RU2794559C1 - Integrated security system based on automated functional systems and subsystems - Google Patents

Abstract

FIELD: territory protection.

SUBSTANCE: technical result consists in expanding the arsenal of technical means by forming a new structure for organizing an integrated security system (ISS) by combining automated systems into a single information space for managing, transmitting data, analysing and displaying information using a local area network (LAN). The ISS contains automated systems: a central control centre, operator workstations, database servers and display facilities; security alarm system with fixed technical means of detection; mobile territory control posts; optical-electronic surveillance systems; security personnel equipment; unmanned aerial vehicles; access control and management system; robotic means; engineering and technical means; control of adjacent territories; airspace control; electronic control strip; outdoor security lighting; backup power supply; decision support; operational communications and alerts; local area network for information exchange between automated systems.

EFFECT: expanding the arsenal of technical means by forming a new structure for organizing an integrated security system (ISS) by combining automated systems into a single information space for managing, transmitting data, analysing and displaying information using a local area network (LAN).

5 cl, 3 dwg

Description

The invention relates to the field of physical protection of objects, territories and adjacent water areas using a security alarm designed to detect violators, with the organization of access and screening of personnel and visitors to the objects, and using the control of security forces and means. The proposed integrated security system (hereinafter referred to as the ISB or the system) can also be used in the design of anti-terrorist protection of critical facilities, territories and adjacent water areas.

The protection of the State Border of the Russian Federation, long perimeters, vast territories and adjacent water areas of especially important objects (for example, objects of the State Corporation Rosatom) is initially associated with the presence of a large number of engineering and technical means (ITS) of physical protection, a central control center (CPU), control - checkpoints (checkpoints), an extensive information transmission system (information channels), as well as a significant number of technical means of detection (TSO) and means of an optical-electronic surveillance system (SOES) and situation assessment. Such protection is well known and is implemented in the form of system variants in which each TSO and SOEN is directly connected to the CPU through an information channel. The presence in such a physical protection system (PSS) of a large number of TSS and SOEN with a large amount of transmitted information, as well as the presence of a checkpoint, determines increased requirements for the functioning of the system and, accordingly, requires a large number of personnel to ensure the functioning of the system at various levels. In addition, a necessary condition for the existence of PPS facilities is the protection of these facilities, perimeters, territories and adjacent water areas using security units and personnel of special services units. A large number of human resources to ensure the functioning of the PPS of the facility and its protection imposes certain requirements on the organization of the service of the personnel of the power units for the protection and control over compliance with all the internal regulations of the service personnel. Thanks to the rapidly growing digital economy, the world is increasingly using intelligent information processing methods to analyze various situations and make the right decision. These methods can also be used in the field of PPS in relation to objects where a large number of sources of heterogeneous information should be analyzed. The use of intelligent methods for obtaining and processing information will increase the level of automation of the system and reduce the number of human resources. To increase the effectiveness of PPS, it is also necessary to expand the arsenal of tools used, taking into account the search for ways to increase the degree of automation of physical protection processes.

Usually, the PPS of an object is built by using a number of separate technical means (and their further increase), closing them all to the core of the system using radio channels and communication lines. Such an organization of the PPS is not universal, rational and requires significant improvement if it is necessary to include additional equipment in the PPS. In this technical solution, it is proposed, when creating a PPS, to operate not with individual equipment and technical means, but with entire complete automated functional systems built according to the functional principle. Such systems can be: an automated security alarm system (SOS), an automated optoelectronic surveillance system SOEN, an automated access control system (ACS) and others, which will be described later in the text. This technical solution also proposes the possibility of organizing separate additional automated subsystems with certain functional purposes with the involvement of technical means from other automated ISB systems.

A feature of the proposed solution is that each system and subsystem of the information security system additionally includes a processor associated with the technical means included in them, with the help of which each system and subsystem acquires a new quality, which makes it possible to organize a separate (independent) automated system or subsystem with complete functions and create a cluster capable of functioning independently and independently, as well as the ability to automate it (if necessary) for more efficient operation and a reduction in the number of maintenance personnel. The automated systems and subsystems created in this way are capable of exchanging information with other automated systems and subsystems through the use of a local area network (LAN) organized in this way, forming a single information space. LAN is a platform for programming control processes, data transmission, analysis and display of information. When managing and analyzing data, Big Data and Data Mining technologies can be used in conjunction with the use of decision support procedures. In addition, the LAN can be configured to implement a traffic control function, which can improve the distribution of computing resources in the ISF and increase its efficiency.

Known "Radar system for the protection of territories with a low-frame video surveillance system and the optimal number of security forces", described in patent RU No. 2595532, IPC G08B 25/00, G08B 19/00, G01S 3/72, publ. 2016 The system consists of the following groups of equipment: a set of detection tools operating on different physical principles (radar stations, video cameras and thermal imagers), a central security console (CPO), as well as equipment for the security forces, containing one or more sets of technical means of power groups response (TS GSR), automated workstations (AWS) of operators as part of the CPO, switch and stationary terminal of the CPO. Each workstation contains an additional recognition device, a monitoring terminal and a stationary workstation terminal. Each GSR vehicle set contains a mobile navigator terminal, a GLONASS/GPS navigator, a mobile radio communication terminal and a portable security console. The system provides intruder recognition in low-frame mode and classification of moving objects according to the "friend or foe" criterion. Force response groups can advance towards the detected intruder and carry out the suppression of the intruder's actions using lethal and non-lethal methods of influence.

Similar essential features are: a set of detection tools operating on different physical, TsPO, equipment of the security forces, operator workstation, navigation equipment and radio communication equipment, the ability to recognize an intruder and classify moving objects according to the "friend or foe" criterion, as well as the ability to use groups of power response to stop the actions of the offender.

The disadvantage of the system is its complexity, bulkiness, insufficient level of automation of functioning processes and the presence of numerous service personnel.

These shortcomings are partially eliminated in another, the closest in technical essence to the claimed invention, the known "Low maintenance system for the physical protection of objects", described in patent RU No. 2708509, IPC G06F 17/00, publ. 2019, which is selected as a prototype. The system contains a system core in the form of a CPU, which includes interconnected operator workstations, database servers, display facilities and LAN facilities; complexes of technical means (CTS) of control and automation, including in their TSS, operating on different physical principles, stationary, autonomous, and made with the ability to receive control information from the CPU and transmit signals to the CPU with the numbers of control sections for processing, as well as mobile posts control (IPC) of the territory, with means of navigation and means of communication with LAN means; security force equipment (ASO) with means of lethal and non-lethal effects, deterrents, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), having navigation tools for linking objects to a local or geographic coordinate system, and communication tools for communicating with the CPU; automated checkpoint equipment (AA checkpoint) containing communication means and LAN means and made with the ability to control the passage to the protected area and transmit data to the CPU; robotic means (RTS) designed to check and control the parts included in the system and exchange information with the communication means of the CPU; engineering and technical means of ITS of protective structures, having control mechanisms, made with the possibility of exchanging information with the CCP, made with the possibility of processing incoming information using intelligent neural networks to detect the fact of violation of the security boundary, identify the intruder and exchange information by means of the LAN between the CCP, CTS and AA Checkpoint.

Similar essential features are: the core of the system in the form of a CPU, which includes interconnected operator workstations, database servers, display facilities and LAN facilities; CTS of control and automation, including stationary TSS, operating on different physical principles and made with the ability to receive control information from the CPU and transmit signals to the CPU with the numbers of control sections for processing; IPC of the territory, with means of navigation and means of communication with LAN means; ASO with means of lethal and non-lethal effects, deterrents and UAVs, having navigation tools for linking objects to a local or geographic coordinate system, and communication tools for communicating with the CPU; AA checkpoint, containing communication facilities and LAN facilities and made with the ability to control and manage access to the protected area and transfer data to the CPU; RTS designed to check and control the parts included in the system and exchange information with the means of communication of the CPU; ITS of protective structures, having control mechanisms, made with the possibility of exchanging information with the CCP, made with the possibility of processing incoming information using intelligent neural networks to detect the fact of violation of the security boundary, identify the offender and exchange information by means of a LAN between the CCP, CTS and AA checkpoint.

The disadvantages of the system are: the irrational structure of its organization, the lack of the necessary arsenal of tools, the insufficient automation of the system for its more effective use as a PPS of objects, territories and adjacent water areas.

The purpose of the present invention is to expand the arsenal of tools, automate all ISF systems and form a new structure for organizing the ISF by combining automated systems into a single information space for managing, transmitting data, analyzing and displaying information using a local area network (LAN), while forming a platform for programming of these processes, as well as by the possibility of organizing additional automated subsystems with certain functional purposes with the involvement of technical means from other automated ISB systems.

Automation of ISB systems is achieved through:

a) automation of the system of the central control point of the central control room, the security alarm system SOS with stationary TSO, as well as the system of the IPC of the territory, by:

- detailed analysis of events and threats;

- automation of the processes of detection and identification of a potential intruder;

- reducing the number of false positives of the ISF when using intelligent information processing algorithms, including neural network algorithms and fuzzy logic algorithms with the possibility of learning and predicting the system operation;

- use of Big Data analysis and Data Mining technology;

- the possibility of combining data coming from detection tools operating on different physical principles to ensure the maximum detection probability and reduce the number of false alarms;

- use of an extensive navigation network using GLONASS/GPS;

- changing the parameters of the settings of technical means in an automated mode;

- use of electronic forms for accounting, control and long-term storage of the necessary information;

b) automation of the SOEN optical-electronic surveillance system by:

- the use of optical and optoelectronic automated means of observation and video control in the visible and infrared wavelengths;

c) automation of the ASO system by:

- the possibility of classifying moving objects according to the criterion "friend or foe";

- use of systems of sound, light and chemical deterrence of potential violators;

- use of an extensive navigation network using GLONASS/GPS;

- use of lethal and non-lethal means of influencing the identified violator;

d) automation of the UAV system by the possibility of patrolling the protected area with video filming of the area to analyze alarm situations and accompany the identified intruder objects in the protected area with the continuation of video surveillance and reporting additional information to the automated CCP system;

e) automation of the ACS access control and management system by using automated means of screening passing personnel and passing vehicles for the admission, carrying or transportation of prohibited items, including weapons, radioactive materials, explosives and poisonous substances, and the screening of passing personnel is made with the possibility of using various types of biometric identification;

f) automation of the robotic system (RTS) by using robotic tools to remotely configure, check and control the components of the system with the ability to patrol the area, carry out control passes in the detection zones, and also to provide temporary protection of some zones in case of failure of technical means or repair work and organization of additional security lines;

g) automating the system of engineering and technical means of ITS protective structures by using the mechanisms of electronic control of these means, as well as by automated monitoring of the state of the alarm barrier;

h) automation of the control system of adjacent territories (CPT) by using several coherent radar facilities with a sector or circular view, which ensure the creation of a continuous radar control zone with the ability to determine the trajectory of intruders;

i) automation of the airspace control system (ACS) by using several three-coordinate radar facilities with electronic beam scanning in space, providing the detection of low-altitude, low-speed moving air objects, including UAVs, in the entire upper hemisphere of the protected area;

j) automation of the electronic control-trace strip (EKSP) system by placing numerous seismic sensors buried in the ground along the perimeter fence, located along the width of the strip and its length, and using video surveillance equipment located on supports along the perimeter at a certain distance from each other;

k) automation of the outdoor security lighting (LEO) system by using lighting devices on poles with sensors and controlling lighting modes depending on weather conditions by changing the intensity of lighting, the spectral characteristics of lighting and controlling energy consumption;

l) automation of the decision support system (DSS) by:

- analysis of situations;

- combining and comparing data on the state of technical means, determining a response plan, performing automatic standard procedures, as well as using tools to resolve situations;

- planning, accounting and control over the implementation of the maintenance regulations for the equipment used;

- connection of rapid reaction forces (capture groups) to eliminate threats and their information support;

- strengthening the protection of the perimeter in case of emergencies;

m) automation of the integrated ISF security system as a whole by:

- unification of all automated systems by functional features into a single information space for managing and displaying information.

The organization in the ISB of additional automated subsystems according to their functional purpose through the use of technical means of other systems allows expanding the range of tasks to be solved and providing additional opportunities for the physical protection system. The created automated subsystems with certain functional purposes can achieve synergy in subsystems and differ in such characteristics as: adaptability, self-diagnostics, available configuration, versatility, the ability to use the PSIM (Physical Security Information Management) concept, which provides "management through information", as well as use of protocols and standards of web technologies and the possibility of implementing additional requirements from ISB Customers.

As an example, we can distinguish the following automated subsystems, organized according to their functional purpose:

- subsystem of protection of the perimeter section of the object;

- a subsystem for control and monitoring of approaches to an object and territory with a special legal status;

- subsystem for monitoring the territory of the facility;

- subsystem of checkpoints for personnel and visitors.

The approximate composition and functions of organized automated subsystems are given below in the text of the description.

The protection of the State Border of the Russian Federation, long perimeters, territories and adjacent water areas of especially important objects imposes increased requirements on the accuracy of detecting alarm situations and illegal acts with recognition of objects of violation and suppression of unauthorized actions, which should be ensured by the high efficiency of the ISF.

To achieve this goal, new essential features and functional links have been introduced into the well-known technical solution, which allow increasing the degree of automation of the ISF, ensuring the formation of a new structure of the organization of the ISF, and thereby creating reliable protection of the State Border of the Russian Federation, extended perimeters, territories and adjacent water areas of especially important facilities, and reduce the number of human resources.

This goal is achieved in the proposed ISS, which contains an automated system of the central control center of the CPU, which includes interconnected automated workstations of operators' workstations, database servers, display facilities, which is configured to process incoming information using intelligent neural networks to identify the fact violation of the border of protection and identification of the offender; automated security alarm system SOS with stationary technical means for detecting TSO, operating on different physical principles: radio beam, radio wave, vibrometric, magnetometric, infrared, seismic and providing digital methods for obtaining and processing information; an automated system of mobile control posts for monitoring the territory's MPC, operating on different physical principles: radio beam, radio wave, vibrometric, magnetometric, infrared, seismic and providing digital methods for obtaining and processing information, as well as endowed with navigation aids; an automated optoelectronic surveillance system SOEN, made with the use of optical and optoelectronic means of surveillance and video monitoring in the visible and infrared wavelength ranges; an automated system of equipment for the security forces of the ASO with means of lethal, non-lethal impact and scare, having navigation tools for linking objects to a local or geographical coordinate system; an automated system of unmanned aerial vehicles UAVs, made with the ability to patrol the protected area with video filming of the area to analyze alarm situations and accompany the identified intruder objects in the protected area with the continuation of video surveillance and reporting additional information to the automated CCP system; an automated access control and management system ACS, designed to control passages and passages to a protected area, use means of screening passing personnel and passing vehicles for admission, carrying or transporting prohibited items, including weapons, radioactive materials, explosives and poisonous substances, moreover, the screening of passing personnel is made with the possibility of using various types of biometric identification; an automated system of robotic means RTS, made with the ability to patrol the area to check the state of TSS and MPK by reading information from their memory, making control passes in detection zones, providing temporary protection of some detection zones in case of failure of TSS and MPK or repair work, as well as for organizing additional security lines; automated system of engineering and technical means of ITS protective structures with electronic control mechanisms; an automated system for operational communication and notification of the OSO, made with the ability to ensure the exchange of information between all automated systems using radio channels and communication lines, as well as containing alarm-call signaling equipment (FA); local computer network LAN, made with the possibility of exchanging information between all automated systems using LAN tools. The ISF additionally includes: an automated control system for adjacent territories of the KPT, made using several coherent radar tools with a sector or circular view, providing the creation of a continuous radar control zone with the ability to determine the trajectory of intruders; an automated airspace control system of the KVP, made using several three-coordinate radar facilities with electronic beam scanning in space, providing the detection of low-altitude, low-speed moving air objects, including UAVs, in the entire upper hemisphere of the protected area; automated system of the electronic control and trace strip EKSP, located along the perimeter barrier and consisting of numerous seismic sensors buried in the ground, located along the width of the strip and its length, and equipped with video surveillance equipment located on supports along the perimeter at a certain distance from each other; automated outdoor security lighting system LEO, containing lighting devices on poles with sensors, and made with the ability to control lighting modes depending on weather conditions by changing the intensity of lighting, the spectral characteristics of lighting and controlling energy consumption; automated backup power supply system (REP); automated decision support system for PPR, made with the ability to analyze situations, combine and compare data on the state of technical means, determine a response plan, perform automatic standard procedures, record and control the implementation of maintenance procedures for the equipment used, as well as use tools to resolve alarm situations , and the list and number of automated systems included in the ISF can be selected taking into account the task of the physical protection of each object, territory and water area separately. All automated ISB systems are combined into a single information space for managing, transmitting data, analyzing and displaying information using a local area network LAN, which forms a platform for programming these processes, as well as with the possibility of organizing additional automated subsystems with certain functional purposes involving composition of technical means from other automated ISB systems. All automated systems and subsystems are additionally equipped with processors that are configured to ensure the functioning of the formed local computer network LAN for communication with all automated systems and subsystems included in the ISB. The automated CPU system is made with the additional ability to process information using Big Data analysis, Data Mining technology and fuzzy logic algorithms. The technical means of the automated systems SOS, MPK and SOEN are equipped with electronic forms (EF) for accounting, control and long-term storage of the necessary information during their operation. When equipping facilities, territories and adjacent water areas with an integrated security system, it can be used both in its entirety and in a reduced version from a combination of the necessary automated systems and subsystems to effectively solve physical protection problems.

The essence of the invention is illustrated in Fig. 1-3.

In FIG. 1 shows the main attributes of the ISB and introduced the designations: ISB - 1, the automated system of the central control center of the CPU - 2, the automated security alarm system SOS with stationary technical means for detecting TCO - 3, the automated system of mobile control posts of the MPC of the territory - 4, the automated system of optical electronic surveillance SOEN - 5, automated system of equipment for security forces ASO - 6, automated system of unmanned aerial vehicles UAV - 7, automated system for access control and management ACS - 8, automated system of robotic means RTS - 9, automated system of engineering and technical means ITS protective structures - 10, automated backup power system REP - 11, automated operational communication and warning system (OSO) - 12 with alarm and call signaling equipment TVS, local computer network LAN - 13, automated control system for adjacent territories KPT - 14, automated control system airspace KVP - 15, the automated system of the electronic control and trail lane EXP - 16, the automated system for outdoor security lighting NOO - 17, the automated decision support system PPR - 18. The arrows in Fig. 1 shows the radio communication channels and communication lines connecting all automated systems that are part of the ISF.

In FIG. Figure 2 shows an example of the organization of two additional separate functional subsystems, where the following designations are introduced: the automated subsystem of the perimeter section of the object - 19, the automated subsystem for controlling and monitoring approaches to the object and the territory with a special legal status - 20, the processor - 21, the technical means of detecting TCO - 22 allocated from the automated SOS system, technical means - 23 allocated from the automated system of mobile control posts of the MPC of the territory, engineering and technical means - 24 allocated from the automated ITS system, technical means - 25 allocated from the automated system of outdoor security lighting LEO, technical means - 26 allocated from the automated system of robotic means RTS, means - 27 allocated from the automated decision support system PPR, technical means - 28 allocated from the automated optoelectronic surveillance system SOEN for the automated subsystem 19, technical means - 29, allocated from the automated system of the electronic control and trace strip EXP, technical means - 30, allocated from the automated system of optical-electronic surveillance SOEN for the automated subsystem 20, technical means - 31, allocated from the automated control system for adjacent territories of the KPT, technical means - 32, allocated from the STOL automated airspace control system. The processors 21, which are part of the automated subsystems 19 and 20, are connected to all the technical means allocated to the subsystems, on the one hand, and are connected to the local area network (LAN), on the other hand. The arrows in Fig. 2 denotes radio communication channels and communication lines connecting all the elements that make up the ISF.

In FIG. 3 shows an example of the organization of two other additional separate functional subsystems, where the following designations are introduced: an automated subsystem for monitoring the territory of an object - 33, an automated subsystem for a checkpoint for personnel and visitors - 34, technical means - 35, allocated from an automated system of robotic means RTS, technical means - 36 allocated from the automated system of unmanned aerial vehicles of the UAV, technical means - 37 allocated from the automated system of outdoor security lighting of the LEO, technical means - 38 allocated from the automated optoelectronic surveillance system SOEN for the automated subsystem 33, means - 39 allocated from automated decision support system PPR for the automated subsystem 33, technical means - 40 allocated from the automated optoelectronic surveillance system SOEN for the automated subsystem 34, means - 41 allocated from the automated decision support system PPR for the automated subsystem 34, technical means - 42 isolated from the automated control and access control system ACS. The processors 21, which are part of the automated subsystems 33 and 34, are connected to all the technical means allocated to the subsystems, on the one hand, and are connected to the local computer network LAN, on the other hand. The arrows in Fig. 3 denotes the radio communication channels and communication lines connecting all the elements that make up the ISF.

The proposed ISB works as follows.

ISB 1 provides protection of objects, territories and adjacent water areas in open areas. When organizing the protection of the State Border of the Russian Federation, an extended perimeter or territory of a particularly important object, the entire perimeter or territory is conditionally divided into many control areas (control posts), which house a lot of SOS 3, MPK 4 and SOEN 5 facilities. Each control post generates a number (address) of “own” zone or area. Many territorially located control posts are connected to the CPU 2 by means of an automated LAN system 13 via communication lines.

Automated system SOS 3 with stationary technical means of detection of TCO, operates on different physical principles with the ability to receive control information from the CPU 2 and transmit to the CPU 2 signals with the numbers of control areas for information processing. The automated system of mobile control posts of the MPK 4 territory with navigation aids performs the function of protecting places of temporary basing of people, vehicles, and material assets. The SOEN 5 automated optical-electronic surveillance system performs the function of video surveillance both on the territory of the protected facility and on the territory and water area adjacent to it.

The CPU 2 system includes operator workstations, database servers and display facilities. The CPU 2 is provided with archive memory located in the database servers. The display means is made with the possibility of alarm notification and display on the terrain plan of the SOS, MPK and SOEN, registration of alarm messages from the TSO and MPK, as well as the generated "Alarm" signals in each of the stationary and mobile control posts of the territory.

The automated systems SOS and IPC are configured to receive control information from the CPU 2, as well as transmit to the CPU 2 a large data stream via the LAN 13 via communication lines. Data from the SOS and the IPC can be transmitted in digital format as separate files (frames) to the CPU 2 in a structured or unstructured form in case of an alarm situation or a change in the situation in the control areas. This data may include the following information:

- presence of an alarm signal (yes/no);

- probabilistic sign of the reliability of anxiety (from 0 to 1, for example, 0.98);

- place of violation of the protected boundary (number of the control area, number of the segment of the control area);

- classification of the detected object (“single”, “group”, “vehicle”);

- direction of movement ("to us", "away from us");

- speed of movement;

- parameters of the violation object (overall dimensions);

- the detected object has a metal weapon (“armed”, “not armed”);

- signal fragment;

- signal level (energy);

- signal spectrum;

- other signs and parameters (on/off, battery discharge, threshold levels, malfunction, processing error, etc.).

Automated systems SOS and MPC can operate on different physical principles. They can use seismic alarm sensors, radio wave alarm sensors, passive infrared alarm sensors, magnetometric alarm sensors, single position or dual position radio beam alarm sensors, and vibration alarm sensors mounted on a physical fence.

When detecting threats in automated SOS and MPC systems operating on different physical principles, polysyllabic signs that are not always expressed explicitly can be used. For example, for a seismic detection tool, one of the signs is the energy of the spectrum in the sliding window, the other is the number of signal trains (steps) of the intruder recorded in the detection zone, the third is the time delays between individual signals. For a chirp radar, a feature is a shift in the harmonics of the signal spectrum by some amount in the frequency domain. For a passive infrared (IR) - sensor, the signs can be the number of intersections by the intruder of the narrow sectors of the detection zone and the time intervals between rising and falling edges of the shadowing signals of the sectors of the detection zone. Thus, detection tools that work with complex algorithms can generate polysyllabic features. All the data and signs described above are conditionally combined by the term "attack signature".

Information processing algorithms in the integrated security system are made with the ability to use neural network algorithms and fuzzy logic algorithms for intelligent information processing and combining alarm messages necessary for training and predicting the system operation based on the analysis of threat events, taking into account the physical principle of operation of the automated SOS and MPK systems, location them on the ground, time of year, time of day, weather conditions and operational situation at the object of protection associated with the occurrence of threats. Increasing the degree of automation of the ISF and its systems is aimed at ensuring the principle of reliability and survivability in normal and emergency situations and in the conditions of using an automated decision support system 18.

When an object (for example, a violator) enters the protected area at one of the control posts, the corresponding automated SOS or IPC systems will generate threat signals with “their” numbers (addresses) of control areas and the necessary related data that will be transmitted via LAN 13 via communication lines to the CPU 2 for data analysis and processing.

As a result of the analysis, taking into account the attack signatures and combining the technical means of the automated SOS and MPK systems, CPU 2 classifies moving objects according to the “friend or foe” criterion, confirms or does not confirm the threat that has arisen, and, if the threat is confirmed, generates a generalized signal “Alarm ".

The technical means of the SOS and MPK automated systems, made in the form of alarm sensors, can be configured to detect a human intruder, or to detect larger objects, such as cars and trucks, tracked and horse-drawn vehicles. Moreover, these automated systems have the ability to change the settings in an automated mode, depending on changes in operating conditions and climatic factors. Alarm sensors operating on different physical principles have their own characteristics of functioning under various man-made, seasonal and weather conditions. For example, seismic alarm sensors degrade performance during heavy rains, wetting and waterlogging of the soil. Infrared alarm sensors reduce performance in fog. Radio beam and radio wave alarm sensors are sensitive to the effects of electronic interference operating in their operating frequency ranges. Vibration alarm sensors installed on the fence are sensitive to strong continuous wind loads. Therefore, the combination of the physical principles of operation of alarm sensors is an important direction in the organization of security.

To implement the secrecy (or camouflage) of the system, it is recommended to use seismic or radio wave underground detection tools installed in the ground as TSS. Such means can be point seismic detection tools BSK-SSO (BAZhK.425139.010) and radio wave underground detection tools BSK-RVP (BAZHK.425142.058) of the Pautina-M complex, described in the materials on the website www.nikiret.ru. Seismic detection tools provide classification of the detected object (“single”, “group”, “vehicle”) and determine the direction of movement (“towards us”, “away from us”). Radio wave underground detection tools ensure operation on terrain with a complex landscape (hills, ravines, rocky terraces, wooded, swampy and densely vegetated terrain, sand dunes, etc.). To control the carrying of metal objects (for example, firearms and cold steel) by a person-intruder into the territory of a protected facility, magnetometric detection tools can be used as TSS, providing the formation of signals of the presence of metal weapons (“armed” or “not armed”).

The automated system of mobile control points MPK 4 of the territory can be used to create rapidly deployable places for temporary basing of people, vehicles, and material assets. On long flat areas of the terrain, radio-beam single-position (BSK-RLO, BZHAK.425142.050) and two-position (BSK-RLD, BZHAK.425142.051) detection means of the Pautina-M complex can be used. On hard-to-reach areas of the terrain (roads, forest paths, mountain passes, gorges, ravines, etc.), passive infrared detection devices BSK-IK (BZhAK.425152.003) can be used. All of these technical means are described in detail in the materials on the website www.nikiret.ru.

The information coming to the CPU 2 from the TSO, as a rule, is uncorrelated and carries different information that complements each other. A comparative analysis of this information and a combination of various factors make it possible with a high probability to reveal the fact of violation of the security line and identify the offender.

The processing of information received from the TSO is carried out in the system based on the analysis of threat events according to the criteria of the maximum probability of detection or the minimum number of false alarms and taking into account the physical principle of operation of alarm sensors, their location on the ground, as well as depending on the time of year, time of day, weather conditions and the operational situation at the object of protection associated with the emergence of threats. When using the TCO combination mechanism, information processing algorithms are selected in accordance with the decision rules “AND”, “OR”, “2 out of 3”, depending on tactical tasks.

Information processing algorithms can be selected based on the analysis of threat events with the possibility of using more complex intelligent algorithms of fuzzy logic (Fuzzy Logic) or a neural sensor network. The fuzzy logic algorithm in signal processing is a well-known algorithm and is used, for example, in radio beam alarm sensors of the ERMO 482X PRO series from CIAS, www.cias-russia.ru. Training and forecasting of the operation of the sensor network of the complex is carried out in accordance with the use of neural network algorithms. Intelligent neural network algorithms are used to qualitatively detect the fact of violation of the security line, identify the offender and the possibility of predicting responses to threats in the future. Event forecasting is carried out by accumulating and storing attack signatures in the system for a certain period of time, followed by identifying the dynamics of changes in threats and determining the trend of their aggravation. The principle of operation of a trained neural sensor network is well known and is described in detail, for example, in patents: US No. 5276770 (“Training a neural network for combining data with multiple sources”), US No. 7429923 (“Neural sensor networks”), US No. 8615476 (“Protection of military perimeters from an approaching person and vehicle using a biologically realistic neural network”) and RU No. 2665264 (“Intelligent intruder detection system”). The use of intelligent algorithms will significantly improve the performance characteristics of the proposed system in terms of more reliable detection of intruders and increase its noise immunity, and, as a result, it makes it possible to reduce the number of human resources required to check and eliminate false events in a protected area.

Automated control methods in the analysis of threat events can also use the following additional features:

- adaptation to threats and models of violators;

- taking into account weather conditions in order to adjust processing algorithms (for example, in case of rain, hail, strong wind, fog, etc.);

- polling the state of neighboring TSOs in order to make a final decision about an alarming situation in a certain control area of a protected area (for example, during a thunderstorm or strong gusts of wind);

- accumulation of data to take them into account when analyzing the state of TSS in the event of similar situations in the future;

- the use of sleep mode (sleep) to save energy system;

- distribution and redistribution of computing resources between the CPU, SOS and MPC using LAN facilities;

- the use of information about the distance to the place of violation, the parameters of the object of violation, the speed and direction of its movement through the guarded border to identify the object of violation by class (human, small animal or bird, vehicle), which provides additional information to the security forces to counter violators.

The processing of a large amount of information in the ISB should be carried out using Big Data analysis (Big Data), Data Mining technology and taking into account the requirements of the automated PPR system 18. The use of big data analysis in security systems is well known and is described, for example, in patents for inventions RU No. 2682013 and RU No. 2731032. The automated PPR system 18 should use the integration and comparison of data on the state of its own technical means, follow the response plan, provide information support for the decisions made, apply automatic standard procedures, and also ensure the use of tools for resolving alarm situations.

Automation of the processes of obtaining and processing information, leading to an increase in the noise immunity of the system, eliminates the need for frequent promotion of service personnel to remote security areas to clarify and analyze situations on the ground that lead to false alarms. Hence, as a consequence, the possibility of reducing human resources.

The automated optoelectronic surveillance system SOEN 5 is made using optical and optoelectronic means of observation and video control in the visible and infrared wavelength ranges, while the means of observation and video control are controlled automatically or in an automated mode by commands of the automated LAN 13 system, depending on location of the intruder. To confirm attempts to overcome the security line, video surveillance equipment is used, which are video cameras and thermal imagers operating in continuous or low-frame modes.

The automated optoelectronic surveillance system SOEN 5 provides identification of the intruder by his visual observation by the operator on the means of displaying information of the CPU 2 in real time. The devices of the system are dual-band optical-electronic modules (OEM) operating in the visible (video camera) and infrared (thermal imager) wavelength ranges, and perform the task day and night. The characteristics of the OEMs that make up the system provide identification of objects at ranges up to 3 km. The differences between the optical-electronic surveillance system SOEN 5 in the claimed ISB from the known analogues are the following:

- OEM uses thermal imagers with a cooled matrix, which have a high temperature sensitivity, for example, (20-25 mK);

- devices of the subsystem are controlled from the CPU 2 by commands from three automated systems: the security alarm system SOS 3 with stationary technical means for detecting TSO, the control system for adjacent territories KPT 14 and the airspace control system KVP 15;

- SOEN 5 has a video auto-tracking mode that allows you to automatically carry out the primary guidance of the optical axes of devices on an object detected by other automated systems, while further tracking of the observed object is carried out independently of these systems, which frees up their work resource for viewing space;

- the performance characteristics of devices of the automated system SOEN 5 are selected in such a way that the recognition ranges are equal or close to the ranges of their detection by automated systems for monitoring adjacent territories KPT 14 and airspace control KVP 15, which ensures the continuity of detection and identification processes in the system and excludes possible loss of time.

Examples of used OEMs of the SOEN 5 automated system are optoelectronic modules of the Focus series used in offline mode (patent for invention RU No. 2427006, utility model patent RU No. 136590), and a number of others.

The low-frame operation mode used in video surveillance equipment is well-known and is described in patents RU No. 2517042 (“Low-frame video surveillance system for monitoring extended security lines”) and RU No. 2504015 (“Low-frame mobile video surveillance system”). In the monitoring zone, “Kamuflazh-Video” BAJK.463349.005 (www.nikiret.ru) products can be used as mobile control posts of the MPC 4 of the territory.

The established fact of the intruder's penetration into the protected area, his identification and determination of data on the location of the violation, the direction and speed of movement, as well as the degree of his armament, make it possible to manage with a smaller number of security forces to stop the actions of the intruder, thereby reducing the total number of human resources of the protected object.

The structure of the automated system of equipment of the security forces ASO 6 includes means of lethal, non-lethal impact and scare. The use of lethal means in burglar alarms is well known and is described, for example, in patent RU No. for the purpose of preventing a terrorist act. The means of non-lethal impact include, for example, the non-lethal impact of electric current when trying to overcome the protective barrier. Non-lethal impact can also be carried out using underbarrel grenade launchers with irritating, light-sound and shock-shock ammunition. It is allowed to use light-sound and annoying grenades such as "Dawn", "Flame", "Torch" and "Drift". Speech, sound, light and chemical means of influence can be used as deterrents. For example, a loud scream recorded on a tape recorder, a bright flash of light, a deafening sonic boom, the application of coloring or foul-smelling extracts to the offender's clothes. Simultaneously with these actions that prevent the movement of a person in a protected area, you can use means that scare away animals and birds (light and sound effects, electric shock). Deterrents can be used in places most likely for intruders to enter the protected area. Also relevant is the use in the system of identification marks "friend or foe", carried with you, which are intended to control the movement and behavior of service personnel outside and inside the zone of the object of protection. RFID tags in the 865-868 MHz band (UHF band) can be used as tags. ISF 1 also presents the possibility of connecting response forces using the automated decision support system PPR 18 in case of detection of threats when creating temporary security lines and patrolling the territory. The equipment of the security forces of the ASO 6 automated system incorporates navigation tools, for example, built-in GLONASS / GPS receivers, which are used to link objects to a local or geographic coordinate system.

The automated system of unmanned aerial vehicles UAV 7 is made with the ability to patrol the protected area with video filming of the area to analyze alarm situations and accompany the identified intruder objects in the protected area with the continuation of video surveillance and reporting additional information to the automated system CPU 2. to a protected area is well known and described, for example, in patent RU No. 2583742. Automation of patrolling inside protected areas by means of UAVs makes it possible to timely determine the source of threats and provide counteraction to it by the forces and means of protection of the automated system ASO 6. An example is the robotic system patented in NIKIRET for guarding the territory of an object using an unmanned aerial vehicle inspector (RU No. 2756355 ).

The automated access control and management system ACS 8 is designed to control and ensure authorized access of personnel and visitors to the security facility and allows you to increase the degree of security of the checkpoint from unauthorized passage and passage to the protected area. ACS 8 includes screening tools that provide screening of passing personnel and passing vehicles for carrying (transportation) of prohibited items (weapons, nuclear and radioactive materials, explosives and poisonous substances). The method of detection of these prohibited items and substances is well known. Known patents for inventions: RU No. 2632564, 2294549, 2247361, 2489706 and 2283485, which describe the principles of detecting metal objects (weapons), explosives and drugs. The main method for detecting explosives and narcotic substances is the method of irradiating a controlled object with a microwave signal with specified characteristics, measuring the phase shift of the received reflected signal, and, based on the results of comparison with the reference value, the presence of explosives and narcotic substances is determined. Another way to detect explosives, narcotic substances and metals hidden under people's clothes is to use the nuclear quadrupole resonance method described, for example, in patent RU No. 2247361. Detection of radioactive materials is provided with the help of radiometers by measuring the current radiation background and comparing it with a set threshold value. To enhance the quality of control, in addition to comparing the visitor by his photograph, they use such biometric methods as control by voice, face, iris, hand geometry or vein pattern, fingerprints, handwritten password or signature, as well as in biodynamics. As identification in biodynamics, it is proposed to use individual personality traits, manifested, for example, in the dynamics of human movement. This is the movement of his arms, legs, features of walking, head movements, posture. The behavioral signs of objects of observation include, for example, “abnormal” behavior of people at the checkpoint, nervousness in movements, “yaw”, a sharp change in direction of movement, an attempt to hide one’s face from surveillance cameras. These types of biometric identification are well known and are described, for example, in the patent for the invention RU No. 2731519. At the checkpoint, Smart Radar technology can also be used to scan individual signs of a person (smell, sweat, heart rate, etc.), as well as to recognize material objects hidden on the body of a person - an intruder. The use of these methods virtually eliminates possible errors in the identification of personnel and visitors.

The automated system of robotic means RTS 9 is made with the possibility of patrolling the area to check the condition of technical means by reading information from their memory, making control passes in the detection zones, providing temporary protection of some detection zones in case of failure of technical means or repair work, as well as for the organization of additional lines of protection. As RTS 9 robotic means, technical means for remote configuration, verification and control of system components can be used, operating using radio communication channels by an automated operational communication and warning system OSO 12. As an example, it is possible to propose the use of mobile radio-controlled mechanisms for remote control crossing of security lines in remote areas of the perimeter. Another effective means of robotic perimeter security is the use of a radio-controlled self-propelled "cart" equipped with "technical" vision (TV camera and thermal imager). Such a "cart", using 3D - information processing algorithms, will move along the perimeter of the object, read information from the memory of technical means, and transmit the necessary information to CPU 2. Such a cart can also be equipped with some types of TSS to create, if necessary, additional boundaries protection. As an example of the use of robotic means in security equipment, we can cite automated complexes patented at NIKIRET for protecting the perimeters and territories of objects with a robotic system (RU No. 2759345 and RU No. 2759423).

The automated system of engineering and technical means ITS 10 of protective structures has electronic control mechanisms with communication means from the composition of the automated system OCO 12. The following are used as engineering and technical means to ensure the physical protection of objects and territories:

- physical barriers (protective barriers, gates, gates, barriers, ditches and other physical obstacles);

- protective and defensive structures for sentries (observation towers, pillboxes, guard mushrooms, booths, cabins, etc.);

- engineering equipment of checkpoints of the checkpoint;

- engineering equipment of perimeters (district cabinets, distribution boxes, etc.).

Protective barriers include barriers of a light or rigid type, usually from 2 to 3.5 meters high. For the stability of extended barriers, supports are used, which are installed in the ground at a certain distance from each other. Sections of the fence (between the supports) can consist of mesh cloths, netting "chain-link" or solid structures (wooden, reinforced concrete, brick), as well as tightly stretched wires (including "barbed"). When organizing the physical protection of objects and territories, barriers with mesh cloths are preferable. Mesh cloths are usually assembled from horizontally and vertically oriented steel wires or rods fastened together, which form cells of a certain size throughout the entire barrier cloth. Cloths of mesh barriers have a protective layer of zinc, polymer or ceramic coating and can be successfully used as physical and signal barriers. For the organization of signal barriers, a vibrometric cable detection tool "Hodograph-Universal" (www.nikiret.ru) is used. To enhance perimeter protection in flat areas, the following can be used: an active multi-beam infrared detection tool "Glazur" and two-position active radio beam detection tools, such as "RLD Redut-500", "RLD Redut / 1-300I" and "RLD Redan-125" (www .nikiret.ru). Gates and wickets are usually built into mesh barriers to allow people and vehicles to pass. Gates and gates are usually equipped with electromechanical locking devices (EMZU), which provide control of the opening and closing of gates and gates from the CPU 2 through the communication means of the automated system OCO 12. The following locking devices can be used as an EMZU: Gobi-EMZU, Bazalt ”, “Rubezh”, “Korund”, given in the materials on the website www.nikiret.ru.

Automation of control over the state of the alarm barrier consists in checking the state of elasticity of the barrier using a calibrated mechanical effect on the elements of the barrier, followed by measuring the parameters of the response of the vibration signal. On this basis, a conclusion is made about the quality of the installation of supports and the elasticity of the barrier sections. As a calibrated mechanical action, a shock impulse is used, caused by an impact or a fall on the surface of the barrier element of a load of a certain mass from a certain distance. As parameters of the vibration response from the shock pulse, the maxima of the amplitudes of the signals and their duration are measured to calculate the quality factors of the elasticity of the barrier elements and, based on these data, conclusions are drawn about the state of elasticity of the entire signal barrier. The procedure for monitoring the state of the alarm fence is well known and is described, for example, in the patent for the invention RU No. 2666168.

To protect the perimeter near the alarm barriers, it is proposed to use the automated system of the electronic control and trace strip EXP 16, consisting of numerous seismic sensors buried in the ground, located along the width of the strip and its length, and equipped with video surveillance equipment located on supports along the perimeter at a certain distance from each other. friend. Seismic sensors have circular intersecting detection zones that record the fact of movement of 16 violators of the security line along the EXP. The EXP 16 video surveillance equipment is in a "sleep" mode and switches to the active state on signals from seismic sensors that have detected the fact of movement along the EXP 16. The video surveillance equipment, at the same time, records the fact that the intruder has overcome the EXP 16. Video surveillance equipment has zoom lenses, with which you can zoom in on the video image for a detailed examination of the intruder, as well as periodic inspection of the surface of the runway to study traces or objects left by the intruder. Information about the violation of the security line from seismic sensors and video surveillance equipment is transmitted using the automated systems OSO 12 and LAN 13 to the automated system TsPU 2. regularly plow and harrow in a mechanized or manual way and inspect the outfits of law enforcement agencies (border guards), which requires human resources. The use of EXP 16 will increase the effectiveness of protection and reduce the number of human resources.

The KPT 14 automated control system for adjacent territories is made using several coherent radar tools with a sector or circular view, which ensure the creation of a continuous radar control zone with the ability to determine the trajectory of intruders. Radar stations (RLS) systems are stationary or portable coherent small-sized Doppler devices with low power consumption, providing a detection probability of at least 0.9 for moving objects of the “person” and “vehicle” type in a given or circular field of view. The system's radars are controlled by the CPU 2 system, provide the CPU with information about the detected objects and allow automatic guidance of video surveillance equipment on the detected object. As such radars, radar stations used to solve similar problems both in autonomous and system modes can be used: Radeskan radar (Yumirs website http://www.umirs.ru), Orwell-type radar R" (site of the company "ELVEES-NeoTek" http://elveesneotek.com), radar "Rosa" (patent for utility model RU No. 88815) and a number of others. The inclusion in the system of radars with wide fields of view up to circular and instrumental detection ranges of up to 2-3 km make it possible to carry out preliminary detection of objects moving towards the protected area long before the TCO is triggered, located directly or near the guard line. This provides a time gain of up to ten minutes for the maintenance personnel of the complex in order to reliably recognize the intruder and identify the degree of possible security threat. Displaying information from surveillance radar stations (RLS), which implement the functions of automatic tracking and trajectory processing when a moving object is detected, in combination with the deployment of other TSOs, allows you to predict both the further behavior of the intruder and your own action plan to prevent the possibility of a real threat to the protected object .

The KVP 15 automated airspace control system is made using several three-coordinate radar tools with electronic beam scanning in space, providing detection of low-altitude, low-speed moving air objects, including UAVs, in the entire upper hemisphere of the protected area. The function of radar control over airspace in the upper hemisphere over a protected area is carried out by one or more three-coordinate radar stations for detecting small-sized low-speed maneuvering aircraft, such as UAVs. They form the airspace control system. As such radars, coherent Doppler radars with a fast electronic space scanning rate are used, which are implemented using antennas in the form of passive phased antenna arrays with a complex broadband radiated signal. The system forms a radar zone in the form of a dome above the object of protection with a detection range of UAVs with an effective scattering surface of about 0.01 m ² about 3 km. This makes it possible to detect the UAV during its approach to the protected area of about 2-3 minutes, which provides a solution to the problem of its recognition and the operator's decision to take further actions. At the same time, the radar systems provide the issuance of target designation commands to video surveillance equipment, as well as to external devices that ensure the suppression of the actions of a possible intruder. Examples of airspace monitoring radars used are small low-power compact radar stations: ENOTS radar (ELVIS website http://elvees.ru), Location Workshops company radar (http://antikopter.ru website), detection of drones "Dome" (website of the company "Wifinder" www.wifinder.biz) and a number of others.

Communication KPT 14 and KVP 15 with the CPU 2 is carried out by means of automated systems OCO 12 and LAN 13.

The protection of the water area adjacent to the object and the territory is carried out with the help of technical means of automated control systems for adjacent territories KPT 14, airspace control KVP 15, and optical-electronic surveillance SOEN 5. Several coherent radar facilities with a sector view are used as technical means of KPT 14. As technical means of KVP 15, three-coordinate radar means with electronic beam scanning in space are used. As means of optical-electronic surveillance SOEN 5 - video cameras, technical means of detection and thermal imagers operating in continuous or low-frame modes. Information from the technical means of KPT 14, KVP 15 and SOEN 5 is transmitted to the CPU 2 for further analysis of possible threats and making a decision on countering violators in the water area.

The technical means of the automated systems SOS, MPK and SOEN are equipped with electronic EF forms for accounting, control and long-term storage of the necessary information during their operation. Each ESP contains an electronic controller, a radio modem with a transceiver antenna for forming a radio communication channel with an external receiving and transmitting point, flash memory, a rechargeable battery, a battery charger and a real time clock. The principle of using electronic forms in security systems is well known and is described in the NIKIRET utility model patents RU No. 205406 and No. 208950. The use of electronic forms makes it possible to reduce the time for servicing the means of automated systems SOS, MPK and SOEN during their operation and during repairs by quickly obtaining the necessary information, and thereby saving time for maintenance personnel.

Automated outdoor security lighting system LEO 17 contains lighting devices on poles with sensors and is configured to control lighting modes depending on weather conditions by changing the intensity of lighting, the spectral characteristics of lighting and controlling energy consumption. As sensors for monitoring weather conditions, light sensors are used that fix the level of illumination during the time of day, and Doppler radar sensors that provide information on the amount and type of precipitation (rain, hail or snow). The information from these sensors is used to control the intensity of the radiation and manage the consumption of electricity. The processor of the specified LEO automated system is configured to receive information from sensors and control lighting devices. One of the main applications of outdoor security lighting is to illuminate the perimeters of a protected area during the day, evening and night. Typically infrared and white light are used for illumination. Lighting in the daytime is relevant with heavy fog, rain and snowfall, at night - with a decrease in the level of natural light. The ambient light level can be classified as: sunny (30000 lux and above), cloudy (3000-30000) lux, rain or snow (100-3000) lux, night (below 100 lux). A good solution is, for example, lighting fixtures that emit both infrared (850 nm) and white light (with a color temperature of 4500 K) and that can switch between infrared light and white light. The automated LEO system maintains the desired level of illumination depending on the time of day and weather conditions, taking into account energy savings. The principle of operation of outdoor security lighting is well known and is described, for example, in patents RU No. 2604654 and US No. 9648688.

The automated decision support system PPR 18 is designed to analyze situations, combine and compare data on the state of technical means, determine a response plan, perform automatic standard procedures, record and monitor the implementation of maintenance procedures for the equipment used, as well as use tools to resolve alarm situations .

In addition, the automated PPR system provides:

- connection of rapid reaction forces (capture groups) to eliminate threats and their information support;

- Strengthening the protection of the perimeter in case of emergencies.

To ensure the decentralization of computing facilities of the integrated security system ISB 1, local computer network LAN 13 is used, which, using a wired or fiber optic communication line, provides communication between all automated systems, for example, via an Ethernet interface or an RS-485 interface.

Automated operational communication and warning system OSO 12 is designed to organize communication between all systems and subsystems of the ISF using wired communication lines, fiber-optic communication lines and radio communication. OSO 12 is made according to the modular principle and provides the exchange of data and commands between the modules of all components of the ISF. To ensure decentralization of computing facilities in OCO 12, communication modules are used, which, using a wired or fiber-optic communication line, provide communication between the components of the ISF, for example, via an Ethernet interface or an RS-485 interface. For the operation of radio communication channels, modules of radio modems and radio stations operating at dedicated radio frequencies are used. OSO 12 modules allow you to create a reliable telecommunications system between all the components of the ISF. The TVS alarm-call signaling equipment, which is part of OSO 12, is made using control posts and security manual call points for prompt notification of emerging service and alarm situations.

The automated backup power system (REP) 11 is used to provide emergency power and resume the operation of the entire integrated security system ISB 1 in the event of a power outage for any reason.

All automated systems of ISB 1 are functionally combined into a single information space for control, data transmission, analysis and display of information using the LAN.

Examples of the organization of automated subsystems with certain functional purposes with a description of their composition and functions are shown in Fig. 2 and FIG. 3.

In FIG. Figure 2 shows an example of organizing two separate additional automated subsystems by allocating technical means for their construction from the composition of automated ISB systems. The first automated subsystem is the subsystem for protecting the perimeter section of the object 19. The automated subsystem 19 includes technical means allocated from eight automated ISF systems: SOS, IPC, ITS, NOO, RTS, PPR, EXP and SOEN systems. The subsystem 19 also includes a processor 21, which provides communication with all the technical means allocated to the subsystem, on the one hand, and with the local computer network LAN, on the other hand. The specified automated subsystem has: engineering and technical means 24, for example, a mesh alarm barrier with gates and gates equipped with electromechanical locks; technical means of 23 mobile control points located near the gates and gates: technical means of video surveillance 28, carrying out an overview of the detection zone along the barrier; technical detection means 22, for example, in the form of two-position detection means located along the barrier. The perimeter section of the object is equipped with technical means 29 of an electronic control and trace strip and technical means 25 of external security lighting. Robotic means 26 provide patrolling of the territory along the perimeter fence, and decision support means 27 provide increased protection of the perimeter in case of emergencies. The processor 21 provides control and monitoring of the operability of these technical means.

The second automated subsystem is a subsystem for controlling and monitoring approaches to an object and territory with a special legal status 20. The automated subsystem 20 includes technical means allocated from three automated ISF systems: KPT, KVP and SOEN systems, and also uses a processor 21 with similar functions . The specified automated subsystem has: technical means 31 control of adjacent territories with the help of radar; technical means 32 for airspace control for detecting low-altitude, low-speed flying objects and technical means for video surveillance 30, including those for issuing target designation commands to suppress the actions of an intruder. The processor 21 also provides control and monitoring of the operability of these technical means.

In FIG. Figure 3 shows an example of the organization of two other separate additional automated subsystems by allocating technical means for their construction from the composition of automated ISB systems. The third automated subsystem is the subsystem for monitoring the territory of the object 33. The automated subsystem 33 includes technical means allocated from five automated ISF systems: RTS, UAV, LEO, PPR and SOEN systems. The subsystem 33 also includes a processor 21. The specified automated subsystem has: technical means of video surveillance 38 for the state of the territory under control; technical means 37 for external security lighting of the territory; 39 decision support tools to connect the rapid reaction forces to eliminate threats. Robotic means 35 and UAV 36 provide patrolling of the territory. The processor 21 also provides control and monitoring of the operability of these technical means.

The fourth automated subsystem is the personnel and visitors checkpoint subsystem 34. The automated subsystem 34 includes technical means allocated from three automated ISF systems: ACS, PPR and SOEN systems, and a processor 21 is also used. The specified automated subsystem has: technical means 42 of control and access control; video surveillance technical means 40 on the territory of the checkpoint and in the area in front of the checkpoint, decision support means 41 for connecting the rapid reaction forces (capture groups) to eliminate threats.

When equipping objects, territories and adjacent water areas with physical protection means, ISB 1 can be used both in its entirety and in an abbreviated version from a combination of the necessary automated systems and subsystems for solving physical protection problems.

The additional features and functional links introduced into the well-known system make it possible to impart new essential properties to the proposed ISB 1, increase the degree of automation of its systems and subsystems and, as a result, reduce the number of human resources for its maintenance.

Claims (5)

1. An integrated security system (ISS) based on automated functional systems and subsystems, containing an automated system of a central control center (CPU), which includes interconnected automated workstations (AWS) of operators, database servers, display facilities, which is made with the possibility of processing incoming information using intelligent neural networks to identify the fact of violation of the security line and identify the offender; an automated security alarm system (SOS) with stationary technical detection means (TSO) operating on different physical principles: radio beam, radio wave, vibrometric, magnetometric, infrared, seismic and providing digital methods for obtaining and processing information; an automated system of mobile control posts (MPC) of the territory operating on different physical principles: radio beam, radio wave, vibrometric, magnetometric, infrared, seismic and providing digital methods for obtaining and processing information, as well as endowed with navigation aids; an automated system of means of optoelectronic surveillance (SOES), made with the use of optical and optoelectronic means of observation and video monitoring in the visible and infrared wavelength ranges; an automated system of equipment for the security forces (ASO) with means of lethal, non-lethal impact and scare, having navigation tools for linking objects to a local or geographical coordinate system; an automated system of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), made with the ability to patrol the protected area with video filming of the area to analyze alarm situations and accompany the identified intruder objects in the protected area with the continuation of video surveillance and reporting additional information to the automated CCP system; an automated access control and management system (ACS) designed to control passages and passages to a protected area, use means of screening passing personnel and passing vehicles for admission, carrying or transportation of prohibited items, including weapons, radioactive materials, explosives and poisonous substances, and the inspection of passing personnel is made with the possibility of using various types of biometric identification; an automated system of robotic means (RTS), made with the ability to patrol the area to check the state of TSS and MPK by reading information from their memory, making control passes in detection zones, providing temporary protection of some detection zones in case of failure of TSS and MPK or repair works, as well as for the organization of additional security lines; automated system of engineering and technical means (ITS) of protective structures with electronic control mechanisms; an automated operational communication and warning system (OSO) designed to provide information exchange between all automated systems using radio channels and communication lines, as well as containing alarm and call signaling equipment (FA); a local area network (LAN) configured to exchange information between all automated systems using LAN tools; characterized in that the ISF additionally includes: an automated control system for adjacent territories (CPT), made using several coherent radar tools with a sector or circular view, providing the creation of a continuous radar control zone with the ability to determine the trajectory of intruders; automated airspace control system (ACS), made using several three-coordinate radar facilities with electronic beam scanning in space, providing detection of low-altitude, low-speed moving air objects, including UAVs, in the entire upper hemisphere of the protected area; an automated system of electronic control and trace strip (EKSP), located along the perimeter barrier and consisting of numerous seismic sensors buried in the ground, located along the width of the strip and its length, and equipped with video surveillance equipment located on supports along the perimeter at a certain distance from each other; an automated outdoor security lighting system (LEO) containing lighting devices on poles with sensors and capable of controlling lighting modes depending on weather conditions by changing the intensity of lighting, the spectral characteristics of lighting and controlling energy consumption; automated backup power supply system (REP); automated decision support system (CDS), designed to analyze situations, combine and compare data on the state of technical means, determine a response plan, perform automatic standard procedures, record and control the implementation of maintenance procedures for the equipment used, as well as use tools for resolving alarm situations, and the list and number of automated systems that make up the ISF can be selected taking into account the task of physically protecting each object, territory and adjacent water area separately; and all automated ISB systems are combined into a single information space for managing, transmitting data, analyzing and displaying information using a local area network (LAN) that forms a platform for programming these processes, as well as with the possibility of organizing additional automated subsystems with certain functional purposes with the involvement of their composition of technical means from other automated ISB systems. 2. ISB according to claim 1, characterized in that processors are additionally introduced into all automated systems and subsystems, configured to ensure the functioning of the formed local computer network LAN for communication with all automated systems and subsystems included in the ISB. 3. ISB according to claim 1, characterized in that the automated CPU system is made with the additional ability to process information using Big Data analysis, Data Mining technology and fuzzy logic algorithms. 4. ISB according to claim 1, characterized in that the technical means of the automated systems SOS, IPC and SOEN are equipped with electronic forms (EF) for accounting, control and long-term storage of the necessary information during their operation. 5. ISF according to claim 1, characterized in that when equipping facilities, territories and adjacent water areas with an integrated security system, it can be used both in its entirety and in an abbreviated version from a combination of the necessary automated systems and subsystems to effectively solve physical protection problems .

Images