US1064393A - Art of dyeing. - Google Patents

Description

UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE.

IBEBTRAND S. SUMMERS, OF PORT HURON, MICHIGAN, ASSIGNOB TO SUMMERS LINEN COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF MAINE.

ART OF DYEING.

No Drawing.

Patented June 10, 1913.

To all whom it may concern:

Be it known that I, BERTRAND S. Som- MERS, a citizen of the United States, residing at Port Huron, in the county of St. Clair and State of Michigan, have invented certain new and useful Improvements in the Art of Dyeing, of which the following is a specification.

My invention relates more particularly to that class of dyes derived from anthracene or synthetic indigo, commonly known in the art as vat dyes. It is the usual practice withdyes of this class to render them soluble by. a reducing agent and while in the reduced. state deposit them upon the fiber. The dye is subsequently re-oxidized which gives the permanent color toward washing and light characteristic of these dyes. It is customary to prepare such dyes for use by dissolving them in an alkaline bath containing either caustic soda or carbonate of soda or both, also hydrosulfite of soda, the last. named serving as the reducing agent. The bath prepared in this way, however, is not entirely satisfactory although the solution of the dye is substantially complete, for the reason that the dye deposits so rapidl on the fiber that an even shade is Very di cult to obtain. And this is particularly true of material such as mercerized yarns having a base of hydro-cellulose though it is true in greater or less degree of all vegetable fibers especially Where they have been previously submitted to strong alkalis, and the 'difii culty is especially pronounced, in machine dyeing, so much so that the use of dye stuti's of this class is greatly reduced where the machine process is employed. I have discovered that if the alkali heretofore employed be replaced by sulfid of soda in the reducing bath and the latter-employed with the usual hydro-sulfite the objection above noted 'is obviated and not only is the material dyed an even shade but less hydrosulfite and dye are required and the dyeing operation is therefore more economical. I wish to emphasize the fact that in my process the hydrosulfite of soda remains the reducing agent and the sulfid of soda replaces the alkaline reagents heretofore used for it is old in this art and in connection with certain of these dyes to employ sulfid of soda as the reducing agent in place of the hydrosulfite generally used but the last mentioned employed isextremely simple.

process is not entirely satisfactory since it is not so fast and the shade produced is dull.

Where, however, hydrosulfite is the reducfor machine dyeing I employ ten pounds of crystals of sulfid of soda to one hundred gallons of solution, and hydrosulfite of soda to the extent of from one per cent. to one and a half per cent. of the weight of the material to be treated. Again, if open vat dyeing is employed the proportion of hydrosulfite is somewhat increased.

The dyeing operation when my process is When an open vat is used the solution is made by introducing the sulfid of soda and hydrosulfite of soda in the proportions stated above into a vat containing water to the amount of from fifteen to twenty times the weight of the material to be dyed. 01" course in the machine processthe amount of solution required is less, usually from five to six times the weight of the material to be treated. Before the dye is introduced the bath must be brought to the proper temperature for the particular" dye employed, which temperatures, however, are well known to dyers and need not be here specified, and after the dye has been put in, the bath must be stirred at intervals until the dye is thoroughly re duced and dissolved. In the'case of the open vat treatment the material to be dyed is simply put into the vat but in. the machine treatment thesolution is usually letin onto the material to be'dyed. The dyeing operation in either case may be conducted in the usual or approved manner, and is generally completed in about forty minutes.

It will be obvious that the precise quantities which I have givenfor illustration only may be somewhat varied as well as the steps of the dyeing operation which I have described, without departing from my invention which is defined in the following claims.

What I claim is:

1. The method of dyeing with non-sulfurized vat'dyes, which consists in dissolving the dye in a solution containing a soluble sulfid and a reducin treating the material to solution.

2. The method of dyeing with non-sulfurized vat dyes, which consists in dissolving the dye in a solution containing sulfid of sodium and a reducing agent,' and then treating the material to be dyed with said solution.

3. The method of dyeing with non-sulfurized vat dyes, which consists in dissolving the dye in a solution containing sulfid of sodium and hydrosulfite of soda, and then treating the material to'be dyed with said solution.

e dyed with said agent, and then neonate 4. A bath for dyeing with non-sulfurized vat dyes consisting of a solution of a soluble sulfid, a reducing agent and a Vet dye. 5. A bath for dyeing consisting of a solution of snlfid of soda, a reducing agent and a non-sulfurized vat dye.

6. A bath for dyeing consisting of a solution of sulfid of soda,- hydrsulfite of soda and a non-sulfurized vat dye.

BERTRAND s. SUMMERS.

Witnesses:

D. MAGTAGGART, J. D. PATTUNIS.