US20040073778A1 - Parallel processor architecture - Google Patents
Parallel processor architecture Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20040073778A1 US20040073778A1 US10/615,500 US61550003A US2004073778A1 US 20040073778 A1 US20040073778 A1 US 20040073778A1 US 61550003 A US61550003 A US 61550003A US 2004073778 A1 US2004073778 A1 US 2004073778A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- processor
- memory
- microengines
- bus
- references
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 23
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 claims description 11
- 230000011664 signaling Effects 0.000 claims description 10
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000001360 synchronised effect Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 29
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 20
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 description 14
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 13
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 11
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 11
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000003111 delayed effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 241001522296 Erithacus rubecula Species 0.000 description 2
- 230000006399 behavior Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000009977 dual effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000006855 networking Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 2
- LHMQDVIHBXWNII-UHFFFAOYSA-N 3-amino-4-methoxy-n-phenylbenzamide Chemical compound C1=C(N)C(OC)=CC=C1C(=O)NC1=CC=CC=C1 LHMQDVIHBXWNII-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 240000007320 Pinus strobus Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003139 buffering effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004020 conductor Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001934 delay Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000284 extract Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000605 extraction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009499 grossing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000010365 information processing Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003252 repetitive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013519 translation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001960 triggered effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F9/00—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
- G06F9/06—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
- G06F9/30—Arrangements for executing machine instructions, e.g. instruction decode
- G06F9/30003—Arrangements for executing specific machine instructions
- G06F9/30076—Arrangements for executing specific machine instructions to perform miscellaneous control operations, e.g. NOP
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F15/00—Digital computers in general; Data processing equipment in general
- G06F15/76—Architectures of general purpose stored program computers
- G06F15/80—Architectures of general purpose stored program computers comprising an array of processing units with common control, e.g. single instruction multiple data processors
- G06F15/8007—Architectures of general purpose stored program computers comprising an array of processing units with common control, e.g. single instruction multiple data processors single instruction multiple data [SIMD] multiprocessors
- G06F15/8015—One dimensional arrays, e.g. rings, linear arrays, buses
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F9/00—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
- G06F9/06—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
- G06F9/30—Arrangements for executing machine instructions, e.g. instruction decode
- G06F9/30003—Arrangements for executing specific machine instructions
- G06F9/3004—Arrangements for executing specific machine instructions to perform operations on memory
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F9/00—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
- G06F9/06—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
- G06F9/30—Arrangements for executing machine instructions, e.g. instruction decode
- G06F9/30098—Register arrangements
- G06F9/3012—Organisation of register space, e.g. banked or distributed register file
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F9/00—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
- G06F9/06—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
- G06F9/30—Arrangements for executing machine instructions, e.g. instruction decode
- G06F9/30098—Register arrangements
- G06F9/3012—Organisation of register space, e.g. banked or distributed register file
- G06F9/30123—Organisation of register space, e.g. banked or distributed register file according to context, e.g. thread buffers
- G06F9/30127—Register windows
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F9/00—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
- G06F9/06—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
- G06F9/30—Arrangements for executing machine instructions, e.g. instruction decode
- G06F9/38—Concurrent instruction execution, e.g. pipeline, look ahead
- G06F9/3824—Operand accessing
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F9/00—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
- G06F9/06—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
- G06F9/30—Arrangements for executing machine instructions, e.g. instruction decode
- G06F9/38—Concurrent instruction execution, e.g. pipeline, look ahead
- G06F9/3824—Operand accessing
- G06F9/3834—Maintaining memory consistency
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F9/00—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
- G06F9/06—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
- G06F9/30—Arrangements for executing machine instructions, e.g. instruction decode
- G06F9/38—Concurrent instruction execution, e.g. pipeline, look ahead
- G06F9/3836—Instruction issuing, e.g. dynamic instruction scheduling or out of order instruction execution
- G06F9/3842—Speculative instruction execution
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F9/00—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
- G06F9/06—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
- G06F9/30—Arrangements for executing machine instructions, e.g. instruction decode
- G06F9/38—Concurrent instruction execution, e.g. pipeline, look ahead
- G06F9/3836—Instruction issuing, e.g. dynamic instruction scheduling or out of order instruction execution
- G06F9/3851—Instruction issuing, e.g. dynamic instruction scheduling or out of order instruction execution from multiple instruction streams, e.g. multistreaming
Definitions
- This invention relates to parallel processors.
- Parallel processing is an efficient form of information processing of concurrent events in a computing process.
- Parallel processing demands concurrent execution of many programs in a computer, in contrast to sequential processing.
- parallelism involves doing more than one thing at the same time.
- a serial paradigm where all tasks are performed sequentially at a single station or a pipelined machine where tasks are performed at specialized stations
- parallel processing a plurality of stations are provided with each capable of performing all tasks. That is, in general all or a plurality of the stations work simultaneously and independently on the same or common elements of a problem. Certain problems are suitable for solution by applying parallel processing.
- types of computer processing include single instruction stream, single data stream, the conventional serial von Neumann computer in which there is a single stream of instructions.
- a second processing type is the single instruction stream, multiple data streams process (SIMD). This processing can have multiple arithmetic-logic processors and a single control processor. Each of the processors perform operations on the data in lock-step. These machines are synchronized by the control processor.
- SIMD single instruction stream
- MIMD multiple instruction streams
- MIMD multiple instruction streams
- MIMD multiple data streams
- MIMD multiple data streams
- a parallel hardware-based multithreaded processor includes a general purpose processor that coordinates system functions and a plurality of microengines that support multiple hardware threads.
- a parallel hardware-based multithreaded processor includes a general purpose processor that coordinates system functions and a plurality of microengines that support multiple hardware threads.
- the processor also includes a memory control system including a first memory controller that sorts memory references based on whether the memory references are directed to an even bank or an odd bank of memory and a second memory controller that optimizes memory references based upon whether the memory references are read references or write references.
- This parallel multithreaded architecture provides a very general purpose microprocessor architecture.
- the processor can be connected to other devices to process large amounts of data.
- the system is especially useful for tasks that can be broken into parallel subtasks or functions.
- the hardware-based multithreaded processor is useful for tasks that are bandwidth oriented rather than latency oriented.
- the hardware-based multithreaded processor has multiple microengines each with multiple hardware controlled threads that can be simultaneously active and independently work on a task.
- One example of an application for the hardware-based multithreaded processor is as a network processor.
- the hardware-based multithreaded processor can interfaces to network devices such as a media access controllers.
- the hardware-based multithreaded processor can interface to any type of communication device or interface that receives/sends large amounts of data.
- the processor can be used a print engine for a postscript processor or as a processor for a storage subsystem, i.e., RAID disk storage.
- a further use is as a matching engine.
- the advent of electronic trading requires the use of electronic matching engines to match orders between buyers and sellers. These and other parallel types of tasks can be accomplished on the processor used in a system.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a communication system employing a hardware-based multithreaded processor.
- FIG. 2 is a detailed block diagram of the hardware-based multithreaded processor of FIG. 1.
- FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a microengine functional unit employed in the hardware-based multithreaded processor of FIGS. 1 and 2.
- FIG. 3A is a block diagram of a pipeline in the microengine of FIG. 3.
- FIG. 3B is diagram that shows a format for a context switch instruction.
- FIG. 3C is a block diagram showing general purpose register address arrangement.
- FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a memory controller for enhanced bandwidth operation used in the hardware-based multithreaded processor.
- FIG. 4A is a flow chart that represents an arbitration policy in an SDRAM controller of FIG. 4.
- FIG. 4B is a timing diagram that shows advantages of optimizing SDRAM controller.
- FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a memory controller for latency limited operations used in the hardware-based multithreaded processor.
- FIG. 5A is a timing diagram that shows advantages of optimizing SRAM controller.
- FIG. 6 is a block diagram of a communication bus interface in the processor of FIG. 1.
- a communication system 10 includes a parallel, hardware-based multithreaded processor 12 .
- the hardware-based multithreaded processor 12 is coupled to a bus such as a PCI bus 14 , a memory system 16 and a second bus 18 .
- the system 10 is especially useful for tasks that can be broken into parallel subtasks or functions.
- hardware-based multithreaded processor 12 is useful for tasks that are bandwidth oriented rather than latency oriented.
- the hardware-based multithreaded processor 12 has multiple microengines 22 each with multiple hardware controlled threads that can be simultaneously active and independently work on a task.
- the hardware-based multithreaded processor 12 also includes a central controller 20 that assists in loading microcode control for other resources of the hardware-based multithreaded processor 12 and performs other general purpose computer type functions such as handling protocols, exceptions, extra support for packet processing where the microengines pass the packets off for more detailed processing such as in boundary conditions.
- the processor 20 is a Strong Arm® (Arm is a trademark of ARM Limited, United Kingdom) based architecture.
- the general purpose microprocessor 20 has an operating system. Through the operating system the processor 20 can call functions to operate on microengines 22 a - 22 f .
- the processor 20 can use any supported operating system preferably a real time operating system.
- operating systems such as, MicrosoftNT real-time, VXWorks and ⁇ CUS, a freeware operating system available over the Internet, can be used.
- the hardware-based multithreaded processor 12 also includes a plurality of function microengines 22 a - 22 f .
- Functional microengines (microengines) 22 a - 22 f each maintain a plurality of program counters in hardware and states associated with the program counters. Effectively, a corresponding plurality of sets of threads can be simultaneously active on each of the microengines 22 a - 22 f while only one is actually operating at any one time.
- each microengine 22 a - 22 f has capabilities for processing four hardware threads.
- the six microengines 22 a - 22 f operate with shared resources including memory system 16 and bus interfaces 24 and 28 .
- the memory system 16 includes a Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory (SDRAM) controller 26 a and a Static Random Access Memory (SRAM) controller 26 b .
- SDRAM memory 16 a and SDRAM controller 26 a are typically used for processing large volumes of data, e.g., processing of network payloads from network packets.
- the SRAM controller 26 b and SRAM memory 16 b are used in a networking implementation for low latency, fast access tasks, e.g., accessing look-up tables, memory for the core processor 20 , and so forth.
- the six microengines 22 a - 22 f access either the SDRAM 16 a or SRAM 16 b based on characteristics of the data. Thus, low latency, low bandwidth data is stored in and fetched from SRAM, whereas higher bandwidth data for which latency is not as important, is stored in and fetched from SDRAM.
- the microengines 22 a - 22 f can execute memory reference instructions to either the SDRAM controller 26 a or SRAM controller 16 b.
- SRAM or SDRAM memory accesses can be explained by SRAM or SDRAM memory accesses.
- an SRAM access requested by a Thread_ 0 from a microengine will cause the SRAM controller 26 b to initiate an access to the SRAM memory 16 b .
- the SRAM controller controls arbitration for the SRAM bus, accesses the SRAM 16 b , fetches the data from the SRAM 16 b , and returns data to a requesting microengine 22 a - 22 b .
- the microengine e.g., 22 a had only a single thread that could operate, that microengine would be dormant until data was returned from the SRAM.
- Thread_ 1 can function while the first thread, e.g., Thread_ 0 , is awaiting the read data to return.
- Thread_ 1 may access the SDRAM memory 16 a .
- Thread_ 1 operates on the SDRAM unit, and Thread_ 0 is operating on the SRAM unit, a new thread, e.g., Thread_ 2 can now operate in the microengine 22 a .
- Thread_ 2 can operate for a certain amount of time until it needs to access memory or perform some other long latency operation, such as making an access to a bus interface. Therefore, simultaneously, the processor 12 can have a bus operation, SRAM operation and. SDRAM operation all being completed or operated upon by one microengine 22 a and have one more thread available to process more work in the data path.
- the hardware context swapping also synchronizes completion of tasks. For example, two threads could hit the same shared resource e.g., SRAM.
- Each one of these separate functional units, e.g., the FBUS interface 28 , the SRAM controller 26 a , and the SDRAM controller 26 b when they complete a requested task from one of the microengine thread contexts reports back a flag signaling completion of an operation.
- the microengine can determine which thread to turn on.
- One example of an application for the hardware-based multithreaded processor 12 is as a network processor.
- the hardware-based multithreaded processor 12 interfaces to network devices such as a media access controller device e.g., a 10/100BaseT Octal MAC 13 a or a Gigabit Ethernet device 13 b .
- the hardware-based multithreaded processor 12 can interface to any type of communication device or interface that receives/sends large amounts of data.
- Communication system 10 functioning in a networking application could receive a plurality of network packets from the devices 13 a , 13 b and process those packets in a parallel manner. With the hardware-based multithreaded processor 12 , each network packet can be independently processed.
- processor 12 Another example for use of processor 12 is a print engine for a postscript processor or as a processor for a storage subsystem, i.e., RAID disk storage.
- a further use is as a matching engine.
- the advent of electronic trading requires the use of electronic matching engines to match orders between buyers and sellers. These and other parallel types of tasks can be accomplished on the system 10 .
- the processor 12 includes a bus interface 28 that couples the processor to the second bus 18 .
- Bus interface 28 in one embodiment couples the processor 12 to the so-called FBUS 18 (FIFO bus).
- the FBUS interface 28 is responsible for controlling and interfacing the processor 12 to the FBUS 18 .
- the FBUS 18 is a 64-bit wide FIFO bus, used to interface to Media Access Controller (MAC) devices.
- MAC Media Access Controller
- the processor 12 includes a second interface e.g., a PCI bus interface 24 that couples other system components that reside on the PCI 14 bus to the processor 12 .
- the PCI bus interface 24 provides a high speed data path 24 a to memory 16 e.g., the SDRAM memory 16 a . Through that path data can be moved quickly from the SDRAM 16 a through the PCI bus 14 , via direct memory access (DMA) transfers.
- DMA direct memory access
- the hardware based multithreaded processor 12 supports image transfers.
- the hardware based multithreaded processor 12 can employ a plurality of DMA channels so if one target of a DMA transfer is busy, another one of the DMA channels can take over the PCI bus to deliver information to another target to maintain high processor 12 efficiency.
- the PCI bus interface 24 supports target and master operations.
- Target operations are operations where slave devices on bus 14 access SDRAMs through reads and writes that are serviced as a slave to target operation.
- master operations the processor core 20 sends data directly to or receives data directly from the PCI interface 24 .
- Each of the functional units are coupled to one or more internal buses.
- the internal buses are dual, 32 bit buses (i.e., one bus for read and one for write).
- the hardware-based multithreaded processor 12 also is constructed such that the sum of the bandwidths of the internal buses in the processor 12 exceed the bandwidth of external buses coupled to the processor 12 .
- the processor 12 includes an internal core processor bus 32 , e.g., an ASB bus (Advanced System Bus) that couples the processor core 20 to the memory controller 26 a , 26 c and to an ASB translator 30 described below.
- the ASB bus is a subset of the so called AMBA bus that is used with the Strong Arm processor core.
- the processor 12 also includes a private bus 34 that couples the microengine units to SRAM controller 26 b , ASB translator 30 and FBUS interface 28 .
- a memory bus 38 couples the memory controller 26 a , 26 b to the bus interfaces 24 and 28 and memory system 16 including flashrom 16 c used for boot operations and so forth.
- each of the microengines 22 a - 22 f includes an arbiter that examines flags to determine the available threads to be operated upon. Any thread from any of the microengines 22 a - 22 f can access the SDRAM controller 26 a , SDRAM controller 26 b or FBUS interface 28 .
- the memory controllers 26 a and 26 b each include a plurality of queues to store outstanding memory reference requests. The queues either maintain order of memory references or arrange memory references to optimize memory bandwidth. For example, if a thread_ 0 has no dependencies or relationship to a thread_ 1 , there is no reason that thread 1 and 0 cannot complete their memory references to the SRAM unit out of order.
- the microengines 22 a - 22 f issue memory reference requests to the memory controllers 26 a and 26 b .
- the microengines 22 a - 22 f flood the memory subsystems 26 a and 26 b with enough memory reference operations such that the memory subsystems 26 a and 26 b become the bottleneck for processor 12 operation.
- the processor 12 can perform memory reference sorting.
- Memory reference sorting improves achievable memory bandwidth.
- Memory reference sorting reduces dead time or a bubble that occurs with accesses to SRAM. With memory references to SRAM, switching current direction on signal lines between reads and writes produces a bubble or a dead time waiting for current to settle on conductors coupling the SRAM 16 b to the SRAM controller 26 b.
- Memory reference sorting allows the processor 12 to organize references to memory such that long strings of reads can be followed by long strings of writes. This can be used to minimize dead time in the pipeline to effectively achieve closer to maximum available bandwidth. Reference sorting helps maintain parallel hardware context threads. On the SDRAM, reference sorting allows hiding of pre-charges from one bank to another bank. Specifically, if the memory system 16 b is organized into an odd bank and an even bank, while the processor is operating on the odd bank, the memory controller can start precharging the even bank. Precharging is possible if memory references alternate between odd and even banks.
- the processor 12 By ordering memory references to alternate accesses to opposite banks, the processor 12 improves SDRAM bandwidth. Additionally, other optimizations can be used. For example, merging optimizations where operations that can be merged, are merged prior to memory access, open page optimizations where by examining addresses an opened page of memory is not reopened, chaining, as will be described below, and refreshing mechanisms, can be employed.
- the FBUS interface 28 supports Transmit and Receive flags for each port that a MAC device supports, along with an Interrupt flag indicating when service is warranted.
- the FBUS interface 28 also includes a controller 28 a that performs header processing of incoming packets from the FBUS 18 .
- the controller 28 a extracts the packet headers and performs a microprogrammable source/destination/protocol hashed lookup (used for address smoothing) in SRAM. If the hash does not successfully resolve, the packet header is sent to the processor core 20 for additional processing.
- the FBUS interface 28 supports the following internal data transactions: FBUS unit (Shared bus SRAM) to/from microengine. FBUS unit (via private bus) writes from SDRAM Unit. FBUS unit (via Mbus) Reads to SDRAM.
- the FBUS 18 is a standard industry bus and includes a data bus, e.g., 64 bits wide and sideband control for address and read/write control.
- the FBUS interface 28 provides the ability to input large amounts of data using a series of input and output FIFO's 29 a - 29 b .
- the microengines 22 a - 22 f fetch data from or command the SDRAM controller 26 a to move data from a receive FIFO in which data has come from a device on bus 18 , into the FBUS interface 28 .
- the data can be sent through memory controller 26 a to SDRAM memory 16 a , via a direct memory access.
- the microengines can move data from the SDRAM 26 a to interface 28 , out to FBUS 18 , via the FBUS interface 28 .
- a command request can be a memory request or a FBUS request.
- a command request can move data from a register located in a microengine 22 a to a shared resource, e.g., an SDRAM location, SRAM location, flash memory or some MAC address.
- the commands are sent out to each of the functional units and the shared resources.
- the shared resources do not need to maintain local buffering of the data. Rather, the shared resources access distributed data located inside of the microengines.
- microengines 22 a - 22 f This enables microengines 22 a - 22 f , to have local access to data rather than arbitrating for access on a bus and risk contention for the bus. With this feature, there is a 0 cycle stall for waiting for data internal to the microengines 22 a - 22 f.
- the data buses, e.g., ASB bus 30 , SRAM bus 34 and SDRAM bus 38 coupling these shared resources, e.g., memory controllers 26 a and 26 b are of sufficient bandwidth such that there are no internal bottlenecks.
- the processor 12 has an bandwidth requirement where each of the functional units is provided with at least twice the maximum bandwidth of the internal buses.
- the SDRAM can run a 64 bit wide bus at 83 MHz.
- the SRAM data bus could have separate read and write buses, e.g., could be a read bus of 32 bits wide running at 166 MHz and a write bus of 32 bits wide at 166 MHz. That is, in essence, 64 bits running at 166 MHz which is effectively twice the bandwidth of the SDRAM.
- the core processor 20 also can access the shared resources.
- the core processor 20 has a direct communication to the SDRAM controller 26 a to the bus interface 24 and to SRAM controller 26 b via bus 32 .
- the core processor 20 access the microengines 22 a - 22 f via the ASB Translator 30 over bus 34 .
- the ASB translator 30 can physically reside in the FBUS interface 28 , but logically is distinct.
- the ASB Translator 30 performs an address translation between FBUS microengine transfer register locations and core processor addresses (i.e., ASB bus) so that the core processor 20 can access registers belonging to the microengines 22 a - 22 c.
- a scratchpad memory 27 is also provided to permit microengines to write data out to the memory for other microengines to read.
- the scratchpad 27 is coupled to bus 34 .
- the processor core 20 includes a RISC core 50 implemented in a five stage pipeline performing a single cycle shift of one operand or two operands in a single cycle, provides multiplication support and 32 bit barrel shift support.
- This RISC core 50 is a standard Strong Arm® architecture but it is implemented with a five stage pipeline for performance reasons.
- the processor core 20 also includes a 16 kilobyte instruction cache 52 , an 8 kilobyte data cache 54 and a prefetch stream buffer 56 .
- the core processor 20 performs arithmetic operations in parallel with memory writes and instruction fetches.
- the core processor 20 interfaces with other functional units via the ARM defined ASB bus.
- the ASB bus is a 32-bit bi-directional bus 32 .
- the microengine 22 f includes a control store 70 which, in one implementation, includes a RAM of here 1,024 words of 32 bit.
- the RAM stores a microprogram.
- the microprogram is loadable by the core processor 20 .
- the microengine 22 f also includes controller logic 72 .
- the controller logic includes an instruction decoder 73 and program counter (PC) units 72 a - 72 d .
- the four micro program counters 72 a - 72 d are maintained in hardware.
- the microengine 22 f also includes context event switching logic 74 .
- Context event logic 74 receives messages (e.g., SEQ_#_EVENT_RESPONSE; FBI_EVENT_RESPONSE; SAM_EVENT_RESPONSE; SDRAM_EVENT_RESPONSE; and ASB_EVENT_RESPONSE) from each one of the shared resources, e.g., SRAM 26 a , SDRAM 26 b , or processor core 20 , control and status registers, and so forth. These messages provide information on whether a requested function has completed. Based on whether or not a function requested by a thread has completed and signaled completion, the thread needs to wait for that completion signal, and if the thread is enabled to operate, then the thread is placed on an available thread list (not shown).
- the microengine 22 f can have a maximum of e.g., 4 threads available.
- the microengines 22 In addition to event signals that are local to an executing thread, the microengines 22 employ signaling states that are global. With signaling states, an executing thread can broadcast a signal state to all microengines 22 . Receive Request Available signal, Any and all threads in the microengines can branch on these signaling states. These signaling states can be used to determine availability of a resource or whether a resource is due for servicing.
- the context event logic 74 has arbitration for the four (4) threads. In one embodiment, the arbitration is a round robin mechanism. Other techniques could be used including priority queuing or weighted fair queuing.
- the microengine 22 f also includes an execution box (EBOX) data path 76 that includes an arithmetic logic unit 76 a and general purpose register set 76 b .
- the arithmetic logic unit 76 a performs arithmetic and logical functions as well as shift functions.
- the registers set 76 b has a relatively large number of general purpose registers. As will be described in FIG. 3B, in this implementation there are 64 general purpose registers in a first bank, Bank A and 64 in a second bank, Bank B.
- the general purpose registers are windowed as will be described so that they are relatively and absolutely addressable.
- the microengine 22 f also includes a write transfer register stack 78 and a read transfer stack 80 . These registers are also windowed so that they are relatively and absolutely addressable.
- Write transfer register stack 78 is where write data to a resource is located.
- read register stack 80 is for return data from a shared resource. Subsequent to or concurrent with data arrival, an event signal from the respective shared resource e.g., the SRAM controller 26 a , SDRAM controller 26 b or core processor 20 will be provided to context event arbiter 74 which will then alert the thread that the data is available or has been sent.
- Both transfer register banks 78 and 80 are connected to the execution box (EBOX) 76 through a data path.
- the read transfer register has 64 registers and the write transfer register has 64 registers.
- the microengine datapath maintains a 5-stage micro-pipeline 82 .
- This pipeline includes lookup of microinstruction words 82 a , formation of the register file addresses 82 b , read of operands from register file 82 c , ALU, shift or compare operations 82 d , and write-back of results to registers 82 e .
- the microengine can perform a simultaneous register file read and write, which completely hides the write operation.
- the SDRAM interface 26 a provides a signal back to the requesting microengine on reads that indicates whether a parity error occurred on the read request.
- the microengine microcode is responsible for checking the SDRAM read Parity flag when the microengine uses any return data. Upon checking the flag, if it was set, the act of branching on it clears it. The Parity flag is only sent when the SDRAM is enabled for checking, and the SDRAM is parity protected.
- the microengines and the PCI Unit are the only requesters notified of parity errors. Therefore, if the processor core 20 or FIFO requires parity protection, a microengine assists in the request.
- the microengines 22 a - 22 f support conditional branches.
- the worst case conditional branch latency occurs when the branch decision is a result of condition codes being set by the previous microcontrol instruction.
- the latency is shown below in Table 1: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 microstore lookup n1 cb n2 XX b1 b2 b3 b4 reg addr gen n1 cb XX XX b1 b2 b3 reg file lookup n1 cb XXXX b1 b2 ALU/shifter/cc n1 cb XXXX b1 write back m2 n1 cb XXXXX
- nx is pre-branch microword (n 1 sets cc's)
- the microengines support deferred branches.
- Deferring branches are when a microengine allows 1 or 2 microwords after the branch to occur before the branch takes effect (i.e. the effect of the branch is “deferred” in time). Thus, if useful work can be found to fill the wasted cycles after the branch microword, then the branch latency can be hidden.
- a 1-cycle deferred branch is shown below where n 2 is allowed to execute after cb, but before b 1 : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 microstore lookup n1 cb n2 XX b1 b2 b3 b4 reg addr gen n1 cb n2 XX b1 b2 b3 reg file lookup n1 cb n2 XX b1 b2 ALU/shifter/cc n1 cb n2 XX b1 write back n1 cb n2 XX
- a 2-cycle deferred branch is shown below, where n 2 and n 3 are both allowed to complete before the branch to b 1 occurs. Note that a 2-cycle branch deferment is only allowed when the condition codes are set on the microword preceding the branch.
- the microengines also support condition code evaluation. If the condition codes upon which a branch decision are made are set 2 or more microwords before the branch, then 1 cycle of branch latency can be eliminated because the branch decision can be made 1 cycle earlier: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 microstore lookup n1 n2 cb XX b1 b2 b3 b4 reg addr gen n1 n2 cb XX b1 b2 b3 reg file lookup n1 n2 cb XX b1 b2 ALU/shifter/cc n1 n2 cb XX b1 write back n1 n2 cb XX
- n 1 sets the condition codes and n 2 does not set the conditions codes. Therefore, the branch decision can be made at cycle 4 (rather than 5), to eliminate 1 cycle of branch latency.
- cycle 4 (rather than 5)
- the 1-cycle branch deferment and early setting of condition codes are combined to completely hide the branch latency:
- Condition codes set 2 cycles before a 1-cycle deferred branch: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 microstore lookup n1 n2 cb n3 b1 b2 b3 b4 reg addr gen n1 n2 cb n3 b1 b2 b3 reg file lookup n1 n2 cb n3 b1 b2 ALU/shifter/cc n1 n2 cb n3 b1 write back n1 n2 cb n3
- the microengine supports branch guessing which attempts to reduce the 1 cycle of exposed branch latency that remains. By “guessing” the branch path or the sequential path, the microsequencer pre-fetches the guessed path 1 cycle before it definitely knows what path to execute. If it guessed correctly, 1 cycle of branch latency is eliminated as shown below:
- guess branch taken/branch is taken 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 microstore lookup n1 cb n1 b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 reg addr gen n1 cb XX b1 b2 b3 b4 reg file lookup n1 cb XX b1 b2 b3 ALU/shifter/cc n1 cb XX b1 b2 write back n1 cb XX b1
- guess branch taken/branch is NOT taken 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 microstore lookup n1 cb n1 XX n2 n3 n4 n5 reg addr gen n1 cb n1 XX n2 n3 n4 reg file lookup n1 cb n1 XX n2 n3 ALU/shifter/cc n1 cb n1 XX n2 write back n1 cb n1 XX
- the microengine can combine branch guessing with 1-cycle branch deferment to improve the result further.
- For guess branch taken with 1-cycle deferred branch/branch is taken is: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 microstore lookup n1 cb n2 b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 reg addr gen n1 cb n2 b1 b2 b3 b4 reg file lookup n1 cb n2 b1 b2 b3 ALU/shifter/cc n1 cb n2 b1 b2 write back n1 cb n2 b1
- microcode correctly guesses a branch NOT taken then the pipeline flows sequentially in the normal unperturbed case. If microcode incorrectly guesses branch NOT taken, the microengine again exposes 1 cycle of unproductive execution as shown below:
- nx is pre-branch microword (n 1 sets cc's)
- a context switch is a special form of a branch that causes a different context (and associated PC) to be selected. Context switching introduces some branch latency as well.
- Context switching introduces some branch latency as well.
- ca is context rearbitration (causes context switch)
- nx is new context flow
- Conditional branches that operate on ALU condition codes which are set on the microword before the branch can select 0, 1 or 2-cycle branch deferment modes.
- Condition codes set 2 or more microwords before the conditional branch that operates on them can select 0 or 1-cycle branch deferment modes. All other branches (including context rearbitrations) can select either 0 or 1-cycle branch deferment modes.
- the architecture could be designed to make a context arbitration microword within a branch deferment window of a preceding branch, jump or context arbitration microword, an illegal option. That is, in some embodiments, a context switch would not be allowed to occur during a branch transition in the pipeline because as mentioned, it could unduly complicate saving of the old context PC.
- the architecture could also be designed to make branching within the branch deferment window of a preceding branch, jump or context arbitration microword illegal to avoid complicated and possible unpredictable branch behaviors.
- Each microengine 22 a - 22 f supports multi-threaded execution of four contexts.
- One reason for this is to allow one thread to start executing just after another thread issues a memory reference and must wait until that reference completes before doing more work. This behavior is critical to maintaining efficient hardware execution of the microengines because memory latency is significant. Stated differently, if only a single thread execution was supported, the microengines would sit idle for a significant number of cycles waiting for references to return and thereby reduce overall computational throughput.
- Multi-threaded execution allows an microengines to hide memory latency by performing useful independent work across several threads. Two synchronization mechanisms are supplied in order to allow a thread to issue an SRAM or SDRAM reference, and then subsequently synchronize to the point in time when that reference completes.
- One mechanism is Immediate Synchronization.
- immediate synchronization the microengine issues the reference and immediately swap out that context.
- the context will be signaled when the corresponding reference completes. Once signaled, the context will be swapped back in for execution when a context-swap event occurs and it is its turn to run.
- the microword after issuing the mem reference does not get executed until the reference completes.
- a second mechanism is Delayed Synchronization.
- the microengine issues the reference, and then continues to execute some other useful work independent of the reference. Some time later it could become necessary to synchronize the thread's execution stream to the completion of the issued reference before further work is performed. At this point a synchronizing microword is executed that will either swap out the current thread, and swap it back in sometime later when the reference has completed, or continue executing the current thread because the reference has already completed. Delayed synchronization is implemented using two different signaling schemes:
- the signal from which the thread is triggered is generated when the corresponding transfer register valid bit is set or cleared. For example, an SRAM read which deposits data into transfer register A would be signaled when the valid bit for A is set. If the memory reference is associated with the transfer FIFO or the receive FIFO, instead of a transfer register, then the signal is generated when the reference completes in the SDRAM controller 26 a . Only one signal state per context is held in the microengines scheduler, thus only one outstanding signal can exist in this scheme.
- microcontroller micro-programs There are at least two general operational paradigms from which microcontroller micro-programs could be designed. One would be that overall microcontroller compute throughput and overall memory bandwidth are optimized at the expense of single thread execution latency. This paradigm would make sense when the system has multiple microengines executing multiple threads per microengine on unrelated data packets.
- a second one is that microengine execution latency should be optimized at the expense of overall microengine compute throughput and overall memory bandwidth.
- This paradigm could involve execution of a thread with a real-time constraint, that is, a constraint which dictates that some work must absolutely be done by some specified time. Such a constraint requires that optimization of the single thread execution be given priority over other considerations such as memory bandwidth or overall computational throughput.
- a real-time thread would imply a single microengine that executes only one thread. Multiple threads would not be handled because the goal is to allow the single real-time thread to execute as soon as possible—execution of multiple threads would hinder this ability.
- the two register address spaces that exist are Locally accessibly registers, and Globally accessible registers accessible by all microengines.
- Each bank is capable of performing a simultaneous read and write to two different words within its bank.
- the register set 76 b is also organized into four windows 76 b 0 - 76 b 3 of 32 registers that are relatively addressable per thread.
- thread_ 0 will find its register 0 at 77 a (register 0 )
- the thread_ 1 will find its register_ 0 at 77 b (register 32 )
- thread_ 2 will find its register_ 0 at 77 c (register 64 )
- thread_ 3 at 77 d (register 96 ).
- Relative addressing is supported so that multiple threads can use the exact same control store and locations but access different windows of register and perform different functions.
- the uses of register window addressing and bank addressing provide the requisite read bandwidth using only dual ported RAMS in the microengine 22 f.
- windowed registers do not have to save data from context switch to context switch so that the normal push and pop of a context swap file or stack is eliminated.
- Context switching here has a 0 cycle overhead for changing from one context to another.
- Relative register addressing divides the register banks into windows across the address width of the general purpose register set. Relative addressing allows access any of the windows relative to the starting point of the window. Absolute addressing is also supported in this architecture where any one of the absolute registers may be accessed by any of the threads by providing the exact address of the register.
- SDRAM
- a 6 1
- a 5 0
- a 4 1
- register address directly specified in 8-bit dest field (d 7 -d 0 ): 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
- microengines are not interrupt driven. Each microflow executes until completion and then a new flow is chosen based on state signaled by other devices in the processor 12 .
- the SDRAM memory controller 26 a includes memory reference queues 90 where memory reference requests arrive from the various microengines 22 a - 22 f .
- the memory controller 26 a includes an arbiter 91 that selects the next the microengine reference requests to go to any of the functioning units. Given that one of the microengines is providing a reference request, the reference request will come through the address and command queue 90 , inside the SDRAM controller 26 a . If the reference request has a bit set called the “optimized MEM bit” the incoming reference request will be sorted into either the even bank queue 90 a or the odd bank queue 90 b .
- the SDRAM controller 26 is a resource which is shared among the FBUS interface 28 , the core processor 20 and the PCI interface 24 .
- the SDRAM controller 26 also maintains a state machine for performing READ-MODIFY-Write atomic operations.
- the SDRAM controller 26 also performs byte alignment for requests of data from SDRAM.
- the order queue 90 c maintains the order of reference requests from the microengines. With a series of odd and even banks references it may be required that a signal is returned only upon completion of a sequence of memory references to both the odd and even banks. If the microengine 22 f sorts the memory references into odd bank and even bank references and one of the banks, e.g., the even bank is drained of memory references before the odd bank but the signal is asserted on the last even reference, the memory controller 26 a could conceivably signal back to a microengine that the memory request had completed, even though the odd bank reference had not been serviced. This occurrence could cause a coherency problem. The situation is avoided by providing the order queue 90 c allowing a microengine to have multiple memory references outstanding of which only its last memory reference needs to signal a completion.
- the SDRAM controller 26 a also includes a high priority queue 90 d .
- the high priority queue 90 d an incoming memory reference from one of the microengines goes directly to the high priority queue and is operated upon at a higher priority than other memory references in the other queues. All of these queues, the even bank queue 90 a , the odd bank queue 90 b , the order queue 90 c and the high priority queue, are implemented in a single RAM structure that is logically segmented into four different windows, each window having its own head and tail pointer. Since filling and draining operations are only a single input and a single output, they can be placed into the same RAM structure to increase density of RAM structures.
- the SDRAM controller 26 a also includes core bus interface logic i.e., ASB bus 92 .
- the ASB bus interface logic 92 interfaces the core processor 20 to the SDRAM controller 26 a .
- the ASB bus is a bus that includes a 32 bit data path and a 28 bit address path.
- the data is accessed to and from memory through MEM ASB data device 98 , e.g., a buffer.
- MEM ASB data device 98 is a queue for write data. If there is incoming data from the core processor 20 via ASB interface 92 , the data can be stored into the MEM ASB device 98 and subsequently removed from MEM ASB device 98 through the SDRAM interface 110 to SDRAM memory 16 a .
- the same queue structure can be provided for the reads.
- the SDRAM controller 26 a also includes an engine 97 to pull data from the microengines and PCI bus.
- Additional queues include the PCI address queue 94 and ASB read/write queue 96 that maintain a number of requests.
- the memory requests are sent to SDRAM interface 110 via multiplexer 106 .
- the multiplexer 106 is controlled by the SDRAM arbiter 91 which detects the fullness of each of the queues and the status of the requests and from that decides priority based on a programmable value stored in a priority service control register 100 .
- bus 112 is actually two separate buses instead of a single bus. The separate buses would include a read bus coupling the distributed microengines 22 a - 22 f and a write bus coupling the distributed microengines 22 a - 22 f.
- a feature of the SDRAM controller 26 a is that when a memory reference is stored in the queues 90 , in addition to the optimized MEM bit that can be set, there is a “chaining bit”.
- the chaining bit when set allows for special handling of contiguous memory references.
- the arbiter 12 controls which microengine will be selected to provide memory reference requests over the commander bus to queue 90 (FIG. 4). Assertion of the chain bit will control the arbiter to have the arbiter select the functional unit which previously requested that bus because setting of the chain bit indicates that the microengine issued a chain request.
- Contiguous memory references will be received in queue 90 when the chaining bit is set. Those contiguous references will typically be stored in the order queue 90 c because the contiguous memory references are multiple memory references from a single thread.
- the memory controller 26 a need only signal at the end of the chained memory references when done.
- the memory references could go into different banks and potentially complete on one of the banks issuing the signal “done” before the other bank was fully drained, thus destroying coherency. Therefore, the chain bit is used by the controller 110 to maintain the memory references from the current queue.
- the arbitration policy favors chained microengine memory requests.
- the process 115 starts by examining for Chained microengine memory reference requests 115 a .
- the process 115 stays at the chained requests until the chain bit is cleared.
- the process examines ASB bus requests 115 b followed by PCI bus requests 115 c , High Priority Queue Service 115 d , Opposite Bank Requests 115 e , Order Queue Requests 115 f , and Same Bank Requests 115 g . Chained request are serviced completely, whereas services 115 b -115 d are serviced in round robin order.
- FIG. 4B typical timing of a memory without active memory optimization and with active memory optimization is shown.
- the use of active memory optimizations maximizes the use of the bus and thus hides the inherent latency within physical SDRAM devices.
- a non-optimized access can take 14 cycles while optimized access can take 7 cyles.
- the memory controller 26 b for the SRAM includes an address and command queue 120 . While the memory controller 26 a (FIG. 4) has a queue for memory optimization based on odd and even banking, memory controller 26 b is optimized based on the type of memory operation, i.e., a read or a write.
- the address and command queue 120 includes a high priority queue 120 a , a read queue 120 b which is the predominant memory reference function that an SRAM performs, and an order queue 120 c which in general will include all writes to SRAM and reads that are to be non-optimized. Although not shown, the address and command queue 120 could also include a write queue.
- the SRAM controller 26 b also includes core bus interface logic i.e., ASB bus 122 .
- the ASB bus interface logic 122 interfaces the core processor 20 to the SRAM controller 26 b .
- the ASB bus is a bus that includes a 32 bit data path and a 28 bit address path.
- the data is accessed to and from memory through MEM ASB data device 128 , e.g., a buffer.
- MEM ASB data device 128 is a queue for write data. If there is incoming data from the core processor 20 via ASB interface 122 , the data can be stored into the MEM ASB device 128 and subsequently removed from MEM ASB device 128 through SRAM interface 140 to SRAM memory 16 b .
- the same queue structure can be provided for reads.
- the SRAM controller 26 b also includes an engine 127 to pull data from the microengines and PCI bus.
- the memory requests are sent to SRAM interface 140 via multiplexer 126 .
- the multiplexer 126 is controlled by the SRAM arbiter 131 which detects the fullness of each of the queues and the status of the requests and from that decides priority based on a programmable value stored in a priority service control register 130 . Once control to the multiplexer 126 selects a memory reference request, the memory reference request, is sent to a decoder 138 where it is decoded and an address is generated.
- the SRAM Unit maintains control of the Memory Mapped off-chip SRAM and Expansion ROM.
- the SRAM controller 26 b can address, e.g., 16 MBytes, with, e.g., 8 MBytes mapped for SRAM 16 b , and 8 MBytes reserved for special functions including: Boot space via flashrom 16 c ; and Console port access for MAC devices 13 a , 13 b and access to associated (RMON) counters.
- the SRAM is used for local look-up tables and queue management functions.
- the SRAM controller 26 b supports the following transactions: Microengine requests (via private bus) to/from SRAM. Core Processor (via ASB bus) to/from SRAM.
- the SRAM controller 26 b performs memory reference sorting to minimize delays (bubbles) in the pipeline from the SRAM interface 140 to memory 16 b .
- the SRAM controller 26 b does memory reference sorting based on the read function.
- a bubble can either be 1 or 2 cycles depending on the type of memory device employed.
- the SRAM controller 26 b includes a lock lookup device 142 which is an eight (8 entry address content addressable memory for look-ups of read locks. Each position include a valid bit that is examined by subsequent read-lock requests.
- the address and command queue 120 also includes a Read Lock Fail Queue 120 d .
- the Read Lock Fail Queue 120 d is used to hold read memory reference requests that fail because of a lock existing on a portion of memory. That is, one of the microengines issues a memory request that has a read lock request that is processed in address and control queue 120 . The memory request will operate on either the order queue 120 c or the read queue 120 b and will recognize it as a read lock request.
- the controller 26 b will access lock lookup device 142 to determine whether this memory location is already locked. If this memory location is locked from any prior read lock request, then this memory lock request will fail and will be stored in the read lock fail queue 120 d . If it is unlocked or if 142 shows no lock on that address, then the address of that memory reference will be used by the SRAM interface 140 to perform a traditional SRAM address read/write request to memory 16 b .
- the command controller and address generator 138 will also enter the lock into the lock look up device 142 so that subsequent read lock requests will find the memory location locked.
- a memory location is unlocked by operation of the a microcontrol instruction in a program after the need for the lock has ended. The location is unlocked by clearing the valid bit in the CAM. After an unlock, the read lock fail queue 120 d becomes the highest priority queue giving all queued read lock misses, a chance to issue a memory lock request.
- FIG. 5A typical timing of a static random access memory without active memory optimization and with active memory optimization is shown. As can be seen, grouping reads and writes improves cycletime eliminating dead cycles.
- the FBUS interface 28 in a network application can performs header processing of incoming packets from the FBUS 18 .
- a key function which the FBUS interface performs is extraction of packet headers, and a microprogrammable source/destination/protocol hashed lookup in SRAM. If the hash does not successfully resolve, the packet header is promoted to the core processor 28 for more sophisticated processing.
- the FBI 28 contains a Transmit FIFO 182 , a Receive FIFO 183 , a HASH unit 188 and FBI control and status registers 189 . These four units communicate with the microengines 22 , via a time-multiplexed access to the SRAM bus 38 which is connected to the transfer registers 78 , 80 in the microengines. That is, all communications to and from the microengines are via the transfer registers 78 , 80 .
- the FBUS interface 28 includes a push state machine 200 for pushing data into the transfer registers during the time cycles which the SRAM is NOT using the SRAM data bus (part of bus 38 ) and a pull state machine 202 for fetching data from the transfer registers in the respective microengine.
- the Hashing unit includes a pair of FIFO's 188 a , 188 b .
- the hash unit determines that the FBI 28 received an FBI_hash request.
- the hash unit 188 fetches hash keys from the calling microengine 22 . After the keys are fetched and hashed, the indices are delivered back to the calling microengine 22 . Up to three hashes are performed under a single FBI_hash request.
- the busses 34 and 38 are each unidirectional: SDRAM_push/pull_data, and Sbus_push/pull_data. Each of these busses require control signals which will provide read/write controls to the appropriate microengine 22 Transfer registers.
- transfer registers require protection from the context controlling them to guarantee read correctness.
- a write transfer register is being used by a thread_ 1 to provide data to the SDRAM 16 a , thread_ 1 must not overwrite this register until the signal back from SDRAM controller 26 a indicates that this register has been promoted and may now be re-used. Every write does not require a signal back from the destination indicating that the function has been completed, because if the thread writes to the same command queue at that destination with multiple requests, the order of the completion is guaranteed within that command queue, thus only the last command requires the signaling back to the thread.
- any microengine 22 that uses the FBI unsolicited push technique must test the protection flag prior to accessing the FBUS interface/microengine agreed upon transfer registers. If the flag is not asserted, then the transfer registers may be accessed by the microengine. If the flag is Asserted then the context should wait N cycles prior to accessing the registers. A priori this count is determined by the number of transfer registers being pushed, plus a frontend protection window. The basic idea is that the microengine must test this flag then quickly move the data which it wishes to read from the read transfer registers to GPR's in contiguous cycles, so the push engine does not collide with the microengine read.
Abstract
A parallel hardware-based multithreaded processor is described. The processor includes a general purpose processor that coordinates system functions and a plurality of microengines that support multiple hardware threads. The processor also includes a memory control system that has a first memory controller that sorts memory references based on whether the memory references are directed to an even bank or an odd bank of memory and a second memory controller that optimizes memory references based upon whether the memory references are read references or write references.
Description
- This invention relates to parallel processors.
- Parallel processing is an efficient form of information processing of concurrent events in a computing process. Parallel processing demands concurrent execution of many programs in a computer, in contrast to sequential processing. In the context of a parallel processor, parallelism involves doing more than one thing at the same time. Unlike a serial paradigm where all tasks are performed sequentially at a single station or a pipelined machine where tasks are performed at specialized stations, with parallel processing, a plurality of stations are provided with each capable of performing all tasks. That is, in general all or a plurality of the stations work simultaneously and independently on the same or common elements of a problem. Certain problems are suitable for solution by applying parallel processing.
- Thus, types of computer processing include single instruction stream, single data stream, the conventional serial von Neumann computer in which there is a single stream of instructions. A second processing type is the single instruction stream, multiple data streams process (SIMD). This processing can have multiple arithmetic-logic processors and a single control processor. Each of the processors perform operations on the data in lock-step. These machines are synchronized by the control processor. A third type is multiple instruction streams, single data stream (MISD) process. This processing has the same data stream flows through a linear array of processors executing different instruction streams. A fourth is multiple instruction streams, multiple data streams (MIMD). This processing uses multiple processors, each executing its own instruction stream to process a data stream fed to each of the processors. Multiple instruction streams, multiple data streams (MIMD) processors may have several instruction processing units and therefore several data streams.
- According to an aspect of the present invention, a parallel hardware-based multithreaded processor includes a general purpose processor that coordinates system functions and a plurality of microengines that support multiple hardware threads.
- According to an additional aspect of the present invention, a parallel hardware-based multithreaded processor includes a general purpose processor that coordinates system functions and a plurality of microengines that support multiple hardware threads. The processor also includes a memory control system including a first memory controller that sorts memory references based on whether the memory references are directed to an even bank or an odd bank of memory and a second memory controller that optimizes memory references based upon whether the memory references are read references or write references.
- One or more of the following advantages may be provided by one or more aspects of the invention.
- This parallel multithreaded architecture provides a very general purpose microprocessor architecture. The processor can be connected to other devices to process large amounts of data. The system is especially useful for tasks that can be broken into parallel subtasks or functions. The hardware-based multithreaded processor is useful for tasks that are bandwidth oriented rather than latency oriented. The hardware-based multithreaded processor has multiple microengines each with multiple hardware controlled threads that can be simultaneously active and independently work on a task. One example of an application for the hardware-based multithreaded processor is as a network processor. As a network processor, the hardware-based multithreaded processor can interfaces to network devices such as a media access controllers. As a network processor, the hardware-based multithreaded processor can interface to any type of communication device or interface that receives/sends large amounts of data. The processor can be used a print engine for a postscript processor or as a processor for a storage subsystem, i.e., RAID disk storage. A further use is as a matching engine. In the securities industry for example, the advent of electronic trading requires the use of electronic matching engines to match orders between buyers and sellers. These and other parallel types of tasks can be accomplished on the processor used in a system.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a communication system employing a hardware-based multithreaded processor.
- FIG. 2 is a detailed block diagram of the hardware-based multithreaded processor of FIG. 1.
- FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a microengine functional unit employed in the hardware-based multithreaded processor of FIGS. 1 and 2.
- FIG. 3A is a block diagram of a pipeline in the microengine of FIG. 3.
- FIG. 3B. is diagram that shows a format for a context switch instruction.
- FIG. 3C is a block diagram showing general purpose register address arrangement.
- FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a memory controller for enhanced bandwidth operation used in the hardware-based multithreaded processor.
- FIG. 4A is a flow chart that represents an arbitration policy in an SDRAM controller of FIG. 4.
- FIG. 4B is a timing diagram that shows advantages of optimizing SDRAM controller.
- FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a memory controller for latency limited operations used in the hardware-based multithreaded processor.
- FIG. 5A is a timing diagram that shows advantages of optimizing SRAM controller.
- FIG. 6 is a block diagram of a communication bus interface in the processor of FIG. 1.
- Architecture:
- Referring to FIG. 1, a
communication system 10 includes a parallel, hardware-basedmultithreaded processor 12. The hardware-basedmultithreaded processor 12 is coupled to a bus such as aPCI bus 14, amemory system 16 and asecond bus 18. Thesystem 10 is especially useful for tasks that can be broken into parallel subtasks or functions. Specifically hardware-basedmultithreaded processor 12 is useful for tasks that are bandwidth oriented rather than latency oriented. The hardware-basedmultithreaded processor 12 hasmultiple microengines 22 each with multiple hardware controlled threads that can be simultaneously active and independently work on a task. - The hardware-based
multithreaded processor 12 also includes acentral controller 20 that assists in loading microcode control for other resources of the hardware-basedmultithreaded processor 12 and performs other general purpose computer type functions such as handling protocols, exceptions, extra support for packet processing where the microengines pass the packets off for more detailed processing such as in boundary conditions. In one embodiment, theprocessor 20 is a Strong Arm® (Arm is a trademark of ARM Limited, United Kingdom) based architecture. Thegeneral purpose microprocessor 20 has an operating system. Through the operating system theprocessor 20 can call functions to operate onmicroengines 22 a-22 f. Theprocessor 20 can use any supported operating system preferably a real time operating system. For the core processor implemented as a Strong Arm architecture, operating systems such as, MicrosoftNT real-time, VXWorks and μCUS, a freeware operating system available over the Internet, can be used. - The hardware-based
multithreaded processor 12 also includes a plurality offunction microengines 22 a-22 f. Functional microengines (microengines) 22 a-22 f each maintain a plurality of program counters in hardware and states associated with the program counters. Effectively, a corresponding plurality of sets of threads can be simultaneously active on each of themicroengines 22 a-22 f while only one is actually operating at any one time. - In one embodiment, there are six
microengines 22 a-22 f as shown. Eachmicroengines 22 a-22 f has capabilities for processing four hardware threads. The sixmicroengines 22 a-22 f operate with shared resources includingmemory system 16 andbus interfaces memory system 16 includes a Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory (SDRAM)controller 26 a and a Static Random Access Memory (SRAM)controller 26 b.SDRAM memory 16 a andSDRAM controller 26 a are typically used for processing large volumes of data, e.g., processing of network payloads from network packets. TheSRAM controller 26 b andSRAM memory 16 b are used in a networking implementation for low latency, fast access tasks, e.g., accessing look-up tables, memory for thecore processor 20, and so forth. - The six
microengines 22 a-22 f access either theSDRAM 16a orSRAM 16 b based on characteristics of the data. Thus, low latency, low bandwidth data is stored in and fetched from SRAM, whereas higher bandwidth data for which latency is not as important, is stored in and fetched from SDRAM. Themicroengines 22 a-22 f can execute memory reference instructions to either theSDRAM controller 26 a orSRAM controller 16 b. - Advantages of hardware multithreading can be explained by SRAM or SDRAM memory accesses. As an example, an SRAM access requested by a Thread_0, from a microengine will cause the
SRAM controller 26 b to initiate an access to theSRAM memory 16 b. The SRAM controller controls arbitration for the SRAM bus, accesses theSRAM 16 b, fetches the data from theSRAM 16 b, and returns data to a requestingmicroengine 22 a-22 b. During an SRAM access, if the microengine e.g., 22 a had only a single thread that could operate, that microengine would be dormant until data was returned from the SRAM. By employing hardware context swapping within each of themicroengines 22 a-22 f, the hardware context swapping enables other contexts with unique program counters to execute in that same microengine. Thus, another thread e.g., Thread_1 can function while the first thread, e.g., Thread_0, is awaiting the read data to return. During execution, Thread_1 may access theSDRAM memory 16 a. While Thread_1 operates on the SDRAM unit, and Thread_0 is operating on the SRAM unit, a new thread, e.g., Thread_2 can now operate in themicroengine 22 a. Thread_2 can operate for a certain amount of time until it needs to access memory or perform some other long latency operation, such as making an access to a bus interface. Therefore, simultaneously, theprocessor 12 can have a bus operation, SRAM operation and. SDRAM operation all being completed or operated upon by onemicroengine 22 a and have one more thread available to process more work in the data path. - The hardware context swapping also synchronizes completion of tasks. For example, two threads could hit the same shared resource e.g., SRAM. Each one of these separate functional units, e.g., the
FBUS interface 28, theSRAM controller 26 a, and theSDRAM controller 26 b, when they complete a requested task from one of the microengine thread contexts reports back a flag signaling completion of an operation. When the flag is received by the microengine, the microengine can determine which thread to turn on. - One example of an application for the hardware-based
multithreaded processor 12 is as a network processor. As a network processor, the hardware-basedmultithreaded processor 12 interfaces to network devices such as a media access controller device e.g., a 10/100BaseT Octal MAC 13 a or aGigabit Ethernet device 13 b. In general, as a network processor, the hardware-basedmultithreaded processor 12 can interface to any type of communication device or interface that receives/sends large amounts of data.Communication system 10 functioning in a networking application could receive a plurality of network packets from thedevices multithreaded processor 12, each network packet can be independently processed. - Another example for use of
processor 12 is a print engine for a postscript processor or as a processor for a storage subsystem, i.e., RAID disk storage. A further use is as a matching engine. In the securities industry for example, the advent of electronic trading requires the use of electronic matching engines to match orders between buyers and sellers. These and other parallel types of tasks can be accomplished on thesystem 10. - The
processor 12 includes abus interface 28 that couples the processor to thesecond bus 18.Bus interface 28 in one embodiment couples theprocessor 12 to the so-called FBUS 18 (FIFO bus). TheFBUS interface 28 is responsible for controlling and interfacing theprocessor 12 to theFBUS 18. TheFBUS 18 is a 64-bit wide FIFO bus, used to interface to Media Access Controller (MAC) devices. - The
processor 12 includes a second interface e.g., aPCI bus interface 24 that couples other system components that reside on thePCI 14 bus to theprocessor 12. ThePCI bus interface 24, provides a highspeed data path 24 a tomemory 16 e.g., theSDRAM memory 16 a. Through that path data can be moved quickly from theSDRAM 16 a through thePCI bus 14, via direct memory access (DMA) transfers. The hardware basedmultithreaded processor 12 supports image transfers. The hardware basedmultithreaded processor 12 can employ a plurality of DMA channels so if one target of a DMA transfer is busy, another one of the DMA channels can take over the PCI bus to deliver information to another target to maintainhigh processor 12 efficiency. Additionally, thePCI bus interface 24 supports target and master operations. Target operations are operations where slave devices onbus 14 access SDRAMs through reads and writes that are serviced as a slave to target operation. In master operations, theprocessor core 20 sends data directly to or receives data directly from thePCI interface 24. - Each of the functional units are coupled to one or more internal buses. As described below, the internal buses are dual, 32 bit buses (i.e., one bus for read and one for write). The hardware-based
multithreaded processor 12 also is constructed such that the sum of the bandwidths of the internal buses in theprocessor 12 exceed the bandwidth of external buses coupled to theprocessor 12. Theprocessor 12 includes an internalcore processor bus 32, e.g., an ASB bus (Advanced System Bus) that couples theprocessor core 20 to thememory controller ASB translator 30 described below. The ASB bus is a subset of the so called AMBA bus that is used with the Strong Arm processor core. Theprocessor 12 also includes aprivate bus 34 that couples the microengine units toSRAM controller 26 b,ASB translator 30 andFBUS interface 28. Amemory bus 38 couples thememory controller memory system 16 includingflashrom 16 c used for boot operations and so forth. - Referring to FIG. 2, each of the
microengines 22 a-22 f includes an arbiter that examines flags to determine the available threads to be operated upon. Any thread from any of themicroengines 22 a-22 f can access theSDRAM controller 26 a,SDRAM controller 26 b orFBUS interface 28. Thememory controllers thread microengines 22 a-22 f issue memory reference requests to thememory controllers microengines 22 a-22 f flood thememory subsystems memory subsystems processor 12 operation. - If the
memory subsystem 16 is flooded with memory requests that are independent in nature, theprocessor 12 can perform memory reference sorting. Memory reference sorting improves achievable memory bandwidth. Memory reference sorting, as described below, reduces dead time or a bubble that occurs with accesses to SRAM. With memory references to SRAM, switching current direction on signal lines between reads and writes produces a bubble or a dead time waiting for current to settle on conductors coupling theSRAM 16 b to theSRAM controller 26 b. - That is, the drivers that drive current on the bus need to settle out prior to changing states. Thus, repetitive cycles of a read followed by a write can degrade peak bandwidth. Memory reference sorting allows the
processor 12 to organize references to memory such that long strings of reads can be followed by long strings of writes. This can be used to minimize dead time in the pipeline to effectively achieve closer to maximum available bandwidth. Reference sorting helps maintain parallel hardware context threads. On the SDRAM, reference sorting allows hiding of pre-charges from one bank to another bank. Specifically, if thememory system 16 b is organized into an odd bank and an even bank, while the processor is operating on the odd bank, the memory controller can start precharging the even bank. Precharging is possible if memory references alternate between odd and even banks. By ordering memory references to alternate accesses to opposite banks, theprocessor 12 improves SDRAM bandwidth. Additionally, other optimizations can be used. For example, merging optimizations where operations that can be merged, are merged prior to memory access, open page optimizations where by examining addresses an opened page of memory is not reopened, chaining, as will be described below, and refreshing mechanisms, can be employed. - The
FBUS interface 28 supports Transmit and Receive flags for each port that a MAC device supports, along with an Interrupt flag indicating when service is warranted. TheFBUS interface 28 also includes a controller 28 a that performs header processing of incoming packets from theFBUS 18. The controller 28 a extracts the packet headers and performs a microprogrammable source/destination/protocol hashed lookup (used for address smoothing) in SRAM. If the hash does not successfully resolve, the packet header is sent to theprocessor core 20 for additional processing. TheFBUS interface 28 supports the following internal data transactions:FBUS unit (Shared bus SRAM) to/from microengine. FBUS unit (via private bus) writes from SDRAM Unit. FBUS unit (via Mbus) Reads to SDRAM. - The
FBUS 18 is a standard industry bus and includes a data bus, e.g., 64 bits wide and sideband control for address and read/write control. TheFBUS interface 28 provides the ability to input large amounts of data using a series of input and output FIFO's 29 a-29 b. From theFIFOs 29 a-29 b, themicroengines 22 a-22 f fetch data from or command theSDRAM controller 26 a to move data from a receive FIFO in which data has come from a device onbus 18, into theFBUS interface 28. The data can be sent throughmemory controller 26 a toSDRAM memory 16 a, via a direct memory access. Similarly, the microengines can move data from theSDRAM 26 a to interface 28, out toFBUS 18, via theFBUS interface 28. - Data functions are distributed amongst the microengines. Connectivity to the
SRAM 26 a,SDRAM 26 b andFBUS 28 is via command requests. A command request can be a memory request or a FBUS request. For example, a command request can move data from a register located in a microengine 22 a to a shared resource, e.g., an SDRAM location, SRAM location, flash memory or some MAC address. The commands are sent out to each of the functional units and the shared resources. However, the shared resources do not need to maintain local buffering of the data. Rather, the shared resources access distributed data located inside of the microengines. This enables microengines 22 a-22 f, to have local access to data rather than arbitrating for access on a bus and risk contention for the bus. With this feature, there is a 0 cycle stall for waiting for data internal to themicroengines 22 a-22 f. - The data buses, e.g.,
ASB bus 30,SRAM bus 34 andSDRAM bus 38 coupling these shared resources, e.g.,memory controllers processor 12 has an bandwidth requirement where each of the functional units is provided with at least twice the maximum bandwidth of the internal buses. As an example, the SDRAM can run a 64 bit wide bus at 83 MHz. The SRAM data bus could have separate read and write buses, e.g., could be a read bus of 32 bits wide running at 166 MHz and a write bus of 32 bits wide at 166 MHz. That is, in essence, 64 bits running at 166 MHz which is effectively twice the bandwidth of the SDRAM. - The
core processor 20 also can access the shared resources. Thecore processor 20 has a direct communication to theSDRAM controller 26 a to thebus interface 24 and toSRAM controller 26 b viabus 32. However, to access themicroengines 22 a-22 f and transfer registers located at any of themicroengines 22 a-22 f, thecore processor 20 access themicroengines 22 a-22 f via theASB Translator 30 overbus 34. TheASB translator 30 can physically reside in theFBUS interface 28, but logically is distinct. TheASB Translator 30 performs an address translation between FBUS microengine transfer register locations and core processor addresses (i.e., ASB bus) so that thecore processor 20 can access registers belonging to themicroengines 22 a-22 c. - Although
microengines 22 can use the register set to exchange data as described below, ascratchpad memory 27 is also provided to permit microengines to write data out to the memory for other microengines to read. Thescratchpad 27 is coupled tobus 34. - The
processor core 20 includes aRISC core 50 implemented in a five stage pipeline performing a single cycle shift of one operand or two operands in a single cycle, provides multiplication support and 32 bit barrel shift support. ThisRISC core 50 is a standard Strong Arm® architecture but it is implemented with a five stage pipeline for performance reasons. Theprocessor core 20 also includes a 16kilobyte instruction cache 52, an 8kilobyte data cache 54 and aprefetch stream buffer 56. Thecore processor 20 performs arithmetic operations in parallel with memory writes and instruction fetches. Thecore processor 20 interfaces with other functional units via the ARM defined ASB bus. The ASB bus is a 32-bitbi-directional bus 32. - Microengines:
- Referring to FIG. 3, an exemplary one of the
microengines 22 a-22 f, e.g.,microengine 22 f is shown. The microengine includes acontrol store 70 which, in one implementation, includes a RAM of here 1,024 words of 32 bit. The RAM stores a microprogram. The microprogram is loadable by thecore processor 20. Themicroengine 22 f also includescontroller logic 72. The controller logic includes aninstruction decoder 73 and program counter (PC)units 72 a-72 d. The four micro program counters 72 a-72 d are maintained in hardware. Themicroengine 22 f also includes contextevent switching logic 74.Context event logic 74 receives messages (e.g., SEQ_#_EVENT_RESPONSE; FBI_EVENT_RESPONSE; SAM_EVENT_RESPONSE; SDRAM_EVENT_RESPONSE; and ASB_EVENT_RESPONSE) from each one of the shared resources, e.g.,SRAM 26 a,SDRAM 26 b, orprocessor core 20, control and status registers, and so forth. These messages provide information on whether a requested function has completed. Based on whether or not a function requested by a thread has completed and signaled completion, the thread needs to wait for that completion signal, and if the thread is enabled to operate, then the thread is placed on an available thread list (not shown). Themicroengine 22 f can have a maximum of e.g., 4 threads available. - In addition to event signals that are local to an executing thread, the
microengines 22 employ signaling states that are global. With signaling states, an executing thread can broadcast a signal state to all microengines 22. Receive Request Available signal, Any and all threads in the microengines can branch on these signaling states. These signaling states can be used to determine availability of a resource or whether a resource is due for servicing. - The
context event logic 74 has arbitration for the four (4) threads. In one embodiment, the arbitration is a round robin mechanism. Other techniques could be used including priority queuing or weighted fair queuing. Themicroengine 22 f also includes an execution box (EBOX)data path 76 that includes anarithmetic logic unit 76 a and general purpose register set 76 b. Thearithmetic logic unit 76 a performs arithmetic and logical functions as well as shift functions. The registers set 76 b has a relatively large number of general purpose registers. As will be described in FIG. 3B, in this implementation there are 64 general purpose registers in a first bank, Bank A and 64 in a second bank, Bank B. The general purpose registers are windowed as will be described so that they are relatively and absolutely addressable. - The
microengine 22 f also includes a writetransfer register stack 78 and aread transfer stack 80. These registers are also windowed so that they are relatively and absolutely addressable. Writetransfer register stack 78 is where write data to a resource is located. Similarly, readregister stack 80 is for return data from a shared resource. Subsequent to or concurrent with data arrival, an event signal from the respective shared resource e.g., theSRAM controller 26 a,SDRAM controller 26 b orcore processor 20 will be provided tocontext event arbiter 74 which will then alert the thread that the data is available or has been sent. Both transfer registerbanks - As shown in FIG. 3A, the microengine datapath maintains a 5-stage micro-pipeline82. This pipeline includes lookup of
microinstruction words 82 a, formation of the register file addresses 82 b, read of operands from register file 82 c, ALU, shift or compareoperations 82 d, and write-back of results toregisters 82 e. By providing a write-back data bypass into the ALU/shifter units, and by assuming the registers are implemented as a register file (rather than a RAM), the microengine can perform a simultaneous register file read and write, which completely hides the write operation. - The
SDRAM interface 26 a provides a signal back to the requesting microengine on reads that indicates whether a parity error occurred on the read request. The microengine microcode is responsible for checking the SDRAM read Parity flag when the microengine uses any return data. Upon checking the flag, if it was set, the act of branching on it clears it. The Parity flag is only sent when the SDRAM is enabled for checking, and the SDRAM is parity protected. The microengines and the PCI Unit are the only requesters notified of parity errors. Therefore, if theprocessor core 20 or FIFO requires parity protection, a microengine assists in the request. Themicroengines 22 a-22 f support conditional branches. The worst case conditional branch latency (not including jumps) occurs when the branch decision is a result of condition codes being set by the previous microcontrol instruction. The latency is shown below in Table 1:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 microstore lookup n1 cb n2 XX b1 b2 b3 b4 reg addr gen n1 cb XX XX b1 b2 b3 reg file lookup n1 cb XX XX b1 b2 ALU/shifter/cc n1 cb XX XX b1 write back m2 n1 cb XX XX - where
- nx is pre-branch microword (n1 sets cc's)
- cb is conditional branch
- bx is post-branch microword
- XX is aborted microword
- As shown in Table 1, it is not until
cycle 4 that the condition codes of n1 are set, and the branch decision can be made (which in this case causes the branch path to be looked up in cycle 5). The microengine incurs a 2-cycle branch latency penalty because it must abort operations n2 and n3 (the 2 microwords directly after the branch) in the pipe, before the branch path begins to fill the pipe with operation b1. If the branch is not taken, no microwords are aborted and execution continues normally. The microengines have several mechanisms to reduce or eliminate the effective branch latency. - The microengines support deferred branches. Deferring branches are when a microengine allows 1 or 2 microwords after the branch to occur before the branch takes effect (i.e. the effect of the branch is “deferred” in time). Thus, if useful work can be found to fill the wasted cycles after the branch microword, then the branch latency can be hidden. A 1-cycle deferred branch is shown below where n2 is allowed to execute after cb, but before b1:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 microstore lookup n1 cb n2 XX b1 b2 b3 b4 reg addr gen n1 cb n2 XX b1 b2 b3 reg file lookup n1 cb n2 XX b1 b2 ALU/shifter/cc n1 cb n2 XX b1 write back n1 cb n2 XX - A 2-cycle deferred branch is shown below, where n2 and n3 are both allowed to complete before the branch to b1 occurs. Note that a 2-cycle branch deferment is only allowed when the condition codes are set on the microword preceding the branch.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 microstore lookup n1 cb n2 n3 b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 reg addr gen n1 cb n2 n3 b1 b2 b3 b4 reg file lkup n1 cb n2 n3 b1 b2 b3 ALU/shftr/cc n1 cb n2 n3 b1 b2 write back n1 cb n2 n3 b1 - The microengines also support condition code evaluation. If the condition codes upon which a branch decision are made are set 2 or more microwords before the branch, then 1 cycle of branch latency can be eliminated because the branch decision can be made 1 cycle earlier:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 microstore lookup n1 n2 cb XX b1 b2 b3 b4 reg addr gen n1 n2 cb XX b1 b2 b3 reg file lookup n1 n2 cb XX b1 b2 ALU/shifter/cc n1 n2 cb XX b1 write back n1 n2 cb XX - In this example, n1 sets the condition codes and n2 does not set the conditions codes. Therefore, the branch decision can be made at cycle 4 (rather than 5), to eliminate 1 cycle of branch latency. In the example below, the 1-cycle branch deferment and early setting of condition codes are combined to completely hide the branch latency:
- Condition codes (cc's) set 2 cycles before a 1-cycle deferred branch:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 microstore lookup n1 n2 cb n3 b1 b2 b3 b4 reg addr gen n1 n2 cb n3 b1 b2 b3 reg file lookup n1 n2 cb n3 b1 b2 ALU/shifter/cc n1 n2 cb n3 b1 write back n1 n2 cb n3 - In the case where the condition codes cannot be set early (i.e. they are set in the microword preceding the branch), the microengine supports branch guessing which attempts to reduce the 1 cycle of exposed branch latency that remains. By “guessing” the branch path or the sequential path, the microsequencer pre-fetches the guessed
path 1 cycle before it definitely knows what path to execute. If it guessed correctly, 1 cycle of branch latency is eliminated as shown below: - guess branch taken/branch is taken
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 microstore lookup n1 cb n1 b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 reg addr gen n1 cb XX b1 b2 b3 b4 reg file lookup n1 cb XX b1 b2 b3 ALU/shifter/cc n1 cb XX b1 b2 write back n1 cb XX b1 - If the microcode guessed a branch taken incorrectly, the microengine still only wastes 1 cycle:
- guess branch taken/branch is NOT taken
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 microstore lookup n1 cb n1 XX n2 n3 n4 n5 reg addr gen n1 cb n1 XX n2 n3 n4 reg file lookup n1 cb n1 XX n2 n3 ALU/shifter/cc n1 cb n1 XX n2 write back n1 cb n1 XX - However, the latency penalty is distributed differently when microcode guesses a branch is not taken:
- For guess branch NOT taken/branch is NOT taken there are no wasted cycles as set out below.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 microstore lookup n1 cb n1 n2 n3 n4 n5 n6 reg addr gen n1 cb n1 n2 n3 n4 n5 reg file lookup n1 cb n1 n2 n1 b4 ALU/shifter/cc n1 cb n1 n2 n3 write back n1 cb n1 n2 - However for guess branch NOT taken/branch is taken there are 2 wasted cycles.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 microstore lookup n1 cb n1 XX b1 b2 b3 b4 reg addr gen n1 cb XX XX b1 b2 b3 reg file lookup n1 cb XX XX b1 b2 ALU/shifter/cc n1 cb XX XX b1 write back n1 cb XX XX - The microengine can combine branch guessing with 1-cycle branch deferment to improve the result further. For guess branch taken with 1-cycle deferred branch/branch is taken is:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 microstore lookup n1 cb n2 b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 reg addr gen n1 cb n2 b1 b2 b3 b4 reg file lookup n1 cb n2 b1 b2 b3 ALU/shifter/cc n1 cb n2 b1 b2 write back n1 cb n2 b1 - In the case above, the 2cycles of branch latency are hidden by the execution of n2, and by correctly guessing the branch direction. If microcode guesses incorrectly, 1 cycle of branch latency remains exposed as shown below:
- guess branch taken with 1-cycle deferred branch/branch is NOT taken
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 microstore lookup n1 cb n2 XX n3 n4 n5 n6 n7 reg addr gen n1 cb n2 XX n3 n4 n5 n6 reg file lkup n1 cb n2 XX n3 n4 n5 ALU/shftr/cc n1 cb n2 XX n3 n4 write back n1 cb n2 XX n3 - If microcode correctly guesses a branch NOT taken, then the pipeline flows sequentially in the normal unperturbed case. If microcode incorrectly guesses branch NOT taken, the microengine again exposes 1 cycle of unproductive execution as shown below:
- guess branch NOT taken/branch is taken
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 microstore lookup n1 cb n2 XX b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 reg addr gen n1 cb n2 XX b1 b2 b3 b4 reg file lkup n1 cb n2 XX b1 b2 b3 ALU/shftr/cc n1 cb n2 XX b1 b2 write back n1 cb n2 XX b1 - where
- nx is pre-branch microword (n1 sets cc's)
- cb is conditional branch
- bx is post-branch microword
- XX is aborted microword
- In the case of a jump instruction, 3 extra cycles of latency are incurred because the branch address is not known until the end of the cycle in which the jump is in the ALU stage:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 microstore n1 jp XX XX XX j1 j2 j3 j4 lookup reg addr gen n1 jp XX XX XX j1 j2 j3 reg file lkup n1 jp XX XX XX j1 j2 ALU/shftr/cc n1 jp XX XX XX j1 write back n1 jp XX XX XX - Context Switch:
- Referring to FIG. 3B, a format from a context switch instruction is shown. A context switch is a special form of a branch that causes a different context (and associated PC) to be selected. Context switching introduces some branch latency as well. Consider the following context switch:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 microstore lookup o1 ca br n1 n2 n3 n4 n5 n6 reg addr gen o1 ca XX n1 n2 n3 n4 n5 reg file lkup o1 ca XX n1 n2 n3 n4 ALU/shftr/cc o1 ca XX n1 n2 n3 write back o1 ca XX n1 n2 - where
- ox is old context flow
- br is branch microword in old context
- ca is context rearbitration (causes context switch)
- nx is new context flow
- XX is aborted microword
- In a context switch the “br” microword is aborted to avoid control and timing complexities that could be caused by saving the correct old context PC.
- Conditional branches that operate on ALU condition codes which are set on the microword before the branch can select 0, 1 or 2-cycle branch deferment modes. Condition codes set 2 or more microwords before the conditional branch that operates on them can select 0 or 1-cycle branch deferment modes. All other branches (including context rearbitrations) can select either 0 or 1-cycle branch deferment modes. The architecture could be designed to make a context arbitration microword within a branch deferment window of a preceding branch, jump or context arbitration microword, an illegal option. That is, in some embodiments, a context switch would not be allowed to occur during a branch transition in the pipeline because as mentioned, it could unduly complicate saving of the old context PC. The architecture could also be designed to make branching within the branch deferment window of a preceding branch, jump or context arbitration microword illegal to avoid complicated and possible unpredictable branch behaviors.
- Each
microengine 22 a-22 f supports multi-threaded execution of four contexts. One reason for this is to allow one thread to start executing just after another thread issues a memory reference and must wait until that reference completes before doing more work. This behavior is critical to maintaining efficient hardware execution of the microengines because memory latency is significant. Stated differently, if only a single thread execution was supported, the microengines would sit idle for a significant number of cycles waiting for references to return and thereby reduce overall computational throughput. Multi-threaded execution allows an microengines to hide memory latency by performing useful independent work across several threads. Two synchronization mechanisms are supplied in order to allow a thread to issue an SRAM or SDRAM reference, and then subsequently synchronize to the point in time when that reference completes. - One mechanism is Immediate Synchronization. In immediate synchronization, the microengine issues the reference and immediately swap out that context. The context will be signaled when the corresponding reference completes. Once signaled, the context will be swapped back in for execution when a context-swap event occurs and it is its turn to run. Thus, from the point of view of a single context's instruction stream, the microword after issuing the mem reference does not get executed until the reference completes.
- A second mechanism is Delayed Synchronization. In delayed synchronization, the microengine issues the reference, and then continues to execute some other useful work independent of the reference. Some time later it could become necessary to synchronize the thread's execution stream to the completion of the issued reference before further work is performed. At this point a synchronizing microword is executed that will either swap out the current thread, and swap it back in sometime later when the reference has completed, or continue executing the current thread because the reference has already completed. Delayed synchronization is implemented using two different signaling schemes:
- If the memory reference is associated with a transfer register, the signal from which the thread is triggered is generated when the corresponding transfer register valid bit is set or cleared. For example, an SRAM read which deposits data into transfer register A would be signaled when the valid bit for A is set. If the memory reference is associated with the transfer FIFO or the receive FIFO, instead of a transfer register, then the signal is generated when the reference completes in the
SDRAM controller 26 a. Only one signal state per context is held in the microengines scheduler, thus only one outstanding signal can exist in this scheme. - There are at least two general operational paradigms from which microcontroller micro-programs could be designed. One would be that overall microcontroller compute throughput and overall memory bandwidth are optimized at the expense of single thread execution latency. This paradigm would make sense when the system has multiple microengines executing multiple threads per microengine on unrelated data packets.
- A second one is that microengine execution latency should be optimized at the expense of overall microengine compute throughput and overall memory bandwidth. This paradigm could involve execution of a thread with a real-time constraint, that is, a constraint which dictates that some work must absolutely be done by some specified time. Such a constraint requires that optimization of the single thread execution be given priority over other considerations such as memory bandwidth or overall computational throughput. A real-time thread would imply a single microengine that executes only one thread. Multiple threads would not be handled because the goal is to allow the single real-time thread to execute as soon as possible—execution of multiple threads would hinder this ability.
- The coding style of these two paradigms could be significantly different with regard to issuing memory references and context switching. In the real time case, the goal is to issue as many memory references as soon as possible in order to minimize the memory latency incurred by those references. Having issued as many references as early as possible the goal would be to perform as many computations as the microengines as possible in parallel with the references. A computation flow that corresponds to real-time optimization is:
-
issue mem ref 1 -
issue mem ref 2 -
issue mem ref 3 - perform work independent of
mem refs - synch to completion of
mem ref 1 - perform work dependent on
mem ref 1 and independent ofmem ref - issue any new mem refs based on preceding work.
- synch to completion of
mem ref 2 - perform work dependent on
mem ref mem ref 3 - issue any new mem refs based on preceding work.
- synch to completion of
mem ref 3 - perform work dependent on the completion of all3 refs
- issue any new mem refs based on preceding work.
- In contrast, optimization for throughput and bandwidth would take a different approach. With optimization for microengine computational throughput and overall memory bandwidth less consideration is given to single thread execution latency. To accomplish this, the goal would be to equally space memory references across the microprogram for each thread. This would provide a uniform stream of memory references to the SRAM and SDRAM controllers and would maximize the probability that 1 thread is always available to hide the memory latency incurred when another thread is swapped out.
- Register File Address Types:
- Referring to FIG. 3C, the two register address spaces that exist are Locally accessibly registers, and Globally accessible registers accessible by all microengines. The General Purpose Registers (GPRs) are implemented as two separate banks (A bank and B bank) whose addresses are interleaved on a word-by-word basis such that A bank registers have lsb=0, and B bank registers have lsb=1. Each bank is capable of performing a simultaneous read and write to two different words within its bank.
- Across banks A and B, the register set76 b is also organized into four
windows 76 b 0-76 b 3 of 32 registers that are relatively addressable per thread. Thus, thread_0 will find itsregister 0 at 77 a (register 0), the thread_1 will find its register_0 at 77 b (register 32), thread_2 will find its register_0 at 77 c (register 64), and thread_3 at 77 d (register 96). Relative addressing is supported so that multiple threads can use the exact same control store and locations but access different windows of register and perform different functions. The uses of register window addressing and bank addressing provide the requisite read bandwidth using only dual ported RAMS in themicroengine 22 f. - These windowed registers do not have to save data from context switch to context switch so that the normal push and pop of a context swap file or stack is eliminated. Context switching here has a 0 cycle overhead for changing from one context to another. Relative register addressing divides the register banks into windows across the address width of the general purpose register set. Relative addressing allows access any of the windows relative to the starting point of the window. Absolute addressing is also supported in this architecture where any one of the absolute registers may be accessed by any of the threads by providing the exact address of the register.
- Addressing of general purpose registers78 can occur in 2 modes depending on the microword format. The two modes are absolute and relative. In absolute mode, addressing of a register address is directly specified in 7-bit source field (a6-a0 or b6-b0):
7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 A GPR: a6 0 a5 a4 a3 a2 a1 a0 a6 = 0 B GPR: b6 1 b5 b4 b3 b2 b1 b0 b6 = 0 SRAM/ASB: a6 a5 a4 0 a3 a2 a1 a0 a6 = 1, a5 = 0, a4 = 0 - SDRAM: |a6|a5|a4|0|a3|a2|a1|a0| a6=1, a5=0, a4=1
- register address directly specified in 8-bit dest field (d7-d0):
7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 A GPR: d7 d6 d5 d4 d3 d2 d1 d0 d7 = 0, d6 = 0 B GPR: d7 d6 d5 d4 d3 d2 d1 d0 d7 = 0, d6 = 1 SRAM/ASB: d7 d6 d5 d4 d3 d2 d1 d0 d7 = 1, d6 = 0, d5 = 0 SDRAM: d7 d6 d5 d4 d3 d2 d1 d0 d7 = 1, d6 = 0, d5 = 1 - If <a6:a5>=1,1, <b6:b5>=1,1, or <d7:d6>=1,1 then the lower bits are interpreted as a context-relative address field (described below). When a non-relative A or B source address is specified in the A, B absolute field, only the lower half of the SRAM/ASB and SDRAM address spaces can be addressed. Effectively, reading absolute SRAM/SDRAM devices has the effective address space; however, since this restriction does not apply to the dest field, writing the SRAM/SDRAM still uses the full address space.
- In relative mode, addresses a specified address is offset within context space as defined by a 5-bit source field (a4-a0 or b4-b0):
7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 A GPR: a4 0 context a3 a2 a1 a0 a4 = 0 B GPR: b4 1 context b3 b2 b1 b0 b4 = 0 SRAN/: ab4 0 ab3 context b2 b1 ab0 ab4 = 1, ab3 = 0 ASB SDRAM: ab4 0 ab3 context b2 b1 ab0 ab4 = 1, ab3 = 1 - or as defined by the 6-bit dest field (d5-d0):
7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 A GPR: d5 d4 context d3 d2 d1 d0 d5 = 0, d4 = 0 B GPR: d5 d4 context d3 d2 d1 d0 d5 = 0, d4 = 1 SRAN/ASB: d5 d4 d3 context d2 d1 d0 d5 = 1, d4 = 0, d3 = 0 SDRAN: d5 d4 d3 context d2 d1 d0 d5 = 1, d4 = 0, d3 = 1 - If <d5:d4>=1,1, then the destination address does not address a valid register, thus, no dest operand is written back.
- The following registers are globally accessible from the microengines and the memory controllers:
- hash unit registers
- scratchpad and common registers
- receive FIFO and receive status FIFO
- transmit FIFO
- transmit control FIFO
- The microengines are not interrupt driven. Each microflow executes until completion and then a new flow is chosen based on state signaled by other devices in the
processor 12. - Referring to FIG. 4, the
SDRAM memory controller 26 a includesmemory reference queues 90 where memory reference requests arrive from thevarious microengines 22 a-22 f. Thememory controller 26 a includes anarbiter 91 that selects the next the microengine reference requests to go to any of the functioning units. Given that one of the microengines is providing a reference request, the reference request will come through the address andcommand queue 90, inside theSDRAM controller 26 a. If the reference request has a bit set called the “optimized MEM bit” the incoming reference request will be sorted into either theeven bank queue 90 a or theodd bank queue 90 b. If the memory reference request does not have a memory optimization bit set, the default will be to go into anorder queue 90 c. TheSDRAM controller 26 is a resource which is shared among theFBUS interface 28, thecore processor 20 and thePCI interface 24. TheSDRAM controller 26 also maintains a state machine for performing READ-MODIFY-Write atomic operations. TheSDRAM controller 26 also performs byte alignment for requests of data from SDRAM. - The
order queue 90 c maintains the order of reference requests from the microengines. With a series of odd and even banks references it may be required that a signal is returned only upon completion of a sequence of memory references to both the odd and even banks. If themicroengine 22 f sorts the memory references into odd bank and even bank references and one of the banks, e.g., the even bank is drained of memory references before the odd bank but the signal is asserted on the last even reference, thememory controller 26 a could conceivably signal back to a microengine that the memory request had completed, even though the odd bank reference had not been serviced. This occurrence could cause a coherency problem. The situation is avoided by providing theorder queue 90 c allowing a microengine to have multiple memory references outstanding of which only its last memory reference needs to signal a completion. - The
SDRAM controller 26 a also includes ahigh priority queue 90 d. In thehigh priority queue 90 d, an incoming memory reference from one of the microengines goes directly to the high priority queue and is operated upon at a higher priority than other memory references in the other queues. All of these queues, theeven bank queue 90 a, theodd bank queue 90 b, theorder queue 90 c and the high priority queue, are implemented in a single RAM structure that is logically segmented into four different windows, each window having its own head and tail pointer. Since filling and draining operations are only a single input and a single output, they can be placed into the same RAM structure to increase density of RAM structures. - The
SDRAM controller 26 a also includes core bus interface logic i.e.,ASB bus 92. The ASBbus interface logic 92 interfaces thecore processor 20 to theSDRAM controller 26 a. The ASB bus is a bus that includes a 32 bit data path and a 28 bit address path. The data is accessed to and from memory through MEMASB data device 98, e.g., a buffer. MEMASB data device 98 is a queue for write data. If there is incoming data from thecore processor 20 viaASB interface 92, the data can be stored into theMEM ASB device 98 and subsequently removed fromMEM ASB device 98 through theSDRAM interface 110 toSDRAM memory 16 a. Although not shown, the same queue structure can be provided for the reads. TheSDRAM controller 26 a also includes anengine 97 to pull data from the microengines and PCI bus. - Additional queues include the
PCI address queue 94 and ASB read/write queue 96 that maintain a number of requests. The memory requests are sent toSDRAM interface 110 viamultiplexer 106. Themultiplexer 106 is controlled by theSDRAM arbiter 91 which detects the fullness of each of the queues and the status of the requests and from that decides priority based on a programmable value stored in a priorityservice control register 100. - Once control to the
multiplexer 106 selects a memory reference request, the memory reference request, is sent to adecoder 108 where it is decoded and an address is generated. The decoded address is sent to theSDRAM interface 110 where it is decomposed into row and column address strobes to access theSDRAM 16 a and write or read data overdata lines 16 a sending data tobus 112. In one implementation,bus 112 is actually two separate buses instead of a single bus. The separate buses would include a read bus coupling the distributedmicroengines 22 a-22 f and a write bus coupling the distributedmicroengines 22 a-22 f. - A feature of the
SDRAM controller 26 a is that when a memory reference is stored in thequeues 90, in addition to the optimized MEM bit that can be set, there is a “chaining bit”. The chaining bit when set allows for special handling of contiguous memory references. As previously mentioned, thearbiter 12 controls which microengine will be selected to provide memory reference requests over the commander bus to queue 90 (FIG. 4). Assertion of the chain bit will control the arbiter to have the arbiter select the functional unit which previously requested that bus because setting of the chain bit indicates that the microengine issued a chain request. - Contiguous memory references will be received in
queue 90 when the chaining bit is set. Those contiguous references will typically be stored in theorder queue 90 c because the contiguous memory references are multiple memory references from a single thread. In order to provide synchronization, thememory controller 26 a need only signal at the end of the chained memory references when done. However, in an optimized memory chaining, (e..g, when optimized MEM bit and chaining bit are set) the memory references could go into different banks and potentially complete on one of the banks issuing the signal “done” before the other bank was fully drained, thus destroying coherency. Therefore, the chain bit is used by thecontroller 110 to maintain the memory references from the current queue. - Referring to FIG. 4A, a flow representation of the arbitration policy in the
SDRAM controller 26 a is shown. The arbitration policy favors chained microengine memory requests. Theprocess 115 starts by examining for Chained microenginememory reference requests 115 a. Theprocess 115 stays at the chained requests until the chain bit is cleared. The process examinesASB bus requests 115 b followed by PCI bus requests 115 c, HighPriority Queue Service 115 d, Opposite Bank Requests 115 e, Order Queue Requests 115 f, and Same Bank Requests 115 g. Chained request are serviced completely, whereasservices 115 b-115d are serviced in round robin order. Only whenservices 115 a-115 d are fully drained does the process handleservices 115 e-115g. Chained microengine memory reference requests are when the previous SDRAM memory request has the chain bit set. When the chain bit is set then the arbitration engine simply services the same queue again, until the chain bit is cleared. The ASB is higher priority than PCI due to the severe performance penalty imposed on the Strong arm core when the ASB is in wait state. PCI has higher priority than the microengines due to the latency requirements of PCI. However with other buses, the arbitration priority could be different. - As shown in FIG. 4B, typical timing of a memory without active memory optimization and with active memory optimization is shown. As can be seen, the use of active memory optimizations maximizes the use of the bus and thus hides the inherent latency within physical SDRAM devices. In this example, a non-optimized access can take 14 cycles while optimized access can take 7 cyles.
- Referring to FIG. 5, the
memory controller 26 b for the SRAM is shown. Thememory controller 26 b includes an address andcommand queue 120. While thememory controller 26 a (FIG. 4) has a queue for memory optimization based on odd and even banking,memory controller 26 b is optimized based on the type of memory operation, i.e., a read or a write. The address andcommand queue 120 includes ahigh priority queue 120 a, aread queue 120 b which is the predominant memory reference function that an SRAM performs, and anorder queue 120 c which in general will include all writes to SRAM and reads that are to be non-optimized. Although not shown, the address andcommand queue 120 could also include a write queue. - The
SRAM controller 26 b also includes core bus interface logic i.e.,ASB bus 122. The ASBbus interface logic 122 interfaces thecore processor 20 to theSRAM controller 26 b. The ASB bus is a bus that includes a 32 bit data path and a 28 bit address path. The data is accessed to and from memory through MEMASB data device 128, e.g., a buffer. MEMASB data device 128 is a queue for write data. If there is incoming data from thecore processor 20 viaASB interface 122, the data can be stored into theMEM ASB device 128 and subsequently removed fromMEM ASB device 128 throughSRAM interface 140 toSRAM memory 16 b. Although not shown, the same queue structure can be provided for reads. TheSRAM controller 26 b also includes anengine 127 to pull data from the microengines and PCI bus. - The memory requests are sent to
SRAM interface 140 viamultiplexer 126. Themultiplexer 126 is controlled by theSRAM arbiter 131 which detects the fullness of each of the queues and the status of the requests and from that decides priority based on a programmable value stored in a priorityservice control register 130. Once control to themultiplexer 126 selects a memory reference request, the memory reference request, is sent to adecoder 138 where it is decoded and an address is generated. - The SRAM Unit maintains control of the Memory Mapped off-chip SRAM and Expansion ROM. The
SRAM controller 26 b can address, e.g., 16 MBytes, with, e.g., 8 MBytes mapped forSRAM flashrom 16 c; and Console port access forMAC devices - The
SRAM controller 26 b supports the following transactions:Microengine requests (via private bus) to/from SRAM. Core Processor (via ASB bus) to/from SRAM. - The
SRAM controller 26 b performs memory reference sorting to minimize delays (bubbles) in the pipeline from theSRAM interface 140 tomemory 16 b. TheSRAM controller 26 b does memory reference sorting based on the read function. A bubble can either be 1 or 2 cycles depending on the type of memory device employed. - The
SRAM controller 26 b includes alock lookup device 142 which is an eight (8 entry address content addressable memory for look-ups of read locks. Each position include a valid bit that is examined by subsequent read-lock requests. The address andcommand queue 120 also includes a Read Lock FailQueue 120 d. The Read Lock FailQueue 120 d is used to hold read memory reference requests that fail because of a lock existing on a portion of memory. That is, one of the microengines issues a memory request that has a read lock request that is processed in address andcontrol queue 120. The memory request will operate on either theorder queue 120 c or theread queue 120 b and will recognize it as a read lock request. Thecontroller 26 b will accesslock lookup device 142 to determine whether this memory location is already locked. If this memory location is locked from any prior read lock request, then this memory lock request will fail and will be stored in the read lock failqueue 120 d. If it is unlocked or if 142 shows no lock on that address, then the address of that memory reference will be used by theSRAM interface 140 to perform a traditional SRAM address read/write request tomemory 16 b. The command controller andaddress generator 138 will also enter the lock into the lock look updevice 142 so that subsequent read lock requests will find the memory location locked. A memory location is unlocked by operation of the a microcontrol instruction in a program after the need for the lock has ended. The location is unlocked by clearing the valid bit in the CAM. After an unlock, the read lock failqueue 120 d becomes the highest priority queue giving all queued read lock misses, a chance to issue a memory lock request. - As shown in FIG. 5A, typical timing of a static random access memory without active memory optimization and with active memory optimization is shown. As can be seen, grouping reads and writes improves cycletime eliminating dead cycles.
- Referring to FIG. 6, communication between the microengines22 and the FBUS interface Logic (FBI) is shown. The
FBUS interface 28 in a network application can performs header processing of incoming packets from theFBUS 18. A key function which the FBUS interface performs is extraction of packet headers, and a microprogrammable source/destination/protocol hashed lookup in SRAM. If the hash does not successfully resolve, the packet header is promoted to thecore processor 28 for more sophisticated processing. - The
FBI 28 contains a TransmitFIFO 182, a ReceiveFIFO 183, a HASH unit 188 and FBI control and status registers 189. These four units communicate with themicroengines 22, via a time-multiplexed access to theSRAM bus 38 which is connected to the transfer registers 78, 80 in the microengines. That is, all communications to and from the microengines are via the transfer registers 78, 80. TheFBUS interface 28 includes a push state machine 200 for pushing data into the transfer registers during the time cycles which the SRAM is NOT using the SRAM data bus (part of bus 38) and apull state machine 202 for fetching data from the transfer registers in the respective microengine. - The Hashing unit includes a pair of FIFO's188 a, 188 b. The hash unit determines that the
FBI 28 received an FBI_hash request. The hash unit 188 fetches hash keys from the callingmicroengine 22. After the keys are fetched and hashed, the indices are delivered back to the callingmicroengine 22. Up to three hashes are performed under a single FBI_hash request. Thebusses appropriate microengine 22 Transfer registers. - Generally, transfer registers require protection from the context controlling them to guarantee read correctness. In particular, if a write transfer register is being used by a thread_1 to provide data to the
SDRAM 16 a, thread_1 must not overwrite this register until the signal back fromSDRAM controller 26 a indicates that this register has been promoted and may now be re-used. Every write does not require a signal back from the destination indicating that the function has been completed, because if the thread writes to the same command queue at that destination with multiple requests, the order of the completion is guaranteed within that command queue, thus only the last command requires the signaling back to the thread. However, if the thread uses multiple command queues (order and read), then these command requests must be broken into separate context tasks, so that ordering is maintained via context swapping. The exception case indicated at the beginning of this paragraph is relative to a certain class of operations using an unsolicited PUSH to transfer registers from the FBI for FBUS status information. In order to protect read/write determinism on the transfer registers, the FBI provides a special Push_protect signal when these special FBI push operations are set up. - Any
microengine 22 that uses the FBI unsolicited push technique must test the protection flag prior to accessing the FBUS interface/microengine agreed upon transfer registers. If the flag is not asserted, then the transfer registers may be accessed by the microengine. If the flag is Asserted then the context should wait N cycles prior to accessing the registers. A priori this count is determined by the number of transfer registers being pushed, plus a frontend protection window. The basic idea is that the microengine must test this flag then quickly move the data which it wishes to read from the read transfer registers to GPR's in contiguous cycles, so the push engine does not collide with the microengine read. - It is to be understood that while the invention has been described in conjunction with the detailed description thereof, the foregoing description is intended to illustrate and not limit the scope of the invention, which is defined by the scope of the appended claims. Other aspects, advantages, and modifications are within the scope of the following claims.
Claims (20)
1. A parallel hardware-based multithreaded processor comprises:
a general purpose processor that coordinates system functions; and
a plurality of microengines that support multiple hardware threads.
2. The processor of claim 1 wherein the general purpose processor load microcontrol programs in the plurality of microcontrol engines.
3. The processor of claim 1 further comprising a memory control system.
4. The processor of claim 1 wherein the memory control system comprises a synchronous dynamic random access memory controller that sorts memory references based on whether the memory references are directed to an even bank or an odd bank of memory.
5. The processor of claim 1 wherein the memory control system comprises a static random access memory controller that optimizes memory references based upon whether the memory references are read references or write references.
6. The processor of claim 1 wherein each of the plurality of microengines employ hardware-based context swapping amongst a plurality of threads that are independently executable within each of the microengines.
7. The processor of claim 1 further comprising a high speed bus interface that couples the processor to a communication bus.
8. The processor of claim 1 further comprising a bus interface that couples the processor to a computer system bus.
9. The processor of claim 1 further comprising an internal bus arrangement to couple shared resources in the processor to the plurality of microengines.
10. The processor of claim 9 wherein the internal bus arrangement to couple shared resources, comprises:
a first bus to couple the general purpose processor to the plurality of microengines.
11. The processor of claim 9 wherein the internal bus arrangement to couple shared resources, comprises:
a translator device that translates requests from the general purpose processor to the microengines; and
a first bus to couple the general purpose processor to the plurality of microengines.
12. The processor of claim 3 wherein the internal bus arrangement to couple shared resources, comprises:
a translator device that translates requests from the general purpose processor to the microengines; and
a first bus to couple the general purpose processor to the plurality of microengines; and
a second bus to couple the general purpose processor to the memory control system.
13. The processor of claim 11 , further comprising a third bus to couple the microengines to external bus interfaces.
14. The processor of claim 8 wherein the shared resources comprise:
a memory controller for controlling access to low latency memory;
a memory controller for controlling an access to high bandwidth memory;
a bus interface for controlling access to a communications bus; and
a bus interface for controlling access to a computer bus.
15. The processor of claim 1 wherein each one of the microengines includes a program counter to uniquely identify a position of a thread during execution in the microengine.
16. The processor of claim 1 wherein the processor supports global signaling to each of the microengines.
17. The processor of claim 16 wherein the global signaling is available to each thread in each microengine.
18. The processor of claim 17 wherein the global signaling is available to each thread to permit each thread to take a branch.
19. A parallel hardware-based multithreaded processor comprises:
a general purpose processor that coordinates system functions;
a plurality of microengines that support multiple hardware threads;
a memory control system comprising:
a first memory controller that sorts memory references based on whether the memory references are directed to an even bank or an odd bank of memory; and
a second memory controller that optimizes memory references based upon whether the memory references are read references or write references.
20. The parallel hardware-based multithreaded processor of claim 19 wherein the first memory controller controls synchronous dynamic random access memory and the second memory controller controls static random access static memory.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/615,500 US20040073778A1 (en) | 1999-08-31 | 2003-07-08 | Parallel processor architecture |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/387,111 US6606704B1 (en) | 1999-08-31 | 1999-08-31 | Parallel multithreaded processor with plural microengines executing multiple threads each microengine having loadable microcode |
US10/615,500 US20040073778A1 (en) | 1999-08-31 | 2003-07-08 | Parallel processor architecture |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/387,111 Continuation US6606704B1 (en) | 1999-08-31 | 1999-08-31 | Parallel multithreaded processor with plural microengines executing multiple threads each microengine having loadable microcode |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20040073778A1 true US20040073778A1 (en) | 2004-04-15 |
Family
ID=23528511
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/387,111 Expired - Lifetime US6606704B1 (en) | 1999-08-31 | 1999-08-31 | Parallel multithreaded processor with plural microengines executing multiple threads each microengine having loadable microcode |
US10/615,500 Abandoned US20040073778A1 (en) | 1999-08-31 | 2003-07-08 | Parallel processor architecture |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/387,111 Expired - Lifetime US6606704B1 (en) | 1999-08-31 | 1999-08-31 | Parallel multithreaded processor with plural microengines executing multiple threads each microengine having loadable microcode |
Country Status (9)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US6606704B1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1221105B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN1185592C (en) |
AT (1) | ATE253238T1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU6641900A (en) |
CA (1) | CA2391833C (en) |
DE (1) | DE60006270T2 (en) |
HK (1) | HK1049716B (en) |
WO (1) | WO2001016782A2 (en) |
Cited By (25)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20030041216A1 (en) * | 2001-08-27 | 2003-02-27 | Rosenbluth Mark B. | Mechanism for providing early coherency detection to enable high performance memory updates in a latency sensitive multithreaded environment |
US20030067934A1 (en) * | 2001-09-28 | 2003-04-10 | Hooper Donald F. | Multiprotocol decapsulation/encapsulation control structure and packet protocol conversion method |
US20030105899A1 (en) * | 2001-08-27 | 2003-06-05 | Rosenbluth Mark B. | Multiprocessor infrastructure for providing flexible bandwidth allocation via multiple instantiations of separate data buses, control buses and support mechanisms |
US20030115426A1 (en) * | 2001-12-17 | 2003-06-19 | Rosenbluth Mark B. | Congestion management for high speed queuing |
US20050132132A1 (en) * | 2001-08-27 | 2005-06-16 | Rosenbluth Mark B. | Software controlled content addressable memory in a general purpose execution datapath |
US20050144413A1 (en) * | 2003-12-30 | 2005-06-30 | Chen-Chi Kuo | Method and apparatus utilizing non-uniformly distributed DRAM configurations and to detect in-range memory address matches |
US20050216710A1 (en) * | 2002-01-17 | 2005-09-29 | Wilkinson Hugh M Iii | Parallel processor with functional pipeline providing programming engines by supporting multiple contexts and critical section |
US20050254480A1 (en) * | 2004-05-17 | 2005-11-17 | Kicheon Kim | Router using clock synchronizer for distributed traffic control |
US20060059316A1 (en) * | 2004-09-10 | 2006-03-16 | Cavium Networks | Method and apparatus for managing write back cache |
US20060059314A1 (en) * | 2004-09-10 | 2006-03-16 | Cavium Networks | Direct access to low-latency memory |
US20060067348A1 (en) * | 2004-09-30 | 2006-03-30 | Sanjeev Jain | System and method for efficient memory access of queue control data structures |
US20060072563A1 (en) * | 2004-10-05 | 2006-04-06 | Regnier Greg J | Packet processing |
US20060140203A1 (en) * | 2004-12-28 | 2006-06-29 | Sanjeev Jain | System and method for packet queuing |
US20060155959A1 (en) * | 2004-12-21 | 2006-07-13 | Sanjeev Jain | Method and apparatus to provide efficient communication between processing elements in a processor unit |
US20070234009A1 (en) * | 2000-08-31 | 2007-10-04 | Intel Corporation | Processor having a dedicated hash unit integrated within |
US7418582B1 (en) * | 2004-05-13 | 2008-08-26 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Versatile register file design for a multi-threaded processor utilizing different modes and register windows |
US7558925B2 (en) | 2004-09-10 | 2009-07-07 | Cavium Networks, Inc. | Selective replication of data structures |
US7751402B2 (en) | 1999-12-29 | 2010-07-06 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for gigabit packet assignment for multithreaded packet processing |
USRE41849E1 (en) | 1999-12-22 | 2010-10-19 | Intel Corporation | Parallel multi-threaded processing |
US7895239B2 (en) | 2002-01-04 | 2011-02-22 | Intel Corporation | Queue arrays in network devices |
US7991983B2 (en) | 1999-09-01 | 2011-08-02 | Intel Corporation | Register set used in multithreaded parallel processor architecture |
US8099777B1 (en) * | 2004-08-26 | 2012-01-17 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | High security, multi-level processor and method of operating a computing system |
US8316191B2 (en) | 1999-08-31 | 2012-11-20 | Intel Corporation | Memory controllers for processor having multiple programmable units |
US8738886B2 (en) | 1999-12-27 | 2014-05-27 | Intel Corporation | Memory mapping in a processor having multiple programmable units |
US10884662B2 (en) * | 2018-08-06 | 2021-01-05 | Silicon Motion, Inc. | Method for performing storage control in a storage server, associated memory device and memory controller thereof, and associated storage server |
Families Citing this family (81)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7266725B2 (en) | 2001-09-03 | 2007-09-04 | Pact Xpp Technologies Ag | Method for debugging reconfigurable architectures |
DE19651075A1 (en) | 1996-12-09 | 1998-06-10 | Pact Inf Tech Gmbh | Unit for processing numerical and logical operations, for use in processors (CPU's), multi-computer systems, data flow processors (DFP's), digital signal processors (DSP's) or the like |
DE19654595A1 (en) | 1996-12-20 | 1998-07-02 | Pact Inf Tech Gmbh | I0 and memory bus system for DFPs as well as building blocks with two- or multi-dimensional programmable cell structures |
US6542998B1 (en) | 1997-02-08 | 2003-04-01 | Pact Gmbh | Method of self-synchronization of configurable elements of a programmable module |
US8686549B2 (en) * | 2001-09-03 | 2014-04-01 | Martin Vorbach | Reconfigurable elements |
DE19861088A1 (en) | 1997-12-22 | 2000-02-10 | Pact Inf Tech Gmbh | Repairing integrated circuits by replacing subassemblies with substitutes |
AU5805300A (en) | 1999-06-10 | 2001-01-02 | Pact Informationstechnologie Gmbh | Sequence partitioning in cell structures |
US6631430B1 (en) * | 1999-12-28 | 2003-10-07 | Intel Corporation | Optimizations to receive packet status from fifo bus |
US6898179B1 (en) * | 2000-04-07 | 2005-05-24 | International Business Machines Corporation | Network processor/software control architecture |
EP1342158B1 (en) | 2000-06-13 | 2010-08-04 | Richter, Thomas | Pipeline configuration unit protocols and communication |
US8058899B2 (en) | 2000-10-06 | 2011-11-15 | Martin Vorbach | Logic cell array and bus system |
US7131125B2 (en) * | 2000-12-22 | 2006-10-31 | Nortel Networks Limited | Method and system for sharing a computer resource between instruction threads of a multi-threaded process |
US9037807B2 (en) | 2001-03-05 | 2015-05-19 | Pact Xpp Technologies Ag | Processor arrangement on a chip including data processing, memory, and interface elements |
US7444531B2 (en) | 2001-03-05 | 2008-10-28 | Pact Xpp Technologies Ag | Methods and devices for treating and processing data |
US7844796B2 (en) | 2001-03-05 | 2010-11-30 | Martin Vorbach | Data processing device and method |
US7996827B2 (en) | 2001-08-16 | 2011-08-09 | Martin Vorbach | Method for the translation of programs for reconfigurable architectures |
US7434191B2 (en) | 2001-09-03 | 2008-10-07 | Pact Xpp Technologies Ag | Router |
US8686475B2 (en) | 2001-09-19 | 2014-04-01 | Pact Xpp Technologies Ag | Reconfigurable elements |
US7676588B2 (en) * | 2001-10-05 | 2010-03-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Programmable network protocol handler architecture |
US7072970B2 (en) * | 2001-10-05 | 2006-07-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | Programmable network protocol handler architecture |
EP1483682A2 (en) | 2002-01-19 | 2004-12-08 | PACT XPP Technologies AG | Reconfigurable processor |
US7610451B2 (en) * | 2002-01-25 | 2009-10-27 | Intel Corporation | Data transfer mechanism using unidirectional pull bus and push bus |
EP2043000B1 (en) | 2002-02-18 | 2011-12-21 | Richter, Thomas | Bus systems and reconfiguration method |
US8914590B2 (en) | 2002-08-07 | 2014-12-16 | Pact Xpp Technologies Ag | Data processing method and device |
US7437724B2 (en) * | 2002-04-03 | 2008-10-14 | Intel Corporation | Registers for data transfers |
US7657861B2 (en) | 2002-08-07 | 2010-02-02 | Pact Xpp Technologies Ag | Method and device for processing data |
AU2003286131A1 (en) | 2002-08-07 | 2004-03-19 | Pact Xpp Technologies Ag | Method and device for processing data |
US20040034858A1 (en) * | 2002-08-14 | 2004-02-19 | Kushlis Robert J. | Programming a multi-threaded processor |
JP4388895B2 (en) | 2002-09-06 | 2009-12-24 | ペーアーツェーテー イクスペーペー テクノロジーズ アクチエンゲゼルシャフト | Reconfigurable sequencer structure |
EP1634182A2 (en) * | 2003-06-17 | 2006-03-15 | PACT XPP Technologies AG | Data processing device and method |
EP1676208A2 (en) | 2003-08-28 | 2006-07-05 | PACT XPP Technologies AG | Data processing device and method |
US7664823B1 (en) | 2003-09-24 | 2010-02-16 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Partitioned packet processing in a multiprocessor environment |
US20050102474A1 (en) * | 2003-11-06 | 2005-05-12 | Sridhar Lakshmanamurthy | Dynamically caching engine instructions |
US7536692B2 (en) | 2003-11-06 | 2009-05-19 | Intel Corporation | Thread-based engine cache partitioning |
US20050108479A1 (en) * | 2003-11-06 | 2005-05-19 | Sridhar Lakshmanamurthy | Servicing engine cache requests |
JP4502650B2 (en) * | 2004-02-03 | 2010-07-14 | 日本電気株式会社 | Array type processor |
US7555753B2 (en) * | 2004-02-26 | 2009-06-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | Measuring processor use in a hardware multithreading processor environment |
US20050198482A1 (en) * | 2004-03-02 | 2005-09-08 | Altek Corporation | Central processing unit having a micro-code engine |
US20050216655A1 (en) * | 2004-03-25 | 2005-09-29 | Rosenbluth Mark B | Content addressable memory constructed from random access memory |
US7181568B2 (en) * | 2004-03-25 | 2007-02-20 | Intel Corporation | Content addressable memory to identify subtag matches |
US20060048156A1 (en) * | 2004-04-02 | 2006-03-02 | Lim Soon C | Unified control store |
US8074051B2 (en) | 2004-04-07 | 2011-12-06 | Aspen Acquisition Corporation | Multithreaded processor with multiple concurrent pipelines per thread |
US7418540B2 (en) * | 2004-04-28 | 2008-08-26 | Intel Corporation | Memory controller with command queue look-ahead |
US7216216B1 (en) | 2004-06-30 | 2007-05-08 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Register window management using first pipeline to change current window and second pipeline to read operand from old window and write operand to new window |
US7426630B1 (en) * | 2004-06-30 | 2008-09-16 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Arbitration of window swap operations |
DE102004035843B4 (en) * | 2004-07-23 | 2010-04-15 | Infineon Technologies Ag | Router Network Processor |
GB2417105B (en) * | 2004-08-13 | 2008-04-09 | Clearspeed Technology Plc | Processor memory system |
US20060095730A1 (en) * | 2004-09-30 | 2006-05-04 | Gilbert Wolrich | Expansion of compute engine code space by sharing adjacent control stores using interleaved program addresses |
US7277990B2 (en) | 2004-09-30 | 2007-10-02 | Sanjeev Jain | Method and apparatus providing efficient queue descriptor memory access |
US7418543B2 (en) | 2004-12-21 | 2008-08-26 | Intel Corporation | Processor having content addressable memory with command ordering |
US7467256B2 (en) * | 2004-12-28 | 2008-12-16 | Intel Corporation | Processor having content addressable memory for block-based queue structures |
US7734895B1 (en) | 2005-04-28 | 2010-06-08 | Massachusetts Institute Of Technology | Configuring sets of processor cores for processing instructions |
KR101270925B1 (en) * | 2005-05-20 | 2013-06-07 | 소니 주식회사 | Signal processor |
CN100407701C (en) * | 2005-06-25 | 2008-07-30 | 华为技术有限公司 | Network processor |
US7853951B2 (en) * | 2005-07-25 | 2010-12-14 | Intel Corporation | Lock sequencing to reorder and grant lock requests from multiple program threads |
US20070044103A1 (en) * | 2005-07-25 | 2007-02-22 | Mark Rosenbluth | Inter-thread communication of lock protected data |
US7434039B2 (en) * | 2005-09-13 | 2008-10-07 | Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. | Computer processor capable of responding with comparable efficiency to both software-state-independent and state-dependent events |
US7996255B1 (en) * | 2005-09-29 | 2011-08-09 | The Mathworks, Inc. | System and method for providing sales leads based on-demand software trial usage |
US20070124728A1 (en) * | 2005-11-28 | 2007-05-31 | Mark Rosenbluth | Passing work between threads |
US20070157030A1 (en) * | 2005-12-30 | 2007-07-05 | Feghali Wajdi K | Cryptographic system component |
US7900022B2 (en) * | 2005-12-30 | 2011-03-01 | Intel Corporation | Programmable processing unit with an input buffer and output buffer configured to exclusively exchange data with either a shared memory logic or a multiplier based upon a mode instruction |
EP1974265A1 (en) | 2006-01-18 | 2008-10-01 | PACT XPP Technologies AG | Hardware definition method |
US8984256B2 (en) | 2006-02-03 | 2015-03-17 | Russell Fish | Thread optimized multiprocessor architecture |
JP4987882B2 (en) * | 2006-02-03 | 2012-07-25 | ラッセル・エイチ・フィッシュ | Thread-optimized multiprocessor architecture |
US8001549B2 (en) * | 2006-04-27 | 2011-08-16 | Panasonic Corporation | Multithreaded computer system and multithread execution control method |
US20090228686A1 (en) * | 2007-05-22 | 2009-09-10 | Koenck Steven E | Energy efficient processing device |
US7693167B2 (en) * | 2007-05-22 | 2010-04-06 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | Mobile nodal based communication system, method and apparatus |
US20090228693A1 (en) * | 2007-05-22 | 2009-09-10 | Koenck Steven E | System and method for large microcoded programs |
US7843554B2 (en) * | 2008-04-25 | 2010-11-30 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | High dynamic range sensor system and method |
US9038087B2 (en) * | 2008-06-18 | 2015-05-19 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Fence elision for work stealing |
CN102023844B (en) * | 2009-09-18 | 2014-04-09 | 深圳中微电科技有限公司 | Parallel processor and thread processing method thereof |
US8732711B2 (en) * | 2010-09-24 | 2014-05-20 | Nvidia Corporation | Two-level scheduler for multi-threaded processing |
US10095526B2 (en) * | 2012-10-12 | 2018-10-09 | Nvidia Corporation | Technique for improving performance in multi-threaded processing units |
US9870339B2 (en) * | 2015-06-26 | 2018-01-16 | Intel Corporation | Hardware processors and methods for tightly-coupled heterogeneous computing |
US10699362B2 (en) * | 2016-06-23 | 2020-06-30 | Intel Corporation | Divergent control flow for fused EUs |
US20180330288A1 (en) * | 2017-05-15 | 2018-11-15 | Alteryx, Inc. | Method of data aggregation for cache optimization and efficient processing |
US10489348B2 (en) | 2017-07-17 | 2019-11-26 | Alteryx, Inc. | Performing hash joins using parallel processing |
US10558364B2 (en) | 2017-10-16 | 2020-02-11 | Alteryx, Inc. | Memory allocation in a data analytics system |
US10552452B2 (en) | 2017-10-16 | 2020-02-04 | Alteryx, Inc. | Asynchronously processing sequential data blocks |
US10810064B2 (en) | 2018-04-27 | 2020-10-20 | Nasdaq Technology Ab | Publish-subscribe framework for application execution |
CN109739556B (en) * | 2018-12-13 | 2021-03-26 | 北京空间飞行器总体设计部 | General deep learning processor based on multi-parallel cache interaction and calculation |
Citations (99)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US379241A (en) * | 1888-03-13 | nelson | ||
US3373408A (en) * | 1965-04-16 | 1968-03-12 | Rca Corp | Computer capable of switching between programs without storage and retrieval of the contents of operation registers |
US3736566A (en) * | 1971-08-18 | 1973-05-29 | Ibm | Central processing unit with hardware controlled checkpoint and retry facilities |
US3792441A (en) * | 1972-03-08 | 1974-02-12 | Burroughs Corp | Micro-program having an overlay micro-instruction |
US3940745A (en) * | 1973-06-05 | 1976-02-24 | Ing. C. Olivetti & C., S.P.A. | Data processing unit having a plurality of hardware circuits for processing data at different priority levels |
US4016548A (en) * | 1975-04-11 | 1977-04-05 | Sperry Rand Corporation | Communication multiplexer module |
US4075691A (en) * | 1975-11-06 | 1978-02-21 | Bunker Ramo Corporation | Communication control unit |
US4514807A (en) * | 1980-05-21 | 1985-04-30 | Tatsuo Nogi | Parallel computer |
US4745544A (en) * | 1985-12-12 | 1988-05-17 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Master/slave sequencing processor with forced I/O |
US4831358A (en) * | 1982-12-21 | 1989-05-16 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Communications system employing control line minimization |
US4991112A (en) * | 1987-12-23 | 1991-02-05 | U.S. Philips Corporation | Graphics system with graphics controller and DRAM controller |
US5115507A (en) * | 1987-12-23 | 1992-05-19 | U.S. Philips Corp. | System for management of the priorities of access to a memory and its application |
US5390329A (en) * | 1990-06-11 | 1995-02-14 | Cray Research, Inc. | Responding to service requests using minimal system-side context in a multiprocessor environment |
US5392412A (en) * | 1991-10-03 | 1995-02-21 | Standard Microsystems Corporation | Data communication controller for use with a single-port data packet buffer |
US5392391A (en) * | 1991-10-18 | 1995-02-21 | Lsi Logic Corporation | High performance graphics applications controller |
US5392411A (en) * | 1992-02-03 | 1995-02-21 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Dual-array register file with overlapping window registers |
US5404469A (en) * | 1992-02-25 | 1995-04-04 | Industrial Technology Research Institute | Multi-threaded microprocessor architecture utilizing static interleaving |
US5404464A (en) * | 1993-02-11 | 1995-04-04 | Ast Research, Inc. | Bus control system and method that selectively generate an early address strobe |
US5404482A (en) * | 1990-06-29 | 1995-04-04 | Digital Equipment Corporation | Processor and method for preventing access to a locked memory block by recording a lock in a content addressable memory with outstanding cache fills |
US5404484A (en) * | 1992-09-16 | 1995-04-04 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Cache system for reducing memory latency times |
US5485455A (en) * | 1994-01-28 | 1996-01-16 | Cabletron Systems, Inc. | Network having secure fast packet switching and guaranteed quality of service |
US5515296A (en) * | 1993-11-24 | 1996-05-07 | Intel Corporation | Scan path for encoding and decoding two-dimensional signals |
US5517648A (en) * | 1993-04-30 | 1996-05-14 | Zenith Data Systems Corporation | Symmetric multiprocessing system with unified environment and distributed system functions |
US5592622A (en) * | 1995-05-10 | 1997-01-07 | 3Com Corporation | Network intermediate system with message passing architecture |
US5613071A (en) * | 1995-07-14 | 1997-03-18 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for providing remote memory access in a distributed memory multiprocessor system |
US5613136A (en) * | 1991-12-04 | 1997-03-18 | University Of Iowa Research Foundation | Locality manager having memory and independent code, bus interface logic, and synchronization components for a processing element for intercommunication in a latency tolerant multiple processor |
US5623489A (en) * | 1991-09-26 | 1997-04-22 | Ipc Information Systems, Inc. | Channel allocation system for distributed digital switching network |
US5627829A (en) * | 1993-10-07 | 1997-05-06 | Gleeson; Bryan J. | Method for reducing unnecessary traffic over a computer network |
US5630130A (en) * | 1992-12-23 | 1997-05-13 | Centre Electronique Horloger S.A. | Multi-tasking low-power controller having multiple program counters |
US5630641A (en) * | 1993-07-29 | 1997-05-20 | Aisin Seiki Kabushiki Kaisha | Sunroof device for vehicle |
US5717898A (en) * | 1991-10-11 | 1998-02-10 | Intel Corporation | Cache coherency mechanism for multiprocessor computer systems |
US5721870A (en) * | 1994-05-25 | 1998-02-24 | Nec Corporation | Lock control for a shared main storage data processing system |
US5740402A (en) * | 1993-12-15 | 1998-04-14 | Silicon Graphics, Inc. | Conflict resolution in interleaved memory systems with multiple parallel accesses |
US5742587A (en) * | 1997-02-28 | 1998-04-21 | Lanart Corporation | Load balancing port switching hub |
US5742822A (en) * | 1994-12-19 | 1998-04-21 | Nec Corporation | Multithreaded processor which dynamically discriminates a parallel execution and a sequential execution of threads |
US5742782A (en) * | 1994-04-15 | 1998-04-21 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Processing apparatus for executing a plurality of VLIW threads in parallel |
US5745913A (en) * | 1996-08-05 | 1998-04-28 | Exponential Technology, Inc. | Multi-processor DRAM controller that prioritizes row-miss requests to stale banks |
US5751987A (en) * | 1990-03-16 | 1998-05-12 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Distributed processing memory chip with embedded logic having both data memory and broadcast memory |
US5754764A (en) * | 1994-02-22 | 1998-05-19 | National Semiconductor Corp. | Combination of input output circuitry and local area network systems |
US5860158A (en) * | 1996-11-15 | 1999-01-12 | Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd. | Cache control unit with a cache request transaction-oriented protocol |
US5886992A (en) * | 1995-04-14 | 1999-03-23 | Valtion Teknillinen Tutkimuskeskus | Frame synchronized ring system and method |
US5887134A (en) * | 1997-06-30 | 1999-03-23 | Sun Microsystems | System and method for preserving message order while employing both programmed I/O and DMA operations |
US5890208A (en) * | 1996-03-30 | 1999-03-30 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Command executing method for CD-ROM disk drive |
US5892979A (en) * | 1994-07-20 | 1999-04-06 | Fujitsu Limited | Queue control apparatus including memory to save data received when capacity of queue is less than a predetermined threshold |
US5898701A (en) * | 1995-12-21 | 1999-04-27 | Cypress Semiconductor Corporation | Method and apparatus for testing a device |
US5905889A (en) * | 1997-03-20 | 1999-05-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Resource management system using next available integer from an integer pool and returning the integer thereto as the next available integer upon completion of use |
US5905876A (en) * | 1996-12-16 | 1999-05-18 | Intel Corporation | Queue ordering for memory and I/O transactions in a multiple concurrent transaction computer system |
US6012151A (en) * | 1996-06-28 | 2000-01-04 | Fujitsu Limited | Information processing apparatus and distributed processing control method |
US6014729A (en) * | 1997-09-29 | 2000-01-11 | Firstpass, Inc. | Shared memory arbitration apparatus and method |
US6023742A (en) * | 1996-07-18 | 2000-02-08 | University Of Washington | Reconfigurable computing architecture for providing pipelined data paths |
US6032190A (en) * | 1997-10-03 | 2000-02-29 | Ascend Communications, Inc. | System and method for processing data packets |
US6049867A (en) * | 1995-06-07 | 2000-04-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for multi-thread switching only when a cache miss occurs at a second or higher level |
US6058168A (en) * | 1995-12-29 | 2000-05-02 | Tixi.Com Gmbh Telecommunication Systems | Method and microcomputer system for the automatic, secure and direct transmission of data |
US6061710A (en) * | 1997-10-29 | 2000-05-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Multithreaded processor incorporating a thread latch register for interrupt service new pending threads |
US6067585A (en) * | 1997-06-23 | 2000-05-23 | Compaq Computer Corporation | Adaptive interface controller that can operate with segments of different protocol and transmission rates in a single integrated device |
US6067300A (en) * | 1998-06-11 | 2000-05-23 | Cabletron Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for optimizing the transfer of data packets between local area networks |
US6070231A (en) * | 1997-12-02 | 2000-05-30 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for processing memory requests that require coherency transactions |
US6170051B1 (en) * | 1997-08-01 | 2001-01-02 | Micron Technology, Inc. | Apparatus and method for program level parallelism in a VLIW processor |
US6182177B1 (en) * | 1997-06-13 | 2001-01-30 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for maintaining one or more queues of elements such as commands using one or more token queues |
US6195676B1 (en) * | 1989-12-29 | 2001-02-27 | Silicon Graphics, Inc. | Method and apparatus for user side scheduling in a multiprocessor operating system program that implements distributive scheduling of processes |
US6199133B1 (en) * | 1996-03-29 | 2001-03-06 | Compaq Computer Corporation | Management communication bus for networking devices |
US6201807B1 (en) * | 1996-02-27 | 2001-03-13 | Lucent Technologies | Real-time hardware method and apparatus for reducing queue processing |
US6212611B1 (en) * | 1998-11-03 | 2001-04-03 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for providing a pipelined memory controller |
US6212544B1 (en) * | 1997-10-23 | 2001-04-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | Altering thread priorities in a multithreaded processor |
US6212542B1 (en) * | 1996-12-16 | 2001-04-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for executing a program within a multiscalar processor by processing linked thread descriptors |
US6216220B1 (en) * | 1998-04-08 | 2001-04-10 | Hyundai Electronics Industries Co., Ltd. | Multithreaded data processing method with long latency subinstructions |
US6223207B1 (en) * | 1995-04-24 | 2001-04-24 | Microsoft Corporation | Input/output completion port queue data structures and methods for using same |
US6223274B1 (en) * | 1997-11-19 | 2001-04-24 | Interuniversitair Micro-Elecktronica Centrum (Imec) | Power-and speed-efficient data storage/transfer architecture models and design methodologies for programmable or reusable multi-media processors |
US6223238B1 (en) * | 1998-03-31 | 2001-04-24 | Micron Electronics, Inc. | Method of peer-to-peer mastering over a computer bus |
US6223279B1 (en) * | 1991-04-30 | 2001-04-24 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Single chip microcomputer having a dedicated address bus and dedicated data bus for transferring register bank data to and from an on-line RAM |
US6338078B1 (en) * | 1998-12-17 | 2002-01-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for sequencing packets for multiprocessor parallelization in a computer network system |
US6345334B1 (en) * | 1998-01-07 | 2002-02-05 | Nec Corporation | High speed semiconductor memory device capable of changing data sequence for burst transmission |
US6347344B1 (en) * | 1998-10-14 | 2002-02-12 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Integrated multimedia system with local processor, data transfer switch, processing modules, fixed functional unit, data streamer, interface unit and multiplexer, all integrated on multimedia processor |
US6356692B1 (en) * | 1999-02-04 | 2002-03-12 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Optical module, transmitter, receiver, optical switch, optical communication unit, add-and-drop multiplexing unit, and method for manufacturing the optical module |
US6360262B1 (en) * | 1997-11-24 | 2002-03-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Mapping web server objects to TCP/IP ports |
US6366998B1 (en) * | 1998-10-14 | 2002-04-02 | Conexant Systems, Inc. | Reconfigurable functional units for implementing a hybrid VLIW-SIMD programming model |
US6373848B1 (en) * | 1998-07-28 | 2002-04-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Architecture for a multi-port adapter with a single media access control (MAC) |
US6389449B1 (en) * | 1998-12-16 | 2002-05-14 | Clearwater Networks, Inc. | Interstream control and communications for multi-streaming digital processors |
US6393026B1 (en) * | 1998-09-17 | 2002-05-21 | Nortel Networks Limited | Data packet processing system and method for a router |
US6393483B1 (en) * | 1997-06-30 | 2002-05-21 | Adaptec, Inc. | Method and apparatus for network interface card load balancing and port aggregation |
US6526451B2 (en) * | 1998-09-30 | 2003-02-25 | Stmicroelectronics, Inc. | Method and network device for creating circular queue structures in shared memory |
US6529983B1 (en) * | 1999-11-03 | 2003-03-04 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Group and virtual locking mechanism for inter processor synchronization |
US6532509B1 (en) * | 1999-12-22 | 2003-03-11 | Intel Corporation | Arbitrating command requests in a parallel multi-threaded processing system |
US6535878B1 (en) * | 1997-05-02 | 2003-03-18 | Roxio, Inc. | Method and system for providing on-line interactivity over a server-client network |
US6552826B2 (en) * | 1997-02-21 | 2003-04-22 | Worldquest Network, Inc. | Facsimile network |
US6553406B1 (en) * | 2000-08-03 | 2003-04-22 | Prelude Systems, Inc. | Process thread system receiving request packet from server thread, initiating process thread in response to request packet, synchronizing thread process between clients-servers. |
US6560667B1 (en) * | 1999-12-28 | 2003-05-06 | Intel Corporation | Handling contiguous memory references in a multi-queue system |
US6570850B1 (en) * | 1998-04-23 | 2003-05-27 | Giganet, Inc. | System and method for regulating message flow in a digital data network |
US6675190B1 (en) * | 1998-10-08 | 2004-01-06 | Alcatel | Method for cooperative multitasking in a communications network, and a network element for carrying out the method |
US6678746B1 (en) * | 2000-08-01 | 2004-01-13 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Processing network packets |
US6681300B2 (en) * | 1999-12-28 | 2004-01-20 | Intel Corporation | Read lock miss control and queue management |
US6694380B1 (en) * | 1999-12-27 | 2004-02-17 | Intel Corporation | Mapping requests from a processing unit that uses memory-mapped input-output space |
US20040039895A1 (en) * | 2000-01-05 | 2004-02-26 | Intel Corporation, A California Corporation | Memory shared between processing threads |
US20040054880A1 (en) * | 1999-08-31 | 2004-03-18 | Intel Corporation, A California Corporation | Microengine for parallel processor architecture |
US20040071152A1 (en) * | 1999-12-29 | 2004-04-15 | Intel Corporation, A Delaware Corporation | Method and apparatus for gigabit packet assignment for multithreaded packet processing |
US20040073728A1 (en) * | 1999-12-28 | 2004-04-15 | Intel Corporation, A California Corporation | Optimizations to receive packet status from FIFO bus |
US6728845B2 (en) * | 1999-08-31 | 2004-04-27 | Intel Corporation | SRAM controller for parallel processor architecture and method for controlling access to a RAM using read and read/write queues |
US6876561B2 (en) * | 1999-12-28 | 2005-04-05 | Intel Corporation | Scratchpad memory |
US6983350B1 (en) * | 1999-08-31 | 2006-01-03 | Intel Corporation | SDRAM controller for parallel processor architecture |
Family Cites Families (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3478322A (en) * | 1967-05-23 | 1969-11-11 | Ibm | Data processor employing electronically changeable control storage |
GB2311882B (en) | 1996-04-04 | 2000-08-09 | Videologic Ltd | A data processing management system |
US5915123A (en) * | 1997-10-31 | 1999-06-22 | Silicon Spice | Method and apparatus for controlling configuration memory contexts of processing elements in a network of multiple context processing elements |
US6079008A (en) * | 1998-04-03 | 2000-06-20 | Patton Electronics Co. | Multiple thread multiple data predictive coded parallel processing system and method |
US6272616B1 (en) * | 1998-06-17 | 2001-08-07 | Agere Systems Guardian Corp. | Method and apparatus for executing multiple instruction streams in a digital processor with multiple data paths |
-
1999
- 1999-08-31 US US09/387,111 patent/US6606704B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2000
- 2000-08-15 AT AT00954073T patent/ATE253238T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2000-08-15 AU AU66419/00A patent/AU6641900A/en not_active Abandoned
- 2000-08-15 CN CNB008152578A patent/CN1185592C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2000-08-15 CA CA002391833A patent/CA2391833C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2000-08-15 DE DE60006270T patent/DE60006270T2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2000-08-15 WO PCT/US2000/022322 patent/WO2001016782A2/en active IP Right Grant
- 2000-08-15 EP EP00954073A patent/EP1221105B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2003
- 2003-03-10 HK HK03101706.0A patent/HK1049716B/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2003-07-08 US US10/615,500 patent/US20040073778A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (99)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US379241A (en) * | 1888-03-13 | nelson | ||
US3373408A (en) * | 1965-04-16 | 1968-03-12 | Rca Corp | Computer capable of switching between programs without storage and retrieval of the contents of operation registers |
US3736566A (en) * | 1971-08-18 | 1973-05-29 | Ibm | Central processing unit with hardware controlled checkpoint and retry facilities |
US3792441A (en) * | 1972-03-08 | 1974-02-12 | Burroughs Corp | Micro-program having an overlay micro-instruction |
US3940745A (en) * | 1973-06-05 | 1976-02-24 | Ing. C. Olivetti & C., S.P.A. | Data processing unit having a plurality of hardware circuits for processing data at different priority levels |
US4016548A (en) * | 1975-04-11 | 1977-04-05 | Sperry Rand Corporation | Communication multiplexer module |
US4075691A (en) * | 1975-11-06 | 1978-02-21 | Bunker Ramo Corporation | Communication control unit |
US4514807A (en) * | 1980-05-21 | 1985-04-30 | Tatsuo Nogi | Parallel computer |
US4831358A (en) * | 1982-12-21 | 1989-05-16 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Communications system employing control line minimization |
US4745544A (en) * | 1985-12-12 | 1988-05-17 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Master/slave sequencing processor with forced I/O |
US4991112A (en) * | 1987-12-23 | 1991-02-05 | U.S. Philips Corporation | Graphics system with graphics controller and DRAM controller |
US5115507A (en) * | 1987-12-23 | 1992-05-19 | U.S. Philips Corp. | System for management of the priorities of access to a memory and its application |
US6195676B1 (en) * | 1989-12-29 | 2001-02-27 | Silicon Graphics, Inc. | Method and apparatus for user side scheduling in a multiprocessor operating system program that implements distributive scheduling of processes |
US5751987A (en) * | 1990-03-16 | 1998-05-12 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Distributed processing memory chip with embedded logic having both data memory and broadcast memory |
US5390329A (en) * | 1990-06-11 | 1995-02-14 | Cray Research, Inc. | Responding to service requests using minimal system-side context in a multiprocessor environment |
US5404482A (en) * | 1990-06-29 | 1995-04-04 | Digital Equipment Corporation | Processor and method for preventing access to a locked memory block by recording a lock in a content addressable memory with outstanding cache fills |
US6223279B1 (en) * | 1991-04-30 | 2001-04-24 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Single chip microcomputer having a dedicated address bus and dedicated data bus for transferring register bank data to and from an on-line RAM |
US5623489A (en) * | 1991-09-26 | 1997-04-22 | Ipc Information Systems, Inc. | Channel allocation system for distributed digital switching network |
US5392412A (en) * | 1991-10-03 | 1995-02-21 | Standard Microsystems Corporation | Data communication controller for use with a single-port data packet buffer |
US5717898A (en) * | 1991-10-11 | 1998-02-10 | Intel Corporation | Cache coherency mechanism for multiprocessor computer systems |
US5392391A (en) * | 1991-10-18 | 1995-02-21 | Lsi Logic Corporation | High performance graphics applications controller |
US5613136A (en) * | 1991-12-04 | 1997-03-18 | University Of Iowa Research Foundation | Locality manager having memory and independent code, bus interface logic, and synchronization components for a processing element for intercommunication in a latency tolerant multiple processor |
US5392411A (en) * | 1992-02-03 | 1995-02-21 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Dual-array register file with overlapping window registers |
US5404469A (en) * | 1992-02-25 | 1995-04-04 | Industrial Technology Research Institute | Multi-threaded microprocessor architecture utilizing static interleaving |
US5404484A (en) * | 1992-09-16 | 1995-04-04 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Cache system for reducing memory latency times |
US5630130A (en) * | 1992-12-23 | 1997-05-13 | Centre Electronique Horloger S.A. | Multi-tasking low-power controller having multiple program counters |
US5404464A (en) * | 1993-02-11 | 1995-04-04 | Ast Research, Inc. | Bus control system and method that selectively generate an early address strobe |
US5517648A (en) * | 1993-04-30 | 1996-05-14 | Zenith Data Systems Corporation | Symmetric multiprocessing system with unified environment and distributed system functions |
US5630641A (en) * | 1993-07-29 | 1997-05-20 | Aisin Seiki Kabushiki Kaisha | Sunroof device for vehicle |
US5627829A (en) * | 1993-10-07 | 1997-05-06 | Gleeson; Bryan J. | Method for reducing unnecessary traffic over a computer network |
US5515296A (en) * | 1993-11-24 | 1996-05-07 | Intel Corporation | Scan path for encoding and decoding two-dimensional signals |
US5740402A (en) * | 1993-12-15 | 1998-04-14 | Silicon Graphics, Inc. | Conflict resolution in interleaved memory systems with multiple parallel accesses |
US5485455A (en) * | 1994-01-28 | 1996-01-16 | Cabletron Systems, Inc. | Network having secure fast packet switching and guaranteed quality of service |
US5754764A (en) * | 1994-02-22 | 1998-05-19 | National Semiconductor Corp. | Combination of input output circuitry and local area network systems |
US5742782A (en) * | 1994-04-15 | 1998-04-21 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Processing apparatus for executing a plurality of VLIW threads in parallel |
US5721870A (en) * | 1994-05-25 | 1998-02-24 | Nec Corporation | Lock control for a shared main storage data processing system |
US5892979A (en) * | 1994-07-20 | 1999-04-06 | Fujitsu Limited | Queue control apparatus including memory to save data received when capacity of queue is less than a predetermined threshold |
US5742822A (en) * | 1994-12-19 | 1998-04-21 | Nec Corporation | Multithreaded processor which dynamically discriminates a parallel execution and a sequential execution of threads |
US5886992A (en) * | 1995-04-14 | 1999-03-23 | Valtion Teknillinen Tutkimuskeskus | Frame synchronized ring system and method |
US6223207B1 (en) * | 1995-04-24 | 2001-04-24 | Microsoft Corporation | Input/output completion port queue data structures and methods for using same |
US5592622A (en) * | 1995-05-10 | 1997-01-07 | 3Com Corporation | Network intermediate system with message passing architecture |
US6049867A (en) * | 1995-06-07 | 2000-04-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for multi-thread switching only when a cache miss occurs at a second or higher level |
US5613071A (en) * | 1995-07-14 | 1997-03-18 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for providing remote memory access in a distributed memory multiprocessor system |
US5898701A (en) * | 1995-12-21 | 1999-04-27 | Cypress Semiconductor Corporation | Method and apparatus for testing a device |
US6058168A (en) * | 1995-12-29 | 2000-05-02 | Tixi.Com Gmbh Telecommunication Systems | Method and microcomputer system for the automatic, secure and direct transmission of data |
US6201807B1 (en) * | 1996-02-27 | 2001-03-13 | Lucent Technologies | Real-time hardware method and apparatus for reducing queue processing |
US6199133B1 (en) * | 1996-03-29 | 2001-03-06 | Compaq Computer Corporation | Management communication bus for networking devices |
US5890208A (en) * | 1996-03-30 | 1999-03-30 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Command executing method for CD-ROM disk drive |
US6012151A (en) * | 1996-06-28 | 2000-01-04 | Fujitsu Limited | Information processing apparatus and distributed processing control method |
US6023742A (en) * | 1996-07-18 | 2000-02-08 | University Of Washington | Reconfigurable computing architecture for providing pipelined data paths |
US5745913A (en) * | 1996-08-05 | 1998-04-28 | Exponential Technology, Inc. | Multi-processor DRAM controller that prioritizes row-miss requests to stale banks |
US5860158A (en) * | 1996-11-15 | 1999-01-12 | Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd. | Cache control unit with a cache request transaction-oriented protocol |
US6212542B1 (en) * | 1996-12-16 | 2001-04-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for executing a program within a multiscalar processor by processing linked thread descriptors |
US5905876A (en) * | 1996-12-16 | 1999-05-18 | Intel Corporation | Queue ordering for memory and I/O transactions in a multiple concurrent transaction computer system |
US6552826B2 (en) * | 1997-02-21 | 2003-04-22 | Worldquest Network, Inc. | Facsimile network |
US5742587A (en) * | 1997-02-28 | 1998-04-21 | Lanart Corporation | Load balancing port switching hub |
US5905889A (en) * | 1997-03-20 | 1999-05-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Resource management system using next available integer from an integer pool and returning the integer thereto as the next available integer upon completion of use |
US6535878B1 (en) * | 1997-05-02 | 2003-03-18 | Roxio, Inc. | Method and system for providing on-line interactivity over a server-client network |
US6182177B1 (en) * | 1997-06-13 | 2001-01-30 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for maintaining one or more queues of elements such as commands using one or more token queues |
US6067585A (en) * | 1997-06-23 | 2000-05-23 | Compaq Computer Corporation | Adaptive interface controller that can operate with segments of different protocol and transmission rates in a single integrated device |
US6393483B1 (en) * | 1997-06-30 | 2002-05-21 | Adaptec, Inc. | Method and apparatus for network interface card load balancing and port aggregation |
US5887134A (en) * | 1997-06-30 | 1999-03-23 | Sun Microsystems | System and method for preserving message order while employing both programmed I/O and DMA operations |
US6170051B1 (en) * | 1997-08-01 | 2001-01-02 | Micron Technology, Inc. | Apparatus and method for program level parallelism in a VLIW processor |
US6014729A (en) * | 1997-09-29 | 2000-01-11 | Firstpass, Inc. | Shared memory arbitration apparatus and method |
US6032190A (en) * | 1997-10-03 | 2000-02-29 | Ascend Communications, Inc. | System and method for processing data packets |
US6212544B1 (en) * | 1997-10-23 | 2001-04-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | Altering thread priorities in a multithreaded processor |
US6061710A (en) * | 1997-10-29 | 2000-05-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Multithreaded processor incorporating a thread latch register for interrupt service new pending threads |
US6223274B1 (en) * | 1997-11-19 | 2001-04-24 | Interuniversitair Micro-Elecktronica Centrum (Imec) | Power-and speed-efficient data storage/transfer architecture models and design methodologies for programmable or reusable multi-media processors |
US6360262B1 (en) * | 1997-11-24 | 2002-03-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Mapping web server objects to TCP/IP ports |
US6070231A (en) * | 1997-12-02 | 2000-05-30 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for processing memory requests that require coherency transactions |
US6345334B1 (en) * | 1998-01-07 | 2002-02-05 | Nec Corporation | High speed semiconductor memory device capable of changing data sequence for burst transmission |
US6223238B1 (en) * | 1998-03-31 | 2001-04-24 | Micron Electronics, Inc. | Method of peer-to-peer mastering over a computer bus |
US6216220B1 (en) * | 1998-04-08 | 2001-04-10 | Hyundai Electronics Industries Co., Ltd. | Multithreaded data processing method with long latency subinstructions |
US6570850B1 (en) * | 1998-04-23 | 2003-05-27 | Giganet, Inc. | System and method for regulating message flow in a digital data network |
US6067300A (en) * | 1998-06-11 | 2000-05-23 | Cabletron Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for optimizing the transfer of data packets between local area networks |
US6373848B1 (en) * | 1998-07-28 | 2002-04-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Architecture for a multi-port adapter with a single media access control (MAC) |
US6393026B1 (en) * | 1998-09-17 | 2002-05-21 | Nortel Networks Limited | Data packet processing system and method for a router |
US6526451B2 (en) * | 1998-09-30 | 2003-02-25 | Stmicroelectronics, Inc. | Method and network device for creating circular queue structures in shared memory |
US6675190B1 (en) * | 1998-10-08 | 2004-01-06 | Alcatel | Method for cooperative multitasking in a communications network, and a network element for carrying out the method |
US6347344B1 (en) * | 1998-10-14 | 2002-02-12 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Integrated multimedia system with local processor, data transfer switch, processing modules, fixed functional unit, data streamer, interface unit and multiplexer, all integrated on multimedia processor |
US6366998B1 (en) * | 1998-10-14 | 2002-04-02 | Conexant Systems, Inc. | Reconfigurable functional units for implementing a hybrid VLIW-SIMD programming model |
US6212611B1 (en) * | 1998-11-03 | 2001-04-03 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for providing a pipelined memory controller |
US6389449B1 (en) * | 1998-12-16 | 2002-05-14 | Clearwater Networks, Inc. | Interstream control and communications for multi-streaming digital processors |
US6338078B1 (en) * | 1998-12-17 | 2002-01-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for sequencing packets for multiprocessor parallelization in a computer network system |
US6356692B1 (en) * | 1999-02-04 | 2002-03-12 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Optical module, transmitter, receiver, optical switch, optical communication unit, add-and-drop multiplexing unit, and method for manufacturing the optical module |
US6983350B1 (en) * | 1999-08-31 | 2006-01-03 | Intel Corporation | SDRAM controller for parallel processor architecture |
US6728845B2 (en) * | 1999-08-31 | 2004-04-27 | Intel Corporation | SRAM controller for parallel processor architecture and method for controlling access to a RAM using read and read/write queues |
US20040054880A1 (en) * | 1999-08-31 | 2004-03-18 | Intel Corporation, A California Corporation | Microengine for parallel processor architecture |
US6529983B1 (en) * | 1999-11-03 | 2003-03-04 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Group and virtual locking mechanism for inter processor synchronization |
US6532509B1 (en) * | 1999-12-22 | 2003-03-11 | Intel Corporation | Arbitrating command requests in a parallel multi-threaded processing system |
US6694380B1 (en) * | 1999-12-27 | 2004-02-17 | Intel Corporation | Mapping requests from a processing unit that uses memory-mapped input-output space |
US6681300B2 (en) * | 1999-12-28 | 2004-01-20 | Intel Corporation | Read lock miss control and queue management |
US20040073728A1 (en) * | 1999-12-28 | 2004-04-15 | Intel Corporation, A California Corporation | Optimizations to receive packet status from FIFO bus |
US6560667B1 (en) * | 1999-12-28 | 2003-05-06 | Intel Corporation | Handling contiguous memory references in a multi-queue system |
US6876561B2 (en) * | 1999-12-28 | 2005-04-05 | Intel Corporation | Scratchpad memory |
US20040071152A1 (en) * | 1999-12-29 | 2004-04-15 | Intel Corporation, A Delaware Corporation | Method and apparatus for gigabit packet assignment for multithreaded packet processing |
US20040039895A1 (en) * | 2000-01-05 | 2004-02-26 | Intel Corporation, A California Corporation | Memory shared between processing threads |
US6678746B1 (en) * | 2000-08-01 | 2004-01-13 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Processing network packets |
US6553406B1 (en) * | 2000-08-03 | 2003-04-22 | Prelude Systems, Inc. | Process thread system receiving request packet from server thread, initiating process thread in response to request packet, synchronizing thread process between clients-servers. |
Cited By (39)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8316191B2 (en) | 1999-08-31 | 2012-11-20 | Intel Corporation | Memory controllers for processor having multiple programmable units |
US7991983B2 (en) | 1999-09-01 | 2011-08-02 | Intel Corporation | Register set used in multithreaded parallel processor architecture |
USRE41849E1 (en) | 1999-12-22 | 2010-10-19 | Intel Corporation | Parallel multi-threaded processing |
US9824037B2 (en) | 1999-12-27 | 2017-11-21 | Intel Corporation | Memory mapping in a processor having multiple programmable units |
US8738886B2 (en) | 1999-12-27 | 2014-05-27 | Intel Corporation | Memory mapping in a processor having multiple programmable units |
US9128818B2 (en) | 1999-12-27 | 2015-09-08 | Intel Corporation | Memory mapping in a processor having multiple programmable units |
US9824038B2 (en) | 1999-12-27 | 2017-11-21 | Intel Corporation | Memory mapping in a processor having multiple programmable units |
US9830285B2 (en) | 1999-12-27 | 2017-11-28 | Intel Corporation | Memory mapping in a processor having multiple programmable units |
US9830284B2 (en) | 1999-12-27 | 2017-11-28 | Intel Corporation | Memory mapping in a processor having multiple programmable units |
US7751402B2 (en) | 1999-12-29 | 2010-07-06 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for gigabit packet assignment for multithreaded packet processing |
US20070234009A1 (en) * | 2000-08-31 | 2007-10-04 | Intel Corporation | Processor having a dedicated hash unit integrated within |
US7681018B2 (en) | 2000-08-31 | 2010-03-16 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for providing large register address space while maximizing cycletime performance for a multi-threaded register file set |
US7743235B2 (en) | 2000-08-31 | 2010-06-22 | Intel Corporation | Processor having a dedicated hash unit integrated within |
US20050132132A1 (en) * | 2001-08-27 | 2005-06-16 | Rosenbluth Mark B. | Software controlled content addressable memory in a general purpose execution datapath |
US20030105899A1 (en) * | 2001-08-27 | 2003-06-05 | Rosenbluth Mark B. | Multiprocessor infrastructure for providing flexible bandwidth allocation via multiple instantiations of separate data buses, control buses and support mechanisms |
US20030041216A1 (en) * | 2001-08-27 | 2003-02-27 | Rosenbluth Mark B. | Mechanism for providing early coherency detection to enable high performance memory updates in a latency sensitive multithreaded environment |
US20030067934A1 (en) * | 2001-09-28 | 2003-04-10 | Hooper Donald F. | Multiprotocol decapsulation/encapsulation control structure and packet protocol conversion method |
US20030115426A1 (en) * | 2001-12-17 | 2003-06-19 | Rosenbluth Mark B. | Congestion management for high speed queuing |
US7895239B2 (en) | 2002-01-04 | 2011-02-22 | Intel Corporation | Queue arrays in network devices |
US8380923B2 (en) | 2002-01-04 | 2013-02-19 | Intel Corporation | Queue arrays in network devices |
US20050216710A1 (en) * | 2002-01-17 | 2005-09-29 | Wilkinson Hugh M Iii | Parallel processor with functional pipeline providing programming engines by supporting multiple contexts and critical section |
US20050144413A1 (en) * | 2003-12-30 | 2005-06-30 | Chen-Chi Kuo | Method and apparatus utilizing non-uniformly distributed DRAM configurations and to detect in-range memory address matches |
US7418582B1 (en) * | 2004-05-13 | 2008-08-26 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Versatile register file design for a multi-threaded processor utilizing different modes and register windows |
US7583683B2 (en) * | 2004-05-17 | 2009-09-01 | Yang Soon Cha | Router using clock synchronizer for distributed traffic control |
US20050254480A1 (en) * | 2004-05-17 | 2005-11-17 | Kicheon Kim | Router using clock synchronizer for distributed traffic control |
US8099777B1 (en) * | 2004-08-26 | 2012-01-17 | Rockwell Collins, Inc. | High security, multi-level processor and method of operating a computing system |
US20060059310A1 (en) * | 2004-09-10 | 2006-03-16 | Cavium Networks | Local scratchpad and data caching system |
US7594081B2 (en) * | 2004-09-10 | 2009-09-22 | Cavium Networks, Inc. | Direct access to low-latency memory |
US7558925B2 (en) | 2004-09-10 | 2009-07-07 | Cavium Networks, Inc. | Selective replication of data structures |
US9141548B2 (en) | 2004-09-10 | 2015-09-22 | Cavium, Inc. | Method and apparatus for managing write back cache |
US20060059314A1 (en) * | 2004-09-10 | 2006-03-16 | Cavium Networks | Direct access to low-latency memory |
US7941585B2 (en) | 2004-09-10 | 2011-05-10 | Cavium Networks, Inc. | Local scratchpad and data caching system |
US20060059316A1 (en) * | 2004-09-10 | 2006-03-16 | Cavium Networks | Method and apparatus for managing write back cache |
US20060067348A1 (en) * | 2004-09-30 | 2006-03-30 | Sanjeev Jain | System and method for efficient memory access of queue control data structures |
US20060072563A1 (en) * | 2004-10-05 | 2006-04-06 | Regnier Greg J | Packet processing |
US20060155959A1 (en) * | 2004-12-21 | 2006-07-13 | Sanjeev Jain | Method and apparatus to provide efficient communication between processing elements in a processor unit |
US20060140203A1 (en) * | 2004-12-28 | 2006-06-29 | Sanjeev Jain | System and method for packet queuing |
US10884662B2 (en) * | 2018-08-06 | 2021-01-05 | Silicon Motion, Inc. | Method for performing storage control in a storage server, associated memory device and memory controller thereof, and associated storage server |
US11366616B2 (en) | 2018-08-06 | 2022-06-21 | Silicon Motion, Inc. | Method for performing storage control in a storage server, associated memory device and memory controller thereof, and associated storage server |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN1387649A (en) | 2002-12-25 |
WO2001016782A9 (en) | 2002-06-27 |
DE60006270D1 (en) | 2003-12-04 |
CA2391833C (en) | 2006-08-01 |
US6606704B1 (en) | 2003-08-12 |
AU6641900A (en) | 2001-03-26 |
HK1049716A1 (en) | 2003-05-23 |
WO2001016782A2 (en) | 2001-03-08 |
CA2391833A1 (en) | 2001-03-08 |
HK1049716B (en) | 2005-08-19 |
ATE253238T1 (en) | 2003-11-15 |
EP1221105A2 (en) | 2002-07-10 |
CN1185592C (en) | 2005-01-19 |
DE60006270T2 (en) | 2004-08-05 |
WO2001016782A3 (en) | 2001-05-31 |
EP1221105B1 (en) | 2003-10-29 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6606704B1 (en) | Parallel multithreaded processor with plural microengines executing multiple threads each microengine having loadable microcode | |
US7191321B2 (en) | Microengine for parallel processor architecture | |
US6983350B1 (en) | SDRAM controller for parallel processor architecture | |
US7743235B2 (en) | Processor having a dedicated hash unit integrated within | |
US7305500B2 (en) | Sram controller for parallel processor architecture including a read queue and an order queue for handling requests | |
EP1242869B1 (en) | Context swap instruction for multithreaded processor | |
WO2001016703A1 (en) | Instruction for multithreaded parallel processor |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: INTEL CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ADILETTA, MATTHEW J.;WOLRICH, GILBERT;WHEELER, WILLIAM R.;REEL/FRAME:016968/0066;SIGNING DATES FROM 19991118 TO 20000214 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |