RU2537817C2 - Lock with three-degree-of-freedom code elements - Google Patents

Abstract

FIELD: construction.

SUBSTANCE: objective of the invention is to develop a lock that is invulnerable to bumping, increased protection of the lock against unauthorized opening. Substance of the invention: in the lock comprising at least one code element 14, the latter moves in several directions and is installed as capable of lock locking by its movement in more than one direction. The proposed lock is protected against opening by means of bumping, since it is not known, in which direction (directions) it is necessary to move or (and) turn the code element for opening of the lock.

EFFECT: building of a lock, for "locked-unlocked" condition of which the position of the code element is significant in more than one direction.

6 cl, 25 dwg

Description

FIELD OF TECHNOLOGY

The invention relates to locking devices and can be used in locks for various purposes.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Such a lock design as a cylinder mechanism is widely known (see, for example, Pat. RF No. 96103706). This lock contains a cylindrical core mounted in the recess of the castle body with the possibility of rotation. The lock is equipped with at least one pair of transverse cylindrical channels - the first and second, made, respectively, in the core and in the housing. By turning the core relative to the housing, the channels can be combined with each other, thus forming a common cavity. The core is also equipped with a turnkey socket.

In the first and second channels (and when combined, in the common cavity), the first and second code elements of a cylindrical shape (pins) are arranged with the possibility of translational movement in the first (transverse) direction, the second code element being pushed towards the core, and the first acts in a turnkey socket, due to which it serves, simultaneously, as a mechanism for connecting the key with code elements.

Each code element also plays the role of a latch - a part of the lock serving as a means of locking it. Indeed, the state of the lock is “locked-unlocked”, i.e. the possibility of rotation of the core relative to the housing depends on the position of the code elements in the common cavity. More precisely, the core is movable relative to the case, when each of the code elements occupies a strictly "own" channel, i.e. when the adjacent ends of the first and second elements are aligned with the boundary (adjacent surface) between the core and the housing. Note that each of the code elements is mobile in a different (second) direction, namely, it has a natural possibility of rotation in its channel (and in the common cavity) around its own axis, i.e. around an axis parallel to the first direction. However, unlike the translational movement of the code element, its rotation is not significant for the state of the locked-unlocked lock (ie, it does not affect this state).

Even if there are several pairs of code elements in the lock, the natural gaps between the parts of the lock and the limited hardness of the material from which the parts are made, make it possible to unlock the lock by bumping (see, for example, www.locks.su/bump / index) is an ordered small displacement of the code elements of each pair, because known signs allow fixing the core output from its blocking by this pair.

The closest analogue to the proposed solution is a cylinder lock of a slightly different design (mod. "3KS", manufactured by Evva, www.evvalocks.com), containing one or more code elements located in the lock core in isolation from one another. The code elements do not perform the function of the latch. The latch is made in the form of a separate movable part installed in the core and having the ability to interact with one or more code elements; the latch is partially pushed into its niche in the surface of the core and pressed into the response niche in the housing. The side faces of the code elements are equipped with transverse grooves for the latch.

When the “correct” key is introduced into the core, the code elements are arranged in such a way that their transverse grooves form a common groove corresponding to the lock. During the subsequent turn of the key, the latch, under the action of the force from the side of the housing, slides into its niche in the core and into the aforementioned common groove. Thus, the core is unlocked, and the lock goes into an unlocked state.

In the absence of a “correct” key in the core, the transverse grooves of several code elements do not form a “correct” common groove, and when you try to rotate the core, the latch abuts one or more code elements and does not leave a response niche in the housing. Thus, the lock remains locked.

Obviously, this lock, as discussed above, is by no means free from the possibility of unlocking it by "bumping". For this reason, the manufacturer equipped the code elements with additional "false" grooves, which should complicate the attempt of unauthorized unlocking of the lock.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The objective of the invention is to create a lock that is invulnerable to "bumping", increasing the security of the castle from unauthorized opening.

The technical result that allows to solve this problem: the construction of the castle, for the status of which is "locked-unlocked" significant position of the code element in more than one direction.

The problem is solved, and the technical result is achieved due to the fact that in the lock containing at least one code element, the latter is movable in several directions and installed with the possibility of locking the lock by moving it in more than one direction.

Signs that distinguish from the closest analogue are:

- the code element is movable in several directions;

- the code element is installed with the possibility of locking the lock by moving it in more than one direction.

DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

The invention is further explained in the description of four simplified structures and their schematic drawings, moreover:

- Fig.1-3 shows the first lock, built according to claims 1, 3 with a pair of code elements, each of which according to claim 2 has the ability to rotate around an axis normal to the first direction;

- Figures 4-7 show a second lock constructed according to claims 1, 3 with a pair of code elements, each of which according to claim 2 has the possibility of translational movement in the second direction;

- Figs. 8-19 show a third lock, which is taken as a basis for a structure adopted as the closest analogue, moreover, in paragraphs 1, 4, the lock contains a latch and a single code element that has the ability to perform three movements - two translational and rotation:

- Fig.20-25 shows a fourth lock, different from the third in that according to claim 6, the latch interacts with the code element by means of a summing mechanism.

Description of the first castle

The cylindrical core 2 (Fig. 1, 2) is located in the recess 3 (Fig. 1) of the housing 4. According to claim 3, the core 2 is equipped with a first channel 8, made in the form of a flat groove, and a key socket 9 having the shape of a slotted slot 10 (figure 1, 2), communicating with the first channel 8 through a pair of windows (holes) 12. The latter are designed to accommodate the fingers 13 (figure 2), which serve as the mechanism of action of the key 9 on the first code element 14.

Housing 4 (FIG. 1) according to claim 3 is equipped with a second channel 15 made in the form of a flat groove and communicating with a recess 3. According to claim 3, at a certain position of the core 2 relative to the housing 4, the first 8 and second 15 channels form a common cavity (8 , 15) (Fig.2).

The first and second code elements are made in the form of, respectively, curly plates 14 and 18 located, respectively, in the first 8 and second 15 channels. When combining channels 8 and 15, each of the code elements 14, 18 has the ability, according to claim 2, to progressively move in the first direction in its own channel and in the common cavity (8, 15), namely, in the transverse direction, i.e. in the direction normal to the longitudinal axis of the core. According to claim 2, each code element also has the ability to make a rotation in its own channel and in the common cavity, moreover, around an axis normal to the first direction (in the drawing, in the drawing plane).

The side walls 19 of each of the code elements 14, 18 are made arcuate, so that the rotation of the code element does not cause its side play in its “own” channel and in the common cavity.

The spring lobe 20 installed in the channel 15, the code element 18 is pressed towards the core 2.

Description of the second castle

This castle has several of the following differences from the first. The main difference is that according to claim 2, each code element 14, 18 (Fig. 5) has the ability to translate in its own channel and in the common cavity both in the first direction — transverse and in the second — longitudinal, i.e. along the longitudinal axis of the core 2.

The adjacent surfaces 22 of the core 2 and the housing 4 are equipped, respectively, with an annular girdle 30 and a reciprocal groove 32. Adjacent faces 33 (Fig. 6) of the first 14 and second 18 code elements are equipped, respectively, with the protrusion 34 and the reciprocal cavity 36, matching in shape, respectively, with the profile of the girdle 30 and the groove 32.

The key socket 10 (FIG. 4) directly communicates with the first channel 8, so that the first code element 14 (FIG. 6) has the ability to directly interact with the key 9 inserted into the socket 10. Thus, the code element 14 is also a mechanism its interactions with key 9.

The first channel 8 (figure 5) is equipped with a side clamp 40, designed to press with his hat 41 of the element 14 to the side wall 42 of the common cavity (8, 15). The clamp 40, due to the possibility of its rectilinear movement in the hole 44 in the wall of the core 2 and the flat shape of the cap 41, prevents the rotation of the code element 14 in the channel 8 and the common cavity (8, 15).

Description of the third castle

The cylindrical core 2 of the lock (Fig.8, 9) is equipped with:

- longitudinally oriented blind flat channel 8 under the flat code element 14 (figure 10, 11);

- parallel to the channel 8 (Fig.8, 9) and located opposite the socket 10 turnkey 9 (Fig.14, 15);

- two niches 48 (Fig.9) in the surface of the core 2 - under a pair of retainers 50 (Fig.17), according to claim 4, designed to limit the movement of the core 2 relative to the housing 4 (Fig.9); niches 48 (and latches in them) are located along the longitudinal axis of the core 2.

Channel 8 (Fig. 8, 9) communicates with the socket 10 through a pair of windows 12, and with each of the niches 48 (Fig. 9), a hole 52 (Fig. 8, 9), moreover, shaped, namely elongated.

The code element 14 (Fig. 10, 11) is made in the form of a disk with a pair of code holes 54 (blind or through), corresponding in shape to the holes 52 (Fig. 8, 9) in the core 2. On one side of the code element 14 (Fig. .10, 11) a pair of fingers 13 is mounted vertically for interacting with the figured code groove 56 (Figs. 14, 15) of the key 9.

The code element 14 (FIGS. 16-19) is movably mounted in the channel 8 of the core 2, and both fingers 13 of the element 14 penetrate the windows 12, protruding their ends into the socket 10. Thus, the borders of the windows 12 define the limits of movement of the code element 14 in the channel 8 PP.1, 2 in three independent directions - translational movement in two directions (in the longitudinal - along the longitudinal axis of the core 2 and in the transverse), as well as rotation.

In the channel 8 (Fig. 16) of the core 2 there is also installed a spring tab 58, which is designed to depress the code element 14 to its initial state - towards the key input into slot 10 (to the right in the drawing).

Each of the latches 50 (Fig. 17) is equipped with a stylus 60, in cross-sectional shape corresponding to the shape of the hole 52 in the core 2. The toe 62 of the retainer 50 is prismatic in shape and is designed to interact with the lock case.

Each of the latches 50 is pressed out of the core 2 by a spring 64.

The code groove 56 (Fig. 14, 15) of the key 9 is formed by a tapering inlet section 65 (Fig. 14), a figured section 66 and a pressure section 67.

Description of the fourth castle

The locks considered above - known and proposed - have the following peculiarity: when you try to unlock the lock with a "foreign" key, the effort from the hand, through the key, completely takes over the code elements. In locks constructed according to claim 3, the unlocking force is transmitted to the code elements directly through the core, and in locks built according to claim 4, through the chain “core-lock-probe”. The action of the unlocking force (limited only by the ergonomics of the lock and the shape of the key) leads to deformation of the most delicate parts and areas of the lock - probes and channels under them in the core, code holes in the code elements. As a result, the backlash between the parts of the lock increases, the security of the lock from unauthorized opening is reduced.

In the modification of the third lock discussed below, this problem is solved by limiting the force transmitted to the aforementioned parts and zones of the castle.

According to claim 6, a latch 50, a movable pusher 68, and a summing mechanism are installed in the core 2 (Fig. 20). The pusher 68 is made prismatic in shape (Fig.21). The housing 4 (Fig.20) is provided with mating first and second niches for the latch 50 and the pusher 68, respectively. The summing mechanism is made in the form of a rocker arm 69 located in the recess 70 of the core 2, and the latch 50 and the pusher 68 are installed at the ends, respectively, of the first and second arms of the rocker arm 69, as at the summing inputs. Spring 71, rocker 69 is turned to a position in which the latch 50 is pushed into the niche 70, and the pusher 68 is pulled out of it.

The middle section of the rocker arm 69, which performs the function of the output of the summing mechanism, interacts with the probe 60, pressed by an squeezing spring (not shown) from the code element 14.

The code element 14 and the probe 60 according to claim 5 are made with non-smooth edges intended for interaction with one another.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION

The functioning of the first lock

The castle operates as follows.

In the initial state of the mechanism, the key 9 (figure 2) is not inserted into the socket 10, and the core 2 is rotated relative to the housing 4 to a position in which the first 8 and second 15 channels form a common cavity (8, 15). Under the action of the spring tab 20, the second code element 18 is pressed against the first code element 14, and the one to the fingers 13.

Moreover, the adjacent faces 33 of the code elements 14, 18 are not aligned with the adjacent surfaces 22 of the core 2 and the housing 4. Thus, the core 2 is locked relative to the housing 4, and the lock is in a locked state.

To unlock the lock, a key 9 is inserted into the slot 10, the latter is pushed onto the fingers 13 and pushes them with the code sections 72 and 73 of its beard towards the first channel 8. The fingers 13 act on the element 14 and through it on the element 18 and, overcoming the action of the petal 20 , move (in the first direction) the code elements in a common cavity (8, 15) with the simultaneous rotation of the code elements around an axis normal to the direction of their movement (i.e., rotation in the drawing plane). As a result, the first 14 and second 18 elements move to a position in which their adjacent faces 33 are aligned with the adjacent surfaces 22 of the core 2 and the housing 4 (figure 3). The blocking of the core 2 relative to the housing 4 disappears, and the lock goes into an unlocked state. Next, the key 9 rotate the core 2 to the desired position.

To lock the lock, the core 2 is turned with the key 9 inserted into the lock into the position corresponding to the formation of a common cavity (8, 15), and the key 9 is removed from the lock. In this case, the elements 14 and 18 under the action of the petal 20 are displaced towards the fingers 13 and rotate to the previous position, the fingers 13 are pushed into the key socket. As a result, the lock reverts to the locked state (FIG. 2). After that, the key is removed.

The functioning of the second lock

In the initial state of the lock, the key is not inserted into the socket 10 (Fig. 4), and the core 2 is rotated relative to the housing 4 to a position in which the first 8 and second 15 channels form a common cavity (8, 15). The first 14 and second 18 elements under the action of the petal 20 are pressed one against the other by their adjacent faces 33 and both to the bottom 72 of the first channel 8. In addition, under the action of the clamp 40, the element 14 is also pressed against the side wall 42 of the common cavity (8, 15 ), while the element 14 by means of the protrusion 34 on its adjacent edge 33 holds at the side wall 42 and the element 18. At the above position of the code elements, their adjacent edges 33 are not aligned with the adjacent surfaces 22 of the core 2 and the housing 4. Also, the protrusion 34 and reciprocal notch of code elements with a belt 3 0 and groove 32 of the core and body. Due to this, the rotation of the core 2 relative to the housing 4 is blocked by the elements 14, 18 and the lock is in a locked state.

To unlock the lock in the socket 10 (Fig.6) enter the key 9, the latter is pushed onto the code element 14 section 74 of his beard. In this case, the key 9, overcoming the action of the petal 20, squeezes the element 14 from the bottom 72; the code elements 14, 18, held by the clamp 40 near the side wall 42, translationally move in the common cavity (8, 15) in the first direction, namely from the bottom 72, and move to a position where their adjacent faces 33 coincide with the adjacent surface 22 .

With further movement inward of the socket 10, the key 9 acts on the element 14 with the push code section 76 of its beard as an emphasis, overcomes the action of the clamp 40 and moves the element 14 in the second direction normal to the first, namely along the adjacent surface 22. Element 14 by means of the protrusion 34 entrains element 18 in the same direction. As a result, the code elements move to the position (Fig. 7), in which their protrusion 34 and recess 36 are aligned, respectively, with the girdle 30 and the groove 32 on adjacent surfaces 22 of the core 2 and the housing 4. Blocking pov the orot of the core 2 relative to the housing 4 disappears and the lock goes into an unlocked state. Further actions of the user to unlock the lock are similar to those described above.

To lock the lock, the core 2 is turned with the key 9 inserted into the lock into the position corresponding to the formation of a common cavity, and the key is removed from the lock. While the code elements under the action of the clamp 40 are shifted in the direction of movement of the key, namely in the direction of the side wall 42 of the common cavity. Further, under the action of the petal 20, the code elements are moved to the bottom 72, as a result of which the lock reverts to the locked state. After that, the key 9 is removed.

The functioning of the third castle

The castle operates as follows.

In the initial, locked state of the lock, the key is not inserted into the socket 10 (Fig. 16), with the spring tab 58, the code element 14 located in the channel 8 is pressed towards the key, namely in the longitudinal direction, to the wall of the window 12 (finger 13) or to the right wall 78 of the channel 8 (its sidewall). In another translational direction (transverse), the element 14 occupies a certain indefinite position in the channel 8, limited by the arrangement of the fingers 13 in the windows 12 or the upper 80 and the lower 82 by the walls of the channel 8. In the third, rotational direction, the element 14 occupies a certain indefinite position in the channel 8 the location of the fingers 13 in the windows 12. In this case, the code holes 54 in the code element 14 are not aligned with the holes 52 in the core 2. Each of the latches 50 (Fig. 17) occupies its slot 48 in the core 2 and is pressed by the spring 64 out of the heart Nick 2 in the response niche 84 (Fig.9) in the housing 4 of the castle. When you try to rotate the core 2 (Fig.17) relative to the body, the latter acts on the toes 62 of the latches 50, causing the latter to shift into the core 2. However, since the code holes 54 in the code element 14 are not aligned with the holes 52 in the core 2, the movement of each latch 50 inside the core 2 according to claim 4 it is blocked by its own probe 60, abutting against the code element 14. As a result, the latches 50 do not go into the sockets 48, the core 2 does not rotate relative to the case, more precisely according to claim 4 it is limited by the play and the lock remains locked with standing.

To unlock the lock in the slot 10 enter the key 9 (Fig.19). The latter with its entry section 65 (Fig. 14) acts on the fingers 13 (Fig. 16), prompting the code element 14 to rotate through them. With further advancement of the key into the socket 10 (Fig. 17), the ends of the fingers 13 move along the figured portion 66 (Fig. 14) of the key 9, as a result of which the code element 14 (Fig. 16) is shifted in the first translational direction (namely, in the transverse direction , from the wall 80 to the wall 82 or vice versa) and at the same time rotates in the plane of the channel 8. Next, the key 9 (Fig. 14) is pushed by its pressing portion 67 onto the end of one of the fingers 13 (Fig. 16) and engages the code element 14 in moving to channel 8 in the second direction (longitudinal) - from the wall 78 of channel 8. After Nogo administration "right" key in the socket 10 code element 14 assumes the position in which the code apertures 54 therein aligned with the holes 52 in the core 2 (18, 19). Next, the core 2 is pulled into the rotation by the key, the lock body acts on the beveled toes 62 (Fig. 17) of the latches 50, causing them to be displaced inside the core 2. The latches 50, overcoming the action of the springs 64, slide into the core 2 (Fig. 19), and their probes 60 — into the holes 52 in the core 2 and then into the code holes combined with them in the code element 14. As a result, the lock goes into an unlocked state.

To re-lock the lock, the core with the key inserted into it is rotated to the position in which the response niches in the housing are combined with the latches 50. As a result, the latches 50 are returned to the response niches pressed by the springs 64. After that, the key 9 is removed from the socket 10 and the code element 14 under the action of the spring tab 58 (Fig. 18), it returns to its initial state, in which the holes 52 in the core 2 are not aligned with the code holes 54 (Fig. 16) in the code element 14. Thus, the lock goes into its original, locked state.

The functioning of the fourth castle

The castle operates as follows.

In the initial, locked state of the lock, the “correct” key is not inserted into the socket 10 (Figs. 20, 21) and the code element 14 occupies a certain position in which the code hole 54 in the code element 14 is not aligned with the hole 52 for the probe 60 in the core 2 By spring 71 (Fig. 20), the rocker arm 69 is rotated to a position in which the latch 50 is recessed into a niche 70 in the core 2, and the pusher 68 is extended from the niche 70 into the second response niche in the housing.

When you try to rotate the core 2 with a "foreign" key or in the absence of a key in the socket 10, the housing 4 acts on the toe of the pusher 68, causing it to move inside the core 2. The pusher 68 goes into the niche 70, acting through the rocker 69 on the probe 60. That resting on the code element 14, remains in place. Next, the rocker 69, overcoming the action of the spring 71, rotates (Fig.22, 23), while the latch 50 is pushed from the niche 70 out of the core 2 into the first response niche in the housing, as a result of which the further rotation of the core 2 is blocked. Thus, the lock remains locked. Moreover, due to the non-smooth edges of the probe 60 and the code element 14 interacting with one another according to claim 5, slipping of the code element 14 along the end of the probe 60 is eliminated and “bumping” is not possible.

To unlock the lock in the slot 10 (Fig.24, 25) enter the "correct" key. The latter sets the code element 14 in a position in which the code hole 54 in the code element 14 is aligned with the hole 52 for the probe 60. Further, when the core 2 is rotated by the key 2 relative to the housing 4, the pusher 68 (Fig. 24) rotates the beam 69 around its first shoulder, held by the spring 71, and the probe 60 moves into the code hole 54 in the code plate 14. As a result, the latch 50 held by the spring 71 remains pushed into the niche 70 (Figs. 24-25) and does not prevent the rotation of the core 2. Thus, the lock goes into an unlocked state.

To re-lock the lock, the core 2 is turned with the key to its original position. When combining the second response niche in the housing 4 with the pusher 68 (Fig.24), the squeezing spring of the probe 60 pushes it out of the code hole 54 in the code plate 14, the probe 60 acts on the rocker arm 69 (while the latch 50 held by the spring 71 remains inside niches 70) and the rocker 69 rotates, as a result of which the pusher 68 extends from the niche 70 into the second response niche in the housing 4. Next, the key is removed from the socket 10 of the core 2 and the code plate 14 is returned to its previous position. As a result, the lock returns to its original, locked state (Figs. 20-21).

Note that with the functioning of this lock, the force from the equal-arm rocker arm 69 to the probe 60 does not exceed the doubled force of the spring 71.

DISCUSSION

1. In the first lock to reduce the moment of friction when turning the code element (figure 2) can be applied one of the following solutions:

- grooves are made in the side walls of one of (or each) channels, in which the ends of the pin transversely mounted in the plate of the code element located in this channel are located with the possibility of movement. For example, in the side walls 86 (Fig. 1) of the first channel 8, radially oriented guide grooves 88 are made, and a transverse pin 90 is installed in the plate of the first element 14 (Figs. 2, 3), the ends of which can freely move in the grooves 88. Pin 90 provides rotation, and the grooves 88 - translational movement of the element 14;

- in one (or each) of the channels, a transverse pin is rigidly installed, piercing the elongated hole in the plate of the code element located in this channel (not shown).

2. In the third lock, the surface 92 (Fig. 12) of the code element 14 facing the probe, as well as the end face of the probe, according to claim 5 can be made not smooth, for example, corrugated. This measure makes it possible to exclude the tip of the probe from slipping over the surface of the code element 14 and, thereby, complicate attempts to carry out “bumping”. In this case, in order to ensure unhindered movement of the code element 14 in the channel occupied by it, the peripheral zone (border) 94 of the code element 14 should be left smooth and slightly raised relative to the surface 92. The spring connection between the code element and the key is also useful to prevent deformation of another, namely the fingers 13 and the code groove 56 (FIG. 14) of the key 9. For this, it is enough on the code element 14 (FIG. 12) to install each finger 13 with the possibility of spring deflection from its normal, to the plane of the code vogo element, position.

3. In the third lock, the latch 50 (Fig.13) and the probe 60 can be made in the form of structurally independent elements that can interact with one another. Such a constructive solution allows you to free from delicate efforts such delicate parts of the castle as probes. Due to this, it is possible to reduce the gaps between the probes 60 on the one hand and the holes 52, 54 (Fig. 10) on the other. This increases the security of the castle from attempts to unauthorized opening. Note that the latch 50 (Fig.13) can be made in the form of a common locking strip located in a longitudinally or transversely oriented niche in the surface of the core 2 and having the ability to interact with several (located in line or otherwise) probes 60. The latter can apply to both one and several code elements.

We also note that:

- holes 52 for the probes 60 can be located both along the longitudinal axis of the core 2, and in some other way;

- if the hole 54 (Fig.13) in the code element 14 is the only one, it should be shaped (according to claim 1 - for the significance of the rotation of the code element); if there are more than one, they can be made round.

4. For all considered designs:

- adjacent, adjacent to one another surface of the core and the housing may be flat or be some kind of surface of revolution, for example, conical. In the case of a flat adjacent surface, the core may have the possibility of both rotational and translational movement thereof relative to the housing;

- a turnkey socket can be made not in the movable part of the lock (in this example, the core), but in the fixed, namely in the case. In this case, the movable part (core) should be provided with a handle or other drive means.

We add that the core can be fixed, and the body can be movable and used as a handle.

Thus, since according to claim 1, the state of the locked-unlocked lock depends on the position of the code element in more than one direction, the implementation of the "bumping" would require prohibitively long time, because it is not clear in which direction to unlock the lock it is necessary to shift or (and) rotate the code element. Moreover, if, according to claim 5, the interacting faces of the code element and the probe are made non-smooth, carrying out “bumping” is not physically feasible. All together, this leads to high security of the proposed locks from unauthorized opening.

INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY

Details of the proposed designs can be made of the same materials (steel, brass, etc.) and through the same set of technological operations as the well-known cylinder mechanisms. Note that the third castle (Figs. 8-19) is technologically and structurally simpler than its prototype. Indeed, it requires less code elements (1-2 pcs.), And the manufacture of lock parts and releases in them requires mainly turning and drilling operations, as well as a few milling operations with a large diameter tool.

Claims (6)

1. A lock containing at least one code element mounted for translational movement in the first direction and rotation around an axis normal to the first direction. 2. The lock according to claim 1, characterized in that the code element has the possibility of translational movement in the first direction, as well as translational movement in a direction different from the first second or (and) rotation around an axis normal to the first direction. 3. The lock according to claim 2, characterized in that it contains a movable core installed in the housing, the core and the housing are equipped, respectively, with first and second channels forming a common cavity at a certain position of the core relative to the housing, while the above channels are respectively first and second code elements. 4. The lock according to claim 1, characterized in that it contains a movable core installed in the housing, at least one code element and one latch are movably installed in the core, the code element being mounted for movement in the plane and has the ability to limit the movement of the latch to its movement in this plane in more than one direction, and the latch has the ability to limit the core stroke. 5. The lock according to claim 4, characterized in that the faces of the code element and the latch intended for interaction with one another are non-smooth. 6. A lock containing a movable core installed in the housing with a latch and a code element located in it, while the latch has the ability to restrict the core stroke by its movement, and the code element the latch stroke, characterized in that a movable pusher is also installed in the core interaction with the body, and the summing mechanism associated with the pusher and latch its inputs, and with the code element - its output.

Images