NZ619822B2 - Plant for manual packaging of products, in particular fruit and vegetable products - Google Patents

Abstract

hand packaging work table for the manual packaging of crates: A support structure (1) of elongate shape supported on a plane. A first mobile conveyor (2) (fruit storage conveyor) with upper mobile surface (3) arranged on a horizontal plane, has a flat substantially elongate upper surface, travels in a closed-loop path, is supported by said structure and is suitable to support and transfer the products 4 placed on it. A second mobile belt conveyor (5) (crate transfer conveyor), has an mobile upper surface (6) which travels in the same direction as the first mobile conveyor (2) and has a flat substantially elongate upper surface, supported by said structure, and suitable to move a plurality of crates (7).A return conveyor (8) is provided to create a loop for products not yet packaged. The upper surfaces (3, 6) of said two mobile conveyors (2, 5) are arranged on parallel horizontal planes, and arranged at a predefined and constant height difference (h). Optionally additional conveyers, for discarded fruit for example can be added, as well as seating for the operators. in a closed-loop path, is supported by said structure and is suitable to support and transfer the products 4 placed on it. A second mobile belt conveyor (5) (crate transfer conveyor), has an mobile upper surface (6) which travels in the same direction as the first mobile conveyor (2) and has a flat substantially elongate upper surface, supported by said structure, and suitable to move a plurality of crates (7).A return conveyor (8) is provided to create a loop for products not yet packaged. The upper surfaces (3, 6) of said two mobile conveyors (2, 5) are arranged on parallel horizontal planes, and arranged at a predefined and constant height difference (h). Optionally additional conveyers, for discarded fruit for example can be added, as well as seating for the operators.

Description

“PLANT FOR MANUAL PACKAGING OF PRODUCTS, IN PARTICULAR FRUIT AND VEGETABLE PRODUCTS” DESCRIPTION The present invention concerns an improved plant for manually arranging a plurality of products, in particular but not ively fruit and vegetable products, in respective crates, in a manner such as to fill the crates in an orderly, precise and gentle manner in order to ready them for use in the final distribution network.

It is well known that, in the field of marketing of fruit and vegetable products, in particular fruit, it is a common practice to use rather wide crates in which is preferably placed a semi-rigid sheet shaped in such a manner as to t a plurality of upwardly-facing alveoli, naturally appropriately sized for the ts they are intended to contain.

In said alveoli are inserted, normally in a single layer, the relative products, which are thus ly protected against impacts, crushing, and in any case against improper handling.

In addition to this, the fact that the products are all plainly visible from above, that is from the point of view of the potential customer, gives them a more attractive appearance.

This methodology is used principally to enhance the value of products of high quality, which naturally would not be sed if the same products were piled in bulk, and thus often damaged, in normal containers, such as deep crates or bins.

Different methods are known and used to implement this type of packaging.

US Patent 3,685,624 proposes a mode of ing fruit and vegetable products that also uses, among other means, a plurality of suction cups that are lowered and applied onto each product to arrange; the “grip” of such suction cups on the relative product is obtained by applying a vacuum inside said suction cups, so that the t is drawn up and carried by its suction cup to the d position, where it is released.

This procedure has however some cks: - firstly, it is considerably costly, as it require s a suction and release system, and naturally all the flexible ducts to e the various suction cups above the s products; it is also necessary to provide various adjusting and control devices to recognize the different products, to move the n cups in the proper position, to adjust the various ary pneumatic valves; - in addition, there is no guarantee that the suction cups manage to effectively hold the relative ts, due to the porosity of the products and to the normal unevenness of their surfaces; thus, it is necessary to provide for manual assistance given by operators dedicated to the task, but naturally this would counter the advantages of this methodology because it implies a further increase of the overall costs; - moreover, this method cannot provide for any control of visual type on the effective externally nt quality of the products, that is, on the l appearance of the individual products, with the possibility that products of inferior quality or appearance will be packaged together with other products of better quality, with the result of compromising the high-quality appearance of all the products arranged in the same crate, including naturally the products that in fact offer and display the required quality.

To overcome such drawbacks, hand packaging work tables as shown in the enclosed Fig. 1 have been provided.

According to this solution, two “crate transfer conveyors” are provided, consisting of two parallel conveyors carrying the empty crates to be filled with the products. ntially, in front of said ors are shown, from the side, two corresponding rows of operators who, while standing on their feet, arrange the products into the crates before them; the operators collect said products form two respective “fruit storage conveyors” located below the tive “crate transfer conveyors”.

Said “fruit storage ors” also consist of respective mobile conveyors that travel under the respective “crate transfer conveyors”.

Between the two “fruit e conveyors” are also arranged two “fruit recirculation conveyors” which receive those products which the operators have not yet been able to er and place in the respective crates.

In addition, between the two “crate transfer conveyors” is arranged, in the ost position, a “rejected product conveyor”.

It can also be seen that the two “fruit storage conveyors” extend considerably in the direction in front of said operators, so that the operators can inevitably see only one part of the products held there, since a relatively high percentage of the products are not visible to the operator due to the fact that they are covered by the relative overlying “crate transfer conveyor”.

This type of hand packaging work table is well known to operators in the field, and therefore a further detailed ption of the same is considered unnecessary.

The solution illustrated here, although it is quite actory from the point of view of making it possible to carry out an accurate packaging of each product in a respective alveolus of a selected crate, has however shown that it cannot avoid the following serious operating drawbacks: - the operators cannot see all the products present on the relative “fruit e conveyor” in front of them, since this or is largely masked by the overlying and respective “crate transfer or”.

Therefore, in order to be able to also pick up these “hidden” products, the operator must be able to lean forward as necessary, so as to see them and pick them up properly.

Naturally, this requires the operator to almost continuously bend her back to lean forward, which in time causes her aches and pains, and logically requires frequent work breaks, with a uent reduced efficiency of the whole process; - it must also be ered that the same ors are forced to stand up at all times, so that they can lean fonNard sufficiently to be able to see the whole area of the “fruit storage or”; clearly, this upright position, with continuous fonNard leaning movements, leads to fatigue and justified complaints, because as is well known the upright standing on, without the leg movements that are common when walking, results in well-known negative effects on the spine and on blood circulation; - moreover, it can be seen that, in order to facilitate the work of the operator, the relative “crate transfer conveyor” is inclined toward her, so as to allow her to have a full view of the alveoli on the whole surface of the crates.

However, this forces the operator to lift her arms to approximately eye level or , in order to reach the higher alveoli, which lly are the farthest ones. This continuous movement of the wrist and arm joints results, in relatively short times, in a consequent systematic articular painfulness, leading in the more serious cases to a risk of arthrosis of the wrist and arm joints that can often force the operator to interrupt her work.

Lastly, it must also be considered that recent tory obligations require that certain manual operations and processes, carried out with raised arms, must comply with precise ergonomic principles, which are only briefly mentioned here, principles and requirements that the present hand packaging work tables do not meet.

It would therefore be desirable, and it is the main objective of the present invention, to realize a type of hand packaging work table, particularly for manually packaging fruit and ble ts, such as to substantially eliminate the problems described and that naturally is completely in line with the most recent requirements in the field.

Alternatively, it is an object of the invention to at least provide the public with a useful alternative to known work tables.

These objectives are achieved by the type of hand ing work table built according to the enclosed claims. teristics and advantages of the invention will become t from the description which follows, given by way of example and without limitations, with reference to the enclosed gs, n: • Figure 1 rates a vertical plane view of a hand packaging work table according to the known art, seen from the side and in simplified form, that is, from a point on a plane orthogonal to the direction of nt of the conveyors and on the plane symmetrical to the same hand packaging work table.

• Figure 2 is a completely identical view, but showing a hand packaging work table according to the invention.

• Figure 3 is a view completely identical to Fig, 2, but in which further details of the invention are shown.

• Figure 4 shows a plane view from above of the hand packaging work table of Fig. 2, illustrated in symbolic form.

• Figure 5 illustrates a plane view from above along cross section A-A of Fig.

• Figure 6 is a view similar to Fig. 2, but with further details of the hand packaging work table according to the invention.

Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, throughout the description and the claims, the words “comprise”, “comprising”, and the like are to be construed in an inclusive sense as opposed to an exclusive or exhaustive sense; that is to say, in the 4 [followed by page 4a] sense of "including, but not limited to".

Although the present invention refers generally to a hand packaging work table that can theoretically be positioned at different angles and orientations, it will however be evident that it can find the best and most typical embodiment when the hand ing work table is set on a horizontal floor; thus the description should be read with particular reference to the drawings, and therefore the terms “over”, [followed by page 5] 4a [followed by page 5] “under above , , below”, etc., that may be employed refer logically to this normal ement of the same hand packaging work table.

The present invention significantly modifies the known art of Fig. 1 through four basic cations that are briefly summarized below: 1) The crate er conveyors are unified in a single conveyor, whose crates can then be filled by the operators from both sides. This substantial modification makes it possible to significantly reduce the width of the entire hand packaging work table, which offers the fundamental age of being able to decisively restrict both the width of the fruit storage conveyors and the width of the respective fruit recirculation conveyors.

This circumstance in particular makes it possible to achieve the fundamental result of ing directly, easily and without particularly tiresome body contortions practically all the products arranged on the fruit storage conveyors that are now geometrically below the single crate transfer conveyor.

A not secondary advantage of the invention is also the possibility of limiting as much as possible the space occupied by the lines and the equipment, with an evident general economic advantage. 2) The rejected product conveyor is eliminated from its original raised position but it is arranged between two distinct crate transfer conveyors, and is located in two different positions, alternative to each other: - in the first case the rejected product conveyor is still in a raised position, but this time it is placed above the crate transfer conveyor (and not in an ediate position between two distinct and separate crate er conveyors), and therefore in a more convenient and comfortable position for the operators; - in the second case, the rejected product conveyor (that can also be used to transfer products of different y, not similar to the quality of the products to be ed at that moment) is placed in a lower position, below the other conveyors that carry the crates or the products to be packaged.

The above described new higher or lower positioning of the crate transfer conveyor is in fact made possible by the fact of combining the two crate transfer ors into a single one, which makes it possible to free a precious space above and between the fruit storage conveyors; 3) The two fruit recirculation conveyors are also combined into a single conveyor, that can then be supplied by both fruit e conveyors, and this further contributes to narrowing the entire hand packaging work table; 4) As a consequence of the above described arrangements, the operators can now work while being , since the distance to which they have to stretch their arms is shorter, and the height to which they need to raise their hands is significantly lower, thanks to the fact that now the fruit storage conveyor and the crate transfer conveyor, being much narrower, can be brought significantly closer in height, without impairing their view by the operators.

Although the preferred and normal form of a hand packaging work table according to the ion is the one that includes two separate fruit e conveyors, attended by two rows of operators seated face to face, as is shown in Figure 2, the invention also applies in the more simplified case in which the hand packaging work table is without one of the two fruit storage conveyors and of the relative work stations.

Thus, Claims from 1 to 3 refer to that more simplified solution, and therefore are ated to also include that one; obviously, the ideal and normal configuration of the hand ing work table is described in the subsequent claims.

With reference to Figure 2, a hand packaging work table for the manual packaging of crates with fruit and vegetable products comprises generally: - a support structure 1 of elongate shape ted on a plane; - a first mobile conveyor 2 (fruit storage conveyor); > whose upper mobile surface 3 is arranged on a horizontal plane; > has a flat ntially elongate upper surface; > travels in a closed-loop path; > is supported by said structure and is suitable to support and transfer with a substantially horizontal and lly controllable movement the products 4 placed on it; - a second mobile belt or 5 (crate transfer conveyor), whose mobile upper surface 6 travels in the same direction and has a flat substantially elongate upper surface, is supported by said structure, and is suitable to move a plurality of crates 7.

According to the invention, said hand packaging work table is ated with the following characteristics, which can also be realized separately from each other: - a single, common return or 8 is provided, wherein are transferred, with means that will be better explained later, those ts that it was not yet possible to transfer and place in the respective crates, and that are brought back to the front of the fruit storage conveyor, by known manners; - and a single common conveyor 70 is also provided, which for convenience of ption will herein be referred to as “conveyor for products selected in other ways” arranged above said crate transfer conveyor 5, by which the operators eliminate those products that the operators do not wish, for any reason, to include in the crates being packaged.

Also, the upper es 3, 6 of said two mobile conveyors 2, 5 are arranged on parallel horizontal , - and are arranged at a predefined and nt height difference (h).

This simple first embodiment, in order to be suitably optimized, must be accompanied by a suitable downsizing of the width of the two conveyors 2 and 5, and of the return conveyor 8, however such downsizing is easily ined by a person d in the art on the basis of other constructive ements, and naturally of the preferences of the operators assigned to ng out the work on the hand packaging work table.

It can be observed in particular that the return path of the products not placed in the respective crate include here a single return conveyor 8, which moves substantially on the same horizontal plane of the first conveyor 2. Said conveyors 2 and 8 travel in opposite directions, so as to enable the products that are not packaged and therefore arrive to the end of the travel on the conveyor 2 to return to the head of the conveyor on the return travel on the return conveyor 8.

It should also be d out that, in order for this operation to be carried out t hindrances, the return conveyor 8 must be arranged on the same horizontal plane as the respective first conveyor 2 (product storage conveyor).

In these conditions, it also becomes particularly advantageous if said return conveyor 8 is positioned entirely below the second conveyor 5, the crate transfer conveyor. In fact, if the two conveyors 2 and 5 must be, for ergonomic reasons, as near as possible to the body of the operators, the position of the return conveyor 8, which must be near the conveyor 2, will be below said second conveyor (crate transfer conveyor).

A conveyor will now be described in its most complete embodiment. With reference to the figures, on the hand packaging work table described above is added a third mobile conveyor 10, having ntially the same characteristics of said first conveyor 2, arranged, with respect to a vertical plane “m” substantially median to the upper sliding e of said return conveyor 8, in a position opposite and preferably rical to said first conveyor 2.

This third conveyor 10 is also oriented like said first conveyor 2, and is driven in a motion el to the same.

In addition, said return conveyor 8 is made suitable to also transfer the products coming from said third or 10, and therefore it is adjacent to the latter.

To enable said return conveyor 8 to receive the products that are still present at the end of the two conveyors 2 and 10 (product storage conveyors), first deflecting means 20 are arranged above said first and third conveyor 2, 10 in the respective end zone, and suitable to deflect the products still present on these conveyors toward and onto said common return or (8).

Such means can be realized in various manners, for example by means of flaps, mobile walls, also with curved and/or variably able paths; advantageously, said deflecting means are also made active or removable to suit operating requirements.

Similarly, second deflecting means 21 are provided arranged above and at the end of the travel of the return conveyor, and suitable to move the objects carried by said return conveyor 8 toward and above said first and third conveyor 2, 10, in tely similar manners.

Said first and second deflecting means 20, 21 make it possible for the products to be carried on said conveyors 2 and 10, and then transferred onto said return conveyor 8, and then again to the conveyors 2, 10, in a closed path continuously in motion, until the moment when they are transferred manually to the respective crate.

With reference to Fig. 3, the separation in height (a) of the second crate conveyor 5 with respect to the level “p” of said first conveyor 2 and/or of said third conveyor 10 is usefully made adjustable preferably by means of the variation in height of said second conveyor 5 through suitable adjusting and control devices 50 shown here as a telescopic adjustment of the vertical support ts of the second or 5.

In addition, said hand packaging work table is accompanied by appropriate seats 30, 31, 32, 33, arranged externally to said first and/or third conveyor 2, 10 and aligned with them, wherein said seats are adjustable in height. y, below said first and third conveyor the structure of the hand packaging work table is built in such a way as to obtain an empty space 13 suitable to be used to insert the folded legs of the operators 40, 41, 42, 43, seated on said seats 30, 31, 32, 33, It will now be appreciated that the concurrent possibility of adjusting the height of the second conveyor 5 and the possibility of adjusting the height of said seats 30, 31, 32, 33, as well as the possibility for the operators of inserting their legs under the hand packaging work table, allows the operators to maintain extremely more comfortable and natural postures, and satisfies on the whole the requirements of the previously mentioned new regulations in this regard.

With reference to Figure 3 and 5, in order to prevent the products carried by said return or 8 from moving in an uncontrolled manner toward one or the other of said first or third product conveyor 2 and 10, and vice versa, before having arrived at the respective stops and being deflected by the respective means 20, 21, tive separation devices are led in such a manner as they can lly be easily removed, and can substantially separate said return conveyor 8 from the two adjacent conveyors 2, 10; as exemplified, said ting devices can be simply activated by means of respective barriers 15, 16 arranged “flush” with the same conveyors.

With reference to Fig. 6, the alternative form of the embodiment of the so-called “rejected product conveyor” will now be y described.

According to such alternative, a rejected products conveyor 65 is built and installed in a position below said first and third conveyor so as not to take up any space above; in this manner, the l ion in the width of the hand packaging work table, as previously ted, is maintained.

Preferably, said or 65 for rejected products is located in a central position, and below said return conveyor 8.

For the further purpose of transferring in a simple, immediate and ergonomic manner the discarded products singled out by said operators, at least one guide 60 is arranged, in a manner suitable to convey the products g the hands of the operators toward said rejected product conveyor 65.

As shown in Fig. 6, said guides 60: - are installed in a substantially inclined orientation; - are provided at the respective upper ends with a feeding mouth 61 ; - are provided at their lower end with respective rge mouths 62, naturally arranged above said rejected product conveyor 65.

WO 41464 It is also necessary to consider the possibility that the products transferred from said product storage conveyor should be y examined by the operators before being placed in the ve crates, and that those products that are not considered homogeneous with the quality to be packaged should be in turn separated in two different classes: - ts that are of y inferior quality that should be sent to less prized processes, such as for example in the production of jams; - or products of lesser y, but still acceptable for sale as single fresh products, but with a different quality rating.

In these circumstances, that is, considering both of said sub-classes, it can be advantageously en that the configuration of the hand packaging work table of Fig. 2 should be substantially integrated with the configuration of the hand packaging work table of Fig. 6; in other words, both the above-mentioned “rejected product conveyor” and “conveyor for products selected in other ways”, indicated by numbers 65 and 70 should be provided, and not only one of them.

In fact, from both the construction and the operating point of view there is no obstacle or logical impediment to realize and install on the same hand packaging work table both of said conveyors indicated by numbers 65 and 70, nor naturally to using both at the same time, or one or the other individually, as it may be ient.

From the enclosed figures, and from the description, it will be easily appreciated that, for construction and functional reasons, said hand packaging work table should be substantially symmetrical with respect to said vertical plane “m” substantially median to the upper sliding surface of the return conveyor 8. *****

Claims (20)

1) Hand packaging work table for manual packaging of crates comprising: - a support ure of elongate shape supported o n a plane; - a first mobile conveyor belt; ? whose upper mobile surface is arranged on a horizontal plane; ? has a flat substantially elongate upper e; ? travels with a closed-loop path; ? is supported by said ure and is suitable to support and transfer with a substantially horizontal movement the products placed on it; ? moves with a controllable motion; - a second mobile belt conveyor whose upper mobile surface moves in a same ion as said first conveyor and has a flat substantially elongate upper shape, is supported by said ure, and adapted to move a plurality of crates; - means suitable to guarantee the return path of th e products that are not packaged, wherein: - the upper surfaces of said two mobile conveyors a re arranged on parallel and horizontal planes: - and are arranged at a pre-defined and constant di fference in height.

2) Hand-packaging work table according to claim 1 adapted to manually package fruit and vegetable products.

3) Hand packaging work table ing to claim 1 or 2, wherein said means suitable to guarantee the return path of the products not placed in the respective crate includes a single return conveyor, which moves substantially on the same horizontal plane of said first conveyor, which travels in the opposite ion to said first conveyor.

4) Hand packaging work table according to claim 3, wherein said return conveyor is arranged completely below said second conveyor.

5) Hand packaging work table ing to claim 3 or 4, wherein a third mobile conveyor is ed: - having substantially the same characteristics of said first conveyor; - arranged, with respect to a vertical plane substa ntially median to a sliding upper surface of said return conveyor, in a on opposite to said first conveyor; - oriented like said first conveyor, and adapted to travel in a motion el to the same.

6) Hand packaging work table according to claim 5, n the third mobile conveyor is arranged symmetrical to said first conveyor.

7) Hand packaging work table according to claim 5 or 6, wherein said return conveyor is adapted to also carry the products coming from said third conveyor, and first deflecting means are arranged above said first and third conveyor to deflect the products carried by said first and third conveyor toward and onto said common return conveyor.

8) Hand ing work table according to any one of claims 5 to 7, wherein second deflecting means are provided arranged above said return conveyor to deflect the objects carried by said return conveyor toward and onto said first and third conveyor.

9) Hand packaging work table according to claim 8, wherein said first and/or said second deflecting means can be selectively activated, removed or inclined.

10) Hand packaging work table according to any one of claims 5 to 7, wherein the separation in height of the second conveyor with respect to the level of said first conveyor and/or of the third conveyor is able.

11) Hand packaging work table according to claim 10, wherein the separation in height of the second conveyor with t to the level of said first or and/or of the third conveyor is adjustable through the variation in height of said second conveyor by means of suitable adjusting and control devices.

12) Hand ing work table according to any one of claims 5 to 11, including one or more support means arranged externally to said first and/or third or and aligned with them, and adapted to be used as supports or support planes for the operators of said hand packaging work table, wherein said support means are adjustable in height.

13) Hand packaging work table according to claim 12, wherein below said first and third conveyor is an empty space adapted to be used as leg space for the operators seated on said support means.

14) Hand packaging work table according to any one of claims 5 to 13, wherein: - n said first conveyor and said return conve yor, - and n said third conveyor and the same retu rn conveyor are installed respective separation devices to prevent in a selectively activated manner the products carried by said return conveyor from moving toward one or the other of said first or third conveyor, and vice versa.

15) Hand packaging work table ing to any one of claims 5 to 14, including a conveyor for rejected products, which is arranged in a position lower than said first and third conveyor.

16) Hand packaging work table according to claim 15, wherein the conveyor for rejected products is located in a position below said return conveyor.

17) Hand packaging work table according to claim 15 or 16, wherein at least one guide is provided for rejected products, and said guide: - is installed in a substantially ed orientat ion; - is provided at the upper end with a feeding mouth ; - is provided at its lower end with a discharge mou th, substantially arranged above said rejected product conveyor.

18) Hand ing work table ing to any one of claims 3 to 17, including a further conveyor for ts selected in other ways, which is ed in a position substantially above said return conveyor.

19) Hand packaging work table according to any one of claims 5 to 18, wherein the table is substantially symmetrical with respect to said vertical plane substantially median to the sliding upper surface of said return conveyor.

20) Hand packaging work table, substantially as herein described with reference to any one of the embodiments shown in any one of