OA17271A - Localized hardening of metallic surfaces. - Google Patents

Abstract

The present invention relates to a method and system for treatment of a surface of a metallic material component, the method comprising the steps : electro-spark treating the surface of the metallic component by means of an electro-spark electrode, wherein the metallic material is a basically ferritic, perlitic and/or austenitic steel and the method creates a thin layer with martensitic microstructures at the surface of the metallic material component. Serpentines and quartz can be incorporated by an additional step as well as the surface randomly structured by this.

Description

The présent invention relates to a method and system for surface treatment of metallic materials. In particular, the system and method according to the présent invention relate to the hardening of a metallic surface, optionally to the densification of the hardened surface and further optionally to a surface modification with minerais to generate predefined tribomechanical and/or tribo-corrosive properties.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Most steels, ferritic steels and austentic steels are difficult to nitride or carburize. Thermochemical treatment, like carburization and/or nitriding, affects the dimensional stability of components, which require further machining, limit the choice of metallic materials as well as represent a time consuming, additional steps due to the need for heating-up the entire part/component to be treated with further heat treatment.

It is well known in the art that laser can be used as a controlled heat source for hardening the surface of a metallic component. When laser is traversed onto a steel surface, a very thin superficial surface layer heats up very fast to the thermodynamic stability région of austenite and then quenches down (rapid cooling or autoquenching) due to the calorie mass of the material volume of the metallic component, which results into the formation of martensite. This martensite is untempered and tends to a very fine to amorphous microstructure.

Another prior art technique which uses a laser heat source represents laser nitriding which was, inter alia developed in the nineties for a local nitridation of cylinder liners in grey cast iron by using a UV-Excimer-Laser (λ=308ηιη). This prior art process and the resulting surface layer produced on cast irons are disclosed, for example, in the patent applications DE 197 06 833 Al, DE 197 42 739 Al and DE 10 2006 057 940 Al. For instance, after repeated treatment of this laser nitriding process, approximately 16-18 wt.-% of nitrogen are diluted in the grey cast iron surface in a depth of up to 2pm. Laser treatments act very locally on the surface of the metallic material to be treated. However, laser treatment requires significant investments in the laser source.

Another known prior art technique for hardening of surfaces is the inductive hardening. In this technique, the whole surface of ferromagnetic steels is heated by a magnetic field. The steel hardnesses increase to approximately 850 -1.000 HV (Vickers Pyramid Number HV) by amorphisation and/or nanosizing. This technology is frequently applied to gears. The pénétration depth can be reduced by aplying a dual frequency magnetic field at high frequencies, as disclosed by FR 2 790 007, using very high powers for a short time. The génération of a

A magnetic field, however, only allows the treatment of spécifie geometries. Moreover, electromagnetic hardening requires large investments in high-frequency, high power magnetic field generators.

Further, electrical discharge surface treatment is known from US 2011/0135845 wherein a coating on a treated métal is intentionally created by melting an electrode material by the energy of a pulsed electrical discharge (surface alloying technique).

It is an object of the présent invention to overcome or ameliorate the obstacles of the prior art methods. In particular, it is an object to provide a method and device which allows for preferably easy and reliable surface treatment of a workpiece, preferably locally appiied on tribologically stressed surfaces of metallic materials.

It is a further object of the invention to provide a device and method for hardening the surface of a metallic workpiece. It is a further object of the invention to provide a device and method for densification of a treated surface. It is yet a further object of the invention to provide a device and method for surface modifications with minerais to generate predefined tribomechanical and/or tribo-corrosive properties.

The objects of the invention are accomplîshed by the independent claims. Further preferred embodiments are defined by the dépendent claims.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The présent invention particularly relates to a surface treatment locally appiied on tribologically stressed surfaces of metallic materials, preferably ferritic and austenitic steels, which increases the hardness and/or wear résistance without compromising in dimensional stability. In contrast to the known prior art hot treatment methods, the method of the présent invention may be characterized as a macroscopically cold treatment which preferably generates locally a thin layer with a martensitic microstucture.

Furthermore, the présent invention also relates to an additional or alternative method for densification of treated surfaces.

The process of the présent invention preferably transforms the structure of the subsurface région from a pre-existing metallurgical structure into a new structure. In other words, it is preferred that the process does not generate a coating by additionally depositing extemal material on the surface but merely modifies the structure of the preexisting material at a thin surface layer. Preferably, the surface modifications realized by the présent process do preferably not create porosities in the treated surface in contrast to coating techniques, like thermal spraying.

In other words, the method of the présent invention forms a thin layer with martensitic microstructures at the surface of the workpiece. Still in other words, the method of the présent invention re-forms or transforms a thin surface layer of the workpiece into a surface layer with martensitic microstructures at the surface of the workpiece. It is therefore preferred to avoid depositing additional material on the présent surface structure of the workpiece.

Moreover, the présent invention also relates to an additional or alternative method for doping minerais into the surface of a workpiece by a defined and controlled way which preferably generates a micro-structure of a randomly or substantially randomly distributed pattern.

According to the first aspect, the method of the présent invention may comprise two main method steps: (i) electro-spark treatment of the surface of the metallic component and (ii) doping of the previously treated surfaces with minerai particles.

According to a further aspect, the method of the présent invention may comprise three main method steps: (i) electro-spark treatment of the surface of the metallic component; (ii) densification of the treated surface optionally; and (iii) doping of the previously treated surfaces with minerai particles.

It is explicitly pointed out that each of the above mentioned steps may be performed alone/separately without the need to perform other steps before or afterwards. The three preferred individual steps (in the following also abbreviated as steps 1 - 3) will be discussed in more detail.

EIcctro-spark treatment / step 1

The electro-spark treatment according to the présent invention uses an electrical discharge device. Sparks generated from the electrical discharge device on the surface of the metallic material to be treated induce a strong heat flow into the surface of the metallic material. The electrical discharge device (also called spark electrode or just electrode in the following) is preferably designed as a moving heat source. In other words, it is preferred that the metallic material component to be treated (also abbreviated as workpiece) may perform a movement relative to the spark electrode or vice versa. Preferably, due to the spark treatment, the localized area of the surface of the workpiece heats up to températures in the thermodynamic stability région of austenite and is preferably instantly quenches down due to the calorie mass of the material volume.

The system or device according to the présent invention for surface treatment of the metallic material/workpiece comprises at least one electrode (spark electrode). The electrode may be provided and/or controlled by a current supply device. Preferably, the electrode is fed with an altemating voltage (AC), preferably between 110V through 220/240V to 380V. One of the preferred frequencies is 50Hz, but not limited to this frequency. The power consumption of the supply unit fed to the electrode is preferably between 0,25 kW and 3 kW.

The electrode is preferably made from a wear-resistant alloy, like cemented carbide tools of WC-Co type, such as BK8 (ISO K30/40), T5K10 (ISO P30), BK10OM (ISO M30), or of steels, like 95X18 (GOST 5632 équivalent to X105CrMol7, 1.4125), etc., and is not limited to these. Suited for the electrode are also carbon tool steels, high-speed tool steels or alloy tool k

steels as well as electrically conductive hard metals bonded by nickel, nickel/chromium or nickel/molybdenum alloys.

According to a preferred embodiment, the electrode is cylindrical, preferably with a round or substantially round cross-section. The diameter of the (cylindrical) electrode is preferably 1 mm to 10 mm. The cylindrical electrode may comprise a tip which is not limited to a particular shape. For instance, the tip may be fiat or pointed. Preferably, the tip comprises a canonical shape.

According to the présent invention, a plurality of metallic materials with different surface properties may be treated. Preferably, the initial surface roughness of the metallic material prior to treatment is Ra (C.L.A.)= 0,01 to 1,6 pm, more preferably between Ra of 0,1 to 1,6 pm, wherein Ra is defined as the arithmetical mean déviation of the assessed profile and the inch équivalent parameter is C.L.A. (centre line average).

It is preferred that there is a relative movement between the part to be treated (workpiece) and the electrode during treatment. In other words, the part to be treated and/or the electrode perform relative movement(s) during treatment. Preferably, the part to be treated rotâtes. Preferably, the surface of the part to be treated rotâtes with a rotational speed of 0,1 m/min to 1 m/min. Altematively or additionally, the electrode may slide, roll or slip-roll over the surface area to be treated.

Moreover, it is further preferred that the electrode, preferably the cylindrical electrode, performs a rotation along his own (longitudinal) axis. Preferably the cylindrical electrode rotâtes with a rotational speed of 10 rpm to 1.500 rpm. The rotational movement may be continuons or may be stepped.

Furthermore, it is preferred that a particular area of the surface to be treated is treated at least once, preferably more than once. For instance, a number of double strokes (back and forth movements) of the material or repeated treatments up to 10 times are preferred. According to further preferred embodiments, up to 100 repeats may assure the desired surfaces transformations and/or depths. The Iater dépends from the hardenability of the alloy. However, for a plurality of predetermined properties and most common alloys it is already sufficient if the workpiece is only treated once.

The voltage passing the electrode is preferably between 20-50 Volts during the first pass/first treatment. In case multiple passes/treatments should be performed, it is preferred that the voltage is >40 Volts for subséquent repeats.

In order to generate slmultaneously dimples/cavities/indents, the tip point of the electrode may be addîtionally actuated along its (longitudinal) axis and preferably indents more or less perpendicular to the surface. This actuation (longitudinal or axial movement) may be achieved by electromagnetic actuators, pneumatic, piezoelectric actuators or stroke-yoke Systems. The axial actuation of the electrode or the tip of the electrode may be performed with the following parameters: The actuation frequency is preferably between 40 Hz to 50.000 Hz. Preferably, the frequency is between 50 Hz and 1000 Hz. However, according to the présent invention ultrasonic actuation of the electrode is also possible, i.e., actuation with a frequency > 20 000 Hz. The axial (vibrational) amplitude is preferably in the range between 0,005 to 0,5 mm. The axially indenting load is preferably in the range from 10 g to 3.000 g (0.1 N to 30 N).

Densification / step 2

The electro-spark treatment as well as the doping (see step 3 below) lead to a transformation of the surface. An additional optional densification step (also labeled step 2 in the présent application) intends to smoothen the treated and/or doped surface areas. This additional densification step 2 may be applied subséquent to the above discussed electro-spark treatment (step 1) and/or the minerai coating (step 3). It is, however, preferred to apply this step 2 after steps 1 and preferably before step 3.

For instance, machine hammer peening is a relatively new method for finishing surfaces. The workpiece surface is modified through repeated impact by a spherical carbide tool through oscillating movement. Such a method increases the hardness or residual stresses due to hammer peening. Machine hammer peening intends to plastically transform a thin surface layer (100-500 nm) by cold working hardening, which increases the compressive residual stresses in the subsurfacial layers, and not by rapid heating Iike the electro-spark hardening. According to the présent invention, however, it is preferred to avoid hammer peening.

According to the présent invention, it is preferred to densify the surface subséquent to the electro-spark treatment, preferably by other methods. In particular, a surface densification according to the présent invention may be achieved by rolling or press rolling.

Preferably a (metallic) tool for applying pressure to the workpiece is used for this treatment. For instance, a metallic sphere or roll, preferably made from a hard material is preferred. The hardness of the tool is preferably > 60 HRC. By means of said tool a contact pressure is applied to the surface of the workpiece, e.g., by rolling, sliding or otherwise. According to a preferred embodiment, the workpiece is rotated during this treatment, preferably a rotational speed of the surface to be treated is between 3 m/min to 300 m/ min.

According to a further preferred embodiment, the tool is supplied until it gets in contact with the surface to be treated. Afterwards the tool is moved along the rotation axis of the workpiece with a traveling speed over the surface of the workpiece between 0,01 to 10 mm per rotation and with contact pressure of 0.5 kg/mm² to 100 kg/mm². The number of double strokes (back and forth) is up to 10. Densification of surface coating is preferably performed for the entire length that requires treatment.

Minerai treatment / step 3

As mentioned above, the method of the présent invention may be divided into two method steps, namely, the electro-spark treatment of the surface of the metallic component and, optionally (additionally or altematively), the doping of the previously treated surfaces with minerai particles. According to a preferred embodiment of the présent invention, step 2 is an optional step between steps 1 and 3.

According to the présent invention, tribological surfaces may be doped with nanosized or sub-micron particles of various minerais. The particles/particulates are preferably dispersed homogeneously in a fluid, preferably in a liquid such as oil, glycerin, polyglykol or water. In other words, the particles are preferably provided in a suspension. The fluid is preferably the carrier fluid for the particulates to be doped in order to apply these evenly distributed. This suspension is preferably only used during the treatment for doping and preferably not as lubricating oil like in an oil circuit with pump. The surface area to be treated is preferably immersed in the suspension or wetted by the suspension.

Preferably, an indenter tool (in the following also abbreviated as indenter) is used for indenting the minerais on and/or into the surface of the surface area to be treated. Moreover, the indenter is used to fill pores or irregularities in the surface of the material to be treated. Accordingly, the surface roughness decreases; the surface becomes smoother.

The mechanisms of the indents/minerals are: (i) cold work hardening around the indents by plastic deformation and (ii) enhancement of early fluid film formation by the micro-cavities.

It is known that micro-cavities with various shapes, diameters and depths may enhance the hydrodynamic film formation during start/stop. This effect is prédominant during start-stop of

e.g. journal bearings and reduces the wear, because the length of mixed and/or boundary lubrication is significantly shortened. Furthermore, the micro-cavities store lubricant and enhance emergency running properties, when the lubrication supply is shortened or interrupted. The technologies used today for création of micro-cavities in seals and bearings intend to generate arrays of uniformly distributed or harmonie patterns. For instance, laser surface texturing (LST) is a widely used technology that allows improving the surface micro-topography and -structure of tribologically stressed surfaces, but also punching/stamping of patterns is known. These techniques for artificial or synthetical texturing aim to generate a regular structure of iso-shape in any form and iso-spacing. In contrast, the doping method according to the présent invention preferably créâtes a randomly distributed pattern of irregular shaped cavities/dimples/indents by applying a simple process.

Furthermore, according to the présent invention it is preferred to use serpentines as solid and minerai additives for the doping process.

The dispersion of nanosized particulates, like soot, CaCO₃ or MoS₂ and graphite („LiquiMoly“ or „Molygraphite“ von ELF ANTAR) in engine oils is known. There are also some new minerais that are called “geoadditives”. For instance, silicate-based blending/ additive materials for lubricants can be found in literature and patent applications. The commercially available lubricant “FORSAN™” contains 5 % by volume of silicate-based particulates (www.forsan.info). Moreover, the applications WO 02/18673, DE 10 2004 058 276 and US 7,304,020 apply a wide range of minerais dispersed in the lubricating oil. The common mechanism of this prior art lubricants is the following. During tribological operation of the lubricant containing these minerais, a transfer layer is generated on the rubbing surfaces by the particulates dispersed in the lubricants. This mechanism can also be applied for restoring/reconditioning of wom out surfaces. The Chinese authored publication [Tribology International 37 (2004) 561-567] validated particulates of Mg6(Si40io)(OH)g dispersed in a SAE 40 (API SD/CC) engine oil operated in locomotive engines (16V280, 3.600 kW), which had already accumulated 150.000 km. On the liner surfaces are formed by transfer film formation a layer of 8-10 pm of thickness having a micro-hardness of ~ 780 HV. The disadvantage for such engine oils is the fact, that ail silicate-based particulates form ash, which blocks the soot particulate filters and deactivates the active centers of the catalytic converter. Ail ACEA Cl to C4 engine oil spécifications require low ash formulations (lower than 0,5% by weight), which are far below the necessary treat rate of the suspensions used in this Chinese publication. Lubricating engine oils containing “geo-additives”, silicate-based particulates, are unsuitable worldwide for ail engine types (passenger cars and trucks) that hâve ash built-up exhaust after treatment devices.

According to the présent invention, it is preferred to use serpentine for the minerai doping. In particular, within the group of such silicates the subgroup of phyllosilicates is found containing serpentines among other groups according to chemistry. Serpentine is a double layered silicate. The generic formula for serpentine Mg3Si₂O5(OH)₄ in a double (or bimolar) expression is:

X₆¥₄O_I0(OH)₈, where X stands for different ions, like Mg²⁺, Fe²⁺, Ni²⁺, Mn²⁺, Mn³⁺, Cr³⁴ or Cu²⁺ located in octahedral lattice positions and Y for ions, like Si⁴⁺, Al³⁴ and Fe³⁴ in an tetrahedral lattice position, and for magnesium-type Serpentines, like Lizardite, Antigorite and Chrysotile:

(M3._x ²⁺Mx³⁺)[(Si2-xMx³⁺)O₅(OH)₄], where M²⁺ = Mg, Fe, Mn and Ni as well as M³⁴ = Al, Fe and Cr.

The serpentine powder as preferably used according to the présent invention can be of natural- or synthetic origin. Serpentine powders derived from natural/mineral resources may contain up to 10 % by weight of other components, like corundum or silicates, which occur naturally and were not blended intentionally. Figure 3 illuminâtes cavities filled with serpentines composed of silicon, magnésium and oxygen.

The concentration of serpentine particulates in the dispersion is preferably between 1% and 20%. Furthermore, the suited size of the particles is preferably in the range from 1 pm to 50 pm.

According most of the présent embodiments, the chemical nature of the base oil for the dispersing the particulates is substantially irrelevant. Preferably, the viscosity of the dispersant fluid is in the range between water (|40°C= 1 mPas) and literally “butter” (|40°C= 10.000 mPas).

For reducing friction, it is preferred to use serpentine, preferably serpentine as a component or sole component. For enhancing corrosion résistance and/or wear reducing properties it is preferred to use quartz, preferably as a component or sole component. Furthermore, for reducing friction, enhancing corrosion résistance and reducing wear, it is preferred to use serpentine and quartz in combination, preferably in a 50:50 ratio.

In order to generate dimples/cavities/indents, the tip point of the electrode can be additionally actuated along its axis and indents more or less perpendicular to the surface. This axial actuation can be achieved by electromagnetic actuators, piezoelectric actuators or strokeyoke Systems. The axial actuation may be characterized, for example by at least one of the following parameters:

Frequency: 40 Hz to 50.000 Hz.

Axial amplitude: 0,005 to 0,5 mm

Axial indenting load: 50 g to 3000 g.

The intender is preferably formed from a hard material. In particular, the term “indenter” refers to an instrument such as the instrument NI (roll) or instrument N2 (metallic sphere) or instrument N3 (working tool of the ultrasonic device) as discussed in the detailed description below. Preferred materials for the intender are hard alloys based on tungsten carbide or titanium carbide bonded with nickel, nickel/molybdenum or cobalt; either natural or synthetic diamond or polycrystalline diamond (PKD). Hard metals may also be composed of mixtures of hard phases, like WC, Cr2C3, TiC, TaC and/or NbC.

According to a preferred embodiment shown in the figures, the serpentine powder comprises at least one of the following components, preferably ail of the following components: antigorite, lizardite and talc. According to preferred embodiment the serpentine power is composed by approximately ~45 wt.-% of Antigorite, ~45 wt.-% Lizardite and ~ 10 wt.-% Talc. These composition of the serpentine powder can vary in phase compositions.

Micrographs hâve been taken from an example treated with the above defined serpentine powder. The micrographs taken by means of scanning électron microscopy (SEM) showed a flaky-like morphology in the sub-micron range. The overlay of éléments mapping to the SEM picture confirmed, that the serpentine power used is composed of magnésium, silicon and oxygen. Some contaminations with aluminium and calcium are of natural matter from the minerai ore used as well as the iron contamination results from the milling process.

Figure 7 displays a typical pattem/morphology for bail milled powders

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Various features of the embodiments can be more fully appreciated, as the same become better understood with reference to the following detailed description of the embodiments when considered in connection with the accompanying figures, in which:

Fig. 1 shows schematically a cross section of a treated X12Crl3 surface by means of focussed ion beam (FIB) cutting;

Fig. 2 shows schematically an enlargement of the cross section of the treated X12Crl3 surface shown in Figure 1 by means of transmission électron microscopy (TEM); and

Fig. 3 shows a SEM micrograph as enlargement of a cavity/dimple containing Serpentine

Fig. 4 shows SEM micrographs of sample PT507 (electro-spark treatment) with mapping of the éléments silicon, magnésium and oxygen [left column: magnification of 1,000x; right column: magnification of 500x)J

Fig. 5 shows a roll as used as instrument NI;

Fig. 6 shows an example for instrument N2 with a metallic sphère;

Fig. 7 SEM micrograph of the serpentine powder used for the disclosed embodiments; and

Fig. 8 shows an example of an instrument N3.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

A X12Crl3 (~20Crl3) steel was electro-spark treated in accordance with the présent invention (sample PT501) and the cross sections are shown in the Figure 1 and Figure 2.

As shown in Figure 1 and depending on the operating parameters, a more or less deep transformation zone 100 is created. The transformation zone in Figure 1 is approximately 4 pm.

In contrast to hardening by laser, the microstructure is micro- or nano-crystalline with an average grain size smaller than the untreated material below. The affected zone or pénétration depth in Figure 1 is ~3-4 pm and shows martensite with inclusion of FeCr₂O₄. The grain sizes of the transformed layer were refined, but still remained crystalline. The formation of FeCr₂O₄ indicates locally high températures during the treatment, even for short periods. The ferritic X12Crl3 (1.4006; 12X13-IU in Russian, closely to X20Crl3) substrate treated in Figure 1 showed M23C6 carbides on the grain boundaries.

The Figure 2 highlights the oxidic inclusions of FeCr₂O₄, which are marked by référencé sign 200. The formed martensite is a lath martensite with twinnings. Figure 2 clearly shows that the electro-spark treatment has not created an amorphous microstructure. The average universal hardness and the average plastic hardness determined by nanoindentation (using Fischerscope H100) of the untreated X12Crl3 surface were:

-Universal hardness: 2.260 MPa ± 70 MPa and

-Plastic hardness: 2.530 MPa + 80 MPa.

The treatment shown in Figure 1 resulted in an increase of hardness, which is cohérent with the findings in Figure 1 :

-Universal hardness: 4.300 MPa± 700 MPa and

-Plastic hardness: 6.300 MPa± 1.000 MPa.

The treatment according to the présent invention may be repeated in order to achieve the desired depth of affected zone. Two passes are preferred in order to avoid annealing of the martensite. Depending on the metallurgy and annealing température of the metal/steel in question, repeated treatments may apply.

As a conséquence from the localized treatment according to the présent invention, the part as a whole will not be heated. This assures, inter alia, the dimensional stability of the part during and after treatment as well as allows to avoid further machining and fînishing operations. In conséquence, it is preferred that only the tribologically stressed sections of a part/component will be treated. This widens the freedom in selecting of metallic materials for tribological applications, because no thermochemical treatments, like nitriding or carburizing, are necessary.

Figure 4 illustrâtes the results of a treatment according to an electro-spark treatment. The scanning électron microscope (SEM) pictures were taken using a SEM Supra 40 from ZEISS equipped with an EDX-Detector “X-Flash” from BRUKER and the software “Quantax 4000”. The pictures in the left column are taken at a magnification of l,000x (x= times). The corresponding pictures in the right column are taken at a magnification of 5,000x.

The (SEM) pîcture in the top row (l^st row) show the network of cavities, indents or dimples. In the SEM pictures in the 2^nd to 4^th row show one element mapping overlayed to the SEM pictures of the top row. The éléments were silicon (Si; 2^nd row), magnésium (Mg; 3^rd row) and oxygen (O; 4 row), because Serpentines are composed by these éléments and not the X12Crl3 steel. Ail three prédominant éléments of Serpentines are in the cavities, proving that the X12Crl3 surfaces were doped with serpentines by the indenter.

The Figure 4 also shows that nearly ail the cavities were filled with Serpentine.

Details for preparing the example “1.2-10 LUT 1.2 PT501,, shown in Fig. 4 are summarized in the following Table 1, 3^rd column. Preferred parameter ranges are summarized in the 2^nd column of Table 1.

	Preferred range of operating conditions according to the présent invention	PT501 (1.2) 1.2-10 HIT
Material of part	Metals and alloys	X12Crl3 (1.4006; 12X13-HI)
Step 1 (electrospark hardening)
Initial surface roughness	Ra=3,2pmto Ra=0,l pm	Ra=l,6 pm to Ra=2,2 pm
Electrode material	VK8, T5K10, VKIOOM, or steels 95X18	VK8
Shape of electrode tip	not relevant	Fiat ended rod
Electrode diameter	1 mm to 1 Omm	3 mm
Auto-rotational speed of electrode	10 rpm to 1500 rpm	800 rpm
Travelling speed over surface of part, mm/rotation	0.01-2	0.8
Axial load on electrode	50 gr. to 3000 gr.	200 gr.
Electrode axial vibration frequency	100 Hz to 50 000 Hz	400 Hz
Electrode axial vibration amplitude	0,01mm to 0,5mm	0,20 mm
Voltage amplitude fed to electrode, [V]	first run: 20-40 V subséquent runs: >40 V	first run 30 V, subséquent runs 50 V
Voltage in mains	220 V	220 V
Frequency of voltage	50 Hz	50 Hz
Step 2 (densification)
Material type of tool	NI orN2, orN3	steel 40X nitrided
Geometry of tool		roller
Rotational speed of part	3 m/min to 300 m/min	30 m/min
Traverse speed of tool, mm per rotation	0,01 mm to 10 mm	0,2 mm per rotation
Load on tool	0.5 kg/mm2to 100kg/mm2	20 kg/mm2
Suspension (type of minerai, particle size, concentration)
Number of double strokes	up to 10	2

Step 3 (minerai doping)
Material type of tool	NI orN2, orN3	steel 40X nitrided
Geometry of tool		roll
Rotational speed of part	3 m/min to 300 m/min	30 m/min
Traverse speed of tool, mm per rotation	0,01 to 10 mm per rotation	0,2 mm per rotation
Load on tool	5 kg to 100 kg	20 kg/mm2
Number of double strokes	up to 10	1

Table 1

Figure 5 shows an example of a tool NI (see ref. Sign 10). The roller 10 preferably comprises a shaft or mandrel 12 for mounting the tool to an appropriate mounting structure such that tool 10 can be forced against the workpiece to be treated. It is preferred that at least the roll 11 of tool 10 is made from a hard alloy, e.g., based on tungsten carbide or titanium carbide bonded with nickel, nickel/molybdenum or cobalt. The roller 10 can be used for the densification step (pressing step 2). In particular, according to the présent invention it is preferred to use the shown roller as an instrument N1.

Figure 6 shows a further example of an instrument 20 for the densification step with a spherical tip 21 that may rotate (also labeled tool N2). The tool 20 preferably comprises a shaft or mandrel 22 for mounting the tool to an appropriate mounting structure such that tool 20 can be forced against the workpiece to be treated. It is further preferred that at least the spherical ball/tip 21 of tool 20 is made from a hard alloy, e.g., based on tungsten carbide or titanium carbide bonded with nickel, nickel/molybdenum or cobalt.

Figure 8 shows a further example of an instrument 30, which may be used as tool N3. The shown tool 30 is an ultrasonic indentor with the indentor 1 an ultrasonic device 20 which can be used to generate dimples/cavities/indents at the surface of the workpiece. In particular, the shownultrasonic indentor allows that the tip point 1 can be actuated the along the longitudinal axis of the tool 30. This actuation (longitudinal or axial movement) can be achieved by a pneumatic mechanism. The axial actuation of the tip 1 may be performed with the following parameters. The actuation frequency is preferably between 40 Hz to 50.000 Hz. Preferably, the frequency is between 50 Hz and 1000 Hz. However, according to the présent invention ultrasonic actuation of the electrode is also possible, i.e., actuation with a frequency > 20 000 Hz. The axial (vibrational) amplitude is preferably in the range between 0,005 to 0,5 mm. The axially indenting load is preferably in the range from 10 g to 3.000 g (0.1 N to 30 N).

While the invention has been described with reference to the exemplary embodiments thereof, those skilled in the art will be able to make various modifications to the described embodiments without departing from the true scope of the invention. The terms and descriptions used herein are set forth by way of illustration only and are not meant as limitations. In particular, although the methods and devices has been described by examples, the steps of the method may be performed in a different order than illustrated or simultaneously. Those skilled in 5 the art will recognize that these and other variations are possible within the scope as defined in the claims and their équivalents.

Claims (15)

1. A method for treatment of a surface of a metallic workpiece, the method comprising the steps:

electro-spark treating the surface of the workpiece by means of an electro-spark electrode, wherein material the workpiece is ferritic, perlitic and/or austenitic steel and the method forms a thin layer with martensitic microstructures at the surface of the workpiece.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the electro-spark electrode is made from a wear-resistant alloy, like cemented carbide tools of WC-Co type, such as BK8 (ISO K30/40), T5K10 (ISO P30), BK10OM (ISO M30), or of steels, like 95X18 (GOST 5632 équivalent to X105CrMol7, 1.4125).

3. The method according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the initial surface roughness of the workpiece prior treatment is Ra (C.L.A.)= 0,01 to 1,6 pm, more preferably between Ra of 0,1 to 1,6 pm.

4. The method according to any of the preceding claims, wherein a relative movement between the workpiece and the electrode is provided during treatment, preferably at least the workpiece is rotated, preferably with a rotational speed of 0,1 m/min to 1 m/min.

5. The method according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the electrode performs a rotation around its longitudinal axis, preferably with a rotational speed between 10 rpm to 1.500 rpm.

6. The method according to any of the preceding claims, wherein a tip point of the electrode which gets in contact with the workpiece moves along its longitudinal axis back and forth during treatment, preferably with a frequency between 40 Hz to 50.000 Hz.

*

7. The method according to any of the preceding claims, wherein subséquent to the electro-spark treatment the surface of the workpiece is densified by means of a tool (N 1, N2, N3), preferably by rolling or press rolling.

8. The method according to claim 7, wherein the hardness of the tool (NI, N2, N3) is preferably >60 HRC.

9. The method according to claim 7 or 8, wherein the workpiece is rotated during the densifying treatment, preferably with a rotational speed of 3 m/min to 300 m/ min

10. The method according to any of the preceding claims, further comprising the step of (iii) doping the previously treated surface of the workpiece with minerai particles, wherein preferably a randomly distributed pattern of irregular shaped cavities/dimples/indents is created on the surface of the workpiece.

11. The method according to claim 10, wherein the minerai particles are provided in a suspension, wherein the workpiece is immersed in the suspension or wetted by the suspension before or during treatment.

12. The method according to claim 10 or 11, wherein the minerai particles are indented on the surface of the workpiece by means of an intender to fill pores or irregularities in the surface.

13. The method according to any of claims 10-12, wherein the minerais comprise at least one of the following components: serpentines and quartz.

14. A device for treating of a surface of a metallic workpiece, preferably according to any of the method as claimed in the preceeding claims, the device comprises:

an electrode for electro-spark treating the surface of the workpiece, wherein material the workpiece is ferritic, perlitic and/or austenitic steel and the method créâtes a thin layer with martensitic microstructures at the surface of the workpiece.

15. The device according to claim 14, further comprising at least one of tools NI to N3 for densification treatment and/or minerai doping treatment as elaimed in the preceding method daims.