TWI732296B - System for generating detection model according to standard data to confirm soldering state and method thereof - Google Patents
System for generating detection model according to standard data to confirm soldering state and method thereof Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- TWI732296B TWI732296B TW108133815A TW108133815A TWI732296B TW I732296 B TWI732296 B TW I732296B TW 108133815 A TW108133815 A TW 108133815A TW 108133815 A TW108133815 A TW 108133815A TW I732296 B TWI732296 B TW I732296B
- Authority
- TW
- Taiwan
- Prior art keywords
- solder joint
- data
- detection model
- solder
- classification
- Prior art date
Links
Images
Landscapes
- Electric Connection Of Electric Components To Printed Circuits (AREA)
Abstract
Description
一種焊接檢測系統及其方法,特別係指一種依據標準值建立檢測模型以確認焊接狀態之系統及方法。A welding inspection system and method, in particular, refers to a system and method that establishes an inspection model based on standard values to confirm the welding state.
目前電子組裝業裡最常使用的技術是表面黏著技術(Surface-Mount Technology, SMT),也就是將電阻、電容、電晶體、積體電路等電子元件通過釺焊與印刷電路板(Printed circuit Board, PCB)形成電氣連接。藉由使用表面黏著技術可以增加組裝的整體處理速度。At present, the most commonly used technology in the electronic assembly industry is Surface-Mount Technology (SMT), which means that electronic components such as resistors, capacitors, transistors, and integrated circuits are soldered to a printed circuit board (Printed Circuit Board). , PCB) to form electrical connections. By using surface mount technology, the overall processing speed of the assembly can be increased.
然而,由於電子元件的微小化及密度增加,電子元件在印刷電路板上的焊接不良的可能性因而隨之提高,所以,在任何表面黏著技術的印刷電路板製造過程中,焊接狀況的偵測已經變成必要的一環。However, due to the miniaturization and increased density of electronic components, the possibility of poor soldering of electronic components on printed circuit boards has increased accordingly. Therefore, the detection of soldering conditions during the manufacturing process of printed circuit boards with any surface mount technology Has become a necessary part.
目前,錫膏厚度測試(Solder Paste Inspection, SPI)設備可以檢測每個焊點的體積、面積、高度、X偏移和Y偏移等指標資料,並使用所檢測出的指標資料來判斷焊點是否有焊接不良。因此,錫膏厚度測試設備一直以來發揮著對焊接品質的檢查作用,可以發現焊接品質的缺陷。At present, Solder Paste Inspection (SPI) equipment can detect the volume, area, height, X offset and Y offset of each solder joint, and use the detected index data to determine the solder joint Whether there is poor welding. Therefore, solder paste thickness testing equipment has always been playing a role in inspecting soldering quality, and defects in soldering quality can be found.
但實際上,錫膏厚度測試設備所檢測正確率並不夠高,往往可能有半數被判斷為焊接不良的焊點被復判人員確認並沒有焊接不良的情況。如此增加了復判人員不必要的工作量。But in fact, the accuracy of the solder paste thickness test equipment is not high enough, and it is often possible that half of the solder joints that are judged to be poorly soldered are confirmed by the reviewer that there is no poor soldering. This increases the unnecessary workload of reviewers.
綜上所述,可知先前技術中長期以來一直存在目前錫膏厚度測試設備的檢測正確率不足的問題,因此有必要提出改進的技術手段,來解決此一問題。In summary, it can be seen that the prior art has long been a problem of insufficient detection accuracy of the current solder paste thickness testing equipment. Therefore, it is necessary to propose improved technical means to solve this problem.
有鑒於先前技術存在錫膏厚度測試設備的檢測正確率不足的問題,本發明遂揭露一種依據標準值建立檢測模型以確認焊接狀態之系統及方法,其中:In view of the problem of insufficient detection accuracy of solder paste thickness testing equipment in the prior art, the present invention discloses a system and method for establishing a detection model based on standard values to confirm the soldering state, in which:
本發明所揭露之依據標準值建立檢測模型以確認焊接狀態之系統,至少包含:資料收集模組,用以收集標準值資料、第一焊點資料、及第二焊點資料,第一焊點資料與標準值資料都與焊點對應;焊點分類模組,用以依據標準值資料產生焊點分類;模型建立模組,用以依據焊點分類包含之焊點對應之焊點資料建立檢測模型;資料分析模組,用以使用檢測模型分析第二焊點資料是否存在焊接不良。The system for establishing a detection model based on standard values to confirm welding status disclosed in the present invention at least includes: a data collection module for collecting standard value data, first solder joint data, and second solder joint data. The first solder joint The data and standard value data correspond to the solder joints; the solder joint classification module is used to generate solder joint classifications based on the standard value data; the model building module is used to establish inspections based on the solder joint data corresponding to the solder joints included in the solder joint classification Model: The data analysis module is used to use the detection model to analyze whether the second solder joint data has welding defects.
本發明所揭露之依據標準值建立檢測模型以確認焊接狀態之方法,其步驟至少包括:收集標準值資料及第一焊點資料,第一焊點資料與標準值資料都與焊點對應;依據標準值資料產生焊點分類;依據焊點分類包含之焊點對應之第一焊點資料建立檢測模型;收集第二焊點資料;使用檢測模型分析第二焊點資料是否存在焊接不良。The method for establishing a detection model based on standard values to confirm welding status disclosed in the present invention includes at least the steps of: collecting standard value data and first solder joint data, where both the first solder joint data and standard value data correspond to the solder joints; The standard value data generates the solder joint classification; the detection model is established according to the first solder joint data corresponding to the solder joint included in the solder joint classification; the second solder joint data is collected; the detection model is used to analyze whether the second solder joint data has poor welding.
本發明所揭露之系統與方法如上,與先前技術之間的差異在於本發明透過依據標準值資料產生焊點分類,並依據與焊點分類所包含之焊點相對應的第一焊點資料建立檢測模型後,使用檢測模型分析由印刷電路板檢測產生之第二焊點資料是否存在焊接不良,藉以解決先前技術所存在的問題,並可以達成減少人工復判的焊點數量以縮短人工復判所需時間的技術功效。The system and method disclosed in the present invention are as above. The difference with the prior art is that the present invention generates solder joint classification based on standard value data, and establishes it based on the first solder joint data corresponding to the solder joints included in the solder joint classification After inspecting the model, use the inspection model to analyze whether the second solder joint data generated by the printed circuit board inspection has soldering defects, so as to solve the problems of the previous technology, and can reduce the number of solder joints for manual re-judgment and shorten the manual re-judgment The technical efficacy of the required time.
以下將配合圖式及實施例來詳細說明本發明之特徵與實施方式,內容足以使任何熟習相關技藝者能夠輕易地充分理解本發明解決技術問題所應用的技術手段並據以實施,藉此實現本發明可達成的功效。In the following, the features and implementation of the present invention will be described in detail with the drawings and embodiments. The content is sufficient to enable any person familiar with the relevant art to easily and fully understand the technical means used by the present invention to solve the technical problems and implement them accordingly. The achievable effect of the present invention.
本發明可以依據焊點或焊盤(land/pad)的標準值資料產生檢測模型,並使用檢測模型分析焊點資料是否存在焊接不良的情況。其中,標準值資料可以是相對應之焊點的指標資料的上下限,也可以是相對應之焊盤的寬度、高度、及面積等資料。上述之指標資料包含相對應之焊點的體積、面積、高度、水平偏移、及垂直偏移等資料。The present invention can generate a detection model based on the standard value data of solder joints or pads (land/pad), and use the detection model to analyze whether the solder joint data has poor soldering. Among them, the standard value data can be the upper and lower limits of the index data of the corresponding solder joint, or the width, height, and area of the corresponding pad. The above index data includes the volume, area, height, horizontal offset, and vertical offset of the corresponding solder joints.
以下先以「第1圖」本發明所提之依據標準值建立檢測模型以確認焊接狀態之系統架構圖來說明本發明的系統運作。如「第1圖」所示,本發明之系統含有資料收集模組110、焊點分類模組120、模型建立模組130、資料分析模組150、及輸出模組160。其中,本發明之系統可以應用於計算設備100中。Hereinafter, the system architecture diagram of establishing a detection model based on standard values to confirm the welding state mentioned in the present invention is used to illustrate the operation of the system of the present invention. As shown in "Figure 1", the system of the present invention includes a
資料收集模組110負責收集第一焊點資料。資料收集模組110所收集之第一焊點資料為與印刷電路板(Printed circuit Board, PCB)上的焊點對應的指標資料。其中,印刷電路板通常包含一個或多個焊盤,每一個焊盤上有一個或多個焊點,每一個焊點與一個不同的第一焊點資料對應。The
一般而言,資料收集模組110可以由計算設備100之儲存媒體中讀出過去所檢測之印刷電路板的檢測檔案,並解析所讀出之檢測檔案中以取得檢測檔案中所記錄之第一焊點資料;資料收集模組110也可以連線到計算設備100外部的儲存設備下載印刷電路板的檢測檔案並由檢測檔案中取得第一焊點資料。Generally speaking, the
資料收集模組110也負責收集標準值資料。資料收集模組110所收集的每一個標準值資料可以與印刷電路板上之一個不同的焊點對應,也可以與印刷電路板所包含之一個不同的焊盤上之一個或多個焊點對應。The
資料收集模組110也可以由計算設備100之儲存媒體中或由計算設備100外部的儲存設備中取得同一塊印刷電路板之檢測檔案與設定檔案,並解析所取得之設定檔案,藉以由設定檔案中取得標準值資料。The
資料收集模組110也負責收集第二焊點資料。與上述相似的,資料收集模組110可以由計算設備100的儲存媒體中或計算設備100外部的儲存裝置中取得第二焊點資料。資料收集模組110所收集之第二焊點資料除了包含與相對應之焊點對應的指標資料外,還可以包含焊點周圍一定範圍內的圖像(在本發明中被稱為檢測圖像),也可以包含焊點在焊盤或印刷電路板上的座標或識別資料等位置資訊。The
資料收集模組110所收集之第二焊點資料通常包含與使用錫膏厚度測試(Solder Paste Inspection, SPI)設備(圖中未示)檢測印刷電路板上之所有焊點後,被錫膏厚度測試設備判斷為焊接不良之焊點對應的指標資料。但本發明並不以此為限,第二焊點資料也可以是與印刷電路板上之各個焊點對應的指標資料。The second solder joint data collected by the
焊點分類模組120負責依據資料收集模組110所收集之標準值資料產生一個或多個焊點分類,焊點分類模組120所產生的每一個焊點分類包含一個或多個焊點。在大部分的實施例中,不同的焊點分類不會包含相同的焊點,也就是一個焊點只包含一個焊點分類中。The solder
焊點分類模組120可以使用特定的演算法依據標準值資料所包含之指標資料的上下限分類標準值資料所對應的焊點。其中,焊點分類模組120所使用之演算法包含但不限於K平均演算法(k-means clustering)等。The solder
在部分的實施例中,焊點分類模組120可以依據資料分析模組150所分析出之第二焊點資料存在焊接不良的比率調整焊點分類。In some embodiments, the solder
模型建立模組130負責依據與焊點分類模組120所產生之每一個焊點分類所包含的各個焊點對應之焊點資料建立檢測模型。舉例來說,模型建立模組130可以由焊點資料中隨機產生k棵決策樹,並可以採用基尼(Gini)係數選擇特徵,每棵決策樹通過不斷遍歷該棵決策樹之特徵子集所有可能的分割點,藉以尋找Gini係數最小的特徵分割點來將資料集分成兩個子集,直至滿足停止條件為止,再使用簡單投票法將得到最多票數的類別作為最終的檢測模型。但模型建立模組130建立檢測模型之方式並不以上述為限。The
模型建立模組130可以將焊點資料分為兩部分,模型建立模組130可以使用其中一部份的焊點資料用來訓練檢測模型,並可以使用另一部份的焊點資料預測準確度,直到準確度達到預定值為止。舉例來說,模型建立模組130可以由所有的焊點資料中隨機選出預定比例的焊點資料來訓練檢測模型,並使用未被選出的焊點資料判斷檢測模型的準確度,若準確度未達預定值,則模型建立模組130可以調整預定比例,並再次由所有的焊點資料中隨機選出調整後之預定比例的焊點資料來訓練檢測模型,並使用未被選出的焊點資料判斷檢測模型的準確度。但本發明並不以此為限。The
資料分析模組150負責使用模型建立模組130所建立的檢測模型分析資料收集模組110所收集到的第二焊點資料是否存在焊接不良。更詳細的,資料分析模組150可以將第二焊點資料提供給檢測模型,使得檢測模型分別產生與各個第二焊點資料對應的分析結果,資料分析模組150可以依據檢模型所產生的分析結果判斷相對應之第二焊點資料是否表示相對應之焊點是否存在焊接不良的情況。The
輸出模組160負責在資料分析模組150判斷第二焊點資料存在焊接不良時,輸出存在焊接不良之第二焊點資料。輸出模組160可以顯示存在焊接不良之第二焊點資料,使得使用者可以依據輸出模組160所顯示之第二焊點資料所包含的檢測圖像判斷與第二焊點資料對應之焊點是否確實焊接不良。The
在部分的實施例中,輸出模組160也可以輸出與存在焊接不良之第二焊點資料對應之焊點的位置資訊,例如,焊點在印刷電路板上的座標等,但本發明並不以此為限。In some embodiments, the
接著以一個實施例來解說本發明的運作系統與方法,並請參照「第2A圖」本發明所提之依據標準值建立檢測模型以確認焊接狀態之方法流程圖。Next, an embodiment is used to explain the operating system and method of the present invention, and please refer to "Figure 2A" for the flow chart of the method of establishing a detection model based on standard values to confirm the welding state according to the present invention.
首先,資料收集模組110可以收集與印刷電路板上之焊點對應的第一焊點資料以及標準值資料(步驟210)。在本實施例中,假設資料收集模組110可以連線到伺服器(圖中未示)下載過去檢測完成之印刷電路板的檢測檔案以及設定檔案,並分別解析檢測檔案與設定檔案,藉以由檢測檔案與設定檔案中讀出第一焊點資料以及標準值資料。First, the
在資料收集模組110收集到第一焊點資料與標準值資料(步驟210)後,焊點分類模組120可以依據資料收集模組110所收集到之標準值資料產生焊點分類(步驟220),模型建立模組130可以依據與焊點分類模組120所產生之焊點分類所包含的焊點相對應的焊點資料建立檢測模型(步驟230)。在本實施例中,假設模型建立模組130將每一個焊點分類中的焊點資料都以3:1的比例分為兩部分,其中,模型建立模組130使用數量較多之部分的焊點資料訓練檢測模型,並使用數量較少之部分的焊點資料評估預測的準確度,直到準確度達到預定值為止。After the
在模型建立模組130建立檢測模型(步驟230)後,資料收集模組110可以收集第二焊點資料(步驟240)。在本實施例中,假設資料收集模組110是連線到伺服器下載錫膏厚度測試設備檢測相同印刷電路板所產生的檢測報告,並解析所下載之檢測報告後,由檢測報告中讀取出被錫膏厚度測試設備判斷為存在焊接不良的焊點資料。After the
實務上,模型建立模組130建立檢測模型(步驟230)與錫膏厚度測試設備檢測印刷電路板以產生檢測報告並沒有先後次序的關係,也就是說,在本發明中,模型建立模組130可以在錫膏厚度測試設備產生檢測報告之前、之後或同時建立檢測模型,本發明並沒有特別的限制。In practice, the
在資料收集模組110收集到第二焊點資料(步驟240)後,資料分析模組150可以使用模型建立模組130所建立的檢測模型分析資料收集模組110所收集到的第二焊點資料,使得檢測模型分析第二焊點資料是否存在焊接不良(步驟250)。若否,則資料分析模組150可以繼續分析下一個第二焊點資料;而若資料分析模組150判斷檢測模型所輸出的分析結果表示第二焊點資料存在焊接不良,則輸出模組160可以將第二焊點資料加入分析報表中。After the
在資料分析模組150使用檢測模型分析所有的第二焊點資料是否存在焊接不良(步驟250)後,輸出模組160可以將所產生的分析報表儲存在計算設備100或伺服器中,藉以輸出存在焊接不良之第二焊點資料(步驟260),使得復判人員可以依據輸出模組160所產生的分析報表對第二焊點資料所對應的焊點進行復判。在本實施例中,輸出模組160也可以直接顯示第二焊點資料所包含的檢測圖像以輸出存在焊接不良之第二焊點資料(步驟260),藉以提供使用者依據所顯示的檢測圖像復判第二焊點資料所對應之焊點是否真的焊接不良。After the
如此,透過本發明,可以降低焊點被誤判為焊接不良的機率,減少復判人員的工作量。In this way, through the present invention, the probability that a solder joint is misjudged as a defective solder can be reduced, and the workload of the re-judgment personnel can be reduced.
另外,上述實施例中,在資料分析模組150使用模型建立模組130所建立之檢測模型分析資料收集模組110所收集到之第二焊點資料是否存在焊接不良(步驟250)後,更可以如「第2B圖」之流程所示,模型建立模組130可以依據資料分析模組150判斷第二焊點資料存在焊接不良的比率調整焊點分類(步驟270)。In addition, in the above-mentioned embodiment, after the
綜上所述,可知本發明與先前技術之間的差異在於具有依據標準值資料產生焊點分類,並依據與焊點分類所包含之焊點相對應的第一焊點資料建立檢測模型後,使用檢測模型分析由印刷電路板檢測產生之第二焊點資料是否存在焊接不良之技術手段,藉由此一技術手段可以解決先前技術所存在錫膏厚度測試設備的檢測正確率不足的問題,進而達成減少人工復判的焊點數量以縮短人工復判所需時間的技術功效。In summary, it can be seen that the difference between the present invention and the prior art is that after the solder joint classification is generated based on the standard value data, and the inspection model is established based on the first solder joint data corresponding to the solder joint included in the solder joint classification, The detection model is used to analyze whether the second solder joint data generated by the printed circuit board inspection has a technical means for poor soldering. This technical means can solve the problem of insufficient detection accuracy of the solder paste thickness test equipment in the prior art, and then Achieve the technical effect of reducing the number of solder joints for manual re-judgment and shorten the time required for manual re-judgment.
再者,本發明之依據標準值建立檢測模型以確認焊接狀態之方法,可實現於硬體、軟體或硬體與軟體之組合中,亦可在電腦系統中以集中方式實現或以不同元件散佈於若干互連之電腦系統的分散方式實現。Furthermore, the method of the present invention for establishing a detection model based on standard values to confirm the welding status can be implemented in hardware, software, or a combination of hardware and software, and can also be implemented in a centralized manner in a computer system or distributed with different components Realize in a distributed way of several interconnected computer systems.
雖然本發明所揭露之實施方式如上,惟所述之內容並非用以直接限定本發明之專利保護範圍。任何本發明所屬技術領域中具有通常知識者,在不脫離本發明所揭露之精神和範圍的前提下,對本發明之實施的形式上及細節上作些許之更動潤飾,均屬於本發明之專利保護範圍。本發明之專利保護範圍,仍須以所附之申請專利範圍所界定者為準。Although the embodiments of the present invention are disclosed as above, the content described is not intended to directly limit the scope of patent protection of the present invention. Any person with ordinary knowledge in the technical field to which the present invention belongs, without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention, makes slight modifications to the form and details of the implementation of the present invention, all belong to the patent protection of the present invention. range. The scope of patent protection of the present invention shall still be determined by the scope of the attached patent application.
100 計算設備
110 資料收集模組
120 焊點分類模組
130 模型建立模組
150 資料分析模組
160 輸出模組
步驟210 收集標準值資料及第一焊點資料
步驟220 依據標準值資料產生焊點分類
步驟230 依據焊點分類包含之焊點所對應之焊點資料建立檢測模型
步驟240 收集第二焊點資料
步驟250 使用檢測模型分析第二焊點資料是否存在焊接不良
步驟260 輸出存在焊接不良之第二焊點資料
步驟270 依據第二焊點資料存在焊接不良之比率調整焊點分類
100
第1圖為本發明所提之依據標準值建立檢測模型以確認焊接狀態之系統架構圖。 第2A圖為本發明所提之依據標準值建立檢測模型以確認焊接狀態之方法流程圖。 第2B圖為本發明所提之依焊接不良之比率調整焊點分類之方法流程圖。 Figure 1 is a system architecture diagram of the present invention for establishing a detection model based on standard values to confirm the welding state. Figure 2A is a flow chart of the method of establishing a detection model based on standard values to confirm the welding state according to the present invention. Figure 2B is a flow chart of the method for adjusting the classification of solder joints according to the ratio of poor soldering according to the present invention.
步驟210 收集標準值資料及第一焊點資料
步驟220 依據標準值資料產生焊點分類
步驟230 依據焊點分類包含之焊點所對應之焊點資料建立檢測模型
步驟240 收集第二焊點資料
步驟250 使用檢測模型分析第二焊點資料是否存在焊接不良
步驟260 輸出存在焊接不良之第二焊點資料
Step 210 Collect standard value data and first solder
Claims (8)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
TW108133815A TWI732296B (en) | 2019-09-19 | 2019-09-19 | System for generating detection model according to standard data to confirm soldering state and method thereof |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
TW108133815A TWI732296B (en) | 2019-09-19 | 2019-09-19 | System for generating detection model according to standard data to confirm soldering state and method thereof |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
TW202113599A TW202113599A (en) | 2021-04-01 |
TWI732296B true TWI732296B (en) | 2021-07-01 |
Family
ID=76604468
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
TW108133815A TWI732296B (en) | 2019-09-19 | 2019-09-19 | System for generating detection model according to standard data to confirm soldering state and method thereof |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
TW (1) | TWI732296B (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
TWI783548B (en) * | 2021-06-24 | 2022-11-11 | 英業達股份有限公司 | Printing solder point quality identification and maintenance suggestion system and method thereof |
TWI799104B (en) * | 2022-01-24 | 2023-04-11 | 和碩聯合科技股份有限公司 | Method and apparatus for generating optimal parameters |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
TW201722256A (en) * | 2015-09-09 | 2017-06-16 | Bosch Gmbh Robert | System and method for checking solder joints |
CN108596871A (en) * | 2018-03-08 | 2018-09-28 | 中北大学 | A kind of BGA air blister defect image detection methods based on deep learning |
TWM569427U (en) * | 2018-05-02 | 2018-11-01 | 鍾東霖 | Welding optical real-time detection device, and welding optical real-time detection, marking and data exchange system including the same |
CN109035242A (en) * | 2018-08-09 | 2018-12-18 | 长安大学 | A kind of HF-ERW welded condition detection method and device based on deep learning |
-
2019
- 2019-09-19 TW TW108133815A patent/TWI732296B/en active
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
TW201722256A (en) * | 2015-09-09 | 2017-06-16 | Bosch Gmbh Robert | System and method for checking solder joints |
CN108596871A (en) * | 2018-03-08 | 2018-09-28 | 中北大学 | A kind of BGA air blister defect image detection methods based on deep learning |
TWM569427U (en) * | 2018-05-02 | 2018-11-01 | 鍾東霖 | Welding optical real-time detection device, and welding optical real-time detection, marking and data exchange system including the same |
CN109035242A (en) * | 2018-08-09 | 2018-12-18 | 长安大学 | A kind of HF-ERW welded condition detection method and device based on deep learning |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
TW202113599A (en) | 2021-04-01 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN111145175B (en) | SMT welding spot defect detection method based on iForest model verification | |
CN105510348A (en) | Flaw detection method and device of printed circuit board and detection equipment | |
TWI732296B (en) | System for generating detection model according to standard data to confirm soldering state and method thereof | |
TW202036353A (en) | Solder paste printing quality detecting method, data processing device and computer storage medium | |
CN111681235B (en) | IC welding spot defect detection method based on learning mechanism | |
TWI715051B (en) | Machine learning method and automatic optical inspection device using the method thereof | |
KR102228957B1 (en) | Printed circuit board inspecting apparatus, method for determining fault type of screen printer and computer readable recording medium | |
CN113971654A (en) | Welding spot detection model training method, welding spot detection method and welding spot detection device | |
CN113628179B (en) | PCB surface defect real-time detection method, device and readable medium | |
CN113758524A (en) | Circuit board processing monitoring system | |
KR102174424B1 (en) | Method for Inspecting Component basesd Server and system and apparatus therefor | |
US6404206B1 (en) | Process and circuit for testing a solder joint for faults | |
CN116385770A (en) | PCB defect board marking and storing method, system, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
US12007377B2 (en) | System and method for building detection model based on standard value to confirm soldering status | |
Lin et al. | A visual inspection system for surface mounted devices on printed circuit board | |
JP4454428B2 (en) | Component edge detection method, component edge detection program, and inspection apparatus | |
TWI695977B (en) | System for using deep learning model to detect whether solder joint is bridged and method thereof | |
CN116609359A (en) | Chip bonding wire detection method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
CN112557416A (en) | System and method for detecting whether welding spots are bridged or not by using deep learning model | |
JP4480947B2 (en) | Product inspection content setting method, product inspection content changing method, product inspection content setting system, and product inspection content changing system | |
JP3309322B2 (en) | Printed circuit board inspection system | |
CN113034496A (en) | PCB testing system | |
JPH1164235A (en) | Automatic packaging parts inspection system and device and method for setting packaging parts inspecting standard | |
TW202111530A (en) | Failure analyzing method and system for electronic device | |
KR20200022835A (en) | Method And Apparatus for Improving Inspection Parameters |