatus
DE4440481A1 (en) * 1994-11-12 1996-05-15 Buehler Gmbh Process and plant for processing the husks and optimizing the refining process
DE19740209C1 (en) * 1997-09-12 1998-08-13 Steinecker Maschf Anton Beer brewing method and assembly
JP2005261374A (en) * 2004-03-22 2005-09-29 Kamine Seiki Kogyo Kk Method for treating fermenting raw material and method for fermenting the treated fermenting raw material

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4165388A (en) * 1977-12-09 1979-08-21 Grain Processing Corporation Torrefied barley for brewer's mashes
US4255456A (en) * 1978-11-22 1981-03-10 Peavey Company Roasted ground wheat coating
US4504514A (en) * 1981-10-22 1985-03-12 Asahi-Matsu Foods Inc. Soybean-based fibrous or granular food material having improved texture
US6613371B2 (en) * 1997-07-23 2003-09-02 Cargill, Incorporated Method for malting seeds

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
BRPI0621759A2 (en) 2011-12-20
EP2029720B1 (en) 2009-11-18
MX2008014152A (en) 2008-11-20
JP4868551B2 (en) 2012-02-01
CA2654766A1 (en) 2007-12-13
DE102006021777A1 (en) 2007-10-25
KR101309606B1 (en) 2013-09-17
JP2009539356A (en) 2009-11-19
DE502006005433D1 (en) 2009-12-31
US8141799B2 (en) 2012-03-27
CA2654766C (en) 2014-04-29
DK2029720T3 (en) 2010-02-01
KR20090024105A (en) 2009-03-06
ATE449158T1 (en) 2009-12-15
WO2007140630A1 (en) 2007-12-13
EP2029720A1 (en) 2009-03-04

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP5695323B2 (en) Beer-taste beverage using colored malt and brown rice and method for producing the same
CN108714453A (en) It is a kind of to return the processing technology for adding legal system and making wholewheat flour using wheat bran
van Donkelaar et al. Pearling barley to alter the composition of the raw material before brewing
JP2010207214A (en) Method for improving flavor of beer taste beverage using yeast extract and beer taste beverage with improved flavor
US8141799B2 (en) Process for wholegrain-conditioning of brewer's cereal grains used in beer production
JP2010207213A (en) Beer taste drink using unpolished rice and method for producing the same
US8104699B2 (en) Process and device for dehusking cereal grains
US3443958A (en) Method of preparing ground cereal grains in the production of brewery mash
DE102012200771B4 (en) Method for crushing malt using a grinder
CN107208011B (en) Method for producing sugar-containing liquid
JP4031063B2 (en) Method and apparatus for optimizing the selection and purification process of wheat husks
JP2022540803A (en) Serial flakes (CEREAL FLAKES)
JP4711043B2 (en) Liquor production method using buckwheat ingredients and buckwheat ingredients for liquor production
RU2109040C1 (en) Method of preparing raw for brewery, raw for brewery and a method of brewery
DE102006019609A1 (en) Procedure for removing the husk and/or the seed coat and the seedlings of brewing grains, comprises cleaning the cereal grains, supplying the grains to a malt process, peeling the grains, and grinding and polishing the grains
JP4730874B2 (en) Method for producing fermented alcoholic beverage
EP0849356A2 (en) Method for producing mash products
Beta et al. Sorghum processing technologies in Southern Africa
US8800897B2 (en) Process and device for producing flour
CN114130450A (en) Low-arsenic rice and preparation method thereof
JP2009530094A (en) Peeling wheat grains using ozone
SE521750C2 (en) Preparation of malt extract used to make energy drinks, by saccharification of mash comprising malted corn and oats

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: BUEHLER AG, SWITZERLAND

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:GEHRIG, KLAUS;MENGER, HANS-JOERG;KELLER, URS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20120124 TO 20120125;REEL/FRAME:027643/0511

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

LAPS Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

STCH Information on status: patent discontinuation

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362

FP Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee

Effective date: 20200327