US20010011758A1 - Method and device to increase latch-up immunity in cmos device - Google Patents
Method and device to increase latch-up immunity in cmos device Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20010011758A1 US20010011758A1 US09/044,356 US4435698A US2001011758A1 US 20010011758 A1 US20010011758 A1 US 20010011758A1 US 4435698 A US4435698 A US 4435698A US 2001011758 A1 US2001011758 A1 US 2001011758A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- mobility
- implant
- isolation structure
- latch
- species
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 20
- 230000036039 immunity Effects 0.000 title abstract description 12
- 239000007943 implant Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 44
- 238000002955 isolation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 30
- 239000000969 carrier Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 8
- 239000004065 semiconductor Substances 0.000 claims description 11
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 claims description 11
- XKRFYHLGVUSROY-UHFFFAOYSA-N Argon Chemical compound [Ar] XKRFYHLGVUSROY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 6
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000002019 doping agent Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000007935 neutral effect Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- ZOXJGFHDIHLPTG-UHFFFAOYSA-N Boron Chemical compound [B] ZOXJGFHDIHLPTG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 4
- OAICVXFJPJFONN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Phosphorus Chemical compound [P] OAICVXFJPJFONN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 4
- 229910052787 antimony Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 4
- WATWJIUSRGPENY-UHFFFAOYSA-N antimony atom Chemical compound [Sb] WATWJIUSRGPENY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 4
- 229910052796 boron Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 4
- 229910052738 indium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 4
- APFVFJFRJDLVQX-UHFFFAOYSA-N indium atom Chemical compound [In] APFVFJFRJDLVQX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 4
- 229910052698 phosphorus Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000011574 phosphorus Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 229910052786 argon Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 3
- QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N atomic oxygen Chemical compound [O] QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 3
- 229910052732 germanium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 3
- GNPVGFCGXDBREM-UHFFFAOYSA-N germanium atom Chemical compound [Ge] GNPVGFCGXDBREM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 3
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000001301 oxygen Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 229910052760 oxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000000593 degrading effect Effects 0.000 claims 9
- 230000000254 damaging effect Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 238000000206 photolithography Methods 0.000 abstract description 3
- 239000002800 charge carrier Substances 0.000 abstract description 2
- VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silicium dioxide Chemical compound O=[Si]=O VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 230000000873 masking effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 6
- 230000003647 oxidation Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000007254 oxidation reaction Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000000377 silicon dioxide Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229910052581 Si3N4 Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000004020 conductor Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000009792 diffusion process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000003071 parasitic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000001020 plasma etching Methods 0.000 description 2
- HQVNEWCFYHHQES-UHFFFAOYSA-N silicon nitride Chemical compound N12[Si]34N5[Si]62N3[Si]51N64 HQVNEWCFYHHQES-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000001960 triggered effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000356 contaminant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005530 etching Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002513 implantation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005468 ion implantation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003672 processing method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000012239 silicon dioxide Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01L—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
- H01L27/00—Devices consisting of a plurality of semiconductor or other solid-state components formed in or on a common substrate
- H01L27/02—Devices consisting of a plurality of semiconductor or other solid-state components formed in or on a common substrate including semiconductor components specially adapted for rectifying, oscillating, amplifying or switching and having potential barriers; including integrated passive circuit elements having potential barriers
- H01L27/04—Devices consisting of a plurality of semiconductor or other solid-state components formed in or on a common substrate including semiconductor components specially adapted for rectifying, oscillating, amplifying or switching and having potential barriers; including integrated passive circuit elements having potential barriers the substrate being a semiconductor body
- H01L27/08—Devices consisting of a plurality of semiconductor or other solid-state components formed in or on a common substrate including semiconductor components specially adapted for rectifying, oscillating, amplifying or switching and having potential barriers; including integrated passive circuit elements having potential barriers the substrate being a semiconductor body including only semiconductor components of a single kind
- H01L27/085—Devices consisting of a plurality of semiconductor or other solid-state components formed in or on a common substrate including semiconductor components specially adapted for rectifying, oscillating, amplifying or switching and having potential barriers; including integrated passive circuit elements having potential barriers the substrate being a semiconductor body including only semiconductor components of a single kind including field-effect components only
- H01L27/088—Devices consisting of a plurality of semiconductor or other solid-state components formed in or on a common substrate including semiconductor components specially adapted for rectifying, oscillating, amplifying or switching and having potential barriers; including integrated passive circuit elements having potential barriers the substrate being a semiconductor body including only semiconductor components of a single kind including field-effect components only the components being field-effect transistors with insulated gate
- H01L27/092—Devices consisting of a plurality of semiconductor or other solid-state components formed in or on a common substrate including semiconductor components specially adapted for rectifying, oscillating, amplifying or switching and having potential barriers; including integrated passive circuit elements having potential barriers the substrate being a semiconductor body including only semiconductor components of a single kind including field-effect components only the components being field-effect transistors with insulated gate complementary MIS field-effect transistors
- H01L27/0921—Means for preventing a bipolar, e.g. thyristor, action between the different transistor regions, e.g. Latchup prevention
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01L—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
- H01L21/00—Processes or apparatus adapted for the manufacture or treatment of semiconductor or solid state devices or of parts thereof
- H01L21/70—Manufacture or treatment of devices consisting of a plurality of solid state components formed in or on a common substrate or of parts thereof; Manufacture of integrated circuit devices or of parts thereof
- H01L21/71—Manufacture of specific parts of devices defined in group H01L21/70
- H01L21/76—Making of isolation regions between components
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S148/00—Metal treatment
- Y10S148/04—Dopants, special
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S148/00—Metal treatment
- Y10S148/05—Etch and refill
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S148/00—Metal treatment
- Y10S148/085—Isolated-integrated
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S148/00—Metal treatment
- Y10S148/086—Isolated zones
Definitions
- This invention generally relates to semiconductor devices, and more specifically relates to methods and structures to increase latch-up immunity.
- Latch-up is a well known problem caused by unwanted transistor action between elements of the integrated circuit. This unwanted transistor action can be triggered by a wide variety of events, and can cause the semiconductor device to fail.
- Latch-up is generally caused by the close proximity of n-channel and p-channel devices in modern CMOS devices.
- CMOS devices fabricated on a p-type substrate would contain a p-channel device fabricated in a n-well (or n-type region) and an n-channel device fabricated in a p-well (or p-type region), with only a short distance between the wells.
- This structure inherently forms a parasitic lateral bipolar structure (npn) and parasitic vertical bipolar structure (pnp). Under certain biasing conditions the pnp structure can supply base current to npn structure (or vice versa), causing a large current to flow from one well to the other well. This large current can damage the CMOS device.
- CMOS devices have been addressed in several ways.
- One way involves reducing the “gain” or beta of the transistor (npn and pnp). This generally reduces the propensity of the CMOS device to latch-up by increasing the trigger voltage/current, where the trigger voltage/current is the voltage/current that must be applied to a node to induce latch-up.
- the latch-up holding voltage is the lowest stable voltage that can support a large current after latch-up is triggered.
- the optimal situation is to have a holding voltage greater than the burn-in voltage, typically 1.5 volts above the nominal supply voltage (Vdd).
- Shallow trench isolation has been used between the n-channel and p-channel devices to minimize the likelihood of latch-up.
- STI shallow trench isolation
- the STI depth tends to decrease. This causes the latch-up holding voltage to be reduced. If the latch-up holding voltage is reduced significantly, i.e., to less than the bum-in voltage, the reliability of the device can be negatively impacted.
- the present invention overcomes the limitations of the prior art and provides a device and method to increase the latch-up immunity of CMOS devices by reducing the mobility of charge carriers between the devices.
- the preferred embodiment uses an implant formed beneath trench isolation between n-channel and p-channel devices.
- the implant reduces the mobility of the carriers wich flow from P+ regions to N+ regions and vice versa. This increases the latch-up holding voltage and thus improves the reliability of the technology.
- the implants can be formed without the need for additional photolithography masks.
- the advantage of the present invention is to increase the immunity to latch-up without adding undue complexity to the manufacturing process or requiring a larger area on the semiconductor substrate.
- FIG. 1 is a cross sectional side view of a wafer portion
- FIG. 2 is a cross sectional side view of a wafer portion with after trench etch for shallow trench isolation
- FIG. 3 is a cross sectional side view of a wafer portion with a shallow trench isolation with sidewall oxidation
- FIG. 4 is a cross sectional side view of a wafer portion with a shallow trench isolation and an implant beneath the shallow trench isolation;
- FIG. 5 is a cross sectional side view of a wafer portion with a finished shallow trench isolation and an implant beneath the shallow trench isolation;
- FIG. 6 is a cross sectional side view of a wafer portion with devices fabricated in the n-well and p-well.
- the preferred embodiment of the present invention overcomes the limitations of the prior art and provides a device and method to increase the latch-up immunity of CMOS devices by decreasing carrier mobility between n-channel and p-channel devices. This is accomplished by forming an implant between the devices.
- the implant is formed beneath a shallow trench isolation (STI) between the n-channel and p-channel devices.
- STI shallow trench isolation
- the implant can be formed without requiring additional high energy implants or additional mask levels.
- FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional schematic view of wafer portion 100 on which a CMOS device will be fabricated.
- the wafer portion 100 comprises a p+ substrate with a p ⁇ epitaxial layer at the top portion.
- CMOS device CMOS device
- shallow trench isolation (STI) 102 is used to separate n-channel from p-channel devices.
- the STI can be formed with any suitable processing method, such as reactive ion etching (RIE).
- RIE reactive ion etching
- a masking layer 104 is deposited across the wafer 100 .
- the masking layer can comprise any suitable material, for example, a layer of silicon dioxide (SiO 2 ) under a layer of silicon nitride (SiN) is a commonly used material that may be patterned to form an etch mask.
- the masking layer 104 is then patterned using conventional photolithography techniques.
- the STI 102 is then formed by etching away portions of the wafer no longer covered by masking layer 104 .
- Further processing steps will form n-channel devices and p-channel devices on the wafer portion 100 .
- Isolation regions such as STI 102 are formed between these various devices (i.e., between two n-channel devices, between two p-channel devices and between an n-channel and a p-channel device. In all these cases the STI 102 serves to isolate the devices from each other.
- the preferred embodiment results in less mobility for carriers beneath the STI 102 and thus allows the STI 102 to be more shallow than prior art STI's and still maintain effective isolation between devices.
- the preferred embodiment improves the scalibility of STI without decreasing the latch-up immunity.
- the next step is to grow sidewall oxidation 110 (suitably SiO 2 ) in the STI trench.
- the sidewall oxidation 110 serves to reduce stress incurred by the STI etch and to remove surface contaminants.
- the latch-up immunity is increased by reducing the mobility of carriers that travel under the STI 102 .
- an implant or implants are used that improves the latch-up holding voltage. These implants can be made without additional masks.
- a species is implanted forming implant 106 underneath STI 102 .
- the implantation can be done with any suitable procedure, such as traditional ion implantation techniques.
- the masking layer 104 blocks the implants from entering the other portions of wafer 100 .
- the implant is self aligned, and does not require additional masks or process steps.
- the implants can comprise any suitable material that would sufficiently degrade conductor mobility beneath STI 102 .
- elements for implants are selected to minimize n-well or p-well counterdoping, and as such the preferred implant would result in minimal doping change for the adjacent n-wells or p-wells.
- the preferred implant should be selected to have low diffusitivity, thus reducing the probability of the implants diffusing into neighboring devices.
- the elements preferably comprise large, heavy elements. Large elements result in an increased probability of scattering, and hence significantly decrease the mobility of the conductors beneath the STI. When latch-up occurs, the current flows almost entirely beneath the STI 102 , thus reductions in the mobility beneath the STI 102 will increase the latch-up holding voltage.
- the preferred implants can be electrically neutral species, such as argon (Ar), germanium (Ge), oxygen (O), nitrogen (N), and would thus decrease the mobility of carriers with a very low change to the dopant profile of the substrate.
- the implants can be p-type and n-type materials used in combination to reduce the mobility while resulting a low net dopant profile changes.
- species such as indium (In) in combination with antimony (Sb) and phosphorus (P) in combination with boron (B) can be used.
- the implants are preferably either a counter doping combination of n-type and p-type materials to minimize effects to neighboring wells, or an electrically inactive species.
- the implants are preferably implanted at relatively low energies to keep the implants directly under the STI 102 .
- the implant 106 is formed before the formation of the sidewall oxidation 110 .
- the fabrication of the wafer continues.
- the STI trench is then filled and the wafer 100 is then planaraized with a chemical mechanical polish (CMP). This removes the remaining masking layer 104 and excess sidewall oxidation, resulting in the finished shallow trench isolation.
- CMP chemical mechanical polish
- a n-channel device including a gate 602 , gate oxide 604 and diffusions 606 and 608 are formed in the p-well 610 .
- a p-channel device including a gate 612 , gate oxide 614 and diffusions 616 and 618 are formed in the n-well 620 .
- the implant 106 serves to increase the latch-up holding voltage by reducing carrier mobility between the devices. This increases the latch-up immunity of the CMOS devices.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Power Engineering (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Condensed Matter Physics & Semiconductors (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Microelectronics & Electronic Packaging (AREA)
- Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
- Metal-Oxide And Bipolar Metal-Oxide Semiconductor Integrated Circuits (AREA)
- Element Separation (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- 1. Technical Field
- This invention generally relates to semiconductor devices, and more specifically relates to methods and structures to increase latch-up immunity.
- 2. Background Art
- As integrated semiconductor devices continue to grow in complexity, there is a constant need to increase the density of the semiconductor devices. This increase in density creates several problems that can cause device failures if not addressed. One such problem is the propensity for semiconductor devices, particularly CMOS devices, to “latch-up.” Latch-up is a well known problem caused by unwanted transistor action between elements of the integrated circuit. This unwanted transistor action can be triggered by a wide variety of events, and can cause the semiconductor device to fail.
- Latch-up is generally caused by the close proximity of n-channel and p-channel devices in modern CMOS devices. For example, a typical CMOS device fabricated on a p-type substrate would contain a p-channel device fabricated in a n-well (or n-type region) and an n-channel device fabricated in a p-well (or p-type region), with only a short distance between the wells. This structure inherently forms a parasitic lateral bipolar structure (npn) and parasitic vertical bipolar structure (pnp). Under certain biasing conditions the pnp structure can supply base current to npn structure (or vice versa), causing a large current to flow from one well to the other well. This large current can damage the CMOS device.
- The propensity for CMOS devices to latch-up has been addressed in several ways. One way involves reducing the “gain” or beta of the transistor (npn and pnp). This generally reduces the propensity of the CMOS device to latch-up by increasing the trigger voltage/current, where the trigger voltage/current is the voltage/current that must be applied to a node to induce latch-up.
- Another method in dealing with latch-up is to raise the latch-up holding voltage. The latch-up holding voltage is the lowest stable voltage that can support a large current after latch-up is triggered. By increasing the latch-up holding voltage, the latch-up immunity is increased and the likelihood of the circuit being damaged is decreased. The optimal situation is to have a holding voltage greater than the burn-in voltage, typically 1.5 volts above the nominal supply voltage (Vdd).
- Shallow trench isolation (STI) has been used between the n-channel and p-channel devices to minimize the likelihood of latch-up. However, as device density continues to increase the STI depth tends to decrease. This causes the latch-up holding voltage to be reduced. If the latch-up holding voltage is reduced significantly, i.e., to less than the bum-in voltage, the reliability of the device can be negatively impacted.
- Thus, there is a need for improved methods for increasing the latch-up immunity of CMOS devices by increasing the latch-up holding voltage.
- The present invention overcomes the limitations of the prior art and provides a device and method to increase the latch-up immunity of CMOS devices by reducing the mobility of charge carriers between the devices. The preferred embodiment uses an implant formed beneath trench isolation between n-channel and p-channel devices. The implant reduces the mobility of the carriers wich flow from P+ regions to N+ regions and vice versa. This increases the latch-up holding voltage and thus improves the reliability of the technology. The implants can be formed without the need for additional photolithography masks. The advantage of the present invention is to increase the immunity to latch-up without adding undue complexity to the manufacturing process or requiring a larger area on the semiconductor substrate.
- The foregoing and other advantages and features of the invention will be apparent from the following more particular description of a preferred embodiment of the invention, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings.
- The preferred exemplary embodiment of the present invention will hereinafter be described in conjunction with the appended drawings, where like designations denote like elements, and
- FIG. 1 is a cross sectional side view of a wafer portion;
- FIG. 2 is a cross sectional side view of a wafer portion with after trench etch for shallow trench isolation;
- FIG. 3 is a cross sectional side view of a wafer portion with a shallow trench isolation with sidewall oxidation;
- FIG. 4 is a cross sectional side view of a wafer portion with a shallow trench isolation and an implant beneath the shallow trench isolation;
- FIG. 5 is a cross sectional side view of a wafer portion with a finished shallow trench isolation and an implant beneath the shallow trench isolation; and
- FIG. 6 is a cross sectional side view of a wafer portion with devices fabricated in the n-well and p-well.
- The preferred embodiment of the present invention overcomes the limitations of the prior art and provides a device and method to increase the latch-up immunity of CMOS devices by decreasing carrier mobility between n-channel and p-channel devices. This is accomplished by forming an implant between the devices. In the preferred embodiment, the implant is formed beneath a shallow trench isolation (STI) between the n-channel and p-channel devices. The implant can be formed without requiring additional high energy implants or additional mask levels.
- FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional schematic view of
wafer portion 100 on which a CMOS device will be fabricated. In the preferred embodiment, thewafer portion 100 comprises a p+ substrate with a p− epitaxial layer at the top portion. Of course other suitable substrate materials can be used. - Turning to FIG. 2, according to the preferred embodiment, shallow trench isolation (STI)102 is used to separate n-channel from p-channel devices. The STI can be formed with any suitable processing method, such as reactive ion etching (RIE). For example, a
masking layer 104 is deposited across thewafer 100. The masking layer can comprise any suitable material, for example, a layer of silicon dioxide (SiO2) under a layer of silicon nitride (SiN) is a commonly used material that may be patterned to form an etch mask. Themasking layer 104 is then patterned using conventional photolithography techniques. The STI 102 is then formed by etching away portions of the wafer no longer covered bymasking layer 104. - This forms the
shallow trench isolation 102. Further processing steps will form n-channel devices and p-channel devices on thewafer portion 100. Isolation regions such asSTI 102 are formed between these various devices (i.e., between two n-channel devices, between two p-channel devices and between an n-channel and a p-channel device. In all these cases the STI 102 serves to isolate the devices from each other. - As will become clear, the preferred embodiment results in less mobility for carriers beneath the
STI 102 and thus allows theSTI 102 to be more shallow than prior art STI's and still maintain effective isolation between devices. Thus, the preferred embodiment improves the scalibility of STI without decreasing the latch-up immunity. - Turning now to FIG. 3, the next step is to grow sidewall oxidation110 (suitably SiO2) in the STI trench. The
sidewall oxidation 110 serves to reduce stress incurred by the STI etch and to remove surface contaminants. - According to the preferred embodiment, the latch-up immunity is increased by reducing the mobility of carriers that travel under the
STI 102. In particular, an implant or implants are used that improves the latch-up holding voltage. These implants can be made without additional masks. - Turning to FIG. 4, a species is implanted forming
implant 106 underneathSTI 102. The implantation can be done with any suitable procedure, such as traditional ion implantation techniques. Themasking layer 104 blocks the implants from entering the other portions ofwafer 100. Thus, the implant is self aligned, and does not require additional masks or process steps. - The implants can comprise any suitable material that would sufficiently degrade conductor mobility beneath
STI 102. Preferably elements for implants are selected to minimize n-well or p-well counterdoping, and as such the preferred implant would result in minimal doping change for the adjacent n-wells or p-wells. Additionally, the preferred implant should be selected to have low diffusitivity, thus reducing the probability of the implants diffusing into neighboring devices. - Thus, the elements preferably comprise large, heavy elements. Large elements result in an increased probability of scattering, and hence significantly decrease the mobility of the conductors beneath the STI. When latch-up occurs, the current flows almost entirely beneath the
STI 102, thus reductions in the mobility beneath theSTI 102 will increase the latch-up holding voltage. - The preferred implants can be electrically neutral species, such as argon (Ar), germanium (Ge), oxygen (O), nitrogen (N), and would thus decrease the mobility of carriers with a very low change to the dopant profile of the substrate. In the alternative, the implants can be p-type and n-type materials used in combination to reduce the mobility while resulting a low net dopant profile changes. In these cases species such as indium (In) in combination with antimony (Sb) and phosphorus (P) in combination with boron (B) can be used. These elements, when implanted under the
STI 102 causes the mobility of the carriers beneath theSTI 102 to decrease. This increases the latch-up holding voltage and increases latch-up immunity. - Thus, the implants are preferably either a counter doping combination of n-type and p-type materials to minimize effects to neighboring wells, or an electrically inactive species. The implants are preferably implanted at relatively low energies to keep the implants directly under the
STI 102. - In an alterative embodiment, the
implant 106 is formed before the formation of thesidewall oxidation 110. - Turning now to FIG. 5, the fabrication of the wafer continues. In particular, the STI trench is then filled and the
wafer 100 is then planaraized with a chemical mechanical polish (CMP). This removes the remainingmasking layer 104 and excess sidewall oxidation, resulting in the finished shallow trench isolation. - The individual devices are now fabricated on both sides of the shallow trench isolation. Turning to FIG. 6, an example of completed devices are shown. In particular, a n-channel device, including a
gate 602,gate oxide 604 and diffusions 606 and 608 are formed in the p-well 610. Likewise, a p-channel device including agate 612, gate oxide 614 and diffusions 616 and 618 are formed in the n-well 620. In accordance with the preferred embodiment, theimplant 106 serves to increase the latch-up holding voltage by reducing carrier mobility between the devices. This increases the latch-up immunity of the CMOS devices. - While the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to a preferred exemplary embodiment with an CMOS device using shallow trench isolation, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. In particular any type of implant can be made that would reduce the mobility of the carriers beneath the STI.
Claims (20)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/044,356 US20010011758A1 (en) | 1997-03-17 | 1998-03-19 | Method and device to increase latch-up immunity in cmos device |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US08/819,615 US5770504A (en) | 1997-03-17 | 1997-03-17 | Method for increasing latch-up immunity in CMOS devices |
US09/044,356 US20010011758A1 (en) | 1997-03-17 | 1998-03-19 | Method and device to increase latch-up immunity in cmos device |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US08/819,615 Division US5770504A (en) | 1997-03-17 | 1997-03-17 | Method for increasing latch-up immunity in CMOS devices |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20010011758A1 true US20010011758A1 (en) | 2001-08-09 |
Family
ID=25228617
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US08/819,615 Expired - Lifetime US5770504A (en) | 1997-03-17 | 1997-03-17 | Method for increasing latch-up immunity in CMOS devices |
US09/044,356 Abandoned US20010011758A1 (en) | 1997-03-17 | 1998-03-19 | Method and device to increase latch-up immunity in cmos device |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US08/819,615 Expired - Lifetime US5770504A (en) | 1997-03-17 | 1997-03-17 | Method for increasing latch-up immunity in CMOS devices |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US5770504A (en) |
JP (1) | JP2938422B2 (en) |
KR (1) | KR100288669B1 (en) |
MY (1) | MY120978A (en) |
SG (1) | SG60207A1 (en) |
TW (1) | TW353796B (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20080283962A1 (en) * | 2007-05-15 | 2008-11-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Self-aligned and extended inter-well isolation structure |
Families Citing this family (41)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6218704B1 (en) * | 1997-05-07 | 2001-04-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | ESD protection structure and method |
US6133123A (en) | 1997-08-21 | 2000-10-17 | Micron Technology, Inc. | Fabrication of semiconductor gettering structures by ion implantation |
US5970362A (en) * | 1997-12-18 | 1999-10-19 | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | Simplified shallow trench isolation formation with no polish stop |
EP0929098A1 (en) * | 1998-01-13 | 1999-07-14 | STMicroelectronics S.r.l. | Process for selectively implanting dopants into the bottom of a deep trench |
US6262453B1 (en) * | 1998-04-24 | 2001-07-17 | Magepower Semiconductor Corp. | Double gate-oxide for reducing gate-drain capacitance in trenched DMOS with high-dopant concentration buried-region under trenched gate |
US6232165B1 (en) * | 1998-12-09 | 2001-05-15 | Winbond Electronics Corporation | Buried guard rings and method for forming the same |
JP3955404B2 (en) * | 1998-12-28 | 2007-08-08 | 株式会社ルネサステクノロジ | Manufacturing method of semiconductor integrated circuit device |
US6177333B1 (en) * | 1999-01-14 | 2001-01-23 | Micron Technology, Inc. | Method for making a trench isolation for semiconductor devices |
US6245639B1 (en) * | 1999-02-08 | 2001-06-12 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company | Method to reduce a reverse narrow channel effect for MOSFET devices |
US6144086A (en) * | 1999-04-30 | 2000-11-07 | International Business Machines Corporation | Structure for improved latch-up using dual depth STI with impurity implant |
US6423615B1 (en) | 1999-09-22 | 2002-07-23 | Intel Corporation | Silicon wafers for CMOS and other integrated circuits |
US6514833B1 (en) * | 1999-09-24 | 2003-02-04 | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | Method of inhibiting lateral diffusion between adjacent wells by introducing carbon or fluorine ions into bottom of STI groove |
US6342429B1 (en) * | 1999-12-22 | 2002-01-29 | Lsi Logic Corporation | Method of fabricating an indium field implant for punchthrough protection in semiconductor devices |
KR20010066388A (en) * | 1999-12-31 | 2001-07-11 | 박종섭 | Method for forming semiconductor device with trench type isolation layer |
TW451423B (en) * | 2000-02-01 | 2001-08-21 | Ind Tech Res Inst | Latch-up structure for improving CMOS processing using latch-up ion implantation and the manufacturing method thereof |
KR100327348B1 (en) * | 2000-07-26 | 2002-03-06 | Samsung Electronics Co Ltd | Semiconductor capable of decreasing junction leakage current and narrow width effect and fabricating method thereof |
US6686252B2 (en) * | 2001-03-10 | 2004-02-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and structure to reduce CMOS inter-well leakage |
US7041581B2 (en) * | 2001-11-16 | 2006-05-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and structure for improving latch-up immunity using non-dopant implants |
KR100449318B1 (en) * | 2001-12-20 | 2004-09-18 | 동부전자 주식회사 | Method for forming isolation layer in semiconductor device |
US6885080B2 (en) * | 2002-02-22 | 2005-04-26 | International Business Machines Corporation | Deep trench isolation of embedded DRAM for improved latch-up immunity |
US20030211701A1 (en) * | 2002-05-07 | 2003-11-13 | Agere Systems Inc. | Semiconductor device including an isolation trench having a dopant barrier layer formed on a sidewall thereof and a method of manufacture therefor |
KR20030096703A (en) * | 2002-06-17 | 2003-12-31 | 주식회사 하이닉스반도체 | method for fabricating semicinductor device |
KR100480604B1 (en) * | 2002-07-24 | 2005-04-06 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Method for fabricating shallow well of semiconductor device by low energy implantation |
JP3621400B2 (en) * | 2003-03-03 | 2005-02-16 | 松下電器産業株式会社 | Solid-state imaging device and manufacturing method thereof |
DE10345345A1 (en) * | 2003-09-19 | 2005-04-14 | Atmel Germany Gmbh | Method of manufacturing semiconductor devices in a semiconductor substrate |
US7012316B1 (en) | 2004-09-17 | 2006-03-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Isolation structures in semiconductor integrated circuits (IC) |
US20070120196A1 (en) * | 2005-11-28 | 2007-05-31 | Via Technologies, Inc. Of R.O.C. | Prevention of latch-up among p-type semiconductor devices |
KR100724199B1 (en) * | 2005-12-28 | 2007-05-31 | 동부일렉트로닉스 주식회사 | Method for forming shallow trench isolation of soi |
US20070170517A1 (en) * | 2006-01-26 | 2007-07-26 | International Business Machines Corporation | CMOS devices adapted to reduce latchup and methods of manufacturing the same |
US7618857B2 (en) * | 2007-01-17 | 2009-11-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method of reducing detrimental STI-induced stress in MOSFET channels |
US7391200B1 (en) | 2007-02-02 | 2008-06-24 | Netlogic Microsystems, Inc. | P-channel power chip |
US8274265B1 (en) | 2007-02-28 | 2012-09-25 | Netlogic Microsystems, Inc. | Multi-phase power system with redundancy |
US7691734B2 (en) * | 2007-03-01 | 2010-04-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | Deep trench based far subcollector reachthrough |
US7808223B1 (en) | 2007-05-08 | 2010-10-05 | Netlogic Microsystems, Inc. | Transistor with spatially integrated schottky diode |
KR100948296B1 (en) | 2007-11-30 | 2010-03-17 | 주식회사 동부하이텍 | Method for fabricating semiconductor device |
US8956948B2 (en) * | 2010-05-20 | 2015-02-17 | Globalfoundries Inc. | Shallow trench isolation extension |
US9698044B2 (en) | 2011-12-01 | 2017-07-04 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. | Localized carrier lifetime reduction |
KR102037867B1 (en) | 2013-03-04 | 2019-10-29 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Method of manufacturing a semiconductor device |
KR102053354B1 (en) | 2013-07-17 | 2019-12-06 | 삼성전자주식회사 | A semiconductor device having a buried channel array and method of manufacturing the same |
US9728598B2 (en) * | 2015-04-07 | 2017-08-08 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. | Semiconductor device having barrier layer to prevent impurity diffusion |
US11164746B2 (en) | 2018-06-26 | 2021-11-02 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. | Method of manufacturing semiconductor devices and a semiconductor device |
Family Cites Families (17)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4027380A (en) * | 1974-06-03 | 1977-06-07 | Fairchild Camera And Instrument Corporation | Complementary insulated gate field effect transistor structure and process for fabricating the structure |
US4470852A (en) * | 1982-09-03 | 1984-09-11 | Ncr Corporation | Method of making CMOS device and contacts therein by enhanced oxidation of selectively implanted regions |
US4477310A (en) * | 1983-08-12 | 1984-10-16 | Tektronix, Inc. | Process for manufacturing MOS integrated circuit with improved method of forming refractory metal silicide areas |
US4647957A (en) * | 1983-10-11 | 1987-03-03 | At&T Bell Laboratories | Latchup-preventing CMOS device |
US4646123A (en) * | 1983-10-11 | 1987-02-24 | At&T Bell Laboratories | Latchup-preventing CMOS device |
US4683488A (en) * | 1984-03-29 | 1987-07-28 | Hughes Aircraft Company | Latch-up resistant CMOS structure for VLSI including retrograded wells |
US4599789A (en) * | 1984-06-15 | 1986-07-15 | Harris Corporation | Process of making twin well VLSI CMOS |
US4656730A (en) * | 1984-11-23 | 1987-04-14 | American Telephone And Telegraph Company, At&T Bell Laboratories | Method for fabricating CMOS devices |
US4578128A (en) * | 1984-12-03 | 1986-03-25 | Ncr Corporation | Process for forming retrograde dopant distributions utilizing simultaneous outdiffusion of dopants |
US4653177A (en) * | 1985-07-25 | 1987-03-31 | At&T Bell Laboratories | Method of making and selectively doping isolation trenches utilized in CMOS devices |
US4947227A (en) * | 1985-09-16 | 1990-08-07 | Texas Instruments, Incorporated | Latch-up resistant CMOS structure |
US4729006A (en) * | 1986-03-17 | 1988-03-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Sidewall spacers for CMOS circuit stress relief/isolation and method for making |
US4766090A (en) * | 1986-04-21 | 1988-08-23 | American Telephone And Telegraph Company, At&T Bell Laboratories | Methods for fabricating latchup-preventing CMOS device |
US4963502A (en) * | 1988-08-25 | 1990-10-16 | Texas Instruments, Incorporated | Method of making oxide-isolated source/drain transistor |
US5179038A (en) * | 1989-12-22 | 1993-01-12 | North American Philips Corp., Signetics Division | High density trench isolation for MOS circuits |
US5420061A (en) * | 1993-08-13 | 1995-05-30 | Micron Semiconductor, Inc. | Method for improving latchup immunity in a dual-polysilicon gate process |
US5536675A (en) * | 1993-12-30 | 1996-07-16 | Intel Corporation | Isolation structure formation for semiconductor circuit fabrication |
-
1997
- 1997-03-17 US US08/819,615 patent/US5770504A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1997-12-18 TW TW086119222A patent/TW353796B/en not_active IP Right Cessation
-
1998
- 1998-01-20 KR KR1019980001521A patent/KR100288669B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1998-02-20 MY MYPI98000730A patent/MY120978A/en unknown
- 1998-02-23 JP JP10039909A patent/JP2938422B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1998-02-26 SG SG1998000433A patent/SG60207A1/en unknown
- 1998-03-19 US US09/044,356 patent/US20010011758A1/en not_active Abandoned
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20080283962A1 (en) * | 2007-05-15 | 2008-11-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Self-aligned and extended inter-well isolation structure |
US7750429B2 (en) * | 2007-05-15 | 2010-07-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | Self-aligned and extended inter-well isolation structure |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
KR19980079630A (en) | 1998-11-25 |
MY120978A (en) | 2005-12-30 |
SG60207A1 (en) | 1999-02-22 |
JPH10261766A (en) | 1998-09-29 |
TW353796B (en) | 1999-03-01 |
KR100288669B1 (en) | 2001-06-01 |
JP2938422B2 (en) | 1999-08-23 |
US5770504A (en) | 1998-06-23 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US5770504A (en) | Method for increasing latch-up immunity in CMOS devices | |
EP0661751B1 (en) | Method of making a CMOS device with high and low voltage transistors | |
US6445044B2 (en) | Apparatus improving latchup immunity in a dual-polysilicon gate | |
KR100243715B1 (en) | Cmos structure with fets having isolated wells with merged depletions and methods of making same | |
US5416351A (en) | Electrostatic discharge protection | |
US6228726B1 (en) | Method to suppress CMOS device latchup and improve interwell isolation | |
US5851864A (en) | Method of fabricating BiCMOS devices | |
US20070158779A1 (en) | Methods and semiconductor structures for latch-up suppression using a buried damage layer | |
US20060220109A1 (en) | Selectively doped trench device isolation | |
JPH0332224B2 (en) | ||
US7105413B2 (en) | Methods for forming super-steep diffusion region profiles in MOS devices and resulting semiconductor topographies | |
JP3364903B2 (en) | Deep divot mask for improving performance and reliability of buried channel PFET | |
US4707456A (en) | Method of making a planar structure containing MOS and bipolar transistors | |
US6051457A (en) | Method for fabricating electrostatic discharge protection device | |
KR20020094955A (en) | Semiconductor device with sti sidewall implant | |
US6249025B1 (en) | Using epitaxially grown wells for reducing junction capacitances | |
US7095087B2 (en) | Semiconductor device and fabrication method thereof | |
US6083795A (en) | Large angle channel threshold implant for improving reverse narrow width effect | |
US4947227A (en) | Latch-up resistant CMOS structure | |
US6855618B2 (en) | Radiation hardened semiconductor device | |
US4660278A (en) | Process of making IC isolation structure | |
US6406974B1 (en) | Method of forming triple N well utilizing phosphorus and boron ion implantations | |
US20030062572A1 (en) | Transistor with bottomwall/sidewall junction capacitance reduction region and method | |
US6890832B1 (en) | Radiation hardening method for shallow trench isolation in CMOS | |
US5049519A (en) | Latch-up resistant CMOS process |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S. 2 LLC, NEW YORK Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:036550/0001 Effective date: 20150629 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GLOBALFOUNDRIES INC., CAYMAN ISLANDS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S. 2 LLC;GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S. INC.;REEL/FRAME:036779/0001 Effective date: 20150910 |