TWI614338B - Pseudomonas mendocina strain isolated from mud and use thereof - Google Patents

Pseudomonas mendocina strain isolated from mud and use thereof Download PDF

Info

Publication number
TWI614338B
TWI614338B TW106102507A TW106102507A TWI614338B TW I614338 B TWI614338 B TW I614338B TW 106102507 A TW106102507 A TW 106102507A TW 106102507 A TW106102507 A TW 106102507A TW I614338 B TWI614338 B TW I614338B
Authority
TW
Taiwan
Prior art keywords
pseudomonas
group
strain
tomato
growth
Prior art date
Application number
TW106102507A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
TW201726910A (en
Inventor
王惠亮
Original Assignee
行政院農業委員會動植物防疫檢疫局
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 行政院農業委員會動植物防疫檢疫局 filed Critical 行政院農業委員會動植物防疫檢疫局
Publication of TW201726910A publication Critical patent/TW201726910A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of TWI614338B publication Critical patent/TWI614338B/en

Links

Landscapes

  • Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)

Abstract

本發明係有關於一種自泥漿分離之門多薩假單胞菌菌株及其用途,所述門多薩假單胞菌菌株(Pseudomonas mendocina)(財團法人食品工業發展研究所,專利微生物寄存編號BCRC910628)命名為A6,其具有蛋白分解酵素(protease)、β-葡聚醣分解酵素(β-glucanase)、幾丁質分解酵素(chitinase)的酵素活性,且具有多種抗病原能力,能促進植物生長,增加作物果實產量,而可應用於植物保護之生物防治用途。 The present invention relates to a strain of Pseudomonas mendocs isolated from mud and the use thereof, the Pseudomonas mendocina (Pseudomonas mendocina) (Institute of Food Industry Development, Patent Microbial Deposit No. BCRC910628) Named A6, it has the enzyme activity of protease, β-glucanase, chitinase, and has a variety of anti-pathogenic ability to promote plants. Growth, increase crop fruit yield, and can be applied to biological control of plant protection.

Description

自泥漿分離之門多薩假單胞菌菌株及其用途 Pseudomonas sinensis strain isolated from mud and its use

本發明係有關於一種自泥漿分離之門多薩假單胞菌菌株,尤其是指一種其命名為A6(財團法人食品工業發展研究所,專利微生物寄存編號BCRC 910628)之門多薩假單胞菌菌株,能產生多種酵素及多種抗病原能力,而能用於促進植物生長、增加作物果實產量之生物防治用途。 The present invention relates to a strain of Pseudomonas mendocus isolated from mud, in particular to a Mendoza pseudomonocyte named as A6 (the Institute of Food Industry Development, Patent Microbial Deposit No. BCRC 910628). The strain can produce a variety of enzymes and a variety of anti-pathogenic capabilities, and can be used for biological control purposes to promote plant growth and increase crop fruit yield.

農作物病害防治向來為農作物栽培成功與否的關鍵,隨著科學技術水準不斷進步以及人們在生產過程中遭遇到的問題,在經濟與速度上考量,仍有大部分的傳統農家持續使用大量化學農藥。然而,農藥的使用對生態環境有太多的影響;如:1.農藥中毒與殘毒;2.使用不當而有害植物或產生抗藥性;3.危害非目標生物;4.環境汙染。 Crop disease control has always been the key to the success of crop cultivation. With the continuous improvement of scientific and technological standards and the problems people encounter in the production process, most of the traditional farmers continue to use a large number of chemical pesticides in terms of economy and speed. . However, the use of pesticides has too much impact on the ecological environment; such as: 1. pesticide poisoning and residual poison; 2. improper use of harmful plants or resistance; 3. harm to non-target organisms; 4. environmental pollution.

近年來基於環保意識抬頭,化學農藥因為會對環境造成嚴重傷害,使得生物農藥成為未來農業用藥的安全替代產品。而有機農業的首要目標是使土壤生命、植物、動物和人類相互依存的生態群落保持健康和生產與生活達到和諧的境界,因此生物農藥的研發與應用是否能成為化學農藥的替代藥劑,對有機農業發展扮演著關鍵的角色。 In recent years, based on the awareness of environmental protection, chemical pesticides have caused serious damage to the environment, making bio-pesticide a safe substitute for future agricultural drugs. The primary goal of organic agriculture is to maintain the ecological community of soil life, plants, animals and humans in harmony and to achieve a harmonious state of production and life. Therefore, whether the development and application of biological pesticides can become a substitute for chemical pesticides, Agricultural development plays a key role.

生物農藥的優點主要有:1.作用機制複雜,不易產生抗藥性;2.控制化學農藥無法抑制之病蟲害;3.無殘留問題;4.容易分解,不會造成環境累積。 The advantages of biological pesticides are as follows: 1. The mechanism of action is complex and it is not easy to produce drug resistance; 2. The pests and diseases that can not be inhibited by chemical pesticides are controlled; 3. There is no residue problem; 4. It is easy to decompose and will not cause environmental accumulation.

又,生物農藥主要是透過各種微生物來控制植物疾病的生物活性,並且為已知手段,對於控制植物疾病及發展殺蟲劑的領域上已有所幫助,但市面上大多數被應用的殺蟲劑仍是合成化合物。這些化學性殺真菌劑中因對野生生物及其他非標的種類具有毒性,故有許多化學性殺真菌劑是被美國的環境保護局(EPA)分類為致癌物。 In addition, biological pesticides mainly control the biological activity of plant diseases through various microorganisms, and have been known as a means for controlling plant diseases and developing insecticides, but most of the insecticides on the market have been applied. The agent is still a synthetic compound. These chemical fungicides are toxic to wildlife and other non-standard species, so many chemical fungicides are classified as carcinogens by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

假單胞菌屬(Pseudomonas spp.)是桿狀不產生孢子的革蘭氏陰性桿菌,具有一個或多個極性鞭毛,為好氧菌,對環境的適應力很強,能利用近百種的有機物,分布在土壤及水中。此外,Pseudomonas spp.具有多樣化生理特性,可利用廣泛之碳源,去除環境有機污染物,包括石油類與石化類碳氫化合物、含氯有機溶劑多氯聯本和農藥等。再者,某些Pseudomonas spp.之菌種可運用於穀物種子或土壤中以防止作物病原體的生長,例如:Pseudomonas sp.可防治康乃馨萎凋病、番茄細菌性 斑點、胡瓜嵌紋病與番茄青枯病(Ralstonia solanacearum)。多數Pseudomonas spp.可分泌鐵離子牽合物(siderophores),限制病原細菌吸收土壤中游離二價鐵離子,進而達到競爭的效果,在生物防治上扮演重要角色。目前亦發現Pseudomonas spp.的菌株可以促進植物生長、產生剋它物質(allelochemicals)與誘導植物產生系統獲得抗性(systemic acquired resistance,SAR)與誘導系統抗性(induced systemic resistance,ISR),且經由根部處以根圈益生菌,使植物的根組織與葉片等對病原菌產生抗性。 Pseudomonas spp. is a rod-shaped, non-spore-forming Gram-negative bacterium with one or more polar flagella. It is an aerobic bacterium and has strong adaptability to the environment. It can utilize nearly 100 species. Organic matter, distributed in soil and water. In addition, Pseudomonas spp. has a variety of physiological properties, can use a wide range of carbon sources to remove environmental organic pollutants, including petroleum and petrochemical hydrocarbons, chlorine-containing organic solvents, polychlorinated pesticides and pesticides. Furthermore, some species of Pseudomonas spp. can be used in cereal seeds or soil to prevent the growth of crop pathogens, for example: Pseudomonas sp. can prevent carnation wilt, tomato bacteriality Spot, courgette mosaic disease and tomato bacterial wilt (Ralstonia solanacearum). Most Pseudomonas spp. can secrete siderophores, which restrict pathogenic bacteria from absorbing free ferrous ions in the soil, thereby achieving competitive effects and playing an important role in biological control. It has also been found that strains of Pseudomonas spp. can promote plant growth, produce allelochemicals and induce systemic acquired resistance (SAR) and induced systemic resistance (ISR), and via The roots are probiotics in the root zone, which makes the root tissues and leaves of the plants resistant to pathogenic bacteria.

根圈益生菌之定義為:某些細菌用以處理種子或繁殖體後可棲息於植物根部並促進植株生長。而促進植物生長之根棲細菌包括多類的土壤細菌,其藉由一種或一種以上不同機制間接或直接促進植物生長,其主要功能有:1.產生植物性荷爾蒙,促進植物生長;2.非共生型固氮作用;3.抗植物病原菌生長;4.溶解土壤中有機磷、礦物質或其他營養以利植物利用。促進植物生長根圈細菌(Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria,PGPR)對植物生長與促進活力上之功能也與其分泌之胞外水解酵素(extracellular hydrolase)、蛋白酶(protease)或揮發性有機物質(volatile organic compounds)有關,如拮抗性桿菌屬(Bacillus spp.)分泌包含水解酵素、蛋白酶,可分解蛋白質成氨基酸供植物吸收。而枯草桿菌(Bacillus subtilis)及洋蔥假單胞菌(Pseudomonas cepacia)可分泌植酸,轉化土壤中磷成游離態,以利植物吸收。 The root ring probiotic is defined as: some bacteria can invade the roots of plants and promote plant growth after treating seeds or propagules. The root-borne bacteria that promote plant growth include many types of soil bacteria, which promote plant growth indirectly or directly by one or more different mechanisms. The main functions are: 1. Produce plant hormones and promote plant growth; 2. Non- Symbiotic nitrogen fixation; 3. Resistance to plant pathogen growth; 4. Dissolving organic phosphorus, minerals or other nutrients in the soil for plant utilization. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) promotes plant growth and promotes viability. It also secretes extracellular hydrolase, protease or volatile organic compounds. Related to, for example, Bacillus spp. secretion contains hydrolyzing enzymes, proteases, which can decompose proteins into amino acids for plant absorption. Bacillus subtilis and Pseudomonas cepacia secrete phytic acid, which transforms the soil into free form for plant uptake.

本發明係鑒於Pseudomonas spp.菌株,其抗生物質與酵素活性的產量會產生抑菌能力及促進植物生長,故本發明自泥漿中篩選出Pseudomonas meadocina菌株,並將之應用在農業生物防治及促進植物生長之用途。 The present invention is based on the Pseudomonas spp. strain, and its anti-biomass and enzyme activity yields bacteriostatic ability and promotes plant growth. Therefore, the present invention screens Pseudomonas meadocina strain from mud and applies it to agricultural biological control and plant promotion. The purpose of growth.

本發明之主要目的,為提供一種菌株,該菌株係為具有代號為A6的新穎門多薩假單胞菌菌株,此新穎菌株生產具專一性且有益的酵素,例如蛋白分解酵素(protease)、β-葡聚醣分解酵素(β-glucanase)、幾丁質分解酵素(chitinase),且該菌株能用於植物保護與促進植物生長。 The main object of the present invention is to provide a strain which is a novel strain of Pseudomonas Mendoca with the code A6, which produces a specific and beneficial enzyme such as a protease, --glucanase, chitinase, and the strain can be used for plant protection and to promote plant growth.

上述本發明之主要目的是由以下之技術達成: The above main object of the present invention is achieved by the following techniques:

一種自泥漿分離之門多薩假單胞菌菌株,其寄存於財團法人食品工業發展研究所,寄存編號為:BCRC 910628,並命名為A6,具有獨特的基因序列。 A strain of Pseudomonas sinensis isolated from mud, deposited in the Food Industry Development Research Institute of the consortium, registered as BCRC 910628, and named A6, with a unique gene sequence.

一種如申請專利範圍第1項所述之菌株用途,係用於生產下列組成群組中至少一種酵素,該組成群組包括:蛋白分解酵素(protease)、β-葡聚醣分解酵素(β-glucanase)、幾丁質分解酵素(chitinase)。 A strain for use according to the first aspect of the patent application, for producing at least one enzyme in the following group consisting of: a protease, a beta-glucan decomposing enzyme (β- Glucanase), chitinase.

一種如申請專利範圍第1項所述之菌株用途,係用於抑制植物病原細菌之活性,其中,該植物病原細菌至少包括下列其中一種:番茄細菌性斑點(Xanthomonas campestris pv.vesicatoria)、番茄青枯病菌(Ralstonia solanacearum)。 A use of the strain according to the first aspect of the invention is for inhibiting the activity of a phytopathogenic bacterium, wherein the phytopathogenic bacterium comprises at least one of the following: a tomato bacterial spot (Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria), tomato green Ralstonia solanacearum.

一種如申請專利範圍第1項所述之菌株用途,係用於促進植物生長,其中,該植物之科屬至少包括下列其中一種:胡蘆科(Cucurbitaceae)、茄科(Solanaceae)、芭蕉科(Musaceae)、蘭科(Orchidaceae)、番木瓜科(Caricaceae)。 A use of the strain according to the first aspect of the invention is for promoting plant growth, wherein the genus of the plant comprises at least one of the following: Cucurbitaceae, Solanaceae, and Musa ( Musaceae), Orchidaceae, Caricaceae.

如上所述之菌株用於促進植物生長用途,其中,該胡蘆科(Cucurbitaceae)包括洋香瓜(Cucumis melo var.saccharinus)與小黃瓜(Cucumis anguria)。 The strain as described above is used for promoting plant growth use, wherein the Cucurbitaceae includes Cucumis melo var. saccharinus and Cucumis anguria.

如上所述之菌株用於促進植物生長用途,其中,該茄科(Solanaceae)包括茄子(Solanum melongena)和番茄(So1anum lycopersicum)。 The strain as described above is used for promoting plant growth use, wherein the Solanaceae includes eggplant (Solanum melongena) and tomato (So1anum lycopersicum).

如上所述之菌株用於促進植物生長用途,其中,該芭蕉科(Musaceae)為香蕉(Musa sapientum L.)。 The strain as described above is used for promoting plant growth use, wherein the Musaceae is a banana (Musa sapientum L.).

如上所述之菌株用於促進植物生長用途,其中,該蘭科(Orchidaceae)為蝴蝶蘭(Phalaenopsis aphrodite Reichb.f.)。 The strain as described above is used for promoting plant growth use, wherein the Orchidaceae is Phalaenopsis aphrodite Reichb.f.

如上所述之菌株用於促進植物生長用途,其中,該番木瓜科(Caricaceae)為木瓜(Carica papaya)。 The strain as described above is used for promoting plant growth use, wherein the Caricaceae is Carica papaya.

本發明之優點為: The advantages of the invention are:

本發明分別測試protease、β-glucanase與chitinase在不同培養天數下的酵素活性,發現培養一天protease、β-glucanase與chitinase各有最大酵素活性。在抑菌能力方面,對番茄青枯病(Ralstonia solanacearum)病原細菌抑制半徑可達0.8cm。而在致病力測試方面,分別對胡蘆科 (Cucurbitaceae)、茄科(Solanaceae)、十字花科(Brassicaceae)與禾本科(Poaceae)共九種常見作物進行接種,發現皆不會感染。同時在促進植物生長方面,分別針對胡蘆科(Cucurbitaceae)、茄科(Solanaceae)、芭蕉科(Musaceae)、蘭科(Orchidaceae)、番木瓜科(Caricaceae)進行接種,發現能促進此等植物的生長。因此,Pseudomonas meadocina A6為根圈益生菌(Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria,PGPR)的菌種,具有促進植物生長,增進作物果實產量,以及多種抗病原之效果。 The present invention tests the activity of protease, β-glucanase and chitinase in different culture days, and finds that the protease, β-glucanase and chitinase have the maximum enzyme activity in one day. In terms of antibacterial ability, the pathogenic bacteria against tomato bacterial wilt (Ralstonia solanacearum) has a radius of inhibition of 0.8 cm. In the pathogenicity test, respectively, the cucurbitaceae Nine common crops (Cucurbitaceae), Solanaceae, Brassicaceae, and Poaceae were inoculated and found to be uninfected. At the same time, in the promotion of plant growth, Cucurbitaceae, Solanaceae, Musaceae, Orchidaceae, Caricaceae were inoculated separately and found to promote these plants. Growing. Therefore, Pseudomonas meadocina A6 is a species of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR), which promotes plant growth, enhances crop yield, and has a variety of anti-pathogenic effects.

第一圖:泥漿分離菌以16S universal primer增幅結果Lane M:14kb DNA marker(promega,USA)Lane 1~8:A group bacteria were isolated from No.5 mud. First: Mud separation bacteria with 16S universal primer increase results Lane M: 14kb DNA marker (promega, USA) Lane 1~8: A group bacteria were isolated from No.5 mud.

第二圖:ITS序列PCR增幅之結果Lane M:100bp-3kb DNA marker(promega,USA)Lane 2:Pseudomonas meadocina Figure 2: Results of PCR amplification of ITS sequence Lane M: 100bp-3kb DNA marker (promega, USA) Lane 2: Pseudomonas meadocina

第三圖:rec A基因序列增幅之結果 Figure 3: Results of the increase in the rec A gene sequence

第四圖:分別添加不同氮源成份,其對Pseudomonas meadocina A6生長時pH值之變化 Figure 4: Adding different nitrogen source components to change the pH value of Pseudomonas meadocina A6

第五圖:添加不同氮源成份其對Pseudomonas meadocina A6生長情形之比較 Figure 5: Comparison of the growth of Pseudomonas meadocina A6 with different nitrogen sources

第六圖:分別添加不同碳源成份,其對Pseudomonas meadocina A6生長時pH值之變化 Figure 6: Adding different carbon source components to change the pH value of Pseudomonas meadocina A6

第七圖:添加不同碳源成份其對Pseudomonas meadocina A6生長情形之比較 Figure 7: Comparison of the growth of Pseudomonas meadocina A6 with different carbon source components

第八圖:不同培養基對Pseudomonas meadocina A6生長之影響 Figure 8: Effect of different media on the growth of Pseudomonas meadocina A6

第九圖:Pseudomonas meadocina A6在MISP培養基之生長曲線 Figure 9: Growth curve of Pseudomonas meadocina A6 in MISP medium

第十圖:Pseudomonas meadocina A6經UVB照射後不同時間的CFU與存活率 Figure 10: CFU and survival rate of Pseudomonas meadocina A6 at different times after UVB irradiation

第十一圖:Pseudomonas meadocina A6酵素擴散在MS固態培養基之結果 Figure 11: Results of Pseudomonas meadocina A6 enzyme diffusion in MS solid medium

第十二圖:Pseudomonas meadocina A6培養三日之protease、β-glucanase與chitinase之酵素活性 Figure 12: Pseudomonas meadocina A6 enzyme activity for three days of protease, β-glucanase and chitinase

第十三圖:Pseudomonas meadocina A6對病原細菌在LB固態平板培養基抑制情形A.番茄細菌性斑點病菌(Xanthomonas campestris pv.vesicatoria)B.蕃茄青枯病菌(Ralstonia solanacearum) Figure 13: Pseudomonas meadocina A6 inhibits pathogenic bacteria in LB solid plate medium A. Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria B. Ralstonia solanacearum

第十四圖:Pseudomonas meadocina A6對病原菌四天的抑制半徑Aac:瓜類細菌性果斑(Acidovorax avenae subsp.Citrulli)Xac:柑桔潰瘍病(Xanthomonas axonopodis pv.Citri)Xcv:番茄細菌性斑點(Xanthomonas campestris pv.vesicatoria)Pcc:芋頭細菌性軟腐(Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp.carotovorum)Rs:番茄青枯病菌(Ralstonia solanacearum) Figure 14: Pseudomonas meadocina A6 Four-day inhibition radius of pathogens Aac: Acidovorax avenae subsp. Citrulli Xac: Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. Citri Xcv: Tomato bacterial spots ( Xanthomonas campestris pv.vesicatoria) Pcc: Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum Rs: Ralstonia solanacearum

第十五圖:Pseudomonas meadocina A6在番茄作物之生物防治試驗情形A(left):澆灌Pseudomonas meadocina A6菌液之番茄作物於於接種青枯病病原細菌14天後之生長情形A(right):未澆灌Pseudomonas meadocina A6菌液之番茄作物於於接種青枯病病原細菌14天後之生長情形B:將A(left)之番茄植株莖切斷後插入清水中由切口緩緩流出白色菌液之情形 Figure 15: Pseudomonas meadocina A6 in the biological control test of tomato crops A (left): The growth of the tomato crop watering Pseudomonas meadocina A6 in 14 days after inoculation of bacterial wilt pathogens A (right): not The growth of the tomato crop with Pseudomonas meadocina A6 solution after 14 days of inoculation with bacterial wilt pathogen B: The case where the stem of tomato plant of A (left) was cut and inserted into clear water, and the white bacterial liquid was slowly discharged from the incision.

第十六圖:Pseudomonas meadocina A6於攪拌式發酵槽之生長情形 Figure 16: Growth of Pseudomonas meadocina A6 in a stirred fermentation tank

第十七圖:Pseudomonas meadocina A6在洋香瓜之PGPR試驗情形A:plant hight B:maximum leaf C:dry root Figure 17: Pseudomonas meadocina A6 in the PGPR test of cantaloupe A: plant hight B: maximum leaf C: dry root

第十八圖:Pseudomonas meadocina A6在番茄之PGPR試驗情形A:plant hight B:dry root Figure 18: Pseudomonas meadocina A6 in tomato PGPR test scenario A: plant hight B: dry root

第十九圖:Pseudomonas meadocina A6在香蕉根圈益生菌的雙週平均折線圖A.Hd高度差High difference B.Ld葉片數差leaves number difference C.ML最大葉面積差max leaf Figure 19: Bi-period average line of Pseudomonas meadocina A6 probiotics in banana root ring A.Hd height difference High difference B.Ld leaf number difference number difference C.ML maximum leaf area difference max leaf

第二十圖:Pseudomonas meadocina A6在蝴蝶蘭根圈益生菌的雙週平均折線圖A.Ld葉片數差leaves number difference B.ML最大葉面積差max leaf Figure 20: Bi-period average line of Pseudomonas meadocina A6 probiotics in Phalaenopsis root ring A. Ld leaf number difference leaves number difference B.ML maximum leaf area difference max leaf

第二十一圖:Pseudomonas meadocina A6在木瓜根圈益生菌的雙週平均折線圖A.Hd高度差High difference B.Ld葉片數差leaves number difference C.ML最大葉面積差max leaf Twenty-first picture: Biseed mean line diagram of Pseudomonas meadocina A6 probiotics in papaya root ring A.Hd height difference High difference B.Ld leaf number difference leaves number difference C.ML maximum leaf area difference max leaf

第二十二圖:Pseudomonas meadocina A6在小黃瓜根圈益生菌的每週平均折線圖 Twenty-second picture: Weekly average line chart of Pseudomonas meadocina A6 in the cucumber root ring probiotics

第二十三圖:Pseudomonas meadocina A6在茄子根圈益生菌的每週平均折線圖 Twenty-third map: weekly average line chart of Pseudomonas meadocina A6 probiotics in eggplant root ring

第二十四圖:番茄植株的青枯病罹病度試驗情形A.藥劑處理(1X109CFU/mL A6)100倍B.藥劑處理(1X109CFU/mL A6)200倍C.藥劑處理(1X109CFU/mL A6)400倍D.對照組CK Twenty-fourth picture: Bacterial wilt disease test situation of tomato plants A. Chemical treatment (1X10 9 CFU/mL A6) 100 times B. Chemical treatment (1X10 9 CFU/mL A6) 200 times C. Pharmaceutical treatment (1X10 9 CFU/mL A6) 400 times D. Control group CK

第二十五圖:顯示除草劑對Pseudomonas meadocina A6的影響 Figure 25: shows the effect of herbicides on Pseudomonas meadocina A6

第二十六圖:顯示殺細菌劑對Pseudomonas meadocina A6的影響 Figure 26: shows the effect of bactericides on Pseudomonas meadocina A6

為令本發明所運用之技術內容、發明目的及其達成之功效有更完整且清楚的揭露,茲於下詳細說明之,並請一併參閱所揭之圖式及圖號: For a more complete and clear disclosure of the technical content, the purpose of the invention and the effects thereof achieved by the present invention, it is explained in detail below, and please refer to the drawings and drawings:

本發明為有關於一種泥漿分離之門多薩假單胞菌菌株,其寄存於財團法人食品工業發展研究所,寄存編號為:BCRC 910628,其命名為A6具有獨特的基因序列(參序列表)。 The invention relates to a strain of Pseudomonas mendoc, which is deposited in a mud separation method, which is deposited in the Food Industry Development Research Institute of the consortium, and has the registration number: BCRC 910628, which is named as A6 has a unique gene sequence (parameter list). .

此代號為A6的門多薩假單胞菌菌株能生產具專一性且有益的酵素,例如蛋白分解酵素(protease)、β-葡聚醣分解酵素(β-glucanase)、幾丁質分解酵素(chitinase)。 This strain of Pseudomonas mendoc, codenamed A6, produces specific and beneficial enzymes such as protease, beta-glucanase, chitinolytic enzymes (β-glucanase) Chitinase).

以下係詳細說明本發明之菌落篩選,以及其生長條件測試及菌株特性測試結果。 The following is a detailed description of the colony screening of the present invention, as well as its growth condition test and strain property test results.

<Pseudomonas sp.細菌分子鑑定分析> <Pseudomonas sp. bacterial molecular identification analysis>

(1)細菌菌株之分離純化: (1) Isolation and purification of bacterial strains:

從泥漿中分離純化完成的單一菌種以四區劃法畫在NA培養基(Nutrient Agar)上,置於30℃培養箱中,培養16到18小時,挑出細菌之單一菌落(single colony),菌株共經過三次單菌落分離純化於NA培養基上。 A single strain isolated and purified from the mud was drawn on a NA medium (Nutrient Agar) in a four-zone method, placed in a 30 ° C incubator, cultured for 16 to 18 hours, and a single colony of bacteria was picked. A total of three single colonies were isolated and purified on NA medium.

(2)細菌基因體DNA(Genomic DNA)抽取: (2) Extraction of bacterial genetic DNA (Genomic DNA):

使用DNA萃取純化試劑組抽取基因體DNA,置於-20℃保存,以供試驗之用。 Genomic DNA was extracted using a DNA extraction purification reagent set and stored at -20 ° C for testing.

(3)細菌16S rRNA基因序列增幅、定序及序列比對: (3) Augmentation, sequencing and sequence alignment of bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences:

細菌16S rRNA基因以通用引子16S-F:5′-AGAGTTTGATCATGGCTCAG-3′及16S-R:5′-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′ The bacterial 16S rRNA gene is universally introduced with 16S-F: 5'-AGAGTTTGATCATGGCTCAG-3' and 16S-R: 5'-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3'

經PCR方式增幅。PCR反應體積為20μl,包括:13.8μl ddH2O、2μl 10X PCR buffer、1μl 2.5mM dNTP、0.2μl Taq DNA polymerase、0.5μl forward primer、0.5μl reverse primer、2μl A6 genomic DNA。將PCR反應液混合均勻,放入PCR自動循環控制器中(Perkin Elmer,USA),設定各階段之溫度與時間:變性(denature)溫度為94℃時間是30秒,黏合(annealing)溫度為54℃時間是30秒,延長合成(extension)溫度為72℃時間是1分鐘,總共進行30個循環(cycles)。將PCR產物置於膠上進行膠體電泳,取1μl 6倍濃度電泳染劑(loading dye)、5μl PCR產物混合均勻,經由1.5%瓊脂膠體(agarose gel)及0.5電泳緩衝液〔TAE(Tris-acetate-EDTA)buffer system〕,於50伏特電壓電泳5分鐘,再調成100伏特電泳20分鐘,經溴化乙錠(ethidium bromide)染色後,於UV燈下觀察並與DNA標記(markers)比對並估算其分子大小。並將DNA產物進行核苷酸序列定序與核苷酸序列比對,以進行菌屬鑑定。 Increased by PCR. The PCR reaction volume was 20 μl, including: 13.8 μl of ddH 2 O, 2 μl of 10X PCR buffer, 1 μl of 2.5 mM dNTP, 0.2 μl of Taq DNA polymerase, 0.5 μl of forward primer, 0.5 μl of reverse primer, and 2 μl of A6 genomic DNA. The PCR reaction solution was uniformly mixed and placed in a PCR automatic circulation controller (Perkin Elmer, USA) to set the temperature and time of each stage: the denature temperature was 94 ° C for 30 seconds, and the annealing temperature was 54. The °C time was 30 seconds, the extension temperature was 72 ° C, and the time was 1 minute, for a total of 30 cycles. The PCR product was placed on a gel for colloidal electrophoresis, and 1 μl of 6-fold concentration of electrophoresis dye (loading dye) and 5 μl of PCR product were uniformly mixed, and passed through 1.5% agarose gel and 0.5 electrophoresis buffer [TAE (Tris-acetate). -EDTA)buffer system], electrophoresis at 50 volts for 5 minutes, then adjusted to 100 volts for 20 minutes, stained with ethidium bromide, observed under UV light and compared with DNA markers And estimate the molecular size. The DNA product is subjected to nucleotide sequence sequencing and nucleotide sequence alignment for fungal identification.

分離的菌株以通用引子(universal primer)進行16S rRNA基因進行增幅,結果可發現所有自泥漿分離的菌株皆可增幅到16S rRNA基因片段,大小皆約為1.5kb(參看第一圖)。經定序後進行比對得知,分離的菌株屬於Pseudomonas sp.。 The isolated strain was amplified by the 16S rRNA gene using a universal primer, and it was found that all strains isolated from the mud could be amplified to 16S rRNA gene fragments, both of which are about 1.5 kb in size (see the first panel). After sequencing, it was found that the isolated strain belonged to Pseudomonas sp.

(4)16S-23S internal transcribed spacer(ITS)基因序列、定序及序列比對: (4) 16S-23S internal transcribed spacer (ITS) gene sequence, sequencing and sequence alignment:

挑選本發明A6菌株並與同屬之16S rRNA基因序列與23S rRNA基因序列進行多重序列比對程序(CLUSTALW)比對彼此的保守序列(conserved region),取最高相似片段與最適合溫度與GC比條件進行引子合成(primer)設計(參表一)。將A6 genomic DNA進行PCR增幅得知ITS片段後進行切膠與定序,最後得知序列結果,再將所得核苷酸序列進行比對,以確認此菌株片段序列為門多薩假單胞菌菌種。 The A6 strain of the present invention was selected and compared with the 16S rRNA gene sequence of the same genus and the 23S rRNA gene sequence for multiplex sequence alignment program (CLUSTALW) to align each other with the conserved region, and the highest similarity fragment was selected for the most suitable temperature and GC ratio. Conditions are used for primer design (see Table 1). The A6 genomic DNA was amplified by PCR to obtain the ITS fragment, and then the fragmentation and sequencing were performed. Finally, the sequence results were obtained, and the obtained nucleotide sequences were aligned to confirm that the fragment sequence of this strain was Pseudomonas mendocs. Species.

A6以專一性引子(primer)針對ITS序列進行增幅,由於ITS序列有重複性且重複序列間可能會插入數個tRNA codon序列,所以挑選最清晰產物區域進行產物回收作業。A6在瓊脂膠體(agarose Gel)上約1.5kb的位置有明顯片段(參看第二圖),將以上片段進行回收後送定序。定序後之序列發現與Pseudomonas mendocina ymp(CP000680.1)有95%相同度,與P.putida KT2440(AE015451.1)有94%相同度。 A6 uses a specific primer to increase the ITS sequence. Since the ITS sequence is repetitive and several tRNA codon sequences may be inserted between the repeat sequences, the clearest product region is selected for product recovery. A6 has a distinct fragment at about 1.5 kb on the agarose gel (see Figure 2), and the above fragments are recovered and sequenced. The sequence after sequencing was found to be 95% identical to Pseudomonas mendocina ymp (CP000680.1) and 94% identical to P. putida KT2440 (AE015451.1).

Figure TWI614338BD00001
Figure TWI614338BD00001

(5)rec A基因序列增幅及序列比對: (5) Rec A gene sequence increase and sequence alignment:

以專一性引子(primer): Forward:5'-CBTGYGCNTTCGTCGAYGC-3';Reverse:5'-ATCTGGAAYTCRGCYTGRC-3';針對專一性功能基因rec A基因進行序列增幅後進行電泳。電泳結果可在520bp與650bp位置看到兩條明顯的片段,切取520bp片段進行回收、定序,定序結果發現rec A基因與Pseudomonas mendocina有97%相同度(請參看第三圖)。 With a specificity primer: Forward: 5'-CBTGYGCNTTCGTCGAYGC-3'; Reverse: 5'-ATCTGGAAYTCRGCYTGRC-3'; electrophoresis was carried out after sequence amplification of the specific functional gene rec A gene. Electrophoresis results showed two distinct fragments at 520 bp and 650 bp. The 520 bp fragment was cut and sequenced. The sequencing results showed that the rec A gene was 97% identical to Pseudomonas mendocina (see Figure 3).

<氮素源對生長之影響> <Impact of nitrogen source on growth>

(1)前培養 (1) Pre-cultivation

首先將菌種自培養基以接種環取單一菌落,接種至含3ml LB培養液的15ml無菌圓底試管,置於28℃、150rpm震盪培養箱培養24小時。 First, a single colony was taken from the culture medium by inoculation, and inoculated into a 15 ml sterile round bottom tube containing 3 ml of LB culture solution, and cultured in a shaking incubator at 28 ° C for 24 hours in a 150 rpm incubator.

(2)主培養 (2) Main training

利用基礎合成培養基(成分為0.5% NaCl、0.01% CaCl2‧2H2O、0.02% MgSO4‧7H2O、0.1% KH2PO4、0.1% K2HPO4、0.5% glucose),分別添加NH4Cl,NH4NO3,,KNO3,Urea及NaNO3作為氮素源(濃度為1g/L)配製培養液,經高壓滅菌後備用,經前培養24小時候的菌液於無菌操作台以pipette吸取2ml菌體發酵液,接種於裝有200ml基礎合成培養基(分別含不同氮素源)的500ml三角錐形瓶裡,後置於28℃、150rpm震盪培養箱培養。培養期間每日於無菌操作台取菌體發酵液測其OD值、pH值並進行序列稀釋,後取100μl菌體發酵液於LB固態培養基塗盤, 48小時後計算其菌落數。總菌數(CFU/mL)=盤面菌落數×稀釋倍數×10。 Using a basic synthetic medium (ingredients: 0.5% NaCl, 0.01% CaCl 2 ‧2H 2 O, 0.02% MgSO 4 ‧7H 2 O, 0.1% KH 2 PO 4 , 0.1% K 2 HPO 4 , 0.5% glucose), respectively NH 4 Cl, NH 4 NO 3 ,, KNO 3 , Urea and NaNO 3 were used as nitrogen sources (concentration: 1g/L) to prepare culture medium. After autoclaving, it was used for pre-culture for 24 hours. 2 ml of the bacterial fermentation broth was pipetted, and inoculated into a 500 ml triangular conical flask containing 200 ml of basic synthetic medium (containing different nitrogen sources), and then cultured in a shaking incubator at 28 ° C and 150 rpm. During the culture period, the OD value and pH value of the bacterial fermentation broth were measured and serially diluted in the aseptic processing table. Then, 100 μl of the bacterial fermentation broth was applied to the LB solid medium for the plate, and the number of colonies was calculated 48 hours later. Total bacterial count (CFU/mL) = number of dish colonies × dilution factor × 10.

伴隨供試菌的生長,試驗過程中,NH4Cl處理之pH維持在5.5-5.9之間,而NaNO3與NH4NO3則維持在6.5-7.4,其餘處理組皆在6.0-6.5之間(請參看第四圖)。 With the growth of the test bacteria, the pH of the NH 4 Cl treatment was maintained between 5.5 and 5.9, while the NaNO 3 and NH 4 NO 3 were maintained at 6.5-7.4, and the remaining treatment groups were between 6.0 and 6.5. (Please refer to the fourth picture).

於供試6種氮素源中,NH4Cl、NH4NO3、NaNO3等3種氮源,其總菌落數(CFU)在第2天達109CFU/mL,其中NH4Cl到第4天總菌落數仍維持在109CFU/mL,其餘2組之總菌落數(CFU)從第3天開始下降。而KNO3與Urea處理組效果最佳,第2天總菌落數已達1010CFU/mL,但Urea處理組自第4天總菌落數已下降至107CFU/mL(參第五圖)。 Among the six nitrogen sources tested, NH 4 Cl, NH 4 NO 3 , NaNO 3 and other three nitrogen sources, the total number of colonies (CFU) reached 10 9 CFU/mL on the second day, of which NH 4 Cl On the fourth day, the total number of colonies remained at 10 9 CFU/mL, and the total number of colonies (CFU) in the other two groups decreased from the third day. The KNO 3 and Urea treatment groups had the best effect. The total number of colonies on the second day had reached 10 10 CFU/mL, but the total number of colonies in the Urea treatment group had decreased to 10 7 CFU/mL since the fourth day (see Figure 5). .

<碳素源對生長之影響> <The effect of carbon source on growth>

利用基礎合成培養基(成分為0.5% NaCl、0.01% CaCl2‧2H2O、0.02% MgSO4‧7H2O、0.1% KH2PO4、0.1% K2HPO4、0.1% KNO3),分別以glucose,lactose,mannitol,sorbitol,sucrose,starch,arabinose等取代原先之glucose作為供試碳素源(濃度為5g/L)配製培養液,經高壓滅菌後,依上述方法進行試驗。 Using a basic synthetic medium (components of 0.5% NaCl, 0.01% CaCl 2 ‧2H 2 O, 0.02% MgSO 4 ‧7H 2 O, 0.1% KH 2 PO 4 , 0.1% K 2 HPO 4 , 0.1% KNO 3 ), respectively The culture solution was prepared by replacing the original glucose with glucose, lactose, mannitol, sorbitol, sucrose, starch, arabinose, etc. as the carbon source for testing (concentration: 5 g/L), and after autoclaving, the test was carried out according to the above method.

隨著供試菌的生長,試驗過程中,Glucose處理其pH值隨聲長天數逐漸下降;arabinose處理組則於第2天下降至pH 6.0,隨後逐漸升高並維持在pH6.3;lactose處理組則維持在pH6.4;其餘處理組則皆維持在pH6.6左右(參第六圖)。 With the growth of the test bacteria, the pH value of Glucose treatment decreased gradually with the length of sound during the test; the arabinese treatment group decreased to pH 6.0 on the second day, then gradually increased and maintained at pH 6.3; lactose treatment The group was maintained at pH 6.4; the remaining treatment groups were maintained at pH 6.6 (see Figure 6).

於供試7種碳素源中,以starch處理組效果最佳,第2天總菌落數已達1010CFU/mL,隨後逐漸下降,第7天降至108CFU/mL,仍比其他處理組高;lactose處理組效果最差,培養7天其總菌落數皆維持在105CFU/mL左右(參第七圖)。 Among the 7 carbon sources tested, the starch treatment group had the best effect. The total number of colonies on the second day had reached 10 10 CFU/mL, and then gradually decreased. On the 7th day, it decreased to 10 8 CFU/mL, still better than other. The treatment group was the highest; the lactose treatment group had the worst effect, and the total number of colonies was maintained at 10 5 CFU/mL for 7 days (see Figure 7).

<不同培養基對Pseudomonas meadocina A6生長之影響> <Effects of different media on the growth of Pseudomonas meadocina A6>

欲了解適合Pseudomonas meadocina A6生長之培養基,故而選用下列之數種培養基:碳氮源培養基、LB、NB、MISP、TM,進行不同培養基對Pseudomonas meadocina A6生長之影響測試。 For the medium suitable for the growth of Pseudomonas meadocina A6, the following mediums were selected: carbon-nitrogen source medium, LB, NB, MISP, TM, and the effects of different media on the growth of Pseudomonas meadocina A6 were tested.

(1)前培養 (1) Pre-cultivation

首先將菌種自培養基以接種環取單一菌落,接種至含3ml LB培養液的15ml無菌圓底試管,置於28℃、150rpm震盪培養箱培養24小時。 First, a single colony was taken from the culture medium by inoculation, and inoculated into a 15 ml sterile round bottom tube containing 3 ml of LB culture solution, and cultured in a shaking incubator at 28 ° C for 24 hours in a 150 rpm incubator.

(2)主培養 (2) Main training

經前培養24小時候的菌液於無菌操作台以pipette吸取500μl菌體發酵液,分別接種於含49.5ml上述培養液的125ml三角錐形瓶裡,後置於28℃、150rpm震盪培養箱培養,培養天數為3天。培養期間每隔24小時於無菌操作台取1ml菌體發酵液進行序列稀釋,後取100μl菌體發酵液於LB固態培養基塗盤,48小時後計算其菌落數。總菌數(CFU/mL)=盤面菌落數×稀釋倍數×10。 The bacteria solution was cultured for 24 hours before the culture, and 500 μl of the bacterial fermentation broth was pipetted into the aseptic console, and inoculated into a 125 ml triangular conical flask containing 49.5 ml of the above culture solution, and then cultured in a shaking incubator at 28 ° C and 150 rpm. The number of days of cultivation is 3 days. During the culture, 1 ml of the bacterial fermentation broth was taken at the aseptic table every 24 hours for serial dilution, and then 100 μl of the bacterial fermentation broth was applied to the LB solid medium for the plate, and the number of colonies was counted 48 hours later. Total bacterial count (CFU/mL) = number of dish colonies × dilution factor × 10.

培養24小時後,其中TM培養基之總菌落數已達1.32×1010CFU/mL,但48小時後,隨即下降至1.2×108CFU/mL;而A6以MISP培養24小時後,其總菌落數為7.56×109CFU/mL,培養48小時後,總菌落數高達9.3×1010CFU/mL,第72小時,仍有3.35×108CFU/mL;其他3種培養基,除碳氮源於培養48小時總菌落數為4.45×109CFU/mL,其餘總菌落數皆×108CFU/mL。A6利用上述5種培養液培養3天,以MISP培養基之總菌落數最高,故MISP培養基較適合A6生長(參考第八圖)。 After 24 hours of culture, the total number of colonies of TM medium reached 1.32×10 10 CFU/mL, but after 48 hours, it dropped to 1.2×10 8 CFU/mL; while A6 was cultured for 24 hours with MISP, the total colonies were The number is 7.56×10 9 CFU/mL. After 48 hours of culture, the total number of colonies is as high as 9.3×10 10 CFU/mL, and at 72 hours, there is still 3.35×10 8 CFU/mL; the other three media, except for carbon and nitrogen sources The total number of colonies in the 48 hours of culture was 4.45 × 10 9 CFU/mL, and the total number of colonies was × 10 8 CFU/mL. A6 was cultured for 3 days using the above five culture solutions, and the total number of colonies in MISP medium was the highest, so MISP medium was more suitable for A6 growth (refer to Fig. 8).

<Pseudomonas meadocina A6生理特性測試> <Pseudomonas meadocina A6 physiological characteristics test>

(1)生長曲線測定 (1) Determination of growth curve

(A)前培養 (A) pre-cultivation

A6在進入主培養搖瓶時必須經過活化,為了活化菌種以及減少遲滯期,必須將細菌進行24小時培養。首先將菌種自培養基以接種環取單一菌落,接種至含3ml LB培養液的15ml無菌tube,置於28℃、150rpm震盪培養箱培養24小時。 A6 must be activated when entering the main culture shake flask. In order to activate the strain and reduce the lag phase, the bacteria must be cultured for 24 hours. First, a single colony was taken from the culture medium by inoculation, and inoculated into a 15 ml sterile tube containing 3 ml of LB culture solution, and cultured at 28 ° C, 150 rpm shaking incubator for 24 hours.

(B)主培養 (B) main training

經前培養24小時候的菌液於無菌操作台以pipette吸取500μl菌體發酵液,接種於含49.5ml MISP培養液的125ml三角錐形瓶裡,後置於28℃、150rpm震盪培養箱培養,培養天數為3天。培養期間在不同時間於無菌操作台取1ml菌體發酵液進行序列稀釋,後取100μl菌體發酵液於LB固態培養基塗盤,24小時後計算其菌落數。 The bacterial culture solution was cultured for 24 hours before the aseptic operation. Pipette 500 μl of the bacterial fermentation broth, pipette it into a 125 ml triangular conical flask containing 49.5 ml of MISP culture solution, and then incubate it in a shaking incubator at 28 ° C and 150 rpm. The number of days is 3 days. During the culture, 1 ml of the bacterial fermentation broth was taken at a different time for serial dilution, and then 100 μl of the bacterial fermentation broth was applied to the LB solid medium, and the number of colonies was calculated 24 hours later.

總菌數(CFU/mL):盤面菌落數×稀釋倍數×10 Total bacterial count (CFU/mL): number of dish colonies × dilution factor × 10

總菌落數於第4小時之後明顯上升為對數生長期(Log or exponential phase)階段;第20小時達到高峰9.44×109CFU/mL,隨即進入靜止期(Stationary phase);第24小時之後菌數明顯下降進入到死亡期(Decline or death phase),第48至72小時總菌落數則無明顯的變化(參第九圖)。 The total number of colonies increased significantly to the log or exponential phase after the 4th hour; the peak reached 9.44×10 9 CFU/mL at the 20th hour, and then entered the stationary phase (Stationary phase); the number of bacteria after the 24th hour Significant decline into the death period (Decline or death phase), the total number of colonies from 48 to 72 hours did not change significantly (see Figure IX).

(2)紫外光UVB測試: (2) UV UVB test:

取培養1天之A6菌液調至108CFU/mL,取200μl均勻塗佈於玻璃培養皿上,後置於紫外光箱(287nm:512μw/cm2:11cm)分別照射10、20、30分鐘,收取培養皿加入1.8ml無菌水將菌體洗下,收集洗出液後進行序列稀釋,接著取100μl塗盤接著將培養基置於28℃培養箱,隔日計算其菌落數後以計算出其存活率。其存活率(Survial Ratelog)=(CFU/mL)/log(107CFU/mL)×100% The A6 bacterial solution cultured for 1 day was adjusted to 10 8 CFU/mL, and 200 μl was uniformly coated on a glass culture dish, and then placed in an ultraviolet light box (287 nm: 512 μw/cm 2 : 11 cm), respectively, irradiated with 10, 20, 30 In minutes, collect the culture dish and add 1.8 ml of sterile water to wash the cells. Collect the eluate and serially dilute it. Then take 100 μl of the plate and then place the medium in a 28 ° C incubator. Calculate the number of colonies every other day to calculate the number. Survival rate. Survival Ratelog = (CFU / mL) / log (10 7 CFU / mL) × 100%

以LB培養基(Luria-bertani agar)培養一日之菌液,再無額外添加抗UV保護劑,紫外光UVB照射10分鐘內細菌存活率約為43%,在20分鐘後,存活率隨著時間增長呈現迅速的下降趨勢,時間延長至30分鐘細菌存活率下降至19%(參看第十圖)。 The bacterial solution was cultured in LB medium (Luria-bertani agar) without additional anti-UV protective agent. The bacterial survival rate was about 43% within 10 minutes after UVB irradiation. After 20 minutes, the survival rate was over time. Growth showed a rapid downward trend, and the bacterial survival rate dropped to 19% over a 30-minute period (see Figure 10).

(3)酵素擴散試驗: (3) Enzyme diffusion test:

本試驗採用礦物鹽培養基(mineral salt medium)添加不同碳原配製成不同配方平板培養基,於盤面中央貼紙錠片,並取培養24小時菌液 調至108CFU/mL後吸取50μl加於紙錠片上,後置28℃培養箱培養2天。以0.1%剛果紅(congo red,Sigma,USA)染色10分鐘,後以1M氫氧化鈉(NaOH)退染10分鐘兩次,再觀察到酵素是否擴散有一透明或粉紅色酵素圈。 This experiment uses mineral salt medium to add different carbon raw materials to prepare different formula plate medium, and paste the tablet in the center of the disk surface, and take the culture liquid for 24 hours to adjust to 10 8 CFU/mL, then take 50 μl and add to the paper ingot. On-chip, the cells were cultured in a 28 ° C incubator for 2 days. After staining with 0.1% Congo red (Sigma, USA) for 10 minutes, it was defeated twice with 1 M sodium hydroxide (NaOH) for 10 minutes, and it was observed whether the enzyme diffused with a transparent or pink enzyme circle.

測試蛋白分解酵素(protease)、β-葡聚醣分解酵素(β-glucanase)、幾丁質分解酵素(chitinase),其中,蛋白質(Protein)培養基是MS添加1%安佳脫脂奶粉(友賓食品工業有限公司),β-葡聚醣(β-glucan)培養基是MS添加1%昆布糖(laminarin,Sigma,USA),幾丁質(chitin)培養基則是添加本發明所製做出的1%膠態幾丁質(colloidal chitin)。 Test protease, β-glucanase, chitinase, and protein culture medium is 1% Anjia skim milk powder (Friend Food) Industrial Co., Ltd.), β-glucan (β-glucan) medium is MS added 1% laminarin (laminarin, Sigma, USA), chitin medium is added 1% made by the invention Colloidal chitin.

請參看第十一圖。在三種配方的培養基,經剛果紅染色後,發現酵素皆可分解其基質。其中β-glucanase在昆布糖培養基所形成的酵素圈比較明顯,但protease在蛋白培養基與chitinase在幾丁培養基所形成之酵素圈效果比較不明顯。 Please refer to Figure 11. In the three formulations of the medium, after staining with Congo red, it was found that the enzyme could decompose the matrix. Among them, β-glucanase is more obvious in the enzymatic circle formed by laminaria, but the effect of protease on proteinase and chitinase in chitin culture is not obvious.

(4)酵素活性試驗 (4) Enzyme activity test

將培養1、2、3天之菌液50ml以10,000rpm、4℃離心(Thermo LegendTM MACH 1.6/R,Germany)30分鐘,將菌液分為菌體與上清液,後置於冰裡以進行接下來酵素測試。 50 ml of the culture liquid for 1, 2, and 3 days of culture was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm and 4 ° C (Thermo Legend TM MACH 1.6/R, Germany) for 30 minutes, and the bacterial liquid was divided into a bacterial body and a supernatant, and then placed in ice. For the next enzyme test.

(A)蛋白分解酵素(protease) (A) Protease

取1ml上清液於離心管(eppendorf),實驗組加入40μl蛋白質基質(protein substrate)〔0.4g偶氮酪蛋白(Azocasein,Sigma,USA)加 入10ml 50mM三羥甲基鹽酸緩衝溶液(Tris-HCl buffer)混合〕後,再加入40μl 50mM Tris-HCl,對照組加入80μl 50mM Tris-HCl,後置於37℃培養箱3小時。反應後的樣品加入400μl 10%三氯乙酸(Trichloroacetic acid,TC)後置於冰中10分鐘,再將離心管以10,000g離心(centrifuge 5415G,Germany)10分鐘,並以分光光度計440nm測其吸光值。其中,酵素活性IU=mol/L/hr/mg。 1 ml of the supernatant was taken in a centrifuge tube (eppendorf), and the experimental group was added with 40 μl of protein substrate [0.4 g of azocasein (Azocasein, Sigma, USA) plus After 10 ml of 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer was mixed, 40 μl of 50 mM Tris-HCl was added, and 80 μl of 50 mM Tris-HCl was added to the control group, followed by placing in a 37 ° C incubator for 3 hours. The reacted sample was added to 400 μl of 10% Trichloroacetic acid (TC) and placed in ice for 10 minutes. The centrifuge tube was centrifuged at 10,000 g for 10 minutes (centrifuge 5415G, Germany) and measured with a spectrophotometer at 440 nm. Absorbance value. Among them, the enzyme activity IU = mol / L / hr / mg.

(B)β-葡聚醣分解酵素(β-glucanase) (B) β-glucan degrading enzyme (β-glucanase)

取1ml上清液於離心管(eppendorf)裡,實驗組加入300μl多醣體溶液〔β-glucan solution(250mg β-glucan加入40ml DNS buffer)〕,對照組加入300μl DNS buffer後,置於37℃培養箱20分鐘。反應後加入100μl stop solution,於沸水加熱10分鐘,結束後冰浴10分鐘。將離心管(appendorf)以13,000g離心1分鐘,後以分光光度計550nm測其吸光值。其中,酵素活性IU=μmol/L/min/mg。 1 ml of the supernatant was taken in a centrifuge tube (eppendorf), and the experimental group was added with 300 μl of a polysaccharide solution [β-glucan solution (250 mg β-glucan added to 40 ml of DNS buffer)], and the control group was added with 300 μl of DNS buffer, and then cultured at 37 ° C. Box for 20 minutes. After the reaction, 100 μl of stop solution was added, and the mixture was heated in boiling water for 10 minutes, and then ice-cooled for 10 minutes. The centrifuge tube (appendorf) was centrifuged at 13,000 g for 1 minute, and then the absorbance was measured with a spectrophotometer at 550 nm. Among them, the enzyme activity IU = μmol / L / min / mg.

(C)幾丁質分解酵素(chitinase) (C) Chitinase (chitinase)

取750μl上清液於離心管(eppendorf),實驗組加入750μl幾丁質緩衝液{chitin buffer〔0.05%膠態幾丁質(colloidal chitin)加入50mM醋酸緩衝液(acetate buffer)〕},對照組加入750μl 50mM Tris-HCl,後於室溫下反應30分鐘。反應後於100℃沸水浴5分鐘終止反應,後取500μl樣品加入100μl 0.8M K2B4O7,再置於100℃沸水浴3分鐘,後取出室溫冷卻。取200μl樣品加入1mL二甲胺硼烷試劑{DMAB reagent〔使用前將二甲胺硼烷(DMAB,Dimethylamineborane)用醋酸(acetic acid) 稀釋10倍使用〕},立刻混合後放置37℃培養箱20分鐘,結束後室溫下冷卻,後以分光光度計544nm測其吸光值。其中,酵素活性IU=mol/L/min/mg。 Take 750 μl of the supernatant in a centrifuge tube (eppendorf), and add 750 μl of chitin buffer {chitin buffer [0.05% colloidal chitin to 50 mM acetate buffer]} in the experimental group. 750 μl of 50 mM Tris-HCl was added, followed by a reaction at room temperature for 30 minutes. After the reaction, the reaction was terminated by boiling water bath at 100 ° C for 5 minutes, and then 500 μl of the sample was added to 100 μl of 0.8 MK 2 B 4 O 7 , and then placed in a boiling water bath at 100 ° C for 3 minutes, and then taken out at room temperature to cool. Take 200 μl of sample and add 1 mL of dimethylamine borane reagent {DMAB reagent [dimethylamineborane (DMAB) diluted 10 times with acetic acid before use]}, immediately mix and place 37 °C incubator 20 After the minute, the temperature was cooled at room temperature, and then the absorbance was measured by a spectrophotometer at 544 nm. Among them, the enzyme activity IU = mol / L / min / mg.

(D)總蛋白質測定 (D) Total protein assay

取20μl ddH2O做為空白組加入蛋白質定量檢測試劑(1/5X Bradford)1mL,將培養不同天數的除去菌體之上清液同樣取20μl加入1mL的蛋白質定量檢測試劑(1/5X Bradford),反應時間8分鐘後以OD595測其吸光值。後將數據各帶入各酵素檢量線,計算出酵素活性後除以總蛋白含量以定量出酵素比活性。其中,酵素活性IU=μmole/min/mg。 Take 20 μl of ddH 2 O as a blank group and add 1 mL of protein quantitative detection reagent (1/5X Bradford). Add 20 μl of the supernatant from the cultured cells for different days and add 1 mL of protein quantitative detection reagent (1/5X Bradford). After 8 minutes of reaction time, the absorbance was measured by OD 595 . After that, the data were taken into each enzyme calibration curve, and the activity of the enzyme was calculated and divided by the total protein content to quantify the specific activity of the enzyme. Among them, the enzyme activity IU = μmole / min / mg.

以LB培養基培養三天之酵素活性,可看出幾丁質分解酵素(chitinase)隨著培養時間增長下降,但蛋白分解酵素(protease)、β-葡聚醣分解酵素(β-glucanase)於第二天有最低量,但於第三天β-葡聚醣分解酵素(β-glucanase)呈現微量增長趨勢,蛋白分解酵素(protease)則是呈現明顯的上升,為0.002IU(參第十二圖)。 After three days of enzyme activity in LB medium, it can be seen that the chitinase decreases with the growth time, but the protease and β-glucanase are in the first step. There was a minimum amount in two days, but on the third day, β-glucanase showed a slight increase trend, and the protease showed a significant increase of 0.002 IU (see the twelfth map). ).

<培養基上Pseudomonas meadocina A6對病原細菌抑制試驗> <Pseudomonas meadocina A6 on the medium for inhibition of pathogenic bacteria>

將培養24小時之病原菌菌液調至108後取100μl滴於PDA培養基塗盤,後貼錠片於PDA盤中央,滴入50μl調至108的A6菌液至錠片後培養24小時後觀察結果(參第十三、十四圖)。由第十三圖可看出在番茄細菌性斑點(Xanthomonas campestris pv.vesicatoria Dye)、番茄青枯病菌(Ralstonia solanacearum)周圍產生一明顯抑制圈,特別是針對番茄青枯 病的抑制效果,培養4天抑制半徑可達到0.7cm(第十四圖),而Pseudomonas meadocina A6菌圈生長持續擴張到第7天。 After 24 hours the culture broth was adjusted to pathogens 24 hours after taking 100μl drops 108 PDA medium plate coating, the paste in the central pastilles PDA plate, 50μl bacterial suspension was adjusted to A6 added dropwise to 108 pastilles Observe the results (see Figures 13 and 14). It can be seen from the thirteenth figure that a significant inhibition zone is produced around the tomato bacterial spots (Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria Dye) and Ralstonia solanacearum, especially for the inhibition of tomato bacterial wilt. The day suppression radius can reach 0.7 cm (Fig. 14), while the Pseudomonas meadocina A6 ring growth continues to expand to day 7.

<植物致病試驗> <Phytopathogenic test>

為測試A6是否具有危害植物之可能性,而可以做為生物農藥的潛力評估,於是挑選了幾種一般常見作物,分別是胡蘆科(Cucurbitaceae)的洋香瓜(Cucumis melo var.saccharinus)與大胡瓜(Cucumis sativus)、茄科(Solanaceae)的甜椒(Capsicam annuum var.grossum)、茄子(Solanum melongena)、番茄(Solanum lycopersicum)和聖女番茄(Lycopersicon esculentum Mill)、十字花科(Brassicaceae)的花椰菜(Brassica oleracea L.var.botrytis L.)和油菜心(Brassica campestris)、禾本科(Poaceae)的玉米(Zea mays var.rugosa)進行接種。 In order to test whether A6 has the possibility of harming plants, it can be used as a potential assessment of biopesticide, so several common crops were selected, namely Cucurbitaceae melon var. saccharinus and large Cauliflower (Cucumis sativus), Solanaceae (Capsicam annuum var. grossum), eggplant (Solanum melongena), tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) and sacred tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill), Brassicaceae broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. var. botrytis L.) and Brassica campestris, Poaceae corn (Zea mays var. rugosa) were inoculated.

將植物培育至適合接種年齡,將A6菌液調至108CFU/mL,將植株以根部刺傷法(root stabbing method)製造傷口,後均勻澆取50ml菌液至土壤後蓋上一層塑膠膜保持土壤濕度,於一個月內連續進行觀察並拍照記錄之。 The plants were grown to the appropriate age for inoculation, the A6 bacterial solution was adjusted to 10 8 CFU/mL, and the plants were wounded by the root stabbing method. Then, 50 ml of the bacterial liquid was uniformly poured into the soil and covered with a plastic film to keep it. Soil moisture was continuously observed and photographed within one month.

以根部刺傷法接種A6後經連續觀察一個月,發現胡蘆科(Cucurbitaceae)的洋香瓜(Cucumis melo var.saccharinus)與大胡瓜(Cucumis sativus)、茄科(Solanaceae)的甜椒(Capsicam annuum var.grossum)、茄子(Solanum melongena)、番茄(Solanum lycopersicum)和聖女番茄(Lycopersicon esculentum Mill)、十字花科(Brassicaceae)的花椰菜(Brassica oleracea L.var.botrytis L.)和油菜心(Brassica campestris)、禾本科(Poaceae)的玉米(Zea mays var.rugosa)植株與對照組相比皆無出現染病情形(參看表二)。 After inoculation of A6 by root pricking and continuous observation for one month, Cucurisaceae melon var. saccharinus and Cucumis sativus and Solanaceae sweet pepper (Capsicam annuum var) were found. .grossum), eggplant (Solanum melongena), tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) and sacred tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill), Brassica broccoli (Brassica oleracea L.var.botrytis L.) and Brassica (Brassica) The campestris), Poaceae corn (Zea mays var. rugosa) plants showed no disease compared with the control group (see Table 2).

Figure TWI614338BD00002
Figure TWI614338BD00002

<Pseudomonas meadocina A6生物防治之溫室試驗> <Pseudomonas meadocina A6 Greenhouse Test for Biological Control>

本實驗主要探討A6是否具備生物防治的能力。將番茄(Solanum lycopersicum)培育至適合接種高度對青枯病病原細菌(Ralstonia solanacearum)進行實驗。先將菌液調至108CFU/mL,取50ml菌液均勻澆部於根部土壤,每隔一周施用一次,連續施用三次。再以根部刺傷法製造傷口,將植株靜置兩天使根圈能充分與A6菌接觸,最後將青枯病病原細菌(Ralstonia solanacearum)稀釋至108CFU/mL,取50ml菌液均勻澆部於根部土壤後連續觀察至對照組發病枯死。 This experiment mainly explores whether A6 has the ability of biological control. Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) was incubated to a suitable height for the bacterial wilt pathogen (Ralstonia solanacearum). The bacterial liquid was first adjusted to 10 8 CFU/mL, and 50 ml of the bacterial liquid was uniformly poured into the root soil, and applied once every other week for three times. The wound is made by the root pricking method, and the plant is allowed to stand for two angel root circles to fully contact with the A6 bacteria. Finally, the bacterial wilt pathogen (Ralstonia solanacearum) is diluted to 10 8 CFU/mL, and 50 ml of the bacterial liquid is evenly poured. After the root soil was continuously observed, the control group died of onset.

實驗組以A6處理後,接著製造傷口再處以青枯病病原細菌 (Ralstonia solanacearum)並連續觀察,在第10天時,對照組出現病徵,葉片呈現青色萎凋症狀。在第14天時,對照組整株番茄枝條皆向下彎曲葉片呈現嚴重萎凋,為茄科青枯病病徵。而處以A6的實驗組雖然也以根切法製造傷口後並處以病原菌,但植株則是正常發育未受到病原菌影響(參看第十五圖(A))。在第20天時,對照組整株之條已枯萎,莖部出現褐化,但實驗組此時有兩株出現葉片青枯病徵。第27天對照組已全數枯萎,實驗組則是有幾株出現萎凋症狀,大部分還是持續生長。 After the experimental group was treated with A6, the wound was then wounded and the bacterial wilt pathogen was (Ralstonia solanacearum) and continuous observation, on the 10th day, the control group showed signs of symptoms, and the leaves showed symptoms of blue withering. On the 14th day, the whole tomato shoots of the control group showed severe withering in the downward curved leaves, which was a symptom of the bacterial wilt of Solanaceae. In the experimental group treated with A6, although the wounds were made by root cutting and pathogenic bacteria were used, the normal development of the plants was not affected by the pathogens (see Figure 15 (A)). On the 20th day, the whole plant strip of the control group had withered and browning occurred in the stem, but in the experimental group, two strains showed leaf wilt symptoms. On the 27th day, the control group had all withered, and in the experimental group, several plants showed symptoms of withering, and most of them continued to grow.

將對照組之番茄植株莖切斷後插入清水中可看見明顯之白色菌液由切口緩緩流出(參第十五圖(B))。將白色菌液塗盤、抽取genomic DNA、經16S rDNA序列增幅後定序,接著進行比對後得知與本發明接種菌相同度為100%。另外經NCBI的GenBank資料庫比對後發現,全數資料皆為青枯病病原細菌(Ralstonia solanacearum),且相同度皆為99%,可以確定分離出的菌為青枯病病原細菌(Ralstonia solanacearum)。 After cutting the stem of the tomato plant of the control group and inserting it into clear water, it was observed that the apparent white bacterial liquid gradually flowed out from the incision (refer to Fig. 15 (B)). The white bacterial solution was plated, genomic DNA was extracted, and the 16S rDNA sequence was amplified and sequenced, and then the alignment was found to be 100% identical to the inoculum of the present invention. In addition, after comparison with NCBI's GenBank database, all the data were Ralstonia solanacearum, and the degree of identity was 99%. It was confirmed that the isolated bacteria were bacterial wilt pathogens (Ralstonia solanacearum). .

<攪拌式發酵槽實驗> <Stirring fermentation tank experiment>

以MISP培養基進行Pseudomonas meadocina A6之攪拌式發酵槽培養試驗,工作體積為3公升。 A stirred fermentation tank culture test of Pseudomonas meadocina A6 was carried out in MISP medium at a working volume of 3 liters.

(1)前培養 (1) Pre-cultivation

首先將A6菌種自培養基以接種環取單一菌落,接種至LB培養液,置於28℃、150rpm震盪培養箱培養24小時。 First, the A6 strain was taken from the culture medium in a single colony by inoculation, inoculated into the LB culture solution, and cultured in a shaking incubator at 28 ° C and 150 rpm for 24 hours.

(2)主培養 (2) Main training

取適量之上述種菌液(最終反應濃度為1×106CFU/mL)接入攪拌式發酵槽培養,在發酵期間控制其通氣量(aeration rate)為1vvm,攪拌速率(agitation)為150rpm,於28℃的條件下進行發酵。每24小時取樣一次,每次取樣1ml進行10倍序列稀釋,後取100μl菌體發酵液於LB固態培養基塗盤,48小時後計算其菌落數。總菌數(CFU/mL):盤面菌落數×稀釋倍數×10。 An appropriate amount of the above-mentioned inoculum solution (final reaction concentration: 1×10 6 CFU/mL) was placed in a stirred fermentation tank, and the aeration rate was controlled to be 1 vvm during the fermentation, and the agitation was 150 rpm. The fermentation was carried out at 28 °C. Samples were taken every 24 hours, and 1 ml of each sample was taken for 10-fold serial dilution. Then, 100 μl of the bacterial fermentation broth was applied to the LB solid medium, and the number of colonies was counted 48 hours later. Total bacterial count (CFU/mL): number of dish colonies × dilution factor × 10.

以5公升攪拌式發酵槽加入檔板,工作體積為3公升,在發酵期間控制其通氣量(aeration rate)為1vvm,攪拌速率(agitation)為150rpm,於28℃的條件下進行發酵。參第十六圖,第24小時總菌落數達1.48×1010CFU/mL,而第48小時則總菌落數已下降至4.68×108CFU/mL,第72小時仍維持在108CFU/mL無明顯變化。 The baffle was placed in a 5 liter agitated fermentation tank at a working volume of 3 liters, and the aeration rate was controlled to 1 vvm during fermentation, and the agitation was 150 rpm, and fermentation was carried out at 28 °C. In the sixteenth chart, the total number of colonies at the 24th hour reached 1.48×10 10 CFU/mL, while at 48 hours, the total number of colonies had dropped to 4.68×10 8 CFU/mL, and remained at 10 8 CFU/72 hours. There was no significant change in mL.

<Pseudomonas meadocina A6根圈益生(PGPR)試驗> <Pseudomonas meadocina A6 Root Ring Probiotic (PGPR) Test>

<<溫室幼苗生長影響評估>> <<Greenhouse seedling growth impact assessment>>

本實驗測試作物為洋香瓜(Cucumis melo var.saccharinus)、番茄(Solanum lycopersicum)、香蕉(Musasapientum L.)、蝴蝶蘭(Phalaenopsis aphrodite Reichb.f.)和木瓜(Carica papaya)。 The test crops in this experiment were Cucumis melo var. saccharinus, Solanum lycopersicum, Mussapientum L., Phalaenopsis aphrodite Reichb.f., and Carica papaya.

將植物培養至適合接種之大小(約20cm高),共分為三組,分別為H2O組(即CK組)、LB組與A6組。在A6組方面,需先將A6菌液調至108CFU/mL。三組皆取50ml均勻澆部於根部土壤,每隔七天施用一次,連續施用4次。其中洋香瓜及番茄於第三次澆菌後,連續觀察一個月並記錄植株高度、葉片數、最大葉面與乾燥根重;香蕉、蝴蝶 蘭和木瓜則為每週紀錄其株高、葉片數及最大葉片面積。實驗完成所得數據進行單因子變異數分析(One-way ANOVA)。 The plants were grown to the appropriate inoculum size (approximately 20cm high), divided into three groups, each group 2 is O (i.e. CK group) H, LB group and group A6. In the A6 group, the A6 bacteria solution should be adjusted to 10 8 CFU/mL. All three groups were treated with 50 ml of uniform pouring in the root soil, applied once every seven days, and continuously applied four times. After the third time, the cantaloupe and tomato were observed for one month and the plant height, leaf number, maximum leaf surface and dry root weight were recorded. Banana, Phalaenopsis and papaya recorded their plant height and number of leaves per week. And the maximum blade area. The experimentally completed data was analyzed by one-way ANOVA.

由洋香瓜植株看來,在高度差上LB與A6組高度上相似,但明顯高於CK組。在葉片大小可看出,A6組明顯大於CK與LB,且在色澤上也比較深綠。最後乾燥根部分,三者由外觀不容易判定生長情形,但秤重後可知A6組相對上是比較重的(第十七圖)。統計數值部分,洋香瓜方面在高度差則是p=0.443>0.05,為不顯著差異,而葉片數差的p=0.004<0.05為顯著差異,最大葉面的p=0.027<0.05為顯著差異,乾燥根重的p=0.025<0.05,為顯著差異(參表三)。 From the point of view of the melon plant, the LB was similar in height to the A6 group in height difference, but significantly higher than the CK group. As can be seen from the leaf size, the A6 group is significantly larger than CK and LB, and is darker in color. Finally, the root part is dried, and the three are not easy to judge the growth condition by the appearance, but it is known that the A6 group is relatively heavy after weighing (Fig. 17). In the statistical part, the difference in height of melon is p=0.443>0.05, which is insignificant, while the difference of leaf number is p=0.004<0.05, and the difference of p=0.027<0.05 is the significant difference. The dry root weight was p=0.025<0.05, which was a significant difference (see Table 3).

Figure TWI614338BD00003
Figure TWI614338BD00003

由番茄植株來看,A6組明顯優良於LB組與CK組,差異甚大。在枝條數量上A6組也明顯優於兩者。但在乾燥根方面之探討,由圖片可看出是LB組相對上比較良好(參第十八圖)。在統計數值來看,番 茄部分高度差則是p=0.008<0.05為顯著差異,枝條數p=0.001<0.05為顯著差異,乾燥根重則是p=0.231>0.05,為不顯著差異(如表四)。 From the perspective of tomato plants, the A6 group was significantly better than the LB group and the CK group, and the difference was very large. The A6 group was also significantly better than the two in terms of the number of branches. However, in the discussion of dry roots, it can be seen from the picture that the LB group is relatively good (see Figure 18). In terms of statistical values, Fanfan The height difference of the eggplant portion was p=0.008<0.05, which was a significant difference. The number of branches p=0.001<0.05 was a significant difference, and the dry root weight was p=0.231>0.05, which was insignificant (Table 4).

Figure TWI614338BD00004
Figure TWI614338BD00004

由香蕉植株看來,在第六及第十週皆有相對高的數值(參第十九圖),所以將這兩週的數據以One-way ANOVA(單因子變異數分析)進行分析,發現在第六週時,高度差、葉片數和最大葉面積的p值都小於0.05(p=0.000),為顯著差異(如表五);後續在第十週時,經One-way ANOVA(單因子變異數分析)分析,高度差(p=0.002)、葉片數(p=0.008)和最大葉面積(p=0.001)的p值都小於0.05,為顯著差異(如表六)。 From the perspective of banana plants, there are relatively high values in the sixth and tenth weeks (see Figure 19), so the two-week data were analyzed by One-way ANOVA (one-way analysis of variance). At the sixth week, the p-values for height difference, number of leaves, and maximum leaf area were all less than 0.05 (p=0.000), which was a significant difference (as shown in Table 5); subsequent to the tenth week, by One-way ANOVA (single-factor variance analysis) analysis showed that the p values of height difference (p=0.002), number of leaves (p=0.008), and maximum leaf area (p=0.001) were all less than 0.05, which were significant differences (Table 6).

Figure TWI614338BD00005
Figure TWI614338BD00005

Figure TWI614338BD00006
Figure TWI614338BD00006

由蝴蝶蘭的植株看來,以葉片數來說,CK組、LB組和A6組的生長狀況很相近,但在第十週有明顯的漲幅(參第二十圖),而以最大葉面積來說,A6的成長狀況是最好的,分別在第六週及第十週也有明顯的高峰,所以將這兩週的數據進行One-way ANOVA(單因子變異數分析)分析,發現葉片數雖然在第六週時p值大於0.05(p=0.311)(參表七),但在第十週時p值就小於0.05(p=0.016),為顯著差異(參表八),而最大葉片面積不論是第六週或第十週,p值都小於0.000,為顯著差異。 From the plant of Phalaenopsis, the growth of CK group, LB group and A6 group is similar in terms of number of leaves, but there is a significant increase in the tenth week (see the twenty-fifth figure), and the maximum leaf area In terms of A6's growth, it is the best. There are also obvious peaks in the sixth and tenth weeks, so the two-week data was analyzed by One-way ANOVA (single-factor variance analysis) and the number of leaves was found. Although the p-value was greater than 0.05 (p=0.311) at the sixth week (see Table VII), the p-value was less than 0.05 (p=0.016) at the tenth week, which was a significant difference (see Table VIII), while the largest leaf Regardless of whether the area is the sixth week or the tenth week, the p value is less than 0.000, which is a significant difference.

Figure TWI614338BD00007
Figure TWI614338BD00007

Figure TWI614338BD00008
Figure TWI614338BD00008

由木瓜的統計曲線圖來看,在第3週和第5週有較為明顯的波峰(參第二十一圖),以One-way ANOVA(單因子變異數分析)分析,不論是高度差、葉片數差或是最大葉面積差,p值皆為0.000,為顯著性差異,證實A6菌對於木瓜來說是有極高的促生能力(參表九、十)。 From the statistical graph of papaya, there are obvious peaks at the 3rd and 5th week (see the 21st chart), analyzed by One-way ANOVA (one-way variance analysis), regardless of height difference, The difference in leaf number or the maximum leaf area difference, p value is 0.000, which is a significant difference, confirming that A6 bacteria have a very high growth-promoting ability for papaya (see Tables IX and X).

Figure TWI614338BD00009
Figure TWI614338BD00009

Figure TWI614338BD00010
Figure TWI614338BD00010

<<田間生長影響評估>> <<Field growth impact assessment>>

將田地整好覆上深色塑膠布,依植物的不同來量出其間距,挖好深度再將植物組株高相近者種進田中,以CK組、LB組、A6全菌液組、A6菌沉澱組和A6上清液組(須先調至108CFU/ml)五組不同的的試劑處理,每處理組8株,每株施用的試劑量約50ml,施用前需以無菌竹筷在距植株10公分的位置,戳下4到5個約5公分深的洞,每7天澆一 次,連續4次,每週需紀錄其株高、葉片數及最大葉片面積,待植物開始產果或收成後,亦須記錄其產物重量。實驗完成所得數據以SPSS程式進行One-way ANOVA(單因子變異數分析)分析。本實驗測試作物為茄子(Solanum melongena)、小黃瓜(Cucunis anguria)。 The field is covered with dark plastic cloth, and the spacing is measured according to the different plants. The depth is excavated and the plant height is similar to the plant height. The CK group, LB group, A6 whole liquid group, A6 The bacteria precipitation group and the A6 supernatant group (which must be adjusted to 10 8 CFU/ml first) were treated with five different reagents, 8 strains per treatment group, and the amount of reagent applied per plant was about 50 ml. Sterile bamboo chopsticks were required before application. At a position 10 cm from the plant, poke 4 to 5 holes about 5 cm deep, and pour once every 7 days for 4 times. The plant height, number of leaves and maximum leaf area should be recorded every week. After fruit or harvest, the weight of the product must also be recorded. The experimentally completed data was analyzed by One-way ANOVA (single-factor variance analysis) using the SPSS program. The test crops in this experiment were eggplant (Solanum melongena) and cucumber (Cucunis anguria).

請參看表十一~表十三。由小黃瓜植株的平均高度來看,在第四週及第六週時有相對高的數值,由平均葉片數及平均最大葉片面積來看,在第四週和第五週也有數值較高的趨勢,所以將這三週的數據以SPSS軟體進行One-way ANOVA(單因子變異數分析)分析,發現在第四週時,高度差(p=0.000)、葉片數(p=0.024)和最大葉面積(p=0.001)的p值都小於0.05,為顯著差異;將第五週數據以One-way ANOVA(單因子變異數分析)分析,高度差(p=0.001)和最大葉面積(p=0.003)的p值都小於0.05,為顯著差異,但葉片數差的p值卻大於0.05,為不顯著差異;第六週的高度差(p=0.004)、葉片數差(p=0.009)和最大葉面積差(p=0.006)的p值都小於0.05,為顯著性差異,推論第四週到第六週可能是A6菌對小黃瓜的最佳增生階段。由每週的平均折線圖來看,幾乎都是A6組的數值最大,沉澱組和上清液組次之的狀態,證明A6菌對小黃瓜的促生效果。高度的部分則因為太高不易觀察,所以在140公分左右剪去頂芽,同時缺少頂部葉片的增生,所以高度差和葉片數差從曲線圖看來就有停滯的現象(參第二十二圖)。 Please refer to Table 11 to Table 13. From the average height of cucumber plants, there are relatively high values at the fourth and sixth weeks. From the average number of leaves and the average maximum leaf area, there are also higher values in the fourth and fifth weeks. Trend, so the three-week data was analyzed by SPSS software for One-way ANOVA (one-way variance analysis), and found that at the fourth week, the height difference (p=0.000), the number of leaves (p=0.024), and the maximum The p-values of the leaf area (p=0.001) were all less than 0.05, which was a significant difference; the fifth week data were analyzed by One-way ANOVA (single-factor variation analysis), height difference (p=0.001) and maximum leaf area (p = 0.003) The p values are all less than 0.05, which is a significant difference, but the p value of the leaf number difference is greater than 0.05, which is not significant difference; the sixth week height difference (p=0.004), the leaf number difference (p=0.009) The p-values of the difference with the maximum leaf area (p=0.006) were all less than 0.05, which was a significant difference. It is inferred that the fourth to sixth weeks may be the best proliferative stage of A6 bacteria to cucumber. From the weekly average line chart, almost all of the A6 group had the highest value, and the sedimentation group and the supernatant group were in the second state, which proved that the A6 strain promoted the cucumber. The height part is too high to be observed, so the top bud is cut at about 140 cm, and the top leaf is not proliferated, so the height difference and the difference in the number of leaves are stagnant from the graph (see the twenty-second Figure).

小黃瓜果實平均重量最高者為沉澱組125.2g,次之為上清液組,平均重量為99.2g;再來是A6組,平均重量為98.3g;LB組平均重量為 94.9g,CK組的平均重量則為89.1g。而此五組的生產數量以LB組和上清液組居冠,次之為CK組,是LB和上清液組的95%,A6組的生產數量只佔LB和上清液組的90%,沉澱組只佔LB和上清液組的78%。 The highest average weight of cucumber fruit was 125.2g in the sediment group, followed by the supernatant group, the average weight was 99.2g; the A6 group, the average weight was 98.3g; the average weight of the LB group was The average weight of 94.9 g and CK group was 89.1 g. The production quantities of the five groups were ranked in the LB group and the supernatant group, followed by the CK group, which was 95% of the LB and supernatant groups, and the production of the A6 group accounted for only 90% of the LB and supernatant groups. %, the sedimentation group accounted for only 78% of the LB and supernatant groups.

Figure TWI614338BD00011
Figure TWI614338BD00011

Figure TWI614338BD00012
Figure TWI614338BD00012

Figure TWI614338BD00013
Figure TWI614338BD00013

參表十四~表十六。由茄子的植株來看,不論是高度、葉片數或最大葉面積,皆以上清液組的效果最佳,次之為沉澱組,A6組則和LB組極為相近。觀察平均曲線圖可以發現在第七週、第八週以及第十週有相對高的趨勢,以SPSS軟體進行One-way ANOVA(單因子變異數分析)分析,其p值都小於0.05,證明A6菌液對茄子植株的促生性。葉片數在第五週有呈現下降的趨勢,原因為茄子在種植的過程中需去除下位葉,才能使植株的生長更為良好(參第二十三圖)。 Refer to Table 14 to Table 16. From the perspective of the eggplant plants, the supernatant group was the best in terms of height, number of leaves or maximum leaf area, followed by the sedimentation group, and the A6 group was very similar to the LB group. Observing the average curve, we can find that there is a relatively high trend in the seventh week, the eighth week and the tenth week. One-way ANOVA (one-way variance analysis) analysis is performed with SPSS software, and the p value is less than 0.05, which proves A6. The growth promoting effect of bacterial liquid on eggplant plants. The number of leaves showed a downward trend in the fifth week, because the lower leaves of the eggplants needed to be removed during the planting process to make the plants grow better (see Figure 23).

茄子果實平均重量最高者為沉澱組135.9g,次之為A6組,平均重量為135.8g;再來是LB組,平均重量為129.5g;上清液組平均重量為126.9g,CK組的平均重量則為121.5g。而此五組的生產數量以上清液組居冠,次之為沉澱組,是LB和上清液組的94%,A6組的生產數量 只佔上清液組的63%,LB組佔上清液組的50.6%,CK組則佔上清液組41%。 The highest average weight of eggplant fruit was 135.9g in the sediment group, followed by A6 group, the average weight was 135.8g; the average weight was 129.5g in the LB group; the average weight in the supernatant group was 126.9g, the average in the CK group. The weight is 121.5g. The production volume of the five groups above the crown group, followed by the sedimentation group, which is 94% of the LB and supernatant groups, and the production quantity of the A6 group. Only 63% of the supernatant group, LB group accounted for 50.6% of the supernatant group, and CK group accounted for 41% of the supernatant group.

Figure TWI614338BD00014
Figure TWI614338BD00014

Figure TWI614338BD00015
Figure TWI614338BD00015

Figure TWI614338BD00016
Figure TWI614338BD00016

<番茄青枯病(Ralstonia solanacearum)田間防治試驗及評估> <Ramstonia solanacearum field control trial and evaluation>

番茄選擇標準:以外觀正常、未明顯受病蟲害感染之番茄為試驗材料。 Tomato selection criteria: Tomatoes with normal appearance and no obvious infection by pests and diseases were used as test materials.

田區設計:本試驗為單因子試驗,採逢機完全區集設計(Randomized Complete Block Design,RCBD)。每小區,以直徑27公分,高17公分盆子種植植1株番茄,每小區擺放盆子2行,行距及株距各40公分。共計4處理,每處理4重複。每小區擺放20盆子,每一區集之小區間設一公尺長之隔離區,避免藥液飄散與汙染另一個處理,將4處理之16小區以逢機方式配置於各區集內。 Field design: This test is a single factor test, Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD). In each plot, 1 tomato was planted with a diameter of 27 cm and a height of 17 cm, and 2 rows of pots were placed in each plot, with a row spacing and a plant spacing of 40 cm each. A total of 4 treatments, 4 repetitions per treatment. 20 pots are placed in each plot, and one meter long isolation zone is set up between the cells in each zone to avoid the liquid medicine floating and polluting another treatment. The 16 cells treated in 4 are arranged in each zone in a random manner.

病原菌接種:將Ralstonia solanacearum培養於TM培養液(每公升含peptone 10g,Casein 1g,Glucose 5g)30℃下,24小時。為符合田 間感染情形,故將青枯病菌於定植番茄苗前,直接將病原菌拌入介質中,病原細菌最終濃度>1×105CFU/g介質。 Pathogen inoculation: Ralstonia solanacearum was cultured in TM medium (peptone 10 g per liter, Casein 1 g, Glucose 5 g) at 30 ° C for 24 hours. In order to meet the field infection situation, the bacterial wilt bacteria should be directly mixed into the medium before planting the tomato seedlings, and the final concentration of the pathogenic bacteria is >1×10 5 CFU/g medium.

施藥方法:青枯病病菌感染時可危害葉及莖部,由根部侵入植株,造成植株維管束核化,造成植株快速萎凋,此病原菌為土壤傳播性細菌,可在連續種植非寄主植物的田土中存活10年之久,在休耕田之土壤中亦可存活4年以上,土壤pH值在6.6時發病最嚴重,24~36℃為最適發病溫度。 Application method: When the bacterial wilt pathogen is infected, it can damage the leaves and stems, and the roots invade the plants, causing the vascularization of the plant vascular bundles, causing the plants to wither rapidly. The pathogen is a soil-borne bacteria, which can continuously grow non-host plants. It has survived for 10 years in the field and can survive for more than 4 years in the soil of the fallow field. The soil pH value is the most serious at 6.6, and the optimum temperature is 24-36 °C.

部位:植株根部均勻施用。 Location: Plant roots are evenly applied.

間隔及次數:於定植前3天之苗期(植株約高度10公分)施藥1次;於定植後一天進行第一次施藥,每隔七天施藥一次,每次每株澆灌100ml,連續施藥三次。記錄施藥次數和每次施藥日期及番茄生長發育情形。 Interval and frequency: Apply 3 times in the seedling stage 3 days before planting (plant height about 10 cm); apply for the first time one day after planting, apply once every seven days, each time 100ml per plant, continuous Apply three times. Record the number of applications and the date of each application and the growth and development of the tomato.

害物發生調查時期:於定植後之每次施藥前調查一次,於第三次施藥後每七天調查一次,連續調查2次,共調查五次。 The period of investigation of the occurrence of pests: one survey before each application after planting, every seven days after the third application, and two consecutive investigations, a total of five investigations.

調查及計量方法:調查時每株植株若全萎凋即為罹病株,記錄罹病株數,並計算罹病率與防治率。 Investigation and measurement methods: When the plants were completely withered, the number of rickets was recorded, and the rickets rate and prevention rate were calculated.

統計分析:各處理罹病度經資料轉換後進行顯著性測驗,若達顯著水準,則進行費雪最小顯著差異測驗法(Fisher’s Least Significance Test,LSD)測定1%及5%顯著差異。 Statistical analysis: Each treatment was tested for significance after data conversion. If the level was significant, the Fisher's Least Significance Test (LSD) was used to determine 1% and 5% significant differences.

參表十七及第二十四圖。對照組與藥劑處理(1X109CFU/mL A6)100倍、200倍、400倍與CK的番茄植株的青枯病罹病度均為22.5%、45%、51.25%、53.75。由此調查結果經SPSS18.0統計軟體以One-way ANOVA測定1%、5%顯著差異分析,藥劑處理(1X109CFU/mL A6)100倍與對照處理有顯著差異。 See Tables 17 and 24. The control group and the drug treatment (1× 10 9 CFU/mL A6) were 100 times, 200 times, 400 times and the CK tomato plants had a bacterial wilt disease of 22.5%, 45%, 51.25%, and 53.75. The results of this investigation were analyzed by SPSS18.0 statistical software with 1% and 5% significant difference by One-way ANOVA, and 100 times of drug treatment (1× 10 9 CFU/mL A6) was significantly different from the control treatment.

Figure TWI614338BD00017
Figure TWI614338BD00017

<化學藥劑對A6存活之影響> <Impact of chemical agents on the survival of A6>

於LB固態培養基平板挑選單一菌落,接種於3ml LB液態培養基中,於28℃恆溫震盪培養24小時後,將菌液濃度調整為108(cfu/ml),取100μl菌液、100μl 10X stock的化學性藥劑與800μl無菌水加入混合後混合搖晃均勻後靜置10分鐘,對照組則為100μl菌液與900μl無菌水混合,10分鐘後取100μl進行序列稀釋,稀釋103、104、105各取100μl於LB固態培養基平板上進行塗盤,置於28℃培養箱進行24小時培養後,計算其菌落數。使用之化學農藥皆依行政院農業委員會動植物防疫檢疫局農藥資訊服務網建議使用濃度測試,有殺細菌劑、除草劑等重要化學藥劑。存活率:log(CFU/ml)/log Check×100% A single colony was selected from the LB solid medium plate, inoculated into 3 ml of LB liquid medium, and cultured at 28 ° C for 24 hours under constant temperature, the concentration of the bacterial solution was adjusted to 10 8 (cfu/ml), 100 μl of bacterial solution, 100 μl of 10X stock was taken. The chemical agent was mixed with 800 μl of sterile water, mixed and shaken uniformly, and then allowed to stand for 10 minutes. In the control group, 100 μl of the bacterial solution was mixed with 900 μl of sterile water. After 10 minutes, 100 μl was taken for serial dilution, and diluted 10 3 , 10 4 , 10 5 100 μl of each was plated on an LB solid medium plate, and placed in a 28 ° C incubator for 24 hours, and the number of colonies was counted. The chemical pesticides used are recommended for concentration testing according to the pesticide information service network of the Animal and Plant Epidemic and Quarantine Bureau of the Executive Yuan Agricultural Committee. There are important chemical agents such as bactericides and herbicides. Survival rate: log (CFU / ml) / log Check × 100%

其中,使用之除草劑為苯氧酸系的二、四地鈉鹽、四級胺類的巴拉刈、次磷酸系的固殺草、醯胺類的嘉磷賽異丙胺鹽、聯苯醚系的復祿芬、二硝基苯胺系的施得圃。 Among them, the herbicide used is a phenoxy acid-based di- or tetra-sodium salt, a quaternary amine-type paraben, a hypophosphorous acesulfame, a guanamine-based phosphamethoxazole salt, and a diphenyl ether. The system is based on the complex of ruthenium and dinitroaniline.

其中,使用之殺細菌劑為喹啉類之歐索林酸、銅類之嘉賜銅、氫氧化銅、抗生素類之鏈四環黴素、鏈黴素。 Among them, the bactericide used is oxolinic acid of quinoline type, copper of copper, copper hydroxide, antibiotic class of tetracycline, streptomycin.

參看第二十五圖,顯示除草劑對A6的影響,其中,大部分的除草劑對A6並無顯著的影響,苯氧酸系的二、四地鈉鹽80% WP、二硝基苯胺系的施得圃38.7% CS和次磷酸系的固殺草13.5% SL的存活率幾乎和CK組一樣,四級胺類的巴拉刈24% SL的存活率則達80%以上,聯苯醚系的復祿芬22.3% EC對A6在存活率影響特別顯著,存活率小於70%。其中A6與醯胺類的嘉磷賽異丙胺鹽41% SL作用則是完全無法生 長。 See Figure 25 for the effect of herbicides on A6. Most of the herbicides have no significant effect on A6. The phenoxy acid-based di- and tetra-sodium salts are 80% WP, dinitroaniline. The survival rate of 38.7% of CS and the sub-phosphorus of Trichoderma sinensis was almost the same as that of CK group, and the survival rate of quaternary amines with 24% SL was more than 80%. The 22.3% EC of Fulufen had a significant effect on the survival rate of A6, and the survival rate was less than 70%. Among them, the action of A6 and guanamine-based phosphazone isopropylamine salt 41% SL is completely unproductive. long.

參看第二十六圖,顯示殺細菌劑對A6的影響,其中,銅類的氫氧化銅53.8% WG、抗生素類的鏈四環黴素10% WP、抗生素類的鏈黴素12.5% SL和銅類的嘉賜銅81.3% WP對A6菌的存活率影響是比較明顯的,存活率幾乎為0%。而喹啉類殺菌劑的歐索林酸20% WP,則是比較沒有影響,存活率為86%。 See Figure 26 for the effect of bactericides on A6, including copper copper hydroxide 53.8% WG, antibiotic tetracycline 10% WP, antibiotic streptomycin 12.5% SL and copper. The effect of CAT on 81.3% WP on the survival rate of A6 bacteria is obvious, and the survival rate is almost 0%. The quinoline fungicide with 20% WP of oxolinic acid had no effect and the survival rate was 86%.

<結論> < Conclusion>

A6菌在培養10天還有108CFU/mL,尤其是A6菌的生長期特別長,持續培養至30天都還有菌體存活,在實際應用於生物防治方面或是促進植物生長上都具備很大的優勢。 A6 bacteria still have 10 8 CFU/mL in 10 days of culture, especially the growth period of A6 bacteria is particularly long. After continuous culture for 30 days, there are also bacteria to survive, which can be applied to biological control or promote plant growth. Have great advantages.

A6菌不像革蘭氏陽性菌會產生內孢子,所以紫外光照射對存活率的影響會很明顯,在實際使用上建議直接施用於土壤。 A6 bacteria do not produce endospores like Gram-positive bacteria, so the effect of ultraviolet light irradiation on survival rate will be obvious, and it is recommended to apply directly to soil in practical use.

A6的protease、β-glucanase與chitinase,酵素活性的最大活性出現於第一日。 A6 protease, β-glucanase and chitinase, the maximum activity of enzyme activity appeared on the first day.

A6在對有良好的抑制效果,抑制圈半徑達0.7cm且持續生長,一直到第七天抑制圈半徑達1.2cm。 A6 has a good inhibitory effect on the pair, and the radius of the inhibition circle is 0.7 cm and continues to grow until the radius of the inhibition circle reaches 1.2 cm on the seventh day.

A6對葫蘆科的洋香瓜(Cucumis melo var.saccharinus)與小黃瓜(Cucumis anguria)、茄科(Solanaceae)的茄子(Solanum melongena)和番茄(Solanum lycopersicum)、芭蕉科(Musaceae)的香蕉(Musa sapientum L.)、蘭科(Orchidaceae)的蝴蝶蘭(Phalaenopsis aphrodite Reichb.f.)和 番木瓜科(Caricaceae)的木瓜(Carica papaya)皆有促進生長的效果。 A6 vs. Cucumis melo var. saccharinus and Cucumis anguria, Solanaceae eggplant (Solanum melongena) and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), Muscoaceae (Musa sapientum) L.), Orchidaceae (Phalaenopsis aphrodite Reichb.f.) and Carica papaya (Carica papaya) has a growth-promoting effect.

A6菌確實可以幫助番茄達到生物防治功效,可使實驗組番茄延緩發病達10天,且減緩發病嚴重程度與延長存活日期。 A6 bacteria can really help the tomato to achieve biological control effects, which can delay the onset of tomato in the experimental group for 10 days, and slow down the severity of the disease and prolong the survival date.

以上所舉者僅係本發明之部份實施例,並非用以限制本發明,致依本發明之創意精神及特徵,稍加變化修飾而成者,亦應包括在本專利範圍之內。 The above is only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, and is not intended to limit the present invention. It is intended to be included in the scope of the present invention.

綜上所述,本發明實施例確能達到所預期之使用功效,又其所揭露之具體技術手段,不僅未曾見諸於同類產品中,亦未曾公開於申請前,誠已完全符合專利法之規定與要求,爰依法提出發明專利之申請,懇請惠予審查,並賜准專利,則實感德便。 In summary, the embodiments of the present invention can achieve the expected use efficiency, and the specific technical means disclosed therein have not been seen in similar products, nor have they been disclosed before the application, and have completely complied with the patent law. The regulations and requirements, the application for invention patents in accordance with the law, and the application for review, and the grant of patents, are truly sensible.

<110> 國立高雄師範大學 <110> National Kaohsiung Normal University

<120> 自泥火山泥漿分離之門多薩假單胞菌菌株及其用途 <120> Pseudomonas sinensis strain isolated from mud volcanic mud and its use

<160> 2 <160> 2

<210> 1 <210> 1

<211> 640 <211> 640

<212> DNA <212> DNA

<213> 門多薩假單胞菌菌株16S rRNA及ITS之基因序列 <213> Gene sequence of Pseudomonas mendocs strain 16S rRNA and ITS

<400> 1

Figure TWI614338BD00018
<400> 1
Figure TWI614338BD00018

<210> 2 <210> 2

<211> 510 <211> 510

<212> DNA <212> DNA

<213> 門多薩假單胞菌菌株rec A之基因序列 <213> Gene sequence of Pseudomonas mendocella strain rec A

<400> 1

Figure TWI614338BD00019
<400> 1
Figure TWI614338BD00019

Claims (9)

一種自泥漿分離之門多薩假單胞菌菌株,其寄存於財團法人食品工業發展研究所,寄存編號為:BCRC 910628,並命名為A6。 A strain of Pseudomonas sinensis isolated from mud, deposited in the Institute of Food Industry Development, the registration number: BCRC 910628, and named A6. 一種如申請專利範圍第1項所述之菌株用途,係用於生產下列組成群組中至少一種酵素,該組成群組包括:蛋白分解酵素(protease)、β-葡聚醣分解酵素(β-glucanase)、幾丁質分解酵素(chitinase)。 A strain for use according to the first aspect of the patent application, for producing at least one enzyme in the following group consisting of: a protease, a beta-glucan decomposing enzyme (β- Glucanase), chitinase. 一種如申請專利範圍第1項所述之菌株用途,係用於抑制植物病原細菌之活性,其中,該植物病原細菌至少包括下列其中一種:番茄細菌性斑點(Xanthomonas campestris pv.vesicatoria)、番茄青枯病菌(Ralstonia solanacearum)。 A use of the strain according to the first aspect of the invention is for inhibiting the activity of a phytopathogenic bacterium, wherein the phytopathogenic bacterium comprises at least one of the following: a tomato bacterial spot (Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria), tomato green Ralstonia solanacearum. 一種如申請專利範圍第1項所述之菌株用途,係用於促進植物生長,其中,該植物之科屬至少包括下列其中一種:胡蘆科(Cucurbitaceae)、茄科(Solanaceae)、芭蕉科(Musaceae)、蘭科(Orchidaceae)、番木瓜科(Caricaceae)。 A use of the strain according to the first aspect of the invention is for promoting plant growth, wherein the genus of the plant comprises at least one of the following: Cucurbitaceae, Solanaceae, and Musa ( Musaceae), Orchidaceae, Caricaceae. 如申請專利範圍第4項所述之用途,其中,該胡蘆科(Cucurbitaceae)包括洋香瓜(Cucumis melo var.saccharinus)與小黃瓜(Cucumis anguria)。 The use according to claim 4, wherein the Cucurbitaceae comprises Cucumis melo var. saccharinus and Cucumis anguria. 如申請專利範圍第4項所述之用途,其中,該茄科(Solanaceae)包括茄子(Solanum melongena)和番茄(Solanum lycopersicum)。 The use according to claim 4, wherein the Solanaceae comprises eggplant (Solanum melongena) and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). 如申請專利範圍第4項所述之用途,其中,該蘭科(Orchidaceae)包括蝴蝶蘭(Phalaenopsis aphrodite Reichb.f)。 The use of the invention of claim 4, wherein the Orchidaceae comprises Phalaenopsis aphrodite Reichb.f. 如申請專利範圍第4項所述之用途,其中,該芭蕉科(Musaceae)為香蕉(Musa sapientum L.)。 The use of the invention of claim 4, wherein the Musaceae is a banana (Musa sapientum L.). 如申請專利範圍第4項所述之用途,其中,該番木瓜科(Caricaceae)為木瓜(Carica papaya)。 The use of the invention of claim 4, wherein the Caricaceae is Carica papaya.
TW106102507A 2016-01-27 2017-01-23 Pseudomonas mendocina strain isolated from mud and use thereof TWI614338B (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
??105102543 2016-01-27
TW105102543 2016-01-27

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
TW201726910A TW201726910A (en) 2017-08-01
TWI614338B true TWI614338B (en) 2018-02-11

Family

ID=60186556

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
TW106102507A TWI614338B (en) 2016-01-27 2017-01-23 Pseudomonas mendocina strain isolated from mud and use thereof

Country Status (1)

Country Link
TW (1) TWI614338B (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN111073835B (en) * 2019-12-28 2022-07-12 河南省农业科学院植物保护研究所 Pseudomonas mendocina capable of effectively degrading atrazine and application thereof
CN113040175A (en) * 2021-02-07 2021-06-29 兴安盟莱绅生物农业有限公司 Oat seed coating agent for pseudomonas mendocina

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
TWI377249B (en) * 2007-12-04 2012-11-21 Univ Nat Sun Yat Sen Microbial reagents for scavenging dioxin pollutants present in a contaminated medium and methods of using the same
WO2015100431A2 (en) * 2013-12-24 2015-07-02 Symbiota, Inc. Plants containing beneficial endophytes

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
TWI377249B (en) * 2007-12-04 2012-11-21 Univ Nat Sun Yat Sen Microbial reagents for scavenging dioxin pollutants present in a contaminated medium and methods of using the same
WO2015100431A2 (en) * 2013-12-24 2015-07-02 Symbiota, Inc. Plants containing beneficial endophytes

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Mariutto M et al,"The elicitation of a systemic resistance by Pseudomonas putida BTP1 in tomato involves the stimulation of two lipoxygenase isoforms.", BMC Plant Biol. 2011 Feb 4;11:29. *
劉益宏等人,"利用植物免疫力防治病害的現況與展望", 節能減碳與作物病害管理研討會專刊,p.193-202,2008年 *
劉益宏等人,"利用植物免疫力防治病害的現況與展望", 節能減碳與作物病害管理研討會專刊,p.193-202,2008年。

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
TW201726910A (en) 2017-08-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
RU2634386C2 (en) Microbacterium strain, compositions and methods to combat fusariosis
KR101569737B1 (en) Novel endophytic bacteria Bacillus oryzicola isolated from rice rhizosphere and development of a natural biopesticide and plant strengthener using same
CN106455580A (en) Methods and compositions for improving corn yield
KR101346698B1 (en) Endophytic Bacillus methylotrophicus EML-CAP7 with antimicrobial activity against plant pathogens and MRSA
CN111172084A (en) Bacillus tequilensis and application thereof
KR101677513B1 (en) Paenibacillus polymyxa strain effective against Root Rot Pathogen of ginseng and Use Thereof
CN103109870B (en) Application of fermentation supernatant liquid of pseudomonas
KR101175532B1 (en) Novel burkholderia sp., and media for mass culture of burkholderia for increasing antifungal effect and method for mass production thereof using the same
CN113943670B (en) Disease-preventing growth-promoting pseudomonas tolaciens and application thereof
TWI614338B (en) Pseudomonas mendocina strain isolated from mud and use thereof
Sadoma et al. Biological control of downy mildew disease of maize caused by Peronosclerospora sorghi using certain biocontrol agents alone or in combination
KR20170054158A (en) Burkholderia ambifaria CJ4 strain Possessing antifungal activity against Root Rot Pathogen of ginseng and Use Thereof
KR20080045346A (en) Bacillus subtilis m27 and biological control of sclerotinia rot by using the same
Kim et al. Comparison of microbial fungicides in antagonistic activities related to the biological control of phytophthora blight in chili pepper caused by Phytophthora capsici
CN114480160B (en) Pseudomonas strain beneficial to rhizosphere and application thereof
Ghazi et al. Evaluation of an endophytic plant growth-promoting bacterium, Klebsiella variicola, in mitigation of salt stress in tuberose (Polianthes tuberosa L.)
JP2007332110A (en) Agent for controlling clubroot and method for controlling clubroot
CN112825864B (en) Application of Paenibacillus jimila in preventing and treating tomato bacterial wilt
TWI638889B (en) Bacillus subtiliskhy8, cultivation method for increasing khy8 and use thereof
KR101403304B1 (en) Streptomyces acidiscabies JA(Ⅱ)-10, biopesticide comprising the strain against gray mold and control method of gray mold with same
Orel Biocontrol of bacterial diseases with beneficial bacteria in lettuce
Kartadi et al. Combined use of Enterobacter cloacae MB20 and the microelements of copper and manganese to control damping-off of tomato
Yadav et al. Elicitation of native bio protective microbial agents associated systemic defense responses and plant growth promotion against bacterial stalk rot pathogen in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)
CN114958682B (en) Use of Rennoborn hol-de la in the preparation of a product for inducing systemic resistance in plants or seeds thereof
RU2777606C2 (en) Compositions and methods for fusarium control