SU546926A1 - Training device - Google Patents

Description

one

The invention relates to the field of automated training systems and can be used both in training and in the study of the educational process.

| 1 known devices for training with the definition of the complexity of the actions of students.

One of the known training devices comprises an answer-entry panel, a logic unit, a counter, a decoder, and an evaluation indicator. The logical block contains an assignment node IB6COB for answers, a polyentile one from a mastering generator connected to counting thrasters and elements of time selection, as well as a program setting node connected to the synchronization node and to the console for inputting answers 1.

However, this device does not allow an assessment of the laboriousness of mastering the program of students in group training.

It is also known a training device containing a trigger signal node, a trigger trigger, a time stamp generator, a table highlighting node, a time stamp counter, AND elements, input resolution triggers, an input register key, a comparison node, a reference response register, a valid input counter, and a registration node. The specified device provides a case-specific assessment of features per square meter of human tp 2.

2

However, such a device does not allow students to be equal in terms of the laboriousness of learning a program.

The closest technical solutions to this invention is a device for determining the labor-intensiveness of the actions of students during training, containing a teaching gear (the teacher’s console and the students' control panels), a clock mechanism and a potentiometer (judge), a phase amplifier and a relay (comparison circuit), indicators (indicator ) and the master of the estimated time. This device is used in monitoring and training to determine the laboriousness of mastering a program by measuring the time from issuing the program to the motment of a positive average assessment of the group 1, 1, and comparing the time received with a given calculated 3.

However, the known device does not allow an accurate and objective assessment of the laboriousness of mastering the program because of two main disadvantages. First, in determining the complexity of learning a program, the total work time of students is taken into account, which includes the time used to work on the program. Secondly, it may be possible to obtain a positive average grade for a group of students, adopted in a known device for the moment

fixing the labor intensity, is not equivalent to my learning of the material of the whole group. In addition, the known device does not allow to determine the level of laboriousness of mastering the program for each student, which would require a significant increase in the efficiency of learning by grouping the schools according to the same level of laboriousness of the program.

The aim of the invention is to increase the effectiveness of training by increasing the accuracy and objectivity of the assessment of the laboriousness of training programs: WE, as well as the additional grouping of students with the same level of laboriousness in mastering the program.

To achieve this goal, the proposed pp () approach uses the effect of depression of brain arrhythms, the essence of which is that when activating the work of the brain, a-rtym of the brain is depressed, and when the active mental work is stopped, the amplitude of the brain's rhythms BHOiBb is restored. Consequently, by measuring the time between the moments of depression and the recovery of the brain's r-rhythms, it is possible to determine the time of active work of the participant, xc iodine, and program. In order to implement i, e.iii of the invention, an amplitude selector is introduced into the device containing the teacher’s console, the students' consoles, the correct answer counter, the clock generator, the AND gates, the OR gate, the time counters, the comparison circuit, the adder, the indicator and the biocurrent sensors. The inputs of which are connected to biocurrent sensors, and outputs to the third inputs of the AND gates, and the node for determining the average laboriousness of the program connected to the output of the OR logic element and to the input of the adder.

The drawing shows a functional diagram of the proposed device.

The teacher's console 1 via the students' learners 2, is connected to the correct answer counter 3. In addition, the teacher's console I is connected to a clock pulse generator 4. The sensors of biocurrents 5, installed in each student, serve to isolate the brain's rhythms. The outputs of the sensors of biocurrents 5 are connected to (The inputs of the amplitude selector 6. The first inputs of logic elements And 7 are connected to the clock generator 4 pulses, and the second inputs are connected to the learning consoles 2. The outputs of logic elements And 7 are connected to the inputs of time counters 8 and the inputs of the logic element OR 9, the outputs of which through the node determine the average complexity of mastering the program 10 are connected to the inputs of the adder 11, the output of which is connected to the input of the indicator 12. The outputs of the time counters 8 are connected to the first inputs of the block 13, 13 second inputs - outputs of the adder 11, and outputs the comparison unit 13 are connected to an indicator 12. The indicator 12 is connected to the output of the counter 3 nravilnyh responses.

The operation of the device osuiyust.ch STS following way.

Students receive a program, after which the teacher 1 remote includes all

device blocks. At the same time, the clock pulse generator 4 delivers clock pulses to the first inputs of logic elements AND 7. If at least one of the students begins to actively work on the program, then its biocurrent sensor 5, compatible with amplitude selector 6, captures the moment of brain arggma depression and sends a signal to the third input logical element And 7, na second, whose input until the input of the correct answer

Participation 1ms receives a signal from the zero of the student 2. As a result, the clock pulses through the logic element AND 7 arrive at the time counter 8 and through the logical element OR 9, the node determining the average laboriousness of mastering the program 10, providing the division by the number of students in the group, enters 1. From the output of the adder 11, the signal and the signal go to the second inputs of the comparison unit 13 and the indicator 12. Both the first inputs of the block 13 and 13 receive a signal from the time counter 8, and from the output of the comparison circuit 13 - to the indicator 12. However, the indicator 12 does not provides a visual indication due to the lack of a resolution signal from the counter of correct answers 3. If a student ceases to work actively on an irogrammy, i.e. is distracted, then the sensor of biocurrents 5 together with an amusing selector 6 fixes the moment of recovery

a-rhythms of the brain and sends a signal to prohibit the logical element I 7, as a result of which the clock pulses no longer pass through the logical element I 7. Upon the resumption of active activity, the pupils again depress the moment of depression of the a-rhythms of the brain the logical element I 7 opens. So the work will take place until the students enter the correct answer. In this case, from the student console 2, the correct answer signal goes to the correct answer counter 3, and the prohibition signal goes to the logical element AND 7. Thus, by the time the program is mastered, students in time counter 8 will have recorded their active work on

the program. The total AND of the channel of the given student through the logical element OR 9 and the node for determining the average laboriousness of mastering the programs 10 will record the time of active work of the student divided by the number of students in the group. Similarly, the device will work in parallel for the student. When all students give the correct answers in time counters 8, the active time will be recorded

the work of each student on the program, my, and in adder 11 is the total time of active work of all students on the program divided by the number of students in the group, i.e., the average labor intensity of mastering the program.

At the same time, a permission signal to indicator 12 is received from the counter / correct answers 3. In this case, indicator 12 provides a visual indication of the average complexity of mastering the program. Signals from time counter 8, arriving at the first inputs of comparator 13, and signals from adder 11 to second inputs of comparator 13, provide signals at the outputs of comparator 13 and the indicator 12 to trigger. In this case, if the active time of the student is (signal from time counter 8) is less than the average labor input for mastering the program (adder signal 11), it is indicated by "I level in indicator 12; if the time of active work of the student is equal to the average labor input of mastering the program, then "Level II" is indicated; if the time of active work of a student more than the average complexity of mastering a program, then "III level.

According to the results of the indication of the average labor intensity of mastering the program, curricula and courses can be adjusted, and according to the results of indication of the levels of labor intensity of mastering the program, each student can be grouped together by the time spent on studying the program. Adjusting the programs and creating groups of students who have the same time working on the program will significantly improve the effectiveness of training, especially with front-line teaching methods.

Claims (3)

1. USSR author's certificate number 287423, M. Cl. G 09B 7/00, 1970 2.Authorial certificateSSSR N ° 364018, M. Kl.2 G 09V 7/00, 1972 3. USSR Author's Certificate No. 285386, M. Kl.2 G 09V 7/00, 1970 i.,